Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (monarchE): results from a preplanned interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Synergistic effect of bazedoxifene and abemaciclib co‑treatment in triple‑negative breast cancer cells in vitro

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease with the capability of metastasizing quickly. However, treatment options for patients with TNBC still remain limited. CDK4/6 inhibitors have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and are administered for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer subtypes, but not yet for TNBC. Although pre-clinical research is being conducted on their efficacy in treating TNBC, acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors is now a growing clinical problem. One of the identified resistance mechanisms is through the IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway. In the present study, the CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, was tested in combination with the IL-6 inhibitor, bazedoxifene, on human (SUM159 and MDA-MB-231) and murine (4T1) TNBC cell lines. Both abemaciclib and bazedoxifene monotherapies inhibited cell cycle progression and cell viability, migration and invasion, and induced apoptosis; however, the combination treatment exerted a greater effect than either monotherapy. These findings support the concept of CDK4/6 and IL-6 dual inhibition as a novel targeted therapy against TNBC.

Hormones as a double-edged sword: the role of hormones in cancer progression and the potential of targeted hormone therapies

Cancer remains a significant cause of mortality in the world, with increasing prevalence worldwide. There are numerous treatments ranging from surgery to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but since cancer is a heterogeneous disease, only few patients possibly respond to treatments. However, it opens a huge space for the advent of targeted therapies such as hormone therapy, immunotherapy, and target-specific drugs. Hormonal therapy using hormone agonists/antagonists or hormone receptor inhibitors-called the next-generation hormonal agents-hits distinct hormonal pathways that are involved in breast, prostate and ovarian cancer. Preliminary results show that through combination of drugs, it is possible that the synergistic effects may actually lead to better survival than with the use of single drugs. With manageable adverse effects, hormonal therapy offers much hope for treatment of this rather challenging malignancy of the hormone-sensitive cancers, especially in combination with other treatments.

Further Optimizing Care of Patients With Operable Hormone Receptor-Sensitive Breast Cancer

Harmonized global collaborations are crucial to improving outcomes in hormone sensitive operable breast cancer.

Clinical characterization, prognostic, and predictive values of HER2-low in patients with early breast cancer in the PALLAS trial (ABCSG-42/AFT-05/BIG-14-13/PrE0109)

BACKGROUND

Bidirectional crosstalk between HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) pathways may influence outcomes and the efficacy of endocrine therapy (ET). Low HER2 expression levels (HER2-low) have emerged as a predictive biomarker in patients with breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

PALLAS is an open, international, phase 3 study evaluating the addition of palbociclib for 2 years to adjuvant ET in patients with stage II-III ER-positive/HER2-negative BC. To assess the impact of HER2 expression on patient outcomes in the phase III PALLAS trial, we analyzed (1) the association between rate of HER2-low with demographic and clinicopathological parameters, (2) the prognostic value of HER2-low status on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS) and (3) HER2 expression's value as a predictive biomarker of response to palbociclib. HER2-low was defined as HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1 + or IHC 2 + with negative in situ hybridization (ISH). All pathologic evaluation was performed locally. Prognostic and predictive power of HER2 were assessed with Cox models.

RESULTS

From the original PALLAS intention-to-treat population (N = 5753), 5304 patients (92.2%) were included in this analysis. Among these, 2254 patients (42.5%) were classified as having HER2 IHC 0 (HER2-0), and 3050 (57.5%) as having HER2-low disease (1838 with IHC 1 + and 1212 with IHC 2 +). Median follow-up was 59.8 months. HER2-low prevalence varied significantly across 21 participating countries (range 16.7% to 75.6%; p < 0.001) and was more frequent in patients enrolled in North America (63.1%) than in Europe (53.4%) or other regions (53.4%) (p < 0.001). HER2 status was not significantly associated with iDFS in a multivariable Cox model (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.81 - 1.06). No significant interaction was observed between treatment arm and HER2 status for iDFS (p = 0.43). Similar results were obtained for DRFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, prospective, global patient cohort, no differences were observed in clinical parameters, prognosis, or differential benefit from palbociclib between HER2-0 and HER2-low tumors. Significant geographic variability was observed in the prevalence of HER2-low status, suggesting a high degree of variation in pathologic assessment of HER2 expression without impact on outcomes.

The epidemiology, treatments and outcomes of patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node-positive early breast cancer in Taiwan

Aim: Estimate patient counts, treatment patterns and outcomes of a subset of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) presenting with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node positive features, who are at high-risk of recurrence, in Taiwan.Materials & methods: Data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2020 were analyzed.Results: There were 4500 patients with high-risk EBC (10.4% of all patients with EBC) from 2012 to 2018, with an annual average incidence of 643 that increased over time. Five-year progression was 24.8% in patients with high-risk EBC and 8-year survival was low (69.6%).Conclusion: Patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node positive high-risk EBC clinical features are an increasing high-risk subset of all patients with EBC.

Updates in Systemic Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Hormone-receptor positive (HR +) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative early breast cancer (eBC) is a heterogeneous disease with several contributing factors for increased risk of recurrence, including tumor features, individual biomarkers, and genomic risk. The current standard approach in the management of HR + /HER2neg eBC includes chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (ET), and additional therapies based on risk profile, menopausal status, and genetics are sometimes appropriate. The risk of recurrence is more pronounced in patients with high-risk eBC including large tumor size, nodal involvement, high proliferative index, and genetic predisposition. In premenopausal patients with high-risk eBC, ovarian function suppression in combination with adjuvant ET improves survival. In postmenopausal patients, extended aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy can be considered. Recent trials have identified novel treatment approaches to reduce the risk of recurrence in high-risk HR + /HER2neg eBC including the addition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors to adjuvant ET. For patients with germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, adjuvant poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been shown to improve overall survival (OS). However, despite these recent advances, the risk of recurrence remains substantial, highlighting an area of unmet need. There are several ongoing clinical trials further investigating the role of CDK 4/6 inhibitors and immunotherapy in high-risk HR + /HER2neg eBC.

Patient-reported outcome and survival in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients at moderate to high risk: comparing toremifene with aromatase inhibitor in a real-world study

Toremifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is commonly used in China for premenopausal breast cancer patients. This real-world study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) and survival between toremifene and aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) in patients with moderate-/high-risk premenopausal hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. The primary endpoint was PROs, assessed using SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires between January and March 2023. A total of 392 patients were included, with 171 receiving toremifene and 221 receiving AI. The toremifene group showed significantly higher scores in the role physical (p = 0.034) and mental health (p = 0.009) dimensions of SF-36 and lower anxiety/depression (AD) scores (p = 0.038) in EQ-5D-5L compared to AI group. The estimated 5- and 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were similar in toremifene and AI groups: 96.5% versus 91.9%, and 87.4% versus 87.8% (p = 0.39), respectively. Adverse event rates were similar in two groups, except for a greater risk of endometrial thickening (p < 0.001) and a lower occurrence of morning stiffness (p < 0.001) in the toremifene compared to the AI group. Premenopausal HR-positive breast cancer patients receiving toremifene plus OFS had better role physical and mental health outcomes and lower AD dimensions than those receiving AI plus OFS. Both treatments had comparable DFS and favorable tolerability profiles.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy choices in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: Insights from the prospective GIM23-POSTER study

BACKGROUND

Most premenopausal patients with early breast cancer (eBC) are diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive disease and therefore candidate for adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) 23-POSTER (GIM23) is a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in 26 Italian institutions, aiming to evaluate ET choices for premenopausal patients affected by hormone receptor-positive eBC in a real-world setting. Here we report also the results in terms of type of ET prescribed according to the definition of high-risk patients by monarchE and NATALEE trials.

