Oral administration of rapamycin and cyclosporine differentially alter intestinal function in rabbits

Immunosuppressive drugs and the gastrointestinal tract in renal transplant patients

Gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort is common after renal transplantation and can be caused by the use of various immunosuppressive drugs. GI symptoms affect the quality of life, lead to an impaired graft survival and an increased mortality. Moreover, diseases and disturbances of the GI tract also affect the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs. This review addresses the interaction between immunosuppressive agents and GI disorders. The GI tract is involved in the metabolism of several immunosuppressive drugs. Calcineurin inhibitors, mTor inhibitors, and corticosteroids are subjected to metabolism by the intestinal cytochrome P450 (CYP3A) and by the drug efflux pump ABCB1. Mycophenolate is partly metabolized in the stomach and intestine and undergoes enterohepatic recirculation. Gastrointestinal disturbances can lead to a modified exposure to immunosuppressive drugs. In the first and second part of this review, we focus on the role of the GI tract in the pharmacokinetics of the immunosuppressive drugs and how to adjust immunosuppressive therapy in patients with vomiting, need for tube feeding, delayed gastric emptying, intestinal resection, and diarrhea. In the third part, we review the GI adverse effects of the various immunosuppressive drugs, with special attention for diarrhea and dyspepsia. Finally, we discuss the effects of drugs used for relief of GI complaints on the exposure to immunosuppressive agents.

Intestinal Epithelial-Specific mTORC1 Activation Enhances Intestinal Adaptation After Small Bowel Resection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Intestinal adaptation is a compensatory response to the massive loss of small intestine after surgical resection. We investigated the role of intestinal epithelial cell-specific mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (i-mTORC1) in intestinal adaptation after massive small bowel resection (SBR).

METHODS

We performed 50% proximal SBR on mice to study adaptation. To manipulate i-mTORC1 activity, Villin-Cre^ER transgenic mice were crossed with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)1^flox/flox or Raptor^flox/flox mice to inducibly activate or inactivate i-mTORC1 activity with tamoxifen. Western blot was used to confirm the activity of mTORC1. Crypt depth and villus height were measured to score adaptation. Immunohistochemistry was used to investigate differentiation and rates of crypt proliferation.

RESULTS

After SBR, mice treated with systemic rapamycin showed diminished structural adaptation, blunted crypt cell proliferation, and significant body weight loss. Activating i-mTORC1 via TSC1 deletion induced larger hyperproliferative crypts and disorganized Paneth cells without a significant change in villus height. After SBR, ablating TSC1 in intestinal epithelium induced a robust villus growth with much stronger crypt cell proliferation, but similar body weight recovery. Acute inactivation of i-mTORC1 through deletion of Raptor did not change crypt cell proliferation or mucosa structure, but significantly reduced lysozyme/matrix metalloproteinase-7-positive Paneth cell and goblet cell numbers, with increased enteroendocrine cells. Surprisingly, ablation of intestinal epithelial cell-specific Raptor after SBR did not affect adaptation or crypt proliferation, but dramatically reduced body weight recovery after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic, but not intestinal-specific, mTORC1 is important for normal adaptation responses to SBR. Although not required, forced enterocyte mTORC1 signaling after resection causes an enhanced adaptive response.

Rapamycin Inhibition of mTOR Reduces Levels of the Na+/H+ Exchanger 3 in Intestines of Mice and Humans, Leading to Diarrhea

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The immunosuppressant rapamycin frequently causes noninfectious diarrhea in organ transplant recipients. We investigated the mechanisms of this process.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of renal transplant recipients treated with rapamycin from 2003 through 2010 at Albany Medical College, collecting data on serum levels of rapamycin. Levels of the Na+/H+ exchanger 3 (NHE3) were measured in human ileal biopsy specimens from patients who did and did not receive rapamycin (controls), in ileum tissues from rats or mice given rapamycin, and in mice with intestine-specific disruption of mammalian target of rapamycin (Mtor) (mTOR(f/f):Villin-cre mice) or Atg7 (Atg7(flox/flox); Villin-Cre). Exchange activity and intestinal water absorption were measured using a pH-sensitive dye and small intestine perfusion, respectively.

