Are patients with limb and head tremor a clinically distinct subtype of essential tremor?

Dynamic functional changes upon thalamotomy in essential tremor depend on baseline brain morphometry

Patients with drug-resistant essential tremor (ET) may undergo Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgical thalamotomy (SRS-T), where the ventro-intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim) is lesioned by focused beams of gamma radiations to induce clinical improvement. Here, we studied SRS-T impacts on left Vim dynamic functional connectivity (dFC, n = 23 ET patients scanned before and 1 year after intervention), and on surface-based morphometric brain features (n = 34 patients, including those from dFC analysis). In matched healthy controls (HCs), three dFC states were extracted from resting-state functional MRI data. In ET patients, state 1 spatial stability increased upon SRS-T (F1,22 = 19.13, p = 0.004). More frequent expression of state 3 over state 1 before SRS-T correlated with greater clinical recovery in a way that depended on the MR signature volume (t6 = 4.6, p = 0.004). Lower pre-intervention spatial variability in state 3 expression also did (t6 = - 4.24, p = 0.005) and interacted with the presence of familial ET so that these patients improved less (t6 = 4.14, p = 0.006). ET morphometric profiles showed significantly lower similarity to HCs in 13 regions upon SRS-T (z ≤ - 3.66, p ≤ 0.022), and a joint analysis revealed that before thalamotomy, morphometric similarity and states 2/3 mean spatial similarity to HCs were anticorrelated, a relationship that disappeared upon SRS-T (z ≥ 4.39, p < 0.001). Our results show that left Vim functional dynamics directly relates to upper limb tremor lowering upon intervention, while morphometry instead has a supporting role in reshaping such dynamics.

Cognitive impairment in essential tremor assessed by the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale

Background

Essential tremor (ET) is a movement disorder characterized by cerebellar neurodegenerative changes. ET is also associated with non-motor symptoms including cognitive impairment. The neuropsychologic profile of a patient with ET could relate to cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS).

Objective

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of cognitive impairment in patients with ET and identify whether the cognitive impairment in ET corresponds to a CCAS.

Methods

Cognitive functions were evaluated with the CCAS-Scale (CCAS-S) in 20 patients with ET and 20 controls matched for age, sex, and level of education. The results of the CCAS-S were compared between patients and controls. The underlying determinant of CCAS inpatients with ET was identified through the correlation between the results of the CCAS-S and age at onset of symptoms, disease duration, and the Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS).

Results

On a group level, ET patients performed significantly worse than matched controls. In total, 13 individuals with ET had a definite CCAS (CCAS-S failed items ≥ 3). ASO and TETRAS scores significantly correlated with CCAS-S performances in ET patients.

Conclusion

CCAS is highly prevalent in patients with ET which supports the cerebellar pathophysiology of associated cognitive impairment and supports a more systematic use of the CCAS-S to cognitively assessed patients with ET.

Exploring the heterogeneous morphometric data in essential tremor with probabilistic modelling

Essential tremor (ET) is a prevalent movement disorder characterized by marked clinical heterogeneity. Here, we explored the morphometric underpinnings of this cross-subject variability on a cohort of 34 patients with right-dominant drug-resistant ET and 29 matched healthy controls (HCs). For each brain region, group-wise morphometric data was modelled by a multivariate Gaussian to account for morphometric features' (co)variance. No group differences were found in terms of mean values, highlighting the limits of more basic group comparison approaches. Variance in surface area was higher in ET in the left lingual and caudal anterior cingulate cortices, while variance in mean curvature was lower in the right superior temporal cortex and pars triangularis, left supramarginal gyrus and bilateral paracentral gyrus. Heterogeneity further extended to the right putamen, for which a mixture of two Gaussians fitted the ET data better than a single one. Partial Least Squares analysis revealed the rich clinical relevance of the ET population's heterogeneity: first, increased head tremor and longer symptoms' duration were accompanied by broadly lower cortical gyrification. Second, more severe upper limb tremor and impairments in daily life activities characterized the patients whose morphometric profiles were more atypical compared to the average ET population, irrespective of the exact nature of the alterations. Our results provide candidate morphometric substrates for two different types of clinical variability in ET. They also demonstrate the importance of relying on analytical approaches that can efficiently handle multivariate data and enable to test more sophisticated hypotheses regarding its organization.

