Central and systemic haemodynamic effects of terlipressin in portal hypertensive patients

Multisystem hemodynamic effects of terlipressin in cirrhosis: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI) is a serious complication of advanced liver disease. Pharmacologic options are limited in effectiveness, therefore liver transplantation is the definitive therapy. Early investigation into terlipressin as a first-line therapy for HRS-AKI has been promising but expected hemodynamic changes across organ systems in patients with cirrhosis have not been thoroughly examined.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the literature including adult patients with cirrhosis who received terlipressin and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. Non-human studies, case reports, conference abstracts, and review articles were excluded. Searches were performed up to December 2024 in the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL.

RESULTS

Of 2022 studies retrieved, 56 studies met inclusion criteria. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and cardiac output were the most reported parameters. Pulmonary arterial pressure and wedge pressure were the next most common. Systemic vascular resistance, hepatic and renal measures such as resistive indices and portal pressure gradients had fewer studies. Studies reported decreased heart rate, increased mean arterial pressure, decreased cardiac output/index, and increased systemic vascular resistance. Other hemodynamic outcomes were more varied across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Terlipressin exerts a variety of hemodynamic effects across organ systems and vascular beds. More studies are required to understand if any hemodynamic parameters might predict terlipressin response or adverse events.

Long-Term Continuous Terlipressin Infusion Improves Cardiac Reserve in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cardiac dysfunction is a key factor in the pathogenesis of hepatorenal syndrome, for which terlipressin is the recommended first-line treatment. This study investigates whether long-term terlipressin can ameliorate the subclinical cardiac dysfunction observed in decompensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ascites enrolled in a prospective study of home continuous terlipressin infusion were included. Cardiac function was assessed using dobutamine stress echocardiogram before and after 12 weeks of terlipressin. The primary outcome was the impact of terlipressin on cardiac reserve, the change in cardiac output (CO) in response to stress.

RESULTS

The median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 56-64 years), the median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 15 (interquartile range, 12.3-17.0), and 72.7% were male. The increase in CO in response to low-dose dobutamine was significantly higher following terlipressin (↑4.0 L/min [↑57.8%]) as compared with baseline (↑1.8 L/min [21.3%]) (P = .0001). The proportion of patients with impaired cardiac reserve (defined by ΔCO <25% after low-dose dobutamine) reduced from 81.8% at baseline to 40.9% after terlipressin, (P = .02), driven primarily by improvement in inotropic function. Resting CO decreased significantly after terlipressin from 8.9 ± 2.2 L/min to 7.2 ± 1.8 L/min (normal range 5-6 L/min) (P < .001), due to a decrease in stroke volume from 108 to 86 mL/beat (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term continuous terlipressin infusion resulted in a significant increase in cardiac reserve and attenuation of the hyperdynamic state usually observed in decompensated cirrhosis. These data provide important mechanistic insight into the pathogenesis and reversibility of cardiac dysfunction in cirrhosis. Future studies are required to evaluate whether long-term terlipressin can prevent hepatic decompensating events such as hepatorenal syndrome in high-risk individuals. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Number: ACTRN12619000891123.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Portal Hypertension

Portal hypertension is the key mechanism driving the transition from compensated to decompensated cirrhosis. In this review, the authors described the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in cirrhosis and the rationale of pharmacologic treatment of portal hypertension. We discussed both etiologic and nonetiologic treatment of portal hypertension and the specific clinical scenarios how nonselective beta-blocker can be used in patients with cirrhosis. Finally, the authors summarized the evidence for emerging alternatives for portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis.

Hepatorenal Syndrome in Cirrhosis

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a form of kidney dysfunction that characteristically occurs in liver cirrhosis. It is characterized by a marked impairment of kidney function in response to circulatory and hemodynamic alterations that occur in advanced stages of liver cirrhosis, aggravated by systemic inflammation and bacterial translocation. The classical definitions of the types of HRS have been recently revisited and 2 forms of HRS have been redefined: the acute form, referred to as acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI), and the chronic form, referred to as chronic kidney disease. HRS-AKI is one of the most severe forms of AKI in patients with cirrhosis and it consists of an abrupt impairment of kidney function, frequently triggered by an infection, appearing in the setting of advanced decompensated cirrhosis. Differential diagnosis with other causes of AKI is crucial because HRS-AKI requires a specific treatment. Differential diagnosis with AKI-acute tubular necrosis may be challenging and kidney biomarkers may be useful in this setting. Treatment of HRS-AKI is based on the administration of vasoconstrictor drugs in combination with volume expansion with albumin. Prognosis of HRS-AKI is poor, and the ideal definitive treatment consists of liver transplantation or simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. HRS-AKI has a big impact on patients' quality of life. Management of HRS-AKI remains challenging in specific situations such as alcohol-associated hepatitis or metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease cirrhosis. Developing preventive measures for HRS-AKI, improving its early identification, discovering new biomarkers for differential diagnosis, and improving the response to therapy are some of the unmet needs in the field of HRS-AKI.

Efficacy and safety of terlipressin infusion during liver surgery: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Liver disease causes 2 million deaths annually, accounting for 4% of all deaths worldwide. Liver surgery is one of the effective therapeutic options. Bleeding is a major complication during liver surgery. Perioperative bleeding and allogeneic blood transfusion may deteriorate the prognosis. Terlipressin (TP), a synthetic analogue of the antidiuretic hormone, may reduceblood loss during abdominal surgery. Several clinical centres have attempted to use TP during liver surgery, but the evidence for its effectiveness in reducing blood loss and the need for allogeneic blood transfusion, as well as its safety during the perioperative period, remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TP in reducing blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion needs during liver surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science for studies on perioperative use of TP during liver surgery from inception to July 2023. We will limit the language to English, and two reviewers will independently screen and select articles. The primary study outcomes are estimated blood loss and the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes include operating time, intensive care unit stay, length of stay, intraoperative urine output, acute kidney injury rate, postoperative complications, hepatic and renal function during follow-up, and TP-related adverse effects. We will include studies that met the following criteria: (1) randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies or case-control studies; (2) the publication time was till July 2023; (3) adult patients (≥18 years old) undergoing elective liver surgery; (4) comparison of TP with other treatments and (5) the study includes at least one outcome. We will exclude animal studies, case reports, case series, non-original articles, reviews, paediatric articles, non-controlled trials, unpublished articles, non-English articles and other studies that are duplicates. We will use Review Manager V.5.3 software for meta-analysis and perform stratification analysis for the study quality of RCTs based on the Jadad score. For cohort or case-control studies, the study quality will be analysed based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale scores. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to assess confidence in the cumulative evidence. For primary outcomes, we will conduct subgroup analyses based on meta-regression. We will also perform leave-one-out sensitivity analyses to evaluate the effect of each individual study on the combined results by removing the individual studies one by one for outcomes with significant heterogeneity. The protocol follows the Cochrane Handbook for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is a secondary analysis of existing data; therefore, it does not require ethical approval. We will disseminate the results through peer-reviewed publications.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023450333.