RESULTS

Between October 2019 and June 2022, 600 premenopausal patients were included, with a median age of 46 years. Almost half (271, 45.2 %) of the patients had stage I disease, while 254 (42.3 %) and 60 (10.0 %) patients had stage II and III, respectively. Overall, 149 (25.1 %) patients received tamoxifen alone, 83 (14.0 %) tamoxifen with ovarian function suppression (OFS), while 361 (60.9 %) received aromatase inhibitor (AI) with OFS. Patients treated with AI and OFS had higher number of metastatic axillary nodes, higher grade and more often received chemotherapy (all p < 0.001). According to the inclusion criteria of the monarchE and NATALEE trials, 81 patients (15.6 %) were considered high-risk for the monarchE and received AI with OFS in 88.9 % of the cases, while 231 patients (44.4 %) were considered high-risk for the NATALEE trial and received AI with OFS in 74.5 % of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

AI with OFS is the most prescribed adjuvant ET among premenopausal patients, especially in the presence of high-risk features.

Questionnaire survey and analysis of drug clinical research implementation capabilities of breast cancer treatment departments in Chinese hospitals

BACKGROUND

Clinical research competence determines the quality of clinical research and the reliability of research findings. We aimed to explore the clinical research implementation capabilities of breast cancer treatment departments in China.

METHODS

This was a department-based cross-sectional study conducted in the form of electronic questionnaires on the Wenjuanxing platform from 7th August to 31st August 2023 among hospitals from the first batch of breast cancer standardized diagnosis and treatment quality control pilot centers in China.

RESULTS

A total of 127 questionnaires from 122 hospitals were ultimately included in the analysis. Medical personnel involved in the clinical research of 118 (92.9 %) departments received good clinical practice (GCP) training. The steps of the approval process from research initiation to completion lasted 2-4 weeks or longer. The majority of departments initiated or participated in 2 or fewer clinical research projects over the past year. Among the differences between different departments, the Department of Medical Oncology had a better qualification profile and process and greater number of initiated and participated clinical studies than did the Department of Surgical Oncology. For needs and problems, most of the departments were strongly willing to undertake clinical research and receive professional training; the most common problem in the process of conducting studies was patient recruitment.

CONCLUSIONS

Most departments generally exhibited complete capabilities for implementing clinical research. Improvements in implementation efficiency, quality of research and patient recruitment are still needed. Professional training and communication, as well as the recommendation of clinical research, are required in future development.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The combination of cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and endocrine therapy is the standard treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. However, the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in early breast cancer remains controversial.

Methods

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer. A systematic review of Cochrane, PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted. The efficacy endpoints of adjuvant therapy were invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), overall survival (OS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS). The efficacy endpoint included complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA) and complete pathologic response (PCR) with neoadjuvant therapy. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were assessed as safety outcomes.

Results

Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the study. CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy showed a significant improvement in IDFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.68-0.97, P = 0.024), but not DRFS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.56-1.29, P = 0.106) or OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.77-1.19, P = 0.692) in adjuvant therapy. In the neoadjuvant therapy setting, CDK4/6 inhibitors improved CCCA compared with the control group (RR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.33-3.26, P = 0.001). The risk of 3/4 grade AEs increased significantly with the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy.

Conclusion

The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients significantly improved IDFS in adjuvant therapy and CCCA in neoadjuvant. However, CDK4/6 inhibitors also showed significant toxicities during therapy.

Systematic Review Registration

Identifier CRD42024530704.

Oral SERDs changing the scenery in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Primary and acquired endocrine resistance remains a major issue in the treatment of hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Acquired resistance often results from estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations leading to estrogen independent estrogen receptor activation. Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) induce degradation of this receptor, thereby overcoming this resistance. The intramuscular administration and modest efficacy of fulvestrant, the first SERD, triggered development of oral, more potent SERDs. This narrative review gives an overview of the current evidence regarding this new drug class.

METHODS

Medline/PubMed and Embase database were screened using a systematic search strategy. We assessed the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium abstract reports, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting resources by applying the following terms: 'SERD', 'giredestrant', 'elacestrant', 'imlunestrant', 'amcenestrant', 'camizestrant' and 'rintodestrant'.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov was consulted to include ongoing trials.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 1191 articles. After screening, 108 articles were retained. In the phase 3 EMERALD trial, elacestrant demonstrated benefit in progression free survival (PFS) in second line metastatic disease in postmenopausal women or men, leading to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval for the ESR1 mutated population. This PFS advantage was more pronounced among patients who had priorly received at least 12 months of a cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). In the phase 2 SERENA-2 trial, camizestrant improved PFS as second line treatment. However, trials of giredestrant and amcenestrant failed to show PFS benefit in second line metastatic setting. In the preoperative setting, several oral SERDs resulted in a significant reduction of tumoral proliferation. Furthermore, many trials are still in progress.

CONCLUSION

Oral SERDs constitute an exciting new drug class. Ongoing and future research will further refine the role of these drugs next to standard endocrine treatments and targeted therapies.

Abemaciclib increases the risk of venous thromboembolism in breast cancer: Integrate meta-analysis, pharmacovigilance database analysis, and in vitro validation

BACKGROUND

Recently, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have emerged as a novel treatment strategy for breast cancer. However, increasing reports of CDK4/6i-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) have garnered attention. This study assessed CDK4/6i-associated VTE in breast cancer, and examined the effect of CDK4/6i on platelet/coagulation function for the first time in vitro.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies published from the establishment of the database to December 31, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies of CDK4/6i in patients with breast cancer, and the data obtained from the included studies were used for meta-analysis. A disproportionality analysis by extracting adverse drug reaction signals of CDK4/6i-associated VTE from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was also conducted. Additionally, the in vitro effect of CDK4/6i on platelet function was assessed based on platelet aggregation tests and flow cytometry, and coagulation function was assessed based on the blood clotting function test.

FINDINGS

A total of 16,903 patients in 13 RCTs and 6,490 patients in 9 real-world studies were included in the meta-analysis. In RCTs, VTE occurred in 193 (2.1 %) and 55 (0.7 %) patients in the CDK4/6i and control groups, respectively. In real-world studies, the aggregate incidence rate of VTE was 4.2 % (95 % CI: 2.1, 6.3). The meta-analysis of RCTs revealed that abemaciclib (Odds ratio [OR]: 4.40 [95 % CI: 2.74,7.05], p < 0.001) and palbociclib (OR: 2.35 [95 % CI: 1.34, 4.12], p < 0.01) significantly increased the risk of VTE in patients with breast cancer compared to placebo. FAERS database analysis revealed that abemaciclib (reporting odds ratio [ROR]: 1.63 [95 % CI: 1.36, 1.97]; IC025: 0.67) and ribociclib (ROR: 1.17 [95 % CI: 1.0, 1.39]; IC025: 0.18) demonstrated a significantly increased signal of VTE. Similarly, findings from in vitro experiments demonstrated that abemaciclib enhanced agonist-induced platelet activation, especially when collagen was used as the inducer, and this effect became more prominent with increasing its concentration.

INTERPRETATION

Use of abemaciclib may increase the risk of VTE in patients with breast cancer, which may be partially attributed to the effect of abemaciclib on platelet function. Close monitoring of VTE occurrence is highly recommended while using abemaciclib, especially in patients at a high risk of VTE.

Adjuvant treatment strategy evolution and risk stratification for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative early breast cancer in China

BACKGROUND

Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC) with high-risk clinicopathological features face an increased risk of recurrence. This study explored the evolving treatment landscape and clinical outcomes in patients with EBC using a nationwide database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study cohort comprised HR+/HER2-, stages 1-3, patients with EBC who underwent surgery and received adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) from January 2013 to March 2021. High-risk patients were defined by ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1-3 positive lymph node(s) with at least one high-risk feature (histologic grade 3, tumor size ≥5 cm, or Ki-67 ≥20%). A low-risk cohort included patients not meeting the criteria. Survival analysis was conducted with a cutoff of September 2021.

