Appropriate management of polycythaemia vera with cytoreductive drug therapy: European LeukemiaNet 2021 recommendations

Current myeloproliferative neoplasm scoring systems for clinical practice

ABSTRACT

BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematologic malignancies that are caused by the proliferation of myeloid cells that harbor a JAK-STAT pathway activating driver mutation. MPN management recommendations are based on the evaluation of different risks to prevent disease evolution-associated events while preserving patients' quality of life. Such risks can be common across all MPNs or specific to each subtype (polycythemia vera [PV], essential thrombocythemia [ET], prefibrotic myelofibrosis [MF], and primary MF). Patients with MF harbor the worse prognosis, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment at the expense of a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, accurate scoring systems to estimate overall survival are crucial for the management of patients with MF and the selection for HSCT. In PV and ET, the prediction of vascular events is prioritized given their higher incidence and related morbidity and mortality. Finally, quality of life evaluation is important for all subtypes. To predict these risks and adapt MPN therapeutic strategies, clinical risk scores have been developed over the past decades and more recently have incorporated molecular risk factors for more accurate risk stratification. The large number of scoring systems available, combined with disease heterogeneity and the necessity to predict diverse outcomes, make it difficult for clinicians to choose the most appropriate score to evaluate their patients' risk in 2024. Here, we provide an overview of MPN disease evolution-associated event incidence and conduct an exhaustive comparative review of the scoring systems currently available for each risk. Finally, we propose an algorithm for the use of these scores in clinical practice in each MPN subtype.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycythemia Vera: A Review

Importance

Polycythemia vera (PV), a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by an increased red blood cell mass and increased risk of thrombosis, affects approximately 65 000 people in the US, with an annual incidence of 0.5 to 4.0 cases per 100 000 persons.

Observations

Erythrocytosis (hemoglobin >16.5 mg/dL in men or >16.0 mg/dL in women) is a required diagnostic criterion, although thrombocytosis (53%) and leukocytosis (49%) are common. Patients may have pruritus (33%), erythromelalgia (5.3%), transient visual changes (14%), and splenomegaly (36%) with abdominal discomfort. More than 95% of patients have a JAK2 gene variant, which helps distinguish PV from secondary causes of erythrocytosis, such as tobacco smoking or sleep apnea. Among 7 cohorts (1545 individuals), the median survival from diagnosis was 14.1 to 27.6 years. Prior to or at the time of PV diagnosis, arterial thrombosis occurred in 16% of patients and 7% had venous thrombotic events, which could involve unusual sites, such as splanchnic veins. PV is also associated with an increased bleeding risk, especially in patients with acquired von Willebrand disease, which can occur with extreme thrombocytosis (platelet count, ≥1000 × 109/L). All patients with PV should receive therapeutic phlebotomy (goal hematocrit, <45%) and low-dose aspirin (if no contraindications). Patients who are at higher risk of thrombosis include those aged 60 years or older or with a prior thrombosis. These patients and those with persistent PV symptoms may benefit from cytoreductive therapy with hydroxyurea or interferon to lower thrombosis risk and decrease symptoms. Ruxolitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor that can alleviate pruritus and decrease splenomegaly in patients who are intolerant of or resistant to hydroxyurea. About 12.7% of patients with PV develop myelofibrosis and 6.8% develop acute myeloid leukemia.

Conclusions and Relevance

PV is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis and is almost universally associated with a JAK2 gene variant. PV is associated with an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis, hemorrhage, myelofibrosis, and acute myeloid leukemia. To decrease the risk of thrombosis, all patients with PV should be treated with aspirin and therapeutic phlebotomy to maintain a hematocrit of less than 45%. Cytoreductive therapies, such as hydroxyurea or interferon, are recommended for patients at high risk of thrombosis.

Pegylated interferon: the who, why, and how

Interferon alpha (IFN-α) is a fascinating molecule with many biological properties yet to be fully understood. Among these properties, several have demonstrated usefulness for targeting malignant cells, including hematopoietic cells from patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Indeed, IFN-α has been used for decades across all myeloproliferative neoplasms, but only recently a new form, ropegIFN-α2b, was approved to treat patients with polycythemia vera. Many phase 2 and more recently phase 3 studies have demonstrated IFN-α's promise in treating patients with essential thrombocythemia and early-stage myelofibrosis. In addition, although not approved in that situation, IFN-α is the only cytoreductive therapy that can be used during pregnancy. Today, IFN-α is a key medicine for polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia, while its place in the management of myelofibrosis must be better defined. The advantages of IFN therapy include a well-known safety profile, high rates of clinical and molecular responses, and a unique ability to deeply reduce the mutant allele burden of most of the driver mutations causing myeloproliferative neoplasms. Recent preliminary data from prospective studies suggest that molecular responses may be correlated with prolonged event-free survival, raising the hope that IFN therapy may ultimately alter the natural history of many diseases.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Rusfertide, a Hepcidin Mimetic, Following Subcutaneous Administration of a Lyophilized Powder Formulation in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hepcidin, an endogenous peptide hormone, binds to ferroportin and is the master regulator of iron trafficking. Rusfertide, a synthetic peptide, is a potent hepcidin mimetic. Clinical studies suggest rusfertide may be effective in the treatment of polycythemia vera. This study investigated the dose-ranging pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of a lyophilized formulation of rusfertide.

METHODS

A randomized open-label crossover study was conducted in two groups of healthy adult subjects to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous rusfertide doses that ranged from 10 to 60 mg of a lyophilized formulation and 20 mg of an aqueous prefilled syringe formulation that were used in clinical trials.

RESULTS

Rusfertide showed a rapid initial absorption. Median time to peak plasma concentrations for the lyophilized formulation was 24 h for doses of 10-30 mg and 2-4 h for doses of 45 and 60 mg. Mean terminal half-life ranged from 19.6 to 57.1 h. Rusfertide peak concentration and area under the concentration-time curve increased with an increasing dose, but in a less than dose-proportional manner. Metabolites M4 and M9 were identified as major metabolites. At the rusfertide 20-mg dose, the lyophilized formulation had an area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity approximately 1.5-fold higher than the aqueous formulation. The elimination half-life was comparable for the two formulations. Dose-related decreases in serum iron and transferrin-iron saturation were seen following rusfertide treatment. The majority of treatment-emergent adverse events were mild; treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events seen in ≥10% of subjects were injection-site erythema and injection-site pruritus.

CONCLUSIONS

Rusfertide was well tolerated; the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results indicate that lyophilized rusfertide is suitable for once-weekly or twice-weekly administration.

