Angiotensin-induced dipsogenesis in domestic fowl (Gallus gallus)

Angiotensin, thirst, and sodium appetite

Angiotensin (ANG) II is a powerful and phylogenetically widespread stimulus to thirst and sodium appetite. When it is injected directly into sensitive areas of the brain, it causes an immediate increase in water intake followed by a slower increase in NaCl intake. Drinking is vigorous, highly motivated, and rapidly completed. The amounts of water taken within 15 min or so of injection can exceed what the animal would spontaneously drink in the course of its normal activities over 24 h. The increase in NaCl intake is slower in onset, more persistent, and affected by experience. Increases in circulating ANG II have similar effects on drinking, although these may be partly obscured by accompanying rises in blood pressure. The circumventricular organs, median preoptic nucleus, and tissue surrounding the anteroventral third ventricle in the lamina terminalis (AV3V region) provide the neuroanatomic focus for thirst, sodium appetite, and cardiovascular control, making extensive connections with the hypothalamus, limbic system, and brain stem. The AV3V region is well provided with angiotensinergic nerve endings and angiotensin AT1 receptors, the receptor type responsible for acute responses to ANG II, and it responds vigorously to the dipsogenic action of ANG II. The nucleus tractus solitarius and other structures in the brain stem form part of a negative-feedback system for blood volume control, responding to baroreceptor and volume receptor information from the circulation and sending ascending noradrenergic and other projections to the AV3V region. The subfornical organ, organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis and area postrema contain ANG II-sensitive receptors that allow circulating ANG II to interact with central nervous structures involved in hypovolemic thirst and sodium appetite and blood pressure control. Angiotensin peptides generated inside the blood-brain barrier may act as conventional neurotransmitters or, in view of the many instances of anatomic separation between sites of production and receptors, they may act as paracrine agents at a distance from their point of release. An attractive speculation is that some are responsible for long-term changes in neuronal organization, especially of sodium appetite. Anatomic mismatches between sites of production and receptors are less evident in limbic and brain stem structures responsible for body fluid homeostasis and blood pressure control. Limbic structures are rich in other neuroactive peptides, some of which have powerful effects on drinking, and they and many of the classical nonpeptide neurotransmitters may interact with ANG II to augment or inhibit drinking behavior. Because ANG II immunoreactivity and binding are so widely distributed in the central nervous system, brain ANG II is unlikely to have a role as circumscribed as that of circulating ANG II. Angiotensin peptides generated from brain precursors may also be involved in functions that have little immediate effect on body fluid homeostasis and blood pressure control, such as cell differentiation, regeneration and remodeling, or learning and memory. Analysis of the mechanisms of increased drinking caused by drugs and experimental procedures that activate the renal renin-angiotensin system, and clinical conditions in which renal renin secretion is increased, have provided evidence that endogenously released renal renin can generate enough circulating ANG II to stimulate drinking. But it is also certain that other mechanisms of thirst and sodium appetite still operate when the effects of circulating ANG II are blocked or absent, although it is not known whether this is also true for angiotensin peptides formed in the brain. Whether ANG II should be regarded primarily as a hormone released in hypovolemia helping to defend the blood volume, a neurotransmitter or paracrine agent with a privileged role in the neural pathways for thirst and sodium appetite of all kinds, a neural organizer especially in sodium appetit

Altered spontaneous and osmotically induced drinking for fowls with permanent access to dilute quinine

Fowls were given a dilute quinine solution as their sole source of fluid, and effects on normal ingestion and on drinking responses to dipsogenic stimuli were examined. Compared to controls with water, daily fluid intakes were depressed by 25% with quinine. There was no significant effect of quinine on food intake, but growth was suppressed slightly. Drinking in response to hypertonic NaCl injections was attenuated with quinine, and whereas an initial peak in water intake was seen directly after hypertonic NaCl injection, this was absent with quinine. Moreover, increases in quinine intake after hypertonic NaCl injections were insufficient to restore normal osmolality. Plasma analyses indicated that birds drinking quinine were permanently dehydrated and, unlike birds with water, they appeared to reduce the hyperosmolality induced by hypertonic NaCl injections in the absence of drinking. In contrast, drinking responses to angiotensin were generally similar with quinine and water, although birds drinking quinine tended to stop sooner with the highest dose of angiotensin. These results support previous suggestions that osmotic thirst is of primary importance in control of normal drinking, but also demonstrate that birds tolerate a degree of dehydration if a suitable fluid source is unavailable.

Preloads of water, but not isotonic saline, reduce drinking in domestic fowls

Fowls were deprived of water for 2 or 6 hr, and then given graded intravenous (IV) injections of water or isotonic saline. With both levels of deprivation, water preloads caused dose-dependent reductions in water intake which matched closely the volumes of preload given, whereas isotonic saline preloads had no effect on drinking, and feeding was unaffected in both cases. These results imply that drinking elicited by short periods of water deprivation is a response to increased plasma osmolality rather than to a loss of extracellular fluid volume. In further experiments, water intakes were reduced by at least as much as the volume administered when undeprived fowls were given 6 hr continuous IV infusions or IV injections of water, and food intakes were also suppressed. Plasma analyses taken at the end of continuous infusions of water indicated a fall in osmolality during this time. It was concluded that whereas increases in plasma osmolality increase drinking in fowls, a fall in osmolality below normal inhibits both drinking and feeding. It is suggested that spontaneous drinking may be regulated mainly by changes in plasma osmolality, rather than in extracellular volume.

