1
|
Luijten MMW, van Weelden WJ, Lalisang RI, Bulten J, Lindemann K, van Beekhuizen HJ, Trum H, Boll D, Werner HMJ, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Yigit R, Krakstad C, Witteveen PO, Galaal K, van Ginkel AA, Bignotti E, Weinberger V, Sweegers S, Eriksson AGZ, Keizer DM, van de Stolpe A, Romano A, Pijnenborg JMA. Hormone Receptor Expression and Activity for Different Tumour Locations in Patients with Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2084. [PMID: 38893205 PMCID: PMC11171125 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Response to hormonal therapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) can be predicted by oestrogen and progesterone receptor immunohistochemical (ER/PR-IHC) expression, with response rates of 60% in PR-IHC > 50% cases. ER/PR-IHC can vary by tumour location and is frequently lost with tumour progression. Therefore, we explored the relationship between ER/PR-IHC expression and tumour location in EC. METHODS Pre-treatment tumour biopsies from 6 different sites of 80 cases treated with hormonal therapy were analysed for ER/PR-IHC expression and classified into categories 0-10%, 10-50%, and >50%. The ER pathway activity score (ERPAS) was determined based on mRNA levels of ER-related target genes, reflecting the actual activity of the ER receptor. RESULTS There was a trend towards lower PR-IHC (33% had PR > 50%) and ERPAS (27% had ERPAS > 15) in lymphogenic metastases compared to other locations (p = 0.074). Hematogenous and intra-abdominal metastases appeared to have high ER/PR-IHC and ERPAS (85% and 89% ER-IHC > 50%; 64% and 78% PR-IHC > 50%; 60% and 71% ERPAS > 15, not significant). Tumour grade and previous radiotherapy did not affect ER/PR-IHC or ERPAS. CONCLUSIONS A trend towards lower PR-IHC and ERPAS was observed in lymphogenic sites. Verification in larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings, which may have implications for the use of hormonal therapy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje M. W. Luijten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands (J.M.A.P.)
- Department of Gynaecology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Jan van Weelden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands (J.M.A.P.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Roy I. Lalisang
- GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kristina Lindemann
- Division of Medicine, Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Heleen J. van Beekhuizen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Hans Trum
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dorry Boll
- Department of Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands;
| | - Henrica M. J. Werner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Luc R. C. W. van Lonkhuijzen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Refika Yigit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Camilla Krakstad
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway;
| | - Petronella O. Witteveen
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Khadra Galaal
- Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Center, Muscat P.O. Box 566 PC 123, Oman
| | | | - Eliana Bignotti
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, A. Nocivelli Institute for Molecular Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Vit Weinberger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brno, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Sanne Sweegers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands (J.M.A.P.)
| | - Ane Gerda Z. Eriksson
- Division of Medicine, Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Andrea Romano
- GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Johanna M. A. Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands (J.M.A.P.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li H, Zhou T, Zhang Q, Yao Y, Hua T, Zhang J, Wang H. Characterization and validation of fatty acid metabolism-related genes predicting prognosis, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity in endometrial cancer. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2024. [PMID: 38616327 DOI: 10.1002/bab.2586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is considered to be the second most common tumor of the female reproductive system, and patients diagnosed with advanced endometrial cancer have a poor prognosis. The influence of fatty acid metabolism in the prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer remains unclear. We constructed a prognostic risk model using transcriptome sequencing data of endometrial cancer and clinical information of patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis. The tumor immune microenvironment was analyzed using the CIBERSORT algorithm, followed by functional analysis and immunotherapy efficacy prediction by gene set variation analysis. The role of model genes in regulating endometrial cancer in vitro was verified by CCK-8, colony formation, wound healing, and transabdominal invasion assays, and verified in vivo by subcutaneous tumor transplantation in nude mice. A prognostic model containing 14 genes was constructed and validated in 3 cohorts and clinical samples. The results showed differences in the infiltration of immune cells between the high-risk and low-risk groups, and that the high-risk group may respond better to immunotherapy. Experiments in vitro confirmed that knockdown of epoxide hydrolase 2 (EPHX2) and acyl-CoA oxidase like (ACOXL) had an inhibitory effect on EC cells, as did overexpression of hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase (HPGDS). The same results were obtained in experiments in vivo. Prognostic models related to fatty acid metabolism can be used for the risk assessment of endometrial cancer patients. Experiments in vitro and in vivo confirmed that the key genes HPGDS, EPHX2, and ACOXL in the prognostic model may affect the development of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haojia Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Ting Zhou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Qi Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yuwei Yao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Teng Hua
