1
|
Parasayan O, Laurelut C, Bôle C, Bonnabel L, Corona A, Domenech-Jaulneau C, Paresys C, Richard I, Grange T, Geigl EM. Late Neolithic collective burial reveals admixture dynamics during the third millennium BCE and the shaping of the European genome. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024; 10:eadl2468. [PMID: 38896620 PMCID: PMC11186501 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adl2468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
The third millennium BCE was a pivotal period of profound cultural and genomic transformations in Europe associated with migrations from the Pontic-Caspian steppe, which shaped the ancestry patterns in the present-day European genome. We performed a high-resolution whole-genome analysis including haplotype phasing of seven individuals of a collective burial from ~2500 cal BCE and of a Bell Beaker individual from ~2300 cal BCE in the Paris Basin in France. The collective burial revealed the arrival in real time of steppe ancestry in France. We reconstructed the genome of an unsampled individual through its relatives' genomes, enabling us to shed light on the early-stage admixture patterns, dynamics, and propagation of steppe ancestry in Late Neolithic Europe. We identified two major Neolithic/steppe-related ancestry admixture pulses around 3000/2900 BCE and 2600 BCE. These pulses suggest different population expansion dynamics with striking links to the Corded Ware and Bell Beaker cultural complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oğuzhan Parasayan
- Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Institut Jacques Monod, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Christophe Laurelut
- INRAP Grand Est, Châlons-en-Champagne, France
- UMR 8215 Trajectoires (CNRS-University Paris I), Paris, France
| | - Christine Bôle
- Genomics Core Facility, Institut Imagine-Structure Fédérative de Recherche Necker, INSERM U1163 et INSERM US24/CNRS UAR3633, Paris Descartes Sorbonne Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Alois Corona
- Service archéologique interdépartemental, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Cynthia Domenech-Jaulneau
- Service Régional, Direction Régionale des Affaires culturelles d’Île-de-France, UMR 8215 Trajectoires (CNRS-University Paris I), Paris, France
| | - Cécile Paresys
- INRAP Grand Est, Châlons-en-Champagne, France
- UMR 6472 CEPAM (CNRS-Nice University), Nice, France
| | - Isabelle Richard
- INRAP Grand Est, Châlons-en-Champagne, France
- UMR 6472 CEPAM (CNRS-Nice University), Nice, France
| | - Thierry Grange
- Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Institut Jacques Monod, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Eva-Maria Geigl
- Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Institut Jacques Monod, F-75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kondor D, Bennett JS, Gronenborn D, Antunes N, Hoyer D, Turchin P. Explaining population booms and busts in Mid-Holocene Europe. Sci Rep 2023; 13:9310. [PMID: 37291136 PMCID: PMC10250413 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35920-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Archaeological evidence suggests that the population dynamics of Mid-Holocene (Late Mesolithic to Initial Bronze Age, ca. 7000-3000 BCE) Europe are characterized by recurrent booms and busts of regional settlement and occupation density. These boom-bust patterns are documented in the temporal distribution of 14C dates and in archaeological settlement data from regional studies. We test two competing hypotheses attempting to explain these dynamics: climate forcing and social dynamics leading to inter-group conflict. Using the framework of spatially-explicit agent-based models, we translated these hypotheses into a suite of explicit computational models, derived quantitative predictions for population fluctuations, and compared these predictions to data. We demonstrate that climate variation during the European Mid-Holocene is unable to explain the quantitative features (average periodicities and amplitudes) of observed boom-bust dynamics. In contrast, scenarios with social dynamics encompassing density-dependent conflict produce population patterns with time scales and amplitudes similar to those observed in the data. These results suggest that social processes, including violent conflict, played a crucial role in the shaping of population dynamics of European Mid-Holocene societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Daniel Hoyer
- Evolution Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
