1
|
Klompas M. Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with acute brain injury. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2024; 12:340-341. [PMID: 38262429 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00006-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Klompas
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodríguez-Gascón A, Lloréns-Villar Y, Solinís MÁ, Barrasa H, Canut-Blasco A. Does selective digestive decontamination (SDD) increase antibiotic resistance? Long-term comparison of two intensive care units (with and without SDD) of the same tertiary hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2024; 43:885-893. [PMID: 38460030 PMCID: PMC11108900 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-024-04792-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to to compare the antimicrobial resistance rate and its relationship with the antibiotic consumption in two separate Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of the same hospital, one with and other without selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD). METHODS We performed a retrospective study in the two ICUs of the Araba University Hospital. Trauma and neurosurgical patients are admitted to the SDD-ICU, and general digestive surgery patients go to the no SDD-ICU. From 2014 to 2018 we analyzed the number of isolates, and the bacterial resistance trends of 47 antimicrobial-microorganism combinations. Additionally, antimicrobial consumption was estimated in both ICUs. Resistance rates were also compared with those reported in ENVIN-HELICS Spanish national registry. RESULTS In the ICU with SDD protocol, there was a significant decrease in the resistance of E. coli to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and in the resistance of E. faecalis to high concentration of gentamycin and high concentration of streptomycin. A significant increase of resistance of Staphylococcus coagulasa negative (CoNS) to linezolid in the no SDD-ICU was also detected. Overall, the level of resistance in the SDD-ICU was lower or of the same order than in the ICU without SDD and that reported in the Spanish national registry. CONCLUSIONS SDD had neither a clinically relevant impact on emergence and spread of resistance, nor in the overall systemic antimicrobial use. The patient type rather than the SDD protocol showed to condition the ecology and therefore, the resistance rate in the ICUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Rodríguez-Gascón
- Pharmacokinetic, Nanotechnology and Gene Therapy Group (Pharma Nano Gene), Faculty of Pharmacy, Centro de Investigación Lascaray Ikergunea, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo de la Universidad 7, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01006, Spain.
- Bioaraba, Microbiology, Infectious Disease, Antimicrobial Agents, and Gene Therapy, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01009, Spain.
| | - Yanire Lloréns-Villar
- Hospital Pharmacy Service, Araba University Hospital, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01009, Spain
| | - María Ángeles Solinís
- Pharmacokinetic, Nanotechnology and Gene Therapy Group (Pharma Nano Gene), Faculty of Pharmacy, Centro de Investigación Lascaray Ikergunea, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo de la Universidad 7, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01006, Spain
- Bioaraba, Microbiology, Infectious Disease, Antimicrobial Agents, and Gene Therapy, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01009, Spain
| | - Helena Barrasa
- Bioaraba, Microbiology, Infectious Disease, Antimicrobial Agents, and Gene Therapy, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01009, Spain
- Intensive Care Unit, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Araba University Hospital, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01009, Spain
| | - Andrés Canut-Blasco
- Bioaraba, Microbiology, Infectious Disease, Antimicrobial Agents, and Gene Therapy, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01009, Spain
- Microbiology Service, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Araba University Hospital, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01009, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dahyot-Fizelier C, Lasocki S, Kerforne T, Perrigault PF, Geeraerts T, Asehnoune K, Cinotti R, Launey Y, Cottenceau V, Laffon M, Gaillard T, Boisson M, Aleyrat C, Frasca D, Mimoz O. Ceftriaxone to prevent early ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with acute brain injury: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, assessor-masked superiority trial. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2024; 12:375-385. [PMID: 38262428 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(23)00471-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with acute brain injury are at high risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The benefit of short-term antibiotic prophylaxis remains debated. We aimed to establish the effect of an early, single dose of the antibiotic ceftriaxone on the incidence of early VAP in patients with severe brain injury who required mechanical ventilation. METHODS PROPHY-VAP was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, assessor-masked, superiority trial conducted in nine intensive care units in eight French university hospitals. We randomly assigned comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale score [GCS] ≤12) adult patients (age ≥18 years) who required mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h after acute brain injury to receive intravenous ceftriaxone 2 g or placebo once within the 12 h following tracheal intubation. Participants did not receive selective oropharyngeal and digestive tract decontamination. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients developing early VAP from the 2nd to the 7th day of mechanical ventilation, confirmed by masked assessors. The analysis was reported in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients except those who withdrew or did not give consent to continue and those who did not receive the allocated treatment because they met a criterion for non-eligibility. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02265406. FINDINGS From Oct 14, 2015, to May 27, 2020, 345 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ceftriaxone (n=171) or placebo (n=174); 330 received the allocated intervention and 319 were included in the analysis (162 in the ceftriaxone group and 157 in the placebo group). 166 (52%) participants in the analysis were men and 153 (48%) were women. 15 patients did not receive the allocated intervention after randomisation and 11 withdrew their consent. Adjudication confirmed 93 cases of VAP, including 74 early infections. The incidence of early VAP was lower in the ceftriaxone group than in the placebo group (23 [14%] vs 51 [32%]; hazard ratio 0·60 [95% CI 0·38-0·95], p=0·030), with no microbiological impact and no adverse effects attributable to ceftriaxone. INTERPRETATION In patients with acute brain injury, a single ceftriaxone dose decreased the risk of early VAP. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that an early, single dose of ceftriaxone be included in all bundles for the prevention of VAP in patients with brain injury who require mechanical ventilation. FUNDING French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Dahyot-Fizelier
- UFR de Médicine et Pharmacie, INSERM U1070, PHAR2, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
| | - Sigismond Lasocki
- Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Université d'Angers, Angers, France
| | - Thomas Kerforne
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Pierre-Francois Perrigault
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier Université, Montpellier, France
| | - Thomas Geeraerts
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, University Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Karim Asehnoune
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
| | - Raphaël Cinotti
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
| | - Yoann Launey
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Critical Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Vincent Cottenceau
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marc Laffon
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Thomas Gaillard
- Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Université d'Angers, Angers, France
| | - Matthieu Boisson
- UFR de Médicine et Pharmacie, INSERM U1070, PHAR2, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Camille Aleyrat
- Direction de la Recherche Clinique et Innovation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Denis Frasca
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Direction de la Recherche Clinique et Innovation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Olivier Mimoz
- UFR de Médicine et Pharmacie, INSERM U1070, PHAR2, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Service des Urgences Adultes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guillamet CV, Kollef MH. Is Zero Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Achievable? Updated Practical Approaches to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Prevention. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2024; 38:65-86. [PMID: 38040518 DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a significant clinical entity with reported incidence rates of 7% to 15%. Given the considerable adverse consequences associated with this infection, VAP prevention became a core measure required in most US hospitals. Many institutions took pride in implementing effective VAP prevention bundles that combined at least head of bed elevation, hand hygiene, chlorhexidine oral care, and subglottic drainage. Spontaneous breathing and awakening trials have also consistently been shown to shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and secondarily reduce the occurrence of VAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marin H Kollef
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carlet J. Selective digestive decontamination: We must make an international decision on this 40-year old controversy. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:272-274. [PMID: 38117320 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07289-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Carlet
- ESICM and Waaar (World Alliance Against Antibiotic Resistance), Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Steyer GE, Puchinger M, Pfeifer J. Successful Clinical Avoidance of Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage through Local Decontamination. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:79. [PMID: 38247638 PMCID: PMC10812415 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13010079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM An anastomotic leak is an unpredictable postoperative complication during recovery from colorectal surgery that may require a re-operation. Potentially pathogenic bacteria like Pseudomonas (and Enterococcus) contribute to the pathogenesis of an anastomotic leak through their capacity to degrade collagen and to activate tissue matrix metalloprotease-9 in host intestinal tissues. The microbiome, therefore, is the key to preventing an anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. The aim of this trial was to investigate whether perioperative selective decontamination with a new mixture of locally acting antibiotics specially designed against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis can reduce or even stop early symptomatic leakage. METHOD All hospitalized patients in our University Clinic undergoing colorectal surgery with a left-sided anastomosis were included as two groups; patients in the intervention group received polymyxin B, gentamicin and vancomycin every six hours for five postoperative days and those in the control group did not receive such an intervention. An anastomotic leak was defined as a clinically obvious defect of the intestinal wall integrity at the colorectal anastomosis site (including suture) that leads to a communication between the intra- and extraluminal compartments, requiring a re-do surgery within seven postoperative days. RESULTS Between February 2017 and May 2023, a total of 301 patients (median age of 63 years) were analyzed. An anastomotic leak was observed in 11 patients in the control group (n = 152), but in no patients in the intervention group (n = 149); this difference was highly significant. CONCLUSION The antibiotic mixture (with polymyxin B, gentamicin and vancomycin) used for local decontamination in our study stopped the occurrence of anastomotic leaks completely. According to the definition of anastomotic leak, no further surgery was required after local perioperative decontamination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerhard Ernst Steyer
- Division of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036 Graz, Austria;
- Doctoral School of Lifestyle-Related Diseases, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Markus Puchinger
- Medical Engineering and Computing, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036 Graz, Austria;
| | - Johann Pfeifer
- Division of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036 Graz, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cho NA, Strayer K, Dobson B, McDonald B. Pathogenesis and therapeutic opportunities of gut microbiome dysbiosis in critical illness. Gut Microbes 2024; 16:2351478. [PMID: 38780485 PMCID: PMC11123462 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2351478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
For many years, it has been hypothesized that pathological changes to the gut microbiome in critical illness is a driver of infections, organ dysfunction, and other adverse outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). The advent of contemporary microbiome methodologies and multi-omics tools have allowed researchers to test this hypothesis by dissecting host-microbe interactions in the gut to better define its contribution to critical illness pathogenesis. Observational studies of patients in ICUs have revealed that gut microbial communities are profoundly altered in critical illness, characterized by markedly reduced alpha diversity, loss of commensal taxa, and expansion of potential pathogens. These key features of ICU gut dysbiosis have been associated with adverse outcomes including life-threatening hospital-acquired (nosocomial) infections. Current research strives to define cellular and molecular mechanisms connecting gut dysbiosis with infections and other outcomes, and to identify opportunities for therapeutic modulation of host-microbe interactions. This review synthesizes evidence from studies of critically ill patients that have informed our understanding of intestinal dysbiosis in the ICU, mechanisms linking dysbiosis to infections and other adverse outcomes, as well as clinical trials of microbiota-modifying therapies. Additionally, we discuss novel avenues for precision microbial therapeutics to combat nosocomial infections and other life-threatening complications of critical illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole A Cho
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kathryn Strayer
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Breenna Dobson
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Braedon McDonald
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pathan N, Woolfall K, Popa M, de la Fuente GM, Ferrando-Vivas P, Brown A, Gouliouris T, Tume LN, Shulman R, Cuthbertson BH, Sale I, Feltbower RG, Myburgh J, Pappachan J, Harrison D, Mouncey P, Rowan K. Selective digestive tract decontamination to prevent healthcare associated infections in critically ill children: the PICNIC multicentre randomised pilot clinical trial. Sci Rep 2023; 13:21668. [PMID: 38066012 PMCID: PMC10709430 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46232-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill children. Data from adult studies suggest Selective Decontamination of the Digestive tract (SDD) may reduce the incidence of HCAIs and improve survival. There are no data from randomised clinical trials in the paediatric setting. An open label, parallel group pilot cRCT and mixed-methods perspectives study was conducted in six paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in England. Participants were children (> 37 weeks corrected gestational age, up to 16 years) requiring mechanical ventilation expected to last for at least 48 h. Sites undertook standard care for a period of 9 weeks and were randomised into 3 sites which continued standard care and 3 where SDD was incorporated into infection control practice for eligible children. Interviews and focus groups were conducted for parents and staff working in PICU. 434 children fulfilled eligibility criteria, of whom 368 (85%) were enrolled. This included 207 in the baseline phase (Period One) and 161 in the intervention period (Period Two). In sites delivering SDD, the majority (98%) of children received at least one dose of SDD and of these, 68% commenced within the first 6 h. Whilst admission swabs were collected in 91% of enrolled children, consent for the collection of additional swabs was low (44%). Recruited children were representative of the wider PICU population. Overall, 3.6 children/site/week were recruited compared with the potential recruitment rate for a definitive cRCT of 3 children/site/week, based on data from all UK PICUs. Parents (n = 65) and staff (n = 44) were supportive of the aims of the study, suggesting adaptations for a larger definitive trial including formulation and administration of SDD paste, approaches to consent and ecology monitoring. Stakeholders identified preferred clinical outcomes, focusing on complications of critical illness and quality-of-life. A definitive cRCT in SDD to prevent HCAIs in critically ill children is feasible but should include adaptations to ecology monitoring along with the dosing schedule and packaging into a paediatric specific format. A definitive study is supported by the findings with adaptations to ecology monitoring and SDD administration.Trial Registration: ISRCTN40310490 Registered 30/10/2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazima Pathan
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | - Alanna Brown
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
- University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Myburgh
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - David Harrison
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Paul Mouncey
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Kathryn Rowan
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
He S, Lin F, Hu X, Pan P. Gut Microbiome-Based Therapeutics in Critically Ill Adult Patients-A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2023; 15:4734. [PMID: 38004128 PMCID: PMC10675331 DOI: 10.3390/nu15224734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in the human microenvironment. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is a common pathophysiological phenomenon in critically ill patients. Therefore, utilizing intestinal microbiota to prevent complications and improve the prognosis of critically ill patients is a possible therapeutic direction. The gut microbiome-based therapeutics approach focuses on improving intestinal microbiota homeostasis by modulating its diversity, or treating critical illness by altering the metabolites of intestinal microbiota. There is growing evidence that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), selective digestive decontamination (SDD), and microbiota-derived therapies are all effective treatments for critical illness. However, different treatments are appropriate for different conditions, and more evidence is needed to support the selection of optimal gut microbiota-related treatments for different diseases. This narrative review summarizes the curative effects and limitations of microbiome-based therapeutics in different critically ill adult patients, aiming to provide possible directions for gut microbiome-based therapeutics for critically ill patients such as ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and COVID-19, etc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiyue He
- Center of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China; (S.H.); (F.L.)
