Metabolism of amprenavir in liver microsomes: role of CYP3A4 inhibition for drug interactions

Generation of a Weakly Acidic Amorphous Solid Dispersion of the Weak Base Ritonavir with Equivalent In Vitro and In Vivo Performance to Norvir Tablet

Ritonavir is an anti-viral compound that has also been employed extensively as a CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (Pgp) inhibitor to boost the pharmacokinetic performance of compounds that undergo first pass metabolism. For use in combination products, there is a desire to minimize the mass contribution of the ritonavir system to reduce patient pill burden in these combination products. In this study, KinetiSol® processing was utilized to produce an amorphous solid dispersion of ritonavir at two times the drug load of the commercially available form of ritonavir, and the composition was subsequently developed into a tablet dosage form. The amorphous intermediate was demonstrated to be amorphous by X-ray powder diffraction and ¹³C solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance and an intimately mixed single-phase system by modulated differential scanning calorimetry and ¹H T₁/¹H T_1ρ solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation. In vitro transmembrane flux analysis showed similar permeation rates for the KinetiSol-made tablet and the reference tablet dosage form, Norvir®. In vivo pharmacokinetic comparison between the two dosage forms resulted in equivalent exposure with approximately 20% Cmax reduction for the KinetiSol tablet. These performance gains were realized with a concurrent reduction in dosage form mass of 45%.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between drugs of abuse and antiretroviral medications: implications and management for clinical practice

Substance abuse and HIV/AIDS are two of the most serious, yet treatable diseases worldwide. Global access to HIV treatment continues to expand. In settings where both active illicit drug use and HIV treatment are concurrent, potentional problematic pharmacokinetic drug interactions may arise and complicate therapy. Clinical case series and carefully controlled pharmacokinetic interaction studies have been conducted between only a few drugs of abuse and approved antiretroviral therapies. Important pharmacokinetic drug interactions have been described for benzodiazepines, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, methadone and buprenorphine; however, most have not been studied and few well-controlled studies have been conducted to adequately address the clinical implications of these interactions. The metabolism of drugs of abuse, description of the known interactions, and clinical implications and management of these interactions are reviewed. Certain interactions between drugs of abuse and antiretroviral therapies are known and others are likely based upon shared metabolic pathways. These may result in important clinical consequences. To optimize care, clinicians must be alert, knowledgeable about known and possible interactions and equipped to clinically manage the medical consequences. Moreover, there is considerable need for carefully controlled studies in this important and emerging area.

Reversible mechanisms of enzyme inhibition and resulting clinical significance

Inhibition of a drug-metabolizing enzyme by the reversible interaction of a drug with the enzyme, thus decreasing the metabolism of another drug, is a major cause of clinically significant drug-drug interactions. This chapter defines the four reversible mechanisms of inhibition exhibited by drugs: competitive, noncompetitive, uncompetitive, and mixed competitive/noncompetitive. An in vitro procedure to determine the potential of a drug to be a reversible inhibitor is also provided. Finally, a number of examples of clinically significant drug-drug interactions resulting from reversible inhibition are described.

A review of pharmacological interactions between HIV or hepatitis C virus medications and opioid agonist therapy: implications and management for clinical practice

Global access to opioid agonist therapy and HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment is expanding but when used concurrently, problematic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions may occur. Articles published from 1966 to 2012 in Medline were reviewed using the following keywords: HIV, AIDS, HIV therapy, HCV, HCV therapy, antiretroviral therapy, highly active antiretroviral therapy, drug interactions, methadone and buprenorphine. In addition, a review of abstracts from national and international meetings and conference proceedings was conducted; selected reports were reviewed as well. The metabolism of both opioid and antiretroviral therapies, description of their known interactions and clinical implications and management of these interactions were reviewed. Important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions affecting either methadone or HIV medications have been demonstrated within each class of antiretroviral agents. Drug interactions between methadone, buprenorphine and HIV medications are known and may have important clinical consequences. Clinicians must be alert to these interactions and have a basic knowledge regarding their management.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation of amprenavir following fosamprenavir/ritonavir administration for dose optimization in HIV infected pediatric patients

Fosamprenavir (FPV) is the phosphate ester prodrug of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor amprenavir (APV). A pediatric population pharmacokinetic model for APV was developed and simulation was used to identify dosing regimens for pediatric patients receiving FPV in combination with ritonavir (RTV) which resulted in concentrations similar to those in adults receiving FPV/RTV 700/100 mg BID. Pharmacokinetic data was obtained from HIV infected subjects aged 2 months to 18 years receiving either FPV or FPV/RTV. A two-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination was an appropriate structural model. Significant covariates in the model included RTV coadministration on clearance, fed status on bioavailability for the oral suspension, body weight on clearance and volume terms, black race on clearance, and age on clearance. The following FPV/RTV twice daily dosing regimens in pediatric patients delivered plasma APV exposure similar to adults: 45/7 mg/kg in patients weighing <11 kg, 30/3 mg/kg in patients weighing 11 to <15 kg, 23/3 mg/kg in patients weighing 15 to <20 kg, and 18/3 mg/kg in patients weighting ≥20 kg. Additionally children weighing ≥39 kg can receive the adult regimen.

Intestinal first-pass metabolism by cytochrome p450 and not p-glycoprotein is the major barrier to amprenavir absorption

Recent studies showed that P-glycoprotein (P-gp) increases the portal bioavailability (FG) of loperamide by sparing its intestinal first-pass metabolism. Loperamide is a drug whose oral absorption is strongly attenuated by intestinal P-gp-mediated efflux and first-pass metabolism by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A). Here the effect of the interplay of P-gp and Cyp3a in modulating intestinal first-pass metabolism and absorption was investigated for another Cyp3a/P-gp dual substrate amprenavir, which is less efficiently effluxed by P-gp than loperamide. After oral administration of amprenavir, the portal concentrations and FG of amprenavir were approximately equal in P-gp competent and P-gp deficient mice. Mechanistic studies on the effect of P-gp on Cyp3a-mediated metabolism of amprenavir using intestinal tissue from P-gp competent and P-gp deficient mice (Ussing-type diffusion chamber) revealed that P-gp-mediated efflux caused only a slight reduction of oxidative metabolism of amprenavir. Studies in which portal concentrations and FG were measured in P-gp competent and P-gp deficient mice whose cytochrome P450 (P450) enzymes were either intact or inactivated showed that intestinal first-pass metabolism attenuates the oral absorption of amprenavir by approximately 10-fold, whereas P-gp efflux has a relatively small effect (approximately 2-fold) in attenuating the intestinal absorption. Cumulatively, these studies demonstrate that P-gp has little influence on the intestinal first-pass metabolism and FG of amprenavir and that intestinal P450-mediated metabolism plays the dominant role in attenuating the oral absorption of this drug.

