Appendicectomy as a therapy for ulcerative proctitis

The Clinical Relevance of an Inflamed Appendix in Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

An appendectomy for appendiceal inflammation has been suggested to ameliorate the clinical course of patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. In contrast, for Crohn's disease [CD] an inverse association has been suggested with a higher incidence of CD and worse prognosis after appendectomy. The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical relevance of an inflamed appendix in CD patients undergoing ileocaecal resection [ICR].

METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing primary ICR between 2007 and 2018 were considered for inclusion. Microscopic data of available appendiceal resection specimens [n = 99] were revised by a dedicated inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] pathologist and scored as inflamed or not inflamed. Eighteen patients had a previous appendectomy. Pathological findings were correlated with disease characteristics and recurrence rates [clinical, endoscopic, and intervention-related].

RESULTS

In total 117 patients were included, 77 [65.8%] females, with a median age of 30 years (interquartile range [IQR] 24-43), and a median follow up of 102 months [IQR 76-114]. Of patients without previous appendectomy [n = 99], 39% had an inflamed appendix. No significant differences in disease characteristics [eg, disease location, behaviour, time to surgery] or prognosis could be demonstrated between the two groups. In contrast, previous appendectomy [n = 18] was associated with penetrating disease and numerically shorter disease duration at the time of resection. Furthermore, a trend was seen towards a stronger association with postoperative recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The current study could not confirm a different prognosis for CD patients with and without an inflamed appendix. In contrast, in patients with a previous appendectomy, a trend was seen towards increased postoperative recurrence, which might be related to the higher incidence of penetrating disease.

Management of proctitis in ulcerative colitis and the place of biological therapies

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 20-30% of the patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may present with isolated proctitis. Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is a challenging condition to manage due to its significant burden in terms of disabling symptoms.

AREAS COVERED

PubMed was searched up to March 2024 to identify relevant studies on UP. A comprehensive summary and critical appraisal of the available data on UP are provided, highlighting emerging treatments and areas for future research.

EXPERT OPINION

Patients with UP are often undertreated, and the disease burden is often underestimated in clinical practice. Treat-to-target management algorithms can be applied to UP, aiming for clinical remission in the short term, and endoscopic remission and maintenance of remission in the long term. During their disease, approximately one-third of UP patients require advanced therapies. Escalation to biologic therapy is required for refractory or steroid dependent UP. For optimal patient care and management of UP, it is necessary to include these patients in future randomized clinical trials.

The appendix and ulcerative colitis - an unsolved connection

The appendix is thought to have a role in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis, but the nature and basis of this association remains unclear. In this Perspective, we consider the biology of the appendix with respect to its immunological function and the microbiome, and how this relates to evidence that supports the involvement of the appendix in ulcerative colitis. In experimental models, removal of the inflamed appendix prevents colitis, and in human observational studies, appendectomy is associated with protection against ulcerative colitis. Further, among people who develop ulcerative colitis, appendectomy before diagnosis might influence the course and outcomes of the disease - some evidence suggests that it protects against colectomy but could increase the risk of colorectal cancer. Appendectomy after onset of ulcerative colitis seems to have disparate consequences. Clinical trials to understand whether appendectomy has a role in the treatment of ulcerative colitis are ongoing. Major questions about the role of the appendix in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis remain unanswered, and further research is needed to establish whether the connection is clinically relevant.

Intestinal ultrasound detects an increased diameter and submucosal layer thickness in the appendix of patients with ulcerative colitis compared to healthy controls - a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence suggests that appendicectomy as alternative treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), especially in patients with histopathological appendiceal inflammation. Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive diagnostic modality to characterise appendiceal inflammation.

AIMS

To assess appendiceal IUS characteristics in UC patients and compare findings to healthy controls (HC).

METHODS

In this prospective study, appendiceal IUS was performed in consecutive UC patients with active (A; n = 35) or quiescent (Q; n = 30) disease and in HC (n = 30). Transverse appendiceal diameter (TAD) and additional IUS parameters (bowel wall thickness, submucosal layer thickness and colour Doppler signal) were assessed.

RESULTS

The appendix was visualised in 41/65 UC patients (63.1%; A vs. Q: 23/35 vs. 18/30, p = 0.67) and 18/30 (60%) HC. UC patients had a higher TAD (A: 5.5 mm, Q: 5.0 mm, HC: 4.3 mm; A-HC p < 0.01; Q-HC p = 0.01, A-Q p = ns) and submucosal layer thickness (A: 1.0 mm, Q: 1.0 mm, HC: 0.7 mm; A-HC p < 0.01, Q-HC: p = 0.01, A-Q: p = ns) when compared to HC. A TAD ≥6 mm corresponding to an ultrasonographic suspicion of acute appendicitis was mainly reported in A-UC patients (A: 43%; Q: 6%; HC: 0%, p = 0.01) and occurred irrespective of disease extent. However, none of the patients had a clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

A TAD ≥6 mm was predominantly seen in A-UC. TAD was higher in UC patients compared to HC irrespective of disease activity and was characterised by an increased submucosal layer thickness. IUS therefore has the potential to identify UC patients with appendiceal inflammation.

Clinical relevance of endoscopic peri-appendiceal red patch in ulcerative colitis patients

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence is suggesting appendectomy as an alternative treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), especially in case of histological appendiceal inflammation. Therefore, preoperative identification of appendiceal inflammation could be beneficial. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of peri-appendiceal red patch (PARP) on colonoscopy. In addition, prognostic relevance of PARP for disease course and its predictive value for histological appendiceal inflammation in patients undergoing appendectomy was assessed.

METHODS

UC patients undergoing colonoscopy in 2014/2015 were included to determine PARP-prevalence in a cross-sectional study. Findings were correlated to patient and disease characteristics, upscaling of treatment and colectomy rates after cross-sectional colonoscopy. In patients undergoing appendiceal resection, histopathological inflammation was assessed using the Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI).

