Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study

Eculizumab Use in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: Routine Clinical Care Data From a European Cohort

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Attack prevention is crucial in managing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs). Eculizumab (ECU), an inhibitor of the terminal complement cascade, was highly effective in preventing attacks in a phase III trial of aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG seropositive(+) NMOSDs. In this article, we evaluated effectiveness and safety of ECU in routine clinical care.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD treated with ECU between December 2014 and April 2022 at 20 German and 1 Austrian university center(s) of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) by chart review. Primary outcomes were effectiveness (assessed using annualized attack rate [AAR], MRI activity, and disability changes [Expanded Disability Status Scale {EDSS}]) and safety (including adverse events, mortality, and attacks after meningococcal vaccinations), analyzed by descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (87% female, age 55.0 ± 16.3 years) received ECU for 16.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 9.6 - 21.7) months. Forty-five patients (87%) received meningococcal vaccination before starting ECU, 9 with concomitant oral prednisone and 36 without. Seven of the latter (19%) experienced attacks shortly after vaccination (median: 9 days, IQR 6-10 days). No postvaccinal attack occurred in the 9 patients vaccinated while on oral prednisone before starting ECU and in 25 (re-)vaccinated while on ECU. During ECU therapy, 88% of patients were attack-free. The median AAR decreased from 1.0 (range 0-4) in the 2 years preceding ECU to 0 (range 0-0.8; p < 0.001). The EDSS score from start to the last follow-up was stable (median 6.0), and the proportion of patients with new T2-enhancing or gadolinium-enhancing MRI lesions in the brain and spinal cord decreased. Seven patients (13%) experienced serious infections. Five patients (10%; median age 53.7 years) died on ECU treatment (1 from myocardial infarction, 1 from ileus with secondary sepsis, and 3 from systemic infection, including 1 meningococcal sepsis), 4 were older than 60 years and severely disabled at ECU treatment start (EDSS score ≥ 7). The overall discontinuation rate was 19%.

DISCUSSION

Eculizumab proved to be effective in preventing NMOSD attacks. An increased risk of attacks after meningococcal vaccination before ECU start and potentially fatal systemic infections during ECU-particularly in patients with comorbidities-must be considered. Further research is necessary to explore optimal timing for meningococcal vaccinations.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that eculizumab reduces annualized attack rates and new MRI lesions in AQP4-IgG+ patients with NMOSD.

Efficacy and safety of maintenance intravenous immunoglobulin in generalized myasthenia gravis patients with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Prospective, randomized, controlled trials of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) maintenance therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG) are lacking. In this trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of caprylate/chromatography-purified IVIG; (IGIV-C) in patients with generalized MG undergoing standard care.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients enrolled in this phase 2, multicenter, international, randomized trial (1:1 IGIV-C [2 g/kg loading dose; 1 g/kg every 3 weeks through week 21] or placebo). Efficacy was assessed by changes in Quantitative MG (QMG) score at week 24 versus baseline (primary endpoint) and percentage of patients with clinical improvement in QMG, MG Composite (MGC), and MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores (secondary endpoints). Safety assessments reported all adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

The change in QMG at 24 weeks was -5.1 for IGIV-C and -3.1 for placebo (p = .187). Seventy percent of patients in the IGIV-C group had improvement in MG-ADL (≥2-point decrease) versus 40.6% in the placebo group (p = .025). Patients showing clinical improvement in QMG and MGC (≥3-point decrease) were 70.0% for IGIV-C versus 59.4% for placebo (p = .442) and 60.0% for IGIV-C versus 53.1% for placebo (p = .610). IGIV-C was well tolerated; serious AEs were similar between arms. Three of four MG exacerbations requiring hospitalizations occurred in the IGIV-C arm with one death.

DISCUSSION

Several efficacy parameters showed numerical results greater than those seen in the placebo group. This was a small study and may have been underpowered to see significant differences. Additional studies may be warranted to fully determine the efficacy of IVIG maintenance therapy in MG.

Eculizumab in refractory myasthenia gravis: a real-world single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppressive treatment is effective in most Myasthenia gravis patients, but 10-15% of patients areconsidered refractory due to inadequate response or intolerance to therapy. Eculizumab, a humanized monoclonalantibody directed against C5 complement protein, was approved in Italy to treat Ab-AchR generalized refractoryMG (rMG) in October 2022.

AIM

We aim to describe a real-world Italian experience in a population of refractory myasthenia gravis patients with oneyear follow up.

METHODS

A retrospective data analysis was conducted on patients with refractory generalized MG treated with eculizumabbetween November 2022 and May 2024. Clinical assessment through specific scales (MG ADL - QMG - MGFA -PIS), rescue, and background therapy was recorded after one, three, six, and twelve months.

RESULTS

21 rMG patients were treated with eculizumab with a medium follow up of 10.4 months and 14 patients had at leastone year follow up. A clinically meaningful reduction in total MG-ADL and QMG scores was achieved in the firstmonth. It was maintained throughout the first, third, sixth, and twelfth month along with concomitant reduction ofimmunosuppressive treatments. A drastic reduction of myasthenic exacerbations and crisis was observed duringfollow up and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment was discontinued in all patients except one. The total dailydose of prednisone was significantly reduced.

DISCUSSION

This single-center real-world study confirmes safety and effectiveness of eculizumab. Eculizumab improved rapidlyall clinical outcome measures, leading to discontinuation of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment and remarkable immunosuppressant-sparing benefits.

Two-decade battle with myasthenia gravis: A breakthrough case report on the long-term success with eculizumab and ravulizumab treatment

This unique case of generalized myasthenia gravis shows sustained stability of a patient's condition for 3 years with eculizumab/ravulizumab treatment following 16 years of refractory disease. It highlights the long-term effectiveness of C5 inhibitors in a real-world setting, aiding physicians in their decision-making for refractory cases and treatment discontinuation scenarios.

Targeted Treatments for Myasthenia Gravis in Children and Adolescents

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an antibody-mediated disorder of the neuromuscular junction affecting children and adults. MG is a treatable condition with most patients requiring immunosuppression for disease control and/or remission. Juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) is rare in comparison with adult-onset MG but given the same underlying pathophysiology, treatment strategies are similar to those in adults. Until recently, there were only a few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for MG treatments in adults and none in children, and management strategies were primarily based on expert consensus. In addition, treatment options for refractory MG cases have been severely limited, resulting in poor long-term quality of life in such patients due to the significant disease burden. Recently, there have been several RCTs focussing on novel therapeutic strategies with potentially promising outcomes, suggesting a change in MG management over the coming years and access to more effective and faster-acting drugs for MG patients. This paper will review current and new MG treatments including efgartigimod, eculizumab, rozanolixizumab, ravulizumab, and zilucoplan, with a focus on juvenile myasthenia gravis.

New treatment strategies in Myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune neuromuscular disorder characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. The disease is primarily caused by antibodies targeting acetylcholine receptors (AChR) and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) proteins at the neuromuscular junction. Traditional treatments for MG, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants, have shown efficacy but are often associated with significant long-term side effects and variable patient response rates. Notably, approximately 15% of patients exhibit inadequate responses to these standard therapies. Recent advancements in molecular therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, B cell-depleting agents, complement inhibitors, Fc receptor antagonists, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-based therapies, have introduced promising alternatives for MG treatment. These novel therapeutic approaches offer potential improvements in targeting specific immune pathways involved in MG pathogenesis. This review highlights the progress and challenges in developing and implementing these molecular therapies. It discusses their mechanisms, efficacy, and the potential for personalized medicine in managing MG. The integration of new molecular therapies into clinical practice could significantly transform the treatment landscape of MG, offering more effective and tailored therapeutic options for patients who do not respond adequately to traditional treatments. These innovations underscore the importance of ongoing research and clinical trials to optimize therapeutic strategies and improve the quality of life for individuals with MG.

