1
|
Kohjimoto Y, Uemura H, Yoshida M, Hinotsu S, Takahashi S, Takeuchi T, Suzuki K, Shinmoto H, Tamada T, Inoue T, Sugimoto M, Takenaka A, Habuchi T, Ishikawa H, Mizowaki T, Saito S, Miyake H, Matsubara N, Nonomura N, Sakai H, Ito A, Ukimura O, Matsuyama H, Hara I. Japanese clinical practice guidelines for prostate cancer 2023. Int J Urol 2024. [PMID: 39078210 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
This fourth edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prostate Cancer 2023 is compiled. It was revised under the leadership of the Japanese Urological Association, with members selected from multiple academic societies and related organizations (Japan Radiological Society, Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology, the Department of EBM and guidelines, Japan Council for Quality Health Care (Minds), Japanese Society of Pathology, and the patient group (NPO Prostate Cancer Patients Association)), in accordance with the Minds Manual for Guideline Development (2020 ver. 3.0). The most important feature of this revision is the adoption of systematic reviews (SRs) in determining recommendations for 14 clinical questions (CQs). Qualitative SRs for these questions were conducted, and the final recommendations were made based on the results through the votes of 24 members of the guideline development group. Five algorithms based on these results were also created. Contents not covered by the SRs, which are considered textbook material, have been described in the general statement. In the general statement, a literature search for 14 areas was conducted; then, based on the general statement and CQs of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prostate Cancer 2016, the findings revealed after the 2016 guidelines were mainly described. This article provides an overview of these guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuo Kohjimoto
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Chiba, Japan
- Department of EBM and Guidelines, Japan Council for Quality Health Care (Minds), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiro Hinotsu
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Management, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Satoru Takahashi
- Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- NPO Prostate Cancer Patients Association, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Shinmoto
- Department of Radiology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Tamada
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - Mikio Sugimoto
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Atsushi Takenaka
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shiro Saito
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hideaki Miyake
- Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Matsubara
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideki Sakai
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
- Nagasaki Rosai Hospital, Sasebo, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akihiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Osamu Ukimura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideyasu Matsuyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
- Department of Urology, JA Yamaguchi Kouseiren Nagato General Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Isao Hara
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dave P, Carlsson SV, Watts K. Randomized trials of PSA screening. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00487-3. [PMID: 38926075 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in prostate cancer (PCa) screening has evolved over recent decades with multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) spurring guideline changes. At present, controversy exists due to the indolent nature of many prostate cancers and associated risks of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. This review examines major RCTs evaluating PSA screening to inform clinical practices. METHODS AND MATERIALS We summarize findings from primary RCTs investigating PSA screening's impact on PCa mortality and incidence: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), and the Cluster Randomized Trial of PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer (CAP). RESULTS The PLCO Trial randomized men to annual PSA and DRE screening or usual care, reporting no significant difference in PCa mortality between groups at 17 years (RR 0.93, [95% CI: 0.81-1.08]), yet significantly increased detection and concomitant decreased detection in Gleason 6 (RR 1.17, [95% CI: 1.11-1.23]) and 8-10 disease (RR 0.89, [95% CI: 0.80-0.99]) in the screening group, respectively. The ESPRC Trial randomized men across seven European countries to PSA screening every 2-4 years or usual care, noting a 20% reduction in PCa mortality at 9 years (RR 0.81, [95% CI: 0.65-0.98]) and significant decrease in metastatic disease at 12 years (RR 0.70, [95% CI: 0.60-0.82]). The CAP Trial assessed a single PSA screening test's impact on PCa mortality yielding no significant difference in PCa mortality at 10 years (RR 0.96, [95% CI: 0.85-1.08]). Limitations amongst studies included high contamination between study arms and low compliance with study protocols. CONCLUSIONS While the CAP and initial PLCO trials showed no significant reduction in PCa mortality, the ERSPC demonstrated a 21% reduction at 13 years, with further benefits at extended follow-up. Differences in outcomes are attributed to variations in trial design, contamination, adherence rates, and PSA thresholds. Future studies are needed focus on optimizing screening intervals, targeting high-risk populations, and incorporating non-invasive diagnostic tools to improve screening efficacy and reduce associated harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Dave
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Urological Cancers, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kara Watts
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martelin N, De Witt B, Chen B, Eschwège P. Development and validation of an imageless machine-learning algorithm for the initial screening of prostate cancer. Prostate 2024; 84:842-849. [PMID: 38571454 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing is a low-cost screening method for prostate cancer (PCa). However, its accuracy is limited. While progress is being made using medical imaging for PCa screening, PSA testing can still be improved as an easily accessible first step in the screening process. We aimed to develop and validate a new model by further personalizing the analysis of PSA with demographic, medical history, lifestyle parameters, and digital rectal examination (DRE) results. METHODS Using data from 34,224 patients in the screening arm of the PLCO trial (22,188 for the training set and 12,036 for the validation set), we applied a gradient-boosting model whose features (Model 1) were one PSA value and the personal variables available in the PLCO trial except those that signaled an ex-ante assumption of PCa. A second algorithm (Model 2) included a DRE result. The primary outcome was the occurrence of PCa, while the aggressiveness of PCa was a secondary outcome. ROC analyses were used to compare both models to other initial screening tests. RESULTS The areas under the curve (AUC) for Model 2 was 0.894 overall and 0.908 for patients with a suspicious DRE, compared to 0.808 for PSA for patients with a suspicious DRE. The AUC for Model 1 was 0.814 compared to 0.821 for PSA. Model 2 predicted 58% more high-risk PCa than PSA ≥4 combined with an abnormal DRE and had a positive predictive value of 74.7% (vs. 50.6%). CONCLUSION Personalizing the interpretation of PSA values and DRE results with a gradient-boosting model showed promising results as a potential novel, low-cost method for the initial screening of PCa. The importance of DRE, when included in such a model, was also highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Pascal Eschwège
- Urology Department, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Unité de Biologie des Tumeurs, CRAN UMR 7039 CNRS, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Josefsson A, Månsson M, Kohestani K, Spyratou V, Wallström J, Hellström M, Lilja H, Vickers A, Carlsson SV, Godtman R, Hugosson J. Performance of 4Kscore as a Reflex Test to Prostate-specific Antigen in the GÖTEBORG-2 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02379-0. [PMID: 38772787 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE We investigated whether adding 4Kscore as a reflex test to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) could improve the screening algorithm for prostate cancer (PC). METHODS In the GÖTEBORG-2 PC screening trial, 38 000men (50-60 yr) were invited to PSA testing and, if elevated, followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For 571 men with PSA ≥3.0 ng/ml and evaluable outcomes, 4Kscore was calculated. The performance using a prespecified 4Kscore cutoff of 7.5% was evaluated. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The area under the curve for 4Kscore to identify intermediate- and high-risk PC was 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.89), and the positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 15% (0.12-0.20) and 99% (97-100%), respectively. Of the 54 men diagnosed with intermediate- or high-grade PC, two had a 4Kscore cutoff below 7.5%, both with organ-confined intermediate-risk PC. Per 1000 men with elevated PSA, adding 4Kscore would have resulted in avoidance of MRI for 408 (41%) men, biopsies for 95 (28% reduction) men, and diagnosis of 23 low-grade cancers (23% reduction) while delaying the diagnosis of four men with intermediate-grade cancers (4%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Including 4Kscore as a reflex test for men with elevated PSA reduces the need for MRI and biopsy markedly, and results in less overdiagnosis of low-grade PC at the cost of delaying the diagnosis of intermediate-grade PC in a few men. These results add further evidence for including new blood-based biomarkers in addition to PSA to improve the harm and benefit ratio of PC screening and reduce the need for resource-demanding MRI and biopsies. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, 4Kscore, a blood-based biomarker, as a reflex test for men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), reduces the need for magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy. These results support the inclusion of new blood-based biomarkers in addition to PSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Josefsson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Urology and Andrology, Institute of Surgery and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Marianne Månsson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kimia Kohestani
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Vasiliki Spyratou
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jonas Wallström
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mikael Hellström
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hans Lilja
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Urological Cancers, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Rebecka Godtman
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jonas Hugosson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tesfai A, Norori N, Harding TA, Wong YH, Hobbs MD. Variation in harms and benefits of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer by socio-clinical risk factors: A rapid review. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:417-432. [PMID: 38751945 PMCID: PMC11090766 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To analyse the latest evidence on the relative harms and benefits of screening and diagnostic pathways with close examination of (i) men aged 50 years or older, (ii) men whose ethnicity places them at higher risk and (iii) men with a family history. Methods We conducted a literature search using PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases and other sources, from January 1990 to 25 January 2023. Two independent reviewers selected for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies which met our inclusion criteria. Results Twenty-eight articles were selected, from six trials, including the Göteborg trial-reported separately from European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening led to the increased detection of low-grade cancer and reduction of advanced/metastatic disease but had contradictory effects on prostate cancer (PCa)-specific mortality (no difference or reduced), possibly due to issues of contamination or compliance. Screening men from a relatively young age (50-55) reduced risk of PCa-specific mortality in a subanalysis of an 18-year follow-up study and in a 17-year cohort study from the main Göteborg trial. Moreover, one Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial analysis reported a trend of reduced risk of PCa-specific mortality for men with a family history who were screened. [Correction added on 05 March 2024, after first online publication: "Cancer Screening Trial" has been added to the preceding sentence.] However, we did not find relevant studies for ethnicity. Conclusion Under current UK practice, the choice to conduct a PSA test relies on a shared decision-making approach guided by known risk factors. However, we found there was a lack of strong evidence on the harms and benefits of PSA screening by socio-clinical risk factors and suggest further research is required to understand the long-term impact of screening on high-risk populations in the current diagnostic setting.
Collapse
|
6
|
Arvendell M, Björnebo L, Eklund M, Giovanni Falagario U, Chandra Engel J, Akre O, Grönberg H, Nordström T, Lantz A. Prediagnostic Prostate-specific Antigen Testing and Clinical Characteristics in Men with Lethal Prostate Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 62:61-67. [PMID: 38468863 PMCID: PMC10925930 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Prostate cancer (PC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in men worldwide. Opportunistic testing with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has limited impact on PC mortality. Our objective was to assess prediagnostic PSA testing patterns and clinical characteristics at diagnosis in men with lethal PC. Methods We conducted a population-based observational study of all men dying from PC in Stockholm County, Sweden, from 2015 to 2019. Data were retrieved from the National Prostate Cancer Register and the Stockholm PSA and Biopsy Register. If the first PSA was registered within 1 yr before diagnosis, men were categorised as PSA naïve. If an elevated PSA level was registered >1 yr before diagnosis without leading to prostate biopsy or repeating PSA within 1 yr, men were categorised as having delayed diagnosis. If a normal PSA level was registered within 5 yr before diagnosis, followed by an elevated PSA level that resulted in PC diagnosis within 1 yr, men were categorised as PSA tested. Clinical characteristics at diagnosis were stratified with D'Amico risk group classification. Key findings and limitations Among 1473 men dying from PC, PSA test history was available for 995. Of these men, 60% (n = 592) were PSA naïve, 25% (n = 250) received delayed diagnosis, and 15% (n = 153) were PSA tested. After examining all 1473 men, 25% (n = 350) were diagnosed with low- or intermediate-risk cancer, 48% (n = 687) with high-risk cancer, and 27% (n = 385) with metastatic disease. Limitations include the retrospective design. Conclusions and clinical implications Many men with lethal PC lacked PSA testing before diagnosis or had been tested without subsequent follow-up. Nearly half of the study population was diagnosed with high-risk cancer and almost one-third with metastatic disease. These findings suggest further evaluation of the current opportunistic PSA testing approach. Patient summary Data from a population-based observational study of men dying from prostate cancer showed that many of them did not undergo either prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing before diagnosis or subsequent follow-up if tested. These findings implicate deficiencies in the current opportunistic PSA testing approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Arvendell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Björnebo
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Eklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ugo Giovanni Falagario
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Jan Chandra Engel
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tobias Nordström
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Lantz
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Terao H, Nagasaka H, Yamamoto S, Suzuki A, Usui K, Nakaigawa N, Kishida T, Watanabe K, Nakamura S, Narimatsu H. Screening for prostate cancer in a city in Japan: age-specific prostate-specific antigen cutoff thresholds. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:671-677. [PMID: 38012421 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01824-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Older men have higher prostate-specific antigen levels than younger men. However, the current Japanese Urological Association guidelines recommend secondary screening at a cutoff value of 4.0 ng/mL, even in older men. Here, we reexamined the cutoffs for older men using a prostate screening cohort in Japan and first performed an analysis to determine the indication cutoffs for detecting positive biopsies. METHODS Data from 68,566 prostate cancer screenings in the city in 2018 were combined with cancer registration data. The optimal prostate-specific antigen levels to predict prostate cancer in different age groups were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves after determining whether a cancer was registered within one year of screening. RESULTS At the conventional prostate-specific antigen threshold of 4.0 ng/mL, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were 94.9%, 91.7%, and 91.7%, respectively. The optimal prostate-specific antigen cutoff values for patients aged 50-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and over 80 years were 3.900 ng/mL, 4.014 ng/mL, 4.080 ng/mL, and 4.780 ng/mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity and specificity of prostate cancer screening in the city were high, indicating a highly accurate screening. The prostate-specific antigen threshold was 4.78 ng/mL in patients older than 80 years. A higher prostate-specific antigen threshold may be useful in men over 80 years of age to avoid excess biopsy and reduce costs. Our results suggest that the current Japanese method of using PSA 4.0 ng/mL as a cutoff regardless of age may not be preferable for older men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideyuki Terao
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan.