RESULTS

The study included 4088 eligible patients (1310 high-risk patients and 2778 low-risk patients). High-risk patients were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared to low-risk patients. From 2013 to 2021, an increasing proportion of patients received aromatase inhibitors and ovarian function suppression as part of their AET. The 2-, 5-, and 7-year invasive disease-free survival for high-risk cohort were 90.67%, 75.26%, and 57.10%, respectively, these rates were notably higher for low-risk cohort at 97.14%, 89.85%, and 84.83%. High-risk patients demonstrated a higher risk of recurrence or death compared with low-risk patients (hazard ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.82-3.12).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of standard or even intensive AET, patients with EBC with high-risk features still present high recurrence risk, highlighting the urgent need for innovative adjuvant treatment strategies.

Abemaciclib Therapy Using the MonarchE Criteria Results in Large Numbers of Excess Axillary Node Clearances-Time to Pause and Reflect?

The monarchE study added the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib to the care of women with oestrogen-positive (ER+) breast cancers. Eligibility required meeting monarchE criteria-either >3 positive axillary nodes, or 1-3 positive sentinel nodes (SNB+) with tumour size >50 mm or grade 3 cancers. Women were advised to proceed to completion axillary node clearance (cANC) if size/grade criteria were not fulfilled for >3 positive nodes to be identified. However, cANC is associated with significant morbidity, conflicting with the potential benefits of abemaciclib. We analysed data of 229 consecutive women (2016-2022) with ER+ breast cancer and SNB+ who proceeded to cANC, keeping with contemporary treatment guidelines. We used this cohort to assess numbers that, under national guidance in place currently, would be advised to undergo cANC solely to check eligibility for abemaciclib treatment. Using monarchE criteria, 90 women (39%) would have accessed abemaciclib based on SNB+ and size/grade, without cANC. In total, 139 women would have been advised to proceed to cANC to check eligibility, with only 15/139 (11%) having >3 positive nodes after sentinel node biopsy and cANC. The remaining 124 (89%) would have undergone cANC but remained ineligible for abemaciclib. Size, age, grade, and Ki67 did not predict >3 nodes at cANC. Following cANC, a large majority of women with ER+, <50 mm, and grade 1-2 tumours remain ineligible for abemaciclib yet are subject to significant morbidity including lifelong lymphoedema risk. The monarchE authors state that 15 women need abemaciclib therapy for 1 to clinically benefit. Thus, in our cohort, 139 women undergoing cANC would lead to one woman benefitting.

Individualized prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Chinese breast cancer patients with ≥ 3 positive sentinel lymph nodes based on machine-learning algorithms

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is a standard procedure for early-stage breast cancer (BC) patients with three or more positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). However, ALND can lead to significant postoperative complications without always providing additional clinical benefits. This study aims to develop machine-learning (ML) models to predict non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis in Chinese BC patients with three or more positive SLNs, potentially allowing the omission of ALND.

METHODS

Data from 2217 BC patients who underwent SLN biopsy at Shantou University Medical College were analyzed, with 634 having positive SLNs. Patients were categorized into those with ≤ 2 positive SLNs and those with ≥ 3 positive SLNs. We applied nine ML algorithms to predict non-SLN metastasis. Model performance was evaluated using ROC curves, precision-recall curves, and calibration curves. Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) assessed the clinical utility of the models.

RESULTS

The RF model showed superior predictive performance, achieving an AUC of 0.987 in the training set and 0.828 in the validation set. Key predictive features included size of positive SLNs, tumor size, number of SLNs, and ER status. In external validation, the RF model achieved an AUC of 0.870, demonstrating robust predictive capabilities.

CONCLUSION

The developed RF model accurately predicts non-SLN metastasis in BC patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs, suggesting that ALND might be avoided in selected patients by applying additional axillary radiotherapy. This approach could reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve patient quality of life. Further validation in prospective clinical trials is warranted.

Mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance to CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treatment

Cell cycle dysregulation is a hallmark of cancer that promotes eccessive cell division. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) are key molecules in the G1-to-S phase cell cycle transition and are crucial for the onset, survival, and progression of breast cancer (BC). Small-molecule CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) block phosphorylation of tumor suppressor Rb and thus restrain susceptible BC cells in G1 phase. Three CDK4/6i are approved for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) BC in combination with endocrine therapy (ET). Though this has improved the clinical outcomes for survival of BC patients, there is no established standard next-line treatment to tackle drug resistance. Recent studies suggest that CDK4/6i can modulate other distinct effects in both BC and breast stromal compartments, which may provide new insights into aspects of their clinical activity. This review describes the biochemistry of the CDK4/6-Rb-E2F pathway in HR+ BC, then discusses how CDK4/6i can trigger other effects in BC/breast stromal compartments, and finally outlines the mechanisms of CDK4/6i resistance that have emerged in recent preclinical studies and clinical cohorts, emphasizing the impact of these findings on novel therapeutic opportunities in BC.

The REMAR (Rhein-Main-Registry) real-world study: prospective evaluation of the 21-gene breast recurrence score® assay in addition to Ki-67 for adjuvant treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

Ki-67 is recommended by international/national guidelines for risk stratification in early breast cancer (EBC), particularly for defining "intermediate risk," despite inter-laboratory/inter-observer variability and cutoff uncertainty. We investigated Ki-67 (> 10%- < 40%, determined locally) as a prognostic marker for intermediate/high risk in EBC, pN0-1 patients.

METHODS

This prospective, non-interventional, real-world study included females ≥ 18 years, with pN0/pN1mi/pN1, HR+ , HER2-negative EBC, and locally determined Ki-67 ranging 10%-40%. The primary outcome was changes in treatment recommendations after disclosing the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score®(RS) assay result.

RESULTS

The analysis included 567 patients (median age, 57 [range, 29-83] years; 70%/1%/29%/ with pN0/pN1mi/pN1 disease; 81% and 19% with RS results 0-25 and 26-100, respectively). The correlations between local and central Ki-67, local Ki-67, and the RS, and central Ki-67 and the RS results were weak (r = 0.35, r = 0.3, and r = 0.46, respectively), and discrepancies were noted in both directions (e.g., local Ki-67 was lower or higher than central Ki-67). After disclosing the RS, treatment recommendations changed for 190 patients (34%). Changes were observed in pN0 and pN1mi/pN1 patients and in patients with centrally determined Ki-67 ≤ 10% and > 10%. Treatment changes were aligned with RS results (adding chemotherapy for patients with higher RS results, omitting it for lower RS results), and their net result was 8% reduction in adjuvant chemotherapy use (from 32% pre-RS results to 24% post-RS results).

CONCLUSION

The Oncotype DX® assay is a tool for individualizing treatments that adds to classic treatment decision factors. The RS result and Ki-67 are not interchangeable, and Ki-67, as well as nodal status, should not be used as gatekeepers for testing eligibility, to avoid under and overtreatment.

Prognostic impact of selection criteria of current adjuvant endocrine therapy trials NATALEE and monarchE in postmenopausal HRpos/HER2neg breast cancer patients treated with upfront letrozole

BACKGROUND

The monarchE and NATALEE trials demonstrated the benefit of CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) therapy in adjuvant breast cancer (BC) treatment. Patient selection, based on clinical characteristics, delineated those at high (monarchE) and high/intermediate recurrence risk (NATALEE). This study employed a historical patient cohort to describe the proportion and prognosis of patients eligible for adjuvant CDK4/6i trials.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2011, 3529 patients were enrolled in the adjuvant PreFace clinical trial (NCT01908556). Eligibility criteria included postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HRpos) BC for whom a five-year upfront therapy with letrozole was indicated. Patients were categorized into prognostic groups according to monarchE and NATALEE inclusion criteria, and their invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 2891 HRpos patients, 384 (13.3 %) met the primary monarchE inclusion criteria. The majority (n = 261) qualified due to having ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes. For NATALEE, 915 out of 2886 patients (31.7 %) met the eligibility criteria, with 126 patients (13.7 %) being node-negative. Patients from monarchE with ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes and NATALEE with stage III BC exhibited the poorest prognosis (3-year iDFS rate 0.87). Patients ineligible for the trials demonstrated prognoses similar to the most favorable patient groups within the eligibility criteria.

