1
|
Hanrahan AJ, Chen Z, Rosen N, Solit DB. BRAF - a tumour-agnostic drug target with lineage-specific dependencies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:224-247. [PMID: 38278874 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00852-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
In June 2022, the FDA granted Accelerated Approval to the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib in combination with the MEK inhibitor trametinib for the treatment of adult and paediatric patients (≥6 years of age) with unresectable or metastatic BRAFV600E-mutant solid tumours, except for BRAFV600E-mutant colorectal cancers. The histology-agnostic approval of dabrafenib plus trametinib marks the culmination of two decades of research into the landscape of BRAF mutations in human cancers, the biochemical mechanisms underlying BRAF-mediated tumorigenesis, and the clinical development of selective RAF and MEK inhibitors. Although the majority of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant tumours derive clinical benefit from BRAF inhibitor-based combinations, resistance to treatment develops in most. In this Review, we describe the biochemical basis for oncogenic BRAF-induced activation of MAPK signalling and pan-cancer and lineage-specific mechanisms of intrinsic, adaptive and acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors. We also discuss novel RAF inhibitors and drug combinations designed to delay the emergence of treatment resistance and/or expand the population of patients with BRAF-mutant cancers who benefit from molecularly targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aphrothiti J Hanrahan
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ziyu Chen
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Physiology, Biophysics & Systems Biology, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neal Rosen
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - David B Solit
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rutkowski P, Mandala M. Perioperative therapy of melanoma: Adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:107969. [PMID: 38342039 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.107969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Surgery is the mainstay treatment of melanoma. However, even after radical resection the risk of relapses in majority of stage IIB-IV disease remains high. Currently, the standard treatment after surgery in high risk patients is systemic adjuvant therapy administered up to one year based on the results of clinical trials indicating significant reduction of risk of relapses. All clinical trials in adjuvant setting were based as primary end-point on relapse-free survival, not overall survival, and they did not incorporate and validate biomarkers prospectively. A new therapeutic strategy in locoregional advanced melanomas becomes a preoperative treatment to further increase of the cure rates and decrease the duration of systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Santa Maria Misericordia Hospital, Piazza Menghini 1, 06132, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Basilicata M, Terrano V, D’Aurelio A, Bruno G, Troiani T, Bollero P, Napolitano S. Oral Adverse Events Associated with BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Melanoma Treatment: A Narrative Literature Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:105. [PMID: 38201012 PMCID: PMC10778825 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12010105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma cancer represents the most lethal type of skin cancer originating from the malignant transformation of melanocyte cells. Almost 50% of melanomas show the activation of BRAF mutations. The identification and characterization of BRAF mutations led to the development of specific drugs that radically changed the therapeutic approach to melanoma. METHODS We conducted a narrative review of the literature according to a written protocol before conducting the study. This article is based on previously conducted studies. We identified articles by searching electronic databases (Medline, Google Scholar and PubMed). We used a combination of "melanoma", "Braf-Mek inhibitors", " targeted therapy" and "oral side effects". RESULTS Eighteen studies were reported in this article showing the relationship between the use of targeted therapy in melanoma cancer and the development of oral side effects, such as mucositis, hyperkeratosis and cellular proliferation. CONCLUSION Targeted therapy plays an important role in the treatment of melanoma cancer, showing a notable increase in response rate, prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in BRAF-mutated melanoma patients. Oral side effects represent a common finding over the course of treatment. However, these adverse effects can be easily managed in a multidisciplinary approach involving collaboration between medical oncologists and dental doctors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Basilicata
- UOSD Special Care Dentistry, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Roma Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (M.B.); (A.D.); (P.B.)
- UniCamillus-Saint Camillus, International University of Health Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Terrano
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Napoli, Italy; (V.T.); (T.T.); (S.N.)
| | - Alessandro D’Aurelio
- UOSD Special Care Dentistry, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Roma Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (M.B.); (A.D.); (P.B.)
| | - Giovanni Bruno
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, 35121 Padova, Italy
- Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Teresa Troiani
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Napoli, Italy; (V.T.); (T.T.); (S.N.)
| | - Patrizio Bollero
- UOSD Special Care Dentistry, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Roma Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (M.B.); (A.D.); (P.B.)
| | - Stefania Napolitano
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Napoli, Italy; (V.T.); (T.T.); (S.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang S, Xie R, Zhong A, Chen J. Targeted therapeutic strategies for melanoma. Chin Med J (Engl) 2023; 136:2923-2930. [PMID: 37144745 PMCID: PMC10752476 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Melanoma accounts for a small proportion of skin cancers diagnosed each year, but it has a high degree of malignancy and rapid progression, resulting in a short survival period for patients. The incidence of melanoma continues to rise, and now melanoma accounts for 1.7% of cancer diagnoses worldwide and is the fifth most common cancer in the United States. With the development of high-throughput sequencing technologies, the understanding of the pathophysiology of melanoma had also been improved. The most common activating mutations in melanoma cells are BRAF , NRAS , and KIT mutations, which disrupt cell signaling pathways related to tumor proliferation. The progress has led to the emergence of molecularly targeted drugs, which extends the survival of patients with advanced melanoma. A large number of clinical trials have been conducted to confirm that targeted therapy for patients with advanced melanoma can improve progression-free survival and overall survival, and for stage III patients after radical tumor resection targeted therapy can reduce the recurrence of melanoma. Patients who were originally stage III or IV inoperable have the opportunity to achieve tumor radical resection after targeted therapy. This article reviewed the clinical trial data and summarized the clinical benefits and limitations of these therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Junjie Chen
- Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Quaglino P, Ascierto PA, Consoli F, Queirolo P, Spagnolo F, Morelli MF, Berardi R, Chiarion-Sileni V, Tucci M, Troiani T, Melotti B, Rossi E, Mandala M, Rinaldi G, Marcon IG, Pizzuti M, Del Vecchio M. Characteristics of Real-World Patients with High-Risk BRAFV600E/K-Mutated Melanoma Receiving Adjuvant Treatment with Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib After Surgical Resection, Through the Italian Managed Access Program. Cancer Manag Res 2023; 15:1271-1281. [PMID: 38027240 PMCID: PMC10649847 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s423970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Real-world data from patients with BRAFV600-mutated, resected, stage III melanoma treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib as adjuvant targeted therapy are limited, and it is important to gain an understanding of the characteristics of this patient population, as well as of the patient journey. Here we aimed to describe the characteristics, dosage reductions and discontinuations in patients with BRAFV600E/K-mutated melanoma receiving adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib after surgical resection through an Italian managed access program (MAP). Patients and Methods Eligible patients had completely resected cutaneous melanoma with confirmed BRAF V600E or V600K mutation, or initially resectable lymph node recurrence after a diagnosis of stage I or II melanoma. The starting dose of dabrafenib and trametinib was 150 mg twice daily and 2 mg once daily, respectively. Results A total of 557 patients received dabrafenib plus trametinib through the MAP (stage III resected disease at inclusion, 554). Median age was 54.0 years, and 40.2% of patients were female. The proportion of all treated patients who required a dose reduction was low (10.8%) as was the proportion of patients who discontinued treatment (13.5%). The main reason for treatment discontinuation was adverse events (36.0%). Conclusion New treatments, including BRAF-targeted therapies and immunotherapy, have transformed the natural history of melanoma. This is the largest study to date describing patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib in routine clinical practice in Italy between 2018 and 2019. Results highlight the characteristics of the patients treated and their journey, as well as the tolerable safety profile of dabrafenib plus trametinib in a real-world patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Quaglino
- Department of Medical Sciences, Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Paola Queirolo
- Oncology Division, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy, and Division of Medical Oncology for Melanoma, Sarcoma, and Rare Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maria Francesca Morelli
- Department of Oncology and Dermatological Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacola, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Università Politecnica delle Marche – Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Marco Tucci