- FuRong Laboratory, Changsha 410078, China
| | - Fengyu Lin
- Center of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China; (S.H.); (F.L.)
- FuRong Laboratory, Changsha 410078, China
| | - Xinyue Hu
- Center of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China; (S.H.); (F.L.)
- FuRong Laboratory, Changsha 410078, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha 410008, China
- Hunan Engineering Research Center for Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Disease, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Pinhua Pan
- Center of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China; (S.H.); (F.L.)
- FuRong Laboratory, Changsha 410078, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha 410008, China
- Hunan Engineering Research Center for Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Disease, Changsha 410008, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tejerina-Álvarez EE, de la Cal López MÁ. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: concept and application. Med Intensiva 2023; 47:603-615. [PMID: 37858367 DOI: 10.1016/j.medine.2023.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) is a prophylactic strategy aimed at preventing or eradicating bacterial overgrowth in the intestinal flora that precedes the development of most infections in the Intensive Care Unit. SDD prevents serious infections, reduces mortality, is cost-effective, has no adverse effects, and its short- or long-term use is not associated with any significant increase in antimicrobial resistance. SDD is one of the most widely evaluated interventions in critically ill patients, yet its use is not widespread. The present article offers a narrative review of the most relevant evidence and an update of the pathophysiological concepts of infection control supporting the use of SDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Esther Tejerina-Álvarez
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Carretera de Toledo, Getafe, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Spain.
| | - Miguel Ángel de la Cal López
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Carretera de Toledo, Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wiersinga WJ. Selective digestive decontamination- Not sure. Intensive Care Med 2023; 49:984-986. [PMID: 37336865 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07115-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Willem Joost Wiersinga
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Room G2-130, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Roson-Calero N, Ballesté-Delpierre C, Fernández J, Vila J. Insights on Current Strategies to Decolonize the Gut from Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Pros and Cons. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1074. [PMID: 37370393 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12061074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last decades, we have witnessed a steady increase in infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. These infections are associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Several interventions should be taken to reduce the emergence and spread of MDR bacteria. The eradication of resistant pathogens colonizing specific human body sites that would likely cause further infection in other sites is one of the most conventional strategies. The objective of this narrative mini-review is to compile and discuss different strategies for the eradication of MDR bacteria from gut microbiota. Here, we analyse the prevalence of MDR bacteria in the community and the hospital and the clinical impact of gut microbiota colonisation with MDR bacteria. Then, several strategies to eliminate MDR bacteria from gut microbiota are described and include: (i) selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) using a cocktail of antibiotics; (ii) the use of pre and probiotics; (iii) fecal microbiota transplantation; (iv) the use of specific phages; (v) engineered CRISPR-Cas Systems. This review intends to provide a state-of-the-art of the most relevant strategies to eradicate MDR bacteria from gut microbiota currently being investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Roson-Calero
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Basic Clinical Practice, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Clara Ballesté-Delpierre
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Fernández
- Liver ICU, Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS and CIBERehd, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF-Clif), 08021 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Vila
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Basic Clinical Practice, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Herrera S, Torralbo B, Herranz S, Bernal-Maurandi J, Rubio E, Pitart C, Fortes I, Valls S, Rodríguez L, Santana G, Bodro M, Garcia-Vidal C, Hernández-Meneses M, Puerta P, Morata L, Villella A, Bertran MJ, Brey M, Soriano A, Del Río A, Martinez JA. Carriage of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: duration and risk factors. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2023; 42:631-638. [PMID: 36964885 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-023-04581-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
Identification of risk factors influencing the duration of carriage of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) may be useful for infection control. The aim of this study is to estimate the impact of several factors collected for routine hospital surveillance on the duration of carriage of selected MDR-GNB. From January 2015 to July 2021, patients with at least two clinical/surveillance samples positive for MDR-GNB different from ESBL-producing E. coli or AmpC - exclusively producing Enterobacterales were assessed. Microorganisms, age, number of admissions, clinical or rectal sample, sex, and admission service were evaluated as risk factors. Multivariate analysis was performed by a Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 1981 episodes of colonization were included. Involved microorganisms were ESBL-Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) in 1057 cases (53.4%), other ESBL-non-E. coli Enterobacterales in 91 (4.6%), OXA-48-KP in 263 (13.3%), KPC-KP in 90 (4.5%), VIM-KP in 29 (1.5%), carbapenemase-producing non-KP Enterobacterales (CP-non-KP) in 124 (6.3%), and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PAER) in 327 (16.5%). No differences in duration of colonization were observed among ESBL-KP (median colonization time 320 days), ESBL-non-E. coli Enterobacterales (226 days), OXA48-KP (305 days), and MDR-PAER (321 days). For each group, duration of colonization was significantly longer than that of KPC-KP (median colonization time 60 days), VIM-KP (138 days), and CP-non-KP (71 days). Male sex (HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-0.99), detection in Hepatology-Gastroenterology (HR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.54-0.93), clinical sample (HR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.53-0.69), and > 2 admissions after first detection (HR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.42-0.52) were independent predictors of longer carriage, whereas VIM-KP (HR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.04-2.48), KPC-KP (HR = 1.85; 95% CI 1.49-2.3), and CP-non-KP (HR = 1.92; 95% CI 1.49-2.47) were associated with shorter colonization time. Duration of colonization was significantly longer for ESBL-KP, other ESBL-non-E. coli Enterobacterales, OXA-48-KP, and MDR-PAER. For these microorganisms, prolonging surveillance up to 2.5-3 years should be considered. Male sex, clinical sample, multiple readmissions, admission service, and type of microorganism are independent predictors of the duration of carriage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Herrera
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Torralbo
- Preventive Medicine, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Herranz
- Preventive Medicine, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Bernal-Maurandi
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Rubio
- Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, ISGLOBAL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Pitart
- Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, ISGLOBAL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Fortes
- Preventive Medicine, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Valls
- Preventive Medicine, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Rodríguez
- Preventive Medicine, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Santana
- Preventive Medicine, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Bodro
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Garcia-Vidal
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Hernández-Meneses
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Puerta
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Morata
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Villella
- Preventive Medicine, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M J Bertran
- Preventive Medicine, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Brey
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Soriano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Del Río
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J A Martinez
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona-IDIBAPS, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Myburgh JA, Seppelt IM, Goodman F, Billot L, Correa M, Davis JS, Gordon AC, Hammond NE, Iredell J, Li Q, Micallef S, Miller J, Mysore J, Taylor C, Young PJ, Cuthbertson BH, Finfer SR. Effect of Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract on Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022; 328:1911-1921. [PMID: 36286097 PMCID: PMC9607966 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.17927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Whether selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) reduces mortality in critically ill patients remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE To determine whether SDD reduces in-hospital mortality in critically ill adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cluster, crossover, randomized clinical trial that recruited 5982 mechanically ventilated adults from 19 intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia between April 2018 and May 2021 (final follow-up, August 2021). A contemporaneous ecological assessment recruited 8599 patients from participating ICUs between May 2017 and August 2021. INTERVENTIONS ICUs were randomly assigned to adopt or not adopt a SDD strategy for 2 alternating 12-month periods, separated by a 3-month interperiod gap. Patients in the SDD group (n = 2791) received a 6-hourly application of an oral paste and administration of a gastric suspension containing colistin, tobramycin, and nystatin for the duration of mechanical ventilation, plus a 4-day course of an intravenous antibiotic with a suitable antimicrobial spectrum. Patients in the control group (n = 3191) received standard care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality within 90 days. There were 8 secondary outcomes, including the proportion of patients with new positive blood cultures, antibiotic-resistant organisms (AROs), and Clostridioides difficile infections. For the ecological assessment, a noninferiority margin of 2% was prespecified for 3 outcomes including new cultures of AROs. RESULTS Of 5982 patients (mean age, 58.3 years; 36.8% women) enrolled from 19 ICUs, all patients completed the trial. There were 753/2791 (27.0%) and 928/3191 (29.1%) in-hospital deaths in the SDD and standard care groups, respectively (mean difference, -1.7% [95% CI, -4.8% to 1.3%]; odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82-1.02]; P = .12). Of 8 prespecified secondary outcomes, 6 showed no significant differences. In the SDD vs standard care groups, 23.1% vs 34.6% had new ARO cultures (absolute difference, -11.0%; 95% CI, -14.7% to -7.3%), 5.6% vs 8.1% had new positive blood cultures (absolute difference, -1.95%; 95% CI, -3.5% to -0.4%), and 0.5% vs 0.9% had new C difficile infections (absolute difference, -0.24%; 95% CI, -0.6% to 0.1%). In 8599 patients enrolled in the ecological assessment, use of SDD was not shown to be noninferior with regard to the change in the proportion of patients who developed new AROs (-3.3% vs -1.59%; mean difference, -1.71% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 4.31%] and 0.88% vs 0.55%; mean difference, -0.32% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 5.47%]) in the first and second periods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation, SDD, compared with standard care without SDD, did not significantly reduce in-hospital mortality. However, the confidence interval around the effect estimate includes a clinically important benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02389036.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John A Myburgh
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ian M Seppelt
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia
- Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Fiona Goodman
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Laurent Billot
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Maryam Correa
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joshua S Davis
- John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
- Menzies School of Heath Research, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Anthony C Gordon
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, England
| | - Naomi E Hammond
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jon Iredell
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Infectious Disease and Microbiology Westmeath Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Qiang Li
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sharon Micallef
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jennene Miller
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jayanthi Mysore
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Colman Taylor
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul J Young
- Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Brian H Cuthbertson
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simon R Finfer
