1
|
Ali E, Latif F, Mashkoor Y, Sheikh A, Iqbal A, Owais R, Ahmed J, Naveed S, Moeed A, Ullah I, Mughal S. Role of adjunctive cariprazine for treatment-resistant depression in patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Asian J Psychiatr 2024; 95:104005. [PMID: 38513509 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cariprazine is an orally active dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 receptor and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist, being considered as a treatment for refractory MDD. Therefore, we aim to perform the first meta-analysis of current literature, to collate changes in depression from baseline and assess tolerability of adjunctive cariprazine in MDD populace. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.Gov, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception till 1st September 2023. RCTs of adult patients with refractory MDD under adjunctive cariprazine vs. placebo were included. Primary outcomes included improvement in MADRS, CGI-S, and HAM-D 17 scores. Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events. The statistical analysis was performed using generic inverse variance with random-effects model. The overall risk ratios (RR) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS A total of five RCTs were analysed, enrolling 2013 participants (cariprazine: 959 participants, Placebo: 1054). Supplementation of ADT with cariprazine demonstrated a significant improvement in MADRAS, CGI-S and HAMD-17 scores from baseline (LSMD: -1.88, 95% CI [-2.94, -0.83], p=0.0005), (LSMD: -0.18, 95% CI [-0.29, -0.07], p=0.002), and (LSMD: -0.96, 95% CI [-1.70, -0.21], p=0.01) respectively. Treatment with adjunctive cariprazine therapy demonstrated significantly increased incidence of akathisia, nausea, dizziness, fatigue, restlessness, somnolence, and tremors when compared with placebo. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the efficacy of adjunctive cariprazine in patients with refractory MDD. However, it is essential to consider the safety profile of cariprazine, particularly the increased risk of adverse events. The vigilant monitoring and management of these side effects should be integrated into clinical practice to minimize discontinuation rates and optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eman Ali
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Fakhar Latif
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Yusra Mashkoor
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Ayesha Sheikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Amna Iqbal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Rabia Owais
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Jawad Ahmed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sadiq Naveed
- Psychiatry Program Director at Eastern Connecticut Health Network, CT, USA; Associate Professor of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut, CT, USA; Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Frank H. Netter School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, CT, USA; Fellow, Infant, Parent Mental Health, University of Massachusetts, Boston, USA
| | - Abdul Moeed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Irfan Ullah
- Kabir Medical College, Gandhara University, Peshawar, Pakistan
| | - Sanila Mughal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang L, Chen X, Gu X, De Smedt H, Popova V, Fu DJ, Canuso CM, Drevets WC, Chen G. A Meta-Analysis of the Antidepressant Responses in Pivotal Trials on Esketamine Nasal Spray and Atypical Antipsychotics. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2023; 19:2857-2870. [PMID: 38161513 PMCID: PMC10757775 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s417027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This meta-analysis assessed whether atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) and esketamine nasal spray (ESK-NS), which are mechanistically distinct, differ in antidepressant outcomes. Patients and Methods Data were extracted from 12 trials of ESK-NS or AAPs in depressed patients (4276) with inadequate response or resistance to conventional antidepressants. Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score reductions from baseline and response rates (≥50% reduction) were analyzed. Results At endpoint, the estimated MADRS score reduction of pooled ESK-NS arms was greater than pooled AAP arms (+9.16 points, p < 0.0001). The reduction also was greater in the pooled control arms of the ESK-NS trials than the pooled control arms of the AAP trials (+7.57 points, p < 0.0001). The mean difference in the reductions between pooled ESK-NS and control arms was 1.87 points greater than that between pooled AAP and control arms, but this difference was not significant (95% CI: -4.49, 0.74, p = 0.16). Relative to their respective control arms, the mean difference in response rates was 25% for the pooled ESK-NS and 9% for the pooled AAP arms; the mean response rate was 16% greater in the pooled ESK-NS studies than the pooled AAP studies (p = 0.0004). Comparisons against specific AAPs showed mean differences in the MADRS score reductions at 1 week between the experimental and control arms that were numerically larger in the ESK-NS trials than in the aripiprazole trials (mean difference of 1.71 points, p = 0.06) and the brexpiprazole trials (mean difference of 2.05 points, p = 0.02). Conclusion The ESK-NS arms showed numerically larger MADRS score reductions at week-1 and endpoint, and a significantly larger response rate compared with AAP arms. Prospective studies involving direct comparisons are warranted to compare the relative efficacy between these treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lien Wang
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Brisbane, CA, USA
| | - Xiaowei Chen
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaojing Gu
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Heidi De Smedt
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Vanina Popova
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Dong-Jing Fu
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Carla M Canuso
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Wayne C Drevets
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Brisbane, CA, USA
| | - Guang Chen
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Brisbane, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reif A, Bitter I, Buyze J, Cebulla K, Frey R, Fu DJ, Ito T, Kambarov Y, Llorca PM, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Messer T, Mulhern-Haughey S, Rive B, von Holt C, Young AH, Godinov Y. Esketamine Nasal Spray versus Quetiapine for Treatment-Resistant Depression. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1298-1309. [PMID: 37792613 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2304145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In treatment-resistant depression, commonly defined as a lack of response to two or more consecutive treatments during the current depressive episode, the percentage of patients with remission is low and the percentage with relapse is high. The efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray as compared with extended-release quetiapine augmentation therapy, both in combination with ongoing treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), in patients with treatment-resistant depression are unknown. METHODS In an open-label, single-blind (with raters unaware of group assignments), multicenter, phase 3b, randomized, active-controlled trial, we assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive flexible doses (according to the summary of product characteristics) of esketamine nasal spray (esketamine group) or extended-release quetiapine (quetiapine group), both in combination with an SSRI or SNRI. The primary end point was remission, defined as a score of 10 or less on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), at week 8 (scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression). The key secondary end point was no relapse through week 32 after remission at week 8. All patients were included in the analysis; patients who discontinued the trial treatment were considered as having had an unfavorable outcome (i.e., they were grouped with patients who did not have remission or who had a relapse). Analyses of the primary and key secondary end points were adjusted for age and number of treatment failures. RESULTS Overall, 336 patients were assigned to the esketamine group and 340 to the quetiapine group. More patients in the esketamine group than in the quetiapine group had remission at week 8 (91 of 336 patients [27.1%] vs. 60 of 340 patients [17.6%]; P = 0.003) and had no relapse through week 32 after remission at week 8 (73 of 336 patients [21.7%] vs. 48 of 340 patients [14.1%]). Over 32 weeks of follow-up, the percentage of patients with remission, the percentage of patients with a treatment response, and the change in the MADRS score from baseline favored esketamine nasal spray. The adverse events were consistent with the established safety profiles of the trial treatments. CONCLUSIONS In patients with treatment-resistant depression, esketamine nasal spray plus an SSRI or SNRI was superior to extended-release quetiapine plus an SSRI or SNRI with respect to remission at week 8. (Funded by Janssen EMEA; ESCAPE-TRD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04338321.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Reif
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Istvan Bitter
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Jozefien Buyze
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Kerstin Cebulla
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Richard Frey
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Dong-Jing Fu
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Tetsuro Ito
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Yerkebulan Kambarov
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Pierre-Michel Llorca
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Albino J Oliveira-Maia
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Thomas Messer
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Siobhán Mulhern-Haughey
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Benoît Rive
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Christian von Holt
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Allan H Young
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| | - Yordan Godinov
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Frankfurt (A.R.), Danuvius Klinik, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm (T.M.), and Janssen Germany (K.C.) and Janssen EMEA (C.H.), Neuss - all in Germany; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (I.B.); Janssen Pharmaceutica (J.B.) and Janssen EMEA (Y.K.) - both in Beerse, Belgium; the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (R.F.); Janssen Research and Development, New Jersey (D.-J.F.); Janssen EMEA, High Wycombe (T.I.), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham (A.H.Y.) - all in the United Kingdom; CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Department of Psychiatry, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR 6602 Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand (P.-M.L.), and Janssen EMEA, Paris (B.R.) - both in France; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, and NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa - both in Lisbon, Portugal (A.J.O.-M.); Janssen EMEA, Dublin (S.M.-H.); and Janssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria (Y.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McIntyre RS, Alsuwaidan M, Baune BT, Berk M, Demyttenaere K, Goldberg JF, Gorwood P, Ho R, Kasper S, Kennedy SH, Ly-Uson J, Mansur RB, McAllister-Williams RH, Murrough JW, Nemeroff CB, Nierenberg AA, Rosenblat JD, Sanacora G, Schatzberg AF, Shelton R, Stahl SM, Trivedi MH, Vieta E, Vinberg M, Williams N, Young AH, Maj M. Treatment-resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions. World Psychiatry 2023; 22:394-412. [PMID: 37713549 PMCID: PMC10503923 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 83.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is common and associated with multiple serious public health implications. A consensus definition of TRD with demonstrated predictive utility in terms of clinical decision-making and health outcomes does not currently exist. Instead, a plethora of definitions have been proposed, which vary significantly in their conceptual framework. The absence of a consensus definition hampers precise estimates of the prevalence of TRD, and also belies efforts to identify risk factors, prevention opportunities, and effective interventions. In addition, it results in heterogeneity in clinical practice decision-making, adversely affecting quality of care. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have adopted the most used definition of TRD (i.e., inadequate response to a minimum of two antidepressants despite adequacy of the treatment trial and adherence to treatment). It is currently estimated that at least 30% of persons with depression meet this definition. A significant percentage of persons with TRD are actually pseudo-resistant (e.g., due to inadequacy of treatment trials or non-adherence to treatment). Although multiple sociodemographic, clinical, treatment and contextual factors are known to negatively moderate response in persons with depression, very few factors are regarded as predictive of non-response across multiple modalities of treatment. Intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine (co-administered with an antidepressant) are established as efficacious in the management of TRD. Some second-generation antipsychotics (e.g., aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, quetiapine XR) are proven effective as adjunctive treatments to antidepressants in partial responders, but only the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination has been studied in FDA-defined TRD. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is established as effective and FDA-approved for individuals with TRD, with accelerated theta-burst TMS also recently showing efficacy. Electroconvulsive therapy is regarded as an effective acute and maintenance intervention in TRD, with preliminary evidence suggesting non-inferiority to acute intravenous ketamine. Evidence for extending antidepressant trial, medication switching and combining antidepressants is mixed. Manual-based psychotherapies are not established as efficacious on their own in TRD, but offer significant symptomatic relief when added to conventional antidepressants. Digital therapeutics are under study and represent a potential future clinical vista in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger S McIntyre
- Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mohammad Alsuwaidan
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bernhard T Baune
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Deakin University IMPACT Institute, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Koen Demyttenaere
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joseph F Goldberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip Gorwood
- Department of Psychiatry, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Roger Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Institute for Health Innovation and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Siegfried Kasper
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and Center of Brain Research, Molecular Neuroscience Branch, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sidney H Kennedy
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Josefina Ly-Uson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, University of The Philippines College of Medicine, Manila, The Philippines
| | - Rodrigo B Mansur
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R Hamish McAllister-Williams