Clinical characteristics in adolescents and young adults with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia in Japan

We report the first large-scale retrospective cohort study on adolescent and young adult (AYA) polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) in Japan, a subgroup analysis using Japanese multicenter registry data (JSH-MPN-R18). This study included patients with PV (n = 31) or ET (n = 141) aged 20 to 39 years at the initial visit. Hemorrhage-free survival (HFS) was better in AYA ET than in non-AYA ET (5-year HFS: 100% vs. 88.6%, p < 0.01), which might be attributed to differences in antithrombotic treatment rates between AYA and non-AYA patients. Although thrombosis-free survival did not differ statistically, the percentage of venous thrombotic events (TEs) among total TEs was higher in AYA compared to non-AYA PV and ET in Japan (26.0% vs. 6.0%, p < 0.01), but much lower than figures reported in European or US cohorts. Cytoreductive therapy (CRT) was administered to 25.8% of AYA patients with PV and 43.3% of AYA patients with ET, and the reason was usually unrelated to high risk of thrombosis. These results could be used to develop a more appropriate strategy for managing PV and ET in the Japanese AYA population.

A higher JAK2V617F allele burden may be a risk factor for hemorrhagic events in younger patients with polycythemia vera

OBJECTIVES

Hemorrhagic events are a rare but potentially fatal complication in patients with polycythemia vera (PV).

METHODS

We analyzed the characteristics of hemorrhagic events in 267 patients with PV.

RESULTS

A median follow-up of 4.8 years revealed that 23 (8.6%) hemorrhagic events occurred. Significantly more hemorrhagic events occurred in younger patients aged below 60 years (n = 72) than in older patients aged 60 years or above (n = 191) (n = 12 [16.7%] vs. n = 11 [5.8%], respectively, P = 0.012). In univariate analysis among the younger patients, white blood cell (WBC) count ≥ 15 × 109/L (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.746, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.082-28.830, P = 0.002), palpable splenomegaly (HR = 5.629, 95% CI 1.193-26.550, P = 0.029), and JAK2V617F allele burden ≥ 80% (HR = 22.850, 95% CI 2.885-181.00, P = 0.003) were associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic events. In multivariate analysis, JAK2V617F allele burden ≥ 80% (HR = 9.394, 95% CI 1.046-84.380, P = 0.046) was a significant risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increased risk of hemorrhagic events after diagnosis in younger PV patients with a high JAK2V617F allele burden, high WBC count or palpable splenomegaly. It is important to consider treatment options that aim to avoid hemorrhagic events by reducing the JAK2V617F allele burden in younger PV patients.

Long-term safety and efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in Japanese patients with polycythemia vera

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropegIFN), a new-generation interferon-based agent, has been approved in Japan for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who are ineligible for or respond inadequately to conventional treatment. However, long-term outcomes with ropegIFN in Japanese patients have not been reported. This extension of a phase 2 study of ropegIFN in Japanese patients with PV aimed to determine its long-term safety/efficacy, and changes over time in JAK2 V617F allele burden. Here, we report data from the phase 2 study and subsequent extension over a period of 36 months. The primary endpoint was the complete hematologic response (CHR) maintenance rate without phlebotomy (hematocrit value < 45% without phlebotomy during the previous 12 weeks, platelet count ≤ 400 × 109/L, and white blood cell count ≤ 10 × 109/L). The CHR maintenance rates were 8/27 (29.6%), 18/27 (66.7%), and 22/27 (81.5%) at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. No thrombotic or hemorrhagic events occurred. The median allele burden change from baseline was - 74.8% at 36 months. All patients experienced adverse events; 25/27 (92.6%) experienced adverse drug reactions (ADRs), but no serious ADRs or deaths occurred. This interim analysis demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ropegIFN over 36 months in Japanese patients with PV.

Arterial Stiffness as a New Predictor of Clinical Outcome in Patients with Polycythemia Vera

Background: Thrombotic adverse events and disease progression are crucial in Polycythemia Vera (PV), as it stands as the leading cause of mortality. The pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a valuable indicator of arterial aging and often plays a significant independent role in contributing to cardiovascular adverse events (CV-AEs). The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between PWV and critical vascular function parameters, with the goal of identifying new predictive factors of vascular damage and exploring a potential connection with disease progression. Methods: Non-invasive aortic stiffness was assessed through carotid-femoral PWV measurement. PWV was measured using the SphygmoCor device. History of arterial or venous thrombosis (TAEs) or other CV-AEs was collected at baseline. PWV measurements were repeated at baseline, at 6 and at 12 months. Results: The study involved 28 PV patients aged 27 to 77 years, with 57.1% being male. Fourteen patients (50%) reported a high-risk thrombotic score at diagnosis, and 60.7% had at least one comorbidity. Multivariable regression models showed that hemoglobin levels were independently associated with PWV (β: 0.68, SE 0.24, p < 0.01). During the follow-up period (median duration 21.3 months, range 6-33), a total of 13 events were documented. Specifically, two patients exhibited a loss of response to treatment, four patients presented an increase in spleen diameters, three patients displayed an escalation of systemic symptoms, and three patients had a clear progression to secondary myelofibrosis. PWV (per 1 m/s: OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00-2.91, p = 0.047) and leukocyte count (per 1 × 103/μL: OR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.09, p = 0.043) were significant predictors of events, independently of waist circumference, blood pressure, treatment, and hematocrit. Conclusions: PWV has demonstrated its potential as an effective tool for monitoring PV patients. It stands as a clinical parameter that can predict the risk of progression in PV patients. Further investigation is essential to fully explore this potential. If successful, it could offer clinicians a valuable resource for effectively managing PV patients.

Polycythemia vera: past, present and future

There has been remarkable progress in the development of novel therapeutic approaches for patients with polycythemia vera (PV). Historically, therapy goals in PV were to mitigate thrombotic risks and control blood counts and symptoms. There is now increased focus on disease modification through progressive attrition of JAK2-mutant stem/progenitor cells. The approval of ropeginterferon, a novel monoPEGylated interferon, coupled with findings from LOW-PV and longer-term data from CONTINUATION-PV that strongly support a disease-modifying effect for interferon therapy, have transformed the treatment paradigm for this disorder. Results from MAJIC-PV demonstrate that disease modification can also be induced with JAK inhibitors, suggesting an urgent need to incorporate prospective molecular monitoring into PV trials. Novel agents, such as hepcidin mimetics, aim to help patients with PV restore normal hematocrit levels and become phlebotomy-free. In this review, we will summarize past, current and future approaches to PV management and highlight findings from key clinical studies.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms: young patients, current data and future considerations

The Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders predominantly occurring in elderly, whereas in children and young adults are quite infrequent. Therefore, less is known about clinical presentation, genetic abnormalities, prognosis and best management strategies for this groups of patients. Currently, more cases of younger MPN patients are diagnosed. Nevertheless, diagnosis of MPNs, especially in childhood, may be difficult due to lower incidence of JAK2V617F and CALR mutations and differences in peripheral blood counts between adults and children. Challenges for younger MPN patients are longer life expectances, specific psychosocial need, fertility and pregnancy need and a long term therapy side effect (including second cancers). The most severe MPNs complication is transformation to secondary myelofibrosis (MF) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Optimal management of young MPNs remains a challenge as the classical risk scores fail in young MPNs. Moreover, the main objective of young MPNs therapy should be the disease outcome modification. Therefore, international collaborative work between pediatricians and "adult hematologists" is required to measure outcomes and generate protocol of management of young MPNs.

