1
|
Völter F, Eckenweber S, Scheifele M, Eckenweber F, Hirsch F, Franzmeier N, Kreuzer A, Griessl M, Steward A, Janowitz D, Palleis C, Bernhardt A, Vöglein J, Stockbauer A, Rauchmann BS, Schöberl F, Wlasich E, Buerger K, Wagemann O, Perneczky R, Weidinger E, Höglinger G, Levin J, Brendel M, Schönecker S. Correlation of early-phase β-amyloid positron-emission-tomography and neuropsychological testing in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025:10.1007/s00259-025-07175-5. [PMID: 40019578 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07175-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2025] [Indexed: 03/01/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical staging in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) typically relies on neuropsychological testing. Recognizing the imperative for an objective measure of clinical AD staging, regional perfusion in early-phase β-amyloid-PET may aid as a cost-efficient index for the assessment of neurodegeneration severity in patients with Alzheimer's disease. METHODS Regional perfusion deficits in early-phase β-amyloid-PET as well as neuropsychological testing (max. 90 days delay) were evaluated in 82 patients with biologically defined AD according to the ATN classification. In reference to the Braak staging system patients were classified into the groups stage0, stageI-II+, stageI-IV+, stageI-VI+, and stageatypical+ according to regional perfusion deficits in regions of interest (ROIs) published by the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Multiple regression analysis controlling for age, gender, and education was used to evaluate the association of regional z-scores on perfusion-phase PET with clinical scores for all patients and with annual decline of cognitive performance in 23 patients with follow-up data. RESULTS Patients classified as stage0 and stageI-II+ demonstrated significantly superior neuropsychological performance compared to those classified as stageI-IV+ and stageI-VI+. Lower cognitive performance was associated with decreased perfusion in early-phase β-amyloid-PET globally and regionally, with the most pronounced association identified in the left temporal lobe. Mean z-scores on early-phase PET in temporal and parietal regions offered a robust prediction of future annual decline in MMSE and sum scores of the CERAD-Plus (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease) test battery. CONCLUSION Regional and global perfusion deficits in early-phase β-amyloid-PET can serve as an objective index of neurodegeneration severity and may act as prognostic markers of future cognitive decline in AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike Völter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Eckenweber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Scheifele
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Eckenweber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Hirsch
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolai Franzmeier
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal and Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Annika Kreuzer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Griessl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anna Steward
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Janowitz
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), Munich, Germany
| | - Carla Palleis
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Bernhardt
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan Vöglein
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Anna Stockbauer
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Boris-Stephan Rauchmann
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Schöberl
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Wlasich
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Buerger
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Olivia Wagemann
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Robert Perneczky
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Endy Weidinger
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Günter Höglinger
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Levin
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Sonja Schönecker
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cabreira V, Alty J, Antic S, Araujo R, Aybek S, Ball HA, Baslet G, Bhome R, Coebergh J, Dubois B, Edwards M, Filipovic SR, Frederiksen KS, Harbo T, Hayhow B, Howard R, Huntley J, Isaacs JD, LaFrance C, Larner A, Di Lorenzo F, Main J, Mallam E, Marra C, Massano J, McGrath ER, Portela Moreira I, Nobili F, Pal S, Pennington CM, Tábuas-Pereira M, Perez D, Popkirov S, Rayment D, Rossor M, Russo M, Santana I, Schott J, Scott EP, Taipa R, Teodoro T, Tinazzi M, Tomic S, Toniolo S, Tørring CW, Wilkinson T, Zeidler M, Frostholm L, McWhirter L, Stone J, Carson A. Development of a diagnostic checklist to identify functional cognitive disorder versus other neurocognitive disorders. BMJ Neurol Open 2025; 7:e000918. [PMID: 40034653 PMCID: PMC11873336 DOI: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Functional cognitive disorder (FCD) poses a diagnostic challenge due to its resemblance to other neurocognitive disorders and limited biomarker accuracy. We aimed to develop a new diagnostic checklist to identify FCD versus other neurocognitive disorders. Methods The clinical checklist was developed through mixed methods: (1) a literature review, (2) a three-round Delphi study with 45 clinicians from 12 countries and (3) a pilot discriminative accuracy study in consecutive patients attending seven memory services across the UK. Items gathering consensus were incorporated into a pilot checklist. Item redundancy was evaluated with phi coefficients. A briefer checklist was produced by removing items with >10% missing data. Internal validity was tested using Cronbach's alpha. Optimal cut-off scores were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results A full 11-item checklist and a 7-item briefer checklist were produced. Overall, 239 patients (143 FCD, 96 non-FCD diagnoses) were included. The checklist scores were significantly different across subgroups (FCD and other neurocognitive disorders) (F(2, 236)=313.3, p<0.001). The area under the curve was excellent for both the full checklist (0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.99) and its brief version (0.96, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.98). Optimal cut-off scores corresponded to a specificity of 97% and positive predictive value of 91% for identifying FCD. Both versions showed good internal validity (>0.80). Conclusions This pilot study shows that a brief clinical checklist may serve as a quick complementary tool to differentiate patients with neurodegeneration from those with FCD. Prospective blind large-scale validation in diverse populations is warranted.Cite Now.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verónica Cabreira
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jane Alty
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Sonja Antic
- Neurology, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rui Araujo
- Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal
- Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, University of Porto Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| | - Selma Aybek
- Neurology, University of Fribourg Faculty of Science and Medicine, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Harriet A Ball
- University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Gaston Baslet
- Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rohan Bhome
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jan Coebergh
- St George’s University of London, London, London, UK
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Department of Neurology, Institut de la mémoire et de la maladie d’Alzheimer, Centre de Référence ‘Démences Rares’, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
- ICM-INSERM 1127, FrontLab, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière (ICM), Paris, France
| | - Mark Edwards
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Sasa R Filipovic
- Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Kristian Steen Frederiksen
- Clinical Trial Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Thomas Harbo
- Neurology, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bradleigh Hayhow
- Neurology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Robert Howard
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Huntley
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Curt LaFrance
- Alpert Medical School Area Health Education Centre, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Neurology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Andrew Larner
- Cognitive Function Clinic, Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK
| | - Francesco Di Lorenzo
- Department of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Fondazione Santa Lucia Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Roma, Italy
| | - James Main
- Bristol Dementia Wellbeing Service, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Camillo Marra
- Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Sede di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - João Massano
- Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal
- Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, University of Porto Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| | - Emer R McGrath
- University of Galway School of Medicine, Galway, Ireland
| | - Isabel Portela Moreira
- Neurology Department, Private Hospital of Gaia of the Trofa Saúde Group, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Flavio Nobili
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Suvankar Pal
- Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Neurology, NHS Forth Valley, Stirling, UK
| | - Catherine M Pennington
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Neurology, NHS Forth Valley, Stirling, UK
| | - Miguel Tábuas-Pereira
- Neurology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- University of Coimbra Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - David Perez
- Neurology and Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stoyan Popkirov
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dane Rayment
- Rosa Burden Centre for Neuropsychiatry, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Martin Rossor
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Mirella Russo
- Department of Sciences, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Gabriele d’Annunzio University of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Isabel Santana
- Neurology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Jonathan Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Emmi P Scott
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ricardo Taipa
- Neuropathology Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Tiago Teodoro
- Neurology, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Michele Tinazzi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sofia Toniolo
- Cognitive Disorder Clinic, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Tim Wilkinson
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Lisbeth Frostholm
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Laura McWhirter
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jon Stone
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alan Carson
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vergani AA, Mazzeo S, Moschini V, Burali R, Lassi M, Amato LG, Carpaneto J, Salvestrini G, Fabbiani C, Giacomucci G, Morinelli C, Emiliani F, Scarpino M, Bagnoli S, Ingannato A, Nacmias B, Padiglioni S, Sorbi S, Bessi V, Grippo A, Mazzoni A. Event-related potential markers of subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment during a sustained visuo-attentive task. Neuroimage Clin 2025; 45:103760. [PMID: 40023055 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 02/11/2025] [Accepted: 02/16/2025] [Indexed: 03/04/2025]
Abstract
Subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease stages lack well-defined electrophysiological correlates, creating a critical gap in the identification of robust biomarkers for early diagnosis and intervention. In this study, we analysed event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded during a sustained visual attention task in a cohort of 178 individuals (119 SCD, 40 MCI, and 19 healthy subjects, HS) to investigate sensory and cognitive processing alterations associated with these conditions. SCD patients exhibited significant attenuation in both sensory (P1, N1, P2) and cognitive (P300, P600, P900) components compared to HS, with cognitive components showing performance-related gains. In contrast, MCI patients did not show a further decrease in any ERP component compared to SCD. Instead, they exhibited compensatory enhancements, reversing the downward trend observed in SCD. This compensation resulted in a non-monotonic pattern of ERP alterations across clinical conditions, suggesting that MCI patients engage neural mechanisms to counterbalance sensory and cognitive deficits. These findings support the use of electrophysiological markers in support of medical decision-making, enhancing personalized prognosis and guiding targeted interventions in cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Vergani
- The BioRobotics Institute, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera-Pisa, Italy; Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera-Pisa, Italy
| | - S Mazzeo
- Research and Innovation Centre for Dementia-CRIDEM, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132 Milano, Italy; IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Edmondo Malan, 2, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - V Moschini
- Research and Innovation Centre for Dementia-CRIDEM, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - R Burali
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, via di Scandicci, 269, 50143 Florence, Italy
| | - M Lassi
- The BioRobotics Institute, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera-Pisa, Italy; Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera-Pisa, Italy
| | - L G Amato
- The BioRobotics Institute, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera-Pisa, Italy; Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera-Pisa, Italy
| | - J Carpaneto
- The BioRobotics Institute, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera-Pisa, Italy; Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera-Pisa, Italy
| | - G Salvestrini
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, via di Scandicci, 269, 50143 Florence, Italy
| | - C Fabbiani
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, via di Scandicci, 269, 50143 Florence, Italy
| | - G Giacomucci
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy; Research and Innovation Centre for Dementia-CRIDEM, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - C Morinelli
- Research and Innovation Centre for Dementia-CRIDEM, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - F Emiliani
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - M Scarpino
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, via di Scandicci, 269, 50143 Florence, Italy
| | - S Bagnoli
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - A Ingannato
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - B Nacmias
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, via di Scandicci, 269, 50143 Florence, Italy
| | - S Padiglioni
- Research and Innovation Centre for Dementia-CRIDEM, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - S Sorbi
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy; Research and Innovation Centre for Dementia-CRIDEM, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, via di Scandicci, 269, 50143 Florence, Italy
| | - V Bessi
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy; Research and Innovation Centre for Dementia-CRIDEM, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy.
