Binding of a chaperonin to the folding intermediates of lactate dehydrogenase

Mycobacterial chaperonins in cellular proteostasis: Evidence for chaperone function of Cpn60.1 and Cpn60.2-mediated protein folding

Mycobacterium tuberculosis encodes two chaperonin proteins, MtbCpn60.1 and MtbCpn60.2, that share substantial sequence similarity with the Escherichia coli chaperonin, GroEL. However, unlike GroEL, MtbCpn60.1 and MtbCpn60.2 purify as lower-order oligomers. Previous studies have shown that MtbCpn60.2 can functionally replace GroEL in E. coli, while the function of MtbCpn60.1 remained an enigma. Here, we demonstrate the molecular chaperone function of MtbCpn60.1 and MtbCpn60.2, by probing their ability to assist the folding of obligate chaperonin clients, DapA, FtsE and MetK, in an E. coli strain depleted of endogenous GroEL. We show that both MtbCpn60.1 and MtbCpn60.2 support cell survival and cell division by assisting the folding of DapA and FtsE, but only MtbCpn60.2 completely rescues GroEL-depleted E. coli cells. We also show that, unlike MtbCpn60.2, MtbCpn60.1 has limited ability to support cell growth and proliferation and assist the folding of MetK. Our findings suggest that the client pools of GroEL and MtbCpn60.2 overlap substantially, while MtbCpn60.1 folds only a small subset of GroEL clients. We conclude that the differences between MtbCpn60.1 and MtbCpn60.2 may be a consequence of their intrinsic sequence features, which affect their thermostability, efficiency, clientomes and modes of action.

Chaperonin-assisted protein folding: a chronologue

This chronologue seeks to document the discovery and development of an understanding of oligomeric ring protein assemblies known as chaperonins that assist protein folding in the cell. It provides detail regarding genetic, physiologic, biochemical, and biophysical studies of these ATP-utilizing machines from both in vivo and in vitro observations. The chronologue is organized into various topics of physiology and mechanism, for each of which a chronologic order is generally followed. The text is liberally illustrated to provide firsthand inspection of the key pieces of experimental data that propelled this field. Because of the length and depth of this piece, the use of the outline as a guide for selected reading is encouraged, but it should also be of help in pursuing the text in direct order.

A Possible Role of the Full-Length Nascent Protein in Post-Translational Ribosome Recycling

Each cycle of translation initiation in bacterial cell requires free 50S and 30S ribosomal subunits originating from the post-translational dissociation of 70S ribosome from the previous cycle. Literature shows stable dissociation of 70S from model post-termination complexes by the concerted action of Ribosome Recycling Factor (RRF) and Elongation Factor G (EF-G) that interact with the rRNA bridge B2a/B2b joining 50S to 30S. In such experimental models, the role of full-length nascent protein was never considered seriously. We observed relatively slow release of full-length nascent protein from 50Sof post translation ribosome, and in that process, its toe prints on the rRNA in vivo and in in vitro translation with E.coli S30 extract. We reported earlier that a number of chemically unfolded proteins like bovine carbonic anhydrase (BCA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), malate dehydrogenase (MDH), lysozyme, ovalbumin etc., when added to free 70Sin lieu of the full length nascent proteins, also interact with identical RNA regions of the 23S rRNA. Interestingly the rRNA nucleotides that slow down release of the C-terminus of full-length unfolded protein were found in close proximity to the B2a/B2b bridge. It indicated a potentially important chemical reaction conserved throughout the evolution. Here we set out to probe that conserved role of unfolded protein conformation in splitting the free or post-termination 70S. How both the RRF-EFG dependent and the plausible nascent protein–EFG dependent ribosome recycling pathways might be relevant in bacteria is discussed here.

Role of denatured-state properties in chaperonin action probed by single-molecule spectroscopy

The bacterial chaperonin GroEL/GroES assists folding of a broad spectrum of denatured and misfolded proteins. Here, we explore the limits of this remarkable promiscuity by mapping two denatured proteins with very different conformational properties, rhodanese and cyclophilin A, during binding and encapsulation by GroEL/GroES with single-molecule spectroscopy, microfluidic mixing, and ensemble kinetics. We find that both proteins bind to GroEL with high affinity in a reaction involving substantial conformational adaptation. However, whereas the compact denatured state of rhodanese is encapsulated efficiently upon addition of GroES and ATP, the more expanded and unstructured denatured cyclophilin A is not encapsulated but is expelled into solution. The origin of this surprising disparity is the weaker interactions of cyclophilin A with a transiently formed GroEL-GroES complex, which may serve as a crucial checkpoint for substrate discrimination.

Transient conformational remodeling of folding proteins by GroES-individually and in concert with GroEL

The commonly accepted dogma of the bacterial GroE chaperonin system entails protein folding mediated by cycles of several ATP-dependent sequential steps where GroEL interacts with the folding client protein. In contrast, we herein report GroES-mediated dynamic remodeling (expansion and compression) of two different protein substrates during folding: the endogenous substrate MreB and carbonic anhydrase (HCAII), a well-characterized protein folding model. GroES was also found to influence GroEL binding induced unfolding and compression of the client protein underlining the synergistic activity of both chaperonins, even in the absence of ATP. This previously unidentified activity by GroES should have important implications for understanding the chaperonin mechanism and cellular stress response. Our findings necessitate a revision of the GroEL/ES mechanism.

Repetitive protein unfolding by the trans ring of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex stimulates folding

A key constraint on the growth of most organisms is the slow and inefficient folding of many essential proteins. To deal with this problem, several diverse families of protein folding machines, known collectively as molecular chaperones, developed early in evolutionary history. The functional role and operational steps of these remarkably complex nanomachines remain subjects of active debate. Here we present evidence that, for the GroEL-GroES chaperonin system, the non-native substrate protein enters the folding cycle on the trans ring of the double-ring GroEL-ATP-GroES complex rather than the ADP-bound complex. The properties of this ATP complex are designed to ensure that non-native substrate protein binds first, followed by ATP and finally GroES. This binding order ensures efficient occupancy of the open GroEL ring and allows for disruption of misfolded structures through two phases of multiaxis unfolding. In this model, repeated cycles of partial unfolding, followed by confinement within the GroEL-GroES chamber, provide the most effective overall mechanism for facilitating the folding of the most stringently dependent GroEL substrate proteins.

Visualizing GroEL/ES in the act of encapsulating a folding protein

The GroEL/ES chaperonin system is required for the assisted folding of many proteins. How these substrate proteins are encapsulated within the GroEL-GroES cavity is poorly understood. Using symmetry-free, single-particle cryo-electron microscopy, we have characterized a chemically modified mutant of GroEL (EL43Py) that is trapped at a normally transient stage of substrate protein encapsulation. We show that the symmetric pattern of the GroEL subunits is broken as the GroEL cis-ring apical domains reorient to accommodate the simultaneous binding of GroES and an incompletely folded substrate protein (RuBisCO). The collapsed RuBisCO folding intermediate binds to the lower segment of two apical domains, as well as to the normally unstructured GroEL C-terminal tails. A comparative structural analysis suggests that the allosteric transitions leading to substrate protein release and folding involve concerted shifts of GroES and the GroEL apical domains and C-terminal tails.