Efficacy and safety outcomes in Japanese patients with low-risk polycythemia vera treated with ropeginterferon alfa-2b

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal erythrocytosis. A phase 2 study reported that ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for PV in Japanese patients. This post hoc analysis of the phase 2 data further evaluated outcomes in patients at low risk of thrombosis (low-risk PV). Among 20 patients with low-risk PV, 60.0% (12/20) and 85.0% (17/20) achieved < 45% hematocrit by weeks 24 and 52, respectively. The proportion of responders with complete hematologic response (CHR) was 60.0% (12/20) at week 52, and the median time to response was 11.9 months. The mean JAK2 V617F allele burden decreased from 75.8% at baseline to 53.7% at week 52. No patient experienced thrombosis or bleeding episodes. All patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to ropeginterferon alfa-2b, but no grade ≥ 3 TEAEs or deaths related to ropeginterferon alfa-2b occurred, and no new safety concerns arose. This analysis indicated that ropeginterferon alfa-2b may be an effective treatment option for Japanese patients with low-risk PV.

Contemporary Challenges in Polycythemia Vera Management From the Perspective of Patients and Physicians

Although polycythemia vera (PV) is a chronic and incurable disease, effective management can allow most patients to maintain functional lives with near-normal life expectancy. However, there remain several inter-related factors that contribute to many ongoing challenges associated with the management of PV, which this review aims to explore. First, as a disease hallmarked by constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway, PV is often accompanied by inflammatory symptoms that negatively impact quality of life. Next, patients often require recurrent therapeutic phlebotomies to maintain their hematocrit below the 45% threshold that has been associated with a decreased risk of thrombotic events. The need to closely monitor hematocrit and perform conditional therapeutic phlebotomies ties patients to the healthcare system, thereby limiting their autonomy. Furthermore, many patients describe therapeutic phlebotomies as burdensome and the procedure is often poorly tolerated, further contributing to quality-of-life decline. Phlebotomy needs can be reduced by utilizing cytoreductive therapy; however, standard first-line cytoreductive options (i.e., hydroxyurea and interferon) have not been shown to significantly improve symptom burden. Collectively, current PV management, while reducing thrombotic risk, often has a negative impact on patient quality of life. As researchers continue to advance towards the goal of developing a disease-modifying therapy for patients with PV, pursuit of nearer-term opportunities to shift the current treatment paradigm towards improving symptoms without compromising quality of life is also warranted, for example, by reducing or eliminating the frequent use of phlebotomy.

Clinical impact of mutated JAK2 allele burden reduction in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia

The variant allele frequency (VAF) of driver mutations (JAK2, CALR) in myeloproliferative neoplasms is associated with features of advanced disease and complications. Ruxolitinib and interferon were reported to variably reduce the mutant VAF, but the long-term impact of molecular responses (MR) remains debated. We prospectively measured changes in JAK2 and CALR VAF in 77 patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia, treated with ruxolitinib for a median of 8 years, and assessed correlation with complete clinical and hematological response (CCHR) and outcomes. At last observation time, JAK2 VAF reduced overall from a median of 68% (range, 20%-99%) to 3.5% (0%-98%). A profound and durable MR (DMR; defined as a VAF stably ≤2%), including complete MR in 8%, was achieved in 20% of the patients, a partial MR (PMR; VAF reduction >50% of the baseline level) in 25%, and 56% had no molecular response (NMR). A CCHR was reached by 69% overall, independently of any degree of MR achieved; conversely, a DMR correlated with longer duration of CCHR and, most importantly, with reduced rate of progression to myelofibrosis and with longer myelofibrosis-free, event-free and progression-free survival. Achievement of PMR also had some favorable impact on outcomes, compared to NMR. A baseline JAK2 VAF <50%, and a VAF reduction of ≥35% after 2 years of treatment, predicted for the achievement of DMR and reduced progression to myelofibrosis. Overall, these findings support the clinical value of achieving profound, durable MR and its consideration as surrogate endpoint in future clinical trials.

The evolving landscape of polycythemia vera therapies

INTRODUCTION

The treatment landscape of polycythemia vera (PV) has seen major advancements within the last decade including approval of ruxolitinib in the second line setting after hydroxyurea, ropegylated interferon-α2b, and advanced clinical development of a novel class of agents called hepcidin mimetics.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a comprehensive review of the evidence discussing the risk stratification, treatment indications, role and limitations of phlebotomy only approach and pivotal trials covering nuances related to the use of interferon-α (IFN-α), ruxolitinib, hepcidin mimetics, and upcoming investigational agents including HDAC and LSD1 inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

The research paradigm in PV is slowly shifting from the sole focus on hematocrit control and moving toward disease modification. The discovery of hepcidin mimetics has come as a breakthrough in restoring iron homeostasis, achieving phlebotomy-independence and may lead to improved thrombosis-free survival with stricter hematocrit control. On the other hand, emerging data with IFN- α and ruxolitinib as well as combination of the two agents suggests the potential for achieving molecular remission in a subset of PV patients and long-term follow-up is awaited to validate the correlation of molecular responses with clinically relevant outcomes of progression-free and thrombosis-free survival.

Impact of Hydroxyurea to Treat Haematological Disorders on Male Fertility: Two Case Reports and a Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Hydroxyurea (HU) is a cytoreductive agent used as standard treatment option for sickle cell anaemia/disease (SCD), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and polycythaemia vera (PV). Despite its overall good safety profile, its use also in relatively young patients raises an interest on its potential impact on spermatogenesis. To perform a systematic review of all published articles investigating fertility in male patients affected by SCD, ET, and PV and treated with HU. Two paradigmatic case reports of patients affected by PV and ET, respectively, have been also reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were queried for all the published studies indexed up to November 15th, 2022. A combination of the following keywords was used: "hydroxyurea," "fertility," "male," "sperm," "sickle cell anaemia," "sickle cell disease," "essential thrombocythemia," "polycythaemia vera."

RESULTS

Of 48 articles identified, 8 studies, involving 161 patients, were eligible for inclusion. Overall, the number of spermatogonia per round cross section of seminiferous tubule were decreased in patients with SCD compared to healthy males. HU treatment was always associated with a worsening of semen parameters, even up to azoospermia. Notably, treatment discontinuation was associated with an improvement of semen parameters and a trend toward normalization in the case of PV and ET, with a less clear amelioration in men with SCD. In both our patients with either PV or ET, HU discontinuation was associated with a significant improvement of spermatogenesis with successful spontaneous pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Published evidence do not consistently report normalization of spermatogenesis after HU discontinuation in SCD cases. Conversely, the literature almost consistently reported an improvement of semen parameters at the discontinuation of HU therapy in PV and ET cases. Our real-life two cases confirmed those findings. The willing of fatherhood and the need for effective fertility treatment warrant further research to improve work-up management in men with hematological disorders.