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hammond NE, Myburgh J, Seppelt I, Garside T, Vlok R, Mahendran S, Adigbli D, Finfer S, Gao Y, Goodman F, Guyatt G, Santos JA, Venkatesh B, Yao L, Di Tanna GL, Delaney A. Association Between Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract and In-Hospital Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2022; 328:1922-1934. [PMID: 36286098 PMCID: PMC9607997 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.19709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance The effectiveness of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) in critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation is uncertain. Objective To determine whether SDD is associated with reduced risk of death in adults receiving mechanical ventilation in intensive care units (ICUs) compared with standard care. Data Sources The primary search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases until September 2022. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials including adults receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICU comparing SDD vs standard care or placebo. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed in duplicate. The primary analysis was conducted using a bayesian framework. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Subgroups included SDD with an intravenous agent compared with SDD without an intravenous agent. There were 8 secondary outcomes including the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, ICU-acquired bacteremia, and the incidence of positive cultures of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. Results There were 32 randomized clinical trials including 24 389 participants in the analysis. The median age of participants in the included studies was 54 years (IQR, 44-60), and the median proportion of female trial participants was 33% (IQR, 25%-38%). Data from 30 trials including 24 034 participants contributed to the primary outcome. The pooled estimated risk ratio (RR) for mortality for SDD compared with standard care was 0.91 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.82-0.99; I2 = 33.9%; moderate certainty) with a 99.3% posterior probability that SDD reduced hospital mortality. The beneficial association of SDD was evident in trials with an intravenous agent (RR, 0.84 [95% CrI, 0.74-0.94]), but not in trials without an intravenous agent (RR, 1.01 [95% CrI, 0.91-1.11]) (P value for the interaction between subgroups = .02). SDD was associated with reduced risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR, 0.44 [95% CrI, 0.36-0.54]) and ICU-acquired bacteremia (RR, 0.68 [95% CrI, 0.57-0.81]). Available data regarding the incidence of positive cultures of antimicrobial-resistant organisms were not amenable to pooling and were of very low certainty. Conclusions and Relevance Among adults in the ICU treated with mechanical ventilation, the use of SDD compared with standard care or placebo was associated with lower hospital mortality. Evidence regarding the effect of SDD on antimicrobial resistance was of very low certainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi E. Hammond
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Myburgh
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Seppelt
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tessa Garside
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ruan Vlok
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sajeev Mahendran
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Derick Adigbli
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon Finfer
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ya Gao
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fiona Goodman
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gordon Guyatt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph Alvin Santos
- Biostatistics and Data Science Division, Meta-Research and Evidence Synthesis, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Balasubramanian Venkatesh
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Wesley and Princess Alexandra Hospitals, Queensland, Australia
| | - Liang Yao
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gian Luca Di Tanna
- Biostatistics and Data Science Division, Meta-Research and Evidence Synthesis, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Innovative Technologies, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Viganello-Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Anthony Delaney
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ecological effects of selective oral decontamination on multidrug-resistance bacteria acquired in the intensive care unit: a case-control study over 5 years. Intensive Care Med 2022; 48:1165-1175. [PMID: 35953676 PMCID: PMC9463265 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06826-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This case–control study investigated the long-term evolution of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) over a 5-year period associated with the use of selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) in the intensive care unit (ICU). In addition, effects on health care-associated infections and ICU mortality were analysed. Methods We investigated patients undergoing mechanical ventilation > 48 h in 11 adult ICUs located at 3 campuses of a university hospital. Administrative, clinical, and microbiological data which were routinely recorded electronically served as the basis. We analysed differences in the rates and incidence densities (ID, cases per 1000 patient-days) of MDRB associated with SOD use in all patients and stratified by patient origin (outpatient or inpatient). After propensity score matching, health-care infections and ICU mortality were compared. Results 5034 patients were eligible for the study. 1694 patients were not given SOD. There were no differences in the incidence density of MDRB when SOD was used, except for more vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (0.72/1000 days vs. 0.31/1000 days, p < 0.01), and fewer ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (0.22/1000 days vs. 0.56/1000 days, p < 0.01). After propensity score matching, SOD was associated with lower incidence rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and death in the ICU but not with ICU-acquired bacteremia or urinary tract infection. Conclusions Comparisons of the ICU-acquired MDRB over a 5-year period revealed no differences in incidence density, except for lower rate of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and higher rate of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium with SOD. Incidence rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and death in the ICU were lower in patients receiving SOD. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-022-06826-7.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kumari R, Yadav Y, Misra R, Das U, Das Adhikari U, Malakar P, Dubey GP. Emerging frontiers of antibiotics use and their impacts on the human gut microbiome. Microbiol Res 2022; 263:127127. [PMID: 35914416 DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Antibiotics, the primary drugs used to cure bacterial diseases, are increasingly becoming ineffective due to the emergence of multiple drug resistance (MDR) leading to recurrence of previously sensitive pathogens. Human gut microbiome (GM), known to play an important role in various physiological processes, consists of pool of diverse microbes. Indiscriminate use of antibiotics during the life span of an individual may lead to development of resistant microbes e.g. Vibrio, Acinetobacter, Escherichia, Klebsiella, Clostridia, etc. in the human GM. Transmission of antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) between pathogenic and commensal bacteria occurs more frequently in microbiome communities wherein bacteria communicate and exchange cellular constituents both among themselves and with the host. Additionally, co-factors like 'early vs. late' exposure, type of antibiotics and duration of treatment modulate the adverse effects of antibiotics on GM maturation. Furthermore, factors like mode of birth, ethnicity, malnutrition, demography, diet, lifestyle, etc., which influence GM composition, can also indirectly alter the host response to antibiotics. Currently, advanced 'omics' and culturomics approaches are revealing novel avenues to study the interplay between antibiotics and the microbiome and to identify resistant genes in these bacterial communities. Here, we discuss the recent developments that have given insights into the effects of antibiotics on the homeostatic balance of the gut microbiome and thus on human health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rekha Kumari
- Department of Zoology, Miranda House, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India.
| | - Yasha Yadav
- Department of Zoology, Miranda House, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
| | - Richa Misra
- Department of Zoology, Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Delhi 1100021, India
| | - Utpal Das
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Upasana Das Adhikari
- The Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, 400 Technology Square Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Pushkar Malakar
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Gyanendra P Dubey
- Molecular Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Cedex 15 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jabłońska-Trypuć A, Makuła M, Włodarczyk-Makuła M, Wołejko E, Wydro U, Serra-Majem L, Wiater J. Inanimate Surfaces as a Source of Hospital Infections Caused by Fungi, Bacteria and Viruses with Particular Emphasis on SARS-CoV-2. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19138121. [PMID: 35805776 PMCID: PMC9265696 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The carriers of nosocomial infections are the hands of medical personnel and inanimate surfaces. Both hands and surfaces may be contaminated as a result of contact with the patient, their body fluids, and touching contaminated surfaces in the patient’s surroundings. Visually clean inanimate surfaces are an important source of pathogens. Microorganisms have properties thanks to which they can survive in unfavorable conditions, from a few days to several months. Bacteria, viruses and fungi are able to transmit from inanimate surfaces to the skin of the patient and the medical staff. These pathogens include SARS-CoV-2, which can survive on various types of inanimate surfaces, being a potential source of infection. By following the recommendations related to washing and disinfecting hands and surfaces, and using appropriate washing and disinfecting agents with a broad biocidal spectrum, high material compatibility and the shortest duration of action, we contribute to breaking the chain of nosocomial infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agata Jabłońska-Trypuć
- Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45E Street, 15-351 Białystok, Poland; (E.W.); (U.W.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Marcin Makuła
- Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Traugutta sq.2, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland;
| | - Maria Włodarczyk-Makuła
- Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Częstochowa University of Technology, 69 Dabrowskiego Str., 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland;
| | - Elżbieta Wołejko
- Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45E Street, 15-351 Białystok, Poland; (E.W.); (U.W.)
| | - Urszula Wydro
- Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45E Street, 15-351 Białystok, Poland; (E.W.); (U.W.)
| | - Lluis Serra-Majem
- Research Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain;
| | - Józefa Wiater
- Department of Agri-Food Engineering and Environmental Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45E Street, 15-351 Białystok, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hirst C, Needham M. Risk factors and outcomes associated with ventilator associated pneumonia amongst intubated trauma patients admitted to the general intensive care unit of a major trauma centre. TRAUMA-ENGLAND 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/14604086221094651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite the use of care bundles, ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a frequently occurring health care-associated infection, increasing costs, length of stay (LOS) and mortality. The incidence is higher amongst trauma patients, although due to variable definitions and study populations risk factors for developing VAP are disputed, with few reports from the UK. Methods This 6-year review of intubated trauma patients admitted to the general Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a UK major trauma centre, collected data on suspected risk factors for VAP, as well as demographic information, outcomes and microbiology. Ninety-nine patients who developed VAP within the first 7 days of admission were compared with 191 patient who did not, with multivariable logistic regression used to control for confounding variables. Results Univariable analysis suggested that injury severity score (ISS) (34 v 29), head injury (66.7% v 50.8%), polytrauma (79.8% v 68.1%) and ventilator days (10 v 5) were associated with increased risk of VAP, but after adjustment only ventilator days remained significant (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.06). Antibiotics within 24 h of admission were associated with reduced odds of developing VAP, whether this was for pulmonary prophylaxis (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22–0.83, p = 0.013) or non-pulmonary reasons (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15–0.51, p < 0.001). Conclusions Only increasing ventilator days was associated with increased odds of developing VAP. The use of early antimicrobials was associated strongly with a reduction in the odds of developing VAP; this could be explained by unmeasured confounding or a prophylactic effect against aspiration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Hirst
- Department of Critical Care, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Matthew Needham
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
A prospective matched case-control study on the genomic epidemiology of colistin-resistant Enterobacterales from Dutch patients. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2022; 2:55. [PMID: 35607432 PMCID: PMC9122983 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-022-00115-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Colistin is a last-resort treatment option for infections with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. However, colistin resistance is increasing.
Methods
A six-month prospective matched case-control study was performed in which 22 Dutch laboratories with 32 associated hospitals participated. Laboratories were invited to send a maximum of five colistin-resistant Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae (COLR-EK) isolates and five colistin-susceptible isolates (COLS-EK) to the reference laboratory, matched for patient location, material of origin and bacterial species. Epidemiological/clinical data were collected and included in the analysis. Characteristics of COLR-EK/COLS-EK isolates were compared using logistic regression with correction for variables used for matching. Forty-six ColR-EK/ColS-EK pairs were analysed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) for whole-genome multi-locus sequence typing and identification of resistance genes, including mcr genes. To identify chromosomal mutations potentially leading to colistin resistance, NGS reads were mapped against gene sequences of pmrAB, phoPQ, mgrB and crrB.
Results
In total, 72 COLR-EK/COLS-EK pairs (75% E. coli and 25% K. pneumoniae) were included. Twenty-one percent of COLR-EK patients had received colistin, in contrast to 3% of COLS-EK patients (OR > 2.9). Of COLR-EK isolates, five contained mcr-1 and two mcr-9. One isolate lost mcr-9 after repeated sub-culturing, but retained colistin resistance. Among 46 sequenced COLR-EK isolates, genetic diversity was large and 19 (41.3%) isolates had chromosomal mutations potentially associated with colistin resistance.