- Northern Center for Mood Disorders, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, and Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - James W Murrough
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Andrew A Nierenberg
- Dauten Family Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua D Rosenblat
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gerard Sanacora
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Alan F Schatzberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Richard Shelton
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Stephen M Stahl
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Madhukar H Trivedi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maj Vinberg
- Mental Health Centre, Northern Zealand, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nolan Williams
- Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Allan H Young
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mario Maj
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading contributor to disability worldwide and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Current pharmacologic treatment options may be ineffective for some patients and can pose several limitations and challenges, including suboptimal response and slow onset of action. Many of these therapies can take 6 to 8 weeks for patients to achieve response and 12 weeks or longer to demonstrate full clinical benefit. Delays in depressive symptom resolution are associated with poor symptomatic and functional outcomes, decreased quality of life, and increased burden on the healthcare system. Achieving response and remission of symptoms soon after diagnosis and treatment is associated with lower rates of relapse and a greater likelihood of functional recovery. An unmet need exists for innovative treatments that offer rapid and sustained effects. This editorial discusses the benefits of rapid improvement in depressive symptoms with available and investigational agents for patients with MDD.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang J, Li W, Li M, Wu H, Qiu Z. Comparative efficacy and safety of 4 atypical antipsychotics augmentation treatment for major depressive disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34670. [PMID: 37746943 PMCID: PMC10519518 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atypical antipsychotic (AAP) augmentation is an alternative strategy for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who had an inadequate response to antidepressant therapy (ADT). We aimed to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of 4 AAPs in the adjuvant treatment of MDD. METHODS We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published and unpublished from the date of databases and clinical trial websites inception to April 30, 2023. The evidence risk of bias (RoB) and certainty are assessed using the Cochrane bias risk tool and grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) framework, respectively. Using network meta-analysis, we estimated summary risk ratios (RRs) or standardized mean difference (SMD) based on the random effects model. RESULTS 56 eligible studies comprising 11448 participants were included. In terms of primary efficacy outcome, compared with placebo (PBO), all AAPs had significant efficacy (SMD = -0.40; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.12 for quetiapine (QTP); -0.35, -0.59 to -0.11 for olanzapine (OLA); -0.28, -0.47 to -0.09 for aripiprazole (ARI) and -0.25, -0.42 to -0.07 for brexpiprazole (BRE), respectively). In terms of acceptability, no significant difference was found, either agents versus agents or agents versus PBO. In terms of tolerability, compared with the PBO, QTP (RR = 0.24; 95% CI,0.11-0.53), OLA (0.30,0.10-0.55), ARI (0.39,0.22-0.69), and BRE (0.37,0.18-0.75) were significantly less well tolerated. 8 (14.2%) of 56 trials were assessed as low RoB, 38 (67.9%) trials had moderate RoB, and 10 (17.9%) had high RoB; By the GRADE, the certainty of most evidence was low or very low. CONCLUSION Adjuvant AAPs had significant efficacy compared with PBO, but treatment decisions must be made to balance the risks and benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Wang
- Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China
| | - Wenwei Li
- Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China
| | - Mengting Li
- Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China
| | - Hanbiao Wu
- Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China
| | - Zhikun Qiu
- Key Department of Clinical Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yang L, Zhang J, Yu J, Yu Z, Hao X, Gao F, Zhou C. Predicting plasma concentration of quetiapine in patients with depression using machine learning techniques based on real-world evidence. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2023; 16:741-750. [PMID: 37466101 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2238604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We develop a model for predicting quetiapine levels in patients with depression, using machine learning to support decisions on clinical regimens. METHODS Inpatients diagnosed with depression at the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 1 November 2019, to 31 August were enrolled. The ratio of training cohort to testing cohort was fixed at 80%:20% for the whole dataset. Univariate analysis was executed on all information to screen the important variables influencing quetiapine TDM. The prediction abilities of nine machine learning and deep learning algorithms were compared. The prediction model was created using an algorithm with better model performance, and the model's interpretation was done using the SHapley Additive exPlanation. RESULTS There were 333 individuals and 412 cases of quetiapine TDM included in the study. Six significant variables were selected to establish the individualized medication model. A quetiapine concentration prediction model was created through CatBoost. In the testing cohort, the projected TDM's accuracy was 61.45%. The prediction accuracy of quetiapine concentration within the effective range (200-750 ng/mL) was 75.47%. CONCLUSIONS This study predicts the plasma concentration of quetiapine in depression patients by machine learning, which is meaningful for the clinical medication guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- The Technology Innovation Center for Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Pharmacy of Hebei Province, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Jinyuan Zhang
- Beijing Medicinovo Technology Co, Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Yu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- The Technology Innovation Center for Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Pharmacy of Hebei Province, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Ze Yu
- Institute of Interdisciplinary Integrative Medicine Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Hao
- Dalian Medicinovo Technology Co, Ltd, Dalian, China
| | - Fei Gao
- Beijing Medicinovo Technology Co, Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Chunhua Zhou
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- The Technology Innovation Center for Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Pharmacy of Hebei Province, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vas C, Jain A, Trivedi M, Jha MK, Mathew SJ. Pharmacotherapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Antidepressants and Atypical Antipsychotics. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2023; 46:261-275. [PMID: 37149344 DOI: 10.1016/j.psc.2023.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affects one in three patients with major depressive disorder and is associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality. Studies of real-world practices suggest that antidepressant monotherapy continues to be the most widely used treatment after inadequate response to a first-line treatment. However, rates of remission with antidepressants in TRD are suboptimal. Atypical antipsychotics are the most widely studied augmentation agent and aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, quetiapine extended-release, and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination are approved for depression. Benefits of using atypical antipsychotics for TRD has to be weighted against their potential adverse events, such as weight gain, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Collin Vas
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ayush Jain
- The Shri Ram School, Aravali, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Mili Trivedi
- Colleyville Heritage High School, Colleyville, TX, USA
| | - Manish Kumar Jha
- Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9119, USA.
| | - Sanjay J Mathew
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, The Menninger Clinic, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jha MK, Mathew SJ. Pharmacotherapies for Treatment-Resistant Depression: How Antipsychotics Fit in the Rapidly Evolving Therapeutic Landscape. Am J Psychiatry 2023; 180:190-199. [PMID: 36855876 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
One in three adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not experience clinically significant improvement after multiple sequential courses of antidepressants and have treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The presence of TRD contributes to the morbidity and excess mortality associated with MDD and has been linked to significantly increased health care expenses. In the absence of a consensus definition of TRD, this report takes a broad approach by considering inadequate response to one or more courses of antidepressants and focuses on atypical antipsychotics that are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of depression (aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, extended-release quetiapine, and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination). While multiple acute-phase studies have demonstrated the efficacy of these medications in improving depressive symptoms, clinically meaningful improvement (i.e., remission) remains limited, with significant concerns about side effects (including weight gain, metabolic dysfunction, extrapyramidal symptoms, and tardive dyskinesia), especially with long-term use. With the rapidly evolving landscape of antidepressant treatments over the past few years, which has witnessed approval of rapid-acting antidepressants (e.g., esketamine nasal spray and dextromethorphan-bupropion combination) and several more in the late-stage pipeline (e.g., zuranolone and psilocybin), it remains to be seen whether the use of atypical antipsychotics will go the way of the older and rarely prescribed antidepressants (such as tricyclics and monoamine oxidase inhibitors). Pragmatic clinical trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics with TRD-specific pharmacotherapies and neuromodulation treatments and to identify the optimal sequencing of these varied approaches for patients with MDD. When using atypical antipsychotics, clinicians and patients are encouraged to use a shared decision-making approach by personalizing treatment selection based on anticipated side effects, tolerability, cost, and feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish K Jha
- Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, and O'Donnell Brain Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Jha); Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Mathew); Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston (Mathew); Menninger Clinic, Houston (Mathew)
| | - Sanjay J Mathew
- Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, and O'Donnell Brain Institute, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Jha); Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Mathew); Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston (Mathew); Menninger Clinic, Houston (Mathew)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lin CY, Chiang CH, Tseng MCM, Tam KW, Loh EW. Effects of quetiapine on sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2023; 67:22-36. [PMID: 36463762 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2022.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Quetiapine is a common off-label antipsychotic drug for treating insomnia. Its effects in different disease conditions and dosages remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in clinical trials examining the efficacy of low-dose quetiapine in sleep. We obtained 21 clinical trials. Mean difference (MD), standard mean difference (SMD), and odds ratio (OR) were used to estimate the effect sizes using a random-effects model. The pooled results showed that quetiapine improved sleep quality compared with placebo (SMD: -0.57 [95%CI: -0.75, -0.4]). The SMD of sleep quality was correlated with age (coefficient: -0.0174) and sex (coefficient: -0.012). The significant effects were observed in the general anxiety disorder (SMD: -0.59 [95%CI: -0.92, -0.27]), major depressive disorder (SMD: -0.47 [95%CI: -0.66, -0.28]), and healthy (SMD: -1.33, [95%CI [-2.12, -0.54]) subgroups, at the dosage of 50 mg (SMD: -0.36 [95%CI: -0.36, -0.11]), 150 mg (SMD: -0.4 [95%CI: -0.52, -0.29]), and 300 mg (SMD: -0.17 [95%CI: -0.31,-0.04]). Quetiapine increased total sleep time compared with placebo (MD: 47.91 [95%CI: 28.06, 67.76]) but not when compared with other psychiatric drugs (MD: -4.19 [95%CI: -19.43, 11.05]). Adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs were common among the quetiapine users. Quetiapine is effective as a sleep-helping drug. Precaution is suggested when interpreting the results on the elderly due to the high heterogeneity caused by incorporating patients over 66 years in the meta-analyses. We recommend an initial dosage of 50-150 mg/day with priority consideration for the elderly with GAD or MDD while monitoring its potential AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Che-Yin Lin
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hen Chiang
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Medical University Shuang-Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Chih Meg Tseng
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ka-Wai Tam
- Center for Evidence-Based Health Care, Department of Medical Research, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - El-Wui Loh
- Center for Evidence-Based Health Care, Department of Medical Research, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medical Imaging, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Juza R, Musilek K, Mezeiova E, Soukup O, Korabecny J. Recent advances in dopamine D 2 receptor ligands in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. Med Res Rev 2023; 43:55-211. [PMID: 36111795 DOI: 10.1002/med.21923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Dopamine is a biologically active amine synthesized in the central and peripheral nervous system. This biogenic monoamine acts by activating five types of dopamine receptors (D1-5 Rs), which belong to the G protein-coupled receptor family. Antagonists and partial agonists of D2 Rs are used to treat schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, depression, and anxiety. The typical pharmacophore with high D2 R affinity comprises four main areas, namely aromatic moiety, cyclic amine, central linker and aromatic/heteroaromatic lipophilic fragment. From the literature reviewed herein, we can conclude that 4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl), 4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-, 4-(benzo[b]thiophen-4-yl)-1-substituted piperazine, and 4-(6-fluorobenzo[d]isoxazol-3-yl)piperidine moieties are critical for high D2 R affinity. Four to six atoms chains are optimal for D2 R affinity with 4-butoxyl as the most pronounced one. The bicyclic aromatic/heteroaromatic systems are most frequently occurring as lipophilic appendages to retain high D2 R affinity. In this review, we provide a thorough overview of the therapeutic potential of D2 R modulators in the treatment of the aforementioned disorders. In addition, this review summarizes current knowledge about these diseases, with a focus on the dopaminergic pathway underlying these pathologies. Major attention is paid to the structure, function, and pharmacology of novel D2 R ligands, which have been developed in the last decade (2010-2021), and belong to the 1,4-disubstituted aromatic cyclic amine group. Due to the abundance of data, allosteric D2 R ligands and D2 R modulators from patents are not discussed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radomir Juza