- George Brown College, Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Buikstra JE, DeWitte SN, Agarwal SC, Baker BJ, Bartelink EJ, Berger E, Blevins KE, Bolhofner K, Boutin AT, Brickley MB, Buzon MR, de la Cova C, Goldstein L, Gowland R, Grauer AL, Gregoricka LA, Halcrow SE, Hall SA, Hillson S, Kakaliouras AM, Klaus HD, Knudson KJ, Knüsel CJ, Larsen CS, Martin DL, Milner GR, Novak M, Nystrom KC, Pacheco-Forés SI, Prowse TL, Robbins Schug G, Roberts CA, Rothwell JE, Santos AL, Stojanowski C, Stone AC, Stull KE, Temple DH, Torres CM, Toyne JM, Tung TA, Ullinger J, Wiltschke-Schrotta K, Zakrzewski SR. Twenty-first century bioarchaeology: Taking stock and moving forward. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 2022; 178 Suppl 74:54-114. [PMID: 36790761 DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
This article presents outcomes from a Workshop entitled "Bioarchaeology: Taking Stock and Moving Forward," which was held at Arizona State University (ASU) on March 6-8, 2020. Funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the School of Human Evolution and Social Change (ASU), and the Center for Bioarchaeological Research (CBR, ASU), the Workshop's overall goal was to explore reasons why research proposals submitted by bioarchaeologists, both graduate students and established scholars, fared disproportionately poorly within recent NSF Anthropology Program competitions and to offer advice for increasing success. Therefore, this Workshop comprised 43 international scholars and four advanced graduate students with a history of successful grant acquisition, primarily from the United States. Ultimately, we focused on two related aims: (1) best practices for improving research designs and training and (2) evaluating topics of contemporary significance that reverberate through history and beyond as promising trajectories for bioarchaeological research. Among the former were contextual grounding, research question/hypothesis generation, statistical procedures appropriate for small samples and mixed qualitative/quantitative data, the salience of Bayesian methods, and training program content. Topical foci included ethics, social inequality, identity (including intersectionality), climate change, migration, violence, epidemic disease, adaptability/plasticity, the osteological paradox, and the developmental origins of health and disease. Given the profound changes required globally to address decolonization in the 21st century, this concern also entered many formal and informal discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E Buikstra
- Center for Bioarchaeological Research, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Sharon N DeWitte
- Department of Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sabrina C Agarwal
- Department of Anthropology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Brenda J Baker
- Center for Bioarchaeological Research, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Eric J Bartelink
- Department of Anthropology, California State University, Chico, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth Berger
- Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, California, USA
| | | | - Katelyn Bolhofner
- School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Alexis T Boutin
- Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California, USA
| | - Megan B Brickley
- Department of Anthropology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michele R Buzon
- Department of Anthropology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Carlina de la Cova
- Department of Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Lynne Goldstein
- Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Anne L Grauer
- Department of Anthropology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Lesley A Gregoricka
- Department of Sociology, Anthropology, & Social Work, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA
| | - Siân E Halcrow
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Sarah A Hall
- Center for Bioarchaeological Research, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Simon Hillson
- Institute of Archaeology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ann M Kakaliouras
- Department of Anthropology, Whittier College, Whittier, California, USA
| | - Haagen D Klaus
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| | - Kelly J Knudson
- Center for Bioarchaeological Research, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Christopher J Knüsel
- Préhistoire à l'Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie, University of Bordeaux, CNRS, MC, PACEA, UMR5199, F-33615, Pessac, France
| | | | - Debra L Martin
- Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| | - George R Milner
- Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mario Novak
- Center for Applied Bioanthropology, Institute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Kenneth C Nystrom
- Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at New Paltz, New Paltz, New York, USA
| | | | - Tracy L Prowse
- Department of Anthropology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gwen Robbins Schug
- Environmental Health Program, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Jessica E Rothwell
- Center for Bioarchaeological Research, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Ana Luisa Santos
