1
|
Gunderson S, Gabriel J. Transfer of embryos with positive PGT-M results: Genetic Counselors' perspectives and ethical considerations. J Genet Couns 2024. [PMID: 38785211 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Increasing numbers of fertility patients use preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions (PGT-M) during in vitro fertilization (IVF). While PGT-M is primarily used to avoid implanting embryos with a monogenic condition, patients can request to transfer an embryo with the monogenic condition (positive embryo transfer), especially in cases where an IVF cycle results in no unaffected embryos. Transferring embryos with known disease-causing variants raises ethical concerns. There is limited understanding about how stakeholders in the assisted reproductive technology (ART) field approach these issues. In this study, genetic counselors were sent a survey to gather insight into their views about transferring embryos with different monogenic conditions. N = 99 genetic counselors completed the survey, 22 of whom had experience with patients requesting or deciding to transfer an embryo with a monogenic condition (positive embryo transfer experience). Most participants, including those with positive embryo transfer experience, were supportive of positive embryo transfer, regardless of the genetic condition. While participating genetic counselors were largely supportive of all patient decisions, they reported increased moral uneasiness around transferring embryos with life-limiting monogenic conditions, such as Huntington's disease. Further investigation into the experiences of genetic counselors who have experienced positive embryo transfer requests in practice can help delineate the ethical questions that ART providers face in this context and clarify how genetic counselors can contribute to establishing guidelines in the ART field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Gunderson
- Division of Graduate Medical Sciences, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Jazmine Gabriel
- Division of Graduate Medical Sciences, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wadman E, Conway L, Garbarini J, Baker M. Moral distress in genetic counseling: A study of North American genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:836-846. [PMID: 35044713 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Moral distress is the phenomenon whereby healthcare providers experience the inability to take action or act in morally appropriate ways when encountering a morally compromising situation. The correlation of moral distress to burnout and resignation in nursing and other healthcare fields has led to increasing attention and concern among healthcare professionals to identify the sources of moral distress, as well as find ways to alleviate it. An online mix-method survey was sent to NSGC members to gain information on (1) sources of moral distress, (2) emotions involved, (3) coping strategies, and (4) suggestions to alleviate it. The ProQOL 5 scale was included to measure genetic counselor compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. Two hundred and thirteen genetic counselors from North America completed the survey. Forty-eight percent of respondents experienced moral distress and five sources were identified. The sources were situations involving other providers, family members, professional responsibility, personal beliefs, and access. Those more likely to experience moral distress worked in a prenatal setting, were over the age of 50, and worked for more than 21 years. Genetic counselors were more likely to talk to a co-worker for support, and seek social support, address the source of the problem, and sustain self through working with patients as coping strategies. Most genetic counselors recommended talking to another genetic counselor to alleviate moral distress. Moral distress did not correlate with genetic counselor burnout, but did correlate with higher levels of secondary traumatic stress (p < 0.01). Thirty-two percent of genetic counselors considered leaving their specialty, and 23% considered leaving their profession based on their experience(s) with moral distress. Our study establishes the existence of moral distress in the genetic counseling field and supports the need for coping strategies and recommendations in order to alleviate future genetic counselor moral distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Wadman
- Genetic Counseling Department, Arcadia University, Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA.,Division of Medical Genetics, Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, Delaware, USA
| | - Laura Conway
- Genetic Counseling Department, Arcadia University, Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA.,Genetic Counseling Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Maria Baker
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ewuoso C, Hall S, Dierickx K. How do healthcare professionals respond to ethical challenges regarding information management? A review of empirical studies. Glob Bioeth 2021; 32:67-84. [PMID: 33897255 PMCID: PMC8023626 DOI: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1909820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim This study is a systematic review that aims to assess how healthcare professionals manage ethical challenges regarding information within the clinical context. Method and Materials We carried out searches in PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase, using two search strings; searches generated 665 hits. After screening, 47 articles relevant to the study aim were selected for review. Seven articles were identified through snowballing, and 18 others were included following a system update in PubMed, bringing the total number of articles reviewed to 72. We used a Q-sort technique for the analysis of identified articles. Findings This study reveals that healthcare professionals around the world generally employ (to varying degrees) four broad strategies to manage different types of challenges regarding information, which can be categorized as challenges related to confidentiality, communication, professional duty, and decision-making. The strategies employed for managing these challenges include resolution, consultation, stalling, and disclosure/concealment. Conclusion There are a variety of strategies which health professionals can adopt to address challenges regarding information management within the clinical context. This insight complements current efforts aimed at enhancing health professional-patient communication. Very few studies have researched the results of employing these various strategies. Future empirical studies are required to address this. Abbreviations CIOMS: Council of International Organization of Medical Sciences; WHO: World Health Organization; AMA: American Medical Association; WMA: World Medical Association; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis; ISCO: International Standard Classification of Occupations; ILO: International Labour Office; SPSS: The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan Hall
- Center for Applied Ethics, Stellenbosch University, Western-Cape, South Africa
| | - Kris Dierickx