- Experimental Neurobiology, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.,Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Kamil Musilek
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.,Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Eva Mezeiova
- Experimental Neurobiology, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.,Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrej Soukup
- Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Korabecny
- Experimental Neurobiology, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.,Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McKeown L, Taylor RW, Day E, Shah R, Marwood L, Tee H, Kerr-Gaffney J, Oprea E, Geddes JR, McAllister-Williams RH, Young AH, Cleare AJ. Patient perspectives of lithium and quetiapine augmentation treatment in treatment-resistant depression: A qualitative assessment. J Psychopharmacol 2022; 36:557-565. [PMID: 35475375 PMCID: PMC9112618 DOI: 10.1177/02698811221089042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) has a profound cost to patients and healthcare services worldwide. Pharmacological augmentation is one therapeutic option for TRD, with lithium and quetiapine currently recommended as first-line agents. Patient opinions about pharmacological augmentation may affect treatment outcomes, yet these have not been systematically explored. AIMS This study aimed to qualitatively assess patient experiences of lithium and quetiapine augmentation. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 patients from the ongoing lithium versus quetiapine open-label trial comparing these augmentation agents in patients with TRD. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and a thematic analysis was used to assess patient opinions of each agent. RESULTS Four main themes were generated from the thematic analysis: 'Initial concerns', 'Experience of side effects', 'Perception of treatment efficacy' and 'Positive perception of treatment monitoring'. Patient accounts indicated a predominantly positive experience of lithium and quetiapine augmentation. Greater apprehension about side effects was reported for lithium prior to treatment initiation, but greater experience of negative side effects was reported for quetiapine. Clinical monitoring was perceived positively. CONCLUSION Patient accounts suggested treatment augmentation with lithium or quetiapine was acceptable and helpful for most patients. However, anticipation and experiences of adverse side effects may prevent some patients from benefitting from these treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas McKeown
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael W Taylor
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Elana Day
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Rupal Shah
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lindsey Marwood
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Helena Tee
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jess Kerr-Gaffney
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK,Jess Kerr-Gaffney, Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
| | - Emanuella Oprea
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - John R Geddes
- Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK,Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R Hamish McAllister-Williams
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK,Northern Centre for Mood Disorders, Newcastle University Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Allan H Young
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anthony J Cleare
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nuñez NA, Joseph B, Pahwa M, Kumar R, Resendez MG, Prokop LJ, Veldic M, Seshadri A, Biernacka JM, Frye MA, Wang Z, Singh B. Augmentation strategies for treatment resistant major depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2022; 302:385-400. [PMID: 34986373 PMCID: PMC9328668 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and discontinuation of augmentation agents in adult patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analyses (NMA) to combine direct and indirect comparisons of augmentation agents. METHODS We included randomized controlled trials comparing one active drug with another or with placebo following a treatment course up to 24 weeks. Nineteen agents were included: stimulants, atypical antipsychotics, thyroid hormones, antidepressants, and mood stabilizers. Data for response/remission and all-cause discontinuation rates were analyzed. We estimated effect-size by relative risk using pairwise and NMA with random-effects model. RESULTS A total of 65 studies (N = 12,415) with 19 augmentation agents were included in the NMA. Our findings from the NMA for response rates, compared to placebo, were significant for: liothyronine, nortriptyline, aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, quetiapine, lithium, modafinil, olanzapine (fluoxetine), cariprazine, and lisdexamfetamine. For remission rates, compared to placebo, were significant for: thyroid hormone(T4), aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, risperidone, quetiapine, and olanzapine (fluoxetine). Compared to placebo, ziprasidone, mirtazapine, and cariprazine had statistically significant higher discontinuation rates. Overall, 24% studies were rated as having low risk of bias (RoB), 63% had moderate RoB and 13% had high RoB. LIMITATIONS Heterogeneity in TRD definitions, variable trial duration and methodological clinical design of older studies and small number of trials per comparisons. CONCLUSIONS This NMA suggests a superiority of the regulatory approved adjunctive atypical antipsychotics, thyroid hormones, dopamine compounds (modafinil and lisdexamfetamine) and lithium. Acceptability was lower with ziprasidone, mirtazapine, and cariprazine. Further research and head-to-head studies should be considered to strengthen the best available options for TRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas A Nuñez
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Boney Joseph
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Mehak Pahwa
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Rakesh Kumar
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Manuel Gardea Resendez
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Larry J Prokop
- Mayo Medical Libraries, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Marin Veldic
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Ashok Seshadri
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Health System, Austin, MN, United States
| | - Joanna M Biernacka
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Mark A Frye
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Zhen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Balwinder Singh
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Treatment-Resistant Depression in Poland—Epidemiology and Treatment. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11030480. [PMID: 35159935 PMCID: PMC8837165 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent psychiatric disorders worldwide. Although several antidepressant drugs have been developed, up to 30% of patients fail to achieve remission, and acute remission rates decrease with the number of treatment steps required. The aim of the current project was to estimate and describe the population of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) patients in outpatient clinics in Poland. (2) Methods: The project involved a representative sample of psychiatrists working in outpatient clinics, chosen through a process of quota random sampling. The doctors completed two questionnaires on a consecutive series of patients with MDD, which captured the patients’ demographics, comorbidities, and medical histories. TRD was defined as no improvement seen after a minimum of two different antidepressant drug therapies applied in sufficient doses for a minimum of 4 weeks each. The data were weighted and extrapolated to the population of TRD outpatients in Poland. (3) Results: A total of 76 psychiatrists described 1781 MDD patients, out of which 396 fulfilled the criteria of TRD. The TRD patients constituted 25.2% of all MDD patients, which led to the number of TRD outpatients in Poland being estimated at 34,800. The demographics, comorbidities, medical histories, and histories of treatment of Polish TRD patients were described. In our sample of the TRD population (mean age: 45.6 ± 13.1 years; female: 64%), the patients had experienced 2.1 ± 1.6 depressive episodes (including the current one), and the mean duration of the current episode was 4.8 ± 4.4 months. In terms of treatment strategies, most patients (around 70%) received monotherapy during the first three therapies, while combination antidepressant drugs (ADs) were applied more often from the fourth line of treatment. The use of additional medications and augmentation was reported in only up to one third of the TRD patients. During all of the treatment steps, patients most often received a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and a serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI). (4) Conclusions: TRD is a serious problem, affecting approximately one fourth of all depressive patients and nearly 35,000 Poles.
Collapse
|
15
|
Floden L, Hudgens S, Jamieson C, Popova V, Drevets WC, Cooper K, Singh J. Evaluation of Individual Items of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in Adults with Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated with Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined with a New Oral Antidepressant. CNS Drugs 2022; 36:649-658. [PMID: 35441931 PMCID: PMC9166828 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00916-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine which symptoms measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) improve in those treated with esketamine nasal spray in combination with oral antidepressant (AD) compared with those treated with placebo plus AD for adult patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). These results complement the interpretation of PHQ-9 and MADRS total scores. METHODS The TRANSFORM 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray in combination with AD. This post-hoc analysis used PHQ-9 and MADRS data to evaluate symptom changes. The total scores change and proportions of individual item change scores on the PHQ-9 and MADRS were evaluated at days 15 and 28; analysis of variance was used to test differences on total scores. Generalized estimation equations of logistic regression models were used to estimate the likelihood of improvement on instrument items. RESULTS The mean total score reduction of the PHQ-9, indicating improvement, was greater in the esketamine plus AD arm compared with placebo plus AD at day 15 (- 1.8; p = 0.045) and day 28 (- 2.8; p = 0.006). Proportions of those who improved (≥ 1 point on a 4-point scale and ≥ 2 points on a 7-point scale for the PHQ-9 and MADRS, respectively) was greater in the esketamine plus AD group compared with the placebo plus AD group across all items. The odds of improving for those in the esketamine plus AD group compared with the placebo plus AD group were over two times greater on the PHQ-9 items: "Little interest/pleasure in things" (OR 2.252, 95% CI 1.165-4.355); "Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless" (OR 2.767, 95% CI 1.400-5.470); and "Feeling tired or having little energy" (OR 2.171, 95% CI 1.153-4.087). The mean reduction in total scores on the MADRS, indicating improvement, was numerically greater at day 15 (- 2.0; p = 0.189) and statistically significantly greater at day 28 (- 4.4; p = 0.017) in the esketamine plus AD arm compared with placebo plus AD. The odds of improving for those in the esketamine plus AD group compared with the placebo plus AD group were over two times greater on the MADRS items measuring "Apparent sadness" (OR 2.007, 95% CI 1.096-3.674); and "Inability to feel" (OR 2.099, 95% CI 1.180-3.735). CONCLUSION Improvement in mean total scores in those treated with esketamine plus AD compared with placebo plus AD are important results to confirm efficacy. The odds of improving in those treated with esketamine plus AD was at least two times greater than with placebo plus AD on three patient- and two clinician-reported individual symptoms of TRD. These findings provide patient-relevant quantification of the esketamine plus AD treatment benefit, adding understanding as to which symptoms are most improved with treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02418585; first posted 16 April 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lysbeth Floden
- Clinical Outcomes Solutions, 1820 E River RD, Suite 220, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.
| | - Stacie Hudgens
- Clinical Outcomes Solutions, 1820 E River RD, Suite 220, Tucson, AZ 85718 USA
| | | | - Vanina Popova
- Janssen Research and Development LLC, Beerse, Belgium
| | | | | | - Jaskaran Singh
- Janssen Research and Development LLC, San Diego, CA USA ,Present Address: Neurocrine Biosciences, San Diego, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kulkarni A. A head-to-head randomised controlled trial of aripiprazole versus quetiapine as augmenting agents in treatment-resistant depression. ADVANCES IN HUMAN BIOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/aihb.aihb_59_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
17
|
Can Quetiapine Prolong the Antidepressant Effect of Ketamine?: A 5-Year Follow-up Study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2021; 41:673-675. [PMID: 34668877 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000001489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ketamine, a noncompetitive, high-affinity antagonist of the N-methyl-d-aspartate-type glutamate receptor, has a rapid effect in patients with treatment-resistant disorder, but many patients who respond to intravenous ketamine relapse within several days. The objective of this study was to examine the long-term outcome of patients' mood 5 years after ketamine treatment. METHODS Sixteen electroconvulsive therapy referrals received at least 1 intravenous ketamine treatment in addition to their stable antidepressant medications. Depression was evaluated using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated, Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression, and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Anxiety was measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale. RESULTS Of 16 patients treated, 6 achieved complete remission, 3 partially responded, and 7 did not respond. At baseline, all patients were treated with antidepressants, 14 patients were also treated with neuroleptics, of whom 5 patients were treated with quetiapine. The time to relapse in the 5 patients taking quetiapine was significantly longer than in patients who were taking other neuroleptics (965.83 ± 824.68 vs 80.5 ± 114.3, Z = 7.001, P = 0.0001). At the 5-year follow-up, 3 of the patients taking quetiapine maintained their remission. Overall levels of depression and anxiety at all times were improved in comparison to baseline. CONCLUSIONS Our follow-up results suggest that the combination of quetiapine and ketamine can prolong time to relapse after ketamine treatment in patients with treatment-resistant disorder.