From past to present to future: Terlipressin and hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a rare and highly morbid form of kidney injury unique to patients with decompensated cirrhosis. HRS is a physiologic consequence of portal hypertension, leading to a functional kidney injury that can be reversed by restoring effective circulating volume and renal perfusion. While liver transplantation is the only definitive "cure" for HRS, medical management with vasoconstrictors and i.v. albumin is a cornerstone of supportive care. Terlipressin, a V1a receptor agonist that acts on the splanchnic circulation, has been used for many years outside the United States for the treatment of HRS. However, its recent Food and Drug Administration approval has generated new interest in this population, as a new base of prescribers now work to incorporate the drug into clinical practice. In this article, we review HRS pathophysiology and diagnostic criteria, the clinical use of terlipressin and alternative therapies, and identify areas of future research in the space of HRS and kidney injury in cirrhosis.

Portal Hypertension in Malnutrition and Sarcopenia in Decompensated Cirrhosis-Pathogenesis, Implications and Therapeutic Opportunities

Malnutrition and sarcopenia are highly prevalent in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and are associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Their pathophysiology is complex and multifactorial, with protein-calorie malnutrition, systemic inflammation, reduced glycogen stores and hormonal imbalances all well reported. The direct contribution of portal hypertension to these driving factors is however not widely documented in the literature. This review details the specific mechanisms by which portal hypertension directly contributes to the development of malnutrition and sarcopenia in cirrhosis. We summarise the existing literature describing treatment strategies that specifically aim to reduce portal pressures and their impact on nutritional and muscle outcomes, which is particularly relevant to those with end-stage disease awaiting liver transplantation.

Continuous vs. intermittent terlipressin infusion for portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Portal hypertension, a major complication of chronic liver disease, often leads to life-threatening variceal bleeding, managed effectively with vasoactive drugs like terlipressin. However, the most optimal method of terlipressin administration, continuous versus intermittent infusion, remains a subject of debate, necessitating this systematic review and meta-analysis for evidence-based decision-making in managing this critical condition.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA standards and explored multiple databases until 6 April 2023, such as MEDLINE through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. Independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met specific inclusion criteria. After assessing study quality and extracting necessary data, statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan), with results presented as risk ratios (RR) or mean differences.

Results

Five RCTs (n=395 patients) were included. The continuous terlipressin group had a significantly lower risk of rebleeding (RR=0.43, P=0.0004) and treatment failure (RR=0.22, P=0.02) and fewer total adverse effects (RR=0.52, P<0.00001) compared to the intermittent group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in mean arterial pressure (P=0.26), length of hospital stays (P=0.78), and mortality rates (P=0.65).

Conclusion

This study provides robust evidence suggesting that continuous terlipressin infusion may be superior to intermittent infusions in reducing the risk of rebleeding, treatment failure, and adverse effects in patients with portal hypertension. However, further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are required to confirm these findings and to investigate the potential benefits of continuous terlipressin infusion on mortality and hospital stays.

Terlipressin in the management of liver disease

INTRODUCTION

Terlipressin is a synthetic vasopressin analog which has been recently approved in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome. Terlipressin stimulates vasopressin receptors located on the smooth muscle vasculature of the splanchnic circulation and renal tubules which results in splanchnic vasoconstriction with improved renal perfusion and antidiuretic activity, respectively.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss available data regarding the FDA approved use of terlipressin, safety, and tolerability, as well as highlight alternative uses in chronic liver disease currently still under investigation.

EXPERT OPINION

Terlipressin is more efficacious compared to other vasoactive agents including midodrine octreotide and norepinephrine in reversal of hepatorenal syndrome and improves short-term survival. Other potential applications of terlipressin's vasoconstrictor actions reported in the literature include management of variceal hemorrhage and other complications of portal hypertension.

Management of Portal Hypertension in Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Disease

Portal hypertension is central to the pathogenesis of complications of cirrhosis, including acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Both nonselective beta-blockers and preemptive transjugular portal-systemic stent shunt can lower portal pressure, reducing the risk of variceal bleeding, a known trigger for ACLF. However, in patients with advanced cirrhosis, both could potentially induce ACLF by causing hemodynamic instability and hepatic ischemia, respectively, and therefore must be used with caution. Lowering portal pressure with vasoconstrictor such as terlipressin can reverse the kidney failure but careful patient selection is key for success, with careful monitoring for complications.

OCE-205, a Selective V1a Partial Agonist, Reduces Portal Pressure in Rat Models of Portal Hypertension

Purpose

Management of decompensated cirrhosis may include the use of vasoconstrictors that can lead to serious adverse events. OCE-205 was designed as a highly selective V1a receptor partial agonist, intended to have a wider therapeutic window than full vasopressin agonists.

Methods

We aimed to characterize the activity of OCE-205 treatment in two rat models of portal hypertension (PHT). For both models, OCE-205 was administered as a subcutaneous bolus injection. Thirty male Wistar rats were fed a methionine/choline-deficient (MCD) diet to model PHT. Animals received OCE-205 (10, 25, 100, or 500 µg/kg) or intra-arterial terlipressin (100 µg/kg). In a more severe model of PHT, 11 male Sprague Dawley rats had the common bile duct surgically ligated (BDL) and received OCE-205. Portal pressure (PP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured.

