1
|
Ratzel E, Pretzell IM, Kindler T, Weber M, Gerlach C. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement (PROM) under real-life conditions of non-curable cancer outpatients with the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS) and NCCN-Distress Thermometer - A mixed methods study. PEC INNOVATION 2024; 4:100264. [PMID: 38404931 PMCID: PMC10883829 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Objective Prospective cohort study to test the real-life feasibility of longitudinal patient-reported outcome measurement PROM (Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale IPOS, and NCCN Distress Thermometer DT) required for outpatients with non-curable lung or prostate cancer in comprehensive cancer centers. Methods Assessment with paper-based IPOS and DT was observed for 15 months. We analyzed response to patients' distress (requests for supportive and palliative services) following PROM. Focus groups to comprehensively explore the user experience of patients, informal caregivers and health care professionals (HCP) supplemented the analysis. Results Ninety-seven percent (125/129) of the patients received a questionnaire once, but quarterly assessment as recommended by certification committees was achieved only in 50% and 31% of prostate and lung cancer patients. Although both instruments were well accepted, only IPOS showed a high content validity, because some patients had difficulties in understanding the DT. Patients felt comfortable with completing the PROM, and HCP found PROM helped to structure the patient encounter. Due to organizational deficiencies in the handling of the instruments and operationalization of reactions to identified distress, the referrals to supportive and palliative services were rare. Conclusion To facilitate consequences from PROM it should be a standardized intervention rather than assessment alone. Innovation The patient perspective improves the implementation of PROM under real-life clinical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen Ratzel
- Interdisciplinary Department of Palliative Care, III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, Geb. 407, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Ina Maria Pretzell
- University Cancer Center Mainz (UCT Mainz), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Kindler
- University Cancer Center Mainz (UCT Mainz), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Germany
| | - Martin Weber
- Interdisciplinary Department of Palliative Care, III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, Geb. 407, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Christina Gerlach
- Interdisciplinary Department of Palliative Care, III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, Geb. 407, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Department of Palliative Care, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valjanow A, Weis J. One-to-one peer-coaching for patients with cancer - results of a pilot study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:385. [PMID: 39110146 PMCID: PMC11306543 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05913-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer is a life threatening disease with negative impact on quality of life and psychological well-being. In international studies, one-to-one peer support and counseling have been shown to improve the psychological well-being of cancer patients. In the study presented, we developed and evaluated an innovative program of peer-coaching. In this program at the University Hospital of Freiburg, cancer survivors were trained to support peers by sharing experience. METHODS In the project, N = 25 cancer survivors were trained to conduct supportive one-to-one conversations with acute patients or patients in aftercare. Based on a prospective observational study, patients were interviewed using questionnaires before and after the conversations. We assessed expectations and experiences with the peer-coaching as well as psychosocial parameters (PHQ9, GAD7, SSUK, NCCN-distress thermometer). RESULTS A total of 52 patients had at least one contact with a peer-coach. Most of the patients attended 1-3 sessions. In total, 85 contacts pairing peer-coaches with patients were conducted. Patients showed on average a high level of distress but a low rate of psychiatric comorbidity. The supportive conversations met the patients` needs. Sharing experiences and empowerment were the most relevant benefits for the patients. Both patients and trained peers showed high satisfaction levels with the program. CONCLUSION Our findings support the feasibility and utility of a peer-coaching program in which trained cancer survivors, acting as peer-coaches, support other patients during or after their oncological treatment. In a further study, the efficacy of peer-coaching should be investigated based on a randomized-controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (No. DRKS DRKS00017500) on 12.12.2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Valjanow
- Comprehensive-Cancer Centre Freiburg (CCCF), Department of Self-Help Research University Clinic, Medical Faculty of the Albert-Ludwigs University, Hugstetterstr. 49, Freiburg, 79106, Germany
| | - Joachim Weis
- Comprehensive-Cancer Centre Freiburg (CCCF), Department of Self-Help Research University Clinic, Medical Faculty of the Albert-Ludwigs University, Hugstetterstr. 49, Freiburg, 79106, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huber J, Karschuck P, Valdix J, Thomas C, Koch R, Ihrig A, Hölscher T, Krones T, Kessler E, Kliesch S, Linné C, Enders P, Michel MS, Wülfing C, Groeben C. Online decision aid for patients with prostate cancer evaluated by 11 290 patients and 91 urologists in Germany. BJU Int 2024; 134:239-248. [PMID: 38506410 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the nationwide online decision aid 'Entscheidungshilfe Prostatakrebs' (established in 2016, >11.000 users and 60 new users/week) for patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), from the perspective of patients and urologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS To provide personalised information, the tool collects most of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement standard set, personal preferences, psychological features, and a validated rating of the tool. To evaluate urologists' opinions, we developed a structured two-page questionnaire. All data were collected anonymously. RESULTS From June 2016 to December 2020, 11 290 patients used the PCa decision aid. Their median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 67 (61-72) years. The median (IQR) time from initial diagnosis to using the tool was 4 (3-7) weeks. In all, 87.7% of users reported high satisfaction. In a multivariable model, predictors for considering observation were higher knowledge, using the decision aid alone, lower oncological risk, normal erectile function, and respective personal preferences. Of 194 urologists, 91 (47%) had implemented the decision aid in their clinical practice. The urologists' mean (SD) satisfaction score (1 'very good'; 6 'unsatisfactory') with it was 1.45 (0.55), and 92% recommended it. Half of the urologists reported time savings. CONCLUSION Patients and urologists report a very high level of acceptance and satisfaction with this online tool. It offers advantages in shared decision-making and time efficiency. The usage of the decision aid might improve the adoption of active surveillance and watchful waiting when indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Huber
- Department of Urology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Karschuck
- Department of Urology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Johanna Valdix
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Rainer Koch
- Department of Urology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Ihrig
- Division of Psycho-Oncology, Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatic, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tanja Krones
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine University of Zürich, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Elke Kessler
- ASD Concepts GmbH & Co. KG - Institut für Patientenzentrierte Versorgungsformen, Reinheim, Germany
| | - Sabine Kliesch
- Department of Clinical and Surgical Andrology, Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Paul Enders
- Prostate Cancer Patient Support Organization of Germany (BPS), Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Christer Groeben
- Department of Urology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dörr A, Vogel I, Wittenbecher F, Westermann J, Thuss-Patience P, Ahn J, Pelzer U, Hardt J, Bullinger L, Flörcken A. Effective symptom relief through continuous integration of palliative care in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients: comprehensive measurement using the palliative care base assessment. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2024; 18:26323524241260424. [PMID: 39045295 PMCID: PMC11265252 DOI: 10.1177/26323524241260424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Due to modern therapies, survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been significantly prolonged. Nevertheless, patients suffering from advanced disease often present with severe symptoms. Early integration of palliative care into anti-cancer treatment has been shown to improve quality of life and may even prolong survival. Therefore, it is recommended to offer palliative care to patients with complex symptoms at the beginning of an advanced disease stage. To our knowledge, so far, no study has been conducted to examine the role of palliative care in patients with mRCC. Objectives This study aimed to assess the symptom burden and quality of life before and after an inpatient palliative care treatment. Design The study design is a retrospective observational study. Methods We included patients with mRCC, who were admitted to our palliative care unit between 2011 and 2017 due to severe symptoms. The symptom burden was assessed at admission, throughout treatment, and at discharge. The evaluation consisted of the palliative care base assessment and daily documentation of relevant symptoms. Results We evaluated 110 hospitalizations of 58 RCC patients. On average, patients were admitted to the palliative care unit 7 years after initial diagnosis (range 1-305 months). The median age was 70.5 years, 69% of the patients were male, 3% female. The main causes for admission were pain (52%) and dyspnea (26%), and the most frequent patient-reported symptoms were fatigue/exhaustion (87%), weakness (83%), and need for assistance with activities of daily living (83%). Multidisciplinary palliative care treatment led to a significant reduction in the median minimal documentation system (MIDOS) symptom score (15.6-9.9, p < 0.001), the median numeric pain rating scale (3-0, p < 0.001), and a significant reduction in mean ratings of the distress thermometer (5.5-3.1, p = 0.016). Conclusion Our analysis shows that the integration of palliative care treatment is effective throughout the disease in mRCC and could measurably reduce the symptom burden in our patient population. Palliative care should not be equated with end-of-life care but should rather be integrated throughout advanced disease, particularly as soon as a cure is impossible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Dörr
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Insa Vogel
- Department of Gynecology, Immanuel Klinikum Bernau, Herzzentrum Brandenburg, Bernau, Germany
| | - Friedrich Wittenbecher
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Westermann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Ahn
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Pelzer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Juliane Hardt
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department for Human Medicine, Institute for Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Herdecke, Germany
| | - Lars Bullinger
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anne Flörcken
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jansen C, Bäuerle A, Jahre LM, Kocol D, Krakowczyk J, Geiger S, Dörrie N, Skoda EM, Teufel M. Needs and Demands for e-Health Interventions in Patients Attending a Psychosomatic Outpatient Clinic: A Baseline Assessment for a User-Centered Design Approach. Telemed J E Health 2024; 30:e1747-e1756. [PMID: 38436236 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: Increased utilization of e-health services can help to meet shortages of psychotherapeutic treatment. e-Health interventions can be effective if tailored according to the individual needs and demands of the target group. To gather comprehensive data for the development of a user-centered e-health intervention, a cross-sectional study was conducted among a heterogeneous cohort of 309 patients seeking treatment or consultation at psychosomatic university hospital in a densely populated region of Germany. Methods: Sociodemographic data, psychometric dimensions of mental burden, as well as needs and demands regarding an e-health intervention were assessed. A descriptive statistical analysis and a cluster analysis were performed to examine distribution of preferences and differences based on level of burden regarding needs and demands for e-health interventions. Results: Two hundred thirty-nine (N = 239) participants were included in the final data analysis. Among this primarily urban target group smartphone availability was favored by 77.8% of the participants. The cluster analysis revealed significant differences dependent on mental burden. 75.2% of participants with a high mental burden preferred longer interventions of 1-4 months compared with 49% in the low burden group, which also considered short interventions of up to 1 month (46%). Differences were also identified for content preferences and daily-life integration and were consistent irrespective of the initial reason for consultation. Conclusion: The findings of this study can provide a foundational framework for developing user-centered psychosomatic interventions. The potential relationship between individual burden and individual needs and demands highlights the crucial role of preliminary research to tailor interventions to effectively address diverse needs and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Jansen
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Bäuerle
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lisa Maria Jahre
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dilara Kocol
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Julia Krakowczyk
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sheila Geiger
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nora Dörrie
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Skoda
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Teufel
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schläpfer S, Schneider F, Santhanam P, Eicher M, Kowatsch T, Witt CM, Barth J. Engagement With a Relaxation and Mindfulness Mobile App Among People With Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of Use Data and Self-Reports From a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Cancer 2024; 10:e52386. [PMID: 38819907 PMCID: PMC11179041 DOI: 10.2196/52386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile health (mHealth) apps offer unique opportunities to support self-care and behavior change, but poor user engagement limits their effectiveness. This is particularly true for fully automated mHealth apps without any human support. Human support in mHealth apps is associated with better engagement but at the cost of reduced scalability. OBJECTIVE This work aimed to (1) describe the theory-informed development of a fully automated relaxation and mindfulness app to reduce distress in people with cancer (CanRelax app 2.0), (2) describe engagement with the app on multiple levels within a fully automated randomized controlled trial over 10 weeks, and (3) examine whether engagement was related to user characteristics. METHODS The CanRelax app 2.0 was developed in iterative processes involving input from people with cancer and relevant experts. The app includes evidence-based relaxation exercises, personalized weekly coaching sessions with a rule-based conversational agent, 39 self-enactable behavior change techniques, a self-monitoring dashboard with gamification elements, highly tailored reminder notifications, an educational video clip, and personalized in-app letters. For the larger study, German-speaking adults diagnosed with cancer within the last 5 years were recruited via the web in Switzerland, Austria, and Germany. Engagement was analyzed in a sample of 100 study participants with multiple measures on a micro level (completed coaching sessions, relaxation exercises practiced with the app, and feedback on the app) and a macro level (relaxation exercises practiced without the app and self-efficacy toward self-set weekly relaxation goals). RESULTS In week 10, a total of 62% (62/100) of the participants were actively using the CanRelax app 2.0. No associations were identified between engagement and level of distress at baseline, sex assigned at birth, educational attainment, or age. At the micro level, 71.88% (3520/4897) of all relaxation exercises and 714 coaching sessions were completed in the app, and all participants who provided feedback (52/100, 52%) expressed positive app experiences. At the macro level, 28.12% (1377/4897) of relaxation exercises were completed without the app, and participants' self-efficacy remained stable at a high level. At the same time, participants raised their weekly relaxation goals, which indicates a potential relative increase in self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS The CanRelax app 2.0 achieved promising engagement even though it provided no human support. Fully automated social components might have compensated for the lack of human involvement and should be investigated further. More than one-quarter (1377/4897, 28.12%) of all relaxation exercises were practiced without the app, highlighting the importance of assessing engagement on multiple levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Schläpfer
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Schneider
- Centre for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Prabhakaran Santhanam
- Centre for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Manuela Eicher
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Kowatsch
- Centre for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- School of Medicine, University of St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Claudia M Witt
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jürgen Barth
