Empagliflozin monotherapy with sitagliptin as an active comparator in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

A multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial of the long-term safety of empagliflozin treatment for refractory diabetes mellitus with insulin resistance (EMPIRE-02)

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Insulin resistance syndrome and lipoatrophic diabetes are rare conditions characterized by the development of treatment-refractory diabetes with severe insulin resistance. We recently conducted a 24 week, multicenter, single-arm trial (EMPIRE-01) that demonstrated a certain level of effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin for these conditions. To evaluate treatment safety over a longer period, we have now performed an additional 28 week trial (EMPIRE-02) that followed on from EMPIRE-01.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The primary and secondary outcomes were safety and efficacy evaluations, respectively. All eight subjects of the EMPIRE-01 trial participated in EMPIRE-02.

RESULTS

Twenty adverse events (AEs) were recorded among five individuals during the combined 52 week treatment period of both trials. Whereas one case of chronic hepatitis B was moderate in severity, all other AEs were mild. There were thus no serious AEs or events necessitating discontinuation or suspension of treatment or a reduction in drug dose. Whereas ketoacidosis or marked increases in serum ketone body levels were not observed, the mean body mass of the subjects was decreased slightly after completion of EMPIRE-02. The improvement in mean values of glycemic parameters observed in EMPIRE-01 was not sustained in EMPIRE-02, mostly because of one individual whose parameters deteriorated markedly, likely as a result of nonadherence to diet therapy. The improvement in glycemic parameters was sustained during EMPIRE-02 after exclusion of this subject from analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Empagliflozin demonstrated a certain level of safety and efficacy for the treatment of insulin resistance syndrome and lipoatrophic diabetes over 52 weeks, confirming its potential as a therapeutic option.

Exploration and detection of nitrosamine impurity nitroso-STG-19 in sitagliptin tablets and API as well as nitrites in excipients by LC-MS/MS methods

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently reported a new nitrosamine impurity in sitagliptin that was named nitroso-STG-19 (NTTP), whose acceptable intake limit was extremely low at 37 ng per day. In addition, NTTP was found to be a degradation impurity in sitagliptin tablets, which was formed by the reaction of 3-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazine hydrochloride and nitrite salts introduced via excipients. Consequently, the NTTP content in tablets was larger than that in active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). To control the impurity, an ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) procedure for the detection of NTTP in sitagliptin phosphate tablets and APIs was developed and validated. Furthermore, a derivatization method for the detection of nitrite salts at lower concentration was developed to select applicable excipients to decelerate the generation of NTTP. During validation of the analytical procedure for NTTP, the quantitation limit (LOQ) of NTTP was 56 ppb (0.056 ng mL-1), the linear correlation coefficient was 0.9998, and recoveries of NTTP in spiked samples ranged from 95.5% to 105.2%, indicating that the method is rapid, sensitive and accurate for an NTTP test. In the nitrite salt detection method, the LOQ was 0.21 ng mL-1, and recoveries of NTTP in spiked samples ranged from 87.6% to 107.8%, indicating a sensitive and accurate method, suitable for screening appropriate pharmaceutical excipients.

Transporter Proteins as Therapeutic Drug Targets-With a Focus on SGLT2 Inhibitors

Membrane transporters interact not only with endogenous substrates but are also engaged in the transport of xenobiotics, including drugs. While the coordinated function of uptake (solute carrier family-SLC and SLCO) and efflux (ATP-binding cassette family-ABC, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion family-MATE) transporter system allows vectorial drug transport, efflux carriers alone achieve barrier functions. The modulation of transport functions was proved to be effective in the treatment strategies of various pathological states. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are the drugs most widely applied in clinical practice, especially in the treatment of diabetes mellitus and heart failure. Sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) serves as virus particles (HBV/HDV) carrier, and inhibition of its function is applied in the treatment of hepatitis B and hepatitis D by myrcludex B. Inherited cholestatic diseases, such as Alagille syndrome (ALGS) and progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) can be treated by odevixibat and maralixibat, which inhibit activity of apical sodium-dependent bile salt transporter (ASBT). Probenecid can be considered to increase uric acid excretion in the urine mainly via the inhibition of urate transporter 1 (URAT1), and due to pharmacokinetic interactions involving organic anion transporters 1 and 3 (OAT1 and OAT3), it modifies renal excretion of penicillins or ciprofloxacin as well as nephrotoxicity of cidofovir. This review discusses clinically approved drugs that affect membrane/drug transporter function.

Effects of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease and Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease: Protocol for 3 Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials (SiRENA Project)

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have revolutionized the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), reducing the risk of cardiovascular and renal end points by up to 40%. The underlying mechanisms are not fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to examine the effects of empagliflozin versus placebo on renal hemodynamics, sodium balance, vascular function, and markers of the innate immune system in patients with DM2, DM2 and CKD, and nondiabetic CKD.

METHODS

We conducted 3 double-blind, crossover, randomized controlled trials, each with identical study protocols but different study populations. We included patients with DM2 and preserved kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min/1.73 m2), DM2 and CKD, and nondiabetic CKD (both with estimated glomerular filtration rate 20-60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Each participant was randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with either 10 mg of empagliflozin once daily or a matching placebo. After a wash-out period of at least 2 weeks, participants were crossed over to the opposite treatment. End points were measured at the end of each treatment period. The primary end point was renal blood flow measured with 82Rubidium positron emission tomography-computed tomography (82Rb-PET/CT). Secondary end points include glomerular filtration rate measured with 99mTechnetium-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate (99mTc-DTPA) clearance, vascular function assessed by forearm venous occlusion strain gauge plethysmography, measurements of the nitric oxide (NO) system, water and sodium excretion, body composition measurements, and markers of the complement immune system.