Methadone: a review of drug-drug and pathophysiological interactions

Numerous established and potential drug interactions with methadone are clinically important in people treated with methadone either for addiction or for chronic pain. Methadone users often have comorbidities and are prescribed drugs that may interact with methadone. Methadone is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP 1A2, 2D6, 2D8, 2C9/2C8, 2C19, and 2B6. Eighty-six percent of methadone is protein bound, predominately to α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP). Polymorphisms in or interactions with CYPs that metabolize methadone, changes in protein binding, and other pathophysiological conditions affect the pharmacokinetic properties of methadone. It is critical for health care providers who treat patients on methadone to have adequate information on the interactions of methadone with other drugs of abuse and other medications. We set out to describe drug-drug interactions as well as physiological and pathophysiological factors that may impact the pharmacokinetics of methadone. Using MEDLINE, we conducted a systematic search for papers and related abstracts published between 1966 and June 2010. Keywords that included methadone, drug-drug interactions, CYP P450 and AGP identified a total of 7709 papers. Other databases, including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Scopus, were also searched; an additional 929 papers were found. Final selection of 286 publications was based on the relevance of each paper to the topic. Over 50 such interactions were found. Interactions of methadone with other drugs can lead to increased or decreased methadone drug levels in patients and result in potential overdose or withdrawal, respectively. The former can contribute to methadone's fatality. Prescribers of methadone and pharmacists should enquire about any new medications (including natural products and over-the-counter medications) periodically, and especially when an otherwise stable patient suddenly experiences drug craving, withdrawal or intoxication.

Qualitative structure-metabolism relationships in the hydrolysis of carbamates

The aims of this review were 1) to compile a large number of reliable literature data on the metabolic hydrolysis of medicinal carbamates and 2) to extract from such data a qualitative relation between molecular structure and lability to metabolic hydrolysis. The compounds were classified according to the nature of their substituents (R³OCONR¹R²), and a metabolic lability score was calculated for each class. A trend emerged, such that the metabolic lability of carbamates decreased (i.e., their metabolic stability increased), in the following series: Aryl-OCO-NHAlkyl >> Alkyl-OCO-NHAlkyl ~ Alkyl-OCO-N(Alkyl)₂ ≥ Alkyl-OCO-N(endocyclic) ≥ Aryl-OCO-N(Alkyl)₂ ~ Aryl-OCO-N(endocyclic) ≥ Alkyl-OCO-NHAryl ~ Alkyl-OCO-NHAcyl >> Alkyl-OCO-NH₂ > Cyclic carbamates. This trend should prove useful in the design of carbamates as drugs or prodrugs.

Interventions for prevention and treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis in women with HIV infection

BACKGROUND

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is one of the most common fungal infections that recur frequently in HIV infected women. Symptoms of VVC are pruritis, discomfort, dyspareunia, and dysuria. Vulval infection presents as a morbiliform rash that may extend to the thighs. Vaginal infection is associated with white discharge, and plaques are seen on erythematous vaginal walls.Even though rarely or never resulting in systemic fungal infection or mortality, left untreated these lesions contribute considerably to the morbidity associated with HIV infection. Prevention and treatment of this condition is an essential part of maintaining the quality of life for these individuals.

OBJECTIVES

-To compare the efficacy of various antifungals given vaginally or orally for the treatment and prophylaxis of VVC in HIV-infected women and to evaluate the risks of the same.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search strategy was comprehensive, iterative and based on that of the HIV/AIDS Cochrane Review Group. The aim was to locate all relevant trials, irrespective of publication status or language. Electronic databases :CENTRAL,Medline, EMBASE, LILACS and CINAHL were searched for randomised controlled trials for the years 1980 to 1st October 2010. WHO ICTRP site and other relevant web sites were also searched for conference abstracts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of palliative, preventative or curative therapy were considered. Participants were HIV positive women receiving one or more of the following:treatment / prophylaxis for VVC or HAART(Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently assessed the methodological quality of the trials and extracted data. The quality of the evidence generated was graded using the GRADE PRO approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search did not yield any trial investigating treatment of VVC in HIV positive women.Two trials dealing with prophylaxis were eligible for inclusion.One trial (n= 323) favoured the use of weekly Fluconazole as compared to placebo (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.97).The second trial with three arms of comparison;Clotrimazole,Lactobacillus and Placebo gave no definitive results in preventing an episode of VVC. Clotrimazole against placebo (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.22 to 1.09), Clotrimazole against lactobacillus (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.76) and lactobacillus against placebo (RR 0.54 ;95% CI 0.26 to 1.13).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Implications for practiceNo trials were found addressing treatment of VVC in HIV positive women.In comparison to placebo,Fluconazole was found to be an effective preventative intervention. However, the potential for resistant Candida organisms to develop might impact the feasibility of implementation.Direction of findings suggests that Clotrimazole and Lactobacillus improved the prophylactic outcomes when compared to placebo.Implications for research There is a need to evaluate drugs and drug regimens for VVC treatment and prophylaxis in HIV positive women through randomised clinical trials. Development of resistance to azoles remains under-studied and more work must be done in this area, so as to determine whether routine prophylaxis for VVC is at all needed or whether adequate ART would be sufficient to prevent recurrent VVC. The viral load in vaginal secretions with or without treatment or prophylaxis has not been studied, this is very relevant to the spread of HIV.

Twenty-six years of HIV science: an overview of anti-HIV drugs metabolism

From the identification of HIV as the agent causing AIDS, to the development of effective antiretroviral drugs, the scientific achievements in HIV research over the past twenty-six years have been formidable. Currently, there are twenty-five anti-HIV compounds which have been formally approved for clinical use in the treatment of AIDS. These compounds fall into six categories: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NtRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), cell entry inhibitors or fusion inhibitors (FIs), co-receptor inhibitors (CRIs), and integrase inhibitors (INIs). Metabolism by the host organism is one of the most important determinants of the pharmacokinetic profile of a drug. Formation of active or toxic metabolites will also have an impact on the pharmacological and toxicological outcomes. Therefore, it is widely recognized that metabolism studies of a new chemical entity need to be addressed early in the drug discovery process. This paper describes an overview of the metabolism of currently available anti-HIV drugs.

Use of antineoplastic agents in patients with cancer who have HIV/AIDS

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has substantially reduced morbidity and mortality of AIDS-related complications in patients with HIV; however, the prevalence of AIDS-defining cancers and non-AIDS-defining cancers has increased. In this Review we discuss the management of HAART pharmacotherapy in relation to cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted antineoplastic agents. We will review potential pharmacological interactions between antiretroviral and antineoplastic therapies and consider how to combine antiretroviral and antineoplastic agents in patients with HIV who are receiving HAART therapy.