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fehrenbach MK, Wilhelmy F, Wende T, Güresir E, Kasper J. Perioperative psychological distress in patients with intracranial tumors; a single center study. J Neurooncol 2024; 168:151-157. [PMID: 38563854 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04657-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Distress Thermometer (DT) was adopted to evaluate distress in neuro-oncology on a scale from 1 to 10. DT values above 4 indicate major distress and should initiate psycho(onco)logical co-therapy. However, data about peri-operative distress is scarce. Hence, we evaluated peri-operative distress levels in a neurosurgical patient cohort with various intracranial tumors using the DT. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study including inpatients with brain tumors who underwent surgery in our department between October 2015 and December 2019. Patients were routinely assessed for distress using the DT before or after initial surgery. A comparative analysis was performed via Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS 254 patients were eligible. Mean DT value of the entire cohort was 5.4 ± 2.4. 44.5% (n = 114) of all patients exceeded DT values of ≥ 6. In our cohort, poor post-operative neurological performance and occurrence of motor deficits were significantly associated with major distress. When analysed for peri-operative changes, DT values significantly declined within the male sub-cohort (6.0 to 4.6, p = 0.0033) after surgery but remained high for the entire cohort (5.7 and 5.3, p = 0.1407). Sub-cohort analysis for other clinical factors revealed no further significant changes in peri-operative distress. CONCLUSION Distress levels were high across the entire cohort which indicated a high need for psychological support. Motor deficits and poor post-operative neurological performance were significantly associated with DT values above 6. Distress levels showed little peri-operative variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael-Karl Fehrenbach
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Florian Wilhelmy
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tim Wende
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Erdem Güresir
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Johannes Kasper
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Springer F, Maier A, Friedrich M, Raue JS, Finke G, Lordick F, Montgomery G, Esser P, Brock H, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A. Digital Therapeutic (Mika) Targeting Distress in Patients With Cancer: Results From a Nationwide Waitlist Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e51949. [PMID: 38663007 PMCID: PMC11082740 DOI: 10.2196/51949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Distress is highly prevalent among patients with cancer, but supportive care needs often go unmet. Digital therapeutics hold the potential to overcome barriers in cancer care and improve health outcomes. OBJECTIVE This study conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of Mika, an app-based digital therapeutic designed to reduce distress across the cancer trajectory. METHODS This nationwide waitlist randomized controlled trial in Germany enrolled patients with cancer across all tumor entities diagnosed within the last 5 years. Participants were randomized into the intervention (Mika plus usual care) and control (usual care alone) groups. The participants completed web-based assessments at baseline and at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in distress from baseline to week 12, as measured by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer. Secondary outcomes included depression, anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue), and quality of life (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale). Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Analyses of covariance were used to test for outcome changes over time between the groups, controlling for baseline. RESULTS A total of 218 patients (intervention: n=99 and control: n=119) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Compared with the control group, the intervention group reported greater reductions in distress (P=.03; ηp²=0.02), depression (P<.001; ηp²=0.07), anxiety (P=.03; ηp²=0.02), and fatigue (P=.04; ηp²=0.02). Per-protocol analyses revealed more pronounced treatment effects, with the exception of fatigue. No group difference was found for quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Mika effectively diminished distress in patients with cancer. As a digital therapeutic solution, Mika offers accessible, tailored psychosocial and self-management support to address the unmet needs in cancer care. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) DRKS00026038; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00026038.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Springer
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Michael Friedrich
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Florian Lordick
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Guy Montgomery
- Center for Behavioral Oncology, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Peter Esser
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Hannah Brock
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schmidt KL, Kowalski A, Schweda A, Dörrie N, Skoda EM, Bäuerle A, Teufel M. Evaluation of a manualised neurofeedback training in psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic outpatient treatment (Neuro-pp-out): study protocol for a clinical mixed-methods pilot study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079098. [PMID: 38631828 PMCID: PMC11029405 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Electroencephalographic neurofeedback (NFB), as a non-invasive form of brainwave training, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of various mental health disorders. However, only few results regarding manualised and standardised NFB trainings exist. This makes comparison as well as replication of studies difficult. Therefore, we developed a standard manual for NFB training in patients with mental health disorders attending a psychosomatic outpatient clinic. The current study aims at investigating the conduction of a standardised manual for NFB training in patients with mental health disorders. If successful, the study provides new opportunities to investigate NFB in a more controlled and comparable manner in clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS 30 patients diagnosed with a mental health disorder will be included. After the educational interview, patients will undergo baseline diagnostics (T0). The subsequent intervention consists of 10 sessions of NFB training aiming at increasing sensorimotor rhythm and alpha-frequency amplitudes and decreasing theta-frequency and high beta-frequency amplitudes to induce relaxation and decrease subjective stress. All patients will undergo a post-treatment diagnostic assessment (T1) and a follow-up assessment 8 weeks following the closing session (T2). Changes in amplitude bands (primary outcome) will be recorded with electroencephalography during pre-assessments, post-assessments and follow-up assessments and during NFB sessions. Physiological (respiratory rate, blood volume pulse, muscle tension) and psychometric parameters (distress, perceived stress, relaxation ability, depressive and anxiety symptoms, insomnia, self-efficacy and quality of life) will be assessed at T0, T1 and T2. Moreover, satisfaction, acceptance and usability will be assessed at T1 after NFB training. Further, qualitative interviews about the experiences with the intervention will be conducted with NFB practitioners 6 months after the study starts. Quantitative data will be analysed using repeated measures analysis of variance as well as mediation analyses on mixed linear models. Qualitative data will be analysed using Mayring's content analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen (23-11140-BO) and patient enrolment began in April 2023. Before participation, written informed consent by each participant will be required. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Prospectively registered on 28 March 2023 in the German clinical trials register, DRKS00031497.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kira Leandra Schmidt
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Adam Schweda
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nora Dörrie
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Skoda
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Bäuerle
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Teufel
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Springer F, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Gebhardt C, Stolzenburg JU, Briest S. Unmet supportive care needs among cancer patients: exploring cancer entity-specific needs and associated factors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:190. [PMID: 38607426 PMCID: PMC11009727 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05715-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recognizing unmet care needs among cancer patients is crucial for improving a person-centered and tailored approach to survivorship care. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of unmet supportive care needs, pinpointing entity-specific areas of burden, and to identify factors associated with unmet needs within a diverse sample of cancer patients. METHODS In this cross-sectional sub-study of a large multicenter study, 944 adult cancer patients reported supportive care needs via the well-validated SCNS. Most frequent diagnoses included breast (n = 276), prostate (n = 237), hematological (n = 90) and gynecological cancer (n = 74), which were analyzed for entity-specific care needs. RESULTS Across most cancer entities, health system and information, and psychological needs were most commonly reported, with fear of the cancer spreading and information regarding cancer control/diminishment ranking as the most prevalent individual concerns. Notable differences in entity-specific needs emerged for gynecological cancer patients, who exhibited more psychological (p = 0.007, OR = 2.01) and physical needs (p = 0.005, OR = 2.02), and prostate cancer patients, who showed higher sexuality needs (p < 0.001, OR = 2.95) but fewer psychological (p < 0.001, OR = 0.55), physical (p < 0.001, OR = 0.31) and patient care needs (p = 0.006, OR = 0.62). Non-distressed participants had fewer supportive care needs in each domain (all p < 0.001). Patients with functional impairments and female respondents reported increased unmet needs across most domains. CONCLUSION The high prevalence of patients feeling inadequately informed about their disease and care aspects, particularly among those with functional impairments, reflects a key challenge in the healthcare system. Specific interventions and improvements in patient-doctor communication are essential to address cancer entity-specific care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Springer
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Claudia Gebhardt
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Susanne Briest
- Department of Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schnalke N, Tekampe E, Feige T, Frank A, Reichmann H, Falkenburger B, D'Souza S. Validation of the Distress Thermometer as a Screening Tool for Psychosocial Distress and Resilience in Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2024; 11:257-264. [PMID: 38468507 PMCID: PMC10928350 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with psychosocial distress that affects patients' quality of life. The distress thermometer (DT) is an 11-point visual analogue scale that is used as a screening tool for the assessment of psychosocial distress, originally developed for oncological diseases. OBJECTIVES To validate the DT for PD and to explore contributing factors. METHODS The DT scale was administered to 105 people with Parkinson's Disease (PwPD). Along with it, we assessed motor symptoms (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III [UPDRS III], Hoehn and Yahr-stage [H&Y]), non-motor symptoms (Non-motor Symptom Questionnaire [NMSQ]), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS], Fear of Progression-Questionnaire Short Form [FOP-Q-SF], Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 [GAD-7], 9-question Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]), the feeling of hope (Herth Hope Index [HHI]) and quality of life (Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life [SEIQoL]). RESULTS With a cut-off of 4, the DT identified PwPD with distress with a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 38%. With this cut-off, the DT will yield false negative results in 1 out of 100 cases. Factor analyses and a random forest regression of the dataset revealed that distress can be predicted by two factors, which we termed "anxiety" and "depression/resilience/motor symptoms". CONCLUSION The DT is an ultra-short and reliable screening tool for distress in PwPD. DT values below 4 rule out distress with a high degree of certainty. Anxiety and depression are important factors in distress but are counterbalanced by the individuals' psychological resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Schnalke
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus DresdenDresdenGermany
- Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases within the Helmholtz Association (DZNE)DresdenGermany
| | - Esther Tekampe
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus DresdenDresdenGermany
| | - Tim Feige
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus DresdenDresdenGermany
- Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases within the Helmholtz Association (DZNE)DresdenGermany
| | - Anika Frank
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus DresdenDresdenGermany
- Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases within the Helmholtz Association (DZNE)DresdenGermany
| | - Heinz Reichmann
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus DresdenDresdenGermany
| | - Björn Falkenburger
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus DresdenDresdenGermany
- Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases within the Helmholtz Association (DZNE)DresdenGermany
| | - Simone D'Souza
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus DresdenDresdenGermany
- Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases within the Helmholtz Association (DZNE)DresdenGermany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kocol D, Geiger S, Schweda A, Beckord J, Schadendorf T, Jansen C, Robitzsch A, Skoda EM, Teufel M, Bäuerle A. An e-mental health intervention to reduce depression symptoms in individuals with obesity: study protocol for the randomized, controlled, two-armed, confirmatory LightMood trial. Trials 2024; 25:149. [PMID: 38419096 PMCID: PMC10900592 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07970-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with obesity often experience psychological distress, specifically depression symptoms. Due to various barriers, such as limitations of healthcare offers, digital interventions, for example medical apps, can provide a suitable approach to support affected people. In the envisaged prospective randomized controlled trial, we aim to examine the efficacy of the LightMood intervention. The LightMood intervention is a manualized and user-centered, digital intervention for patients with obesity, with a duration of 4 months, which contains elements of cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based and skills-based exercises. We expect the LightMood intervention to be superior to treatment as usual (TAU) in terms of reducing depression symptoms. METHODS The trial incorporates four distinct measurement time points: the baseline assessment, the post-treatment assessment, and 1- and 3-month follow-up assessments. Furthermore, we implemented in-treatment assessments for both groups. Participants will be randomized into two groups (LightMood intervention vs TAU). The aim is to include 128 participants (64 per group) in the study. Inclusion criteria are patients who are obese, at least 18 years old, with a private Internet access, and with adequate digital literacy and show depression symptoms (PHQ ≥ 10). Exclusion criteria are weekly outpatient individual psychotherapy, obesity surgery within the last year or planned within the next 7 months, no private Internet access, and the prescription of a new psychotropic drug within the last 2 weeks. The primary outcome is the post-assessment reduction in depression symptoms. Secondary outcomes will include the improvement in self-efficacy, quality of life, mindfulness, reduction in eating disorder symptoms, and body mass index (BMI). Furthermore, we expect a positive development of depression symptoms throughout the different time points (T1, T2, and T3) in patients with obesity. DISCUSSION LightMood is an evidence-based, efficient, low-threshold online intervention that aims to reduce depression symptoms in people with obesity. Online interventions could offer a promising alternative to conventional face-to-face therapy. The primary objective of the current study is to add essential insight into the feasibility, efficacy, effectiveness, and acceptance of e-mental health interventions for people with obesity and depression symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS), DRKS00029219. Registered on May 19, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilara Kocol
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Sheila Geiger
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Adam Schweda
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jil Beckord
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Theresa Schadendorf
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Jansen
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Anita Robitzsch
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Skoda
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Teufel
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Bäuerle
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Marie Uhlenbruch F, Schopow N, Roschke E, Lycke C, Heyde CE, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Osterhoff G. The validity of the distress thermometer in patients with musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Oncol 2024; 44:100479. [PMID: 38143948 PMCID: PMC10733633 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Visits to an outpatient cancer clinic represent a challenging situation for patients, which can trigger anxiety and helplessness in those affected. It is important to identify patients with high psychological distress as early as possible in order to provide them with supportive psychological interventions. The aim of this study was to validate the Distress Thermometer (DT), a widely used screening for distress, in a cohort of patients with musculoskeletal tumors and to explore associations between distress, treatment satisfaction and health literacy. Methods All patients presenting to a University outpatient clinic for musculoskeletal cancers were asked to complete a set of questionnaires including the DT), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as a comparison scale, the Patient Satisfaction with Comprehensive Cancer Care (SCCC) and European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16).To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the DT in a cohort of patients with musculoskeletal tumors, we compare the performance of the DT in relation to an established screener for anxiety and depression using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses. Results A total of 120 patients (age 58 ± 18, 51% female) were analyzed. Patients reported a mean DT of 5.0 (SD 2.3, range, 0 to 10). Eighty-six patients (71.7 %) had a DT score ≥ 5 indicating moderate or severe psychological distress.The mean total HADS score (scale 0 to42 points) was 11.7 (SD 7.6, range, 0 to 32) with a HADS score of ≥ 15 in 29.2% of patients. The DT correlated moderately with anxiety and depression (HADS total r = 0.48, p < 0.001), while the correlation with depression (HADS-D, r = 0.47, p < 0.001) was stronger than with anxiety (HADS-A, r = 0.38, p < 0.001).For a DT score ≥ 5, ROC analysis yielded a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 75.3% for detecting moderate or severe psychological distress (HADS ≥ 15, AUC 0.782).The REPERES-G, collected from a subgroup (n = 49), showed high treatment satisfaction with a median score of 132 (min 90, max 163). Especially the "satisfaction with medical aspects of treatment" (REPERES-G medical aspects) showed a moderate correlation with the DT (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) a strong correlation with anxiety and depression (HADS total, r = 0.69, p < 0.001). Conclusion About three in four patients with musculoskeletal tumors have relevant psychological distress. A visual analogue scale can only be a rough guide for identifying patients in need of psychological support, with a sensitivity of 71.4 % and a specificity of 75.3 %. A strong relationship between patient and care team was associated with lower patient psychological distress.Consequently, screening tools cannot replace detailed discussion and personal contact, especially in the treatment of malignant diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finn Marie Uhlenbruch