CONCLUSION

Patient populations eligible for monarchE and NATALEE trials differed. Nearly a third of the postmenopausal HRpos population, previously under upfront letrozole treatment, met the NATALEE prognostic eligibility criteria. As certain eligible groups had a prognosis similar to non-eligible patients, it might be interesting to explore additional patient groups for CDK4/6i therapy.

Completion axillary lymph node dissection for the identification of pN2-3 status as an indication for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised, phase 3 SENOMAC trial

BACKGROUND

In luminal breast cancer, adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors (eg, abemaciclib) improve invasive disease-free survival. In patients with T1-2, grade 1-2 tumours, and one or two sentinel lymph node metastases, completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) is the only prognostic tool available that can reveal four or more nodal metastases (pN2-3), which is the only indication for adjuvant abemaciclib in this setting. However, this technique can lead to substantial arm morbidity in patients. We aimed to pragmatically describe the potential benefit and harm of this strategy on the individual patient level in patients from the ongoing SENOMAC trial.

METHODS

In the randomised, phase 3, SENOMAC trial, patients aged 18 years or older, of any performance status, with clinically node-negative T1-T3 breast cancer and one or two sentinel node macrometastases from 67 sites in five European countries (Denmark, Germany, Greece, Italy, and Sweden) were randomly assigned (1:1), via permutated block randomisation (random block size of 2 and 4) stratified by country, to either cALND or its omission (ie, they had a sentinel lymph node biopsy only). The primary outcome is overall survival, which is yet to be reported. In this post-hoc analysis, patients from the SENOMAC per-protocol population, with luminal oestrogen-receptor positive, HER2-negative, T1-2, histological grade 1-2 breast cancer, with tumour size of 5 cm or smaller were selected to match the characteristics of cohort 1 of the monarchE trial who would only have an indication for adjuvant abemaciclib if found to have 4 or more nodal metastases. The primary study objective was to determine the number of patients who developed patient-reported severe or very severe impairment of physical arm function after cALND (as measured by the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health [Lymph-ICF] Questionnaire) 1 year after surgery to avoid one invasive disease-free survival event at 5 years with 2 years of adjuvant abemaciclib, using invasive disease-free survival event data from cohort 1 of the monarchE trial. The SENOMAC trial is registered with ClincialTrials.gov, NCT02240472, and is closed to accrual and ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 31, 2015, and Dec 31, 2021, 2766 patients were enrolled in SENOMAC and randomly assigned to cALND (n=1384) or sentinel node biopsy only (n=1382), of whom 2540 were included in the per-protocol population. 1705 (67%) of 2540 patients met this post-hoc study's eligibility criteria, of whom 802 (47%) had a cALND and 903 (53%) had a sentinel lymph node biopsy only. Median age at randomisation was 62 years (IQR 52-71), 1699 (>99%) of 1705 patients were female, and six (<1%) were male. Among 1342 patients who responded to questionnaires, after a median follow-up of 45·2 months (IQR 25·6-59·8; data cutoff Nov 17, 2023), patient-reported severe or very severe impairment of physical arm function was reported in 84 (13%) of 634 patients who had cALND versus 30 (4%) of 708 who had sentinel lymph node biopsy only (χ2 test p<0·0001). To avoid one invasive disease-free survival event at 5 years with adjuvant abemaciclib, cALND would need to be performed in 104 patients, and would result in nine patients having severe or very severe impairment of physical arm function 1 year after surgery.

INTERPRETATION

As a method to potentially identify an indication for abemaciclib, and subsequently avoid invasive disease-free survival events at 5 years with 2 years of adjuvant abemaciclib, cALND carries a substantial risk of severe or very severe arm morbidity and so cALND should be discouraged for this purpose.

FUNDING

Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Cancer Society, the Nordic Cancer Union, and the Swedish Breast Cancer Association.

Revisiting ovarian function suppression with GnRH agonists for premenopausal women with breast cancer: Who should use and the impact on survival outcomes

Breast cancer diagnosed in premenopausal women tends to be more aggressive and the benefit of ovarian function suppression (OFS), at least in certain groups of patients, is well known. There is hesitancy in using OFS in some groups of patients who may otherwise benefit from the treatment. For instance, it is clear that in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), high-risk, early-stage breast cancer, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) should be given in the adjuvant setting; however, confusion remains whether premenopausal patients with intermediate-risk disease benefit from GnRHa, given the lack of consensus on its definition in guidelines and clinical practice. Most recent evidence on the long-term efficacy of GnRHa, with up to 20-years of follow-up, reinforced its benefits in premenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer. In this comprehensive review, we reviewed the long-term efficacy in terms of improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for early-stage HR+ breast cancer and examined evidence from multiple randomized clinical studies to identify the clinicopathological characteristics that correlated with improved DFS and OS with the addition of OFS to adjuvant endocrine therapy. Other aspects of GnRHa, including its efficacy in advanced breast cancer, safety profile, evidence in ovarian function preservation, and the advantages of long-acting formulations were also discussed. By addressing the existing gaps and grey areas regarding the inclusion of OFS as a crucial treatment component for premenopausal breast cancer patients, physicians are more aware of who to administer and the potential impact on survival outcomes.

Practical Guidance on Abemaciclib in Combination with Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Treating Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative High-Risk Early Breast Cancer

The most common subtype of breast cancer is hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, accounting for 65-70% of all breast cancer cases diagnosed in the United States. Until 2015, single-agent endocrine therapy (ET) was the recommended first-line treatment for metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. However, the paradigm has since shifted, as targeted therapy is now recommended in combination with ET. The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this breast cancer subtype, and combining either palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib with ET is now the standard first-line treatment for metastatic disease. Results of clinical trials in the metastatic setting have demonstrated that treatment with the combination of a CDK4/6 inhibitor and ET rather than ET alone is associated with longer overall survival, longer progression-free survival, and better objective response rates. Each of the CDK4/6 inhibitors has been investigated in combination with ET in patients with early-stage HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who are at high risk of relapse. In October 2021, abemaciclib was the first CDK4/6 inhibitor approved in combination with ET by the US Food and Drug Administration for adjuvant treatment of patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer. Herein, we provide practical guidance on the use of abemaciclib in combination with ET for HR-positive, HER2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer to assist clinicians in their day-to-day practice, and we review clinically relevant topics of dosing, side effect management, sequencing and optimal timing for initiation, and patient selection.

Real-World Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients Qualifying for Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib and ribociclib improved disease-free survival (DFS) added to endocrine therapy in hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC), in monarchE (NCT03155997) and NATALEE (NCT03701334) trials respectively. We assessed the proportion and outcome of EBC patients qualifying for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in the real-world.

METHODS

Consecutive female patients with HR-positive HER2-negative EBC between 1997 and 2017 from the Australian Capital Territory and South-East New South Wales Breast Cancer Treatment Group registry were analyzed. Patients eligible for abemaciclib had ≥4 axillary nodes involved or 1-3 nodes plus primary >5 cm or grade 3. Ribociclib eligibility was defined as node-positive and node-negative with primary >5 cm or >2 cm grade 3.

RESULTS

Of 3840 patients, 671 (17.5%) were abemaciclib-eligible and 1587 (41.3%) ribociclib-eligible . The 5-year DFS was 77% and 94% in abemaciclib-eligible and noneligible registry patients respectively (HR 2.6, 95% CI 2.26-3.05, P < .001). The 5-year DFS was 86% and 97% in ribociclib-eligible and noneligible registry patients respectively (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.67-2.19, P < .001). Compared with monarchE trial patients, abemaciclib-eligible registry patients were older (median 55 years in registry vs. 51 years in trial), with lower nodal burden (≥4 nodes in 44% in registry vs. 60% in trial). There were more stage III cancers in NATALEE trial patients (60%) than ribociclib-eligible registry patients (24%).