Toward a detailed description of the pathways of allosteric communication in the GroEL chaperonin through atomistic simulation

GroEL, along with its coprotein GroES, is essential for ensuring the correct folding of unfolded or newly synthesized proteins in bacteria. GroEL is a complex, allosteric molecule, composed of two heptameric rings stacked back to back, that undergoes large structural changes during its reaction cycle. These structural changes are driven by the cooperative binding and subsequent hydrolysis of ATP, by GroEL. Despite numerous previous studies, the precise mechanisms of allosteric communication and the associated structural changes remain elusive. In this paper, we describe a series of all-atom, unbiased, molecular dynamics simulations over relatively long (50-100 ns) time scales of a single, isolated GroEL subunit and also a heptameric GroEL ring, in the presence and absence of ATP. Combined with results from a distance restraint-biased simulation of the single ring, the atomistic details of the earliest stages of ATP-driven structural changes within this complex molecule are illuminated. Our results are in broad agreement with previous modeling studies of isolated subunits and with a coarse-grained, forcing simulation of the single ring. These are the first reported all-atom simulations of the GroEL single-ring complex and provide a unique insight into the role of charged residues K80, K277, R284, R285, and E388 at the subunit interface in transmission of the allosteric signal. These simulations also demonstrate the feasibility of performing all-atom simulations of very large systems on sufficiently long time scales on typical high performance computing facilities to show the origins of the earliest events in biologically relevant processes.

Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence

For the last 20 years, a large volume of experimental and theoretical work has been undertaken to understand how chaperones like GroEL can assist protein folding in the cell. The most accepted explanation appears to be the simplest: GroEL, like most other chaperones, helps proteins fold by preventing aggregation. However, evidence suggests that, under some conditions, GroEL can play a more active role by accelerating protein folding. A large number of models have been proposed to explain how this could occur. Focused experiments have been designed and carried out using different protein substrates with conclusions that support many different mechanisms. In the current article, we attempt to see the forest through the trees. We review all suggested mechanisms for chaperonin-mediated folding and weigh the plausibility of each in light of what we now know about the most stringent, essential, GroEL-dependent protein substrates.

Differential effects of co-chaperonin homologs on cpn60 oligomers

In this study, we have investigated the relationship between chaperonin/co-chaperonin binding, ATP hydrolysis, and protein refolding in heterologous chaperonin systems from bacteria, chloroplast, and mitochondria. We characterized two types of chloroplast cpn60 oligomers, ch-cpn60 composed of alpha and beta subunits (alpha(7)beta(7) ch-cpn60) and one composed of all beta subunits (beta(14) ch-cpn60). In terms of ATPase activity, the rate of ATP hydrolysis increased with protein concentration up to 60 microM, reflecting a concentration at which the oligomers are stable. At high concentrations of cpn60, all cpn10 homologs inhibited ATPase activity of alpha(7)beta(7) ch-cpn60. In contrast, ATPase of beta(14) ch-cpn60 was inhibited only by mitochondrial cpn10, supporting previous reports showing that beta(14) is functional only with mitochondrial cpn10 and not with other cpn10 homologs. Surprisingly, direct binding assays showed that both ch-cpn60 oligomer types bind to bacterial, mitochondrial, and chloroplast cpn10 homologs with an equal apparent affinity. Moreover, mitochondrial cpn60 binds chloroplast cpn20 with which it is not able to refold denatured proteins. Protein refolding experiments showed that in such instances, the bound protein is released in a conformation that is not able to refold. The presence of glycerol, or subsequent addition of mitochondrial cpn10, allows us to recover enzymatic activity of the substrate protein. Thus, in our systems, the formation of co-chaperonin/chaperonin complexes does not necessarily lead to protein folding. By using heterologous oligomer systems, we are able to separate the functions of binding and refolding in order to better understand the chaperonin mechanism.

Role of the ribosome in protein folding

In all organisms, the ribosome synthesizes and folds full length polypeptide chains into active three-dimensional conformations. The nascent protein goes through two major interactions, first with the ribosome which synthesizes the polypeptide chain and holds it for a considerable length of time, and then with the chaperones. Some of the chaperones are found in solution as well as associated to the ribosome. A number of in vitro and in vivo experiments revealed that the nascent protein folds through specific interactions of some amino acids with the nucleotides in the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) in the large ribosomal subunit. The mechanism of this folding differs from self-folding. In this article, we highlight the folding of nascent proteins on the ribosome and the influence of chaperones etc. on protein folding.

Triggering protein folding within the GroEL-GroES complex

The folding of many proteins depends on the assistance of chaperonins like GroEL and GroES and involves the enclosure of substrate proteins inside an internal cavity that is formed when GroES binds to GroEL in the presence of ATP. Precisely how assembly of the GroEL-GroES complex leads to substrate protein encapsulation and folding remains poorly understood. Here we use a chemically modified mutant of GroEL (EL43Py) to uncouple substrate protein encapsulation from release and folding. Although EL43Py correctly initiates a substrate protein encapsulation reaction, this mutant stalls in an intermediate allosteric state of the GroEL ring, which is essential for both GroES binding and the forced unfolding of the substrate protein. This intermediate conformation of the GroEL ring possesses simultaneously high affinity for both GroES and non-native substrate protein, thus preventing escape of the substrate protein while GroES binding and substrate protein compaction takes place. Strikingly, assembly of the folding-active GroEL-GroES complex appears to involve a strategic delay in ATP hydrolysis that is coupled to disassembly of the old, ADP-bound GroEL-GroES complex on the opposite ring.

The intermediate domain defines broad nucleotide selectivity for protein folding in Chlamydophila GroEL1

The chaperonin GroEL assists protein folding in the presence of ATP and magnesium through substrate protein capsulation in combination with the cofactor GroES. Recent studies have revealed the details of folding cycles of GroEL from Escherichia coli, yet little is known about the GroEL-assisted protein folding mechanisms in other bacterial species. Using three model enzyme assays, we have found that GroEL1 from Chlamydophila pneumoniae, an obligate human pathogen, has a broader selectivity for nucleotides in the refolding reaction. To elucidate structural factors involved in such nucleotide selectivity, GroEL chimeras were constructed by exchanging apical, intermediate, and equatorial domains between E. coli GroEL and C. pneumoniae GroEL1. In vitro folding assays using chimeras revealed that the intermediate domain is the major contributor to the nucleotide selectivity of C. pneumoniae GroEL1. Additional site-directed mutation experiments led to the identification of Gln(400) and Ile(404) in the intermediate domain of C. pneumoniae GroEL1 as residues that play a key role in defining the nucleotide selectivity of the protein refolding reaction.