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sutton AL, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Quillin J, Rubinsak L, Temkin SM, Gal T, Sheppard VB. Reducing Disparities in Receipt of Genetic Counseling for Underserved Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2020; 29:1131-1135. [PMID: 31794334 PMCID: PMC7462013 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Genetic counseling (GC) provides critical risk prediction information to women at-risk of carrying a genetic alternation; yet racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities persist with regard to GC uptake. This study examined patterns of GC uptake after a referral in a racially diverse population. Materials and Methods: In an urban academic medical center, medical records were reviewed between January 2016 and December 2017 for women who were referred to a genetic counselor for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Study outcomes were making an appointment (yes/no) and keeping an appointment. We assessed sociodemographic factors and clinical factors. Associations between factors and the outcomes were analyzed using chi square, and logistic regression was used for multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 510 women were referred to GC and most made appointments. More than half were white (55.3%) and employed (53.1%). No significant associations were observed between sociodemographic factors and making an appointment. A total of 425 women made an appointment and 268 kept their appointment. Insurance status (p = 0.003), marital status (p = 0.000), and work status (p = 0.039) were associated with receiving GC. In the logistic model, being married (odds ratio [OR] 2.119 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.341-3.347] p = 0.001) and having insurance (OR 2.203 [95% CI 1.208-4.016] p = 0.021) increased the likelihood of receiving counseling. Conclusions: Racial disparities in GC uptake were not observed in this sample. Unmarried women may need additional support to obtain GC. Financial assistance or other options need to be discussed during navigation as a way to lessen the disparity between women with insurance and those without.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnethea L. Sutton
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | - John Quillin
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Lisa Rubinsak
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Sarah M. Temkin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Tamas Gal
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Vanessa B. Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leighton S, Forrest LE, Young MA, Delatycki MB, Lynch E. Social media usage in family communication about genetic information: 'I no longer speak with my sister but she needed to know'. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:180-190. [PMID: 32648349 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The use of social media has become a ubiquitous form of communication. Little is known about whether social media is used in families to assist with the communication of genetic information. This study aimed to understand if and why individuals use social media to communicate genetic information to at-risk relatives. Individuals with either a pathogenic variant in a cancer-predisposing gene or a heterozygous pathogenic variant in an autosomal or X-linked recessive gene were surveyed about communicating genetic information to their at-risk relatives and their use of social media to assist this process. Surveys were sent to 323 individuals from a reproductive carrier screening program and 250 individuals from a familial cancer center. The 128 responses (response rate 25.2%) showed that while most participants (79.0%) did not use social media to communicate genetic information, those that did use social media (21.0%) found it to be helpful as it was easy, accessible and allowed individuals to overcome communication barriers. Genetic professionals should be aware that social media is being used by individuals to assist family communication about genetic information and should discuss this method of communication with individuals who are faced with communicating genetic information with their family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Leighton
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Hobart, Tas., Australia
| | - Laura E Forrest
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Elly Lynch
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yoshida A, Nakada H, Inaba A, Takahashi M. Ethical and professional challenges encountered by Japanese healthcare professionals who provide genetic counseling services. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:1004-1014. [PMID: 32030851 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
It is important to identify ethical and professional challenges associated with genetic counseling services and systems to improve these services. In previous studies, specific challenges in genetic counseling were categorized into 16 domains. However, these studies were limited to a few countries, and genetic counseling differs according to national cultures or systems. Thus, additional efforts should be made to collect and analyze challenges in genetic counseling to address these issues. We interviewed 48 genetic counseling professionals in Japan (including 29 clinical geneticists, 17 genetic counselors, and 2 other professionals) about anecdotes that included ethical professional challenges. Thematic analysis was used to code the interview data, and anecdotes were categorized according to the ethical and professional challenges. The anecdotes (n = 333) were classified into the 16 previously identified domains and three unique subcategories: 'lack of understanding about genetic professionals or departments of genetic counseling by other professionals and patients', 'insufficient communication skills to carry out counseling on the part of the genetic counseling professionals', and 'lack of a system for self-improvement'. Many of the anecdotes also noted the emotional responses domain. The challenges experienced by Japanese genetic counseling professionals described herein will improve the quality of the service these professionals provide. Furthermore, the results can assist development of high-quality genetic counseling systems in countries developing these systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akiko Yoshida
- Laboratory for Retinal Regeneration, RIKEN, Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Japan.,Kobe City Eye Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Haruka Nakada
- Division of Bioethics and Healthcare Law, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Inaba
- Laboratory for Retinal Regeneration, RIKEN, Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Japan.,Kobe City Eye Hospital, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Medical Ethics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masayo Takahashi
