Clinical and experimental aspects of interactions between amine oxidase inhibitors and amine re-uptake inhibitors

Drug-induced serotonin syndrome: a review

Serotonin syndrome, or serotonin toxicity (ST), is a clinical condition that occurs as a result of an iatrogenic drug-induced increase in intrasynaptic serotonin levels primarily resulting in activation of serotonin(2A) receptors in the central nervous system. The severity of symptoms spans a spectrum of toxicity that correlates with the intrasynaptic serotonin concentration. Although numerous drugs have been implicated in ST, life-threatening cases generally occur only when monoamine oxidase inhibitors are combined with either selective or nonselective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors. The triad of clinical features consists of neuromuscular hyperactivity, autonomic hyperactivity and altered mental status, which may present abruptly and progress rapidly. The awareness of ST is crucial not only in avoiding the unintentional lethal combination of therapeutic drugs but also in recognizing the clinical picture when it occurs so that treatment can be promptly initiated. In this review, the pathophysiology, clinical features, implicated drugs, diagnosis and treatment of ST are discussed.

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors, opioid analgesics and serotonin toxicity

Toxicity resulting from excessive intra-synaptic serotonin, historically referred to as serotonin syndrome, is now understood to be an intra-synaptic serotonin concentration-related phenomenon. Recent research more clearly delineates serotonin toxicity as a discreet toxidrome characterized by clonus, hyper-reflexia, hyperthermia and agitation. Serotonergic side-effects occur with serotonergic drugs, and overdoses of serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SRIs) frequently produce marked serotonergic side-effects, and in 15% of cases, moderate serotonergic toxicity, but not to a severe degree, which produces hyperthermia and risk of death. It is only combinations of serotonergic drugs acting by different mechanisms that are capable of raising intra-synaptic serotonin to a level that is life threatening. The combination that most commonly does this is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) drug combined with any SRI. There are a number of lesser-known drugs that are MAOIs, such as linezolid and moclobemide; and some opioid analgesics have serotonergic activity. These properties when combined can precipitate life threatening serotonin toxicity. Possibly preventable deaths are still occurring. Knowledge of the properties of these drugs will therefore help to ensure that problems can be avoided in most clinical situations, and treated appropriately (with 5-HT(2A) antagonists for severe cases) if they occur. The phenylpiperidine series opioids, pethidine (meperidine), tramadol, methadone and dextromethorphan and propoxyphene, appear to be weak serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and have all been involved in serotonin toxicity reactions with MAOIs (including some fatalities). Morphine, codeine, oxycodone and buprenorphine are known not to be SRIs, and do not precipitate serotonin toxicity with MAOIs.

Fatal interaction between tranylcypromine and imipramine

This case report describes a patient on tranylcypromine who erroneously received a single dose of imipramine and subsequently developed a fatal serotonin syndrome. Both the clinical features and the pathophysiology of the serotonin syndrome are discussed.

Serotonin syndrome and other serotonergic disorders

Serotonin syndrome is an iatrogenic disorder induced by pharmacologic treatment with serotonergic agents that increases serotonin activity. In addition, there is a wide variety of clinical disorders associated with serotonin excess. The frequent concurrent use of serotonergic and neuroleptic drugs and similarities between serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome can present the clinician with a diagnostic challenge. In this article, we review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of serotonin syndrome as well as other serotonergic disorders.

