Pilot evaluation of hypnotic medication during acute traumatic stress response

Differential effects of clonazepam on declarative memory formation and face recognition

Benzodiazepines are commonly used drugs to treat anxiety in crime witnesses. These increase GABA inhibitory effects, which impairs aversive memory encoding and consolidation. Eyewitness memory is essential in justice. However, memory is malleable leading to false memories that could cause a selection of an innocent in a lineup. Here, we studied whether a low dose of Clonazepam impairs memory encoding as well as consolidation of faces and narrative of the event. We performed two experiments using a double-blind and between subject design (N = 216). Day 1: subjects watched a crime video and received Clonazepam 0.25 mg (CLZ group) or placebo (PLC group) before (Exp. 1) or after the video (Exp. 2) to assess the effect on encoding and consolidation. One week later, the memory was assessed using a present and absent target lineup and asking for a free recall. Regarding encoding, we found that in the CLZ group memory was impaired in the free recall task, while no differences were found for recognition memory. Regarding consolidation, we did not observe memory measures that were affected by this dose of benzodiazepines. The results suggest that while some aspects of eyewitness memory could be modulated even with low doses of benzodiazepine, others could not be affected. More studies should be performed with higher doses of CLZ similar to those administered in real life. These results are relevant in the judicial field to assess the reliability of the eyewitness elections under the effects of this drug.

Consensus on the pharmacological treatment of acute stress disorder in Chinese pilots: a Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Appropriate medication is very important for pilots with acute stress disorder. Improper medication can not only affect the physical and mental health of the pilots but can also endanger flight safety. Hence, we aimed to quickly and effectively relieve symptoms and restore cognitive function by forming a consensus of Chinese experts on the pharmacological treatment of acute stress disorder in pilots using the Delphi method.

METHODS

Relevant literature was searched to enumerate the current status of pharmacological treatment of acute stress disorder in pilots, followed by two rounds of expert consultation and discussion according to the listed status of the survey using the Delphi method. A descriptive statistical method was used to analyze the basic information, authority coefficients, concentration of opinions, and survey items of the experts to develop a consensus on the pharmacological treatment of acute stress disorder in pilots.

RESULTS

A total of 16 experts in psychiatry, pharmacology, and aerospace medicine from different provinces and cities across China were invited for consultation. The recovery rate of the two rounds of consultation was 100%, and the expert authority coefficients were 0.897 and 0.906, respectively. Kendall's coefficient of concordance of indicators at all levels was 0.564-0.594 (p < 0.01). Based on the number of votes received, alprazolam tablets (16), eszopiclone tablets (15), and lorazepam tablets (14) were recommended for the treatment of excitatory psychomotor symptoms of acute stress disorder; paroxetine tablets (15) and sertraline tablets (15) were available for psychomotor depressive symptoms; olanzapine tablets (15), olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets (14), and quetiapine fumarate tablets (14) were selected for psychotic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study formed a consensus on rapid and effective pharmacological treatment for different symptoms of acute stress disorder pilots, which provides a reference for clinical treatment.

Effects of acute pain medications on posttraumatic stress symptoms in early aftermath of trauma

Posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) develop as sequelae from traumatic injuries. Limited studies suggest that using opioids to reduce acute pain immediately after trauma may also reduce subsequent PTSS, but other pain medications rarely have been examined for preventing acute PTSS. The current study examined the effects of commonly used pain medications, opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), on PTSS after acute traumatic injuries. Participants ( n = 71) were categorized into opioid or NSAID group according to their medical records and self-reported medication use. Their PTSS were assessed using posttraumatic stress disorder checklist twice within 2 weeks after trauma. Participants' pain levels reduced from pretreatment to follow-up in both groups, F (1, 55) = 6.696, P = 0.012, partial η 2 = 0.109. Interestingly, a significant interaction between time and medication group on PTSS reached statistical significance, F (1, 69) = 6.014, P = 0.017, partial η 2 = 0.080. Follow-up analyses revealed that this interaction was driven by a significant PTSS reduction only in opioid but not in NSAID group. These findings suggested that pain reduction alone is not sufficient to reduce acute PTSS in the NSAID group, highlighting the need to continue further investigations into the mechanisms by which opioids reduce PTSS in the early posttrauma period.

Five-year incidence of substance use and mental health diagnoses following exposure to opioids or opioids with benzodiazepines during an emergency department encounter for traumatic injury

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines and opioids are used alone or in conjunction in certain care settings, but each have the potential for misuse.

OBJECTIVE

This longitudinal observational study evaluated substance use and mental health outcomes associated with providing opioids with or without benzodiazepine to treat traumatic injury in the emergency department (ED) setting.

METHODS

We analyzed a limited dataset obtained through the IBM Watson Health Explorys. Matched cohorts were defined for: 1) patients treated with opioids during the ED encounter (ED-Opioid) vs. neither opioid or benzodiazepine treatment (No medication) (n = 5372); 2) patients treated with opioids and benzodiazepines during the ED encounter (ED-Opioid+Benzodiazepines) vs. No Medication (n = 2454); and 3) ED-Opioid+Benzodiazepines vs. ED-Opioid (n = 2454). Patients consisted of adults with an emergency department encounter in the MetroHealth System (Cleveland, Ohio) with a chief complaint of traumatic injury and medical records for five years following the encounter. Control patients for each cohort were matched to the exposure patients on demographics, body mass index, and residential zip code median income. Outcomes were five-year incidence rates for alcohol, substance use, depression, and anxiety-related diagnoses.