Risk-Benefit Analysis of Novel Treatments for Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

INTRODUCTION

This study used network meta-analysis (NMA) to inform and compare the number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and cost per improved outcome (CPIO) associated with more recently approved treatments for anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (anti-AChR Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).

METHODS

Clinical trials of neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors, efgartigimod intravenous (IV) and rozanolixizumab, and complement inhibitors, ravulizumab and zilucoplan, versus placebo (with background conventional treatment) were included in the primary NMA to compare efficacy and safety outcomes. The outputs from the NMAs were used to estimate NNT and NNH of each treatment versus placebo. CPIO (2024 USD) was estimated for a ≥ 3- or ≥ 5-point reduction from baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores. Sensitivity analyses were performed adding efgartigimod PH20 subcutaneous (SC) and eculizumab to the NMA.

RESULTS

Efgartigimod IV had the lowest NNT versus placebo for achieving a ≥ 3- and ≥ 5-point reduction in QMG, as well as a ≥ 5-point reduction in MG-ADL, whereas rozanolixizumab had the lowest NNT for a ≥ 3-point reduction in MG-ADL. The NNH versus placebo was similar across comparator treatments. Efgartigimod IV had the lowest CPIO among all treatments for all assessed efficacy outcomes. Sensitivity analyses yielded results consistent with primary analysis and indicated that efgartigimod PH20 SC had comparable NNT and CPIO values to efgartigimod IV, whereas eculizumab had comparable NNT and higher CPIO values compared to other complement inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

FcRn inhibitors and complement inhibitors assessed in this study all demonstrated clinical benefit in terms of NNT as well as an acceptable safety profile in terms of NNH. Within the limitations of this meta-analysis, efgartigimod was associated with a favorable benefit-risk profile as well as a better economic value compared to ravulizumab, rozanolixizumab, and zilucoplan as treatments for anti-AChR Ab+ gMG.

US Clinical Practice Experience with Eculizumab in Myasthenia Gravis: Acute Clinical Events and Healthcare Resource Utilization

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab is approved in the USA for the treatment of patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). The ELEVATE study aimed to examine clinical-practice outcome data on eculizumab effectiveness in US adults with MG (generalized or ocular). This paper reports the findings on MG exacerbations and crises and associated healthcare resource utilization, and the use of rescue therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of US adults with MG who initiated eculizumab. Outcomes assessed for up to 2 years before and after eculizumab initiation included percentages and rates per patient per year (PPPY) of exacerbations and crises (the latter defined as intubation/impending intubation), healthcare resource utilization, and rescue therapy administration.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients diagnosed with MG were enrolled in the study; 92 patients had ≥ 3 months of data both before and during eculizumab therapy and were included in the analyses. The mean rate of MG exacerbations decreased from 0.385 PPPY before eculizumab initiation to 0.152 PPPY during eculizumab treatment (p = 0.0034); the mean rate of MG crises decreased from 0.411 to 0.056 PPPY (p = 0.0018). Rates of healthcare resource utilization and rescue therapy use also decreased significantly during eculizumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective chart review analysis provides evidence for a beneficial impact of eculizumab treatment on the incidence of MG exacerbations and crises and associated healthcare resource utilization in clinical practice, and on rescue therapy use. These data further support the therapeutic benefits of eculizumab in patients with MG.

Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in adults with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Numerous clinical trials for myasthenia gravis (MG) treatment have been conducted recently, with satisfactory cognitive and clinical results. However, due to the limited evidence for direct comparison of the safety and effectiveness of various drugs, there is a need for further exploration of the advantages and disadvantages of different monoclonal antibodies and immunosuppressants. Thus, in the present network meta-analysis (NMA), we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in treating MG. We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials published in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library between January 1, 2000 and March 6, 2024. Statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.3), JAGS, and STATA (version 15.0). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value was calculated to assess the potential efficacy of each drug and the likelihood of adverse events (AEs), with higher SUCRA values indicating better efficacy or a lower likelihood of AEs. This NMA included 21 randomized controlled trials involving 13 drugs and 1,657 patients. Based on changes in Quantitative MG and MG Composite scores, batoclimab was most likely to exert the best therapeutic effects, with SUCRA values of 99% and 92%, respectively. Rozanolixzumab performed better than the other drugs in terms of the MG Activities of Daily Living score (85%). Eculizumab exhibited the highest potential in reducing the 15-item revised version of the MG Quality of Life score (96%). Regarding safety, belimumab had the highest SUCRA value (85%), demonstrating the lowest likelihood of AEs. In conclusion, all immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies analyzed in this study were more effective than the placebo in treating MG, with rozanolixzumab and batoclimab potentially being the most effective. Regarding safety, rozanolixzumab exhibited a higher likelihood of AEs than did placebo. The conclusions guide the clinical selection of effective drugs and offer insights for future drug experiments.

Efgartigimod treatment for generalized myasthenia gravis: a single-center case series of 16 patients

Background

Efgartigimod was approved in Japan in January 2022 for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), regardless of antibody status. This case series describes a real-world experience in Japan of efgartigimod treatment for gMG patients with diverse backgrounds.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 16 Japanese patients (11 females and five males, mean age 40.4 years) with gMG who received efgartigimod at the Kumamoto University Hospital between August 2022 and September 2023. The outcomes were Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) responders (≥ 3 point reduction), IgG levels, and change in prednisolone dose, in the first cycle of efgartigimod.

Results

Fifteen patients completed one cycle of efgartigimod. Of the 14 patients for whom QMG scores were obtained, 10 patients were QMG responders. Four of the five patients with Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class V were QMG responders. Improvement in QMG after efgartigimod treatment was observed in one patient with myasthenic crisis and in one refractory patient who had unsuccessful eculizumab treatment. The mean reductions from baseline in IgG levels at weeks 1, 2, 3, and follow-up were 38.3, 56.1, 63.1, and 43.9%, respectively. A decrease in prednisolone dose was observed in seven patients. The most common adverse events were headache (three patients) and diarrhea (two patients). One patient discontinued efgartigimod treatment due to a treatment-related adverse event of rash.

Conclusion

Improvements in the outcomes of patients with gMG, including patients with severe gMG, myasthenic crisis, and refractory to anti-complementary therapy, were observed after the first cycle of efgartigimod treatment. Our real-world experience in Japan suggests the future possibilities for the treatment with efgartigimod for gMG with diverse backgrounds.

Time to response with ravulizumab, a long-acting terminal complement inhibitor, in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of ravulizumab, a terminal complement C5 inhibitor, in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) were demonstrated in the CHAMPION MG study (NCT03920293). This analysis aimed to characterize the latency to onset of a clinically meaningful therapeutic effect for ravulizumab.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of data collected for up to 60 weeks from CHAMPION MG was performed to assess the timing of response to ravulizumab. Response was analyzed based on reductions of ≥2 and ≥3 points (minimal clinically important differences [MCIDs]) in Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores, respectively, and on more rigorous reductions of ≥3 and ≥5 points, respectively. Time to first response was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method.

RESULTS

The median (95% confidence interval) time to first response was 2.1 (2.1-2.6) and 4.1 (2.3-10.0) weeks for reductions of ≥2 and ≥3 points in MG-ADL total score, respectively (n = 139), and 4.1 (2.1-10.0) and 18.3 (11.0-33.4) weeks for reductions of ≥3 and ≥5 points in QMG total score, respectively (n = 134). Cumulative response rates at Week 60 (data cut-off) were 88% and 82% for ≥2- and ≥3-point MG-ADL score reductions, respectively, and 86% and 59% for ≥3- and ≥5-point QMG score reductions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The median times to MCID with ravulizumab treatment in patients with AChR Ab+ gMG were ~2 weeks and ~4 weeks based on MCID MG-ADL and QMG total score reductions, respectively.

