Longitudinal study of the stability of expressed emotion in families of schizophrenic patients: a 9-month follow-up

Expressed emotion and treatment outcome in higher levels of care for eating disorders

OBJECTIVE

Expressed emotion (EE) among caregivers toward the affected offspring is a negative prognostic indicator for adolescent patients with eating disorders (EDs) in outpatient treatment. Less research has examined its impact on adolescents in higher levels of care (HLOC). The current study examined differences in caregiver EE according to the subtype of anorexia nervosa (AN) (restricting [AN-R] versus binge/purge [AN-BP]), and level of care (LOC). We also examined the main effects of baseline caregiver EE (emotional overinvolvement [EOI] or criticism), AN subtype, and their interaction on eating pathology and depression at discharge.

METHOD

Adolescent patients (N = 203) receiving treatment at HLOCs completed measures of ED pathology (Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) at baseline and discharge, and one caregiver of each patient completed a measure of EE (Family Questionnaire) at baseline.

RESULTS

No differences in caregiver EE were found between patients with AN-R versus AN-BP, or relative to LOC. Caregiver EE did not predict outcome for ED symptoms or depression at discharge.

DISCUSSION

The impact of high caregiver EE may be less substantial at HLOCs than outpatient care given that caregivers are less involved in treatment at HLOCs. Future research is needed to determine if high caregiver EOI leads to poor treatment outcome for adolescents as it does for adults, or whether it is an appropriate expression of care for patients who are ill enough to require HLOC treatment.

PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

High caregiver EE was not found to predict treatment outcome for adolescents with eating disorders in higher levels of care (HLOCs), possibly due to the limited involvement of caregivers in HLOCs. However, patients step down to outpatient treatment, where high caregiver EE can have a significant negative impact on outcome. HLOCs should incorporate efforts to reduce high caregiver EE in anticipation of step-down to outpatient treatment.

Relationship between posttraumatic stress symptoms, caregiving response, and parent mental health in youth exposed to single incident trauma

BACKGROUND

Family factors may alter the risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or depression in young people after a traumatic event, but it is not clear which modifiable family variables can be addressed in psychological therapies. This study examined the relationships between family factors (Expressed Emotion [EE] and family accommodation) and psychopathology (posttraumatic stress symptoms; PTSS) in young people following a single incident trauma. Potential mediators of these relationships were also investigated.

METHOD

Sixty-six parent-child dyads (aged 8-17 years) were assessed within one month of attending an Emergency Department. Self-reported PTSS and perceived EE were assessed in young people. Parents' own PTSS, mood symptoms, EE, and accommodating behaviours were also assessed.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional analyses revealed that young person-perceived EE, parent-reported emotional over involvement (EOI) and accommodation behaviours significantly predicted higher PTSS in young people. The stress experienced as a consequence of EE mediated the relationship between young person-perceived EOI and PTSS in young people. Parental PTSS and anxiety were positively correlated with EOI and accommodation. Parental PTSS was not significantly associated with symptoms in young people.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the hypothesis that EE and accommodation are positively associated with PTSS in young people in the month following a potentially traumatic event. Understanding the child in the context of their family environment and relationships offers an important framework for making sense of and facilitating adaptive adjustment following a traumatic event.

Creating a 'social zeitgeber' to synchronize family emotional rhythms: A new therapeutic approach in child and adolescent psychiatry

A family can be viewed as a system respecting the principle of homeostasis and therefore considered as a system in equilibrium or out of equilibrium, or even both simultaneously or consecutively. Within a family system, there are oscillatory phenomena and synchronization of the emotional, behavioral and relational rhythms of each member of the family system as well as synchronization of this system with others. A disruption of family synchronies, consisting of successive desynchronizations and resynchronizations, can take place in order for a change to occur. We created a mobile team for preadolescents and adolescents with psychological difficulties and their families; this mobile team enables to trigger a change by acting on the family synchronies like a 'social zeitgeber', i.e. an external factor synchronizing social and biological rhythms. The mobile team acts by disrupting the synchronies of the family system and this disruption is facilitated by a state of crisis experienced by the family. More specifically, the mobile team intervention provokes changes in the family representations associated with changes in the family emotional climate, measured by expressed emotion, due to disruptions in the synchronization of certain rhythms (desynchronization and then resynchronization of these rhythms), and could therefore be considered as a 'social zeitgeber'. It creates an experience that becomes part of the individual's and family's history and could be reactivated in the future if necessary. Finally, it allows the family and the adolescent with difficulties to reach new perspectives and representations which participates to the process of change, but also to benefit at the same time from a secure basis and frame created by the (re)synchronization of family emotions through the intervention of the mobile team following a ritualized procedure.