Real-life use of ropeg-interferon α2b in polycythemia vera: patient selection and clinical outcomes

Ropeginterferon-alfa2b (ropegIFNα2b) is a long-acting IFN formulation with broad FDA/EMA approval as a therapy of polycythemia vera (PV) with no symptomatic splenomegaly. There is currently lack of information on the real-world patient selection, including the impact of local reimbursement policies, and drug management, particularly: type/timing of screening and follow-up tests; absolute/relative contraindications to therapy; ropegIFNα2b dose and combinations with hydroxyurea. As a sub-analysis of the PV-ARC retrospective study (NCT06134102), we here report our monocenter experience with ropegIFNα2b in the period from January 2021, corresponding to drug availability outside clinical trial, and December 2023. Among the 149 patients with EMA/FDA indication, only 55 (36.9%) met the local reimbursement criteria and 18 (12.1%) received ropegIFNα2b. Thanks to appropriate screening, relative/absolute contraindications to ropegIFNα2b were detected and managed in a multidisciplinary manner. Efficacy and safety of ropegIFNα2b was confirmed, with 3 cases of early molecular response. General use of low ropegIFNα2b dose, with frequent need for hydroxyurea combinations, was noted. This real-world experience suggests a significant impact of local regulations on drug prescription and the need for greater real-world data collection on ropegIFNα2b in PV patients. Also, it describes appropriate multidisciplinary screening and monitoring procedures during ropegIFNα2b therapy.

Cytoreductive therapy in younger adults with polycythemia vera: a meta-analysis of safety and outcomes

ABSTRACT

Cytoreductive therapy is not routinely recommended for younger patients with polycythemia vera (PV) due to concern that treatment toxicity may outweigh therapeutic benefits. However, no systematic data support this approach. To support objective risk/benefit assessment of cytoreductive drugs in patients with PV aged <60 years (PV<60), this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate toxicity and disease-related complications in PV<60 treated with interferon alfa (rIFN-α) or hydroxyurea (HU). A search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase identified 693 unique studies with relevant keywords, of which 14 met inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. The weighted average age of patients treated with rIFN-α was 48 years (n = 744 patients; 12 studies) and for HU was 56 years (n = 1397; 8 studies). The weighted average duration of treatment for either drug was 4.5 years. Using a Bayesian hierarchical model, the pooled annual rate of discontinuation due to toxicity was 5.2% for patients receiving rIFN-α (n = 587; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-8.2) and 3.6% for HU (n = 1097; CI, 1-6.2). The average complete hematologic response for rIFN-α and HU was 62% and 52%, respectively. Patients experienced thrombotic events at a pooled annual rate of 0.79% and 1.26%; secondary myelofibrosis at 1.06% and 1.62%; acute myeloid leukemia at 0.14% and 0.26%; and death at 0.87% and 2.65%, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported. With acceptable rates of nonfatal toxicity, cytoreductive treatment, particularly with disease-modifying rIFN-α, may benefit PV<60. Future randomized trials prioritizing inclusion of PV<60 are needed to establish a long-term benefit of early cytoreductive treatment in these patients.

Analysis of real-world data demonstrating the efficacy of current management of polycythaemia vera in attaining and maintaining therapeutic haematocrit

BACKGROUND

Polycythaemia vera (PV) is a Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm, typically driven by acquired JAK2 mutation and characterised by elevated red cell mass and increased risk of thrombotic events. Patients are managed with phlebotomy to maintain haematocrit (Hct) < 0.45, and patients stratified as 'high risk' for thrombosis are additionally treated with cytoreductive agents to attain this target.

STUDY

This analysis of newly diagnosed JAK2 mutant PV patients (n = 50) over 2 years aimed to determine how effectively patients attained and maintained target Hct according to recommended practice.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that patients spent the majority of time in target Hct range. Findings are supportive of current management guidelines.

Silent Thyroiditis Associated with Ropeginterferon α-2b in a Patient with Polycythemia Vera

Interferon is an emerging treatment option for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), especially for polycythemia vera (PV). Previous studies of interferon used therapeutically for hepatitis C have demonstrated that one of the most important adverse events associated with interferon treatment is thyroid dysfunction, and a management strategy for thyroid dysfunction has been established. However, whether or not the recommendation is also suitable for MPN settings is unclear. In this study, one PV patient developed silent thyroiditis during a phase 2 study of ropeginterferon α-2b. This case suggests that thyroid dysfunction is an important clinical issue to consider in interferon treatment for PV.

SOHO State of the Art Update and Next Questions: Novel Therapies for Polycythemia Vera

In the recent years, landmark advancements in the treatment of polycythemia vera (PV) have been achieved. We witnessed the regulatory approval of ropeginterferon and the advanced clinical development of other novel agents that may affect the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease. Agents with the potential of disease modification may soon overtake preceding treatment options that were based on the patient's age and history of thrombosis. Recent studies using ropeginterferon in low-risk PV patients earlier in the disease course challenge the current treatment paradigm and shift the focus on modifying the course of the disease. Hepcidin mimetics offer an excellent alternative to phlebotomy, providing better quality of life, and may lead to improved outcomes in PV by tight hematocrit control. Novel agents, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors, hold promise to complement the therapeutic landscape of PV and might be particularly promising in rationale combinations. Ruxolitinib is well established as an approved second-line treatment for PV. In the frontline setting, the precise role of ruxolitinib, which also represents an appealing agent in combination regimens, will be determined in ongoing research studies. Longer follow-up is necessary to assess whether novel agents/regimens elicit fewer thromboembolic/ hemorrhagic events and halt disease progression to myelofibrosis and acute myeloid leukemia. We aspire that disease-modifying approaches in PV are on the horizon, and that we will be empowered to ultimately change the natural course of the disease and profoundly impact the lives of PV patients in the near future.

Ruxolitinib in patients with polycythemia vera resistant and/or intolerant to hydroxyurea: European observational study

BACKGROUND

Hydroxyurea (HU) is a commonly used first-line treatment in patients with polycythemia vera (PV). However, approximately 15%-24% of PV patients report intolerance and resistance to HU.

METHODS

This phase IV, European, real-world, observational study assessed the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in PV patients who were resistant and/or intolerant to HU, with a 24-month follow-up. The primary objective was to describe the profile and disease burden of PV patients.

RESULTS

In the 350 enrolled patients, 70% were >60 years old. Most patients (59.4%) had received ≥1 phlebotomy in the 12 months prior to the first dose of ruxolitinib. Overall, 68.2% of patients achieved hematocrit control with 92.3% patients having hematocrit <45% and 35.4% achieved hematologic remission at month 24. 85.1% of patients had no phlebotomies during the study. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 54.3% of patients and the most common event was anemia (22.6%). Of the 10 reported deaths, two were suspected to be study drug-related.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that ruxolitinib treatment in PV maintains durable hematocrit control with a decrease in the number of phlebotomies in the majority of patients and was generally well tolerated.

Rusfertide, a Hepcidin Mimetic, for Control of Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera

BACKGROUND

Polycythemia vera is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis. Rusfertide, an injectable peptide mimetic of the master iron regulatory hormone hepcidin, restricts the availability of iron for erythropoiesis. The safety and efficacy of rusfertide in patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera are unknown.