| | - Hirotaka Nagasaka
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Shotaro Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Atsuto Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Kimitsugu Usui
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Noboru Nakaigawa
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kishida
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Kaname Watanabe
- Cancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Sho Nakamura
- Cancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiroto Narimatsu
- Cancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McLaughlin PW, Cousins MM, Tsodikov A, Soni PD, Crook JM. Mortality reduction and cumulative excess incidence (CEI) in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening era. Sci Rep 2024; 14:5810. [PMID: 38461151 PMCID: PMC10925039 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55859-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024] Open
Abstract
The extent to which PSA screening is related to prostate cancer mortality reduction in the United States (US) is controversial. US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) data from 1980 to 2016 were examined to assess the relationship between prostate cancer mortality and cumulative excess incidence (CEI) in the PSA screening era and to clarify the impact of race on this relationship. CEI was considered as a surrogate for the intensity of prostate cancer screening with PSA testing and subsequent biopsy as appropriate. Data from 163,982,733 person-years diagnosed with 544,058 prostate cancers (9 registries, 9% of US population) were examined. Strong inverse linear relationships were noted between CEI and prostate cancer mortality, and 317,356 prostate cancer deaths were avoided. Eight regions of the US demonstrated prostate cancer mortality reduction of 46.0-63.7%. On a per population basis, the lives of more black men than white men were saved in three of four registries with sufficient black populations for comparison. Factor(s) independent of CEI (potential effects of treatment advances) explained 14.6% of the mortality benefit (p-value = 0.3357) while there was a significant main effect of CEI (effect = -0.0064; CI: [-0.0088, -0.0040]; p-value < 0.0001). Therefore, there is a strong relationship between CEI and prostate cancer mortality reduction that was not related to factors independent of screening utilization. Minority populations have experienced large mortality reductions in the context of PSA mass utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick W McLaughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Assarian Cancer Center, Ascension Providence Hospital, Novi, MI, USA
| | - Matthew M Cousins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology, Self Regional Healthcare, Greenwood, SC, USA.
| | - Alex Tsodikov
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Payal D Soni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dignity Health Cancer Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Juanita M Crook
- British Columbia Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bratt O, Godtman RA, Jiborn T, Wallström J, Akre O, Carlsson S, Nordström T, Thimansson E, Alterbeck M, Zackrisson S, Hugosson J, Bjartell A, Lantz A. Population-based Organised Prostate Cancer Testing: Results from the First Invitation of 50-year-old Men. Eur Urol 2024; 85:207-214. [PMID: 38042646 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Union recently recommended evaluation of the feasibility of organised prostate cancer screening. In Sweden, regional population-based organised prostate cancer testing (OPT) programmes were introduced in 2020. OBJECTIVE To describe initial participation rates and diagnostic outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The three most populated Swedish regions invited all men aged 50 yr to OPT by a letter in 2020-2022. Men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥3 ng/ml were referred for prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PSA assays differed across regions. Men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 1-3 and PSA density ≥0.15 ng/ml/cm3 or PI-RADS 4-5 were referred for a biopsy. Data were obtained from the Swedish Register for Organised Prostate Cancer Testing. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Overall and regional participation rates, PSA distributions, PI-RADS score distributions, cancer detection, and treatment were evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 23 855 (35%) of 68 060 invited men participated; 696 (2.9%) had PSA ≥3 ng/ml, and of them, 306 (44%) had a biopsy indication and 221 (32%) had a biopsy. On biopsy, 93 (42%) had Gleason grade group ≥2 (0.39% of PSA-tested men) and 44 (20%) Gleason grade group 1 cancer. Most men with cancer had treatment with curative intent (70%) or were under active surveillance (28%). Across regions, proportions of men with PSA ≥3 ng/ml ranged from 2.3% to 4.0%, and those with PI-RADS score 4-5 ranged from 12% to 21%. A limitation is that results are applicable only to first testing of men in their early 50s. CONCLUSIONS The OPT programmes are feasible with good compliance to the diagnostic pathway. The use of MRI and PSA density avoided a biopsy for over half of the men with PSA ≥3 ng/ml. Inter-regional differences in diagnostic outcomes show a need for standardisation of the diagnostic pathway's components. PATIENT SUMMARY We report the diagnostic outcomes of inviting 68 000 50-yr-old men to organised prostate cancer testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ola Bratt
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thomas Jiborn
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jonas Wallström
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan Carlsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tobias Nordström
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erik Thimansson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Max Alterbeck
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sophia Zackrisson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jonas Hugosson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anna Lantz
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nordström T, Annerstedt M, Glaessgen A, Carlsson S, Clements M, Abbadi A, Grönberg H, Jäderling F, Eklund M, Discacciati A. Repeated Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Secondary Analysis of the STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2354577. [PMID: 38324313 PMCID: PMC10851096 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed to enhance the benefit-to-harm ratio of prostate cancer screening, but data on repeated screening outcomes are lacking. Objective To describe outcomes of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening with MRI and prostate biopsies at repeat screening. Design, Setting, and Participants This secondary analysis examined the population-based, screen-by-invitation STHLM3-MRI randomized clinical trial, which recruited Swedish men aged 50 to 74 years. Men were eligible for repeat screening at 2 to 3 years if they had PSA levels of 1.5 ng/mL or greater at trial inclusion, were randomized to the MRI-targeted group (including screening using biomarkers and MRI), and were not diagnosed with prostate cancer after the first screening round. Repeat screening was performed between November 10, 2021, and February 20, 2023. Data analysis was performed between May and August 2023. Intervention Participants underwent blood sampling, including PSA testing. A biparametric MRI scan was performed if PSA levels were 3 ng/mL or greater, and men with lesions with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3 or greater were referred for targeted and systematic biopsies. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score of ≥3 + 4). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men with clinically insignificant cancer (Gleason score of 6), the number of elevated PSA tests, MRI scans, and biopsy procedures. Results Of 7609 men from the first screening round, 2078 (27.3%) were eligible for and were invited for rescreening. Among the invitees, 1500 (72.2%) participated. Their median age was 67 (IQR, 61-72) years. Of 1094 men with PSA levels between 1.5 and 2.9 ng/mL in the first screening round, 326 (29.8%) had levels of 3 ng/mL or greater in the second round. Overall, 667 men (44.5%) had PSA levels of 3 ng/mL or greater: 617 underwent MRI (92.5%), revealing 51 (7.6%) with equivocal lesions (PI-RADS score of 3) and 33 (4.9%) with suspicious lesions (PI-RADS score of ≥4). Only 10 of 383 men (2.6%) with a prior negative MRI result had a lesion with a PI-RADS score of 4 or greater. Among the 1500 rescreened men, 48 (3.2%) had a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or greater, including 19 (1.3%) with a score of 4 + 3 or greater and 11 (0.7%) with a score of 6. Conclusions and Relevance In this secondary analysis of the STHLM3-MRI randomized clinical trial, cancer detection during the second screening round in biennial PSA and MRI-based prostate cancer screening was limited, and the detection of low-grade tumors remained low. A substantial proportion of men exhibited elevated PSA levels during rescreening, and a considerable portion of MRI scans performed lacked lesions suggestive of cancer. Future studies should explore strategies to reduce MRI-related resource use. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03377881.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Nordström
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Axel Glaessgen
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Unilabs, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan Carlsson
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mark Clements
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ahmad Abbadi
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Jäderling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Eklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrea Discacciati
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alterbeck M, Thimansson E, Bengtsson J, Baubeta E, Zackrisson S, Bolejko A, Sandeman K, Carlsson S, Jiborn T, Bjartell A. A pilot study of an organised population-based testing programme for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2024; 133:87-95. [PMID: 37523331 PMCID: PMC10787355 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility of a digitally automated population-based programme for organised prostate cancer testing (OPT) in Southern Sweden. PATIENTS AND METHODS A pilot project for a regional OPT was conducted between September 2020 and February 2021, inviting 999 randomly selected men aged 50, 56, or 62 years. Risk stratification was based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density (PSAD), and bi-parametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Men with a PSA level of 3-99 ng/mL had an MRI, and men with elevated PSA level (≥3 ng/mL) had a urological check-up, including a digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Indications for targeted and/or systematic transrectal prostate biopsies were suspicious lesions on MRI (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] 4-5) and/or PSAD > 0.15 ng/mL/mL. Additional indications for prostate biopsies were palpable tumours, PSA ratio < 0.1, or cancer suspicion on TRUS. Patient selection, mail correspondence, data collection, and algorithm processing were performed by an automated digital management system. Feasibility is reported descriptively. RESULTS A total of 418 men had a PSA test (42%), with increasing participation rates by age (50 years, 38%; 56 years, 44%; and 62 years, 45%). Among these, 35 men (8%) had elevated PSA levels (≥3 ng/mL: one of 139, aged 50 years; 10/143, aged 56 years; and 24/146, aged 62 years). On MRI, 16 men (48%) had a negative scan (PI-RADS < 3), seven men (21%) had PI-RADS 3, nine men (27%) had PI-RADS 4, and one man (3%) had PI-RADS 5. All men with PI-RADS 4 or 5 underwent prostate biopsies, as well as two men with PI-RADS 3 due to PSAD > 0.15 ng/mL/mL or a suspicious finding on TRUS. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 10 men. Six men underwent active treatment, whereas four men were assigned to active surveillance. CONCLUSION Our OPT model is feasible from an operational point of view, but due to the limited scale of this study no conclusions can be made regarding the efficacy of the diagnostic model or outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Alterbeck
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Division of Urological Cancers, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Erik Thimansson
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Johan Bengtsson
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Erik Baubeta
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Sophia Zackrisson
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anetta Bolejko
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Kevin Sandeman
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Medical Services, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Sigrid Carlsson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Jiborn
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Division of Urological Cancers, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Division of Urological Cancers, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Messina E, La Torre G, Pecoraro M, Pisciotti ML, Sciarra A, Poscia R, Catalano C, Panebianco V. Design of a magnetic resonance imaging-based screening program for early diagnosis of prostate cancer: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial-Prostate Cancer Secondary Screening in Sapienza (PROSA). Eur Radiol 2024; 34:204-213. [PMID: 37561183 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10019-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The main objective is to propose an MRI-based screening protocol, investigating the role of MRI without the injection of contrast media (bi-parametric MRI, bpMRI) as a secondary prevention test for prostate cancer (PCa) early diagnosis, comparing MRI with the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test. For this reason, preliminary results of Prostate Cancer Secondary Screening in Sapienza (PROSA) are presented, to investigate the efficiency of an MRI-based screening protocol. PROSA is a prospective, randomized, single-center study. To date, 351 men have been enrolled and blindly randomized into two different arms: (A) Men underwent a bpMRI regardless of their PSA values (175); (B) Men followed as per clinical practice: those with increased PSA (61) were referred to bpMRI, while those with normal PSA (112) were not. Men who screened positive on MRI were directed to MR-directed targeted biopsy. On arm A, 4 clinically significant PCa have been detected, while none was found on arm B (p = 0.046). To evaluate the efficiency of the screening protocol, we calculated the experimental event rate (EER, 3.6%), control event rate (CER, 1.2%.), absolute risk reduction (ARR, 2.5%), and number needed to treat (NNT, 40.3). PROSA represents an interesting experience in the field of imaging-based PCa screening. The preliminary data from this trial highlight the promising role of non-contrast MRI as a screening tool for early detection of PCa. Further data will finally validate the most appropriate screening program. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT PROSA depicts an interesting experience in the field of research focused on imaging-based prostate cancer screening. Its preliminary data highlight the promising role of non-contrast MRI as a screening tool for early detection of PCa. KEY POINTS • Promotion of an MRI-based screening protocol, investigating the role of non-contrast MRI as a secondary prevention test for prostate cancer early diagnosis, comparing MRI with PSA test. • Prostate Cancer Secondary Screening in Sapienza (PROSA) represents an interesting experience in the field of research focused on imaging-based prostate cancer screening; its preliminary results indicate that it is possible to use non-contrast MRI as a screening tool for early detection of PCa. • This new approach to PCa screening could facilitate the early diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer while reducing the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies and the detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Messina
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe La Torre
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Pecoraro
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Lucia Pisciotti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Poscia
- Department of Clinical Research and Clinical Competence, DG AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Catalano
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00185, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gómez Rivas J, Leenen RCA, Venderbos LDF, Helleman J, de la Parra I, Vasilyeva V, Moreno-Sierra J, Basu P, Chandran A, van den Bergh RCN, Collen S, Van Poppel H, Roobol MJ, Beyer K. Navigating through the Controversies and Emerging Paradigms in Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Bridging the Gap from Classic RCTs to Modern Population-Based Pilot Programs. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1677. [PMID: 38138904 PMCID: PMC10744765 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13121677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last three decades, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and the US-based Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening have steered the conversation around the early detection of prostate cancer. These two randomized trials assessed the effect of screening on prostate cancer disease-specific mortality. Elevated PSA levels were followed by a systematic sextant prostate biopsy. Standard repeat testing intervals were applied. After controversies from 2009 to 2016 due to contradicting results of the two trials, the results aligned in 2016 and showed that early PSA detection reduces prostate cancer-specific mortality. However, overdiagnosis rates of up to 50% were reported, and this sparked an intense debate on harms and benefits for almost 20 years. The balance between harms and benefits is highly debated and has initiated further research to investigate new ways of early detection. In the meantime, the knowledge and tools for the diagnostic algorithm improved. This is a continuously ongoing effort which focuses on individual risk-based screening algorithms that preserve the benefits of the purely PSA-based screening algorithms, while reducing the side effects. An important push towards investigating new techniques for early detection came from the European Commission on the 20th of September 2022. The European Commission published its updated recommendation to investigate prostate, lung, and gastric cancer early detection programs. This opened a new window of opportunity to move away from the trial setting to population-based early detection settings. With this review, we aim to review 30 years of historical evidence of prostate cancer screening, which led to the initiation of the 'The Prostate Cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union' (PRAISE-U) project, which aims to encourage the early detection and diagnosis of PCa through customized and risk-based screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Health Research Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (I.d.l.P.); (J.M.-S.)
