Esophageal candidiasis as a complication of inhaled corticosteroids

Prevalence, Predictive Factors, and Clinical Manifestations of Fungal Esophagitis in Children

OBJECTIVES

Fungal esophagitis (FE) is the most common cause of esophageal infection and its prevalence in immunocompetent adults is rising. However, there is minimal data on FE in children without human immunodeficiency virus. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, symptoms, endoscopic appearances, and predictive factors of FE in children, regardless of immune status.

METHODS

A 2010-2020 retrospective case-control study was conducted on 1823 children presenting to Sydney Children's Hospital for elective endoscopy with esophageal biopsy. Histopathology reports were reviewed to identify FE cases and determine prevalence rates. Thirty-two patients with FE were age- and sex-matched (1:2) to 64 controls. Significant symptoms and risk factors of FE were identified via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of FE in children was 1.76%. Common symptoms included dysphagia (25%), heartburn (25%), poor oral intake (21.9%), vomiting (18.8%), cough (15.6%), nausea (12.5%), and weight loss (9.4%). No significant differences in symptoms were found between cases and controls. On endoscopy, although white plaques were associated with FE ( P < 0.001), visually normal findings were reported in 28.1% of cases. Topical swallowed corticosteroids were a significant independent risk factor for FE (adjusted odds ratio = 10.740, 95% confidence interval: 1.213-95.101, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of FE in this pediatric cohort reflects rates among immunocompetent adults. Given that many of these children presented with a wide range of gastrointestinal symptoms, esophageal biopsy is required to accurately diagnose FE. Pediatricians should consider the risk of FE when prescribing topical swallowed corticosteroids.

Prevalence and risk factors for Candida esophagitis among human immunodeficiency virus-negative individuals

BACKGROUND

Candida esophagitis (CE) is among the commonest esophageal infections and is known as an opportunistic fungal infection mostly affecting people living with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, some medical conditions might predispose HIV-negative individuals to esophageal candidiasis. The epidemiology and associated endoscopic findings of CE among people without HIV have rarely been reported.

AIM

To investigate the prevalence of CE among HIV-negative persons, and determine risk factors predicting CE.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2018, all consecutive outpatients who underwent routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy as part of health check-ups at their own expense at the Health Check-up Center of the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, were recruited in this study. Those with positive HIV serology results were excluded. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics including age, gender, economic status, smoking history, alcohol consumption, tea and coffee consumption, underlying diseases, body fat percentage, body mass index, endoscopic findings, and Helicobacter pylori infection status were carefully reviewed. CE was confirmed by endoscopic biopsy and pathological assessment with hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff staining. To evaluate independent factors predicting the development of CE, we conducted a univariate analysis of clinical characteristics. The variables found to be significant via univariate analysis were subsequently included in a multivariable analysis of potential risk factors for CE development.

RESULTS

A total of 11802 participants were included in this study. Forty-seven (0.4%) were confirmed as having CE by pathological examination. Univariate analysis identified older age, the presence of chronic kidney disease, alcohol consumption, and steroid use (P = 0.023, < 0.001, 0.033, and 0.004, respectively) as significantly associated with CE. Multivariable analysis revealed older age [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.027; 95%CI: 1.001-1.053; P = 0.045], chronic kidney disease (adjusted OR = 13.470; 95%CI: 4.574-39.673; P < 0.001), alcohol consumption (adjusted OR = 2.103; 95%CI: 1.151-3.844; P = 0.016), and steroid use (adjusted OR = 24.255; 95%CI: 5.343-110.115; P < 0.001) as independent risk factors for CE development. The presence of dysphagia was associated with severe CE (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of CE among HIV-negative persons was 0.4% in Taiwan. Independent risk factors for CE were older age, chronic kidney disease, alcohol consumption, and steroid use.

Esophageal Candidiasis in a Non-HIV Patient: A Primary Care Diagnosis

A 74-year-old man visited his family doctor for dysphagia and was diagnosed with esophageal candidiasis. His risk factors included type 2 diabetes mellitus, long-term intake of budesonide/formoterol inhaler 160/45 µg, and pantoprazole 20 mg. He was treated with fluconazole 200 mg per day for 14 days. Other factors of immunosuppression were excluded, and his chronic medication was adapted by starting him with a proton pump inhibitor withdrawal plan and switching his inhaled device to a formoterol-only device without an inhaled corticosteroid. The patient had complete remission of the symptoms on the seventh day of treatment without relapse to date. The key point is that iatrogenic factors should be considered in the presence of esophageal candidiasis in immunocompetent patients and a therapeutic review is an important tool that should be used in every primary care appointment to refrain from long-term prescriptions without clinical indication and, consequently, to avoid adverse events.