Results

For PP in the MCD model, MAP increased while PP decreased in rats treated with OCE-205 or terlipressin; the peak changes to MAP were 14.7 and 33.5 mmHg, respectively. Changes in MAP began to plateau after 10 min in the OCE-205 groups, whereas in the terlipressin group, MAP rapidly increased and peaked after 20 min. Across all treatment groups in the BDL model, a dose-related decrease from baseline in PP was observed following OCE-205, plateauing as the dose increased. In all treatment groups, PP change remained negative throughout the 30-min testing period. In both PHT rat models, a reduction in PP was coupled to an increase in MAP, with both plateauing in dose-response curves.

Conclusion

Data support OCE-205 as a promising candidate for further development.

Institutional Protocol Number

Procedures were approved by the Ferring Research Institute (FRI) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee on July 13, 2011, under protocol FRI-07-0002.

Critical Care Management of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: Certainties and Unknowns

Intensive care unit (ICU) admission is frequently required in patients with decompensated cirrhosis for organ support. This entity, known as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), is associated with high short-term mortality. ICU management of ACLF is complex, as these patients are prone to develop new organ failures and infectious or bleeding complications. Poor nutritional status, lack of effective liver support systems, and shortage of liver donors are also factors that contribute to increase their mortality. ICU therapy parallels that applied in the general ICU population in some complications but has differential characteristics in others. This review describes the current knowledge on critical care management of patients with ACLF including organ support, prognostic assessment, early liver transplantation, and futility rules. Certainties and knowledge gaps in this area are also discussed.

Current Status of Peptide Medications and the Position of Active Therapeutic Peptides with Scorpion Venom Origin

: Peptides are highly potent, selective, and relatively safe therapeutics. Over the past two decades, natural peptides have been obtained, studied, and eventually approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) due to advancements in identification, production, modification, and analytical technologies. Some peptide therapeutics has been derived from the venom gland of venomous animals, including snake, leech, lizard, snail, and scorpion. Scorpion was identified as a reservoir of important peptides with pharmaceutical properties. The scorpion uses these peptides for capturing prey and defense. However, their pharmacological properties in treating different diseases, including cardiac problems, autoimmune and infectious diseases, and diverse cancers, have been confirmed. Ion channel modifiers are the greatest components of the scorpion venom glands. Due to advances in proteomic and transcriptomic approaches, the identification of new scorpion venom peptides is steadily increasing. In this review, we tried to represent the current status of peptide medicines and describe the last peptide medications approved by FDA in 2022. Moreover, we will further explain potent peptides originating from scorpion venom, which have gone through important steps to be approved.

Practice guidance for the use of terlipressin for liver cirrhosis-related complications

Background

Liver cirrhosis is a major global health burden worldwide due to its high risk of morbidity and mortality. Role of terlipressin for the management of liver cirrhosis-related complications has been recognized during recent years. This article aims to develop evidence-based clinical practice guidance on the use of terlipressin for liver cirrhosis-related complications.

Methods

Hepatobiliary Study Group of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology of the Chinese Medical Association and Hepatology Committee of the Chinese Research Hospital Association have invited gastroenterologists, hepatologists, infectious disease specialists, surgeons, and clinical pharmacists to formulate the clinical practice guidance based on comprehensive literature review and experts' clinical experiences.

Results

Overall, 10 major guidance statements regarding efficacy and safety of terlipressin in liver cirrhosis were proposed. Terlipressin can be beneficial for the management of cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). However, the evidence regarding the use of terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with ascites, post-paracentesis circulatory dysfunction, and bacterial infections and in those undergoing hepatic resection and liver transplantation remains insufficient. Terlipressin-related adverse events, mainly including gastrointestinal symptoms, electrolyte disturbance, and cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events, should be closely monitored.

Conclusion

The current clinical practice guidance supports the use of terlipressin for gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and HRS in liver cirrhosis. High-quality studies are needed to further clarify its potential effects in other liver cirrhosis-related complications.

Vasopressin and Its Analogues: From Natural Hormones to Multitasking Peptides

Human neurohormone vasopressin (AVP) is synthesized in overlapping regions in the hypothalamus. It is mainly known for its vasoconstricting abilities, and it is responsible for the regulation of plasma osmolality by maintaining fluid homeostasis. Over years, many attempts have been made to modify this hormone and find AVP analogues with different pharmacological profiles that could overcome its limitations. Non-peptide AVP analogues with low molecular weight presented good affinity to AVP receptors. Natural peptide counterparts, found in animals, are successfully applied as therapeutics; for instance, lypressin used in treatment of diabetes insipidus. Synthetic peptide analogues compensate for the shortcomings of AVP. Desmopressin is more resistant to proteolysis and presents mainly antidiuretic effects, while terlipressin is a long-acting AVP analogue and a drug recommended in the treatment of varicose bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. Recently published results on diverse applications of AVP analogues in medicinal practice, including potential lypressin, terlipressin and ornipressin in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2, are discussed.

Test-Retest Reliability and Consistency of HVPG and Impact on Trial Design: A Study in 289 Patients from 20 Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Portal hypertension (PH) is a major driver for cirrhosis complications. Portal pressure is estimated in practice by the HVPG. The assessment of HVPG changes has been used for drug development in PH. This study aimed at quantifying the test-retest reliability and consistency of HVPG in the specific context of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of PH in cirrhosis and its impact on power calculations for trial design.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We conducted a search of published RCTs in patients with cirrhosis reporting individual patient-level data of HVPG at baseline and after an intervention, which included a placebo or an untreated control arm. Baseline and follow-up HVPGs in the control groups were extracted after digitizing the plots. We assessed reliability and consistency and the potential impact of study characteristics. We retrieved a total of 289 before and after HVPG measurements in the placebo/untreated groups from 20 RCTs. The time span between the two HVPG measurements ranged between 20 minutes and 730 days. Pre-/post-HVPG variability was lower in studies including only compensated patients; therefore, modeled sample size calculations for trials in compensated cirrhosis were lower than for decompensated cirrhosis. A higher proportion of alcohol-associated cirrhosis and unicentric trials was associated with lower differences between baseline and follow-up measurements. The smallest detectable difference in an individual was 26% and 30% in compensated and decompensated patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The test-retest reliability of HVPG is overall excellent. Within-individual variance was higher in studies including higher proportions of decompensated patients. These findings should be taken into account when performing power analysis for trials based on the effects on HVPG or when considering HVPG as a tool to guide therapy of PH.