RESULTS

Recruitment began in April 2021 and was completed in September 2022. Examinations were completed by December 2022. In total, 49 participants completed the project: 16 participants in the DM2 and preserved kidney function study, 17 participants in the DM2 and CKD study, and 16 participants in the nondiabetic CKD study. Data analysis is ongoing. Results are yet to be published.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper describes the rationale, design, and methods used in a project consisting of 3 double-blind, crossover, randomized controlled trials examining the effects of empagliflozin versus placebo in patients with DM2 with and without CKD and patients with nondiabetic CKD, respectively.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EU Clinical Trials Register 2019-004303-12; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2019-004303-12, EU Clinical Trials Register 2019-004447-80; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2019-004447-80, EU Clinical Trials Register 2019-004467-50; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=and+2019-004467-50.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/56067.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is associated with high risks of premature chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiovascular diseases, cardiovascular death and impaired quality of life. People with diabetes are more likely to develop kidney impairment, and approximately one in three adults with diabetes have CKD. People with CKD and diabetes experience a substantially higher risk of cardiovascular outcomes. Sodium-glucose co-transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have shown potential effects in preventing kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in people with CKD and diabetes. However, new trials are emerging rapidly, and evidence synthesis is essential to summarising cumulative evidence.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to assess the benefits and harms of SGLT2 inhibitors for people with CKD and diabetes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 17 November 2023 using a search strategy designed by an Information Specialist. Studies in the Register are continually identified through regular searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies were eligible if they evaluated SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo, standard care or other glucose-lowering agents in people with CKD and diabetes. CKD includes all stages (from 1 to 5), including dialysis patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the study risk of bias. Treatment estimates were summarised using random effects meta-analysis and expressed as a risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD), with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The primary review outcomes were all-cause death, 3-point and 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), fatal or nonfatal stroke, and kidney failure.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-three studies randomising 65,241 people with CKD and diabetes were included. SGLT2 inhibitors with or without other background treatments were compared to placebo, standard care, sulfonylurea, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, or insulin. In the majority of domains, the risks of bias in the included studies were low or unclear. No studies evaluated the treatment in children or in people treated with dialysis. No studies compared SGLT2 inhibitors with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or tirzepatide. Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors decreased the risk of all-cause death (20 studies, 44,397 participants: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.94; I2 = 0%; high certainty) and cardiovascular death (16 studies, 43,792 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.93; I2 = 29%; high certainty). Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors probably make little or no difference to the risk of fatal or nonfatal MI (2 studies, 13,726 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.14; I2 = 24%; moderate certainty), and fatal or nonfatal stroke (2 studies, 13,726 participants: RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.30; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty). Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors probably decrease 3-point MACE (7 studies, 38,320 participants: RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98; I2 = 46%; moderate certainty), and 4-point MACE (4 studies, 23,539 participants: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.96; I2 = 77%; moderate certainty), and decrease hospital admission due to heart failure (6 studies, 28,339 participants: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.79; I2 = 17%; high certainty). Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors may decrease creatinine clearance (1 study, 132 participants: MD -2.63 mL/min, 95% CI -5.19 to -0.07; low certainty) and probably decrease the doubling of serum creatinine (2 studies, 12,647 participants: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.89; I2 = 53%; moderate certainty). SGLT2 inhibitors decrease the risk of kidney failure (6 studies, 11,232 participants: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.79; I2 = 0%; high certainty), and kidney composite outcomes (generally reported as kidney failure, kidney death with or without ≥ 40% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)) (7 studies, 36,380 participants: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.78; I2 = 25%; high certainty) compared to placebo. Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors incur less hypoglycaemia (16 studies, 28,322 participants: RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.98; I2 = 0%; high certainty), and hypoglycaemia requiring third-party assistance (14 studies, 26,478 participants: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.88; I2 = 0%; high certainty), and probably decrease the withdrawal from treatment due to adverse events (15 studies, 16,622 participants: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.08; I2 = 16%; moderate certainty). The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on eGFR, amputation and fracture were uncertain. No studies evaluated the effects of treatment on fatigue, life participation, or lactic acidosis. The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors compared to standard care alone, sulfonylurea, DPP-4 inhibitors, or insulin were uncertain.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitors alone or added to standard care decrease all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and kidney failure and probably decrease major cardiovascular events while incurring less hypoglycaemia compared to placebo in people with CKD and diabetes.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for the prevention of atrial fibrillation: a systemic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are reported to have cardiac benefits. The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) remain inconclusive. We aimed to investigate whether SGLT2 inhibitors can prevent AF occurrence in patients with cardiometabolic diseases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL database up to 1 July 2023. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney diseases (CKDs), or cardiometabolic risk factors were included. The primary outcome was AF occurrence. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in the overall population and selected subgroups. Forty-six trials comprising 101 100 patients were included. Overall, no significant risk reduction of AF occurrence was observed with SGLT2 inhibitors, although there was a favourable trend (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80-1.01). In trials with follow-up durations of over 1 year, a similar result was achieved (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80-1.01). The results were consistent across different SGLT2 inhibitors, with RRs (95% CIs) of 0.82 (0.60-1.12) for canagliflozin, 0.87 (0.73-1.03) for dapagliflozin, 0.97 (0.78-1.22) for empagliflozin, 0.99 (0.66-1.50) for sotagliflozin, and 0.87 (0.58-1.29) for ertugliflozin. Analyses in different doses of SGLT2 inhibitors yielded similar results. The associations between SGLT2 inhibitors and AF occurrence were also absent in patients with diabetes, heart failure, and CKDs.

CONCLUSION

For patients with cardiometabolic diseases or risk factors, SGLT2 inhibitors did not decrease the risk of AF occurrence, regardless of follow-up duration, type or dose of the drug, or the patient population.

The relationship between use of SGLT2is and incidence of respiratory and infectious diseases and site-specific fractures: a meta-analysis based on 32 large RCTs

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the relationship between use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and incidence of various respiratory and infectious diseases and site-specific fractures.

METHODS

Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SGLT2is enrolling more than 400 subjects were included. Outcomes of interest were various serious adverse events regarding to respiratory and infectious disorders and site-specific fractures. Meta-analysis was done using risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as effect size.

RESULTS

Thirty-two large RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Use of SGLT2is was significantly associated with the lower incidences of 6 kinds of noninfectious respiratory diseases {e.g., Asthma (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.96; P = 0.0299), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.91; P = 0.0027), and Respiratory failure (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61-0.99; P = 0.0447)} and 4 kinds of infectious respiratory diseases {e.g., Bronchitis (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.81; P = 0.0007), and Pneumonia (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.93; P = 0.0002)}. Use of SGLT2is was not significantly associated with the incidences of 31 kinds of site-specific fractures (e.g., Hip fracture, Femoral neck fracture, and Spinal fracture; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis confirmed the benefits of SGLT2is against 6 kinds of noninfectious respiratory diseases (e.g., Asthma, COPD, and Respiratory failure) and 4 kinds of infectious respiratory diseases (e.g., Bronchitis, and Pneumonia). These findings suggest a likelihood that SGLT2is might be used to prevent or treat these respiratory diseases. Moreover, our meta-analysis for the first time revealed no association between use of SGLT2is and incidence of various site-specific fractures.

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin Treatment for Refractory Diabetes Mellitus with Insulin Resistance (EMPIRE-01)

INTRODUCTION

Insulin resistance syndrome and lipoatrophic diabetes are characterized by severe insulin resistance and are often refractory to treatment. Trials assessing the efficacy of antidiabetes drugs for these rare conditions have been limited, however. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, which lower glycemia independently of insulin action, have shown efficacy for type 2 diabetes with insulin resistance. We here investigated the efficacy and safety of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin for treatment of insulin resistance syndrome and lipoatrophic diabetes.

METHODS

The trial was conducted at five academic centers in Japan and included seven patients with insulin resistance syndrome and one patient with lipoatrophic diabetes. Participants received 10 mg of empagliflozin daily. If the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was ≥ 7.0% (52 mmol/mol) after 12 weeks, the dose was adjusted to 25 mg. The study duration was 24 weeks, and the primary outcome was the change in HbA1c level by the end of the treatment period. Safety evaluations were performed for all participants.

RESULTS

By the end of the 24-week treatment period, the mean HbA1c level for all eight patients had decreased by 0.99 percentage points (10.8 mmol/mol) (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 1.38 percentage points, 6.6 to 14.9 mmol/mol) and the mean fasting plasma glucose concentration had declined by 63.9 mg/dL (3.55 mmol/L) (95% CI 25.5 to 102.3 mg/dL, 1.42 to 5.68 mmol/L). Continuous glucose monitoring revealed a reduction in mean glucose levels from 164.3 ± 76.1 to 137.6 ± 46.6 mg/dL (9.13 ± 4.23 to 7.65 ± 2.59 mmol/L) as well as an increase in the time in range (70-180 mg/dL) from 58.9 ± 36.1% to 70.8 ± 18.3%. Seventeen mild adverse events were recorded in five individuals throughout the study period. No severe events were reported. The mean body mass showed a slight decrease and the mean serum ketone body concentration showed a slight increase during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that empagliflozin shows a certain level of efficacy and safety for treatment of insulin resistance syndrome and lipoatrophic diabetes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCTs2051190029 and NCT04018365.

Metformin treatment is associated with reduced risk of hypoglycaemia, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in patients with post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus: a nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus (PPDM) is a frequent complication of pancreatitis and is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Metformin is recommended for the treatment of PPDM, but evidence of its risk-benefit profile is limited. In a pharmaco-epidemiologic study, we investigated the association between metformin treatment and adverse outcomes in patients with PPDM.

DESIGN AND METHODS

In a Danish nationwide population-based cohort study, we included adults (≥18 years) with incident PPDM or type 2 diabetes between 2009 and 2018. Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus was categorised into acute and chronic subtypes (PPDM-A and PPDM-C). Associations between metformin treatment and severe hypoglycaemia, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and all-cause mortality were examined across the diabetes subgroups using Cox regression analysis. Treatments with metformin, insulin, and other glucose-lowering therapies were handled as time-varying exposures.

RESULTS

We included 222 337 individuals with new-onset type 2 diabetes and 3781 with PPDM, of whom 2305 (61%) were classified as PPDM-A and 1476 (39%) as PPDM-C. Treatment with metformin was associated with a lower risk of severe hypoglycaemia (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.62, P < .0001), MACE (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.92, P = .0071), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.49-0.64, P < .0001) in patients with PPDM. In sensitivity analyses and among individuals with type 2 diabetes, metformin treatment exhibited comparable trends of risk reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin is associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes, including all-cause mortality in patients with PPDM, supporting the use of metformin as a glucose-lowering therapy for these patients.