- Research Centre for Anthropology and Health (CIAS), Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Christopher Stojanowski
- Center for Bioarchaeological Research, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Anne C Stone
- Center for Bioarchaeological Research, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Kyra E Stull
- Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | - Daniel H Temple
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| | - Christina M Torres
- Department of Anthropology and Heritage Studies, University of California, Merced, USA, and Instituto de Arqueología y Antropología, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile
| | - J Marla Toyne
- Department of Anthropology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Tiffiny A Tung
- Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jaime Ullinger
- Bioanthropology Research Institute, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xiong J, Tao Y, Ben M, Yang Y, Du P, Allen E, Wang H, Xu Y, Yu Y, Meng H, Bao H, Zhou B, Chen G, Li H, Wen S. Uniparental Genetic Analyses Reveal Multi-Ethnic Background of Dunhuang Foyemiaowan Population (220–907 CE) With Typical Han Chinese Archaological Culture. Front Ecol Evol 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.901295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The relationship between archeological culture and ethnicity is invariably complex. This is especially the case for periods of national division and rapid inter-ethnic exchange, such as China’s Sixteen Kingdoms (304–439 CE) and Northern and Southern Dynasties (420–589 CE). Going by tomb shape and grave goods, the Foyemiaowan cemetery at Dunhuang exhibits a typical third–tenth century Han style. Despite this, the ethnic makeup of the Foyemiaowan population has remained unclear. We therefore analyzed 485 Y-chromosomal SNPs and entire mitochondrial genomes of 34 Foyemiaowan samples. Our study yielded the following discoveries: (1) principal component analysis revealed that the Foyemiaowan population was closely clustered with Tibeto-Burman populations on the paternal side and close to Mongolic-speaking populations on the maternal side; (2) lineage comparisons at the individual level showed that the Foyemiaowan population consisted of primarily Tibeto-Burman and Han Chinese related lineages (Oα-M117, 25%;Oβ-F46, 18.75%), partially Altaic speaking North Eurasian lineages (N-F1206, 18.75%) and a slight admixture of southern East Asian lineages (O1b1a2-Page59, 6.25%; O1b1a1-PK4, 3.13%). Similarly, the maternal gene pool of Foyemiaowan contained northern East Asian (A, 4.17%; CZ, 16.67%; D, 20.83%; G, 4.17%; M9, 4.17%), southern East Asian (B, 12.51%; F, 20.83%) and western Eurasian (H, 4.17%; J, 4.17%) related lineages; (3) we discovered a relatively high genetic diversity among the Foyemiaowan population (0.891) in our ancient reference populations, indicating a complex history of population admixture. Archeological findings, stable isotope analysis and historical documents further corroborated our results. Although in this period China’s central government had relinquished control of the Hexi Corridor and regional non-Han regimes became the dominant regional power, Foyemiaowan’s inhabitants remained strongly influenced by Han culture.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rio J, Quilodrán CS, Currat M. Spatially explicit paleogenomic simulations support cohabitation with limited admixture between Bronze Age Central European populations. Commun Biol 2021; 4:1163. [PMID: 34621003 PMCID: PMC8497574 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02670-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The Bronze Age is a complex period of social, cultural and economic changes. Recent paleogenomic studies have documented a large and rapid genetic change in early Bronze Age populations from Central Europe. However, the detailed demographic and genetic processes involved in this change are still debated. Here we have used spatially explicit simulations of genomic components to better characterize the demographic and migratory conditions that may have led to this change. We investigated various scenarios representing the expansion of pastoralists from the Pontic steppe, potentially linked to the Yamnaya cultural complex, and their interactions with local populations in Central Europe, considering various eco-evolutionary factors, such as population admixture, competition and long-distance dispersal. Our results do not support direct competition but rather the cohabitation of pastoralists and farmers in Central Europe, with limited gene flow between populations. They also suggest occasional long-distance migrations accompanying the expansion of pastoralists and a demographic decline in both populations following their initial contact. These results link recent archaeological and paleogenomic observations and move further the debate of genomic changes during the early Bronze Age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémy Rio