RESULTS

In total, 249 patients were included of which 17.7% (44/249) had a PARP. Patients with PARP were significantly younger with a shorter disease course. The majority of patients with PARP (61.4%) was in endoscopic remission. Patients with PARP required more upscaling of medical therapy (81.8% vs. 58.0%, p < 0.01), and more PARP patients underwent colectomy (13.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.04). Patients with PARP had a higher median RHI in resection specimens (14 vs. 7, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

PARP was present during colonoscopy regardless disease activity and was predominantly found in UC patients with younger age and shorter disease duration. PARP patients had a more severe course of UC, and in case of appendectomy, more severe histopathological appendiceal inflammation. Appendectomy as an experimental therapy for UC has been suggested to be predominantly effective in UC patients with appendiceal inflammation. This study demonstrates that presence of a PARP on colonoscopy predicts appendiceal inflammation. After consensus has been reached on the therapeutic effect of appendectomy, assessing PARP presence during colonoscopy could therefore contribute to identifying patients most likely to respond.

When disease extent is not always a key parameter: Management of refractory ulcerative proctitis

Background

Patients with ulcerative proctitis represent a sub-group of ulcerative colitis patients with specific characteristics. Disease-related symptoms, endoscopic findings and patient's personality perspectives create a difficult-to-assess condition in certain cases.

Objectives

To summarize available evidence on the management of refractory ulcerative proctitis and provide insights in treatment options.

Results

/Conclusion: Topical therapy plays a central role due to the location of the disease. However, well-established treatment options may become exhausted in a considerable proportion of ulcerative proctitis patients, indicating the need to advance to more potent therapies in order to induce and maintain clinical response and remission in these refractory cases. Systemic corticosteroids, thiopurines, calcineurin inhibitors, biologic agents and small molecules have all been tested with variable success rates. Investigational interventions as well as surgical procedures are kept as the ultimate resort in multi-treatment resistant cases. Identifying early prognostic factors that herald a disabling disease progression will help in optimizing treatment and avoiding surgery.

High prevalence of ulcerative appendicitis in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have indicated that the appendix may be a priming site of ulcerative colitis (UC). Appendectomy is inversely associated with the development of UC, and is suggested to have a beneficial effect on the disease course in patients with refractory disease.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the current study was to assess histological features of appendices from patients with UC and their clinical relevance.

METHODS

Patients with UC in remission and active UC (therapy refractory) that underwent appendectomy between 2012 and 2019 were included. Histological features of UC appendices were compared to those of patients with acute appendicitis and colon carcinoma. The Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) was used to assess appendiceal inflammation. In patients with active UC, histological and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without endoscopic response following appendectomy.

RESULTS

In total, 140 appendix specimens were assessed (n = 35 UC remission, n = 35 active UC, n = 35 acute appendicitis, n = 35 colon carcinoma). Histological features of appendices from UC patients looked like UC rather than acute appendicitis. The presence of active appendiceal inflammation was comparable between patients in remission versus active disease (53.7% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.45) and limited versus extensive disease (58.5% vs. 41.5%, p = 0.50). Endoscopic response (Mayo 0-1) following appendectomy, assessed in 28 therapy refractory patients, was more frequently seen in patients with higher RHI scores (RHI > 6: 81.8% vs. RHI ≤ 6: 9.1%, p = 0.03) and limited disease (proctitis/left sided 63.6% vs. pancolitis 36.4%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The presence of active appendiceal inflammation is common in UC and does not correlate with colonic disease activity. More than 50% of UC patients in remission showed active histological disease in the appendix. Favorable response to appendectomy for refractory UC was seen in cases with ulcerative appendicitis. These findings might support the role of the appendix as a pivotal organ in UC.

State-of-the-art surgery for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an autoimmune-mediated colitis which can present in varying degrees of severity and increases the individual’s risk of developing colon cancer. While first-line treatment for UC is medical management, surgical treatment may be necessary in up to 25–30% of patients. With an increasing armamentarium of biologic therapies, patients are presenting for surgery much later in their course, and careful understanding of the complex interplay of the disease, its management, and the patient’s overall health is necessary when considering he appropriate way in which to address their disease surgically. Surgery is generally a total proctocolectomy either with pelvic pouch reconstruction or permanent ileostomy; however, this may need to be spread across multiple procedures given the complexity of the surgery weighed against the overall state of the patient’s health. Minimally invasive surgery, employing either laparoscopic, robotic, or transanal laparoscopic approaches, is currently the preferred approach in the elective setting. There is also some emerging evidence that appendectomy may delay the progression of UC in some individuals. Those who treat these patients surgically must also be familiar with the numerous potential pitfalls of surgical intervention and have plans in place for managing problems such as pouchitis, cuffitis, and anastomotic complications.

Impact of Appendectomy on Gut Microbiota

Background: Considered vestigial from the classic point of view, the vermiform appendix has long been the subject of intensive studies. The recent understanding of appendix function in the context of unique architecture and bacterial complexity and density allows considering it as a safehouse for intestinal biodiversity. Methods: This review analyzes and assesses the current state of scientific knowledge regarding the role of the vermiform appendix in normal gut microbiota maintenance as a crucial factor of host homeostasis. It also highlights the difference in microbial composition between the large bowel and the appendix, as well as the association between the surgical excision, appendectomy, and dysbiosis-induced diseases. In addition, the review discusses the results of epidemiologic studies on appendectomy as a risk factor for the initiation of gastrointestinal carcinogenesis. It also highlights the association between appendectomy and a series of chronic inflammatory and neurologic disorders, including inflammatory bowel disease.

A nationwide database study on colectomy and colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: what is the role of appendectomy?