COVID-19-associated opportunistic infections: a snapshot on the current reports

Treatment of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a complicated challenge, especially among patients with severe disease. In recent studies, immunosuppressive therapy has shown promising results for control of the cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) in severe cases of COVID-19. However, it is well documented that immunosuppressive agents (e.g., corticosteroids and cytokine blockers) increase the risk of opportunistic infections. On the other hand, several opportunistic infections were reported in COVID-19 patients, including Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, Pneumocystis jiroveci (carinii), mucormycosis, Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Herpes simplex virus (HSV), Strongyloides stercoralis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Toxoplasma gondii. This review is a snapshot about the main opportunistic infections that reported among COVID-19 patients. As such, we summarized information about the main immunosuppressive agents that were used in recent clinical trials for COVID-19 patients and the risk of opportunistic infections following these treatments. We also discussed about the main challenges regarding diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19-associated opportunistic infections (CAOIs).

Possible Risk Factors for Candida Esophagitis in Immunocompetent Individuals

Background

Candida esophagitis (CE) is a condition typically diagnosed in patients who are immunocompromised. Risk factors leading to the development of CE in immunocompetent patients have not been entirely elucidated. This study set out to identify risk factors associated with the development of CE in immunocompetent patients.

Methods

This study was a single-center retrospective chart review. Patients diagnosed with CE confirmed by endoscopic biopsy or brushings at our hospital between 2007 and 2017 were reviewed. The medical histories, endoscopy reports and pathology results were noted. Abdominal pain, heartburn, dysphagia and odynophagia were the common indications for endoscopy. A total of 241 patients were identified as having been diagnosed with CE by endoscopic brushing or biopsy. Of these patients, 161 were excluded due to the presence of immunocompromising and 80 patients were included who had no underlying immunocompromising conditions.

Results

Eighty patients with CE satisfied the inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis was 39.8 years old (95% CI: 34.9 - 44.7). The incidences in men and women were similar in this study (49% women and 51% men). Of these patients, 56 (70%) (95% CI: 59-80%; P < 0.005) were taking proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Fifteen patients (19%) had a previous upper endoscopy with evidence of reflux esophagitis, and they were all treated with PPIs and subsequently found to have CE on repeat upper endoscopy with a mean of 21.6 months of PPI treatment. There were 16 (20%) patients without any attributable risk factor and were completely healthy.

Conclusions

CE is an opportunistic infection typically seen in immunocompromised. We report incidence of CE in immunocompetent patients. In our cohort of immunocompetent patients, PPI use was the most common risk factor associated with the development of CE. This could be related to hypochlorhydria resulting from PPI use. However, the cause remains unclear in some patients.

Dysphonia associated with the use of inhaled corticosteroids

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the relationship between inhaled corticosteroids and dysphonia, with discussion of the therapeutic use of inhaled steroids in laryngeal disease and a review of negative laryngeal effects of this class of medication in patients with reactive airway disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although prescribed for their anti-inflammatory effects (predominantly for pulmonary disease and less often for laryngeal conditions), corticosteroid inhalers can cause laryngeal inflammation. This may relate to chemical irritation from the inhaler itself as well as fungal inflammation related to opportunistic candidiasis that may accompany inhaler use. Patients who suffer from dysphonia because of inhaler use may improve if switched to another inhaler. Studies suggest that ciclesonide metered-dose inhaler may have less oropharyngeal deposition and therefore be associated with reduced oropharyngeal candidiasis and dysphonia compared with other inhaled corticosteroids.

SUMMARY

Corticosteroid inhalers are a common cause of dysphonia and their use should be investigated in any patient with laryngeal complaints.

Fluconazole Resistant Candida Oesophagitis in Immunocompetent Patients: Is Empirical Therapy Justifiable?

INTRODUCTION

C. albicans (Candida albicans) is the foremost cause of fungal oesophagitis, however other species such as Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei and Candida stellatoidea have also been implicated to cause this condition. Although, numerous studies have identified risk factors for C. albicans oesophagitis, data for non- C. albicans species is still sparse.