Collapse
|
18
|
Vázquez GH, Bahji A, Undurraga J, Tondo L, Baldessarini RJ. Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Treatments for Major Depression: Antidepressants plus Second-Generation Antipsychotics vs. Esketamine vs. Lithium. J Psychopharmacol 2021; 35:890-900. [PMID: 34238049 PMCID: PMC8358538 DOI: 10.1177/02698811211013579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Successful treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) can be challenging, and failures ("treatment-resistant depression" [TRD]) are frequent. Steps to address TRD include increasing antidepressant dose, combining antidepressants, adding adjunctive agents, or using nonpharmacological treatments. Their relative efficacy and tolerability remain inadequately tested. In particular, the value and safety of increasingly employed second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and new esketamine, compared to lithium as antidepressant adjuncts remain unclear. METHODS We reviewed randomized, placebo-controlled trials and used random-effects meta-analysis to compare odds ratio (OR) versus placebo, as well as numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) and to-harm (NNH), for adding SGAs, esketamine, or lithium to antidepressants for major depressive episodes. RESULTS Analyses involved 49 drug-placebo pairs. By NNT, SGAs were more effective than placebo (NNT = 11 [CI: 9-15]); esketamine (7 [5-10]) and lithium (5 [4-10]) were even more effective. Individually, aripiprazole, olanzapine+fluoxetine, risperidone, and ziprasidone all were more effective (all NNT < 10) than quetiapine (NNT = 13), brexpiprazole (16), or cariprazine (16), with overlapping NNT CIs. Risk of adverse effects, as NNH for most-frequently reported effects, among SGAs versus placebo was 5 [4-6] overall, and highest with quetiapine (NNH = 3), lowest with brexpiprazole (19), 5 (4-6) for esketamine, and 9 (5-106) with lithium. The risk/benefit ratio (NNH/NNT) was 1.80 (1.25-10.60) for lithium and much less favorable for esketamine (0.71 [0.60-0.80]) or SGAs (0.45 [0.17-0.77]). CONCLUSIONS Several modern antipsychotics and esketamine appeared to be useful adjuncts to antidepressants for acute major depressive episodes, but lithium was somewhat more effective and better tolerated. LIMITATIONS Most trials of adding lithium involved older, mainly tricyclic, antidepressants, and the dosing of adjunctive treatments were not optimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo H. Vázquez
- International Consortium for Mood & Psychotic Disorder Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA,Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada,Gustavo H. Vázquez, Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, 752 King Street, Kingston, ON K7P0H9, Canada.
| | - Anees Bahji
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Juan Undurraga
- International Consortium for Mood & Psychotic Disorder Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA,Department of Neurology & Psychiatry, Clinica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile,Early Intervention Program, Instituto Psiquiátrico Dr J. Horwitz Barak, Santiago, Chile
| | - Leonardo Tondo
- International Consortium for Mood & Psychotic Disorder Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA,Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Lucio Bini Mood Disorder Centers, Cagliari & Rome, Italy
| | - Ross J. Baldessarini
- International Consortium for Mood & Psychotic Disorder Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA,Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Quetiapine in the Anxiety Dimension of Mood Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Literature to Support Clinical Practice. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2021; 41:436-449. [PMID: 34166261 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000001420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder are heterogeneous conditions characterized by marked variations in mood. High levels of anxiety are often present in these conditions and are associated with increased suicidal risk, increased disease duration, and treatment resistance. Mood stabilizers or antipsychotics are recommended for the treatment of bipolar disorder in comorbidity with anxiety disorders. This study examines current knowledge to evaluate the efficacy of quetiapine in the treatment of anxiety in mood disorders. METHODS/PROCEDURES A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines, selecting randomized control trials that evaluated the efficacy of quetiapine on anxiety symptoms in patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder and included anxiety evaluation scales. FINDINGS/RESULTS We collected 27 studies (19 with primary data analysis, 8 with secondary data analysis) regarding the use of quetiapine in mood disorders. Quetiapine was more effective than placebo and active comparators in reducing anxiety in unipolar and bipolar patients in 20 of these studies. In 7 studies, quetiapine was not superior to psychoactive comparators or placebo on the anxiety dimension. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS Statistical power might be limited by small sample size in 5 of the studies included in our review. Moreover, data on anxiety were a secondary outcome in most studies. Nevertheless, the reported studies show with good levels of concordance that quetiapine is effective in controlling anxiety symptoms in patients with mood disorders. This evidence supports current guidelines and recommendations concerning the use of quetiapine in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
20
|
Cantù F, Ciappolino V, Enrico P, Moltrasio C, Delvecchio G, Brambilla P. Augmentation with Atypical Antipsychotics for Treatment-Resistant Depression. J Affect Disord 2021; 280:45-53. [PMID: 33202337 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is considered a common clinical condition often associated with relevant suicidal ideation and characterized by a severe functional impairment lifetime. Among the available drugs for the TRD treatment, second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have been reported as effective. In this context, the aim of this study was to review the clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of SGAs as add-on therapy in TRD. METHODS A comprehensive search on PubMed, Medline and PsychINFO of all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the augmentation with antipsychotics in TRD, published from January 2000 until March 2020, was performed. Sixteen RCTs studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS The reviewed studies showed that the add-on therapy with aripiprazole could be beneficial in the treatment of TRD. Furthermore, RCTs on quetiapine augmentation support its use in TRD, especially when comorbid anxiety or insomnia are present. The effects of risperidone and olanzapine as add-on in TRD were less studied, but preliminary data indicated an efficacy respect to placebo, making them a possible therapeutic option in TRD. LIMITATIONS The lack of consistency in the definition of TRD together with the small sample sizes and the heterogeneity of antipsychotics dosages used in the reviewed RCTs may have limited the strength of evidences obtained. CONCLUSION Overall, the available RCTs studies seem to support the hypothesis that the augmentation with SGAs, in particular aripiprazole and quetiapine, is a valid therapeutic option for TRD. However, to improve the therapeutic outcome of patients with TRD, larger and more homogeneous RCTs are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Cantù
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Ciappolino
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Enrico
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Moltrasio
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Delvecchio
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo Brambilla
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Antidepressant Augmentation: A Review of the Literature and a Review of the Pharmacoeconomic Considerations. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2021; 40:396-400. [PMID: 32639292 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000001236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Antidepressant augmentation strategies for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are discussed here with an analysis of patient out-of-pocket costs for various medications. The choice of agent ranges from newer atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, quetiapine) to older agents including buspirone, liothyronine (T3), and lithium. We sought to better understand the differences among these agents to aid in clinical decision making. METHODS We conducted a focused review of the support for each of the aforementioned agents in antidepressant augmentation. We then compared the approximate out-of-pocket cost for each medication during a typical augmentation trial using the typical prescription costs on ClinCalc.com derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We calculated the cost to achieve response for one patient with TRD based on the number needed to treat (NNT). FINDINGS We observed significant variance in cost to achieve response based on the NNT derived from our review of each of the medications. For example, the overall out-of-pocket cost for one patient to achieve response with aripiprazole (the costliest generic agent) could cover lithium prescriptions for 4 to 5 patients with TRD to achieve response. Although brexpiprazole was estimated separately because of its brand name cost, we estimated that 324 patients receiving lithium could achieve response for same cost of single patient receiving brexpiprazole. IMPLICATIONS These findings suggest that among augmentation agents, there are differences in cost that may be highly important in clinical decision making. Other issues of medication monitoring may incur additional costs, and brand name medications offer significantly greater complexity and potential out-of-pocket costs to patients. The use of lithium as a first-line agent for TRD should be considered based on low cost, lowest NNT, and data in support of its efficacy.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kato H, Koizumi T, Takeuchi H, Tani H, Mimura M, Uchida H. Effects of Discontinuation of Drugs Used for Augmentation Therapy on Treatment Outcomes in Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY 2020; 54:106-116. [PMID: 33368090 DOI: 10.1055/a-1330-8587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There has been no consensus on whether and how long add-on drugs for augmentation therapy should be continued in the treatment of depression. METHODS Double-blind randomized controlled trials that examined the effects of discontinuation of drugs used for augmentation on treatment outcomes in patients with depression were identified. Meta-analyses were performed to compare rates of study withdrawal due to any reason, study-defined relapse, and adverse events between patients who continued augmentation therapy and those who discontinued it. RESULTS Seven studies were included (n=841 for continuing augmentation therapy; n=831 for discontinuing augmentation therapy). The rate of study withdrawal due to any reason was not significantly different between the 2 groups (risk ratio [RR]=0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.69-1.08, p=0.20). Study withdrawal due to relapse was less frequent in the continuation group than in the discontinuation group (RR=0.61, 95% CI=0.40-0.92, p=0.02); however, this statistical significance disappeared when one study using esketamine as augmentation was excluded. Analysis of the data from 5 studies that included a stabilization period before randomization found less frequent relapse in the continuation group than in the discontinuation group (RR=0.47, 95% CI=0.36-0.60, p<0.01). This finding was repeated when the esketamine study was excluded. DISCUSSION No firm conclusions could be drawn in light of the small number of studies included. Currently available evidence suggests that add-on drugs, other than esketamine, used for augmentation therapy for depression may be discontinued. This may not be the case for patients who are maintained with augmentation therapy after remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideo Kato
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Teruki Koizumi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Psychiatry, Shimofusa Psychiatric Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroyoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideaki Tani
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Kimel Family Translational Imaging-Genetics Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Masaru Mimura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Uchida
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Taylor RW, Marwood L, Oprea E, DeAngel V, Mather S, Valentini B, Zahn R, Young AH, Cleare AJ. Pharmacological Augmentation in Unipolar Depression: A Guide to the Guidelines. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2020; 23:587-625. [PMID: 32402075 PMCID: PMC7710919 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacological augmentation is a recommended strategy for patients with treatment-resistant depression. A range of guidelines provide advice on treatment selection, prescription, monitoring and discontinuation, but variation in the content and quality of guidelines may limit the provision of objective, evidence-based care. This is of importance given the side effect burden and poorer long-term outcomes associated with polypharmacy and treatment-resistant depression. This review provides a definitive overview of pharmacological augmentation recommendations by assessing the quality of guidelines for depression and comparing the recommendations made. METHODS A systematic literature search identified current treatment guidelines for depression published in English. Guidelines were quality assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Data relating to the prescription of pharmacological augmenters were extracted from those developed with sufficient rigor, and the included recommendations compared. RESULTS Total of 1696 records were identified, 19 guidelines were assessed for quality, and 10 were included. Guidelines differed in their quality, the stage at which augmentation was recommended, the agents included, and the evidence base cited. Lithium and atypical antipsychotics were recommended by all 10, though the specific advice was not consistent. Of the 15 augmenters identified, no others were universally recommended. CONCLUSIONS This review provides a comprehensive overview of current pharmacological augmentation recommendations for major depression and will support clinicians in selecting appropriate treatment guidance. Although some variation can be accounted for by date of guideline publication, and limited evidence from clinical trials, there is a clear need for greater consistency across guidelines to ensure patients receive consistent evidence-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael W Taylor
- The Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lindsey Marwood
- The Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emanuella Oprea
- The Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Valeria DeAngel
- The Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Mather
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Beatrice Valentini
- The Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Roland Zahn
- The Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Allan H Young
- The Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony J Cleare
- The Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Baig MR, Beck RD, Wilson JL, Lemmer JA, Meraj A, Meyer EC, Mintz J, Peterson AL, Roache JD. Quetiapine augmentation of prolonged exposure therapy in veterans with PTSD and a history of mild traumatic brain injury: design and methodology of a pilot study. Mil Med Res 2020; 7:46. [PMID: 33032657 PMCID: PMC7545554 DOI: 10.1186/s40779-020-00278-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selective serotonergic reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are first-line pharmacologic treatments for patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but must be given over extended period of time before the onset of action. The use of SSRIs in PTSD patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is problematic since SSRIs could exacerbate post-concussion syndrome (PCS) symptoms. VA/DOD guidelines identify trauma-focused psychotherapy as the best evidence-based treatment for PTSD, but overall effectiveness is limited by reduced levels of patient engagement and retention. A previous study from this research group suggested that quetiapine monotherapy, but not risperidone or valproate, could increase engagement in trauma-focused psychotherapy. METHODS We report the study protocol of a pilot study funded under the South-Central Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center pilot study program from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. This randomized, open-label study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of completing a randomized trial of quetiapine vs. treatment as usual to promote patient engagement in PTSD patients with a history of mTBI. DISCUSSION We expect that the success of this ongoing study should provide us with the preliminary data necessary to design a full-scale randomized trial. Positive efficacy results in a full- scale trial should inform new VA guidelines for clinical practice by showing that quetiapine-related improvements in patient engagement and retention may be the most effective approach to assure that VA resources achieve the best possible outcome for veterans. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04280965 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad R Baig
- Mental Health, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, 116 A, 7400 Merton Minter Blvd, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. .,Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| | - Robert D Beck
- Mental Health, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, 116 A, 7400 Merton Minter Blvd, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.,Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer L Wilson
- Mental Health, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, 116 A, 7400 Merton Minter Blvd, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.,Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Lemmer
- Mental Health, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, 116 A, 7400 Merton Minter Blvd, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.,Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Adeel Meraj
- Mental Health, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, 116 A, 7400 Merton Minter Blvd, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Eric C Meyer
- Department of Veterans Affairs VISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, Waco, TX, USA.,Central Texas Veterans Healthcare System, Waco, TX, USA.,Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Jim Mintz
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Alan L Peterson
- Mental Health, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, 116 A, 7400 Merton Minter Blvd, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.,Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - John D Roache
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.,Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kamiya M, Sabia HD, Marella J, Fava M, Nemeroff CB, Umeuchi H, Iijima M, Chaki S, Nishino I. Efficacy and safety of TS-121, a novel vasopressin V 1B receptor antagonist, as adjunctive treatment for patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Psychiatr Res 2020; 128:43-51. [PMID: 32521250 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Vasopressin 1B (V1B) receptor has a pivotal role in the regulation of the hypothalamus-adrenal-pituitary axis, and V1B receptor antagonists have shown efficacy in a number of preclinical models of depression. The efficacy and safety of, TS-121 (active ingredient: THY1773), a novel V1B receptor antagonist, was investigated in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who had an inadequate response to current antidepressant therapy. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study, 51 MDD patients (43 of whom completed the study) were randomly assigned to either TS-121 10 mg, 50 mg or placebo for 6 weeks treatment period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score at week 6. The study was conducted from Jul 2017 to Dec 2018. The changes from baseline in MADRS score at week 6 (Least Square Mean [95% Confidence interval] were: TS-121 10 mg (-9.0 [-13.9, -4.1]), TS-121 50 mg (-9.0 [-13.4, -4.5]), and placebo (-6.4 [-10.7, -2.2]). TS-121 groups showed greater numerical reductions in MADRS score change from baseline compared to placebo, though these reductions did not achieve statistical significance. Similar trends of numerically greater improvements in TS-121 groups were observed across secondary endpoints. Higher baseline urinary and hair cortisol levels were associated with a greater separation between TS-121 groups and the placebo group in the primary endpoint. These findings, combined with favorable safety and tolerability, warrant further investigation of TS-121 in an adequately powered study in patients with MDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Kamiya
- Taisho Pharmaceutical R&D Inc., 350 Mount Kemble Avenue, Morristown, NJ, 07960, USA.