AIM

Although has been suggested that an appendectomy has a positive effect on the disease course in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), recent studies indicate a potential increase in risk of colectomy and colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to evaluate the rates of colectomy and CRC after appendectomy in UC patients using a nationwide prospective database [the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis Parelsnoer Institute - Inflammatory Bowel Disease (ICC PSI-IBD) database].

METHOD

All UC patients were retrieved from the ICC PSI-IBD database between January 2007 and May 2018. Primary outcomes were colectomy and CRC. Outcomes were compared in patients with and without appendectomy, with a separate analysis for timing of appendectomy (before or after UC diagnosis).

RESULTS

A total of 826 UC patients (54.7% female; median age 46 years, range 18-89 years) were included. Sixty-three (7.6%) patients had previously undergone appendectomy: 24 (38.1%) before and 33 (52.4%) after their diagnosis of UC. In multivariate analysis, appendectomy after UC diagnosis was associated with a significantly lower colectomy rate compared with no appendectomy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.16, 95% C: 0.04-0.66, P = 0.011], and the same nonsignificant trend was seen in patients with an appendectomy before UC diagnosis (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.08-1.41, P = 0.138). Appendectomy was associated with delayed colectomy, particularly when it was performed after diagnosis of UC (P = 0.009). No significant differences were found in the CRC rate between patients with and without appendectomy (1.6% vs 1.2%; P = 0.555).

CONCLUSION

Appendectomy in established UC is associated with an 84% decreased risk of colectomy and a delay in surgery. Since the colon is in situ for longer, the risk of developing CRC remains, which underscores the importance of endoscopic surveillance programmes.

Prospective cohort study of appendicectomy for treatment of therapy-refractory ulcerative colitis

Introduction

Appendicectomy may reduce relapses and need for medication in patients with ulcerative colitis, but long-term prospective data are lacking. This study aimed to analyse the effect of appendicectomy in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis.

Methods

In this prospective multicentre cohort series, all consecutive patients with refractory ulcerative colitis referred for proctocolectomy between November 2012 and June 2015 were counselled to undergo laparoscopic appendicectomy instead. The primary endpoint was clinical response (reduction of at least 3 points in the partial Mayo score) at 12 months and long-term follow-up. Secondary endpoints included endoscopic remission (endoscopic Mayo score of 1 or less), failure (colectomy or start of experimental medication), and changes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) (range 32–224), EQ-5D™ and EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores.

Results

A total of 28 patients (13 women; median age 40·5 years) underwent appendicectomy. The mean baseline IBDQ score was 127·0, the EQ-5D™ score was 0·65, and the EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL score was 41·1. At 12 months, 13 patients had a clinical response, five were in endoscopic remission, and nine required a colectomy (6 patients) or started new experimental medical therapy (3). IBDQ, EQ-5D™ and EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores improved to 167·1 (P &lt; 0·001), 0·80 (P = 0·003) and 61·0 (P &lt; 0·001) respectively. After a median of 3·7 (range 2·3–5·2) years, a further four patients required a colectomy (2) or new experimental medical therapy (2). Thirteen patients had a clinical response and seven were in endoscopic remission. The improvement in IBDQ, EQ-5D™ and the EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores remained stable over time.

Conclusion

Appendicectomy resulted in a clinical response in nearly half of patients with refractory ulcerative colitis and a substantial proportion were in endoscopic remission. Elective appendicectomy should be considered before proctocolectomy in patients with therapy-refractory ulcerative colitis.

The surgeon and inflammatory bowel disease

Could be involved earlier

The Risk of Colectomy and Colorectal Cancer After Appendectomy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy decreases the risk of developing ulcerative colitis [UC], and is suggested to have a beneficial effect on the clinical course of established UC. However, recent studies showed no significantly decreased colectomy rate, and moreover an apparently increased risk of colorectal cancer [CRC]. We aimed to investigate the suggested correlation in a meta-analysis and to analyse possible confounding factors.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Data from studies describing the influence of appendectomy on colectomy and CRC were extracted from published reports. Exclusion criteria were patients aged <18 years, non-UC, and animal studies.

RESULTS

From 891 studies, 13 studies evaluating 73323 UC patients [appendectomy n = 2859] were included. All studies, except one, were rated as poor quality. Overall, colectomy rate in appendectomised and non-appendectomised patients was not significantly different (odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.77, I2 = 53%). The proportion of colectomies undertaken for CRC or high-grade dysplasia [HGD] was significantly higher after appendectomy [OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.40-5.78, I2 = 32%], with 50% of the colectomies indicated for CRC/HGD compared with 9.4% in non-appendectomised patients. Possible additional confounding factors were a longer UC disease duration, less medication use, and a higher prevalence of primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC] in appendectomised patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Appendectomy in established UC is associated with apparently higher rates of subsequent CRC/HGD, but this appears to be due to inequalities in at-risk exposure between groups, presumably secondary to positive clinical effects of appendectomy on disease symptoms. This finding emphasises the importance of regular endoscopic surveillance in this patient group.

Appendectomy for Therapy-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis Results in Pathological Improvement of Colonic Inflammation: Short-Term Results of the PASSION Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The objective of this study was to examine the modulating effect of an appendectomy on the disease course of therapy-refractory ulcerative colitis [UC] patients, and to analyse appendiceal pathological characteristics predictive of pathological response.

METHODS

Patients with therapy-refractory UC, and referred for proctocolectomy, were invited to undergo laparoscopic appendectomy first. The primary end points were clinical response after 3 and 12 months. Secondary end points were endoscopic remission, failure, and pathologic response. Appendiceal specimens, and pre- and post-operative biopsies were histologically graded according to the validated Geboes score.