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Bari, Italy
| | - Teresa Troiani
- Faculty of Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Barbara Melotti
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ernesto Rossi
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Mandala
- Division of Oncology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy, and University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Michele Del Vecchio
- Unit of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Manzano JL, Martin-Liberal J, Fernández-Morales LA, Benítez G, Medina Martínez J, Quindós M, García-Castaño A, Fernández O, Simo RV, Majem M, Bellido L, Ayala de Miguel P, Campos B, Espinosa E, Macías Cerrolaza JA, Gil-Arnaiz I, Lorente D, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Perez VN, López Castro R, Gramaje MG, Puértolas T, Rodriguez Moreno JF, Espasa Font L, Belaustegui Ferrández G, Cerezuela-Fuentes P. Adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib for patients with resected BRAF -mutated melanoma: DESCRIBE-AD real-world retrospective observational study. Melanoma Res 2023; 33:388-397. [PMID: 36988401 PMCID: PMC10470432 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
BRAF and MEK inhibitor, dabrafenib plus trametinib, adjuvant therapy is effective for high-risk resected melanoma patients with BRAF - V600 mutations. However, real-world evidence is limited. We aimed to determine the feasibility of this therapy in routine clinical practice. DESCRIBE-AD, a retrospective observational study, collected real-world data from 25 hospitals in Spain. Histologically confirmed and resected BRAF -mutated melanoma patients aged ≥18 years who were previously treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib adjuvant therapy, were included. The primary objectives were treatment discontinuation rate and time to discontinuation. The secondary objectives included safety and efficacy. From October 2020 to March 2021, 65 patients were included. Dabrafenib and trametinib discontinuation rate due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade was 9%. Other reasons for discontinuation included patients' decisions (6%), physician decisions (6%), unrelated adverse events (3%), disease progression (5%), and others (5%). The median time to treatment discontinuation was 9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5-11]. G3-4 TRAEs occurred in 21.5% of patients, the most common being pyrexia (3%), asthenia (3%), and diarrhoea (3%). Unscheduled hospitalisations and clinical tests occurred in 6 and 22% of patients, respectively. After 20-month median follow-up (95% CI, 18-22), 9% of patients had exitus due to disease progression, with a 12-month relapse-free survival and overall survival rates of 95.3% and 100%, respectively. Dabrafenib and trametinib adjuvant therapy proved effective for melanoma patients in a real-world setting, with a manageable toxicity profile. Toxicity frequencies were low leading to low incidence of unscheduled medical visits, tests, and treatment discontinuations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José L Manzano
- Medical Oncology, Instituto Catalán de Oncología, ICO-Badalona, H. Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona
| | | | | | - Gretel Benítez
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas
| | | | - María Quindós
- Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, La Coruña
| | | | - Ovidio Fernández
- Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Orense
| | - Rocío V Simo
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Arquitecto Marcide, Ferrol
| | - Margarita Majem
- Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona
| | - Lorena Bellido
- Medical Oncology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca
| | | | - Begoña Campos
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti de Lugo, Lugo
| | - Enrique Espinosa
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz - CIBERONC, Madrid
| | | | | | - David Lorente
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón de la Plana
| | | | | | | | - María G Gramaje
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Son Llàtzer, Mallorca
| | - Teresa Puértolas
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza
| | | | - Laia Espasa Font
- Solid Tumours Medical Department, Novartis Farmacéutica S.A., Barcelona
| | | | - Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, Ciudad de Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Qin Z, Zheng M. Advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for melanoma (Review). Exp Ther Med 2023; 26:416. [PMID: 37559935 PMCID: PMC10407994 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2023.12115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is the most aggressive and deadly type of skin cancer and is known for its poor prognosis as soon as metastasis occurs. Since 2011, new and effective therapies for metastatic melanoma have emerged, with US Food and Drug Administration approval of multiple targeted agents, such as V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors and multiple immunotherapy agents, such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and anti-programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 blockade. Based on insight into the respective advantages of the above two strategies, the present article provided a review of clinical trials of the application of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, as well as novel approaches of their combinations for the treatment of metastatic melanoma in recent years, with a focus on upcoming initiatives to improve the efficacy of these treatment approaches for metastatic melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyao Qin
- No. 4 Research Laboratory, Shanghai Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200051, P.R. China
| | - Mei Zheng
- No. 4 Research Laboratory, Shanghai Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200051, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reinhardt ME, Sun T, Pan CX, Schmults CD, Lee EH, Waldman AB. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures for advanced skin cancer patients. Arch Dermatol Res 2023; 315:1473-1480. [PMID: 36469125 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-022-02479-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Many patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been used to study quality of life (QOL) in the skin cancer population. Advanced melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) may be associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and treatment side effects; however, it is unclear which PROM is valid and appropriate to use in these populations for both clinical and research purposes. We aimed to identify the PROMs that have been used to measure QOL in advanced skin cancer patients and determine which of these PROMs have been validated to assess QOL outcomes in this population. A PubMed and EMBASE search was conducted from its inception to March 2021 according to PRISMA guidelines with a comprehensive list of search terms under three main topics: (1) PROM; (2) advanced skin cancer; and (3) staging and interventions. We included articles utilizing a PROM measuring QOL and having a patient population with advanced skin cancer defined as melanoma stage > T1a or non-melanoma AJCC stage T3 or greater. Advanced skin cancer patients were also defined as those with metastasis or requiring adjuvant therapy (systemic chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy). Studies were excluded according to the following criteria: mix of low-risk and advanced skin cancer patients in the study population without stratification into low-risk and advanced groups, stage T1a melanoma or mix of stages without stratification, low-risk NMSC, no PROM (i.e., study specific questionnaires), non-English publication, review article or protocol paper, conference abstract, or populations including non-skin cancers. A total of 1,998 articles were identified. 82 met our inclusion criteria resulting in 22 PROMs: five generic health-related (QWB-SA, AQoL-8D, EQ-5D, SF-36, and PRISM), six general cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-C36, LASA, IOC, Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, and FACT-G), nine disease-focused or specialized (EORTC QLQ-H&N35, EORTC QLQ-MEL38, EORTC QLQ-BR23, Facial Disability Index, FACT-H&N, FACT-BRM, FACT-B, FACT-M, and scqolit), and two general dermatology (Skindex-16 and DLQI) PROMs. All PROMs have been generally validated except for EORTC QLQ-MEL38. Only two PROMs have been validated in the advanced melanoma population: FACT-M and EORTC QLQ-C36. No PROMS have been validated in the advanced NMSC population. The PROMs that were validated in the advanced melanoma population do not include QOL issues unique to advanced skin tumors such as odor, bleeding, itching, wound care burden, and public embarrassment. Breast cancer and head and neck cancer instruments were adapted but not validated for use in the advanced skin cancer population due to the lack of an adequate instrument for this population. This study highlights the need for PROM instrument validation or creation specifically geared toward the advanced skin cancer population. Future studies should aim to develop and validate a PROM to assess QOL in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrna Eliann Reinhardt
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4J, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
| | - Tiffany Sun
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4J, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
| | | | - Chrysalyne D Schmults
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4J, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
| | - Erica H Lee
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Abigail B Waldman