Is essential tremor a family of diseases or a syndrome? A family of diseases

It is now well-established that essential tremor (ET) can manifest with different clinical presentations and progressions (i.e., upper limb tremor, head tremor, voice tremor, lower limb tremor, task- or position-specific tremor, or a combination of those). Common traits and overlaps are identifiable across these different subtypes of ET, including a slow rate of progression, a response to alcohol and a positive family history. At the same time, each of these manifestations are associated with specific demographic, clinical and treatment-response characteristics suggesting a family of diseases rather than a spectrum of a syndrome. Here we summarize the most important clinical, demographic, neuropathological and imagingfeatures of ET and of its subtypes to support ET as a family of identifiable conditions. This classification has relevance for counseling of patients with regard to disease progression and treatment response, as well as for the design of therapeutic clinical trials.

Tremor Syndromes: An Updated Review

Tremor is the most commonly encountered movement disorder in clinical practice. A wide range of pathologies may manifest with tremor either as a presenting or predominant symptom. Considering the marked etiological and phenomenological heterogeneity, it would be desirable to develop a classification of tremors that reflects their underlying pathophysiology. The tremor task force of the International Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorders Society has worked toward this goal and proposed a new classification system. This system has remained a prime topic of scientific communications on tremor in recent times. The new classification is based on two axes: 1. based on the clinical features, history, and tremor characteristics and 2. based on the etiology of tremor. In this article, we discuss the key aspects of the new classification, review various tremor syndromes, highlight some of the controversies in the field of tremor, and share the potential future perspectives.

Non-motor symptoms are associated with midline tremor in essential tremor

OBJECTIVES

Essential tremor (ET) patients presenting tremor in the midline structures may be a distinct subtype of the syndrome. Therefore, we sought to explore the clinical manifestations, especially non-motor symptoms (NMS) of Chinese ET patients with midline tremor (MT).

METHODS

In the cross-sectional study, we grouped 290 definite or probable ET patients based on their MT conditions. The NMS in ET patients were evaluated using the NMS scale (NMSS). NMS and other clinical correlates were then compared among subgroups with, and without MT.

RESULTS

We revealed that 39.0%, 27.6%, and 6.9% of the patients respectively had neck, voice, and facial tremors. With the accumulation of tremor in midline structures, NMS became more severe and prevalent. Logistic regression analyses revealed that factors such as: female gender (OR = 2.164, 95% CI: 1.307-3.583), having least or highest action arm tremor (OR = 2.512, 95% CI: 1.520-4.151), having higher score of sleep/fatigue domain (OR = 1.692, 95% CI: 1.004-2.850) and mood/apathy (OR = 1.926, 95% CI: 1.143-3.246) domain, to be independently associated with MT manifestation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the heterogeneity of symptoms in ET patients with MT, especially in prominent NMS. In addition, the discrepancy of NMS between patients with, and without MT provides novel insight into the underlying pathophysiology and therapeutic of ET.

Do We Belittle Essential Tremor by Calling It a Syndrome Rather Than a Disease? Yes

Essential tremor (ET) is among the most prevalent neurological diseases. Appreciation in recent years of a richer tremor phenomenology, additional motor and non-motor features, variability in the natural course of tremor, associations with a host of other neurological conditions, and etiological and pathophysiological heterogeneity have resulted in general awareness of the clinical richness of ET. Along with this evolving view of ET have surfaced several conundrums regarding nomenclature. One of these is whether ET should be labeled a "syndrome" or "disease." Here, we revisit the classical definitions of "syndrome" and "disease" and discuss ET in this context. Considering the characteristics of "disease" and "syndrome" and evaluating the characteristics of ET, it seems to fit more into the "disease" construct. There are several reasons: There is considerable knowledge of the underlying etiologies and pathophysiology of ET, in numerous studies ET has been linked with other neurological conditions, the condition is progressive and deteriorative, and therapeutic approaches are grounded in an understanding of disease mechanisms and its associated neuroanatomy. Moreover, the etiological-pathological-clinical heterogeneity suggests that ET should be regarded as a "family of diseases" more appropriately termed "the essential tremors." This nomenclatural issue is not a mere matter of words; public health implications are numerous. A condition with the label "syndrome" may not be recognized as a serious problem, may be plagued by diminished public awareness, and may not garner funds for research that a condition with the label "disease" or "diseases" would. ET should be regarded as a family of diseases.