METHODS

In part 1 of the international, phase 2 REVIVE trial, we enrolled patients in a 28-week dose-finding assessment of rusfertide. Part 2 was a double-blind, randomized withdrawal period in which we assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive rusfertide or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was a response, defined by hematocrit control, absence of phlebotomy, and completion of the trial regimen during part 2. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by means of the modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) patient diary (scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms).

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled in part 1 of the trial, and 59 were assigned to receive rusfertide (30 patients) or placebo (29 patients) in part 2. The estimated mean (±SD) number of phlebotomies per year was 8.7±2.9 during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide and 0.6±1.0 during part 1 (estimated difference, 8.1 phlebotomies per year). The mean maximum hematocrit was 44.5±2.2% during part 1 as compared with 50.0±5.8% during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide. During part 2, a response was observed in 60% of the patients who received rusfertide as compared with 17% of those who received placebo (P = 0.002). Between baseline and the end of part 1, rusfertide treatment was associated with a decrease in individual symptom scores on the MPN-SAF in patients with moderate or severe symptoms at baseline. During parts 1 and 2, grade 3 adverse events occurred in 13% of the patients, and none of the patients had a grade 4 or 5 event. Injection-site reactions of grade 1 or 2 in severity were common.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with polycythemia vera, rusfertide treatment was associated with a mean hematocrit of less than 45% during the 28-week dose-finding period, and the percentage of patients with a response during the 12-week randomized withdrawal period was greater with rusfertide than with placebo. (Funded by Protagonist Therapeutics; REVIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04057040.).

Distinct clinico-molecular arterial and venous thrombosis scores for myeloproliferative neoplasms risk stratification

Current recommended risk scores to predict thrombotic events associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) do not discriminate between arterial and venous thrombosis despite their different physiopathology. To define novel stratification systems, we delineated a comprehensive landscape of MPN associated thrombosis across a large long-term follow-up MPN cohort. Prior arterial thrombosis, age >60 years, cardiovascular risk factors and presence of TET2 or DNMT3A mutations were independently associated with arterial thrombosis in multivariable analysis. ARTS, an ARterial Thrombosis Score, based on these four factors, defined low- (0.37% patients-year) and high-risk (1.19% patients-year) patients. ARTS performance was superior to the two-tiered conventional risk stratification in our training cohort, across all MPN subtypes, as well as in two external validation cohorts. Prior venous thrombosis and presence of a JAK2V617F mutation with a variant allelic frequency ≥50% were independently associated with venous thrombosis. The discrimination potential of VETS, a VEnous Thrombosis Score based on these two factors, was poor, similar to the two-tiered conventional risk stratification. Our study pinpoints arterial and venous thrombosis clinico-molecular differences and proposes an arterial risk score for more accurate patients' stratification. Further improvement of venous risk scores, accounting for additional factors and considering venous thrombosis as a heterogeneous entity is warranted.

Differences in Clinical Outcomes Between Hydroxyurea-Resistant and -Intolerant Polycythemia Vera Patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who exhibit hydroxyurea-resistance (HU-R) and -intolerance (HU-I) may have distinct characteristics and clinical outcomes. However, to date, no studies have reported a comparison between these two groups or assessed prognostic factors in these patients.

METHODS

The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and identify prognostic factors among PV patients with HU-R or HU-I. We conducted a review of PV patients who received frontline treatment with HU from nine centers and identified 90 patients with HU-R or HU-I.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of thrombosis after 7 years of HU-R/I was 21.4%, and the incidence of disease progression was 22.5%. Comparing the HU-R and HU-I groups, the HU-R group had a significantly higher rate of disease progression (36.7% vs. 0.56%, P = 0.009), while there was no significant difference in thrombosis incidence (19.0% vs. 22.9%, P = 0.463). Multivariate analysis revealed that HU-R was an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 6.27, 95% confidence interval, 1.83-21.47, P = 0.003). Additionally, higher lactate dehydrogenase levels, multiple cardiovascular risk factors, and prior thrombosis were identified as unfavorable predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that patients with HU-R face a higher risk of hematological transformation, but have a comparable risk of thrombosis to patients with HU intolerance. These distinctions should guide decisions on second-line treatment options and clinical trials involving these patients.

A safety evaluation of ruxolitinib for the treatment of polycythemia vera

INTRODUCTION

Polycythemia Vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm hallmarked by deregulated proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells leading to prevalent expansion of red cell mass, increased rate of vascular events, splenomegaly, disease-associated symptoms, and risk of evolution to secondary myelofibrosis and blast phase. PV is pathogenetically associated with autonomously persistent activation of JAK2, which causes overproduction of blood cells and an inflammatory condition responsible for the clinical manifestations of the disease. Extensively supported by preclinical studies, targeting JAK2-dependent signaling represents a rational therapeutic approach to PV, finally leading to the approval of ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor.

AREAS COVERED (LITERATURE RESEARCH)

We analyzed reports of phase 2 and phase 3 trials with ruxolitinib in PV and relevant literature dealing with efficacy and safety aspects, including most recent real-world reports.

EXPERT OPINION

Ruxolitinib is the only JAK2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of PV with well-known efficacy for splenomegaly, symptoms, and potentially reduction of vascular events. The treatment regimen is notably manageable and safe, with the most prevalent side effects primarily encompassing myelosuppression, hyperlipidemia, non-melanoma skin cancer and infections, mainly reactivation of Herpes Zoster. These effects necessitate ongoing surveillance and proactive preventive measures.

Polycythemia Vera: Barriers to and Strategies for Optimal Management

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasms characterized by impaired quality of life and severe complications. Despite the increasingly in-depth knowledge of this condition, it necessitates a multifaceted management approach to mitigate symptoms and prevent thrombotic and hemorrhagic events, ensuring prolonged survival. The therapeutic landscape has been revolutionized in recent years, where venesection and hydroxycarbamide associated with antiplatelet therapy have a central role and are now accompanied by other drugs, such as interferon and Janus kinase inhibitors. Ongoing research and advancements in targeted therapies hold promise for further enhancing the therapeutic choice for PV management.

Cytoreduction for ET and PV: who, what, when, and how?

Thrombotic complications are the primary contributor to morbidity and mortality in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV). Cytoreductive therapy is the main tool for primary or tertiary thrombosis prevention in these diseases. In general, high-thrombotic-risk patients and those with symptoms that may be ameliorated from cytoreductive therapy are candidates for this treatment, although the decision is highly individualized. Approved options for cytoreduction in ET and PV include hydroxyurea, long-acting interferons, anagrelide in ET, and ruxolitinib in PV. Selecting the ideal agent requires careful consideration of the toxicity profiles and individual treatment goals. In this review the existing literature on cytoreductive decisions in ET and PV is summarized, with an emphasis on risk-stratification, highlighting the need for personalized care in order to maximize the benefit of these therapies while minimizing toxicities.