- Department of Genetics and Evolution - Anthropology Unit, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Claudio S Quilodrán
- Department of Genetics and Evolution - Anthropology Unit, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mathias Currat
- Department of Genetics and Evolution - Anthropology Unit, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
- Institute of Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (IGE3), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scorrano G, Yediay FE, Pinotti T, Feizabadifarahani M, Kristiansen K. The genetic and cultural impact of the Steppe migration into Europe. Ann Hum Biol 2021; 48:223-233. [PMID: 34459341 DOI: 10.1080/03014460.2021.1942984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the early 3rd millennium BCE migration from Pontic Steppe, mainly related to Yamnaya culture, has affected European populations both culturally and genetically, however, it has long been debated to what extent this migration was male-driven, and how this replacement process took place which eliminated partially/largely Neolithic male lines over time. AIM This paper aims to evaluate the influence of the Steppe migration on European Bronze Age populations by calculating both male and female genetic contributions of the Steppe-related ancestry to the European Bronze Age populations. With this approach, we will be able to clarify the hypotheses on whether it was male-biased migration or not. SUBJECTS AND METHODS To evaluate the genetic impact and the proportion of the Steppe-related ancestry to the European Bronze Age populations, we performed PCA and qpAdm analyses by using published genome-wide data. In addition, we quantified male and female genetic contribution into Europe by using the analysis of uniparental markers and the X-chromosome. RESULTS The Steppe migration had a considerable impact on the genetic makeup of the Bronze Age European populations. The data suggest that the Steppe-related ancestry arriving into Central Europe was male-driven, dominantly in the Corded Ware culture populations and lesser in the Bell Beaker populations. In fact, there is no evidence that this migration had a significant input on the mitochondrial genetic pool of all European Bronze Age populations. CONCLUSIONS Our analyses suggest that the Steppe-related ancestry had genetic impact on mainly Central-Eastern Europe. Moreover, this migration was male-driven for most of the Central European populations belonging to the Corded Ware groups, and to a lesser extent for the Bell Beaker groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Scorrano
- Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Fulya Eylem Yediay
- Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomaz Pinotti
- Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Laboratório de Biodiversidade e Evolução Molecular (LBEM), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | - Kristian Kristiansen
- Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Historical Studies, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Papac L, Ernée M, Dobeš M, Langová M, Rohrlach AB, Aron F, Neumann GU, Spyrou MA, Rohland N, Velemínský P, Kuna M, Brzobohatá H, Culleton B, Daněček D, Danielisová A, Dobisíková M, Hložek J, Kennett DJ, Klementová J, Kostka M, Krištuf P, Kuchařík M, Hlavová JK, Limburský P, Malyková D, Mattiello L, Pecinovská M, Petriščáková K, Průchová E, Stránská P, Smejtek L, Špaček J, Šumberová R, Švejcar O, Trefný M, Vávra M, Kolář J, Heyd V, Krause J, Pinhasi R, Reich D, Schiffels S, Haak W. Dynamic changes in genomic and social structures in third millennium BCE central Europe. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2021; 7:7/35/eabi6941. [PMID: 34433570 PMCID: PMC8386934 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi6941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Europe's prehistory oversaw dynamic and complex interactions of diverse societies, hitherto unexplored at detailed regional scales. Studying 271 human genomes dated ~4900 to 1600 BCE from the European heartland, Bohemia, we reveal unprecedented genetic changes and social processes. Major migrations preceded the arrival of "steppe" ancestry, and at ~2800 BCE, three genetically and culturally differentiated groups coexisted. Corded Ware appeared by 2900 BCE, were initially genetically diverse, did not derive all steppe ancestry from known Yamnaya, and assimilated females of diverse backgrounds. Both Corded Ware and Bell Beaker groups underwent dynamic changes, involving sharp reductions and complete replacements of Y-chromosomal diversity at ~2600 and ~2400 BCE, respectively, the latter accompanied by increased Neolithic-like ancestry. The Bronze Age saw new social organization emerge amid a ≥40% population turnover.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luka Papac
- Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany.