Splenectomy with Portoazygous Disconnection for Correction of Systemic Hemodynamic Disorders in Hepatic Cirrhosis Patients with Portal Hypertension: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of splenectomy for correction of systemic hemodynamic disorders in hepatic cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension.

METHODS

Hepatic cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension were enrolled from April 2015 to July 2018. Systemic hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output, and total peripheral vascular resistance (TPR)) were prospectively measured at baseline and 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively. Paired analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were eligible, and 55 (79.7%) cases had a history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Child-Pugh classification was grade A in 41 (59.4%) cases, grade B in 26 (37.7%) cases, and grade C in 2 (2.9%) cases. The heart rate was significantly higher at 1 week postoperatively versus the baseline (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the heart rate was significantly lower from 3 months to 2 years postoperatively versus the baseline (P < 0.05). The MAP was significantly higher at 6 months to 2 years postoperatively versus the baseline (P < 0.05). At 1 month postoperatively and 6 months to 2 years, the cardiac output was significantly lower versus the baseline (P < 0.05). At 1 month postoperatively and 6 months to 2 years, the TPR was significantly higher versus the baseline (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Splenectomy corrects systemic hemodynamic disorder in hepatic cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension, and the effect is rapid and durable.

Terlipressin has stood the test of time: Clinical overview in 2020 and future perspectives

Vasoactive drugs form the mainstay of therapy for two of the most important complications of liver disease: hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and acute variceal bleed (AVB). With cumulative evidence supporting the use in cirrhosis, terlipressin has been recommended for the management of HRS and AVB. However, owing to the safety concerns, terlipressin was not approved by food and drug administration (FDA) until now. In this review, we discuss the pharmacology and the major practice-changing studies on the safety and efficacy of terlipressin in patients with cirrhosis particularly focusing on existing indications like AVB and HRS and reviewing new data on the expanding indications in liver disease. The references for this review were identified from PUBMED with MeSH terms such as "terlipressin," "hepatorenal syndrome," "varices, esophagal and gastric," "ascites" and "cirrhosis." Terlipressin, a synthetic analogue of vasopressin, was introduced in 1975 to overcome the adverse effects of vasopressin. Terlipressin is an effective drug for HRS reversal in patients with liver cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure. There is documented mortality benefit with terlipressin therapy in HRS and AVB. Adverse effects are common with terlipressin and need to be monitored strictly. There is some evidence to support the use of this drug in refractory ascites, hepatic hydrothorax, paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction and perioperatively during liver transplantation. However, terlipressin is not yet recommended for such indications. In conclusion, terlipressin has stood the test of time with expanding indications and clear prerequisites for clinical use. Our review warrants a fresh perspective on the efficacy and safety of terlipressin.

Development of hyponatremia after terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective multicenter observational study

Background: Terlipressin can effectively control acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in cirrhotic patients by acting on the V1 receptors, but may lead to the development of dilutional hyponatremia by acting on the V2 receptors.Research design and methods: This retrospective multicenter study enrolled 674 cirrhotic patients with acute GIB in whom serum sodium concentrations were tested before and during the use of terlipressin. ΔSodium reduction ≥5 mmol/L, hyponatremia (sodium <130 mmol/L), and severe hyponatremia (sodium <125 mmol/L) during the use of terlipressin were evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were employed to identify the risk factors.Results: The incidence of Δsodium reduction ≥5 mmol/L, hyponatremia, and severe hyponatremia was 37.1%, 26.3%, and 13.0%, respectively. All of them were not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (p = 0.973; p = 0.789; p = 0.887). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, the independent risk factors of Δsodium reduction ≥5 mmol/L were higher baseline sodium concentration, lower serum creatinine and prothrombin time, and larger dosage of terlipressin; those of hyponatremia were lower baseline sodium concentration and longer duration of terlipressin; those of severe hyponatremia were lower baseline sodium concentration and prothrombin time and longer duration of terlipressin.Conclusions: Hyponatremia was common in cirrhotic patients with acute GIB treated with terlipressin, but might not significantly increase the in-hospital mortality.

Endothelin-1/Nitric Oxide Ratio as a Predictive Factor of Response to Therapy With Terlipressin and Albumin in Patients With Type-1 Hepatorenal Syndrome

Background and Purpose

Predictors of response to type-1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) therapy are urgently needed. This study's purpose is to evaluate the proposed predictors in these patients.

Methods

Forty-two type-1 HRS patients with cirrhosis were treated with albumin and terlipressin. Clinical, biochemical, and demographic parameters taken at the onset of therapy and changes in endothelin-1/nitric oxide (ET-1/NO) ratio during therapy were analyzed to check their predictive value.

Results

Response to treatment (serum creatinine level <1.5 mg/dL at the end of therapy) was shown in 20 patients (48%). Independent predictive variables of response to therapy were early reduction of ET-1/NO ratio ≥0.15 at day 3 of therapy and serum bilirubin baseline <8 mg/dL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.751; P < 0.001; specificity, 55%; sensitivity, 85%). Response rates in patients with serum bilirubin level <8 and ≥8 mg/dL were 63% and 20%, respectively (P = 0.008). The corresponding values in patients with an early reduction of ET-1/NO ratio ≥0.15 and <0.15 on day 3 were 85% and 13.6%, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Early reduction of ET-1/NO ratio and lower serum bilirubin baseline can predict response to type-1 HRS therapy with albumin and terlipressin. Alternative therapy should be investigated for nonresponder type-1 HRS patients.

Pharmacologic Management of Portal Hypertension

Terlipressin, somatostatin, or octreotide are recommended as pharmacologic treatment of acute variceal hemorrhage. Nonselective β-blockers decrease the risk of variceal hemorrhage and hepatic decompensation, particularly in those 30% to 40% of patients with good hemodynamic response. Carvedilol, statins, and anticoagulants are promising agents in the management of portal hypertension. Recent advances in the pharmacologic treatment of portal hypertension have mainly focused on modifying an increased intrahepatic resistance through nitric oxide and/or modulation of vasoactive substances. Several novel pharmacologic agents for portal hypertension are being evaluated in humans.

Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update for the general physician

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleed (AUGIB) is one of the most common medical emergencies in the UK, with roughly one presentation every 6 min. Despite advances in therapeutics and endoscopy provision, mortality following AUGIB over the last two decades has remained high, with over 9,000 deaths annually in the UK; consequently, several national bodies have published UK-relevant guidelines. Despite this, the 2015 UK National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death in AUGIB highlighted variations in practice, raised concerns regarding suboptimal patient care and released a series of recommendations. This review paper incorporates the latest available evidence and UK-relevant guidelines to summarise the optimal pre-endoscopic, endoscopic, and post-endoscopic approach to and management of non-variceal and variceal AUGIB that will be of practical value to both general physicians and gastroenterologists.

Effects of terlipressin infusion during hepatobiliary surgery on systemic and splanchnic haemodynamics, renal function and blood loss: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial

Background

Terlipressin, in general, is a vasopressor which acts via V1 receptors. Its infusion elevates mean blood pressure and can reduce bleeding which has a splanchnic origin. The primary outcome was to assess the impact of intraoperative terlipressin infusion on portal venous pressure during hepatobiliary surgery; the 2ry outcomes included effects upon systemic hemodynamics, estimated blood loss, and postoperative renal functions.

Methods

This prospective randomized study involved 50 patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery who were randomly and equally allocated into terlipressin group, or a control group. The terlipressin group received an initial bolus dose of (1 mg over 30 min) followed by a continuous infusion of 2 μg/kg/h throughout the procedure and gradually weaned over the first four postoperative hours, whereas the control group received the same volumes of normal saline. The portal venous pressure changes were measured directly through a portal vein angiocatheter.

Results

Portal pressure was significantly reduced over time in the terlipressin group only (from 17.88 ± 7.32 to 15.96 ± 6.55 mmHg, p < .001). Mean arterial blood pressure was significantly higher in the terlipressin group. Estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the control group than the terlipressin group (1065.7 ± 202 versus 842 ± 145.5 ml; p = 0.004), and the units of packed RBCs transfused were significantly higher in the control group ((0–2) versus (0–4) p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between groups as regards the incidence of acute kidney injury.

Conclusion

Intraoperative infusion of terlipressin during hepatobiliary surgery was shown to improve intraoperative portal hemodynamics with subsequent reduction in blood loss.

Trial registration

Clinical trial number and registry URL: Trial registration number: NCT02718599. Name of registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. URL of registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02718599. Date of registration: March 2016. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: April 2016.

Systemic hemodynamic response to terlipressin predicts development of hepatorenal syndrome and survival in advanced cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to predict the occurrence of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and death in patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 2-year data of 78 patients with cirrhosis and ascites (Child-Pugh B/C: 45/43). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO) were measured in all patients just before administration of 2 mg of terlipressin and 30 min later. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was calculated as MAP/CO. ΔMAP, and ΔCO, and ΔSVR were defined as the percentage change of MAP, CO, and SVR, respectively, after terlipressin injection. Plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone were evaluated at baseline. Two multivariate models were used: one excluding (model 1) and one including (model 2) the Model of End-stage Liver Disease score.

RESULTS

Higher ΔSVR, Model of End-stage Liver Disease score, and PRA were related independently to the severity of cirrhosis. Independent predictors of HRS at 12 and 24 months were ΔSVR (models 1/2: P=0.008/0.01 and 0.01/0.02, respectively), ΔCO (models 1/2: P=0.01/0.03 and 0.03/0.04, respectively), and PRA (models 1/2: P=0.04 and model 1: P=0.04, respectively). ΔSVR at 12 and 24 months (models 1/2: P=0.005/0.01 and 0.01/0.03, respectively) and ΔCO at 24 months (models 1/2: P=0.02/0.01, respectively) were related independently to survival. Patient groups with significantly higher probability of HRS and mortality were identified by certain cutoffs of ΔSVR (20.6 and 22.8%, respectively) and ΔCO (-10.6 and -11.8%, respectively). ΔSVR and ΔCO independently predicted survival in patients with the most advanced cirrhosis and infection-related survival.

CONCLUSION

An increase in SVR by at least 20% and a decrease in CO at least 10% in response to terlipressin could predict HRS and mortality in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Terlipressin for variceal bleeding induces large plasma sodium fluctuations in patients without cirrhosis

Background

Terlipressin is used as pharmacological treatment for variceal bleeding. The drug's physiological effect favours hyponatremia, and rapid changes in plasma sodium (PNa) may cause brain injury. Cirrhosis patients seem to be largely protected against this effect but patients without cirrhosis may not be so.

Objective

The objective of this study was to examine whether terlipressin treatment of patients without cirrhosis leads to more serious fluctuations in PNa than in cirrhosis.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort design, during a 39-month period, 11 patients with prehepatic portal hypertension and no cirrhosis and 134 patients with cirrhosis received a minimum cumulative terlipressin dose of 4 mg during at least 24 hours for variceal bleeding. The groups' PNa changes were compared.

Results

During terlipressin, the non-cirrhotic patients developed a greater reduction in PNa [mean 8.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-14.6) vs. 1.8 (1.0-2.7) mmol/l; p = 0.048], a lower nadir PNa [129 (123-135) vs. 133 (132-134) mmol/l; p = 0.06], and within 48 hours after terlipressin a greater increase in PNa [12.6 (3.4-21.7) vs. 2.3 (1.5-3.0) mmol/l; p = 0.03]. Severe (>10 mmol/l change) hyponatriemia or PNa rebound were seen in 27% of these patients but in only 4% of those with cirrhosis (p = 0.02). One non-cirrhotic patient developed permanent brain damage.

Conclusion

Terlipressin treatment of bleeding varices carries a high risk of potentially dangerous PNa fluctuations in patients with non-cirrhotic prehepatic portal hypertension.