AIM

To determine the aetiology of Candida oesophagitis in our medical centre over a two year period. Additionally, to investigate predisposing conditions for oesophageal candidiasis caused by different Candida species.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All consecutive patients posted for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at the endoscopy unit of a tertiary care hospital in north India with findings consistent with oesophagitis were screened for the presence of Candida oesophagitis by performing KOH (potassium hydroxide) examination and culture on SDA (Sabouraud's dextrose agar). Antifungal susceptibility testing as per CLSI guidelines was performed for fluconazole, a most common empirically prescribed antifungal for the condition.

RESULTS

A total of 1868 patients with no known immune-compromised condition underwent upper gastroscopy at our centre during the study period. The prevalence of Candida oesophagitis was 8.7% (n = 163). C. albicans was recovered from majority of infections (52.1%), followed by C. tropicalis (24%), C. parapsilosis (13.4%), C. glabrata (6.9%) and C. krusei (3.6%). Alarmingly, among the C. albicans isolates 8.6% were resistant to fluconazole.

CONCLUSION

With rising reports of antifungal drug resistance among the isolates of Candida species, an increasing prevalence of this organism could have an impact on the treatment of Candidal oesophagitis and it should be approached with caution by the clinician.

Acid suppression therapy as a risk factor for Candida esophagitis

BACKGROUND/AIM

As the prevalence of reflux esophagitis increases, so does the use of gastric acid suppressants. This study aimed to document the prevalence of Candida esophagitis (CE) at a single Korean university hospital over the last 5 years and to evaluate its risk factors.

METHODS

To investigate the prevalence of CE, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 55,314 individuals who underwent a screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy as part of a health check-up between January 2006 and December 2010 at Kyung Hee University Hospital in Seoul, Korea. A total of 250 patients who were treated for CE between January 2008 and August 2011 and 500 age- and sex-matched non-CE patients were enrolled in this study. The rates of recent gastric acid suppression therapy and other well-known risk factors in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The prevalence of CE was 0.35 % and increased each year (linear-by-linear association, P = 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that gastric acid suppression therapy, malignancy, DM and steroid therapy were related to CE. Multivariate analysis also showed that gastric acid suppression therapy (OR 5.11, 95 % CI 2.92-8.93 and P < 0.001), malignancy (OR 18.68, 95 % CI 6.37-54.75 and P < 0.001), DM (OR 2.67, 95 % CI 1.70-4.21 and P < 0.001) and steroids therapy (OR 6.74, 95 % CI 1.37-33.05 and P = 0.019) were related to CE.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CE in Korea is increasing. Also, our results indicate that acid suppression therapy is a meaningful risk factor for CE.

Prevalence and risk factors of esophageal candidiasis in healthy individuals: a single center experience in Korea

PURPOSE

Esophageal candidiasis (EC) is the most frequent opportunistic fungal infection in immunocompromised host. However, we have found EC in healthy individuals through esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for EC in healthy individuals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 281 patients who had been incidentally diagnosed with EC. We also conducted age and sex matched case control study to identify the risk factor for EC.

RESULTS

The prevalence of EC was 0.32% (281/88125). The most common coexisting EGD finding was reflux esophagitis (49/281, 17.4%). An antifungal agent was prescribed in about half of EC, 139 cases (49.5%). Follow-up EGD was undertaken in 83 cases (29.5%) and 20 cases of candidiasis was persistently found. Case control study revealed EC were more often found in user of antibiotics (p=0.015), corticosteroids (p=0.002) and herb medication (p=0.006) as well as heavy drinking (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of EC was 0.32% (281/88125) in Korea. Use of antibiotics, corticosteroids and herb as well as heavy drinking were significant risk factors for EC in healthy individuals.

Esophageal candidiasis--an adverse effect of inhaled corticosteroids therapy

Over the last few decades, inhaled corticosteroids (ICs) became the cornerstone in the treatment of persistent asthma. Their use improved asthma control, decreased mortality and also minimized adverse reactions associated with systemic steroid. Esophageal candidiasis is a rare complication resulting from the use of ICs. Although, in recent years, as their prescriptions has increased, more cases have been reported, especially in Japan. Listed are 4 case reports regarding esophageal candidiasis in asthmatic patients associated with inhaled budesonide administration. In the cases reported herein, the use of a different device of dry powder budesonide might have favored esophageal drug deposition and Candida infection. Patients denied using systemic corticosteroids in the previous 6 months. Furthermore, none of the patients presented Diabetes mellitus, malignant disease, HIV infection, or other immunosuppressive conditions. We conclude that patients treated with high doses of ICs are at higher risk of developing esophageal candidiasis. These patients should undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy whenever they present symptoms. Nevertheless, we must keep in mind that infection might also be asymptomatic and esophageal candidiasis prevalence may be higher than that reported thus far.