GroEL/S substrate specificity based on substrate unfolding propensity

Phage P22 wild-type (WT) coat protein does not require GroEL/S to fold but temperature-sensitive-folding (tsf) coat proteins need the chaperone complex for correct folding. WT coat protein and all variants absolutely require P22 scaffolding protein, an assembly chaperone, to assemble into precursor structures termed procapsids. Previously, we showed that a global suppressor (su) substitution, T1661, which rescues several tsf coat protein variants, functioned by inducing GroEL/S. This led to an increased formation of tsf:T1661 coat protein:GroEL complexes compared with the tsf parents. The increased concentration of complexes resulted in more assembly-competent coat proteins because of a shift in the chaperone-driven kinetic partitioning between aggregation-prone intermediates toward correct folding and assembly. We have now investigated the folding and assembly of coat protein variants that carry a different global su substitution, F170L. By monitoring levels of phage production in the presence of a dysfunctional GroEL we found that tsf:F170L proteins demonstrate a less stringent requirement for GroEL. Tsf:F170L proteins also did not cause induction of the chaperones. Circular dichroism and tryptophan fluorescence indicate that the native state of the tsf: F170L coat proteins is restored to WT-like values. In addition, native acrylamide gel electrophoresis shows a stabilized native state for tsf:F170L coat proteins. The F170L su substitution also increases procapsid production compared with their tsf parents. We propose that the F170L su substitution has a decreased requirement for the chaperones GroEL and GroES as a result of restoring the tsf coat proteins to a WT-like state. Our data also suggest that GroEL/S can be induced by increasing the population of unfolding intermediates.

A theoretical analysis of rate constants and kinetic isotope effects corresponding to different reactant valleys in lactate dehydrogenase

In some enzymatic systems large conformational changes are coupled to the chemical step, in such a way that dispersion of rate constants can be observed in single-molecule experiments, each corresponding to the reaction from a different reactant valley. Under this perspective here we present a computational study of pyruvate to lactate transformation catalyzed by lactate dehydrogenase. The reaction consists of a hydride transfer and a proton transfer that seem to take place concertedly. The degree of asynchronicity and the energy barrier depend on the particular starting reactant valley. In order to estimate rate constants we used a free energy perturbation technique adapted to follow the intrinsic reaction coordinate for several possible reaction paths. Tunneling effects are also obtained with a slightly modified version of the ensemble-averaged variational transition state theory with multidimensional tunneling contributions. According to our results the closure of the active site by means of a flexible loop can lead to the formation of different reactant complexes displaying different features in the disposition of some key residues (such as Arg109), interactions with the substrate and number of water molecules in the active site. The chemical step of the reaction takes place with a different reaction rate from each of these complexes. Finally, primary kinetic isotope effects for replacement of the transferring hydrogen of the cofactor with a deuteride are in good agreement with experimental observations, thus validating our methodology.

Effects of divalent cations on encapsulation and release in the GroEL-assisted folding

Chaperonin GroEL assists protein folding in the presence of ATP and magnesium. Recent studies have shown that several divalent cations other than magnesium induce conformational changes of GroEL, thereby influencing chaperonin-assisted protein folding, but little is known about the detailed mechanism for such actions. Thus, the effects of divalent cations on protein encapsulation by GroEL/ES complexes were investigated. Of the divalent cations, not only magnesium, but also manganese ions enabled the functional refolding and release of 5,10-methylenetetrahydroforate reductase (METF) by GroEL. Neither ATP hydrolysis nor METF refolding was observed in the presence of zinc ion, whereas only ATP hydrolysis was induced by cobalt and nickel ions. SDS-PAGE and gel filtration analyses revealed that cobalt, nickel and zinc ions permit the formation of stable substrate-GroEL-GroES cis-ternary complexes, but prevent the release of METF from GroEL.

Spectrin organization and dynamics: new insights

Spectrin is the major constituent protein of the erythrocyte cytoskeleton which forms a filamentous network on the cytoplasmic face of the membrane by providing a scaffold for a variety of proteins. In this review, several aspects of spectrin organization are highlighted, particularly with respect to its ability to bind hydrophobic ligands and its interaction with membrane surfaces. The characteristic binding of the fluorescent hydrophobic probes Prodan and pyrene to spectrin, which allows an estimation of the polarity of the hydrophobic probe binding site, is illustrated. In addition, the contribution of uniquely localized and conserved tryptophan residues in the 'spectrin repeats' in these processes is discussed. A functional implication of the presence of hydrophobic binding sites in spectrin is its recently discovered chaperone-like activity. Interestingly, spectrin exhibits residual structural integrity even after denaturation which could be considered as a hallmark of cytoskeletal proteins. Future research could provide useful information about the possible role played by spectrin in cellular physiology in healthy and diseased states.

Significance of the N-terminal domain for the function of chloroplast cpn20 chaperonin

Chaperonins cpn60 and cpn10 are essential proteins involved in cellular protein folding. Plant chloroplasts contain a unique version of the cpn10 co-chaperonin, cpn20, which consists of two homologous cpn10-like domains (N-cpn20 and C-cpn20) that are connected by a short linker region. Although cpn20 seems to function like other single domain cpn10 oligomers, the structure and specific functions of the domains are not understood. We mutated amino acids in the "mobile loop" regions of N-cpn20, C-cpn20 or both: a highly conserved glycine, which was shown to be important for flexibility of the mobile loop, and a leucine residue shown to be involved in binding of co-chaperonin to chaperonin. The mutant proteins were purified and their oligomeric structure validated by gel filtration, native gel electrophoresis, and circular dichroism. Functional assays of protein refolding and inhibition of GroEL ATPase both showed (i) mutation of the conserved glycine reduced the activity of cpn20, whether in N-cpn20 (G32A) or C-cpn20 (G130A). The same mutation in the bacterial cpn10 (GroES G24A) had no effect on activity. (ii) Mutations in the highly conserved leucine of N-cpn20 (L35A) and in the corresponding L27A of GroES resulted in inactive protein. (iii) In contrast, mutant L133A, in which the conserved leucine of C-cpn20 was altered, retained 55% activity. We conclude that the structure of cpn20 is much more sensitive to alterations in the mobile loop than is the structure of GroES. Moreover, only N-cpn20 is necessary for activity of cpn20. However, full and efficient functioning requires both domains.

GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible

Protein folding is a spontaneous process that is essential for life, yet the concentrated and complex interior of a cell is an inherently hostile environment for the efficient folding of many proteins. Some proteins-constrained by sequence, topology, size, and function-simply cannot fold by themselves and are instead prone to misfolding and aggregation. This problem is so deeply entrenched that a specialized family of proteins, known as molecular chaperones, evolved to assist in protein folding. Here we examine one essential class of molecular chaperones, the large, oligomeric, and energy utilizing chaperonins or Hsp60s. The bacterial chaperonin GroEL, along with its co-chaperonin GroES, is probably the best-studied example of this family of protein-folding machine. In this review, we examine some of the general properties of proteins that do not fold well in the absence of GroEL and then consider how folding of these proteins is enhanced by GroEL and GroES. Recent experimental and theoretical studies suggest that chaperonins like GroEL and GroES employ a combination of protein isolation, unfolding, and conformational restriction to drive protein folding under conditions where it is otherwise not possible.

Elucidation of steps in the capture of a protein substrate for efficient encapsulation by GroE

We have identified five structural rearrangements in GroEL induced by the ordered binding of ATP and GroES. The first discernable rearrangement (designated T --> R(1)) is a rapid, cooperative transition that appears not to be functionally communicated to the apical domain. In the second (R(1) --> R(2)) step, a state is formed that binds GroES weakly in a rapid, diffusion-limited process. However, a second optical signal, carried by a protein substrate bound to GroEL, responds neither to formation of the R(2) state nor to the binding of GroES. This result strongly implies that the substrate protein remains bound to the inner walls of the initially formed GroEL.GroES cavity, and is not yet displaced from its sites of interaction with GroEL. In the next rearrangement (R(2).GroES --> R(3).GroES) the strength of interaction between GroEL and GroES is greatly enhanced, and there is a large and coincident loss of fluorescence-signal intensity in the labeled protein substrate, indicating that there is either a displacement from its binding sites on GroEL or at least a significant change of environment. These results are consistent with a mechanism in which the shift in orientation of GroEL apical domains between that seen in the apo-protein and stable GroEL.GroES complexes is highly ordered, and transient conformational intermediates permit the association of GroES before the displacement of bound polypeptide. This ensures efficient encapsulation of the polypeptide within the GroEL central cavity underneath GroES.

Unfolded, oxidized, and thermoinactivated forms of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase interact with the chaperonin GroEL in different ways

The interaction of GroEL with different denatured forms of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase* (GAPDH) has been investigated. GroEL does not prevent thermal denaturation of GAPDH, but effectively interacts with the thermodenatured enzyme, thus preventing the aggregation of denatured molecules. Binding of the thermodenatured GAPDH shifts the Tm value of the GroEL thermodenaturation curve by 3 degrees towards higher temperatures and increases the DeltaHcal value 1.44-fold, indicating a significant increase in the thermal stability of the resulting complex. GAPDH thermodenatured in the presence of GroEL cannot be reactivated by the addition of GroES, Mg2+, and ATP. In contrast, GAPDH denatured in guanidine hydrochloride (GAPDHden) is reactivated in the presence of GroEL, GroES, Mg2+, and ATP, yielding 11-15% of its original activity, while the spontaneous reactivation yields only 2-3%. The oxidation of GAPDH with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of 4 M guanidine hydrochloride results in the formation of the enzyme (GAPDHox) that cannot acquire its native conformation and binds to GroEL irreversibly. Binding of GAPDHox to one of the GroEL rings completely inhibits the GroEL-assisted reactivation of GAPDHden, but does not affect the GroEL-assisted reactivation of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The data suggest that LDH can be successfully reactivated due to the binding of the denatured molecules to the apical domain of the opposite GroEL ring with their subsequent release into the solution without encapsulation (trans-mechanism). In contrast, GAPDH requires the hydrophilic cavity for the reactivation (cis-mechanism).

DNA Polymerases for Translesion DNA Synthesis: Enzyme Purification and Mouse Models for Studying Their Function

This chapter discusses experimental methods and protocols for the purification and preliminary characterization of DNA polymerases that are specialized for the replicative bypass (translesion DNA synthesis) of base or other types of DNA damage that typically arrest high-fidelity DNA synthesis, with particular emphasis on DNA polymerase kappa (Polkappa from mouse cells). It also describes some of the methods employed in the evaluation of mouse strains defective in genes that encode these enzymes.

Characterization of the proteasome from the extremely halophilic archaeon Haloarcula marismortui

A 20S proteasome, comprising two subunits alpha and beta, was purified from the extreme halophilic archaeon Haloarcula marismortui, which grows only in saturated salt conditions. The three-dimensional reconstruction of the H. marismortui proteasome (Hm proteasome), obtained from negatively stained electron micrographs, is virtually identical to the structure of a thermophilic proteasome filtered to the same resolution. The stability of the Hm proteasome was found to be less salt-dependent than that of other halophilic enzymes previously described. The proteolytic activity of the Hm proteasome was investigated using the malate dehydrogenase from H. marismortui (HmMalDH) as a model substrate. The HmMalDH denatures when the salt concentration is decreased below 2 M. Under these conditions, the proteasome efficiently cleaves HmMalDH during its denaturation process, but the fully denatured HmMalDH is poorly degraded. These in vitro experiments show that, at low salt concentrations, the 20S proteasome from halophilic archaea eliminates a misfolded protein.

Misfolded forms of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase interact with GroEL and inhibit chaperonin-assisted folding of the wild-type enzyme

We studied the interaction of chaperonin GroEL with different misfolded forms of tetrameric phosphorylating glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH): (1) GAPDH from rabbit muscles with all SH-groups modified by 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoate); (2) O-R-type dimers of mutant GAPDH from Bacillus stearothermophilus with amino acid substitutions Y283V, D282G, and Y283V/W84F, and (3) O-P-type dimers of mutant GAPDH from B. stearothermophilus with amino acid substitutions Y46G/S48G and Y46G/R52G. It was shown that chemically modified GAPDH and the O-R-type mutant dimers bound to GroEL with 1:1 stoichiometry and dissociation constants K(d) of 0.4 and 0.9 muM, respectively. A striking feature of the resulting complexes with GroEL was their stability in the presence of Mg-ATP. Chemically modified GAPDH and the O-R-type mutant dimers inhibited GroEL-assisted refolding of urea-denatured wild-type GAPDH from B. stearothermophilus but did not affect its spontaneous reactivation. In contrast to the O-R-dimers, the O-P-type mutant dimers neither bound nor affected GroEL-assisted refolding of the wild-type GAPDH. Thus, we suggest that interaction of GroEL with certain types of misfolded proteins can result in the formation of stable complexes and the impairment of chaperonin activity.

Three GroEL homologues from Rhizobium leguminosarum have distinct in vitro properties

The GroEL molecular chaperone of Escherichia coli and its cofactor GroES are highly conserved, and are required for the folding of many proteins. Most but not all bacteria express single GroEL and GroES proteins. Rhizobium leguminosarum strain A34 encodes three complete operons encoding homologues to GroEL and GroES. We have used circular dichroism and measurement of ATPase activity to compare the stabilities of these chaperonins after expression in and purification from E. coli. Significant differences in the stabilities of the proteins with respect to denaturant and temperature were found. The proteins also differed in their ability to refold denatured lactate dehydrogenase. This study, the first to compare the properties of three different GroEL homologues from the same organism, shows that despite the high degree of similarity between different homologues, they can display distinct properties in vitro.