| | - Renée C. A. Leenen
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (R.C.A.L.); (L.D.F.V.); (J.H.); (R.C.N.v.d.B.); (M.J.R.); (K.B.)
| | - Lionne D. F. Venderbos
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (R.C.A.L.); (L.D.F.V.); (J.H.); (R.C.N.v.d.B.); (M.J.R.); (K.B.)
| | - Jozien Helleman
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (R.C.A.L.); (L.D.F.V.); (J.H.); (R.C.N.v.d.B.); (M.J.R.); (K.B.)
| | - Irene de la Parra
- Department of Urology, Health Research Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (I.d.l.P.); (J.M.-S.)
| | - Vera Vasilyeva
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office, PO Box 30016 6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands; (V.V.); (S.C.)
- European Association of Urology, EAU Policy Office, PO Box 30016 6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands;
| | - Jesús Moreno-Sierra
- Department of Urology, Health Research Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (I.d.l.P.); (J.M.-S.)
| | - Partha Basu
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69366 Lyon, France; (P.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Arunah Chandran
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69366 Lyon, France; (P.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Roderick C. N. van den Bergh
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (R.C.A.L.); (L.D.F.V.); (J.H.); (R.C.N.v.d.B.); (M.J.R.); (K.B.)
- Department of Urology, Sint Antonius Hospital, 3543 AZ Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Collen
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office, PO Box 30016 6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands; (V.V.); (S.C.)
- European Association of Urology, EAU Policy Office, PO Box 30016 6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands;
| | - Hein Van Poppel
- European Association of Urology, EAU Policy Office, PO Box 30016 6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands;
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Monique J. Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (R.C.A.L.); (L.D.F.V.); (J.H.); (R.C.N.v.d.B.); (M.J.R.); (K.B.)
| | - Katharina Beyer
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (R.C.A.L.); (L.D.F.V.); (J.H.); (R.C.N.v.d.B.); (M.J.R.); (K.B.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Khanfari H, Mehranfar S, Cheki M, Mohammadi Sadr M, Moniri S, Heydarheydari S, Rezaeijo SM. Exploring the efficacy of multi-flavored feature extraction with radiomics and deep features for prostate cancer grading on mpMRI. BMC Med Imaging 2023; 23:195. [PMID: 37993801 PMCID: PMC10664625 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-01140-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of radiomics and deep features obtained from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for grading prostate cancer. We propose a novel approach called multi-flavored feature extraction or tensor, which combines four mpMRI images using eight different fusion techniques to create 52 images or datasets for each patient. We evaluate the effectiveness of this approach in grading prostate cancer and compare it to traditional methods. METHODS We used the PROSTATEx-2 dataset consisting of 111 patients' images from T2W-transverse, T2W-sagittal, DWI, and ADC images. We used eight fusion techniques to merge T2W, DWI, and ADC images, namely Laplacian Pyramid, Ratio of the low-pass pyramid, Discrete Wavelet Transform, Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Transform, Curvelet Transform, Wavelet Fusion, Weighted Fusion, and Principal Component Analysis. Prostate cancer images were manually segmented, and radiomics features were extracted using the Pyradiomics library in Python. We also used an Autoencoder for deep feature extraction. We used five different feature sets to train the classifiers: all radiomics features, all deep features, radiomics features linked with PCA, deep features linked with PCA, and a combination of radiomics and deep features. We processed the data, including balancing, standardization, PCA, correlation, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Finally, we used nine classifiers to classify different Gleason grades. RESULTS Our results show that the SVM classifier with deep features linked with PCA achieved the most promising results, with an AUC of 0.94 and a balanced accuracy of 0.79. Logistic regression performed best when using only the deep features, with an AUC of 0.93 and balanced accuracy of 0.76. Gaussian Naive Bayes had lower performance compared to other classifiers, while KNN achieved high performance using deep features linked with PCA. Random Forest performed well with the combination of deep features and radiomics features, achieving an AUC of 0.94 and balanced accuracy of 0.76. The Voting classifiers showed higher performance when using only the deep features, with Voting 2 achieving the highest performance, with an AUC of 0.95 and balanced accuracy of 0.78. CONCLUSION Our study concludes that the proposed multi-flavored feature extraction or tensor approach using radiomics and deep features can be an effective method for grading prostate cancer. Our findings suggest that deep features may be more effective than radiomics features alone in accurately classifying prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan Khanfari
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Petroleum University of Technology, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Saeed Mehranfar
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Cheki
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Paramedicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Mahmoud Mohammadi Sadr
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Samir Moniri
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Paramedicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Sahel Heydarheydari
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Paramedicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Seyed Masoud Rezaeijo
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
- Cancer Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thomas J, Atluri S, Zucker I, Reis I, Kwon D, Kim E, Tewari A, Patel V, Wagaskar V, Konety B, Kasraeian A, Czarniecki S, Thoreson G, Soodana-Prakash N, Ritch C, Nahar B, Gonzalgo M, Kava B, Parekh D, Punnen S. A multi-institutional study of 1,111 men with 4K score, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and prostate biopsy. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:430.e9-430.e16. [PMID: 37544833 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biomarkers are often used in conjunction to enhance the selection process for prostate biopsy. However, the optimal sequence of ordering these tests has not been established. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted on a large multi-institutional cohort of patients who underwent MRI, 4K score, and biopsy of the prostate to examine the impact of utilizing both tests vs. either test alone and to determine if the order in which these tests are administered affects the ability to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP). METHODS AND MATERIALS We evaluated men from 8 different institutions who were referred for prostate cancer evaluation and underwent MRI, 4K score test, and prostate biopsy. The primary outcome was the presence of csCaP, defined as grade group 2 or higher cancer on a biopsy of the prostate. We used logistic regression, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis to evaluate using a 4K score or MRI alone vs. both tests together for detecting csCaP. In addition, we evaluated several strategies using one or both tests for selecting men for biopsy and compared them based on the proportion of biopsies avoided and the csCaP's missed. RESULTS Among the 1,111 men who formed the final cohort, 553 (49.8%) had prostate cancer, and 353 (31.8%) had csCaP. We found that using MRI and 4K score together had better discrimination, calibration, and a higher clinical utility on decision curve analysis compared to using either test individually. Using both tests together resulted in fewer biopsies avoided and missed cancers compared to using either test alone. Strategies that sequence MRI and 4K score tests resulted in the largest biopsy reduction, with no appreciable difference between starting with an MRI vs. a biomarker. CONCLUSIONS We found that using both an MRI and 4K score together was superior to using either test alone but found no appreciable difference between starting with an MRI vs. starting with a 4K score. Prospective studies are needed to identify the best strategy to sequence MRI and biomarkers in the evaluation of csCaP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Thomas
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Shrikanth Atluri
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Isaac Zucker
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Isildinha Reis
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Deukwoo Kwon
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Eric Kim
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ashutosh Tewari
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Vipul Patel
- Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital-Celebration Health, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL
| | - Vinayak Wagaskar
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Stefan Czarniecki
- HIFU Clinic, Department of Urology, St. Elizabeth Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Chad Ritch
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Bruno Nahar
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Mark Gonzalgo
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Bruce Kava
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Dipen Parekh
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bittla P, Kaur S, Sojitra V, Zahra A, Hutchinson J, Folawemi O, Khan S. Exploring Circulating Tumor DNA (CtDNA) and Its Role in Early Detection of Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e45784. [PMID: 37745752 PMCID: PMC10516512 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a significant increase in the need for an efficient screening method that might identify cancer at an early stage and could improve patients' long-term survival due to the continued rise in cancer incidence and associated mortality. One such effort involved using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a rescue agent for a non-invasive blood test that may identify many tumors. A tumor marker called ctDNA is created by cells with the same DNA alterations. Due to its shorter half-life, it may be useful for both early cancer detection and real-time monitoring of tumor development, therapeutic response, and tumor outcomes. We obtained 156 papers from PUBMED using the MeSH approach in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria and ten articles from additional online resources. After removing articles with irrelevant titles and screening the abstract and full text of the articles that contained information unrelated to or not specific to the title query using inclusion and exclusion criteria, 18 out of 166 articles were chosen for the quality check. Fourteen medium to high-quality papers were chosen out of the 18 publications to be included in the study design. The reviewed literature showed no significant utility of ctDNA in detecting early-stage tumors of size less than 1 cm diameter. Still, the ideal screening test would require the assay to detect a size <5 mm tumor, which is nearly impossible with the current data. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay ranged from 69% to 98% and 99%, respectively. Furthermore, CancerSEEK achieves tumor origin localization in 83% of cases, while targeted error correction sequencing (TEC-Seq) assays demonstrate a cancer detection rate ranging from 59% to 71%, depending on the type of cancer. However, it could be of great value as a prognostic indicator, and the levels are associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates, wherein the positive detection of ctDNA is associated with worse OS compared to the tumors detected through standard procedures, with an odds ratio (OS) of 4.83. We conclude that ctDNA could be better applied in cancer patients for prognosis, disease progression monitoring, and treatment outcomes compared to its use in early cancer detection. Due to its specific feature of recognizing the tumor-related mutations, it could be implemented as a supplemental tool to assess the nature of the tumor, grade, and size of the tumor and for predicting the outcomes by pre-operative and post-operative evaluation of the tumor marker, ctDNA, and thereby estimating PFS and OS depending on the level of marker present. A vast amount of research is required in early detection to determine the sensitivity, specificity, false positive rates, and false negative rates in evaluating its true potential as a screening tool. Even if the test could detect the mutations, an extensive workup for the search of tumor is required as the assay could only detect but cannot localize the disease. Establishing the clinical validity and utility of ctDNA is imperative for its implementation in future clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parikshit Bittla
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Simran Kaur
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Vani Sojitra
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Anam Zahra
- Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Jhenelle Hutchinson
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Oluwa Folawemi
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Safeera Khan