Conclusions
Colistin resistance is present but uncommon in the Netherlands and caused by the mcr gene in a minority of COLR-EK isolates. There is a need for surveillance of colistin resistance using appropriate susceptibility testing methods.
Collapse
|
21
|
Severyn CJ, Siranosian BA, Kong STJ, Moreno A, Li MM, Chen N, Duncan CN, Margossian SP, Lehmann LE, Sun S, Andermann TM, Birbrayer O, Silverstein S, Reynolds CG, Kim S, Banaei N, Ritz J, Fodor AA, London WB, Bhatt AS, Whangbo JS. Microbiota dynamics in a randomized trial of gut decontamination during allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. JCI Insight 2022; 7:e154344. [PMID: 35239511 PMCID: PMC9057614 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.154344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDGut decontamination (GD) can decrease the incidence and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in murine models of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In this pilot study, we examined the impact of GD on gut microbiome composition and the incidence of aGVHD in HCT patients.METHODSWe randomized 20 patients undergoing allogeneic HCT to receive (GD) or not receive (no-GD) oral vancomycin-polymyxin B from day -5 through neutrophil engraftment. We evaluated shotgun metagenomic sequencing of serial stool samples to compare the composition and diversity of the gut microbiome between study arms. We assessed clinical outcomes in the 2 arms and performed strain-specific analyses of pathogens that caused bloodstream infections (BSI).RESULTSThe 2 arms did not differ in the predefined primary outcome of Shannon diversity of the gut microbiome at 2 weeks post-HCT (genus, P = 0.8; species, P = 0.44) or aGVHD incidence (P = 0.58). Immune reconstitution of T cell and B cell subsets was similar between groups. Five patients in the no-GD arm had 8 BSI episodes versus 1 episode in the GD arm (P = 0.09). The BSI-causing pathogens were traceable to the gut in 7 of 8 BSI episodes in the no-GD arm, including Staphylococcus species.CONCLUSIONWhile GD did not differentially affect Shannon diversity or clinical outcomes, our findings suggest that GD may protect against gut-derived BSI in HCT patients by decreasing the prevalence or abundance of gut pathogens.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02641236.FUNDINGNIH, Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, V Foundation, Sloan Foundation, Emerson Collective, and Stanford Maternal & Child Health Research Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J. Severyn
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Division of Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant and Regenerative Medicine
| | | | | | - Angel Moreno
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Michelle M. Li
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nan Chen
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christine N. Duncan
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Steven P. Margossian
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leslie E. Lehmann
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shan Sun
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tessa M. Andermann
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Olga Birbrayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Carol G. Reynolds
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Soomin Kim
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Niaz Banaei
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jerome Ritz
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anthony A. Fodor
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Wendy B. London
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ami S. Bhatt
- Departments of Genetics and Medicine, Division of Hematology
| | - Jennifer S. Whangbo
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Brown A, Ferrando P, Popa M, de la Fuente GM, Pappachan J, Cuthbertson B, Drikite L, Feltbower R, Gouliouris T, Sale I, Shulman R, Tume LN, Myburgh J, Woolfall K, Harrison DA, Mouncey PR, Rowan KM, Pathan N. Use of selective gut decontamination in critically ill children: protocol for the Paediatric Intensive Care and Infection Control (PICnIC) pilot study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061838. [PMID: 35277414 PMCID: PMC8919465 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill children. In critically ill adults, there are data that suggest the use of Selective Decontamination of the Digestive tract (SDD), alongside standard infection control measures reduce mortality and the incidence of HCAIs. SDD-enhanced infection control has not been compared directly with standard infection prevention strategies in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) population. The aim of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) in critically ill children comparing SDD with standard infection control. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Paediatric Intensive Care and Infection Control is a parallel group pilot cRCT, with integrated mixed-methods study, comparing incorporation of SDD into infection control procedures to standard care. After a 1-week pretrial ecology surveillance period, recruitment to the cRCT will run for a period of 18 weeks, comprising: (1) baseline control period (2) pre, mid and post-trial ecology surveillance periods and (3) intervention period. Six PICUs (in England, UK) will begin with usual care in period 1, then will be randomised 1:1 by the trial statistician using computer-based randomisation, to either continue to deliver usual care or commence delivery of the intervention (SDD) in period 2. Outcomes measures include parent and healthcare professionals' views on trial feasibility, adherence to the SDD intervention, estimation of recruitment rate and understanding of potential patient-centred primary and secondary outcome measures for the definitive trial. The planned recruitment for the cRCT is 324 participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial received favourable ethical opinion from West Midlands-Black Country Research Ethics Committee (reference: 20/WM/0061) and approval from the Health Research Authority (IRAS number: 239324). Informed consent is not required for SDD intervention or anonymised data collection but is sought for investigations as part of the study, any identifiable data collected and monitoring of medical records. Results will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed medical journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN40310490.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alanna Brown
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Paloma Ferrando
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Mariana Popa
- Institute of Life and Human Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Brian Cuthbertson
- Department of Critical Care, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Drikite
- Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Robert Shulman
- Department of Pharmacy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lyvonne N Tume
- School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - John Myburgh
- The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Paul R Mouncey
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Kathryn M Rowan
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Nazima Pathan
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Buitinck SH, Jansen R, Bosman RJ, van der Meer NJM, van der Voort PHJ. Eradication of Resistant and Susceptible Aerobic Gram-Negative Bacteria From the Digestive Tract in Critically Ill Patients; an Observational Cohort Study. Front Microbiol 2022; 12:779805. [PMID: 35185812 PMCID: PMC8853443 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.779805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Selective Decontamination of the Digestive tract (SDD) aims to prevent nosocomial infections, by eradication of potentially pathogenic micro-organisms from the digestive tract. Objectives To estimate the rate of and the time to eradication of resistant vs. susceptible facultative aerobic gram-negative bacteria (AGNB) in patients treated with SDD. Methods This observational and retrospective study included patients admitted to the ICU between January 2001 and August 2017. Patients were included when treated with SDD (tobramycin, polymyxin B, and amphotericin B) and colonized in the upper or lower gastro-intestinal (GI) tract with at least one AGNB present on admission. Decontamination was determined after the first negative set of cultures (rectal and throat). An additional analysis was performed of two consecutive negative cultures. Results Of the 281 susceptible AGNB in the throat and 1,087 in the rectum on admission, 97.9 and 93.7%, respectively, of these microorganisms were successfully eradicated. In the upper GI-tract no differences in eradication rates were found between susceptible and resistant microorganisms. However, the median duration until eradication was significantly longer for aminoglycosides resistant vs. susceptible microorganisms (5 vs. 4 days, p < 0.01). In the lower GI-tract, differences in eradication rates between susceptible and resistant microorganisms were found for cephalosporins (90.0 vs. 95.6%), aminoglycosides (84.4 vs. 95.5%) and ciprofloxacin (90.0 vs. 95.2%). Differences in median duration until eradication between susceptible and resistant microorganisms were found for aminoglycosides and ciprofloxacin (both 5 days vs. 6 days, p = 0.001). Decontamination defined as two negative cultures was achieved in a lower rate (77–98% for the upper GI tract and 64–77% for the lower GI tract) and a median of 1 day later. Conclusion The vast majority of both susceptible and resistant microorganisms are effectively eradicated from the upper and lower GI tract. In the lower GI tract decontamination rates of susceptible microorganisms are significantly higher and achieved in a shorter time period compared to resistant strains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie H. Buitinck
- Department of Intensive Care, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Sophie H. Buitinck,
| | - Rogier Jansen
- Department of Medical Microbiology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rob J. Bosman
- Department of Intensive Care, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Peter H. J. van der Voort
- TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg, Netherlands
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Peter H. J. van der Voort,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Alneama RT, Al-Massody AJ, Mahmud BM, Ghasemian A. The existence and expression of aminoglycoside resistance genes among multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates in intensive care unit centers. GENE REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
25
|
Luque-Paz D, Tattevin P, Jaubert P, Reizine F, Kouatchet A, Camus C. Selective digestive decontamination to reduce the high rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critical COVID-19. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2021; 41:100987. [PMID: 34844031 PMCID: PMC8619941 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David Luque-Paz
- Infectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou Hospital, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France; Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
| | - Pierre Tattevin
- Infectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou Hospital, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Paul Jaubert
- Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Florian Reizine
- Infectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou Hospital, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | - Christophe Camus
- Infectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou Hospital, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Barsuk AL, Nekaeva ES, Lovtsova LV, Urakov AL. Selective Intestinal Decontamination as a Method for Preventing Infectious Complications (Review). Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2021; 12:86-95. [PMID: 34796022 PMCID: PMC8596238 DOI: 10.17691/stm2020.12.6.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Infectious complications are the most common cause of death in patients with severe burns. To date, there is no generally accepted method for preventing such complications in burn injury. One of the possible prevention options is selective intestinal decontamination (SID). This method is based on the enteral administration of non-absorbable antimicrobial agents. The preventive effect of SID involves inhibition of intestinal microflora translocation through the mucous membranes, inasmuch as studies demonstrate that endogenous opportunistic microorganisms are a common cause of infectious complications in various critical conditions. The SID method was originally developed in the Netherlands for patients suffering from mechanical injury. Antimicrobial drugs were selected based on their high activity in relation to the main endogenous opportunistic pathogens and minimal activity against normal intestinal microflora components. The combination of polymyxin (B or E), tobramycin, and amphotericin B with intravenous cefotaxime was chosen as the first SID regimen. Other regimens were proposed afterwards, and the application field of the method was expanded. In particular, it became the method of choice for prevention of infectious complications in patients with severe burn injury. Clinical studies demonstrate efficacy of some SID regimens for preventing infectious complications in patients with thermal injury. Concomitant administration of SID and systemic preventive antibiotics and addition of oropharyngeal decontamination increases the method efficacy. SID is generally well-tolerated, but some studies show an increased risk of diarrhea with this preventive option. In addition, SID increases the risk of developing antibiotic resistance like any other antibiotic regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Barsuk
- Associate Professor, Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia
| | - E S Nekaeva
- Head of Admission and Consultation Department, Clinical Pharmacologist, University Clinic; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia
| | - L V Lovtsova
- Associate Professor, Head of the Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia
| | - A L Urakov
- Professor, Head of the Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology; Izhevsk State Medical Academy, 281 Kommunarov St., Izhevsk, 426034, Udmurt Republic, Russia; Leading Researcher, Department of Modeling and Synthesis of Technological Processes Udmurt Federal Research Center, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 34 Tatyany Baramzinoy St., Izhevsk, 426067, Udmurt Republic, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Weinberger J, Cocoros N, Klompas M. Ventilator-Associated Events: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2021; 35:871-899. [PMID: 34752224 DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2021.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shifted the focus of safety surveillance in mechanically ventilated patients from ventilator-associated pneumonia to ventilator-associated events in 2013 to increase the objectivity and reproducibility of surveillance and to encourage quality improvement programs to focus on preventing a broader array of complications. Ventilator-associated events are associated with a doubling of the risk of dying. Prospective studies have found that minimizing sedation, increasing spontaneous awakening and breathing trials, and conservative fluid management can decrease event rates and the duration of ventilation. Multifaceted interventions to enhance these practices can decrease ventilator-associated event rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Weinberger
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Street, Suite 401, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, 200 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| | - Noelle Cocoros
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Street, Suite 401, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Michael Klompas
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Street, Suite 401, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes recent progress in our understanding of the role of the gut microbiota in sepsis pathogenesis and outlines the potential role of microbiota-targeted therapies. RECENT FINDINGS The composition of the gut microbiome is profoundly distorted during sepsis, with a loss of commensal bacteria and an overgrowth of potential pathogenic micro-organisms. These alterations also extend to nonbacterial intestinal inhabitants. Disruptions of these intestinal communities are associated with both an increased susceptibility to develop sepsis, as well as a higher risk of adverse outcomes. Preclinical studies have characterized the effects of several microbiota-derived metabolites (such as D-lactate, butyrate, and deoxycholic acid) on enhancing the host immune response during critical illness. Microbiota-targeted therapies (e.g. probiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation) might be of benefit, but can also be associated with increased risks of bloodstream infections. SUMMARY Emerging evidence display an important role of gut micro-organisms (including bacteria, fungi, eukaryotic viruses, and bacteriophages) and their derived metabolites in both the susceptibility to, as well as outcomes of sepsis. Despite recent progress in the mechanistic understanding of microbiota-mediated protection, clinical breakthroughs in the development of microbiota-based prognostic tools or therapies are thus far lacking in the field of sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert F J Kullberg
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM)
- Microbiota Center Amsterdam
| | - W Joost Wiersinga
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM)
- Microbiota Center Amsterdam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan W Haak
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM)
- Microbiota Center Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Modelling and Simulation of the Effect of Targeted Decolonisation on Incidence of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infections in Haematological Patients. Infect Dis Ther 2021; 11:129-143. [PMID: 34665434 PMCID: PMC8847524 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00550-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Haematological patients are at higher risk of bloodstream infections (BSI) after chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to develop a simulation model assessing the impact of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) of haematological patients colonised with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) on the incidence of ESBL-E BSI after chemotherapy. Methods A patient population was created by a stochastic simulation model mimicking the patients’ states of colonisation with ESBL-E during hospitalisation. A systematic literature search was performed to inform the model. All ESBL-E carriers were randomised (1:1) to either the intervention (targeted SDD) or the control group (placebo). ESBL-E BSI incidence was the outcome of the model. Sensitivity analyses were performed by prevalence of ESBL-E carriage at hospital admission (low: < 10%, medium: 10–25%, high: > 25%), duration of neutropenia after receiving chemotherapy, administration of antibiotic prophylaxis with quinolones, and time interval between SDD and chemotherapy. Results The model estimated that the administration of targeted SDD before chemotherapy reduces the incidence of ESBL-E BSI in the hospitalised haematological population up to 27%. The greatest benefit was estimated in high-prevalence settings, regardless of the duration of neutropenia, the time interval before chemotherapy, and the administration of antibiotic prophylaxis with quinolones (p < 0.05). In medium-prevalence settings, SDD was effective in patients receiving quinolone prophylaxis, with either 1-day time interval before chemotherapy and a neutropenia duration > 6 days (p < 0.05) or 7-day time interval before chemotherapy and a neutropenia duration > 9 days (p < 0.05). No benefit was observed in low-prevalence settings. Conclusions Our model suggests that targeted SDD could decrease the rate of ESBL-E BSI in haematological carriers before chemotherapy in the setting of high ESBL-E prevalence at hospital admission. These estimates require confirmation by well-designed multicentre RCTs, including the assessment of the impact on resistance/disruption patterns of gut microbiome. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00550-3.
