1
|
Bauri J, Choudhary RB. FRET mechanism to enhance the quantum yield of the PCz/gC 3N 4 nanocomposite, an emissive material for OLED applications. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2023; 25:22195-22210. [PMID: 37566404 DOI: 10.1039/d3cp02637j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
Conjugated polymers such as polycarbazole (PCz) have captivated more attention than other carbazole-based derivatives due to their superior electrical and optical properties. Accordingly, we synthesized PCz/gC3N4 nanocomposites via the in situ polymerization method using FeCl3 as the oxidative reagent. The synthesized nanocomposites were subjected to characterization techniques to examine their optical and electrical parameters and decide whether the materials were suitable as emissive materials. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were carried out to ascertain the crystalline or amorphous nature, surface interactions, and functional groups present in them. The surface microstructural and topographical investigations were conducted using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) techniques. Optical parameters, such as refractive index ∼2.06, optical absorbance, optical band energy ∼2.77 eV, and the photoluminescence emission range, were studied using UV-Visible and photoluminescence spectrometry. The theoretical relative emission quantum yield of ∼67.9% and 87.7% energy transfer from the donor to the acceptor ion via the Förster energy transfer mechanism are illustrated by the PL data. The Förster energy transfer mechanism has been elaborated. The carrier mobility ∼32.03 m2 V-1 S-1, sheet resistance ∼1.6977 × 102 Ω m, carrier density ∼11.96 × 1014 cm-3 and conductivity ∼5.90 × 10-3 S cm-1 were computed using Hall effect measurements. The dielectric constant, dielectric loss, and IV characteristic curve were estimated by the LCR and Four-probe IV measurement methods. The high PL emission intensity, CIE coordinates in the blue emission region, and the CCT value indicate that it is a suitable emissive layer material for OLED applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayanta Bauri
- Nanostructured Composite Materials Laboratory, Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, 826004, India.
| | - Ram Bilash Choudhary
- Nanostructured Composite Materials Laboratory, Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, 826004, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Agam G, Gebhardt C, Popara M, Mächtel R, Folz J, Ambrose B, Chamachi N, Chung SY, Craggs TD, de Boer M, Grohmann D, Ha T, Hartmann A, Hendrix J, Hirschfeld V, Hübner CG, Hugel T, Kammerer D, Kang HS, Kapanidis AN, Krainer G, Kramm K, Lemke EA, Lerner E, Margeat E, Martens K, Michaelis J, Mitra J, Moya Muñoz GG, Quast RB, Robb NC, Sattler M, Schlierf M, Schneider J, Schröder T, Sefer A, Tan PS, Thurn J, Tinnefeld P, van Noort J, Weiss S, Wendler N, Zijlstra N, Barth A, Seidel CAM, Lamb DC, Cordes T. Reliability and accuracy of single-molecule FRET studies for characterization of structural dynamics and distances in proteins. Nat Methods 2023; 20:523-535. [PMID: 36973549 PMCID: PMC10089922 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-023-01807-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Single-molecule Förster-resonance energy transfer (smFRET) experiments allow the study of biomolecular structure and dynamics in vitro and in vivo. We performed an international blind study involving 19 laboratories to assess the uncertainty of FRET experiments for proteins with respect to the measured FRET efficiency histograms, determination of distances, and the detection and quantification of structural dynamics. Using two protein systems with distinct conformational changes and dynamics, we obtained an uncertainty of the FRET efficiency ≤0.06, corresponding to an interdye distance precision of ≤2 Å and accuracy of ≤5 Å. We further discuss the limits for detecting fluctuations in this distance range and how to identify dye perturbations. Our work demonstrates the ability of smFRET experiments to simultaneously measure distances and avoid the averaging of conformational dynamics for realistic protein systems, highlighting its importance in the expanding toolbox of integrative structural biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganesh Agam
- Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, München, Germany
| | - Christian Gebhardt
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Milana Popara
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Rebecca Mächtel
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Julian Folz
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Neharika Chamachi
- B CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sang Yoon Chung
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Marijn de Boer
- Molecular Microscopy Research Group, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, AG Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Dina Grohmann
- Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Single-Molecule Biochemistry Laboratory, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Taekjip Ha
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andreas Hartmann
- B CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jelle Hendrix
- Dynamic Bioimaging Laboratory, Advanced Optical Microscopy Center and Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Agoralaan C (BIOMED), Hasselt, Belgium
- Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Thorsten Hugel
- Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Signalling Research Centers BIOSS and CIBSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Kammerer
- Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hyun-Seo Kang
- Bayerisches NMR Zentrum, Department of Bioscience, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of München, Garching, Germany
| | - Achillefs N Kapanidis
- Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Georg Krainer
- B CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kevin Kramm
- Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Single-Molecule Biochemistry Laboratory, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Edward A Lemke
- Biocenter, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Molecular Biology, Mainz, Germany
- Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eitan Lerner
- Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, and The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, The Edmond J. Safra Campus, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Emmanuel Margeat
- Centre de Biologie Structurale (CBS), University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Kirsten Martens
- Biological and Soft Matter Physics, Huygens-Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jaba Mitra
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Gabriel G Moya Muñoz
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Robert B Quast
- Centre de Biologie Structurale (CBS), University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Nicole C Robb
- Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Michael Sattler
- Bayerisches NMR Zentrum, Department of Bioscience, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of München, Garching, Germany
- Institute of Structural Biology, Molecular Targets and Therapeutics Center, Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Schlierf
- B CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jonathan Schneider
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Tim Schröder
- Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, München, Germany
| | - Anna Sefer
- Institute for Biophysics, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Piau Siong Tan
- Biocenter, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Molecular Biology, Mainz, Germany
| | - Johann Thurn
- Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Technical Physics, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Philip Tinnefeld
- Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, München, Germany
| | - John van Noort
- Biological and Soft Matter Physics, Huygens-Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Shimon Weiss
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicolas Wendler
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Niels Zijlstra
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Anders Barth
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
| | - Claus A M Seidel
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Don C Lamb
- Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, München, Germany.
| | - Thorben Cordes
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jacob MH, D’Souza RN, Lazar AI, Nau WM. Diffusion-Enhanced Förster Resonance Energy Transfer in Flexible Peptides: From the Haas-Steinberg Partial Differential Equation to a Closed Analytical Expression. Polymers (Basel) 2023; 15:polym15030705. [PMID: 36772006 PMCID: PMC9919848 DOI: 10.3390/polym15030705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
In the huge field of polymer structure and dynamics, including intrinsically disordered peptides, protein folding, and enzyme activity, many questions remain that cannot be answered by methodology based on artificial intelligence, X-ray, or NMR spectroscopy but maybe by fluorescence spectroscopy. The theory of Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) describes how an optically excited fluorophore transfers its excitation energy through space to an acceptor moiety-with a rate that depends on the distance between donor and acceptor. When the donor and acceptor moiety are conjugated to different sites of a flexible peptide chain or any other linear polymer, the pair could in principle report on chain structure and dynamics, on the site-to-site distance distribution, and on the diffusion coefficient of mutual site-to-site motion of the peptide chain. However, the dependence of FRET on distance distribution and diffusion is not defined by a closed analytical expression but by a partial differential equation (PDE), by the Haas-Steinberg equation (HSE), which can only be solved by time-consuming numerical methods. As a second complication, time-resolved FRET measurements have thus far been deemed necessary. As a third complication, the evaluation requires a computationally demanding but indispensable global analysis of an extended experimental data set. These requirements have made the method accessible to only a few experts. Here, we show how the Haas-Steinberg equation leads to a closed analytical expression (CAE), the Haas-Steinberg-Jacob equation (HSJE), which relates a diffusion-diagnosing parameter, the effective donor-acceptor distance, to the augmented diffusion coefficient, J, composed of the diffusion coefficient, D, and the photophysical parameters that characterize the used FRET method. The effective donor-acceptor distance is easily retrieved either through time-resolved or steady-state fluorescence measurements. Any global fit can now be performed in seconds and minimizes the sum-of-square difference between the experimental values of the effective distance and the values obtained from the HSJE. In summary, the HSJE can give a decisive advantage in applying the speed and sensitivity of FRET spectroscopy to standing questions of polymer structure and dynamics.
