1
|
Chi S, Flowers CR, Li Z, Huang X, Wei P. MASH: MEDIATION ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL OUTCOME AND HIGH-DIMENSIONAL OMICS MEDIATORS WITH APPLICATION TO COMPLEX DISEASES. Ann Appl Stat 2024; 18:1360-1377. [PMID: 39328363 PMCID: PMC11426188 DOI: 10.1214/23-aoas1838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
Abstract
Environmental exposures such as cigarette smoking influence health outcomes through intermediate molecular phenotypes, such as the methylome, transcriptome, and metabolome. Mediation analysis is a useful tool for investigating the role of potentially high-dimensional intermediate phenotypes in the relationship between environmental exposures and health outcomes. However, little work has been done on mediation analysis when the mediators are high-dimensional and the outcome is a survival endpoint, and none of it has provided a robust measure of total mediation effect. To this end, we propose an estimation procedure for Mediation Analysis of Survival outcome and High-dimensional omics mediators (MASH) based on sure independence screening for putative mediator variable selection and a second-moment-based measure of total mediation effect for survival data analogous to theR 2 measure in a linear model. Extensive simulations showed good performance of MASH in estimating the total mediation effect and identifying true mediators. By applying MASH to the metabolomics data of 1919 subjects in the Framingham Heart Study, we identified five metabolites as mediators of the effect of cigarette smoking on coronary heart disease risk (total mediation effect, 51.1%) and two metabolites as mediators between smoking and risk of cancer (total mediation effect, 50.7%). Application of MASH to a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma genomics data set identified copy-number variations for eight genes as mediators between the baseline International Prognostic Index score and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunyi Chi
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher R Flowers
- Department of Lymphoma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Ziyi Li
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xuelin Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peng Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chi S, Flowers CR, Li Z, Huang X, Wei P. MASH: MEDIATION ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL OUTCOME AND HIGH-DIMENSIONAL OMICS MEDIATORS WITH APPLICATION TO COMPLEX DISEASES. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.08.22.554286. [PMID: 37662296 PMCID: PMC10473652 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.22.554286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Environmental exposures such as cigarette smoking influence health outcomes through intermediate molecular phenotypes, such as the methylome, transcriptome, and metabolome. Mediation analysis is a useful tool for investigating the role of potentially high-dimensional intermediate phenotypes in the relationship between environmental exposures and health outcomes. However, little work has been done on mediation analysis when the mediators are high-dimensional and the outcome is a survival endpoint, and none of it has provided a robust measure of total mediation effect. To this end, we propose an estimation procedure for Mediation Analysis of Survival outcome and High-dimensional omics mediators (MASH) based on sure independence screening for putative mediator variable selection and a second-moment-based measure of total mediation effect for survival data analogous to the R 2 measure in a linear model. Extensive simulations showed good performance of MASH in estimating the total mediation effect and identifying true mediators. By applying MASH to the metabolomics data of 1919 subjects in the Framingham Heart Study, we identified five metabolites as mediators of the effect of cigarette smoking on coronary heart disease risk (total mediation effect, 51.1%) and two metabolites as mediators between smoking and risk of cancer (total mediation effect, 50.7%). Application of MASH to a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma genomics data set identified copy-number variations for eight genes as mediators between the baseline International Prognostic Index score and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunyi Chi
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher R Flowers
- Department of Lymphoma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Ziyi Li
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xuelin Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peng Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee KB, Ang L, Yau WP, Seow WJ. Association between Metabolites and the Risk of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Metabolites 2020; 10:E362. [PMID: 32899527 PMCID: PMC7570231 DOI: 10.3390/metabo10090362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, lung cancer is the most prevalent cancer type. However, screening and early detection is challenging. Previous studies have identified metabolites as promising lung cancer biomarkers. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis aimed to identify metabolites associated with lung cancer risk in observational studies. The literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE databases, up to 31 December 2019, for observational studies on the association between metabolites and lung cancer risk. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and Cochran's Q test. Meta-analyses were performed using either a fixed-effects or random-effects model, depending on study heterogeneity. Fifty-three studies with 297 metabolites were included. Most identified metabolites (252 metabolites) were reported in individual studies. Meta-analyses were conducted on 45 metabolites. Five metabolites (cotinine, creatinine riboside, N-acetylneuraminic acid, proline and r-1,t-2,3,c-4-tetrahydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenanthrene) and five metabolite groups (total 3-hydroxycotinine, total cotinine, total nicotine, total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (sum of concentrations of the metabolite and its glucuronides), and total nicotine equivalent (sum of total 3-hydroxycotinine, total cotinine and total nicotine)) were associated with higher lung cancer risk, while three others (folate, methionine and tryptophan) were associated with lower lung cancer risk. Significant heterogeneity was detected across most studies. These significant metabolites should be further evaluated as potential biomarkers for lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kian Boon Lee
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore; (K.B.L.); (W.-P.Y.)