Candida esophagitis: species distribution and risk factors for infection

Although Candida albicans is the main cause of fungal esophagitis, other species such as C. tropicalis, C. krusei and C. stellatoidea have also been implicated. Several studies have identified risk factors for C. albicans esophagitis. However, data for non-C. albicans species is still sparse. The aim of this study was to determine the etiology of Candida esophagitis in our medical centre over an 18-month period. Additionally, we aimed to investigate predisposing conditions for esophageal candidosis caused by different Candida species. A total of 21,248 upper gastroscopies were performed in Santa Casa Complexo Hospitalar between January 2005 and July 2006. The prevalence of Candida esophagitis was 0.74% (n = 158). C. albicans caused the vast majority of infections (96.2%), followed by C. tropicalis (2.5%), C. lusitaniae (0.6%) and C. glabrata (0.6%). There were 81 women (51.3%) and 77 men (48.7%). No case of mixed infection occurred. Concomitant oral candidosis was documented for 10.8% (n = 17). Most of cases (55.1%) involved outpatients. Around one fifth of patients in our cohort had no identifiable risk factors for esophageal candidosis (20.8%). Since nearly all infections were caused by C. albicans we were not able to determine risk factors for esophagitis caused by other Candida species.

Candida Glabrata Esophagitis: new case reports and management

Candida esophagitis (CE) is a common opportunistic infection in the immunocompromised host. C. glabrata is rarely cited as agent of CE and has been underestimated due to lack of proper identification. In this study, two cases of C. glabrata esophagitis in AIDS and chagasic patients are reported. Diagnosis of Candida species should be considered an important key for the ideal choice of antifungal therapy against this mycosis.

Oesophageal candidiasis in elderly patients: risk factors, prevention and management

This article reviews risk factors, prevention and management of oesophageal candidiasis (OC) in the elderly. Putative risk factors for OC in the elderly include old age itself, malignant disease, antibacterial and corticosteroid use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acid suppression treatment, oesophageal dysmotility and other local factors, diabetes mellitus and HIV/AIDS. We have found evidence for a risk association between OC in the elderly and malignant disease (both haematological and non-haematological), antibacterial therapy and corticosteroid (including inhaled corticosteroids) use. We also found evidence of an association between OC in the elderly and oesophageal dysmotility or HIV/AIDS, but little direct evidence of an association between diabetes or old age per se. The literature on OC in the elderly is not large. The published series evaluating OC in this age group are small in size, often do not contain controls and mostly contain only limited information about the age of the patients. Prevention of OC is mainly the avoidance of exposure to the risk factors wherever possible. Specific measures such as highly active antiretroviral therapy in AIDS, prophylactic fluconazole when receiving chemotherapy for malignancy, using spacing devices, mouth rinsing soon after inhalation of corticosteroids and avoiding the use of cortiocosteroids just before bedtime are useful. OC is often responsive to a 2- to 3-week course of oral fluconazole, but resistance may be encountered in AIDS or in the presence of uncorrected anatomical factors in the oesophagus. Itraconazole solution, voriconazole or caspofungin may be used in refractory cases. Use of amphotericin B is restricted because of its narrow therapeutic index.

Kinetic analysis of effects of mouth washing on removal of drug residues following inhalation of fluticasone propionate dry powder

Fluticasone propionate dry powder inhaler (FP-DPI) is widely used for the treatment of asthma. However, local adverse effects such as oropharyngeal candidiasis are often seen and mouth washing after inhaling is recommended. In our previous study, we reported a nonlinear relationship between the amount of drug residue and number of times mouth washing was employed. Thus, we developed a compartment model, in which the inhaled drugs were distributed in both easy and difficult to remove areas. Using this model, we analyzed drug removal efficiency in each area with different mouth washing procedures. Three methods of mouth washing were studied; gargling and rinsing in combination, rinsing alone, and gargling alone, following administration of FP-DPI by sprinkling or inhaling. The amounts of drugs recovered from areas considered to be easy to remove (X(1)) and difficult to remove (X(2)) were determined using a nonlinear least-squares program, while the removal efficiency of each of the 3 methods was also calculated. The ratios of X(1) after sprinkling and inhalation were 63.9% and 21.8%, respectively, while those of X(2) were 6.0% and 12.4%, respectively. The numbers of mouth washings required to remove half doses from easy and difficult to remove areas were 0.2 and 1.4 times, respectively, with a combination of gargling and rinsing following inhalation of FP-DPI, while those were 0.3 and 3.6 times, respectively, with rinsing alone, and 0.4 and 5.8 times, respectively, with gargling only, thus demonstrating significant differences among the mouth washing methods for efficiency in the difficult to remove area. The present results show that the employed methods of mouth washing had a significant influence on the removal of drug residues following inhalation of FP-DPI, with gargling and rinsing in combination considered to be the most effective.

Candidemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent critically ill patients: a prospective comparative study

The purpose of this study was to compare the risk factors, clinical manifestations, and outcome of candidemia in immunocompromised (IC) and nonimmunocompromised (NIC) critically ill patients. Data were collected prospectively over a 2-year period (02/2000–01/2002) from patients in a 25-bed, medical–surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Eligible for participation in this study were patients who developed candidemia during their ICU stay. Patients under antifungal therapy and with a confirmed systemic fungal infection prior to the diagnosis of candidemia were excluded. Cultures of blood, urine, and stool were performed for all patients in the study, and all patients underwent endoscopy/biopsy of the esophagus for detection of Candida. Smears and/or scrapings of oropharyngeal and esophageal lesions were examined for hyphae and/or pseudohyphae and were also cultured for yeasts. During the study period, 1,627 patients were hospitalized in the ICU, 57% for primary medical reasons and 43% for surgical reasons. After application of the study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 patients with candidemia (9 IC and 15 NIC) were analyzed. Total parenteral nutrition was more common in IC than in NIC patients (9/9 [100%] vs 8/15 [53%], p = 0.02). Oropharyngeal candidiasis was detected in 5 of 9 (55.5%) IC patients and in 1 of 15 (6.5%) NIC patients (p = 0.015). Esophageal candidiasis was also more common in IC than in NIC patients (4/9 [44%] vs 0/15 [0%], p = 0.012). Among the 9 IC patients, all except 2 died, resulting in a crude mortality of 78%; among the 15 NIC patients, 9 died, resulting in a crude mortality of 60% (p > 0.05). Autopsy was performed in two IC and in six NIC patients, with disseminated candidiasis found in one IC patient. Oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis are frequent in IC patients with candidemia. In contrast, this coexistence is rare in NIC critically ill patients with Candida bloodstream infections. A high mortality was noted in both IC and NIC critically ill patients with candidemia.

Effects of Mouth Washing Procedures on Removal of Budesonide Inhaled by Using Turbuhaler

Mouth washing after inhalation of corticosteroids is effective for prevention of local adverse effects. We determined the amounts of drug residues remaining on the oropharyngeal mucosa following inhalation of budesonide (BUD) via a Turbuhaler (BUD-TH) (100 microg). Further, we studied the effects of mouth washing on the removal of drug residues by quantification of BUD in expectorated wash solution using an HPLC method. The amount of BUD recovered after gargling and rinsing for 5 s each was 19.4+/-9.4 microg, as compared to 23.8+/-13.6 microg after rinsing alone for 10 s and 18.3+/-8.9 microg after gargling alone for 10 s, though the differences were not significant. Our results indicated that about 20% of the dose was remaining on the oropharyngeal mucosa after inhalation. In a comparison of washing times, the amounts of BUD recovered were 26.3+/-3.2 microg after gargling and rinsing for 3 s each, and 19.4+/-9.3 microg after those for 5 s each. As for the effect of lag time before beginning mouth washing, the ratio of BUD recovered following mouth washing with a lag time of 1 min was 73.2%, while it was reduced to 27.8% after 10 min, as compared to immediate mouth washing following administration. Our results suggest that the amount of BUD removed by mouth washing is associated with the lag time between inhalation and mouth washing, however, not with the duration of mouth washing. We concluded that immediate mouth washing after inhalation is most useful for the removal of drugs following BUD-TH administration.