Empagliflozin-A Sodium Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitor: Overview ofits Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Toxicology

BACKGROUND

Empagliflozin is a sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that has gained significant attention in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Understanding its chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology is crucial for the safe and effective use of this medication.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology of empagliflozin, synthesizing the available literature to present a concise summary of its properties and implications for clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic search of relevant databases was conducted to identify studies and articles related to the chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology of empagliflozin. Data from preclinical and clinical studies, as well as post-marketing surveillance reports, were reviewed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

RESULTS

Empagliflozin is a selective SGLT2 inhibitor that works by constraining glucose reabsorption in the kidneys, causing increased urinary glucose elimination. Its unique mechanism of action provides glycemic control, weight reduction, and blood pressure reduction. The drug's chemistry is characterized by its chemical structure, solubility, and stability. Pharmacologically, empagliflozin exhibits favorable pharmacokinetic properties with rapid absorption, extensive protein binding, and renal elimination. Clinical studies have demonstrated its efficacy in improving glycemic control, reducing cardiovascular risks, and preserving renal function. However, adverse effects, for instance, urinary tract infections, genital infections, and diabetic ketoacidosis have been reported. Toxicological studies indicate low potential for organ toxicity, mutagenicity, or carcinogenicity.

CONCLUSION

Empagliflozin is a promising SGLT2 inhibitor that offers an innovative approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its unique action mechanism and favorable pharmacokinetic profile contribute to its efficacy in improving glycemic control and reducing cardiovascular risks. While the drug's safety profile is generally favorable, clinicians should be aware of potential adverse effects and monitor patients closely. More study is required to determine the longterm safety and explore potential benefits in other patient populations. Overall, empagliflozin represents a valuable addition to the armamentarium of antidiabetic medications, offering significant benefits to patients suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study covers all aspects of empagliflozin, including its history, chemistry, pharmacology, and various clinical studies, case reports, and case series.

Epicardial adipose tissue, metabolic disorders, and cardiovascular diseases: recent advances classified by research methodologies

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is located between the myocardium and visceral pericardium. The unique anatomy and physiology of the EAT determines its great potential in locally influencing adjacent tissues such as the myocardium and coronary arteries. Classified by research methodologies, this study reviews the latest research progress on the role of EAT in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), particularly in patients with metabolic disorders. Studies based on imaging techniques demonstrated that increased EAT amount in patients with metabolic disorders is associated with higher risk of CVDs and increased mortality. Then, in-depth profiling studies indicate that remodeled EAT may serve as a local mediator of the deleterious effects of cardiometabolic conditions and plays a crucial role in CVDs. Further, in vitro coculture studies provided preliminary evidence that the paracrine effect of remodeled EAT on adjacent cardiomyocytes can promote the occurrence and progression of CVDs. Considering the important role of EAT in CVDs, targeting EAT might be a potential strategy to reduce cardiovascular risks. Several interventions have been proved effective in reducing EAT amount. Our review provides valuable insights of the relationship between EAT, metabolic disorders, and CVDs, as well as an overview of the methodological constructs of EAT-related studies.

Randomized Trial Comparing SGLT2 Inhibition and Hydrochlorothiazide on Sympathetic Traffic in Type 2 Diabetes

Introduction

Reductions in sympathetic nervous system activity may contribute to beneficial effects of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition on cardiovascular outcomes. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin (Empa) lowers muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared with hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) to discern SGLT2-specific actions from responses to increased natriuresis.

Methods

We randomized patients with T2DM on metformin monotherapy to either 25 mg/d Empa (n = 20) or 25 mg/d HCT (n = 21) for 6 weeks in a parallel, double-blind fashion. We assessed MSNA by peroneal microneurography, blood pressure, cardiovascular and metabolic biomarkers at baseline and at the end of treatment.

Results

Both drugs elicited volume depletion, as indicated by increased thoracic impedance. Compared with HCT, Empa caused 1.23 kg more body weight loss (P = 0.011) and improved glycemic control. Seated systolic blood pressure decreased with both treatments (P < 0.002). MSNA did not change significantly with either treatment; however, MSNA changes were negatively correlated with changes in body weight on Empa (P = 0.042) and on HCT(P = 0.001). The relationship was shifted to lower MSNA on Empa compared with HCT (P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Increased renal sodium excretion eliciting body weight loss may promote sympathetic activation. However, sympathetic excitation in the face of increased sodium loss may be attenuated by SGLT2 inhibitor-specific actions.

Pharmacometrics enhanced Bayesian borrowing approach to improve clinical trial efficiency: Case of empagliflozin in type 2 diabetes

We report use of a pharmacometrics enhanced Bayesian borrowing (PEBB) approach to leverage historical clinical trial data on a drug product to build models, project the outcome of future clinical trials, and borrow information from these projections to improve the efficiency of future target trials. This design takes a two-stage approach. First, a design phase is performed before target trial data are available to determine the operating characteristics and an appropriate tuning parameter that will be used in the subsequent analysis phase of a chosen target trial. Second, once the target trial data are available, the analysis phase is performed with the determined tuning parameter. This step is where borrowing is applied from these projections to inform the results for the target trial. To illustrate how a PEBB could improve the efficiency of clinical trials, we apply our design to trials with empagliflozin for treating patients with type 2 diabetes. We performed a retrospective evaluation applying the method to a phase III target trial and a hypothetical smaller trial. The type I error could be kept below 10% while increasing the trial power and effective sample size. Our findings suggest that a PEBB has the potential to increase the power of clinical trials, while controlling for type I error, by leveraging the information from previous trials through population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation.

Dose-dependent renoprotection efficacy of sglt2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis

AIM

To compare the relative effects of different dosages of sodium-glucose cotransport inhibitors (SGLT2i) for renoprotection in Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

The study searched different databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) for studies comparing dose-dependent renoprotective efficacy defined as a decline in eGFR with the different "-flozins namely Empagliflozin, Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, Ertugliflozin, Ipragliflozin, Luseogliflozin, Remogliflozin and Sotagliflozin. The studies were compared with the Bayesian approach of network meta-analysis coupled with the random-effect model using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2.0), and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score was allotted to each dosage of different SGLT-2i.

RESULTS

A total of 43,434 citations were identified, out of which forty-five randomized trials with 48,067 patients, mentioning the flozin dose and eGFR as an endpoint, were found to be eligible for further analysis. The median duration of the follow-up in the trials was 12 months (IQR 5.5-16 months). Canagliflozin 100 mg demonstrated distinct eGFR benefit with an odds ratio of 2.3 (CI 0.72-3.9) compared to placebo. A statistically non-significant eGFR benefit was observed with all other "-flozins." Canagliflozin 100 mg drug dose category showed the highest sucra rank probability score of 93%, followed by the Canagliflozin 300 mg and Dapagliflozin 5 mg with sucra rank probability scores of 69% and 65%, respectively. The Flozin-dose assessment against eGFR was similar to the albumin-creatinine ratios as the secondary endpoint in the SUCRA ranking.

CONCLUSION

The renoprotective efficacy of SGLT2i is independent of the incremental doses suggesting lower doses may suffice for renal outcomes.

Association of SGLT-2 Inhibitors With Treatment Satisfaction and Diabetes-Specific and General Health Status in Adults With Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes

Background It is unknown if initiation of a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) is associated with changes in patient-reported health status outside of clinical trials. Methods and Results Using a prospective observational study design, adults with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease were recruited from 14 US hospitals between November 2019 and December 2021 if they were new users of noninsulin antidiabetic medications. The primary outcome was change in 6-month diabetes treatment satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included diabetes-related symptom distress, diabetes-specific quality of life, and general health status for all patients and based on cardiovascular disease type. Inverse probability of treatment weight using propensity score was performed to compare outcome changes based on medication use. Of 887 patients (SGLT-2i: n=242) included in the inverse probability of treatment weight analyses, there was no difference in changes in treatment satisfaction in SGLT-2i users compared with other diabetes medication users (0.99 [95% CI, -0.14 to 2.13] versus 1.54 [1.08 to 2.00], P=0.38). Initiating an SGLT-2i versus other diabetes medications was associated with a greater reduction in ophthalmological symptoms (-3.09 [95% CI, -4.99 to -1.18] versus -0.38 [-1.54 to 0.77], P=0.018) but less improvement in hyperglycemia (1.08 [-2.63 to 4.79] versus -3.60 [-5.34 to -1.86], P=0.026). In subgroup analyses by cardiovascular disease type, SGLT-2i use was associated with a greater reduction in total diabetes symptom burden and neurological sensory symptoms in patients with heart failure. Conclusions Among patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, initiating an SGLT-2i was not associated with changes in diabetes treatment satisfaction, total diabetes symptoms, diabetes-specific quality of life, or general health status.