| | - Michal Ernée
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | - Miroslav Dobeš
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | - Michaela Langová
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | - Adam B Rohrlach
- Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Franziska Aron
- Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Gunnar U Neumann
- Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Maria A Spyrou
- Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Nadin Rohland
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Petr Velemínský
- Department of Anthropology, The National Museum, Prague, Cirkusová 1740, Prague 9, Horní Počernice, CZ 193 00, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Kuna
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Brzobohatá
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | - Brendan Culleton
- Institutes of Energy and the Environments, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - David Daněček
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
- Central Bohemian Museum in Roztoky u Prahy, Zámek 1, Roztoky, CZ 252 63, Czech Republic
| | - Alžběta Danielisová
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | - Miluše Dobisíková
- Department of Anthropology, The National Museum, Prague, Cirkusová 1740, Prague 9, Horní Počernice, CZ 193 00, Czech Republic
| | - Josef Hložek
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
- Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Philosophy and Arts, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Sedláčkova 38, Pilsen, CZ 301 00, Czech Republic
| | - Douglas J Kennett
- Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
| | - Jana Klementová
- Central Bohemian Museum in Roztoky u Prahy, Zámek 1, Roztoky, CZ 252 63, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Kostka
- The City of Prague Museum, Kožná 1/475, Prague 1, CZ 110 00, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Krištuf
- Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Philosophy and Arts, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Sedláčkova 38, Pilsen, CZ 301 00, Czech Republic
| | - Milan Kuchařík
- Labrys o.p.s., Hloubětínská 16/11, Prague 9, CZ 198 00, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Kuljavceva Hlavová
- Institute of Preservation of Archaeological Heritage of Northwest Bohemia, Jana Žižky 835, Most, CZ 434 01, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Limburský
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | - Drahomíra Malyková
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | - Lucia Mattiello
- Central Bohemian Archaeological Heritage Institute, Nad Olšinami 3/448, Prague 10, CZ 100 00, Czech Republic
| | - Monika Pecinovská
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | | | - Erika Průchová
- Institute of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Branišovská 31a, CZ 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
| | - Petra Stránská
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | - Lubor Smejtek
- Central Bohemian Archaeological Heritage Institute, Nad Olšinami 3/448, Prague 10, CZ 100 00, Czech Republic
| | - Jaroslav Špaček
- The Municipal Museum in Čelákovice (formerly), Komenského 1646, Čelákovice, CZ 250 88, Czech Republic (private)
| | - Radka Šumberová
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | - Ondřej Švejcar
- Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Letenská 4, Prague 1, CZ 118 01, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Trefný
- Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen/Nürnberg, Kochstrasse 4/18, DE 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Miloš Vávra
- Central Bohemian Archaeological Heritage Institute, Nad Olšinami 3/448, Prague 10, CZ 100 00, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Kolář
- Department of Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lidická 25/27, Brno 60200, Czech Republic
- Institute of Archaeology and Museology, Masaryk University, Arne Nováka 1, Brno 60200, Czech Republic
| | - Volker Heyd
- Department of Cultures/Archaeology, P.O. Box 59, Unioninkatu 38, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johannes Krause
- Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ron Pinhasi
- Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - David Reich
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Stephan Schiffels
- Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Haak
- Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany.