Collapse
|
30
|
Bernts LHP, Dekker SEI, Soonawala D, Brüggemann RJM, Wertheim HFL, de Fijter JW, Drenth JPH, Lantinga MA. Efficacy and safety of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) to prevent recurrent hepatic cyst infections in polycystic liver disease: a retrospective case series. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 75:2666-2669. [PMID: 32437580 PMCID: PMC7443730 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatic cyst infection is a complication of polycystic liver disease (PLD) that causes substantial morbidity. Repetitive infection is frequent and is increasingly difficult to treat. As translocated gut bacteria are considered the cause, we hypothesize that selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) reduces recurrence of hepatic cyst infection. Methods We performed a retrospective, observational study in two referral centres. All patients with PLD treated with SDD for hepatic cyst infection were included. Efficacy was determined by calculating the infection incidence (hepatic cyst infections per month) before and during SDD therapy. Adverse events were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results We identified eight patients who received SDD (88% female, 88% polycystic kidney disease). The median age was 65 years (IQR: 51–74 years). SDD lowered the median incidence from 0.09 episodes per month (IQR: 0.06–0.25 episodes per month) to 0.01 episodes per month (IQR: 0.00–0.05 episodes per month) (P = 0.12). Discontinuation of SDD led to rapid recurrence of cyst infection (71% within 6 weeks). SDD consisted of polymyxins with/without aminoglycosides. The median SDD treatment duration was 20 months (range: 3–89 months). Six patients (75%) developed adverse events [CTCAE Grade 1 (gastrointestinal: n = 3) or Grade 3 (ototoxicity: n = 1; fungal infection: n = 1)], mostly attributable to aminoglycosides; one patient developed polymyxin E resistance. Conclusions SDD prophylaxis provides a novel strategy for limiting recurrent hepatic cyst infection in PLD patients. However, adverse events are frequent and curtail its use. As most were attributable to aminoglycosides, polymyxin E is considered the preferred therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas H P Bernts
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Shosha E I Dekker
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Darius Soonawala
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Roger J M Brüggemann
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Heiman F L Wertheim
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joost P H Drenth
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marten A Lantinga
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Asymmetric Effects of Decontamination Using Topical Antibiotics for the ICU Patient. Symmetry (Basel) 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/sym13061027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
There are several antiseptic, antibiotic and non-decontamination-based interventions for preventing intensive care unit (ICU) acquired infection. These have been evaluated in >200 studies. Infection prevention using topical antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) appears to be the most effective. Whether antibiotic use in the ICU may influence the risk of infection among concurrent control patients within the same ICU and result in asymmetrical herd effects cannot be resolved with individual studies examined in isolation. The collective observations within control and intervention groups from numerous ICU infection prevention studies simulates a multi-center natural experiment enabling the herd effects of antibiotics to be evaluated. Among the TAP control groups, the incidences for both ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and mortality are unusually high in comparison to literature-derived benchmarks. Paradoxically, amongst the TAP intervention groups, the incidences of mortality are also unusually high and the VAP incidences are similar (i.e., not lower) compared to the incidences among studies of other interventions. By contrast, the mortality incidences among the intervention groups of other studies are similar to those among the intervention groups of TAP studies. Using topical antibiotics to prevent infections acquired within the ICU environment may result in profoundly asymmetrical effects.
Collapse
|
32
|
Billot L, Cuthbertson B, Gordon A, Al-Beidh F, Correa M, Davis J, Finfer S, Glass P, Goodman F, Hammond N, Iredell J, Miller J, Murthy S, Rose L, Seppelt I, Taylor C, Young P, Myburgh J. Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract in Intensive Care Unit Patients (SuDDICU) crossover, cluster randomised controlled trial. CRIT CARE RESUSC 2021; 23:183-193. [PMID: 38045525 PMCID: PMC10692556 DOI: 10.51893/2021.2.oa5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: It is unclear whether the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) improves outcomes in ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and whether SDD is associated with the development of antibiotic resistance. Objective: To describe the study protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract in Intensive Care Unit Patients (SuDDICU) trial. Design, setting, participants and intervention: SuDDICU is an international, crossover, cluster randomised controlled trial of mechanically ventilated patients in ICUs using two 12-month trial periods. For each period, participating ICUs will implement SDD plus standard care or standard care alone. The SuDDICU drug intervention is an oral paste and gastric suspension of three antibiotics combined with a 4-day course of intravenous antibiotics. Observational ecological assessments will be conducted during five surveillance periods. The trial will be conducted in 19 ICUs in Australia and ten ICUs in Canada and the United Kingdom, and will recruit 15 000-17 000 patients. Recruitment commenced in Australia in 2017. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome is all-cause hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include: duration of ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay; incidence of new antibiotic-resistant organisms during the index ICU admission; changes in antibiotic-resistant organism rates; incidence of new Clostridioides difficile infections; and total use of antibiotics. Results and conclusions: SuDDICU will determine whether the use of SDD plus standard care is associated with a reduction in hospital mortality in ventilated ICU patients compared with standard care alone. It will also quantify the impact of the use of SDD on the development of antibiotic resistance. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615000411549) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02389036).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Billot
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brian Cuthbertson
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anthony Gordon
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Maryam Correa
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joshua Davis
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Simon Finfer
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Parisa Glass
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Fiona Goodman
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Naomi Hammond
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathon Iredell
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Ian Seppelt
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Nepean Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Colman Taylor
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul Young
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
- Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - John Myburgh
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Classen AY, Henze L, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Maschmeyer G, Sandherr M, Graeff LD, Alakel N, Christopeit M, Krause SW, Mayer K, Neumann S, Cornely OA, Penack O, Weißinger F, Wolf HH, Vehreschild JJ. Primary prophylaxis of bacterial infections and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors: 2020 updated guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (AGIHO/DGHO). Ann Hematol 2021; 100:1603-1620. [PMID: 33846857 PMCID: PMC8116237 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04452-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Hematologic and oncologic patients with chemo- or immunotherapy-related immunosuppression are at substantial risk for bacterial infections and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PcP). As bacterial resistances are increasing worldwide and new research reshapes our understanding of the interactions between the human host and bacterial commensals, administration of antibacterial prophylaxis has become a matter of discussion. This guideline constitutes an update of the 2013 published guideline of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). It gives an overview about current strategies for antibacterial prophylaxis in cancer patients while taking into account the impact of antibacterial prophylaxis on the human microbiome and resistance development. Current literature published from January 2012 to August 2020 was searched and evidence-based recommendations were developed by an expert panel. All recommendations were discussed and approved in a consensus conference of the AGIHO prior to publication. As a result, we present a comprehensive update and extension of our guideline for antibacterial and PcP prophylaxis in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Y Classen
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Herderstr. 52-54, 50931, Cologne, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Larissa Henze
- Department of Medicine, Clinic III - Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Clinic for Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Georg Maschmeyer
- Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Michael Sandherr
- Specialist Clinic for Haematology and Oncology, Medical Care Center Penzberg, Penzberg, Germany
| | - Luisa Durán Graeff
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Herderstr. 52-54, 50931, Cologne, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nael Alakel
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maximilian Christopeit
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefan W Krause
- Department of Medicine 5 - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Karin Mayer
- Medical Clinic III for Oncology, Hematology, Immunooncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Silke Neumann
- Interdisciplinary Center for Oncology, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Oliver A Cornely
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Herderstr. 52-54, 50931, Cologne, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Chair Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinical Trials Centre Cologne (ZKS Köln), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Olaf Penack
- Medical Department for Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Weißinger
- Department for Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, and Palliative Care, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel v. Bodelschwinghsche Stiftungen Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Hans-Heinrich Wolf
- Department IV of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Jörg Janne Vehreschild
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Herderstr. 52-54, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Atamna-Mawassi H, Huberman-Samuel M, Hershcovitz S, Karny-Epstein N, Kola A, Cortés LEL, Leibovici L, Yahav D. Interventions to reduce infections caused by multidrug resistant Enterobacteriaceae (MDR-E): A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect 2021; 83:156-166. [PMID: 34000343 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate different interventions to reduce multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (MDR-E) infection/colonization. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating interventions for prevention of MDR-E infection/colonization among hospitalized adult patients. The co-primary outcomes were mortality and MDR-E infections. PubMed, Cochrane library, and LILACS databases were searched up till December 2019, as well as grey literature sources. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Infection/colonization/acquisition outcomes were reported per patient-days as pooled incidence ratios (IRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis studies were reported separately. RESULTS Sixty-three studies were included, 16 RCTs, 33 observational studies, and 14 ITS. For the intervention of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), 23 studies were included. No differences in mortality or MDR-E infections were observed with ASP, however, MDR-E colonization was significantly reduced (IR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.82). Seventeen studies examined decolonization without significant difference in outcomes. Other interventions were scarcely represented. Among 14 ITS publications, most evaluating ASP, 11 showed benefit of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS ASP is an effective measure in preventing MDR-E colonization. Decolonization did not show significant benefit in reducing infection or colonization. Studies are needed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of ASP and assess bundles of interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Axel Kola
- Institute for Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, National Reference Centre for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Charité-University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luis Eduardo López Cortés
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Sevilla, Spain
| | - Leonard Leibovici
- Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Dafna Yahav
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel; Infectious Diseases Unit, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is a major global health challenge and, worryingly, several key Gram negative pathogens can become resistant to most currently available antibiotics. Polymyxins have been revived as a last-line therapeutic option for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram negative bacteria, in particular Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacterales. Polymyxins were first discovered in the late 1940s but were abandoned soon after their approval in the late 1950s as a result of toxicities (e.g., nephrotoxicity) and the availability of "safer" antibiotics approved at that time. Therefore, knowledge on polymyxins had been scarce until recently, when enormous efforts have been made by several research teams around the world to elucidate the chemical, microbiological, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, and toxicological properties of polymyxins. One of the major achievements is the development of the first scientifically based dosage regimens for colistin that are crucial to ensure its safe and effective use in patients. Although the guideline has not been developed for polymyxin B, a large clinical trial is currently being conducted to optimize its clinical use. Importantly, several novel, safer polymyxin-like lipopeptides are developed to overcome the nephrotoxicity, poor efficacy against pulmonary infections, and narrow therapeutic windows of the currently used polymyxin B and colistin. This review discusses the latest achievements on polymyxins and highlights the major challenges ahead in optimizing their clinical use and discovering new-generation polymyxins. To save lives from the deadly infections caused by Gram negative "superbugs," every effort must be made to improve the clinical utility of the last-line polymyxins. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to global health. The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections has been highlighted by leading global health organizations and authorities. Polymyxins are a last-line defense against difficult-to-treat MDR Gram negative pathogens. Unfortunately, the pharmacological information on polymyxins was very limited until recently. This review provides a comprehensive overview on the major achievements and challenges in polymyxin pharmacology and clinical use and how the recent findings have been employed to improve clinical practice worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue C Nang
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (S.C.N., M.A.K.A., J.L.); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (T.V.); and Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (Q.T.Z.)