RESULTS

Thirty patients [53% male] with a median age of 40 (interquartile range [IQR], 33-47) underwent appendectomy, with a median preoperative total Mayo score of 9 [IQR, 8-11]. After 12 months, 9 patients [30%] had lasting clinical response, of whom 5 [17%] were in endoscopic remission. Pathological evaluation was possible in 28 patients. After a median of 13.0 weeks [range 7-51], pathological response was seen in 13 patients [46%], with a median decrease of 2 points [range 1-3]. Appendiceal inflammation was highly predictive of pathological response when compared with no inflammation or extensive ulcerations [85% vs 20%, p = 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Appendectomy was effective in one-third of therapy-refractory UC patients, with a substantial proportion of patients demonstrating complete endoscopic remission after 1 year. Pathological response was seen in almost 50% of patients and was related to active inflammation in the appendix, limited disease, and shorter disease duration. These early results suggest that there is a UC patient group that may benefit from appendectomy.

The treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative proctitis is defined as a mucosal inflammation limited to the rectum. Ulcerative proctitis is responsible for distressing symptoms and alteration of patient quality of life. Effective treatment is important to prevent or delay proximal extension of the disease and to improve quality of life. Refractory ulcerative proctitis is defined as the failure of topical and oral 5-aminosalicylic acid and corticosteroids. Medical management of refractory ulcerative proctitis may be challenging as there is little evidence regarding drug efficacy in this clinical situation. Data are currently available for azathioprine, topical tacrolimus and anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies as rescue treatment for refractory ulcerative proctitis. Other biologics may be of benefit despite a lack of dedicated clinical trials. Ultimately, experimental therapies such as epidermal growth factor enemas, appendectomy or fecal transplantation may be tried before restorative proctocolectomy with J pouch anastomosis, which has demonstrated good results with regards to clinical remission and quality of life.

Streptococcus agalactiae bacteremia in non-pregnant adult patients at two teaching hospitals

Streptococcus agalactiae or group B streptococcus (GBS) is a frequent pathogen in immunocompromised adults. The aim of this study was to determine the relative frequency, clinical presentation, antimicrobial susceptibility profile, and risk factors associated with GBS bacteremia in non-pregnant adult patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of blood cultures performed in two hospitals between the years 2009-2013. From 1110 bacteremia episodes, 13 were caused by GBS, all of which were susceptible to ampicillin. GBS bacteremia was more frequent in females and in patients older than 60 years of age. The most frequent comorbidities were chronic kidney disease, cardiac failure and neoplasia. History of appendectomy was detected in 53.8% of the patients, being the most relevant comorbidity for GBS bacteremia in the multivariate analysis (OR 4.13, p=0.012). The main presentations were primary bacteremia and soft tissue infection. GBS bacteremia was infrequent in our institution, and a history of appendectomy might be related to bacteremia occurrence.

Clinical Predictors and Natural History of Disease Extension in Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis

BACKGROUND

A proportion of patients with initial presentation of ulcerative proctitis (UP) progress to more extensive colitis. We sought to characterize the natural history and identify clinical predictors of extension in UP.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of participants with a new diagnosis of UP from January 2000 to December 2015. We used Cox proportional hazard modeling to identify predictors of disease extension.

RESULTS

We identified 169 new cases of UP with a median age of diagnosis of 40 years (range: 16-91 yr) and a median follow-up of 4.3 years (range: 3.3-15.1 yr). Fifty-three (31%) patients developed extension over the follow-up time. Compared with nonextenders, the need for immunosuppressive or biologic therapy was significantly higher among extenders (34% versus 2.6%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, compared with UP cases with body mass index <25, the adjusted hazard ratios of extension were 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-3.23) and 2.77 (95% CI, 1.07-7.14) among overweight and obese patients, respectively (Ptrend = 0.03). Similarly, patients with a history of appendectomy or endoscopic finding of moderate to severe disease had a higher risk of extension (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.74, 95% CI, 1.07-7.01 and 1.96, 95% CI, 1.05-3.67, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective cohort study, we show that appendectomy, body mass index, and endoscopic activity at the time of diagnosis of proctitis are associated with an increased risk of extension. In addition, our data suggest that extenders are more likely to require immunosuppressive or biologic therapy.

Appendectomy and the Risk of Colectomy in Ulcerative Colitis: A National Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease usually responding well to anti-inflammatory drugs but many patients will still need colectomy. Appendectomy is associated with a lower risk of later developing UC. We aimed to assess the longitudinal relationship between appendectomy, appendicitis, and disease course in UC patients.

METHODS

A national cohort of UC patients with a diagnosis in 1964-2010 was identified from the Swedish National Patient Register that also provided information regarding appendicitis and/or appendectomy before or after the UC diagnosis. The risk for colectomy and UC-related hospital admissions was evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 63,711 UC patients, 2,143 had appendectomy and 7,690 underwent colectomy. Appendectomy for appendicitis before 20 years of age and for non-appendicitis at all ages before UC diagnosis was associated with a lower risk of colectomy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 0.27-0.72 and HR 0.62, 0.43-0.90, respectively), and fewer hospital admissions (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.73 and IRR 0.54, 0.47-0.63, respectively). Appendectomy for appendicitis after the UC diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of colectomy (HR 1.56, 1.20-2.03), whereas no such association was found for other pathology (HR 1.40, 0.79-2.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Appendectomy early in life and before developing UC is associated with a lower risk of colectomy as well as UC-related hospital admissions. Appendectomy for appendicitis after established UC appears associated with a worse disease course, with an increased rate of subsequent colectomy.

Appendectomy does not decrease the risk of future colectomy in UC: results from a large cohort and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Early appendectomy is inversely associated with the development of UC. However, the impact of appendectomy on the clinical course of UC is controversial, generally favouring a milder disease course. We aim to describe the effect appendectomy has on the disease course of UC with focus on the timing of appendectomy in relation to UC diagnosis.

DESIGN

Using the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium database of patients with UC, the risk of colectomy was compared between patients who did and did not undergo appendectomy. In addition, we performed a meta-analysis of studies that examined the association between appendectomy and colectomy.