RESULTS

Episodes of noninfectious diarrhea occurred in organ recipients after increases in serum levels of rapamycin. The expression of NHE3 was reduced in the ileal brush border of patients with diarrhea. In rats and mice, continuous administration of low doses of rapamycin reduced levels of NHE3 in intestinal tissues; this effect was not observed in mice with intestinal deletion of ATG7, indicating that autophagy is required for the reduction. Administration of single high doses of rapamycin to mice, to model the spikes in rapamycin levels that occur in patients with severe diarrheal episodes, resulted in reduced phosphorylation of S6 and AKT in ileal tissues, indicating inhibition of the mTOR complex (mTORC1 and mTORC2). The intestines of mice with intestine-specific deletion of mTOR were dilated and contained large amounts of liquid stools; they also had reduced levels of total NHE3 and NHERF1 compared with control mice. We observed a significant reduction in Na(+)/H(+) exchange activity in ileum tissues from these mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapamycin inhibition of mTOR reduces levels of NHE3 and Na(+)/H(+) exchange activity in intestinal tissues of patients and rodents. This process appears to require the autophagic activity mediated by ATG7. Loss of mTOR regulation of NHE3 could mediate the development of diarrhea in patients undergoing rapamycin therapy.

Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement

The use of oral anticancer drugs has increased during the last decade, because of patient preference, lower costs, proven efficacy, lack of infusion-related inconveniences, and the opportunity to develop chronic treatment regimens. Oral administration of anticancer drugs is, however, often hampered by limited bioavailability of the drug, which is associated with a wide variability. Since most anticancer drugs have a narrow therapeutic window and are dosed at or close to the maximum tolerated dose, a wide variability in the bioavailability can have a negative impact on treatment outcome. This review discusses mechanisms of low bioavailability of oral anticancer drugs and strategies for improvement. The extent of oral bioavailability depends on many factors, including release of the drug from the pharmaceutical dosage form, a drug's stability in the gastrointestinal tract, factors affecting dissolution, the rate of passage through the gut wall, and the pre-systemic metabolism in the gut wall and liver. These factors are divided into pharmaceutical limitations, physiological endogenous limitations, and patient-specific limitations. There are several strategies to reduce or overcome these limitations. First, pharmaceutical adjustment of the formulation or the physicochemical characteristics of the drug can improve the dissolution rate and absorption. Second, pharmacological interventions by combining the drug with inhibitors of transporter proteins and/or pre-systemic metabolizing enzymes can overcome the physiological endogenous limitations. Third, chemical modification of a drug by synthesis of a derivative, salt form, or prodrug could enhance the bioavailability by improving the absorption and bypassing physiological endogenous limitations. Although the bioavailability can be enhanced by various strategies, the development of novel oral products with low solubility or cell membrane permeability remains cumbersome and is often unsuccessful. The main reasons are unacceptable variation in the bioavailability and high investment costs. Furthermore, novel oral anticancer drugs are frequently associated with toxic effects including unacceptable gastrointestinal adverse effects. Therefore, compliance is often suboptimal, which may negatively influence treatment outcome.

Diarrhea in solid-organ transplant recipients: a review of the evidence

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of the literature as it relates to diarrhea in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. In this article, we review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and management of diarrhea in SOT recipients and discuss recent advances and challenges.

METHODS

Two investigators conducted independent literature searches using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus until January 1st, 2013. All databases were searched using a combination of the terms diarrhea, solid organ transplant, SOT, transplant associated diarrhea, and transplant recipients. Articles that discussed diarrhea in SOT recipients were reviewed and relevant cross-references also read and evaluated for inclusion. Selection bias could be a possible limitation of the approach used in selecting or finding articles for this article.

FINDINGS

Post-transplant diarrhea is a common and distressing occurrence in patients, which can have significant deleterious effects on the clinical course and well-being of the organ recipient. A majority of cases are due to infectious and drug-related etiologies. However, various other etiologies including inflammatory bowel disease must be considered in the differential diagnosis. A step-wise, informed approach to post-transplant diarrhea will help the clinician achieve the best diagnostic yield. The use of diagnostic endoscopy should be preceded by exclusion of an infectious or drug-related cause of diarrhea. Empiric management with antidiarrheal agents, probiotics, and lactose-free diets may have a role in managing patients for whom no cause can be determined even after an extensive investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should be familiar with the common etiologies that result in post-transplant diarrhea. A directed approach to diagnosis and treatment will not only help to resolve the diarrhea but also prevent potentially life-threatening consequences including loss of the graft as well. Prospective studies are required to determine the etiology of post-transplant diarrhea in different clinical and geographic settings.