Local oropharyngeal side effects of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma

The widespread use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for the treatment of persistent asthma, although highly effective, may be associated with both systemic and local side effects. Systemic side effects of ICS have been extensively studied. In contrast, relatively few studies have been performed to specifically evaluate local side effects of ICS. These local side effects--including oropharyngeal candidiasis, dysphonia, pharyngitis, and cough--are generally viewed as minor complications of therapy. However, they can be clinically significant, affect patient quality of life, hinder compliance with therapy, and mask symptoms of more serious disease. Local side effects result from deposition of an active ICS in the oropharynx during administration of the drug. Numerous factors can influence the proportion of an inhaled dose that is deposited in the oropharyngeal cavity, including the ICS formulation, type of delivery system, and patient compliance with administration instructions. Therefore, the incidence of local side effects can vary widely. The goal in developing a new ICS is to include key pharmacologic characteristics that reduce oropharyngeal exposure to active drug while maintaining efficacy comparable with currently available ICS.

Typhoid fever as a cause of opportunistic infection: case report

Background

Typhoid fever is a systemic infection caused by the bacterium Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serotype typhi, which is acquired by ingestion of contaminated food and water. Each year the disease affects at least 16 million persons world-wide, most of whom reside in the developing countries of Southeast Asia and Africa. In Italy the disease is uncommon with a greater number of cases in Southern regions than in Northern ones.

Case presentation

We report on a 57-year-old Sri-Lankan male affected by typhoid fever, the onset of which was accompanied by oropharyngeal candidiasis. This clinical sign was due to a transient cell-mediated immunity depression (CD4+ cell count was 130 cells/mm³) probably caused by Salmonella typhi infection. Human immunodeficiency virus infection was ruled out. Diagnosis of typhoid fever was made by the isolation of Salmonella typhi from two consecutive blood cultures. The patient recovered after a ten days therapy with ciprofloxacin and his CD4+ cell count improved gradually until normalization within 3 weeks.

Conclusion

Our patient is the first reported case of typhoid fever associated with oropharyngeal candidiasis. This finding suggests a close correlation between Salmonella typhi infection and transitory immunodepression.

Influence of Mouth Washing Procedures on the Removal of Drug Residues Following Inhalation of Corticosteroids

Mouth washing after inhalation of corticosteroids is effective for prevention of local adverse effects such as hoarseness and oropharyngeal candidiasis. To establish an optimal procedure for such mouth washing, we investigated the removal rates of drug residues remaining on the oropharyngeal mucosa using various mouth washing methods following inhalation. A beclomethasone dipropionate metered dose inhaler (BDP-MDI) (100 microg) and a fluticasone propionate dry powder inhaler (FP-DPI) (100 microg) were used. The effects of different mouth washing methods were evaluated by quantification of drugs in the expectorated rinse solution using an HPLC method. The amounts of BDP recovered in the rinse after gargling and rinsing for 5 s each were 47.1+/-13.6 microg, while they were 42.9+/-9.4 microg after rinsing alone for 10 s and 38.7+/-9.2 microg after gargling alone for 10 s. Under the same conditions, FP amounts were 32.9+/-7.3 microg, 28.9+/-2.4 microg, and 27.1+/-7.9 microg, respectively. In a comparison of washing time, the amounts of BDP recovered were 49.8+/-9.7 microg after gargling and rinsing for 2 s each, 53.5+/-10.2 microg after those for 3 s each, and 47.1+/-13.6 microg after those for 5 s each, while the amounts of FP under the same conditions were 36.4+/-2.4 microg, 33.3+/-6.4 microg, and 32.9+/-7.4 microg, respectively. As for the effect of time lag before mouth washing, the amount of BDP recovered decreased by 65.7% with a lag time of 1 min and by 5.6% after 10 min, while that of FP decreased by 51.1% with a lag time of 1 min and by 7.7% after 10 min. Our results suggest that the amount of drugs removed by mouth washing is significantly associated with the time lag between inhalation and mouth washing. We concluded that immediate gargling and rinsing after inhalation is most useful for the removal of drugs following inhalation of corticosteroids.

Investigation of mouth washing by patients after inhaling corticosteroids

We report an effective method for mouth washing after inhalation of corticosteroids for the prevention of local adverse effects such as hoarseness and oropharyngeal candidiasis. This method involves gargling and rinsing immediately after inhalation, repeated at least twice. We performed a questionnaire survey on mouth washing after inhalation of corticosteroids of 19 inpatients who used inhaled corticosteroids at the University of Tokyo Hospital. The questions concerned: 1) awareness of local adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids; 2) gargling and rinsing habits; 3) repeating mouth washing at least twice; and 4) mouth washing immediately after inhalation. The percentage of patients correctly performing the individual maneuvers were: 1) 63.2%; 2) 36.8%; 3) 36.8%; and 4) 63.2%. The percentage of patients performing our recommended method of mouth washing (all four elements) was 11%. These results suggest that patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids poorly comprehend mouth washing procedures after inhalation of corticosteroids. It is important that pharmacists advise patients on the correct method of mouth washing.