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lantz A, Nordlund P, Falagario U, Jäderling F, Özbek O, Clements M, Discacciati A, Grönberg H, Eklund M, Stricker P, Emberton M, Aly M, Nordström T. Prostate Cancer IRE Study (PRIS): A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Focal Therapy to Radical Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 51:89-94. [PMID: 37091033 PMCID: PMC10114162 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of focal treatments (FTs) in prostate cancer (PCa) is to treat lesions while preserving surrounding benign tissue and anatomic structures. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal technique that uses high-voltage electric pulses to increase membrane permeability and induce membrane disruption in cells, which potentially causes less damage to the surrounding tissue in comparison to other ablative techniques. We summarize the study protocol for the Prostate Cancer IRE Study (PRIS), which involves two parallel randomized controlled trials comparing IRE with (1) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or (2) radiotherapy in men with newly diagnosed intermediate-risk PCa (NCT05513443). To reduce the number of patients for inclusion and the study duration, the primary outcomes are functional outcomes: urinary incontinence in study 1 and irritative urinary symptoms in study 2. Providing evidence of the lower impact of IRE on functional outcomes will lay a foundation for the design of future multicenter studies with an oncological outcome as the primary endpoint. Erectile function, quality of life, treatment failure, adverse events, and cost effectiveness will be evaluated as secondary objectives. Patients diagnosed with Gleason score 3 + 4 or 4 + 3 PCa from a single lesion visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without any Gleason grade 4 or higher in systematic biopsies outside of the target (unifocal significant disease), aged ≥40 yr, with no established extraprostatic extension on multiparametric MRI, a lesion volume of <1.5 cm3, prostate-specific antigen <20 ng/ml, and stage ≤T2b are eligible for inclusion. The study plan is to recruit 184 men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lantz
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Corresponding author. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Per Nordlund
- Department of Urology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ugo Falagario
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Fredrik Jäderling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Capio S:t Göran Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Orhan Özbek
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mark Clements
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrea Discacciati
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Eklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Phillip Stricker
- St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Department Urology St Vincents Hospital Sydney, Garvan Institute of Research, St Vincents Prostate Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW
| | - Mark Emberton
- Department of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Markus Aly
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tobias Nordström
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Semsarian CR, Ma T, Nickel B, Barratt A, Varma M, Delahunt B, Millar J, Parker L, Glasziou P, Bell KJL. Low-risk prostate lesions: An evidence review to inform discussion on losing the "cancer" label. Prostate 2023; 83:498-515. [PMID: 36811453 PMCID: PMC10952636 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) mitigates harms from overtreatment of low-risk prostate lesions. Recalibration of diagnostic thresholds to redefine which prostate lesions are considered "cancer" and/or adopting alternative diagnostic labels could increase AS uptake and continuation. METHODS We searched PubMed and EMBASE to October 2021 for evidence on: (1) clinical outcomes of AS, (2) subclinical prostate cancer at autopsy, (3) reproducibility of histopathological diagnosis, and (4) diagnostic drift. Evidence is presented via narrative synthesis. RESULTS AS: one systematic review (13 studies) of men undergoing AS found that prostate cancer-specific mortality was 0%-6% at 15 years. There was eventual termination of AS and conversion to treatment in 45%-66% of men. Four additional cohort studies reported very low rates of metastasis (0%-2.1%) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (0%-0.1%) over follow-up to 15 years. Overall, AS was terminated without medical indication in 1%-9% of men. Subclinical reservoir: 1 systematic review (29 studies) estimated that the subclinical cancer prevalence was 5% at <30 years, and increased nonlinearly to 59% by >79 years. Four additional autopsy studies (mean age: 54-72 years) reported prevalences of 12%-43%. Reproducibility: 1 recent well-conducted study found high reproducibility for low-risk prostate cancer diagnosis, but this was more variable in 7 other studies. Diagnostic drift: 4 studies provided consistent evidence of diagnostic drift, with the most recent (published 2020) reporting that 66% of cases were upgraded and 3% were downgraded when using contemporary diagnostic criteria compared to original diagnoses (1985-1995). CONCLUSIONS Evidence collated may inform discussion of diagnostic changes for low-risk prostate lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin R. Semsarian
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Tara Ma
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Murali Varma
- Department of Cellular PathologyUniversity Hospital of WalesCardiffUK
| | - Brett Delahunt
- Wellington School of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of OtagoWellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Jeremy Millar
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, The AlfredMelbourneAustralia
| | - Lisa Parker
- Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsAustralia
| | - Paul Glasziou
- Institute for Evidence‐Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and MedicineBond UniversityGold CoastAustralia
| | - Katy J. L. Bell
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mayo ZS, Parker SM, Kilic SS, Weleff J, Phelan M, Mian OY, Stephans KL, Suh JH, Tendulkar RD. Disparities in Prostate Cancer Diagnoses Among Persons Experiencing Homelessness. Eur Urol 2023:S0302-2838(23)02704-5. [PMID: 37031006 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
|
20
|
Shu X, Liu Y, Qiao X, Ai G, Liu L, Liao J, Deng Z, He X. Radiomic-based machine learning model for the accurate prediction of prostate cancer risk stratification. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220238. [PMID: 36475858 PMCID: PMC9975368 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To precisely predict prostate cancer (PCa) risk stratification, we constructed a machine learning (ML) model based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features. METHODS Between August 2016 and May 2021, patients with histologically proven PCa who underwent pre-operative MRI and prostate-specific antigen screening were included. The patients were grouped into different risk categories as defined by the European Association of Urology-European Association of Nuclear Medicine-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-European Society of Urogenital Radiology-International Society of Geriatric Oncology guidelines. Using Artificial Intelligence Kit software, PCa regions of interest were delineated and radiomic features were extracted. Subsequently, predictable models were built by utilising five traditional ML approaches: support vector machine, logistic regression, gradient boosting decision tree, k-nearest neighbour and random forest (RF) classifiers. The classification capacity of the developed models was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS A total of 213 patients were enrolled, including 16 low-risk, 65 intermediate-risk, and 132 high-risk PCa patients. The risk stratification of PCa could be revealed by MRI radiomic features, and second-order features accounted for most of the selected features. Among the five established ML models, the RF model showed the best overall predictive performance (AUC = 0.87). After further analysis of the subgroups based on the RF model, the prediction of the high-risk group was the best (AUC = 0.89). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that the MR radiomics-based ML method could be a promising tool for predicting PCa risk stratification precisely. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The ML models have valuable prospect for accurate PCa risk assessment, which might contribute to customize treatment and surveillance strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Shu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yunfan Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiaofeng Qiao
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Guangyong Ai
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Liu
- College of Big Data & Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jun Liao
- College of Big Data & Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhengqiao Deng
- College of Big Data & Software Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiaojing He
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Qian Z, Al Khatib K, Chen X, Belani S, Labban M, Lipsitz S, Cole AP, Iyer HS, Trinh QD. Investigating the racial gap in prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen among younger men from 2012 to 2020. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:7008336. [PMID: 36708009 PMCID: PMC9991604 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommended against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in 2012, which was modified in 2018 into shared decision making for men aged 55-70 years with a life expectancy over 10 years. We studied the trends in PSA screening in younger Black and White men with the implementation of the 2012 and 2018 guidelines. METHODS Younger Black and White men (aged 40-54 years) were identified using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System database biennially from 2012 to 2020. Our primary outcome was PSA screening within 2 years of the survey. An adjusted logistic regression model with 2-way interaction assessment between race and survey year was used to investigate the temporal trend of PSA screening in younger Black and White men. RESULTS A total of 142 892 men were included. We saw steadily decreasing odds of PSA screening among both younger Black and White men in 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020 compared with 2012 (for younger Black men: odds ratio [OR]2014 = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.62 to 0.96, OR2016 = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.63, OR2018 = 0.33, 95%CI = 0.27 to 0.42, OR2020 = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.32; and for younger White men: OR2014 = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.87, OR2016 = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.71, OR2018 = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.37 to 0.44, OR2020 = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.39). Younger Black men showed a brisker decrease in PSA screening in 2016, 2018, and 2020 compared with younger White men (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS PSA screening among younger men steadily decreased over the past decade since the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines, demonstrating a narrowing racial gap. How such an observed trend translates to long-term clinical outcomes for younger Black men remains to be seen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyu Qian
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Khalid Al Khatib
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xi Chen
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sanvi Belani
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Muhieddine Labban
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stuart Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hari S Iyer
- Section of Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
The Combined Effect of Polygenic Risk Score and Prostate Health Index in Chinese Men Undergoing Prostate Biopsy. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041343. [PMID: 36835879 PMCID: PMC9960699 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
To date, the combined effect of polygenic risk score (PRS) and prostate health index (phi) on PCa diagnosis in men undergoing prostate biopsy has never been investigated. A total of 3166 patients who underwent initial prostate biopsy in three tertiary medical centers from August 2013 to March 2019 were included. PRS was calculated on the basis of the genotype of 102 reported East-Asian-specific risk variants. It was then evaluated in the univariable or multivariable logistic regression models that were internally validated using repeated 10-fold cross-validation. Discriminative performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) index. Compared with men in the first quintile of age and family history adjusted PRS, those in the second, third, fourth, and fifth quintiles were 1.86 (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-2.56), 2.07 (95%CI: 1.50-2.84), 3.26 (95%CI: 2.36-4.48), and 5.06 (95%CI: 3.68-6.97) times as likely to develop PCa (all p < 0.001). Adjustment for other clinical parameters yielded similar results. Among patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at 2-10 ng/mL or 2-20 ng/mL, PRS still had an observable ability to differentiate PCa in the group of prostate health index (phi) at 27-36 (Ptrend < 0.05) or >36 (Ptrend ≤ 0.001). Notably, men with moderate phi (27-36) but highest PRS (top 20% percentile) would have a comparable risk of PCa (positive rate: 26.7% or 31.3%) than men with high phi (>36) but lowest PRS (bottom 20% percentile positive rate: 27.4% or 34.2%). The combined model of PRS, phi, and other clinical risk factors provided significantly better performance (AUC: 0.904, 95%CI: 0.887-0.921) than models without PRS. Adding PRS to clinical risk models could provide significant net benefit (NRI, from 8.6% to 27.6%), especially in those early onset patients (NRI, from 29.2% to 44.9%). PRS may provide additional predictive value over phi for PCa. The combination of PRS and phi that effectively captured both clinical and genetic PCa risk is clinically practical, even in patients with gray-zone PSA.