RESULTS

Our results indicate that, although receiving opioids during the ED visit predicted a relatively lower likelihood of subsequent substance use and mental health diagnoses, the brief co-use of benzodiazepines was strongly associated with poorer outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Even brief exposure to co-prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines during emergency traumatic injury care may be associated with negative substance use and mental health consequences in the years following the event.

Revealing Unknown Benefits of Existing Medications to Aid the Discovery of New Treatments for Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder

Objective

To systematically identify novel pharmacological strategies for preventing or treating post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) by leveraging large‐scale analysis of real‐world observational data.

Methods

Using a self‐controlled study design, the association between 1399 medications and the incidence of PTSD across four US insurance claims databases covering commercially insured, Medicare eligible, and Medicaid patients was examined. A validated algorithm for identifying PTSD in claims data was used, and medications were identified by their RxNorm ingredient. Medications used to treat PTSD or its symptoms (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics) were excluded. Medications associated with ≥30% reduction in risk of PTSD in ≥2 databases were identified.

Results

A total of 137,182,179 individuals were included in the analysis. Fifteen medications met the threshold criteria for a potential protective effect on PTSD; six were categorized as “primary signals” while the remaining nine were considered “potential signals”. The primary signals include a beta blocker that has been previously studied for PTSD, and five medications used to treat attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The potential signals include four medications used to treat substance use disorders and five medications used to treat sleep disorders.

Discussion

The medications identified in this analysis provide targets for further research in studies that are designed to examine specific hypotheses regarding these medications and the incidence of PTSD. This work may aid in discovering novel therapeutic approaches to treat PTSD, wherein new and effective treatments are badly needed.

Four large US‐based administrative claims databases were used to analyze the association between all marketed prescription medications and the outcome of incident post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

Of the 1399 medications examined, there were 15 that met the strict filtering criteria for showing consistent, moderate‐to‐strong, protective effects against the outcome

Medications fell into four main classes: (1) a beta blocker (propranolol), (2) five medications used to treat attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), (3) four medications used to treat substance use disorders and (4) five medications used to treat sleep disorders

These findings identify rational starting points for future hypothesis‐driven research to explore these associations in greater detail

Measuring the Effectiveness of Benzodiazepine Prescriptions Control in Community Setting Using Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP)

Benzodiazepines have been widely prescribed for several years for the treatment of anxiety, insomnia, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Benzodiazepines were meant to be for short term use but in clinical settings long term use has been the "norm" for the treatment. Benzodiazepines are known for addiction potential and have been involved in accidental overdose deaths. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), there has been a tenfold increase in the number of deaths due to overdose from 1999 to 2017. Benzodiazepines contributed to staggering high figures of 11,537 deaths in 2017 alone. Kentucky was ranked 4th in overdose related deaths in 2015 by CDC. Seeing this rise in overdose deaths, our community mental health clinics (CMHC) took the initiative to protect the community by removing benzodiazepines from the approved formulary in all adult outpatient community mental health clinics (total six clinics) in 2016. This project was initiated to protect the community from overdose deaths. In order to see the decrease in the benzodiazepine prescriptions, we did a quarterly Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting (KASPER) prescriber's reports to see the trend. The goal of this project was to monitor the trend of benzodiazepine prescription control in CMHC. Our hypothesis was implementation of CMHC "No Benzodiazepine" policy would decrease in the number of prescriptions. To implement this change, we made a committee to educate staff including physicians, APRN's and therapists. Patients were also educated and informed regarding benzodiazepine free policy. Education materials were posted in the clinics and handed over to patients. Patients were offered individual and group therapy sessions to learn coping skills to cope with their anxiety. Patients had the option of inpatient detoxification, if clinically indicated. No new patients were started on benzodiazepines and patients who were already on benzodiazepines were slowly titrated off. Slow titration over the course of a few months was done as needed and tolerated. Quarterly, prescriber's prescription reports were generated with the help of KASPER (KASPER is PDMP in the state of Kentucky). After analyzing quarterly reports over the span of 2 years, we concluded that there was a total of 89% decrease in benzodiazepine prescriptions. We are hoping to reach close to 100% in the next few years. We conduct a Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) which is a general patient satisfaction survey done annually. We used this data to monitor the change with this new policy. Open patients report was run to monitor any change in case load before and after the implementation of the policy. After compilation of the KASPER/ PDMP data of all the prescribers- MD's and APRN's, we found an 89% decrease in the number of benzodiazepines prescriptions over the span of 2 years. We did the open patients report and did not find any decrease in case load. In 2016, there were 10,359 open patients and in 2018 there were 12,266 open patients. We reviewed the MHSIP general patient satisfaction survey that is done annually, and we did not find any major difference in overall satisfaction as compared to previous years. These practice- based interventions implementing harm reduction strategies suggest that, although it was a difficult task, with strict adherence to no benzodiazepine policy, we were able to achieve a stark drop in the number of benzodiazepine prescriptions, in the span of 2 years, and have been able to continue to maintain the low numbers of benzodiazepine prescriptions.

'I can see clearly now': clarifying the role of psychiatry in global disaster

OBJECTIVE

First, to review the principles and practice of disaster psychiatry, in light of recent global events. Second, to identify opportunities for research.

METHOD

A literature review of the MEDLINE database, UpToDate and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Reference lists were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Psychiatrists are well-positioned to contribute to positive outcomes at all stages of the disaster response. These contributions derive from their roles as doctors, mental illness specialists and clinical leaders.

CONCLUSION

A novel framework for the psychiatrist's contributions was proposed. Specific knowledge of disaster psychiatry may be worthwhile, and establishment of a public disaster psychiatry centre is reasonable. Research should further examine the role of tele-psychiatry and pursue a best practice for community and front-line employee psychological preparedness.