Isolation and characterisation of mutants of GroEL that are fully functional as single rings

A key aspect of the reaction mechanism for the molecular chaperone GroEL is the transmission of an allosteric signal between the two rings of the GroEL complex. Thus, the single-ring mutant SR1 is unable to act as a chaperone as it cannot release bound substrate or GroES. We used a simple selection procedure to identify mutants of SR1 that restored chaperone activity in vivo. A large number of single amino acid changes, mapping at diverse positions throughout the protein, enabled SR1 to regain its ability to act as a chaperone while remaining as a single ring. In vivo assays were used to identify the proteins that had regained maximal activity. In some cases, no difference could be detected between strains expressing wild-type GroEL and those expressing the mutated proteins. Three of the most active proteins where the mutations were in distinct parts of the protein were purified to homogeneity and characterised in vitro. All were capable of acting efficiently as chaperones for two different GroES-dependent substrates. All three proteins bound nucleotide as effectively as did GroEL, but the binding of GroES in the presence of ATP or ADP was reduced significantly relative to the wild-type. These active single rings should provide a useful tool for studying the nature of the allosteric changes that occur in the GroEL reaction cycle.

Alpha-crystallin and ATP facilitate the in vitro renaturation of xylanase: enhancement of refolding by metal ions

Alpha-crystallin is a multimeric protein that functions as a molecular chaperone and shares extensive structural homology to small heat shock proteins. For the functional in vitro analysis of alpha-crystallin, the xylanase Xyl II from alkalophilic thermophilic Bacillus was used as a model system. The mechanism of chaperone action of alpha-crystallin is less investigated. Here we studied the refolding of Gdn HCl-denatured Xyl II in the presence and absence of alpha-crystallin to elucidate the molecular mechanism of chaperone-mediated in vitro folding. Our results, based on intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence and hydrophobic fluorophore 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonate binding studies, suggest that alpha-crystallin formed a complex with a putative molten globule-like intermediate in the refolding pathway of Xyl II. The alpha-crystallin.Xyl II complex exhibited no functional activity. Addition of ATP to the complex initiated the renaturation of Xyl II with 30%-35% recovery of activity. The nonhydrolyzable analog 5'-adenylyl imidodiphosphate (AMP-PNP) was capable of reconstitution of active Xyl II to a lesser extent than ATP. Although the presence of Ca(2+) was not required for the in vitro refolding of Xyl II, the renaturation yield was enhanced in its presence. Experimental evidence indicated that the binding of ATP to the alpha-crystallin.Xyl II complex brought about conformational changes in alpha-crystallin facilitating the dissociation of xylanase molecules. This is the first report of the enhancement of alpha-crystallin chaperone functions by metal ions.

Amyloid-fibril formation. Proposed mechanisms and relevance to conformational disease

The phenomenon of the transformation of proteins into amyloid-fibrils is of interest, firstly, because it is closely connected to the so-called conformational diseases, many of which are hitherto incurable, and secondly, because it remains to be explained in physical terms (energetically and structurally). The process leads to fibrous aggregates in the form of extracellular amyloid plaques, neuro-fibrillary tangles and other intracytoplasmic or intranuclear inclusions. In this review, basic principles common to the field of amyloid fibril formation and conformational disease are underlined. Existing models for the mechanism need to be tested by experiment. The kinetic and energetic bases of the process are reviewed. The main controversial issue remains the coexistence of more than one protein conformation. The possible role of oligomeric intermediates, and of domain-swapping is also discussed. Mechanisms for cellular defence and novel therapies are considered.

Promotion of the in vitro renaturation of dodecameric glutamine synthetase from Escherichia coli in the presence of GroEL (chaperonin-60) and ATP

The folding and assembly of dodecameric glutamine synthetase (GS) from Escherichia coli was examined in the absence and presence of the E. coli heat shock protein, GroEL (chaperonin-60). At nonphysiological temperatures (15-20 degrees C), unfolded GS spontaneously renatured to 80-90% of its original activity in the absence of GroEL. At near-physiological temperatures (37 degrees C), only 20-40% of the original activity returns. Under the latter solution conditions, GroEL and ATP enhance the extent of GS renaturation to 70-80% of the original activity at 37 degrees C. In the absence of ATP, GroEL arrests the renaturation of unfolded GS by forming a stable binary complex. The addition of ATP to this complex resulted in the release of GS subunits and formation of active dodecameric GS. The order of addition of ATP or unfolded GS to GroEL results in differences in the t1/2 values where half-maximal GS activity is attained. At a constant GS concentration, the formation of the GroEL.GS complex followed by ATP addition resulted in approximately a 2-fold increase in the observed t1/2 value compared to that observed when GroEL was preincubated with ATP before the GS renaturation reaction was initiated. These differences in renaturation rates may be related to binding affinity differences between the ATP-free and -bound GroEL conformer for unfolded or partially folded protein substrates [Badcoe, I. G., Smith, C. J., Wood, S., Halsall, D. J., Holbrook, J. J., Lund, P., & Clarke, A. R. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 9195-9200].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Characterization of a novel complex from halophilic archaebacteria, which displays chaperone-like activities in vitro

We isolated a protein, P45, from the extreme halophilic archaeon Haloarcula marismortui, which displays molecular chaperone activities in vitro. P45 is a weak ATPase that assembles into a large ring-shaped oligomeric complex comprising about 10 subunits. The protein shows no significant homology to any known protein. P45 forms complexes with halophilic malate dehydrogenase during its salt-dependent denaturation/renaturation and decreases the rate of deactivation of the enzyme in an ATP-dependent manner. Compared with other halophilic proteins, the P45 complex appears to be much less dependent on salt for its various activities or stability. In vivo experiments showed that P45 accumulates when cells are exposed to a low salt environment. We suggest, therefore, that P45 could protect halophilic proteins against denaturation under conditions of cellular hyposaline stress.

Binding of a denatured heme protein and ATP to erythroid spectrin

Spectrin is a large, worm-like cytoskeletal protein that is abundant in all cell types. The denatured heme enzyme, horseradish peroxidase showed significant decrease in the reactivation yield, after 30 min of refolding, in presence of increasing concentrations of spectrin from that in the absence. This indicated that spectrin could bind denatured HRP and inhibit their refolding. In presence of 1 mM ATP and 10 mM MgCl(2) the spectrin binding of denatured HRP is abolished. This activity of decreasing the reactivation yield was found to be ATP-dependent and the denatured enzyme after 30 min refolding in the presence of spectrin, pretreated with Mg/ATP, showed about 40% increase in the reactivation yield compared to the same in absence of spectrin. Fluorescence spectroscopic studies indicated binding of ATP to native spectrin showing concentration-dependent quenching of tryptophan fluorescence by ATP. The apparent dissociation constant of binding of ATP to spectrin was estimated to be 1.1 mM. A high affinity binding of spectrin with denatured HRP has been characterized (K(d) = 16 nM). Since these properties are similar to those of established molecular chaperone proteins, these data indicate that spectrin might have a chaperone-like function in erythrocytes.