Change in Polycythemia Vera Treatment: Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b in Light of Current Trials

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (RopegIFN) enables effective cytoreduction in polycythemia vera (PV). Recent analyses suggest that long-term RopegIFN therapy fulfills treatment goals important to patients with PV including good quality of life, the slowing of disease progression, and long event-free survival. Data support the use of RopegIFN in both early PV therapy and second-line and beyond.

Management of classical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in Asia: consensus of the Asian Myeloid Working Group

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized clinically by the proliferation of one or more hematopoietic lineage(s). The classical Philadelphia-chromosome (Ph)-negative MPNs include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The Asian Myeloid Working Group (AMWG) comprises representatives from fifteen Asian centers experienced in the management of MPN. This consensus from the AMWG aims to review the current evidence in the risk stratification and treatment of Ph-negative MPN, to identify management gaps for future improvement, and to offer pragmatic approaches for treatment commensurate with different levels of resources, drug availabilities and reimbursement policies in its constituent regions. The management of MPN should be patient-specific and based on accurate diagnostic and prognostic tools. In patients with PV, ET and early/prefibrotic PMF, symptoms and risk stratification will guide the need for early cytoreduction. In younger patients requiring cytoreduction and in those experiencing resistance or intolerance to hydroxyurea, recombinant interferon-α preparations (pegylated interferon-α 2A or ropeginterferon-α 2b) should be considered. In myelofibrosis, continuous risk assessment and symptom burden assessment are essential in guiding treatment selection. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in MF should always be based on accurate risk stratification for disease-risk and post-HSCT outcome. Management of classical Ph-negative MPN entails accurate diagnosis, cytogenetic and molecular evaluation, risk stratification, and treatment strategies that are outcome-oriented (curative, disease modification, improvement of quality-of-life).

Moving toward disease modification in polycythemia vera

Polycythemia vera (PV) belongs to the BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and is characterized by activating mutations in JAK2 and clinically presents with erythrocytosis, variable degrees of systemic and vasomotor symptoms, and an increased risk of both thromboembolic events and progression to myelofibrosis and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment selection is based on a patient's age and a history of thrombosis in patients with low-risk PV treated with therapeutic phlebotomy and aspirin alone, whereas cytoreductive therapy with either hydroxyurea or interferon alfa (IFN-α) is added for high-risk disease. However, other disease features such as significant disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly, concurrent thrombocytosis and leukocytosis, or intolerance of phlebotomy can constitute an indication for cytoreductive therapy in patients with otherwise low-risk disease. Additionally, recent studies demonstrating the safety and efficacy (ie, reduction in phlebotomy requirements and molecular responses) of ropegylated IFN-α2b support its use for patients with low-risk PV. Additionally, emerging data suggest that early treatment is associated with higher rates of molecular responses, which might eventually enable time-limited therapy. Nonetheless, longer follow-up is needed to assess whether molecular responses associate with clinically meaningful outcome measures such as thrombosis and progression to myelofibrosis or AML. In this article, we provide an overview of the current and evolving treatment landscape of PV and outline our vision for a patient-centered, phlebotomy-free, treatment approach using time-limited, disease-modifying treatment modalities early in the disease course, which could ultimately affect the natural history of the disease.

Diagnosis and Management of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Polycythemia Vera

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by aberrant myeloid lineage hematopoiesis with excessive red blood cell and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Patients with PV present with a range of thrombotic and hemorrhagic symptoms that affect quality of life and reduce overall survival expectancy. Thrombotic events, transformation into acute myeloid leukemia, and myelofibrosis are largely responsible for the observed mortality. Treatment of PV is thus primarily focused on symptom control and survival extension through the prevention of thrombosis and leukemic transformation. Patients with PV frequently experience thrombotic events and have elevated cardiovascular risk, including hypertension, dyslipidemias, obesity, and smoking, all of which negatively affect survival. To reduce the risk of thrombotic complications, PV therapy should aim to normalize hemoglobin, hematocrit, and leukocytosis and, in addition, identify and modify cardiovascular risk factors. Herein, we review what is currently known about the associated cardiovascular risk and propose strategies for diagnosing and managing patients with PV.

Renin-angiotensin inhibitors reduce thrombotic complications in Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera patients with arterial hypertension

Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) and Polycythemia Vera (PV) are chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) characterized by thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, leading to a high risk of disability and mortality. Although arterial hypertension was found to be the most significant modifiable cardiovascular (CV) risk factor in the general population, little is known about its role in MPNs as well as a possible role of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in comparison with other anti-hypertensive treatments. We investigated a large cohort of 404 MPN adult patients, 133 diagnosed with PV and 271 with ET. Over half of the patients (53.7%) reported hypertension at MPN diagnosis. The 15-year cumulative incidence of thrombotic-adverse events (TAEs) was significantly higher in patients with hypertension (66.8 ± 10.3% vs 38.5 ± 8.4%; HR = 1.83; 95%CI 1.08-3.1). Multivariate analysis showed that PV diagnosis and hypertension were independently associated with a higher risk of developing TAEs (HR = 3.5; 95%CI 1.928-6.451, p < 0.001 and HR = 1.8; 95%CI 0.983-3.550, p = 0.05, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the diagnosis of PV confirmed a significant predictive role in developing TAEs (HR = 4.4; 95%CI 1.92-10.09, p < 0.01), also considering only MPN patients with hypertension. In addition, we found that the use of RASi showed a protective effect from TAEs both in the whole cohort of MPN with hypertension (HR = 0.46; 95%CI 0.21-0.98, p = 0.04) and in the subgroup of thrombotic high-risk score patients (HR = 0.49; 95%CI 0.24-1.01, p = 0.04). In particular, patients with ET and a high risk of thrombosis seem to benefit most from RASi treatment (HR = 0.27; 95%CI 0.07-1.01, p = 0.03). Hypertension in MPN patients represents a significant risk factor for TAEs and should be adequately treated.

Recent progress of JAK inhibitors for hematological disorders

JAK inhibitors are important therapeutic options for hematological disorders, especially myeloproliferative neoplasms. Ruxolitinib, the first JAK inhibitor approved for clinical use, improves splenomegaly and ameliorates constitutional symptoms in both myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera patients. Ruxolitinib is also useful for controlling hematocrit levels in polycythemia vera patients who were inadequately controlled by conventional therapies. Furthermore, pretransplantation use of ruxolitinib may improve the outcome of allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis. In contrast to these clinical merits, evidence of the disease-modifying action of ruxolitinib, i.e., reduction of malignant clones or improvement of bone marrow pathological findings, is limited, and many myelofibrosis patients discontinued ruxolitinib due to adverse events or disease progression. To overcome these limitations of ruxolitinib, several new types of JAK inhibitors have been developed. Among them, fedratinib was proven to provide clinical merits even in patients who were resistant or intolerant to ruxolitinib. Pacritinib and momelotinib have shown merits for myelofibrosis patients with thrombocytopenia or anemia, respectively. In addition to treatment for myeloproliferative neoplasms, recent studies have demonstrated that JAK inhibitors are novel and attractive therapeutic options for corticosteroid-refractory acute as well as chronic graft versus host disease.