CONCLUSIONS

Many women with EBC will qualify for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors (17.5% abemaciclib, 41.3% ribociclib) with resource and workforce implications. In the real-world setting, a greater proportion of adjuvant CDK4/6-eligible patients have lower stage disease, therefore the absolute benefit from treatment may be smaller than estimated by the trials.

Real-world experience of abemaciclib for adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer is the most common subtype. Abemaciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6, was approved to reduce risk of recurrence in high-risk, HR+, HER2-, early breast cancer based on the monarchE trial. The most common adverse events reported in monarchE were diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue. Real-world tolerability data and incidence of adverse events with abemaciclib in the adjuvant setting versus the metastatic setting is lacking.

DATA SOURCES

This is a retrospective analysis of HR+, HER2- breast cancer patients on abemaciclib from March 2018 to September 2021 at Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center in Chicago, Illinois. Incidence, grade of adverse events, dose reductions, and discontinuations were evaluated in patients taking abemaciclib in the adjuvant setting and the metastatic setting.

DATA SUMMARY

Of the 30 patients included in this analysis, 100% experienced an adverse event of any grade. During treatment, 12.5% treated in the adjuvant setting and 35.7% in the metastatic setting experienced grade ≥3 adverse events. Adverse events leading to discontinuation of abemaciclib occurred in 18.8% of patients in the adjuvant setting and 57.1% in the metastatic setting.

CONCLUSIONS

This data suggests abemaciclib is better tolerated in high-risk, HR+, HER2-, node-positive, early breast cancer treated in the adjuvant setting compared to the metastatic setting. Management of adverse events is crucial to help patients stay on therapy to improve clinical outcomes. Real-world tolerability of abemaciclib in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings is of importance.

Real-world prevalence, treatment and survival of "high risk" early breast cancer, with mandatory testing of gBRCA1/2 mutation according to the OlympiA trial inclusion criteria: Data from a population-based registry

BACKGROUND

The results of the OlympiA study led to the approval of a PARP inhibitor (olaparib) as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer (eBC) at high risk of relapse in patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). However, the proportion of patients in routine practice who meet the "high-risk" criteria applied in the OlympiA study, and for whom gBRCAm testing would now be mandatory, remains unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this population-based study, we use unique data from the French specialized Côte d'Or Breast and Gynecological Cancer Registry, to assess the real-life proportion, and long-term prognosis of patients treated for eBC between 2005 and 2015 with standard treatment, and at "high risk" of relapse according to the OlympiA trial criteria.

RESULTS

We included 3483 patients treated for HER2-negative eBC (N = 380 with ER-, and N = 3103 with ER + tumor). We found N = 62 (1.8 %) patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations. A total of 494 patients (14.2 %) were classified as "high risk" according to the Olympia criteria; 55 % with ER-tumors, and 9.1 % with ER + tumors, respectively. Despite more intensive systemic treatments in "high risk" patients, 10-year overall survival was much worse in these "high risk" patients compared to the others: 60.1 % vs 83.8 % in ER-tumors, and 55.4 % vs 84.1 % in ER + tumors. Our estimates of net survival show an even greater difference.

CONCLUSION

This study provides real-life insights into the prevalence and prognosis of patients with high-risk eBC, in a context where the approval of adjuvant olaparib requires careful reorganization of care, so as not to overlook a patient with gBRCAm who could benefit from adjuvant olaparib.

Parp-inhibitors in the therapeutic landscape of breast cancer patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic germline variants: An Italian consensus paper and critical review

The introduction of PARP inhibitors has revolutionized the management and treatment of patients with pathogenic germline variants of BRCA1/2 who have developed breast cancer. The implementation of PARP inhibitors in clinical settings can be challenging due to their overlapping indications with other drugs, including both recently approved medications and those with proven efficacy. This study utilized the Delphi method to present the first Italian consensus regarding genetic testing, the use of PARP inhibitors in both early and metastatic settings, and strategies for managing the potential toxicity of these novel drugs. The Panel unanimously agreed on various issues, including the timing, techniques, and patient characteristics for BRCA1/2 genetic testing, andthe appropriate placement of PARP inhibitors in the treatment algorithm for both early and advanced breast cancer. Nevertheless, some areas of divergence became evident, particularly regarding the use of axillary surgery for therapeutic purposes and the application of hormone replacement therapy in cases of bilateral mastectomy and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for patients treated for triple negative breast cancer. Additional research is needed in these particular domains to improve the care of patients with breast cancer who bear an increased genetic risk.

Comment on Giraudo et al. The Use of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: What Do We Know? Cancers 2024, 16, 1838

In "The Use of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: What Do We Know [...].

Comparative analysis of adverse events associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors based on FDA's adverse event reporting system: a case control pharmacovigilance study

BACKGROUND

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors marked a milestone in the breast cancer treatment. Due to the potential impact of adverse effects on treatment decisions and patient outcomes, careful consideration of the varying toxicities of CDK4/6 inhibitors is crucial, as three inhibitors-palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib-have been approved with differences in adverse event profiles. However, limitations in clinical trials call for urgent real-world safety studies to evaluate and compare the risk of adverse events (AEs) among these CDK4/6 inhibitors. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors and provide insights for clinical drug selection, using real world database.

METHODS

The AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (2015-2022) were analyzed. Four disproportionality methods were used to detect safety signals: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian Confidence Neural Network Propagation, and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. Venn analysis was used to compare and select common and specific AEs.

RESULTS

This study included 73,042 patients treated with palbociclib, 25,142 with ribociclib, and 7563 with abemaciclib. All three inhibitors had 27 common AEs. Palbociclib exhibited the highest ROR for hematologic toxicities, while ribociclib showed the highest ROR for macrocytosis, nail disorders, and hepatic lesions. Abemaciclib displayed the highest ROR for mucosal toxicity. Common signals for both palbociclib and ribociclib included hematologic toxicities, decreased immune responsiveness, and aphthous ulcers. Myelosuppression, oral pain, and pseudocirrhosis were common signals for palbociclib and abemaciclib. Anemia, hepatotoxicity, and pneumonitis were observed as common signals for ribociclib and abemaciclib. Furthermore, specific AEs associated with palbociclib included fatigue, alopecia, and stomatitis. For ribociclib, specific AEs included electrocardiogram QT prolongation, thrombocytopenia, and decreased hemoglobin. Abemaciclib was specifically linked to diarrhea, vomiting, and interstitial lung disease.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis revealed that palbociclib showed a higher risk of hematologic toxicity. Ribociclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and QT prolongation. Abemaciclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal effects, interstitial lung disease, and thrombosis. These findings provide valuable insights for CDK4/6 inhibitor selection.

Impact of neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis in patients with hormone-receptor positive / HER2-negative breast cancer: A propensity score matching population-based study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this population-based cohort study was to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared to adjuvant chemotherapy in prognosis among patients with HR+/HER2 negative breast cancer.

METHOD

This population-based study utilized data from the research database BCBaSe 3.0, based on the Swedish National Quality breast cancer register, including all patients with breast cancer diagnosis in Sweden between 2008 and 2019. Propensity score matching approach was applied. The outcomes of interest consisted of distant-disease free (DDFS), breast-cancer specific (BCSS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 14 459 patients were included in the study cohort of whom 2086 received NACT. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 1539 patients in each study group were available for analyses. No statistically significant difference in survival outcomes were observed between patients treated with NACT compared to those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (Hazard Ratio (HR) for DDFS: 1.20; 95 % CI: 0.80-1.79; HR for BCSS: 1.16; 95 % CI: 0.54-2.49; HR for OS: 1.14; 95 % CI: 0.64-2.05).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based cohort study of patients with HR+/HER2-breast cancer, the use of NACT seems to be comparable to adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of prognosis, although non-inferiority cannot be proven by this study design. Until further evidence suggesting a survival benefit in favor of either treatment is available, NACT can be pursued when surgical-de-escalation is intended.