| | - Helene D Sabia
- Taisho Pharmaceutical R&D Inc., 350 Mount Kemble Avenue, Morristown, NJ, 07960, USA
| | - Julie Marella
- Taisho Pharmaceutical R&D Inc., 350 Mount Kemble Avenue, Morristown, NJ, 07960, USA
| | - Maurizio Fava
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Bulfinch 351, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Charles B Nemeroff
- University of Texas Dell Medical School in Austin, 1601 Trinity Street, Stop Z0600, Office HDB 4.112, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Hideo Umeuchi
- Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Development Headquarters, 3-24-1 Takada, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 170-8633, Japan
| | - Michihiko Iijima
- Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Research Headquarters, 1-403 Yoshino-cho, Kita-ku, Saitama, Saitama, 331-9530, Japan
| | - Shigeyuki Chaki
- Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Research Headquarters, 1-403 Yoshino-cho, Kita-ku, Saitama, Saitama, 331-9530, Japan
| | - Izumi Nishino
- Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Development Headquarters, 3-24-1 Takada, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 170-8633, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ruberto VL, Jha MK, Murrough JW. Pharmacological Treatments for Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020; 13:ph13060116. [PMID: 32512768 PMCID: PMC7345023 DOI: 10.3390/ph13060116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Over a third of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not have an adequate response to first-line antidepressant treatments, i.e., they have treatment-resistant depression (TRD). These patients tend to have a more severe course of illness and are at an increased risk of suicide. Next step treatment options for patients with TRD, include switching to a different antidepressant, combining more than one antidepressant, or augmenting an antidepressant with another (non-antidepressant) medication. It is unclear which of these treatment approaches should be applied to a given patient, and in what order. Due to this ambiguity, comparing antidepressants and augmentation agents on the basis of their efficacy, tolerability, and speed of symptom relief would be beneficial for clinicians. To accomplish this, a systematic search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Only randomized controlled trials were included in this qualitative synthesis, resulting in 66 articles. This review identified several effective pharmaco-therapeutic strategies that are currently available for patients with TRD. Ketamine and esketamine appear to be effective for the treatment of TRD. Augmentation with certain second generation antipsychotics, such as quetiapine or aripiprazole is likewise effective, and may be preferred over switching to antidepressant monotherapy. While the combination of olanzapine and fluoxetine was one of the first pharmacotherapy approved for TRD, and its use may be limited by metabolic side-effects. Other effective strategies include augmentation with lithium, liothyronine (T3), lamotrigine, or combination of antidepressants including bupropion, tricyclics, or mirtazapine. There is insufficient research to demonstrate the efficacy of ziprasidone or levothyroxine (T4). A shared decision-making approach is recommended to guide treatment selection to address each patient’s individual needs.
Collapse
|
27
|
Hawthorne SCC, Williams-Wengerd A. 'Effective' at What? On Effective Intervention in Serious Mental Illness. HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS 2020; 27:289-308. [PMID: 30895412 DOI: 10.1007/s10728-019-00367-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The term "effective," on its own, is honorific but vague. Interventions against serious mental illness may be "effective" at goals as diverse as reducing "apparent sadness" or providing housing. Underexamined use of "effective" and other success terms often obfuscates differences and incompatibilities in interventions, degrees of effectiveness, key omissions in effectiveness standards, and values involved in determining what counts as "effective." Yet vague use of such success terms is common in the research, clinical, and policy realms, with consequences that negatively affect the care offered to individuals experiencing serious mental illness. A pragmatist-oriented solution to these problems suggests that when people use success terms, they need to explain and defend the goals and supporting values embedded in the terms, asking and answering the questions, "Effective at what? For whom? How effective? And why that goal?" Practical and epistemic standards for effectiveness will likely remain plural for good reasons, but each standard should be well explained and well justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan C C Hawthorne
- Philosophy Department, St. Catherine University, 2004 Randolph Ave, St. Paul, MN, 55105, USA.
| | - Anne Williams-Wengerd
- Psychology Department, St. Catherine University, 2004 Randolph Ave, St. Paul, MN, 55105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
A Post-Authorization Safety Study of Quetiapine as Antidepressant Treatment in Sweden: Nested Case-Control Analyses of Select Outcomes. Drug Saf 2020; 43:135-145. [PMID: 31848933 PMCID: PMC7007414 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00889-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Introduction This post-authorization safety study (PASS) was a commitment to the European Medicines Agency. Objective This PASS investigated quetiapine as antidepressant treatment in Swedish registers with regard to the risk for all-cause mortality, self-harm and suicide, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, diabetes mellitus, extrapyramidal disorders, and somnolence. Methods Users of quetiapine and antidepressants (2011‒2014) who had changed treatment in the past year were included. Conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome in nested case–control studies for quetiapine as combination therapy and monotherapy, monotherapy with antidepressants, and no medication, versus the use of combinations of antidepressants (reference group). Results Overall, 7421 quetiapine users and 281,303 antidepressant users were included. For quetiapine in combination, risks were increased for all-cause mortality [adjusted OR (aOR) 1.31, 95% CI 1.12–1.54] compared with combinations of antidepressants; however, when stratified by age, only patients ≥ 65 years of age had an increased mortality, and, in a post hoc analysis excluding patients with Parkinson’s disease, no mortality increase remained. Furthermore, the risk for self-harm and suicide was increased (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.31–1.79), but when stratified by age, the risk increase was found only among patients aged 18–64 years. Risks were also increased for stroke among patients ≥ 65 years of age (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.01–2.12), for extrapyramidal disorder (aOR 6.15, 95% CI 3.57–10.58), and for somnolence (aOR 2.41, 95% CI 1.42–4.11). Conclusion Risks for all-cause mortality, self-harm and suicide, and stroke in older patients may be higher among patients treated with quetiapine and antidepressant combination therapy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-019-00889-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
29
|
Chan CH, Su CH. Improvement of hoarding symptoms with low-dose quetiapine treatment in traumatic brain injury: A case report. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/tpsy.tpsy_4_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
30
|
Voineskos D, Daskalakis ZJ, Blumberger DM. Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression: Challenges and Strategies. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2020; 16:221-234. [PMID: 32021216 PMCID: PMC6982454 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s198774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a subset of Major Depressive Disorder which does not respond to traditional and first-line therapeutic options. There are several definitions and staging models of TRD and a consensus for each has not yet been established. However, in common for each model is the inadequate response to at least 2 trials of antidepressant pharmacotherapy. In this review, a comprehensive analysis of existing literature regarding the challenges and management of TRD has been compiled. A PubMed search was performed to assemble meta-analyses, trials and reviews on the topic of TRD. First, we address the confounds in the definitions and staging models of TRD, and subsequently the difficulties inherent in assessing the illness. Pharmacological augmentation strategies including lithium, triiodothyronine and second-generation antipsychotics are reviewed, as is switching of antidepressant class. Somatic therapies, including several modalities of brain stimulation (electroconvulsive therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, magnetic seizure therapy and deep brain stimulation) are detailed, psychotherapeutic strategies and subsequently novel therapeutics including ketamine, psilocybin, anti-inflammatories and new directions are reviewed in this manuscript. Our review of the evidence suggests that further large-scale work is necessary to understand the appropriate treatment pathways for TRD and to prescribe effective therapeutic options for patients suffering from TRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Voineskos
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zafiris J Daskalakis
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel M Blumberger
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Davies P, Ijaz S, Williams CJ, Kessler D, Lewis G, Wiles N. Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 12:CD010557. [PMID: 31846068 PMCID: PMC6916711 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010557.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although antidepressants are often a first-line treatment for adults with moderate to severe depression, many people do not respond adequately to medication, and are said to have treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Little evidence exists to inform the most appropriate 'next step' treatment for these people. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of standard pharmacological treatments for adults with TRD. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Controlled Trials Register (CCMDCTR) (March 2016), CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science (31 December 2018), the World Health Organization trials portal and ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished and ongoing studies, and screened bibliographies of included studies and relevant systematic reviews without date or language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with participants aged 18 to 74 years with unipolar depression (based on criteria from DSM-IV-TR or earlier versions, International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10, Feighner criteria or Research Diagnostic Criteria) who had not responded to a minimum of four weeks of antidepressant treatment at a recommended dose. Interventions were: (1) increasing the dose of antidepressant monotherapy; (2) switching to a different antidepressant monotherapy; (3) augmenting treatment with another antidepressant; (4) augmenting treatment with a non-antidepressant. All were compared with continuing antidepressant monotherapy. We excluded studies of non-standard pharmacological treatments (e.g. sex hormones, vitamins, herbal medicines and food supplements). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers used standard Cochrane methods to extract data, assess risk of bias, and resolve disagreements. We analysed continuous outcomes with mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated a relative risk (RR) and 95% CI. Where sufficient data existed, we conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models. MAIN RESULTS We included 10 RCTs (2731 participants). Nine were conducted in outpatient settings and one in both in- and outpatients. Mean age of participants ranged from 42 - 50.2 years, and most were female. One study investigated switching to, or augmenting current antidepressant treatment with, another antidepressant (mianserin). Another augmented current antidepressant treatment with the antidepressant mirtazapine. Eight studies augmented current antidepressant treatment with a non-antidepressant (either an anxiolytic (buspirone) or an antipsychotic (cariprazine; olanzapine; quetiapine (3 studies); or ziprasidone (2 studies)). We judged most studies to be at a low or unclear risk of bias. Only one of the included studies was not industry-sponsored. There was no evidence of a difference in depression severity when current treatment was switched to mianserin (MD on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) = -1.8, 95% CI -5.22 to 1.62, low-quality evidence)) compared with continuing on antidepressant monotherapy. Nor was there evidence of a difference in numbers dropping out of treatment (RR 2.08, 95% CI 0.94 to 4.59, low-quality evidence; dropouts 38% in the mianserin switch group; 18% in the control). Augmenting current antidepressant treatment with mianserin was associated with an improvement in depression symptoms severity scores from baseline (MD on HAM-D -4.8, 95% CI -8.18 to -1.42; moderate-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in numbers dropping out (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.72; low-quality evidence; 19% dropouts in the mianserin-augmented group; 38% in the control). When current antidepressant treatment was augmented with mirtazapine, there was little difference in depressive symptoms (MD on Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) -1.7, 