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hongbo Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Clinical Research Center of Cancer Immunotherapy, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giannini A, D'Oria O, Corrado G, Bruno V, Sperduti I, Bogani G, Laganà AS, Chiantera V, Caserta D, Vizza E. The role of L1CAM as predictor of poor prognosis in stage I endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 309:789-799. [PMID: 37454351 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07149-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Molecular and genomic profiling in endometrial cancer is increasing popularity. L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) is frequently mutated in endometrial cancer. In this paper, we aim to evaluate the prognostic role of L1CAM in patients with stage I endometrial cancer. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis searching in PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Web of Science database to identify studies reporting the expression of L1CAM in endometrial cancer. The primary endpoint measure was to assess and evaluate the impact of L1CAM on survival outcomes. This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. RESULTS Five studies were included. The pooled results suggested that L1CAM expression influences survival outcomes in stage I endometrial cancer. High L1CAM expression correlated with worse disease-free survival (HR 4.11, 95% CI 1.02-16.59, p = 0.047) and overall survival (HR 3.62, 95% CI 1.32-9.31, p = 0.012). High L1CAM level was also associated with a more aggressive FIGO grade and with older age. CONCLUSION This systematic review supported that L1CAM have a prognostic role in stage I endometrial cancer, thus providing a potential useful tool for tailoring the need of adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Giannini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, PhD Course in "Translational Medicine and Oncology", Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
| | - Ottavia D'Oria
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, PhD Course in "Translational Medicine and Oncology", Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Corrado
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino, e di Sanità Pubblica, Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Bruno
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCSS-Regina Elena National Cancer Unit Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Donatella Caserta
- Gynecology Division, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCSS-Regina Elena National Cancer Unit Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reijnen C, Vrede SW, Eijkelenboom A, Draak R, Sweegers S, Snijders MPLM, van Gestel P, Pijnenborg JMA, Bulten J, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN. Pure and mixed clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: A molecular and immunohistochemical analysis study. Cancer Med 2023. [PMID: 37081760 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine clear cell carcinoma (CCC) consists of either pure clear cell histology but can also display other histological components (mixed uterine CCCs). In this study, the molecular and immunohistochemical background of pure and mixed uterine CCC was compared. Secondly, it was evaluated whether histological classification and molecular background affected clinical outcome. METHODS A retrospective multicenter study was performed comparing pure uterine CCCs (n = 22) and mixed uterine CCCs (n = 21). Targeted next-generation sequencing using a 12-gene targeted panel classified cases as polymerase-ε (POLE) mutated, microsatellite instable (MSI), TP53 wildtype or TP53 mutated. Immunohistochemistry was performed for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, L1 cell adhesion molecule, MSH6, and PMS2. RESULTS The following molecular subgroups were identified for pure and mixed uterine CCCs, respectively: POLE mutated 0% (0/18) and 6% (1/18); MSI in 6% (1/18) and 50% (9/18); TP53 wildtype in 56% (10/18) and 22% (4/18); TP53 mutated in 39% (7/18) and 22% (4/18) (p = 0.013). Patients with mixed CCCs had improved outcome compared to patients with pure CCCs. Frequent TP53 mutations were found in pure CCCs and frequent MSI in mixed CCCs, associated with clinical outcome. CONCLUSION Pure and mixed uterine CCCs are two entities with different clinical outcomes, which could be explained by different molecular backgrounds. These results underline the relevance of both morphological and molecular evaluation, and may assist in tailoring treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper Reijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Stéphanie W Vrede
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid Eijkelenboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud Draak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne Sweegers
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc P L M Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Puck van Gestel
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ishikawa M, Nakayama K, Razia S, Yamashita H, Ishibashi T, Haraga H, Kanno K, Ishikawa N, Kyo S. The Case of an Endometrial Cancer Patient with Breast Cancer Who Has Achieved Long-Term Survival via Letrozole Monotherapy. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2023; 45:2908-2916. [PMID: 37185714 PMCID: PMC10136412 DOI: 10.3390/cimb45040190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Herein, we present the successful treatment of a 92-year-old woman who experienced recurrent EC in the vaginal stump and para-aortic lymph nodes. The patient was first treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin for recurrent EC, which was abandoned after two cycles of chemotherapy because of G4 hematologic toxicity. Later, the patient was treated with letrozole for early-stage breast cancer, which was diagnosed simultaneously with EC recurrence. After four months of hormonal therapy, a partial response was observed not only in the lesions in the breast, but also those in the vaginal stump and para-aortic lymph nodes. She had no recurrence of breast cancer or EC, even after six years of treatment with letrozole-based hormonal therapy. Subsequent whole-exome sequencing using the genomic DNA isolated from the surgical specimen in the uterine tumor identified several genetic variants, including actionable mutations, such as CTNNB1 (p.S37F), PIK3R1 (p.M582Is_10), and TP53 c.375 + 5G>T. These data suggest that the efficacy of letrozole is mediated by blocking the mammalian target of the rapamycin pathway. The findings of this study, substantiated via genetic analysis, suggest the possibility of long-term disease-free survival, even in elderly patients with recurrent EC, which was thought to be difficult to cure completely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masako Ishikawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Shimane, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nakayama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Shimane, Japan