Targeted therapies to treat non-AIDS-defining cancers in patients with HIV on HAART therapy: treatment considerations and research outlook

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Highly active antiretroviral therapy has led to a dramatic improvement in the prognosis of patients diagnosed with HIV and AIDS. This includes a significant decline in the rates of AIDS-related cancers, including Kaposi's sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Unfortunately, rates of non-AIDS-defining cancers are on the rise, and now exceed the rates of AIDS-related cancers in patients with HIV. Treating non-AIDS-defining cancers in patients who are on highly active antiretroviral therapy is an open and complicated clinical question.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer targeted therapies are now available to treat cancers which were historically refractory to traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Highly active antiretroviral therapy agents are notorious for causing drug-drug interactions. The co-administration of targeted chemotherapies with highly active antiretroviral therapy could well impede the efficacy or increase the toxicity of these targeted therapies. Unfortunately little is known about possible drug-drug interactions because HIV patients are typically excluded from clinical trials.

SUMMARY

We highlight what is known about how and why highly active antiretroviral therapy agents can affect drug metabolism. We then present the clinical and pharmacological data for nine recently approved targeted therapies - imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, erlotinib, sunitinib, lapatinib, bortezomib, sorafenib, and temsirolimus. We conclude with considerations on how to use these new agents to treat non-AIDS-defining cancers, and discuss a future research agenda to better understand and predict potential highly active antiretroviral therapy-targeted therapy interactions.

Polymorphisms of human cytochrome P450 2C9 and the functional relevance

Human cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) accounts for ∼20% of hepatic total CYP content and metabolizes ~15% clinical drugs such as phenytoin, S-warfarin, tolbutamide, losartan, and many nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs). CYP2C9 is highly polymorphic, with at least 33 variants of CYP2C9 (*1B through *34) being identified so far. CYP2C9*2 is frequent among Caucasians with ~1% of the population being homozygous carriers and 22% are heterozygous. The corresponding figures for the CYP2C9*3 allele are 0.4% and 15%, respectively. There are a number of clinical studies addressing the impact of CYP2C9 polymorphisms on the clearance and/or therapeutic response of therapeutic drugs. These studies have highlighted the importance of the CYP2C9*2 and *3 alleles as a determining factor for drug clearance and drug response. The CYP2C9 polymorphisms are relevant for the efficacy and adverse effects of numerous NSAIDs, sulfonylurea antidiabetic drugs and, most critically, oral anticoagulants belonging to the class of vitamin K epoxide reductase inhibitors. Warfarin has served as a practical example of how pharmacogenetics can be utilized to achieve maximum efficacy and minimum toxicity. For many of these drugs, a clear gene-dose and gene-effect relationship has been observed in patients. In this regard, CYP2C9 alleles can be considered as a useful biomarker in monitoring drug response and adverse effects. Genetic testing of CYP2C9 is expected to play a role in predicting drug clearance and conducting individualized pharmacotherapy. However, prospective clinical studies with large samples are warranted to establish gene-dose and gene-effect relationships for CYP2C9 and its substrate drugs.

Pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation of BILR 355, a second-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in healthy volunteers

BILR 355 is a second-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) under clinical development for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection, particularly in those who harbor virus resistant to the currently available NNRTIs. Two single-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel dose-escalation studies were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of oral BILR 355 administration alone and after coadministration with ritonavir (RTV) at 100 mg. Following a single dose of BILR 355 in oral solution, the mean half life (t(1/2)) was 2 to 4 h, with peak concentrations occurring at 0.5 to 1 h postadministration. The mean apparent clearance (CL/F) ranged from 79.2 to 246 liters/h for administered doses of 12.5 mg to 100 mg. This observed nonlinearity in CL/F resulted from the increased bioavailability attributed to a saturated absorption and/or elimination process at higher doses. In contrast, after the coadministration of single doses of 5 mg to 87.5 mg of BILR 355 with RTV, the mean CL/F ranged from 5.88 to 8.47 liters/h. Over the dose range (5 to 87.5 mg) studied, systemic BILR 355 exposures were approximately proportional to the doses administered when they were coadministered with RTV. With RTV coadministration, the mean t(1/2) increased to 10 to 16 h, and the mean time of the maximum concentration in plasma lengthened to 1.5 to 5 h. Compared to the values for BILR 355 given alone, the mean area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, the maximum concentration in plasma, and the t(1/2) of BILR 355 achieved after coadministration with RTV increased 15- to 30-fold, 2- to 5-fold, and 3- to 5-fold, respectively. In both studies, BILR 355 appeared to be safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers when the outcomes in the treated volunteers were compared with those in the placebo group.

High-throughput microsomal stability assay for screening new chemical entities in drug discovery

In this work, the authors present a novel, robotic, automated protocol for assessing a metabolic stability protocol assembled on a Hamilton platform and a new strategy for pooling samples (cassette analysis). To increase the high throughput of the liquid chromatography (LC) step, fast chromatography and automated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) analytical methods were also developed, and a rapid data analysis system was generated that converts peak areas obtained by LC/MS/MS in intrinsic clearance values. All of the steps of the microsomal stability assay were carefully studied and optimized. Standard errors and confidence intervals of the measured clearances were also automatically generated in the process to allow an immediate evaluation of the significance of observed values. Methods based on pooling analysis of 2 and 4 different analytes were compared with a standard method without pooling. A simple statistical treatment was used to show their equivalence. The different protocols developed were analyzed in terms of the best compromise between accuracy and high-throughput capabilities.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between efavirenz and dual protease inhibitors in healthy volunteers

The combination of efavirenz with HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PI) results in complex interactions secondary to mixed induction and inhibition of oxidative metabolism. ACTG A5043 was a prospective, open-label, controlled, two-period, multiple-dose study with 55 healthy volunteers. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between efavirenz and dual PIs. The subjects received a daily dose of 600 mg efavirenz for 10 days with amprenavir 600 mg twice daily added at day 11 and were randomized to receive nelfinavir, indinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, or no second PI on days 15-21. Intensive pharmacokinetic studies were conducted on day 14 and 21. Efavirenz plasma concentrations were fit to candidate models using weighted non-linear regression. The disposition of efavirenz was described by a linear two-compartment model with first order absorption following a fitted lag time. Apparent clearance (CLt/F), volume of distribution at steady state (Vss/F), inter-compartmental clearance, and the central and peripheral volume of distribution were estimated. The mean CLt/F and Vss/F of efavirenz were 0.126 l/h/kg and 4.412 l/kg, respectively. Both AUC and CLt/F of efavirenz remained unchanged after 7 days of dual PI dosing. The mean Vss/F of efavirenz increased an average of 89% across arms, ranging from 52% (nelfinavir) to 115% (indinavir) relative to efavirenz with amprenavir alone. Increases were also observed in Vp/F after the addition of nelfinavir, indinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir by 85%, 170%, 162% and 111%, respectively. In conclusion, concomitant administration of dual PIs is unlikely to have any clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of CYP2B6 substrates in general or oral efavirenz specifically.