95% CI -4.03 to 0.63; high-quality evidence) and no evidence of a difference in dropout numbers (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.62; dropouts 2% in mirtazapine-augmented group; 3% in the control). Augmentation with buspirone provided no evidence of a benefit in terms of a reduction in depressive symptoms (MD on Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) -0.30, 95% CI -9.48 to 8.88; low-quality evidence) or numbers of drop-outs (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.53; low-quality evidence; dropouts 11% in buspirone-augmented group; 19% in the control). Severity of depressive symptoms reduced when current treatment was augmented with cariprazine (MD on MADRS -1.50, 95% CI -2.74 to -0.25; high-quality evidence), olanzapine (MD on HAM-D -7.9, 95% CI -16.76 to 0.96; low-quality evidence; MD on MADRS -12.4, 95% CI -22.44 to -2.36; low-quality evidence), quetiapine (SMD -0.32, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.18; I2 = 6%, high-quality evidence), or ziprasidone (MD on HAM-D -2.73, 95% CI -4.53 to -0.93; I2 = 0, moderate-quality evidence) compared with continuing on antidepressant monotherapy. However, a greater number of participants dropped out when antidepressant monotherapy was augmented with an antipsychotic (cariprazine RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.41; quetiapine RR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.14 to 2.17; ziprasidone RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.55) compared with antidepressant monotherapy, although estimates for olanzapine augmentation were imprecise (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.69). Dropout rates ranged from 10% to 39% in the groups augmented with an antipsychotic, and from 12% to 23% in the comparison groups. The most common reasons for dropping out were side effects or adverse events. We also summarised data about response and remission rates (based on changes in depressive symptoms) for included studies, along with data on social adjustment and social functioning, quality of life, economic outcomes and adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS A small body of evidence shows that augmenting current antidepressant therapy with mianserin or with an antipsychotic (cariprazine, olanzapine, quetiapine or ziprasidone) improves depressive symptoms over the short-term (8 to 12 weeks). However, this evidence is mostly of low or moderate quality due to imprecision of the estimates of effects. Improvements with antipsychotics need to be balanced against the increased likelihood of dropping out of treatment or experiencing an adverse event. Augmentation of current antidepressant therapy with a second antidepressant, mirtazapine, does not produce a clinically important benefit in reduction of depressive symptoms (high-quality evidence). The evidence regarding the effects of augmenting current antidepressant therapy with buspirone or switching current antidepressant treatment to mianserin is currently insufficient. Further trials are needed to increase the certainty of these findings and to examine long-term effects of treatment, as well as the effectiveness of other pharmacological treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippa Davies
- University of BristolPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolCanynge HallBristolUKBS8 2PS
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation TrustNIHR ARC WestBristolUK
| | - Sharea Ijaz
- University of BristolPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolCanynge HallBristolUKBS8 2PS
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation TrustNIHR ARC WestBristolUK
| | - Catherine J Williams
- University of BristolSchool of Social and Community Medicine39 Whatley RoadBristolUKBS8 2PS
| | - David Kessler
- University of BristolPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolCanynge HallBristolUKBS8 2PS
| | - Glyn Lewis
- UCLUCL Division of Psychiatry67‐73 Riding House StLondonUKW1W 7EJ
| | - Nicola Wiles
- University of BristolPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolCanynge HallBristolUKBS8 2PS
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Baig MR, Wilson JL, Lemmer JA, Beck RD, Peterson AL, Roache JD. Enhancing Completion of Cognitive Processing Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder with Quetiapine in Veterans with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: a Case Series. Psychiatr Q 2019; 90:431-445. [PMID: 31054021 DOI: 10.1007/s11126-019-09638-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the outcomes of the antiarousal medications valproate, risperidone, and quetiapine on completion of treatment of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for PTSD. A case series of fifty treatment-seeking adult (≥18 years) veterans with mild traumatic brain injury and combat-related PTSD who had unsuccessful trials of 2 or more first-line agents and previously declined treatment with trauma-focused therapy, seen at the psychiatric outpatient services of the local Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2017. Patients were prescribed valproate (n = 8), risperidone (n = 17), or quetiapine (n = 25) and were referred for individual weekly treatment with CPT. Outcome measurements of interest were measures of engagement and completion rate of CPT, PTSD Checklist total score (range, 0-80; higher scores indicate greater PTSD severity) and arousal subscale score (range, 0-24; higher scores indicate greater arousal severity), and clinical observations of sleep variables. Of the 50 patients included in the study, 48 (96%) were men; mean (SD) age was 36 (8) years. Eighteen (86%) patients initially receiving quetiapine and none taking valproate or risperidone became adequately engaged in and completed CPT. Among patients who completed CPT, the mean decrease in the PTSD Checklist score was 25 [95% CI, 30 to 20] and 9 (50%) patients no longer met criteria for PTSD. These preliminary findings support quetiapine as an adjunctive medication to facilitate CPT. A pragmatic trial is needed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of quetiapine to improve engagement in and completion rate of CPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad R Baig
- Mental Health, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA. .,Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| | - Jennifer L Wilson
- Mental Health, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA.,Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Lemmer
- Mental Health, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA.,Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Robert D Beck
- Mental Health, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA.,Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Alan L Peterson
- Mental Health, South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, TX, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.,Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - John D Roache
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.,Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mulder R, Hamilton A, Irwin L, Boyce P, Morris G, Porter RJ, Malhi GS. Treating depression with adjunctive antipsychotics. Bipolar Disord 2018; 20 Suppl 2:17-24. [PMID: 30328223 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using adjunctive antipsychotics in patients with major depressive disorder. METHOD Studies published since the last Cochrane review conducted in 2010 were identified via a literature search of recognised databases, using the keywords "adjunct*", "augment*", "antipsychotic" and "depression", and systematically evaluated. A targeted review of relevant guidelines was undertaken. RESULTS Adjunctive antipsychotics produce a small but significant improvement in depressive symptoms in most studies. Most of the studies focussed on patients with an inadequate response to antidepressants rather than patients with treatment resistant depression. Treatment guidelines were variable but generally supported the use of adjunctive antipsychotics while cautioning about the risk of side effects. Most were non-specific about the length of time adjunctive antipsychotics should be prescribed. CONCLUSIONS The studies do not support the routine use of adjunctive antipsychotics in patients with an inadequate response to antidepressants. They may be beneficial when used short-term in patients with treatment resistant depression who have specific symptoms (severe ruminations, melancholia, major sleep disturbance) that appear to respond well to adjunctive antipsychotics. There is no support for long-term use. Research should focus on specifying which symptom profiles are responsive and how adjunctive antipsychotics compare to other strategies in treatment resistant depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Mulder
- Sophisticated Mood Appraisal & Refinement of Treatment (SMART) Group.,Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago-Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Amber Hamilton
- Sophisticated Mood Appraisal & Refinement of Treatment (SMART) Group.,Academic Department of Psychiatry, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Lauren Irwin
- Sophisticated Mood Appraisal & Refinement of Treatment (SMART) Group.,Academic Department of Psychiatry, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip Boyce
- Sophisticated Mood Appraisal & Refinement of Treatment (SMART) Group.,Discipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Grace Morris
- Sophisticated Mood Appraisal & Refinement of Treatment (SMART) Group.,Academic Department of Psychiatry, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard J Porter
- Sophisticated Mood Appraisal & Refinement of Treatment (SMART) Group.,Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago-Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Gin S Malhi
- Sophisticated Mood Appraisal & Refinement of Treatment (SMART) Group.,Academic Department of Psychiatry, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hobart M, Skuban A, Zhang P, Josiassen MK, Hefting N, Augustine C, Brewer C, Sanchez R, McQuade RD. Efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed brexpiprazole for the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized, active-referenced, placebo-controlled study. Curr Med Res Opin 2018; 34:633-642. [PMID: 29343128 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1430220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brexpiprazole as adjunctive treatment in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and an inadequate response to prior antidepressant treatment (ADT). METHODS Patients with a current major depressive episode after prior treatment with 1-3 ADTs entered an 8- or 10-week prospective treatment phase in which they received double-blind placebo adjunct to open-label ADT. Inadequate responders were randomized (2:2:1) to brexpiprazole 2-3 mg/day, placebo, or quetiapine extended-release (XR) 150-300 mg/day, adjunct to the same ADT, for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline (randomization) to week 6 in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The key secondary efficacy endpoint was the change in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) mean score. RESULTS Adjunctive brexpiprazole showed a greater improvement in MADRS total score than adjunctive placebo (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval] = -1.48 [-2.56, -0.39]; p = .0078), whereas adjunctive quetiapine XR did not separate from placebo (-0.30 [-1.63, 1.04]; p = .66). Adjunctive brexpiprazole failed to separate from placebo on the SDS mean score (-0.23 [-0.52, 0.07]; p = .13), but did improve functioning on two of the three SDS items (family life and social life). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events in patients receiving brexpiprazole were akathisia (6.1%), somnolence (5.6%), and headache (5.6%). CONCLUSIONS Adjunctive brexpiprazole 2-3 mg/day improved symptoms of depression compared with adjunctive placebo in patients with MDD and an inadequate response to ADTs, and was well tolerated with no unexpected side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Hobart
- a Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc. , Princeton , NJ , USA
| | - Aleksandar Skuban
- a Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc. , Princeton , NJ , USA
| | - Peter Zhang
- a Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc. , Princeton , NJ , USA
| | | | | | - Carole Augustine
- a Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc. , Princeton , NJ , USA
| | - Claudette Brewer
- a Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc. , Princeton , NJ , USA
| | - Raymond Sanchez
- a Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc. , Princeton , NJ , USA
| | - Robert D McQuade