| | - Lina Ang
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore;
| | - Wai-Ping Yau
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore; (K.B.L.); (W.-P.Y.)
| | - Wei Jie Seow
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore;
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 119228, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Larose TL, Guida F, Fanidi A, Langhammer A, Kveem K, Stevens VL, Jacobs EJ, Smith-Warner SA, Giovannucci E, Albanes D, Weinstein SJ, Freedman ND, Prentice R, Pettinger M, Thomson CA, Cai Q, Wu J, Blot WJ, Arslan AA, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Le Marchand L, Wilkens LR, Haiman CA, Zhang X, Stampfer MJ, Hodge AM, Giles GG, Severi G, Johansson M, Grankvist K, Wang R, Yuan JM, Gao YT, Koh WP, Shu XO, Zheng W, Xiang YB, Li H, Lan Q, Visvanathan K, Hoffman Bolton J, Ueland PM, Midttun Ø, Caporaso N, Purdue M, Sesso HD, Buring JE, Lee IM, Gaziano JM, Manjer J, Brunnström H, Brennan P, Johansson M. Circulating cotinine concentrations and lung cancer risk in the Lung Cancer Cohort Consortium (LC3). Int J Epidemiol 2018; 47:1760-1771. [PMID: 29901778 PMCID: PMC6280953 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Self-reported smoking is the principal measure used to assess lung cancer risk in epidemiological studies. We evaluated if circulating cotinine-a nicotine metabolite and biomarker of recent tobacco exposure-provides additional information on lung cancer risk. Methods The study was conducted in the Lung Cancer Cohort Consortium (LC3) involving 20 prospective cohort studies. Pre-diagnostic serum cotinine concentrations were measured in one laboratory on 5364 lung cancer cases and 5364 individually matched controls. We used conditional logistic regression to evaluate the association between circulating cotinine and lung cancer, and assessed if cotinine provided additional risk-discriminative information compared with self-reported smoking (smoking status, smoking intensity, smoking duration), using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results We observed a strong positive association between cotinine and lung cancer risk for current smokers [odds ratio (OR ) per 500 nmol/L increase in cotinine (OR500): 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32-1.47]. Cotinine concentrations consistent with active smoking (≥115 nmol/L) were common in former smokers (cases: 14.6%; controls: 9.2%) and rare in never smokers (cases: 2.7%; controls: 0.8%). Former and never smokers with cotinine concentrations indicative of active smoking (≥115 nmol/L) also showed increased lung cancer risk. For current smokers, the risk-discriminative performance of cotinine combined with self-reported smoking (AUCintegrated: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.68-0.71) yielded a small improvement over self-reported smoking alone (AUCsmoke: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.64-0.68) (P = 1.5x10-9). Conclusions Circulating cotinine concentrations are consistently associated with lung cancer risk for current smokers and provide additional risk-discriminative information compared with self-report smoking alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tricia L Larose
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- K.G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Florence Guida
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Anouar Fanidi
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - Arnulf Langhammer
- HUNT Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway
| | - Kristian Kveem
- K.G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- HUNT Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway
| | - Victoria L Stevens
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Eric J Jacobs
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stephanie A Smith-Warner
- Department of Epidemiology
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Demetrius Albanes
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie J Weinstein
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Neal D Freedman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Ross Prentice
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mary Pettinger
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Qiuyin Cai
- Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jie Wu
- Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - William J Blot
- Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
- International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Alan A Arslan
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Population Health, and Environmental Medicine
| | | | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Epidemiology Program, Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Epidemiology Program, Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Xuehong Zhang
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meir J Stampfer
- Department of Epidemiology
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allison M Hodge
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gianluca Severi
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine (IIGM), Torino, Piedmont, Italy
- Centre de Recherche en Epidemiologie et Saé des Populations (CESP) UMR1018 Inserm, Facultés de Médicine Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Mikael Johansson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Västerbotten, Sweden
| | - Kjell Grankvist
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Västerbotten, Sweden
| | - Renwei Wang
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jian-Min Yuan
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Yu-Tang Gao
- Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Woon-Puay Koh
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yong-Bing Xiang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Honglan Li
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Qing Lan
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- George W. Comstock Center for Public Health Research and Prevention Health Monitoring Unit, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Judith Hoffman Bolton
- George W. Comstock Center for Public Health Research and Prevention Health Monitoring Unit, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Per Magne Ueland
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Neil Caporaso
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Mark Purdue
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Howard D Sesso
- Department of Epidemiology
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julie E Buring
- Department of Epidemiology
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - I-Min Lee
- Department of Epidemiology
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J Michael Gaziano
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston VA Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonas Manjer
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Malmö Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Hans Brunnström
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Laboratory Medicine Region Skåne, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Paul Brennan
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Mattias Johansson
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee PN, Fry JS, Forey BA, Hamling JS, Thornton AJ. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and lung cancer: A systematic review. World J Meta-Anal 2016; 4:10-43. [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i2.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Revised: 01/19/2016] [Accepted: 03/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To review evidence relating passive smoking to lung cancer risk in never smokers, considering various major sources of bias.