Dystonia and Tremor: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Dystonia Coalition Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical manifestations and predictors of different types of tremors in individuals with different types of isolated dystonia.

METHODS

Clinical manifestations of tremor were assessed in a multicenter, international cross-sectional, cohort study of 2,362 individuals with all types of isolated dystonia (focal, segmental, multifocal, and generalized) recruited through the Dystonia Coalition.

RESULTS

Methodical and standardized assessments of all participants in this cohort revealed the overall prevalence of any type of tremor was 53.3%. The prevalence of dystonic tremor varied from 36.9% to 48.4%, depending on criteria used to define it. To identify the factors associated with tremors in dystonia, the data were analyzed by generalized linear modeling and cluster analyses. Generalized linear modeling indicated 2 of the strongest factors associated with tremor included body region affected by dystonia and recruitment center. Tremor was also associated with severity of dystonia and duration of dystonia, but not with sex or race. The cluster analysis distinguished 8 subgroups within the whole cohort; defined largely by body region with dystonia, and secondarily by other clinical characteristics.

CONCLUSION

The large number of cases evaluated by an international team of movement disorder experts facilitated the dissection of several important factors that influence the apparent prevalence and phenomenology of tremor in dystonia. These results are valuable for understanding the many differences reported in prior studies, and for guiding future studies of the nosology of tremor and dystonia.

Prodromal Markers of Parkinson's Disease in Patients With Essential Tremor

Background: Essential tremor (ET) is manifested as an isolated syndrome of bilateral upper limb action tremor. Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, with typical motor symptoms of bradykinesia, rigidity, and resting tremor. ET-PD describes the new-onset of PD in ET patients. Recently, numerous studies on epidemiology, genetics, pathology, clinical features, and neuroimaging studies are challenging the idea that ET is an isolated disease, suggesting that patients with ET have the tendency to develop PD. Methods: In this review article, we collected recent findings that reveal prodromal markers of PD in patients with ET. Results: Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity serves as a prodromal marker for predicting the development of PD in patients with ET and provides a reference for therapeutic strategies. Additional potential markers include other neuroimaging, clinical features, heart rate, and genetics, whereas others lack sufficient evidence. Conclusion: In consideration of the limited research of PD in patients with ET, we are still far from revealing the prodromal markers. However, from the existing follow-up studies on ET patients, Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity may enable further exploration of the relationship between ET and PD and the search for pathogenesis-based therapies.

Essential tremor-plus: a controversial new concept

In addition to redefining essential tremor (ET), the 2018 consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor coined a new term: essential tremor-plus (ET-plus). This term is uncertainly defined as tremor with the characteristics of ET, with additional neurological signs of uncertain clinical significance. If ET-plus had been defined on the basis of a difference in underlying pathology or an appreciable difference in prognosis, it would have a valid, scientific rationale, as does the term Parkinson-plus. However, there is no such evidence, so the basis for the term is questionable. In fact, ET-plus might only represent a state condition (ie, patients with ET might develop these additional clinical features when the disease is at a more advanced stage). We caution against coining new terms that are not supported by a firm scientific basis and encourage research into the creation of essential tremor subsets that are defined with respect to differences in underlying causes or pathophysiology.