Screening of the use of benzodiazepines during COVID-19 pandemic in the general population

Benzodiazepines have been commonly prescribed for the treatment of anxiety and insomnia in the last few decades. There has been a rising concern regarding safety of benzodiazepines due to overdose related deaths, addictions and cognitive side effects. COVID-19 pandemic is expected to cause a mental health crisis. Several studies have shown an increase in anxiety and insomnia. Тhe prescriptions of benzodiazepines could increase due to increase in anxiety and insomnia. The pandemic calls for a rapid adaptation of conventional medical practices to meet the evolving needs of such vulnerable patients. COVID-19 patients may frequently require treatment with psychotropic medications. This pandemic is leading to additional health problems such as stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, insomnia, denial, anger and fear, globally. The COVID-19 pandemic is a challenge to humanity. It is not only a health crisis but also a social crisis. The life is unlikely to be the same after we come out of the pandemic. There will be changes at the level of individuals, families, communities, states, nations, international relationships, and the way all of us will deal with a range of human and environmental situations. Disasters are always associated with increased rates of emotional health needs from distress to specific disorders, such as posttraumatic stress disorder. Past experiences have shown psychosocial interventions, ranging from self‑care, psychological first aid, counseling, social support and formal psychiatric care can minimize the emotional health impact of disasters. These activities can be initiated by individuals and professionals. Keywords: coronavirus, COVID-19, mental health, benzodiazepines

Theranostic pharmacology in PTSD: Neurobiology and timing

Recent reviews and treatment guidelines regard trauma-focused cognitive-behavior therapies as the treatments of choice for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, many patients do not engage in this treatment when it is available, drop out before completion, or do not respond. Medications remain widely used, alone and in conjunction with psychotherapy, although the limitations of traditional monoamine-based pharmacotherapy are increasingly recognized. This article will review recent developments in psychopharmacology for PTSD, with a focus on current clinical data that apply putative neurobiologic mechanisms to medication use-i.e., a theranostic approach. A theranostic approach however, also requires consideration of timing, pre, peri or post trauma in conjunction with underlying dynamic processes affecting synaptic plasticity, the HPA axis, hippocampal activation, PFC-amygdala circuitry and fear memory.

Drug treatment strategies for insomnia in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder

INTRODUCTION

Insomnia is among the most reported sleep disturbances in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The pervasiveness of this disorder among trauma-inflicted civilians and military personnel has been associated with reduced quality of life, impaired psychosocial functioning including cognitive impairments, negative mood swings, cardiovascular complications, and increased utilization of medical services.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the current state of science with respect to the impact of the most dispensed pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic insomnia. At the present, there are no established treatment algorithms for PTSD-related insomnia. Pharmacotherapy offers an alternative treatment modality for patients with PTSD who fail or decline cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Selection of a hypnotic/sedative agent should be based on the patient's history, precipitating and perpetuating factors of insomnia, side effect profile, and potential medication-related interactions. Antipsychotics and benzodiazepines appear ineffective or are associated with significant harm in treating PTSD-related insomnia.

EXPERT OPINION

In the absence of randomized controlled trials, prescription patterns have been guided by anecdotal reports and expert opinion. Due to the complexity and multifactorial etiology of insomnia in PTSD, clinical investigations should examine available pharmacologic agents in comparative trials or in combination with CBT or complementary therapies to assess both short-term and long-term sleep outcomes in this population.

Benzodiazepines I: Upping the Care on Downers: The Evidence of Risks, Benefits and Alternatives

Benzodiazepines are some of the most commonly prescribed medications in the world. These sedative-hypnotics can provide rapid relief for symptoms like anxiety and insomnia, but are also linked to a variety of adverse effects (whether used long-term, short-term, or as needed). Many patients take benzodiazepines long-term without ever receiving evidence-based first-line treatments (e.g., psychotherapy, relaxation techniques, sleep hygiene education, serotonergic agents). This review discusses the risks and benefits of, and alternatives to benzodiazepines. We discuss evidence-based indications and contraindications, and the theoretical biopsychosocial bases for effectiveness, ineffectiveness and harm. Potential adverse effects and drug-drug interactions are summarized. Finally, both fast-acting/acute and delayed-action/chronic alternative treatments for anxiety and/or insomnia are discussed. Response to treatment-whether benzodiazepines, other pharmacological agents, or psychotherapy-should be determined based on functional recovery and not merely sedation.

Treatment-refractory anxiety; definition, risk factors, and treatment challenges

A sizable proportion of psychiatric patients will seek clinical evaluation and treatment for anxiety symptoms reportedly refractory to treatment. This apparent lack of response is either due to “pseudo-resistance” (a failure to have received and adhered to a recognized and effective treatment or treatments for their condition) or to true “treatment resistance.” Pseudo-resistance can be due to clinician errors in selecting and delivering an appropriate treatment effectively, or to patient nonadherence to a course of treatment. True treatment resistance can be due to unrecognized exogenous anxiogenic factors (eg, caffeine overuse, sleep deprivation, use of alcohol or marijuana) or an incorrect diagnosis (eg, atypical bipolar illness, occult substance abuse, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder). Once the above factors are eliminated, treatment should focus on combining effective medications and cognitive behavioral therapy, combining several medications (augmentation), or employing novel medications or psychotherapies not typically indicated as first-line evidence-based anxiety treatments.