| | - Mohammad A K Azad
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (S.C.N., M.A.K.A., J.L.); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (T.V.); and Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (Q.T.Z.)
| | - Tony Velkov
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (S.C.N., M.A.K.A., J.L.); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (T.V.); and Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (Q.T.Z.)
| | - Qi Tony Zhou
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (S.C.N., M.A.K.A., J.L.); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (T.V.); and Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (Q.T.Z.)
| | - Jian Li
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (S.C.N., M.A.K.A., J.L.); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (T.V.); and Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (Q.T.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
de la Court JR, Sigaloff KCE, Groot T, van der Spoel JI, Schade RP. Reducing the dosing frequency of selective digestive tract decontamination to three times daily provides effective decontamination of Gram-negative bacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2021; 40:1843-1850. [PMID: 33791891 PMCID: PMC8012068 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-021-04234-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This study evaluated the effectiveness of selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD) application three times daily (t.i.d.) compared to the standard four times daily (q.i.d.). Retrospective equivalence (combined non-inferiority and non-superiority design) study with a before-and-after design on a tertiary ICU in which the SDD frequency was reduced from q.i.d. to t.i.d. All patients with ICU admissions ≥72h and with ≥2 surveillance cultures collected on different dates were included in this study. We compared successful decontamination of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Furthermore, time to decontamination, ICU-acquired GNB bacteraemia and 28-day mortality were compared between the two groups. In total 1958 ICU admissions (1236 q.i.d., 722 t.i.d). Decontamination was achieved during the first week of admission in 77% and 76% of patients receiving SDD q.i.d and t.i.d., respectively. Successful decontamination within 14 days (without consecutive acquisition of Gram-negative bacteria) was achieved in 69.3% of the admissions with q.i.d. versus 66.8% in t.i.d. SDD (p-value = 0.2519). The proportions of successful decontamination of GNB were equivalent in both groups (−0.025, 98% CI: −0.087; 0.037). There was no significant difference in time to decontamination between the two regimens (log-rank test p-value = 0.55). Incidence (episodes/1000 days) of ICU-acquired GNB bacteraemia was 0.9 in both groups, and OR for death at day 28 in the t.i.d. group compared to the q.i.d. group was 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.80–1.21). This study shows that a t.i.d. application regimen achieves similar outcomes to the standard q.i.d. regime, for both microbiological and clinical outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jara R de la Court
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Room ZH 3A74, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Kim C E Sigaloff
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Groot
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Room ZH 3A74, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan I van der Spoel
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Schade
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Room ZH 3A74, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Osmanov A, Farooq Z, Richardson MD, Denning DW. The antiseptic Miramistin: a review of its comparative in vitro and clinical activity. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2021; 44:399-417. [PMID: 32386213 DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuaa012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Miramistin is a topical antiseptic with broad antimicrobial action, including activity against biofilms and a clinical profile showing good tolerability. Miramistin was developed within a framework of the Soviet Union Cold War Space Program. It is available for clinical use in several prior Soviet bloc countries, but barely known outside of these countries and there is almost no mention of miramistin in the English literature. However, considering emerging antimicrobial resistance, the significant potential of miramistin justifies its re-evaluation for use in other geographical areas and conditions. The review consists of two parts: (i) a review of the existing literature on miramistin in English, Russian and Ukrainian languages; (ii) a summary of most commonly used antiseptics as comparators of miramistin. The oral LD50 was 1200 mg/kg, 1000 mg/kg and 100 g/L in rats, mice and fish, respectively. Based on the results of the review, we suggest possible applications of miramistin and potential benefits over currently used agents. Miramistin offers a novel, low toxicity antiseptic with many potential clinical uses that need better study which could address some of the negative impact of antimicrobial, antiseptic and disinfectant resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Osmanov
- Next Level Diagnostics, Mikhailovsky lane 20,7, Kiev 01001, Ukraine
| | - Zara Farooq
- School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
| | - Malcolm D Richardson
- Mycology Reference Centre Manchester, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M23 9LT, UK.,Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - David W Denning
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,National Aspergillosis Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Minozzi S, Pifferi S, Brazzi L, Pecoraro V, Montrucchio G, D'Amico R. Topical antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 1:CD000022. [PMID: 33481250 PMCID: PMC8094382 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd000022.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients treated with mechanical ventilation in intensive care units (ICUs) have a high risk of developing respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) has been estimated to affect 5% to 40% of patients treated with mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours. The attributable mortality rate of VAP has been estimated at about 9%. Selective digestive decontamination (SDD), which consists of the topical application of non-absorbable antimicrobial agents to the oropharynx and gastroenteric tract during the whole period of mechanical ventilation, is often used to reduce the risk of VAP. A related treatment is selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD), in which topical antibiotics are applied to the oropharynx only. This is an update of a review first published in 1997 and updated in 2002, 2004, and 2009. OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of topical antibiotic regimens (SDD and SOD), given alone or in combination with systemic antibiotics, to prevent mortality and respiratory infections in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours in ICUs. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Group's Specialised Register, PubMed, and Embase on 5 February 2020. We also searched the WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing and unpublished studies on 5 February 2020. All searches included non-English language literature. We handsearched references of topic-related systematic reviews and the included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs assessing the efficacy and safety of topical prophylactic antibiotic regimens in adults receiving intensive care and mechanical ventilation. The included studies compared topical plus systemic antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment; topical antibiotics versus no treatment; and topical plus systemic antibiotics versus systemic antibiotics. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS We included a total of 41 trials involving 11,004 participants (five new studies were added in this update). The minimum duration of mechanical ventilation ranged from 2 (19 studies) to 6 days (one study). Thirteen studies reported the mean length of ICU stay, ranging from 11 to 33 days. The percentage of immunocompromised patients ranged from 0% (10 studies) to 22% (1 study). The reporting quality of the majority of included studies was very poor, so we judged more than 40% of the studies as at unclear risk of selection bias. We judged all studies to be at low risk of performance bias, though 47.6% were open-label, because hospitals usually have standardised infection control programmes, and possible subjective decisions on who should be tested for the presence or absence of RTIs are unlikely in an ICU setting. Regarding detection bias, we judged all included studies as at low risk for the outcome mortality. For the outcome RTIs, we judged all double-blind studies as at low risk of detection bias. We judged five open-label studies as at high risk of detection bias, as the diagnosis of RTI was not based on microbiological exams; we judged the remaining open-label studies as at low risk of detection bias, as a standardised set of diagnostic criteria, including results of microbiological exams, were used. Topical plus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis reduces overall mortality compared with placebo or no treatment (risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 0.96; 18 studies; 5290 participants; high-certainty evidence). Based on an illustrative risk of 303 deaths in 1000 people this equates to 48 (95% CI 15 to 79) fewer deaths with topical plus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Topical plus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis probably reduces RTIs (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.53; 17 studies; 2951 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on an illustrative risk of 417 RTIs in 1000 people this equates to 238 (95% CI 196 to 271) fewer RTIs with topical plus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Topical antibiotic prophylaxis probably reduces overall mortality compared with no topical antibiotic prophylaxis (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.05; 22 studies, 4213 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on an illustrative risk of 290 deaths in 1000 people this equates to 19 (95% CI 37 fewer to 15 more) fewer deaths with topical antibiotic prophylaxis. Topical antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce RTIs (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.74; 19 studies, 2698 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on an illustrative risk of 318 RTIs in 1000 people this equates to 137 (95% CI 83 to 178) fewer RTIs with topical antibiotic prophylaxis. Sixteen studies reported adverse events and dropouts due to adverse events, which were poorly reported with sparse data. The certainty of the evidence ranged from low to very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Treatments based on topical prophylaxis probably reduce respiratory infections, but not mortality, in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours, whereas a combination of topical and systemic prophylactic antibiotics reduces both overall mortality and RTIs. However, we cannot rule out that the systemic component of the combined treatment provides a relevant contribution in the observed reduction of mortality. No conclusion can be drawn about adverse events as they were poorly reported with sparse data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Minozzi
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Pifferi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Luca Brazzi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, 'Città della salute e della Scienza' Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Valentina Pecoraro
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ospedale Civile Sant'Agostino Estense, Modena, Italy
| | - Giorgia Montrucchio
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, 'Città della salute e della Scienza' Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto D'Amico
- Italian Cochrane Centre, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy
- Unit of Methodological/Statistical Support to Clinical Research, Azienda-Ospedaliero Universitaria, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Zaher S. Nutrition and the gut microbiome during critical illness: A new insight of nutritional therapy. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:300487. [PMID: 33208559 PMCID: PMC8019138 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_352_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 08/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Changes in the microbiome in response to environmental influences can affect the overall health. Critical illness is considered one of the major environmental factors that can potentially influence the normal gut homeostasis. It is associated with pathophysiological effects causing damage to the intestinal microbiome. Alteration of intestinal microbial composition during critical illness may subsequently compromise the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier and intestinal mucosa absorptive function. Many factors can impact the microbiome of critically ill patients including ischemia, hypoxia and hypotension along with the iatrogenic effects of therapeutic agents and the lack of enteral feeds. Factors related to disease state and medication are inevitable and they are part of the intensive care unit (ICU) exposure. However, a nutritional intervention targeting gut microbiota might have the potential to improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill population given the extensive vascular and lymphatic links between the intestines and other organs. Although nutrition is considered an integral part of the treatment plan of critically ill patients, still the role of nutritional intervention is restricted to improve nitrogen balance. What is dismissed is whether the nutrients we provide are adequate and how they are processed and utilised by the host and the microbiota. Therefore, the goal of nutrition therapy during critical illness should be extended to provide good quality feeds with balanced macronutrient content to feed up the entire body including the microbiota and host cells. The main aim of this review is to examine the current literature on the effect of critical illness on the gut microbiome and to highlight the role of nutrition as a factor affecting the intestinal microbiome-host relationship during critical illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Zaher