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nikolas Schopow
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Roschke
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Lycke
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Georg Osterhoff
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nurtsch A, Teufel M, Jahre LM, Esber A, Rausch R, Tewes M, Schöbel C, Palm S, Schuler M, Schadendorf D, Skoda EM, Bäuerle A. Drivers and barriers of patients' acceptance of video consultation in cancer care. Digit Health 2024; 10:20552076231222108. [PMID: 38188860 PMCID: PMC10768612 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231222108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Due to digitization in the medical sector, many healthcare interactions are switched to online services. This study assessed the acceptance of video consultations (VCs) in cancer care, and determined drivers and barriers of acceptance. Methods A cross-sectional online-based survey study was conducted in Germany from February 2022 to February 2023. Recruitment took place at oncology outpatient clinics, general practitioners, oncology practices and via cancer-related social media channels. Inclusion criteria were a cancer diagnosis, cancer treatment and internet access. Sociodemographic, medical data, eHealth-related data were acquired via an online assessment. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model was used to determine the acceptance of VC and its predictors. Results Of N = 350 cancer patients, 56.0% (n = 196) reported high acceptance of VC, 28.0% (n = 98) stated moderate acceptance and 16.0% (n = 56) indicated low acceptance. Factors influencing acceptance were younger age (β = -.28, p < .001), female gender (β = .35, p = .005), stage of disease (β = .11, p = .032), high digital confidence (β = .14, p = .010), low internet anxiety (β = -.21, p = .001), high digital overload (β = -.12, p = .022), high eHealth literacy (β = .14, p = .028), personal trust (β = -.25, p < .001), internet use (β = .17, p = .002), and the UTAUT predictors: performance expectancy (β = .24, p < .001), effort expectancy (β = .26, p < .001), and social influence (β = .34, p < .001). Conclusions Patients' acceptance of VC in cancer care is high. Drivers and barriers to acceptance identified should be considered for personalized applications. Considering the growing demand for cancer care establishing digital healthcare solutions is justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelina Nurtsch
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Teufel
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lisa Maria Jahre
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - André Esber
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Raya Rausch
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Mitra Tewes
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Schöbel
- Faculty of Sleep Medicine and Telemedicine, West German Lung Center, University Medicine Essen - Ruhrlandklinik, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stefan Palm
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Schuler
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Skoda
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Bäuerle
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Goerling U, Albus C, Bergelt C, Erim Y, Faller H, Geiser F, Hönig K, Hornemann B, Maatouk I, Stein B, Teufel M, Wickert M, Weis J. Predictors of cancer patients' utilization of psychooncological support: Examining patient´s attitude and physician´s recommendation. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:17997-18004. [PMID: 37978060 PMCID: PMC10725332 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05507-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with cancer suffer from a wide range of psychological distress. Nevertheless, in the literature low utilization rates of psychooncological services are reported. Various factors may influence the utilization of professional support during inpatient care. Up to now it is unclear to what extent patients' attitude towards psychooncological support and physicians' recommendation for psychooncological care may influence the utilization. METHODS In a multicenter longitudinal observational study in Comprehensive Cancer Centers Germany, 1398 patients with mixed cancer diagnoses were assessed at baseline during their hospital stay with respect to psychooncological distress and the need for and use of psychooncological services. RESULTS Psychooncological support was used by almost 28.4% of patients up to this time. A positive attitude towards psychooncological support was reported by 41.6%. A recommendation of psychooncological support by a physician was received by 16.2%. These patients reported a significant higher level of distress compared to patients who did not received a recommendation. Multivariable logistic regression detected that the utilization rate was 3.79 times higher among patients with positive attitude towards psychooncological support (OR, 3.79; 95% CI 2.51-5.73, p < 0.001). Utilization was 4.21 times more likely among patients who received a physician´s recommendation (OR, 4.21; 95% CI 2.98-5.95, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The results of the study provide evidence of the relevance of giving more attention to psychooncological distress and attitudes towards psychooncological care. To reduce reservations, patients need low-threshold information about the psychooncological services offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ute Goerling
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Christian Albus
- Department of Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty and University Clinic, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Corinna Bergelt
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Greifswald University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Yesim Erim
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hermann Faller
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Geiser
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, University Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Klaus Hönig
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Clinic, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm (CCCU), Ulm, Germany
| | - Beate Hornemann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Clinic Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Imad Maatouk
- Division of Medical Psychosomatics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Stein
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Medical University, General Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Martin Teufel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Comprehensive Cancer Center Essen (WTZ) and LVR Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Wickert
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University Clinic Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Joachim Weis
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Self-Help Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Meinlschmidt G, Frick A, Baenteli I, Karpf C, Studer A, Bachmann M, Dörner A, Tschudin S, Trost S, Wyss K, Fink G, Schwenkglenks M, Caviezel S, Rocco T, Schaefert R. Prevention of psychosocial distress consequences in somatic hospital inpatients via a stepped and collaborative care model: protocol of SomPsyNet, a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e076814. [PMID: 37996236 PMCID: PMC10668178 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 30% of somatic hospital inpatients experience psychosocial distress, contributing to increased (re-)hospitalisation rates, treatment resistance, morbidity, and direct and indirect costs. However, such distress often remains unrecognised and unaddressed. We established 'SomPsyNet', a 'stepped and collaborative care model' (SCCM) for somatic hospital inpatients, aiming at alleviating this issue through early identification of distress and provision of appropriate care, providing problem-focused pathways and strengthening collaborative care. We report the protocol of the 'SomPsyNet' study, aiming to evaluate implementation and impact of the SCCM on distressed patients' health-related quality of life. Secondary objectives include assessing efficacy of the screening procedures, influence of SCCM on other health outcomes and associated costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Our stepped wedge cluster randomised trial conducted at three tertiary hospitals comprises three conditions: treatment as usual (TAU) without screening for distress (phase 0), TAU with screening but without consequences (phase I, main comparator) and TAU with screening and psychosomatic-psychiatric consultations for those distressed (phase II). The time-of-transition between phases I and II was randomised. Sample size target is N=2200-2500 participants, with 6 month follow-up for distressed (anticipated n=640-700) and a subsample of non-distressed (anticipated n=200) patients. Primary outcome is mental health-related quality of life (SF-36 'Mental Health Component Summary score'); secondary outcomes include psychosocial distress, anxiety, depressive and somatic symptoms, symptom burden and distress, resilience, social support and qualitative of life, assessed by internationally accepted instruments, with good psychometric properties. Further, health claims data will be used to assess SCCM's impact on direct and indirect costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION SomPsyNet adheres to the Helsinki Declaration and is approved by the 'Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz' (2019-01724). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and communicated to participants, healthcare professionals and the public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal; ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04269005, updated 19.09.2023).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunther Meinlschmidt
- Department of Digital and Blended Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy (focus CBT), International Psychoanalytic University Berlin gGmbH, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Frick
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Iris Baenteli
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christina Karpf
- Division of Prevention, Department of Health Canton Basel-Stadt, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anja Studer
- Division of Prevention, Department of Health Canton Basel-Stadt, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marco Bachmann
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinik Barmelweid AG, Barmelweid, Switzerland
| | | | - Sibil Tschudin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Trost
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Universitäre Altersmedizin FELIX PLATTER, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kaspar Wyss
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Günther Fink
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Schwenkglenks
- Health Economics Facility, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Seraina Caviezel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tabea Rocco
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rainer Schaefert
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychiatry, Bethesda Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sleimann M, Balcerek M, Cytera C, Richter F, Borgmann-Staudt A, Wörmann B, Kronziel LL, Calaminus G, Kock-Schoppenhauer AK, Grabow D, Baust K, Neumann A, Langer T, Gebauer J. Implementation of a clinical long-term follow-up database for adult childhood cancer survivors in Germany: a feasibility study at two specialised late effects clinics. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:12855-12866. [PMID: 37462771 PMCID: PMC10587240 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05145-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at risk for increased morbidity and reduced quality of life associated with treatment-related late effects. In Germany, however, only a few of the more than 40,000 CCS registered in the German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) currently benefit from adequate clinical long-term follow-up (LTFU) structures. To establish a comprehensive knowledge base on CCS' long-term health in Germany, a database was developed in cooperation with the GCCR. Following a first evaluation phase at two German university centres, this database will be implemented more widely within Germany allowing longitudinal documentation of clinical LTFU data. METHODS The feasibility study cohort comprised 208 CCS aged 18 or older whose medical, mental and psychosocial health data were collected during routine LTFU or first clinic visits in adult care. CCS were enrolled from 04/2021 to 12/2022, and data entry was completed by 03/2023. Descriptive data analysis was conducted. All CCS were stratified into three risk groups (RG) based on their individual risk for developing late effects resulting from their respective diagnoses and treatments. RESULTS Chronic health conditions of various organ systems associated with late and long-term effects of cancer therapy affected CCS in all RG supporting the clinical relevance of risk-adapted LTFU. Enrolment into the database was feasible and broadly accepted amongst CCS. CONCLUSION Implementation of a clinical follow-up care infrastructure and database in Germany will pave the way to collect clinically evaluated and regularly updated health data of potentially over 40,000 German CCS and facilitate future national and international cooperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelaine Sleimann
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Abteilung für Endokrinologie, Diabetologie und Stoffwechselmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
- Department of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Mittelallee 6A, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Magdalena Balcerek
- Department of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Mittelallee 6A, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Chirine Cytera
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Franziska Richter
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Anja Borgmann-Staudt
- Department of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Mittelallee 6A, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Wörmann
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Mittelallee 11, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Lea Louisa Kronziel
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik (IMBS), Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, V24, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Gabriele Calaminus
- Pädiatrische Hämatologie/Onkologie, Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Desiree Grabow
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology/German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55101 Mainz, Germany
| | - Katja Baust
- Pädiatrische Hämatologie/Onkologie, Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Anke Neumann
- IT Center for Clinical Research, Lübeck, Universität zu Lübeck, Haus 32, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Thorsten Langer
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Judith Gebauer
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Abteilung für Endokrinologie, Diabetologie und Stoffwechselmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kuehl R, Koeppel M, Goldschmidt H, Maatouk I, Rosenberger F, Wiskemann J. Physical activity-related health competence and symptom burden for exercise prescription in patients with multiple myeloma: a latent profile analysis. Ann Hematol 2023; 102:3091-3102. [PMID: 37355476 PMCID: PMC10567830 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05326-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to ensure best possible supply of exercise therapy to patients with multiple myeloma (MM); it is helpful to identify patient groups with similar symptom burden and physical activity-related health competences (PAHCO). Latent profile analyses (LPA) of MM patients were used to identify profiles of patients with similar PAHCO and symptom burden. Analysis of variance was applied to investigate group differences in important covariates. N = 98 MM patients (57% male, age 64 ± 9 years) could be assigned to three distinct PAHCO profiles: 46% were patients with high PAHCO, 48% patients with moderate, and 5% were patients with low PAHCO. The mean probability to be assigned to a certain profile was over 99%. The first group showed significant higher physical activity (PA) and lower comorbidities. Regarding symptom burden, three different profiles exist, including group one (32% of patients) with very low symptom burden, profile two (40%) with medium symptom burden, and group three (15%) with very high symptom burden (mean probability ≥ 98%). Patients in profile one had a lower number of treatment lines compared to the other profiles. Patients who were assigned to the high PAHCO profile were more likely to display a milder symptoms profile. In this exploratory analysis, we identified different patient profiles for PAHCO and symptom burden that may be used to individualize exercise recommendations and supervision modalities in MM patients. PAHCO and symptom burden level may be used to stratify MM patients in order to provide more personalized and effective exercise counseling. The profiles require individualized exercise recommendations and different supervision modalities, including educational instructions tailored particularly to every patient's needs, according to their PAHCO and symptom profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04328038.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rea Kuehl
- Working Group Exercise Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Koeppel
- Working Group Exercise Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Imad Maatouk
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Section of Psychosomatic Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Julius-Maximilian University Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Friederike Rosenberger
- Working Group Exercise Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Health Sciences, German University of Applied Sciences for Prevention and Health Management, Saarbruecken, Germany
| | - Joachim Wiskemann