From minichaperone to GroEL 2: importance of avidity of the multisite ring structure

Structural studies on minichaperones and GroEL imply a continuous ring of binding sites around the neck of GroEL. To investigate the importance of this ring, we constructed an artificial heptameric assembly of minichaperones to mimic their arrangement in GroEL. The heptameric Gp31 co-chaperonin from bacteriophage T4, an analogue of GroES, was used as a scaffold to display the GroEL minichaperones. A fusion protein, MC(7), was generated by replacing a part of the highly mobile loop of Gp31 (residues 23-44) with the sequence of the minichaperone (residues 191-376 of GroEL). The purified recombinant protein assembled into a heptameric ring composed of seven 30.6 kDa subunits. Although single minichaperones (residues 193-335 to 191-376 of GroEL) have certain chaperone activities in vitro and in vivo, they cannot refold heat and dithiothreitol-denatured mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (mtMDH), a reaction that normally requires GroEL, its co-chaperonin GroES and ATP. But, MC(7) refolded MDH in vitro. The expression of MC(7) complements in vivo two temperature-sensitive Escherichia coli alleles, groEL44 and groEL673, at 43 degrees C. Although MC(7) could not compensate for the complete absence of GroEL in vivo, it enhanced the colony-forming ability of cells containing limiting amounts of wild-type GroEL at 37 degrees C. MC(7 )also reduces aggregate formation and cell death in mammalian cell models of Huntington's disease. The assembly of seven minichaperone subunits on a heptameric ring significantly improves their activity, demonstrating the importance of avidity in GroEL function.

Stability and release requirements of the complexes of GroEL with two homologous mammalian aminotransferases

The mitochondrial (mAAT) and cytosolic (cAAT) homologous isozymes of aspartate aminotransferase are two relatively large proteins that in their nonnative states interact very differently with GroEL. MgATP alone can increase the rate of GroEL-assisted reactivation of cAAT, yet the presence of GroES is mandatory for mAAT. Addition of an excess of a denatured substrate accelerates reactivation of cAAT in the presence of GroEL, but has no effect on mAAT. These competition studies suggest that the more stringent substrate mAAT forms a thermodynamically stable complex with GroEL, while rebinding affects the slow reactivation kinetics of cAAT with GroEL alone. However, the competitor appears to accelerate the release of cAAT from GroEL, most likely by displacing bound cAAT from the GroEL cavity. Moreover, cAAT, but not mAAT, shows a time-dependent increase in protease resistance while bound to GroEL at low temperature. These results suggest that folding and release of cAAT from GroEL in the absence of cofactors may occur stepwise with certain interactions being broken and reformed until the protein escapes binding. The distinct behavior of these two isozymes most likely results from differences in the structure of the nonnative states that bind to GroEL.

GroEL and protein disulfide isomerase each binds with folding intermediates of D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase released from complexes formed with the other

Simultaneous presence of two chaperones, GroEL and protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), assists the reactivation of denatured D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in an additive way. Delayed addition of chaperones to the refolding solution after dilution of denatured GAPDH indicates an interaction with intermediates formed mainly in the first 5 min for PDI and formed within a longer time period for GroEL-ATP. The above indicate that the two chaperones interact with different folding intermediates of GAPDH. After delayed addition of one chaperone to the refolding mixture containing the other at 4 degrees C, GroEL binds with all GAPDH intermediates dissociated from PDI, and PDI interacts with the intermediates released from GroEL during the first 10-20 min. It is suggested that the GAPDH folding intermediates released from the chaperone-bound complex are still partially folded so as to be rebound by the other chaperone. The above results clearly support the network model of GroEL and PDI.

Refolding of target proteins from a "rigid" mutant chaperonin demonstrates a minimal mechanism of chaperonin binding and release

One of the most interesting facets of GroEL-facilitated protein folding lies in the fact that the requirement for a successful folding reaction of a given protein target depends upon the refolding conditions used. In this report, we utilize a mutant of GroEL (GroEL T89W) whose domain movements have been drastically restricted, producing a chaperonin that is incapable of utilizing the conventional cyclic mechanism of chaperonin action. This mutant was, however, still capable of improving the refolding yield of lactate dehydrogenase in the absence of both GroES and ATP hydrolysis. A very rapid interconversion of conformations was detected in the mutant immediately after ATP binding, and this interconversion was inferred to form part of the target release mechanism in this mutant. The possibility exists that some target proteins, although dependent on GroEL for improved refolding yields, are capable of refolding successfully by utilizing only portions of the entire mechanism provided by the chaperonins.

A thermodynamic coupling mechanism can explain the GroEL-mediated acceleration of the folding of barstar

Despite extensive structural and kinetic studies, the mechanism by which the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL assists protein folding has remained somewhat elusive. It appears that GroEL might play an active role in facilitating folding, in addition to its role in restricting protein aggregation by secluding folding intermediates. We have investigated the kinetic mechanism of GroEL-mediated refolding of the small protein barstar. GroEL accelerates the observed fast (millisecond) refolding rate, but it does not affect the slow refolding kinetics. A thermodynamic coupling mechanism, in which the concentration of exchange-competent states is increased by the law of mass action, can explain the enhancement of the fast refolding rates. It is not necessary to invoke a catalytic role for GroEL, whereby either the intrinsic refolding rate of a productive folding transition or the unfolding rate of a kinetically trapped off-pathway intermediate is increased by the chaperonin.