CDK4/6 inhibitors as adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer? Uncertain benefits, guaranteed harms

CDK4/6 inhibitors are oral agents inhibiting key molecules of the cell cycle regulation. In patients with endocrine receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer, the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy is an effective treatment in the metastatic setting. Now, two studies in the adjuvant setting - MonarchE (2 years of abemaciclib) and NATALEE (3 years of ribociclib) - report positive invasive disease-free survival. Here, we re-evaluate these seminal trials. First, an excess drop-out or loss-to-follow up occurred early in the control arms of both studies. Since both trials are open-label, there is concern that the patients who drop-out do not do so at random but based on socioeconomic factors and alternative options. Is it possible that the results merely appear favorable due to loss to follow up? Based on re-constructed Kaplan-Meier curves, we concluded the results of these studies remain fragile, being prone to informative censoring. Secondly, adverse events were notably higher in both trials, and some of them, like COVID-19 related deaths in NATALEE, raise serious concerns. Third, the potential costs associated with CDK4/6 inhibition given as adjuvant therapy are unprecedented. The NATALEE strategy, in particular, could affect up to 35 % of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, which is the cancer with the highest incidence worldwide. Without confirmatory data based on a placebo-controlled trial, or better identification of patients that would benefit from the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant setting, we argue against their routine use as adjuvant therapy in ER+ /HER2- early breast cancer.

Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results of MONARCH 3

BACKGROUND

In MONARCH 2, the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) with disease progression on prior endocrine therapy. In MONARCH 3, the addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- ABC significantly improved PFS. Here, we present the prespecified final OS results for MONARCH 3.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MONARCH 3 is a randomized, double-blind, phase III study of abemaciclib plus NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole) versus placebo plus NSAI in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC without prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. The primary objective was investigator-assessed PFS; OS was a gated secondary endpoint, and chemotherapy-free survival was an exploratory endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 493 women were randomized 2 : 1 to receive abemaciclib plus NSAI (n = 328) or placebo plus NSAI (n = 165). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, there were 198 OS events (60.4%) in the abemaciclib arm and 116 (70.3%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.804; 95% confidence interval 0.637-1.015; P = 0.0664, non-significant). Median OS was 66.8 versus 53.7 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. In the subgroup with visceral disease, there were 113 OS events (65.3%) in the abemaciclib arm and 65 (72.2%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.758; 95% confidence interval 0.558-1.030; P = 0.0757, non-significant). Median OS was 63.7 months versus 48.8 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. The previously demonstrated PFS benefit was sustained, and chemotherapy-free survival numerically improved with the addition of abemaciclib. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Abemaciclib combined with an NSAI resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in median OS (intent-to-treat population: 13.1 months; subgroup with visceral disease: 14.9 months) in patients with HR+ HER2- ABC; however, statistical significance was not reached.

MicroRNA-based interventions in aberrant cell cycle diseases: Therapeutic strategies for cancers, central nervous system disorders and comorbidities

Malignant tumors and central nervous system (CNS) disorders are intricately linked to a process known as "aberrant cell cycle re-entry," which plays a critical role in the progression of these diseases. Addressing the dysregulation in cell cycles offers a promising therapeutic approach for cancers and CNS disorders. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a crucial role as regulators of gene expression in cell cycle transitions, presenting a promising therapeutic avenue for treating these disorders and their comorbidities. This review consolidates the progress made in the last three years regarding miRNA-based treatments for diseases associated with aberrant cell cycle re-entry. It encompasses exploring fundamental mechanisms and signaling pathways influenced by miRNAs in cancers and CNS disorders, particularly focusing on the therapeutic effects of exosome-derived miRNAs. The review also identifies specific miRNAs implicated in comorbidity of cancers and CNS disorders, discusses the future potential of miRNA reagents in managing cell cycle-related diseases.

TP53-associated early breast cancer: new observations from a large cohort

BACKGROUND

A recent large, well-annotated international cohort of patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome and early-stage breast cancer was examined for shared features.

METHODS

This multicenter cohort study included women with a germline TP53 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant and nonmetastatic breast cancer diagnosed between 2002 and 2022. Clinical and genetic data were obtained from institutional registries and clinical charts. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize proportions, and differences were assessed using χ2 or Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Metachronous contralateral breast cancer risk, radiation-induced sarcoma risk, and recurrence-free survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier methodology.

RESULTS

Among 227 women who met study criteria, the median age of first breast cancer diagnosis was 37 years (range = 21-71), 11.9% presented with bilateral synchronous breast cancer, and 18.1% had ductal carcinoma in situ only. In total, 166 (73.1%) patients underwent mastectomies, including 67 bilateral mastectomies as first breast cancer surgery. Among those patients with retained breast tissue, the contralateral breast cancer rate was 25.3% at 5 years. Among 186 invasive tumors, 72.1% were stages I to II, 48.9% were node negative, and the most common subtypes were hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (40.9%) and hormone receptor positive/HER2 positive (34.4%). At a median follow-up of 69.9 months (interquartile range = 32.6-125.9), invasive hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative disease had the highest recurrence risk among the subtypes (5-year recurrence-free survival = 61.1%, P = .001). Among those who received radiation therapy (n = 79), the 5-year radiation-induced sarcoma rate was 4.8%.

CONCLUSION

We observed high rates of ductal carcinoma in situ, hormone receptor-positive, and HER2-positive breast cancers, with a worse outcome in the hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative luminal tumors, despite appropriate treatment. Confirmation of these findings in further studies could have implications for breast cancer care in those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Postrecurrence Treatment in Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant FDA Registration Trials: A Systematic Review

Importance

In oncology randomized clinical trials, suboptimal access to best available care at recurrence (or relapse) may affect overall survival results.

Objective

To assess the proportion and the quality of postrecurrence treatment received by patients enrolled in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) registration trials of systemic therapy in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting.

Evidence Review

For this systematic review, all trials leading to an FDA approval from January 2018 through May 2023 were obtained from the FDA website and drug announcements. Randomized clinical trials of an anticancer drug in the neoadjuvant or the adjuvant setting were included. Trials of supportive care treatment and treatments given in combination with radiotherapy were excluded. Information abstracted for each trial included tumor type, setting, phase, type of sponsor, reporting and assessment of postrecurrence, and overall survival data.

Findings

A total of 14 FDA trials met the inclusion criteria. Postrecurrence data were not available in 6 of 14 registration trials (43%). Of the 8 remaining trials, postrecurrence treatment was assessed as suboptimal in 6 (75%). Overall, only 2 of 14 trials (14%) had data assessed as appropriate.

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review found that 43% of randomized clinical trials of anticancer treatment in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant context failed to present any assessable postrecurrence treatment data. In instances in which these data were shared, postrecurrence treatment was suboptimal 75% of the time. The findings suggest that regulatory bodies should enforce rules stipulating that patients have access to the best standard of care at recurrence.

A retrospective analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and risk factors for recurrence in young patients with breast cancer

Background

Younger and older patients with breast cancer often present with different clinicopathological characteristics and exhibit different risk factors for recurrence. This study sought to evaluate the biological characteristics and identify the recurrence risk factors in patients with operable breast cancer who were ≤40 years of age.

Methods

This retrospective study investigated the biological characteristics and clinical outcomes of young patients (aged ≤40 years) with operable breast cancer who had been admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University for treatment from January 2015 to December 2019. Clinicopathological and follow-up data were collected and statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS 27.0 software. The disease-free survival (DFS) rates were evaluated, and regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes.

Results

A total of 154 young patients (aged ≤40 years) with operable breast cancer were included in this study, of whom 68 (44.2%) were aged ≤35 years. In terms of breast cancer subtypes, there were 19 (12.3%) patients with luminal A-like disease, 74 (48.1%) patients with luminal B-like disease, 17 (11.0%) patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (non-luminal) disease, and 44 (28.6%) patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The 5-year DFS rate of all the patients was 88%; among those with TNBC, the rate was slightly lower at 76%. According to the results of the log-rank test, tumor (T) stage, node (N) status (N0 or N+), the biological subtype, and the Ki-67 index (with a 14% cut-off value between high and low expression levels) were risk factors for recurrence. The Cox regression analysis showed that the biological subtype was the only risk factor for recurrence. The multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the pathological type, tumor grade, estrogen receptor (ER) labeling intensity, and progesterone receptor (PR) expression level significantly affected the level of Ki-67 expression.