Advances in management of primary myelofibrosis and polycythaemia vera: Implications in clinical practice

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and polycythaemia vera (PV) are rare BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, haemorrhagic complications and progression to fibrosis or leukaemia or fibrosis for PV. Both diseases are characterised by biological and clinical heterogeneity, leading to great variability in their management in routine clinical practice. In this review, we present an updated overview of the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of PMF and PV, and we discuss how our multidisciplinary expert group based across France translates this evidence-based knowledge into routine clinical practice.

Predictors of Response to Hydroxyurea and Switch to Ruxolitinib in HU-Resistant Polycythaemia VERA Patients: A Real-World PV-NET Study

In polycythemia vera (PV), the prognostic relevance of an ELN-defined complete response (CR) to hydroxyurea (HU), the predictors of response, and patients' triggers for switching to ruxolitinib are uncertain. In a real-world analysis, we evaluated the predictors of response, their impact on the clinical outcomes of CR to HU, and the correlations between partial or no response (PR/NR) and a patient switching to ruxolitinib. Among 563 PV patients receiving HU for ≥12 months, 166 (29.5%) achieved CR, 264 achieved PR, and 133 achieved NR. In a multivariate analysis, the absence of splenomegaly (p = 0.03), pruritus (p = 0.002), and a median HU dose of ≥1 g/day (p < 0.001) remained associated with CR. Adverse events were more frequent with a median HU dose of ≥1 g/day. Overall, 283 PR/NR patients (71.3%) continued HU, and 114 switched to ruxolitinib. In the 449 patients receiving only HU, rates of thrombosis, hemorrhages, progression, and overall survival were comparable among the CR, PR, and NR groups. Many PV patients received underdosed HU, leading to lower CR and toxicity rates. In addition, many patients continued HU despite a PR/NR; however, splenomegaly and other symptoms were the main drivers of an early switch. Better HU management, standardization of the criteria for and timing of responses to HU, and adequate intervention in poor responders should be advised.

Ropeginterferon versus Standard Therapy for Low-Risk Patients with Polycythemia Vera

BACKGROUND: Whether phlebotomy alone can adequately maintain target hematocrit in patients with low-risk polycythemia vera (PV) remains elusive. METHODS: In a phase 2 open-label randomized trial, we compared ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropeg; 100 μg every 2 weeks) with phlebotomy only regarding maintenance of a median hematocrit level (≤45%) over 12 months in the absence of progressive disease (primary end point). In follow-up, crossover to the alternative treatment group was allowed if the primary end point was not met. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients were enrolled (ropeg: n=64; standard group: n=63). The primary end point was met in 81% and 51% in the ropeg and standard groups, respectively. Responders continued the assigned treatment until month 24 and maintained response in 83% and 59%, respectively (P=0.02). Ropeg responders less frequently experienced moderate/severe symptoms (33% vs. 67% in the standard group) and palpable splenomegaly (14% vs. 37%) and showed normalization of ferritin levels and blood counts. Nonresponders at 12 months crossed over to the standard (n=9) or ropeg (n=23) group; in patients switched to ropeg only, 7 of 23 met the response criteria in 12 months, and phlebotomy need was high (4.7 per patient per year). Discontinuation because of adverse events occurred in seven patients treated with ropeg. CONCLUSIONS: In this 24-month trial, ropeg was superior to phlebotomy alone in maintaining hematocrit on target. No dose-limiting side effects or toxicities were noted; 9.2% of patients on ropeg and no patients on standard treatment developed neutropenia. (Funded by AOP Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03003325.)

Novel therapeutic strategies for essential thrombocythemia/polycythemia vera

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal disorders of hematopoietic stem cells; these include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). MPNs are inflammatory cancers, wherein the malignant clone generates cytokines that sustain the inflammatory drive in a self-perpetuating vicious cycle. The course of MPNs follows a biological continuum, that is, from early cancer stages (ET/PV) to advanced myelofibrosis as well as impending leukemic transformation. MPN-related symptoms, e.g., fatigue, general weakness, and itching, are caused by inflammatory cytokines. Thrombosis and bleeding are also exacerbated by inflammatory cytokines in patients with MPN. Until recently, the primary objective of ET and PV therapy was to increase survival rates by preventing thrombosis. However, several medications have recently demonstrated the ability to modify the course of the disease; symptom relief is expected for most patients. In addition, there is increasing interest in the active treatment of patients at low risk with PV and ET. This review focuses on the ET/PV treatment strategies as well as novel treatment options for clinical development.

Evaluating ropeginterferon alfa-2b for the treatment of adults with polycythemia vera

INTRODUCTION

Interferons (IFNs) have been used for decades to treat polycythemia vera (PV). Single-arm clinical trials assessing IFN in PV patients demonstrated high hematological and molecular response rates, indicating potential disease-modifying activity of IFN. However, discontinuation rates of IFNs have been rather high due to frequent treatment-related side-effects.

AREAS COVERED

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ROPEG) is a monopegylated IFN consisting of a single isoform, which differentiates it from previous IFNs with respect to tolerability and dosing frequency. ROPEG has improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, which allow extended dosing every 2 weeks and monthly administration during maintenance phase. This review covers ROPEG's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, presents results of randomized clinical trials (RCT) that evaluated ROPEG in the treatment of PV patients, and discusses contemporary findings regarding the potential disease-modifying activity of ROPEG.

EXPERT OPINION

RCT have demonstrated high rates of hematological and molecular responses in PV patients treated with ROPEG, irrespective of thrombotic risk. Drug discontinuation rates were generally low. However, even though RCT captured the most important surrogate endpoints of thrombotic risk and disease progression in PV, they were not statistically powered to fully determine whether therapeutic intervention with ROPEG indeed has a direct positive effect on these important clinical outcomes.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms and splanchnic vein thrombosis: Contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic strategies

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are the most common etiologies of primary splanchnic vein thrombosis, present in almost forty percent of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome or portal vein thrombosis. Diagnosis of MPNs can be difficult in these patients because key characteristics, such as elevated blood cell counts and splenomegaly, are confounded by portal hypertension or bleeding complications. In recent years, diagnostic tools have improved to provide more accurate diagnosis and classification of MPNs. Although bone marrow biopsy findings remain a major diagnostic criterion, molecular markers are playing an increasing role not only in diagnosis but also in better estimating prognosis. Therefore, though screening for JAK2V617F mutation should be the starting point of the diagnostic workup performed in all patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to accurately diagnose the subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm, recommend the useful additional tests (bone marrow biopsy, search for an additional mutation using targeted next-generation sequencing), and suggest the best treatment strategy. Indeed, providing a specific expert care pathway for patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis and underlying myeloproliferative neoplasm is crucial to determine the optimal management to reduce the risk of both hematological and hepatic complications.