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4J, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee R, Mandala M, Long GV, Eggermont AMM, van Akkooi ACJ, Sandhu S, Garbe C, Lorigan P. Adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma: the need for further studies. Eur J Cancer 2023; 189:112914. [PMID: 37301717 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionised the outcomes for melanoma patients. In the metastatic setting, patients treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab have an expected 5-year survival of> 50%. For patients with resected high-risk stage III disease, adjuvant pembrolizumab, nivolumab or dabrafenib and trametinib are associated with a significant improvement in both relapse-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). More recently neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown very promising outcomes in patients with clinically detectable nodal disease and is likely to become a new standard of care. For stage IIB/C disease, two pivotal adjuvant trials of pembrolizumab and nivolumab have also reported a significant improvement in both RFS and DMFS. However, the absolute benefit is low and there are concerns about the risk of severe toxicities as well as long-term morbidity from endocrine toxicity. Ongoing registration phase III trials are currently evaluating newer immunotherapy combinations and the role of BRAF/MEK-directed targeted therapy for stage II melanoma. However, our ability to personalise therapy based on molecular risk stratification has lagged behind the development of novel immune therapies. There is a critical need to evaluate the use of tissue and blood-based biomarkers, to better select patients that will recur and avoid unnecessary treatment for the majority of patients cured by surgery alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Lee
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Oncology, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, UK
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; Ospedale Papa Givoanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- University Medical Center Utrecht & Princess Maxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center München, Technical University München & Ludwig Maximiliaan University, München, Germany
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München, Technical University München & Ludwig Maximiliaan University, München, Germany; Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claus Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Oncology, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yue W, Deng X, Wang Z, Jiang M, Hu R, Duan Y, Wang Q, Cui J, Fang Y. Inhibition of the MEK/ERK pathway suppresses immune overactivation and mitigates TDP-43 toxicity in a Drosophila model of ALS. Immun Ageing 2023; 20:27. [PMID: 37340309 DOI: 10.1186/s12979-023-00354-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
TDP-43 is an important DNA/RNA-binding protein that is associated with age-related neurodegenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD); however, its pathomechanism is not fully understood. In a transgenic RNAi screen using Drosophila as a model, we uncovered that knockdown (KD) of Dsor1 (the Drosophila MAPK kinase dMEK) suppressed TDP-43 toxicity without altering TDP-43 phosphorylation or protein levels. Further investigation revealed that the Dsor1 downstream gene rl (dERK) was abnormally upregulated in TDP-43 flies, and neuronal overexpression of dERK induced profound upregulation of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). We also detected a robust immune overactivation in TDP-43 flies, which could be suppressed by downregulation of the MEK/ERK pathway in TDP-43 fly neurons. Furthermore, neuronal KD of abnormally increased AMPs improved the motor function of TDP-43 flies. On the other hand, neuronal KD of Dnr1, a negative regulator of the Drosophila immune deficiency (IMD) pathway, activated the innate immunity and boosted AMP expression independent of the regulation by the MEK/ERK pathway, which diminished the mitigating effect of RNAi-dMEK on TDP-43 toxicity. Finally, we showed that an FDA-approved MEK inhibitor trametinib markedly suppressed immune overactivation, alleviated motor deficits and prolonged the lifespan of TDP-43 flies, but did not exhibit a lifespan-extending effect in Alzheimer disease (AD) or spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) fly models. Together, our findings suggest an important role of abnormal elevation of the MEK/ERK signaling and innate immunity in TDP-43 pathogenesis and propose trametinib as a potential therapeutic agent for ALS and other TDP-43-related diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenkai Yue
- Interdisciplinary Research Center On Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Xue Deng
- Interdisciplinary Research Center On Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Zhao Wang
- Interdisciplinary Research Center On Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
| | - Mingsheng Jiang
- Interdisciplinary Research Center On Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Rirong Hu
- Interdisciplinary Research Center On Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Yongjia Duan
- Interdisciplinary Research Center On Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Qiangqiang Wang
- Interdisciplinary Research Center On Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
| | - Jihong Cui
- Interdisciplinary Research Center On Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
| | - Yanshan Fang
- Interdisciplinary Research Center On Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lai-Kwon J, Inderjeeth AJ, Lisy K, Sandhu S, Rutherford C, Jefford M. Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy on health-related quality of life of people with stage III and IV melanoma: a mixed-methods systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2023; 184:83-105. [PMID: 36907021 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies (TT) have significantly improved disease control and survival in people with stage III and IV cutaneous melanoma. Understanding the impact of therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQL) is vital for treatment decision-making and determining targets for supportive care intervention. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review to synthesise the impact of ICIs and TT on all domains of HRQL in these populations. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in April 2022 on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Quantitative and qualitative data relevant to the review question were extracted and synthesised in tables according to setting (adjuvant versus metastatic), treatment type (ICI versus TT) and HRQL issue. RESULTS Twenty-eight papers describing 27 studies were included: 15 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), four cohort studies, four single arm cross-sectional studies, two qualitative studies, one case control study and one mixed-methods study. In four studies of people with resected stage III melanoma, adjuvant pembrolizumab and dabrafenib-trametinib did not clinically or statistically change HRQL compared to baseline. In 17 studies of people with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma, inconsistencies in the impact of ICI on symptoms, functioning and overall HRQL were noted across different study designs. TT was associated with improvements in symptoms, functioning and HRQL across six studies. CONCLUSION This review highlights the key physical, psychological and social issues experienced by people with stage III and IV melanoma treated with ICI and TT. Inconsistencies in the impact of ICI on HRQL were observed in different study designs. This highlights the need for treatment-specific patient-reported outcome measures for determining the impact of these therapies on HRQL and real-world data to inform treatment decision-making and appropriate supportive care interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | - Karolina Lisy
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Cancer Nursing Research Unit (CNRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Quality of Life Office, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Allard-Coutu A, Dobson V, Schmitz E, Shah H, Nessim C. The Evolution of the Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13020489. [PMID: 36836846 PMCID: PMC9966203 DOI: 10.3390/life13020489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The growing repertoire of approved immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy has revolutionized the adjuvant treatment of melanoma. While the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma remains wide local excision (WLE), the management of regional lymph nodes continues to evolve in light of practice-changing clinical trials and dramatically improved adjuvant therapy. With large multicenter studies reporting no benefit in overall survival for completion lymph node dissection (CLND) after a positive sentinel node biopsy (SLNB), controversy remains regarding patient selection and clinical decision-making. This review explores the evolution of the SLNB in cutaneous melanoma in the context of a rapidly changing adjuvant treatment landscape, summarizing the key clinical trials which shaped current practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Allard-Coutu
- Department of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Erika Schmitz
- Department of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Hely Shah
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Carolyn Nessim
- Department of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Garbe C, Keim U, Amaral T, Berking C, Eigentler TK, Flatz L, Gesierich A, Leiter U, Stadler R, Sunderkötter C, Tüting T, Utikal J, Wollina U, Zimmer L, Zouboulis CC, Ascierto PA, Eggermont AM, Grob JJ, Hauschild A, Sekulovic LK, Long GV, Luke JJ, Michielin O, Peris K, Schadendorf D, Kirkwood JM, Lorigan PC. Prognosis of Patients With Primary Melanoma Stage I and II According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Version 8 Validated in Two Independent Cohorts: Implications for Adjuvant Treatment. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3741-3749. [PMID: 35709414 PMCID: PMC9649277 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The first randomized trial of adjuvant treatment with checkpoint inhibitor in stage II melanoma reported a significant reduction in risk of tumor recurrence. This study evaluates two independent data sets to further document survival probabilities for patients with primary stage I and II melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Central Malignant Melanoma Registry (CMMR) in Germany evaluated 17,544 patients with a primary diagnosis of stage I and II melanoma from 2000 to 2015. The exploratory cohort consisted of 6,725 patients from the Center for Dermato-Oncology at the University of Tübingen, and the confirmatory cohort consisted of 10,819 patients from 11 other German centers. Survival outcomes were compared with published American Joint Committee on Cancer version 8 (AJCCv8) stage I and II survival data. RESULTS For the two CMMR cohorts in stage IA compared with the AJCCv8 cohort, melanoma-specific survival rates at 10 years were 95.1%-95.6% versus 98%; 89.7%-90.9% versus 94% in stage IB; 80.7%-83.1% versus 88% in stage IIA; 72.0%-79.9% versus 82% in stage IIB; and 57.6%-64.7% versus 75% in stage IIC, respectively. Recurrence rates were approximately twice as high as melanoma-specific mortality rates in stages IA-IIA. CONCLUSION The melanoma-specific survival rates in the two CMMR cohorts across stages I and II are less favorable than published in AJCCv8. This has important implications for the consideration of adjuvant treatment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus Garbe