Conclusions

This retrospective study showed that biological subtype was the most important risk factor for recurrence in operable breast cancer patients ≤40 years. The Ki-67 index is influenced by the pathological type, primary tumor grade, ER labeling intensity, and PR expression level. Fourteen percent is recommended as the cut-off value for the high and low expression of Ki-67 in clinical practice.

Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer guidelines 2024

Background

Developing guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of common cancers in China based on the evidence-based practice, the availability of diagnosis and treatment products, and the up-to-date advances in precision medicine is one of the basic tasks of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer (CSCO BC) Committee.

Methods

Protocols with high evidence level and good availability are used as the Level I recommendations; protocols with relatively high evidence level but slightly lower expert consensus or with poor availability are used as the Level II recommendations; and protocols that are clinically applicable but with low evidence level are regarded as the Level III recommendations. Based on the findings of clinical research at home and abroad and the opinions of CSCO BC experts, the CSCO BC guidelines determine the levels of recommendations for clinical application.

Results

For human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, a combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab regimen were recommended as Level I recommendation for neoadjuvant and first line metastatic breast cancer. Pyrotinib is also recommended as Level I recommendation in first line and second line therapy according to the latest studies conducted in China. Antibody drug conjugates was also recommended for patients with trastuzumab progression. For triple negative breast cancer, immunotherapy in early and metastatic breast cancer was highlighted and listed as new chapters in this version of guideline. For hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) was recommended in different stages, especially in adjuvant therapy. There was also a new chapter for HER2-low breast cancer stratified by HR status.

Conclusions

We firmly believe that evidence-based, availability-concerned, and consensus-based guidelines will be more feasible for clinical practice in China and in other countries with similar situations.

Oncologic Outcomes for Different Axillary Staging Techniques in Patients with Nodal-Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systematic Treatment: A Cancer Registry Study

BACKGROUND

Targeted approaches such as targeted axillary dissection (TAD) or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) showed false-negative rates of < 10% compared with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with nodal-positive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST). We aimed to evaluate real-world oncologic outcomes for different axillary staging techniques.

METHODS

We identified nodal-positive breast cancer patients undergoing NAST from 2016 to 2021 from the state cancer registry of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. Invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and multivariate Cox regression models (adjusted for age, ypN stage, ypT stage, and tumor biologic subtype).

RESULTS

A total of 2698 patients with a median follow-up of 24.7 months were identified: 2204 underwent ALND, 460 underwent SLNB (255 with ≥ 3 sentinel lymph nodes [SLNs] removed, 205 with 1-2 SLNs removed), and 34 underwent TAD. iDFS 3 years after surgery was 69.7% (ALND), 76.6% (SLNB with ≥ 3 SLNs removed), 76.7% (SLNB with < 3 SLNs removed), and 78.7% (TAD). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no significant influence of different axillary staging techniques on iDFS (hazard ratio [HR] for SLNB with < 3 SLNs removed 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-1.50; HR for SLNB with ≥ 3 SLNs removed 0.86, 95% CI 0.56-1.3; HR for TAD 0.23, 95% CI 0.03-1.64; ALND reference), and for ypN+ (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.49-2.49), triple-negative breast cancer (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.80-3.06), and ypT3-4 (HR 2.93, 95% CI 2.02-4.24).

CONCLUSION

These real-world data provide evidence that patient selection for de-escalated axillary surgery for patients with nodal-positive breast cancer undergoing NAST was successfully adopted and no early alarm signals of iDFS detriment were detected.

Evaluation of markers of immunity in different metastatic immune microenvironments suggests more suppression within breast to liver metastases in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Programmed death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are approved screening biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in advanced triple negative breast cancer. We examined these biomarkers along with characterization of the tumor microenvironment (TME) between breast tumors (BrTs), axillary metastases (AxMs), liver metastases (LvMs), non-axillary lymph node metastases, and non-liver metastases to determine differences related to site of metastatic disease.

METHODS

3076 unpaired biopsies from breast cancer patients were analyzed using whole transcriptome sequencing and NextGen DNA depicting TMB within tumor sites. The PD-L1 positivity was determined with VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay. The immune cell fraction within the TME was calculated by QuantiSeq and MCP-counter.

RESULTS

Compared to BrT, more LvM samples had a high TMB (≥ 10 mutations/Mb) and fewer LvM samples had PD-L1+ expression. Evaluation of the TME revealed that LvM sites harbored lower infiltration of adaptive immune cells, such as CD4+, CD8+, and regulatory T-cells compared with the BrT foci. We saw differences in innate immune cell infiltration in LvM compared to BrT, including neutrophils and NK cells.

CONCLUSIONS

LvMs are less likely to express PD-L1+ tumor cells but more likely to harbor high TMB as compared to BrTs. Unlike AxMs, LvMs represent a more immunosuppressed TME and demonstrate lower gene expression associated with adaptive immunity compared to BrTs. These findings suggest biopsy site be considered when interpreting results that influence ICI use for treatment and further investigation of immune composition and biomarkers expression by metastatic site.

Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Abemaciclib and Ribociclib in High-Risk Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: An Indian Perspective

PURPOSE

Incorporating adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib and ribociclib along with endocrine therapy has been shown to improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC). This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of this strategy, along with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors from an Indian perspective.

METHODS

A Markov chain model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of abemaciclib and ribociclib with letrozole compared with letrozole alone for HR+/HER2- EBC from a payer perspective in India. Key measures included lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), life-years (LY), and total costs. This study explores two scenarios for effectiveness: a best-case (BC) scenario, where the benefit of CDK4/6 inhibitors in improving iDFS lasts a lifetime, and a worst-case (WC) scenario, where benefits disappear after 5 years. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were used to account for simulation uncertainty.

RESULTS

In the BC scenario, abemaciclib added 2.17 QALY and 4.96 LY, incurring ₹2,317,957.7 ($27,756.65 in US dollars [USD]) in additional costs. However, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for abemaciclib exceeded India's willingness-to-pay threshold in the BC and WC scenarios. In the BC scenario, ribociclib added 0.98 QALY and 2.58 LY with added costs of ₹1,711,504.32 ($20,494.6 USD). The ICER for ribociclib also surpassed India's threshold in both scenarios. PSA showed that neither drug was cost-effective at the current market prices in either BC/WC scenario. The cost of abemaciclib and ribociclib needs to be reduced by at least 78.61% and 87.19%, respectively, to be cost-effective in the BC scenario.

CONCLUSION

The combination of adjuvant abemaciclib or ribociclib with letrozole is not cost-effective for HR+/HER2- EBC in India in either the BC or WC scenario.

Real-world data of HER2-negative early breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline and/or taxane regimens in Japan

BACKGROUND

Anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens are established treatments for human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative early-stage breast cancer with high risk of recurrence. This study examined the prevalence of these chemotherapy regimens as perioperative therapy, the patterns of retreatment, and factors influencing prescription choices in Japan.

METHODS

This observational cohort study focused on high-risk early-stage breast cancer patients not undergoing anti-HER2 therapy, utilizing data from a hospital-based claims database in Japan spanning from April 2008 to September 2021.