Moclobemide: therapeutic use and clinical studies

Moclobemide is a reversible inhibitor of monoamine-oxidase-A (RIMA) and has been extensively evaluated in the treatment of a wide spectrum of depressive disorders and less extensively studied in anxiety disorders. Nearly all meta-analyses and most comparative studies indicated that in the acute management of depression this drug is more efficacious than placebo and as efficacious as tricyclic (or some heterocyclic) antidepressants or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). There is a growing evidence that moclobemide is not inferior to other antidepressants in the treatment of subtypes of depression, such as dysthymia, endogenous (unipolar and bipolar), reactive, atypical, agitated, and retarded depression as with other antidepressants limited evidence suggests that moclobemide has consistent long-term efficacy. However, more controlled studies addressing this issue are needed. For patients with bipolar depression the risk of developing mania seems to be not higher with moclobemide than with other antidepressants. The effective therapeutic dose range for moclobemide in most acute phase trials was 300 to 600 mg, divided in 2 to 3 doses. While one controlled trial and one long-term open-label study found moclobemide to be efficacious in social phobia, three controlled trials subsequently revealed either no effect or less robust effects with the tendency of higher doses (600 - 900 mg/d) to be more efficacious. Two comparative trials demonstrated moclobemide to be as efficacious as fluoxetine or clomipramine in patients suffering from panic disorder. Placebo-controlled trials in this indication are, however, still lacking. A relationship between the plasma concentration of moclobemide and its therapeutic efficacy is not apparent but a positive correlation with adverse events has been found. Dizziness, nausea and insomnia occurred more frequently on moclobemide than on placebo. Due to negligible anticholinergic and antihistaminic actions, moclobemide has been better tolerated than tri- or heterocyclic antidepressants. Gastrointestinal side effects and, especially, sexual dysfunction were much less frequent with moclobemide than with SSRIs. Unlike irreversible MAO-inhibitors, moclobemide has a negligible propensity to induce hypertensive crisis after ingestion of tyramine-rich food ("cheese-reaction"). Therefore, dietary restrictions are not as strict. However, with moclobemide doses above 900 mg/d the risk of interaction with ingested tyramine might become clinically relevant. After multiple dosing the oral bioavailability of moclobemide reaches almost 100%. At therapeutic doses, moclobemide lacks significant negative effects on psychomotor performance, cognitive function or cardiovascular system. Due to the relative freedom from these side effects, moclobemide is particularly attractive in the treatment of elderly patients. Moclobemide is a substrate of CYP2C19. Although it acts as an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6, relatively few clinically important drug interactions involving moclobemide have been reported. It is relatively safe even in overdose. The drug has a short plasma elimination half-life that allows switching to an alternative agent within 24 h. Since it is well tolerated, therapeutic doses can often be reached rapidly upon onset of treatment. Steady-state plasma levels are reached approximately at one week following dose adjustment. Patients with renal dysfunction require no dose reduction in contrast to patients with severe hepatic impairment. Cases of refractory depression might improve with a combination of moclobemide with other antidepressants, such as clomipramine or a SSRI. Since this combination has rarely been associated with a potentially lethal serotonin syndrome, it requires lower entry doses, a slower dose titration and a more careful monitoring of patients. Combination therapy with moclobemide and other serotonergic agents, or opioids, should be undertaken with caution, although no serious adverse events have been published with therapeutic doses of moclobemide to date. On the basis of animal data the combined use of moclobemide with pethidine or dextropropoxyphene should be avoided. There is no evidence that moclobemide would increase body weight or produce seizures. Some preclinical data suggest that moclobemide may have anticonvulsant property.

Moclobemide: evolution, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic properties

The benzamide moclobemide is a reversible inhibitor of monoamine-oxidase-A (RIMA). It has been extensively evaluated in the treatment of a wide spectrum of depressive disorders and less extensively in anxiety disorders. While clinical aspects will be presented in a subsequent review, this article focuses primarily on moclobemide's evolution, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. In particular, the effects on neurotransmission and intracellular signal transduction, the neuroendocrine system, the tyramine pressure response and animal models of depression are surveyed. In addition, other CNS effects are reviewed with special respect to experimental serotonergic syndrome, anxiolytic and antinociceptive activity, sleep, cognition and driving performance, neuroprotection and seizures.

An exploratory approach to the serotonin syndrome: an update of clinical phenomenology and revised diagnostic criteria

Serotonin-related adverse side-effects of psychotropic drugs were first recorded in humans in 1960. However, since 1991, these related cases have been diagnosed as 'serotonin syndrome (SS)' according to the criteria reported by Sternbach. In this article, we have reviewed and further explored the validity of these criteria. The clinical profile of 24 cases of the SS published between 1991 and 1995 has been analysed in detail and compared with the symptomatology of 38 previous cases which were also further analysed. Mainly Medline and references from other reports were used to review these cases. The general concept put forward by Sternbach has been approved. On the basis of the severity of overall clinical presentation, it appeared that there is a need to further classify SS into three main groups as: (1) mild state of serotonin-related symptoms; (2) serotonin syndrome (full-blown form); (3) toxic states. Furthermore, the detailed analysis of the SS cases published so far suggests that 'the diagnostic criteria for SS' also require further revision, and these are presented here. We also review, present and discuss the guidelines for the management and treatment of SS.