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Keim
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Teresa Amaral
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas K. Eigentler
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lukas Flatz
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anja Gesierich
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Rudolf Stadler
- Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Hospital Minden, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Minden, Germany
| | - Cord Sunderkötter
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Thomas Tüting
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jochen Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Uwe Wollina
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Municipal Hospital of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christos C. Zouboulis
- Departments of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Immunology, Dessau Medical Center, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane and Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Dessau, Germany
| | - Paolo A. Ascierto
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Alexander M.M. Eggermont
- Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jean-Jacques Grob
- Dermatology and Skin Cancer Department, APHM Timone, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jason J. Luke
- Cancer Immunotherapeutic Center of UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Olivier Michielin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ketty Peris
- Institute of Dermatology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - John M. Kirkwood
- Melanoma and Skin Cancer Program, Hillman Cancer Research Pavilion Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Paul C. Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Homan M, Warrier G, Lao CD, Yentz S, Kraft S, Fecher LA. Treatment related toxicities with combination BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy in resected stage III melanoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:855794. [PMID: 36212431 PMCID: PMC9538392 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.855794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Combination dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) is an FDA approved adjuvant therapy for patients with resected stage III BRAF-mutant melanoma. We describe treatment-related toxicities with adjuvant D+T in a real-world population through a retrospective case series. The primary endpoint was development of toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Homan
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Govind Warrier
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Christopher D. Lao
- Department of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Sarah Yentz
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Shawna Kraft
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Leslie A. Fecher
- Department of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- *Correspondence: Leslie A. Fecher,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen C, Wang Z, Qin Y. Health-related quality of life in stage III-IV melanoma treated with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: A systematic review on the adequacy of reporting and clinical issues in phase III randomized controlled trials. Cancer Med 2022; 12:2262-2280. [PMID: 36030506 PMCID: PMC9939121 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma represents around over 90% of all melanoma. With more effective treatments able to extend patients' survival, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly becoming an important endpoint in cancer clinical trials. They are often secondary outcomes measured in phase III randomized controlled trials and their implementation, collection, analysis, and reporting can be challenging methodologically. For these reasons, an increasing number of international recommendations introduced the standards regarding the conduct of HRQOL. In this systematic review, we appraise the adequacy of HRQOL reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of stage III-IV cutaneous melanoma and the clinical issues of immunotherapy and small-molecular-targeted therapy on HRQOL. Our search strategy totally got 55 articles, and only 13 studies met all inclusion criteria. Findings suggest that most treatments did not yield significant improvements in HRQOL but kept baseline levels, accompanied by prolonged survival and acceptable toxicity. Except for some existing limitations, reporting of HRQOL has made encouraging progress during the period covered by our search, but some aspects still need further optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Chen
- Department of OncologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina,Cancer Institute, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Zehua Wang
- Department of OncologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Yan‐Ru Qin
- Department of OncologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee KJ, Betz-Stablein B, Stark MS, Janda M, McInerney-Leo AM, Caffery LJ, Gillespie N, Yanes T, Soyer HP. The Future of Precision Prevention for Advanced Melanoma. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:818096. [PMID: 35111789 PMCID: PMC8801740 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.818096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision prevention of advanced melanoma is fast becoming a realistic prospect, with personalized, holistic risk stratification allowing patients to be directed to an appropriate level of surveillance, ranging from skin self-examinations to regular total body photography with sequential digital dermoscopic imaging. This approach aims to address both underdiagnosis (a missed or delayed melanoma diagnosis) and overdiagnosis (the diagnosis and treatment of indolent lesions that would not have caused a problem). Holistic risk stratification considers several types of melanoma risk factors: clinical phenotype, comprehensive imaging-based phenotype, familial and polygenic risks. Artificial intelligence computer-aided diagnostics combines these risk factors to produce a personalized risk score, and can also assist in assessing the digital and molecular markers of individual lesions. However, to ensure uptake and efficient use of AI systems, researchers will need to carefully consider how best to incorporate privacy and standardization requirements, and above all address consumer trust concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie J. Lee
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Brigid Betz-Stablein
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mitchell S. Stark
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Aideen M. McInerney-Leo
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Liam J. Caffery
- Centre for Health Services Research, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicole Gillespie
- The University of Queensland Business School, Faculty of Business, Economics and Law, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Tatiane Yanes
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - H. Peter Soyer
- Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Dermatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- *Correspondence: H. Peter Soyer
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thawer A, Miller WH, Gregorio N, Claveau J, Rajagopal S, Savage KJ, Song X, Petrella TM. Management of Pyrexia Associated with the Combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib: Canadian Consensus Statements. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3537-3553. [PMID: 34590600 PMCID: PMC8482100 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The combination of dabrafenib and trametinib is a well-established treatment for BRAF-mutated melanoma. However, the effectiveness of this approach may be hindered by the development of treatment-related pyrexia syndrome, which occurs in at least 50% of treated patients. Without appropriate intervention, pyrexia syndrome has the potential to worsen and can result in hypotension secondary to dehydration and associated organ-related complications. Furthermore, premature treatment discontinuation may result in a reduction in progression-free and overall survival. Despite existing guidance, there is still a wide variety of therapeutic approaches suggested in the literature for both the definition and management of dabrafenib and trametinib-related pyrexia. This is reflected in the practice variation of its prevention and treatment within and between Canadian cancer centres. A Canadian working group was formed and consensus statements were constructed based on evidence and finalised through a two-round modified Delphi approach. The statements led to the development of a pyrexia treatment algorithm that can easily be applied in routine practice. The Canadian working group consensus statements serve to provide practical guidance for the management of dabrafenib and trametinib-related pyrexia, hopefully leading to reduced discontinuation rates, and ultimately improve patients' quality of life and cancer-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alia Thawer
- Department of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
| | - Wilson H. Miller
- Departments of Medicine and Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada;
| | - Nancy Gregorio
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada;
| | - Joël Claveau
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dermatology Division, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1Y 0A1, Canada;
| | | | - Kerry J. Savage
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada;
| | - Xinni Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada;