- Working Group Exercise Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Horn A, Jírů-Hillmann S, Widmann J, Montellano FA, Salmen J, Pryss R, Wöckel A, Heuschmann PU. Systematic review on the effectiveness of mobile health applications on mental health of breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01470-6. [PMID: 37906420 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01470-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer survivors are more likely to report psychological distress and unmet need for support compared to healthy controls. Psychological mobile health interventions might be used in follow-up care of breast cancer patients to improve their mental health. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Cochrane and PROSPERO for articles on controlled trials examining the effectiveness of psychological mobile health interventions compared to routine care regarding mental health outcomes of adult breast cancer survivors. This review followed the PRISMA statement and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022312972). Two researchers independently reviewed publications, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. RESULTS After screening 204 abstracts published from 2005 to February 2023, eleven randomised trials involving 2249 patients with a mean age between 43.9 and 56.2 years met the inclusion criteria. All interventions used components of cognitive behavioural therapy. Most studies applied self-guided interventions. Five studies reported percentages of patients never started (range = 3-15%) or discontinued the intervention earlier (range = 3-36%). No long-term effect > 3 months post intervention was reported. Three of seven studies reported a significant short-term intervention effect for distress. Only one study each showed an effect for depression (1/5), anxiety (1/5), fear of recurrence (1/4) and self-efficacy (1/3) compared to a control group. CONCLUSIONS A wide variance of interventions was used. Future studies should follow guidelines in developing and reporting their mobile interventions and conduct long-term follow-up to achieve reliable and comparable results. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS No clear effect of psychological mobile health interventions on patients' mental health could be shown. REGISTRATION PROSPERO ID 312972.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Horn
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Steffi Jírů-Hillmann
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Widmann
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Felipe A Montellano
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jessica Salmen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Pryss
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Institute for Medical Data Science, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Peter U Heuschmann
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Institute for Medical Data Science, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Clinical Trial Centre Würzburg, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Burgard C, Zacherl MJ, Todica A, Hornung J, Grawe F, Pekrul I, Zimmermann P, Schmid-Tannwald C, Ladurner R, Krenz D, Trupka A, Wagner J, Bartenstein P, Spitzweg C, Wenter V. Primary presentation and clinical course of pediatric and adolescent patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma after radioiodine therapy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1237472. [PMID: 37849815 PMCID: PMC10577432 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1237472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) in childhood and during adolescence is extremely rare. Pediatric DTC commonly presents with advanced disease at diagnosis including a high prevalence of cervical lymph node metastases and pulmonary metastases. Studies in children with DTC are limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the initial presentation, effectiveness of radioiodine therapy (RIT), and long-term outcome of prepubertal in comparison to pubertal/postpubertal patients. Methods Eighty-five pediatric and young patients aged 6.4 to 21.9 years with histopathologically confirmed DTC were retrospectively included. They all underwent total thyroidectomy followed by RIT. Initial presentation and outcome of prepubertal and pubertal/postpubertal patients were compared 1 year after RIT, during follow-up, and at the last visit of follow-up. Results Prepubertal patients presented with significantly higher T and M stages. One year after RIT, 42/81 (52%) patients still presented with evidence of disease (ED). During follow-up of a median of 7.9 years, prepubertal patients were less often in complete remission (58% vs. 82% in pubertal patients). At the last visit of follow-up, 19/80 (24%) patients still had ED without statistical differences between the two groups (42% prepubertal vs. 18% pubertal/postpubertal, p-value 0.06). None of our patients died disease-related over the observed period. Conclusion Prepubertal children with DTC presented with a more advanced tumor stage at the initial presentation. During follow-up, they present more often with ED. However, at the end of our study, we did not observe statistically relevant differences in patient outcomes between the prepubertal and pubertal/postpubertal groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Burgard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University, UdS, Homburg, Germany
| | - Mathias Johannes Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Hornung
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Freba Grawe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabell Pekrul
- Department of Anaesthesiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Petra Zimmermann
- Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Visceral and Endocrinological Surgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Schmid-Tannwald
- Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Roland Ladurner
- Department of Surgery, Martha-Maria Krankenhaus, Munich, Germany
| | - Detlef Krenz
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Dritter Orden, Munich, Germany
| | - Arnold Trupka
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Starnberg Hospital, Starnberg, Germany
| | - Johanna Wagner
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Developmental Medicine and Social Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- Interdisciplinary Center for Thyroid Carcinoma (ISKUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lortz J, Rassaf T, Jansen C, Knuschke R, Schweda A, Schnaubert L, Rammos C, Köberlein-Neu J, Skoda EM, Teufel M, Bäuerle A. A mHealth intervention to reduce perceived stress in patients with ischemic heart disease: study protocol of the randomized, controlled confirmatory intervention "mStress-IHD" trial. Trials 2023; 24:592. [PMID: 37715203 PMCID: PMC10504703 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07618-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stress is highly prevalent in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and is associated with lower health-related quality of life and impaired cardiovascular outcome. The importance of stress management is now recognized in recent guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease. However, effective stress management interventions are not implemented in clinical routine yet. The development of easily disseminated eHealth interventions, particularly mHealth, may offer a cost-effective and scalable solution to this problem. The aim of the proposed trial is to assess the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the mHealth intervention "mindfulHeart" in terms of reducing stress in patients with IHD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This randomized controlled confirmatory interventional trial with two parallel arms has assessments at six measurement time points: baseline (T0, prior randomization), post-treatment (T1), and four follow-ups at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after intervention (T2, T3, T4, and T5). We will include patients with confirmed diagnosis of IHD, high-perceived stress, and use of an internet-enabled smartphone. Patients will be randomized into two groups (intervention vs. control). The proposed sample size calculation allocates 128 participants in total. The primary analysis will be performed in the intention-to-treat population, with missing data imputed. An ANCOVA with the outcome at T1, a between-subject factor (intervention vs. control), and the participants' pre-intervention baseline values as a covariate will be used. Different ANOVAs, regression, and descriptive approaches will be performed for secondary analyses. ETHICS The Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen approved the study (22-11,015-BO). TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials NCT05846334. Release 26.04.2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lortz
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Christoph Jansen
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
- Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Ramtin Knuschke
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Adam Schweda
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
- Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Lenka Schnaubert
- Learning Sciences Research Institute, School of Education, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK
| | - Christos Rammos
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Juliane Köberlein-Neu
- Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, 42119, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Skoda
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
- Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Martin Teufel
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
- Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
| | - Alexander Bäuerle
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
- Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Harms J, Kunzmann B, Bredereke J, Harms L, Jungbluth T, Zimmermann T. Anxiety in patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing primary surgery. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:8191-8200. [PMID: 37060473 PMCID: PMC10374702 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04759-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Anxiety in the perioperative period is not only an unpleasant emotional state, but can also negatively affect the outcomes and quality of life of surgical patients. The present study investigated anxiety in patients with gastrointestinal cancer scheduled for primary surgery. METHODS A total of 101 patients in four non-university surgical departments were included. Anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), distress (Distress thermometer), and illness perception (Brief IPQ) were assessed at four time points: first outpatient contact before surgery (t1), preoperative inpatient contact (t2), postoperative inpatient contact before hospital discharge (t3), and postoperative outpatient follow-up contact after 30 days (t4). RESULTS 56% of patients had an episode of mild or moderate anxiety and 5% had an episode of severe anxiety and/or depression. Subjectively perceived anxiety and depression were highest at t1, followed by t3. 30% of patients had elevated anxiety and depression scores at t1. Regression analyses showed that high subjectively perceived mental distress at t1 was associated with higher anxiety scores at t3 and t4. Women, and younger women in particular, were significantly more likely to experience stress than men. Higher levels of subjectively perceived stress at t1 were associated with higher levels of anxiety at t3 and t4. Sociodemographic factors were not relevant predictors of anxiety. CONCLUSION Anxiety and depression appear to be a persistent problem during the perioperative course in patients with gastrointestinal tumors. Identifying patients at risk for clinically relevant anxiety and depression remains a particular challenge. The results confirm the relevance of repeated screening for mental distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Harms
- Department of Abdominal and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Sauerbruchstrasse 7, 38140, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Kunzmann
- Department of Abdominal and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Sauerbruchstrasse 7, 38140, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Jan Bredereke
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lea Harms
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Columbia University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Thomas Jungbluth
- Department of Abdominal and Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Sauerbruchstrasse 7, 38140, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Zimmermann
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hiltrop K, Heidkamp P, Breidenbach C, Kowalski C, Bruns G, Ernstmann N. Cancer rehabilitation support by cancer counselling centres (CARES): study protocol of a quasi-experimental feasibility study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067868. [PMID: 37567747 PMCID: PMC10441687 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While maintaining or restoring work ability after a cancer diagnosis is an essential aim of the rehabilitation process for working-age patients, problems can arise during the return to work (RTW) or when retaining work. Counselling could provide support for patients with or after cancer with employment-related questions (eg, questions related to RTW and work retention). Outpatient psychosocial cancer counselling centres in Germany offer counselling on work-related questions; however, resources for this are limited. This protocol presents a feasibility study of an intensified needs-based counselling intervention that supports those seeking employment-related advice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The CARES (cancer rehabilitation support by cancer counselling centres) project is a feasibility study for a newly developed counselling intervention. The intervention is being developed as part of the project and piloted in about 20 outpatient cancer counselling centres. The CARES study has a quasi-experimental pre-post design with a control cohort. First, patients who undergo regular counselling are recruited. Second, after the counsellors have been trained for the newly developed intervention, participants for the intervention group are recruited from the cancer counselling centres. Quantitative and formative evaluations will be performed in accordance with the existing guidelines. The quantitative evaluation comprises three patient surveys (at the beginning of the counselling process, 3 months into the counselling process and, for the intervention group, at the end of the counselling process) and routine data of the counselling process. The formative evaluation includes interviews with patients, counsellors and other stakeholders, as well as participatory observations of counselling sessions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval has been obtained from the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University Bonn (061/22; 09.04.2022). A data protection concept ensures adherence to data protection regulations for the handled data. The dissemination strategies include discussing the results with the cancer counselling centres. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028121); Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kati Hiltrop
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Chair of Health Services Research, Cologne, Germany
- University Hospital Bonn, Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, Bonn, Germany
| | - Paula Heidkamp
- University Hospital Bonn, Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Gudrun Bruns
- Cancer Counseling Center of the Tumor Network in Muensterland (TiM), Muenster, Germany
| | - Nicole Ernstmann
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Chair of Health Services Research, Cologne, Germany
- University Hospital Bonn, Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sommerlatte S, Lugnier C, Schoffer O, Jahn P, Kraeft AL, Kourti E, Michl P, Reinacher-Schick A, Schmitt J, Birkner T, Schildmann J, Herpertz S. Mental burden and moral distress among oncologists and oncology nurses in Germany during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:6211-6223. [PMID: 36700979 PMCID: PMC9878480 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04580-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is evidence for mental burden and moral distress among healthcare workers during the pandemic. However, there is scarcity of analyses regarding possible correlations of mental burden and moral distress in this context. This study provides data to quantify mental burden and possible associations with moral distress among physicians and nurses working in oncology in Germany. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with physicians and nurses working in oncology in Germany between March and July 2021. Next to sociodemographic characteristics and working conditions, mental burden and moral distress were assessed using standardized instruments. Binary multivariate logistic regression using the enter method was performed in order to explore the relationship between mental burden and moral distress. RESULTS 121 physicians and 125 nurses were included in the study. Prevalence of clinically relevant depressive symptoms, anxiety, somatic symptoms, burnout symptoms and moral distress was 19.2, 14.5, 12.7, 46.0 and 34.7% in physicians and 41.4, 24.0, 46.8, 46.6 and 60.0% in nurses respectively. Mental burden was significantly associated with moral distress, being female/diverse, younger age < 40 and increase in workload. Nurses who felt sufficiently protected from COVID-19 reported significantly less moral distress. CONCLUSION To improve pandemic resilience, there is a need to ensure safe working environment including psychosocial support. Further evidence on risk and protective factors for moral distress is needed to be able to develop and implement strategies to protect healthcare workers within and beyond the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Sommerlatte
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - Celine Lugnier
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Olaf Schoffer
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Patrick Jahn
- Health Services Research Working Group, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Anna-Lena Kraeft
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Eleni Kourti
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Patrick Michl
- Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anke Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Birkner
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jan Schildmann
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Stephan Herpertz
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL-University Clinic, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Simnacher F, Götz A, Kling S, Schulze JB, von Känel R, Euler S, Günther MP. A short screening tool identifying systemic barriers to distress screening in cancer care. Cancer Med 2023; 12:17313-17321. [PMID: 37439075 PMCID: PMC10501250 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION International guidelines on cancer treatment recommend screening for early detection and treatment of distress. However, screening rates are insufficient. In the present study, a survey was developed to assess perceived systemic barriers to distress screening. METHODS A three-step approach was used for the study. Based on qualitative content analysis of interviews and an expert panel, an initial survey with 53 questions on barriers to screening was designed. It was completed by 98 nurses in a large comprehensive cancer center in Switzerland. From this, a short version of the survey with 24 questions was derived using exploratory principal component analysis. This survey was completed by 150 nurses in four cancer centers in Switzerland. A confirmatory factor analysis was then performed on the shortened version, yielding a final set of 14 questions. RESULTS The initial set of 53 questions was reduced to a set of 14 validated questions retaining 53% of the original variance. These 14 questions allow for an assessment within 2-3 min that identifies relevant barriers to distress screening from the perspective of those responsible for implementation of distress screening. Across several hospitals in Switzerland, the timing of the first distress screening, lack of capacity, patient and staff overload, and refusal of distressed patients to be referred to support services emerged as major problems. CONCLUSION The validated 14 questions on barriers to screening cancer patients for distress enable clinicians and hospital administrators to quickly identify relevant issues and take action to improve screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice Simnacher