Collapse
|
23
|
Carlsson SV, Arnsrud Godtman R, Pihl CG, Vickers A, Lilja H, Hugosson J, Månsson M. Young Age on Starting Prostate-specific Antigen Testing Is Associated with a Greater Reduction in Prostate Cancer Mortality: 24-Year Follow-up of the Göteborg Randomized Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial. Eur Urol 2023; 83:103-109. [PMID: 36334968 PMCID: PMC10481420 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of death from prostate cancer (PC) depends on age, but the age at which to start prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE To study the relationship between risk reduction for PC mortality and age at first PSA screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The randomized Göteborg-1 trial invited men for biennial PSA screening between the ages of 50 and 70 yr (screening, n = 10 000) or no invitation but exposure to opportunistic PSA testing (control, n = 10 000). INTERVENTION Regular versus opportunistic PSA screening or no PSA. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We modeled the nonlinear association between starting age and the absolute risk reduction in PC mortality in three settings: (1) intention-to-screen (randomized arms); (2) historical control (screening group and 1990-1994 registry data); and (3) attendees only (screening attendees and matched controls). We tested whether the effect of screening on PC mortality depends on the age at starting screening by comparing survival models with and without an interaction between trial arm and age (intention-to-screen and attendees only). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Younger age on starting PSA testing was associated with a greater reduction in PC mortality. Starting screening at age 55 yr approximately halved the risk of PC death compared to first PSA at age 60 yr. The test of association between starting age and the effect of screening on PC mortality was slightly greater than the conventional level of statistical significance (p = 0.052) for the entire cohort, and statistically significant among attendees (p = 0.002). This study is limited by the low number of disease-specific deaths for men starting screening before age 55 yr and the difficulty in discriminating between the effect of starting age and screening duration. CONCLUSIONS Given that prior screening trials included men aged up to 70 yr on starting screening, our results suggest that the effect size reported in prior trials underestimates that of currently recommended programs starting at age 50-55 yr. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study from the Göteborg-1 trial, we looked at the effect of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in reducing men's risk of dying from prostate cancer given the age at which they begin testing. Starting at a younger age reduced the risk of prostate cancer death by a greater amount. We recommend that PSA screening should start no later than at age 55 yr.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrid V Carlsson
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
| | | | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hans Lilja
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jonas Hugosson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Marianne Månsson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Albertsen PC. Screening for Prostate Cancer with Prostate-specific Antigen: The Journey Continues. Eur Urol 2023; 83:110-111. [PMID: 36372628 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
25
|
Mehring G, Tilki D, Heinzer H, Steuber T, Pose RM, Thederan I, Budäus L, Salomon G, Haese A, Michl U, Maurer T, Huland H, Graefen M, Isbarn H. Histopathological results of radical prostatectomy specimen of men younger than 50 years of age at the time of surgery: possible implications for prostate cancer screening programs? World J Urol 2023; 41:421-425. [PMID: 36656332 PMCID: PMC9947052 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04287-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer (PCa) detection is usually achieved by PSA measurement and, if indicated, further diagnostics. The recent EAU guidelines recommend a first PSA test at the age of 50 years, if no family history of PCa or BRCA2 mutation exists. However, some men might harbor significant PCa at younger age; thus we evaluated the histopathological results of men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) in their 40 s at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS We relied on the data of all patients who underwent RP in our institution between 1992 and 2020 and were younger than 50 years at the time of surgery. The histopathological results are descriptively presented. Moreover, we tested the effect of a positive family history on the descriptive results. RESULTS Overall, 1225 patients younger than 50 years underwent RP at our institution. Median age was 47 years. Most patients showed favorable histopathological characteristics. However, 20% of patients had extraprostatic disease (≥ pT3a), 15% had ISUP Gleason grade group ≥ 3, and 7% had positive lymph nodes (pN1). Patients with a known positive family history did not have a higher rate of adverse disease as their counterparts with a negative family history. DISCUSSION Our data show that the majority of patients who were diagnosed with PCa at a very young age had favorable histopathological RP characteristics. However, a non-negligible proportion of patients already showed locally advanced disease and would have probably benefited from earlier PCa detection. This should be kept in mind when PCa screening recommendations are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gisa Mehring
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany ,Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans Heinzer
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany ,Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Randi M. Pose
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Imke Thederan
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lars Budäus
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Georg Salomon
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Haese
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uwe Michl
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany ,Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Isbarn
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hugosson J, Månsson M, Wallström J, Axcrona U, Carlsson SV, Egevad L, Geterud K, Khatami A, Kohestani K, Pihl CG, Socratous A, Stranne J, Godtman RA, Hellström M. Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA and MRI Followed by Targeted Biopsy Only. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:2126-2137. [PMID: 36477032 PMCID: PMC9870590 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2209454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening for prostate cancer is burdened by a high rate of overdiagnosis. The most appropriate algorithm for population-based screening is unknown. METHODS We invited 37,887 men who were 50 to 60 years of age to undergo regular prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Participants with a PSA level of 3 ng per milliliter or higher underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate; one third of the participants were randomly assigned to a reference group that underwent systematic biopsy as well as targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions shown on MRI. The remaining participants were assigned to the experimental group and underwent MRI-targeted biopsy only. The primary outcome was clinically insignificant prostate cancer, defined as a Gleason score of 3+3. The secondary outcome was clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as a Gleason score of at least 3+4. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS Of the men who were invited to undergo screening, 17,980 (47%) participated in the trial. A total of 66 of the 11,986 participants in the experimental group (0.6%) received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer, as compared with 72 of 5994 participants (1.2%) in the reference group, a difference of -0.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.0 to -0.4; relative risk, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.64; P<0.001). The relative risk of clinically significant prostate cancer in the experimental group as compared with the reference group was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.1). Clinically significant cancer that was detected only by systematic biopsy was diagnosed in 10 participants in the reference group; all cases were of intermediate risk and involved mainly low-volume disease that was managed with active surveillance. Serious adverse events were rare (<0.1%) in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The avoidance of systematic biopsy in favor of MRI-directed targeted biopsy for screening and early detection in persons with elevated PSA levels reduced the risk of overdiagnosis by half at the cost of delaying detection of intermediate-risk tumors in a small proportion of patients. (Funded by Karin and Christer Johansson's Foundation and others; GÖTEBORG-2 ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN94604465.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Hugosson
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Marianne Månsson
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Jonas Wallström
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Ulrika Axcrona
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Lars Egevad
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Kjell Geterud
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Ali Khatami
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Kimia Kohestani
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Carl-Gustaf Pihl
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Andreas Socratous
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Johan Stranne
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| | - Mikael Hellström
- From the Departments of Urology (J.H., A.K., K.K., J.S., R.A.G.), Radiology (J.W., K.G., A.S., M.H.), and Pathology (C.-G.P.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, and the Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University (J.H., M.M., S.V.C.), Gothenburg, and the Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (L.E.) - all in Sweden; the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (U.A.); and the Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (S.V.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Designing and Implementing a Population-based Organised Prostate Cancer Testing Programme. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1568-1574. [PMID: 35811285 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND European guidelines recommend that well-informed men at elevated risk of having prostate cancer (PCa) should be offered prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing with risk-stratified follow-up. The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare recommends against screening for PCa but supports regional implementation of organised prostate cancer testing (OPT). OBJECTIVE To report the process for designing and implementing OPT programmes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Population-based OPT programmes in two Swedish regions, designed to include men aged between 50 and 74 yr, launched in September 2020 for 50-yr-old men. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The number of men invited, the participation rate, and the numbers of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, urological visits, and biopsies from September 2020 to June 2021 were recorded. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Two Swedish regions co-designed an OPT programme with a risk-stratified diagnostic algorithm based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, MRI findings, and age. An automated administrative system was developed on a nationwide web-based platform. Invitation letters and test results are automatically generated and sent out by post. Men with PSA ≥3ng/ml, a suspicious MRI lesion, and/or PSA density ≥0.15 ng/ml/cm3 are referred for a prostate biopsy. Test results are registered for quality control and research. By June 2021, a total of 16 515 men were invited, of whom 6309 (38%) participated; 147 had an MRI scan and 39 underwent prostate biopsy. The OPT framework, algorithm, and diagnostic pathways have been working well. CONCLUSIONS We designed and implemented a framework for OPT with a high grade of automation. The framework and organisational experiences may be of value for others who plan a programme for early detection of PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY We describe the implementation of an organised testing programme for early detection of prostate cancer in two Swedish regions. This model is the first of its kind and may serve as a template for similar programmes.
Collapse
|
28
|
Mayo ZS, Kilic SS, Weleff J, Parker SM, Strzalka C, Phelan M, Mian OY, Stephans KL, Suh JH, Tendulkar RD. Prostate Cancer Screening Disparities in Persons Experiencing Homelessness. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1866-e1873. [PMID: 36206501 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing rates in persons experiencing homelessness (PEH), identify factors associated with screening, and compare PSA screening rates in PEH with a matched cohort of persons not experiencing homelessness (non-PEH). MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 9,249 potentially eligible PEH cared for at a large metropolitan hospital system from an institutional registry of all patients who presented to the health care system as homeless from 2014 to 2021. Homelessness was defined by the presence of the Z-code for homelessness (Z59), the listed address matching to the address of a homeless shelter or other transitional housing or a positive screen for homelessness. A matched cohort of 10,000 non-PEH was generated for comparison. Univariate chi-square analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to evaluate variables associated with PSA testing. RESULTS A total of 1,605 PEH and 3,413 non-PEH were eligible for PSA screening within the study timeframe. Half of PEH were Black (50%). Medicaid was the most common insurance (51%), followed by Medicare (18%). PEH were less likely to have a PCP (58% v 81%, P < .001) and had a significantly lower PSA testing rate (13% v 34%, P < .001) compared with non-PEH. Univariate analysis revealed that PSA testing was more common in PEH who were employed (P < .001), had private insurance or Medicare (P < .001), or had an established primary care provider (PCP; P < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that having a PCP (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.62 to 4.00; P < .001) significantly increased the likelihood of PSA testing in PEH. CONCLUSION PEH experience low rates of prostate cancer screening. Interventions to increase screening in this population, including increased PCP access, are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sarah S Kilic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jeremy Weleff
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Center for Behavioral Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sean M Parker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Michael Phelan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Services Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Omar Y Mian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Kevin L Stephans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Rahul D Tendulkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abila DB, Wasukira SB, Ainembabazi P, Kisuza RK, Nakiyingi EK, Mustafa A, Kangoma G, Adebisi YA, Lucero-Prisno DE, Wabinga H, Niyonzima N. Socioeconomic inequalities in prostate cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries: An analysis of the demographic and health surveys between 2010 and 2019. J Cancer Policy 2022; 34:100360. [PMID: 36089226 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer screening is a valuable public health tool in the early detection of prostate cancer. In this study, we aimed to determine the socioeconomic inequalities in the coverage of prostate cancer screening in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of men's recode data files that were collected by the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) in LMICs (Armenia, Colombia, Honduras, Kenya, Namibia, Dominican Republic, and the Philippines). We included surveys that were conducted from 2010 to 2020 and measured the coverage of prostate cancer screening and the study population was men aged 40 years or older. Socioeconomic inequality was measured using the Concertation Index (CIX) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). RESULTS Eight surveys from seven countries were included in the study with a total of 47,863 men. The coverage of prostate cancer screening was below 50% in all the countries with lower rates in the rural areas compared to the urban areas. The pooled estimate for the coverage of screening was 10.4% [95% CI, 7.9-12.9%). Inequalities in the coverage of prostate cancer screening between the wealth quintiles were observed in the Democratic Republic, Honduras, and Namibia. Great variation in inequalities in the coverage of prostate cancer screening between rural and urban residents was observed in Colombia and Namibia. CONCLUSION The coverage of prostate cancer screening was low in LMICs with variations in the coverage by the quintile of wealth (pro-rich) and type of place of residence (pro-urban). POLICY SUMMARY To achieve the desired impact of prostate cancer screening services in LMICs, it is important that the coverage of screening programs targets men living in rural areas and those in low wealth quintiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derrick Bary Abila
- Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda; Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
| | | | - Provia Ainembabazi
- Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K; Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - Asia Mustafa
- Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Grace Kangoma
- School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno
- Global Health Focus, UK; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Henry Wabinga
- Department of Pathology, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fredsøe J, Rasmussen M, Tin AL, Vickers AJ, Borre M, Sørensen KD, Lilja H. Predicting Grade group 2 or higher cancer at prostate biopsy by 4Kscore in blood and uCaP microRNA model in urine. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15193. [PMID: 36071094 PMCID: PMC9452554 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19460-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels often lead to unnecessary and possibly harmful transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy, e.g. when the biopsy is negative or contains only low-grade insignificant cancer, unlikely to become symptomatic in the man's normal lifespan. A model based on four-kallikrein markers in blood (commercialized as 4Kscore) predicts risk of Grade group 2 or higher prostate cancer at biopsy, reducing unnecessary biopsies. We assessed whether these results extend to a single institution prostate biopsy cohort of Danish men and are enhanced by three microRNAs from urine (referred to as uCaP). The 4Kscore measured in cryopreserved blood from 234 men referred for 10+ core biopsy to Aarhus University Hospital, 29 with PSA > 25 ng/ml. We explored uCaP in urine from 157 of these men. Combined with age and DRE findings, both 4Kscore and uCaP could accurately predict Grade group 2 or higher prostate cancer (all patients: AUC = 0.802 and 0.797; PSA ≤ 25: AUC = 0.763 and 0.759). There was no additive effect when combining the 4Kscore and uCaP. Limitations include a study cohort with higher risk than commonly reported for biopsy cohorts. Our findings further support the clinical use of the 4Kscore to predict Grade group 2 or higher cancers in men being considered for biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Fredsøe
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Martin Rasmussen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Borre
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karina D Sørensen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hans Lilja
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Surgery, and Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. .,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Schliemann D, Tan MM, Hoe WMK, Mohan D, Taib NA, Donnelly M, Su TT. mHealth Interventions to Improve Cancer Screening and Early Detection: Scoping Review of Reviews. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e36316. [PMID: 35969450 PMCID: PMC9425170 DOI: 10.2196/36316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer screening provision in resource-constrained settings tends to be opportunistic, and uptake tends to be low, leading to delayed presentation and treatment and poor survival. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify, review, map, and summarize findings from different types of literature reviews on the use of mobile health (mHealth) technologies to improve the uptake of cancer screening. METHODS The review methodology was guided by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). Ovid MEDLINE, PyscINFO, and Embase were searched from inception to May 2021. The eligible criteria included reviews that focused on studies of interventions that used mobile phone devices to promote and deliver cancer screening and described the effectiveness or implementation of mHealth intervention outcomes. Key data fields such as study aims, types of cancer, mHealth formats, and outcomes were extracted, and the data were analyzed to address the objective of the review. RESULTS Our initial search identified 1981 titles, of which 12 (0.61%) reviews met the inclusion criteria (systematic reviews: n=6, 50%; scoping reviews: n=4, 33%; rapid reviews: n=1, 8%; narrative reviews: n=1, 8%). Most (57/67, 85%) of the interventions targeted breast and cervical cancer awareness and screening uptake. The most commonly used mHealth technologies for increasing cancer screening uptake were SMS text messages and telephone calls. Overall, mHealth interventions increased knowledge about screening and had high acceptance among participants. The likelihood of achieving improved uptake-related outcomes increased when interventions used >1 mode of communication (telephone reminders, physical invitation letters, and educational pamphlets) together with mHealth. CONCLUSIONS mHealth interventions increase cancer screening uptake, although multiple modes used in combination seem to be more effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Désirée Schliemann