275th ENMC international workshop: Seronegative myasthenia gravis: An update paradigm for diagnosis and management, 9-11 February 2024, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands

The 275th ENMC workshop on the diagnosis and management of seronegative myasthenia gravis (SNMG) was held on February 9-11, 2024. The participants included experts in the field of adult and pediatric MG together with patient representatives. This workshop aimed to redefine SNMG in view of recent diagnostic and therapeutic updates and to identify patient unmet needs. The workshop has highlighted considerable challenges in the SNMG diagnostic work-up. To date, SNMG confirmation is often controversial, given the absence of specific diagnostic tests; no recommendations from international panels of experts are available in literature; myopathies, congenital myasthenic syndromes and functional disorders are the commonest misdiagnoses. Improving the disease diagnosis is crucial to avoid long delays in receiving appropriate treatment. To this purpose, a comprehensive diagnostic algorithm achieved consensus. Moreover, a remarkable variability in SNMG response to therapy and long-term prognosis has also been highlighted.

Post-hoc analyses from the ADAPT clinical study demonstrate aggregate sustained benefit of Efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVES

This post-hoc analysis evaluates the long-term efficacy of efgartigimod versus placebo in adult patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) with acetylcholine-receptor autoantibodies (AChR-Ab+), based on data from the ADAPT RCT and its open-label extension ADAPT+.

METHODS

Changes from baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores were assessed by treatment group over the ADAPT (up to 20 weeks) and ADAPT+ time horizon (extended to 64 weeks for efgartigimod group patients). Response to treatment was defined as (Meriggioli, 2009 [3])5-point reduction in QMG or (Meriggioli, 2009 [3])3-point reduction in MG-ADL vs. baseline values.

RESULTS

AChR-Ab+ patients treated with efgartigimod spent a substantially greater percentage of time in response in ADAPT based on at least a 5-point change in QMG compared to the placebo group (44 % versus 13 % respectively, p = 0.0034). Analyses based on a 3-point change in MG-ADL in ADAPT showed the percentage of time in response was nearly double for efgartigimod versus placebo (59 % versus 30 % respectively, p = 0.010). These trends were also maintained using different response definitions, as well as in patients with and without prior immune therapy exposure and by time from diagnosis (<7 years versus ≥7 years).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical benefit of efgartigimod was sustained over repeat treatment cycles and maintained over the long term. Response to treatment was consistent regardless of response definition and was repeated in different patient subgroups. Overall, the results of this analysis indicate that efgartigimod is an effective therapeutic option, demonstrating a robust benefit among AChR-Ab+ patients with gMG.

The changing landscape of autoantibody testing in myasthenia gravis in the setting of novel drug treatments

Acquired myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease targeting the specific proteins in the postsynaptic muscle membrane. 50% of ocular and 80% of generalized MG have acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AChR Abs). 1-10% of MG patients have antibodies against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK), and 2-50 % of seronegative MG cases have antibodies against lipoprotein-receptor-related protein4 antibodies (LRP4 Abs). Serological testing is crucial for diagnosing and determining the appropriate therapeutic approach for MG patients. The radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) method is a historical standard test for detecting the AChR Abs and MuSK Abs. While it has nearly 100% specificity in the AChR Abs detection, its sensitivity is between 50--92%. The sensitivity and specificity of RIPA for detecting MuSK Abs is much lower. The fixed and live Cell-Based assays (f-CBA and L- CBA) have higher sensitivity than RIPA. With advancements in the serological diagnosis and management of MG, we now recommend a complete reflex testing algorithm on the first pretreatment sample of a suspected MG patient, starting with the binding and blocking assays for AChR Abs by RIPA and/ or f-CBA. If AChR Ab is negative, then reflex to MuSK Abs by RIPA and/ or CBAs. If AChR and MuSK Abs are negative, then use clustered L-CBA by request.

Complement-targeted therapeutics: Are we there yet, or just getting started?

Therapeutic interventions in the complement system, a key immune-inflammatory mediator and contributor to a broad range of clinical conditions, have long been considered important yet challenging or even unfeasible to achieve. Almost 20 years ago, a spark was lit demonstrating the clinical and commercial viability of complement-targeted therapies. Since then, the field has experienced an impressive expansion of targeted indications and available treatment modalities. Currently, a dozen distinct complement-specific therapeutics covering several intervention points are available in the clinic, benefiting patients suffering from eight disorders, not counting numerous clinical trials and off-label uses. Observing this rapid rise of complement-targeted therapy from obscurity to mainstream with amazement, one might ask whether the peak of this development has now been reached or whether the field will continue marching on to new heights. This review looks at the milestones of complement drug discovery and development achieved so far, surveys the currently approved drug entities and indications, and ventures a glimpse into the future advancements yet to come.

Efgartigimod in refractory autoimmune myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc-receptor inhibitor, has recently been approved as treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG). In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to systematically assess short- and long-term effectiveness of efgartigimod in patients with refractory MG.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with refractory autoimmune acetylcholine receptor MG were treated with efgartigimod. Data were collected from January 2021 to March 2023 on Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), Myasthenia Gravis Composite score (MGC) and the 15-item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life questionnaire (MG-QoL15r).

RESULTS

A favorable outcome was seen in 56% of patients at the last measurement. Out of 16 patients, 50% were an MG-ADL responder after the first treatment cycle. After 4 weeks, a clinically meaningful improvement compared to baseline was seen on the MG-ADL, QMG, and MGC. There was a statistically significant improvement on the MGQoL15r from baseline to week 4. The improvement was maintained until the last measurement for the MGC and the MGQoL15r. At the last visit, all patients had discontinued 4-weekly dosages, shifting to administration frequencies of 1, 2, or 3 weeks. Drug doses could be decreased for prednisolone (n = 7), azathioprine (n = 2), and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 9). Frequency of plasma exchange was decreased in nine patients.

DISCUSSION

In patients with refractory MG, efgartigimod was effective for at least half of all patients. Patients required more frequent dosing compared to the ADAPT phase 3 trial. In 80% of the patients concurrent medication could be reduced or discontinued.

A real-life experience with eculizumab and efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis patients

INTRODUCTION

Eculizumab, a complement active antibody, and efgartigimod, an Fc fragment that blocks neonatal Fc receptor, are both approved to treat generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical response to both treatments in a real-life setting.

METHODS

We collected baseline and follow-up clinical data using the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG). We included 63 patients, 32 treated with eculizumab and 31 with efgartigimod. Of the efgartigimod-treated patients, 22 were anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab +) and 9 were AChR-Ab- (3 MuSK-Ab + and 6 seronegative).

RESULTS

Both treatments showed similar efficacy relative to the MG-ADL scale reduction (p = 0.237). Efgartigimod had a similar effect on both AChR-Ab + and AChR-Ab- (p = 0.280). Eculizumab was superior to efgartigimod relative to the QMG score reduction for the entire dataset (p = 0.003) and was more likely to achieve a clinical response at the QMG compared to efgartigimod (OR 1.373; p = 0.016). Steroid-sparing effect was higher for eculizumab than efgartigimod ( - 16.7 vs  - 5.2 mg of the baseline daily dose at follow-up; p = 0.001). Mean speed of prednisone reduction was  - 13.1 mg of the daily dose for each month of follow-up for eculizumab-treated patients and  - 3.2 for efgartigimod (p = 0.001). We found three serious events, all not related to treatment in the investigator's opinion. One eculizumab-treated patient experienced a severe pneumonia and died despite treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides evidence that eculizumab and efgartigimod can be used in clinical practice to reduce disability in gMG patients. Eculizumab-treated patients had a higher QMG response and steroid sparing effect. Efgartigimod may offer a more flexible schedule due to its cyclical use, no need for vaccination, and efficacy in AChR-Ab- patients.

The efficacy and safety of eculizumab in patients and the role of C5 polymorphisms

Eculizumab is an orphan drug with indications for extremely rare autoimmune disorders. It is primarily prescribed for use in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; but is also highly effective in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, among others. By binding to the C5 protein in the complement system, eculizumab effectively inhibits cellular hemolysis and autoimmune reactions. Despite this effective treatment, some patients reported no improvement in symptoms. Genetic sequencing revealed three distinct C5 mutations in the non-responders and these polymorphisms appeared to be most prevalent among Japanese, Korean and African populations. Here, we present an overview of the current and potential future applications of eculizumab, as well as the disadvantages of eculizumab treatment in patients with C5 polymorphisms.