| | - A Grippo
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, via di Scandicci, 269, 50143 Florence, Italy
| | - A Mazzoni
- The BioRobotics Institute, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera-Pisa, Italy; Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera-Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Babiloni C, Arakaki X, Baez S, Barry RJ, Benussi A, Blinowska K, Bonanni L, Borroni B, Bayard JB, Bruno G, Cacciotti A, Carducci F, Carino J, Carpi M, Conte A, Cruzat J, D'Antonio F, Della Penna S, Del Percio C, De Sanctis P, Escudero J, Fabbrini G, Farina FR, Fraga FJ, Fuhr P, Gschwandtner U, Güntekin B, Guo Y, Hajos M, Hallett M, Hampel H, Hanoğlu L, Haraldsen I, Hassan M, Hatlestad-Hall C, Horváth AA, Ibanez A, Infarinato F, Jaramillo-Jimenez A, Jeong J, Jiang Y, Kamiński M, Koch G, Kumar S, Leodori G, Li G, Lizio R, Lopez S, Ferri R, Maestú F, Marra C, Marzetti L, McGeown W, Miraglia F, Moguilner S, Moretti DV, Mushtaq F, Noce G, Nucci L, Ochoa J, Onorati P, Padovani A, Pappalettera C, Parra MA, Pardini M, Pascual-Marqui R, Paulus W, Pizzella V, Prado P, Rauchs G, Ritter P, Salvatore M, Santamaria-García H, Schirner M, Soricelli A, Taylor JP, Tankisi H, Tecchio F, Teipel S, Kodamullil AT, Triggiani AI, Valdes-Sosa M, Valdes-Sosa P, Vecchio F, Vossel K, Yao D, Yener G, Ziemann U, Kamondi A. Alpha rhythm and Alzheimer's disease: Has Hans Berger's dream come true? Clin Neurophysiol 2025; 172:33-50. [PMID: 39978053 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2025.02.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2024] [Revised: 01/14/2025] [Accepted: 02/09/2025] [Indexed: 02/22/2025]
Abstract
In this "centenary" paper, an expert panel revisited Hans Berger's groundbreaking discovery of human restingstate electroencephalographic (rsEEG) alpha rhythms (8-12 Hz) in 1924, his foresight of substantial clinical applications in patients with "senile dementia," and new developments in the field, focusing on Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most prevalent cause of dementia in pathological aging. Clinical guidelines issued in 2024 by the US National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) and the European Neuroscience Societies did not endorse routine use of rsEEG biomarkers in the clinical workup of older adults with cognitive impairment. Nevertheless, the expert panel highlighted decades of research from independent workgroups and different techniques showing consistent evidence that abnormalities in rsEEG delta, theta, and alpha rhythms (< 30 Hz) observed in AD patients correlate with wellestablished AD biomarkers of neuropathology, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline. We posit that these abnormalities may reflect alterations in oscillatory synchronization within subcortical and cortical circuits, inducing cortical inhibitory-excitatory imbalance (in some cases leading to epileptiform activity) and vigilance dysfunctions (e.g., mental fatigue and drowsiness), which may impact AD patients' quality of life. Berger's vision of using EEG to understand and manage dementia in pathological aging is still actual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Babiloni
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer," Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Raffaele of Cassino, Cassino, (FR), Italy.
| | - Xianghong Arakaki
- Cognition and Brain Integration Laboratory, Neurosciences, Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Sandra Baez
- Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia; Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California, San Francisco, USA; Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Robert J Barry
- Brain & Behaviour Research Institute and School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia
| | - Alberto Benussi
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Katarzyna Blinowska
- Department of Biomedical Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Poland; Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Laura Bonanni
- Department of Medicine, Aging Sciences University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara Chieti 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Barbara Borroni
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Molecular Markers Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia 25125, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Bruno
- Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Cacciotti
- Brain Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, Italy; Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, Novedrate, Como, Italy
| | - Filippo Carducci
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer," Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - John Carino
- Clinical Neurophysiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matteo Carpi
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer," Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Conte
- Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Josephine Cruzat
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibañez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Fabrizia D'Antonio
- Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Della Penna
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy; Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Claudio Del Percio
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer," Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Javier Escudero
- Institute for Imaging, Data and Communications, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Giovanni Fabbrini
- Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Francesca R Farina
- The University of Chicago Division of the Biological Sciences 5841 S Maryland Avenue Chicago, IL 60637, USA; Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Francisco J Fraga
- Engineering, Modeling and Applied Social Sciences Center, Federal University of ABC, Santo André, Brazil
| | - Peter Fuhr
- Department of Neurology, Hospitals of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ute Gschwandtner
- Department of Neurology, Hospitals of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bahar Güntekin
- Department of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey; Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technologies (SABITA), Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yi Guo
- Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital and The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China; Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, China; Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Mihaly Hajos
- Cognito Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Comparative Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, Medical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 7D37, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-1428, USA
| | - Harald Hampel
- Sorbonne University, Alzheimer Precision Medicine, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Lutfu Hanoğlu
- Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technologies (SABITA), Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ira Haraldsen
- Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mahmoud Hassan
- MINDIG, F-35000 Rennes, France; School of Science and Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - András Attila Horváth
- Neurocognitive Research Centre, Nyírő Gyula National Institute of Psychiatry and Addictology, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Research Centre for Natural Sciences, HUN-REN, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Agustin Ibanez
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibañez, Santiago, Chile; Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Universidad de San Andrés, Victoria, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Alberto Jaramillo-Jimenez
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Grupo de Neurociencias de Antioquia (GNA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Jaeseung Jeong
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, South Korea
| | - Yang Jiang
- Aging Brain and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; Sanders Brown Center on Aging, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Maciej Kamiński
- Department of Biomedical Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Poland
| | - Giacomo Koch
- Human Physiology Unit, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; Experimental Neuropsychophysiology Laboratory, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Sanjeev Kumar
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Giorgio Leodori
- Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Gang Li
- Real World Evidence & Medical Value, Global Medical Affairs, Neurology, Eisai Inc., New Jersey, USA
| | - Roberta Lizio
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer," Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Oasi Research Institute - IRCCS, Troina, Italy
| | - Susanna Lopez
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer," Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Fernando Maestú
- Center For Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
| | - Camillo Marra
- Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy; Memory Clinic, Foundation Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Marzetti
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy; Department of Engineering and Geology, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti and Pescara, Pescara, Italy
| | - William McGeown
- Department of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills Building, 40 George Street, Glasgow, UK
| | - Francesca Miraglia
- Brain Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, Italy; Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, Novedrate, Como, Italy
| | - Sebastian Moguilner
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibañez, Santiago, Chile; Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Universidad de San Andrés, Victoria, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Davide V Moretti
- Alzheimer's Rehabilitation Operative Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125 Brescia, Italy
| | - Faisal Mushtaq
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Lorenzo Nucci
- Brain Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - John Ochoa
- Neurophysiology Laboratory GNA-GRUNECO. Universidad de Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia
| | - Paolo Onorati
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer," Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Padovani
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Department of Continuity of Care and Frailty, Neurology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy; Neurobiorepository and Laboratory of Advanced Biological Markers, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy; Laboratory of Digital Neurology and Biosensors, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Brain Health Center, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Chiara Pappalettera
- Brain Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, Italy; Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, Novedrate, Como, Italy
| | - Mario Alfredo Parra
- Department of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, Graham Hills Building, 40 George Street, Glasgow, UK
| | - Matteo Pardini
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Roberto Pascual-Marqui
- The KEY Institute for Brain-Mind Research, University Hospital of Psychiatry, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany; University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Vittorio Pizzella
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy; Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies (ITAB), "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Pavel Prado
- Escuela de Fonoaudiología, Facultad de Odontología y Ciencias de la Rehabilitación, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile
| | - Géraldine Rauchs
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, U1237, PhIND "Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders", NeuroPresage Team, GIP Cyceron, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Petra Ritter
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Focus State Dependencies of Learning and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neuroscience Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center Digital Future, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Hernando Santamaria-García