Terlipressin: Current and emerging indications in chronic liver disease

Terlipressin is an analogue of vasopressin that has potent vasoactive properties and has been available for use in most countries for nearly two decades. It has both established roles and emerging indications in the management of complications of decompensated chronic liver disease. We explore historic and emerging literature regarding the use of terlipressin for a range of indications including hepatorenal syndrome, portal hypertensive bleeding, and disruptions in sodium homeostasis. Novel methods of infusion-based terlipressin administration including the beneficial effect in reduction of adverse events are explored, in addition to new indications for the use of terlipressin in decompensated cirrhosis in an outpatient setting.

Signaling through hepatocyte vasopressin receptor 1 protects mouse liver from ischemia-reperfusion injury

Terlipressin has been used extensively in the management of certain complications associated with end-stage liver diseases (ESLDs). In our pilot study, terlipressin treatment showed beneficial effects on liver function in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, however whether it plays a role in liver ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) remains unknown. Using a mouse nonlethal hepatic IR model, we found terlipressin administration significantly ameliorated IR-induced liver apoptosis, necrosis and inflammation. Furthermore, despite its known effect on visceral vasoconstriction, hemodynamic evaluation of murine hepatic tissue after IR revealed no change of overall hepatic blood flow after terlipressin treatment. Further studies identified the upregulation of vasopressin receptor 1 (V1R) expression on hepatocytes upon IR. In isolated hepatocyte hypoxia/reoxygenation model, the active component of terlipressin, lysine vasopressin, conferred hepatocytes resistant to oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. Mechanistic studies revealed the V1R engagement activated the Wnt/β-catenin/FoxO3a/AKT pathway, which subsequently circumvented the proapoptotic events, thus ameliorated hepatocyte apoptosis. Furthermore, genetic knockdown of V1R expression in hepatocyte cell lines or blockade of this signaling pathway abrogated such protective effect.

CONCLUSION

These data highlight the functional importance of the hepatocyte V1R/Wnt/β-catenin/FoxO3a/AKT pathway in protecting liver from oxidative stress-induced injury.

Hepatorenal syndrome: the clinical impact of vasoactive therapy

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a unique form of acute kidney injury seen in cirrhotic patients and associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Despite its impact, diagnosis and treatment of HRS remains challenging and this review aims to assess and compare the available vasoconstrictors used as first-line treatment for HRS. Areas covered: A literature review was undertaken on the use of vasoconstrictors in HRS, using PubMed/Medline database searches of: 'hepatorenal syndrome', 'HRS' and 'vasoconstrictor'. Expert commentary: Current diagnosis criteria are based on an exclusion-based approach using serum creatinine as a biomarker. However, this method relies on the measurement over a sustained period of time resulting in delayed treatment. Using urine biomarkers, the revised acute kidney injury guidelines and novel plasma expanders may improve diagnosis and the implementation of time-sensitive management of HRS. Vasoconstrictors are the first-line treatment for HRS, in which terlipressin is the vasoconstrictor of choice supported by current guidelines and a substantial clinical evidence base over other vasoconstrictors, such as noradrenaline or midodrine plus octreotide. Future developments in dosage and administrative techniques for terlipressin may have an important role to play in maintaining clinical efficacy whilst improving tolerability in the management of HRS.

Double-blind randomized controlled trial of the routine perioperative use of terlipressin in adult living donor liver transplantation

Perioperative terlipressin (Tp) during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been shown to reduce intraoperative portal pressures and improve renal function. Its role and safety profile have never been evaluated in a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). The aim was to evaluate the hemodynamic effects, clinical benefits, and safety of perioperative Tp infusion in adult LDLT. This was a single-center double-blind RCT. Consenting adults with chronic liver disease and low risk of posttransplant renal dysfunction undergoing their first LDLT were randomized. The study group (terlipressin group [TpG]) received an initial bolus of Tp during surgery followed by a Tp infusion for 72 hours in the postoperative period. The placebo group (PbG) received a saline infusion. The primary endpoint was portal pressure after arterial reperfusion. Multiple intraoperative and postoperative variables served as secondary endpoints. A total of 41 patients were enrolled in the trial (TpG, 21; PbG, 20). There were no significant differences in intraoperative portal pressures, blood loss, fluid requirement, vasopressor requirement, or urine output. Peak intraoperative and end of surgery lactate levels were significantly higher in the Tp group. There was no difference in postoperative liver function tests. Incidence of acute kidney injury as assessed by Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-Stage Kidney Disease criteria was lower in the Tp group (27% versus 60%; P = 0.04). The TpG had less postoperative ascites, a lower need for percutaneous interventions, and a shorter hospital stay. Incidence of bradycardia requiring pharmacological intervention and withdrawal from study was significantly higher in the TpG. In conclusion, this study has not demonstrated a reduction in postreperfusion portal pressure with Tp. However, Tp infusion reduced postoperative ascitic drain output resulting in less frequent percutaneous interventions and reduced hospital stay. Intraoperative hyperlactatemia and symptomatic bradycardia are major concerns. Its use should be restricted to patients with high-volume ascites, and it needs close monitoring during drug infusion. Liver Transplantation 23 1007-1014 2017 AASLD.

Modulation of hepatic perfusion did not improve recovery from hepatic outflow obstruction

Background

Focal hepatic venous outflow obstruction frequently occurs after extended liver resection and leads to a portal hypertension, arterial hypoperfusion and parenchymal necrosis.

In this study, we investigated the pharmacological modulation of liver perfusion and hepatic damage in a surgical model of hepatic outflow obstruction after extended liver resection by administration of 5 different drugs in comparison to an operative intervention, splenectomy.

Methods

Male inbred Lewis rats (Lew/Crl) were subjected to right median hepatic vein ligation + 70% partial hepatectomy. Treatment consisted of a splenectomy or the application of saline, carvedilol or isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN) (5 mg · kg⁻¹ respectively 7,2 mg · kg⁻¹ per gavage 12 h⁻¹). The splenectomy was performed during operation. The effect of the treatments on hepatic hemodynamics were measured in non-operated animals, immediately after operation (n = 4/group) and 24 h after operation (n = 5/group). Assessment of hepatic damage (liver enzymes, histology) and liver cell proliferation (BrdU-immunohistochemistry) was performed 24 h after operation. Furthermore sildenafil (10 μg · kg⁻¹ i.p. 12h⁻¹), terlipressin (0.05 mg · kg⁻¹ i.v. 12 h⁻¹) and octreotide (10 μg · kg⁻¹ s.c. 12 h⁻¹) were investigated regarding their effect on hepatic hemodynamics and hepatic damage 24 h after operation (n = 4/group).