Nevirapine concentration in nonstimulated saliva: an alternative to plasma sampling in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection

BACKGROUND

The monitoring of nevirapine (NVP) concentrations in pediatric patients has gained interest since the introduction of NVP as part of the preferred first-line antiretroviral regimen for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children in resource-limited settings. Adequate trough concentrations of NVP predict successful therapy, whereas subtherapeutic levels are correlated with virologic failure and development of resistance. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of agreement between total and free plasma NVP concentrations and nonstimulated saliva NVP concentrations and to evaluate the feasibility of saliva sampling as an alternative tool for therapeutic drug monitoring of NVP in children.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The study was designed as an observational cohort analysis. NVP concentrations were obtained in paired plasma and saliva samples of pediatric patients receiving antiretroviral therapy, including NVP. NVP plasma and saliva concentrations were determined by a tandem-mass spectrometric method. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis were used to evaluate agreement and to assess pattern in any discrepancies between measurements.

RESULTS

For the random paired plasma and saliva NVP sampling, 19 African-American children (8 boys, 11 girls) with a median age of 8.0 years were enrolled. Two male subjects were recruited for the 12 hour NVP plasma and saliva pharmacokinetics study. The intraclass correlations between saliva and serum measurements of NVP concentrations indicated >90% agreement between these two modes of measurement. The saliva concentrations reflected the free concentrations very closely but were on average 34% higher. The Bland-Altman plots indicated that the discrepancy between saliva and plasma measures is consistent across the range of average NVP concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results strongly indicate agreement between saliva and plasma NVP concentrations in pediatric patients with HIV infection, on the basis of Bland-Altman analysis. Nonstimulated NVP saliva concentrations can be used as an alternative noninvasive, reliable, cost-effective method for direct measurement of adherence and application of therapeutic drug monitoring in NVP therapy.

Fosamprenavir calcium plus ritonavir for HIV infection

Fosamprenavir is a protease inhibitor (PI) approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Fosamprenavir is a prodrug of amprenavir developed to reduce the pill burden yet maintain the unique resistance pattern and efficacy associated with amprenavir. In a head-to-head, noninferiority trial in antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-infected patients, the antiviral efficacy and tolerability of ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir was not inferior to ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, when the PIs were combined with two other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. There are fewer studies published about fosamprenavir use in antiretroviral treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients. The high genetic barrier to the development of resistance to fosamprenavir and the low level of cross-resistance between ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir and other PI regimens are notable. As with amprenavir, gastrointestinal disturbance and rash are the most frequent short-term treatment-limiting events with fosamprenavir. Treatment with ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir can produce a durable response. To date, fosamprenavir is one of the recommended preferred PI components for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients.

Interpretation of genotype and pharmacokinetics for resistance to fosamprenavir-ritonavir-based regimens in antiretroviral-experienced patients

In this study, named the Zephir study (Telzir-pharmacokinetics), 121 antiretroviral-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients failing on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were included in a prospective cohort and received a fosamprenavir-ritonavir (700 mg/100 mg twice a day)-based regimen. The impact of baseline HIV type 1 (HIV-1) mutations, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and genotype inhibitory quotient (GIQ) on the virological response at week 12 (W12) was assessed. HIV reverse transcriptase and protease were sequenced at W0. The response at W12 was defined as<2.3 log10 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml or a virus load decrease of>or=1 log10 copies/ml. W4 amprenavir PK were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Patients had a median of nine previous treatments over 8 years. Median W0 values were as follows: 295 CD4+/microl, 4.4 log10 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml, and 6 protease- and 5 nucleotide reverse transcription inhibitor-related mutations. Respective values for minimum concentration of drug in serum (Cmin) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 24 h were 1,400 ng/ml and 35 mg.h/ml. At W12, 52% of the patients were successes, with a median decrease of -0.7 log10 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml. The Zephir mutation score included 12 IAS protease mutations associated with poorer virological response: L10I/F/R/V, L33F, M36I, M46I/L, I54L/M/T/V, I62V, L63P, A71I/L/V/T, G73A/C/F/T, V82A/F/S/T, I84V, L90M, and polymorphism mutations I13V, L19I, K55R, and L89M. Comparing<4 versus>or=4 mutations, HIV-1 RNA decreases were -2.3 log10 copies/ml versus -0.1 log10 copies/ml (P<10(-4)) with 93% versus 19% successes (P<10(-4)), respectively. This score predicted W12 failure with 94% sensitivity, versus 31% for the ANRS 2005 algorithm. Cmin (<1,600 ng/ml), AUC (<40 mg.h/ml), and GIQ (<300) values were associated with failure (all P values were <10(-4)). The need to test genotype-based algorithms using different patient databases before their implementation in clinical practice is highlighted. Specific mutations, PK and GIQ, provide relevant information for monitoring fosamprenavir-ritonavir-based HAART.

Strategies for management and treatment of dyslipidemia in HIV/AIDS

With the improved survival of HIV-infected patients, there are increased concerns about the long-term effects of treatment, including protease inhibitor (PI)-related dyslipidemia. Some 50-70% of patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) involving PIs develop lipid abnormalities consisting of elevated levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides that are well-known risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Treatment of HIV dyslipidemia should include lifestyle modifications such as a low-fat diet, increased exercise, reduced alcohol consumption and smoking cessation. In many patients, however, these changes alone will not correct lipid levels. In some patients, changing the PI component of ART to another PI or non-PI and/or lipid-lowering drugs has proven successful. Each approach is associated with advantages and limitations and the need to maintain viral suppression must be balanced with the need to treat abnormal lipid levels.

The medical management of opioid dependence in HIV primary care settings

Injecting drug use is a common mode of transmission among persons with HIV/AIDS. Many HIV-infected patients meet diagnostic criteria for opioid dependence, a chronic and relapsing brain disorder. Most HIV providers, however, receive little training in substance use disorders. Opioid agonist therapy (OAT) has a stabilizing effect on opioid-dependent patients and is associated with greater acceptance of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy, higher ARV adherence, and greater engagement in HIV-related health care. Although methadone maintenance has been the OAT gold standard, methadone is available for the treatment of opioid dependence only in strictly regulated narcotic treatment programs. Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist approved for the office-based treatment of opioid dependence in 2002, may result in better health and substance use treatment outcomes for patients with HIV disease.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between opioid agonist therapy and antiretroviral medications: implications and management for clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Opioid dependence and HIV/AIDS are 2 of the most serious yet treatable diseases worldwide. Global access to opioid agonist therapy and HIV treatment is expanding but when concurrently used, problematic pharmacokinetic drug interactions can occur.