Serotonin syndrome. Presentation of 2 cases and review of the literature

Serotonin syndrome is an underreported complication of pharmacotherapy that has been relatively ignored in the medical literature. We discuss 2 recent cases seen at our institution and 39 cases described in the English-language literature since 1995. We found that patients with serotonin syndrome most often (74.3%) presented within 24 hours of medication initiation, overdose, or change in dosage. The most common presenting symptoms and signs were confusion, agitation, diaphoresis, tachycardia, myoclonus, and hyperreflexia. The prevalences of hypertension, coma/unresponsiveness, seizures, and death were not as prominent in our study as previously reported, perhaps reflecting earlier recognition and intervention. The most common therapeutic intervention was supportive care alone (48% of patients). The use of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) antagonists such as cyproheptadine, however, has become more common and might reduce the duration of symptoms. Only 1 death occurred, and most patients (57.5%) had complete resolution of their symptoms within 24 hours of presentation. The increased use of serotonergic agents (alone and in combination) across multiple medical disciplines presents the possibility that the prevalence and clinical significance of this condition will rise in the future. Internists will need to be increasingly aware of and prepared for this pharmacologic complication. Prevention, early recognition of the clinical presentation, identification and removal of the offending agents, supportive care, and specific pharmacologic therapy are all important to the successful management of serotonin syndrome.

The serotonin syndrome and its treatment

Serotonin syndrome is caused by drug induced excess of intrasynaptic 5-hydroxytryptamine. The clinical manifestations are mediated by the action of 5-hydroxytryptamine on various subtypes of serotonin receptors. There is no effective drug treatment established. The history of the treatment of serotonin syndrome with 5-hydroxytryptamine blocking drugs is reviewed. A literature search was undertaken using both Medline and a manual search of the older literature. Reports of cases treated with the 5-HT2 blockers cyproheptadine and chlorpromazine were identified and analysed. There is some evidence suggesting the efficacy of chlorpromazine and cyproheptadine in the treatment of serotonin syndrome. The evidence for cyproheptadine is less substantial, perhaps because the dose of cyproheptadine necessary to ensure blockade of brain 5-HT2 receptors is 20-30 mg, which is higher than that used in the cases reported to date (4-16 mg).

Serotonin syndrome: history and risk

This review focuses on the history of investigations into the behavioural reaction resulting from excess stimulation of post-synaptic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors and the relative risk of this occurring with different combinations of drugs. Other aspects, particularly treatment with 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists, are reviewed in a recent separate paper [44]. The first human case was in 1955 and animal work had defined the characteristic features by 1958, and established they were lessened by chlorpromazine. Substantial evidence of a 'dose-effect' relationship existed by 1984. The relative risk with different drug combinations is assessed from available evidence and argued to be strongly associated with the degree of elevation of 5-hydroxytryptamine, which is greatest following combinations of irreversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase A and B with potent serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The various serotonergic drugs that may be implicated in serotonin syndrome are tabulated and discussed in relation to the relative risk. It is suggested that the proposed 'diagnostic criteria' for serotonin syndrome are inappropriate since there is a continuous spectrum from side effects to toxicity. The term 'serotonin syndrome' may encourage the presumption that it is an idiosyncratic response, as neuroleptic malignant syndrome is usually considered to be. The terms 'toxic serotomimetic reaction' or 'toxic serotonin syndrome' may be preferable alternatives. The differences between serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome are highlighted with examples from difficult or questionable cases in the recent literature. It is proposed that more systematic national collection of toxicity data is essential in order to quantify the relative risk of serotonin syndrome with various combinations of serotonergic drugs.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between fluoxetine and moclobemide in the investigation of development of the "serotonin syndrome"

OBJECTIVE

To assess the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of combined treatment with fluoxetine and moclobemide in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Fluoxetine (20 to 40 mg/day) was administered for 23 days to 18 subjects. At (nor)fluoxetine steady state, subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive in addition either moclobemide (ascending doses up to 600 mg/day) of placebo. A single 300 mg dose of moclobemide was administered before and at the end of the fluoxetine regimen to assess the effects of the latter on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of moclobemide. Adverse events and vital signs were recorded and pharmacokinetic parameters of fluoxetine and moclobemide were determined. Plasma concentrations of 3,4-dihydroxy-phenyl-glycol, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, and serotonin uptake into platelets were assessed as pharmacodynamic measures.

RESULTS

The number, intensity, or type of adverse events did not change when moclobemide was added to fluoxetine. No clinically relevant changes in safety parameters occurred. Fluoxetine markedly inhibited the metabolism of moclobemide. However, multiple dosing of moclobemide did not lead the excessive accumulation. 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylglycol, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid plasma levels and serotonin uptake did not reveal a pharmacodynamic interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination treatment with fluoxetine and moclobemide did not provide any indication of development of the "serotonin syndrome."