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Melone MA, Heming N, Meng P, Mompoint D, Aboab J, Clair B, Salomon J, Sharshar T, Orlikowski D, Chevret S, Annane D. Early mechanical ventilation in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome at high risk of respiratory failure: a randomized trial. Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10:128. [PMID: 32997260 PMCID: PMC7525233 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00742-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction About 30% of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome become ventilator dependent, of whom roughly 75% develop pneumonia. This trial aimed at assessing the impact of early mechanical ventilation (EMV) on pneumonia occurrence in GBS patients. We hypothesize that EMV will reduce the incidence of pneumonia. Methods This was a single centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial performed on two parallel groups. 50 intensive care unit adults admitted for Guillain-Barré syndrome and at risk for acute respiratory failure. Patients were randomized to early mechanical ventilation via face-mask or endotracheal intubation owing to the presence or absence of impaired swallowing (experimental arm), or to conventional care (control arm). The primary outcome was the incidence of pneumonia up to intensive care unit discharge (or 90 days, pending of which occurred first). Findings Twenty-five patients were randomized in each group. There was no significant difference between groups for the incidence of pneumonia (10/25 (40%) vs 9/25 (36%), P = 1). There was no significant difference between groups for the time to onset of pneumonia (P = 0.50, Gray test). During follow-up, there were 16/25 (64%) mechanically ventilated patients in the control group, and 25/25 (100%) in the experimental arm (P < 000·1). The time on ventilator was non-significantly shorter in the experimental arm (14 [7; 29] versus 21.5 [17.3; 35.5], P = 0.10). There were no significant differences between groups for length of hospital stay, neurological scores, the proportion of patients who needed tracheostomy, in-hospital death, or any serious adverse events. Conclusions In the present study including adults with Guillain-Barré syndrome at high risk of respiratory failure, we did not observe a prevention of pneumonia with early mechanical ventilation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT00167622. Registered 9 September 2005, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00167622?cond=Guillain-Barre+Syndrome&cntry=FR&draw=2&rank=1
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Anne Melone
- Respiratory, Thoracic Oncology and Respiratory Intensive Care Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
| | - Nicholas Heming
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, 104 boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380, Garches, France
| | - Paris Meng
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, 104 boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380, Garches, France
| | - Dominique Mompoint
- Radiology Department, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France
| | - Jerôme Aboab
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, 104 boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380, Garches, France
| | - Bernard Clair
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, 104 boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380, Garches, France
| | - Jerôme Salomon
- Infectious Diseases Department, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches, France
| | - Tarek Sharshar
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, 104 boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380, Garches, France
| | - David Orlikowski
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, 104 boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380, Garches, France
| | | | - Djillali Annane
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, 104 boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380, Garches, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pérez-Granda MJ, Alonso B, Zavala R, Latorre MC, Hortal J, Samaniego R, Bouza E, Muñoz P, Guembe M. Selective digestive decontamination solution used as "lock therapy" prevents and eradicates bacterial biofilm in an in vitro bench-top model. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2020; 19:44. [PMID: 32972419 PMCID: PMC7513905 DOI: 10.1186/s12941-020-00387-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Most preventing measures for reducing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are based mainly on the decolonization of the internal surface of the endotracheal tubes (ETTs). However, it has been demonstrated that bacterial biofilm can also be formed on the external surface of ETTs. Our objective was to test in vitro the efficacy of selective digestive decontamination solution (SDDs) onto ETT to prevent biofilm formation and eradicate preformed biofilms of three different microorganisms of VAP. Methods We used an in vitro model in which we applied, at the subglottic space of ETT, biofilms of either P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442, or E. coli ATCC 25922, or S. aureus ATCC 29213, and the SDDs at the same time (prophylaxis) or after 72 h of biofilm forming (treatment). ETT were incubated during 5 days with a regimen of 2 h-locks. ETT fragments were analyzed by sonication and confocal laser scanning microscopy to calculate the percentage reduction of cfu and viable cells, respectively. Results Median (IQR) percentage reduction of live cells and cfu/ml counts after treatment were, respectively, 53.2% (39.4%—64.1%) and 100% (100%–100.0%) for P. aeruginosa, and 67.9% (46.7%–78.7%) and 100% (100%–100.0%) for E. coli. S. aureus presented a complete eradication by both methods. After prophylaxis, there were absence of live cells and cfu/ml counts for all microorganisms. Conclusions SDDs used as “lock therapy” in the subglottic space is a promising prophylactic approach that could be used in combination with the oro-digestive decontamination procedure in the prevention of VAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Jesús Pérez-Granda
- Cardiac Surgery Postoperative Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, 28007, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, 28009, Spain.,CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias-CIBERES, CB06/06/0058), Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Alonso
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, 28009, Spain. .,Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, 28007, Spain. .,Servicio de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Hospital General Universitario "Gregorio Marañón", C/. Dr. Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain.
| | - Ricardo Zavala
- Biology Department, School of Biology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
| | - María Consuelo Latorre
- Biology Department, School of Biology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
| | - Javier Hortal
- Cardiac Surgery Postoperative Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, 28007, Spain.,CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias-CIBERES, CB06/06/0058), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rafael Samaniego
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, 28009, Spain.,Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, 28007, Spain
| | - Emilio Bouza
- Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
| | - Patricia Muñoz
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, 28009, Spain.,CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias-CIBERES, CB06/06/0058), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, 28007, Spain.,Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
| | - María Guembe
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, 28009, Spain. .,Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, 28007, Spain. .,Servicio de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Hospital General Universitario "Gregorio Marañón", C/. Dr. Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Dimitriou V, Biehl LM, Hamprecht A, Vogel W, Dörfel D, Peter S, Schafhausen P, Rohde H, von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Klassert TE, Slickers P, Ehricht R, Slevogt H, Christ H, Hellmich M, Farowski F, Tsakmaklis A, Higgins PG, Seifert H, Vehreschild MJGT. Controlling intestinal colonization of high-risk haematology patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre, Phase II trial (CLEAR). J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 74:2065-2074. [PMID: 31220256 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We assessed the efficacy and safety of an oral antimicrobial regimen for short- and long-term intestinal eradication of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-EC/KP) in immunocompromised patients. METHODS We performed a randomized (2:1), double-blind multicentre Phase II study in four haematology-oncology departments. Patients colonized with ESBL-EC/KP received a 7 day antimicrobial regimen of oral colistin (2 × 106 IU 4×/day), gentamicin (80 mg 4×/day) and fosfomycin (three administrations of 3 g every 72 h), or placebo. Faecal, throat and urine specimens were collected on day 0, 6 ± 2, 11 ± 2, 28 ± 4 and 42 ± 4 after treatment initiation, and the quantitative burden of ESBL-EC/KP, resistance genes and changes in intestinal microbiota were analysed. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01931592. RESULTS As the manufacture of colistin powder was suspended worldwide, the study was terminated prematurely. Overall, 29 (18 verum/11 placebo) out of 47 patients were enrolled. The short-term intestinal eradication was marginal at day 6 (verum group 15/18, 83.3% versus placebo 2/11, 18.2%; relative risk 4.58, 95% CI 1.29-16.33; Fisher's exact test P = 0.001) and not evident at later timepoints. Quantitative analysis showed a significant decrease of intestinal ESBL-EC/KP burden on day 6. Sustained intestinal eradication (day 28 + 42) was not achieved (verum, 38.9% versus placebo, 27.3%; P = 0.299). In the verum group, mcr-1 genes were detected in two faecal samples collected after treatment. Microbiome analysis showed a significant decrease in alpha diversity and a shift in beta diversity. CONCLUSIONS In this prematurely terminated study of a 7 day oral antimicrobial eradication regimen, short-term ESBL-EC/KP suppression was marginal, while an altered intestinal microbiota composition was clearly apparent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vassiliki Dimitriou
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lena M Biehl
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Axel Hamprecht
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Wichard Vogel
- Department of Oncology, Haematology, Immunology, Rheumatology and Pulmonology, Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Dörfel
- Department of Oncology, Haematology, Immunology, Rheumatology and Pulmonology, Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Silke Peter
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Hubertus Wald Tumorzentrum/University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Rohde
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Tilman E Klassert
- Host Septomics Research Group, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Ralf Ehricht
- Center for Applied Research, InfectoGnostics Research Campus, Jena, Germany.,Department for Optical Molecular Diagnostics and Systems Technology, Leibniz-Institute of Photonic Technology (IPHT), Jena, Germany
| | - Hortense Slevogt
- Host Septomics Research Group, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Hildegard Christ
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Fedja Farowski
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anastasia Tsakmaklis
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Paul G Higgins
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Harald Seifert
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maria J G T Vehreschild
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Alagna L, Palomba E, Mangioni D, Bozzi G, Lombardi A, Ungaro R, Castelli V, Prati D, Vecchi M, Muscatello A, Bandera A, Gori A. Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Decolonization in Immunocompromised Patients: A Focus on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21165619. [PMID: 32764526 PMCID: PMC7460658 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is an important issue for global health; in immunocompromised patients, such as solid organ and hematological transplant recipients, it poses an even bigger threat. Colonization by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria was acknowledged as a strong risk factor to subsequent infections, especially in individuals with a compromised immune system. A growing pile of studies has linked the imbalance caused by the dominance of certain taxa populating the gut, also known as intestinal microbiota dysbiosis, to an increased risk of MDR bacteria colonization. Several attempts were proposed to modulate the gut microbiota. Particularly, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was successfully applied to treat conditions like Clostridioides difficile infection and other diseases linked to gut microbiota dysbiosis. In this review we aimed to provide a look at the data gathered so far on FMT, focusing on its possible role in treating MDR colonization in the setting of immunocompromised patients and analyzing its efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Alagna
- Infectious Disease Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (D.M.); (G.B.); (A.L.); (R.U.); (V.C.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Emanuele Palomba
- Infectious Disease Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (D.M.); (G.B.); (A.L.); (R.U.); (V.C.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Centre for Multidisciplinary Research in Health Science, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-3494073517
| | - Davide Mangioni
- Infectious Disease Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (D.M.); (G.B.); (A.L.); (R.U.); (V.C.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Bozzi
- Infectious Disease Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (D.M.); (G.B.); (A.L.); (R.U.); (V.C.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Andrea Lombardi
- Infectious Disease Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (D.M.); (G.B.); (A.L.); (R.U.); (V.C.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Riccardo Ungaro
- Infectious Disease Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (D.M.); (G.B.); (A.L.); (R.U.); (V.C.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Valeria Castelli
- Infectious Disease Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (D.M.); (G.B.); (A.L.); (R.U.); (V.C.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Centre for Multidisciplinary Research in Health Science, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Prati
- Department of Transfusion Medicine and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Muscatello
- Infectious Disease Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (D.M.); (G.B.); (A.L.); (R.U.); (V.C.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Alessandra Bandera
- Infectious Disease Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (D.M.); (G.B.); (A.L.); (R.U.); (V.C.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Centre for Multidisciplinary Research in Health Science, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gori
- Infectious Disease Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (D.M.); (G.B.); (A.L.); (R.U.); (V.C.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Centre for Multidisciplinary Research in Health Science, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Scheufele F, Schirren R, Friess H, Reim D. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in upper gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BJS Open 2020; 4:1015-1021. [PMID: 32749070 PMCID: PMC7709368 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infectious complications are common after gastrointestinal surgery. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) might reduce their incidence. SDD is used widely in colorectal resections, but its role in upper gastrointestinal resection is less clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of SDD on postoperative outcome in upper gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS Studies investigating SDD in upper gastrointestinal surgery were included after search of medical databases (PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar). Results were analysed according to predefined criteria. The incidence of perioperative overall complications and death was pooled. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. RESULTS Some 1384 studies were identified, of which four RCTs were included in the final analysis. These studies included 415 patients, of whom 213 (51·3 per cent) received standard treatment/placebo and 202 (48·7 per cent) had SDD. The incidence of anastomotic leakage (odds ratio (OR) 0·39, 95 per cent c.i. 0·19 to 0·80; P = 0·010) and pneumonia (OR 0·42, 0·23 to 0·78; P = 0·006) was reduced in patients receiving SDD. Rates of surgical-site infection (P = 0·750) and mortality (P = 0·130) were not affected by SDD. CONCLUSION SDD seems to be associated with reduction of anastomotic leakage and pneumonia following upper gastrointestinal resection, without affecting postoperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. Scheufele