METHODS

We reviewed English, Spanish, French, and Italian language articles from 1966 to 2005 in Medline using the following keywords: HIV, AIDS, HIV therapy, antiretroviral therapy, HAART, drug interactions, methadone, and buprenorphine. Additionally, we reviewed abstracts from national and international meetings and conference proceedings. Selected references from these articles were reviewed as well.

RESULTS

Clinical case series and carefully controlled pharmacokinetic interaction studies have been conducted between methadone and most approved antiretroviral therapies. Important pharmacokinetic drug interactions have been demonstrated within each class of agents, affecting either methadone or antiretroviral agents. Few studies, however, have been conducted with buprenorphine. The metabolism of both therapies, description of the known interactions, and clinical implications and management of these interactions are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Certain interactions between methadone and antiretroviral medications are known and may have important clinical consequences. To optimize care, clinicians must be alert to these interactions and have a basic knowledge regarding their management.

MDR- and CYP3A4-mediated drug–herbal interactions

According to recent epidemiological reports, almost 40% of American population use complimentary and alternative medicine (CAM) during their lifetime. Patients detected with HIV or cancer often consume herbal products especially St. John's wort (SJW) for antidepressants in combination with prescription medicines. Such self-administered herbal products along with prescribed medicines raise concerns of therapeutic activity due to possible drug-herbal interactions. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) together constitute a highly efficient barrier for many orally absorbed drugs. Available literature, clinical reports and in vitro studies from our laboratory indicate that many drugs and herbal active constituents are substrates for both P-gp and CYP3A4. Results from clinical studies and case reports indicate that self-administered SJW reduce steady state plasma concentrations of amitriptyline, cyclosporine, digoxin, fexofenadine, amprenavir, indonavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, benzodiazepines, theophyline, irinotecan, midazolan and warfarin. This herbal agent has been also reported to cause bleeding and unwanted pregnancies when concomitantly administered with oral contraceptives. Most of these medicinal agents and SJW are substrates for P-gp and/or CYP3A4. In vitro studies from our laboratory suggest that short-term exposure with pure herbal agents such as hypericin, kaempferol and quercetin or extract of SJW resulted in higher uptake or influx of ritonavir and erythromycin. Hypericin, kaempferol and quercetin also caused a remarkable inhibition of cortisol metabolism with the percent intact cortisol values of 64.58%, 89.6% and 90.1%, respectively, during short-term in vitro experiments. Conversely, long-term exposure of herbal agents (hyperforin, kaempferol and quercetin) showed enhanced expression of CYP3A4 mRNA in Caco-2 cells. In another study, we observed that long-term exposure of hypericin, kaempferol, quercetin and silibinin resulted in higher MDR-1 mRNA expression in Caco-2 cells. Therefore, herbs can pharmacokinetically act as inhibitors or inducers. Medicinal agents that are substrates P-gp-mediated efflux and/or CYP-mediated metabolism are likely to be potential candidates for drug-herbal interactions. The duration of exposure of cells/healthy volunteers/animals to herbals appears to be critical for drug-herbal interaction. An increase in plasma drug concentration is possible during concomitant administration of SJW and prescribed drugs. In contrast, prolonged intake of herbal supplement followed by drug administration may result in subtherapeutic concentrations. Therefore, clinical implications of such drug herbal interactions depend on a variety of factors such as dose, frequency and timing of herbal intake, dosing regimen, route of drug administration and therapeutic range. In vitro screening techniques will play a major role in identifying possible herb-drug interactions and thus create a platform for clinical studies to emerge. Mechanisms of drug-herbal interaction have been discussed in this review article.

Differential Inhibition of Cytochrome P450 3A4, 3A5 and 3A7 by Five Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Protease Inhibitors in vitro

The effects of five HIV protease inhibitors (amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir) on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, 3A5 and 3A7 activities were studied in vitro using testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation in recombinant CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and CYP3A7 enzymes. The protease inhibitors showed differential inhibitory effects on the three CYP3A forms. Ritonavir and saquinavir were non-selective and preferential inhibitors of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 (K(i) 0.03 microM and 0.6-0.8 microM for ritonavir and saquinavir, respectively), and weaker inhibitors of CYP3A7 (K(i) 0.6 microM and 1.8 microM, respectively). Nelfinavir was a potent and non-selective inhibitor of all three CYP3A forms (K(i) 0.3-0.4 microM). Amprenavir and indinavir preferentially inhibited CYP3A4 (K(i) 0.1 microM and 0.2 microM, respectively), with weaker inhibitory effects on CYP3A5 (K(i) 0.5 microM and 2.2 microM, respectively) and CYP3A7 (K(i) 2.1 microM and 10.6 microM, respectively). In conclusion, significant differences exist in the inhibitory potency of protease inhibitors for different CYP3A forms. Ritonavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir and amprenavir seem to be prone to drug-drug interactions by inhibiting both CYP3A4 and CYP3A5. Especially nelfinavir and ritonavir also have a potential to inhibit foetal CYP3A7-mediated drug metabolism and some endogenous pathways that may be crucial to normal foetal development, while indinavir has the lowest potential to inhibit CYP3A5 and CYP3A7.

Application and impact of population pharmacokinetics in the assessment of antiretroviral pharmacotherapy

Population pharmacokinetics has been an important technique used to explore and define relevant sources of variation in drug exposure and response in patient populations. This has been especially true in the area of antiretroviral therapy where the assurance of adequate and sustained drug exposure of multiple agents is highly correlated with therapeutic success. Population pharmacokinetic analyses across the four drug classes and 20 US FDA-approved products used to treat HIV have been published to date. The published reports were predominantly based on actual clinical trials conducted in HIV-infected patients with one or more agents administered. Modelling and simulation approaches have been used in the evaluation of antiretroviral agent outcomes incorporating problematic design and analysis factors such as sparse plasma sampling, data imbalance and censored data. Additional benefits of population modelling approaches applied to the investigation of antiretroviral agents include the ability to assess dosing compliance, understanding and quantifying drug-drug interactions in order to select dosing regimens and the screening of new drug candidates. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models have been used to characterise the relationship between drug exposure and virological and immunological response, and to predict clinical outcome. These models offer the best opportunity for individualising and optimising patient therapy, particularly when adjusted for adherence/compliance. The impact of population pharmacokinetics in the area of antiretroviral therapy can be directly assessed by its role in the validation of surrogate markers such as viral RNA load, therapeutic drug monitoring and the management of individual patient outcomes via exposure-toxicity relationships. Each of these population pharmacokinetic outcomes has contributed to the current regulatory environment, specifically in the area of accelerated approval of new antiretroviral agents.

Mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 by therapeutic drugs

Consistent with its highest abundance in humans, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A is responsible for the metabolism of about 60% of currently known drugs. However, this unusual low substrate specificity also makes CYP3A4 susceptible to reversible or irreversible inhibition by a variety of drugs. Mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 is characterised by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate hydrogen (NADPH)-, time- and concentration-dependent enzyme inactivation, occurring when some drugs are converted by CYP isoenzymes to reactive metabolites capable of irreversibly binding covalently to CYP3A4. Approaches using in vitro, in silico and in vivo models can be used to study CYP3A4 inactivation by drugs. Human liver microsomes are always used to estimate inactivation kinetic parameters including the concentration required for half-maximal inactivation (K(I)) and the maximal rate of inactivation at saturation (k(inact)). Clinically important mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitors include antibacterials (e.g. clarithromycin, erythromycin and isoniazid), anticancer agents (e.g. tamoxifen and irinotecan), anti-HIV agents (e.g. ritonavir and delavirdine), antihypertensives (e.g. dihydralazine, verapamil and diltiazem), sex steroids and their receptor modulators (e.g. gestodene and raloxifene), and several herbal constituents (e.g. bergamottin and glabridin). Drugs inactivating CYP3A4 often possess several common moieties such as a tertiary amine function, furan ring, and acetylene function. It appears that the chemical properties of a drug critical to CYP3A4 inactivation include formation of reactive metabolites by CYP isoenzymes, preponderance of CYP inducers and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate, and occurrence of clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with coadministered drugs. Compared with reversible inhibition of CYP3A4, mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 more frequently cause pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions, as the inactivated CYP3A4 has to be replaced by newly synthesised CYP3A4 protein. The resultant drug interactions may lead to adverse drug effects, including some fatal events. For example, when aforementioned CYP3A4 inhibitors are coadministered with terfenadine, cisapride or astemizole (all CYP3A4 substrates), torsades de pointes (a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia associated with QT prolongation) may occur.However, predicting drug-drug interactions involving CYP3A4 inactivation is difficult, since the clinical outcomes depend on a number of factors that are associated with drugs and patients. The apparent pharmacokinetic effect of a mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP3A4 would be a function of its K(I), k(inact) and partition ratio and the zero-order synthesis rate of new or replacement enzyme. The inactivators for CYP3A4 can be inducers and P-gp substrates/inhibitors, confounding in vitro-in vivo extrapolation. The clinical significance of CYP3A inhibition for drug safety and efficacy warrants closer understanding of the mechanisms for each inhibitor. Furthermore, such inactivation may be exploited for therapeutic gain in certain circumstances.

Drug bioactivation, covalent binding to target proteins and toxicity relevance

A number of therapeutic drugs with different structures and mechanisms of action have been reported to undergo metabolic activation by Phase I or Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes. The bioactivation gives rise to reactive metabolites/intermediates, which readily confer covalent binding to various target proteins by nucleophilic substitution and/or Schiff's base mechanism. These drugs include analgesics (e.g., acetaminophen), antibacterial agents (e.g., sulfonamides and macrolide antibiotics), anticancer drugs (e.g., irinotecan), antiepileptic drugs (e.g., carbamazepine), anti-HIV agents (e.g., ritonavir), antipsychotics (e.g., clozapine), cardiovascular drugs (e.g., procainamide and hydralazine), immunosupressants (e.g., cyclosporine A), inhalational anesthetics (e.g., halothane), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDSs) (e.g., diclofenac), and steroids and their receptor modulators (e.g., estrogens and tamoxifen). Some herbal and dietary constituents are also bioactivated to reactive metabolites capable of binding covalently and inactivating cytochrome P450s (CYPs). A number of important target proteins of drugs have been identified by mass spectrometric techniques and proteomic approaches. The covalent binding and formation of drug-protein adducts are generally considered to be related to drug toxicity, and selective protein covalent binding by drug metabolites may lead to selective organ toxicity. However, the mechanisms involved in the protein adduct-induced toxicity are largely undefined, although it has been suggested that drug-protein adducts may cause toxicity either through impairing physiological functions of the modified proteins or through immune-mediated mechanisms. In addition, mechanism-based inhibition of CYPs may result in toxic drug-drug interactions. The clinical consequences of drug bioactivation and covalent binding to proteins are unpredictable, depending on many factors that are associated with the administered drugs and patients. Further studies using proteomic and genomic approaches with high throughput capacity are needed to identify the protein targets of reactive drug metabolites, and to elucidate the structure-activity relationships of drug's covalent binding to proteins and their clinical outcomes.

Drug interactions in the management of HIV infection

The availability of antiretroviral therapy has significantly reduced the morbidity and mortality of HIV infection. In addition, improved treatment of opportunistic infections and comorbidities common to patients with HIV is further prolonging the lives of patients. Improvement in the treatment of HIV has led to a significant increase in the number of medications which caregivers are able to utilise to manage HIV/AIDS. Antiretroviral medications, as well as many of the drugs used in the management of opportunistic infections and primary care (e.g., macrolide antibiotics, azole antifungals, cholesterol-lowering medications), are particularly prone to drug interactions. The interpretation of clinically significant interactions is complicated by the rate at which new information on drug metabolism and transport is becoming available. Management of drug interactions in HIV is further confounded by conflicting study results and differences between documented and theoretical inter-actions. The mechanisms and significance of interactions involving antiretrovirals, drugs used for opportunistic infections, and other medications commonly used in HIV patients will be reviewed.

Medical illness and comorbidities in drug users: implications for addiction pharmacotherapy treatment

Providing effective medical care to those with substance use disorders can be a challenge to clinicians. In this article, we briefly summarize issues that occur frequently in the medical treatment of substance users. The focus of this article is twofold. The first is to briefly summarize common co-occurring medical illnesses in those manifesting substance use disorders with an emphasis on issues related to providing effective treatment for these diseases in this population. Using specific examples of frequently occurring comorbid medical illness in substance users, including infectious diseases (hepatitis C and HIV disease), sexually transmitted diseases, and pregnancy as examples, the complexities of medical care for this population is demonstrated. Second, this article addresses some of the difficulties encountered in pharmacotherapy aimed specifically at treatment of substance use disorders. For example, difficulties in managing concomitant opiate therapy in those requiring medications for medical illness that may have strong and adverse interactions with opiates are addressed. Adverse events reported for some substance use disorder pharmacotherapies are also highlighted. We conclude with a brief review of models of care that have been effective in addressing the needs of this challenging population that can provide additional means for enhancing the clinical care of substance users.

Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir Hard-Gel/Ritonavir/Fosamprenavir in HIV-1???Infected Patients

BACKGROUND

In vitro synergy and complementary resistance profiles provide a strong rationale for combining fosamprenavir with saquinavir as part of a potent double-boosted protease inhibitor regimen. This study evaluated the steady-state pharmacokinetics of saquinavir 1000 mg twice daily (bid) and fosamprenavir 700 mg bid administered with 2 different doses of ritonavir (100 and 200 mg bid) in HIV-1-infected subjects.