RESULTS

Of 42,636 high-risk patients who underwent breast cancer surgery, 32,133 (75.4%) were categorized as having luminal-type (received endocrine therapy) and 10,503 (24.6%) as having triple-negative cancer (not receiving any endocrine therapies). Most patients (98.7%) with luminal-type breast cancer received perioperative therapy, and 40.3% of those received anthracycline/taxane. In the triple-negative group, 57.0% of all patients received perioperative therapy and of those, 93.4% received anthracycline/taxane. Being over 40 years old, having an early stage (clinical stage ≤ II), and receiving treatment in non-specialized facilities were associated with less use of anthracycline/taxane in the luminal-type group. For the triple-negative group, associated factors with less use of anthracycline/taxane included being over 60 years old, treatment in small hospital (capacity < 200 beds), and treatment in non-specialized facilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half the patients in both the luminal-type and triple-negative groups were prescribed anthracycline and/or taxane for perioperative chemotherapy. The choice was associated with patient age, cancer stage, and the scale and specialization of the treatment facilities. This study sheds light on the current state of breast cancer treatment practices in Japan.

Fit-for-Purpose Ki-67 Immunohistochemistry Assays for Breast Cancer

New therapies are being developed for breast cancer, and in this process, some "old" biomarkers are reutilized and given a new purpose. It is not always recognized that by changing a biomarker's intended use, a new biomarker assay is created. The Ki-67 biomarker is typically assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to provide a proliferative index in breast cancer. Canadian laboratories assessed the analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy of their Ki-67 IHC laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) of relevance for the LDTs' clinical utility. Canadian clinical IHC laboratories enrolled in the Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance Pilot Run for Ki-67 in breast cancer by invitation. The Dako Ki-67 IHC pharmDx assay was employed as a study reference assay. The Dako central laboratory was the reference laboratory. Participants received unstained slides of breast cancer tissue microarrays with 32 cases and performed their in-house Ki-67 assays. The results were assessed using QuPath, an open-source software application for bioimage analysis. Positive percent agreement (PPA, sensitivity) and negative percent agreement (NPA, specificity) were calculated against the Dako Ki-67 IHC pharmDx assay for 5%, 10%, 20%, and 30% cutoffs. Overall, PPA and NPA varied depending on the selected cutoff; participants were more successful with 5% and 10%, than with 20% and 30% cutoffs. Only 4 of 16 laboratories had robust IHC protocols with acceptable PPA for all cutoffs. The lowest PPA for the 5% cutoff was 85%, for 10% was 63%, for 20% was 14%, and for 30% was 13%. The lowest NPA for the 5% cutoff was 50%, for 10% was 33%, for 20% was 50%, and for 30% was 57%. Despite many years of international efforts to standardize IHC testing for Ki-67 in breast cancer, our results indicate that Canadian clinical LDTs have a wide analytical sensitivity range and poor agreement for 20% and 30% cutoffs. The poor agreement was not due to the readout but rather due to IHC protocol conditions. International Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) recommendations related to Ki-67 IHC standardization cannot take full effect without reliable fit-for-purpose reference materials that are required for the initial assay calibration, assay performance monitoring, and proficiency testing.

Targeting STAT3 potentiates CDK4/6 inhibitors therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Anti-CDK4/6 therapy has been employed for the treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with CDK4/6 hyperactivation, but the response rate is relatively low. In this study, we first showed that CDK4 and CDK6 was over-expressed and conferred poor prognosis in HNSCC. Moreover, in RB-positive HNSCC, STAT3 signaling was activated induced by CDK4/6 inhibition and STAT3 promotes RB deficiency by upregulation of MYC. Thirdly, the combination of Stattic and CDK4/6 inhibitor results in striking anti-tumor effect in vitro and in Cal27 derived animal models. Additionally, phospho-STAT3 level negatively correlates with RB expression and predicts poor prognosis in patients with HNSCC. Taken together, our findings suggest an unrecognized function of STAT3 confers to CDK4/6 inhibitors resistance and presenting a promising combination strategy for patients with HNSCC.

Breast Cancer Patient's Outcomes after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery at 5 and 10 Years for Stage II-III Disease

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer offers the possibility to facilitate breast and axillary surgery; it is a test of chemosensibility in vivo with significant prognostic value and may be used to tailor adjuvant treatment according to the response. Material and Methods: A retrospective single-institution cohort of 482 stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on anthracycline and taxans, plus antiHEr2 in Her2-positive cases, was studied. Survival was calculated at 5 and 10 years. Kaplan-Meier curves with a log-rank test were calculated for differences according to age, BRCA status, menopausal status, TNM, pathological and molecular surrogate subtype, 20% TIL cut-off, surgical procedure, response to chemotherapy and the presence of vascular invasion. Results: The pCR rate was 25.3% and was greater in HER2 (51.3%) and TNBC (31.7%) and in BRCA carriers (41.9%). The factors independently related to patient survival were pathology and molecular surrogate subtype, type of surgery, response to NACT and vascular invasion. BRCA status was a protective prognostic factor without reaching statistical significance, with an HR 0.5 (95%CI 0.1-1.4). Mastectomy presented a double risk of distant recurrence compared to breast-conservative surgery (BCS), supporting BCS as a safe option after NACT. After a mean follow-up of 126 (SD 43) months, luminal tumors presented a substantial difference in survival rates calculated at 5 or 10 years (81.2% compared to 74.7%), whereas that for TNBC was 75.3 and 73.5, respectively. The greatest difference was seen according to the response in patients with pCR, who exhibited a 10 years DDFS of 95.5% vs. 72.4% for those patients without pCR, p < 0001. This difference was especially meaningful in TNBC: the 10 years DDFS according to an RCB of 0 to 3 was 100%, 80.6%, 69% and 49.2%, respectively, p < 0001. Patients with a particularly poor prognosis were those with lobular carcinomas, with a 10 years DDFS of 42.9% vs. 79.7% for ductal carcinomas, p = 0.001, and patients with vascular invasion at the surgical specimen, with a 10 years DDFS of 59.2% vs. 83.6% for those patients without vascular invasion, p < 0.001. Remarkably, BRCA carriers presented a longer survival, with an estimated 10 years DDFS of 89.6% vs. 77.2% for non-carriers, p = 0.054. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can help patients and clinicians make well-informed decisions.

Who still needs surgical staging of the axilla for invasive breast cancer?

Sentinel lymphadenectomy may be safely omitted for postmenopausal patients with low-risk estrogen-receptor-positive cancers who have a negative pretreatment axillary ultrasound. Surgical staging should still be done for patients who are premenopausal or postmenopausal with high-risk estrogen receptor-positive cancers, for those having neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or those with estrogen-receptor-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive cancers.

Novel Treatment Strategies for Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) is the most common BC subtype. Endocrine therapy (ET) targeting ER signaling still remains the mainstay treatment option for hormone receptor (HR)-positive BC either in the early or in advanced setting, including different strategies, such as the suppression of estrogen production or directly blocking the ER pathway through SERMs-selective estrogen receptor modulators-or SERDs-selective estrogen receptor degraders. Nevertheless, the development of de novo or acquired endocrine resistance still remains challenging for oncologists. The use of novel ET combined with targeted drugs, such as cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, has significantly improved long-term outcome rates, thus changing the therapeutic algorithm for metastatic BC (MBC) and recently the therapeutic strategy in the adjuvant setting for early high-risk BC. Eluding the resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET is currently an unmet medical need, and there is disagreement concerning the best course of action for patients who continue to progress after this combination approach. Genetic changes in the tumor along its growth uncovered by genomic profiling of recurrent and/or metastatic lesions through tumor and/or liquid biopsies may predict the response or resistance to specific agents, suggesting the best therapeutic strategy for each patient by targeting the altered ER-dependent pathway (novel oral SERDs and a new generation of anti-estrogen agents) or alternative ER-independent signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR or tyrosine kinase receptors (HER2 mutations or HER2 low status) or by inhibiting pathways weakened through germline BRCA1/2 mutations. These agents are being investigated as single molecules and in combination with other target therapies, offering promising weapons to overcome or avoid treatment failure and propose increasingly more personalized treatment approaches. This review presents novel insights into ET and other targeted therapies for managing metastatic HR+/HER2- BC by exploring potential strategies based on clinical evidence and genomic profiling following the failure of the CDK4/6i and ET combination.