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PhD Program in Neuroscience), Bogotá, Colombia; Center of Memory and Cognition Intellectus, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio Bogotá, San Ignacio, Colombia
| | - Michael Schirner
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Focus State Dependencies of Learning and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neuroscience Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center Digital Future, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Soricelli
- IRCCS Synlab SDN, Naples, Italy; Department of Medical, Movement and Wellbeing Sciences, University of Naples Parthenope, Naples, Italy
| | - John-Paul Taylor
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Hatice Tankisi
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Franca Tecchio
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione (ISTC), Roma, Italy
| | - Stefan Teipel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Alpha Tom Kodamullil
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | - Antonio Ivano Triggiani
- Neurophysiology of Epilepsy Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | - Pedro Valdes-Sosa
- Cuban Center for Neuroscience, Havana, Cuba; The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Fabrizio Vecchio
- Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia; Brain Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Keith Vossel
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Dezhong Yao
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Görsev Yener
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey; Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anita Kamondi
- Neurocognitive Research Centre, Nyírő Gyula National Institute of Psychiatry and Addictology, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Neurosurgery and Neurointervention and Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Losa M, Garbarino S, Cirone A, Argenti L, Lombardo L, Calizzano F, Girtler N, Brugnolo A, Mattioli P, Bauckneht M, Raffa S, Sambuceti G, Canosa A, Caneva S, Piana M, Bozzo G, Roccatagliata L, Serafini G, Uccelli A, Gotta F, Origone P, Mandich P, Massa F, Morbelli S, Arnaldi D, Orso B, Pardini M. Clinical and metabolic profiles in behavioural frontotemporal dementia: Impact of age at onset. Cortex 2025; 185:84-95. [PMID: 39999654 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Revised: 01/08/2025] [Accepted: 01/08/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025]
Abstract
AIM Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder, with considerable variability of age-at-onset. We explored clinical and metabolic differences between early- and late-onset behavioural FTD (bvFTD), assuming that they might represent different disease phenotypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively studied consecutive patients diagnosed with prodromal or overt bvFTD with [18F]FDG PET scan, neuropsychological assessment (NPS), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) available at baseline. Patients were divided into three groups based on age-at-onset: early onset-bvFTD (EO-bvFTD, age<70), late onset-bvFTD (LO-bvFTD, age 70-75) and very late onset-bvFTD (vLO-bvFTD, age>75). NPS and NPI were compared between groups and in the subset of prodromal patients, to study different syndromic phenotypes. Voxel-based analysis compared brain [18F]FDG PET of EO-bvFTD, LO-bvFTD and vLO-bvFTD independently, with respect to healthy controls, to explore metabolic differences. An inter-regional metabolic covariance analysis was performed in frontal lobe subregions, to explore differences in brain connectivity. Moreover, we supported our result using a correlation-based approach on clinical and metabolic variables. RESULTS 101 bvFTD (62 prodromal bvFTD) were enrolled (EO-bvFTD: n = 36, prodromal n = 21; LO-bvFTD: n = 36, prodromal: n = 22; vLO-bvFTD: n = 29, prodromal: n = 19). Greater verbal memory deficit was evident in LO-bvFTD and vLO-bvFTD compared to EO-bvFTD (immediate recall: p = .018; p = .024; delayed recall: both p = .001, respectively), with similar results in the subset of prodromal patients. EO-bvFTD and LO-bvFTD had a higher behavioural severity than vLO-bvFTD. LO-bvFTD and vLO-bvFTD showed more widespread relative hypometabolism, with a greater involvement of posterior, subcortical and temporo-limbic regions compared with EO-bvFTD. Moreover, vLO-bvFTD showed a different pattern of intrafrontal metabolic covariance compared to EO-bvFTD and LO-bvFTD. DISCUSSION The cognitive-behavioural profile of bvFTD differs between early- and late-onset, already from the prodromal stage of the disease. Both metabolic pattern and functional connectivity vary based on age-at-onset. Understanding these differences could contribute to improve diagnostic accuracy and understanding the underling pathological heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Losa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Sara Garbarino
- Liscomp Lab, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessio Cirone
- Liscomp Lab, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Lucia Argenti
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Lombardo
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Calizzano
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nicola Girtler
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Clinical Psychology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Andrea Brugnolo
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Clinical Psychology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Pietro Mattioli
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Neurophysiopathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Bauckneht
- Department of Health Science (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa Italy; Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefano Raffa
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Canosa
- Department of Neuroscience, ALS Centre, 'Rita Levi Montalcini', University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Caneva
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michele Piana
- Liscomp Lab, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; MIDA, Department of Mathematics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giulia Bozzo
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Roccatagliata
- Department of Health Science (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Uccelli
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Fabio Gotta
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Genetic Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paola Origone
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Genetic Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paola Mandich
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Genetic Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Federico Massa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Silvia Morbelli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Dario Arnaldi
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Neurophysiopathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Beatrice Orso
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Pardini
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giannakis A, Konitsiotis S. A new paradigm for neurodegenerative diseases classification: A clinical perspective. J Clin Neurosci 2025; 134:111099. [PMID: 39903975 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2024] [Revised: 01/06/2025] [Accepted: 01/31/2025] [Indexed: 02/06/2025]
Abstract
A vast progress has been made in the understanding of neurodegenerative diseases during the past few years. However, clinical diagnostic accuracy continues to be very low, despite the introduction of various diagnostic tools and repeated revisions of diagnostic criteria. For instance, patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) may present with symptoms that overlap with other neurodegenerative conditions like dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), making accurate diagnosis challenging. This diagnostic uncertainty can lead to delayed or incorrect treatment, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and prognosis. Thus, the definite diagnosis still relies on post-mortem pathological findings, placing a significant burden on both clinicians and researchers. As a growing body of evidence indicates, co-pathology seems to be the rule among neurodegenerative diseases. Additionally, a single pathological diagnosis, such as AD, can manifest in various clinical presentations, ranging from predominantly cognitive impairment to significant motor symptoms. Each of these presentations currently requires its own set of complicated diagnostic criteria. Perhaps, the time has come for a much-needed radical revision of existing clinical diagnostic criteria. Inclusion of patients do not neatly fit into existing diagnostic categories for neurodegenerative diseases, in future large-scale, longitudinal studies and/or clinical trials, and systematic assessment of their clinical features and disease progression using machine learning could generate valuable data on patients with mixed pathologies and improve our understanding of how to effectively treat these complex cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Giannakis
- Department of Neurology, University of Ioannina, University Campus, Stavrou Niarchou Av., Ioannina, Greece.
| | - Spiridon Konitsiotis
- Department of Neurology, University of Ioannina, University Campus, Stavrou Niarchou Av., Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dickerson BC, Atri A. Introduction to the DETeCD-ADRD special issue. Alzheimers Dement 2025; 21:e14483. [PMID: 39732506 PMCID: PMC11848391 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/25/2024] [Indexed: 12/30/2024]
Abstract
HIGHLIGHT This special issue contains multiple articles related to the DETeCD-ADRD guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradford C. Dickerson
- Frontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of NeurologyMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Alireza Atri
- Banner Sun Health Research Institute and Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Banner HealthSun CityArizonaUSA
- Center for Brain/Mind MedicineDepartment of NeurologyBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Musso G, Gabelli C, Puthenparampil M, Cosma C, Cagnin A, Gallo P, Sorarù G, Pegoraro E, Zaninotto M, Antonini A, Moz S, Zambon CF, Plebani M, Corbetta M, Basso D. Blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease with the Lumipulse automated platform: Age-effect and clinical value interpretation. Clin Chim Acta 2025; 565:120014. [PMID: 39442787 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.120014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2024] [Revised: 10/20/2024] [Accepted: 10/20/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in analytical methods have recently paved the way to Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers testing in blood along with the more established CSF testing. To ensure a forthcoming application of this low-invasive diagnostic that might allow to recognize early onset of dementia, appropriate pathological cut-points need to be defined. METHODS In this cross-sectional study we measured blood and CSF neurofilament light chain (NFL), phosphorylated tau (pTau 181), Amyloid-β1-42 (AB 1-42) and Amyloid-β1-40 (AB 1-40) on a fully automated chemiluminescent platform (Lumipulse, Fujirebio) in 80 cognitively impaired patients and 55 cognitively unimpaired subjects. Clinical cut points were calculated with receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and a head-to-head comparison of blood and CSF testing was performed. RESULTS Blood NFL best discriminant thresholds to distinguish neurodegenerative diseases from controls varied age-dependently, being 19 and 33 pg/mL in subjects 50-65 years and > 65 years respectively. AD was best framed by AB 1-42/1-40 ratio < 0.079 and ptau181 > 1 pg/mL. Though a strong correlation for all biomarkers, only blood AB ratio was equal to CSF testing for AD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS The specific context of use might be considered to define the cut-offs of blood biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases. Future efforts towards reference materials for each AD blood biomarker will improve clinical cut-offs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Musso
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova Italy; Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy.