RESULTS

2980 patients with UC were initially included. 111 (4.4%) patients with UC had an appendectomy; of which 63 were performed prior to UC diagnosis and 48 after diagnosis. In multivariable analysis, appendectomy performed at any time was an independent risk factor for colectomy (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.1), with appendectomy performed after UC diagnosis most strongly associated with colectomy (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.5). An updated meta-analysis showed appendectomy performed either prior to or after UC diagnosis had no effect on colectomy rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Appendectomy performed at any time in relation to UC diagnosis was not associated with a decrease in severity of disease. In fact, appendectomy after UC diagnosis may be associated with a higher risk of colectomy. These findings question the proposed use of appendectomy as treatment for UC.

Effect of appendicectomy on colonic inflammation and neoplasia in experimental ulcerative colitis

Background

Ulcerative colitis (UC) promotes cancer, and can be ameliorated by early appendicectomy for appendicitis. The aim of the study was to explore the effect of appendicectomy on colitis and colonic neoplasia in an animal model of colitis and a cohort of patients with UC.

Methods

Five-week old IL10/Nox1DKO mice with nascent colitis and 8-week-old IL10/Nox1DKO mice with established colitis underwent appendicectomy (for experimental appendicitis or no appendicitis) or sham laparotomy. The severity and extent of colitis was assessed by histopathological examination, and a clinical disease activity score was given. From a cohort of consecutive patients with UC who underwent colectomy, the prevalence of appendicectomy and pathological findings were collected from two institutional databases.

Results

Appendicectomy for appendicitis ameliorated experimental colitis in the mice; the effect was more pronounced in the 5-week-old animals. Appendicectomy in the no-appendicitis group was associated with an increased rate of colonic high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer compared with rates in sham and appendicitis groups (13 of 20 versus 0 of 20 and 0 of 20 respectively; P &lt; 0·001). Fifteen of 232 patients who underwent colectomy for UC had previously had an appendicectomy, and nine of these had colonic cancer or HGD. Thirty (13·8 per cent) of 217 patients with the appendix in situ had colonic neoplastic lesions. Multivariable analysis showed that previous appendicectomy was associated with colorectal neoplasia (odds ratio 16·88, 95 per cent c.i. 3·32 to 112·69).

Conclusion

Appendicectomy for experimental appendicitis ameliorated colitis. The risk of colorectal neoplasia appeared to increase following appendicectomy without induced appendicitis in a mouse model of colitis, and in patients with UC who had undergone appendicectomy.

The Link between the Appendix and Ulcerative Colitis: Clinical Relevance and Potential Immunological Mechanisms

The human appendix has long been considered as a vestigial organ, an organ that has lost its function during evolution. In recent years, however, reports have emerged that link the appendix to numerous immunological functions in humans. Evidence has been presented for an important role of the appendix in maintaining intestinal health. This theory suggests that the appendix may be a reservoir or 'safe house' from which the commensal gut flora can rapidly be reestablished if it is eradicated from the colon. However, the appendix may also have a role in the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Several large epidemiological cohort studies have demonstrated the preventive effect of appendectomy on the development of ulcerative colitis, a finding that has been confirmed in murine colitis models. In addition, current studies are examining the possible therapeutic effect of an appendectomy to modulate disease course in patients with ulcerative colitis. This literature review assesses the current knowledge about the clinical and immunological aspects of the vermiform appendix in IBD and suggests that the idea of the appendix as a vestigial remnant should be discarded.

Appendectomy and the clinical course of ulcerative colitis: a retrospective cohort study and a nested case-control study from Korea

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Appendectomy protects against the development of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the relationship between appendectomy and the clinical course of UC is complex, and could be impacted by a number of variables. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical course of UC between appendectomized patients and nonappendectomized patients in Korea.

METHODS

Data on 2648 UC patients were retrieved from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease registry at Asan Medical Center. This retrospective cohort study compared the clinical course of UC in 68 patients who received an appendectomy before their UC diagnosis and 2544 patients who did not receive this procedure. A nested case-control study was also conducted to compare the disease course before and after appendectomy in 36 patients who received this surgery after UC diagnosis. To control for potential confounders, 144 matched controls were retrieved from among 2544 nonappendectomized patients

RESULTS

In the retrospective cohort study, an appendectomy before UC diagnosis demonstrated no influence on disease extent at diagnosis, rates of medication use, proximal disease extension, or colectomy. The 10- and 20-year probabilities of receiving a colectomy were 12.7% and 20.6%, respectively, in appendectomized patients, in comparison with 8.9% and 16.4%, respectively, in nonappendectomized patients (P = 0.81). According to the nested case-control study, an appendectomy after UC diagnosis did not change the subsequent disease course in terms of medication use, proximal disease extension, or hospital admission rate. The adjusted ratio of hospital admissions after appendectomy versus before appendectomy was 1.01 (95% confidence interval = 0.46-2.23; P = 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Appendectomies performed before or after UC diagnosis do not affect its clinical course in the Korean population.

Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of ulcerative proctitis, chronic radiation proctopathy, and diversion proctitis

Chronic proctitis refers to persistent or relapsing inflammation of the rectum, which results from a wide range of etiologies with various pathogenic mechanisms. The patients may share similar clinical presentations. Ulcerative proctitis, chronic radiation proctitis or proctopathy, and diversion proctitis are the 3 most common forms of chronic proctitis. Although the diagnosis of these disease entities may be straightforward in the most instances based on the clinical history, endoscopic, and histologic features, differential diagnosis may sometimes become problematic, especially when their etiologies and the disease processes overlap. The treatment for the 3 forms of chronic proctitis is different, which may shed some lights on their pathogenetic pathway. This article provides an overview of the latest data on the clinical features, etiologies, diagnosis, and management of ulcerative proctitis, chronic radiation proctopathy, and diversion proctitis.