A kinetic analysis of the nucleotide-induced allosteric transitions of GroEL

Single-point mutants of GroEL were constructed with tryptophan replacing a tyrosine residue in order to examine nucleotide-induced structural transitions spectrofluorometrically. The tyrosine residues at positions 203, 360, 476 and 485 were mutated. Of these, the probe at residue 485 gave the clearest fluorescence signals upon nucleotide binding. The probe at 360 reported similar signals. In response to the binding of ATP, the indole fluorescence reports four distinct structural transitions occurring on well-separated timescales, all of which precede hydrolysis of the nucleotide. All four of these rearrangements were analysed, two in detail. The fastest is an order of magnitude more rapid than previously identified rearrangements and is proposed to be a T-to-R transition. The next kinetic phase is a rearrangement to the open state identified by electron cryo-microscopy and this we designate an R to R* transition. Both of these rearrangements can occur when only a single ring of GroEL is loaded with ATP, and the results are consistent with the occupied ring behaving in a concerted, cooperative manner. At higher ATP concentrations both rings can be loaded with the nucleotide and the R to R* transition is accelerated. The resultant GroEL:ATP14 species can then undergo two final rearrangements, RR*-->[RR](+)-->[RR](#). These final slow steps are completely blocked when ADP occupies the second ring, i.e. it does not occur in the GroEL:ATP7:ADP7 or the GroEL:ATP7 species. All equilibrium and kinetic data conform to a minimal model in which the GroEL ring can exist in five distinct states which then give rise to seven types of oligomeric conformer: TT, TR, TR*, RR, RR*, [RR](+) and [RR](#), with concerted transitions between each. The other eight possible conformers are presumably disallowed by constraints imposed by inter-ring contacts. This kinetic behaviour is consistent with the GroEL ring passing through distinct functional states in a binding-encapsulation-folding process, with the T-form having high substrate affinity (binding), the R-form being able to bind GroES but retaining substrate affinity (encapsulation), and the R*-form retaining high GroES affinity but allowing the substrate to dissociate into the enclosed cavity (folding). ADP induces only one detectable rearrangement (designated T to T*) which has no properties in common with those elicited by ATP. However, asymmetric ADP binding prevents ATP occupying both rings and, hence, restricts the system to the T*T, T*R and T*R* complexes.

Chaperone activity of a chimeric GroEL protein that can exist in a single or double ring form

The molecular chaperone GroEL is a protein complex consisting of two rings each of seven identical subunits. It is thought to act by providing a cavity in which a protein substrate can fold into a form that has no propensity to aggregate. Substrate proteins are sequestered in the cavity while they fold, and prevented from diffusion out of the cavity by the action of the GroES complex, that caps the open end of the cavity. A key step in the mechanism of action of GroEL is the transmission of a conformational change between the two rings, induced by the binding of nucleotides to the GroEL ring opposite to the one containing the polypeptide substrate. This conformational change then leads to the discharge of GroES from GroEL, enabling polypeptide release. Single ring forms of GroEL are thus predicted to be unable to chaperone the folding of GroES-dependent substrates efficiently, since they are unable to discharge the bound GroES and unable to release folded protein. We describe here a detailed functional analysis of a chimeric GroEL protein, which we show to exist in solution in equilibrium between single and double ring forms. We demonstrate that whereas the double ring form of the GroEL chimera functions effectively in refolding of a GroES-dependent substrate, the single ring form does not. The single ring form of the chimera, however, is able to chaperone the folding of a substrate that does not require GroES for its efficient folding. We further demonstrate that the double ring structure of GroEL is likely to be required for its activity in vivo.

GroEL-assisted and -unassisted refolding of mature and precursor adrenodoxin: the role of the precursor sequence

We have performed refolding studies on a [2Fe-2S] protein, adrenodoxin (Adx), and its precursor form, preadrenodoxin. In vitro, mature Adx is expressed as a soluble active form in Escherichia coli, but precursor Adx is expressed in inclusion bodies. Both mature and precursor Adx refolded spontaneously from their denatured forms and the recovery levels of enzyme activities were 40 and 37% for mature and precursor Adx, respectively. Furthermore, the interaction between GroEL- and Gdn-HCl-denatured mature and precursor forms was investigated. In the case of mature Adx, the activity was increased in the presence of either GroEL, GroES, or bovine serum albumin and the refolding of mature Adx is a nonspecific process. However, the GroEL-mediated reaction is specific for precursor Adx under the experimental conditions used here. A higher electron transfer activity is obtained after ATP addition to the GroEL-containing refolding mixture, and GroEL-precursor complexes were found by gel chromatography studies. Our observation suggests that the small single-domain protein Adx (mature form) folded independently of the chaperonin GroEL. The contribution of the chaperonin complexes to the folding is toward the aggregation-sensitive precursor Adx, which in vitro folded 1.3- to 1.4-fold slower than mature Adx. This demonstrates that the presequence is responsible for the formation of inclusion bodies and for the in vitro recognition motif for GroEL binding.

Thermodynamics of nucleotide binding to the chaperonin GroEL studied by isothermal titration calorimetry: evidence for noncooperative nucleotide binding

We characterized the thermodynamics of binding reactions of nucleotides ADP and ATPgammaS (a nonhydrolyzable analog of ATP) to GroEL in a temperature range of 5 degrees C to 35 degrees C by isothermal titration calorimetry. Analysis with a noncooperative binding model has shown that the bindings of nucleotides are driven enthalpically with binding constants of 7x103 M-1 and 4x104 M-1 for ADP and ATPgammaS, respectively, at 26 degrees C and that the heat capacity change DeltaCp is about 100 cal/mol.K for both the nucleotides. The stoichiometries of binding were about 8 and 9 molecules for ADP and ATPgammaS, respectively, per GroEL tetradecamer at 5 degrees C, and both increased with temperature to reach about 14 (ADP) and 12 (ATPgammaS) for both nucleotides at 35 degrees C. The absence of initial increase of binding heat as well as Hill coefficient less than 1.2, which were obtained from the fitting to the model curve by assuming positive cooperativity, showed that there was virtually no positive cooperativity in the nucleotide bindings. Incorporating a difference in affinity for the nucleotide (ADP and ATPgammaS) between the two rings of GroEL into the noncooperative binding model improved the goodness of fitting and the difference in the affinity increased with decreasing temperature.

GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings

The double-ring chaperonin GroEL mediates protein folding in the central cavity of a ring bound by ATP and GroES, but it is unclear how GroEL cycles from one folding-active complex to the next. We observe that hydrolysis of ATP within the cis ring must occur before either nonnative polypeptide or GroES can bind to the trans ring, and this is associated with reorientation of the trans ring apical domains. Subsequently, formation of a new cis-ternary complex proceeds on the open trans ring with polypeptide binding first, which stimulates the ATP-dependent dissociation of the cis complex (by 20- to 50-fold), followed by GroES binding. These results indicate that, in the presence of nonnative protein, GroEL alternates its rings as folding-active cis complexes, expending only one round of seven ATPs per folding cycle.

Participation of chaperonin GroEL in the folding of D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. An approach based on the use of different oligomeric forms of the enzyme immobilized on sepharose

The binding of denatured B. stearothermophilus D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) to the E. coli chaperonin GroEL was investigated in two systems: (1) GroEL immobilized on Sepharose via a single subunit was titrated with urea-denatured soluble GAPDH and (2) a Sepharose-bound denatured GAPDH monomer was titrated with soluble GroEL. Similar apparent KD values for the complex GroEL x GAPDH were obtained in both cases (0.04 and 0.03 microM, respectively), the stoichiometry being 1.0 mol chaperonin per GAPDH subunit in the system with the immobilized GroEL and 0.2 mol chaperonin per Sepharose-bound GAPDH monomer. Addition of GroEL and Mg x ATP to a reactivation mixture increased the yield of reactivation of both E. coli and B. stearothermophilus GAPDHs. Incubation of the Sepharose-bound catalytically active tetrameric and dimeric GAPDH forms with the protein fraction of a wild-type E. coli cell extract resulted in the binding of GroEL to the dimer and no interaction with the tetrameric form. These data suggest that GroEL may be capable of interacting with the interdimeric contact regions of the folded GAPDH dimers.

