1
|
White AJ, Kelly-Hedrick M, Miranda SP, Abdelbarr MM, Lázaro-Muñoz G, Pouratian N, Shen F, Nahed BV, Williamson T. Bioethics and Neurosurgery: An Overview of Existing and Emerging Topics for the Practicing Neurosurgeon. World Neurosurg 2024; 190:181-186. [PMID: 39004179 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
Neurosurgery is a field with complex ethical issues. In this article, we aim to provide an overview of key and emerging ethical issues in neurosurgery with a focus on issues relevant to practicing neurosurgeons. These issues include those of informed consent, capacity, clinical trials, emerging neurotechnology, innovation, equity and justice, and emerging bioethics areas including community engagement and organizational ethics. We argue that bioethics can help neurosurgeons think about and address these issues, and, in turn, the field of bioethics can benefit from engagement by neurosurgeons. Several ideas for increasing engagement in bioethics are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra J White
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Margot Kelly-Hedrick
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
| | - Stephen P Miranda
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Nader Pouratian
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Francis Shen
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian V Nahed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Theresa Williamson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith JN, Dorfman N, Hurley M, Cenolli I, Kostick-Quenet K, Storch EA, Lázaro-Muñoz G, Blumenthal-Barby J. Adolescent OCD Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Identity, Authenticity, and Normalcy in Potential Deep Brain Stimulation Treatment. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2024:1-14. [PMID: 38602092 DOI: 10.1017/s0963180124000203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
The ongoing debate within neuroethics concerning the degree to which neuromodulation such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) changes the personality, identity, and agency (PIA) of patients has paid relatively little attention to the perspectives of prospective patients. Even less attention has been given to pediatric populations. To understand patients' views about identity changes due to DBS in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), the authors conducted and analyzed semistructured interviews with adolescent patients with OCD and their parents/caregivers. Patients were asked about projected impacts to PIA generally due to DBS. All patient respondents and half of caregivers reported that DBS would impact patient self-identity in significant ways. For example, many patients expressed how DBS could positively impact identity by allowing them to explore their identities free from OCD. Others voiced concerns that DBS-related resolution of OCD might negatively impact patient agency and authenticity. Half of patients expressed that DBS may positively facilitate social access through relieving symptoms, while half indicated that DBS could increase social stigma. These views give insights into how to approach decision-making and informed consent if DBS for OCD becomes available for adolescents. They also offer insights into adolescent experiences of disability identity and "normalcy" in the context of OCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared N Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Natalie Dorfman
- Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Meghan Hurley
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ilona Cenolli
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristin Kostick-Quenet
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric A Storch
- Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liker MA, Sanger TD, MacLean JA, Nataraj J, Arguelles E, Krieger M, Robison A, Olaya J. Stereotactic Awake Basal Ganglia Electrophysiological Recording and Stimulation (SABERS): A Novel Staged Procedure for Personalized Targeting of Deep Brain Stimulation in Pediatric Movement and Neuropsychiatric Disorders. J Child Neurol 2024; 39:33-44. [PMID: 38409793 DOI: 10.1177/08830738231224057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
Selection of targets for deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been based on clinical experience, but inconsistent and unpredictable outcomes have limited its use in patients with heterogeneous or rare disorders. In this large case series, a novel staged procedure for neurophysiological assessment from 8 to 12 temporary depth electrodes is used to select targets for neuromodulation that are tailored to each patient's functional needs. Thirty children and young adults underwent deep brain stimulation target evaluation with the new procedure: Stereotactic Awake Basal ganglia Electrophysiological Recording and Stimulation (SABERS). Testing is performed in an inpatient neuromodulation monitoring unit over 5-7 days, and results guide the decision to proceed and the choice of targets for permanent deep brain stimulation implantation. Results were evaluated 3-6 months postoperatively with the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale and the Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale. Stereotactic Awake Basal ganglia Electrophysiological Recording and Stimulation testing allowed modulation to be tailored to specific neurologic deficits in a heterogeneous population, including subjects with primary dystonia, secondary dystonia, and Tourette syndrome. All but one subject were implanted with 4 permanent deep brain stimulation leads. Results showed significant improvement on both scales at postoperative follow-up. No significant adverse events occurred. Use of the Stereotactic Awake Basal ganglia Electrophysiological Recording and Stimulation protocol with evaluation in the neuromodulation monitoring unit is feasible and results in significant patient benefit compared with previously published results in these populations. This new technique supports a significant expansion of functional neurosurgery to predict effective stimulation targets in a wide range of disorders of brain function, including those for which the optimal target is not yet known.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Liker
- Divison of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Terence D Sanger
- Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
- Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer A MacLean
- Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Jaya Nataraj
- Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Enrique Arguelles
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark Krieger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aaron Robison
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Joffre Olaya