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced serotonin syndrome: review

The selective pharmacology of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) results in a lower potential for pharmacodynamic drug interactions relative to other antidepressants such as the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). However, the SSRIs have been implicated in the development of the serotonin syndrome--a potentially life-threatening complication of treatment with psychotropic drugs. The syndrome is produced most often by the concurrent use of two or more drugs that enhance central nervous system serotonin activity and often goes unrecognized because of the varied and nonspecific nature of its clinical features. The serotonin syndrome is characterized by alterations in cognition (disorientation, confusion), behavior (agitation, restlessness), autonomic nervous system function (fever, shivering, diaphoresis, diarrhea), and neuromuscular (ataxia, hyperreflexia, myoclonus) activity. The difference between this syndrome and the occurrence of adverse effects caused by serotonin reuptake inhibitors alone is the clustering of the signs and symptoms, their severity, and their duration. There are important pharmacokinetic interactions between SSRIs and other serotonergic drugs due principally to their effects on the cytochrome P450(CYP) isoenzymes, the potential for which varies widely amongst the SSRI group, which may increase the likelihood of a pharmacodynamic interaction. The exceptionally long washout period required after fluoxetine discontinuation may cause additional problems and/or inconvenience. Patients with serotonin syndrome usually respond to discontinuation of drug therapy and supportive care alone, but they may also require treatment with antiserotonergic agent such as cyproheptadine, methysergide, and/or propranolol. To reduce the occurrence, morbidity, and mortality of the serotonin syndrome, it must be both prevented by prudent pharmacotherapy and given prompt recognition when it is present.

Novel strategies for treatment-resistant depression

This article describes a highly selective constellation of the more unique strategies for managing the treatment-resistant patient. In light of the often-devastating toll that treatment-resistant depression takes on an individual's life, it behooves us to continue the search for more effective strategies for those patients that fail more traditional interventions. As each successive move down the treatment algorithm flowchart becomes necessary, the risk/benefit ratio may shift toward less well-substantiated, but still biologically informed, strategies. Although some of the more unusual treatments described in this article represent minimally charted territories, the more promising techniques are deserving of further careful exploration.

Interactions between 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtypes: is a disturbed receptor balance contributing to the symptomatology of depression in humans?

The purpose of this review is to describe the consequences of antidepressant treatment on the behaviour of rodents after activation of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) receptor subtypes. In a summary table, the involvement of 5-HT receptors in inducing behavioural changes are described. It is emphasized that these effects are not always only exclusively linked to serotonergic functions nor that they are only initiated by central 5-HT receptors. Hereafter, the complex mutual inhibitory effects of 5-HT receptor subtype-mediated processes are discussed by interpreting effects of antagonists and describing the different effects of low and high doses of mixed 5-HT1C/5-HT2 receptor agonists. Mutual influences are seen particularly with 5-HT1A, 5-HT1C and 5-HT2, but not with 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D or 5-HT3 receptor-mediated effects. It is shown that the behavioural consequences of 5-HT1A, 5-HT1C and 5-HT2 receptor stimulation may be changed by brain lesions or chronic treatment with drugs. Among these drugs are the antidepressants. Finally, 5-HT receptor function in depressed patients is discussed, and the hypothesis is proposed that an important function of antidepressants is to restore a disturbed balance between 5-HT1A, 5-HT1C and 5-HT2 receptors in depressed patients.

Venlafaxine. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in depression

Venlafaxine is a phenylethylamine derivative which facilitates neurotransmission in the brain by blocking presynaptic reuptake of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine: 5-HT) and noradrenaline (norepinephrine). Clinical data from patients with major depression are consistent with the favourable efficacy and tolerability profile of venlafaxine predicted by pharmacodynamic studies. In patients with major depression, venlafaxine 75 to 375 mg/day administered for 6 weeks was significantly more effective than placebo, and at least as effective as imipramine, clomipramine, trazodone or fluoxetine. Venlafaxine is well tolerated, being associated with fewer anticholinergic and CNS adverse effects than tricyclic antidepressants. Unlike the tricyclic antidepressants, venlafaxine does not appear to significantly affect cardiac conduction, although there have been a few reports of modest increases in blood pressure, particularly after high doses of the drug. In conclusion, wider clinical experience is required to better characterise and confirm potential advantages of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressant agents. These advantages may include a rapid onset of action and reduced propensity to cause anticholinergic effects and cardiotoxicity compared with tricyclic antidepressants. Nevertheless, at this stage venlafaxine offers a more attractive treatment option than tricyclic antidepressants for patients with major depression, primarily because of its good overall tolerability profile.

