de Montgomery CJ, Faurholdt IM, Cullen AE, Taipale H, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Krasnik A, Norredam M. Involuntary admissions for non-affective psychotic disorders in young refugees and peers in Denmark: A population cohort study.
Schizophr Res 2024;
270:366-371. [PMID:
38971014 DOI:
10.1016/j.schres.2024.06.049]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
People with psychotic disorders are at increased risk of experiencing involuntary hospital admissions relative to other psychiatric patients. Within this group, refugees and other minority groups may be at even greater risk. However, little is known about the role of migration background in the risk of involuntary admissions around the time of first psychosis-related treatment.
METHOD
We utilized nationwide administrative data from Denmark covering the period 2006-2018. We included all persons aged 18-35 years in first treatment for psychotic disorders [inpatient and hospital-based outpatient settings (N = 11,871)]. We estimated odds ratios (OR) of any involuntary inpatient admission within three months of first treatment using logistic regression, and rate ratios (RR) of further involuntary admissions, total number of involuntary admissions, and days of involuntary care among patients initially admitted involuntarily using Poisson regression. We compared refugees with majority peers (native-born with native-born parent), other migrants, and descendants of non-refugee migrants.
RESULTS
Compared with the majority group, refugees, non-refugee migrants and descendants were at increased risk of involuntarily admissions (ORrange = 2.12-2.69). Differences in sex, age, education, household income and family situation did not explain these disparities. In contrast, the risk of subsequent involuntary care did not differ between groups (RRrange = 0.77-1.31).
CONCLUSIONS
The findings highlight the need to review if and why processes of needs detection and voluntary treatment enrolment are less effective for minorities in Denmark. Further studies should investigate the pathways to care across population groups to inform interventions that address disparities.
Collapse