Glucometabolic control of once-weekly dulaglutide switched from DPP4 inhibitor versus daily empagliflozin add-on in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin, sulfonylurea, and DPP4 inhibitor: A randomised trial

AIMS

To compare the effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin and dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled by oral triple therapy.

METHODS

In this 24-week, multi-center, randomized trial, patients with T2D and HbA1c level ≥7.5% (58 mmol/mol) on metformin, sulfonylurea, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4-i) were randomly assigned into two groups: daily empagliflozin add-on or once-weekly dulaglutide switched from DPP4-i. The primary endpoint was changes from baseline HbA1c at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

In total, 152 patients were recruited to the empagliflozin-added quadruple group (n = 76) or the switched-to-dulaglutide triple group (n = 76). At week 24, both groups showed significant reduction in HbA1c level from baseline with greater reduction with empagliflozin (the mean treatment difference: -0.27% [95% CI -0.50 to -0.04, p = 0.024]) (-2.88 mmol/mol [95% CI -5.37 to -0.39], p = 0.024). Empagliflozin significantly reduced body weight from baseline to week 24 (-1.72 kg [95% CI -1.98 to -0.59, p < 0.001]). No serious adverse events were reported with either empagliflozin or dulaglutide.

CONCLUSIONS

Empagliflozin, compared with once-weekly dulaglutide switched from DPP4-i, demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction and weight loss in patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin, sulfonylurea, and DPP4-i.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0006157).

Safety and effectiveness of empagliflozin in clinical practice as monotherapy or with other glucose-lowering drugs in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: subgroup analysis of a 3-year post-marketing surveillance study

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors such as empagliflozin are increasingly prescribed as initial glucose-lowering drugs for type 2 diabetes (T2D), based on their cardiorenal benefits. However, information regarding the safety and the effectiveness of monotherapy with SGLT2 inhibitors in routine clinical practice is limited.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We analyzed data from a prospective, 3-year, post-marketing surveillance study of empagliflozin in Japan. We evaluated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (the primary endpoint) and glycemic effectiveness with or without other glucose-lowering drugs.

RESULTS

7931 T2D patients were treated with empagliflozin. At baseline, mean age was 58.7 years, 63.0% were male, and 1835 (23.14%) were not receiving other glucose-lowering drugs. ADRs occurred in 141 (7.68%) and 875 (14.62%) patients initiating empagliflozin as monotherapy or combination therapy, respectively. The most frequent ADRs of special interest with empagliflozin as monotherapy or combination therapy were urinary tract infections (0.82% and 1.14% of patients, respectively) and excessive/frequent urination (0.65%, 1.50%). At last observation, glycated hemoglobin level was reduced by a mean of 0.78% with empagliflozin monotherapy (from baseline mean of 7.55%) and 0.74% with combination therapy (baseline 8.16%).

CONCLUSIONS

Empagliflozin is well tolerated and effective in clinical practice in Japan when initiated as monotherapy or combination therapy.

A Comprehensive Review on Weight Loss Associated with Anti-Diabetic Medications

Obesity is a complex metabolic condition that can have a negative impact on one's health and even result in mortality. The management of obesity has been addressed in a number of ways, including lifestyle changes, medication using appetite suppressants and thermogenics, and bariatric surgery for individuals who are severely obese. Liraglutide and semaglutide are two of the five Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-obesity drugs that are FDA-approved agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. In order to highlight the positive effects of these drugs as anti-obesity treatments, we analyzed the weight loss effects of T2DM agents that have demonstrated weight loss effects in this study by evaluating clinical studies that were published for each agent. Many clinical studies have revealed that some antihyperglycemic medications can help people lose weight, while others either cause weight gain or neutral results. Acarbose has mild weight loss effects and metformin and sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter proteins-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have modest weight loss effects; however, some glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists had the greatest impact on weight loss. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors showed a neutral or mild weight loss effect. To sum up, some of the GLP-1 agonist drugs show promise as weight-loss treatments.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors: Harms or Unexpected Benefits?

There is a need for innovative pharmaceutical intervention in light of the increasing prevalence of metabolic disease and cardiovascular disease. The kidneys' sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2) receptors are targeted to reduce glucose reabsorption by SGLT2. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) benefit the most from reduced blood glucose levels, although this is just one of the numerous physiological consequences. To establish existing understanding and possible advantages and risks for SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical practice, this article will explore the influence of SGLT2 inhibitors on six major organ systems. In addition, this literature review will discuss the benefits and potential drawbacks of SGLT2 inhibitors on various organ systems and their potential application in therapeutic settings.

Empagliflozin in Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Current Evidence and Place in Therapy

Chronic kidney disease guidelines and disease modifying therapy have seen a dramatic shift in the last 5 years. The SGLT2 inhibitor class of medications has been catapulted from hyperglycemia management medications, to cardiovascular and kidney disease improvement therapies. Multiple trials looking at dedicated cardiovascular and kidney endpoints have resulted in favorable results. This review will target empagliflozin and the exciting journey that it has taken along this path. Empagliflozin has been studied for hyperglycemia, cardiovascular, and kidney hard outcome endpoints. Both patients with diabetes and without have been rigorously studied and shown surprising results. The major implications for patients on empagliflozin will be shown. Future studies and directions are highly anticipated to add to the growing knowledge of the SGLT2 inhibitor class, as well as discover possibilities for new disease states to benefit from empagliflozin.

Empagliflozin in South Asians with type 2 diabetes: Real world data on effects on cardiometabolic parameters, safety and determinants of response to therapy from a diabetes practice in Sri Lanka

AIMS

SGLT2 inhibitors provide cardiovascular and renal protection in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Real-world data on their effect on improving glucose and cardiovascular risk factors, and adverse effects in South Asians are limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical, demographic, anthropometric and biochemical data among adults with T2DM, commenced on empagliflozin and followed up for at least one month in a diabetes clinic in Colombo.

RESULTS

Among 1523 participants (men 49.6 %, age 54.9 (± 10.8) years, diabetes duration 11.5 (± 7.6) years, body mass index 28.2 (± 4.5 kg/m²), over a median follow up of 12 months (range: 1-24 months), reduction in HbA1c, weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and urine albumin-creatinine ratio were evident within the first month. Benefits sustained up to two-years (mean changes from baseline: HbA1c - 0.31 (± 1.49), weight - 1.14 (± 4.17), SBP - 3.44 (± 21.75), UACR - 19.84 (± 108.22) follow up. eGFR declined by the third month, returned to baseline by 12th and remained stable over 24 months. Higher baseline HbA1c, weight and SBP predicted greater decline in HbA1c, weight and SBP respectively. Weight reduction independently predicted the SBP reduction. Eighteen participants per 100 patient-years discontinued therapy due to adverse effects: genital mycotic infections and features of hypovolaemia were the commonest. We observed only two events of diabetic ketoacidosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Empagliflozin effectively improves glucose, weight and SBP and retards progression of renal impairment in South Asians with T2D. Genital mycotic infections and hypovolaemia were the commonest reasons for discontinuation. Careful patient selection and advice can avoid other sinister complications.

Efficacy and safety of janagliflozin monotherapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on diet and exercise: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trial

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of janagliflozin, a selective renal sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, as monotherapy in drug-naive Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This Phase 3 trial included a 24-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period, followed by a 28-week extension period. A total of 432 patients with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and ≤10.5% (91 mmol/mol) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive once-daily placebo, 25 mg or 50 mg janagliflozin. After 24 weeks, patients on placebo were switched and re-randomized (1:1) to 25 mg or 50 mg janagliflozin, whereas patients on janagliflozin maintained the initial therapy. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c after 24 weeks.