- Department of Consultation‐Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital ZurichUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Anna Götz
- Department of Consultation‐Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital ZurichUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Sabine Kling
- Computer Vision Laboratory, Department of Information Technology and Electrical EngineeringSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Jan Ben Schulze
- Department of Consultation‐Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital ZurichUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Roland von Känel
- Department of Consultation‐Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital ZurichUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Sebastian Euler
- Department of Consultation‐Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital ZurichUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Moritz Philipp Günther
- Department of Consultation‐Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital ZurichUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gödde K, Fügemann H, Goerling U, Grittner U, Kohl R, Meisel A, Reinhold T, Schnitzer S, Deckert PM, Frost N, Schreiber SJ, Rieckmann N, Holmberg C. Feasibility of a patient-oriented navigation programme for patients with lung cancer or stroke in Germany: Protocol of the CoreNAVI study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287638. [PMID: 37384672 PMCID: PMC10309639 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient navigation programmes were introduced in the United States and recently gained interest in Germany, where the health care system is fragmented. Navigation programmes aim to decrease barriers to care for patients with age-associated diseases and complex care paths. Here we describe a feasibility study to evaluate a patient-oriented navigation model that was developed in a first project phase by integrating data about barriers to care, vulnerable patient populations and existing support services. METHODS We designed a mixed-methods feasibility study that consists of two two-arm randomized controlled trials aligned with observational cohorts. The intervention group of the RCTs gets support by personal navigators for 12 months. The control group receives a brochure with regional support offers for patients and caregivers. The feasibility of the patient-oriented navigation model for two prototypic age-associated diseases, lung cancer and stroke, is evaluated with regard to its acceptance, demand, practicality and efficacy. This investigation includes process evaluation measures with detailed documentation of the screening and recruitment process, questionnaires about satisfaction with navigation, observant participation and qualitative interviews. Estimates of efficacy for patient-reported outcomes are obtained at three follow-up time points including satisfaction with care and health-related quality of life. Furthermore, we analyze health insurance data from patients of the RCT insured at a large German health insurance (AOK Nordost) to investigate heath care utilization, costs and cost effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00025476).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Gödde
- Institute of Public Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hella Fügemann
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ute Goerling
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrike Grittner
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Raphael Kohl
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Meisel
- Center for Stroke Research (CSB), Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Reinhold
- Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Schnitzer
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - P. Markus Deckert
- Oncology and Palliative Care and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Hematology, Both: Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nikolaj Frost
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan J. Schreiber
- Department of Neurology, Oberhavel Kliniken, Clinic Hennigsdorf, Hennigsdorf, Germany
| | - Nina Rieckmann
- Institute of Public Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Holmberg
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Berlin, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Colomer-Lahiguera S, Canella C, Giacomini S, Van KL, Pedrazzani C, Naegele M, Thouvenin L, O'Meara Stern A, Condorelli R, Corbière T, Witt CM, Eicher M, Ribi K. Patient-reported experiences of cancer care related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:410. [PMID: 37347278 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07871-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to describe the experience of Swiss oncological patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS A national multi-center study including five hospitals covering the three main language regions of Switzerland was conducted between March and July 2021. Patients with melanoma, breast, lung, or colon cancer receiving active systemic anti-cancer treatment at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic were included. We conducted semi-structured telephone or onsite interviews alongside the administration of distress and resilience-validated questionnaires. Thematic analysis was performed for the qualitative data and descriptive statistics for the quantitative data. RESULTS Sixty-two cancer patients with a mean age of 61 (SD=14) (58% female) were interviewed. Based on the interviews, we identified that the experience of having cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic was related to five dimensions: psychological, social, support, healthcare, and vaccination. Three themes transverse the five dimensions: (a) needs, (b) positive changes, and (c) phases of the pandemic. In general, patients did not experience delays or disruptions in their cancer treatment nor felt additionally burdened by the pandemic. Lockdown and isolation were reported as mixed experiences (positive and negative), and access to vaccination reassured patients against the risk of infection and instilled hope to return to normalcy. Additionally, we found low distress levels (M=2.9; SD=2.5) and high resilience scores (M=7; SD=1.3) in these patients. CONCLUSION Swiss patients with cancer did not express major needs or disruptions in their care during this period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results identify the mixed experiences of patients and highlight the high resilience levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Colomer-Lahiguera
- Institute of Higher Education and Research & Department of Oncology Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Office 01/169 - PROLINE - Rte de la Corniche, 10-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Claudia Canella
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stellio Giacomini
- Institute of Higher Education and Research & Department of Oncology Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Office 01/169 - PROLINE - Rte de la Corniche, 10-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kim Lê Van
- Institute of Higher Education and Research & Department of Oncology Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Office 01/169 - PROLINE - Rte de la Corniche, 10-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Carla Pedrazzani
- Department of Economics, Health and Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Naegele
- Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Department of Development and Quality Management in Nursing, Network Oncology, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Laure Thouvenin
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals of Geneva (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alix O'Meara Stern
- Department of Medical Oncology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchatelois, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Rosaria Condorelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, EOC - Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Tourane Corbière
- Institute of Higher Education and Research & Department of Oncology Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Office 01/169 - PROLINE - Rte de la Corniche, 10-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claudia M Witt
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Manuela Eicher
- Institute of Higher Education and Research & Department of Oncology Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Office 01/169 - PROLINE - Rte de la Corniche, 10-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Karin Ribi
- Department Health, Kalaidos University of Applied Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Frank T, Pichler T, Maier S, Batenhorst I, Abawi T, Harbeck N, Algül H, Heinemann V, Hermelink K, Mumm F, Dinkel A. Stressors related to the COVID-19 pandemic and their association with distress, depressive, and anxiety symptoms in cancer out-patients. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1100236. [PMID: 37333585 PMCID: PMC10272444 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1100236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer might be particularly prone to stress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of pandemic-related stressors on oncological patients' psychological well-being. During the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany 122 cancer out-patients of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich reported on COVID-19-related stressors (information satisfaction, threat perception, and fear of disease deterioration) and answered standardized questionnaires for psychosocial distress (DT) as well as depression and anxiety symptoms (PHQ-2, GAD-2). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify associations of the COVID-19-related stressors with psychological symptoms, controlling for sociodemographic, psychological (self-efficacy, ASKU) and clinical (somatic symptom burden, SSS-8) variables. Initially, satisfaction with information was significantly negatively associated with all three outcome variables. Fear of disease deterioration was associated with distress and depressive symptoms. After controlling for additional variables, only satisfaction with information remained an independent determinant of anxiety (β = -0.35, p < 0.001). All three outcomes were most strongly determined by somatic symptom burden (β ≥ 0.40, p < 0.001). The results of this study tentatively suggest that physical well-being overrides the relevance of some COVID-19-related stressors for oncological patients' psychological wellbeing. Physical symptoms are strongly tied to personal wellbeing as they are associated with suffering from cancer, which might be more central to personal wellbeing than the possibility of getting infected with SARS-CoV-2. However, satisfaction with the information received seems to be important beyond physical wellbeing, as this emerged as an independent determinant of anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Frank
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Tanja Abawi
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Hana Algül
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
- Mildred-Scheel-Professor of Tumor Metabolism, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hermelink
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Dinkel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schrage T, Görlach M, Betz CS, Bokemeyer C, Kröger N, Mueller V, Krüll A, Schulz H, Bleich C. Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1158449. [PMID: 37260965 PMCID: PMC10228503 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly developed health-related quality of life (HrQoL) questionnaire for use in oncological clinical routines. Methods This observational study with a repeated measurements design included oncological inpatients and outpatients. A total of 630 patients participated at the first point of measurement and 404 at the second point of measurement. To evaluate the instrument, we conducted hierarchical confirmative factor analyses and for further validation correlated the resulting factors with standardized and validated HrQoL measurements. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change were tested. Results The developed questionnaire "HELP-6" ("Hamburg Inventory for Measuring Quality of Life in Oncological Patients") has a six-factor structure and has moderate-to-good convergent validity (r= -0.25 --0.68). Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good (r =0.56-0.81, p < 0.001). Indications for responsiveness to change were found for three dimensions. The final version of the questionnaire HELP-6 has six dimensions with one item each. Conclusion With the HELP-6 instrument for measuring HrQoL in cancer patients, we provide a short and practical patient-reported outcome instrument. Though responsiveness to change could not be confirmed for all dimensions in this study, the HELP-6 includes time-efficient completion and evaluation and is informative in relevant HrQoL dimensions of cancer patients. Therefore, the HELP-6 poses an important addition to inpatient and outpatient routine cancer care. Trial registration This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/), on 9 June 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Schrage
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mirja Görlach
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Stephan Betz
- Department of Otolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nicolaus Kröger
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Mueller
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Krüll
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Schulz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christiane Bleich
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fabian A, Rühle A, Domschikowski J, Trommer M, Wegen S, Becker JN, Wurschi G, Boeke S, Sonnhoff M, Fink CA, Käsmann L, Schneider M, Bockelmann E, Treppner M, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Krug D, Nicolay NH. Psychosocial distress in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: a prospective national cohort of 1042 patients in Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-023-04837-5. [PMID: 37165119 PMCID: PMC10374761 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04837-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Psychosocial distress is common among cancer patients in general, but those undergoing radiotherapy may face specific challenges. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence and risk factors for distress in a large national cohort. METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study which surveyed cancer patients at the end of a course of radiotherapy using a patient-reported questionnaire. Distress was measured with the distress thermometer (DT), using a cut-off of ≥ 5 points for clinically significant distress. Univariate analyses and multivariate multiple regression were used to assess associations of distress with patient characteristics. A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Out of 2341 potentially eligible patients, 1075 participated in the study, of which 1042 completed the DT. The median age was 65 years and 49% (511/1042) of patients were female. The mean DT score was 5.2 (SD = 2.6). Clinically significant distress was reported by 63% (766/1042) of patients. Of the patient characteristics that were significantly associated with distress in the univariate analysis, a lower level of education, a higher degree of income loss, lower global quality of life, and a longer duration of radiotherapy in days remained significantly associated with higher distress in the multivariate analysis. Yet effect sizes of these associations were small. CONCLUSION Nearly two in three cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy reported clinically significant distress in a large multicenter cohort. While screening and interventions to reduce distress should be maintained and promoted, the identified risk factors may help to raise awareness in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRY IDENTIFIER DRKS: German Clinical Trial Registry identifier: DRKS00028784.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Justus Domschikowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Maike Trommer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Niklas Becker
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Georg Wurschi
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Jena University Hospital, 07740, Jena, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mathias Sonnhoff
- Center for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, 28239, Bremen, Germany
| | - Christoph A Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie Schneider
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elodie Bockelmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Treppner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Braulke F, Para S, Alt-Epping B, Tewes M, Bäumer M, Haberland B, Mayer-Steinacker R, Hopprich A, de Wit M, Grabe M, Bender-Säbelkampf S, Weßling C, Aulmann C, Gerlach C, Regincos P, Fischer F, Haarmann S, Huys T, Drygas S, Rambau A, Kiani A, Schnabel A, Buhl C, Seipke S, Hiemer S, Polata S, Meßmann M, Hansmeier A, Anastasiadou L, Letsch A, Wecht D, Hellberg-Naegele M, Krug U, Wedding U, van Oorschot B. Systematic symptom screening in patients with advanced cancer treated in certified oncology centers: results of the prospective multicenter German KeSBa project. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-023-04818-8. [PMID: 37145199 PMCID: PMC10374724 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04818-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Guidelines recommend a structured symptom screening (SC) for especially advanced cancer patients (CPs). The aim of this multicenter German prospective quality assurance project KeSBa (Kennzahl Symptom- und Belastungserfassung) was to gain knowledge on SC procedures in Oncology Centers (OCs) for advanced cancer patients and a first impression on the consequences of SC. METHODS The KeSBa project consisted of three phases: pilot, 3 months screening and feedback phase. Participating OCs decided to use either the Minimal Documentation System (MIDOS) or the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) and defined the cutoff values for positive screening results. RESULTS Out of 172 certified German OCs, 40 (23%) participated in the KeSBa pilot phase, 29 (16.8%) in the 3 months screening phase using MIDOS (n = 18, 58.6%) or IPOS (n = 11, 41.3%) and in the feedback round. 25/29 performed paper-based screening (86.2%). 2.963 CPs were screened. Results were documented for 1255 (42.2%, SC +) positive and 874 (29.5%, SC-) negative screenings depending on the center´s schedules: 452 SC + CPs (28.4%) and 42 SC- CPs (2.6%) had contact to specialized palliative care or other supportive specialist teams afterwards, 458 SC + CPs (28.8%) and 605 SC- CPs (38.1%) remained in standard oncology care. In the feedback round missing resources (personal and IT) and improved communication were mentioned most often. CONCLUSION Routine SC is feasible in advanced CPs treated in OCs but associated with considerable workload. In 42.2% of CPs SC was classified as positive, indicating the need of further diagnostics or professional judgment. SC requires staff and IT resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike Braulke