Comparison of stimulus properties of fluoxetine and 5-HT receptor agonists in a conditioned taste aversion procedure

Pre-exposure to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor agonists in conditioned taste aversion experiments was used to characterize the stimulus properties of fluoxetine. The taste aversion induced by fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) was completely prevented when mice were pre-exposed to fluoxetine or when they were pre-exposed to the preferential 5-HT1C receptor agonist MK 212. Pre-exposure to MK 212 also prevented the conditioned taste aversion induced by another serotonin uptake inhibitor, paroxetine. A partial attenuation of fluoxetine-induced conditioned taste aversion was seen after pre-exposure to a high dose of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT; 1 mg/kg), but not to lower doses. No familiarization for the fluoxetine stimulus was obtained by pre-exposure to treatments with the mixed 5-HT1C/2 receptor agonist (+/-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane HCl (DOI). With the reversed sequence, pre-exposure to fluoxetine prevented the conditioned taste aversion induced by MK 212 or 8-OH-DPAT and reduced that induced by DOI. It is concluded that the acute stimulus properties of fluoxetine mostly resemble those of a 5-HT1C receptor agonist. This supports the suggestion that the 5-HT1C receptor can play an important role in the therapeutic effect of 5-HT reuptake inhibitors.

Interactions of moclobemide with concomitantly administered medication: evidence from pharmacological and clinical studies

Interactions may occur on pharmacological or pharmacokinetic grounds. Both types of interactions are discussed in relationship with the pharmacological and pharmacokinetic data of moclobemide, a reversible MAO-inhibitor. A variety of interaction studies either designed more specifically as kinetic or as dynamic studies have been performed with moclobemide. The results of these studies are presented. In view of these results as well as in view of data stemming from clinical trials it can be concluded that apart from interactions with cimetidine and pethidine, moclobemide has been shown to be devoid of relevant interactions.

Paroxetine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in depressive illness

Paroxetine is a potent and selective inhibitor of the neuronal reuptake of serotonin, thereby facilitating serotoninergic transmission; this action appears to account for the antidepressant activity observed with this drug. A mean terminal elimination half-life of approximately 24 hours permits once daily administration. Results of short term clinical trials have shown paroxetine to be significantly superior to placebo, and comparable to amitriptyline, clomipramine, imipramine, dothiepin and mianserin in relieving symptoms associated with major depressive disorders. Paroxetine has shown some preliminary promise in the treatment of depressive illness resistant to tricyclic antidepressant therapy but further studies are required before any conclusions can be drawn. Paroxetine in therapeutic doses has been very well tolerated, and the favourable tolerability profile of this agent appears to be its primary advantage over traditional antidepressant agents. Paroxetine causes minimal anticholinergic-type adverse effects, and unlike tricyclic antidepressants, it does not precipitate cardiovascular effects or provoke cardiac conduction disturbances. Nausea has been the most frequently reported adverse event during short term use of paroxetine, but it is generally mild and transient and subsides with continued use. With longer term use headache, sweating and constipation were the most frequently reported side effects but the incidence rate was not significantly different from that noted for comparator antidepressants. Furthermore, the frequency of withdrawal due to adverse effects is less with paroxetine than with tricyclic antidepressant agents. Overall, available data appear to indicate that while the efficacy of paroxetine is similar to that of traditional antidepressant drugs, the newer agent possesses much improved tolerability. In addition, the wide therapeutic index of paroxetine may be beneficial when treating patients with an increased risk of suicide. Thus, paroxetine clearly looks to become a valuable addition to the range of drugs currently available to treat depressive illness. Future research may help to further define the relative place of this newer agent in antidepressant therapy and determine how its overall therapeutic efficacy compares with that of other related antidepressant agents such as fluoxetine.

Some basic aspects of reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase-A

A novel class of antidepressants is emerging with considerable therapeutic potential: reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase type A (RIMA). Moclobemide (Aurorix) is a representative RIMA. It is a fully and rapidly reversible inhibitor of MAO-A with a correspondingly intermediate duration of action in vivo. It is free of hepatotoxicity and produces a much weaker potentiation of the tyramine pressor effect than the classical irreversible MAO inhibitors. Interaction of MAO inhibitors and monoamine reuptake inhibitors with tyramine is discussed on the basis of experiments in conscious rats. The issue of tyramine content of foods and beverages has been reinvestigated and its relevance for treatment with RIMA antidepressants is discussed. Recently observed antihypoxic (neuroprotective) effects of moclobemide suggest new indications for this compound.