Results

Carvedilol and ISMN significantly decreased the portal pressure in normal non-operated rats from 11,1 ± 1,1 mmHg (normal rats) to 8,4 ± 0,3 mmHg (carvedilol) respectively 7,4 ± 1,8 mmHg (ISMN). ISMN substantially reduced surgery-induced portal hypertension from 15,4 ± 4,4 mmHg to 9,6 ± 2,3 mmHg. Only splenectomy reduced the portal flow immediately after operation by approximately 25%. No treatment had an immediate effect on the hepatic arterial perfusion. In all treatment groups, portal flow increased by approximately 3-fold within 24 h after operation, whereas hepatic arterial flow decreased substantially. Neither treatment reduced hepatic damage as assessed 24 h after operation. The distribution of proliferating cells appeared very similar in all drug treated groups and the splenectomy group.

Conclusion

Transient relative reduction of portal pressure did not result in a reduction of hepatic damage. This might be explained by the development of portal hyperperfusion which was accompanied by arterial hypoperfusion.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40360-017-0155-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effect of different therapeutic modalities on systemic, renal, and hepatic hemodynamics and short-term outcomes in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a major risk factor for hepatorenal syndrome. Albumin infusion has been shown to prevent renal impairment and reduce mortality in SBP. The study aimed to compare the effect of different therapeutic modalities on hemodynamics and short clinical outcomes in high-risk patients with SBP.

METHODS

Two hundred cirrhotic patients with SBP and bilirubin greater than 4 mg[Fraction Slash]dl or creatinine more than 1 mg[Fraction Slash]dl were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive albumin, terlipressin, low-dose albumin plus terlipressin, or midodrine. Systemic, renal, and hepatic hemodynamics were estimated at baseline, 3, and 10 days of treatment. Renal impairment was diagnosed when the blood urea nitrogen or serum creatinine levels increased by more than 50% of the pretreatment value.

RESULTS

SBP resolved in most of patients in all groups (P>0.05). Cardiac output and portal flow decreased, whereas systemic vascular resistance increased significantly in terlipressin and albumin plus terlipressin groups compared with the albumin group after 3 and 10 days. After 10 days, plasma renin activity, renal, and hepatic arteries resistive index were significantly higher in the midodrine group compared with the albumin group. The midodrine group did not show any significant changes in the heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and portal blood flow compared with the albumin group after 3 or 10 days. There was no significant difference in renal impairment or mortality between any of the groups.

CONCLUSION

Terlipressin and low-dose albumin plus terlipressin could be used as a therapeutic alternative to standard-dose albumin in high-risk SBP patients.

[Aspects of pathogenetc pharmacotherapy for portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis]

The review of literature considers the principles of medical treatment for portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis, which are based on the current views of its development mechanisms. It describes both current pharmacotherapy methods for portal hypertension and drugs, the efficacy of which is being investigated.

Vasopressin 1a receptor partial agonism increases sodium excretion and reduces portal hypertension and ascites in cirrhotic rats

Patients and rats with cirrhosis and ascites have portal hypertension and circulatory dysfunction. Synthetic arginine vasopressin (AVP) receptor agonists able to induce systemic and mesenteric vasoconstriction have shown their usefulness in reducing portal pressure (PP) in this condition. We assessed the potential therapeutic value of a new V1 a -AVP receptor partial agonist with a preferential splanchnic vasoconstrictor effect (FE 204038) in rats with cirrhosis and ascites. The hemodynamic effects of cumulative intravenous doses of FE 204038, terlipressin, or vehicle were investigated. Mean arterial pressure and PP were continuously recorded and cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) assessed at 30-minute intervals for 90 minutes. Urine volume, urine osmolality, and urinary excretion of sodium and creatinine were measured in basal conditions and following twice-daily subcutaneous doses of FE 204038 or vehicle. PP, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, SVR, and ascites volume were also measured after 6 days. The expression of an array of vasoactive genes was assessed in the thoracic aorta and the mesenteric circulation of control rats and rats with cirrhosis and ascites. FE 204038 dose-dependently decreased PP, did not modify mean arterial pressure, and increased SVR. The effect of the V1a -AVP receptor partial agonist on PP was associated with an improvement in urine volume and urinary excretion of sodium during the first day of treatment. SVR was higher and cardiac output and ascites volume were lower in rats with cirrhosis and ascites treated with FE 204038. V1a -AVP receptor expression in rats with cirrhosis and ascites was markedly enhanced in the mesenteric circulation compared to the thoracic aorta.

CONCLUSION

FE 204038 increases sodium excretion and reduces portal hypertension and ascites in experimental cirrhosis. V1a -AVP receptor partial agonism could be a useful pharmacological treatment in decompensated patients with cirrhosis.

Current approaches to the management of patients with liver cirrhosis who have acute esophageal variceal bleeding

OBJECTIVE

Esophageal variceal bleeding is the most dangerous complication in patients with liver cirrhosis, and it is accompanied by high mortality. Their treatment can be complex, and requires a multidisciplinary approach. This review examines current approaches to the management of patients with liver cirrhosis who have acute esophageal variceal bleeding.

METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Systematic Reviews were searched for articles published between 1987 and 2015. Relevant articles were identified using the following terms: 'esophageal variceal bleeding', 'portal hypertension' and 'complications of liver cirrhosis'. The reference lists of articles identified were also searched for other relevant publications. Inclusion criteria were restricted to the management of patients with liver cirrhosis who have acute esophageal variceal bleeding.