Prevention of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder After Trauma: Current Evidence and Future Directions

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a frequent, tenacious, and disabling consequence of traumatic events. The disorder's identifiable onset and early symptoms provide opportunities for early detection and prevention. Empirical findings and theoretical models have outlined specific risk factors and pathogenic processes leading to PTSD. Controlled studies have shown that theory-driven preventive interventions, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), or stress hormone-targeted pharmacological interventions, are efficacious in selected samples of survivors. However, the effectiveness of early clinical interventions remains unknown, and results obtained in aggregates (large groups) overlook individual heterogeneity in PTSD pathogenesis. We review current evidence of PTSD prevention and outline the need to improve the disorder's early detection and intervention in individual-specific paths to chronic PTSD.

Benzodiazepines for PTSD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although benzodiazepines (BZDs) are commonly used in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), no systematic review or meta-analysis has specifically examined this treatment. The goal of this study was to analyze and summarize evidence concerning the efficacy of BZDs in treating PTSD.

METHODS

The review protocol was undertaken according to the principles recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and is registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, registration number CRD42014009318). Two authors independently conducted a search of all relevant articles using multiple electronic databases and independently abstracted information from studies measuring PTSD outcomes in patients using BZDs. Eighteen clinical trials and observational studies were identified, with a total of 5236 participants. Outcomes were assessed using qualitative and quantitative syntheses, including meta-analysis.

RESULTS

BZDs are ineffective for PTSD treatment and prevention, and risks associated with their use tend to outweigh potential short-term benefits. In addition to adverse effects in general populations, BZDs are associated with specific problems in patients with PTSD: worse overall severity, significantly increased risk of developing PTSD with use after recent trauma, worse psychotherapy outcomes, aggression, depression, and substance use. Potential biopsychosocial explanations for these results are proposed based on studies that have investigated BZDs, PTSD, and relevant animal models.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review suggest that BZDs should be considered relatively contraindicated for patients with PTSD or recent trauma. Evidence-based treatments for PTSD should be favored over BZDs.

Disaster Management: Mental Health Perspective

Disaster mental health is based on the principles of 'preventive medicine' This principle has necessitated a paradigm shift from relief centered post-disaster management to a holistic, multi-dimensional integrated community approach of health promotion, disaster prevention, preparedness and mitigation. This has ignited the paradigm shift from curative to preventive aspects of disaster management. This can be understood on the basis of six 'R's such as Readiness (Preparedness), Response (Immediate action), Relief (Sustained rescue work), Rehabilitation (Long term remedial measures using community resources), Recovery (Returning to normalcy) and Resilience (Fostering). Prevalence of mental health problems in disaster affected population is found to be higher by two to three times than that of the general population. Along with the diagnosable mental disorders, affected community also harbours large number of sub-syndromal symptoms. Majority of the acute phase reactions and disorders are self-limiting, whereas long-term phase disorders require assistance from mental health professionals. Role of psychotropic medication is very limited in preventing mental health morbidity. The role of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in mitigating the mental health morbidity appears to be promising. Role of Psychological First Aid (PFA) and debriefing is not well-established. Disaster management is a continuous and integrated cyclical process of planning, organising, coordinating and implementing measures to prevent and to manage disaster effectively. Thus, now it is time to integrate public health principles into disaster mental health.

The role of early pharmacotherapy in the development of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms after traumatic injury: an observational cohort study in consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

Pharmacological intervention during traumatic memory consolidation has been suggested to prevent posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The aim of this study was to examine the association between prescription of early pharmacotherapy and the risk of developing PTSD symptoms following traumatic injury.

METHOD

The use of opiate analgesics, beta-adrenergic blockers, corticosteroids and benzodiazepines within 48 h postinjury was documented based on hospital charts for 629 Level 1 trauma center patients. PTSD symptoms were assessed using structured clinical interviews. Primary outcome was 6-week PTSD symptoms. Secondary outcomes were PTSD diagnoses at 6 weeks and during 1 year posttrauma.

RESULTS

Linear regression analyses showed that opiate administration within 48 h was negatively associated with PTSD symptoms at 6 weeks (β=-0.14, P=.009) after controlling for demographic and injury-related characteristics and concurrent pharmacotherapy. Fewer patients with opiates had a PTSD diagnosis at 6 weeks (P=.047) and during 1 year posttrauma (P=.013) than patients with none of the specified pharmacotherapies. Low prescription frequency of beta-blockers (3.8%), corticosteroids (2.2%) and benzodiazepines (7.8%) precluded further examination of their role in the development of PTSD symptoms because of limited statistical power.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests a possible beneficial influence of opiate administration within 48 h posttrauma on the development of PTSD symptoms. Future studies may evaluate the effectiveness of inhospital opiate analgesics compared to placebo in preventing PTSD and may focus on the mechanisms underlying the effect of opiates in preventing PTSD.