Essential tremor pathology: neurodegeneration and reorganization of neuronal connections

Essential tremor (ET) is the most common tremor disorder globally and is characterized by kinetic tremor of the upper limbs, although other clinical features can also occur. Postmortem studies are a particularly important avenue for advancing our understanding of the pathogenesis of ET; however, until recently, the number of such studies has been limited. Several recent postmortem studies have made important contributions to our understanding of the pathological changes that take place in ET. These studies identified abnormalities in the cerebellum, which primarily affected Purkinje cells (PCs), basket cells and climbing fibres, in individuals with ET. We suggest that some of these pathological changes (for example, focal PC axonal swellings, swellings in and regression of the PC dendritic arbor and PC death) are likely to be primary and degenerative. By contrast, other changes, such as an increase in PC recurrent axonal collateral formation and hypertrophy of GABAergic basket cell axonal processes, could be compensatory responses to restore cerebellar GABAergic tone and cerebellar cortical inhibitory efficacy. Such compensatory responses are likely to be insufficient, enabling the disease to progress. Here, we review the results of recent postmortem studies of ET and attempt to place these findings into an anatomical-physiological disease model.

Which disease features run in essential tremor families? A systematic review

Essential tremor is a common and highly heritable movement disorder. It is largely unknown, however, to what extent family members share overlapping symptoms. Such knowledge would be useful, as it may lead to the definition of familial essential tremor phenotypes, which will aid the ongoing search for genotypes. Also, this information can be used by clinicians in patient counselling. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to provide an overview of the evidence on which essential tremor features run in families, to assess the literature's strengths and weaknesses, and to provide recommendations for future studies. PubMed was searched resulting in 460 titles: sixteen articles ultimately proved fit for inclusion. The results are represented in line with the Axis 1 classification of tremor as published in the latest Consensus Statement. In summary, we found varying levels of positive evidence for familial aggregation of age at onset, disease progression, alcohol responsiveness, parkinsonism and dystonia. Evidence on midline tremor was conflicting. The evidence on familial clustering was negative for cerebellar signs and action tremor asymmetry. Although the level of evidence is modest, it seems that some disease features are indeed familial, while other features are not. We discuss complicating factors, such as state-vs-trait dependency of characteristics, the place of familial dystonia, and the development of diagnostic criteria for essential tremor over time. In the future, comprehensive replication studies are needed, with the addition of several characteristics that have not been investigated so far, as the next step towards discovery of essential tremor phenotypes.

Relationship between jerky and sinusoidal oscillations in cervical dystonia

INTRODUCTION

Dystonia is often associated with repetitive jerky oscillations (i.e. dystonic tremor), while tremor is characterized by sinusoidal oscillations. We propose two competing predictions for dystonic tremor and sinusoidal tremor relationship. In any given patient, (1) the oscillation could be characterized as either sinusoidal or jerky based on the degree of distortion in the waveforms, (2) the oscillation consists of both sinusoidal and jerky waveforms mixed in a certain proportion that varies among individuals. We objectively test these predictions in patients with cervical dystonia.

METHODS

We recorded head oscillations in 14 subjects with cervical dystonia using a high-resolution magnetic field search coil system. Distortion in the signal was used as a measure of jerkiness. A hierarchical clustering classified the oscillations based on distortion characteristics.

RESULTS

Signal analysis in the frequency domain allowed identification of the components of the waveforms at frequencies other than the fundamental frequency. The distortion from the component at fundamental frequency was present in both low and high frequency range. Based on varying levels of distortions, i.e. jerkiness, the head oscillations were grouped into 4 clusters: one cluster with lowest distortion (sinusoidal waveforms), one cluster with highest distortion (jerky waveforms), and two intermediate clusters - one with distortion at low frequency and another with distortion at high frequency. The distribution of 4 clusters varied across subjects suggesting co-existence of sinusoidal and jerky waveforms.

CONCLUSION

These results support the prediction that jerky and sinusoidal waveforms concur in cervical dystonia. Amount of concurrence varies amongst patients.

Phenotypic Variability of Essential Tremor Based on the Age at Onset

Background: Essential tremor (ET) is reported to have a bimodal distribution of age at onset (AAO) with phenotypic variability based on the AAO. This study aims to explore the distribution of AAO based on mathematical modeling and ascertain the differences, if any, in the clinical features of groups. Methods: A chart review was conducted for 252 patients with ET diagnosed based on the Consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on Tremor. Finite mixture modeling was performed to identify groups of the cohort based on the AAO. Results: Three groups were defined: early onset (EO): AAO ≤ 22 years, n = 63, intermediate onset (IO): 23 ≤ AAO ≤ 35 years, n = 43, and late onset (LO): AAO ≥ 36 years, n = 146. There were no significant differences related to family history or responsiveness to alcohol. The EO group had significantly higher prevalence of upper limb and lower limb tremor. Head tremor and voice tremor was more prevalent in the IO and LO groups. Cerebellar signs showed a significant increase with an increase in AAO. Conclusions: ET shows significant phenotypic variability based on the AAO. Patients with an early AAO are more likely to develop an appendicular tremor, whereas the probability of axial tremor and cerebellar signs increases with increasing AAO.