RESULTS

It is currently recommended to combine vasoactive drugs (preferable somatostatin or terlipressin) and endoscopic therapies (endoscopic band ligation as first choice, sclerotherapy if endoscopic band ligation not feasible) for the initial treatment of acute variceal bleeding. Antibiotic prophylaxis must be regarded as an integral part of the treatment. The use of a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube is appropriate only in cases of refractory bleeding if the above methods cannot be used. An alternative to balloon tamponade may be the installation of self-expandable metal stents. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is an extremely useful technique for the treatment of acute bleeding from esophageal varices. Although most current clinical guidelines classify it as second-line therapy, the Baveno VI workshop recommends early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents within 72 h (ideally <24 h) in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding at high risk of treatment failure (e.g. Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C < 14 points or Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with active bleeding) after initial pharmacological and endoscopic therapy. Urgent surgical intervention is rarely performed and can be considered only in case of failure of conservative and/or endoscopic therapy and being unable to use a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Among surgical operations described in the literature are a variety of portocaval anastomosis and azygoportal disconnection procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve the results of treatment for patients with liver cirrhosis who develop acute esophageal variceal bleeding, it is important to stratify patients into risk groups, which will allow one to tailor therapeutic approaches to the expected results.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Terlipressin and Albumin with a Combination of Concurrent Dopamine, Furosemide, and Albumin in Hepatorenal Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Terlipressin with albumin is recommended in hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Terlipressin is expensive and not licensed in many countries. Alternative therapy is necessary. We compared the efficacy of terlipressin and albumin with concurrent low-dose dopamine, furosemide, and albumin in HRS.

METHODS

In an open-label, randomized trial, forty consecutive patients each with HRS type I and HRS type II received either concurrent infusion of terlipressin 0.5 mg for every 6 hr and albumin 20 g/day for 5 days (n = 20) or a combination of dopamine 2 μg/kg/min, furosemide 0.01 mg/kg/hr, and albumin 20 g/day (triple therapy), in one of two therapeutic arms. Twenty-four-hour urine output, urinary sodium, and plasma renin activity (PRA) were assessed before and after treatment.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable at baseline in both HRS-I and II. In HRS-I, 24 hr urine output and urine sodium at the end of 5 days increased in both treatment groups (terlipressin, urine output 278 ± 136 to 765 ± 699 ml/day, P < 0.01; urine sodium 28 ± 25.1 to 39 ± 32.1 meq/l, P = 0.05. Triple therapy: urine output 219 ± 134 to 706 ± 595 ml/day, P < 0.01; urine sodium 25 ± 18.3 to 41 ± 27.5 meq/l, P < 0.01). PRA (ng/ml/hr) decreased from 28.1 ± 9.76 to 24.2 ± 9.5 (P = 0.01) and from 29.5 ± 15.8 to 27.3 ± 17.1 (P = 0.02) in the terlipressin and triple therapy groups, respectively. In HRS-II, similar significant improvement (P < 0.01) was seen in 24 hr urine output and urine sodium; decrease in PRA (P < 0.05) was documented after treatment in both the arms. Post-treatment changes in parameters were comparable between the two arms, in both HRS-I and HRS-II cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent triple therapy improved renal function in HRS and was less expensive than terlipressin (Registration: CTRI/2011/07/001860; www.ctri.nic.in).

Cardiohepatic syndrome

Accumulating evidence shows that acute as well as chronic heart disease can directly contribute to an acute or chronic worsening of liver function and vice versa. Description and definition of cardiohepatic syndrome (CHS) in this review are based on the cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) concept. The eye-catching analogy between CHS and CRS is applied to facilitate an understanding of the pathophysiology and overall burden of disease for each of the proposed CHS subtypes, their natural course, and associated morbidity and mortality.

Complications of cirrhosis. A 50 years flashback

In patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, it is largely the frequency and severity of complications relating to the diseased liver, degree of portal hypertension and hemodynamic derangement that determine the prognosis. It can be considered as a multiple organ failure that apart from the liver involves the heart, lungs, kidneys, the immune systems and other organ systems. Progressive fibrosis of the liver and subsequent metabolic impairment leads to a systemic and splanchnic arteriolar vasodilatation. With the progression of the disease development of portal hypertension leads to formation of esophageal varices and ascites. The circulation becomes hyperdynamic with cardiac, pulmonary as well as renal consequences for dysfunction and reduced survival. Infections and a changed cardiac function known as cirrhotic cardiomyopathy may be involved in further aggravation of other complications such as renal failure precipitating the hepatorenal syndrome. Patients with end-stage liver disease and related complications as for example the hepatopulmonary syndrome can only radically be treated by liver transplantation.

Contemporary concepts of the medical therapy of portal hypertension under liver cirrhosis

Severe complications of liver cirrhosis are mostly related to portal hypertension. At the base of the pathogenesis of portal hypertension is the increase in hepatic vascular resistance to portal blood flow with subsequent development of hyperdynamic circulation, which, despite of the formation of collateral circulation, promotes progression of portal hypertension. An important role in its pathogenesis is played by the rearrangement of vascular bed and angiogenesis. As a result, strategic directions of the therapy of portal hypertension under liver cirrhosis include selectively decreasing hepatic vascular resistance with preserving or increasing portal blood flow, and correcting hyperdynamic circulation and pathological angiogenesis, while striving to reduce the hepatic venous pressure gradient to less than 12 mmHg or 20% of the baseline. Over the last years, substantial progress in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of hemodynamic disorders under liver cirrhosis has resulted in the development of new drugs for their correction. Although the majority of them have so far been investigated only in animal experiments, as well as at the molecular and cellular level, it might be expected that the introduction of the new methods in clinical practice will increase the efficacy of the conservative approach to the prophylaxis and treatment of portal hypertension complications. The purpose of the review is to describe the known methods of portal hypertension pharmacotherapy and discuss the drugs that may affect the basic pathogenetic mechanisms of its development.

Terlipressin-induced ischemic skin necrosis: a rare association

Patient: Male, 65

Final Diagnosis: Drug-iduced skin necrosis

Symptoms: —

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Skin graft

Specialty: Surgery

Pharmacologic management of portal hypertension

Progress in the knowledge of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension has disclosed new targets for therapy, resulting in a larger spectrum of drugs with a potential role for clinical practice. This review focuses on pharmacologic treatments already available for reducing portal pressure and summarizes drugs currently under investigation in this field.