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Servet Para
- Interdisciplinary Center Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Alt-Epping
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mitra Tewes
- Department of Palliative Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Markus Bäumer
- Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Anne Hopprich
- Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maike de Wit
- Cancer Center Berlin-Neukölln - Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michaela Grabe
- Cancer Center Rems-Murr-Hospital Winnenden, Winnenden, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Christina Gerlach
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascale Regincos
- Clinic of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | - Soraya Haarmann
- Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH, Fachklinik Löwenstein, Löwenstein, Germany
| | | | - Sabine Drygas
- Brüderkrankenhaus St. Josef Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Anett Rambau
- Caritas Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Alexander Kiani
- Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Buhl
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Palliative Medicine, Special Pain Therapy, Hospital Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Seipke
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Silke Polata
- Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Berlin-Spandau, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maximilian Meßmann
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Hospital St. Elisabeth Straubing GmbH, Straubing, Germany
| | | | | | - Anne Letsch
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Daniel Wecht
- Specialist Care in Oncology and Palliative Care, University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Utz Krug
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Palliative Medicine, Special Pain Therapy, Hospital Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Wedding
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
| | - Birgitt van Oorschot
- Interdisciplinary Center Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dreier M, Ludwig J, Härter M, von dem Knesebeck O, Rezvani F, Baumgardt J, Pohontsch NJ, Bock T, Liebherz S. Evaluation of an online suicide prevention program to improve suicide literacy and to reduce suicide stigma: A mixed methods study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0284944. [PMID: 37115766 PMCID: PMC10146514 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Low-threshold e-health approaches in prevention to reduce suicide stigma are scarce. We developed an online program containing video reports on lived experience of suicide and evidence-based information on suicidality. We evaluated the program by a mixed methods design. We examined pre-post-changes of program completers (n = 268) in suicide literacy, suicide stigma (self and perceived), and self-efficacy expectation of being able to seek support in psychologically difficult situations using linear mixed models. To examine reported changes and helpful program elements 12-26 weeks after program completion, we content analyzed transcripts of telephone interviews (n = 16). Program completers showed more suicide literacy (Cohen's d = .74; p < .001), higher self-efficacy expectations to seek support (d = .09; p < .01), lower self-stigma (subscales glorification/normalization: d = -.13, p = .04; isolation/depression: d = -.14; p = .04; stigma: d = -.10; p = .07; n = 168) compared to baseline. We found no significant differences in perceived suicide stigma. We identified lived experience reports, the possibility of sharing own narrative on stigma and suicidality, and information on support as helpful elements. The current online program can increase suicide literacy and self-efficacy expectations to seek support and reduce self-stigma. We recommend a larger randomized controlled trial with longer follow-up to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mareike Dreier
- Department of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julia Ludwig
- Institute of Medical Sociology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Härter
- Department of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Olaf von dem Knesebeck
- Institute of Medical Sociology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Farhad Rezvani
- Department of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johanna Baumgardt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nadine Janis Pohontsch
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Bock
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Liebherz
- Department of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Hufeld JM, Esser P, Goerling U, Hermann M, Zimmermann T, Reuter H, Ernst J. Prevalence of mental disorders, psychosocial distress, and perceived need for psychosocial support in cancer patients and their relatives stratified by biopsychosocial factors: rationale, study design, and methods of a prospective multi-center observational cohort study (LUPE study). Front Psychol 2023; 14:1125545. [PMID: 37151329 PMCID: PMC10157044 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite remarkable progress, cancer remains a life-threatening disease for millions of people worldwide, also resulting in significant psychosocial limitations. High-quality, comprehensive cancer care requires patient and family involvement and the provision of needs-based, targeted psychosocial services. Although progress has been made in understanding the occurrence of mental comorbidity and psychosocial distress in cancer patients, comparatively little is known about the course of psychological comorbidity and psychosocial distress in early survivorship among patients and their families. We therefore aim to estimate the prevalence of mental disorders according to the DSM-5, psychosocial distress, perceived needs for psychosocial support and utilization of psychosocial support offers in newly diagnosed cancer patients and their relatives, taking into account potential contributing biopsychosocial factors for the occurrence of psychological comorbidity. Methods/design This study follows a prospective multi-center observational cohort design across four measurement time points: within 2 months after cancer diagnosis (t1), and in the follow-up period at 6 months (t2), at 12 months (t3), and at 18 months (t4) after t1. Patients older than 18 years who have a confirmed initial diagnosis of a malignant solid tumor and are scheduled for cancer treatment at one of the participating cancer centers are eligible for study participation. Relatives of eligible patients are also eligible for study participation if they are older than 18 years. Patients are interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders (SCID-5-CV). In addition, patients and relatives receive a set of validated questionnaires at each measurement time point, covering comorbid conditions and functional performance, perceived psychological distress and quality of life, partnership aspects and social relationships, supportive care needs and use of psychosocial support services, health literacy, and health behavior and meaning in life. Discussion This prospective multi-center observational cohort study has a major focus on increasing quality of care and quality of life in cancer survivors through providing rigorous longitudinal data for the development and implementation of target group-specific psychosocial support services. Trial registration NCT04620564, date of registration 9/11/2020; DKG OnkoZert: Registrier-No.: ST-U134, date of registration 5/11/2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Julia Marie Hufeld
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter Esser
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ute Goerling
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Myriel Hermann
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Zimmermann
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Hannah Reuter
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jochen Ernst
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bokemeyer F, Lebherz L, Schulz H, Bokemeyer C, Gali K, Bleich C. Smoking patterns and the intention to quit in German patients with cancer: study protocol for a cross-sectional observational study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069570. [PMID: 37055212 PMCID: PMC10106069 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients who continue to smoke cigarettes after a cancer diagnosis can experience poorer treatment tolerance and outcomes than those who quit immediately. Identifying risk factors specific to patients with cancer who smoke, as well as their smoking behaviours (eg, frequency of use, types of tobacco products), dependency level and quit intentions, is necessary to better inform patients and encourage quitting smoking after a cancer diagnosis. This study aims to examine the occurrence of smoking in patients with cancer treated at specialised oncology departments and outpatient clinics based within the metropolitan region of Hamburg, Germany, and presents an analysis of their smoking patterns. This understanding is the first step in developing an adequate smoking cessation intervention and shall contribute to a sustainable improvement in the treatment results, long-term survival and quality of life of patients with cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A questionnaire will be administered to patients with cancer (N=865) aged 18 years and above in the catchment area of Hamburg, Germany. Data acquisition includes sociodemographic, medical and psychosocial data as well as information on current smoking patterns. To identify the associations between smoking patterns and sociodemographic characteristics, disease-related variables, and psychological risk factors, descriptive statistics and multiple logistic as well as multinomial regressions will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PGBY8). It was approved by the ethics committee of the local psychological Ethic committee at the centre of psychosocial medicine Hamburg, Germany (LPEK) (tracking number: LPEK-0212). The study will be carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederike Bokemeyer
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Lebherz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Schulz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kathleen Gali
- University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christiane Bleich
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Herbert SL, Hirzle P, Bartmann C, Schlaiß T, Kiesel M, Curtaz C, Löb S, Wöckel A, Diessner J. Optimized process quality in certified breast centers through adherence to stringent diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms effects of structural as well as socio-demographic factors on start of therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 307:1097-1104. [PMID: 35927591 PMCID: PMC10023602 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06666-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE An increasing incidence of breast cancer can be observed worldwide. Since a delay of therapy can have a negative impact on prognosis, timely cancer care is an important quality indicator. By receiving treatment at a certified breast cancer center, the patient has the best chance of treatment in accordance with guidelines and the best prognosis. The identification of risk factors for a delay of therapy is of central importance and should be the basis for a continuous optimization of treatment at breast cancer centers. METHODS This retrospective study included women with breast cancer (primary diagnosis, relapse, or secondary malignancy) at the University Hospital Würzburg in 2019 and 2020. Data were retrieved from patients' records. Correlations and regression analyses were performed to detect potential risk factors for treatment delay. RESULTS Patients who received the histological confirmation of breast cancer at an external institution experienced a later therapy start than those patients who received the histological confirmation at the University Hospital Würzburg itself. (35.7 vs. 32.2 days). The interval between histological confirmation and the first consultation at the University Hospital Würzburg correlated statistically significant with age, distress and distance to the hospital. CONCLUSION Patients with an in-house diagnosis of breast cancer are treated more quickly than those whose diagnosis was confirmed in an external institution. We identified factors such as increased age, greater distance to the hospital as well as increased distress to prolong the time until start of oncological treatment. Intensified patient care should be offered to these subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia-Laureen Herbert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 4, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Paula Hirzle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 4, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Catharina Bartmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 4, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Schlaiß
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 4, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Kiesel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 4, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Carolin Curtaz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 4, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sanja Löb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 4, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 4, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Joachim Diessner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Würzburg, Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 4, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fabian A, Rühle A, Domschikowski J, Trommer M, Wegen S, Becker JN, Wurschi G, Boeke S, Sonnhoff M, Fink CA, Käsmann L, Schneider M, Bockelmann E, Treppner M, Krug D, Nicolay NH. Financial toxicity in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in a universal health care system - a prospective multicenter study of 1075 patients. Radiother Oncol 2023; 183:109604. [PMID: 36889598 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To establish and confirm prevalence as well as risk factors of financial toxicity in a large national cohort of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in a universal health care system. METHODS We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study offering a patient-reported questionnaire to all eligible cancer patients treated with radiotherapy in 11 centers in Germany during 60 consecutive days. The four-point subjective financial distress question of the EORTC QLQ-C30 was used as a surrogate for financial toxicity. Confirmatory hypothesis testing evaluated the primary study outcomes: overall prevalence of financial toxicity and its association with predefined risk factors. P-values <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS Of 2341 eligible patients, 1075 (46%) participated. The prevalence of subjective financial distress (=any grade higher than not present) was 41% (438/1075) exceeding the hypothesized range of 26.04-36.31%. Subjective financial distress was felt "A little" by 26% (280/1075), "Quite a bit" by 11% (113/1075) and "Very much" by 4% (45/1075) of the patients. Lower household income, lower global health status/ quality of life, higher direct costs and higher loss of income significantly predicted higher subjective financial distress per ordinal regression and confirmed these risk factors. Higher psychosocial distress and lower patient satisfaction were significantly associated with higher subjective financial distress in an exploratory ordinal regression model. CONCLUSION The overall prevalence of financial toxicity was higher than anticipated, although reported at low or moderate degrees by most affected patients. As we confirmed risk factors associated with financial toxicity, patients at risk should be addressed early for potential support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Justus Domschikowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Maike Trommer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Niklas Becker
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Georg Wurschi
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Jena University Hospital, 07740 Jena, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mathias Sonnhoff
- Center for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, 28239 Bremen, Germany
| | - Christoph A Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie Schneider
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Elodie Bockelmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Treppner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Study protocol: the OptiScreen-Study: optimized psycho-oncological care-from screening to intervention. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1343-1354. [PMID: 36166092 PMCID: PMC9514185 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04368-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adequate, needs-oriented psycho-oncological care contributes to reducing psychological distress in cancer patients and their relatives and improving quality of life. Regarding the precise determination of objective and subjective needs, there are often discrepancies in practice between the screening instrument completed by patients, the clinical impression of the treatment team, and the judgment of the psycho-oncology team. METHODS The present multicenter study "OptiScreen", involving three German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (Hannover, Leipzig, Dresden), aims to professionalize psychosocial screening to enable targeted and needs-based allocation to psycho-oncological support. Optimization and professionalization of the screening process will be achieved by training of oncological nursing staff to improve the targeted identification of distressed patients and provide them with needs-based psycho-oncological care. The non-randomized pre-post study will include inpatients with gastrointestinal cancers from the visceral oncology centers at the three sites. First, the comparison group (CG) will be assessed of N = 300. After completion of nursing training, the intervention group (IG) with N = 600 patients will be evaluated by validated questionnaires. RESULTS The aim is to reduce barriers on both the patient and treatment side by promoting interdisciplinary dialogue and linking the screening with a personal consultation offer provided by the nurses, which should help to increase utilization and reduce patients' fears, shame and information deficits. CONCLUSION It is not sufficient to establish a well-validated screening procedure, it also has to be feasible and useful in clinical practice. "OptiScreen" aims to improve the psycho-oncological care situation. In parallel, the study enables the professionalization of psycho-oncological care with the involvement of important professional groups (e.g. nursing) and thus aims to develop a "best practice model".