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Min Min Tan
- South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.,Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Wilfred Mok Kok Hoe
- South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.,Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Devi Mohan
- Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Nur Aishah Taib
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya Cancer Research Institute, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Tin Tin Su
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.,South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.,Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Liu F, Shi X, Wang F, Han S, Chen D, Gao X, Wang L, Wei Q, Xing N, Ren S. Evaluation and multi-institutional validation of a novel urine biomarker lncRNA546 to improve the diagnostic specificity of prostate cancer in PSA gray-zone. Front Oncol 2022; 12:946060. [PMID: 36033474 PMCID: PMC9411806 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.946060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is currently the most commonly used biomarker for prostate cancer diagnosis. However, when PSA is in the gray area of 4-10 ng/ml, the diagnostic specificity of prostate cancer is extremely low, leading to overdiagnosis in many clinically false-positive patients. This study was trying to discover and evaluate a novel urine biomarker long non-coding RNA (lncRNA546) to improve the diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer in PSA gray-zone. Methods A cohort study including consecutive 440 participants with suspected prostate cancer was retrospectively conducted in multi-urology centers. LncRNA546 scores were calculated with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), decision curve analysis (DCA) and a biopsy-specific nomogram were utilized to evaluate the potential for clinical application. Logistic regression model was constructed to confirm the predictive power of lncRNA546. Results LncRNA546 scores were sufficient to discriminate positive and negative biopsies. ROC analysis showed a higher AUC for lncRNA546 scores than prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) scores (0.78 vs. 0.66, p<0.01) in the overall cohort. More importantly, the AUC of lncRNA546 (0.80) was significantly higher than the AUCs of total PSA (0.57, p=0.02), percentage of free PSA (%fPSA) (0.64, p=0.04) and PCA3 (0.63, p<0.01) in the PSA 4-10 ng/ml cohort. A base model constructed by multiple logistic regression analysis plus lncRNA546 scores improved the predictive accuracy (PA) from 79.8% to 86.3% and improved AUC results from 0.862 to 0.915. DCA showed that the base model plus lncRNA546 displayed greater net benefit at threshold probabilities beyond 15% in the PSA 4-10 ng/ml cohort. Conclusion LncRNA546 is a promising novel biomarker for the early detection of prostate cancer, especially in the PSA 4-10 ng/ml cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Liu
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Fei Liu, ; Shancheng Ren,
| | - Xiaolei Shi
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Fangming Wang
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Sujun Han
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Chen
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Gao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Nianzeng Xing
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shancheng Ren
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Fei Liu, ; Shancheng Ren,
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sheetz T, Amin S, Diab D, Payne N, Posid T. Current Knowledge and Opinions of Medical Trainees Regarding PSA Screening. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:942-949. [PMID: 33090317 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01904-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
After 2008 and 2012 USPSTF recommendations against PSA screening, studies revealed a decline in screening rates and trend towards more advanced disease at presentation. After revision of this recommendation in 2017, PSA screening guidelines remain inconsistent and controversy still exists about its clinical utility. We seek to better understand the knowledge of medical trainees regarding this fundamental controversy and gain better insight into what they are being taught regarding this topic. Participants were medical students (n = 66) and residents (n = 60) from a single institution. REDCap software was used for informed consent, survey distribution, and data collection. Variables measured included PSA clinical knowledge, awareness of the PSA guideline changes, and attitudes, confidence, and viewpoints on use of PSA screening in clinical practice. More than 60% of medical trainees reported little or no knowledge of PSA screening guidelines. Although residents reported more knowledge than medical students, actual assessed knowledge of PSA screening did not differ between groups. Trainees reported receiving education primarily from other healthcare professionals and didactics, with some self-learning online. Though confidence was low overall, residents were more confident than medical students in discussing PSA screening with patients. The majority of respondents wanted more information about PSA testing, with medical students particularly interested in diagnosis/detection, treatment, and survival. Overall, opinions towards PSA testing as an aid were generally positive. Better education about the current PSA screening guidelines for medical trainees is imperative, particularly given that shared decision-making is of great importance when counseling patients on cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Sheetz
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 915 Olentangy River Rd., Suite 3100, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Sabrina Amin
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 915 Olentangy River Rd., Suite 3100, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Dinah Diab
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 915 Olentangy River Rd., Suite 3100, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Nicolette Payne
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 915 Olentangy River Rd., Suite 3100, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Tasha Posid
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 915 Olentangy River Rd., Suite 3100, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Our goal was to analyze results from 22 years of followup in the Göteborg randomized prostate cancer (PC) screening trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS In December 1994, 20,000 men born 1930-1944 were randomly extracted from the Swedish population register and were randomized (1:1) into either a screening group (SG) or to a control group (CG). Men in the SG were repeatedly invited for biennial prostate specific antigen testing up to an average age of 69 years. Main endpoints were PC incidence and mortality (intention-to-screen principle). RESULTS After 22 years, 1,528 men in the SG and 1,124 men in the CG had been diagnosed with PC. In total, 112 PC deaths occurred in the SG and 158 in the CG. Compared with the CG, the SG showed a PC incidence rate ratio (RR) of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.31-1.53) and a PC mortality RR of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.55-0.91). The 22-year cumulative PC mortality rate was 1.55% (95% CI, 1.29-1.86) in the SG and 2.13% (95% CI, 1.83-2.49) in the CG. Correction for nonattendance (Cuzick method) yielded a RR of PC mortality of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.43-0.80). Number needed to invite and number needed to diagnose was estimated to 221 and 9, respectively. PC death risk was increased in the following groups: nontesting men, men entering the program after age 60 and men with >10 years of followup after screening termination. CONCLUSIONS Prostate specific antigen-based screening substantially decreases PC mortality. However, not attending, starting after age 60 and stopping at age 70 seem to be major pitfalls regarding PC death risk.
Collapse
|
35
|
Maia R, Santos GAD, Reis S, Viana NI, Pimenta R, Guimarães VR, Recuero S, Romão P, Leite KRM, Srougi M, Passerotti CC. Can we use Ki67 expression to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness? Rev Col Bras Cir 2022; 49:e20223200. [PMID: 35792806 PMCID: PMC10578861 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223200-en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION specialists have an urge for biomarkers that can discriminate indolent prostate cancer from aggressive tumors. Ki67 is a proliferation marker, and its expression is associated with the aggressiveness of several cancers. OBJECTIVE analyze the expression of Ki67 in prostate cancer samples correlating with the aggressiveness of the disease. METHODS Ki67 mRNA levels were determined utilizing data from a TCGA cohort (Tumor(n)=492 and control(n)=52). The protein expression was determined on 94 biopsies from patients by immunohistochemical assay. RESULTS in mRNA, the Ki67 upregulation is associated with cancer tissue (p<0.0001) and worst disease-free survival (p=0.035). The protein upregulation is associated with increase of the ISUP score (p<0.0001), cancer stage (p=0.05), biochemical recurrence (p=0.0006) and metastasis (p<0.0001). We also show a positive correlation between Ki67 expression and ISUP score (r=0.5112, p<0.0001) and disease risk stratification (r=0.3388, p=0.0009). Ki67 expression is a factor independently associated with biochemical recurrence (p=0.002) and metastasis (p<0.0001). Finally, the patients with high Ki67expression shows better survival regarding biochemical recurrence (p=0.008) and metastasis (p=0.056). Patients with high Ki67 expression are 2.62 times more likely to develop biochemical recurrence (p=0.036). CONCLUSION Ki67 upregulation is associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronaldo Maia
- - Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Center for Robotic Surgery - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | - Gabriel Arantes Dos Santos
- - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Urologia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
- - D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR) - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | - Sabrina Reis
- - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Urologia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
- - Hospital Moriah - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
- - Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (UEMG) - Passos - MG - Brasil
| | - Nayara I Viana
- - Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Center for Robotic Surgery - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | - Ruan Pimenta
- - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Urologia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
- - D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR) - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | - Vanessa R Guimarães
- - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Urologia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | - Saulo Recuero
- - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Urologia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | - Poliana Romão
- - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Urologia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | | | - Miguel Srougi
- - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Urologia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
- - D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR) - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Appavoo S. How Did CNBSS Influence Guidelines for So Long and What Can That Teach Us? Curr Oncol 2022; 29:3922-3932. [PMID: 35735422 PMCID: PMC9221595 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29060313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The biased randomization and other quality concerns about the Canadian National Breast Screening Studies (CNBSS) were documented and criticized for decades, even by several individuals very close to the research. CNBSS were the outlier studies among several RCTs of the era and yet were given equal weighting and occasionally higher importance than the remainder of the canon of mammography RCTs. These studies have had an ongoing influence on subsequent evidence review, guideline formation, and, ultimately, patient access to screening. This article explores possible reasons for the ongoing inclusion of CNBSS in the body of mammography screening evidence, discusses the lack of expertise in critical healthcare guideline processes, and, ultimately, suggests several actions and reforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shushiela Appavoo
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, 2A2.41 WMC 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cassim N, Rebbeck TR, Glencross DK, George JA. Retrospective analysis to describe trends in first-ever prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for primary healthcare facilities in the Gauteng Province, South Africa, between 2006 and 2016. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e050646. [PMID: 35314469 PMCID: PMC8938704 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of our study was to use laboratory data to describe prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing trends for primary healthcare (PHC) services from a single province. PHC is a basic package of services offered to local communities, serving as the first point of contact within the health system. These services are offered at clinics and community health centres (CHC), the latter providing additional maternity, accident and emergency services. DESIGN The retrospective descriptive study design was used. METHODS We analysed national laboratory data between 2006 and 2016 for men ≥30 years in the Gauteng Province. We used the probabilistic matching algorithm to create first-ever PSA cohort. We used the hot-deck imputation to assign missing race group values and the district health information system facility descriptors to identify PHC testing. We reported patient numbers by calendar year, age category and race group as well as descriptive statistics. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess any association for race group and age with a PSA ≥4 µg/L. RESULTS Between 2006 and 2016, numbers of men tested increased from 1782 to 67 025, respectively, with 186 984/239 506 (78.1%) tests were from clinics. The majority of testing was for men in the 50-59 age category (31.5%) and Black Africans (86.4%). We reported a median of 0.9 µg/L that increased with age. A PSA ≥4 µg/L was reported for 11.7% of men, increasing to 35.5% for the ≥70 age category. The logistic regression reported that the adjusted odds of having a PSA ≥4 µg/L was significantly lower for Indian/Asians, multiracials and whites than for Black Africans (p value<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Our study has shown a marked increase in PSA testing from clinics and CHC suggestive of screening for prostate cancer. The approaches reported in this study can be extended for national data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naseem Cassim
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg-Braamfontein, Gauteng, South Africa
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deborah K Glencross
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg-Braamfontein, Gauteng, South Africa
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Jaya A George
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- Department of Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Merriel SWD, Pocock L, Gilbert E, Creavin S, Walter FM, Spencer A, Hamilton W. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients. BMC Med 2022; 20:54. [PMID: 35125113 PMCID: PMC8819971 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02230-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a commonly used test to detect prostate cancer. Attention has mostly focused on the use of PSA in screening asymptomatic patients, but the diagnostic accuracy of PSA for prostate cancer in patients with symptoms is less well understood. METHODS A systematic database search was conducted of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library. Studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of PSA for prostate cancer in patients with symptoms were included. Two investigators independently assessed the titles and abstracts of all database search hits and full texts of potentially relevant studies against the inclusion criteria, and data extracted into a proforma. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool by two investigators independently. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy were calculated with meta-analysis using bivariate mixed effects regression. RESULTS Five hundred sixty-three search hits were assessed by title and abstract after de-duplication, with 75 full text papers reviewed. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, 18 of which were conducted in secondary care settings with one from a screening study cohort. All studies used histology obtained by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS) as a reference test; usually only for patients with elevated PSA or abnormal prostate examination. Pooled data from 14,489 patients found estimated sensitivity of PSA for prostate cancer was 0.93 (95% CI 0.88, 0.96) and specificity was 0.20 (95% CI 0.12, 0.33). The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.72 (95% CI 0.68, 0.76). All studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias in at least one QUADAS-2 domain. CONCLUSIONS Currently available evidence suggests PSA is highly sensitive but poorly specific for prostate cancer detection in symptomatic patients. However, significant limitations in study design and reference test reduces the certainty of this estimate. There is very limited evidence for the performance of PSA in primary care, the healthcare setting where most PSA testing is performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel W D Merriel
- University of Exeter, 1.18 College House, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK.
| | - Lucy Pocock
- University of Exeter, 1.18 College House, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Emma Gilbert
- University of Exeter, 1.18 College House, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Sam Creavin
- University of Exeter, 1.18 College House, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Fiona M Walter
- University of Exeter, 1.18 College House, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Anne Spencer
- University of Exeter, 1.18 College House, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Willie Hamilton
- University of Exeter, 1.18 College House, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Godtman RA, Kollberg KS, Pihl CG, Månsson M, Hugosson J. The Association Between Age, Prostate Cancer Risk, and Higher Gleason Score in a Long-term Screening Program: Results from the Göteborg-1 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial. Eur Urol 2022; 82:311-317. [PMID: 35120773 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have suggested associations between greater age, increased risk of prostate cancer (PC), and higher Gleason score. OBJECTIVE The present study aimed at investigating these associations within the Göteborg-1 randomized, population-based PC screening trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The screening arm of the Göteborg-1 screening trial comprises 10000 randomly selected men (aged 50-64 yr at randomization) from the Göteborg region of Sweden. Between 1995 and 2014, they were biennially invited to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing to an upper age limit of 70 yr (range 67-71 yr). PSA ≥3 ng/ml triggered a prostate biopsy (sextant biopsy 1995-2009, thereafter a ten-core biopsy). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The impact of age on Gleason score, given a screen-detected PC, was investigated with multinomial logistic regression analyses adjusted for year of testing and screening round. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 7625 men had at least one PSA test and 1022 men were diagnosed with PC. For men with screen-detected PC, age was associated with the risk of clinically significant PC above and beyond screening round and year of testing (p < 0.001). For each 1-yr increase in age, the risk of being diagnosed with a Gleason score ≥3 + 4 cancer (vs <7) increased by 11% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7-17), whereas the risk of being diagnosed with a Gleason score ≥4 + 3 cancer (vs <7) increased by 8.5% (95% CI -1.6 to 20). CONCLUSIONS The increased risk of a higher Gleason score in older men should be considered when counseling men regarding early diagnosis and treatment for PC. PATIENT SUMMARY We found that older age increased both the risk of prostate cancer and the risk of more aggressive prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenborg, Sweden.