- a Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc. , Princeton , NJ , USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Seo JS, Bahk WM, Wang HR, Woo YS, Park YM, Jeong JH, Kim W, Shim SH, Lee JG, Jon DI, Min KJ. Korean Medication Algorithm for Depressive Disorders 2017: Third Revision. CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN COLLEGE OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY 2018; 16:67-87. [PMID: 29397669 PMCID: PMC5810446 DOI: 10.9758/cpn.2018.16.1.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In 2002, the Korean Society for Affective Disorders developed the guidelines for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), and revised it in 2006 and 2012. The third revision of these guidelines was undertaken to reflect advances in the field. METHODS Using a 44-item questionnaire, an expert consensus was obtained on pharmacological treatment strategies for MDD 1) without or 2) with psychotic features, 3) depression subtypes, 4) maintenance, 5) special populations, 6) the choice of an antidepressant (AD) regarding safety and adverse effects, and 7) non-pharmacological biological therapies. Recommended first, second, and third-line strategies were derived statistically. RESULTS AD monotherapy is recommended as the first-line strategy for non-psychotic depression in adults, children/adolescents, elderly adults, patient with persistent depressive disorder, and pregnant women or patients with postpartum depression or premenstrual dysphoric disorder. The combination of AD and atypical antipsychotics (AAP) was recommended for psychotic depression in adult, child/adolescent, postpartum depression, and mixed features or anxious distress. Most experts recommended stopping the ongoing initial AD and AAP after a certain period in patients with one or two depressive episodes. As an MDD treatment modality, 92% of experts are considering electroconvulsive therapy and 46.8% are applying it clinically, while 86% of experts are considering repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation but only 31.6% are applying it clinically. CONCLUSION The pharmacological treatment strategy in 2017 is similar to that of Korean Medication Algorithm for Depressive Disorder 2012. The preference of AAPs was more increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Seok Seo
- Department of Psychiatry, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Cheongju,
Korea
| | - Won-Myong Bahk
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hee Ryung Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Young Sup Woo
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Young-Min Park
- Department of Psychiatry, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang,
Korea
| | - Jong-Hyun Jeong
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Won Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Korea/Stress Research Institute, Inje University, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Se-Hoon Shim
- Department of Psychiatry, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan,
Korea
| | - Jung Goo Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan,
Korea
- Paik Institute for Clinical Research, Department of Health Science and Technology, Graduate School of Inje University, Busan,
Korea
| | - Duk-In Jon
- Department of Psychiatry, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang,
Korea
| | - Kyung Joon Min
- Department of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Antidepressant combination versus antidepressants plus second-generation antipsychotic augmentation in treatment-resistant unipolar depression. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2018; 33:34-43. [PMID: 28906325 DOI: 10.1097/yic.0000000000000196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Patients with treatment-resistant unipolar depression (TRD) are treated with antidepressant combinations (ADs) or with second-generation antipsychotics plus AD (SGA+AD) augmentation; however, the clinical characteristics, the factors associated independently with response to SGA+AD, and the outcome trajectories have not yet been characterized. We performed a naturalistic study on the latest stable trial (medication unchanged for about 3 months) in 86 TRD patients with resistance to at least two ADs trials, who received ADs (n=36) or SGA+AD (n=50) treatments. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton-Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17), and other scales were administered before (T0) and after the latest 3-month stable trial (T3). Compared to ADs, the SGA+AD group showed increased percentage of depression with psychotic features, comorbidity for personality disorders and substance use disorders (SUD), higher number of failed ADs pharmacotherapies and depressive symptoms at T0 on all scales (P<0.001). Compared to T0, both treatments significantly decreased depressive symptoms on MADRS and HAM-D17 at T3 (P<0.001); however, the SGA+AD augmentation produced a greater decline in mean score. Logistic regression analysis indicated that psychotic features, personality disorders, and SUD were independently associated with SGA+AD treatment. Given the greater improvement in depression following SGA+AD augmentation, SGA augmentation should be indicated as a first-line treatment in severe TRD with psychotic features, SUD, and personality disorders.
Collapse
|
37
|
Aftab A, Gao K. The preclinical discovery and development of brexpiprazole for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2017; 12:1067-1081. [DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2017.1354849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Awais Aftab
- Department of Psychiatry, Residency Training Program, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Keming Gao
- Mood and Anxiety Clinic in the Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Marwood L, Taylor R, Goldsmith K, Romeo R, Holland R, Pickles A, Hutchinson J, Dietch D, Cipriani A, Nair R, Attenburrow MJ, Young AH, Geddes J, McAllister-Williams RH, Cleare AJ. Study protocol for a randomised pragmatic trial comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of lithium and quetiapine augmentation in treatment resistant depression (the LQD study). BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17:231. [PMID: 28651526 PMCID: PMC5485607 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1393-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 30-50% of patients with major depressive disorder can be classed as treatment resistant, widely defined as a failure to respond to two or more adequate trials of antidepressants in the current episode. Treatment resistant depression is associated with a poorer prognosis and higher mortality rates. One treatment option is to augment an existing antidepressant with a second agent. Lithium and the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine are two such add-on therapies and are currently recommended as first line options for treatment resistant depression. However, whilst neither treatment has been established as superior to the other in short-term studies, they have yet to be compared head-to-head in longer term studies, or with a superiority design in this patient group. METHODS The Lithium versus Quetiapine in Depression (LQD) study is a parallel group, multi-centre, pragmatic, open-label, patient randomised clinical trial designed to address this gap in knowledge. The study will compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of the decision to prescribe lithium or quetiapine add-on therapy to antidepressant medication for patients with treatment resistant depression. Patients will be randomised 1:1 and followed up over 12 months, with the hypothesis being that quetiapine will be superior to lithium. The primary outcomes will be: (1) time to all-cause treatment discontinuation over one year, and (2) self-rated depression symptoms rated weekly for one year via the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology. Other outcomes will include between group differences in response and remission rates, quality of life, social functioning, cost-effectiveness and the frequency of serious adverse events and side effects. DISCUSSION The trial aims to help shape the treatment pathway for patients with treatment resistant depression, by determining whether the decision to prescribe quetiapine is superior to lithium. Strengths of the study include its pragmatic superiority design, broad inclusion criteria (external validity) and longer follow up than previous studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN16387615 , registered 28 February 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03004521 , registered 17 November 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Marwood
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R. Taylor
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K. Goldsmith
- Biostatistics & Health Informatics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - R. Romeo
- Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - R. Holland
- Biostatistics & Health Informatics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - A. Pickles
- Biostatistics & Health Informatics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - J. Hutchinson
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - A. Cipriani
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R. Nair
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | - M.-J. Attenburrow
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - A. H. Young
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J. Geddes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R. H. McAllister-Williams
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - A. J. Cleare
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Activating and Sedating Adverse Effects of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder: Absolute Risk Increase and Number Needed to Harm. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2017; 37:138-147. [PMID: 28141623 DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000000665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND Activating and sedating adverse effects of antipsychotics can be obstacles to their use. METHODS/PROCEDURES This study quantified the activating and sedating properties of first-line oral second-generation antipsychotics by examining the rates of adverse reactions as reported in product labeling for the indications of schizophrenia and adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder. Additional data sources included regulatory documents, study synopses, and published study reports. Attributable risk increase and number needed to harm (NNH) were calculated for each agent versus placebo. FINDINGS/RESULTS Heterogeneity among the different antipsychotics regarding activating or sedating adverse events was observed, with some agents displaying the potential for both activating and sedating properties. For agents indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia, predominantly activating medications include lurasidone (NNH, 11 for akathisia vs 20 for somnolence) and cariprazine (NNH, 15 for akathisia vs 65 for somnolence-combined terms). Similarly activating and sedating are risperidone (NNH, 15 for akathisia vs 13 for sedation) and aripiprazole (NNH, 31 for akathisia vs 34 for somnolence). Predominantly sedating are olanzapine, quetiapine immediate and extended release, ziprasidone, asenapine, and iloperidone. Agents that are neither activating nor sedating are paliperidone and brexpiprazole. For major depressive disorder, the overall findings regarding activation and sedation appear similar to those seen with schizophrenia. Data extracted were limited to those available from registrational studies that contributed to the adverse event tables contained in the product labels. Postregistrational comparative studies may yield different outcomes. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS Differences in tolerability profiles regarding activation and sedation have implications in terms of selecting the optimal antipsychotic for a given individual.
Collapse
|
40
|
Wolff A, Joshi RK, Ekström J, Aframian D, Pedersen AML, Proctor G, Narayana N, Villa A, Sia YW, Aliko A, McGowan R, Kerr AR, Jensen SB, Vissink A, Dawes C. A Guide to Medications Inducing Salivary Gland Dysfunction, Xerostomia, and Subjective Sialorrhea: A Systematic Review Sponsored by the World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI. Drugs R D 2017; 17:1-28. [PMID: 27853957 PMCID: PMC5318321 DOI: 10.1007/s40268-016-0153-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication-induced salivary gland dysfunction (MISGD), xerostomia (sensation of oral dryness), and subjective sialorrhea cause significant morbidity and impair quality of life. However, no evidence-based lists of the medications that cause these disorders exist. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to compile a list of medications affecting salivary gland function and inducing xerostomia or subjective sialorrhea. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases were searched for relevant articles published until June 2013. Of 3867 screened records, 269 had an acceptable degree of relevance, quality of methodology, and strength of evidence. We found 56 chemical substances with a higher level of evidence and 50 with a moderate level of evidence of causing the above-mentioned disorders. At the first level of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system, 9 of 14 anatomical groups were represented, mainly the alimentary, cardiovascular, genitourinary, nervous, and respiratory systems. Management strategies include substitution or discontinuation of medications whenever possible, oral or systemic therapy with sialogogues, administration of saliva substitutes, and use of electro-stimulating devices. LIMITATIONS While xerostomia was a commonly reported outcome, objectively measured salivary flow rate was rarely reported. Moreover, xerostomia was mostly assessed as an adverse effect rather than the primary outcome of medication use. This study may not include some medications that could cause xerostomia when administered in conjunction with others or for which xerostomia as an adverse reaction has not been reported in the literature or was not detected in our search. CONCLUSIONS We compiled a comprehensive list of medications with documented effects on salivary gland function or symptoms that may assist practitioners in assessing patients who complain of dry mouth while taking medications. The list may also prove useful in helping practitioners anticipate adverse effects and consider alternative medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Wolff
- Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
- Saliwell Ltd, 65 Hatamar St, 60917, Harutzim, Israel.