| | - Carlo Gabelli
- Regional Brain Aging Center, University-Hospital of Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Puthenparampil
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 5, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Chiara Cosma
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova Italy
| | - Annachiara Cagnin
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 5, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Gallo
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 5, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Gianni Sorarù
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 5, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Elena Pegoraro
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 5, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Martina Zaninotto
- QI.LAB.MED, Spin-off of the University of Padova, via Antoniana, 220/E, 35011 Campodarsego, Italy
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 5, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Stefania Moz
- Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Carlo Federico Zambon
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova Italy; Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Mario Plebani
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova Italy; QI.LAB.MED, Spin-off of the University of Padova, via Antoniana, 220/E, 35011 Campodarsego, Italy
| | - Maurizio Corbetta
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 5, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Daniela Basso
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova Italy; Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schöll M, Vrillon A, Ikeuchi T, Quevenco FC, Iaccarino L, Vasileva-Metodiev SZ, Burnham SC, Hendrix J, Epelbaum S, Zetterberg H, Palmqvist S. Cutting through the noise: A narrative review of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers for routine clinical use. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2025:100056. [PMID: 39814656 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2024] [Revised: 12/16/2024] [Accepted: 12/30/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2025]
Abstract
As novel, anti-amyloid therapies have become more widely available, access to timely and accurate diagnosis has become integral to ensuring optimal treatment of patients with early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD). Plasma biomarkers are a promising tool for identifying AD pathology; however, several technical and clinical factors need to be considered prior to their implementation in routine clinical use. Given the rapid pace of advancements in the field and the wide array of available biomarkers and tests, this review aims to summarize these considerations, evaluate available platforms, and discuss the steps needed to bring plasma biomarker testing to the clinic. We focus on plasma phosphorylated(p)-tau, specifically plasma p-tau217, as a robust candidate across both primary and secondary care settings. Despite the high performance and robustness demonstrated in research, plasma p-tau217, like all plasma biomarkers, can be affected by analytical and pre-analytical variability as well as patient comorbidities, sex, ethnicity, and race. This review also discusses the advantages of the two-point cut-off approach to mitigating these factors, and the challenges raised by the resulting intermediate range measurements, where clinical guidance is still unclear. Further validation of plasma p-tau217 in heterogeneous, real-world cohorts will help to increase confidence in testing and support establishing a standardized approach. Plasma biomarkers are poised to become a more affordable and less invasive alternative to PET and CSF testing. However, understanding the factors that impact plasma biomarker measurement and interpretation is critical prior to their implementation in routine clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Schöll
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - A Vrillon
- French Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Paris, France
| | - T Ikeuchi
- Niigata University Brain Research Institute, Niigata, Japan
| | - F C Quevenco
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - L Iaccarino
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | | | - S C Burnham
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - J Hendrix
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - S Epelbaum
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - H Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK; Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China; Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - S Palmqvist
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yakushev I, Verger A, Brendel M, Cecchin D, Fernandez PA, Fraioli F, Grimmer T, Tolboom N, Traub-Weidinger T, Guedj E, Van Weehaeghe D. Lecanemab approval in EU: what should we be ready for?- the EANM perspective. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025:10.1007/s00259-025-07066-9. [PMID: 39789225 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07066-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Yakushev
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diego Cecchin
- Department of Medicine, Unit of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Pablo Aguiar Fernandez
- CIMUS, Universidade Santiago de Compostela & Nuclear Medicine Department, Univ. Hospital IDIS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Francesco Fraioli
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Timo Grimmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Clinic Donaustadt, Vienna Health Care Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eric Guedj
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel, Hôpital de La Timone, CERIMED, Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dickerson BC, Atri A, Clevenger C, Karlawish J, Knopman D, Lin P, Norman M, Onyike C, Sano M, Scanland S, Carrillo M. The Alzheimer's Association clinical practice guideline for the Diagnostic Evaluation, Testing, Counseling, and Disclosure of Suspected Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (DETeCD-ADRD): Executive summary of recommendations for specialty care. Alzheimers Dement 2025; 21:e14337. [PMID: 39713957 PMCID: PMC11772716 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or a related dementia (ADRD) are two decades old. This evidence-based guideline was developed to empower all clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. An expert workgroup conducted a review of 7374 publications (133 met inclusion criteria) and developed recommendations as steps in an evaluation process. This summary briefly reviews core recommendations and details specialist recommendations of a high-quality, evidence-supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive-behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes primary care recommendations. If clinicians use the recommendations in this guideline and health-care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings. HIGHLIGHTS: US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or related dementias (ADRD) are decades old and aimed at specialists. This evidence-based guideline was developed to empower all-including primary care-clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. This summary focuses on recommendations appropriate for specialty practice settings, forming key elements of a high-quality, evidence-supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive-behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes primary care recommendations. If clinicians use this guideline and health-care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradford C. Dickerson
- Frontotemporal Disorders Unit, Department of NeurologyMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Alireza Atri
- Banner Sun Health Research Institute and Banner Alzheimer's InstituteSun CityArizonaUSA
- Department of NeurologyCenter for Brain/Mind MedicineBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Carolyn Clevenger
- Department of Neurology, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of NursingEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Jason Karlawish
- Departments of Medicine, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Penn Memory CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - David Knopman
- Department of NeurologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Pei‐Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in HealthInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical CenterBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Mary Norman
- Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterCulver CityCaliforniaUSA
| | - Chiadi Onyike
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and NeuropsychiatryThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Mary Sano
- James J. Peters VAMCBronxNew YorkUSA
- Department of PsychiatryAlzheimer's Disease Research CenterIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Maria Carrillo
- Medical & Scientific Relations DivisionAlzheimer's AssociationChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cabreira V, Alty J, Antic S, Araújo R, Aybek S, Ball HA, Baslet G, Bhome R, Coebergh J, Dubois B, Edwards M, Filipović SR, Frederiksen KS, Harbo T, Hayhow B, Howard R, Huntley J, Isaacs J, LaFrance WC, Larner AJ, Di Lorenzo F, Main J, Mallam E, Marra C, Massano J, McGrath ER, McWhirter L, Moreira IP, Nobili F, Pennington C, Tábuas‐Pereira M, Perez DL, Popkirov S, Rayment D, Rossor M, Russo M, Santana I, Schott J, Scott EP, Taipa R, Tinazzi M, Tomic S, Toniolo S, Tørring CW, Wilkinson T, Frostholm L, Stone J, Carson A. Perspectives on the diagnosis and management of functional cognitive disorder: An international Delphi study. Eur J Neurol 2025; 32:e16318. [PMID: 38700361 PMCID: PMC11617961 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current proposed criteria for functional cognitive disorder (FCD) have not been externally validated. We sought to analyse the current perspectives of cognitive specialists in the diagnosis and management of FCD in comparison with neurodegenerative conditions. METHODS International experts in cognitive disorders were invited to assess seven illustrative clinical vignettes containing history and bedside characteristics alone. Participants assigned a probable diagnosis and selected the appropriate investigation and treatment. Qualitative, quantitative and inter-rater agreement analyses were undertaken. RESULTS Eighteen diagnostic terminologies were assigned by 45 cognitive experts from 12 countries with a median of 13 years of experience, across the seven scenarios. Accurate discrimination between FCD and neurodegeneration was observed, independently of background and years of experience: 100% of the neurodegenerative vignettes were correctly classified and 75%-88% of the FCD diagnoses were attributed to non-neurodegenerative causes. There was <50% agreement in the terminology used for FCD, in comparison with 87%-92% agreement for neurodegenerative syndromes. Blood tests and neuropsychological evaluation were the leading diagnostic modalities for FCD. Diagnostic communication, psychotherapy and psychiatry referral were the main suggested management strategies in FCD. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates the feasibility of distinguishing between FCD and neurodegeneration based on relevant patient characteristics and history details. These characteristics need further validation and operationalisation. Heterogeneous labelling and framing pose clinical and research challenges reflecting a lack of agreement in the field. Careful consideration of FCD diagnosis is advised, particularly in the presence of comorbidities. This study informs future research on diagnostic tools and evidence-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verónica Cabreira
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Jane Alty
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education CentreUniversity of TasmaniaHobartTasmaniaAustralia
| | - Sonja Antic
- Department of NeurologyAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | - Rui Araújo
- Department of NeurologyCentro Hospitalar Universitário São JoãoPortoPortugal
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental HealthFaculty of Medicine University of PortoPortoPortugal
| | - Selma Aybek
- Neurology, Faculty of Sciences and MedicineFribourg UniversityFribourgSwitzerland
| | | | - Gaston Baslet
- Department of PsychiatryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Rohan Bhome
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyLondonUK
- Centre for Medical Image ComputingUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jan Coebergh
- Department of NeurologySt George's University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Department of NeurologyInstitut de la mémoire et de la maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A), AP‐HP, Brain Institute, Sorbonne UniversityParisFrance
| | - Mark Edwards
- Department of Basic and Clinical NeurosciencesInstitute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neurosciences, Kings College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Kristian Steen Frederiksen
- Clinical Trial Unit, RigshospitaletUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Thomas Harbo
- Department of NeurologyAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | - Bradleigh Hayhow
- Department of NeurologyFiona Stanley HospitalMurdochWestern AustraliaAustralia
- School of MedicineUniversity of Notre Dame AustraliaFremantleWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Robert Howard
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jonathan Huntley
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Jeremy Isaacs
- Department of NeurologySt George's University of LondonLondonUK
| | - William Curt LaFrance
- Alpert Medical SchoolBrown UniversityProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
- Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral NeurologyRhode Island HospitalProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | - Andrew J. Larner
- Cognitive Function ClinicWalton Centre for Neurology and NeurosurgeryLiverpoolUK
| | - Francesco Di Lorenzo
- Department of Clinical and Behavioural NeurologySanta Lucia Foundation IRCCSRomeItaly
| | - James Main
- Bristol Dementia Wellbeing Service, Devon Partnership NHS TrustBristolUK
| | | | - Camillo Marra
- Department of NeuroscienceCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Memory Clinic ‐ Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
| | - João Massano
- Department of NeurologyCentro Hospitalar Universitário São JoãoPortoPortugal
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental HealthFaculty of Medicine University of PortoPortoPortugal
| | | | - Laura McWhirter