Pharmacological interventions for preventing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating disorder which, after a sufficient delay, may be diagnosed amongst individuals who respond with intense fear, helplessness or horror to traumatic events. There is some evidence that the use of pharmacological interventions immediately after exposure to trauma may reduce the risk of developing of PTSD.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of pharmacological interventions for the prevention of PTSD in adults following exposure to a traumatic event.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Register (CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References) (to 14 February 2014). This register contains relevant reports of randomised controlled trials from the following bibliographic databases: CENTRAL (all years); EMBASE (1974 to date); MEDLINE (1950 to date) and PsycINFO (1967 to date). We identified unpublished trials by searching the National Institute of Health (NIH) Reporter, the metaRegister of Controlled Trials database (mRCT) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (to December 2013). We scanned the reference lists of articles for additional studies. We placed no constraints on language and setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We restricted studies to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacological interventions compared with placebo for the prevention of PTSD in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors (TA and JI) independently assessed trials for eligibility and inclusion based on the review selection criteria. We independently extracted sample, methodological, outcome and 'Risk of bias' data, as well as the number of side effects, from each trial and entered these into a customised data extraction form. We contacted investigators for missing information. We calculated summary statistics for continuous and dichotomous variables (if provided). We did not undertake subgroup analyses due to the small number of included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine short-term RCTs (duration 12 weeks or less) in the analysis (345 participants; age range 18 to 76 years). Participants were exposed to a variety of traumas, ranging from assault, traffic accidents and work accidents to cardiac surgery and septic shock. Seven studies were conducted at single centres. The seven RCTs included four hydrocortisone studies, three propranolol studies (of which one study had a third arm investigating gabapentin), and single trials of escitalopram and temazepam. Outcome assessment measures included the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D).In four trials with 165 participants there was moderate quality evidence for the efficacy of hydrocortisone in preventing the onset of PTSD (risk ratio (RR) 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.56; P value = 0.004), indicating that between seven and 13 patients would need to be treated with this agent in order to prevent the onset of PTSD in one patient. There was low quality evidence for preventing the onset of PTSD in three trials with 118 participants treated with propranolol (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.59; P value = 0.32). Drop-outs due to treatment-emergent side effects, where reported, were low for all of the agents tested. Three of the four RCTs of hydrocortisone reported that medication was more effective than placebo in reducing PTSD symptoms after a median of 4.5 months after the event. None of the single trials of escitalopram, temazepam and gabapentin demonstrated evidence that medication was superior to placebo in preventing the onset of PTSD.Seven of the included RCTs were at a high risk of bias. Differential drop-outs between groups undermined the results of three studies, while one study failed to describe how the allocation of medication was concealed. Other forms of bias that might have influenced study results included possible confounding through group differences in concurrent medication and termination of the study based on treatment response.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate quality evidence for the efficacy of hydrocortisone for the prevention of PTSD development in adults. We found no evidence to support the efficacy of propranolol, escitalopram, temazepam and gabapentin in preventing PTSD onset. The findings, however, are based on a few small studies with multiple limitations. Further research is necessary in order to determine the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in preventing PTSD and to identify potential moderators of treatment effect.

Memory suppression trades prolonged fear and sleep-dependent fear plasticity for the avoidance of current fear

Sleep deprivation immediately following an aversive event reduces fear by preventing memory consolidation during homeostatic sleep. This suggests that acute insomnia might act prophylactically against the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) even though it is also a possible risk factor for PTSD. We examined total sleep deprivation and memory suppression to evaluate the effects of these interventions on subsequent aversive memory formation and fear conditioning. Active suppression of aversive memory impaired retention of event memory. However, although the remembered fear was more reduced in sleep-deprived than sleep-control subjects, suppressed fear increased, and seemed to abandon the sleep-dependent plasticity of fear. Active memory suppression, which provides a psychological model for Freud's ego defense mechanism, enhances fear and casts doubt on the potential of acute insomnia as a prophylactic measure against PTSD. Our findings bring into question the role of sleep in aversive-memory consolidation in clinical PTSD pathophysiology.

Predictors of acute stress disorder severity

BACKGROUND

The DSM-IV diagnosis of acute stress disorder (ASD) describes a posttraumatic reaction that occurs two to twenty-eight days following a trauma and involves symptoms of intrusion, avoidance, hyper-arousal and dissociation. A better understanding of ASD and its pathogenesis could lead to improved post-trauma health care interventions. The aim of this study was to determine prospectively whether a combination of clinical, cognitive and demographic variables were predictive of ASD severity in an acutely traumatized sample.

METHODS

We assessed demographic (e.g. age, gender, education), clinical (e.g. sleep quality, trait anxiety, previous psychiatric diagnoses), and cognitive (e.g. negative cognitions following trauma) variables in a sample of 125 adult motor vehicle accident survivors (age: 32.26±9.99; gender: 56.6% male) approximately 10 days after the accident. Univariate analyes and stepwise linear regression were performed to identify variables predictive of ASD severity.

RESULTS

Although a number of factors were individually associated with ASD severity, in a regression model only 3 factors, trait anxiety, suicide risk and post-traumatic cognitions, emerged as predictive of the severity of the disorder.

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional nature of the study and use of self-report measures are important to bear in mind.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher levels of trait anxiety, risk for suicide and negative appraisals of the traumatic event were predictive of ASD severity. As these factors may help to identify those who may be at risk of more severe responses after a traumatic event, and who may benefit from secondary prevention strategies, they should be assessed for in acute trauma survivors.

Sleep deprivation facilitates extinction of implicit fear generalization and physiological response to fear

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine hormones, which regulate both homeostasis and stress responses, provide homeostatic recovery and sleep suppression to brains under stress. We examined the effects of total sleep deprivation on subsequent enhancement of aversive event memory, implicit fear recognition, and fear conditioning in healthy humans.

METHODS

Three different recognitions (explicit event, implicit emotion, and physiological response) were assessed in two groups of 14 healthy young volunteers (sleep control and sleep deprived) with aversive (motor vehicle accident films) and nonaversive episodic memory stimuli. Both groups were tested on Day 1 of the experiment and again on Days 3 and 10; the sleep-deprived group was totally deprived of initial nocturnal sleep after the first trial on Day 1.