Minimal and optimal mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding

We have analyzed the effects of different components of the GroE chaperonin system on protein folding by using a nonpermissive substrate (i.e., one that has very low spontaneous refolding yield) for which rate data can be acquired. In the absence of GroES and nucleotides, the rate of GroEL-mediated refolding of heat- and DTT-denatured mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase was extremely low, but some three times higher than the spontaneous rate. This GroEL-mediated rate was increased 17-fold by saturating concentrations of ATP, 11-fold by ADP and GroES, and 465-fold by ATP and GroES. Optimal refolding activity was observed when the dissociation of GroES from the chaperonin complex was dramatically reduced. Although GroEL minichaperones were able to bind denatured mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase, they were ineffective in enhancing the refolding rate. The spectrum of mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding depends on the nature of the substrate. The minimal mechanism for permissive substrates (i.e., having significant yields of spontaneous refolding), requires only binding to the apical domain of GroEL. Slow folding rates of nonpermissive substrates are limited by the transitions between high- and low-affinity states of GroEL alone. The optimal mechanism, which requires holoGroEL, physiological amounts of GroES, and ATP hydrolysis, is necessary for the chaperonin-mediated folding of nonpermissive substrates at physiologically relevant rates under conditions in which retention of bound GroES prevents the premature release of aggregation-prone folding intermediates from the chaperonin complex. The different mechanisms are described in terms of the structural features of mini- and holo-chaperones.

Partitioning of rhodanese onto GroEL. Chaperonin binds a reversibly oxidized form derived from the native protein

The mammalian mitochondrial enzyme, rhodanese, can form stable complexes with the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL if it is either refolded from 8 M urea in the presence of chaperonin or is simply added to the chaperonin as the folded conformer at 37 degreesC. In the presence of GroEL, the kinetic profile of the inactivation of native rhodanese followed a single exponential decay. Initially, the inactivation rates showed a dependence on the chaperonin concentration but reached a constant maximum value as the GroEL concentration increased. Over the same time period, in the absence of GroEL, native rhodanese showed only a small decline in activity. The addition of a non-denaturing concentration of urea accelerated the inactivation and partitioning of rhodanese onto GroEL. These results suggest that the GroEL chaperonin may facilitate protein unfolding indirectly by interacting with intermediates that exist in equilibrium with native rhodanese. The activity of GroEL-bound rhodanese can be completely recovered upon addition of GroES and ATP. The reactivation kinetics and commitment rates for GroEL-rhodanese complexes prepared from either unfolded or native rhodanese were identical. However, when rhodanese was allowed to inactivate spontaneously in the absence of GroEL, no recovery of activity was observed upon addition of GroEL, GroES, and ATP. Interestingly, the partitioning of rhodanese and its subsequent inactivation did not occur when native rhodanese and GroEL were incubated under anaerobic conditions. Thus, our results strongly suggest that the inactive intermediate that partitions onto GroEL is the reversibly oxidized form of rhodanese.

Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding

Recent structural and biochemical investigations have come together to allow a better understanding of the mechanism of chaperonin (GroEL, Hsp60)-mediated protein folding, the final step in the accurate expression of genetic information. Major, asymmetric conformational changes in the GroEL double toroid accompany binding of ATP and the cochaperonin GroES. When a nonnative polypeptide, bound to one of the GroEL rings, is encapsulated by GroES to form a cis ternary complex, these changes drive the polypeptide into the sequestered cavity and initiate its folding. ATP hydrolysis in the cis ring primes release of the products, and ATP binding in the trans ring then disrupts the cis complex. This process allows the polypeptide to achieve its final native state, if folding was completed, or to recycle to another chaperonin molecule, if the folding process did not result in a form committed to the native state.

Changing the nature of the initial chaperonin capture complex influences the substrate folding efficiency

For the chaperonin substrates, rhodanese, malate dehydrogenase (MDH), and glutamine synthetase (GS), the folding efficiencies, and the lifetimes of folding intermediates were measured with either the nucleotide-free GroEL or the activated ATP.GroEL.GroES chaperonin complex. With both nucleotide-free and activated complex, the folding efficiency of rhodanese and MDH remained high over a large range of GroEL to substrate concentration ratios (up to 1:1). In contrast, the folding efficiency of GS began to decline at ratios lower than 8:1. At ratios where the refolding yields were initially the same, only a relatively small increase (1.6-fold) in misfolding kinetics of MDH was observed with either the nucleotide-free or activated chaperonin complex. For rhodanese, no change was detected with either chaperonin complex. In contrast, GS lost its ability to interact with the chaperonin system at an accelerated rate (8-fold increase) when the activated complex instead of the nucleotide-free complex was used to rescue the protein from misfolding. Our data demonstrate that the differences in the refolding yields are related to the intrinsic folding kinetics of the protein substrates. We suggest that the early kinetic events at the substrate level ultimately govern successful chaperonin-substrate interactions and play a crucial role in dictating polypeptide flux through the chaperonin system. Our results also indicate that an accurate assessment of the transient properties of folding intermediates that dictate the initial chaperonin-substrate interactions requires the use of the activated complex as the interacting chaperonin species.

Chaperonins

The molecular chaperones are a diverse set of protein families required for the correct folding, transport and degradation of other proteins in vivo. There has been great progress in understanding the structure and mechanism of action of the chaperonin family, exemplified by Escherichia coli GroEL. The chaperonins are large, double-ring oligomeric proteins that act as containers for the folding of other protein subunits. Together with its co-protein GroES, GroEL binds non-native polypeptides and facilitates their refolding in an ATP-dependent manner. The action of the ATPase cycle causes the substrate-binding surface of GroEL to alternate in character between hydrophobic (binding/unfolding) and hydrophilic (release/folding). ATP binding initiates a series of dramatic conformational changes that bury the substrate-binding sites, lowering the affinity for non-native polypeptide. In the presence of ATP, GroES binds to GroEL, forming a large chamber that encapsulates substrate proteins for folding. For proteins whose folding is absolutely dependent on the full GroE system, ATP binding (but not hydrolysis) in the encapsulating ring is needed to initiate protein folding. Similarly, ATP binding, but not hydrolysis, in the opposite GroEL ring is needed to release GroES, thus opening the chamber. If the released substrate protein is still not correctly folded, it will go through another round of interaction with GroEL.