United States clinical practice experience with eculizumab in myasthenia gravis: symptoms, function, and immunosuppressant therapy use

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The phase 3 REGAIN study and its open-label extension demonstrated the efficacy of the complement C5 inhibitor eculizumab in patients with treatment-refractory, acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). The aim of the ELEVATE study was to assess the effectiveness of eculizumab in clinical practice in adults with MG in the United States.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted in adults with MG who initiated eculizumab treatment between October 23, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Outcomes assessed before and during eculizumab treatment using a pre- versus post-treatment study design included Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total scores; minimal symptom expression (MSE); physician impression of clinical change; minimal manifestation status (MMS); and concomitant medication use.

RESULTS

In total, 119 patients were included in the study. A significant reduction was observed in mean MG-ADL total score, from 8.0 before eculizumab initiation to 5.4 at 3 months and to 4.7 at 24 months after eculizumab initiation (both p < 0.001). At 24 months after eculizumab initiation, MSE was achieved by 19% of patients. MMS or better was achieved by 30% of patients at 24 months. Additionally, 64% of patients receiving prednisone at eculizumab initiation had their prednisone dosage reduced during eculizumab treatment and 13% discontinued prednisone; 32% were able to discontinue nonsteroidal immunosuppressant therapy.

DISCUSSION

Eculizumab treatment was associated with sustained improvements in MG-ADL total scores through 24 months in adults with MG. Prednisone dosage was reduced in approximately two-thirds of patients, suggesting a steroid-sparing effect for eculizumab.

Recommendations for the management of myasthenia gravis in Belgium

International guidelines on the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) have been published but are not tailored to the Belgian situation. This publication presents recommendations from a group of Belgian MG experts for the practical management of MG in Belgium. It includes recommendations for treatment of adult patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) or ocular myasthenia gravis (oMG). Depending on the MG-related antibody a treatment sequence is suggested with therapies that can be added on if the treatment goal is not achieved. Selection of treatments was based on the level of evidence of efficacy, registration and reimbursement status in Belgium, common daily practice and the personal views and experiences of the authors. The paper reflects the situation in February 2024. In addition to the treatment considerations, other relevant aspects in the management of MG are addressed, including comorbidities, drugs aggravating disease symptoms, pregnancy, and vaccination. As many new treatments might potentially come to market, a realistic future perspective on the impact of these treatments on clinical practice is given. In conclusion, these recommendations intend to be a guide for neurologists treating patients with MG in Belgium.

Overview and Diagnostic Approach in Autoimmune Neurology

OBJECTIVE

The field of autoimmune neurology is rapidly evolving. This article reviews the epidemiology and pathophysiology as well as current approaches to clinical and paraclinical assessment, testing paradigms, and general principles of treatment.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Improved recognition of autoimmune diagnoses among patients who have phenotypically diverse, subacute onset neurologic presentations is facilitated by disease-specific antibody biomarker discovery. These antibodies have varying associations with paraneoplastic causation (from no association to greater than 70% positive predictive value), immunotherapy responses, and outcomes. To simplify assessment in an increasingly complex discipline, neurologic phenotype-specific serum and CSF antibody evaluations are recommended. Clinical trials have led to the approval of monoclonal therapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and are underway for N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitides.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Autoimmune neurology is now a mainstream subspecialty, consisting of disorders with diverse presentations detectable using antibody testing of serum and CSF. Early and sustained immunotherapy (eg, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg], plasma exchange) is recommended and may be supplemented by immune suppressants (eg, rituximab or cyclophosphamide) to sustain responses and optimize outcomes.

Treating myasthenia gravis beyond the eye clinic

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is one of the most well characterised autoimmune disorders affecting the neuromuscular junction with autoantibodies targeting the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) complex. The vast majority of patients present with ocular symptoms including double vision and ptosis, but may progress on to develop generalised fatiguable muscle weakness. Severe involvement of the bulbar muscles can lead to dysphagia, dysarthria and breathing difficulties which can progress to myasthenic crisis needing ventilatory support. Given the predominant ocular onset of the disease, it is important that ophthalmologists are aware of the differential diagnosis, investigations and management including evolving therapies. When the disease remains localised to the extraocular muscles (ocular MG) IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies against the AChR (including clustered AChR) are present in nearly 50% of patients. In generalised MG this is seen in nearly 90% patients. Other antibodies include those against muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) and lipoprotein receptor related protein 4 (LRP4). Even though decremental response on repetitive nerve stimulation is the most well recognised neurophysiological abnormality, single fibre electromyogram (SFEMG) in experienced hands is the most sensitive test which helps in the diagnosis. Initial treatment should be using cholinesterase inhibitors and then proceeding to immunosuppression using corticosteroids and steroid sparing drugs. Patients requiring bulbar muscle support may need rescue therapies including plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Newer therapeutic targets include those against the B lymphocytes, complement system, neonatal Fc receptors (FcRn) and various other elements of the immune system.

Therapeutic Approach to Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders

OBJECTIVE

Autoimmune neurologic disorders encompass a broad category of diseases characterized by immune system attack of the central, peripheral, or autonomic nervous systems. This article provides information on both acute and maintenance immunotherapy used to treat autoimmune neurologic disorders as well as a review of symptomatic management and special considerations when caring for patients with these diseases.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Over the past 20 years, more than 50 antibodies have been identified and associated with autoimmune neurologic disorders. Although advances in diagnostic testing have allowed for more rapid diagnosis, the therapeutic approach to these disorders has largely continued to rely on expert opinion, case series, and case reports. With US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of biologic agents to treat neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myasthenia gravis as well as ongoing clinical trials for the treatment of autoimmune encephalitis, the landscape of immunotherapy options continues to expand. Consideration of the unique pathogenesis of individual autoimmune neurologic disorders as well as the mechanism of action of the diverse range of treatment options can help guide treatment decisions today while evidence from clinical trials informs new therapeutics in the future.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Recognizing patients who have a clinical history and examination findings concerning for autoimmune neurologic disorders and conducting a thorough and directed imaging and laboratory evaluation aimed at ruling out mimics, identifying specific autoimmune syndromes, and screening for factors that may have an impact on immunotherapy choices early in the clinical course are essential to providing optimal care for these patients. Providers must consider immunotherapy, symptomatic treatment, and a multidisciplinary approach that addresses each patient's unique needs when treating patients with autoimmune neurologic disorders.

The safety and efficacy profile of eculizumab in myasthenic crisis: a prospective small case series

Eculizumab has improved recovery from ventilatory support in myasthenic crisis (MC) cases. However, the safety and efficacy profiles from prospective studies are still lacking. This study aimed to explore eculizumab's safety and efficacy in a prospective case series of patients with refractory MC. We followed a series of anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) patients who received eculizumab as an add-on therapy for 12 weeks during MC to facilitate the weaning process and reduced disease activity. Serum anti-AChR antibodies and peripheral immune molecules associated with the complement pathway were evaluated before and after eculizumab administration. Compared to the baseline Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA)-quantitative MG test (QMG) scores (22.25 ± 4.92) and MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL; 18.25 ± 2.5) scores at crisis, improvements were observed from 4 weeks (14.5 ± 10.47 and 7.5 ± 7.59, respectively) through 12 weeks (7.5 ± 5.74 and 2.25 ± 3.86, respectively) post-treatment. Muscle strength consistently improved across ocular, bulbar, respiratory, and limb/gross domain groups. One patient died of cardiac failure at 16 weeks. Three cases remained in remission at 24 weeks, with a mean QMG score of 2.67 ± 2.89 and ADL score of 0.33 ± 0.58. No significant side effects were reported. Serum CH50 and soluble C5b-9 levels significantly declined, while there were no significant changes in serum anti-AChR antibody levels, C1q, C5a levels, or peripheral lymphocyte proportions. Eculizumab was well tolerated and showed efficacy in this case series. Large prospective cohort studies with extended follow-up periods are needed to further explore the safety and efficacy profile in real-world practice.