A Case Report of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b for Polycythemia Vera during Pregnancy

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) such as essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) are rare during pregnancy. However, they are harmful because they are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic, hemorrhagic, or microcirculatory disturbances or placental dysfunction leading to fetal growth restriction or loss. Low-dose aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are recommended to reduce pregnancy complications, and interferon (IFN) is the only treatment option for cytoreductive therapy based on the likelihood of live birth in pregnant women with MPN. Since ropeginterferon alfa-2b is the only available IFN in South Korea, we present a case report of ropeginterferon alfa-2b use during pregnancy in an MPN patient. A 40-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with low-risk PV in 2017 and had been maintained on phlebotomy, hydroxyurea (HU), and anagrelide (ANA) for 4 years was confirmed as 5 weeks pregnant on 9 December 2021. After stopping treatment with HU and ANA, the patient showed a rapid increase in platelet count (1113 × 109/L to 2074 × 109/L, normal range, 150–450 × 109/L) and white blood cell count (21.93 × 109/L to 35.55 × 109/L, normal range, 4.0–10.0 × 109/L). Considering the high risk of complications, aggressive cytoreductive treatment was required, for which we chose ropeginterferon alfa-2b, as it is the only available IFN agent in South Korea. The patient underwent 8 cycles of ropeginterferon alfa-2b over 6 months during pregnancy and delivered without any neonatal or maternal complications. This case report highlights the importance of considering treatment options for MPN patients who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy, as well as the need for further investigation into the safety and efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in this population.

Management of polycythemia vera: A survey of treatment patterns in Italy

OBJECTIVES

Polycythemia vera (PV) is an acquired clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder characterized by the overproduction of red blood cells. It has long been underlined that there are differences in treatment patterns in routine practice. Therapeutic strategies have also expanded, and in recent years the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib has emerged as a second-line therapeutic option in patients who are intolerant to or resistant to hydroxyurea. Determining the impact of changes on practice patterns is of interest, especially for aspects that lack detailed guidance for management.

METHODS

To gain insights into treatment patterns by clinicians treating patients with PV in Italy, we carried out a survey of 60 hematologists and transfusion specialists. The questions covered: treatment of low-risk patients, definition of significant leukocytosis, splenomegaly and excessive phlebotomies, resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea, use of ruxolitinib, cytoreductive therapy, and vaccines.

RESULTS

In general, the results of the survey indicate that there is a large heterogeneity in management of patients with PV across these areas.

CONCLUSIONS

While helping to provide greater understanding of treatment patterns for patients with PV in Italy, our survey highlights the need for additional clinical studies to obtain more precise guidance for the routine care of patients with PV.

Current evidence on the use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Thromboembolic events in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity, in which vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been used mostly. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). With the adoption of data from CAT and VTE, the usage of DOACs in MPNs is increasing.

AREAS COVERED

In this paper, we performed a systematic review to the current literature regarding the usage of DOACs in MPNs. Eleven studies involving 944 patients were included. The reasons for initiating DOACs were secondary prophylaxis for thrombosis (arterial or venous) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in 562 and 382 patients, respectively. A total of 84 (8.9%) recurrent thrombotic (arterial or venous) events recorded. Forty-six (8.1%) events occurred in the thrombosis group (arterial or venous) and 38 (9.9%) events occurred in patients with AF.

EXPERT OPINION

Ease of management and patient comfort should be regarded as benefits of DOACs compared to VKAs. However, it would be appropriate to bring an individualized approach until we obtain high-quality data with prospectively designed studies involving more patients and longer follow-up time concerning the use of DOACs in patients with MPNs.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Polycythemia Vera: Is It Time to Rethink Treatment?

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by excessive myeloid cells production, mostly secondary to mutations in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene. PV natural history might be burdened by thrombotic events (TEs) and evolution into post-PV myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) or blast phase (BP). To date, no treatment strategies have been shown to have disease modifying effects, so therapy is directed at preventing TEs. All patients require phlebotomies (PHLs) to keep hematocrit below 45% and once-daily low dose aspirin (if not contraindicated). Apart from patients at "high risk" because of age over 60 years or a thrombosis history, cytoreductive therapies (CT) should be given to patients with relevant signs of myeloproliferation or intolerance to PHLs. Approved choices both for first and second line CT are hydroxyurea (HU) and pegylated forms of interferon (peg-IFN), the latter probably being better for young patients, and subjects without critical and recent vascular events or massive splenomegaly. The JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is the treatment of choice in case of resistance/intolerance to HU, with proved efficacy in terms of thrombotic prevention. Data are too preliminary to consider CT for "low risk" PV cases, but ropeg-IFN is being studied in this setting with a short follow-up. A careful monitoring for signs of evolution into PPV-MF is fundamental for optimizing patient management.

An alternative dosing strategy for ropeginterferon alfa-2b may help improve outcomes in myeloproliferative neoplasms: An overview of previous and ongoing studies with perspectives on the future

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a novel, long-acting mono-pegylated proline-IFN-alpha-2b approved for treatment of polycythemia vera in adults, regardless of thrombotic risk level or treatment history. Clinical trial data indicate the dose and titration of ropeginterferon alfa-2b is safe and effective. However, additional studies may provide rationale for an amended, higher initial dosage and rapid titration. This article is an overview of current and upcoming studies of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in myeloproliferative neoplasms that support the exploration of an amended dosing scheme in order to optimize patient tolerability and efficacy outcomes.

Molecular Genetics of Thrombotic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Implications in Precision Oncology

Classical BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) include polycythaemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia, and primary myelofibrosis. Unlike monogenic disorders, a more complicated series of genetic mutations are believed to be responsible for MPN with various degrees of thromboembolic and bleeding complications. Thrombosis is one of the early manifestations in patients with MPN. To date, the driver genes responsible for MPN include JAK2, CALR, MPL, TET2, ASXL1, and MTHFR. Affords have been done to elucidate these mutations and the incidence of thromboembolic events. Several lines of evidence indicate that mutations in JAK2, MPL, TET2 and ASXL1 gene and polymorphisms in several clotting factors (GPIa, GPIIa, and GPIIIa) are associated with the occurrence and prevalence of thrombosis in MPN patients. Some polymorphisms within XRCC1, FBG, F2, F5, F7, F12, MMP9, HPA5, MTHFR, SDF-1, FAS, FASL, TERT, ACE, and TLR4 genes may also play a role in MPN manifestation. This review aims to provide an insightful overview on the genetic perspective of thrombotic complications in patients with MPN.

The international consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute Leukemias: myeloproliferative neoplasms

A group of international experts, including hematopathologists, oncologists, and geneticists were recently summoned (September 2021, Chicago, IL, USA) to update the 2016/17 World Health Organization classification system for hematopoietic tumors. After careful deliberation, the group introduced the new International Consensus Classification (ICC) for Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias. This current in-depth review focuses on the ICC-2022 category of JAK2 mutation-prevalent myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, primary myelofibrosis, and MPN, unclassifiable. The ICC MPN subcommittee chose to preserve the primary role of bone marrow morphology in disease classification and diagnostics, while also acknowledging the complementary role of genetic markers for establishing clonality, facilitating MPN subtype designation, and disease prognostication.