- Laboratory for Retinal Regeneration, RIKEN, Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Japan.,Kobe City Eye Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Taylor S, Rodrigues M, Poke G, Wake S, McEwen A. Family communication following a diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy: To tell or not to tell? J Genet Couns 2019; 28:1029-1041. [PMID: 31385417 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Family communication about genetic information enables informed medical and reproductive decision-making. The literature suggests that a significant proportion of genetically at-risk family members remain uninformed about genetic risk information as a result of non-disclosure. This study explored the experiences of New Zealand families communicating about a diagnosis of type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1). Eligible individuals were identified and recruited from the New Zealand (NZ) MD Prev study, a nationwide study which aimed to determine the prevalence, impact, and costs of genetic muscle disorders across the lifespan. Twelve qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants. The findings demonstrate diversity among and within families, with several distinct family narratives described. Most participants reported a motivation to tell relatives about their diagnosis to promote autonomy. Women were pivotal throughout communication processes and this was often tied to the concept of maternal responsibility and a desire to promote relatives' reproductive autonomy. The diagnosis of DM1 and the subsequent family communication decisions altered relationships for many, with both positive and negative impacts described. The findings demonstrate that individuals require time to explore the impact of a diagnosis of DM1 on self, family and intimate partner relationships to anticipate unique communication challenges. Genetic counselors can use these findings to inform their approach to counseling families with DM1. Longitudinal genetic counseling may be beneficial as a way to provide individuals with life stage specific support as they communicate with their relatives about a diagnosis of DM1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelby Taylor
- The Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Parkville Familial Cancer Centre and Genomic Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Miriam Rodrigues
- Neurology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.,Muscular Dystrophy Association of New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gemma Poke
- Genetic Health Services, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Samantha Wake
- The Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liker K, Black L, Weil J, Bruce J, Bereknyei Merrell S, Bivona S, Ormond KE. Challenges of infertility genetic counseling: Impact on counselors' personal and professional lives. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:626-640. [PMID: 30821877 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2018] [Revised: 01/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Infertility genetic counselors (GCs) work with patients struggling to become pregnant who desire genetic testing of embryos and preconception genetic testing or carrier screening. Because personal and professional challenges have not been examined in this relatively new genetic counseling specialty, we investigated the difficulties infertility GCs face in their professional roles. Past and present infertility GCs in patient-facing roles were recruited through the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Purposive sampling ensured participants were diverse in clinical setting, reproductive history, and other demographics. Nineteen participants completed a semi-structured interview, at which time data saturation occurred. Thematic analysis revealed infertility GCs consider their patients more emotionally stressed than patients in other specialties. Infertility GCs relate easily to patients, build long-term patient relationships, and feel invested in the reproductive successes of patients. Participants reported heightened concern for their own fertility, leading to high personal uptake of preconception genetic and fertility tests. Participants described discomfort when counseling while visibly pregnant and reluctance to disclose their own reproductive histories. Further research is needed on the complex interactions of GCs' personal and professional lives. Peer support groups and professional dialogue about the personal effects of the role may be beneficial for infertility GCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina Liker
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Lauri Black
- Pacific Reproductive Genetic Counseling, Pacifica, California
| | - Jon Weil
- Department of Biological Sciences, California State University Stanislaus, Turlock, California
| | - Janine Bruce
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell
- Department of Surgery, Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education Center (S-SPIRE), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Stephanie Bivona
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schoeffel K, McCarthy Veach P, Rubin K, LeRoy B. Managing Couple Conflict During Prenatal Counseling Sessions: An Investigation of Genetic Counselor Experiences and Perceptions. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:1275-1290. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0252-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
10
|
The Genetic Counselor’s Role in Managing Ethical Dilemmas Arising in the Laboratory Setting. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:838-54. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9957-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 03/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
11
|
Gschmeidler B, Flatscher-Thöni M, Knitel-Grabher E. Genetics in the medical and psychosocial practice: on the role of value hierarchies in counselling. J Public Health (Oxf) 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s10389-016-0719-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
12
|
Development, Experience, and Expression of Meaning in Genetic Counselors' Lives: an Exploratory Analysis. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:799-817. [PMID: 26498971 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9901-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 10/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Genetic counselors routinely engage with patients and families who grapple with questions of meaning while making decisions about genetic risk. Research and theory demonstrate genetic counselors gain important personal insights through their work and develop professionally from self-reflective practice regarding their beliefs and values. Data are lacking, however, about the nature of the meaning genetic counselors bring to their profession and how they directly experience and/or navigate issues of meaning within clinical practice over time. Accordingly, a national sample (N = 298) of practicing genetic counselors completed a brief survey assessing their demographic characteristics and willingness to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview exploring their views on meaning as they relate to their clinical work and professional development. Sixty-eight individuals of varied experience levels were interviewed about: 1) how they define a meaningful life for themselves; 2) lifetime sources of influence on their sense of meaning; 3) how they experience meaning within both personal and professional contexts; 4) work-related contexts that reaffirm and challenge their sense of meaning; and 5) how their sense of meaning has changed over time. Twenty-five interviews were analyzed using Consensual Qualitative Research methods, at which point, data saturation was reached. Five themes, 32 domains, and 29 categories were extracted. Common findings include: importance of satisfying relationships; helping others; personal fulfillment; personal and patient experiences of illness and loss; religious and/or spiritual foundations; value conflicts; competing obligations; challenges to meaning; development of empathy; resiliency; and increased humility. Results suggest the importance of professional venues for discussions of meaning (e.g., genetic counseling program curricula, continuing education, and peer supervision/consultation). Additional findings, practice implications, and research recommendations are presented.