Integrated Applied Clinical Pharmacology in the Advancement of Rare and Ultra-Rare Disease Therapeutics

The introduction of safe and effective rare/ultra-rare disease treatments is a focus of many biotherapeutic enterprises. Despite this increased activity, a significant unmet need remains, and the responsibility to meet this need is augmented by enhanced genomic, biologic, medical, analytical, and informatic tools. It is recognized that the development of an effective and safe rare/ultra-rare disease therapeutic faces a number of challenges with an important role noted for clinical pharmacology. Clinical pharmacology is foundationally an integrative discipline which must be embedded in and is interdependent upon understanding the pathogenic biology, clinical presentation, disease progression, and end-point assessment of the disease under study. This manuscript presents an overview and two case examples of this integrative approach, the development of C5-targeted therapeutics for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis and asfotase alpha for the treatment of hypophosphatasia. The two presented case examples show the usefulness of understanding the biological drivers and clinical course of a rare disease, having relevant animal models, procuring informative natural history data, importing assessment tools from relevant alternative areas, and using integrated applied clinical pharmacology to inform target engagement, dose, and the cascade of pharmacodynamic and clinical effects that follow. Learnings from these programs include the importance of assuring cross-validation of assays throughout a development program and continued commitment to understanding the relationship among the array of Pd end points and clinical outcomes. Using an integrative approach, substantive work remains to be done to meet the unmet needs of patients with rare/ultra-rare disease.

Exploring the Roles of m6A-Modified circRNAs in Myasthenia Gravis Based on Multi-Omics Analysis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease mediated by autoantibodies. The important roles of circRNAs modified by m6A methylation have been reported in the pathogenesis of other autoimmune diseases, but remain unclear in MG. To address this point, we collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells from six MG patients and six healthy controls and performed m6A‑circRNA epitranscriptomic microarray and RNA sequencing. Differentially m6A-modified circRNAs and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed. A network was constructed containing 17 circRNAs, 30 miRNAs, and 34 DEGs. The GSE85452 dataset was downloaded. DEGs that were differentially expressed in the GSE85452 dataset were selected as seed genes. Finally, four candidate m6A-modified circRNAs (hsa_circ_0084735, hsa_circ_0018652, hsa_circ_0025731, and hsa_circ_0030997) were identified through a random walk with restart. We found that they had different degree correlations with different immune cells. The results of MeRIP-qPCR showed that the m6A methylated levels of hsa_circ_0084735 and hsa_circ_0025731 were downregulated in MG patients, while the other two circRNAs were not significantly different between MG and control group. For the first time, we explored the pathogenesis of MG at the epigenetic transcriptome level. Our results will open new perspectives for MG research and identify potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for MG.

Therapeutic challenges and unmet needs in the management of myasthenia gravis: an Italian expert opinion

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, autoimmune, neurological disorder. Most MG patients have autoantibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). Some have autoantibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) or lipoprotein-receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4), and some are seronegative. Standard of care, which includes anti-cholinesterase drugs, thymectomy, corticosteroids (CS), and off-label use of non-steroidal immunosuppressive drugs (NSISTs), is bounded by potential side effects and limited efficacy in refractory generalized MG (gMG) patients. This highlights the need for new therapeutic approaches for MG. Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the complement system, has been recently approved in Italy for refractory gMG. A panel of 11 experts met to discuss unmet therapeutic needs in the acute and chronic phases of the disease, as well as the standard of care for refractory patients. Survival was emphasized as an acute phase outcome. In the chronic phase, persistent remission and early recognition of exacerbations to prevent myasthenic crisis and respiratory failure were considered crucial. Refractory patients require treatments with fast onset of action, improved tolerability, and the ability to slow disease progression and increase life expectancy. The Panel agreed that eculizumab would presumably meet the therapeutic needs of many refractory gMG patients. The panel concluded that the unmet needs of current standard of care treatments for gMG are significant. Evaluating new therapeutic options accurately is essential to find the best balance between efficacy and tolerability for each patient. Collecting real-world data on novel molecules in routine clinical practice is necessary to address unmet needs.

Eculizumab in Adolescent Patients With Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of eculizumab, a terminal complement C5 inhibitor, in juvenile generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).

METHODS

Adolescents aged 12 to 17 years with refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive gMG received eculizumab (weekly induction [one to two doses of 600 mg or four doses of 900 mg] followed by maintenance doses [300 to 1200 mg] every two weeks for up to 26 weeks) in a phase 3, open-label multicenter study (NCT03759366). Change from baseline to week 26 in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total score (primary end point) and secondary end points including Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total score, Myasthenia Gravis Composite score, Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America postintervention status, EuroQol 5-Dimensions (Youth) and Neurological Quality-of-Life Pediatric Fatigue questionnaire scores, as well as pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety, were recorded.

RESULTS

Eleven adolescents (mean ± S.D. age 14.8 ± 1.8 years) were enrolled; 10 completed the primary evaluation period. Least-squares mean changes from baseline at week 26 were -5.8 (standard error [SE] 1.2; P = 0.0004) for QMG total score and -2.3 (SE 0.6; P = 0.0017) for MG-ADL total score. Overall, the primary and all secondary efficacy end point analyses met statistical significance from the first assessment and were sustained throughout. Complete terminal complement inhibition was sustained through 26 weeks in all patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events were all mild/moderate and predominantly unrelated to eculizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Eculizumab was effective in reducing disease burden and was well tolerated in adolescents with refractory AChR antibody-positive gMG.

Identification of disease phenotypes in acetylcholine receptor-antibody myasthenia gravis using proteomics-based consensus clustering

BACKGROUND

The clinical heterogeneity of myasthenia gravis (MG), an autoimmune disease defined by antibodies (Ab) directed against the postsynaptic membrane, constitutes a challenge for patient stratification and treatment decision making. Novel strategies are needed to classify patients based on their biological phenotypes aiming to improve patient selection and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

For this purpose, we assessed the serum proteome of a cohort of 140 patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor-Ab-positive MG and utilised consensus clustering as an unsupervised tool to assign patients to biological profiles. For in-depth analysis, we used immunogenomic sequencing to study the B cell repertoire of a subgroup of patients and an in vitro assay using primary human muscle cells to interrogate serum-induced complement formation.

FINDINGS

This strategy identified four distinct patient phenotypes based on their proteomic patterns in their serum. Notably, one patient phenotype, here named PS3, was characterised by high disease severity and complement activation as defining features. Assessing a subgroup of patients, hyperexpanded antibody clones were present in the B cell repertoire of the PS3 group and effectively activated complement as compared to other patients. In line with their disease phenotype, PS3 patients were more likely to benefit from complement-inhibiting therapies. These findings were validated in a prospective cohort of 18 patients using a cell-based assay.

INTERPRETATION

Collectively, this study suggests proteomics-based clustering as a gateway to assign patients to a biological signature likely to benefit from complement inhibition and provides a stratification strategy for clinical practice.

FUNDING

CN and CBS were supported by the Forschungskommission of the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf. CN was supported by the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (EKEA.38). CBS was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-German Research Foundation) with a Walter Benjamin fellowship (project 539363086). The project was supported by the Ministry of Culture and Science of North Rhine-Westphalia (MODS, "Profilbildung 2020" [grant no. PROFILNRW-2020-107-A]).

Expert consensus recommendations for improving and standardising the assessment of patients with generalised myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Regular and consistent disease assessment could provide a clearer picture of burden in generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG) and improve patient care; however, the use of assessment tools in practice lacks standardisation. This modified Delphi approach was taken to review current evidence on assessment tool use in gMG and develop expert-derived consensus recommendations for good practice.