The usefulness and limitations of the diabetic macaque model in evaluating long-term porcine islet xenograft survival

BACKGROUND

  Various groups have reported prolonged diabetes reversal and graft function after porcine islet transplantation into diabetic macaques using different experimental designs (macaque source, islet source, type of immunosuppression): subsequently, the International Xenotransplantation Association has published recommendations for entering a clinical trial. Our experiments showed limitations that affected consistent achievement of long-term survival. We aimed to identify these limitations and underlying causes to emphasize the translational value of this highly relevant type 1 diabetic macaque model.

METHODS

  We reviewed data from our institution and literature data on long-term porcine islet xenograft survival in the diabetic macaque model, especially focusing on aspects of incomplete diabetes reversal relative to macaque normal values. This phenomenon was compared with diabetes reversal in an allo-islet transplant model in macaques and with chronic insulin treatment of diabetic macaques, all with 180-day follow-up. This comparison enabled to identify potential model limitations and underlying causative factors.

RESULTS

  Especially in the xenograft model, the achievement of long-term graft survival revealed limitations including chronic, mild hyperglycemia and absence of body weight (BW) gain or even progressive BW loss. Metabolic incompatibilities in glycemic control (i.e., insulin kinetics) between the pig and macaque species underlie chronic, mild hyperglycemia. This phenomenon might not bear relevance for the pig-to-human species combination because the glycemic control in pigs and humans is similar and differs from that in nonhuman primates (NHP). Weight loss could be related to changes in the gastrointestinal tract related with local high exposure to orally administered immunosuppressants; these must be given at higher dose levels because of low bioavailability in macaques to achieve systemic exposure at therapeutic levels. This is aggravated by insufficient graft insulin production in proportion to the needs of macaques: this model limitation has no translational value to the pig-to-human setting. Nutritional deficits can result in incorrect interpretation of blood glucose levels and C-peptide levels regarding graft function. Likewise, nutritional status alters physiologic responses, influencing susceptibility to infectious and noninfectious complications.

CONCLUSION

  THE model-induced confounding described interferes with accurate interpretation of safety and efficacy studies, which affects the translational value of pig-to-NHP islet cell transplant studies to the pig-to-human transplant condition.

Bone growth during rapamycin therapy in young rats

BACKGROUND

Rapamycin is an effective immunosuppressant widely used to maintain the renal allograft in pediatric patients. Linear growth may be adversely affected in young children since rapamycin has potent anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic properties.

METHODS

Weanling three week old rats were given rapamycin at 2.5 mg/kg daily by gavage for 2 or 4 weeks and compared to a Control group given equivalent amount of saline. Morphometric measurements and biochemical determinations for serum calcium, phosphate, iPTH, urea nitrogen, creatinine and insulin-growth factor I (IGF-I) were obtained. Histomorphometric analysis of the growth plate cartilage, in-situ hybridization experiments and immunohistochemical studies for various proteins were performed to evaluate for chondrocyte proliferation, chondrocyte differentiation and chondro/osteoclastic resorption.

RESULTS

At the end of the 2 weeks, body and tibia length measurements were shorter after rapamycin therapy associated with an enlargement of the hypertrophic zone in the growth plate cartilage. There was a decrease in chondrocyte proliferation assessed by histone-4 and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) expression. A reduction in parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone related peptide (PTH/PTHrP) and an increase in Indian hedgehog (Ihh) expression may explain in part, the increase number of hypertrophic chondrocytes. The number of TRAP positive multinucleated chondro/osteoclasts declined in the chondro-osseous junction with a decrease in the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa beta ligand (RANKL) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression. Although body and tibial length remained short after 4 weeks of rapamycin, changes in the expression of chondrocyte proliferation, chondrocyte differentiation and chondro/osteoclastic resorption which were significant after 2 weeks of rapamycin improved at the end of 4 weeks.

CONCLUSION

When given to young rats, 2 weeks of rapamycin significantly decreased endochondral bone growth. No catch-up growth was demonstrated at the end of 4 weeks, although markers of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation improved. Clinical studies need to be done to evaluate these changes in growing children.

Optimal dosing and duration of oral everolimus to inhibit in-stent neointimal growth in rabbit iliac arteries

BACKGROUND

Everolimus is an orally active derivative of sirolimus. Oral administration of rapamycin is efficacious in the reduction of neointima formation and clinical restenosis; however, its optimal dose and duration have not been determined.