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: rehabilitation from recent research?

For a long time, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) have been the Cinderella drugs of psycho-pharmacy. Although they were introduced just before the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), they rapidly became second-line treatments. Several factors contributed to this, in particular the dietary restrictions, the scattered reports of death from overdose and/or toxic interactions, and the unfavourable reports on the efficacy of phenelzine in depression from, among others, the Medical Research Council trial (1965). For a number of years afterwards, prescription of these drugs was limited to a few enthusiasts. More recently, however, their popularity has increased owing firstly to a re-evaluation of their effectiveness in tricyclic-resistant depression and in anxiety disorders, and secondly to growing awareness of the exaggerated claims made about their dangerousness (Pare, 1985).

Combined MAO-inhibitor and tri- (tetra) cyclic antidepressant treatment in therapy resistant depression

1. One aspect of using MAO-inhibitors - combining them with tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of therapy resistant depression - has always been controversely discussed in regard to its unusual toxicity and efficacy. 2. To obtain detailled information about safety and efficacy of such a combined treatment, the charts of 94 inpatients treated with a tranylcypromine - tri- (tetra) cyclic antidepressant combination were reviewed. 3. Within a mean treatment period of 21.9 days, 68% of the patients demonstrated a very good or good improvement to combined treatment, the most effective combination being tranylcypromine + amitriptyline. 4. The incidence of side effects among the patients on the combined regimen was slightly, but not significantly lower as compared to the patients on single tri- (tetra) cyclic antidepressant treatment. 5. Our retrospective study supports the general safety and efficacy of combined MAOI-TCA treatment and suggests that combined treatment, if properly administered, leads to neither serious complications nor an inordinate number of side effects.

Fatal disseminated intravascular coagulation following a monoamine oxidase inhibitor/tricyclic interaction

In spite of intensive therapy, an otherwise fit 34-year-old man died following the hyperpyrexial reaction to an interaction between tranylcypromine and clomipramine. There was no evidence of drug overdose, but severe disseminated intravascular coagulation developed which proved fatal.

Attempts to attenuate the 'cheese effect'. Combined drug therapy in depressive illness

Although earlier results, employing intravenous tyramine challenge, had indicated that a tricyclic antidepressant plus monoamine oxidase inhibitor drug combination might be free from the 'cheese effect', the experiments reported here, involving oral tyramine challenge during the combined therapy, showed that relaxation of a tyramine-free diet during such a drug regimen might be unsafe. Preliminary observations indicated that combined (-)-deprenyl plus nonselective monoamine oxidase inhibitor therapy might lead to an unacceptable degree of orthostatic hypotension without reduction in tyramine sensitivity.

The present status of monoamine oxidase inhibitors

The present status of monoamine oxidase inhibitors in the treatment of depression is reviewed. With adequate doses they are effective antidepressants, but dosages have in the past been too low. Provided proper dietary precautions are taken, the incidence of fatality from dietary interactions is very small and should not deter doctors from using these drugs, especially in those depressed patients who do not respond to tricyclic-type antidepressants. The present status of combining monoamine oxidase inhibitors with tricyclics is discussed, as are the newer specific inhibitors particularly clorgyline and deprenyl.

Interactions between relatively selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors and an inhibitor of 5-hydroxytryptamine re-uptake, clomipramine

Features of interactions with combined antidepressants in man were evoked by clomipramine in rats pretreated with both the relatively selective monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors clorgyline and deprenyl, but not when clomipramine was given to rats pretreated with deprenyl or clorgyline alone, i.e. inhibition of both MAO A and B was a likely prerequisite for clomipramine to elicit the syndrome (with the larger dose of clorgyline and deprenyl, MAO A and B inhibition exceeded 95%). The features evoked were myoclonic--forelimb flexor-extensor movements, wet dog shakes and head and body twitches; hyperthermia and ECG anomalies also developed, and locomotor activity was augmented. Myoclonic phenomena were prevented when the above pretreatment also included p-chlorophenyl-alanine, but were unaffected or even intensified when pretreatment instead included alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine; these phenomena were attenuated or abolished by pirenperone, a 5HT2 antagonist. Relevance of these findings to safer combinations of antidepressants is discussed.