RESULTS

Event recognition performances were similar in both groups throughout the study. Implicit fear recognition remained high for aversive stimuli, with generalization of implicit fear recognition occurring for nonaversive stimuli on Day 3 in the sleep control group. Physiological fear and generalized fear responses were observed for every episode, and delayed enhancement of physiological response was only observed for misidentified aversive episodes in the sleep control group on Day 3. However, in the sleep-deprived group, generalization of implicit fear recognition for nonaversive stimuli on Day 3 and all physiological and generalized fear responses on Days 3 and 10 were comprehensively extinguished.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically, trauma-exposed victims often experience acute insomnia, indicating that such insomnia might provide prophylactic benefits in reducing the development of posttraumatic stress disorder via extinction of the fear-magnifying effects of memory.

Pharmacotherapy of PTSD: premises, principles, and priorities

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent anxiety disorder that results in multiple disabling symptoms. Research into the underlying neurobiology has implicated dysregulation in multiple neurotransmitter systems including norepinephrine, serotonin, and glutamate as well as the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Understanding how these biological systems interact with each other and how they may affect key neural structures, such as the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex, to produce post-traumatic symptoms is critical for the development of effective pharmacological treatments. We briefly discuss the proposed biological dysfunctions underlying PTSD and how agents that target these dysfunctions may be utilized in PTSD. We then provide a review of the different pharmacological agents that have been investigated in PTSD. These drugs include: antidepressants, anti-adrenergic agents, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, atypical antipsychotics, and novel agents.

Pharmacotherapeutic treatment of nightmares and insomnia in posttraumatic stress disorder: an overview of the literature

Sleep disturbances are hallmark symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Where the subjective experience of nightmares and insomnia in PTSD patients is very real indeed and demands treatment, objective research findings on disordered sleep architecture in PTSD are inconclusive and inconsistent. After reviewing the literature an insufficient number of controlled studies are published to formulate evidence-based guidelines. Several studies have methodological limitations, such as small group sizes and heterogenic samples. Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) need to be conducted in order to further develop adequate therapeutic interventions. Objective parameters for insomnia and nightmares need to be identified for understanding underlying mechanisms of disturbed sleep in PTSD, and for evaluating therapy.

Pharmacotherapy for disordered sleep in post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review

Sleep disorders, such as insomnia and nightmares, are common problems in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), exert a strong negative influence on the quality of life and are a great challenge for clinical psychiatry. Several studies have reported on the efficacy of drugs for the treatment of PTSD-related sleep disorders. These studies have not been systematically reviewed. This is the first review on the effectiveness of sleep medication in PTSD. We performed a Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library Indexed search, using the keywords: PTSD, pharmacotherapy, therapy, sleep, nightmares, insomnia and review. From this database, English-language, human subject, data driven papers published after 1980 were selected. Forty eight articles are discussed. Open-label and case studies suggest efficacy for some antidepressants, anticonvulsants and atypical antipsychotics. Only a few placebo-controlled studies have been published. They show promising results for the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine, and the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin. In comparison to the incidence and impact of sleep complaints in PTSD, the pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for PTSD-related sleep complaints remains poorly investigated. Some recent studies show promising results, especially for alpha1-adrenoceptor and 5-HT2 receptor antagonists. However, randomized controlled trials with larger populations need to be conducted.

Pharmacotherapy for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

BACKGROUND

Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent and disabling disorder. Evidence that PTSD is characterised by specific psychobiological dysfunctions has contributed to a growing interest in the use of medication in its treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of medication for post traumatic stress disorder.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group specialised register (CCDANCTR-Studies) on 18 August 2005, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 2004), PsycINFO (1966 to 2004), and the National PTSD Center Pilots database. Reference lists of retrieved articles were searched for additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacotherapy for PTSD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two raters independently assessed RCTs for inclusion in the review, collated trial data, and assessed trial quality. Investigators were contacted to obtain missing data. Summary statistics were stratified by medication class, and by medication agent for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Dichotomous and continuous measures were calculated using a random effects model, heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup/sensitivity analyses were undertaken.

MAIN RESULTS

35 short-term (14 weeks or less) RCTs were included in the analysis (4597 participants). Symptom severity for 17 trials was significantly reduced in the medication groups, relative to placebo (weighted mean difference -5.76, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -8.16 to -3.36, number of participants (N) = 2507). Similarly, summary statistics for responder status from 13 trials demonstrated overall superiority of a variety of medication agents to placebo (relative risk 1.49, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.73, number needed to treat = 4.85, 95% CI 3.85 to 6.25, N = 1272). Medication and placebo response occurred in 59.1% (N = 644) and 38.5% (628) of patients, respectively. Of the medication classes, evidence of treatment efficacy was most convincing for the SSRIs. Medication was superior to placebo in reducing the severity of PTSD symptom clusters, comorbid depression and disability. Medication was also less well tolerated than placebo. A narrative review of 3 maintenance trials suggested that long term medication may be required in treating PTSD.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Medication treatments can be effective in treating PTSD, acting to reduce its core symptoms, as well as associated depression and disability. The findings of this review support the status of SSRIs as first line agents in the pharmacotherapy of PTSD, as well as their value in long-term treatment. However, there remain important gaps in the evidence base, and a continued need for more effective agents in the management of PTSD.

Tiagabine for posttraumatic stress disorder: effects of open-label and double-blind discontinuation treatment

RATIONALE

Preliminary results suggest a potential benefit of agents that enhance gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission in treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

OBJECTIVES

It is the aim of this study to evaluate the effect of a selective GABA reuptake inhibitor (SGRI), tiagabine, in patients with PTSD.

METHODS

Twenty-nine adult outpatients with PTSD were treated with open-label tiagabine for 12 weeks. Those who responded to treatment (i.e., demonstrated at least minimal clinical improvement) were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either tiagabine or matching placebo. Efficacy assessments included measures of PTSD, anxiety, depression, sleep quality, resilience, and disability. Safety evaluation included changes in vital signs and weight and treatment-emergent adverse events.