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Isabel Portela Moreira
- Neurology DepartmentPrivate Hospital of Gaia of the Trofa Saúde GroupVila Nova de GaiaPortugal
| | | | - Catherine Pennington
- Clinical LecturerUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Neurology DepartmentNHS Forth ValleyLarbertUK
- Department of Clinical NeurosciencesNHS LothianEdinburghUK
| | - Miguel Tábuas‐Pereira
- Neurology DepartmentCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Praceta Prof. Mota PintoCoimbraPortugal
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
- Center for Innovative Biomedicine and BiotechnologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
| | - David L. Perez
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Stoyan Popkirov
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital EssenEssenGermany
| | - Dane Rayment
- Rosa Burden Centre for NeuropsychiatrySouthmead HospitalBristolUK
| | - Martin Rossor
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyLondonUK
| | - Mirella Russo
- Department of NeuroscienceImaging and Clinical Sciences G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti‐PescaraChietiItaly
| | - Isabel Santana
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
- Center for Innovative Biomedicine and BiotechnologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
| | - Jonathan Schott
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyLondonUK
| | - Emmi P. Scott
- Medical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Ricardo Taipa
- Neuropathology DepartmentCentro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo AntónioPortoPortugal
| | - Michele Tinazzi
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and MovementUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
| | - Svetlana Tomic
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital Center Osijek, Medical School on University of OsijekOsijekCroatia
| | - Sofia Toniolo
- Cognitive Disorder Clinic, Nuffield Department of Clinical NeurosciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | | | - Tim Wilkinson
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Lisbeth Frostholm
- Department of Clinical MedicineAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
- Department of Functional Disorders and PsychosomaticsAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | - Jon Stone
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Alan Carson
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dyer AH, Dunne J, Dolphin H, Morrison L, O'Connor A, Fullam S, Kenny T, Fallon A, O'Dowd S, Bourke NM, Conlon NP, Kennelly SP. Clinical performance of the fully automated Lumipulse plasma p-tau217 assay in mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2025; 17:e70080. [PMID: 39959359 PMCID: PMC11826441 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.70080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2024] [Revised: 12/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2025] [Indexed: 02/18/2025]
Abstract
Introduction Plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217 is a leading blood-biomarker for the detection of amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology. We assessed the performance of a fully automated plasma p-tau217 immunoassay to detect Aβ pathology in mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/mild dementia. Methods Paired plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were obtained at time of diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP) in a specialist memory service. Plasma p-tau217 was measured using the Lumipulse immunoassay platform and ability to detect CSF-defined Aβ positivity assessed. Results Of 148 participants (69.4 ± 6.5 years; 54.1% female), 101 had MCI and 47 mild dementia. Median plasma p-tau217 was > 4-fold higher in Aβ+ vs Aβ- individuals with an area under the curve of 0.92 (0.87-0.97). Application of 90%, 95%, and 97.5% sensitivity/specificity thresholds for plasma p-tau217 may have obviated the need for more than half of LPs. Discussion Our real-world data support the clinical use of fully automated plasma p-tau217 immunoassays, although further studies in more diverse cohorts are required. HIGHLIGHTS Plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217 was measured using a fully automated immunoassay (Lumipulse).P-tau217 was > 4-fold higher in amyloid beta (Aβ)+ versus Aβ- individuals.Plasma p-tau217 had an area under the curve of 0.92 for detection of Aβ status.Using a previously proposed two-threshold approach may avoid more than half of lumbar punctures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam H. Dyer
- Tallaght Institute of Memory and CognitionTallaght University HospitalDublinIreland
- Discipline of Medical GerontologySchool of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
- Trinity Translational Medicine InstituteTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Jean Dunne
- Clinical Immunology LaboratorySt James's HospitalDublinIreland
| | - Helena Dolphin
- Tallaght Institute of Memory and CognitionTallaght University HospitalDublinIreland
- Discipline of Medical GerontologySchool of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
- Trinity Translational Medicine InstituteTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Laura Morrison
- Tallaght Institute of Memory and CognitionTallaght University HospitalDublinIreland
- Discipline of Medical GerontologySchool of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Antoinette O'Connor
- Tallaght Institute of Memory and CognitionTallaght University HospitalDublinIreland
- Department of NeurologyTallaght University HospitalDublinIreland
- Academic Unity of NeurologySchool of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Sarah Fullam
- Tallaght Institute of Memory and CognitionTallaght University HospitalDublinIreland
- Department of NeurologyTallaght University HospitalDublinIreland
- Academic Unity of NeurologySchool of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Tara Kenny
- Discipline of Medical GerontologySchool of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
- Trinity Translational Medicine InstituteTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Aoife Fallon
- Tallaght Institute of Memory and CognitionTallaght University HospitalDublinIreland
- Discipline of Medical GerontologySchool of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Sean O'Dowd
- Discipline of Medical GerontologySchool of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Nollaig M. Bourke
- Discipline of Medical GerontologySchool of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
- Trinity Translational Medicine InstituteTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Niall P. Conlon
- Clinical Immunology LaboratorySt James's HospitalDublinIreland
- Clinical MedicineSchool of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Sean P. Kennelly
- Tallaght Institute of Memory and CognitionTallaght University HospitalDublinIreland
- Discipline of Medical GerontologySchool of MedicineTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Atri A, Dickerson BC, Clevenger C, Karlawish J, Knopman D, Lin PJ, Norman M, Onyike C, Sano M, Scanland S, Carrillo M. Alzheimer's Association clinical practice guideline for the Diagnostic Evaluation, Testing, Counseling, and Disclosure of Suspected Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (DETeCD-ADRD): Executive summary of recommendations for primary care. Alzheimers Dement 2024. [PMID: 39713942 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2024] [Revised: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or AD and related dementias (ADRD) are decades old and aimed at specialists. This evidence-based guideline was developed to empower all-including primary care-clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. Through a modified-Delphi approach and guideline-development process (7374 publications were reviewed; 133 met inclusion criteria) an expert workgroup developed recommendations as steps in a patient-centered evaluation process. This summary focuses on recommendations, appropriate for any practice setting, forming core elements of a high-quality, evidence-supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive-behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes specialist recommendations. If clinicians use this guideline and health-care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings. Highlights US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or AD and related dementias (ADRD) are decades old and aimed at specialists. This evidence-based guideline was developed to empower all-including primary care-clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. This summary focuses on recommendations, appropriate for any practice setting, forming core elements of a high-quality, evidence-supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive-behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes specialist recommendations. If clinicians use this guideline and health-care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Atri
- Banner Sun Health Research Institute and Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Sun City, Arizona, USA
- Center for Brain/Mind Medicine, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bradford C Dickerson
- Frontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carolyn Clevenger
- Department of Neurology, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jason Karlawish
- Departments of Medicine, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Penn Memory Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David Knopman
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary Norman
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Culver City, California, USA
| | - Chiadi Onyike
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mary Sano
- James J. Peters VAMC, Bronx, New York, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Maria Carrillo
- Medical & Scientific Relations Division, Alzheimer's Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tsantzali I, Athanasaki A, Boufidou F, Constantinides VC, Stefanou MI, Moschovos C, Zompola C, Paraskevas SG, Bonakis A, Giannopoulos S, Tsivgoulis G, Kapaki E, Paraskevas GP. Cerebrospinal Fluid Classical Biomarker Levels in Mixed vs. Pure A +T + (A +T 1+) Alzheimer's Disease. Biomedicines 2024; 12:2904. [PMID: 39767810 PMCID: PMC11672946 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2024] [Revised: 12/15/2024] [Accepted: 12/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) may present with pure (typical or atypical) and mixed phenotypes, sometimes causing difficulties in (differential) diagnosis. In order to achieve a diagnostic accuracy as high as possible, the diagnosis of AD during life depends on various biomarkers, including the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Methods: Classical CSF AD biomarkers were determined in a total of 61 patients, classified as both beta amyloid- and tau-positive A+T+ (or A+T1+ according to the recently revised Alzheimer Association criteria for diagnosis and staging of AD). Twenty one of these patients fulfilled the criteria for mixed AD (mixed with Lewy bodies, cerebrovascular disease, or normal pressure hydrocephalus), whilst 40 had pure AD. Results: Patients did not differ with respect to gender, education, disease duration, and cognitive status. After controlling for confounding factors, no difference was observed between mixed and pure AD groups in Aβ42 or Aβ42/Aβ40 levels. Although by definition, patients of both groups had abnormal (increased) levels of phospho-tau181, the mixed AD group presented with lower (less abnormal) levels of phospho-tau181 and total tau as compared to the pure group. Conclusions: In patients with AD of comparable cognitive status, mixed AD cases may present with lower levels of tau proteins and, if close to the cut-off values, diagnostic uncertainty may be increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioanna Tsantzali
- 2nd Department of Neurology, “Attikon” General University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.T.); (A.A.); (M.-I.S.); (C.M.); (C.Z.); (S.G.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Athanasia Athanasaki
- 2nd Department of Neurology, “Attikon” General University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.T.); (A.A.); (M.-I.S.); (C.M.); (C.Z.); (S.G.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Fotini Boufidou
- Neurochemistry and Βiological Markers Unit, 1st Department of Neurology, “Eginition” Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (F.B.); (V.C.C.); (E.K.)
| | - Vasilios C. Constantinides
- Neurochemistry and Βiological Markers Unit, 1st Department of Neurology, “Eginition” Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (F.B.); (V.C.C.); (E.K.)
| | - Maria-Ioanna Stefanou
- 2nd Department of Neurology, “Attikon” General University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.T.); (A.A.); (M.-I.S.); (C.M.); (C.Z.); (S.G.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Christos Moschovos
- 2nd Department of Neurology, “Attikon” General University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.T.); (A.A.); (M.-I.S.); (C.M.); (C.Z.); (S.G.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Christina Zompola
- 2nd Department of Neurology, “Attikon” General University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.T.); (A.A.); (M.-I.S.); (C.M.); (C.Z.); (S.G.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Sotirios G. Paraskevas
- 2nd Department of Neurology, “Attikon” General University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.T.); (A.A.); (M.-I.S.); (C.M.); (C.Z.); (S.G.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Anastasios Bonakis
- 2nd Department of Neurology, “Attikon” General University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.T.); (A.A.); (M.-I.S.); (C.M.); (C.Z.); (S.G.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Sotirios Giannopoulos
- 2nd Department of Neurology, “Attikon” General University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.T.); (A.A.); (M.-I.S.); (C.M.); (C.Z.); (S.G.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (G.T.)
| | - Georgios Tsivgoulis
- 2nd Department of Neurology, “Attikon” General University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.T.); (A.A.); (M.-I.S.); (C.M.); (C.Z.); (S.G.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (G.T.)
- Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
| | - Elisabeth Kapaki
- Neurochemistry and Βiological Markers Unit, 1st Department of Neurology, “Eginition” Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (F.B.); (V.C.C.); (E.K.)
| | - George P. Paraskevas
- 2nd Department of Neurology, “Attikon” General University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.T.); (A.A.); (M.-I.S.); (C.M.); (C.Z.); (S.G.P.); (A.B.); (S.G.); (G.T.)