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saupe T, Montinaro F, Scaggion C, Carrara N, Kivisild T, D'Atanasio E, Hui R, Solnik A, Lebrasseur O, Larson G, Alessandri L, Arienzo I, De Angelis F, Rolfo MF, Skeates R, Silvestri L, Beckett J, Talamo S, Dolfini A, Miari M, Metspalu M, Benazzi S, Capelli C, Pagani L, Scheib CL. Ancient genomes reveal structural shifts after the arrival of Steppe-related ancestry in the Italian Peninsula. Curr Biol 2021; 31:2576-2591.e12. [PMID: 33974848 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Across Europe, the genetics of the Chalcolithic/Bronze Age transition is increasingly characterized in terms of an influx of Steppe-related ancestry. The effect of this major shift on the genetic structure of populations in the Italian Peninsula remains underexplored. Here, genome-wide shotgun data for 22 individuals from commingled cave and single burials in Northeastern and Central Italy dated between 3200 and 1500 BCE provide the first genomic characterization of Bronze Age individuals (n = 8; 0.001-1.2× coverage) from the central Italian Peninsula, filling a gap in the literature between 1950 and 1500 BCE. Our study confirms a diversity of ancestry components during the Chalcolithic and the arrival of Steppe-related ancestry in the central Italian Peninsula as early as 1600 BCE, with this ancestry component increasing through time. We detect close patrilineal kinship in the burial patterns of Chalcolithic commingled cave burials and a shift away from this in the Bronze Age (2200-900 BCE) along with lowered runs of homozygosity, which may reflect larger changes in population structure. Finally, we find no evidence that the arrival of Steppe-related ancestry in Central Italy directly led to changes in frequency of 115 phenotypes present in the dataset, rather that the post-Roman Imperial period had a stronger influence, particularly on the frequency of variants associated with protection against Hansen's disease (leprosy). Our study provides a closer look at local dynamics of demography and phenotypic shifts as they occurred as part of a broader phenomenon of widespread admixture during the Chalcolithic/Bronze Age transition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Saupe
- Estonian Biocentre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Riia 23B, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
| | - Francesco Montinaro
- Estonian Biocentre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Riia 23B, Tartu 51010, Estonia; Department of Biology-Genetics, University of Bari, Via E. Orabona, 4, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Cinzia Scaggion
- Department of Geosciences, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6, Padova 35131, Italy
| | - Nicola Carrara
- Museum of Anthropology, University of Padova, Palazzo Cavalli, via Giotto 1, Padova 35121, Italy
| | - Toomas Kivisild
- Estonian Biocentre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Riia 23B, Tartu 51010, Estonia; Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Herestraat 49 3000, Belgium
| | - Eugenia D'Atanasio
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, CNR, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome 00185, Italy
| | - Ruoyun Hui
- McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER, UK
| | - Anu Solnik
- Core Facility, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Riia 23B, Tartu 51010, Estonia
| | - Ophélie Lebrasseur
- Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, 12-14 Abercromby Square, Liverpool L69 7WZ, UK; Palaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, 1 South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3TG, UK
| | - Greger Larson
- Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Osservatorio Vesuviano, Via Diocleziano 328, Naples 80125, Italy
| | - Luca Alessandri
- Groningen Institute of Archaeology, University of Groningen, Poststraat 6, Groningen 9712, the Netherlands
| | - Ilenia Arienzo
- Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Osservatorio Vesuviano, Via Diocleziano 328, Naples 80125, Italy
| | - Flavio De Angelis
- Centre of Molecular Anthropology for Ancient DNA Studies, Department of Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Mario Federico Rolfo
- Department of History, Culture and Society, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Via Columbia 1, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Robin Skeates
- Department of Archaeology, Durham University, Lower Mountjoy, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Letizia Silvestri
- Department of History, Culture and Society, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Via Columbia 1, Rome 00133, Italy
| | | | - Sahra Talamo
- Department of Chemistry "Giacomo Ciamician," University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, Bologna 40126, Italy; Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| | - Andrea Dolfini
- School of History, Classics and Archaeology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Monica Miari