METHODS: Epidemiological prospective or case-control studies were identified which provide estimates of relative risk (RR) and 95%CI for never smokers for one or more of seven different indices of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS): The spouse; household; workplace; childhood; travel; social and other; and total. A wide range of study details were entered into a database, and the RRs for each study, including descriptions of the comparisons made, were entered into a linked database. RRs were derived where necessary. Results were entered, where available, for all lung cancer, and for squamous cell cancer and adenocarcinoma. “Most adjusted” results were entered based on results available, adjusted for the greatest number of potential confounding variables. “Least adjusted” results were also entered, with a preference for results adjusted at least for age for prospective studies. A pre-planned series of fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Overall analyses and analyses by continent were run for each exposure index, with results for spousal smoking given by sex, and results for childhood exposure given by source of ETS exposure. For spousal exposure, more extensive analyses provide results by various aspects of study design and definition of the RR. For smoking by the husband (or nearest equivalent), additional analyses were carried out both for overall risk, and for risk per 10 cigarettes per day smoked by the husband. These adjusted for uncontrolled confounding by four factors (fruit, vegetable and dietary fat consumption, and education), and corrected for misclassification of smoking status of the wife. For the confounding adjustment, estimates for never smoking women were derived from publications on the relationship of the four factors to both lung cancer risk and at home ETS exposure, and on the correlations between the factors. The bias due to misclassification was calculated on the basis that the proportion of ever smokers denying smoking is 10% in Asian studies and 2.5% elsewhere, and that those who deny smoking have the same risk as those who admit it. This approach, justified in previous work, balances higher true denial rates and lower risk in deniers compared to non-deniers.
RESULTS: One hundred and two studies were identified for inclusion, published in 1981 onwards, 45 in Asia, 31 in North America, 21 in Europe, and five elsewhere. Eighty-five were of case-control design and 17 were prospective. Significant (P < 0.05) associations were noted, with random-effects of (RR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.14-1.31, n = 93) for smoking by the husband (RR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.01-1.29, n = 45) for smoking by the wife (RR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.15-1.30, n = 47) for workplace exposure (RR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.02-1.29, n = 41) for childhood exposure, and (RR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.19-1.45, n = 48) for total exposure. No significant association was seen for ETS exposure in travel (RR = 1.34, 95%CI: 0.94-1.93, n = 8) or in social situations (RR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.82-1.24, n = 15). A significant negative association (RR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.64-0.94, n = 8) was seen for ETS exposure in childhood, specifically from the parents. Significant associations were also seen for spousal smoking for both squamous cell carcinoma (RR = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.15-1.80, n = 24) and adenocarcinoma (RR = 1.33, 95%CI: 1.17-1.51, n = 30). Results generally showed marked heterogeneity between studies. For smoking by either the husband or wife, where 119 RR estimates gave an overall estimate of (RR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.14-1.29), the heterogeneity was highly significant (P < 0.001), with evidence that the largest RRs were seen in studies published in 1981-89, in small studies (1-49 cases), and for estimates unadjusted by age. For smoking by the husband, the additional analyses showed that adjustment for the four factors reduced the overall (RR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.14-1.31) based on 93 estimates to (RR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.06-1.22), implying bias due to uncontrolled confounding of 7%. Further correction for misclassification reduced the estimate to a marginally non-significant (RR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.999-1.16). In the fully adjusted and corrected analyses, there was evidence of an increase in Asia (RR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.07-1.30, n = 44), but not in other regions (RR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.86-1.07, n = 49). Studies published in the 1980’s, studies providing dose-response data, and studies only providing results unadjusted for age showed elevated RRs, but later published studies, studies not providing dose-response data, and studies adjusting for age did not. The pattern of results for RRs per 10 cigs/d was similar, with no significant association in the adjusted and corrected results (RR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.994-1.07).