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of MedicineTechnical University of MunichIsmaningerstrasse 22D‐81675 MunichGermany
| | - R. Schirren
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of MedicineTechnical University of MunichIsmaningerstrasse 22D‐81675 MunichGermany
| | - H. Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of MedicineTechnical University of MunichIsmaningerstrasse 22D‐81675 MunichGermany
| | - D. Reim
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of MedicineTechnical University of MunichIsmaningerstrasse 22D‐81675 MunichGermany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Choy A, Freedberg DE. Impact of microbiome-based interventions on gastrointestinal pathogen colonization in the intensive care unit. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13:1756284820939447. [PMID: 32733601 PMCID: PMC7370550 DOI: 10.1177/1756284820939447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In the intensive care unit (ICU), colonization of the gastrointestinal tract by potentially pathogenic bacteria is common and often precedes clinical infection. Though effective in the short term, traditional antibiotic-based decolonization methods may contribute to rising resistance in the long term. Novel therapies instead focus on restoring gut microbiome equilibrium to achieve pathogen colonization resistance. This review summarizes the existing data regarding microbiome-based approaches to gastrointestinal pathogen colonization in ICU patients with a focus on prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel E. Freedberg
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Decreased duration of intravenous cephalosporins in intensive care unit patients with selective digestive decontamination: a retrospective before-and-after study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2020; 39:2115-2120. [PMID: 32617694 PMCID: PMC7330883 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-020-03966-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) reduces the rate of infection and improves the outcomes of patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). A risk associated with its use is the development of multi-drug-resistant organisms. We hypothesized that a 1-day reduction in systemic antimicrobial exposure in the SDD regimen would not affect the outcomes of our patients. In this before-and-after study design, 199 patients and 248 patients were included in a 3-day SDD group and a 2-day SDD group, respectively. The rates of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ICU infections were similar in both groups. The rates of bloodstream infection and bacteriuria were significantly lower in the 2-day SDD group than in the 3-day SDD group. Compared with the patients in the 3-day group, the patients in the 2-day SDD group received fewer antibiotics and less exposure to mechanical ventilation, and they used fewer ICU resources. The rates of ICU mortality and 28-day mortality were similar in both groups. The incidence of multi-drug-resistant organisms was similar in both groups. Within the limitations inherent to our study design, reducing the exposure of prophylactic systemic antibiotics in the SDD setting from 3 days to 2 days was not associated with impaired outcomes. Future randomized controlled trials should be conducted to test this hypothesis and investigate the effects on the development of multi-drug resistant organisms.
Collapse
|
47
|
Mulder T, Kluytmans-van den Bergh M, Vlaminckx B, Roos D, de Smet AM, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel R, Verheijen P, Brandt A, Smits A, van der Vorm E, Bathoorn E, van Etten B, Veenemans J, Weersink A, Vos M, van 't Veer N, Nikolakopoulos S, Bonten M, Kluytmans J. Prevention of severe infectious complications after colorectal surgery using oral non-absorbable antimicrobial prophylaxis: results of a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020; 9:84. [PMID: 32539786 PMCID: PMC7294517 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00745-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common complications after colorectal surgery. Oral non-absorbable antibiotic prophylaxis (OAP) can be administered preoperatively to reduce the risk of SSIs. Its efficacy without simultaneous mechanical cleaning is unknown. METHODS The Precaution trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted in six Dutch hospitals. Adult patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery were randomized to receive either a three-day course of preoperative OAP with tobramycin and colistin or placebo. The primary composite endpoint was the incidence of deep SSI or mortality within 30 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints included both infectious and non-infectious complications at 30 days and six months after surgery. RESULTS The study was prematurely ended due to the loss of clinical equipoise. At that time, 39 patients had been randomized to active OAP and 39 to placebo, which reflected 8.1% of the initially pursued sample size. Nine (11.5%) patients developed the primary outcome, of whom four had been randomized to OAP (4/39; 10.3%) and five to placebo (5/39; 12.8%). This corresponds to a risk ratio in the intention-to-treat analysis of 0.80 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-2.78). In the per-protocol analysis, the relative risk was 0.64 (95% CI 0.12-3.46). CONCLUSIONS Observational data emerging during the study provided new evidence for the effectiveness of OAP that changed both the clinical and medical ethical landscape for infection prevention in colorectal surgery. We therefore consider it unethical to continue randomizing patients to placebo. We recommend the implementation of OAP in clinical practice and continuing monitoring of infection rates and antibiotic susceptibilities. TRIAL REGISTRATION The PreCaution trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register under NL5932 (previously: NTR6113) as well as in the EudraCT register under 2015-005736-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Mulder
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Kluytmans-van den Bergh
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Amphia Academy Infectious Disease Foundation, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
- Department of Infection Control, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Vlaminckx
- Department of Medical Microbiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Daphne Roos
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Marie de Smet
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Verheijen
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Brandt
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anke Smits
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Eric van der Vorm
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Bathoorn
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobien Veenemans
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, Goes, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Weersink
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet Vos
- Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nils van 't Veer
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Stavros Nikolakopoulos
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Bonten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Kluytmans
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Infection Control, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ramos-Ramos JC, Lázaro-Perona F, Arribas JR, García-Rodríguez J, Mingorance J, Ruiz-Carrascoso G, Borobia AM, Paño-Pardo JR, Herruzo R, Arnalich F. Proof-of-concept trial of the combination of lactitol with Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus for the eradication of intestinal OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Gut Pathog 2020; 12:15. [PMID: 32280375 PMCID: PMC7137496 DOI: 10.1186/s13099-020-00354-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The major reservoir of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is the gastrointestinal tract of colonized patients. Colonization is silent and may last for months, but the risk of infection by CPE in colonized patients is significant. Methods Eight long-term intestinal carriers of OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae (OXA-PE) were treated during 3 weeks with daily oral lactitol (Emportal®), Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus (Infloran®). Weekly stool samples were collected during the treatment period and 6 weeks later. The presence of OXA-PE was investigated by microbiological cultures and qPCR. Results At the end of treatment (EoT, secondary endpoint 1), four of the subjects had negative OXA-PE cultures. Three weeks later (secondary endpoint 2), six subjects were negative. Six weeks after the EoT (primary endpoint), three subjects had negative OXA-PE cultures. The relative intestinal load of OXA-PE decreased in all the patients during treatment. Conclusions The combination of prebiotics and probiotics was well tolerated. A rapid reduction on the OXA-PE intestinal loads was observed. At the EoT, decolonization was achieved in three patients. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02307383. EudraCT Number: 2014-000449-65.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos Ramos-Ramos
- 1Unidad de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de La Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Lázaro-Perona
- 2Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Paseo de La Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - José Ramón Arribas
- 1Unidad de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de La Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Julio García-Rodríguez
- 2Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Paseo de La Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Mingorance
- 2Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Paseo de La Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Guillermo Ruiz-Carrascoso
- 2Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Paseo de La Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto M Borobia
- 3Departamento de Farmacología Clínica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de La Catellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - José Ramón Paño-Pardo
- 1Unidad de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de La Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain.,6Present Address: Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario "Lozano Blesa", Zaragoza, Spain.,Present Address: Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias (IIS) de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Rafael Herruzo
- 4Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de La Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco Arnalich
- 5Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de La Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Li C, Su HB, Liu XY, Hu JH. Clinical characteristics and 28-d outcomes of bacterial infections in patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:1042-1055. [PMID: 32258075 PMCID: PMC7103966 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i6.1042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), which includes hepatic and multiple extra-hepatic organ failure, is a severe emergency condition that has high mortality. ACLF can rapidly progress and requires an urgent assessment of condition and referral for liver transplantation. Bacterial infections (BIs) trigger ACLF and play pivotal roles in the deterioration of clinical course.
AIM To investigate the clinical characteristics and 28-d outcomes of first BIs either at admission or during hospitalization in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-ACLF as defined by the Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B (COSSH).
METHODS A total of 159 patients with HBV-ACLF and 40 patients with acute decompensation of HBV-related chronic liver disease combined with first BIs were selected for a retrospective analysis between October 2014 and March 2016. The characteristics of BIs, the 28-d transplant-free survival rates, and the independent predictors of the 28-d outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS A total of 194 episodes of BIs occurred in 159 patients with HBV-ACLF. Among the episodes, 13.4% were community-acquired, 46.4% were healthcare-associated, and 40.2% belonged to nosocomial BIs. Pneumonia (40.7%), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) (34.5%), and bloodstream infection (BSI) (13.4%) were the most prevalent. As the ACLF grade increased, the incidence of SBP showed a downward trend (P = 0.021). Sixty-one strains of bacteria, including 83.6% Gram-negative bacteria and 29.5% multidrug-resistant organisms, were cultivated from 50 patients with ACLF. Escherichia coli (44.3%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.0%) were the most common bacteria. As the ACLF grade increased, the 28-d transplant-free survival rates showed a downward trend (ACLF-1, 55.7%; ACLF-2, 29.3%; ACLF-3, 5.4%; P < 0.001). The independent predictors of the 28-d outcomes of patients with HBV-ACLF were COSSH-ACLF score (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.371), acute kidney injury (HR = 2.187), BSI (HR = 2.339), prothrombin activity (HR = 0.967), and invasive catheterization (HR = 2.173).
CONCLUSION For patients with HBV-ACLF combined with first BIs, pneumonia is the most common form, and the incidence of SBP decreases with increasing ACLF grade. COSSH-ACLF score, acute kidney injury, BSI, prothrombin activity, and invasive catheterization are the independent predictors of 28-d outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Li
- Liver Failure Treatment and Research Center, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Hai-Bin Su
- Liver Failure Treatment and Research Center, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Xiao-Yan Liu
- Liver Failure Treatment and Research Center, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Jin-Hua Hu
- Liver Failure Treatment and Research Center, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hamilton LA, Behal ML. Altering Routine Intensive Care Unit Practices to Support Commensalism. Nutr Clin Pract 2020; 35:433-441. [PMID: 32189422 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The gastrointestinal (GI) tract consists of trillions of organisms that support multiple functions in the body, from immunity, digestion, and absorption to drug metabolism. These microbes form an overall collection of microorganisms that form the body's microbiome. In critical illness, many of these functions are aberrant, and the microbiome is altered, leading to untoward effects. Some of the most common medications received by patients include antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors, which affect particular changes in the microbiome. In addition, patients receiving prolonged enteral and parenteral nutrition experience changes in the microbiological composition and diversity of their GI tracts. Research is ongoing to characterize the crosstalk between the microbiome and immune function as targets for drug and nutrition therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie A Hamilton
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Michael L Behal
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|