RESULTS

In subjects completing open-label treatment (n=19), significant improvement was observed on all outcome measures (P<0.05) and the treatment was well tolerated. Eighteen subjects responded and were randomized into the double-blind phase. Following randomization, benefits of treatment were generally upheld, but there was no greater incidence of relapse in the placebo group. However, continued treatment with tiagabine was associated with a greater trend toward likelihood of remission than if one was switched to placebo (P<0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest a possible role for the SGRI tiagabine in the treatment of PTSD. As the role of GABAergic drugs in PTSD is poorly defined, larger, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are needed.

Effects of traumatic stress on brain structure and function: relevance to early responses to trauma

The events of 9/11 and the widening impact of psychological trauma today have raised a higher level of awareness about the potentially deleterious effects of psychological trauma on the individual. One area of interest after 9/11 was the early trauma response and the most effective way to deal with the window of time immediately after traumatization in order to prevent long term psychopathology. Understanding the neurobiology of the acute trauma response may be useful in designing prevention and treatment strategies. Studies in animals and humans have shown that biological stress response systems, including norepinephrine and cortisol, are affected in both the acute and chronic stages of the trauma response. Brain areas involved in memory, including the hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex, may be areas of intervention to ameliorate the early trauma response. Due to the difficulty of performing research in this time period, most research to date has been in patients with chronic disorders such as chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Only a few treatment studies have been performed in the early trauma period, and more research in this area is needed.

Treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: strategies for intervention

The mainstay of treatment for chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a combination of psychotherapy and medication treatments. The first-line medications for PTSD are antidepressants, with two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (sertraline and paroxetine) currently Food and Drug Administration-indicated for PTSD. However, many patients do not have an adequate response to antidepressants, therefore, combinations with other antidepressants or with other classes of psychotropic medication are often utilized to enhance the therapeutic response. Other agents that have been used include mood stabilizers, anti-adrenergics, anxiolytics, and atypical antipsychotics. The heterogeneity of symptom clusters in PTSD as well as the complex psychiatric comorbidities (eg, with depression or substance abuse) further support the notion that combinations of medications may be needed. To date, there is a paucity of data to support specific strategies for augmenting antidepressants in PTSD. This review will address representative existing studies and discuss several potential pharmacologic strategies for patients suffering from treatment-refractory PTSD.

Psychopharmacological possibilities in the acute disaster setting

This article focuses on possible psychopharmacological interventions in the immediate post disaster setting. As there is little evidence for the efficacy or effectiveness of such interventions-given the difficulty in performing randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled studies with these populations-the article will delineate the neurobiological basis for pathological sequelae and theoretical drug interventions targeting putative disease mechanisms.

The traumatized child at the emergency department

The emergency department child and adolescent psychiatrist is in the unique position of informing and helping emergency department providers address the traumatic impact of the cause of a child's emergency presentation and the potential iatrogenic exacerbation of the acute traumatic response. The child and adolescent psychiatrist must become a clinical traumatologist who provides the necessary consultation and education that lead to practice change in emergency department awareness and procedures and performs the optimal evaluation and interventions for children who present in psychiatric crisis.

Toward early pharmacological posttraumatic stress intervention

In the acute aftermath of exposure to extreme stress, nearly all trauma survivors experience one or more transient symptoms of stress. In the short run, these symptoms may serve an adaptive role and generally remit; in some cases, however, acute stress-related symptoms do not diminish and instead evolve into posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). At present it is not clear when and with whom to intervene. On one hand, it is possible that some responses, such as early intrusive memories, effectively recruit support from others and facilitate the psychological processing of trauma; on the other hand, failing to intervene clinically with a recently traumatized individual may permit the subsequent development of PTSD. In this review, we focus on potential pharmacologic interventions aimed at treating early symptoms of extreme arousal or dissociation with the hope of possibly preventing PTSD. To date there is almost no empirical data on effective pharmacologic interventions in the immediate aftermath of extreme psychological trauma. As a result, much of what is discussed in this review is speculative in nature

Acute stress reactions in adults

This article summarizes the literature on acute reactions to traumatic stress in adults. It describes their morphology, natural course, long-term outcome, and underlying biological factors, and outlines directions for management and research. It assumes two categories of responses: those that mediate survival and those related to learning and adaptation. The complementary roles of fear conditioning, processing novelty, and adjusting to change are discussed.

Pharmacotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: a comprehensive review

Significant advances have been made in the past 5 years in defining efficacious treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Currently, sertraline is the first and only FDA-approved medication for this complex and often chronic illness. Other serotonergic antidepressants, such as paroxetine, fluoxetine and nefazodone, have well-controlled or replicated open-label evidence of efficacy. Anticonvulsants are also being studied as potential alternatives to treatment. Finally, atypical antipsychotic medications have shown promise in open-label trials. Clearly, more controlled studies are needed. This is especially true in males and in combat trauma-induced PTSD, where the effects of pharmacotherapy are less robust than in females or civilian trauma-induced PTSD. Also, there are virtually no data on pharmacotherapy for acute stress reaction or for PTSD in children. Future directions for research may focus on combination treatment in the more treatment-resistant patient populations.