- Superintendency of Archeology, Fine Arts and Landscape for the metropolitan city of Bologna and the provinces of Modena, Reggio Emilia and Ferrara, Comune di Bologna, Sede Via Belle Arti n. 52, Bologna 40126, Italy
| | - Mait Metspalu
- Estonian Biocentre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Riia 23B, Tartu 51010, Estonia
| | - Stefano Benazzi
- Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani, 1, Ravenna 40126, Italy
| | - Cristian Capelli
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK; Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, della Vita e della Sostenibilità Ambientale, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 17/A, Parma 43124, Italy
| | - Luca Pagani
- Estonian Biocentre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Riia 23B, Tartu 51010, Estonia; Department of Biology, University of Padova, Via U. Bassi, 58/B, Padova 35122, Italy
| | - Christiana L Scheib
- Estonian Biocentre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Riia 23B, Tartu 51010, Estonia; St. John's College, University of Cambridge, St. John's Street, Cambridge CB2 1TP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Genomic Steppe ancestry in skeletons from the Neolithic Single Grave Culture in Denmark. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0244872. [PMID: 33444387 PMCID: PMC7808695 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Gjerrild burial provides the largest and best-preserved assemblage of human skeletal material presently known from the Single Grave Culture (SGC) in Denmark. For generations it has been debated among archaeologists if the appearance of this archaeological complex represents a continuation of the previous Neolithic communities, or was facilitated by incoming migrants. We sampled and analysed five skeletons from the Gjerrild cist, buried over a period of c. 300 years, 2600/2500–2200 cal BCE. Despite poor DNA preservation, we managed to sequence the genome (>1X) of one individual and the partial genomes (0.007X and 0.02X) of another two individuals. Our genetic data document a female (Gjerrild 1) and two males (Gjerrild 5 + 8), harbouring typical Neolithic K2a and HV0 mtDNA haplogroups, but also a rare basal variant of the R1b1 Y-chromosomal haplogroup. Genome-wide analyses demonstrate that these people had a significant Yamnaya-derived (i.e. steppe) ancestry component and a close genetic resemblance to the Corded Ware (and related) groups that were present in large parts of Northern and Central Europe at the time. Assuming that the Gjerrild skeletons are genetically representative of the population of the SGC in broader terms, the transition from the local Neolithic Funnel Beaker Culture (TRB) to SGC is not characterized by demographic continuity. Rather, the emergence of SGC in Denmark was part of the Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age population expansion that swept across the European continent in the 3rd millennium BCE, resulting in various degrees of genetic replacement and admixture processes with previous Neolithic populations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kinship and social organization in Copper Age Europe. A cross-disciplinary analysis of archaeology, DNA, isotopes, and anthropology from two Bell Beaker cemeteries. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0241278. [PMID: 33196640 PMCID: PMC7668604 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a high-resolution cross-disciplinary analysis of kinship structure and social institutions in two Late Copper Age Bell Beaker culture cemeteries of South Germany containing 24 and 18 burials, of which 34 provided genetic information. By combining archaeological, anthropological, genetic and isotopic evidence we are able to document the internal kinship and residency structure of the cemeteries and the socially organizing principles of these local communities. The buried individuals represent four to six generations of two family groups, one nuclear family at the Alburg cemetery, and one seemingly more extended at Irlbach. While likely monogamous, they practiced exogamy, as six out of eight non-locals are women. Maternal genetic diversity is high with 23 different mitochondrial haplotypes from 34 individuals, whereas all males belong to one single Y-chromosome haplogroup without any detectable contribution from Y-chromosomes typical of the farmers who had been the sole inhabitants of the region hundreds of years before. This provides evidence for the society being patrilocal, perhaps as a way of protecting property among the male line, while in-marriage from many different places secured social and political networks and prevented inbreeding. We also find evidence that the communities practiced selection for which of their children (aged 0–14 years) received a proper burial, as buried juveniles were in all but one case boys, suggesting the priority of young males in the cemeteries. This is plausibly linked to the exchange of foster children as part of an expansionist kinship system which is well attested from later Indo-European-speaking cultural groups.
Collapse
|