METHODS

A European expert panel of 15 experienced gMG neurologists contributed to development of this consensus, four of whom formed a lead Sub-committee. The PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes) framework was used to define six clinical questions on gMG assessment tools, a systematic literature review was conducted, and evidence-based statements were developed. According to a modified Delphi voting process, consensus was reached when ≥70% of the experts rated agreement with a statement as ≥8 on a scale of 1-10.

RESULTS

Eighteen expert- and evidence-based consensus statements based on six themes were developed. Key recommendations include: consistent use of the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living score (MG-ADL) across clinical settings, followed by a simple question (e.g., Patient Acceptable Symptom State [PASS]) or scale to determine patient satisfaction in clinical practice; use of a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis [QMG] or quality of life [QoL] assessment when the MG-ADL indicates disease worsening; and consideration of symptom state to determine the timing and frequency of recommended assessments. Expert panel consensus was reached on all 18 statements after two voting rounds.

CONCLUSIONS

This process provided evidence- and expert consensus-based recommendations for the use of objective and subjective assessment tools across gMG research and care to improve management and outcomes for patients.

The relationship between neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and autoimmune diseases

Objective

There have been reports of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) coexisting with connective tissue disorders. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of NMOSD coexisting with autoimmune diseases (AID).

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated NMOSD patients with and without AID. The enrolled patients had at least one attack, with duration of more than 1 year. Data on the demographics, clinical features, and laboratory findings were assessed. The Poisson model was used to investigate the risk factors associated with the annualized relapse rate (ARR), whereas the Cox model was used to evaluate the risk factors for the first relapse.

Results

A total of 180 patients (154 women and 26 men) with NMOSD were identified: 45 had AID and 135 did not. Female patients had a higher prevalence of concomitant AID (p = 0.006) and a greater relapse rate within the first year. There were no statistically significant differences in the characteristics of patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that NMOSD patients with seropositive aquaporin 4 antibodies (AQP4-Ab; log-rank: p = 0.044), had a shorter time to relapse. Patients seropositive for AQP4-Ab (HR = 2.402, 95%CI = 1.092-5.283, p = 0.029) had a higher risk of suffering a first relapse, according to the Cox model. Patients with and without AID showed a similar declining tendency in terms of change in ARR throughout the first 5 years of the disease. The ARR was greater in the first year [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.534, 95%CI = 1.111-2.118] and the first 2 years (IRR = 1.474, 95%CI = 1.056-2.058) in patients with coexisting AID diagnosis prior to the NMOSD onset.

Conclusions

Patients with NMOSD with coexisting AID had similar characteristics when compared with those without AID. NMOSD patients with AID diagnosed before onset had a higher risk of relapse in the early stage of the disease.

Clinical efficacy and safety of switching from eculizumab to ravulizumab in adult patients with aHUS- real-world data

BACKGROUND

The complement factor 5 (C5)-inhibitor eculizumab has been established as standard-of-care for the treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). In 2021, the long-acting C5-inhibitor ravulizumab was approved, extending intervals of intravenous treatment from two to eight weeks resulting in improvement of quality of life for patients and lowering direct and indirect therapy associated costs.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective data analysis of 32 adult patients with aHUS (including 10 kidney transplant recipients) treated with eculizumab for at least three months and switched to ravulizumab aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching medication in the real-world setting. Hematologic parameters, kidney function, concurrent therapy and aHUS associated events were evaluated three months before and until up to 12 months after switching to ravulizumab.

RESULTS

Mean age (range) at ravulizumab initiation was 41 years (19-78 years) and 59% of the patients were female. Genetic analysis was available for all patients with 72% showing a pathogenic variant. Median time (range) on eculizumab before switching was 20 months (3-120 months). No new events of TMA or worsening of renal function were reported during up to 12 months of follow-up during ravulizumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest, non-industry derived, multi-center retrospective analysis of adult patients with aHUS switching C5-inhibitor treatment from eculizumab to ravulizumab in the real-world setting. Switching to ravulizumab was safe and efficient resulting in sustained hematological stability and preservation of renal function.

Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H3 is a potential biomarker for disease activity in myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis is a chronic antibody-mediated autoimmune disease disrupting neuromuscular synaptic transmission. Informative biomarkers remain an unmet need to stratify patients with active disease requiring intensified monitoring and therapy; their identification is the primary objective of this study. We applied mass spectrometry-based proteomic serum profiling for biomarker discovery. We studied an exploration and a prospective validation cohort consisting of 114 and 140 anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab)-positive myasthenia gravis patients, respectively. For downstream analysis, we applied a machine learning approach. Protein expression levels were confirmed by ELISA and compared to other myasthenic cohorts, in addition to myositis and neuropathy patients. Anti-AChR-Ab levels were determined by a radio receptor assay. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of intercostal muscle biopsies were employed for validation in addition to interactome studies of inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H3 (ITIH3). Machine learning identified ITIH3 as potential serum biomarker reflective of disease activity. Serum levels correlated with disease activity scores in the exploration and validation cohort and were confirmed by ELISA. Lack of correlation between anti-AChR-Ab levels and clinical scores underlined the need for biomarkers. In a subgroup analysis, ITIH3 was indicative of treatment responses. Immunostaining of muscle specimens from these patients demonstrated ITIH3 localization at the neuromuscular endplates in myasthenia gravis but not in controls, thus providing a structural equivalent for our serological findings. Immunoprecipitation of ITIH3 and subsequent proteomics lead to identification of its interaction partners playing crucial roles in neuromuscular transmission. This study provides data on ITIH3 as a potential pathophysiological-relevant biomarker of disease activity in myasthenia gravis. Future studies are required to facilitate translation into clinical practice.

Myasthenia gravis: the future is here

Myasthenia gravis (MG) stands as a prototypical antibody-mediated autoimmune disease: it is dependent on T cells and characterized by the presence of autoantibodies targeting proteins located on the postsynaptic surface of skeletal muscle, known as the neuromuscular junction. Patients with MG exhibit a spectrum of weakness, ranging from limited ocular muscle involvement to life-threatening respiratory failure. Recent decades have witnessed substantial progress in understanding the underlying pathophysiology, leading to the delineation of distinct subcategories within MG, including MG linked to AChR or MuSK antibodies as well as age-based distinction, thymoma-associated, and immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced MG. This heightened understanding has paved the way for the development of more precise and targeted therapeutic interventions. Notably, the FDA has recently approved therapeutic inhibitors of complement and the IgG receptor FcRn, a testament to our improved comprehension of autoantibody effector mechanisms in MG. In this Review, we delve into the various subgroups of MG, stratified by age, autoantibody type, and histology of the thymus with neoplasms. Furthermore, we explore both current and potential emerging therapeutic strategies, shedding light on the evolving landscape of MG treatment.

Ravulizumab use for acetylcholine receptor-positive generalized myasthenia gravis in clinical practice

Purpose

To describe the early experience of ravulizumab use in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ve gMG).

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study included AChR+ve gMG patients who were treated with ravulizumab and had both pre- and post-ravulizumab myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scores. Clinical information regarding MG history, concomitant treatment(s), MG-ADL, other MG-specific measures, and adverse events were recorded.

Results

A total of 18 patients with mean age of 61.83 (±16.08, n = 18) years were included in this cohort. In 10 complement inhibitor naive patients, a clinically meaningful reduction in mean Mg-ADL (baseline: 6.6 (±3.58) vs. 4.4 (±2.28), post ravulizumab) was seen. 6 out of 10 patients (60%) had clinically meaningful reduction post ravulizumab and two achieved minimum symptom expression (MSE). In 8 patients switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab, further reduction was noted in post ravulizumab mean MG-ADL (Baseline: 3.25 (±3.34) vs. 1.5 (±2.34) post ravulizumab). None of the patients who switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab experienced worsening symptoms. Eleven out of 14 (78.5%) patients on prednisone therapy were able to reduce their prednisone dose post-ravulizumab. None of the patients experienced any major side effects.