METHODS

On day 1, 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles for saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg bid) were obtained for 18 subjects. All subjects were receiving ongoing treatment with a saquinavir/ritonavir-containing regimen. Fosamprenavir 700 mg bid was then added to the regimen, and pharmacokinetic sampling was repeated for all 3 agents at day 11. The ritonavir daily dose was then increased to 200 mg bid, and a 3rd pharmacokinetic profile was obtained at day 22.

RESULTS

The coadministration of fosamprenavir 700 mg bid with saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg bid resulted in a statistically nonsignificant decrease in saquinavir concentrations (by 14, 9, and 24%, for saquinavir area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]0-12, C(max), and C(trough), respectively). This was compensated for by an increased ritonavir dose of 200 mg bid, which resulted in a statistically nonsignificant increase in saquinavir exposure compared with baseline. Amprenavir levels did not appear to be significantly influenced by coadministration of saquinavir with fosamprenavir. Fosamprenavir significantly reduced ritonavir exposure, but the increased ritonavir dose compensated for this interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed that saquinavir/ritonavir/fosamprenavir was well tolerated over the study period. Saquinavir plasma concentrations were slightly lowered by the addition of fosamprenavir to the regimen. However, the addition of a further 100 mg ritonavir bid restored the small and insignificant decrease.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Methadone Enantiomers After Coadministration with Amprenavir in Opioid-Dependent Subjects

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of methadone enantiomers when coadministered with amprenavir.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, within-subject pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

University research center.

SUBJECTS

Nineteen opioid-dependent, methadone-maintained, healthy individuals were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

On study day 1, subjects received their usual once-daily dose of methadone alone. On study days 2-11, they received the same once-daily methadone dose plus amprenavir 1200 mg twice/day. Serial blood samples were collected over 24 hours on study days 1 and 11 for measurement of plasma R- and S-methadone, and over 12 hours on day 11 for serum amprenavir concentrations.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the concentrations and compared between the two treatments (methadone alone vs methadone with amprenavir). Subjects served as their own control for methadone comparisons, and amprenavir comparisons were made by using a historic control group (38 healthy men). Opioid-effect measures were assessed throughout the study. Coadministration of amprenavir with methadone resulted in a 3-4-hour delay in plasma R- and S-methadone enantiomer peak concentrations at steady state (Cmax-ss). The active R-methadone enantiomer area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosing interval (AUCt-ss, Cmax-ss, and the minimum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmin-ss) were decreased by 13%, 25%, and 21%, respectively, after coadministration of methadone and amprenavir. The inactive S-enantiomer AUCt-ss, Cmax-ss, and Cmin-ss were decreased by 40%, 48%, and 52%, respectively. No clinically significant changes were noted in opioid pharmacodynamic effects, and there was no evidence of opioid withdrawal. No methadone dosage was changed in any subject.

CONCLUSION

No a priori adjustment in methadone dosage is required during coadministration with amprenavir as there is only a small effect on R-methadone exposure and no evidence of opioid withdrawal.

Management of Dyslipidaemia in HIV-Infected Patients Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy

Dyslipidaemia associated with the treatment of HIV infection, particularly with the use of protease inhibitors (PIs), can raise cholesterol and triglyceride (TG) levels to the thresholds indicated for intervention. Recent evidence from epidemiological studies has shown that there are correlations between antiretroviral drug use and increased risks for, and incidences of, cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease. The primary goals of dyslipidaemia therapy for HIV patients are reductions of both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and markedly elevated TG levels. Dietary strategies and exercise programs may be tried, although these have shown inconsistent results. The two options for drug therapy are switching anti-retroviral agents and using lipid-lowering drugs. Each approach is associated with advantages and limitations, and the need to maintain viral suppression must be balanced with the need to treat abnormal lipid levels. Most drug switches replace the PI component with drugs from another antiretroviral class. Selection of drug therapy for lipid lowering depends on the type of dyslipidaemia predominating and the potential for drug interactions. The use of the statins pravastatin and atorvastatin is recommended for the treatment of patients with elevated LDL-C levels and gemfibrozil or fenofibrate for patients with elevated TG concentrations. Development of new PIs with more favourable effects on the lipid profile should be of benefit.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of drugs with St John's wort

There is a worldwide increasing use of herbs which are often administered in combination with therapeutic drugs, raising the potential for herb-drug interactions. St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) is one of the most commonly used herbal antidepressants. A literature search was performed using Medline (via Pubmed), Biological Abstracts, Cochrane Library, AMED, PsycINFO and Embase (all from their inception to September 2003) to identify known drug interaction with St John's wort. The available data indicate that St John's wort is a potent inducer of CYP 3A4 and P-glycoprotein (PgP), although it may inhibit or induce other CYPs, depending on the dose, route and duration of administration. Data from human studies and case reports indicate that St John's wort decreased the blood concentrations of amitriptyline, cyclosporine, digoxin, fexofenadine, indinavir, methadone, midazolam, nevirapine, phenprocoumon, simvastatin, tacrolimus, theophylline and warfarin, whereas it did not alter the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine, dextromethorphan, mycophenolic acid and pravastatin. St John's wort decreased the plasma concentration of the active metabolite SN-38 in cancer patients receiving irinotecan treatment. St John's wort did not alter the pharmacokinetics of tolbutamide, but increased the incidence of hypoglycaemia. Several cases have been reported that St John's wort decreased cyclosporine blood concentration leading to organ rejection. St John's wort caused breakthrough bleeding and unplanned pregnancies when used concomitantly with oral contraceptives. It also caused serotonin syndrome when coadministered with selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (e.g. sertaline and paroxetine). Both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic components may play a role in these interactions. Because the potential interaction of St John's wort with other drugs is a major safety concern, additional systematic research on herb-drug interactions and appropriate regulation in herbal safety and efficacy is needed.

Pharmacodynamics and clinical use of anti-HIV drugs

Antiretroviral drug exposure has been linked to both antiviral efficacy and the development of toxicity and further research in this area is ongoing and necessary. Use of these data may have important implications for TDM of HAART regimens in clinical practice. TDM, in conjunction with an assessment of the patient's viral resistance in the form of an IQ, needs to be examined and validated in large clinical trials.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretroviral therapy

The concept of managing pharmacotherapy based on plasma drug concentrations has been used for decades in a variety of clinical settings. The interest in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiretroviral drugs has grown significantly since highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) became a standard of care in clinical practice. A primary characteristic of TDM of antiretroviral drugs is that multiple agents are concomitantly used in HAART regimens. Inadequate drug concentrations may lead to evolution of drug resistance mutations and endanger present and future treatment options. A number of clinical trials have demonstrated that drug serum concentrations are an important factor in response to therapy for HIV, but whether TDM will become a tool for the routine management of HIV infection remains to be determined. This review includes an illustrative case report of measuring concentrations of antiretroviral drugs in a pediatric patient.