Appendiceal skip inflammation and ulcerative colitis

In recent decades, the appearance of inflammation near the appendix in patients with distal ulcerative colitis (UC) has been highlighted. Many epidemiological studies have confirmed the link between appendectomy and decreased incidence of UC. However, the clinical significance of appendiceal orifice inflammation (AOI) or peri-appendiceal red patch (PARP) as a "skip lesion" in UC has not been well elucidated. In this review, we summarized the literature regarding AOI/PARP and the role of this lesion in relation to UC. Since the appendiceal "skip area" in UC was first described in 1958, several reports using histologic examination of colectomy specimens and colonoscopy have been published. AOI/PARP has been more frequently associated with distal, mild UC than extensive, severe disease. Although it is still controversial, AOI/PARP seems to have little prognostic implication in the disease course of UC, including remission, relapse and proximal disease extension. However, some case reports have raised the possibility of a relationship between AOI/PARP and appendiceal neoplasms such as appendiceal cystadenoma and appendiceal adenocarcinoma. In addition, some investigators have treated UC patients who were resistant to conventional medical therapy with appendectomy and have reported inconsistent therapeutic effect. Further research may lead to the discovery of etiologic and pathogenic roles of appendiceal inflammation in UC.

Managing intractable proctitis and the problematic pouch

Proctitis accounts for a significant proportion of cases of ulcerative colitis (UC), and some patients subsequently develop more extensive disease. However, most patients continue to have limited inflammation, although the changes in the distal colon and rectum can occasionally be severe, and symptoms of increased frequency, rectal bleeding and urgency can be as disabling as they are for patients with more extensive colitis. Furthermore, although symptoms are typically well controlled with standard medications, medically refractory proctitis poses particular problems. Patients generally are not systemically unwell, and there is no added fear of cancer. Therefore, the prospect of colectomy for such limited disease is resisted by patients, physicians and surgeons alike. Unusual therapies, often delivered locally by enema or suppository, have been tested in small case series without definitive outcomes. The pathogenesis of such limited, yet intractable inflammation remains unclear, and the differential diagnosis should be carefully reviewed to ensure that local disease, whether it is infectious, vascular, or a result of injury or degeneration, is not overlooked. Ileo-anal pouch formation is the surgery of choice for about 20% of patients with UC who undergo colectomy. In the majority of cases, this surgery results in an acceptable quality of life and freedom from a stoma. However, in a sizeable minority of cases, pouch dysfunction can cause intractable problems. The causes of pouch dysfunction are varied and must all be considered carefully, particularly in refractory cases. Pouchitis is a common issue and is usually transient and easily treated. However, refractory and chronic pouchitis can be challenging. Ischaemia, injury, infection and Crohn's disease can all cause refractory pouch dysfunction. In a minority of cases, there appears to be no apparent organic pathology, and the presumptive diagnosis is that of a functional pouch disorder. Although it is much rarer, neoplastic changes in the pouch must also be considered, and the risk managed appropriately. The management of both intractable proctitis and the problematic pouch is made more challenging by the wide differential diagnosis that must be considered and by the paucity of high-quality clinical trials to support any one therapy. Key strategies to overcoming these limitations include methodical and systematic investigation and review, and a willingness to tailor therapy to the individual patient. Clinical trials of new treatments should be supported, and data from the experience with small cohorts of patients should be meticulously collected, critically analysed and widely disseminated.

Appendicectomy and clostridium difficile infection: is there a link?

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a gradually emerging healthcare problem in the western world, occurring predominantly from the de-arrangement of the gut microbiota and the widespread use of antibiotics. Recently, it has been proposed that the presence or absence of the appendix could be a factor influencing the occurrence and/or the severity of CDI. We performed a review of the literature, aiming to identify and interpret in an accumulative way the results of the published clinical studies which addressed the issue of a possible association between prior appendicectomy and the features of CDI. A total of five suitable studies were retrieved, which were all conducted retrospectively. Although the results were conflicting regarding the impact of prior appendicectomy in the occurrence and relapse of CDI, it appears that the presence or absence of the appendix is not associated with the clinical severity of CDI. Based on the current evidence and considering the effects of the widespread use of antibiotics in the clinical practice, it appears that an in situ appendix does not have a definitive impact on the development and severity of CDI. Further observational studies are warranted to clarify any potential association.

The potential benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: A review of current evidence

Up to 35% of patients with ulcerative colitis will require surgery during the course of their disease. Nowadays, a total colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the preferred procedure, which can be performed open or via laparoscopic approach. Since the early '90s, minimally invasive techniques have gained popularity, but the extend of restorative procedures in these patients has restricted the use of laparoscopic approaches mainly to elective procedures in specialised centres. This review discusses the benefits and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery when compared to open surgery. It presents the current evidence on short-term and long-term post-operative results, functional outcome, fecundity, and costs, for both elective and emergency indications. In addition, the value of new techniques (including single port surgery) and alternative laparoscopic approaches (e.g. ileo-rectal anastomosis, Kock-pouch and appendectomy) will be discussed.

Distribution of CD4(pos) -, CD8(pos) - and regulatory T cells in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract in healthy young subjects

The gastrointestinal immune system is involved in the development of several autoimmune-mediated diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and type 1 diabetes mellitus. Alterations in T-cell populations, especially regulatory T cells (Tregs), are often evident in patients suffering from these diseases. To be able to detect changes in T-cell populations in diseased tissue, it is crucial to investigate T-cell populations in healthy individuals, and to characterize their variation among different regions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. While limited data exist, quantitative data on biopsies systematically drawn from various regions of the GI tract are lacking, particularly in healthy young humans. In this report, we present the first systematic assessment of how T cells--including Tregs--are distributed in the gastrointestinal mucosa throughout the GI tract of healthy young humans by means of multi-parameter FACS analysis. Gastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were performed on 16 healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 32. Biopsies were drawn from seven GI regions, and were used to determine the frequencies of CD8(+)-, CD4(+)- and Tregs in the gastrointestinal mucosa by means of multi-parameter FACS analysis. Our data show that there is significant variation in the baseline T-cell landscape along the healthy human gastrointestinal tract, and that mucosal T-cell analyses from a single region should not be taken as representative of the entire gastrointestinal tract. We show that certain T-cell subsets in the gastrointestinal mucosa vary significantly among regions; most notably, that Tregs are enriched in the appendiceal orifice region and the ascending colon, and that CD8(pos) T cells are enriched in the gastric mucosa.