Conclusion

In our clinical practice, 60% of AChR+ve gMG complement inhibitor naive patients experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in MG-ADL scores with ravulizumab. Patients were safely switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab and had further improvement in their mean MG-ADL scores. Of those on prednisone therapy, the majority were able to reduce their prednisone dosage.

Targeting autoimmune mechanisms by precision medicine in Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a chronic disabling autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies to the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), characterized clinically by fluctuating weakness and early fatigability of ocular, skeletal and bulbar muscles. Despite being commonly considered a prototypic autoimmune disorder, MG is a complex and heterogeneous condition, presenting with variable clinical phenotypes, likely due to distinct pathophysiological settings related with different immunoreactivities, symptoms' distribution, disease severity, age at onset, thymic histopathology and response to therapies. Current treatment of MG based on international consensus guidelines allows to effectively control symptoms, but most patients do not reach complete stable remission and require life-long immunosuppressive (IS) therapies. Moreover, a proportion of them is refractory to conventional IS treatment, highlighting the need for more specific and tailored strategies. Precision medicine is a new frontier of medicine that promises to greatly increase therapeutic success in several diseases, including autoimmune conditions. In MG, B cell activation, antibody recycling and NMJ damage by the complement system are crucial mechanisms, and their targeting by innovative biological drugs has been proven to be effective and safe in clinical trials. The switch from conventional IS to novel precision medicine approaches based on these drugs could prospectively and significantly improve MG care. In this review, we provide an overview of key immunopathogenetic processes underlying MG, and discuss on emerging biological drugs targeting them. We also discuss on future direction of research to address the need for patients' stratification in endotypes according with genetic and molecular biomarkers for successful clinical decision making within precision medicine workflow.

FARS-ADL across Ataxias: Construct Validity, Sensitivity to Change, and Minimal Important Change

BACKGROUND

Patient-focused outcomes present a central need for trial-readiness across all ataxias. The Activities of Daily Living part of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS-ADL) captures functional impairment and longitudinal change but is only validated in Friedreich Ataxia.

OBJECTIVE

Validation of FARS-ADL regarding disease severity and patient-meaningful impairment, and its sensitivity to change across genetic ataxias.

METHODS

Real-world registry data of FARS-ADL in 298 ataxia patients across genotypes were analyzed, including (1) cross-correlation with FARS-stage, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM)-ataxia, and European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions visual analogue scale (EQ5D-VAS); (2) sensitivity to change within a trial-relevant 1-year median follow-up, anchored in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C); and (3) general linear modeling of factors age, sex, and depression (nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]).

RESULTS

FARS-ADL correlated with overall disability (rhoFARS-stage = 0.79), clinical disease severity (rhoSARA = 0.80), and patient-reported impairment (rhoPROM-ataxia = 0.69, rhoEQ5D-VAS = -0.37), indicating comprehensive construct validity. Also at item level, and validated within genotype (SCA3, RFC1), FARS-ADL correlated with the corresponding SARA effector domains; and all items correlated to EQ5D-VAS quality of life. FARS-ADL was sensitive to change at a 1-year interval, progressing only in patients with worsening PGI-C. Minimal important change was 1.1. points based on intraindividual variability in patients with stable PGI-C. Depression was captured using FARS-ADL (+0.3 points/PHQ-9 count) and EQ5D-VAS, but not FARS-stage or SARA.

CONCLUSION

FARS-ADL reflects both disease severity and patient-meaningful impairment across genetic ataxias, with sensitivity to change in trial-relevant timescales in patients perceiving change. It thus presents a promising patient-focused outcome for upcoming ataxia trials. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Improving Outcome in Severe Myasthenia Gravis and Guillain-Barré Syndrome

When progressive and severe, myasthenia gravis and Guillain-Barré syndrome may have the potential for fatal and unfavorable clinical outcomes. Regardless of important differences in their clinical course, the development of weakness of oropharyngeal muscles and respiratory failure with requirement of mechanical ventilation is the main driver of poor prognosis in both conditions. The need for prolonged mechanical ventilation is particularly relevant because it immobilizes the patient and care becomes extraordinarily complex due to daily risks of systemic complications. Additionally, patients with myasthenia gravis often require long-term immunosuppressive treatments with associated toxicity and infectious risks. Unlike myasthenia gravis, the recovery period is prolonged in Guillain-Barré syndrome, but often favorable, even in the more severely affected patients. Outcome, for a large part, is determined by expert neurocritical care.

B cell-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cells as an emerging therapy in neuroimmunological diseases

BACKGROUND

Neuroimmunology research and development has been marked by substantial advances, particularly in the treatment of neuroimmunological diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease. With more than 20 drugs approved for multiple sclerosis alone, treatment has become more personalised. The approval of disease-modifying therapies, particularly those targeting B cells, has highlighted the role of immunotherapeutic interventions in the management of these diseases. Despite these successes, challenges remain, particularly for patients who do not respond to conventional therapies, underscoring the need for innovative approaches.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

The approval of monoclonal antibodies, such as ocrelizumab and ofatumumab, which target CD20, and inebilizumab, which targets CD19, for the treatment of various neuroimmunological diseases reflects progress in the understanding and management of B-cell activity. However, the limitations of these therapies in halting disease progression or activity in patients with multiple sclerosis or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders have prompted the exploration of cell-based therapies, particularly chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Initially successful in the treatment of B cell-derived malignancies, CAR T cells offer a novel therapeutic mechanism by directly targeting and eliminating B cells, potentially overcoming the shortcomings of antibody-mediated B cell depletion. WHERE NEXT?: The use of CAR T cells in autoimmune diseases and B cell-driven neuroimmunological diseases shows promise as a targeted and durable option. CAR T cells act autonomously, penetrating deep tissue and effectively depleting B cells, especially in the CNS. Although the therapeutic potential of CAR T cells is substantial, their application faces hurdles such as complex logistics and management of therapy-associated toxic effects. Ongoing and upcoming clinical trials will be crucial in determining the safety, efficacy, and applicability of CAR T cells. As research progresses, CAR T cell therapy has the potential to transform treatment for patients with neuroimmunological diseases. It could offer extended periods of remission and a new standard in the management of autoimmune and neuroimmunological disorders.

Refocusing generalized myasthenia gravis: Patient burden, disease profiles, and the role of evolving therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) continues to present significant challenges for clinical management due to an unpredictable disease course, frequent disease fluctuations, and varying response to therapy. The recent availability of new pharmacologic therapies presents a valuable opportunity to reevaluate how this disease is classified, assessed, and managed and identify new ways to improve the clinical care of patients with gMG.

METHODS

Narrative review was made of publications identified via searches of PubMed and selected congresses (January 2000-September 2022).

RESULTS

New consensus definitions are required to ensure consistency, to better characterize patients, and to identify patients who will benefit from specific drugs and earlier use of these agents. There is a need for more frequent, standardized patient assessment to identify the cause of motor function deficits, provide a clearer picture of the disease burden and its impact on daily living and quality of life (QoL), and better support treatment decision-making. Novel approaches that target different components of the immune system will play a role in more precise treatment of patients with gMG, alongside the development of new algorithms to guide individualized patient management.

CONCLUSIONS

gMG has a physical, mental, and social impact, resulting in a considerable burden of disease and substantially decreased QoL, despite standard treatments. The availability of novel, targeted treatments that influence key pathological mediators of gMG, together with new biomarkers, offers the potential to optimize patient management and ultimately enables a greater number of patients to achieve minimal manifestation status and a reduced burden of disease.

Cost-effectiveness of eculizumab and efgartigimod for the treatment of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Eculizumab and efgartigimod were approved to treat anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (anti-AChR Ab-positive gMG). These relatively new biological treatments provide a more rapid onset of action and improved efficacy compared with conventional immunosuppressive treatments, but at a higher cost.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of eculizumab and, separately, efgartigimod, each added to conventional therapy vs conventional therapy alone, among patients with refractory anti-AChR Ab-positive gMG and those with anti-AChR Ab-positive gMG, respectively.