| | - Sultana Razia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Shimane, Japan
| | - Hitomi Yamashita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Shimane, Japan
| | - Tomoka Ishibashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Shimane, Japan
| | - Hikaru Haraga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Shimane, Japan
| | - Kosuke Kanno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Shimane, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Ishikawa
- Tokushukai Medical Corporation, Shonan Fujisawa Tokushukai Pathology Group, Fujisawa 251-0041, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Satoru Kyo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Shimane, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
da Silva JL, de Albuquerque LZ, Rodrigues FR, Bastos NC, Small IA, Barroso EBC, Cordero FL, Fernandes DDS, Paulino E, de Melo AC. Exploring biomarkers and prognostic factors in uterine carcinosarcoma: An insight into L1CAM, CDX2, p53, and MSI status. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285447. [PMID: 37200263 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine Carcinosarcomas (UCS) are a rare type of cancer composed of an admixture of high-grade carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. Clinicopathological prognostic factors in UCS are well established, but studies that approach the impact of biomarkers in this unusual disease are scarce. The study objective was to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic impact of a panel of prominent biomarkers in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) using an immunohistochemical characterization with four biomarkers. METHODS AND FINDINGS The internal database of a single Brazilian institution was carefully explored to select women diagnosed with UCS who were submitted to surgery and postoperative chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel between January 2012 and December 2017. Tissue microarrays containing UCS samples were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for L1CAM, CDX2, p53 and microsatellite instability markers. A total of 57 cases were included. The mean age was 65.3 years (standard deviation, SD 7.0). L1CAM was negative (score 0, no staining) in 27 (47.4%) patients. Of L1CAM-positive, 10 (17.5%) showed weak (score 1, <10%), 6 (10.5%) showed moderate (score 2, between 10-50%), and 14 (24.6%) showed strong L1CAM staining (score 3, ≧50%). dMMR occurred in 3 (5.3%) cases. The p53 was aberrantly expressed in 15 (26.3%) tumors. CDX2 was positive in 3 (5.3%) patients. The three-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate in the general population of the study was 21.2% (95% CI: 11.7-38.1) and the three-year overall survival (OS) rate was 29.4% (95% CI: 18.1-47.6). By multivariate analysis, the presence of metastases and CDX2-positive were significantly associated with poorer PFS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) and OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION The strong influence of CDX2 on prognosis requires further investigation. Biological or molecular variability may have impaired the assessment of the impact of the other markers on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Lopes da Silva
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Lucas Zanetti de Albuquerque
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Isabele Avila Small
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Fernando Lopes Cordero
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Eduardo Paulino
- Clinical Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Andreia Cristina de Melo
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vrede SW, Kasius J, Bulten J, Teerenstra S, Huvila J, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Boll D, Vos MC, van Altena AM, Asberger J, Sweegers S, van Weelden WJ, van der Putten LJM, Amant F, Visser NCM, Snijders MPLM, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Kruitwagen R, Matias-Guiu X, Weinberger V, Reijnen C, Pijnenborg JMA. Relevance of Molecular Profiling in Patients With Low-Grade Endometrial Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2247372. [PMID: 36525269 PMCID: PMC9856566 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.47372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patients with low-grade (ie, grade 1-2) endometrial cancer (EC) are characterized by their favorable prognosis compared with patients with high-grade (ie, grade 3) EC. With the implementation of molecular profiling, the prognostic relevance of tumor grading might lose attention. As most patients present with low-grade EC and have an excellent outcome, the value of molecular profiling for these patients is unclear. OBJECTIVE To determine the association of molecular profiling with outcomes among patients with low-grade EC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study included a multicenter international European cohort of patients diagnosed with EC between 1994 and 2018, with a median follow-up of 5.9 years. Molecular subgroups were determined by next-generation sequencing using single-molecule molecular inversion probes and by immunohistochemistry. Subsequently, tumors were classified as polymerase epsilon (POLE)-altered, microsatellite instable (MSI), tumor protein p53 (TP53)-altered, or no specific molecular profile (NSMP). Patients diagnosed with any histological subtypes and FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stages of EC were included, but patients with early-stage EC (FIGO I-II) were only included if they had known lymph node status. Data were analyzed February 20 to June 16, 2022. EXPOSURES Molecular testing of the 4 molecular subgroups. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS) within the molecular subgroups. RESULTS A total of 393 patients with EC were included, with a median (range) age of 64.0 (31.0-86.0) years and median (range) body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 29.1 (18.0-58.3). Most patients presented with early-stage (290 patients [73.8%]) and low-grade (209 patients [53.2%]) disease. Of all patients, 33 (8.4%) had POLE-altered EC, 78 (19.8%) had MSI EC, 72 (18.3%) had TP53-altered EC, and 210 (53.4%) had NSMP EC. Across all molecular subgroups, patients with low-grade EC had superior 5-year DSS compared with those with high-grade EC, varying between 90% to 100% vs 41% to 90% (P < .001). Multivariable analysis in the entire cohort including age, tumor grade, FIGO stage, lymphovascular space invasion, and the molecular subgroups as covariates found that only high-grade (hazard ratio [HR], 4.29; 95% CI, 2.15-8.53; P < .001), TP53-altered (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-2.95; P = .03), and FIGO stage III or IV (HR, 4.26; 95% CI, 2.50-7.26; P < .001) disease were independently associated with reduced DSS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study found that patients with low-grade EC had an excellent prognosis independent of molecular subgroup. These findings do not support routine molecular profiling in patients with low-grade EC, and they demonstrate the importance of primary diagnostic tumor grading and selective profiling in low-grade EC to increase cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie W. Vrede