New therapeutic avenues in ulcerative colitis: thinking out of the box

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic idiopathic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract that affects the mucosal lining of the colon. Recent epidemiological data show that its incidence and prevalence are increasing in many parts of the world, in parallel with altered lifestyles, improved access to health, improved sanitation and industrialisation rates. Current therapeutic strategies for treating UC have only been moderately successful. Despite major recent advances in inflammatory bowel disease therapeutic resources, a considerable proportion of patients are still refractory to conventional treatment. Less than half of all patients achieve long-term remission, many require colectomy, and the disease still has a major impact on patients' lives. Moreover, recent data point to slightly raised mortality. While these outcomes could be partly improved by optimising current therapeutic strategies, they clearly highlight the need to develop new therapies. Currently, a number of promising and innovative therapeutic approaches are being explored, some of which will hopefully survive to reach the clinic. Until such a time arrives, it is important that a better understanding of the clinical particularities of the disease, an improved knowledge of the host-microbiome negative interactions and of the environmental factors beyond disease development is achieved to obtain the final and desired outcome: to provide better treatment and quality of life for patients with this disabling disease.

Appendectomy and Clostridium difficile colitis: Relationships revealed by clinical observations and immunology

Advances in understanding the interaction between the human immune system and the microbiome have led to an improved understanding of the function of the vermiform appendix as a safe-house for beneficial bacteria in the colon. These advances have been made despite long standing clinical observations that the appendectomy is a safe and effective procedure. However, more recent clinical data show that an appendectomy puts patients at increased risk for recurrent Clostridium difficile (C. difficile)-associated colitis, and probably other diseases associated with an altered microbiome. At the same time, appendectomy does not apparently put patients at risk for an initial onset of C. difficile-associated colitis. These clinical observations point toward the idea that the vermiform appendix might not effectively protect the microbiome in the face of broad spectrum antibiotics, the use of which precedes the initial onset of C. difficile-associated colitis. Further, these observations point to the idea that historically important threats to the microbiome such as infectious gastrointestinal pathogens have been supplanted by other threats, particularly the use of broad spectrum antibiotics.

Review article: strategies for the management of chronic unremitting ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic active ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with significant morbidity, loss of productivity, increased colorectal cancer risk and cost. Up to 18% of patients suffer chronic active disease, with 30% requiring colectomy at 10 years. The management remains challenging given the relatively few clinical trials in this area.

AIM

To summarise the evidence regarding optimal management strategies for patients with chronic active UC of differing disease extents and degrees of treatment refractoriness.

METHOD

A literature search using the PubMed and Medline databases was performed. No time limit was set on article publication for inclusion.

RESULTS

The principles of management should focus on confirming disease activity, exclusion of alternative diagnoses, adherence and treatment escalation. Infliximab and topical tacrolimus are options in refractory proctitis, although the evidence for these therapies is limited. Both infliximab and adalimumab are effective in corticosteroid-refractory disease, although the proportions of patients achieving corticosteroid-free remission remain modest (24% at 30 weeks and 16.9% at 8 weeks respectively). Alternatives include ciclosporin and tacrolimus, and possibly methotrexate. Colectomy often leads to an improved quality of life; medical strategies unlikely to provide durable corticosteroid-free remission should not be pursued.

CONCLUSIONS

No current pharmacological treatment delivers mucosal healing in the majority of patients. Newer treatments such as vedolizumab and tofacitinib may represent valuable future therapies. Available medical options should be discussed with patients at every step of their management, with an honest appraisal of the evidence. Surgery should always be considered in patients with chronic refractory disease of any extent.

Ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory disorder of the colonic mucosa, which starts in the rectum and generally extends proximally in a continuous manner through part of, or the entire, colon; however, some patients with proctitis or left-sided colitis might have a caecal patch of inflammation. Bloody diarrhoea is the characteristic symptom of the disease. The clinical course is unpredictable, marked by alternating periods of exacerbation and remission. In this Seminar we discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, natural history, medical and surgical management, and main disease-related complications of ulcerative colitis, and briefly outline novel treatment options. Enhanced understanding of how the interaction between environmental factors, genetics, and the immune system results in mucosal inflammation has increased knowledge of disease pathophysiology. We provide practical therapeutic algorithms that are easily applicable in daily clinical practice, emphasising present controversies in treatment management and novel therapies.

TH17, TH22 and Treg cells are enriched in the healthy human cecum

There is increasing evidence that dysregulation of CD4(+) T cell populations leads to intestinal inflammation, but the regional distribution of these populations throughout the intestinal tract in healthy individuals remains unclear. Here, we show that T(H)17, T(H)22 and T(Reg) cells are enriched in the healthy human cecum compared to the terminal ileum and sigmoid colon, whereas T(H)1 and T(H)2 cells do not significantly vary by location. Transcriptional profiling analysis of paired pinch biopsies from different regions of the intestine identified significant differences in the metabolic state of the terminal ileum, cecum, and sigmoid colon. An increased proportion of T(H)17 cells was positively associated with expression of resistin (RETN) and negatively associated with expression of trefoil factor 1 (TFF1). These results suggest that CD4(+) T helper cells that are important in maintaining mucosal barrier function may be enriched in the cecum as a result of metabolic differences of the surrounding microenvironment.