Collapse
|
38
|
Dinse H, Schweda A, Bäuerle A, Musche V, Fink M, Geiger S, Skoda EM, Teufel M. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic causes a dysfunctional dietary behavior: A German cross-sectional study. Nutr Health 2023:2601060221147768. [PMID: 36744411 PMCID: PMC9904988 DOI: 10.1177/02601060221147768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background: Since the COVID-19 pandemic has been affected our daily lives, the global population has been exposed to permanent concerns and thus might suffer from the psychological burden. It is well known that psychological burdens can affect dietary behavior. Aim: The impact of a psychological burden on people, and in particular on their dietary patterns was investigated in this nationawide cross-sectional study. Methods: 7525 participants responded to the questionnaire regarding the psychological burden concerning the COVID-19 pandemic and their current dietary structure with changes in the pattern and food amount (between November 2020 and March 2021). Results: A pandemic-related dysfunction of dietary behavior was found. Some participants reported restrictive (conscious) food intake and as well impulsive food intake, which can be described as dysfunctional eating behaviors. In particular, younger persons and individuals who claimed an increased psychological burden reported dysfunctional dietary behavior. Data clearly show that psychological burdens affect an individual's dietary behavior. Conclusion: Public health strategies have to be developed to support individuals at risk to improve coping strategies. The long-term aim should be avoiding the maintenance of dysfunctional dietary behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Dinse
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Adam Schweda
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Bäuerle
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Venja Musche
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Madeleine Fink
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sheila Geiger
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Skoda
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Teufel
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Solar S, Wieditz J, Lordick F, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Oechsle K, van Oorschot B, Thomas M, Asendorf T, Nauck F, Alt-Epping B. Screening versus multidimensional assessment of symptoms and psychosocial distress in cancer patients from the time of incurability. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1002499. [PMID: 36776341 PMCID: PMC9908949 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1002499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Previous symptom prevalence studies show a diverse spectrum of symptoms and a large diversity in symptom intensities in patients being just diagnosed as having incurable cancer. It is unclear, how physical symptoms and psychosocial burden should be recorded in order to determine the variable need for palliative care and further support. Therefore, we compared two different strategies for detecting physical symptoms and psychosocial burden of patients with newly diagnosed incurable cancer and their effects on the further course of the disease. Methods SCREBEL is a controlled, randomized, non-blinded, longitudinal study of the research network of the Palliative Medicine Working Group (APM) of the German Cancer Society (DKG). We compared: a less complex repeated brief screening for symptoms and burden in patients using the NCCN Distress Thermometer and IPOS questionnaire versus a multidimensional comprehensive assessment using the FACT-G and their entity-specific questionnaires, the PHQ4 scales, SCNS-34-SF, IPOS and NCCN Distress Thermometer. The primary study endpoint was quality of life (QoL), measured using FACT-G, after six months. Secondary study endpoints were QoL by using evaluation of secondary scores (NCCN DT, IPOS, PHQ4, SCNS-SF-34G) at time 6 months, the number of hospital days, the utilization of palliative care, emergency services, and psychosocial care structures. To assess effects and differences, multiple linear regression models were fitted and survival analyses were conducted. Results 504 patients were included in the study. 262 patients were lost to follow-up, including 155 fatalities. There were no significant differences between the low-threshold screening approach and a comprehensive assessment with respect to symptoms and other aspects of QoL. Using the IPOS, we were able to measure an improvement in the quality of life in the low-threshold screening arm by a decrease of 0.67 points (95%-CI: 0.34 to 0.99) every 30 days. (p<0.001). Data on the involvement of emergency facilities and on supportive services were insufficient for analysis. Conclusion A comprehensive, multidimensional assessment did not significantly differ from brief screening in preserving several dimensions of quality of life. These findings may positively influence the implementation of structured low-threshold screening programs for supportive and palliative needs in DKG certified cancer centers.DRKS -No. DRKS00017774 https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00017774.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Solar
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Johannes Wieditz
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany,*Correspondence: Johannes Wieditz,
| | - Florian Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Palliative Care Unit, Center of Oncology, University Hospital of Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Birgitt van Oorschot
- Interdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany,Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Asendorf
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Friedemann Nauck
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bernd Alt-Epping
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany,Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Fink M, Pasche S, Schmidt K, Tewes M, Schuler M, Mülley BW, Schadendorf D, Scherbaum N, Kowalski A, Skoda EM, Teufel M. Neurofeedback Treatment Affects Affective Symptoms, But Not Perceived Cognitive Impairment in Cancer Patients: Results of an Explorative Randomized Controlled Trial. Integr Cancer Ther 2023; 22:15347354221149950. [PMID: 36691908 PMCID: PMC9893099 DOI: 10.1177/15347354221149950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND EEG biofeedback (NF) is an established therapy to enable individuals to influence their own cognitive-emotional state by addressing changes in brainwaves. Psycho-oncological approaches of NF in cancer patients are rare and effects are hardly studied. OBJECTIVE The aim of this explorative, randomized controlled trial was to test the effectiveness of an alpha and theta NF training protocol, compared to mindfulness based therapy as an established psycho-oncological treatment. METHODS Of initially 62 screened patients, 56 were included (inclusion criteria were cancer independent of tumor stage, age >18 years, German speaking; exclusion criteria suicidal ideation, brain tumor). Randomization and stratification (tumor stage) was conducted by a computer system. Participants got 10 sessions over 5 weeks, in (a) an NF intervention (n = 21; 13 female, 8 male; MAge = 52.95(10 519); range = 31 to 73 years)) or (b) a mindfulness group therapy as control condition (CG; n = 21; ie, 15 female, 6 male; MAge = 50.33(8708); range = 32 to 67 years)). Outcome parameters included self-reported cognitive impairment (PCI) as primary outcome, and secondary outcomes of emotional distress (DT, PHQ-8, GAD-7), fatigue (MFI-20), rumination (RSQ), quality of life (QoL, EORTC-30 QoL), self-efficacy (GSE), and changes in EEG alpha, and theta-beta band performance in the NF condition. RESULTS No changes in cognitive impairment were found (P = .079), neither in NF nor CG. High affective distress was evident, with 70.7% showing elevated distress and 34.1% showing severe depressive symptoms. Affective symptoms of distress (P ≤ .01), depression (P ≤ .05) and generalized anxiety (P ≤ .05) decreased significantly over time. No differences between NF and CG were found. There was a significant increase of the alpha band (P ≤ .05; N = 15) over the NF sessions. Self-efficacy predicted QoL increase in NF with P ≤ .001 and an explained variance of 48.2%. CONCLUSION This is the first study to investigate NF technique with regard to basic mechanisms of effectiveness in a sample of cancer patients, compared to an established psycho-oncological intervention in this field. Though there were no changes in cognitive impairment, present data show that NF improves affective symptoms comparably to mindfulness-based therapy and even more pronounced in QoL and self-efficacy.Trial registration: ID: DRKS00015773.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Fink
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany,Madeleine Fink, Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstraße 174, Essen 45147, Germany. Emails: ;
| | | | | | - Mitra Tewes
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Schuler
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany,Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Bernhard W. Mülley
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany,University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany,University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Axel Kowalski
- NeuroFit GmbH, Krefeld, Germany,IB University of Applied Health and Social Sciences, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Labouvie H, Dietz T, Schiewer V, Kusch M. Früherkennung seelischer Belastung in der onkologischen Versorgungspraxis. DIAGNOSTICA 2023. [DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Die Distress-Skala (DS) bildet ein Single-Item-Instrument in Form einer zehnstufigen Likertskala in 2 Varianten zur Identifikation psychosozialer Belastungen zum Krankheitsbeginn (Screening-Variante) sowie im Krankheitsverlauf (Verlaufsvariante). Die DS wurde an einer Stichprobe onkologisch erkrankter Patientinnen und Patienten mit einer Größe von N = 661 nahe am Diagnosezeitpunkt validiert. Bei N = 92 der Stichprobe lagen insgesamt 3 Erhebungszeitpunkte vor, anhand dessen die Validierung der Verlaufsvariante erfolgte. Unter Verwendung des HADS-Gesamtsummenscore-Schwellenwerts > 14 als externes Kriterium wurde für die Screening-Variante der DS ein Schwellenwert > 7 mit einer Sensitivität von 81 % bzw. 78 % und einer Spezifität von 71 % bzw. 75 % ermittelt. Die Verlaufsvariante der DS erzielte bei einem Schwellenwert von > 5 eine Sensitivität zu T2 von 77 % und zu T3 von 70 % und eine Spezifität zu T2 von 67 % und zu T3 von 78 %. Die Ergebnisse weisen eine gute Diskriminierungsfähigkeit auf und empfehlen den Einsatz der DS zu Beginn der Krebserkrankung bzw. im Krankheitsverlauf.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hildegard Labouvie
- Psychoonkologische Versorgungsforschung, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Uniklinik Köln, Deutschland
| | - Thilo Dietz
- Psychoonkologische Versorgungsforschung, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Uniklinik Köln, Deutschland
| | - Vera Schiewer
- Psychoonkologische Versorgungsforschung, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Uniklinik Köln, Deutschland
| | - Michael Kusch
- Psychoonkologische Versorgungsforschung, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Uniklinik Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Solar S, Wieditz J, Lordick F, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Oechsle K, van Oorschot B, Thomas M, Asendorf T, Nauck F, Alt-Epping B. Screening versus multidimensional assessment of symptoms and psychosocial distress in cancer patients from the time of incurability. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1002499. [PMID: 36776341 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1002499.pmid:36776341;pmcid:pmc9908949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous symptom prevalence studies show a diverse spectrum of symptoms and a large diversity in symptom intensities in patients being just diagnosed as having incurable cancer. It is unclear, how physical symptoms and psychosocial burden should be recorded in order to determine the variable need for palliative care and further support. Therefore, we compared two different strategies for detecting physical symptoms and psychosocial burden of patients with newly diagnosed incurable cancer and their effects on the further course of the disease. METHODS SCREBEL is a controlled, randomized, non-blinded, longitudinal study of the research network of the Palliative Medicine Working Group (APM) of the German Cancer Society (DKG). We compared: a less complex repeated brief screening for symptoms and burden in patients using the NCCN Distress Thermometer and IPOS questionnaire versus a multidimensional comprehensive assessment using the FACT-G and their entity-specific questionnaires, the PHQ4 scales, SCNS-34-SF, IPOS and NCCN Distress Thermometer. The primary study endpoint was quality of life (QoL), measured using FACT-G, after six months. Secondary study endpoints were QoL by using evaluation of secondary scores (NCCN DT, IPOS, PHQ4, SCNS-SF-34G) at time 6 months, the number of hospital days, the utilization of palliative care, emergency services, and psychosocial care structures. To assess effects and differences, multiple linear regression models were fitted and survival analyses were conducted. RESULTS 504 patients were included in the study. 262 patients were lost to follow-up, including 155 fatalities. There were no significant differences between the low-threshold screening approach and a comprehensive assessment with respect to symptoms and other aspects of QoL. Using the IPOS, we were able to measure an improvement in the quality of life in the low-threshold screening arm by a decrease of 0.67 points (95%-CI: 0.34 to 0.99) every 30 days. (p<0.001). Data on the involvement of emergency facilities and on supportive services were insufficient for analysis. CONCLUSION A comprehensive, multidimensional assessment did not significantly differ from brief screening in preserving several dimensions of quality of life. These findings may positively influence the implementation of structured low-threshold screening programs for supportive and palliative needs in DKG certified cancer centers.DRKS -No. DRKS00017774 https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00017774.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Solar
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Johannes Wieditz
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Florian Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Palliative Care Unit, Center of Oncology, University Hospital of Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Birgitt van Oorschot
- Interdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Asendorf
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Friedemann Nauck
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bernd Alt-Epping
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ullrich A, Bahloul S, Bokemeyer C, Oechsle K. Evaluation of a Routine Psychosocial Screening for Patients Receiving Inpatient Specialist Palliative Care: Feasibility and Outcomes. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK IN END-OF-LIFE & PALLIATIVE CARE 2023; 19:33-52. [PMID: 36332103 DOI: 10.1080/15524256.2022.2139336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
This prospective one-year cohort study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of a routine psychosocial screening at patients' admittance to specialist inpatient palliative care. Patients admitted to an academic palliative care ward were routinely screened for self-reported distress and psychological morbidity, psychosocial stress factors, and subjective need for help from psychosocial professions. Cognitive impairments were the most common patient barrier to screening. Screenings were completed in 138 of 428 patients (32%). Based on established cutoffs, distress was indicated in 89%, depression in 51%, and anxiety in 50% of these patients. The burden on next-of-kin emerged as the most prevalent stress factor (73%). One-half of the patients disclosed a subjective need for help (53%). Possible depression (p = .023), anxiety (p < .001), and subjective need for help (p < .001) correlated positively with a higher amount of time spent by psychologists and creative arts-based therapists with small to moderate effects. Patients who completed the screening were attributed with a higher amount of time by social workers than patients who did not (p = .004), but there were no relationships between screening results and social work. Results suggest the potential of screenings for the allocation of specialist psychosocial care during specialist palliative care; however, barriers to screening do exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneke Ullrich
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Said Bahloul