- Divison of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dorfman N, Snellman L, Kerley Y, Kostick-Quenet K, Lazaro-Munoz G, Storch EA, Blumenthal-Barby J. Hope and Optimism in Pediatric Deep Brain Stimulation: Key Stakeholder Perspectives. NEUROETHICS-NETH 2023; 16:17. [PMID: 37905206 PMCID: PMC10615366 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-023-09524-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is utilized to treat pediatric refractory dystonia and its use in pediatric patients is expected to grow. One important question concerns the impact of hope and unrealistic optimism on decision-making, especially in "last resort" intervention scenarios such as DBS for refractory conditions. Objective This study examined stakeholder experiences and perspectives on hope and unrealistic optimism in the context of decision-making about DBS for childhood dystonia and provides insights for clinicians seeking to implement effective communication strategies. Materials and Methods Semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n = 29) and caregivers (n = 44) were conducted, transcribed, and coded. Results Using thematic content analysis, four major themes from clinician interviews and five major themes from caregiver interviews related to hopes and expectations were identified. Clinicians expressed concerns about caregiver false hopes (86%, 25/29) and desperation (68.9%, 20/29) in light of DBS being a last resort. As a result, 68.9% of clinicians (20/29) expressed that they intentionally tried to lower caregiver expectations about DBS outcomes. Clinicians also expressed concern that, on the flip side, unrealistic pessimism drives away some patients who might otherwise benefit from DBS (34.5%, 10/29). Caregivers viewed DBS as the last option that they had to try (61.3%, 27/44), and 73% of caregivers (32/44) viewed themselves as having high hopes but reasonable expectations. Fewer than half (43%, 19/44) expressed that they struggled setting outcome expectations due to the uncertainty of DBS, and 50% of post-DBS caregivers (14/28) expressed some negative feelings post treatment due to unmet expectations. 43% of caregivers (19/44) had experiences with clinicians who tried to set low expectations about the potential benefits of DBS. Conclusion Thoughtful clinician-stakeholder discussion is needed to ensure realistic outcome expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Dorfman
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Kristin Kostick-Quenet
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Eric A Storch
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kostick-Quenet K, Kalwani L, Torgerson L, Muñoz K, Sanchez C, Storch EA, Blumenthal-Barby J, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Deep Brain Stimulation for Pediatric Dystonia: Clinicians' Perspectives on the Most Pressing Ethical Challenges. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2023; 101:301-313. [PMID: 37844562 PMCID: PMC10586720 DOI: 10.1159/000530694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pediatric deep brain stimulation (pDBS) is commonly used to manage treatment-resistant primary dystonias with favorable results and more frequently used for secondary dystonia to improve quality of life. There has been little systematic empirical neuroethics research to identify ethical challenges and potential solutions to ensure responsible use of DBS in pediatric populations. METHODS Clinicians (n = 29) who care for minors with treatment-resistant dystonia were interviewed for their perspectives on the most pressing ethical issues in pDBS. RESULTS Using thematic content analysis to explore salient themes, clinicians identified four pressing concerns: (1) uncertainty about risks and benefits of pDBS (22/29; 72%) that poses a challenge to informed decision-making; (2) ethically navigating decision-making roles (15/29; 52%), including how best to integrate perspectives from diverse stakeholders (patient, caregiver, clinician) and how to manage surrogate decisions on behalf of pediatric patients with limited capacity to make autonomous decisions; (3) information scarcity effects on informed consent and decision quality (15/29; 52%) in the context of patient and caregivers' expectations for treatment; and (4) narrow regulatory status and access (7/29; 24%) such as the lack of FDA-approved indications that contribute to decision-making uncertainty and liability and potentially limit access to DBS among patients who may benefit from it. CONCLUSION These results suggest that clinicians are primarily concerned about ethical limitations of making difficult decisions in the absence of informational, regulatory, and financial supports. We discuss two solutions already underway, including supported decision-making to address uncertainty and further data sharing to enhance clinical knowledge and discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Kostick-Quenet
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lavina Kalwani
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura Torgerson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katrina Muñoz
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clarissa Sanchez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric A. Storch
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith J, Blumenthal-Barby J. Call for moral recognition as part of paediatric assent. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023; 49:481-482. [PMID: 37147114 PMCID: PMC10583811 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jared Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Merner AR, Kostick-Quenet K, Campbell TA, Pham MT, Sanchez CE, Torgerson L, Robinson J, Pereira S, Outram S, Koenig BA, Starr PA, Gunduz A, Foote KD, Okun MS, Goodman W, McGuire AL, Zuk P, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Participant perceptions of changes in psychosocial domains following participation in an adaptive deep brain stimulation trial. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:990-998. [PMID: 37330169 PMCID: PMC10529988 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been substantial controversy in the neuroethics literature regarding the extent to which deep brain stimulation (DBS) impacts dimensions of personality, mood, and behavior. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS Despite extensive debate in the theoretical literature, there remains a paucity of empirical data available to support or refute claims related to the psychosocial changes following DBS. METHODS A mixed-methods approach was used to examine the perspectives of patients who underwent DBS regarding changes to their personality, authenticity, autonomy, risk-taking, and overall quality of life. RESULTS Patients (n = 21) who were enrolled in adaptive DBS trials for Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, obsessive-compulsive disorder, Tourette's syndrome, or dystonia participated. Qualitative data revealed that participants, in general, reported positive experiences with alterations in what was described as 'personality, mood, and behavior changes.' The majority of participants reported increases in quality of life. No participants reported 'regretting the decision to undergo DBS.' CONCLUSION(S) The findings from this patient sample do not support the narrative that DBS results in substantial adverse changes to dimensions of personality, mood, and behavior. Changes reported as "negative" or "undesired" were few in number, and transient in nature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda R Merner