Collapse
|
4
|
Sefer A, Kallis E, Eilert T, Röcker C, Kolesnikova O, Neuhaus D, Eustermann S, Michaelis J. Structural dynamics of DNA strand break sensing by PARP-1 at a single-molecule level. Nat Commun 2022; 13:6569. [PMID: 36323657 PMCID: PMC9630430 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34148-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Single-stranded breaks (SSBs) are the most frequent DNA lesions threatening genomic integrity. A highly kinked DNA structure in complex with human PARP-1 domains led to the proposal that SSB sensing in Eukaryotes relies on dynamics of both the broken DNA double helix and PARP-1's multi-domain organization. Here, we directly probe this process at the single-molecule level. Quantitative smFRET and structural ensemble calculations reveal how PARP-1's N-terminal zinc fingers convert DNA SSBs from a largely unperturbed conformation, via an intermediate state into the highly kinked DNA conformation. Our data suggest an induced fit mechanism via a multi-domain assembly cascade that drives SSB sensing and stimulates an interplay with the scaffold protein XRCC1 orchestrating subsequent DNA repair events. Interestingly, a clinically used PARP-1 inhibitor Niraparib shifts the equilibrium towards the unkinked DNA conformation, whereas the inhibitor EB47 stabilizes the kinked state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Sefer
- Institute of Biophysics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Eleni Kallis
- Institute of Biophysics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tobias Eilert
- Institute of Biophysics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany
- Boehringer Ingelheim, CoC CMC Statistics & Data Science, Birkendorfer Str. 65, 88400, Biberach, Germany
| | - Carlheinz Röcker
- Institute of Biophysics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - Olga Kolesnikova
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Neuhaus
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK
| | - Sebastian Eustermann
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg Meyerhofstraße 1, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jens Michaelis
- Institute of Biophysics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barth A, Opanasyuk O, Peulen TO, Felekyan S, Kalinin S, Sanabria H, Seidel CAM. Unraveling multi-state molecular dynamics in single-molecule FRET experiments. I. Theory of FRET-lines. J Chem Phys 2022; 156:141501. [PMID: 35428384 PMCID: PMC9014241 DOI: 10.1063/5.0089134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Conformational dynamics of biomolecules are of fundamental importance for their function. Single-molecule studies of Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (smFRET) between a tethered donor and acceptor dye pair are a powerful tool to investigate the structure and dynamics of labeled molecules. However, capturing and quantifying conformational dynamics in intensity-based smFRET experiments remains challenging when the dynamics occur on the sub-millisecond timescale. The method of multiparameter fluorescence detection addresses this challenge by simultaneously registering fluorescence intensities and lifetimes of the donor and acceptor. Together, two FRET observables, the donor fluorescence lifetime τD and the intensity-based FRET efficiency E, inform on the width of the FRET efficiency distribution as a characteristic fingerprint for conformational dynamics. We present a general framework for analyzing dynamics that relates average fluorescence lifetimes and intensities in two-dimensional burst frequency histograms. We present parametric relations of these observables for interpreting the location of FRET populations in E-τD diagrams, called FRET-lines. To facilitate the analysis of complex exchange equilibria, FRET-lines serve as reference curves for a graphical interpretation of experimental data to (i) identify conformational states, (ii) resolve their dynamic connectivity, (iii) compare different kinetic models, and (iv) infer polymer properties of unfolded or intrinsically disordered proteins. For a simplified graphical analysis of complex kinetic networks, we derive a moment-based representation of the experimental data that decouples the motion of the fluorescence labels from the conformational dynamics of the biomolecule. Importantly, FRET-lines facilitate exploring complex dynamic models via easily computed experimental observables. We provide extensive computational tools to facilitate applying FRET-lines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Barth
- Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Oleg Opanasyuk
- Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Thomas-Otavio Peulen
- Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Suren Felekyan
- Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stanislav Kalinin
- Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hugo Sanabria
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29631, USA
| | - Claus A. M. Seidel
- Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Klose D, Holla A, Gmeiner C, Nettels D, Ritsch I, Bross N, Yulikov M, Allain FHT, Schuler B, Jeschke G. Resolving distance variations by single-molecule FRET and EPR spectroscopy using rotamer libraries. Biophys J 2021; 120:4842-4858. [PMID: 34536387 PMCID: PMC8595751 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy are complementary techniques for quantifying distances in the nanometer range. Both approaches are commonly employed for probing the conformations and conformational changes of biological macromolecules based on site-directed fluorescent or paramagnetic labeling. FRET can be applied in solution at ambient temperature and thus provides direct access to dynamics, especially if used at the single-molecule level, whereas EPR requires immobilization or work at cryogenic temperatures but provides data that can be more reliably used to extract distance distributions. However, a combined analysis of the complementary data from the two techniques has been complicated by the lack of a common modeling framework. Here, we demonstrate a systematic analysis approach based on rotamer libraries for both FRET and EPR labels to predict distance distributions between two labels from a structural model. Dynamics of the fluorophores within these distance distributions are taken into account by diffusional averaging, which improves the agreement with experiment. Benchmarking this methodology with a series of surface-exposed pairs of sites in a structured protein domain reveals that the lowest resolved distance differences can be as small as ∼0.25 nm for both techniques, with quantitative agreement between experimental and simulated transfer efficiencies within a range of ±0.045. Rotamer library analysis thus establishes a coherent way of treating experimental data from EPR and FRET and provides a basis for integrative structural modeling, including studies of conformational distributions and dynamics of biological macromolecules using both techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Klose