- Neurochemistry and Βiological Markers Unit, 1st Department of Neurology, “Eginition” Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece; (F.B.); (V.C.C.); (E.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Engelhardt E, Resende EDPF, Gomes KB. Physiopathological mechanisms underlying Alzheimer's disease: a narrative review. Dement Neuropsychol 2024; 18:e2024VR01. [PMID: 39697643 PMCID: PMC11654088 DOI: 10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2024-vr01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
The neuropathological signature of Alzheimer's disease (AD) comprises mainly amyloid plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles, resulting in synaptic and neuronal loss. These pathological structures stem from amyloid dysfunctional metabolism according to the amyloid cascade hypothesis, leading to the formation of plaques, and apparently inducing the initiation of the abnormal tau pathway, with phosphorylation and aggregation of these proteins, ultimately causing the formation of tangles. In this narrative review, the existing hypothesis related to the pathophysiology of AD were compiled, and biological pathways were highlighted in order to identify the molecules that could represent biological markers of the disease, necessary to establish early diagnosis, as well as the selection of patients for therapeutical interventional strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliasz Engelhardt
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Neurologia Deolindo Couto, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil
| | - Elisa de Paula França Resende
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Belo Horizonte MG, Brazil
- Faculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte MG, Brazil
| | - Karina Braga Gomes
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Farmácia, Belo Horizonte MG, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Gils AM, Tolonen A, van Harten AC, Vigneswaran S, Barkhof F, Visser LNC, Koikkalainen J, Herukka SK, Hasselbalch SG, Mecocci P, Remes AM, Soininen H, Lemstra AW, Teunissen CE, Jönsson L, Lötjönen J, van der Flier WM, Rhodius-Meester HFM. Computerized decision support to optimally funnel patients through the diagnostic pathway for dementia. Alzheimers Res Ther 2024; 16:256. [PMID: 39587679 PMCID: PMC11590510 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01614-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 10/31/2024] [Indexed: 11/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing prevalence of dementia and the introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) highlight the need for efficient diagnostic pathways in memory clinics. We present a data-driven approach to efficiently guide stepwise diagnostic testing for three clinical scenarios: 1) syndrome diagnosis, 2) etiological diagnosis, and 3) eligibility for DMT. METHODS We used data from two memory clinic cohorts (ADC, PredictND), including 504 patients with dementia (302 Alzheimer's disease, 107 frontotemporal dementia, 35 vascular dementia, 60 dementia with Lewy bodies), 191 patients with mild cognitive impairment, and 188 cognitively normal controls (CN). Tests included digital cognitive screening (cCOG), neuropsychological and functional assessment (NP), MRI with automated quantification, and CSF biomarkers. Sequential testing followed a predetermined order, guided by diagnostic certainty. Diagnostic certainty was determined using a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that generates a disease state index (DSI, 0-1), indicating the probability of the syndrome diagnosis or underlying etiology. Diagnosis was confirmed if the DSI exceeded a predefined threshold based on sensitivity/specificity cutoffs relevant to each clinical scenario. Diagnostic accuracy and the need for additional testing were assessed at each step. RESULTS Using cCOG as a prescreener for 1) syndrome diagnosis has the potential to accurately reduce the need for extensive NP (42%), resulting in syndrome diagnosis in all patients, with a diagnostic accuracy of 0.71, which was comparable to using NP alone. For 2) etiological diagnosis, stepwise testing resulted in an etiological diagnosis in 80% of patients with a diagnostic accuracy of 0.77, with MRI needed in 77%, and CSF in 37%. When 3) determining DMT eligibility, stepwise testing (100% cCOG, 83% NP, 75% MRI) selected 60% of the patients for confirmatory CSF testing and eventually identified 90% of the potentially eligible patients with AD dementia. CONCLUSIONS Different diagnostic pathways are accurate and efficient depending on the setting. As such, a data-driven tool holds promise for assisting clinicians in selecting tests of added value across different clinical contexts. This becomes especially important with DMT availability, where the need for more efficient diagnostic pathways is crucial to maintain the accessibility and affordability of dementia diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniek M van Gils
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Argonde C van Harten
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands
| | - Sinthujah Vigneswaran
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Leonie N C Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
- Institute of Clinical Medicine/Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Steen Gregers Hasselbalch
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, RigshospitaletCopenhagen, Denmark
| | - Patrizia Mecocci
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Piazzale Gambuli 1, 06129, Perugia, Italy
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE, Sweden
| | - Anne M Remes
- Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Oulu, 90014, Oulu, Finland
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine/Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Afina W Lemstra
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Laboratory, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands
| | - Linus Jönsson
- Division of Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, 1081HV, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Section, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, 1081HV, The Netherlands
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, The Memory Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, 0379, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Frisoni GB. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and care of Alzheimer's disease are coming together. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2024:jnnp-2024-333864. [PMID: 39532520 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2024-333864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni B Frisoni
- Memory center, Geneva University and University Hospitals, Genève, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Studart-Neto A, Barbosa BJAP, Coutinho AM, de Souza LC, Schilling LP, da Silva MNM, Castilhos RM, Bertolucci PHF, Borelli WV, Gomes HR, Fernandes GBP, Barbosa MT, Balthazar MLF, Frota NAF, Forlenza OV, Smid J, Brucki SMD, Caramelli P, Nitrini R, Engelhardt E, Resende EDPF. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in clinical practice in Brazil: recommendations from the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. Dement Neuropsychol 2024; 18:e2024C001. [PMID: 39534442 PMCID: PMC11556292 DOI: 10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2024-c001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
In recent years, the diagnostic accuracy of Alzheimer's disease has been enhanced by the development of different types of biomarkers that indicate the presence of neuropathological processes. In addition to improving patient selection for clinical trials, biomarkers can assess the effects of new treatments on pathological processes. However, there is concern about the indiscriminate and poorly supported use of biomarkers, especially in asymptomatic individuals or those with subjective cognitive decline. Difficulties interpreting these tests, high costs, and unequal access make this scenario even more challenging in healthcare. This article presents the recommendations from the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology (Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e Envelhecimento da Academia Brasileira de Neurologia) regarding the rational use and interpretation of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in clinical practice. The clinical diagnosis of cognitive-behavioral syndrome is recommended as the initial step to guide the request for biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adalberto Studart-Neto
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Grupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | - Breno José Alencar Pires Barbosa
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Hospital das Clínicas, Recife, Centro de Ciências Médicas, Recife PE, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Recife PE, Brazil
| | - Artur Martins Coutinho
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto de Radiologia, Centro de Medicina Nuclear, Laboratório de Investigação Médica (LIM 43), São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Medicina Nuclear e Serviço de PET-CT, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | - Leonardo Cruz de Souza
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Unidade de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, Belo Horizonte MG, Brazil
| | - Lucas Porcello Schilling
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Pontifícia Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Medicina, Serviço de Neurologia, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil
| | - Mari Nilva Maia da Silva
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Hospital Nina Rodrigues, Serviço de Neuropsiquiatria, São Luís MA, Brazil
| | - Raphael Machado Castilhos
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neurologia, Centro de Neurologia Cognitiva e Comportamental, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil
| | - Paulo Henrique Ferreira Bertolucci
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | - Wyllians Vendramini Borelli
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Instituto de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Departamento de Ciências Morfológicas, Porto Alegre RS, Brazil
| | - Hélio Rodrigues Gomes
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Investigação Médica (LIM 15), São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Departamento Científico de Líquido Cefalorraquiano, Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | | | - Maira Tonidandel Barbosa
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Unidade de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, Belo Horizonte MG, Brazil
| | - Marcio Luiz Figueredo Balthazar
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Campinas SP, Brazil
| | - Norberto Anízio Ferreira Frota
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Serviço de Neurologia, Fortaleza CE, Brazil
- Universidade de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
| | - Orestes Vicente Forlenza
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto de Psiquiatria, Laboratório de Neurociências, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | - Jerusa Smid
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Grupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | - Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Grupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | - Paulo Caramelli
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Unidade de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, Belo Horizonte MG, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Nitrini
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, Grupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
| | - Eliasz Engelhardt
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Neurologia Deolindo Couto, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Psiquiatria, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil
| | - Elisa de Paula França Resende
- Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento, São Paulo SP, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Unidade de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, Belo Horizonte MG, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Oh ES. Dementia. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:ITC161-ITC176. [PMID: 39527814 DOI: 10.7326/annals-24-02207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Dementia, or major neurocognitive disorder, is defined as a decline in 1 or more cognitive domains that causes impairment in everyday function. Alzheimer disease is the most common type of dementia in the United States, with an estimated 6.9 million adults who have Alzheimer disease and are 65 years or older. This article discusses the latest findings in preventing cognitive decline. It also discusses dementia screening, diagnosis, treatment, and the quality of life for persons with dementia and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther S Oh
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (E.S.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Barba L, Abu-Rumeileh S, Barthel H, Massa F, Foschi M, Bellomo G, Gaetani L, Thal DR, Parnetti L, Otto M. Clinical and diagnostic implications of Alzheimer's disease copathology in Lewy body disease. Brain 2024; 147:3325-3343. [PMID: 38991041 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Concomitant Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology is a frequent event in the context of Lewy body disease (LBD), occurring in approximately half of all cases. Evidence shows that LBD patients with AD copathology show an accelerated disease course, a greater risk of cognitive decline and an overall poorer prognosis. However, LBD-AD cases may show heterogeneous motor and non-motor phenotypes with a higher risk of dementia and, consequently, be not rarely misdiagnosed. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of LBD-AD by discussing the synergistic effects of AD neuropathological changes and Lewy pathology and their clinical relevance. Furthermore, we provide an extensive overview of neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers under assessment for use in LBD-AD and their possible diagnostic and prognostic values. AD pathology can be predicted in vivo by means of CSF, MRI and PET markers, whereas the most promising technique to date for identifying Lewy pathology in different biological tissues is the α-synuclein seed amplification assay. Pathological imaging and CSF AD biomarkers are associated with a higher likelihood of cognitive decline in LBD but do not always mirror the neuropathological severity as in pure AD. Implementing the use of blood-based AD biomarkers might allow faster screening of LBD patients for AD copathology, thus improving the overall diagnostic sensitivity for LBD-AD. Finally, we discuss the literature on novel candidate biomarkers being exploited in LBD-AD to investigate other aspects of neurodegeneration, such as neuroaxonal injury, glial activation and synaptic dysfunction. The thorough characterization of AD copathology in LBD should be taken into account when considering differential diagnoses of dementia syndromes, to allow prognostic evaluation on an individual level, and to guide symptomatic and disease-modifying therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Barba
- Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle 06120, Germany