| | - Karin Stinesen Kollberg
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Carl-Gustaf Pihl
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenborg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marianne Månsson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jonas Hugosson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chaemsaithong P, Sahota DS, Poon LC. First trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:S1071-S1097.e2. [PMID: 32682859 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Preeclampsia is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Early-onset disease requiring preterm delivery is associated with a higher risk of complications in both mothers and babies. Evidence suggests that the administration of low-dose aspirin initiated before 16 weeks' gestation significantly reduces the rate of preterm preeclampsia. Therefore, it is important to identify pregnant women at risk of developing preeclampsia during the first trimester of pregnancy, thus allowing timely therapeutic intervention. Several professional organizations such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) have proposed screening for preeclampsia based on maternal risk factors. The approach recommended by ACOG and NICE essentially treats each risk factor as a separate screening test with additive detection rate and screen-positive rate. Evidence has shown that preeclampsia screening based on the NICE and ACOG approach has suboptimal performance, as the NICE recommendation only achieves detection rates of 41% and 34%, with a 10% false-positive rate, for preterm and term preeclampsia, respectively. Screening based on the 2013 ACOG recommendation can only achieve detection rates of 5% and 2% for preterm and term preeclampsia, respectively, with a 0.2% false-positive rate. Various first trimester prediction models have been developed. Most of them have not undergone or failed external validation. However, it is worthy of note that the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) first trimester prediction model (namely the triple test), which consists of a combination of maternal factors and measurements of mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and serum placental growth factor, has undergone successful internal and external validation. The FMF triple test has detection rates of 90% and 75% for the prediction of early and preterm preeclampsia, respectively, with a 10% false-positive rate. Such performance of screening is superior to that of the traditional method by maternal risk factors alone. The use of the FMF prediction model, followed by the administration of low-dose aspirin, has been shown to reduce the rate of preterm preeclampsia by 62%. The number needed to screen to prevent 1 case of preterm preeclampsia by the FMF triple test is 250. The key to maintaining optimal screening performance is to establish standardized protocols for biomarker measurements and regular biomarker quality assessment, as inaccurate measurement can affect screening performance. Tools frequently used to assess quality control include the cumulative sum and target plot. Cumulative sum is a sensitive method to detect small shifts over time, and point of shift can be easily identified. Target plot is a tool to evaluate deviation from the expected multiple of median and the expected median of standard deviation. Target plot is easy to interpret and visualize. However, it is insensitive to detecting small deviations. Adherence to well-defined protocols for the measurements of mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and placental growth factor is required. This article summarizes the existing literature on the different methods, recommendations by professional organizations, quality assessment of different components of risk assessment, and clinical implementation of the first trimester screening for preeclampsia.
Collapse
|
41
|
Hanusek K, Poletajew S, Kryst P, Piekiełko-Witkowska A, Bogusławska J. piRNAs and PIWI Proteins as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers of Genitourinary Cancers. Biomolecules 2022; 12:biom12020186. [PMID: 35204687 PMCID: PMC8869487 DOI: 10.3390/biom12020186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
piRNAs (PIWI-interacting RNAs) are small non-coding RNAs capable of regulation of transposon and gene expression. piRNAs utilise multiple mechanisms to affect gene expression, which makes them potentially more powerful regulators than microRNAs. The mechanisms by which piRNAs regulate transposon and gene expression include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and mRNA degradation. Genitourinary cancers (GC) are a large group of neoplasms that differ by their incidence, clinical course, biology, and prognosis for patients. Regardless of the GC type, metastatic disease remains a key therapeutic challenge, largely affecting patients’ survival rates. Recent studies indicate that piRNAs could serve as potentially useful biomarkers allowing for early cancer detection and therapeutic interventions at the stage of non-advanced tumour, improving patient’s outcomes. Furthermore, studies in prostate cancer show that piRNAs contribute to cancer progression by affecting key oncogenic pathways such as PI3K/AKT. Here, we discuss recent findings on biogenesis, mechanisms of action and the role of piRNAs and the associated PIWI proteins in GC. We also present tools that may be useful for studies on the functioning of piRNAs in cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Hanusek
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Sławomir Poletajew
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, II Department of Urology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (S.P.); (P.K.)
| | - Piotr Kryst
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, II Department of Urology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; (S.P.); (P.K.)
| | - Agnieszka Piekiełko-Witkowska
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland;
- Correspondence: (A.P.-W.); (J.B.)
| | - Joanna Bogusławska
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland;
- Correspondence: (A.P.-W.); (J.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Saito T, Komatsubara S, Hara N, Nishiyama T, Katagiri A, Ishizaki F, Hatano A, Komeyama T, Hanyu S, Terunuma M, Imai T, Go H, Iida H, Kurumada S, Yamaguchi S, Takeda K, Ando T, Hoshii T, Kasahara T, Tomita Y. Significance of PSA Screening in Niigata, Japan: Survey of Actual Status of New Cases of Prostate Cancer. Res Rep Urol 2022; 13:859-866. [PMID: 34993159 PMCID: PMC8713882 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s341347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to investigate the utility of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening by conducting an all-case survey of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients at Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Patients and Methods Depending on whether patients were subjected to screening, information was prospectively collected on all prostate cancer patients newly diagnosed between October 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020, at all institutions in Niigata Prefecture where urologists performing prostate biopsy routinely work and differences in clinical parameters were investigated. Results PSA was measured in 478 out of 1332 patients (35.8%) as part of a community health screening. The rate of metastatic carcinoma (M1) in all patients was 14.9%. When patients were divided into three categories of population-based screening (community health screening and workplace health screening), opportunistic screening (PSA measurements at complete medical check-ups or on patient request), and testing triggered by clinical symptoms or findings, the proportion of metastatic cancer was 4.5%, 3.7%, and 30.6%, respectively, demonstrating that the number of distant metastases was significantly lesser in all patients who underwent screening. Conclusion The one-year all-case survey of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients demonstrated that PSA screening significantly contributed to the early diagnosis of current prostate cancer in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihiro Saito
- Department of Urology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | | | - Noboru Hara
- Department of Urology, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Minamiuonuma, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Minamiuonuma, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Katagiri
- Department of Urology, Niigata Prefectural Central Hospital, Joetsu, Japan
| | - Fumio Ishizaki
- Department of Renal and Urinary Pathology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Akihiko Hatano
- Department of Urology, Niigata Prefectural Shibata Hospital, Shibata, Japan
| | - Takeshi Komeyama
- Department of Urology, Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital, Nagaoka, Japan
| | - Shugo Hanyu
- Department of Urology, Kashiwazaki General Hospital and Medical Center, Kashiwazaki, Japan
| | - Masahiro Terunuma
- Department of Urology, Nagaoka Chuo General Hospital, Nagaoka, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Imai
- Department of Urology, Niigata City General Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Hideto Go
- Department of Urology, Niigata Saiseikai Sanjo Hospital, Sanjo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Iida
- Department of Urology, Joetsu General Hospital, Joetsu, Japan
| | | | - Shunsuke Yamaguchi
- Department of Urology, Niigata Prefectural Central Hospital, Joetsu, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tachikawa General Hospital, Nagaoka, Japan
| | - Keisuke Takeda
- Department of Renal and Urinary Pathology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.,Department of Urology, Murakami General Hospital, Murakami, Japan
| | - Takashi Ando
- Department of Urology, Tachikawa General Hospital, Nagaoka, Japan.,Department of Urology, Murakami General Hospital, Murakami, Japan
| | - Tatsuhiko Hoshii
- Department of Renal and Urinary Pathology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takashi Kasahara
- Department of Renal and Urinary Pathology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Tomita
- Department of Renal and Urinary Pathology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
MAIA RONALDO, SANTOS GABRIELARANTESDOS, REIS SABRINA, VIANA NAYARAI, PIMENTA RUAN, GUIMARÃES VANESSAR, RECUERO SAULO, ROMÃO POLIANA, LEITE KATIARAMOSMOREIRA, SROUGI MIGUEL, PASSEROTTI CARLOCARMARGO. Podemos usar a expressão de Ki67 para prever a agressividade do câncer de próstata? Rev Col Bras Cir 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
RESUMO Introdução: especialistas precisam biomarcadores que podem discriminar o câncer de próstata indolente de tumores agressivos. Ki67 é um marcador de proliferação, e sua expressão está associada à agressividade de vários tumores. Objetivo: analisar a expressão do Ki67 em amostras de câncer de próstata correlacionando com a agressividade da doença. Métodos: os níveis de mRNA de Ki67 foram determinados utilizando dados de uma coorte de TCGA (Tumor(n)=492 e controle(n)=52). A expressão da proteína foi determinada em 94 biópsias de pacientes por ensaio imuno-histoquímica. Resultados: no mRNA, a superexpressão Ki67 está associada ao tecido canceroso (p<0,0001) e à pior sobrevida livre de doença (p=0,035). A superexpressão proteica está associada ao aumento do escore ISUP (p<0,0001), estágio de câncer (p=0,05), recorrência bioquímica (p=0,0006) e metástase (p<0,0001). Também mostramos uma correlação positiva entre a expressão Ki67 e o escore ISUP (r=0,5112, p<0,0001) e a estratificação de risco de doença (r=0,3388, p=0,0009). A expressão Ki67 é um fator independentemente associado à recorrência bioquímica (p=0,002) e metástase (p<0,0001). Finalmente, os pacientes com alta expressão de Ki67 expression mostram melhor sobrevivência em relação à recorrência bioquímica (p=0,008) e metástase (p=0,056). Os pacientes com alta expressão de Ki67 são 2,62 vezes mais propensos a desenvolver recorrência bioquímica (p=0,036). Conclusão: a superexpressão Ki67 está associada à agressividade do câncer de próstata.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - SABRINA REIS
- Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Moriah, Brasil; Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | | - RUAN PIMENTA
- Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil; D’Or Institute for Research and Education, Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | - MIGUEL SROUGI
- Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil; D’Or Institute for Research and Education, Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Becker L, Janssen N, Layland SL, Mürdter TE, Nies AT, Schenke-Layland K, Marzi J. Raman Imaging and Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy for Diagnosis of Cancer State and Metabolic Monitoring. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225682. [PMID: 34830837 PMCID: PMC8616063 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Hurdles for effective tumor therapy are delayed detection and limited effectiveness of systemic drug therapies by patient-specific multidrug resistance. Non-invasive bioimaging tools such as fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) and Raman-microspectroscopy have evolved over the last decade, providing the potential to be translated into clinics for early-stage disease detection, in vitro drug screening, and drug efficacy studies in personalized medicine. Accessing tissue- and cell-specific spectral signatures, Raman microspectroscopy has emerged as a diagnostic tool to identify precancerous lesions, cancer stages, or cell malignancy. In vivo Raman measurements have been enabled by recent technological advances in Raman endoscopy and signal-enhancing setups such as coherent anti-stokes Raman spectroscopy or surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. FLIM enables in situ investigations of metabolic processes such as glycolysis, oxidative stress, or mitochondrial activity by using the autofluorescence of co-enzymes NADH and FAD, which are associated with intrinsic proteins as a direct measure of tumor metabolism, cell death stages and drug efficacy. The combination of non-invasive and molecular-sensitive in situ techniques and advanced 3D tumor models such as patient-derived organoids or microtumors allows the recapitulation of tumor physiology and metabolism in vitro and facilitates the screening for patient-individualized drug treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Becker
- Department for Medical Technologies and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nicole Janssen
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Shannon L Layland
- Department for Medical Technologies and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas E Mürdter
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anne T Nies
- Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Katja Schenke-Layland
- Department for Medical Technologies and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, 72770 Reutlingen, Germany
- Cardiovascular Research Laboratories, Department of Medicine/Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA
| | - Julia Marzi
- Department for Medical Technologies and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, 72770 Reutlingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nerli RB, Ghagane SC, Bidi SR, Thakur ML, Gomella L. Voided urine test to diagnose prostate cancer: Preliminary report. Cytojournal 2021; 18:26. [PMID: 34754324 PMCID: PMC8571200 DOI: 10.25259/cytojournal_76_2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common malignancy affecting elderly male. At present, PCa is estimated using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Prostate biopsy remains the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis of PCa. In this preliminary study, we have assessed the feasibility of detecting PCa using voided urine by targeting the genomic vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor (VPAC) expressed on malignant PCa cells. Material and Methods Patients ≥40 years old, with no lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and serum PSA levels of <1.6 ng/mL formed the control group and patients ≥40 years old, with LUTS and serum PSA >2.6 ng/ mL formed the study group. Patients were advised to give the first 50 mL of voided urine sample for the detection of malignant markers by targeting the VPAC. The results of histopathological studies were then compared to the results of urine biomarker. Results The study revealed absence of malignant markers in 75 patients (control group). In the study group, all the 33 patients with adenocarcinoma were positive for malignant markers in the biomarker study and absence of malignant markers in the 32 patients with benign histology. The results of the biomarker studies and histopathology were consistent with each other. Conclusion This preliminary study validates our belief that patients with PCa do shed malignant cells in the urine which can be identified by targeting the VPAC. The investigation is easy and our data appear to be highly encouraging and further serve as a simple, reliable, and a non-invasive tool in the detection of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R B Nerli