Collapse
|
13
|
Genetic Test Results and Disclosure to Family Members: Qualitative Interviews of Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Ethical and Professional Issues in France. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:483-94. [PMID: 26482743 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9896-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2015] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The benefit of disclosing test results to next of kin is to improve prognosis and-in some cases-even prevent death though earlier monitoring or preventive therapies. Research on this subject has explored the question of intra-familial communication from the standpoint of patients and relatives but rarely, from the standpoint of healthcare professionals. The purpose of this study was to interview relevant healthcare professionals in France, where legislation framing the issue was recently passed. A qualitative study consisting of semi-structured interviews was set up to get a clearer picture of the challenges arising from this issue, its consequences in terms of medical care-service practices, and the positions that frontline professionals have taken in response to this new legal framework. The findings from eight interviews with 7 clinical geneticists and 1 genetic counselor highlight very different patterns of practices among care services and among the genetic diseases involved. It is equally crucial to investigate other issues such as the nature of genetic testing and its consequences in terms of disclosing results to kin, the question of the role of genetic counseling in the disclosure process, the question of prescription by non-geneticist clinicians, and practical questions linked to information content, consent and medical follow-up for patients and their relatives.
Collapse
|
14
|
McCarthy Veach P, Bartels DM, LeRoy BS. Commentary on Genetic Counseling-A Profession in Search of Itself. J Genet Couns 2015; 11:187-91. [PMID: 26141857 DOI: 10.1023/a:1015227106269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
15
|
Genetics and Personal Insurance: the Perspectives of Canadian Cancer Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2015; 24:1022-36. [PMID: 25925606 PMCID: PMC4643106 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9841-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2014] [Accepted: 04/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Genetic discrimination in the context of genetic testing has been identified as a concern for symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals for more than three decades. Genetic counselors are often the health care professionals who discuss risks and benefits of genetic testing with patients, thereby making them most appropriate to address patient concerns about genetics and personal insurance (i.e., life, life as related to mortgage or group insurance, disability, critical illness and travel). A pilot study was conducted to ascertain the current practices of Canadian cancer genetic counselors in regard to their discussions with patients about genetic testing and access to personal insurance. Among the 36 counselors surveyed, 100 % reported discussing the issue of genetic testing and personal insurance with their patients. Several factors influenced the content, depth and length of these discussions including age, cancer status, family members, and patients’ current and future insurance needs. Counselors reported discussing with patients the possible impact of genetic test results on access to personal insurance, possible access and use of patient genetic information by insurance companies, and whom patients should contact if they have additional questions. The most commonly reported inquiries from patients included questions about the possible impact of genetic testing on their ability to obtain insurance, and the insurability of family members. While 28 % of counselors reported having been contacted by an insurer requesting access to patient information, only one counselor was aware of or could recall the outcome of such a request. This pilot study revealed that issues concerning genetics and personal insurance are commonly discussed in Canadian cancer genetic counseling sessions. Counselors furthermore expressed a need for additional educational resources on the topic of genetics and personal insurance for themselves and their patients.
Collapse
|
16
|
Cura JD. Respecting Autonomous Decision Making Among Filipinos: A Re-emphasis in Genetic Counseling. J Genet Couns 2015; 24:213-24. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9823-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 01/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
17
|
Ethical and Professional Challenges Encountered by Laboratory Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2014; 24:580-96. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9787-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/19/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
18
|
Li J, Huang W, Luo S, Lin Y, Duan R. Attitude of medical school students in China towards genetic testing and counseling issues in FXS. J Genet Couns 2013; 22:733-40. [PMID: 23955144 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9634-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2012] [Accepted: 07/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common form of inherited intellectual disability. However, genetic testing protocols and genetic counseling guidelines for FXS are not yet established in mainland China. In the present study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using a self-administered questionnaire among students at the Xiangya medical school to investigate their attitude towards genetic testing and counseling issues of FXS. We have gained a general understanding of the attitudes of medical students towards these FXS issues in China. This information is of immense importance to develop appropriate genetic tests and to train counselors for FXS. As the medical school students surveyed are prospective physicians who will be a part of the Chinese health system, our survey was focused on the basic knowledge of FXS, population-based FXS screening, confidentiality and reproductive options for mutation carriers. The study demonstrated that only less than one third of the participants had heard about FXS. 94.6 % of participants were in favor of FXS screening for women in their reproductive age who had a genetic history of FXS. Furthermore, only half of the participants would inform their families about their genetic status in case of positive test results, and more than half of the participants supported natural conception and prenatal diagnosis for FXS mutation carriers. Additional findings and research implications are also discussed. This survey targeting potential doctors provides important information for the development of FXS genetic test and counselor training for the Chinese health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Li