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Andrea Holla
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Gmeiner
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Nettels
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irina Ritsch
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nadja Bross
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maxim Yulikov
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Benjamin Schuler
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Gunnar Jeschke
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lerner E, Barth A, Hendrix J, Ambrose B, Birkedal V, Blanchard SC, Börner R, Sung Chung H, Cordes T, Craggs TD, Deniz AA, Diao J, Fei J, Gonzalez RL, Gopich IV, Ha T, Hanke CA, Haran G, Hatzakis NS, Hohng S, Hong SC, Hugel T, Ingargiola A, Joo C, Kapanidis AN, Kim HD, Laurence T, Lee NK, Lee TH, Lemke EA, Margeat E, Michaelis J, Michalet X, Myong S, Nettels D, Peulen TO, Ploetz E, Razvag Y, Robb NC, Schuler B, Soleimaninejad H, Tang C, Vafabakhsh R, Lamb DC, Seidel CAM, Weiss S. FRET-based dynamic structural biology: Challenges, perspectives and an appeal for open-science practices. eLife 2021; 10:e60416. [PMID: 33779550 PMCID: PMC8007216 DOI: 10.7554/elife.60416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) has become a mainstream technique for studying biomolecular structural dynamics. The rapid and wide adoption of smFRET experiments by an ever-increasing number of groups has generated significant progress in sample preparation, measurement procedures, data analysis, algorithms and documentation. Several labs that employ smFRET approaches have joined forces to inform the smFRET community about streamlining how to perform experiments and analyze results for obtaining quantitative information on biomolecular structure and dynamics. The recent efforts include blind tests to assess the accuracy and the precision of smFRET experiments among different labs using various procedures. These multi-lab studies have led to the development of smFRET procedures and documentation, which are important when submitting entries into the archiving system for integrative structure models, PDB-Dev. This position paper describes the current 'state of the art' from different perspectives, points to unresolved methodological issues for quantitative structural studies, provides a set of 'soft recommendations' about which an emerging consensus exists, and lists openly available resources for newcomers and seasoned practitioners. To make further progress, we strongly encourage 'open science' practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eitan Lerner
- Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, and The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Mathematics & Science, The Edmond J. Safra Campus, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Anders Barth
- Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-UniversitätDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Jelle Hendrix
- Dynamic Bioimaging Lab, Advanced Optical Microscopy Centre and Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), Hasselt UniversityDiepenbeekBelgium
| | - Benjamin Ambrose
- Department of Chemistry, University of SheffieldSheffieldUnited Kingdom
| | - Victoria Birkedal
- Department of Chemistry and iNANO center, Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
| | - Scott C Blanchard
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalMemphisUnited States
| | - Richard Börner
- Laserinstitut HS Mittweida, University of Applied Science MittweidaMittweidaGermany
| | - Hoi Sung Chung
- Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Thorben Cordes
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenPlanegg-MartinsriedGermany
| | - Timothy D Craggs
- Department of Chemistry, University of SheffieldSheffieldUnited Kingdom
| | - Ashok A Deniz
- Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research InstituteLa JollaUnited States
| | - Jiajie Diao
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Cincinnati School of MedicineCincinnatiUnited States
| | - Jingyi Fei
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and The Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of ChicagoChicagoUnited States
| | - Ruben L Gonzalez
- Department of Chemistry, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUnited States
| | - Irina V Gopich
- Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Taekjip Ha
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteBaltimoreUnited States
| | - Christian A Hanke
- Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-UniversitätDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Gilad Haran
- Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
| | - Nikos S Hatzakis
- Department of Chemistry & Nanoscience Centre, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
- Denmark Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Sungchul Hohng
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, and Institute of Applied Physics, Seoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Seok-Cheol Hong
- Center for Molecular Spectroscopy and Dynamics, Institute for Basic Science and Department of Physics, Korea UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Thorsten Hugel
- Institute of Physical Chemistry and Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, University of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