RESULTS

At Week 24, the placebo-adjusted least squares mean changes in HbA1c were -0.80% (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.98% to -0.62%)/-8.7 mmol/mol (95% CI -10.7 mmol/mol to -6.8 mmol/mol) and -0.88% (95% CI -1.06% to -0.70%)/-9.6 mmol/mol (95% CI -11.6 mmol/mol to -7.7 mmol/mol), respectively (P < 0.001 for both). A higher proportion of patients achieved HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) with janagliflozin 25 mg and janagliflozin 50 mg compared with placebo (47.2%, 49.3%, and 23.5%, respectively). Both janagliflozin doses significantly decreased fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose, body weight and systolic blood pressure, as well as increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and insulin sensitivity compared with placebo (P < 0.05 for all). The trends in improvement of these variables were sustained during the 28-week extension period. Overall incidences of adverse events were 67.8%, 71.5% and 60.7% with janagliflozin 25 mg, janagliflozin 50 mg and placebo, respectively. The incidence of urinary tract infections and genital fungal infections was low. No severe hypoglycaemia or ketoacidosis occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Janagliflozin 25 mg and 50 mg monotherapy once-daily effectively improved glycaemic control, reduced body weight and blood pressure, improved HDL cholesterol and insulin sensitivity, and was generally well tolerated.

Gliflozins: From Antidiabetic Drugs to Cornerstone in Heart Failure Therapy-A Boost to Their Utilization and Multidisciplinary Approach in the Management of Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a complex, multifactorial, progressive clinical condition affecting 64.3 million people worldwide, with a strong impact in terms of morbidity, mortality and public health costs. In the last 50 years, along with a better understanding of HF physiopathology and in agreement with the four main models of HF, many therapeutic options have been developed. Recently, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) HF guidelines enthusiastically introduced inhibitors of the sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT2i) as first line therapy for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in order to reduce hospitalizations and mortality. Despite drugs developed as hypoglycemic agents, data from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial encouraged the evaluation of the possible cardiovascular effects, showing SGLT2i beneficial effects on loading conditions, neurohormonal axes, heart cells' biochemistry and vascular stiffness, determining an improvement of each HF model. We want to give a boost to their use by increasing the knowledge of SGLT2-I and understanding the probable mechanisms of this new class of drugs, highlighting strengths and weaknesses, and providing a brief comment on major trials that made Gliflozins a cornerstone in HF therapy. Finally, aspects that may hinder SGLT2-i widespread utilization among different types of specialists, despite the guidelines' indications, will be discussed.

Ketones: the double-edged sword of SGLT2 inhibitors?

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of medications used by individuals with type 2 diabetes that reduce hyperglycaemia by targeting glucose transport in the kidney, preventing its reabsorption, thereby inducing glucosuria. Besides improving HbA_1c and reducing body weight and blood pressure, the SGLT2 inhibitors have also been demonstrated to improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes, an effect largely independent of their effect on blood glucose levels. Indeed, the mechanisms underlying these benefits remain elusive. Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors has been found to modestly increase systemic ketone levels. Ketone bodies are an ancillary fuel source substituting for glucose in some tissues and may also possess intrinsic anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory effects. Some have proposed that ketones may in fact mediate the cardio-renal benefits of this drug category. However, a rare complication of SGLT2 inhibition is ketoacidosis, sometimes with normal or near-normal blood glucose concentrations, albeit occurring more frequently in patients with type 1 diabetes who are treated (predominately off-label) with one of these agents. We herein explore the notion that an underpinning of one of the more serious adverse effects of SGLT2 inhibitors may, in fact, explain, at least in part, some of their benefits-a potential 'double-edged sword' of this novel drug category.

Budget Impact Analysis of Empagliflozin in the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With Established Cardiovascular Disease in South Africa

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to estimate the budget impact and affordability of empagliflozin added to usual care compared with usual care alone, in a diabetic population with established cardiovascular disease, from a private healthcare payer perspective in South Africa.

METHODS

A budget impact model was adapted and localized. Epidemiological data were obtained from the South African Council for Medical Schemes. Clinical event rates were sourced from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial and drug costs from list prices. Clinical event costs were derived from a claims data analysis of the South African private healthcare sector and microcosting. Scenario analyses were performed on select inputs. The modeled outcomes included annual budget impact of empagliflozin, the incremental cost per life per month, cardiovascular deaths averted, and incremental cost per life saved, over 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 9 503 patients were eligible for empagliflozin (year 1), 12 670 (year 2), and 16 947 (year 3). The incremental cost was $1 272 297, $1 764 705, and $2 455 235, for years 1 to 3, respectively. The incremental cost per beneficiary per month was calculated as $0.012 (year 1), $0.016 (year 2), and $0.023 (year 3). The model estimated a 38.6% reduction in cardiovascular deaths, 305 lives saved, and an incremental cost per life saved of $17 999.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding empagliflozin to usual care has a marginal budget implication and is highly affordable for private healthcare payers, with an acceptable incremental cost based on clinical outcomes.

The interplay between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Therapeutic approaches that lower circulating low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol significantly reduced the burden of cardiovascular disease over the last decades. However, the persistent rise in the obesity epidemic is beginning to reverse this decline. Alongside obesity, the incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has substantially increased in the last three decades. Currently, approximately one third of world population is affected by NAFLD. Notably, the presence of NAFLD and particularly its more severe form, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), serves as an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), thus, raising interest in the relationship between these two diseases. Importantly, ASCVD is the major cause of death in patients with NASH independent of traditional risk factors. Nevertheless, the pathophysiology linking NAFLD/NASH with ASCVD remains poorly understood. While dyslipidemia is a common risk factor underlying both diseases, therapies that lower circulating LDL-cholesterol are largely ineffective against NASH. While there are no approved pharmacological therapies for NASH, some of the most advanced drug candidates exacerbate atherogenic dyslipidemia, raising concerns regarding their adverse cardiovascular consequences. In this review, we address current gaps in our understanding of the mechanisms linking NAFLD/NASH and ASCVD, explore strategies to simultaneously model these diseases, evaluate emerging biomarkers that may be useful to diagnose the presence of both diseases, and discuss investigational approaches and ongoing clinical trials that potentially target both diseases.

New Insights into the Use of Empagliflozin-A Comprehensive Review

Empagliflozin is a relatively new drug that, as an inhibitor of the sodium−glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), causes increased urinary glucose excretion and thus contributes to improved glycemic control, better glucose metabolism, reduced glucotoxicity and insulin resistance. Although its original use was to induce a hypoglycemic effect in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), empagliflozin has also shown a number of other beneficial effects by demonstrating a nephroprotective effect, and it has proven to be a breakthrough in the treatment of heart failure (HF). Empagliflozin has been shown to reduce hospitalizations for HF and the number of deaths from cardiovascular causes. Empagliflozin treatment also reduces the incidence of renal events, including death from renal causes, as well as the risk of end-stage renal failure. Empagliflozin appears to be a fairly well-tolerated and safe drug. In patients with inadequate glycemic control, empagliflozin used in monotherapy or as an adjunct to therapy effectively lowers fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, average daily glucose levels, glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) and also leads to significant weight reduction in patients with T2DM. Unfortunately, there are some limitations, e.g., severe hypersensitivity reaction to the drug and a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. As with any drug, empagliflozin is also characterized by several side effects among which symptomatic hypotension, troublesome genital fungal infections, urinary tract infections and rare ketoacidosis are characteristic.

Assessment of the Safety, Efficacy, and Benefit of Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) at High Risk for Cardiovascular Events

Background Since the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), heart failure coexisting with it has had a significant impact on clinical management and prognosis. Patients with T2DM and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have increased mortality and morbidity. Empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, is widely acknowledged to reduce cardiovascular risk in T2DM patients. We wanted to assess the composite outcomes of heart failure, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization following the start of empagliflozin therapy in the Saudi population. Methods This is a retrospective observational study conducted at King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital-Jeddah. We included patients aged 18 or older, male or female, with T2DM with HFrEF <40% and with a risk of cardiovascular events who were treated with empagliflozin 25 mg once daily as combination therapy and patients using other diabetic agents without empagliflozin as the comparative group. Results A total of 195 patients with T2DM and HFrEF who were at high risk for cardiovascular (CV) events were included in the study. Regarding gender, most of the patients (82.1%) were male with an average age of 61.28 ± 9.92. The patients were divided into 71 individuals who received empagliflozin and 124 who did not. When comparing the surgical procedure and comorbid status of the patients, coronary artery bypass graft (1.4%), coronary artery disease (5.6%), dyslipidemia (5.6%), and ischemic cardiomyopathy (0%) were found compared to the non-empagliflozin group. Meanwhile, hypertension was found to be 71.8% and ischemic heart disease was 50.7% in empagliflozin patients. Furthermore, only dyslipidemia differed significantly (p <0.001) between the empagliflozin and non-empagliflozin groups of patients. However, no significant differences were observed between the average low-density lipoprotein (p = 0.990) and high-density lipoprotein (p = 0.399). There was no significant difference observed in the primary outcome of CV deaths or hospital admission of patients between empagliflozin and non-empagliflozin. No deaths were reported in either of the comparative groups in our study. Conclusion In this study, there was no significant difference observed in hospital admission of the patients between the empagliflozin and non-empagliflozin groups. No cardiovascular mortality was reported in the study population. Further matched group comparative studies or placebo-controlled studies are required to compare the existing evidence of the impact of empagliflozin on T2DM patients with HFrEF and at high risk for CV deaths or hospital admission.

The impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors on blood pressure: a meta-analysis and metaregression of 111 randomized-controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Multiple trials on sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) inhibitors have been performed recently demonstrating blood pressure (BP) reduction benefits in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of different SGLT inhibitors on BP in both patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and SCOPUS) were searched on 4 November 2021 for articles published from 1 January 2000 up to 21 November 2021, for studies evaluating the BP effects of SGLT inhibitors. Pair-wise meta-analysis and random effects metaregression models were utilized.

RESULTS

In total, 111 studies examining SBP (108 studies, 104 304 patients) and/or DBP (82 studies, 74 719 patients) were included. In patients with diabetes, the random effects model demonstrated SGLT inhibitor produced a mean reduction in SBPs of -3.46 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -3.83, -3.09) compared with placebo. There were no statistically significant changes in BP among patients without diabetes. Drug response relationship was not observed in SGLT inhibitors and BP, except for Canagliflozin and DBP.

CONCLUSION

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and combined sodium-glucose cotransporter 1/2 inhibitors produced small reductions in BP in patients with diabetes.

Choice of Glucose-Lowering Drugs as Initial Monotherapy for Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Contraindications or Intolerance to Metformin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There are multiple glucose-lowering drugs available as alternative initial monotherapy for type 2 diabetes patients with contraindications or intolerance to metformin. However, little comparative and systematic data are available for them as initial monotherapy. This study estimated and compared the treatment effects of glucose-lowering drugs as initial monotherapy for type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, Chongqing VIP, and WanFang Data from 1 January 1990 until 31 December 2020 were searched for randomized controlled trials which compared a glucose-lowering drug with placebo/lifestyle-intervention for type 2 diabetes. Drug classes included metformin, sulfonylureas (SUs), thiazolidinediones (TZDs), glinides (NIDEs), α-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), insulins (INSs), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs).

RESULTS

A total of 185 trials were included, identifying 38,376 patients from 56 countries across six continents. When choosing an initial drug monotherapy alternative to metformin, SUs were most efficacious in reducing HbA1c (-1.39%; 95% CI -1.63, -1.16) and FPG (-2.70 mmol/L; 95% CI -3.18, -2.23), but increased hypoglycemia risks (5.44; 95% CI 2.11, 14.02). GLP-1RAs were most efficacious in reducing BMI (-1.05 kg/m²; 95% CI -1.81, -0.29) and TC (-0.42 mmol/L; 95% CI -0.61, -0.22). TZDs were most efficacious in increasing HDL-C (0.12 mmol/L; 95% CI 0.07, 0.17). SGLT2is were most efficacious in lowering SBP (-4.18 mmHg; 95% CI -4.84, -3.53). While AGIs conferred higher risk of AE-induced discontinuations (2.57; 95% CI 1.64, 4.03). Overall, only GLP-1RAs showed an integrated beneficial effect on all outcomes. Our results also confirmed the intraclass differences in treatment effects across drugs. Most trials were short-term, and no significant differences in mortality, total vascular events, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, or diabetic nephropathy were observed across drug classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a potential treatment hierarchy for decision-makers, with GLP-1RAs being the preferred alternative therapy to metformin regarding their favorable efficacy and safety profiles.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers.

METHODS

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development.

RESULTS

This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.

Carbohydrate-based drugs launched during 2000-2021

Carbohydrates are fundamental molecules involved in nearly all aspects of lives, such as being involved in formating the genetic and energy materials, supporting the structure of organisms, constituting invasion and host defense systems, and forming antibiotics secondary metabolites. The naturally occurring carbohydrates and their derivatives have been extensively studied as therapeutic agents for the treatment of various diseases. During 2000 to 2021, totally 54 carbohydrate-based drugs which contain carbohydrate moities as the major structural units have been approved as drugs or diagnostic agents. Here we provide a comprehensive review on the chemical structures, activities, and clinical trial results of these carbohydrate-based drugs, which are categorized by their indications into antiviral drugs, antibacterial/antiparasitic drugs, anticancer drugs, antidiabetics drugs, cardiovascular drugs, nervous system drugs, and other agents.

The Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors Reduce Platelet Activation and Thrombus Formation by Lowering NOX2-Related Oxidative Stress: A Pilot Study

Sodium−glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or gliflozins, the newest anti-hyperglycemic class, induce cardioprotective benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). As platelet activation and oxidative stress play a key role in atherothrombotic-related complications, we hypothesized that gliflozins might modulate oxidative stress, platelet activation and thrombus formation. We performed an interventional open-label single-arm before-after study in 32 T2D patients on top of their ongoing metformin therapy. The population was divided into two groups: treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA, Group A) and gliflozins (Group B). Oxidative stress, platelet activation and thrombus growth were assessed before and after 15 days of treatment. Compared to the baseline, gliflozins treatment significantly decreased sNOX2-dp (−45.2%, p < 0.001), H2O2 production (−53.4%, p < 0.001), TxB2 (−33.1%, p < 0.001), sP-selectin (−49.3%, p < 0.001) and sCD40L levels (−62.3%, p < 0.001) as well as thrombus formation (−32%, p < 0.001), whereas it potentiated anti-oxidant power (HBA, +30.8%, p < 0.001). Moreover, a significant difference in oxidative stress, platelet activation and thrombus formation across groups A and B was found. In addition, an in vitro study on stimulated platelets treated with gliflozins (10−30 μM) showed a reduction in oxidative stress, platelet activation and thrombus growth. Our results showed that gliflozins have antiplatelet and antithrombic activity related to an NOX2 down-regulation, suggesting a new mechanism responsible for cardiovascular protection.

Ultra rapid lispro improves postprandial glucose control versus lispro in combination with insulin glargine/degludec in adults with type 2 diabetes: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Ultra rapid lispro (URLi) is a novel formulation of insulin lispro designed to more closely match the physiological insulin response to a meal, with the aim of improving postprandial glucose (PPG) control. We conducted a multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, treat-to-target, 26-week, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of URLi in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). After an 8-week lead-in period during which basal insulin glargine or degludec was optimized, adults with T2D were randomized (2:1) to prandial URLi (n = 395) or lispro (n = 200). The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of URLi versus lispro in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA_1c) change from baseline to week 26. Multiplicity-adjusted analyses were performed to assess the superiority of URLi in 1- and 2-h PPG excursions during a mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) and HbA_1c change at week 26. URLi showed non-inferiority for HbA_1c change at week 26 versus lispro (least-squares mean [LSM] difference, 0.07%; 95% confidence interval: -0.07, 0.21). HbA_1c was reduced by 0.56% and 0.63% with URLi and lispro, respectively, with no significant treatment difference (P = 0.321). URLi provided superior PPG excursion control versus lispro at 1 h (LSM difference: -14.6 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and 2 h (LSM difference: -21.8 mg/dL, P < 0.001) as well as other time points (30-240 min) during the MMTT. Incremental area under the glucose curve during the MMTT was also significantly lower with URLi versus lispro. The safety profiles were generally similar between treatment groups. In conclusion, URLi was superior to lispro for PPG control, with non-inferiority in HbA_1c improvement, in adults with T2D.