| | - Teresa M. Petrella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mojtahed SA, Boyer NR, Rao SA, Gajewski TF, Tseng J, Turaga KK. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Therapy for BRAF-Mutant Resected Stage III Melanoma in Medicare Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:9039-9047. [PMID: 34129153 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10288-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma improves several measures of patient survival. However, decisions regarding inclusion of adjuvant therapies in the formularies of public payers necessarily consider the cost-effectiveness of those treatments. The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of four recently approved adjuvant therapies for BRAF-mutant stage III melanoma in the Medicare patient population. METHODS In this cost-effectiveness analysis, a Markov microsimulation model was used to simulate the healthcare trajectory of patients randomized to receive either first-line targeted therapy (dabrafenib-trametinib) or immunotherapy (ipilimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab). The base case was a 65-year-old Medicare patient with BRAF V600E-mutant resected stage III melanoma. Possible health states included recurrence-free survival, adverse events, local recurrence, distant metastases, and death. Transition probabilities were determined from published clinical trials. Costs were estimated from reimbursement rates reported by CMS and the Red Book drug price database. Primary outcomes were costs (US$), life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Model robustness was evaluated using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Dabrafenib-trametinib provided 1.83 QALYs over no treatment and 0.23 QALYs over the most effective immunotherapy, pembrolizumab. Dabrafenib-trametinib was associated with an ICER of $95,758/QALY over no treatment and $285,863/QALY over pembrolizumab. Pembrolizumab yielded an ICER of $68,396/QALY over no treatment and dominated other immunotherapies. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab is cost-effective at a conventional willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold, but dabrafenib-trametinib is not. Though dabrafenib-trametinib offers incremental QALYs, optimization of drug pricing is necessary to ensure dabrafenib-trametinib is accessible at an acceptable WTP threshold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saam A Mojtahed
- Pritzker School of Medicine, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nicole R Boyer
- Center for Health and the Social Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Saieesh A Rao
- Pritzker School of Medicine, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thomas F Gajewski
- Department of Pathology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jennifer Tseng
- Department of Surgery, Division of Biological Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kiran K Turaga
- Department of Surgery, Division of Biological Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Xiao B, Liu L, Li A, Wang P, Xiang C, Li H, Xiao T. Identification and validation of immune-related lncRNA prognostic signatures for melanoma. IMMUNITY INFLAMMATION AND DISEASE 2021; 9:1044-1054. [PMID: 34077998 PMCID: PMC8342236 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Melanoma is a highly aggressive malignant skin tumor as well as the primary reason for skin cancer‐specific deaths. We first identified immune‐related long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) prognostic signature and found potential immunotherapeutic targets for melanoma cancer. Methods RNA‐seq data and clinical features of melanoma samples were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Samples of melanoma were randomly assigned to the training and testing cohort. The immune‐related lncRNA signature was then obtained via using univariate, LASSO, and multivariate Cox analysis of patients in the training cohort. Eight significant immune‐related lncRNA signature was then subsequently obtained through correlation analysis between immune‐related genes and lncRNAs. The association between risk score and immune cell infiltration was finally assessed using TIMER and CIBERSORT. Results Three hundred and fifty‐six immune‐related lncRNAs were obtained. Among them, eight immune‐related lncRNAs were identified to build a prognostic risk signature model. The model's performance was then confirmed using the Kaplan–Meier curves, risk plots, and time‐dependent receiver‐operating characteristic curves in the training cohort. The risk score was identified and confirmed as an independent prognostic factor through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. These results were further verified in the testing and whole cohorts. CIBERSORT algorithm showed that the infiltration levels of T cells CD8, M1 macrophages, plasma cells, T cells CD4 memory activated, T cells gamma delta, and mast cells activated were significantly lower in the high‐risk group while the infiltration level of macrophages M0 was significantly lower in the low‐risk group. Conclusion The immune‐related lncRNA signature offers prognostic markers and potential immunotherapeutic targets for melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Xiao
- Department of OrthopedicsThe Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangshaHunanChina
| | - Liyan Liu
- Department of OrthopedicsThe Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangshaHunanChina
| | - Aoyu Li
- Department of OrthopedicsThe Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangshaHunanChina
| | - Pingxiao Wang
- Department of OrthopedicsThe Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangshaHunanChina
| | - Cheng Xiang
- Department of OrthopedicsThe Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangshaHunanChina
| | - Hui Li
- Department of OrthopedicsThe Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangshaHunanChina
| | - Tao Xiao
- Department of OrthopedicsThe Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangshaHunanChina
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Krishnan T, Menzies AM, Roberts-Thomson R. Recent advancements in melanoma management. Intern Med J 2021; 51:327-333. [PMID: 33738950 DOI: 10.1111/imj.15228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The treatment options for patients with melanoma have expanded significantly over the past decade. In particular, the use of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has dramatically transformed the outlook for patients with advanced disease. These treatments are now being utilised as adjuvant therapy for patients with earlier stage melanoma after surgical resection. We review the latest updates for melanoma staging, surgical resection, radiotherapy and systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tharani Krishnan
- Medical Oncology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Medical Oncology Department, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Oncology Department, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachel Roberts-Thomson
- Medical Oncology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Guo W, Zhang C, Qiao T, Zhao J, Shi C. Strategies for the Construction of Mouse Models With Humanized Immune System and Evaluation of Tumor Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:673199. [PMID: 33996603 PMCID: PMC8117211 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.673199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy has been used as a first-line treatment for a variety of advanced tumors, allowing remarkable progress to be made in cancer treatment. Nonetheless, only a small number of patients can benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. To improve the effect of immunotherapy, the underlying mechanism of combination therapy was investigated in the context of an intact human tumor immune microenvironment using mice with a human immune system (HIS) bearing human tumors. Herein, we summarize and discuss strategies for the development and use of HIS mice models in tumor immunotherapies. Most importantly, this review proposes a method of t11umor identification and classification in HIS mice based on the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression, and according to this classification, we propose different combination treatment strategies that can be utilized to enhance the effect of immunotherapy. Thus, we provide effective experimental schemes for tumor immunotherapy in HIS mice models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenwen Guo
- Division of Cancer Biology, Laboratory Animal Center, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.,School of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College of Yan'an University, Yanan, China
| | - Caiqin Zhang
- Division of Cancer Biology, Laboratory Animal Center, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Tianyun Qiao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jumei Zhao
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College of Yan'an University, Yanan, China
| | - Changhong Shi
- Division of Cancer Biology, Laboratory Animal Center, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Remon J, Hendriks LEL. Osimertinib Should be the Standard of Care for the Adjuvant Therapy of Stage IB to IIIA EGFR-Mutant NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2021; 16:368-370. [PMID: 33641720 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Remon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal(HM-CIOCC), Hospital HM Delfos, HM Hospitales, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Lizza E L Hendriks
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dika E, Lambertini M, Gouveia B, Mussi M, Marcelli E, Campione E, Gurioli C, Melotti B, Alessandrini A, Ribero S. Oral Manifestations in Melanoma Patients Treated with Target or Immunomodulatory Therapies. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10061283. [PMID: 33808846 PMCID: PMC8003791 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1) and MEK (mitogen activated protein kinase) inhibitors, as well as immunotherapy against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor and its ligand (PD-L1), have shown good results in improving the disease-free survival of patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). The aim of this review is to summarize the main oral adverse events (oAEs) occurring in patients undergoing target or immunotherapy. We proposed two separate sections: oAEs during the treatment with (1) target therapies with BRAF and MEK inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (gingival hyperplasia, pigmentation disorders, squamo-proliferative lesions) and (2) immunotherapies with CTLA-4 or PD1 inhibitors (lichenoid reactions, immuno-bullous reactions, xerostomia and other reactions). Adverse events frequently include oAEs, although these are often misdiagnosed and under-reported. Indeed, the oral cavity is not routinely evaluated during clinical practice. The symptomatology related to oAEs is significant since it may represent the first manifestation of a severe systemic reaction, possibly leading to difficulties in nutrition with a consequent impact on patients' quality of life. A careful examination of the oral cavity is recommended during the evaluation of oncologic patients in order to promptly detect the onset of new manifestations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emi Dika
- Division of Dermatology, IRCCS—Policlinico Sant’Orsola, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.G.); (B.M.); (A.A.)