Pre-colectomy appendectomy and risk for Crohn's disease in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

A subset of patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis can develop Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch after restorative proctocolectomy. While appendectomy has been implicated to be associated with an increased risk for CD, its impact on the development of de novo CD of the pouch in patients' ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been studied. The aims of the study were to assess the prevalence of CD of the pouch in patients with pre-colectomy appendectomy and to investigate the impact of appendectomy on the development of de novo CD of the pouch.

METHODS

All eligible patients with restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA for IBD who had available information on pre-colectomy appendectomy were studied. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated. Cox regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The study included 434 patients (44.9 % male) with a mean age of 45.2 ± 4.4 years and follow-up of 4.6 ± 2.3 years. Forty patients (9.2 %) had had appendectomy prior to colectomy. Appendectomy was not shown to be associated with CD of the pouch or its phenotypes in both univariable and multivariable analyses. In the Cox model, independent risk factors associated with CD of the pouch were active smoking (hazard ratio [HR] =1.58; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.43) and family history of CD (HR=1.82; 95 % CI, 0.99-3.32).

CONCLUSIONS

While this study has shown no association between previous appendectomy and the development of CD of pouch, active smoking was an independent risk factor for development of CD of the pouch.

The effect of appendectomy on the course of ulcerative colitis: a systematic review

AIM

Previous studies have shown significantly lower appendectomy rates in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients compared with healthy controls. Evidence indicating that the appendix has an immunomodulatory role in UC has been accumulating. To examine the latest evidence on the effect of appendectomy on the disease course of UC.

METHOD

PubMed, The Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched. Primary end-points were number of relapses, use of steroids, number of hospital admissions and number of colectomies.

RESULTS

The search resulted in six observational studies (five case-control studies and one cohort study) totalling 2532 patients. Owing to clinical heterogeneity, no meta-analysis could be conducted. One study found lower relapse rates in patients appendectomized before the onset of UC [absolute risk reduction (ARR)=21.5%; 95% CI: 1.71-45.92%]. Another two studies found a reduced requirement for immunosuppression in appendectomized patients (ARR=20.2%; 95% CI: 9.67-30.46% in the first study and ARR=21.4%; 95% CI: 10.32-32.97% in the second study). In addition, one study found lower colectomy rates in nonappendectomized patients (ARR=8.7%; 95% CI: 1.29-18.66%) and two studies found lower colectomy rates in appendectomized patients (ARR=21.4%; 95% CI: 13.17-28.79% in the first study and ARR=18.7%; 95% CI: 7.50-29.97% in the second study).

CONCLUSION

There are limited and conflicting data available regarding the effect of appendectomy on the disease course of UC. Most studies suggest a beneficial effect and the minority find no, or a negative, effect.

The appendix may protect against Clostridium difficile recurrence

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Several risk factors have been identified for the development of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) that alter host immunity and disrupt colonic flora. Although the function of the appendix has been debated, its active, gut-associated lymphoid tissue and biofilm production indicate potential roles in recovery from initial CDI and protection against recurrent CDI. We investigated whether the presence or absence of an appendix is associated with CDI recurrence.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of adult inpatients with CDI who were admitted to a tertiary-care teaching hospital from 2005 to 2007 to identify those with and without an appendix. The primary dependent variable for statistical analysis was CDI recurrence.

RESULTS

In a multivariate analysis of 11 clinical variables, the presence of an appendix was associated inversely with CDI recurrence (P < .0001; adjusted relative risk, .398). Age older than 60 years also was associated with CDI recurrence (P = .0280; adjusted relative risk, 2.44).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of an appendix has a significant and independent, inverse association with CDI recurrence, but this finding requires validation in a prospective study. Assessing the presence or absence of an appendix might be useful in predicting CDI recurrence.

Familial aggregation in inflammatory bowel disease: Is it genes or environment?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) develops in genetically susceptible individuals due to the influence of environmental factors, leading to an abnormal recognition of microbiota antigens by the innate immune system which triggers an exaggerated immune response and subsequent bowel tissue damage. IBD has been more frequently found in families, an observation that could be due to either genetic, environmental or both types of factors present in these families. In addition to expanding our knowledge on IBD pathogenesis, defining the specific contribution to familial IBD of each one of these factors might have also clinical usefulness. We review the available evidence on familial IBD pathogenesis.

Effects of appendectomy and oral tolerance on dextran sulfate sodium colitis

AIM: To evaluate the concomitant effects of appendectomy and oral tolerance on colitis.

METHODS: Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) was investigated at a 7-d interval after ovalbumin (OVA) administration and immunization under normal and colitis conditions in appendectomized or sham-operated mice. Pathological scores for the colon were graded after ingestion of colon-extracted protein (CEP) and induction of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) colitis in appendectomized or sham-operated mice. Thereafter, Th1 and Th2 in Peyer’s patches and spleen lymphocytes were detected in CEP-treated and bovine serum albumin (BSA)-treated control mice.

RESULTS: In appendectomized mice, DTH was not inhibited at day 7 after OVA administration and at the initial phase of DSS colitis, whereas it was inhibited at day 14 and day 21. However, in sham-operated mice, it was inhibited during the whole procedure and the onset of DSS colitis. The protective role of CEP against DSS colitis was present in sham-operated mice, with predominant improvement of colonic pathological changes, while vanished in the appendectomized mice. A shift from Th1 to Th2 in Peyer’s patches resulted from a decrease of Th1 cells with the ingestion of CEP. Compared with BSA in the sham-operated group, no predominant changes were observed in the appendectomized mice.

CONCLUSION: Appendectomy interferes with the protective role of CEP in DSS colitis via a shift from Th2 to Th1 during oral tolerance induction.