Clinical Benefit of Switching from Low-Dose to High-Dose Empagliflozin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors ameliorate blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by inhibiting the reabsorption of glucose from the kidneys, thus increasing urinary glucose excretion. Most SGLT2 inhibitors have been reported to exert dose-dependent effects. However, little is known about the benefits of increasing the dose of SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical use. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of increasing the dose of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in T2DM.

METHODS

We collected 52 subjects with T2DM with inadequate glycemic control. The dose of empagliflozin was increased from 10 to 25 mg, taken once daily, and the alterations in glycemic control and several other clinical parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

The increased dose of empagliflozin significantly ameliorated glycemic control. In addition, body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), triglyceride (TG), and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) were significantly decreased and hematocrit (Hct) was increased. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (odds ratio 1.093, 95% CI 1.019-1.156, P = 0.012) and baseline TG (odds ratio 1.012, 95% CI 1.001-1.023, P = 0.026) were retained as independent predictors for the improvement of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. Moreover, multivariate stepwise regression analyses revealed that changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (β - 0.264, 95% CI - 1.217 to 0.000, P = 0.049) and HbA1c (β 0.302, 95% CI 0.077-1.096, P = 0.025) were retained as independent predictors for changes in BMI.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the dose of empagliflozin significantly ameliorated BW, BMI, GGT, TG, fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c and increased Hct in patients with T2DM. Moreover, baseline DBP and TG were independent predictors for the improvement of HbA1c. These findings may provide useful information when considering increasing the dosage of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with T2DM who have inadequate glycemic control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000041543).

The dual role of empagliflozin: Cardio renal protection in T2DM patients

Empagliflozin (Jardiance®) is an insulin independent antihyperglycemic agent used in treatment of T2D.The drug is a sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor approved in USA and Europe and other countries of the world. As empagliflozin demonstrates cardioprotective and Reno protective properties its prime target are patients having CVD and CKD complicated by T2D.

This review sheds light on mechanism of action of the drug and with the help of clinical outcomes establishes the use of empagliflozin in T2D patients.

Although empagliflozin is a well-tolerated and easy to administer drug, it has some side effects and contraindications which are discussed in the article to help the reader weigh its beneficial effects against its adverse effect and understand its use in clinical medicine.

SGLT2 inhibitor-empagliflozin treatment ameliorates diabetic retinopathy manifestations and exerts protective effects associated with augmenting branched chain amino acids catabolism and transportation in db/db mice

Empagliflozin (EMPA) is the first sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor to significantly reduce cardiovascular and kidney complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Given this, we speculate that EMPA may have the potential to intervene in diabetic retinopathy (DR), which is another diabetes-specific microvascular complication. Db/db mice were treated with EMPA for different periods to observe the retinas and related mechanisms. EMPA effectively balanced body weight and blood glucose levels, mitigated ocular edema and microaneurysm in db/db mice. EMPA significantly inhibited oxidative stress, apoptosis and recovered tight junction in diabetic retinas. MS/MS analyses showed that EMPA suppressed aberrant branched-chain amino acid (BCAAs) accumulation in db/db retinas, which led to the inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin activation, downregulation of inflammation, and angiogenic factors, including TNF-ɑ, IL-6, VCAM-1, and VEGF induced by diabetes. Furthermore, branched-chain α-keto acids (BCKAs), which are catabolites of BCAAs, were increased in diabetic retinas and decreased with EMPA application. Moreover, branched-chain ketoacid dehydrogenase kinase (BCKDK) was enhanced, BCKDHA and BCKDHB were decreased in diabetic retinas. This could be reversed by EMPA treatment, thus promoting BCAAs catabolism to decrease BCAAs and BCKAs accumulation in diabetic retinas. The high levels of BCAAs in the plasma and enhanced L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) were responsible for the high levels of BCAAs in diabetic retinas, which could be inhibited by EMPA. Overall, EMPA could ameliorate DR manifestations. The normalization of BCAAs catabolism and intake may play a role in this process. This study supports EMPA as a protective drug against DR.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors-from the Treatment of Diabetes to Therapy of Chronic Heart Failure

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are currently the second-line pharmacotherapy in type 2 diabetes, particularly through their effectiveness in reducing glycemia, but also due to their cardioprotective and nephroprotective effects. In light of surprisingly satisfactory results from large, randomized trials on gliflozins, SGLT2 received the highest recommendation (Class IA) with the highest level of evidence (A) in the treatment algorithm for HF with reduced LVEF in recent ESC HF guidelines. This great breakthrough in the treatment of HF is due to different mechanisms of action of gliflozins that are reported to be able to change the natural course of HF by reducing the risk of both hospitalization and death. They are recommended regardless of the patient’s diabetes status. This review summarizes the up-to-date literature on their beneficial and pleiotropic impact on the cardiovascular system.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary disease in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary diseases.

DESIGN

Systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CENTRAL from inception until 31 July 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of adult patients with type 2 diabetes who received dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors compared with placebo or other antidiabetes drugs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases, cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and biliary diseases.

DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of the studies. The quality of the evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework (GRADE) approach. The meta-analysis used pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 82 randomised controlled trials with 104 833 participants were included in the pairwise meta-analysis. Compared with placebo or non-incretin drugs, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were significantly associated with an increased risk of the composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases (odds ratio 1.22 (95%confidence interval 1.04 to 1.43); risk difference 11 (2 to 21) more events per 10 000 person years) and cholecystitis (odds ratio 1.43 (1.14 to 1.79); risk difference 15 (5 to 27) more events per 10 000 person years) but not with the risk of cholelithiasis and biliary diseases. The associations tended to be observed in patients with a longer duration of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor treatment. In the network meta-analysis of 184 trials, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors increased the risk of the composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases and cholecystitis compared with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors but not compared with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

CONCLUSIONS

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors increased the risk of cholecystitis in randomised controlled trials, especially with a longer treatment duration, which requires more attention from physicians in clinical practice.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021271647.

Clinical Parameters Affecting the Therapeutic Efficacy of SGLT-2-Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

(1) Background. We aimed to assess long-term efficacy and safety in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2DM) of two SGLT-2 inhibitors: empagliflozin (Empa) and dapagliflozin (Dapa), combined with metformin, other oral antidiabetics or insulin, according to the protocols in Romania. (2) Methods. The data of 100 patients treated for T2DM with associated dyslipidemia and/or cardiovascular diseases at the University Hospital and Consultmed Medical Center in Iasi were retrospectively reviewed (2017-2021). In total, 48 patients had received dapagliflozin (10 mg with oral antidiabetics or insulin) and 52 patients received empagliflozin (10 mg /25 mg with oral antidiabetics). (3) Results. In both groups, the lowering of BMI was significant: Dapa group (32.04 ± 4.49 vs. 31.40 ± 4.18 kg/m2; p = 0.006), and Empa group (34.16 ± 5.08 vs. 33.17 ± 4.99 kg/m2; p = 0.002). Blood sugar average levels decreased significantly (170 vs. 136 mg/dL; p = 0.001 for Dapa; 163 vs. 140 mg/dL; p = 0.002 for Empa) and also average levels of HbA1c (7.90% vs. 7.51%; p = 0,01 for Dapa; 7.72% vs. 7.35%; p = 0.004 for Empa). (4) Conclusions. Better results in all variables were observed in younger male patients with a shorter duration of diabetes and threshold BMI levels of 34.1, treated with SGLT2, and more significantly with Empa.

Short-Term Treatment with Empagliflozin Resulted in Dehydration and Cardiac Arrest in an Elderly Patient with Specific Complications: A Case Report and Literature Review

Empagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor widely used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus and heart failure. Our case study involved a 68-year-old patient who was admitted to the hospital because of a cerebral infarction. The patient was simultaneously diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and heart failure, for which empagliflozin was initiated. However, food and fluid intake were reduced due to poor appetite. In addition to the side effects of empagliflozin, the patient developed severe dehydration and cardiac arrest. Careful assessment of dehydration and preventive water intake is recommended in elderly patients and those with neurological deficits, especially when receiving empagliflozin.