- State Key Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gschmeidler B, Flatscher-Thoeni M. Ethical and professional challenges of genetic counseling - the case of Austria. J Genet Couns 2013; 22:741-52. [PMID: 23728743 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9610-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2012] [Accepted: 05/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Genetic counseling is gaining in importance with the increasing application of genetic testing for diagnosis and clinical treatment. Genetic counseling often raises ethical and professional challenges and prior research has categorized them into 16 domains. The purpose of this study was to analyze the situation in Austria on the basis of these challenges and discuss it in the national and international context. While in some countries there is a special profession for genetic counseling, in Austria it is provided by medical geneticists or other physicians in the context of their specialization. Psychosocial professionals might be consulted or brought in if necessary. Results from 95 survey respondents (including physicians and psychosocial professionals) revealed a greater interest in the topic of genetic counseling by medical specialists other than medical geneticists. The most frequently encountered challenges among physicians were informed consent, organizational constraints, withholding information, and attaining/maintaining proficiency. The psychosocial professionals experienced maintaining proficiency and organizational constraints as the prevalent challenges. Additional findings and practice implications are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte Gschmeidler
- Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - Private University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall, Tirol, Austria,
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ethical dilemmas associated with genetic testing: which are most commonly seen and how are they managed? Genet Med 2012; 15:345-53. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
21
|
Otlowski M, Taylor S, Bombard Y. Genetic Discrimination: International Perspectives. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2012; 13:433-54. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - S. Taylor
- School of Sociology and Social Work, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia;
| | - Y. Bombard
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Administration, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Enhancing family communication about genetics: ethical and professional dilemmas. J Genet Couns 2012; 22:16-21. [PMID: 22833230 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9514-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2011] [Accepted: 06/06/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
When a new genetic condition is diagnosed within a family, genetic counselors often describe a sense of responsibility towards other at risk family members to be appropriately informed about their status. Successful communication of genetic information in families is contingent on many factors. While a small number of probands directly state their intention not to inform their relatives, many who do intend to communicate this information appear to be unsuccessful for a wide range of reasons and may benefit from follow up support from a genetic counselor. Drawing on the reciprocal-engagement model (REM) of genetic counseling practice we explore how enhancing family communication about genetics raises a number of ethical and professional challenges for counselors-and describe how we resolved these. A subsequent manuscript will describe the counseling framework we have developed to enhance family communication about genetics.
Collapse
|
23
|
Vanstone M, Kinsella EA, Nisker J. Information-Sharing to Promote Informed Choice in Prenatal Screening in the Spirit of the SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline: A Proposal for an Alternative Model. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2012; 34:269-275. [DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)35188-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
24
|
Abad-Perotín R, Asúnsolo-Del Barco Á, Silva-Mato A. A Survey of Ethical and Professional Challenges Experienced by Spanish Health-Care Professionals that Provide Genetic Counseling Services. J Genet Couns 2011; 21:85-100. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9382-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2010] [Accepted: 06/07/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
25
|
Bombard Y, Palin J, Friedman JM, Veenstra G, Creighton S, Paulsen JS, Bottorff JL, Hayden MR. Factors associated with experiences of genetic discrimination among individuals at risk for Huntington disease. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2011; 156B:19-27. [PMID: 21184581 PMCID: PMC3860279 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.31130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify factors that are associated with experiencing genetic discrimination (GD) among individuals at risk for Huntington disease (HD). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with experiencing GD in data from a cross-sectional, self-report survey of 293 individuals at risk for HD. The study sample comprised 167 genetically tested respondents, and 66 who were not tested (80% response rate). Overall, individuals who learn they are at risk for HD at a younger age (OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.5-6.2; P = 0.002), are mutation-positive (OR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.4-6.0; P = 0.006), or are highly educated (OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.4-5.1; P = 0.002) are more likely to experience GD, particularly in insurance, family, and social settings. Further, younger age was associated with discrimination in insurance (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94-1.00; P = 0.038). This study provides evidence that some people who are at risk for HD were more likely to experience GD than others. Individuals who learned they are at risk for HD at a younger age and those who are mutation-positive were more likely to experience GD, particularly in insurance, family, and social settings. Younger individuals were more likely to experience discrimination in the insurance setting. Overall, highly educated individuals were also more likely to report discrimination. These results provide direction for clinical and family discussions, counseling practice, and policy aimed at mitigating experiences of GD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Bombard
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbis, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Department of Health policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - JoAnne Palin
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbis, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jan M. Friedman
- Children’s & Women’s Hospital of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gerry Veenstra
- Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Susan Creighton
- Children’s & Women’s Hospital of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jane S. Paulsen
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Psychology and Neurosciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Joan L. Bottorff
- Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | - Michael R. Hayden