METHODS

New Zealand White rabbits were divided into three groups. The first (low-dose) group received 1.5 mg/kg everolimus 1 day before stenting, followed by 0.75 mg/kg/day everolimus for 28 days. The second (high-dose) group received 6 mg/kg everolimus 1 day before, on the day of, and on the day after stenting, followed by 2 mg/kg/day for 4 days. The third (placebo) group received a matching volume of vehicle similar to that of Group 2. Twenty-eight days after stenting, animals were euthanized and morphometry was performed.

RESULTS

In the high-dose group, circulating everolimus levels corresponded with administrated dose levels; by Day 12, no circulating everolimus could be detected. In the low-dose everolimus group, levels remained constant up to 28 days. When compared with placebo, low-dose everolimus was associated with a significant reduction in medial thickness (32%), neointimal area (60%), and percent stent stenosis (33%); however, high-dose everolimus had no significant effect.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, oral everolimus suppresses in-stent neointimal growth in rabbit iliac arteries. Four weeks of low-dose everolimus is more effective than 7 days of high-dose everolimus.

Sirolimus-Induced Intractable Chronic Diarrhea: A Case Report

Sirolimus is a macrolide that is extensively used in transplant clinics. The most common side effects of sirolimus are hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, rash, and well-tolerated diarrhea. Herein I have reported a case of intractable, disabling, chronic diarrhea secondary to sirolimus in a renal transplant recipient. The sirolimus dose had been recently increased from 2 mg to 5 mg 1 month before the patient began to complain of severe diarrhea. In addition to the case presentation, the literature is reviewed as well as possible mechanisms of sirolimus-induced diarrhea are discussed. In conclusion, clinicians should consider sirolimus as a potential etiology for severe chronic diarrhea among patients who are treated with sirolimus.

Alterations in glucose metabolism by cyclosporine in rat brain slices link to oxidative stress: interactions with mTOR inhibitors

Co-administration of the calcineurin inhibitor cyclosporine and the mTOR inhibitors sirolimus or everolimus increases the efficacy of immunosuppression after organ transplantation. However, clinical studies showed enhancement of cyclosporine toxicity. To characterize the biochemical mechanisms involved, we assessed the time-dependent effects of cyclosporine in combination with mTOR inhibitors on energy production (ex vivo (31)P-MRS), glucose metabolism (ex vivo (13)C-MRS), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation (using the fluorescent agent 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate) in perfused rat brain slices. Cyclosporine alone inhibited energy production (ATP: 75+/-9%), the Krebs cycle (4-(13)C-glutamate from 1-(13)C-glucose: 61+/-27%), and oxidative phosphorylation (NAD(+): 62+/-25%) after 4 h of perfusion. After 10 h, activation of anaerobic glycolysis (3-(13)C-lactate: 140+/-17%) compensated for inhibition of mitochondrial energy production and lowered the intracellular pH. ROS formation was increased after 4 h (285+/-55% of untreated control), but not after 10 h. mTOR inhibitors alone inhibited lactate production. When combined with cyclosporine, sirolimus enhanced cyclosporine-induced inhibition of energy metabolism (ATP: 64+/-9%) and ROS formation (367+/-46%). Most importantly, sirolimus inhibited cytosolic glycolysis and therefore compensation for cyclosporine-induced ATP reduction after 10 h. In contrast to sirolimus, everolimus antagonized cyclosporine-induced inhibition of mitochondrial energy metabolism (ATP: 91+/-7%) and ROS formation (170+/-49%). The antioxidant tocopherol antagonized all cyclosporine effects on cell metabolism. Cyclosporine time-dependently inhibited mitochondrial metabolism and increased ROS, followed by compensation involving anaerobic glycolysis. Everolimus antagonized cyclosporine-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, whereas sirolimus inhibited compensatory anaerobic glycolysis, thus enhancing cyclosporine's negative effects. ROS play the key role in mediating the negative effects of cyclosporine on cell energy metabolism.

Therapeutics for rabbits

A variety of pharmacologic agents are currently available to treat house rabbits. In many cases, dosages are based on extrapolation from other species or empirical data. Dosing in rabbits is further complicated by individual variation. An understanding of rabbit physiology and the pharmacology of prescribed medications helps ensure that the agents are used as effectively and safely as possible. In this article, basic rabbit pharmacobiology is reviewed and techniques for drug administration are described. A formulary for house rabbits is provided.