CONCLUSION: Most, if not all, of the ETS/lung cancer association can be explained by confounding adjustment and misclassification correction. Any causal relationship is not convincingly demonstrated.
Collapse
|
6
|
SmokeHaz: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of the Effects of Smoking on Respiratory Health. Chest 2016; 150:164-79. [PMID: 27102185 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2015] [Revised: 03/11/2016] [Accepted: 03/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking tobacco increases the risk of respiratory disease in adults and children, but communicating the magnitude of these effects in a scientific manner that is accessible and usable by the public and policymakers presents a challenge. We have therefore summarized scientific data on the impact of smoking on respiratory diseases to provide the content for a unique resource, SmokeHaz. METHODS We conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses of longitudinal studies (published to 2013) identified from electronic databases, gray literature, and experts. Random effect meta-analyses were used to pool the findings. RESULTS We included 216 articles. Among adult smokers, we confirmed substantially increased risks of lung cancer (risk ratio (RR), 10.92; 95% CI, 8.28-14.40; 34 studies), COPD (RR, 4.01; 95% CI, 3.18-5.05; 22 studies), and asthma (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.07-2.42; eight studies). Exposure to passive smoke significantly increased the risk of lung cancer in adult nonsmokers and increased the risks of asthma, wheeze, lower respiratory infections, and reduced lung function in children. Smoking significantly increased the risk of sleep apnea and asthma exacerbations in adult and pregnant populations, and active and passive smoking increased the risk of tuberculosis. CONCLUSIONS These findings have been translated into easily digestible content and published on the SmokeHaz website.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yuan JM, Butler LM, Stepanov I, Hecht SS. Urinary tobacco smoke-constituent biomarkers for assessing risk of lung cancer. Cancer Res 2014; 74:401-11. [PMID: 24408916 PMCID: PMC4066207 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-3178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Tobacco-constituent biomarkers are metabolites of specific compounds present in tobacco or tobacco smoke. Highly reliable analytic methods, based mainly on mass spectrometry, have been developed for quantitation of these biomarkers in both urine and blood specimens. There is substantial interindividual variation in smoking-related lung cancer risk that is determined in part by individual variability in the uptake and metabolism of tobacco smoke carcinogens. Thus, by incorporating these biomarkers in epidemiologic studies, we can potentially obtain a more valid and precise measure of in vivo carcinogen dose than by using self-reported smoking history, ultimately improving the estimation of smoking-related lung cancer risk. Indeed, we have demonstrated this by using a prospective study design comparing biomarker levels in urine samples collected from smokers many years before their development of cancer versus those in their smoking counterparts without a cancer diagnosis. The following urinary metabolites were associated with lung cancer risk, independent of smoking intensity and duration: cotinine plus its glucuronide, a biomarker of nicotine uptake; 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol and its glucuronides (total NNAL), a biomarker of the tobacco carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK); and r-1-,t-2,3,c-4-tetrahydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenanthrene (PheT), a biomarker of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). These results provide several possible new directions for using tobacco smoke-constituent biomarkers in lung cancer prevention, including improved lung cancer risk assessment, intermediate outcome determination in prevention trials, and regulation of tobacco products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Min Yuan
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15232
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA15232
| | - Lesley M. Butler
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15232
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA15232
| | - Irina Stepanov
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Stephen S. Hecht
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Janssen-Heijnen ML, Coebergh JW. Trends in incidence and prognosis of the histological subtypes of lung cancer in North America, Australia, New Zealand and Europe. Lung Cancer 2001; 31:123-37. [PMID: 11165391 DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00197-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the incidence of the histological subtypes of lung cancer in industrialised countries has changed dramatically over the last two decades, we reviewed trends in the incidence and prognosis in North America, Australia, New Zealand and Europe, according to period of diagnosis and birth cohort and summarized explanations for changes in mortality. METHODS Review of the literature based on a computerised search (Medline database 1966-2000). RESULTS Although the incidence of lung cancer has been decreasing since the 1970s/1980s among men in North America, Australia, New Zealand and north-western Europe, the age-adjusted rate continues to increase among women in these countries, and among both men and women in southern and eastern Europe. These trends followed changes in smoking behaviour. The proportion of adenocarcinoma has been increasing over time; the most likely explanation is the shift to low-tar filter cigarettes during the 1960s and 1970s. Despite improvement in both the diagnosis and treatment, the overall prognosis for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer hardly improved over time. In contrast, the introduction and improvement of chemotherapy since the 1970s gave rise to an improvement in - only short-term (<2 years) - survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS The epidemic of lung cancer is not over yet, especially in southern and eastern Europe. Except for short-term survival of small cell tumours, the prognosis for patients with lung cancer has not improved significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M L Janssen-Heijnen
- Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, P.O. Box 231, 5600 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Agudo A, Ahrens W, Benhamou E, Benhamou S, Boffetta P, Darby SC, Forastiere F, Fortes C, Gaborieau V, González CA, Jöckel KH, Kreuzer M, Merletti F, Pohlabeln H, Richiardi L, Whitley E, Wichmann HE, Zambon P, Simonato L. Lung cancer and cigarette smoking in women: a multicenter case-control study in Europe. Int J Cancer 2000; 88:820-7. [PMID: 11072254 DOI: 10.1002/1097-0215(20001201)88:5<820::aid-ijc21>3.0.co;2-j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The association between cigarette smoking and lung cancer risk in women was investigated within the framework of a case-control study in 9 centres from 6 European countries. Cases were 1,556 women up to 75 years of age with histologically confirmed primary lung cancer; 2, 450 controls with age distribution similar to cases were selected. The predominant cell type was adenocarcinoma (33.5%), with similar proportions for squamous-cell type (26.4%) and small-cell carcinoma (22.3%). Overall, smoking cigarettes at any time was associated with a 5-fold increase in lung cancer risk (odds ratio 5.21, 95% confidence interval 4.49-6.04); corresponding figures for current smoking habits were 8.94, 7.54-10.6. The association showed a dose-response relationship with duration of the habit and daily and cumulative lifetime smoking. A significant excess risk of 70% was associated with every 10 pack-years smoked. After 10 years of smoking cessation, the relative risk decreased to 20% compared to current smokers. The following characteristics were associated with a higher relative risk: inhalation of smoke, smoking non-filter cigarettes, smoking dark-type cigarettes and starting at young age. The association was observed for all major histological types, being the strongest for small-cell type carcinoma, followed by squamous-cell type and the lowest for adenocarcinoma. The proportion of lung-cancer cases in the population attributable to cigarette smoking ranged from 14% to 85%. We concluded that women share most features of the association between cigarette smoking and lung cancer observed in men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Agudo
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rebagliato M, Bolúmar F, Florey CDV, Jarvis MJ, Pérez-Hoyos S, Hernández-Aguado I, Aviñó MJ. Variations in cotinine levels in smokers during and after pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178:568-71. [PMID: 9580173 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70440-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the antenatal and postnatal cotinine levels in smoking women after controlling for the differences in smoking practices. STUDY DESIGN A paired comparison of two measurements of cotinine concentration was conducted in 40 smoking women voluntarily recruited in a prenatal education program held in La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain, during 1990 and 1991. Cotinine concentration was assayed by gas chromatography in samples of saliva obtained during and after pregnancy. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs test and multiple linear regression analysis were used. RESULTS The cotinine per cigarette ratio during pregnancy (median 3.53 ng/ml per cigarette) was significantly lower than the ratio in the postnatal testing (median 9.87 ng/ml per cigarette). This difference persisted after allowing for differences in reported cigarette consumption. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that the available equivalencies between cotinine level and nicotine intake obtained from adult nonpregnant populations cannot be directly applied during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rebagliato
- Departamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Smith RF, Mather HM, Ellard GA. Assessment of simple colorimetric procedures to determine smoking status of diabetic subjects. Clin Chem 1998. [DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/44.2.275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The performance of a simple colorimetric assay for urinary nicotine metabolites to assess smoking status in diabetic subjects (n = 251) was investigated. Several variations of the colorimetric assay and a qualitative extraction procedure were evaluated in comparison with a cotinine immunoassay as the “gold standard.” Among these, the best overall performance was achieved with the qualitative test (sensitivity 95%; specificity 100%). The quantitative measurement of total nicotine metabolites performed less well (sensitivity 92%; specificity 97%) but could be improved by incorporating a blank extraction (sensitivity 98%; specificity 98%). Allowance for diuresis appeared to offer no advantage over the other methods. These results support previous findings regarding the use of these colorimetric procedures in nondiabetic subjects and, contrary to other recent observations, their performance was not impaired in diabetic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert F Smith
- Division of Biomedical Sciences, School of Science, Sheffield Hallam University, Pond St., Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
| | - Hugh M Mather
- Ealing Hospital, Uxbridge Rd., Southall Middlesex UB1 3HW, UK
| | - Gordon A Ellard
- Department of Medical Microbiology, St. George’s Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK
| |
Collapse
|