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Springer F, Sautier L, Schilling G, Koch-Gromus U, Bokemeyer C, Friedrich M, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Esser P. Effect of depression, anxiety, and distress screeners on the need, intention, and utilization of psychosocial support services among cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:117. [PMID: 36645499 PMCID: PMC9842579 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07580-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In clinical cancer care, distress screening is recommended to identify highly burdened patients in objective need for psychosocial support to improve psychological distress and quality of life and to enhance patient empowerment. It is however unclear whether distress screeners are suitable for psychosocial care planning and thus whether they can predict the willingness that is need, intention, and utilization, to seek psychosocial support. METHODS In a secondary analysis of a cluster intervention study, we assessed cancer patients with three distress screeners (DT, PHQ-9, GAD-7) at baseline. The willingness to seek psychosocial support services was assessed binary for psychosocial services at 3 and 6 months. Logistic regression models were applied to examine the predictive effect of the screeners on need, intention, and utilization. We corrected all models for multiple testing. RESULTS The 660 patients included in the study were on average 60 years, 54% were male. At the 3- and 6-month follow-up, 353 and 259 patients participated, respectively. The screeners were best in predicting the need for support (OR reaching up to 1.15, 1.20, and 1.22 for the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and DT respectively). The intention was predicted by the PHQ-9 and GAD-7, whereas utilization of psychosocial support services was not predicted by the screeners. CONCLUSION The three distress screeners might be useful in psychosocial care planning, as they are able to predict the need and to some degree the intention to seek psychosocial support. Future research needs to examine potential barriers and supporting factors that may explain utilization of psychosocial support. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was retrospectively registered (2/2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT04749056).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Springer
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Leon Sautier
- grid.13648.380000 0001 2180 3484Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Georgia Schilling
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uwe Koch-Gromus
- grid.13648.380000 0001 2180 3484Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- grid.13648.380000 0001 2180 3484Department of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- grid.411339.d0000 0000 8517 9062Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
- grid.411339.d0000 0000 8517 9062Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter Esser
- grid.411339.d0000 0000 8517 9062Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Stöcker A, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Hinz A, Ernst J. Utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by women with breast cancer or gynecological cancer. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285718. [PMID: 37172048 PMCID: PMC10180689 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) has become increasingly popular among cancer patients. The prevalence of CAM use differs worldwide and depends on different sociodemographic and medical characteristics. Findings on predictors for CAM use and its benefits for quality of Life (QoL) have been inconclusive in recent studies. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and methods of CAM use in breast cancer (BC) and gynecological cancer (GC) patients, to compare CAM users vs. non-CAM users regarding their sociodemographic and medical characteristics, and to investigate the relationship between CAM use and QoL. METHODS In a sub-analysis from a multicenter, cross-sectional study in Germany, we examined 1,214 female cancer patients (897 with BC and 317 with GC). We obtained data from self-reports via standardized questionnaires and measured QoL with the EORTC QLQ-C30. RESULTS In total, 565 of the 1,214 patients (46.5%) used some form of CAM. Its use was higher in BC than in GC patients (48.6% vs. 40.7%). In both cancer groups, the users evaluated CAM as being helpful (BC: 60.8%, GC: 59.6%) The most frequently used CAM methods were vitamins/minerals/micronutrients, homeopathy, and mistletoe therapy. CAM users are younger, more highly educated, and financially better off than non-CAM users. They are also characterized by having been diagnosed with cancer a longer time ago, being at more advanced stages of the disease, and experiencing higher distress levels. CAM use is significantly associated with a lower global health status/ QoL in GC patients. Predictors for CAM use are: high level of vocational education, middle or high monthly income, time span since diagnosis of more than 12 months, the status of currently ongoing chemotherapy or hormone therapy treatment, and distress. CONCLUSION Our data support the findings of previous studies and highlight the need to develop a consistent CAM definition with respect to comparability and evaluation of CAM services. More longitudinal studies are desirable to establish viable associations between CAM use and relevant outcomes such as QoL or disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Stöcker
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jochen Ernst
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Resilience as a Factor Influencing Psychological Distress Experience in Patients with Neuro-Oncological Disease. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:9875-9883. [PMID: 36547190 PMCID: PMC9776769 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29120776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer causes psychological distress. Approximately one-third of all patients with cancer suffer from distress requiring psycho-oncological treatment. Examining factors contributing to their distress can inform approaches to counteracting them. Among such factors, resilience is considered to be a psychological adaptive capacity resulting from complex genetic, epigenetic, psychological, and environmental influences. For that reason, we investigated resilience as a factor of psychological distress experience among patients with neuro-oncological disease. To assess distress among patients with neuro-oncological diseases, we performed electronic psycho-oncological screening in the Department of Neurosurgery at Tübingen University Hospital (n = 100) following tumor surgery (T0) using the Resilience Scale 13, the Hornheider Screening Instrument, the Patient Health Questionnaire-2, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-2, and the Distress Thermometer, all administered on tablets. Follow-up was done 6 months after (T1). The distress of patients with neuro-oncological disease decreased significantly after 6 months (p < 0.01). Most patients (87%) showed moderate to high resilience. Although significant correlations with distress are measurable at the T0 time point (ρ = -0.318 **, p < 0.01), no significant correlations were observed at T1. Thus, resilience seems to significantly impact distress in the acute phase of the neuro-oncological disease. For clinical practice, our findings suggest that resilience-focused screening can provide useful information about patients at risk of experiencing distress.
Collapse
|
47
|
Berlin P, Seifart C, von Blanckenburg P. Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) scale in a German hospital setting. PEC INNOVATION 2022; 1:100045. [PMID: 37213740 PMCID: PMC10194301 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Objective For every health behavior, readiness to engage is a necessary and crucial foundation for following conversations, interventions or behavior changes. The present study aims to support a one-factor structure for the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) scale (Berlin et al., 2021) in a population of cancer patients (N = 295). Methods For validation purposes, data of patients participating in a screening development study at a university clinic was used. Model adequacy was analyzed with structural equation modelling and controlled for with goodness of fit indices: χ2-test, SRMR, rRMSEA. Discriminant and convergent validity were assessed with correlations of REOLC and psychological or health behavior measures. Results Factor structure was supported with good fit indices, discriminant validity and convergent validity. Readiness correlated significantly with age and reported death anxiety. Conclusion The REOLC scale is a reliable instrument to assess cancer patients' readiness for end-of-life conversations. Future studies may further address moderating and mediating effects of socio-demographic, medical and psychological factors. Innovation The assessment of readiness may further indicate anxiety levels of cancer patients and enables practitioners to provide interventions accordingly. However, in a clinical setting and especially for patients with a palliative prognosis, end-of-life care conversations may need to be introduced early.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pia Berlin
- Department of Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Germany
- Corresponding author at: Philipps-University of Marburg, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
| | - Carola Seifart
- Department of Medicine, Research Group Medical Ethics, Philipps-University of Marburg, Germany
- University clinic of Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lannen P, Bombach C, Sticca F, Simoni H, Jenni OG. The LifeStories project: Empowering voices and avoiding harm—Ethics protocol of a long-term follow-up study of individuals placed in infant care institutions in Switzerland. Front Psychol 2022; 13:1032388. [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1032388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Little empirical data exist to guide ethical decisions when conducting research with vulnerable populations. The current study assesses a protocol designed to mitigate risks in a population-based cohort of 246 individuals placed in care institutions as infants in a non-selective 60-year follow-up. In total, 116 (47%) individuals chose to participate, of whom 53 (55%) reported positive effects of participation such as the opportunity to fill some gaps in their life stories, to better deal with their past, and to understand previous family dynamics. Only three individuals (2.5%) explicitly reported negative short-term consequences such as feeling upset as a result of thinking about stressful times, but they nonetheless rated the usefulness of the study as high. For six participants (5%), psychological counseling sessions were initiated as a support measure. Our findings suggest that risk of harm can be managed with a rigorous ethics protocol when conducting research with a vulnerable cohort and therefore enable the voices of survivors to be heard. A step wise approach in which increasing amounts of information were presented at each step, clearly operationalized passive decline, and direct and consistent contact with highly trained staff were considered key to mitigating distress.
Collapse
|
49
|
Kastner AM, Kocak HK, Fischer-Jacobs J, Hahne A, Zimmermann T. Desire for Children and Distress in Women with Hereditary Cancer Syndromes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:14517. [PMID: 36361396 PMCID: PMC9654350 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The diagnosis of a hereditary cancer syndrome can be psychologically stressful and influence family planning. This study aimed to gain insights into the relationship between the desire for children and the distress of female carriers. Women (N = 255) with different hereditary cancer syndromes were assessed from November 2019 to July 2021 at genetic counseling centers, the centers of the German HBOC-Consortium and the centers of the German HNPCC-Consortium regarding their distress levels with the NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT). The desire for children was measured by self-developed questions. Levels of distress and desire for children were evaluated descriptively. Factors influencing the desire for children and distress were calculated using binary logistic regression: 56% (n = 51) of 18- to 39-year-old participants reported a desire to have children; 70.6% of the carriers with a desire for children indicated a need for advice from their physicians regarding family planning. The diagnosis led 61.5% to postpone the timing of family planning, and the majority (68.8%) opted for an earlier birth. Carriers had higher levels of distress. Younger carriers (p = 0.037) and those living in poorer economic circumstances (p = 0.011) were more distressed. The diagnosis of hereditary cancer syndrome affects family planning. The results emphasize the importance of physicians addressing family planning in their counseling sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Kastner
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Hatice Kübra Kocak
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Josefine Fischer-Jacobs
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Andrea Hahne
- BRCA-Netzwerk e.V., Thomas-Mann-Street 40, 53111 Bonn, Germany
| | - Tanja Zimmermann
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fröhlich E, Sassenrath C, Nadji-Ohl M, Unteroberdörster M, Rückriegel S, von der Brelie C, Roder C, Forster MT, Schommer S, Löhr M, Pala A, Goebel S, Mielke D, Gerlach R, Renovanz M, Wirtz CR, Onken J, Czabanka M, Tatagiba MS, Rohde V, Ernestus RI, Vajkoczy P, Gansland O, Coburger J. Resilience in Lower Grade Glioma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215410. [PMID: 36358828 PMCID: PMC9656661 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Current data show that resilience is an important factor in cancer patients’ well-being. We aim to explore the resilience of patients with lower grade glioma (LGG) and the potentially influencing factors. We performed a cross-sectional assessment of adult patients with LGG who were enrolled in the LoG-Glio registry. By phone interview, we administered the following measures: Resilience Scale (RS-13), distress thermometer, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test for visually impaired patients (MoCA-Blind), internalized stigmatization by brain tumor (ISBI), Eastern Cooperative Oncological Group performance status (ECOG), patients’ perspective questionnaire (PPQ) and typical clinical parameters. We calculated correlations and multivariate regression models. Of 74 patients who were assessed, 38% of those showed a low level of resilience. Our results revealed significant correlations of resilience with distress (p < 0.001, −0.49), MOCA (p = 0.003, 0.342), ECOG (p < 0.001, −0.602), stigmatization (p < 0.001, −0.558), pain (p < 0.001, −0.524), and occupation (p = 0.007, 0.329). In multivariate analyses, resilience was negatively associated with elevated ECOG (p = 0.020, β = −0.383) and stigmatization levels (p = 0.008, β = −0.350). Occupation showed a tendency towards a significant association with resilience (p = 0.088, β = −0.254). Overall, low resilience affected more than one third of our cohort. Low functional status is a specific risk factor for low resilience. The relevant influence of stigmatization on resilience is a novel finding for patients suffering from a glioma and should be routinely identified and targeted in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Fröhlich
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, 89312 Günzburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Sassenrath
- Department of Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Faculty of Engering, Informatics and Psychology, University of Ulm, 89312 Günzburg, Germany
| | - Minou Nadji-Ohl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Rückriegel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Constantin Roder
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marie-Therese Forster
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Frankfurt, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stephan Schommer
- Department of Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Faculty of Engering, Informatics and Psychology, University of Ulm, 89312 Günzburg, Germany
| | - Mario Löhr
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 12200 Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrej Pala
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, 89312 Günzburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Simone Goebel
- Department of Psychology, University of Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany
| | - Dorothee Mielke
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Gerlach
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helioskliniken Erfurt, 99089 Erfurt, Germany
| | - Mirjam Renovanz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 27, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 12200 Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Czabanka
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Frankfurt, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helioskliniken Erfurt, 99089 Erfurt, Germany
| | - Ralf-Ingo Ernestus
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 12200 Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Gansland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Jan Coburger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, 89312 Günzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|