| | - Revan Kumar Joshi
- Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, DAPMRV Dental College, Bangalore, India
| | - Jörgen Ekström
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
| | | | - Anne Marie Lynge Pedersen
- Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gordon Proctor
- Mucosal and Salivary Biology Division, Dental Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nagamani Narayana
- Department of Oral Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) College of Dentistry, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Alessandro Villa
- Division of Oral Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Oral Medicine Infection and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ying Wai Sia
- McGill University, Faculty of Dentistry, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ardita Aliko
- Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine, Tirana, Albania
- Broegelmann Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | - Siri Beier Jensen
- Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Arjan Vissink
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Colin Dawes
- Department of Oral Biology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Schulze L, Remington G, Giacobbe P, Kennedy SH, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ, Downar J. Effect of antipsychotic pharmacotherapy on clinical outcomes of intermittent theta-burst stimulation for refractory depression. J Psychopharmacol 2017; 31:312-319. [PMID: 27852961 DOI: 10.1177/0269881116675516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Theta-burst stimulation is an emerging protocol for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation that takes 1-3 min to administer, yet offers equal/superior potency to conventional protocols lasting 30-60 min. However, preclinical evidence suggests that D2 receptor blockade may abolish the acute effects of theta-burst stimulation on synaptic facilitation or inhibition. As many patients presenting for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation are taking antipsychotic medications as augmentation for treatment-resistant depression, this finding is potentially concerning for the implementation of theta-burst stimulation in clinical settings. Here, we examined whether treatment-resistant depression patients taking antipsychotics have worse outcomes after a course of intermittent theta-burst stimulation. A chart review identified 105 treatment-resistant depression patients who underwent dorsomedial prefrontal-intermittent theta-burst stimulation; clinical outcomes on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Beck Depression Inventory were compared for those taking and not taking antipsychotics. The 29 of 105 patients who were taking antipsychotics showed non-significantly better response and remission rates, and non-significantly larger percentage improvements on both scales, with a positive but non-significant correlation between higher antipsychotic dose and larger percentage improvement. Contrary to expectations, outcomes were not significantly worse, and in some analyses trended towards being better, in patients taking antipsychotics. Future randomized controlled studies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with standardized dopaminergic manipulations may be justified and warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Schulze
- 1 MRI-Guided rTMS Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network, Canada.,2 Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Gary Remington
- 2 Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Canada.,3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.,4 Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Canada.,5 Department of Psychological Clinical Sciences, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter Giacobbe
- 1 MRI-Guided rTMS Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network, Canada.,3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Sidney H Kennedy
- 2 Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Canada.,3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.,6 Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Daniel M Blumberger
- 3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.,7 Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute and Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Canada
| | - Zafiris J Daskalakis
- 2 Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Canada.,3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.,7 Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute and Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Canada
| | - Jonathan Downar
- 1 MRI-Guided rTMS Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network, Canada.,2 Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Canada.,3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.,6 Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cost-effectiveness of brexpiprazole adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 2017; 207:54-62. [PMID: 27693466 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Revised: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating psychiatric illness with a high cost burden. This analysis evaluates the cost-effectiveness of adjunctive brexpiprazole versus comparator branded adjunctive treatment for MDD and background antidepressant therapy (ADT) alone from a US payer perspective. METHODS An economic model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of brexpiprazole versus comparator adjunctive treatment and ADT alone on total direct medical costs using a 6-week cycle time frame for a total of 48 weeks, with treatment response and remission as primary outcomes. The model consisted of 3 parts, 1 to represent the acute treatment phase and 2 to represent the maintenance stage. RESULTS In the base-case analysis, brexpiprazole as reference treatment resulted in cost per additional responder ranging from $19,442-$48,745 and cost per additional remitter ranging from $27,196-$71,839 versus comparator treatments over 48 weeks. Sensitivity analyses showed treatment with brexpiprazole was more costly, but more clinically effective in all probabilistic simulations. LIMITATIONS This representation of disease natural history over 48 weeks may not account for all possible health states. Resource utilization on treatment was estimated using the resource use data from previous trials, and may overestimate medical costs compared to the real-world setting. Treatment comparators were limited to branded therapies, and head-to-head studies were not available to obtain data inputs. CONCLUSION Compared to other branded adjunctive therapies, brexpiprazole increases response and remission at 6 weeks; medical care cost savings were observed with the use of brexpiprazole. These findings may assist clinicians and formulary decision makers when selecting treatment for MDD.
Collapse
|
43
|
Call to Caution with the Use of Atypical Antipsychotics for Treatment of Depression in Older Adults. Geriatrics (Basel) 2016; 1:geriatrics1040033. [PMID: 31022826 PMCID: PMC6371141 DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics1040033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2016] [Revised: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Atypical antipsychotics are increasingly being used to manage depression in older adults where these symptoms can often be refractory to first-line treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Unfortunately, atypical antipsychotics can be associated with the development of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), with drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) being the most common movement disorder induced by this class of medication. The management of treatment-resistant depression in older adults is of particular concern as depression is a common feature of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (IPD) and can manifest prior to the development of motor symptoms. Herein, we discuss the use of atypical antipsychotics for the management of depression in older adults including the risk of DIP and propose that antipsychotics may potentially unmask IPD.
Collapse
|
44
|
Dilbaz N, Darçin AE, Çavuş SY. Depresyon Tedavisinde Karşılanmamış İhtiyaçlar: Eştanılı Anksiyete ve Yaklaşım. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/10177833.2011.11790744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nesrin Dilbaz
- Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, 2. Psikiyatri Kliniği, Ankara-Türkiye
| | - Aslı Enez Darçin
- Kayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Psikiyatri Kliniği, Kayseri-Türkiye
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Do Atypical Antipsychotics Have Antisuicidal Effects? A Hypothesis-Generating Overview. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17:ijms17101700. [PMID: 27727180 PMCID: PMC5085732 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17101700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Revised: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 09/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Modern antipsychotic drugs are employed increasingly in the treatment of mood disorders as well as psychoses, stimulating interest in their possible contributions to altering suicidal risk. Clozapine remains the only treatment with an FDA-recognized indication for reducing suicidal risk (in schizophrenia). We carried out a systematic, computerized search for reports of studies involving antipsychotic drug treatment and suicidal behaviors. A total of 19 reports provide data with preliminary support for potential suicide risk-reducing effects of olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, aripiprazole, and asenapine in addition to clozapine, and provide some support for antipsychotic drug treatment in general. These preliminary findings encourage further testing of antipsychotics for effects on suicidal behavior, making use of explicit, pre-planned assessments of suicidal behavior.
Collapse
|
46
|
Wang SM, Han C, Lee SJ, Jun TY, Patkar AA, Masand PS, Pae CU. Second Generation Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: An Update. Chonnam Med J 2016; 52:159-72. [PMID: 27689026 PMCID: PMC5040765 DOI: 10.4068/cmj.2016.52.3.159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2016] [Revised: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Less than one third of patients who suffer from major depressive disorder (MDD) report remission following antidepressant treatments requiring more diverse treatment approaches. Augmentation of second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) has been increasingly recognized as an important treatment option. The authors have previously provided a comprehensive review of SGAs for the treatment of MDD in 2013. Since then, numerous additional clinical trials have been conducted to investigate diverse issues regarding the utility of SGAs in MDD. Moreover, a new SGA, brexpiprazole, was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration in July 2015 for the treatment of MDD as an augmentation agent to antidepressants. Thus, the aim of this study was to provide a concise update of all the available SGAs for the treatment of MDD, in particular on the additional clinical trials which have been published since 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng-Min Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.; International Health Care Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Changsu Han
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Korea University, Korea
| | - Soo-Jung Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Youn Jun
- Department of Psychiatry, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ashwin A Patkar
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Chi-Un Pae
- Department of Psychiatry, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Roberts RJ, Lohano KK, El-Mallakh RS. Antipsychotics as antidepressants. Asia Pac Psychiatry 2016; 8:179-88. [PMID: 25963405 DOI: 10.1111/appy.12186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2014] [Accepted: 04/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Three second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) agents have received FDA approval for adjunctive treatment, to antidepressant, of major depressive disorder: quetiapine, aripiprazole, and olanzapine. Additionally, quetiapine and lurasidone have been approved for the treatment of bipolar depression. There are data suggesting that quetiapine is effective for major depressive disorder as monotherapy. These agents are effective for depression only at subantipsychotic doses. Receptor profiles predict that all SGA will have anxiolytic effects as subantipsychotic doses but that all will be dysphorogenic at full antipsychotic doses (i.e., produce a depression-like clinical picture). The antidepressant effect appears to be unique to some agents, with direct evidence of insignificant antidepressant action for ziprasidone. Three general principles can guide the use of antipsychotics as antidepressants: (i) All SGAs may have anxiolytic effects; (ii) full antipsychotic doses are dysphorogenic, and therefore, subantipsychotic doses are to be used; and (iii) SGAs do not have a general antidepressant effect, rather, this appears to be unique to quetiapine and aripiprazole, and possibly lurasidone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rona Jeannie Roberts
- Mood Disorders Research Program, Depression Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Kavita K Lohano
- Mood Disorders Research Program, Depression Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Rif S El-Mallakh
- Mood Disorders Research Program, Depression Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bruijnzeel D, Tandon R. Spotlight on brexpiprazole and its potential in the treatment of schizophrenia and as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of major depression. Drug Des Devel Ther 2016; 10:1641-7. [PMID: 27274197 PMCID: PMC4869657 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s85089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Antipsychotic agents, utilized for the treatment of a range of psychiatric disorders, differ substantially in terms of their pharmacology and adverse effect profiles. Incomplete and variable efficacy, differences in safety-tolerability, and highly heterogeneous response across individuals prompt development of new agents. Brexpiprazole is one of the two most recently introduced antipsychotic agents approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and as an adjunct for treatment of major depressive disorder. Its pharmacology, clinical trial data, and efficacy and side effects in comparison with other antipsychotic agents are discussed. Brexpiprazole is a dopamine D-2 partial agonist with potent activity at the serotonin 5HT1A and 5HT2A and noradrenergic alpha-1B and alpha-2C receptors. Placebo-controlled clinical trials in persons with schizophrenia support its efficacy in treating psychosis and preventing relapse. Short-term clinical trials also support its efficacy as an adjunct to antidepressants in treating major depressive disorder in individuals inadequately responsive to antidepressant treatment alone. Adverse effects include akathisia, gastrointestinal side effects, and moderate weight gain. The recommended oral dose of brexpiprazole is 2-4 mg/day in schizophrenia and 2-3 mg/day as adjunctive treatment in major depression. It must be titrated up to its target dose over 1-2 weeks and is effective in once-daily dosing. How brexpiprazole's unique pharmacological profile will translate into clinically meaningful differences from other antipsychotic agents is unclear. Its place in our antipsychotic armamentarium and potential role in the treatment of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder will be determined by additional clinical data and experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Bruijnzeel
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Rajiv Tandon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
|
50
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large and extensive body of research has examined comorbid anxiety and depression in adults. Children and adolescents also frequently present with comorbid anxiety and depression; however, research and treatment require unique environmental and neurodevelopmental considerations in children. As a result, our understanding of comorbid anxiety and depression in children and adolescents is limited. OBJECTIVE The goal of this systematic review was to examine the current literature focused on comorbid anxiety and depression in children and adolescents. The review included theoretical conceptualizations as well as diagnostic, neurobiological, prevention, and treatment considerations. In addition, a proposed algorithm for the treatment of comorbid anxiety and depression in children/adolescents is provided. METHODS This systematic literature review included 3 discrete searches in Ovid SP Medline, PsycInfo, and PubMed. RESULTS The review included and synthesized 115 articles published between 1987 and 2015. The available evidence suggests that anxiety and depression are common in clinical populations of children and adolescents, and that comorbidity is likely underestimated in children and adolescents. Children and adolescents with comorbid anxiety and depression have unique presentations, greater symptom severity, and treatment resistance compared with those who have either disease in isolation. A dimensional approach may be necessary for the future development of diagnostic strategies and treatments for this population. Nascent neuroimaging work suggests that anxiety and depression each represents a distinct neurobiological phenotype. CONCLUSIONS The literature that is currently available suggests that comorbid anxiety and depression is a common presentation in children and adolescents. This diagnostic picture underscores the importance of comprehensive dimensional assessments and multimodal evidence-based approaches given the high disease severity. Future research on the neurobiology and the treatment of these common clinical conditions is warranted.
Collapse
|