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbis, Vancouver, BC, Canada,Centre for Molecular Medicine & Therapeutics, Child & Family Research Institute, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, 950 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 4H4. Michael R. Hayden ()
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
There are several features of genetic and genomic research that challenge established norms of informed consent. In this paper, we discuss these challenges, explore specific elements of informed consent for genetic and genomic research conducted in the United States, and consider alternative consent models that have been proposed. All of these models attempt to balance the obligation to respect and protect research participants with the larger social interest in advancing beneficial research as quickly as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hines KA, Veach PM, LeRoy BS. Genetic counselors' perceived responsibilities regarding reproductive issues for patients at risk for Huntington disease. J Genet Couns 2009; 19:131-47. [PMID: 19851850 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9265-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2009] [Accepted: 10/01/2009] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Research indicates that health care professionals' attitudes may affect patients' decisions regarding prenatal Huntington Disease testing, but few studies have sampled genetic counselors. In this qualitative study, genetic counselors described their experiences counseling individuals at risk for HD regarding reproductive decision-making. Five major research questions were investigated: 1) What are genetic counselor responsibilities? 2) What issues arise for patients and counselors? 3) How do counselors reconcile prenatal testing with presymptomatic testing? 4) To what extent are counselors' initial expectations of at-risk patients' beliefs and behaviors met? and 5) What advice would counselors offer to novice practitioners about working with this patient population? Fifteen genetic counselors experienced in counseling individuals at risk for HD participated in a semi-structured phone interview that yielded several themes. For example, participants identified their primary responsibility as information provision; less prevalent were psychosocial support and facilitating decision making. The most common ethical challenge was testing prenatally for HD which also results in presymptomatic testing of minors. Participants were divided about how directive to be in response to this ethical issue and about termination of a gene positive pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karrie A Hines
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cragun RT, Woltanski AR, Myers MF, Cragun DL. Genetic counselors' religiosity & spirituality: are genetic counselors different from the general population? J Genet Couns 2009; 18:551-66. [PMID: 19802693 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9241-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2009] [Accepted: 05/29/2009] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Although there is evidence that the religious beliefs of genetic counselors (GCs) can induce internal conflict in at least some genetic counseling scenarios, empirical research on the religiosity of GCs is limited. This study compares genetic counselors to a representative sample of the adult U.S. population on multiple religiosity measures. After controlling for several sociodemographic factors the percentage of GCs who report having a religious affiliation is similar to the general U.S., but GCs are less likely to affiliate with conservative Christian religions and are more likely to be Jewish. GCs are significantly less likely than the general U.S. population to: believe in god, attend religious services, pray, and believe in an afterlife even after controlling for relevant sociodemographic factors. Despite the lower levels of religiosity, a majority of GCs do report themselves to be moderately to highly spiritual. We explore potential reasons for religiosity differences as well as possible implications in the context of the GC scope of practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan T Cragun
- Department of Sociology, University of Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
A Comparative Analysis of Ethical and Professional Challenges Experienced by Australian and U.S. Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2009; 18:379-94. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9229-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2008] [Accepted: 03/02/2009] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
30
|
Geller G, Micco E, Silver RJ, Kolodner K, Bernhardt BA. The role and impact of personal faith and religion among genetic service providers. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS 2009; 151C:31-40. [PMID: 19170100 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
This paper describes the impact of genetic service providers' personal faith and religious values on their experiences interacting with colleagues and patients. We surveyed 480 clinical geneticists (MDs), genetic counselors (GCs), and genetic nurses randomly selected from their professional associations, and then interviewed a sample of survey respondents. Outcomes included religiosity, coping with distress through spiritual beliefs, and personal value conflicts (PVCs). Two hundred fourteen providers completed the survey out of an estimated 348 eligible (61% response rate). Importance attributed to regular attendance at religious services ranged from 39% (not at all important) to 27% (very important). Reliance on religion and spiritual beliefs as a source of comfort ranged from 48% (never) to 33% (sometimes or often). Religiosity varied by discipline with 58% of nurses thinking regular attendance at religious services was moderately or very important as compared to 47% of GCs and 30% of MDs (P = 0.006). Ten percent of respondents had difficulty reconciling their own faith with being a genetics professional, 14% felt the need to hide their own faith from their colleagues or patients, 7% thought their professional stance was not consistent with their personal values, and 4% felt ostracized by the genetics community because of their personal beliefs. The experience of such PVCs was positively correlated with religiosity (r = 0.35; P < 0.0001). GCs were more likely to experience PVCs than MDs or nurses (P = 0.013). Data from the interviews (N = 54) support these findings. A significant minority of genetic service providers are religiously observant and rely on their religious values to cope with distress. These individuals often experience difficulty reconciling their religious beliefs with the expectations of their profession, and sharing their beliefs with their colleagues and patients. Efforts should be made to prevent or reduce the secrecy surrounding personal faith and religion among genetics professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail Geller