Relatives' responses to psychosis: an exploratory investigation of low expressed emotion relatives

OBJECTIVE

Expressed emotion (EE) refers to the emotional climate within a family. High EE significantly increases the risk of relapse in people with psychosis. The focus of research to date has largely been on understanding mechanisms underlying high EE. A greater understanding of low EE would help guide family interventions to build strengths within the family. The aim of this study was to understand how low EE relatives respond to having a close family member with psychosis.

DESIGN

A subsample of eight low EE relatives, from a larger study investigating relatives' adaptation to recent onset psychosis, was interviewed. Transcripts were analysed following the principles of interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA).

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews were carried out with each relative covering broad areas of their experience, including their awareness of the development of mental health problems and relationship with their relative.

RESULTS

Four core themes emerged: witnessing the distress; empathy through acceptance and understanding; a broad range of coping strategies to reduce distress; and realistic optimism for the future.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights that, although relatives described distressing experiences and feelings of frustration and anger, they showed empathy and commitment to support the person. They demonstrated psychological mindedness about the psychosis and related behaviours, had developed coping strategies, and had adjusted their expectations for the future. Further research is warranted to investigate the findings in larger samples, with a view to informing the development of more effective ways of supporting families.

Effects of Family Psychoeducation on Expressed Emotion and Burden of Care in First-Episode Psychosis: A Prospective Observational Study

The present study aimed to examine the levels and interactions of family burden (FB) and expressed emotion (EE) in first episode psychosis (FEP) patients and, secondly, to observe the potential change after a brief psychoeducational group intervention implemented in a real world clinical setting. Twenty-three key relatives of FEP patients received a brief psychoeducational group intervention. FB and EE were assessed before and after the intervention. EE-change and correlations between variables were examined. Half of the sample of key-relatives showed high levels of EE. No severe family burden was observed. FB and EE did not change after the intervention. Family subjective and objective burden were correlated with emotional overinvolvement, but not with criticism. Brief psychoeducational groups may not be sufficient to reduce FB and EE associated to the experience of caregiving for a family member with a first-episode psychotic disorder.

Family and patient predictors of symptomatic status in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

To test an interactive hypothesis that, in schizophrenia, a combination of patients' and relatives' characteristics at 1-month postdischarge from hospital (Time 1 [T1]) better predicts the level of psychotic symptoms at follow-up (Time 2 [T2]), than do the characteristics of patients or relatives alone.

METHODS

Male patients (n = 38) with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, without substance abuse, and in contact with their families, were recruited at the time of hospital discharge. Patients' psychotic symptom levels were monitored every 2 weeks until follow-up, while family measures were administered at T1 and T2. The 4 predictor variables in the regression analysis were T1 symptom levels of the patient and 3 measures of family interaction (expressed emotion, family burden, and family functioning).

RESULTS

The model based on the family variable, family burden at T1, and the patient variable, patients' remitted levels of psychotic symptoms at T1, was found to significantly predict the level of psychotic symptoms at T2. These 2 T1 variables made independent and additive contributions to the level of psychotic symptoms at T2, predicting 19% of the variance. Neither expressed emotion nor family functioning at T1 added to the prediction.

CONCLUSION

This finding suggests a patient-family interactional component to symptomatic relapse in schizophrenia.

Expressed emotion in relatives of first-episode and chronic patients with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder-a comparison

Relatives of first-episode and chronic schizophrenic and depressed patients were examined with respect to their expressed emotion (EE) status. The two aims of the study were to (1) investigate whether relatives of first-episode patients differed from family members of chronic patients, and (2) whether EE indices of relatives of schizophrenic patients were comparable to those of depressed subjects. Twenty patients of each diagnostic group (DSM-III-R and DSM-IV) were included, i.e. a total of 80 patients. The EE status of key relatives was assessed with the Five-Minute Speech Sample on the basis of critical comments and emotional overinvolvement. Additionally, the new criterion 'covert criticism' was applied to detect indirect expressions of critique. Relatives of first-episode and chronic patients of both diagnostic groups did not differ significantly regarding their EE status; in first-episode patients, 52.5% of relatives were classified high EE; in chronic patients, 45%. Moreover, EE indices of relatives of schizophrenic and depressed patients were comparable. Analysis revealed 52.5 and 45% high-EE relatives in the depression and the schizophrenia subsamples, respectively. Thus, the overall incidence of high-EE relatives was comparable to numbers reported in the literature. In our study EE status of relatives was not disease-specific, and it was independent of chronicity of illness.