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.L.); (M.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0512144849
| | - Martina Lambertini
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Bruna Gouveia
- The Poche Centre, Melanoma Institute of Australia, 40 Rocklands Rd, Wollstonecraft, NSW 2065, Australia;
| | - Martina Mussi
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Emanuela Marcelli
- Laboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Elena Campione
- Dermatology Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy;
| | - Carlotta Gurioli
- Division of Dermatology, IRCCS—Policlinico Sant’Orsola, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.G.); (B.M.); (A.A.)
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Barbara Melotti
- Division of Dermatology, IRCCS—Policlinico Sant’Orsola, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.G.); (B.M.); (A.A.)
| | - Aurora Alessandrini
- Division of Dermatology, IRCCS—Policlinico Sant’Orsola, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.G.); (B.M.); (A.A.)
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Simone Ribero
- Department of Medical Sciences, Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Harbeck N, Schneeweiss A, Thuss-Patience P, Miller K, Garbe C, Griesinger F, Eberhardt WEE, Klussmann JP, Wollenberg B, Grimm MO, Zander T, Lüftner D. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant end-points in health technology assessment in oncology. Eur J Cancer 2021; 147:40-50. [PMID: 33611103 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) of clinical and economic value of a new intervention is an integral step in providing the access of patients to innovative cancer care and treatment. Overall survival (OS) is the preferred criterion for demonstrating the therapeutic efficacy in HTA given its direct clinical and patient relevance. However, with often long life expectancy of patients with early cancer, analysis of OS becomes less practical. Partially due to this reason, pathological complete response (pCR) and time-to-event end-points like disease-free survival are frequently incorporated into the pivotal clinical trials in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. However, there exists a discrepancy between different national HTA bodies regarding the acknowledgement of patient relevance of these end-points. In this article, we analysed the perspectives of patients on different aspects of end-points used in clinical trials in early cancer. Gathered evidence strongly suggests that complete tumour eradication and reduced risk of recurrence provide important psychological benefits thus signifying that pCR and time-to-event end-points are directly relevant to patients. Additionally, we reviewed opinions on patient relevance of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy end-points adopted by HTA bodies during the recent evaluations. We found that improvements in end-points used in the adjuvant setting were commonly considered as valuable to patients. In contrast, opinions on patient relevance of neoadjuvant therapy end-points varied between the national HTA bodies. Universal acknowledgement of patient relevance of therapeutic end-points for early cancer by HTA bodies is necessary to balance the inequality in uptake of innovative therapies into national healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Munich (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité University Hospital Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kurt Miller
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Frank Griesinger
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Pius-Hospital, University Department Internal Medicine-Oncology, University of Oldenburg, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Wilfried E E Eberhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, Ruhrlandklinik, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Jens P Klussmann
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Barbara Wollenberg
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital MRI, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Marc-Oliver Grimm
- Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Thomas Zander
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, University Medicine Berlin, 12200 Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
De Leo S, Trevisan M, Fugazzola L. Recent advances in the management of anaplastic thyroid cancer. Thyroid Res 2020; 13:17. [PMID: 33292371 PMCID: PMC7684758 DOI: 10.1186/s13044-020-00091-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is undoubtedly the thyroid cancer histotype with the poorest prognosis. The conventional treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy, and conventional chemotherapy. Surgery should be as complete as possible, securing the airway and ensuring access for nutritional support; the current standard of care of radiotherapy is the intensity-modulated radiation therapy; chemotherapy includes the use of doxorubicin or taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) generally with platin (cisplatin or carboplatin). However, frequently, these treatments are not sufficient and a systemic treatment with kinase inhibitors is necessary. These include multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Lenvatinib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Vandetanib, Axitinib, Pazopanib, Pyrazolo-pyrimidine compounds), single target tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Dabrafenib plus Trametinib and Vemurafenib against BRAF, Gefitinib against EGFR, PPARγ ligands (e.g. Efatutazone), Everolimus against mTOR, vascular disruptors (e.g. Fosbretabulin), and immunotherapy (e.g. Spartalizumab and Pembrolizumab, which are anti PD-1/PD-L1 molecules). Therapy should be tailored to the patients and to the tumor genetic profile. A BRAF mutation analysis is mandatory, but a wider evaluation of tumor mutational status (e.g. by next-generation sequencing) is desirable. When a BRAFV600E mutation is detected, treatment with Dabrafenib and Trametinib should be preferred: this combination has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic ATC with BRAFV600E mutation and with no satisfactory locoregional treatment options. Alternatively, Lenvatinib, regardless of mutational status, reported good results and was approved in Japan for treating unresectable tumors. Other single target mutation agents with fair results are Everolimus when a mutation involving the PI3K/mTOR pathway is detected, Imatinib in case of PDGF-receptors overexpression, and Spartalizumab in case of PD-L1 positive tumors. Several trials are currently evaluating the possible beneficial role of a combinatorial therapy in ATC. Since in this tumor several genetic alterations are usually found, the aim is to inhibit or disrupt several pathways: these combination strategies use therapy targeting angiogenesis, survival, proliferation, and may act against both MAPK and PI3K pathways. Investigating new treatment options is eagerly awaited since, to date, even the molecules with the best radiological results have not been able to provide a durable disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone De Leo
- Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Piazzale Brescia, 20, 20149, Milan, Italy.