Relook at DPP-4 inhibitors in the era of SGLT-2 inhibitors

SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2Is) have significantly improved cardio-renal outcomes and are preferred agents in people with cardiovascular diseases, heart failure, and diabetic kidney disease. Similarly, GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have significantly improved atherosclerotic cardiovascular outcomes. To this end, DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) are cardiac-neutral drugs. While long-acting GLP-1RAs have shown a favorable HbA1c lowering compared to DPP-4Is, there is no clinically meaningful HbA1c lowering difference between SGLT-2Is vs DPP-4Is. Moreover, the glucose-lowering potential of SGLT-2Is gets compromised with a progressive decline in renal functions, unlike DPP-4Is. Furthermore, the HbA1c lowering potential of DPP-4Is is favorable in people with T2DM having a modest baseline HbA1c (8.0%-8.5%) compared with SGLT-2Is which lowers HbA1c larger in a background of higher baseline HbA1c (> 8.5%-9.0%). These findings suggest that the role of DPP-4Is in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus cannot be completely ignored even in the era of SGLT-2Is.

SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a chronic condition that affects nearly one billion people globally, characterized by triacylglycerol accumulation in the liver as a consequence of metabolic abnormalities (obesity and impaired glucose regulation). Low-grade inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and dysbiosis in gut microbiota are involved in the etiology of MAFLD, and both cardiovascular events and hepatic complications are the long-term consequences. In the absence of approved therapies for this condition, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2 Is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have the specific advantage of lowering body weight and providing cardiovascular benefits. Here, we discuss potential roles for SGLT-2 Is and GLP-1 RAs in the prevention and treatment of intrahepatic triacylglycerol accumulation and associated inflammation and/or fibrosis.

Expert consensus on personalized initiation of glucose-lowering therapy in adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes without clinical cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease

Since it is difficult for clinicians to make a decision among the various types of antidiabetic medications due to their great discrepancy in mechanisms, pharmacological properties, and cardiovascular/renal protection, a relatively "precision" or personalized hypoglycemic treatment suggestion is practical for type 2 diabetes (T2D) management in adults. This expert consensus makes some recommendations based on the characteristics of adult T2D patients without clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) by evidence from large-scale clinical trials. The main consideration for initiating antidiabetic medications is the safety and benefits for prevention of target organ damage, such as CVD and CKD. The choice of personalized glucose-lowering therapy regarding target organ protection is based on the various effects of antidiabetic medications, patients' clinical characteristics and their key risks, as well as the sociological factors. According to the effects on glucose reduction, cardiovascular protection, renal benefit, body weight change, hypoglycemic risk, and liver function impact, the antidiabetic medications are recategorized in this consensus. Combined with the glucose control target and the different effects of hypoglycemic agents, a significant body of recommendations have been developed for optimal T2D management according to the risk factors for atherosclerotic CVD, heart failure, CKD, primary fatty liver, and hypoglycemia. This consensus gives detailed guidance on personalized antidiabetic therapy initiation in newly diagnosed T2D adults, which attaches great importance to both glucose control and target organ protection.

The current role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus management

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic, complex metabolic disease characterized by chronic hyperglycemia causing from insufficient insulin signaling because of insulin resistance or defective insulin secretion, and may induce severe complications and premature death. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are oral drugs used to reduce hyperglycemia in patients with T2DM, including empagliflozin, ertugliflozin, dapagliflozin and canagliflozin. The primary objective of this article is to examine the clinical benefit, safety, and tolerability of the four SGLT2 inhibitors approved by the US FDA. SGLT2 inhibitors increase urinary glucose excretion via inhibiting SGLT2 to decrease renal reabsorption of filtered glucose and reduce the renal threshold for glucose. Rather than stimulating insulin release, SGLT2 inhibitors improve β-cell function by improving glucotoxicity, as well as reduce insulin resistance and increase insulin sensitivity. Early clinical trials have confirmed the beneficial effects of SGLT2 in T2DM with acceptable safety and excellent tolerability. In recent years, SGLT2 inhibitors has been successively approved by the FDA to decrease cardiovascular death and decrease the risk of stroke and cardiac attack in T2DM adults who have been diagnosed with cardiovascular disease, treating heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction, and treat diabetic kidney disease (DKD), decrease the risk of hospitalization for HF in T2DM and DKD patients. SGLT2 inhibitors are expected to be an effective treatment for T2DM patients with non alcoholic fatty liver disease. SGLT2 inhibitors have a similar safety profile to placebo or other active control groups, with major adverse events such as Ketoacidosis or hypotension and genital or urinary tract infections.

Defining the Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Primary Care: Time to Think Differently

Disease burden in people with diabetes is mainly driven by long-term complications such as cardiovascular disease, heart failure and chronic kidney disease. This is a consequence of the interconnection between the cardiovascular, renal and metabolic systems, through a continuous chain of events referred to as 'the cardiorenal metabolic continuum'. Increasing evidence suggests that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have beneficial effects across all stages of the cardiorenal metabolic continuum, reducing morbidity and mortality in a wide range of individuals, from those with diabetes and multiple risk factors to those with established heart failure and chronic kidney disease, regardless of the presence of diabetes. Despite this robust evidence base, the complexity of label indications and misconceptions concerning potential side effects have resulted in a lack of clear understanding in primary care regarding the implementation of SGLT2is in clinical practice. With this in mind, we provide an overview of the clinical and economic benefits of SGLT2is across the cardiorenal metabolic continuum together with practical considerations in order to help address some of these concerns and clearly define the role of SGLT2is in primary care as a holistic outcomes-driven treatment with the potential to reduce disease burden across the cardiorenal metabolic spectrum.

Effects of Sodium/Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors and Combined SGLT1/2 Inhibitors on Cardiovascular, Metabolic, Renal, and Safety Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis of 111 Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of anti-hyperglycemic drugs that has been steadily increasing in popularity due to its cardiovascular and renal benefits. Dual SGLT1/SGLT2 (SGLT1/2) inhibitors have potentially augmented anti-hyperglycemic action due to additional SGLT1 inhibition. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the treatment effect across various outcomes between pure SGLT2 inhibitors and combined SGLT1/2 inhibitors in patients with diabetes.

METHODOLOGY

Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus) were searched for randomized controlled trials published from inception to 15th January 2022. Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the treatment effects reported in individual trials, stratified by type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020222031).

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 111 articles, comprising a combined cohort of 103,922 patients. SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, canagliflozin, ipragliflozin, ertugliflozin, and luseogliflozin) and SGLT1/2 inhibitors (licogliflozin and sotagliflozin) were compared. Frequentist network meta-analysis demonstrated that in T2DM patients, SGLT1/2 inhibitors led to a decreased hazard rate of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.98) and stroke (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.92) compared with SGLT2 inhibitors. SGLT2 inhibitors achieved a greater hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction than SGLT1/2 inhibitors (0.16%, 95% CI 0.06-0.26). In patients with T2DM, the risk of diarrhea (risk ratio [RR] 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.88) and severe hypoglycemia (RR 5.89, 95% CI 1.41-24.57) were found to be higher with SGLT1/2 inhibitor use compared with SGLT2 inhibitor use. No differences were observed for cardiovascular, metabolic, and safety outcomes between SGLT1/2 inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with T1DM.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T2DM, compared with pure SGLT2 inhibitors, combined SGLT1/2 inhibitors demonstrated a lower risk of myocardial infarction and of stroke, but were associated with a higher risk of diarrhea and severe hypoglycemia.

Comparative Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on Serum Electrolyte Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported that sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (SGLT2is) affect levels of serum electrolytes, especially magnesium. This study aimed to integrate direct and indirect trial evidence to maximize statistical power to clarify their overall and comparative effects in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to January 2021 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SGLT2is that reported mean changes in serum electrolytes, including magnesium, sodium, potassium, phosphate, and calcium. We performed both random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses to calculate the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

In total, we included 25 RCTs involving 28,269 patients with T2D and 6 SGLT2is. Compared with placebo, SGLT2is were significantly associated with elevations in serum magnesium by 0.07 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.08 mmol/L) and serum phosphate by 0.03 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.04 mmol/L). Our network meta-analysis showed no evidence of significantly superior efficacy of any specific SGLT2 inhibitor over the others, although dapagliflozin was associated with a larger increment in serum magnesium (WMD=0.16 mmol/L) compared with other SGLT2is. Similarly, no statistically detectable differences among the effects of SGLT2is on serum levels of other electrolytes were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2is significantly increased serum magnesium and phosphate levels, consistent with a class effect of SGLT2 inhibition. However, further investigations of long-term efficacy and safety in patients with T2D with different clinical phenotypes are needed.