- Johns Hopkins University, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Arribas-Ayllon M, Sarangi S, Clarke A. Professional ambivalence: accounts of ethical practice in childhood genetic testing. J Genet Couns 2009; 18:173-84. [PMID: 19205854 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-008-9201-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2008] [Accepted: 10/29/2008] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Childhood genetic testing raises complex ethical and moral dilemmas for both families and professionals. In the family sphere, the role of communication is a key aspect in the transmission of 'genetic responsibility' between adults and children. In the professional sphere, genetic responsibility is an interactional accomplishment emerging from the sometimes competing views over what constitutes the 'best interests' of the child in relation to parental preferences on the one hand, and professional judgements on the other. In the present paper we extend our previous research into parental accounts of childhood genetic testing and explore the ethical accounts of professionals in research interviews. Interviews (n = 20) were conducted with professional practitioners involved in the genetic diagnosis and management of children and their families. We first identify four inter-related themes-juxtaposition of parental rights vis-à-vis child's autonomy, elicitation of the child's autonomy, avoidance of parental responsibility and recognition of professional uncertainty. Then, using Rhetorical Discourse Analysis, we examine the range of discourse devices through which ethical accounts are situationally illustrated: contrast, reported speech, constructed dialogue, character and event work. An overarching device in these ethical accounts is the use of extreme case scenarios, which reconstruct dilemmas as justifications of professional conduct. While acknowledging ambivalence, our analysis suggests that professional judgement is not a simple matter of implementing ethical principles but rather of managing the practical conditions and consequences of interactions with parents and children. We conclude that more attention is needed to understand the way professional practitioners formulate judgements about ethical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Arribas-Ayllon
- ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Role of parenting relationship quality in communicating about maternal BRCA1/2 genetic test results with children. J Genet Couns 2008; 17:283-7. [PMID: 18288593 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-007-9147-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2007] [Accepted: 12/18/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
It is known that many mothers rapidly share the results of their BRCA1/2 genetic testing with their children, especially adolescent children. What is less known is the extent to which these mothers may engage fathers in a discussion concerning genetic counseling and the anticipated disclosure of genetic test results to children, or seek shared decision making in this context. This short communication addresses this issue by first examining mothers' and fathers' discussions concerning a research study of family communication. In our view, this conversation likely served as a precursor to, and proxy indicator of, maternal receptivity to partner input regarding the genetic counseling/testing-results disclosure process. We further evaluated how the quality of the parenting relationship is associated with mothers' decisions to include or not include the child's father in this study. Finally, this report addresses potential ways in which the genetic counselor may be able to facilitate parental communication regarding the evolving process of disclosure of genetic information to children and adolescents.
Collapse
|
33
|
Pirzadeh SM, McCarthy Veach P, Bartels DM, Kao J, Leroy BS. A national survey of genetic counselors' personal values. J Genet Couns 2007; 16:763-73. [PMID: 17874285 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-007-9108-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2006] [Accepted: 06/04/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Personal values are motivational sources for an individual's actions [Hitlin and Piliavin (Annual Review of Sociology 30:359-393, 2004)]. Genetic counselors' values may influence their behaviors in clinical practice, but a profile of their personal values has not been identified empirically. In this study, 292 genetic counselors completed the Schwartz Universal Values Questionnaire (SUVQ; Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-65). Boston, MA: Academic.), a widely used measure of value types, and provided information about their demographic characteristics. Results indicate that respondents highly valued benevolence, self-direction, achievement, and universalism indicating a strong pattern of concern for the welfare of others. They placed considerably less value on stimulation, tradition, and power, which reflect personal interests. Respondents who reported practicing a religion scored significantly lower on stimulation and hedonism and higher on tradition and spirituality than those not practicing; married respondents and parents scored significantly lower on stimulation and achievement; and males scored higher on power than females. The value types are described, and training and research recommendations are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara M Pirzadeh
- Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schneider KA, Chittenden AB, Branda KJ, Keenan MA, Joffe S, Patenaude AF, Reynolds H, Dent K, Eubanks S, Goldman J, Leroy B, Warren NS, Taylor K, Vockley CW, Garber JE. Ethical issues in cancer genetics: I 1) whose information is it? J Genet Couns 2007; 15:491-503. [PMID: 17106632 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9053-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This article presents and discusses four clinical cases that exemplify the complexity of ethical dilemmas concerning the provider's obligation to disclose or withhold genetic information from patients. Case 1: What is the responsibility of the cancer genetics provider to ensure that a positive test results is shared with distant relatives? Case 2: To ensure that results go to at-risk relatives, do we have the right to ignore the wishes of the designated next-of-kin? Case 3: Do we have the right to reveal a familial BRCA1 mutation to a patient's relative, who is at 50% risk? Case 4: Do we have an obligation to reveal that a patient is not a blood relative and therefore, not at risk to have inherited a familial mutation? These cases form the basis for discussing the provider's dual obligations to keeping patient confidentiality and informing patients and families about risk (i.e. duty to warn). We also provide a summary of consensus points and additional discussion questions for each case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Schneider
- Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, SM331, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Weil J, Ormond K, Peters J, Peters K, Biesecker BB, LeRoy B. The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling: report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual Education Conference. J Genet Couns 2006; 15:85-93. [PMID: 16525897 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-005-9008-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Nondirectiveness has been a guiding principle for genetic counseling since the founding of the profession. However, its efficacy and appropriateness in this role have been frequently questioned. A workshop at the 2003 Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors provided audience participation in a discussion of these issues. Participants presented arguments for and against nondirectiveness as a central ethos. They described complex personal transitions in adapting what they had learned about nondirectiveness during training to the realities of the workplace. There was support for flexible approaches to genetic counseling, with varying adherence to nondirectiveness, based on client and family needs and values, clinical circumstances, and desired counseling outcomes. The discussion supports the use of clinical experience, outcomes research, and the experience of other professions to move beyond nondirectiveness and more accurately identify the theoretical bases that underlie genetic counseling in the variety of circumstances in which it is currently practiced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Weil
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Clarke A, Richards M, Kerzin-Storrar L, Halliday J, Young MA, Simpson SA, Featherstone K, Forrest K, Lucassen A, Morrison PJ, Quarrell OWJ, Stewart H. Genetic professionals' reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families. Eur J Hum Genet 2005; 13:556-62. [PMID: 15770225 DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients attending genetic clinics are often the main gatekeepers of information for other family members. There has been much debate about the circumstances under which professionals may have an obligation, or may be permitted, to pass on personal genetic information about their clients but without their consent to other family members. We report findings from the first prospective study investigating the frequency with which genetics professionals become concerned about the failure of clients to pass on such information to their relatives. In all, 12 UK and two Australian regional genetic services reported such cases over 12 months, including details of actions taken by professionals in response to the clients' failure to disclose information. A total of 65 cases of non-disclosure were reported, representing <1% of the genetic clinic consultations in the collaborating centres during the study period. These included 39 cases of the failure of parents not passing full information to their adult offspring, 22 cases where siblings or other relatives were not given information and four cases where information was withheld from partners -- including former and prospective partners. Professionals reported clients' reasons for withholding information as complex, more often citing concern and the desire to shield relatives from distress rather than poor family relationships. In most cases, the professionals took further steps to persuade their clients to make a disclosure but in no instance did the professional force a disclosure without the client's consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angus Clarke
- Institute of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pfeffer NL, Veach PM, LeRoy BS. An investigation of genetic counselors' discussion of genetic discrimination with cancer risk patients. J Genet Couns 2004; 12:419-38. [PMID: 15043057 DOI: 10.1023/a:1025816820243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Twenty-five genetic counselors who see familial cancer risk patients were interviewed about their definitions of genetic discrimination, perceptions of patient risk for discrimination, frequency and type of discrimination experienced by their patients, sources of information about discrimination, and what they tell patients about genetic discrimination. There was variability in participant definitions and content of discussions of genetic discrimination. Although 82% regarded risk to be low to theoretical, 40% reported possible instances of genetic discrimination, including insurance companies requiring results to cover procedures, denial of life/health insurance, social discrimination, and employment discrimination. Ninety-six percent of the sample reported always or almost always discussing genetic discrimination, and one or more of the following: insurance discrimination risks, protective legislation, no known cases positively documenting discrimination, strategies to avoid discrimination, and uncertainty of protective measures. The majority use current literature and research as information sources. Practice, policy, and research implications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole L Pfeffer
- Department of Educational Psychology, 139 Burton Hall, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Grover S. The psychological dimension of informed consent: dissonance processes in genetic testing. J Genet Couns 2004; 12:389-403. [PMID: 15043060 DOI: 10.1023/a:1025826019335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
This paper discusses the issue of the psychological dimension of informed consent. In this paper, the author proposes that informed consent is a continuous variable rather than a dichotomous one. When clients better understand their motives and actual, rather than just perceived degree of choice in pursuing a particular option in a medical setting, their level of informed consent is greater. Findings from existing literature in the field of genetic testing are examined in terms of dissonance theory. These findings suggest that testing candidates sometimes overestimate their coping skills and minimize the threat to psychological integrity that a particular genetic result may pose. Counseling directed towards realistic appraisal of degree of choice in pursuing testing is examined as an aspect of supporting informed consent and possibly reducing the potential for adverse psychological outcome in the longer term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Grover
- Faculty of Education, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada P7B 5E1.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
For three decades nondirectiveness has served as the central ethos for genetic counseling. It has evolved from narrow definitions defining what should not be done to broad definitions that promote active counseling skills in support of client autonomy and informed decision making. As broad definitions have been formulated, the term "nondirective" has become largely irrelevant to their content; it persists primarily as a historic relic. It has thus become an impediment to creative theory and clinical practice. I propose that nondirectiveness be replaced as the central ethos, while relevant components (providing balanced information, not imposing the counselor's values) are retained as elements of practice and ethics. This raises the question of what principle(s) should be adopted as a new guiding ethos. To promote a discussion of that issue I propose that the central ethos of genetic counseling should be to bring the psychosocial component into every aspect of the work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Weil
- 2015 Mira Vista Drive, El Cerrito, California 94530, USA.
| |
Collapse
|