- Department of Urology, Division of Urologic-Oncology, JN Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, JNMC Campus, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.,Urinary Biomarkers Research Centre, KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital and M.R.C, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
| | - Shridhar C Ghagane
- Department of Urology, Division of Urologic-Oncology, JN Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, JNMC Campus, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.,Urinary Biomarkers Research Centre, KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital and M.R.C, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
| | - Saziya R Bidi
- Urinary Biomarkers Research Centre, KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital and M.R.C, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
| | - Madhukar L Thakur
- Department of Urology, Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Leonard Gomella
- Department of Urology, Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Centre, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Eyrich NW, Wei JT, Niknafs YS, Siddiqui J, Ellimoottil C, Salami SS, Palapattu GS, Mehra R, Kunju LP, Tomlins SA, Chinnaiyan AM, Morgan TM, Tosoian JJ. Association of MyProstateScore (MPS) with prostate cancer grade in the radical prostatectomy specimen. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:4.e1-4.e7. [PMID: 34753659 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the association between urinary MyProstateScore (MPS) and pathologic grade group (GG) at surgery in men diagnosed with GG1 prostate cancer (PCa) on biopsy. METHODS Using an institutional biospecimen protocol, we identified men with GG1 PCa on biopsy and PSA ≤10 ng/ml who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) at the University of Michigan. MPS was retrospectively calculated using prospectively collected, post-DRE urine samples. The primary outcome was upgrading on RP pathology, defined as GG ≥ 2. The associations of MPS, PSA, and PSA density (PSAD) with upgrading were assessed on univariable logistic regression, and the predictive accuracy of each marker was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS There were 52 men with urinary specimens available that met study criteria, based on biopsy Gleason Grade and specimen collection. At RP, 17 men (33%) had GG1 cancer and 35 (67%) had GG ≥ 2 cancer. Preoperative MPS was significantly higher in patients with GG ≥ 2 cancer at surgery (median 37.8 [IQR, 22.2-52.4]) as compared to GG1 (19.3 [IQR, 9.2-29.4]; P = 0.001). On univariable logistic regression, increasing MPS values were significantly associated with upgrading (odds ratio 1.07 per one-unit MPS increase, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.12, P = 0.004), while PSA and PSAD were not significantly associated with upgrading. Similarly, the discriminative ability of the MPS model (AUC 0.78) for upgrading at RP was higher compared to models based on PSA (AUC 0.52) and PSAD (AUC 0.62). CONCLUSIONS In men diagnosed with GG1 PCa who underwent surgery, MPS was significantly associated with RP cancer grade. In this limited cohort of men, these findings suggest that MPS could help identify patients with undetected high-grade cancer. Additional studies are needed to better characterize this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas W Eyrich
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - John T Wei
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Yashar S Niknafs
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Javed Siddiqui
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Chad Ellimoottil
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Simpa S Salami
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ganesh S Palapattu
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Rohit Mehra
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lakshmi P Kunju
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Scott A Tomlins
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Arul M Chinnaiyan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jeffrey J Tosoian
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Okinaka Y, Kageyama S, Nishizawa K, Yoshida T, Ishitoya S, Shichiri Y, Kim CJ, Iwata T, Yokokawa R, Arai Y, Nishikawa Z, Soga H, Ushida H, Sakano Y, Naya Y, Yoshida T, Narita M, Kawauchi A. Clinical, pathological, and therapeutic features of newly diagnosed prostate cancer predominantly detected by opportunistic PSA screening: A survey of Shiga Prefecture, Japan. Prostate 2021; 81:1172-1178. [PMID: 34418129 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In all the prefectures of Japan, with the exception of Shiga Prefecture, more than half of local governments have an organized prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening system in place. However, in the Shiga Prefecture, only a single city performed PSA screening over the time period of this survey. The purpose of the present study was to determine the clinical, pathological, and therapeutic features of newly diagnosed prostate cancer in localities where a formally organized screening system was almost entirely absent. METHODS A multicenter observational study was conducted in the Shiga Prefecture, which has the lowest rate of population-based PSA-screening in Japan. Patients' age, initial PSA, reasons for PSA testing, Gleason score, clinical stage, and primary treatments were surveyed. We stratified patients according to the reasons for PSA measurement, and compared the differences between groups subject to organized versus opportunistic screening. RESULTS In the 2 years 2012 and 2017, 984 newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients were analyzed. Of these, 954 (97%) were opportunistically tested (i.e., not as part of an organized screening system), with the remaining 29 (3%) measured as part of an organized screening program. Patients in the former group exhibited a higher initial PSA value than in the organized screening group (median: 11.49 vs. 5.67 ng/ml). They also had worse clinical features, including higher Gleason score and TNM stage. More patients in the organized screening group were treated curatively than in the nonorganized screening group in terms of the primary treatment. The results were similar in a subanalysis of the patients of age 50-69 years. CONCLUSIONS Organized PSA screening contributes to increasing the number of patients diagnosed with early-stage cancer who can be treated curatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Okinaka
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
- Department of Urology, Yasu City Hospital, Yasu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Susumu Kageyama
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Koji Nishizawa
- Department of Urology, Shiga General Hospital, Moriyama, Shiga, Japan
| | - Toru Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Shiga General Hospital, Moriyama, Shiga, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ishitoya
- Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Otsu Hospital, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| | | | - Chul Jang Kim
- Department of Urology, Kohka Public Hospital, Koka, Shiga, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Iwata
- Department of Urology, Omihachiman Community Medical Center, Omihachiman, Shiga, Japan
| | - Ryusei Yokokawa
- Department of Urology, Nagahama City Hospital, Nagahama, Shiga, Japan
| | - Yutaka Arai
- Department of Urology, Kusatsu General Hospital, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Zenkai Nishikawa
- Department of Urology, Hino Memorial Hospital, Hino, Shiga, Japan
| | - Hiroki Soga
- Department of Urology, Toyosato Hospital, Toyosato, Shiga, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ushida
- Department of Urology, JCHO Shiga Hospital, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Yuji Sakano
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Higashi-ohmi General Medical Center, Higashiomi, Shiga, Japan
| | - Yoshio Naya
- Department of Urology, Nagahama City Kohoku Hospital, Nagahama, Shiga, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Narita
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kawauchi
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Junqueira PHR, Santos GAD, Xavier M, Romão P, Reis S, Srougi M, Nahas WC, Passerotti CC. PSA density of the lesion: a mathematical formula that uses clinical and pathological data to predict biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients. Rev Col Bras Cir 2021; 48:e20212965. [PMID: 34644741 PMCID: PMC10683463 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20212965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
A main challenge in the clinical management of prostate cancer is to identify which tumor is aggressive and needs invasive treatment. Thus, being able to predict which cancer will progress to biochemical recurrence is a great strategy to stratify prostate cancer patients. With that in mind, we created a mathematical formula that takes into account the patients clinical and pathological data resulting in a quantitative variable, called PSA density of the lesion, which has the potential to predict biochemical recurrence. To test if our variable is able to predict biochemical recurrence, we use a cohort of 219 prostate cancer patients, associating our new variable and classic parameters of prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence. Total PSA, lesion weight, volume and classic PSA density were positively associated with biochemical recurrence (p<0.05). ISUP score was also associated with biochemical recurrence in both biopsy and surgical specimen (p<0.001). The increase of PSA density of the lesion was significantly associated with the biochemical recurrence (p=0.03). Variables derived from the formula, PSA 15% and PSA 152, were also positive associated with the biochemical recurrence (p=0.01 and p=0.002 respectively). Logistic regression analysis shows that classic PSA density, PSA density of the lesion and total PSA, together, can explain up to 13% of cases of biochemical recurrence. PSA density of the lesion alone would have the ability to explain up to 7% of cases of biochemical recurrence. In conclusion, this new mathematical approach could be a useful tool to predict disease recurrence in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriel Arantes Dos Santos
- - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Urologia, Laboratório de Investigação Médica - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | - Marcelo Xavier
- - Hospital Oswaldo Cruz, Centro de Cirurgia Robótica - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | - Poliana Romão
- - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Urologia, Laboratório de Investigação Médica - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | - Sabrina Reis
- - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Urologia, Laboratório de Investigação Médica - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | - Miguel Srougi
- - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Urologia, Laboratório de Investigação Médica - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ashida S, Yamasaki I, Kawada C, Fukuhara H, Fukata S, Tamura K, Karashima T, Inoue K, Shuin T. Evaluation of a rapid one-step PSA test for primary prostate cancer screening. BMC Urol 2021; 21:135. [PMID: 34579701 PMCID: PMC8474843 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-021-00903-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To enhance the convenience and reduce the cost of prostate cancer (PC) screening, a one-step prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test was evaluated in a large population. The PSA SPOT test kit enables rapid detection of human PSA in serum or plasma at or above a cutoff level of 4 ng/mL to aid in the diagnosis of PC. METHODS PC screening using the PSA SPOT test was offered to male participants in educational public lectures that we conducted in various cities. Test results were reported to participants at the end of the lectures. Blood samples from 1429 men were evaluated. Two independent observers interpreted the tests at 15 and 30 min. The remaining serum samples were subsequently tested using a conventional quantitative assay. RESULTS The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the test were 79.9, 93.0, 65.4, 96.6, and 91.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the test changed with variations in the reading time. Quantitative assessment of the intensity of the band was correlated with the PSA value. CONCLUSIONS PSA testing using this kit can be easily performed. The low cost and speed of the test make it a useful and convenient tool for primary PC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shingo Ashida
- Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan.
| | - Ichiro Yamasaki
- Department of Urology, Kubokawa Hospital, Takaoka-gun, Kochi, 786-0002, Japan
| | - Chiaki Kawada
- Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan
| | - Hideo Fukuhara
- Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan
| | - Satoshi Fukata
- Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan
| | - Kenji Tamura
- Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan
| | - Takashi Karashima
- Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan
| | - Keiji Inoue
- Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan
| | - Taro Shuin
- Kochi Medical School Hospital, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wallström J, Geterud K, Kohestani K, Maier SE, Pihl CG, Socratous A, Stranne J, Arnsrud-Godtman R, Månsson M, Hellström M, Hugosson J. Prostate Cancer Screening with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Results from the Second Round of the Göteborg Prostate Cancer Screening 2 Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:54-60. [PMID: 34580053 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Göteborg 2 prostate cancer (PC) screening (G2) trial evaluates screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in case of elevated PSA levels. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety of using a 2-yr interval in men who were previously screened positive with PSA but had negative MRI or positive MRI with a negative biopsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 61 201 men aged 50-60 yr were randomized and 38 366 were invited for screening (years 2015-2020). Men with positive MRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] score ≥3) were scheduled for targeted biopsies. Men with negative MRI or negative biopsies were reinvited after 2 yr. Round 1 and 2 MRI scans (PI-RADS ≥3) of men not diagnosed with PC in round 1 were re-read and classified according to Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) by two radiologists. Interval PCs (detected outside the program before invitation to round 2) were identified by linking to the Regional PC Registry. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Tabulation of overall detection of PC was done. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Between October 2017 and June 2020, 474 men with round 1 elevated PSA and MRI underwent a second screening. Of those, 19% had nonelevated PSA in round 2 and were not examined further. Of the remaining 376 men, 89% had negative MRI. Targeted biopsies yielded 14 PCs: nine grade group (GG) 1 and five GG 2-3. In men with PI-RADS ≥3 and PC diagnosed in round 2, only two (GG 1) progressed according to the PRECISE criteria and the remainder were stable. Ten interval PCs were diagnosed: seven GG 1, one GG 2, and two GG 5. The two GG 5 PCs were PI-RADS 4 and 5 with negative round 1 biopsy. CONCLUSIONS A 2-yr interval seems to be safe in men with negative MRI, while men with PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions with negative biopsies should have a closer follow-up. PATIENT SUMMARY In prostate cancer screening, a 2-yr follow-up seems to be safe if magnetic resonance imaging did not show highly suspicious findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Wallström
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Kjell Geterud
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kimia Kohestani
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Stephan E Maier
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Carl-Gustaf Pihl
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Andreas Socratous
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johan Stranne
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rebecka Arnsrud-Godtman
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marianne Månsson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mikael Hellström
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jonas Hugosson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|