Predisposing factors and clinical symptoms in HIV-negative patients with Candida oesophagitis: are they always present?

Candida oesophagitis (CO) is scarce among immunocompetent patients. This study aimed at evaluating predisposing factors, clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings in this group. We retrospectively reviewed 55 patients diagnosed as CO endoscopically (whitish plaques) and cytologically (fungal mycelia on brush cytology). Carcinoma, diabetes, acid suppression, steroids, gastric surgery and oesophageal motility disorders were considered as predisposing factors. Twenty of 55 patients lacked any predisposing factor for CO. These patients were more frequently asymptomatic (8/20) when compared with those with known predisposing factors (5/35) (p = 0.031). Moreover, dysphagia was more prevalent in the latter group (24/35 vs. 8/20; p = 0.039). Endoscopic findings correlated with the presence of neither predisposing factors nor symptoms (Wilcoxon p > 0.05). Thus, CO can be discovered in patients without apparent predisposing risk factors and clinical symptoms. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of transition from colonisation to infection.

Clinical findings and risk factors for Candida esophagitis in outpatients

We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients with endoscopically discovered Candida esophagitis to more fully characterize this entity and identify predisposing conditions. Candida esophagitis was defined by the presence of fungal mycelia on brush cytology. Only two patients had an associated malignancy. Other possible predisposing risk factors were acid suppressive therapy (14 patients), prior gastric surgery (five), mucosal barrier injury (four), inhaled steroid use (four), oral steroid use (three), esophageal motility disorders (three), rheumatologic disorders (three), prior antibiotic use (two) and diabetes mellitus (two). The majority of patients had more than one proposed risk factor. Ten (56%) were treated with antifungal therapy. Thus, Candida esophagitis was infrequently seen in patients with associated malignancy. Prospective evaluation of predisposing conditions and treatment is recommended.

Prevalence of esophageal candidiasis among patients treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate

OBJECTIVES

Development of oropharyngeal candidiasis is a frequently reported adverse effect of inhaled corticosteroid use, but the prevalence of esophageal candidiasis is unknown. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of esophageal candidiasis among patients treated with an inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate.

METHODS

Upper GI endoscopy was performed on 49 patients treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate to examine the prevalence of esophageal candidiasis. Of the patients, 36 had bronchial asthma and 13 had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. To compare the prevalence with control patients, upper GI endoscopy was performed on 700 consecutive patients without malignancy or immunosuppression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of esophageal candidiasis was 37% among patients treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate, whereas only 0.3% of the control patients had the infection. The prevalence was especially high among patients with diabetes mellitus or those who were treated with a high dose of inhaled fluticasone propionate. Moreover, a reduction in the daily dose of inhaled fluticasone propionate eliminated the infection in four of five patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal candidiasis is a common complication of inhaled corticosteroid use.

Infectious Esophagitis

Infectious esophagitis can have significant implications in an impaired host. Described most commonly in immunocompromised patients, infectious esophagitis can also occasionally be discovered in immunocompetent individuals in several unique clinical settings. Evaluation of the typical presenting complaints, such as dysphagia or odynophagia, are especially important in immunocompetent patients, and therapy should be directed at the appropriate predisposing condition and resultant infectious agent. In immunocompromised patients, however, clinical experience supports the use of empiric therapy in patients without concomitant systemic complaints. Especially in AIDS patients or those with lymphoma or leukemia, the initial approach to infectious esophagitis complaints (ie, dysphagia or odynophagia) is to begin an empiric trial of oral systemic fluconazole for presumed candidal esophagitis. If the individual remains symptomatic after 3 to 7 days or has any associated systemic complaints or concerning clinical findings (eg, hematemesis), then upper endoscopy with biopsies is indicated. If an etiologic agent other than Candida is defined by histologic, immunohistochemical, or culture methods, then appropriate therapy can be initiated. There are many important and pathologic agents implicated in infectious esophagitis. Thus, directed therapy needs to be administered appropriately and in a timely fashion to avoid poor short-term problems or long-term sequelae.

