Linking neural activity to complex decisions

Oscillatory EEG signatures of postponed somatosensory decisions

In recent electroencephalography (EEG) studies, the vibrotactile frequency comparison task has been used to study oscillatory signatures of perceptual decision making in humans, revealing a choice-selective modulation of premotor upper beta band power shortly before decisions were reported. Importantly, these studies focused on decisions that were (1) indicated immediately after stimulus presentation, and (2) for which a direct motor mapping was provided. Here, we investigated whether the putative beta band choice signal also extends to postponed decisions, and how such a decision signal might be influenced by a response mapping that is dissociated from a specific motor command. We recorded EEG data in two separate experiments, both employing the vibrotactile frequency comparison task with delayed decision reports. In the first experiment, delayed choices were associated with a fixed motor mapping, whereas in the second experiment, choices were mapped onto a color code concealing a specific motor response until the end of the delay phase. In between stimulus presentations, as well as after the second stimulus, prefrontal beta band power indexed stimulus information held in working memory. Beta band power also encoded choices during the response delay, notably, in different cortical areas depending on the provided response mapping. In particular, when decisions were associated with a specific motor mapping, choices were represented in premotor cortices, whereas the color mapping resulted in a choice-selective modulation of beta band power in parietal cortices. Together, our findings imply that how a choice is expressed (i.e., the decision consequence) determines where in the cortical sensorimotor hierarchy an according decision signal is processed.

Synchronous beta rhythms of frontoparietal networks support only behaviorally relevant representations

Categorization has been associated with distributed networks of the primate brain, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC). Although category-selective spiking in PFC and PPC has been established, the frequency-dependent dynamic interactions of frontoparietal networks are largely unexplored. We trained monkeys to perform a delayed-match-to-spatial-category task while recording spikes and local field potentials from the PFC and PPC with multiple electrodes. We found category-selective beta- and delta-band synchrony between and within the areas. However, in addition to the categories, delta synchrony and spiking activity also reflected irrelevant stimulus dimensions. By contrast, beta synchrony only conveyed information about the task-relevant categories. Further, category-selective PFC neurons were synchronized with PPC beta oscillations, while neurons that carried irrelevant information were not. These results suggest that long-range beta-band synchrony could act as a filter that only supports neural representations of the variables relevant to the task at hand.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17822.001

A brain that could store only exact experiences would bog us down with details. We have instead evolved to be able to detect the common elements in different experiences and group them into meaningful categories. This imbues the world with meaning. We can recognize and respond appropriately to objects, situations and expressions even if we have never encountered those exact examples before. Without this ability, experiences would be fragmented and unrelated. Things would seem strange and unfamiliar if they differed even trivially from previous examples. This situation describes many of the characteristics of neuropsychiatric disorders such as autism and schizophrenia.

Most studies have focused on how single brain areas or single neurons categorize experiences. The brain, however, is composed of many interacting networks of neurons that extend across several different areas of the brain. Repetitive rhythms, or waves, of electrical activity generated by the neurons seem to play a major role in network interactions. These rhythms are given different names depending on how rapidly they oscillate. In order for our brain to work successfully, these rhythms synchronize across the relevant brain areas.

Antzoulatos and Miller trained monkeys to categorize stimuli as “Above” or “Below” depending on where dots and lines appeared on a screen. The activity of the neurons in two regions of the monkey’s brain – called the prefrontal cortex and the parietal cortex – was recorded as each monkey performed the task. The recordings revealed that synchronized rhythms between the prefrontal and parietal cortices supported the monkey’s ability to categorize the stimuli. Changes in how strongly the rhythmic electrical activity of the neurons was synchronized – particularly for a type of wave called a beta wave – conveyed information about the category of stimuli (i.e., whether they counted as Above or Below). Single neurons also conveyed this categorization, but unlike rhythms, they also carried irrelevant information. Therefore the synchronized beta waves could act as a filter for the features of an object or experience that are relevant to the task at hand.

The prefrontal cortex and the parietal cortex are only two of many brain areas involved in categorization. Much more territory remains to explore.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17822.002

Neural mechanisms regulating different forms of risk-related decision-making: Insights from animal models

Over the past 20 years there has been a growing interest in the neural underpinnings of cost/benefit decision-making. Recent studies with animal models have made considerable advances in our understanding of how different prefrontal, striatal, limbic and monoaminergic circuits interact to promote efficient risk/reward decision-making, and how dysfunction in these circuits underlies aberrant decision-making observed in numerous psychiatric disorders. This review will highlight recent findings from studies exploring these questions using a variety of behavioral assays, as well as molecular, pharmacological, neurophysiological, and translational approaches. We begin with a discussion of how neural systems related to decision subcomponents may interact to generate more complex decisions involving risk and uncertainty. This is followed by an overview of interactions between prefrontal-amygdala-dopamine and habenular circuits in regulating choice between certain and uncertain rewards and how different modes of dopamine transmission may contribute to these processes. These data will be compared with results from other studies investigating the contribution of some of these systems to guiding decision-making related to rewards vs. punishment. Lastly, we provide a brief summary of impairments in risk-related decision-making associated with psychiatric disorders, highlighting recent translational studies in laboratory animals.