In vitro metabolism of clindamycin in human liver and intestinal microsomes

Incubations with human liver and gut microsomes revealed that the antibiotic, clindamycin, is primarily oxidized to form clindamycin sulfoxide. In this report, evidence is presented that the S-oxidation of clindamycin is primarily mediated by CYP3A. This conclusion is based upon several lines of in vitro evidence, including the following. 1) Incubations with clindamycin in hepatic microsomes from a panel of human donors showed that clindamycin sulfoxide formation correlated with CYP3A-catalyzed testosterone 6beta-hydroxylase activity; 2) coincubation with ketaconazole, a CYP3A4-specific inhibitor, markedly inhibited clindamycin S-oxidase activity; and 3) when clindamycin was incubated across a battery of recombinant heterologously expressed human cytochrome P450 (P450) enzymes, CYP3A4 possessed the highest clindamycin S-oxidase activity. A potential role for flavin-containing monooxygenases (FMOs) in clindamycin S-oxidation in human liver was also evaluated. Formation of clindamycin sulfoxide in human liver microsomes was unaffected either by heat pretreatment or by chemical inhibition (e.g., methimazole). Furthermore, incubations with recombinant FMO isoforms revealed no detectable activity toward the formation of clindamycin sulfoxide. Beyond identifying the drug-metabolizing enzyme responsible for clindamycin S-oxidation, the ability of clindamycin to inhibit six human P450 enzymes was also evaluated. Of the P450 enzymes examined, only the activity of CYP3A4 was inhibited (approximately 26%) by coincubation with clindamycin (100 microM). Thus, it is concluded that CYP3A4 appears to account for the largest proportion of the observed P450 catalytic clindamycin S-oxidase activity in vitro, and this activity may be extrapolated to the in vivo condition.

Interactions between antiretroviral drugs and drugs used for the therapy of the metabolic complications encountered during HIV infection

Treatment of HIV infection with potent combination antiretroviral therapy has resulted in major improvement in overall survival, immune function and the incidence of opportunistic infections. However, HIV infection and treatment has been associated with the development of metabolic complications, including hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, lipodystrophy and osteopenia. Safe pharmacological treatment of these complications requires an understanding of the drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and the drugs used in the treatment of metabolic complications. Since formal studies of most of these interactions have not been performed, predictions must be based on our understanding of the metabolism of these agents. All HIV protease inhibitors are metabolised by and inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Ritonavir is the most potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. Ritonavir and nelfinavir also induce a host of CYP isoforms as well as some conjugating enzymes. The non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor delavirdine potently inhibits CYP3A4, whereas nevirapine and efavirenz are inducers of CYP3A4. Drug interaction studies have been performed with HIV protease inhibitors and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Coadministration of ritonavir plus saquinavir to HIV-seronegative volunteers resulted in increased exposure to simvastatin acid by 3059%. Atorvastatin exposure increased by 347%, but exposure to active atorvastatin increased by only 79%. Conversely, pravastatin exposure decreased by 50%. Similar results have been obtained with combinations of simvastatin and atorvastatin with other HIV protease inhibitors. Thus, the lactone prodrugs simvastatin and lovastatin should not be used with HIV protease inhibitors. Atorvastatin may be used with caution. Although there are no formal studies available, calcium channel antagonists and repaglinide may have significant interactions and toxicity when used with HIV protease inhibitors because of their metabolism by CYP3A4. Sulfonylurea drugs utilise mainly CYP2C9 for metabolism, and this isoenzyme may be induced by ritonavir and nelfinavir with a resulting decrease in efficacy of the sulfonylurea. Losartan may have increased effect when coadministered with ritonavir and nelfinavir because of the induction of CYP2C9 and the expected increase in formation of the active metabolite, E-3174. Overall, well-designed drug-drug interaction studies at steady state are needed to determine whether antiretroviral drugs may be safely coadministered with many of the drugs used in the treatment of the metabolic complications of HIV infection.

Drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and comedicated agents

HIV-infected individuals usually receive a wide variety of drugs in addition to their antiretroviral drug regimen. Since both non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors are extensively metabolised by the cytochrome P450 system, there is a considerable potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions when they are administered concomitantly with other drugs metabolised via the same pathway. In addition, protease inhibitors are substrates as well as inhibitors of the drug transporter P-glycoprotein, which also can result in pharmacokinetic drug interactions. The nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are predominantly excreted by the renal system and may also give rise to interactions. This review will discuss the pharmacokinetics of the different classes of antiretroviral drugs and the mechanisms by which drug interactions can occur. Furthermore, a literature overview of drug interactions is given, including the following items when available: coadministered agent and dosage, type of study that is performed to study the drug interaction, the subjects involved and, if specified, the type of subjects (healthy volunteers, HIV-infected individuals, sex), antiretroviral drug(s) and dosage, interaction mechanism, the effect and if possible the magnitude of interaction, comments, advice on what to do when the interaction occurs or how to avoid it, and references. This discussion of the different mechanisms of drug interactions, and the accompanying overview of data, will assist in providing optimal care to HIV-infected patients.

Oxidative metabolism of amprenavir in the human liver. Effect of the CYP3A maturation

Amprenavir is a human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitor intended to be used to treat HIV-infected children. Although a pediatric dosage is proposed by the manufacturer, no data are currently available on the pharmacokinetics of amprenavir in neonates and infants. Amprenavir being primarily eliminated after oxidative biotransformation, we explored its in vitro metabolism by cytochrome P450 (P450)-dependent monooxygenases. In our conditions, five metabolites were formed in vitro and subsequently analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; P450-dependent oxidations occurred either on the tetrahydrofuran ring (M3 and M4), the aniline ring (M5), and the aliphatic chain (M2) or resulted from the N-dealkylation and loss of the tetrahydrofuran ring (M1). The two major metabolites, respectively M3 and M2 were formed by human liver microsomes with K(m) between 10 and 70 microM. CYP3A4 and to a lesser extent CYP3A5 were major contributors for the formation of M2, M3, and M5 metabolites, whereas CYP3A7 had no or little activity. This assumption was confirmed by inhibition with ketoconazole and ritonavir (two potent inhibitors of CYP3A) whereas sulfaphenazole (2C9 inhibitor) and quinidine (2D6 inhibitor) were inefficient. The metabolism of amprenavir was negligible in microsomes from either fetuses or neonates and steadily increased after the first weeks of life in relation with the maturation of CYP3A4/5. In conclusion, results demonstrated that the capacity of the human liver to oxidize amprenavir is low during the first weeks after birth and that dosage could be substantially reduced during the early neonatal period.