Food and water intake response of turkeys to intracerebroventricular injections of angiotensin II

The effects of intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of angiotensin II on food and water intake were studied in adult Medium White turkey hens. Food intake was not significantly affected by ICV injections of angiotensin II. The ICV injection of 50, 100, and 200 ng of angiotensin II significantly increased water intake in a dose-dependent manner. The dipsogenic effect of angiotensin II was significantly attenuated by Saralasin, an angiotensin blocker. These results suggest that angiotensin II functions in neural pathways within the central nervous system to control water intake, but not food intake, in turkeys.

Acute abdominal vagotomy reduces drinking to peripheral but not central angiotensin II

Rats were tested two or three days after bilateral abdominal vagotomy or a laparotomy control procedure for their drinking responses to subcutaneous (1 mg-kg-1) or intracerebroventricular (100 ng) injections of angiotensin II. Vagotomy delayed the initiation of drinking and decreased 60-min water intake after subcutaneous, but not after intracerebroventricular, angiotensin II. This is the shortest postoperative interval in which the decrease in drinking after systemic injection of angiotensin II by abdominal vagotomy has been observed. The failure of vagotomy to decrease the response to intracerebroventricular angiotensin II demonstrates that the deficit after subcutaneous injection was not a nonspecific effect of recent vagotomy. These results, therefore, suggest that the abdominal vagus is necessary for normal drinking in response to circulating angiotensin II. Furthermore, the selective and acute onset of the deficit is consistent with the loss of a specific, rather than tonic facilitatory, vagal mechanism for drinking after elevation of circulating angiotensin II levels. Finally, the results imply that the physiological mechanisms which mediate the drinking responses to central and peripheral angiotensin are not identical.

Mechanisms for induction of drinking with special reference to angiotensin II

The Japanese quail drinks water vigorously after water deprivation, haemorrhage and administration of hypertonic saline solution. Most avian species responded to angiotensin II (AII) by drinking, but carnivorous birds and those originating in arid regions were insensitive. The receptive sites for AII were the subfornical organ (SFO) and the preoptic area (POA) in the Japanese quail. Catecholaminergic fibers proceed from the POA to the SFO. Dipsogenic information generated by AII at the POA is transferred to the SFO through the catecholaminergic nerve fibres. Plasma AII increased following dehydration and haemorrhage and returned to a normal level immediately after rehydration. Following dehydration, arginine vasotocin, aldosterone and corticosterone increased in plasma as well as AII. A single intraperitoneal injection of AII induced increases of arginine vasotocin, aldosterone and corticosterone in plasma. It seems that AII functions as a trigger for release of these other hormones during dehydration.

Drinking and changes in blood pressure in response to angiotensin II in the pigeon Columba livia

1. Angiotensin II is as potent a stimulus to drink in pigeons as it is in mammals. There are striking similarities in the action of this peptide in pigeons and mammals. 2. Angiotensin II injected intracranially, I.V. or I.P. consistently caused short-latency and vigorous drinking in pigeons but no other behaviour. Drinking was completed rapidly and intakes were very large, sometimes in excess of 10% of the bird's body weight. 3. The latency to drink and the amount drunk were dose dependent for all routes of injection. Angiotensin II was most effective when injected directly into the brain. As little as 10(-4) mol angiotensin II injected into the cerebral ventricles caused birds to drink. 4. The rapid cessation of drinking after intracranial injection of angiotensin II was not caused by rapid loss of activity of the peptide in the brain but by the actual ingestion of the water. 5. The brain sites most sensitive to the dipsogenic action of angiotensin II in the pigeon were the dorsal and ventral third ventricle, the tissue adjacent and anterior to these sites, and the lateral ventricles. The lateral hypothalamic area was only slightly less sensitive. Negative sites for drinking were found in the lateral forebrain and the hind brain. These findings are similar to those in mammals. 6. Pigeons drank during I.V. infusion of as little as 16 X 10(-12) mol angiotensin II kg-1 min-1. This was near the threshold for increasing arterial pressure in pigeons and is near the threshold for drinking in rats and dogs. 7. The Asn1, Asp1, Val5 and Ile5 analogues of angiotensin II were equipotent as stimuli to drink but a wide range of other peptides and drugs injected into the brain failed to increase water intake. An exception was eledoisin which was, comparing molecule with molecule, only 10-100 times less potent than angiotensin II in the pigeon. 8. Injections of angiotensin II into brain sites which caused drinking failed to alter heart rate or arterial pressure in pigeons. 9. This and other recent studies demonstrate the wide phylogenetic distribution of the dipsogenic action of angiotensin II and support the idea that the control of water intake is an important physiological function of the renin-angiotensin system in vertebrates.

Involvement of catecholaminergic nerve fibers in angiotensin II-induced drinking in the Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica

Monamine distribution in a septohypothalamic area was investigated in the Japanese quail using a histochemical fluorescence method. This area includes the subfornical organ (SFO) and the preoptic area (POA) which are inferred dipsogenic receptor sites for angiotensin II (AII) in the Japanese quail. Nerve fibers showing yellow-green fluorescence were found between the POA and the SFO. Thwy traversed from the POA to the SFO, and some fibers seemed to terminate on the neurons in the SFO. After a low dose of reserpine, a considerable number of fluorescent perikarya were found in the POA. These fibers and perikarya appeared to be of primary catecholamine judging from the fluorescence color. Following transection of these fibers, fluorescence disappeared from the fibers located on the SFO side of the transection plane, while it became a little more intense on the POA side. After transection, microinjection of AII into the POA was no longer effective in induction of drinking. On the other hand, sham operation or transection in areas other than between the POA and the SFO produced only minute changes in those fluorescent fibers and had little effect on the dipsogenic potency of AII injected into the POA. These results suggest that information of AII perceived at the POA is transferred to the SFO via those primary catecholamine-containing nerve fibers, which effect induced drinking.