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Kristin Kostick-Quenet
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 326D, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Tiffany A Campbell
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Michelle T Pham
- Center for Bioethics and Social Justice, Michigan State University, East Fee Hall, 965 Wilson Road Rm A-126, East Lansing, MI, 48824, United States
| | - Clarissa E Sanchez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 326D, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Laura Torgerson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 326D, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Jill Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 326D, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 326D, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Simon Outram
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco, 490 Illinois Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States
| | - Barbara A Koenig
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco, 490 Illinois Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, 3009 SW Williston Road, Gainesville, FL, 32608, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, Biomedical Science Building, JG283, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, 3009 SW Williston Road, Gainesville, FL, 32608, United States
| | - Michael S Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, 3009 SW Williston Road, Gainesville, FL, 32608, United States
| | - Wayne Goodman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Blvd Suite E4.100, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 326D, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Peter Zuk
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pressing ethical issues in considering pediatric deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brain Stimul 2021; 14:1566-1572. [PMID: 34700055 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.10.388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) among adults is the first psychiatric indication of deep brain stimulation (DBS) to receive an FDA Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE). Given the HDE approval and encouraging evidence that has since emerged, exploration of DBS for OCD may expand to adolescents in the future. More than 100,000 adolescents in the U.S. suffer from refractory OCD, and there is already a precedent for the transition of DBS in adults to children in the case of dystonia. However, the risk-benefit analysis of pediatric DBS for OCD may be more complex and raise different ethical questions compared to pediatric DBS for dystonia. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to gain insight into pressing ethical issues related to using DBS in adolescents with OCD. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians (n = 25) caring for pediatric patients with refractory OCD. Interview transcripts were coded with MAXQDA 2018 software and analyzed using thematic content analysis to identify emergent themes. RESULTS Five central themes were identified in clinician responses, three of which were exacerbated in the pediatric DBS setting. Clinicians expressed concerns related to conditions of decision-making including adolescents' capacity to assent (80%), the lack of evidence about the outcomes and potential unknown effects of using DBS in adolescents with OCD (68%), and the importance of exhausting other treatment options before considering DBS (20%). CONCLUSIONS Strategies to address clinician concerns include implementation of validated decision support tools and further research into the outcomes of pediatric DBS for OCD to establish clear guidelines for patient selection.
Collapse
|
9
|
2020 International Neuroethics Society Annual Meeting Top Abstracts. AJOB Neurosci 2021; 15:1-23. [PMID: 34060979 DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2021.1917726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
10
|
Weinzimmer SA, Schneider SC, Cepeda SL, Guzick AG, Lázaro-Muñoz G, McIngvale E, Goodman WK, Sheth SA, Storch EA. Perceptions of Deep Brain Stimulation for Adolescents with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2021; 31:109-117. [PMID: 33534637 PMCID: PMC7984933 DOI: 10.1089/cap.2020.0166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The present study aims to understand perceptions of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in adolescents among two groups: parents of children with a history of OCD and adults with a history of OCD. Methods: Two hundred sixty participants completed a questionnaire exploring their treatment history, relevant symptom severity, DBS knowledge, and DBS attitudes using an acceptability scale and a series of statements indicating levels of willingness or reluctance to consider DBS for adolescents with severe OCD or severe epilepsy. Results: Overall, participants found DBS to be fairly acceptable for adolescents with severe OCD, with 63% reporting at least 7/10 on a 0-10 acceptability Likert scale. Respondents were more willing to consider DBS for epilepsy than for OCD. Several factors were associated with greater willingness to consider DBS for OCD, including familiarity with DBS, the presence of suicidal thoughts, assurances of daily functioning improvements, and assurances of substantial symptom reduction. Concerns about safety, personality changes, and long-term effects on the body were associated with greatest reluctance to consider DBS for OCD. Conclusions: Our findings support the importance of increasing parents' familiarity with DBS, monitoring factors participants identified as most important to their DBS perceptions in future DBS research, and communicating benefits and risks clearly. We also highlight the need for further research on perceptions of DBS for severe and refractory OCD in adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saira A. Weinzimmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.,Address correspondence to: Saira Weinzimmer, BA, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Boulevard, Suite 4-400, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sophie C. Schneider
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sandra L. Cepeda
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew G. Guzick
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Wayne K. Goodman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Eric A. Storch
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.,Address correspondence to: Eric Storch, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Boulevard, Suite 4-400, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|