| | - Samir Abu-Rumeileh
- Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle 06120, Germany
| | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| | - Federico Massa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa 16132, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa 16132, Italy
| | - Matteo Foschi
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila 67100, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital of Ravenna, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna 48121, Italy
| | - Giovanni Bellomo
- Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia 06129, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gaetani
- Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia 06129, Italy
| | - Dietmar R Thal
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Laboratory for Neuropathology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3001, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, UZ Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Lucilla Parnetti
- Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia 06129, Italy
| | - Markus Otto
- Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle 06120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cappa SF. Cognitive assessment: More important than ever. J Neuropsychol 2024. [PMID: 39358982 DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano F Cappa
- University Institute of Advanced Studies (IUSS), Pavia, Italy
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, 20149, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brendel M, Parvizi T, Gnörich J, Topfstedt CE, Buerger K, Janowitz D, Rauchmann B, Perneczky R, Kurz C, Mehrens D, Kunz WG, Kusche‐Palenga J, Kling AB, Buchal A, Nestorova E, Silvaieh S, Wurm R, Traub‐Weidinger T, Klotz S, Regelsberger G, Rominger A, Drzezga A, Levin J, Stögmann E, Franzmeier N, Höglinger GU. Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease-modifying therapies: Evidence from 10-year real-world experience at university memory clinics. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2024; 16:e70031. [PMID: 39583651 PMCID: PMC11582924 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.70031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Revised: 09/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the advent of disease-modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease-associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real-world memory-clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use. METHODS Patients were evaluated for AD-related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU], n = 402, and Medical University of Vienna [MUV], n = 144). Optimal thresholds of CSF biomarkers were deduced from receiver operating characteristic curves and validated against Aβ PET positivity. RESULTS In both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%-7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%-52% Aβ PET positivity). DISCUSSION A two-cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real-world settings. Highlights We evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid beta (Aβ) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in real-world cohorts.A CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio between 5.5% and 7.1% defines patients at borderline levels.Patients at borderline levels strongly benefit from additional Aβ PET imaging.Two-cutoff CSF Aβ 42/40 and PET will allow effective treatment stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear MedicineLMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) MunichMunichGermany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy)MunichGermany
| | - Tandis Parvizi
- Department of Nuclear MedicineLMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental HealthMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Johannes Gnörich
- Department of Nuclear MedicineLMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
| | - Christof Elias Topfstedt
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)LMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
| | - Katharina Buerger
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) MunichMunichGermany
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)LMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
| | - Daniel Janowitz
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)LMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
| | | | - Robert Perneczky
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) MunichMunichGermany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy)MunichGermany
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental HealthMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Ageing Epidemiology (AGE) Research Unit, School of Public HealthImperial College LondonLondonUK
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience (SITraN)University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Carolin Kurz
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyLMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
| | - Dirk Mehrens
- Department of RadiologyLMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
| | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Department of RadiologyLMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
| | | | | | - Antonia Buchal
- Department of RadiologyLMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
| | - Elizabet Nestorova
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyLMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
| | - Sara Silvaieh
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental HealthMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Raphael Wurm
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental HealthMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Tatjana Traub‐Weidinger
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image‐Guided TherapyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Nuclear MedicineKlinik DonaustadtViennaAustria
| | - Sigrid Klotz
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental HealthMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Günther Regelsberger
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental HealthMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, InselspitalBern University Hospital, University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear MedicineFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneCologneGermany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)BonnGermany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM‐2), Molecular Organization of the BrainForschungszentrum JülichJülichGermany
| | - Johannes Levin
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) MunichMunichGermany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy)MunichGermany
- Department of NeurologyLMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
| | - Elisabeth Stögmann
- Department of NeurologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental HealthMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Nicolai Franzmeier
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy)MunichGermany
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)LMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
- The Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Mölndal and GothenburgUniversity of GothenburgMölndalSweden
| | - Günter U. Höglinger
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) MunichMunichGermany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy)MunichGermany
- Department of NeurologyLMU University Hospital, LMU MunichMunichGermany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Karger AB, Nasrallah IM, Braffett BH, Luchsinger JA, Ryan CM, Bebu I, Arends V, Habes M, Gubitosi-Klug RA, Chaytor N, Biessels GJ, Jacobson AM. Plasma Biomarkers of Brain Injury and Their Association With Brain MRI and Cognition in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:1530-1538. [PMID: 38861647 PMCID: PMC11362129 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-0229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate associations between plasma biomarkers of brain injury and MRI and cognitive measures in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Plasma amyloid-β-40, amyloid-β-42, neurofilament light chain (NfL), phosphorylated Tau-181 (pTau-181), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were measured in 373 adults who participated in the DCCT/EDIC study. MRI assessments included total brain and white matter hyperintensity volumes, white matter mean fractional anisotropy, and indices of Alzheimer disease (AD)-like atrophy and predicted brain age. Cognitive measures included memory and psychomotor and mental efficiency tests and assessments of cognitive impairment. RESULTS Participants were 60 (range 44-74) years old with 38 (30-51) years' T1D duration. Higher NfL was associated with an increase in predicted brain age (0.51 years per 20% increase in NfL; P < 0.001) and a 19.5% increase in the odds of impaired cognition (P < 0.01). Higher NfL and pTau-181 were associated with lower psychomotor and mental efficiency (P < 0.001) but not poorer memory. Amyloid-β measures were not associated with study measures. A 1% increase in mean HbA1c was associated with a 14.6% higher NfL and 12.8% higher pTau-181 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In this aging T1D cohort, biomarkers of brain injury did not demonstrate an AD-like profile. NfL emerged as a biomarker of interest in T1D because of its association with higher HbA1c, accelerated brain aging on MRI, and cognitive dysfunction. Our study suggests that early neurodegeneration in adults with T1D is likely due to non-AD/nonamyloid mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy B. Karger
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Ilya M. Nasrallah
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - Ionut Bebu
- The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Rockville, MD
| | - Valerie Arends
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Mohamad Habes
- Neuroimage Analytics Laboratory and Biggs Institute Neuroimaging Core, Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonino, TX
| | - Rose A. Gubitosi-Klug
- Case Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, OH
| | - Naomi Chaytor
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA
| | - Geert J. Biessels
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Alan M. Jacobson
- New York University Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Thanapornsangsuth P, Booncharoen K, Khieukhajee J, Luechaipanit W, Haethaisong T, Chongsuksantikul A, Supharatpariyakorn T, Chunharas C, Likitjaroen Y, Hemachudha T. The Bayesian approach for real-world implementation of plasma p-tau217 in tertiary care memory clinics in Thailand. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20:6456-6467. [PMID: 39016441 PMCID: PMC11497765 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217 is a promising biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis, but its clinical implementation remains challenging. We propose a strategy based on Bayes' theorem and test it in real-life memory clinics. METHODS Memory clinic patients were evaluated by neurocognitive specialists for prespecified diagnosis and subsequently underwent blood collection for p-tau217, cerebrospinal fluid, or amyloid positron emission tomography. Using cross-validation, the Bayesian approach (pretest probability × individualized likelihood ratio) was compared to other models for AD diagnosis. RESULTS The Bayesian strategy demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.0), significantly outperforming multivariable logistic regression (p-tau217, age, apolipoprotein E; AUC 0.95, p = 0.024) and p-tau217 alone (AUC = 0.94, p = 0.007). When applying the two-threshold approach, the Bayesian strategy yielded an accuracy of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-1.0) without requiring confirmatory tests in 62.9% of the iterations. DISCUSSION The Bayesian strategy offers an effective and flexible approach to address the limitations of plasma p-tau217 in clinical practice. HIGHLIGHTS Incorporating pretest probability into the interpretation of plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217 improves the diagnostic performance significantly. The strategy could obviate the need for confirmatory testing in most of the patients. Plasma p-tau217 proves useful as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease in low- and middle-income country such as Thailand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poosanu Thanapornsangsuth
- Thai Red Cross Emerging Infectious Diseases Health Science Centre, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training on Viral ZoonosesKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital The Thai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
- Division of NeurologyDepartment of MedicineFaculty of MedicineChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
- Memory ClinicKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
- Chula Neuroscience CenterKing Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalThai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
| | - Kittithatch Booncharoen
- Memory ClinicKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
- Neurocognitive Unit, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
- Neurology CenterPhyathai 1 HospitalBangkokThailand
| | | | - Watayuth Luechaipanit
- Thai Red Cross Emerging Infectious Diseases Health Science Centre, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training on Viral ZoonosesKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital The Thai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
| | - Thanaporn Haethaisong
- Thai Red Cross Emerging Infectious Diseases Health Science Centre, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training on Viral ZoonosesKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital The Thai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
| | - Adipa Chongsuksantikul
- Thai Red Cross Emerging Infectious Diseases Health Science Centre, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training on Viral ZoonosesKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital The Thai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
| | - Thirawat Supharatpariyakorn
- Thai Red Cross Emerging Infectious Diseases Health Science Centre, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training on Viral ZoonosesKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital The Thai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
| | - Chaipat Chunharas
- Division of NeurologyDepartment of MedicineFaculty of MedicineChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
- Memory ClinicKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
- Chula Neuroscience CenterKing Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalThai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
- Cognitive Clinical and Computational NeuroscienceDepartment of Internal MedicineFaculty of MedicineChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Yuttachai Likitjaroen
- Division of NeurologyDepartment of MedicineFaculty of MedicineChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
- Memory ClinicKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
- Neurocognitive Unit, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Thiravat Hemachudha