METHODS

A Markov model with 4 health states was developed, evaluating costs and utility with a 4-week cycle length and lifetime time horizon from a health care system perspective and a modified societal perspective including productivity losses from patients and caregiver burden. Model inputs were informed by key clinical trials and relevant publications identified from targeted literature reviews, and drug costs were identified from Micromedex Red Book. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs; cost per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained) were calculated for each comparison.

RESULTS

Among the corresponding populations, lifetime costs and QALYs, respectively, for eculizumab were $5,515,000 and 11.85, and for conventional therapy, $308,000 and 10.29, resulting in an ICER of $3,338,000/QALY gained. For efgartigimod, lifetime costs and QALYs, respectively, were $6,773,000 and 13.22, and for conventional therapy, $322,000 and 9.98, yielding an ICER of $1,987,000/QALY gained. After applying indirect costs in a modified societal perspective, the ICERs were reduced to $3,310,000/QALY gained for eculizumab and $1,959,000/QALY gained for efgartigimod.

CONCLUSIONS

Eculizumab and efgartigimod are rapidly acting and effective treatments for myasthenia gravis. However, at their current price, both therapies greatly exceeded common cost-effectiveness thresholds, likely limiting patient access to these therapies.

Real-World experience with efgartigimod in patients with myasthenia gravis

Recommendations for the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) have been difficult to develop because of limited evidence from large randomized controlled trials. New drugs and treatment approaches have recently been shown to be effective in phase 3 studies in seropositive generalized (g) MG. One such drug is efgartigimod, a human-Fc-fragment of IgG1, with a high affinity for the endosomal FcRn. We conducted a multicenter study to evaluate the real-world clinical and safety effects of efgartigimod in 22 gMG patients. We evaluated the strategies for the timing of re-treatment with it. The participants received a total of 59 efgartigimod -treatment cycles. The median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-6). Twenty patients (86.3%) improved by at least 2 MG-ADL points after the first treatment cycle. The median MG-ADL score at baseline was 6.5 (range: 3-17) and 2.5 (range: 0-9) post-treatment (p < 0.001). A consistent improvement of at least 2 points in the MG-ADL score after each cycle occurs in 18 patients. The effect duration of the treatment was usually between 4 and 12 weeks. Two major clinical patterns of treatment response were found. Treatment with efgartigimod was also associated with significant reductions of prednisone doses Overall, the treatment was safe and associated with only minor adverse events. The single fatality was apparently due tosevere respiratory failure. We found that efgartigimod is clinically effective, may be used as a steroid sparing agent and is generally safe for gMG patients. We recommend a personalized preventive treatment approach until clinical stabilization, followed by discontinuation and periodic evaluations.

The potential application of complement inhibitors-loaded nanosystem for autoimmune diseases via regulation immune balance

The complement is an important arm of the innate immune system, once activated, the complement system rapidly generates large quantities of protein fragments that are potent mediators of inflammation. Recent studies have shown that over-activated complement is the main proinflammatory system of autoimmune diseases (ADs). In addition, activated complements interact with autoantibodies, immune cells exacerbate inflammation, further worsening ADs. With the increasing threat of ADs to human health, complement-based immunotherapy has attracted wide attention. Nevertheless, efficient and targeted delivery of complement inhibitors remains a significant challenge owing to their inherent poor targeting, degradability, and low bioavailability. Nanosystems offer innovative solutions to surmount these obstacles and amplify the potency of complement inhibitors. This prime aim to present the current knowledge of complement in ADs, analyse the function of complement in the pathogenesis and treatment of ADs, we underscore the current situation of nanosystems assisting complement inhibitors in the treatment of ADs. Considering technological, physiological, and clinical validation challenges, we critically appraise the challenges for successfully translating the findings of preclinical studies of these nanosystem assisted-complement inhibitors into the clinic, and future perspectives were also summarised. (The graphical abstract is by BioRender.).

The rate of QMGS change predicts recurrence after thymectomy in myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between short-term changes in quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMGS) after thymectomy and postoperative recurrence in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients without thymoma.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study. The QMGS of 44 patients with non-thymomatous MG were evaluated before and 1 month after thymectomy, and the frequency and time of postoperative recurrence were recorded. The reduction rate of QMGS (rr-QMGS) was defined as (QMGS one week before thymectomy - QMGS one month after thymectomy)/ QMGS one week before thymectomy × 100 %, as an indicator of short-term symptom change after thymectomy. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was established to determine an appropriate cut-off value of rr-QMGS for distinguishing postoperative recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to predict postoperative recurrence.

RESULTS

Postoperative recurrence occurred in 21 patients (30 times in total) during follow-up. The mean annual recurrence rate was 3.98 times/year preoperatively and 0.30 times/year postoperatively. ROC analysis determined the cut-off value of rr-QMGS was 36.7 % (sensitivity 90.5 %, specificity 52.2 %). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that rr-QMGS＜36.7 % (hazard rate[HR]6.251, P = 0.014) is positive predictor of postoperative recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that postoperative recurrence time was earlier in the low rr-QMGS group than in the high rr-QMGS group (12.62 vs. 36.60 months, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Low rr-QMGS is associated with early postoperative recurrence. Rr-QMGS can be used to predict postoperative recurrence of non-thymomatous MG.

Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the efficacy of tocilizumab with conventional immunotherapy in refractory patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).

METHODS

This single-center prospective cohort study was based on patients from an MG registry study in China and conducted from February 10, 2021 to March 31, 2022. Adult refractory patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG were assigned to tocilizumab or conventional immunotherapy groups. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean difference of MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) change at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 corresponding to that at the baseline between the two groups. A generalized estimating equation model was used for the primary outcome analysis. Safety was assessed based on adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 34 eligible patients, 20 (mean [standard deviation] age, 53.8 [21.9] years; 12 [60.0%] female) received tocilizumab and 14 received conventional immunotherapy (45.8 [18.0] years; 8 [57.1%] female). The tocilizumab group had greater reduction in MG-ADL score at week 4 (adjusted mean difference, -3.4; 95% CI, -4.7 to -2.0; p < 0.001) than the conventional immunotherapy group, with significant differences sustained through week 24 (adjusted mean difference, -4.5; 95% CI, -6.4 to -2.6; p < 0.001). At week 24, the proportion of patients achieving higher levels of MG-ADL (up to 7-point reduction) and QMG (up to 11-point reduction) scores improvement was significantly greater with tocilizumab. Tocilizumab had acceptable safety profiles without severe or unexpected safety issues.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab is safe and effective in improving the MG-ADL score and reducing prednisone dose in refractory AChR-Ab+ gMG, suggesting tocilizumab has the potential to be a valuable therapeutic option for such patients.

Advancements and prospects of novel biologicals for myasthenia gravis: toward personalized treatment based on autoantibody specificities

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an antibody-mediated autoimmune disease with a prevalence of 150-250 cases per million individuals. Autoantibodies include long-lived antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), mainly of the IgG1 subclass, and IgG4, produced almost exclusively by short-lived plasmablasts, which are prevalent in muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) myasthenia gravis. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that MG patients receiving conventional medication today still do not possess satisfactory symptom control, indicating a substantial disease burden. Subsequently, based on the type of the autoantibody and the pathogenesis, we synthesized the published material to date and reached a conclusion regarding the literature related to personalized targeted therapy for MG. Novel agents for AChR MG have shown their efficacy in clinical research, such as complement inhibitors, FcRn receptor antagonists, and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) inhibitors. Rituximab, a representative drug of anti-CD20 therapy, has demonstrated benefits in treatment of MuSK MG patients. Due to the existence of low-affinity antibodies or unidentified antibodies that are inaccessible by existing methods, the treatment for seronegative MG remains complicated; thus, special testing and therapy considerations are necessary. It may be advantageous to initiate the application of novel biologicals at an early stage of the disease. Currently, therapies can also be combined and individualized according to different types of antibodies. With such a wide range of drugs, how to tailor treatment strategies to patients with various conditions and find the most suitable solution for each MG profile are our necessary and urgent aims.