| | - Antonino Ingargiola
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Department of Physiology, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
| | - Chirlmin Joo
- Department of BioNanoScience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
| | - Achillefs N Kapanidis
- Biological Physics Research Group, Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Harold D Kim
- School of Physics, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUnited States
| | - Ted Laurence
- Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermoreUnited States
| | - Nam Ki Lee
- School of Chemistry, Seoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Tae-Hee Lee
- Department of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUnited States
| | - Edward A Lemke
- Departments of Biology and Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg UniversityMainzGermany
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB)MainzGermany
| | - Emmanuel Margeat
- Centre de Biologie Structurale (CBS), CNRS, INSERM, Universitié de MontpellierMontpellierFrance
| | | | - Xavier Michalet
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Department of Physiology, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
| | - Sua Myong
- Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUnited States
| | - Daniel Nettels
- Department of Biochemistry and Department of Physics, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Thomas-Otavio Peulen
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
| | - Evelyn Ploetz
- Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Center for Nanoscience (CeNS), Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM) and Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM), Ludwig-Maximilians-UniversitätMünchenGermany
| | - Yair Razvag
- Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, and The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Mathematics & Science, The Edmond J. Safra Campus, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Nicole C Robb
- Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickCoventryUnited Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Schuler
- Department of Biochemistry and Department of Physics, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Hamid Soleimaninejad
- Biological Optical Microscopy Platform (BOMP), University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
| | - Chun Tang
- College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, PKU-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Reza Vafabakhsh
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUnited States
| | - Don C Lamb
- Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Center for Nanoscience (CeNS), Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM) and Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM), Ludwig-Maximilians-UniversitätMünchenGermany
| | - Claus AM Seidel
- Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-UniversitätDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Shimon Weiss
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Department of Physiology, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
- Department of Physiology, CaliforniaNanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hart SM, Chen WJ, Banal JL, Bricker WP, Dodin A, Markova L, Vyborna Y, Willard AP, Häner R, Bathe M, Schlau-Cohen GS. Engineering couplings for exciton transport using synthetic DNA scaffolds. Chem 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
9
|
Fulton LA, Seitz WR, Planalp RP. Aggregation of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) homopolymer by Cu2+ and Zn2+: Significance for ratiometric metal ion indicators. Polyhedron 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2020.114797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
10
|
Hochreiter B, Kunze M, Moser B, Schmid JA. Advanced FRET normalization allows quantitative analysis of protein interactions including stoichiometries and relative affinities in living cells. Sci Rep 2019; 9:8233. [PMID: 31160659 PMCID: PMC6547726 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44650-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) measurements are commonly applied to proof protein-protein interactions. However, standard methods of live cell FRET microscopy and signal normalization only allow a principle assessment of mutual binding and are unable to deduce quantitative information of the interaction. We present an evaluation and normalization procedure for 3-filter FRET measurements, which reflects the process of complex formation by plotting FRET-saturation curves. The advantage of this approach relative to traditional signal normalizations is demonstrated by mathematical simulations. Thereby, we also identify the contribution of critical parameters such as the total amount of donor and acceptor molecules and their molar ratio. When combined with a fitting procedure, this normalization facilitates the extraction of key properties of protein complexes such as the interaction stoichiometry or the apparent affinity of the binding partners. Finally, the feasibility of our method is verified by investigating three exemplary protein complexes. Altogether, our approach offers a novel method for a quantitative analysis of protein interactions by 3-filter FRET microscopy, as well as flow cytometry. To facilitate the application of this method, we created macros and routines for the programs ImageJ, R and MS-Excel, which we make publicly available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Hochreiter
- Medical University Vienna, Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Institute for Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Kunze
- Medical University Vienna, Center for Brain Research, Department of Pathobiology of the Nervous System, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bernhard Moser
- Medical University Vienna, Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Institute for Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes A Schmid
- Medical University Vienna, Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Institute for Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|