- Division of NeurologyDepartment of MedicineFaculty of MedicineChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Cejudo-Ruiz FR, Stommel EW, González-Maciel A, Reynoso-Robles R, Torres-Jardón R, Tehuacanero-Cuapa S, Rodríguez-Gómez A, Bautista F, Goguitchaichvili A, Pérez-Guille BE, Soriano-Rosales RE, Koseoglu E, Mukherjee PS. Single-domain magnetic particles with motion behavior under electromagnetic AC and DC fields are a fatal cargo in Metropolitan Mexico City pediatric and young adult early Alzheimer, Parkinson, frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and in ALS patients. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1411849. [PMID: 39246712 PMCID: PMC11377271 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1411849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Metropolitan Mexico City (MMC) children and young adults exhibit overlapping Alzheimer and Parkinsons' diseases (AD, PD) and TAR DNA-binding protein 43 pathology with magnetic ultrafine particulate matter (UFPM) and industrial nanoparticles (NPs). We studied magnetophoresis, electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry in 203 brain samples from 14 children, 27 adults, and 27 ALS cases/controls. Saturation isothermal remanent magnetization (SIRM), capturing magnetically unstable FeNPs ~ 20nm, was higher in caudate, thalamus, hippocampus, putamen, and motor regions with subcortical vs. cortical higher SIRM in MMC ≤ 40y. Motion behavior was associated with magnetic exposures 25-100 mT and children exhibited IRM saturated curves at 50-300 mT associated to change in NPs position and/or orientation in situ. Targeted magnetic profiles moving under AC/AD magnetic fields could distinguish ALS vs. controls. Motor neuron magnetic NPs accumulation potentially interferes with action potentials, ion channels, nuclear pores and enhances the membrane insertion process when coated with lipopolysaccharides. TEM and EDX showed 7-20 nm NP Fe, Ti, Co, Ni, V, Hg, W, Al, Zn, Ag, Si, S, Br, Ce, La, and Pr in abnormal neural and vascular organelles. Brain accumulation of magnetic unstable particles start in childhood and cytotoxic, hyperthermia, free radical formation, and NPs motion associated to 30-50 μT (DC magnetic fields) are critical given ubiquitous electric and magnetic fields exposures could induce motion behavior and neural damage. Magnetic UFPM/NPs are a fatal brain cargo in children's brains, and a preventable AD, PD, FTLD, ALS environmental threat. Billions of people are at risk. We are clearly poisoning ourselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elijah W Stommel
- Department of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States
| | | | | | - Ricardo Torres-Jardón
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Atmósfera y Cambio Climático, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Francisco Bautista
- Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico
| | - Avto Goguitchaichvili
- Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico
| | | | | | - Emel Koseoglu
- Department of Neurology, Erciyes Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye
| | - Partha S Mukherjee
- Interdisciplinary Statistical Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dyer AH, Dolphin H, O'Connor A, Morrison L, Sedgwick G, Young C, Killeen E, Gallagher C, McFeely A, Connolly E, Davey N, Claffey P, Doyle P, Lyons S, Gaffney C, Ennis R, McHale C, Joseph J, Knight G, Kelly E, O'Farrelly C, Fallon A, O'Dowd S, Bourke NM, Kennelly SP. Performance of plasma p-tau217 for the detection of amyloid-β positivity in a memory clinic cohort using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Alzheimers Res Ther 2024; 16:186. [PMID: 39160628 PMCID: PMC11331802 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01555-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plasma p-tau217 has emerged as the most promising blood-based marker (BBM) for the detection of Alzheimer Disease (AD) pathology, yet few studies have evaluated plasma p-tau217 performance in memory clinic settings. We examined the performance of plasma p-tau217 for the detection of AD using a high-sensitivity immunoassay in individuals undergoing diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP). METHODS Paired plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were analysed from the TIMC-BRAiN cohort. Amyloid (Aβ) and Tau (T) pathology were classified based on established cut-offs for CSF Aβ42 and CSF p-tau181 respectively. High-sensitivity electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunoassays were performed on paired plasma/CSF samples for p-tau217, p-tau181, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), Neurofilament Light (NfL) and total tau (t-tau). Biomarker performance was evaluated using Receiver-Operating Curve (ROC) and Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS Of 108 participants (age: 69 ± 6.5 years; 54.6% female) with paired samples obtained at time of LP, 64.8% (n = 70/108) had Aβ pathology detected (35 with Mild Cognitive Impairment and 35 with mild dementia). Plasma p-tau217 was over three-fold higher in Aβ + (12.4 pg/mL; 7.3-19.2 pg/mL) vs. Aβ- participants (3.7 pg/mL; 2.8-4.1 pg/mL; Mann-Whitney U = 230, p < 0.001). Plasma p-tau217 exhibited excellent performance for the detection of Aβ pathology (AUC: 0.91; 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 0.86-0.97)-greater than for T pathology (AUC: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.75-0.90; z = 1.75, p = 0.04). Plasma p-tau217 outperformed plasma p-tau181 for the detection of Aβ pathology (z = 3.24, p < 0.001). Of the other BBMs, only plasma GFAP significantly differed by Aβ status which significantly correlated with plasma p-tau217 in Aβ + (but not in Aβ-) individuals. Application of a two-point threshold at 95% and 97.5% sensitivities & specificities may have enabled avoidance of LP in 58-68% of cases. CONCLUSIONS Plasma p-tau217 measured using a high-sensitivity ECL immunoassay demonstrated excellent performance for detection of Aβ pathology in a real-world memory clinic cohort. Moving forward, clinical use of plasma p-tau217 to detect AD pathology may substantially reduce need for confirmatory diagnostic testing for AD pathology with diagnostic LP in specialist memory services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam H Dyer
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Helena Dolphin
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Laura Morrison
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gavin Sedgwick
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Conor Young
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emily Killeen
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Conal Gallagher
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aoife McFeely
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eimear Connolly
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Naomi Davey
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Paul Claffey
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Paddy Doyle
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Shane Lyons
- Department of Neurology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christine Gaffney
- Department of Neurology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ruth Ennis
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cathy McHale
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jasmine Joseph
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Graham Knight
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emmet Kelly
- Department of Neurology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cliona O'Farrelly
- School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aoife Fallon
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sean O'Dowd
- Department of Neurology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nollaig M Bourke
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sean P Kennelly
- Department of Age-Related Healthcare, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Massa F, Villain N, Cotta Ramusino M, Frisoni GB. Clinical versus biomarker-based diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders - Authors' reply. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:766-767. [PMID: 39030035 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00275-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Massa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nicolas Villain
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM U1127, CNRS 7225, Institut du Cerveau - ICM, Paris, France; Department of Neurology, Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Matteo Cotta Ramusino
- Unit of Behavioral Neurology and Dementia Research Center (DRC), IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Geneva Memory Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Höglinger GU, Boxer AL, Lang AE. Clinical versus biomarker-based diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:765-766. [PMID: 39030034 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00274-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Günter U Höglinger
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
| | - Adam L Boxer
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anthony E Lang
- University Health Network's Krembil Brain Institute, Edmond J Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and the Rossy PSP Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Skolarus LE, Williams LS. Implementation research: an approach to overcoming the know-do gap. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:656-658. [PMID: 38876733 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00219-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Lesli E Skolarus
- The Ken & Ruth Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Center for Community Health, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Linda S Williams
- Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Traub J, Docherty KF, Frey A. The Link Between Heart Failure and Neurodegeneration: Insights From Circulating Biomarkers. JACC. HEART FAILURE 2024; 12:1086-1088. [PMID: 38839152 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Traub
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Department of Clinical Research and Epidemiology, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Kieran F Docherty
- British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Frey
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Department of Clinical Research and Epidemiology, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Andrews SJ, Jonson C, Fulton-Howard B, Renton AE, Yokoyama JS, Yaffe K. The Role of Genomic-Informed Risk Assessments in Predicting Dementia Outcomes. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.04.27.24306488. [PMID: 38903124 PMCID: PMC11188112 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.27.24306488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
Importance By integrating genetic and clinical risk factors into genomic-informed dementia risk reports, healthcare providers can offer patients detailed risk profiles to facilitate understanding of individual risk and support the implementation of personalized strategies for promoting brain health. Objective To develop a genomic-informed risk assessment composed of family history, genetic, and clinical risk factors and, in turn, evaluate how the risk assessment predicted incident dementia. Design This longitudinal study included data from two clinical case-control cohorts with an average of 6.6 visits. Secondary analyses were conducted from July 2023 - March 2024. Setting Data were previously collected across multiple US locations from 1994 to 2023. Participants Older adults aged 55+ with whole-genome sequencing and dementia-free at baseline. Exposures An additive score comprising the modified Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia Risk Score (mCAIDE), family history of dementia, APOE genotype, and an AD polygenic risk score. Main Outcomes and Measures The risk of progression to all-cause dementia was evaluated using Cox-proportional hazard models (hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals [OR 9%CI]). Results A total of 3,429 older adults were included (aged 75 ± 7 years; 59% female; 75% non-Latino White, 15% Black, 5.2% Latino, 3.6% other, and 0.4% Asian; 27% MCI), with 751 participants progressing to dementia. The most common high-risk indicator was a family history of dementia (56%), followed by APOE*ε4 genotype (36%), high mCAIDE score (34%), and high AD-PRS (11%). Most participants had at least one high-risk indicator, with 39% having one, 32% two, 9.8% three, and 1% four. The presence of 1, 2, 3, or 4 risk indicators was associated with a doubling (HR = 1.72, CI: 1.34-2.22, p = 2.5e-05), tripling (HR = 3.09, CI: 2.41-3.95, p = 4.4e-19), quadrupling (HR = 4.46, CI: 3.34-5.94, p = 2.2e-24), and a twelvefold increase (HR = 12.15, CI: 7.33-20.14, p = 3.2e-22) in dementia risk. Conclusion & Relevance We found that most participants in memory and aging clinics had at least one high-risk indicator for dementia. Furthermore, we observed a dose-response relationship where a greater number of risk indicators was associated with an increased risk of incident dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shea J. Andrews
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Caroline Jonson
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
- Center for Alzheimer’s and Related Dementias, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA 20892
- DataTecnica LLC, Washington, DC USA 20037
| | - Brian Fulton-Howard
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Alan E Renton
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer S Yokoyama
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Kristine Yaffe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Knopman DS. For a dementia diagnosis, clinical acumen must precede biomarkers. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:225-226. [PMID: 38365363 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00021-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- David S Knopman
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vyhnalek M, Laczó M, Laczó J. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease in Clinical Practice: Time to Incorporate Biomarkers? J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 101:1133-1136. [PMID: 39269843 PMCID: PMC11492020 DOI: 10.3233/jad-240660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
Hippocampal dysfunction is associated with early clinical signs of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Due to the limited availability or invasiveness of current biomarkers, the AD diagnosis is usually based on cognitive assessment and structural brain imaging. The recent study by Lalive and colleagues examined the specificity of brain morphometry for the AD diagnosis in a memory clinic cohort with hippocampal-type amnestic syndrome. The results indicate that memory deficits and hippocampal atrophy are similar in AD and non-AD patients, highlighting their low diagnostic specificity. These findings challenge the traditional AD diagnosis and underscore the need for biomarkers to differentiate specific neuropathological entities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Vyhnalek
- Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | - Martina Laczó
- Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | - Jan Laczó
- Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|