Efficacy of CS-758, a novel triazole, against experimental fluconazole-resistant oropharyngeal candidiasis in mice

The therapeutic efficacy of CS-758, a novel triazole, was evaluated against experimental murine oropharyngeal candidiasis induced by Candida albicans with various susceptibilities to fluconazole. Against infections induced by strains with various susceptibilities to fluconazole, the efficacy of fluconazole was strongly correlated with the MIC of fluconazole, as measured by the NCCLS method, and agreed with the NCCLS interpretive breakpoints, suggesting that the efficacies of new drugs could be predicted by using this model. The results of the fungal burden study corresponded with the results of the histopathological study. CS-758 exhibited potent in vitro activity (MICs, 0.004 to 0.06 micro g/ml) against the strains used in this murine model including fluconazole-susceptible dose-dependent and fluconazole-resistant strains (fluconazole MICs, 16 to 64 micro g/ml). CS-758 exhibited excellent efficacy against the infections induced by all the strains including a fluconazole-resistant strain, and the reductions in viable cell counts were significant at 10 and 50 mg/kg of body weight/dose. Fluconazole was not effective even at 50 mg/kg/dose against infections induced by a fluconazole-resistant strain (fluconazole MIC, 64 micro g/ml). These results suggest that CS-758 is a promising compound for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis including fluconazole-refractory infections.

Adverse skin reactions to inhaled corticosteroids

Inhaled corticosteroids are considered to be the therapy of choice in the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis. However, various cutaneous adverse reactions have been described and are probably present in approximately half of patients. Some of these reactions are related to the daily dosage of steroids or the duration of treatment, for example: thinning of the skin, easy bruising, acne or peri-oral dermatitis, mucocutaneous infection and, especially, candidiasis. Other cutaneous side effects are independent of the dose, such as allergic reactions and a few other rare side effects. Adverse effects could be prevented by monitoring the daily dosage and the family history of the patients, and by following advice provided on the use of inhaled corticosteroids. Specific treatments for infection, acne or allergy can cure these side effects. However, cutaneous side effects can become unpleasant for the patient and temporarily withdrawing therapy has proven to be extremely effective.

Effect of salmeterol and salmeterol plus beclomethasone on saliva flow and IgA in patients with moderate-persistent chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

The use of short-acting beta2-agonists is associated with oral mucosa injuries that are probably provoked by decreased saliva flow and decreased concentrations of immunoglobulin (Ig)A in saliva.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the effect of salmeterol, alone or combined with beclomethasone, on the health of oral mucosa, as well as its effect on saliva flow and IgA concentration in saliva.

METHODS

Patients ranging in age from 6 to 15 years with moderate-persistent chronic asthma were enrolled. Patients received two 6-week treatments, one with salmeterol plus beclomethasone and the other with only salmeterol, with a 1-week washout period between treatments. Patients had oral cavity examinations and assessments of saliva flow, IgA in saliva, and total protein in saliva before the beginning and at the end of each treatment

RESULTS

The results of the baseline oral examinations were normal in all patients. The postsalmetrol (PS) examinations detected 13 patients with gingivitis and the postbeclomethasone-salmeterol (PBS) examinations disclosed 10 patients with gingivitis and 1 with lower-lip ulceration. Baseline saliva flow was 16.25 +/- 7.04 mm/minute (confidence interval [CI] 95% 13.67; 18.89), PS was 13.53 +/- 5.93 mm/minute (CI 95% 11.33; 15.73), and PBS was 16.57 +/- 5.54 mm/minute (CI 95% 14.51; 18.62). No statistical differences between the different assessments were found. Mean saliva IgA at baseline was 4.99 +/- 1.96 mg/dL (CI 95% 4.26; 5.71), PS IgA was 6.53 +/- 3.02 mg/dL (CI 95% 5.41; 7.65), and PBS IgA was 4.82 +/- 1.98 mg/dL (CI 95% 4.08; 5.56). PS IgA was significantly higher than the other two determinations (P < 0.05 by Bonferroni and Tukey tests). Baseline saliva IgA-to-protein ratio was 0.72 +/- 0.24 (95% CI 0.64; 0.80), PS IgA:protein ratio was 1.02 +/- 0.38 (95% CI 0.88; 1.16), and PBS IgA:protein ratio was 0.72 +/- 0.25 (95% CI 0.62; 0.82). PS IgA:protein ratio was significantly higher than the other two determinations (P < 0.05 by Bonferroni and Tukey tests).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study it was demonstrated that salmeterol alone or in combination with beclomethasone induced injuries in the oral mucosa, but only salmeterol alone induced increases in the total and protein-adjusted IgA in saliva.