| | - Matteo Trevisan
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Fugazzola
- Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Piazzale Brescia, 20, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sun W, Xu Y, Yang J, Liao Z, Li T, Huang K, Patel P, Yan W, Chen Y. The prognostic significance of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in cutaneous and acral melanoma patients-A multicenter retrospective study. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2020; 40:586-597. [PMID: 33025763 PMCID: PMC7668482 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Whether non‐sentinel lymph node (SLN)‐positive melanoma patients can benefit from completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is still unclear. The current study was performed to identify the prognostic role of non‐SLN status in SLN‐positive melanoma and to investigate the predictive factors of non‐SLN metastasis in acral and cutaneous melanoma patients. Methods The records of 328 SLN‐positive melanoma patients who underwent radical surgery at four cancer centers from September 2009 to August 2017 were reviewed. Clinicopathological data including age, gender, Clark level, Breslow index, ulceration, the number of positive SLNs, non‐SLN status, and adjuvant therapy were included for survival analyses. Patients were followed up until death or June 30, 2019. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to identify factors associated with non‐SLN positivity. Log‐rank analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to identify the prognostic factors for disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Among all enrolled patients, 220 (67.1%) had acral melanoma and 108 (32.9%) had cutaneous melanoma. The 5‐year DFS and OS rate of the entire cohort was 31.5% and 54.1%, respectively. More than 1 positive SLNs were found in 123 (37.5%) patients. Positive non‐SLNs were found in 99 (30.2%) patients. Patients with positive non‐SLNs had significantly worse DFS and OS (log‐rank P < 0.001). Non‐SLN status (P = 0.003), number of positive SLNs (P = 0.016), and adjuvant therapy (P = 0.025) were independent prognostic factors for DFS, while non‐SLN status (P = 0.002), the Breslow index (P = 0.027), Clark level (P = 0.006), ulceration (P = 0.004), number of positive SLNs (P = 0.001), and adjuvant therapy (P = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for OS. The Breslow index (P = 0.020), Clark level (P = 0.012), and number of positive SLNs (P = 0.031) were independently related to positive non‐SLNs and could be used to develop more personalized surgical strategy. Conclusions Non‐SLN‐positive melanoma patients had worse DFS and OS even after immediate CLND than those with non‐SLN‐negative melanoma. The Breslow index, Clark level, and number of positive SLNs were independent predictive factors for non‐SLN status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Sun
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China
| | - JiLong Yang
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Tianjin, 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Tianjin, 300060, P. R. China
| | - ZhiChao Liao
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Tianjin, 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Tianjin, 300060, P. R. China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of Bone and Soft-tissue Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, P. R. China
| | - Kai Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Brandon Regional Hospital, HCA West Florida Division, Brandon, 33511, USA
| | - Poulam Patel
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - WangJun Yan
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yang Y, Wang D, Cui L, Ma HH, Zhang L, Lian HY, Zhang Q, Zhao XX, Zhang LP, Zhao YZ, Li N, Wang TY, Li ZG, Zhang R. Effectiveness and Safety of Dabrafenib in the Treatment of 20 Chinese Children with BRAFV600E-Mutated Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis. Cancer Res Treat 2020; 53:261-269. [PMID: 32972045 PMCID: PMC7812025 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2020.769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We sought to investigate the effectiveness and safety of dabrafenib in children with BRAFV600E-mutated Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 20 children with BRAFV600E-mutated LCH who were treated with dabrafenib. Results The median age at which the patients started taking dabrafenib was 2.3 years old (range, 0.6 to 6.5 years). The ratio of boys to girls was 2.3:1. The median follow-up time was 30.8 months (range, 18.9 to 43.6 months). There were 14 patients (70%) in the risk organ (RO)+ group and six patients (30%) in the RO− group. All patients were initially treated with traditional chemotherapy and then shifted to targeted therapy due to poor control of LCH or intolerance to chemotherapy. The overall objective response rate and the overall disease control rate were 65% and 75%, respectively. During treatment, circulating levels of cell-free BRAFV600E (cfBRAFV600E) became negative in 60% of the patients within a median period of 3.0 months (range, 1.0 to 9.0 months). Grade 2 or 3 adverse effects occurred in five patients. Conclusion Some children with BRAFV600E-mutated LCH may benefit from monotherapy with dabrafenib, especially high-risk patients with concomitant hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and intolerance to chemotherapy. The safety of dabrafenib is notable. A prospective study with a larger sample size is required to determine the optimal dosage and treatment duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Yang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Wang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Cui
- Laboratory of Hematologic Diseases, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Hao Ma
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Yun Lian
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Laboratory of Hematologic Diseases, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Xi Zhao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Li-Ping Zhang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Yun-Ze Zhao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Na Li
- Laboratory of Hematologic Diseases, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Tian-You Wang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Gang Li
- Laboratory of Hematologic Diseases, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology Oncology; National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education; Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Michielin O, van Akkooi A, Lorigan P, Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Robert C, Arance A, Blank CU, Chiarion Sileni V, Donia M, Faries MB, Gaudy-Marqueste C, Gogas H, Grob JJ, Guckenberger M, Haanen J, Hayes AJ, Hoeller C, Lebbé C, Lugowska I, Mandalà M, Márquez-Rodas I, Nathan P, Neyns B, Olofsson Bagge R, Puig S, Rutkowski P, Schilling B, Sondak VK, Tawbi H, Testori A, Keilholz U. ESMO consensus conference recommendations on the management of locoregional melanoma: under the auspices of the ESMO Guidelines Committee. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1449-1461. [PMID: 32763452 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a consensus conference on melanoma on 5-7 September 2019 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of melanoma. The aim of the conference was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were: (i) the management of locoregional disease; (ii) targeted versus immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting; (iii) targeted versus immunotherapies for the first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma; (iv) when to stop immunotherapy or targeted therapy in the metastatic setting; and (v) systemic versus local treatment of brain metastases. The expert panel was divided into five working groups in order to each address questions relating to one of the five topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the results relating to the management of locoregional melanoma, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Michielin
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - A van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - R Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C Robert
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, France
| | - A Arance
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C U Blank
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V Chiarion Sileni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - M Donia
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M B Faries
- Department of Surgery, The Angeles Clinic, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - C Gaudy-Marqueste
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital Timone, Marseille, France
| | - H Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - J J Grob
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital Timone, Marseille, France
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radio-Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J Haanen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A J Hayes
- Department of Academic Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Lebbé
- AP-HP Dermatology, Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U976, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - I Lugowska
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M Mandalà
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - I Márquez-Rodas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Nathan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - B Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - S Puig
- Dermatology Service, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August i Pi Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERER, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - B Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - V K Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa
| | - H Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - A Testori
- Department of Dermatology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - U Keilholz
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Klesse LJ, Jordan JT, Radtke HB, Rosser T, Schorry E, Ullrich N, Viskochil D, Knight P, Plotkin SR, Yohay K. The Use of MEK Inhibitors in Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Associated Tumors and Management of Toxicities. Oncologist 2020; 25:e1109-e1116. [PMID: 32272491 PMCID: PMC7356675 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Early-phase clinical trials using oral inhibitors of MEK, the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase, have demonstrated benefit for patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated tumors, particularly progressive low-grade gliomas and plexiform neurofibromas. Given this potential of MEK inhibition as an effective medical therapy, the use of targeted agents in the NF1 population is likely to increase substantially. For clinicians with limited experience prescribing MEK inhibitors, concern about managing these treatments may be a barrier to use. In this manuscript, the Clinical Care Advisory Board of the Children's Tumor Foundation reviews the published experience with MEK inhibitors in NF1 and outlines recommendations for side-effect management, as well as monitoring guidelines. These recommendations can serve as a beginning framework for NF providers seeking to provide the most effective treatments for their patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) clinical care is on the cusp of a transformative shift. With the success of recent clinical trials using MEK inhibitors, an increasing number of NF1 patients are being treated with MEK inhibitors for both plexiform neurofibromas and low-grade gliomas. The use of MEK inhibitors is likely to increase substantially in NF1. Given these changes, the Clinical Care Advisory Board of the Children's Tumor Foundation has identified a need within the NF1 clinical community for guidance for the safe and effective use of MEK inhibitors for NF1-related tumors. This article provides a review of the published experience of MEK inhibitors in NF1 and provides recommendations for monitoring and management of side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Heather B. Radtke
- Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeWisconsinUSA
- Children's Tumor FoundationNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Tena Rosser
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Children's Hospital of Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Elizabeth Schorry
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital, University of Cincinnati, CincinnatiOhio
| | - Nicole Ullrich
- Boston Children's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Baetz TD, Fletcher GG, Knight G, McWhirter E, Rajagopal S, Song X, Petrella TM. Systemic adjuvant therapy for adult patients at high risk for recurrent melanoma: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2020; 87:102032. [PMID: 32473511 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is typically treated with wide local excision and, when appropriate, a sentinel node biopsy. Many patients are cured with this approach but for patients who have cancers with high risk features there is a significant risk of local and distant relapse and death. Interferon-based adjuvant therapy was recommended in the past but had modest results with significant toxicity. Recently, new therapies (immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies) have been found to be effective in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma and many of these therapies have been evaluated and found to be effective in the adjuvant treatment of high risk patients with melanoma. This systematic review of adjuvant therapies for cutaneous and mucosal melanoma was conducted for Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) as the basis of a clinical practice guideline to address the question of whether patients with completely resected melanoma should be considered for adjuvant systemic therapy and which adjuvant therapy should be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara D Baetz
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario/Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| | - Glenn G Fletcher
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gregory Knight
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, ON, Canada
| | - Elaine McWhirter
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Xinni Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Teresa M Petrella
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hemstock M, Amadi A, Kupas K, Roskell N, Kotapati S, Gooden K, Middleton MR, Schadendorf D. Indirect treatment comparison of nivolumab versus placebo for the adjuvant treatment of melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2020; 132:176-186. [PMID: 32380428 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Until recently, adjuvant treatment options for stage III and IV resectable melanoma have been limited. Patients were often managed through routine surveillance. The phase III randomised controlled trial (RCT) CheckMate 238 (238) demonstrated the safety and efficacy of nivolumab as an adjuvant treatment for melanoma in patients with stage IIIB/C or IV disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC], 7th edition) versus ipilimumab. The study objective was to estimate the relative efficacy, safety and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between nivolumab and routine surveillance. METHODS Indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) of nivolumab versus placebo were constructed using data from 238 and EORTC 18071. EORTC 18071 is a phase III RCT comparing ipilimumab with placebo in patients with resected stage IIIA-IIIC melanoma (AJCC, 6th edition). ITCs were performed using the Bucher comparison method and patient-level data for efficacy, safety and HRQoL. RESULTS For the efficacy outcomes, nivolumab performed significantly better than placebo for recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.41, 0.68]) and distant metastases-free survival (HR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.44, 0.78]). Safety ITCs indicated that patients receiving nivolumab had a greater hazard of experiencing an adverse event (AE) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, whereas there was a non-significant increased hazard of experiencing a serious AE. HRQoL ITCs showed comparable time to deterioration in 14 of the 15 QLQ-C30 domains; only the dyspnoea domain significantly favoured placebo. CONCLUSION Nivolumab was associated with significantly improved efficacy outcomes versus placebo, whereas maintaining patient's overall HRQoL. Across the different analysis and populations, there was a high level of consistency in the effect size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Katrin Kupas
- Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH & Co. KGaA, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Naderi-Azad S, Sullivan R. The potential of BRAF-targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy in melanoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 20:131-136. [PMID: 32003263 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1724097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and BRAF-targeted therapy have been developed for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. The optimal use of these agents, either in sequence or combination, for the 40-50% of melanoma patients whose tumors harbor a BRAFV600 mutation is unknown, but data from a number of clinical trials, including one randomized Phase II study, are emerging.Areas covered: This review describes the preclinical and clinical rationale for combined BRAF-targeted therapy with immunotherapy, including the known effects of BRAF-targeted therapy on the immune microenvironment, and the clinical trial data from a number of studies.Expert opinion: BRAF-targeted therapy is associated with high response rates in patients with metastatic melanoma but also leads to changes in the tumor microenvironment that may sensitize these tumors to immunotherapy. The early trials of BRAF-targeted therapy with immunotherapy, in particular with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, are encouraging and suggest that some patients may benefit from this treatment approach. However, incorporating these combinations into routine clinical practice requires the read-out from two randomized clinical trials expected in the coming 1-2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryan Sullivan
- Center for Melanoma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Health-related quality of life in patients with fully resected BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma receiving adjuvant vemurafenib. Eur J Cancer 2019; 123:155-161. [PMID: 31704549 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM OF STUDY The aim of the study was to assess the impact of treatment with adjuvant vemurafenib monotherapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with resected stage IIC-IIIC melanoma. METHODS The phase 3 BRIM8 study (NCT01667419) randomised patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive resected stage IIC-IIIC melanoma to 960 mg of vemurafenib twice daily or matching placebo for 52 weeks (13 × 28-day cycles). Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3 at baseline, cycle 1 (days 1, 15 and 22), cycle 2 (days 1 and 15), day 1 of every subsequent 4-week cycle, the end-of-treatment visit and each visit during the follow-up period. RESULTS Completion rates for the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire were high (>80%). There was a mean decline in the global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QOL) score of 17.4 (±22.9) and 17.3 (±24.1) points at days 15 and 22 of cycle 1, respectively, among vemurafenib-treated patients who recovered to approximately 10 points below baseline for the remainder of the treatment period. A similar trend was observed in all functional scales except for cognitive function (<10-point change from baseline at all visits) and in the symptom scores for appetite loss, fatigue and pain. As observed for the GHS/QOL score, all scores rapidly returned to baseline after completion of planned vemurafenib treatment or treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS The schedule of HRQOL assessments allowed for an accurate and complete evaluation of the impact of acute treatment-related symptoms. Vemurafenib-treated patients experience clinically meaningful moderate worsening in some treatment- or disease-related symptoms and GHS/QOL that resolve over time.
Collapse
|
34
|
Huang R, Zeng Z, Li G, Song D, Yan P, Yin H, Hu P, Zhu X, Chang R, Zhang X, Zhang J, Meng T, Huang Z. The Construction and Comprehensive Analysis of ceRNA Networks and Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells in Bone Metastatic Melanoma. Front Genet 2019; 10:828. [PMID: 31608101 PMCID: PMC6774271 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims: As a malignant and melanocytic tumor, cutaneous melanoma is the devastating skin tumor with high rates of recurrence and metastasis. Bone is the common metastatic location, and bone metastasis may result in pathologic fracture, neurologic damage, and severe bone pain. Although metastatic melanoma was reported to get benefits from immunotherapy, molecular mechanisms and immune microenviroment underlying the melanoma bone metastasis and prognostic factors are still unknown. Methods: Gene expression profiling of 112 samples, including 104 primary melanomas and 8 bone metastatic melanomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, was assayed to construct a ceRNA network associated with bone metastases. Besides, we detected the fraction of 22 immune cell types in melanoma via the algorithm of “cell type identification by estimating relative subsets of RNA transcripts (CIBERSORT).” Based on the significant ceRNAs or immune cells, we constructed nomograms to predict the prognosis of patients with melanoma. Ultimately, correlation analysis was implemented to discover the relationship between the significant ceRNA and immune cells to reveal the potential signaling pathways. Results: We constructed a ceRNA network based on the interaction among 8 pairs of long noncoding RNA–microRNA and 15 pairs of microRNA–mRNA. CIBERSORT and ceRNA integration analysis discovered that AL118506.1 has both significant prognostic value (P = 0.002) and high correlation with T follicular helper cells (P = 0.033). Meanwhile, T cells CD8 and macrophages M2 were negatively correlated (P < 0.001). Moreover, we constructed two satisfactory nomograms (area under curve of 3-year survival: 0.899; 5-year survival: 0.885; and concordance index: 0.780) with significant ceRNAs or immune cells, to predict the prognosis of patients. Conclusions: In this study, we suggest that bone metastasis in melanoma might be related to AL118506.1 and its role in regulating thrombospondin 2 and T follicular helper cells. Two nomograms were constructed to predict the prognosis of patients with melanoma and demonstrated their value in improving the personalized management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runzhi Huang
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.,Division of Spine, Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiwei Zeng
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Guangyu Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Dianwen Song
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Penghui Yan
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Huabin Yin
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peng Hu
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaolong Zhu
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ruizhi Chang
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Shanghai East Hospital, Key Laboratory of Arrhythmias, Ministry of Education, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tong Meng
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zongqiang Huang
- Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Smithers BM. Conclusions from quality of life studies in patients with resected high-risk melanoma: one part of the full story. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:611-612. [PMID: 30928621 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30176-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- B Mark Smithers
- Queensland Melanoma Project, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Brisbane 4102, QLD, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|