Transient, Isolated Head Tremor in "Unaffected" Individuals: Is Essential Tremor an Even More Prevalent Disease Than We Suppose?

Background: Mild and transient head tremor may sometimes be observed in otherwise tremor-free relatives of essential tremor (ET) cases, although its prevalence is unclear. A diagnostic question is whether this transient, isolated head tremor, often observed as no more than a wobble, is an early manifestation of ET or whether it is a normal finding. A direct comparison with controls is needed.

Methods: Two hundred and forty-one first-degree relatives of ET cases (FD-ET) and 77 spousal controls (Co) were enrolled in a study of ET. Each underwent a detailed evaluation that included a tremor history and videotaped neurological examination. None of the enrollees reported tremor, had a prior diagnosis of ET, or had significant tremor on screening spirals. All videotaped examinations were initially reviewed by a movement disorder neurologist blinded to subject type, and among those with head tremor on examination, co-reviewed by two additional movement disorders neurologists.

Results: Twenty-six (10.8, 95% Confidence interval [CI] = 7.5–15.3%) of 241 FD-ET vs. 2 (2.6, 95% CI = 0.7–9.0%) of 77 Co had isolated, transient head tremor (odds ratio = 4.54, 95% CI = 1.05–19.57, p = 0.04). No enrollee had significant upper extremity tremor and none met inclusion criteria for ET based on the presence of upper extremity tremor. With one exception, head tremor occurred during or after phonation. It was always transient (generally a single back and forth wobble) and rare (observed briefly on one or two occasions during the videotaped examination) and had a faster frequency, lower amplitude and a different quality than voluntary head shaking.

Conclusion: The basis for the observed isolated head tremor is unknown, but it could be an early feature of ET in ET families.Indeed, one-in-ten otherwise unaffected first-degree relatives of ET cases exhibited such tremor. To a far lesser extent it was also observed in “unaffected” controls. In both, it is likely a sign of early, emerging, undiagnosed ET, although follow-up studies are needed to confirm this. If it were ET, it would indicate that the prevalence of ET may be considerably higher than previously suspected.

Resting-state fMRI study on drug-naive patients of essential tremor with and without head tremor

This study used resting-state functional MRI (r-fMRI) to evaluate intrinsic brain activity in drug-naive patients with essential tremor (ET) with and without head tremor. We enrolled 20 patients with ET with hand and head tremor (h-ET), 27 patients with ET without head tremor (a-ET), and 27 healthy controls (HCs). All participants underwent r-fMRI scans on a 3-T MR system. The amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) of blood oxygen level-dependent signals was used to characterize regional cerebral function. We identified increased ALFF value in the bilateral posterior lobe of cerebellum in the h-ET patients relative to a-ET and HCs and demonstrated that h-ET is related to abnormalities in the cerebello-cortical areas, while the a-ET is related to abnormalities in the thalamo-cortical areas. In addition, we observed the ALFF abnormality in the cerebellum (left cerebellum VIII and right cerebellum VI) correlated with the tremor score in h-ET patients and abnormal ALFF in the left precentral gyrus correlated with the age at onset and disease duration in h-ET patients. These findings may be helpful for facilitating further understanding of the potential mechanisms underlying different subtypes of ET.