The psychobiology and psychopharmacology of PTSD

This paper reviews the currently available knowledge about the psychobiology and psychopharmacology of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It also reviews the various studies that have elucidated changes in brain function and structure in PTSD populations, including position emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and event-related potential (ERP) studies. It then reviews the literature on catecholamine and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis abnormalities in PTSD, and finally reviews the literature available on the psychopharmacology of PTSD. It discusses how the pathophysiology of PTSD determines the nature of psychopharmacological interventions. Psychopharmacological interventions in PTSD are largely limited to good studies on the effects of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In order to effectively intervene in PTSD, studies of other psychopharmacological agents are necessary, specifically of agents which affect limbic activation, decreased frontal lobe functioning, altered HPA activity, and other biological features of PTSD. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The use of hypnosis in emergency medicine

Hypnosis can be a useful adjunct in the emergency department setting. Its efficacy in various clinical applications has been replicated in controlled studies. Application to burns, pain, pediatric procedures, surgery, psychiatric presentations (e.g., coma, somatoform disorder, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress), and obstetric situations (e.g., hyperemesis, labor, and delivery) are described. Negative effects are discussed.

Treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder

OBJECTIVE

To thoroughly and critically review the pharmacologic treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and to review the symptomatology, diagnosis, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and assessment of PTSD.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1966-October 1999) in the English language specifying PTSD drug treatment as the search term was used to identify articles.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All articles identified were reviewed; emphasis was given to randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

It appears that a five-week medication trial is necessary to assess clinical effects on PTSD symptoms. The monoamine oxidase inhibitors appear to be superior to the tricyclic antidepressants in improving reexperiencing and avoidance symptoms. Most studies used assessment tools that neglected hyperarousal symptoms; therefore, no conclusions regarding this symptom cluster can be drawn. Other pharmacotherapeutic interventions reported in open-label trials have yielded varying success.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature does not bear a sufficient number of double-blind, placebo-controlled studies using assessment tools that evaluate the three symptom clusters of PTSD to allow for a definite treatment modality to be formulated. Nonetheless, a treatment hierarchy appears to be in order based on the greatest number of double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating antidepressants. Alternate modalities such as mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, and adrenergic blockers should not be considered the mainstays of therapy.

Pharmacotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder

BACKGROUND

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent and disabling disorder. By definition prior psychological trauma plays a causal role in the disorder, and psychotherapy is a widely accepted intervention. Nevertheless there is growing evidence that PTSD is characterized by specific psychobiological dysfunctions, and this has contributed to a growing interest in the use of medication in its treatment.

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to undertake a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the pharmacotherapy of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following the guidelines and using the software of the Cochrane Collaboration, and to provide an estimate of the effects of medication in this disorder. Secondary objectives were to explore questions about whether particular classes of medication are more effective and/or acceptable than others in the treatment of PTSD, and about which factors (clinical and methodological) predict response to pharmacotherapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies of the pharmacotherapy of PTSD were identified using literature searches of MEDLINE (1966 to 1999, using the textwords posttraumatic, post-traumatic, medication, pharmacotherapy) and other electronic databases (PSYCLIT; National PTSD Center Pilots database; Dissertation Abstracts; Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety & Neurosis Controlled Trials Register). In addition, published and unpublished RCTs were requested from PTSD researchers and pharmaceutical companies. An initial broad strategy was undertaken to find not only RCTs, but also open-label trials and reviews of the pharmacotherapy of PTSD; additional studies were sought in reference lists of retrieved articles and included studies in any language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs of PTSD (including both placebo controlled and comparative trials), whether published or unpublished, but completed prior to the end of 1999 were considered for the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Selected RCTs were independently assessed and collated by 2 raters, and Review Manager (RevMan) software was used to capture data on treatment response and PTSD symptom ratings. Ratings of subtypes of PTSD symptoms (intrusive/re-experiencing, avoidant/numbing, hyperarousal), of comorbid symptoms (depression, anxiety), and of quality of life were included where possible. A range of additional information, which may explain possible clinical and methodological heterogeneity amongst the trials, was also captured. Summary statistics for dichotomous and continous measures were calculated, heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup/sensitivity analyses undertaken.

MAIN RESULTS

15 short-term (12 weeks or less) RCTs were found, of which 9 had sufficient data for inclusion in the analysis. Methodological limitations were particularly apparent in early work; these included short (5 weeks or less) duration of trials and a reliance on self-report scales (rather than use of standardized clinician-rated scales). Despite these and other potentially important differences between the trials, many trials demonstrated efficacy for medication over placebo. Summary statistics were calculated for the Clinical Global Impressions scale change item (CGI-C) or close equivalent from 10 sets of data including various antidepressants and other agents - the proportion of non-responders was lower in the pharmacotherapy group than in the control group (relative risk (95% CI) = 0.72 (0.64, 0.83)). Similarly, summary statistics for the intrusion, avoidance and total scales of the Impact of Events Scale (IES) from 4sets of data again including various agents showed a statistically (and clinically) significant difference between medication and placebo (Weighted Mean Difference (95% CI) = -3.81 (-6.72,-0.91), -3.31(-5.24,-1.37), -7.18 (-11.86,-2.50) respectively).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Medication treatments can be effective in PTSD, acting to reduce its core symptoms, and should be considered as part of the treatment of this disorder. The existing evidence base does not provide sufficient data to suggest particular predictors of response to treatment, or to demonstrate that any particular class of medication is more effective or better tolerated than any other. However, the largest trials showing efficacy to date have been with the SSRIs, and in contrast, there have been negative studies of some agents. Given the high prevalence and enormous personal and societal costs of PTSD, there is a need for additional controlled trials in this area. Additional questions for future research include the effects of medication on quality of life in PTSD, appropriate dose and duration of medication, the use of medication in different trauma groups, in pediatric and geriatric subjects, and the value of early (prophylactic), combined (with psychotherapy), and long-term (maintenance) medication treatment.