Tremor

Tremor is a phenomenon observed in a broad spectrum of diseases with different pathophysiologies. While patients with tremor may not complain in the clinic of symptoms of imbalance, gait difficulties, or falls, laboratory research studies using quantitative analysis of gait and posture and neurophysiologic techniques have demonstrated impaired gait and balance across a variety of tremor etiologies. These findings have been supported by careful epidemiologic studies assessing symptoms of imbalance. Imaging and neurophysiologic studies have identified cerebellar networks as important mediators of tremor, and therefore a likely common site of dysfunction to explain the phenomenologic overlap between impaired postural and gait control with tremor. Further understanding of these mechanisms and networks is of crucial importance in the development of new treatments, particularly surgical or minimally invasive lesional therapies.

The Olivary Hypothesis of Essential Tremor: Time to Lay this Model to Rest?

BACKGROUND

Although essential tremor (ET) is the most common tremor disorder, its pathogenesis is not fully understood. The traditional model of ET, proposed in the early 1970s, posited that the inferior olivary nucleus (ION) was the prime generator of tremor in ET and that ET is a disorder of electrophysiological derangement, much like epilepsy. This article comprehensively reviews the origin and basis of this model, its merits and problems, and discusses whether it is time to lay this model to rest.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed in March 2017 to identify articles for this review.

RESULTS

The olivary model gains support from the recognition of neurons with pacemaker property in the ION and the harmaline-induced tremor models (as the ION is the prime target of harmaline). However, the olivary model is problematic, as neurons with pacemaker property are not specific to the ION and the harmaline model does not completely represent the human disease ET. In addition, a large number of neuroimaging studies in ET have not detected structural or functional changes in the ION; rather, abnormalities have been reported in structures related to the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network. Moreover, a post-mortem study of microscopic changes in the ION did not detect any differences between ET cases and controls.

DISCUSSION

The olivary model largely remains a physiological construct. Numerous observations have cast considerable doubt as to the validity of this model in ET. Given the limitations of the model, we conclude that it is time now to lay this model to rest.

Topography of essential tremor

INTRODUCTION

Topography of tremor manifestations is poorly investigated in essential tremor. The present study explores the prevalence and clinical correlates of head and/or voice tremor in essential tremor.

METHODS

Out of a prospectively designed registry of 972 patients, 884 patients with definite and probable essential tremor had complete information on tremor localization. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared among four subgroups: group A (without head or voice tremor, n = 619), B (with head but without voice tremor, n = 155), C (with voice but without head tremor, n = 47), and D (with both head and voice tremor, n = 63).

RESULTS

In our patients, total prevalence of tremor was 24.7% for head, 12.4% for voice and 7.1% for the combination of head and voice. Logistic regression analyses showed that female gender is strongly associated with head tremor, which was confirmed by an additional meta-analysis. Severe hand tremor was the only factor associated with voice tremor. Both female gender and severe hand tremor increase the odds for having the combination of head and voice tremor. For males, hand tremor severity is significantly increased among those with head and voice tremor alone and in combination, but for females only for the combination. Patients with both head and voice tremor have more frequent involvement of legs and other localizations and are less responsive to β-blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

Female gender and severe hand tremor may increase the odds of head and/or voice tremor in essential tremor. The association of hand tremor severity with midline tremor is stronger for males than females.

Early Head Tremor in Essential Tremor: A Case Series and Commentary

BACKGROUND

Classically, the onset of head tremor in essential tremor (ET) patients follows that of hand tremor, such that there is a somatotopic spread of involved areas. Here we present a series of seven self-reportedly "unaffected" relatives of ET cases. These seven were clinically asymptomatic and had normal levels of arm tremor on examination, yet each evidenced a transient head wobble on examination. We estimate the prevalence of this phenotype within the two studies from which cases were ascertained.

METHODS

ET cases and their self-reportedly affected and unaffected relatives, enrolled in two family studies, underwent a medical history and videotaped neurological examination.

RESULTS

In seven self-reportedly "unaffected" relatives, a transient and subtle head wobble was seen, always during sustained phonation, speech, or reading aloud. Total tremor score (a measure of arm tremor) ranged from 5 to 12 (i.e., mild tremor within the range of normal). The prevalence of this phenotype of early head tremor was 3.7% in one study and 23.1% in the other.

DISCUSSION

We present a series of seven individuals who had early head tremor in an evolving transition state from normal to ET. These cases raise a number of broad clinical, phenotypic, and pathophysiological issues about ET.