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jenneke Kasius
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam Medical Centers and Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Steven Teerenstra
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medial Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jutta Huvila
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Eva Colas
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Gynecological Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer, Barcelona, Spain
- Pathology Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dorry Boll
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Maria Caroline Vos
- Departement of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M. van Altena
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jasmin Asberger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sanne Sweegers
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Willem Jan van Weelden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole C. M. Visser
- Department of Pathology, Stichting Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Marc P. L. M. Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Roy Kruitwagen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer, Lleida, Spain
| | - Vit Weinberger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Casper Reijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M. A. Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ravaggi A, Capoferri D, Ardighieri L, Ghini I, Ferrari F, Romani C, Bugatti M, Zanotti L, Vrede S, Tognon G, Pijnenborg JMA, Sartori E, Calza S, Bignotti E, Odicino F. Integrated Biomarker Analysis Reveals L1CAM as a Potential Stratification Marker for No Specific Molecular Profile High-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5429. [PMID: 36358847 PMCID: PMC9658459 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Histopathologic assessment of high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) suffers from intersubject variability and poor reproducibility. The pragmatic classification in four molecular subgroups helps to overcome these limits, showing a significant prognostic value. The "no specific molecular profile" (NSMP) is the most heterogeneous EC subgroup, requiring further characterization to better guide its clinical management. DNA sequencing of POLE exonuclease domain and immunohistochemistry for PMS2, MSH6, and p53 were performed in order to stratify a cohort of 94 high-risk EC patients in the four molecular subgroups. Moreover, a panel of seven additional biomarkers was tested. Patients were found to be 16% POLE-mutated, 36% mismatch repair-deficient, 27% p53-abnormal, and 21% NSMP. In the multivariable model, molecular groups confirmed their significant association with disease-specific survival and progression-free survival, with p53-abnormal and NSMP endometrial cancer characterized by poor outcomes. Among the additional evaluated biomarkers, L1CAM was the only one with a significant prognostic value within the NSMP subgroup. NSMP/L1CAM-positive patients experienced the worst outcome and were "early-relapsing" after platinum-based chemotherapy, with a significantly shorter platinum-free interval compared to L1CAM-negative patients. L1CAM appears to be a promising candidate as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in the high-risk NSMP subgroup, which is actually known to lack specific molecular markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Ravaggi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Angelo Nocivelli’ Institute of Molecular Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Davide Capoferri
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Angelo Nocivelli’ Institute of Molecular Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| | - Laura Ardighieri
- Department of Pathology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Iacopo Ghini
- Department of Pathology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Federico Ferrari
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Chiara Romani
- Angelo Nocivelli’ Institute of Molecular Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Mattia Bugatti
- Department of Pathology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Laura Zanotti
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Angelo Nocivelli’ Institute of Molecular Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| | - Stephanie Vrede
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboudumc, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Germana Tognon
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Sartori
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Calza
- Unit of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Eliana Bignotti
- Angelo Nocivelli’ Institute of Molecular Medicine, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Franco Odicino
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vrede SW, Hulsman AMC, Reijnen C, Van de Vijver K, Colas E, Mancebo G, Moiola CP, Gil-Moreno A, Huvila J, Koskas M, Weinberger V, Minar L, Jandakova E, Santacana M, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F, Snijders MPLM, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Bulten J, Pijnenborg JMA. The amount of preoperative endometrial tissue surface in relation to final endometrial cancer classification. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:196-204. [PMID: 36096975 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the amount of preoperative endometrial tissue surface is related to the degree of concordance with final low- and high-grade endometrial cancer (EC). In addition, to determine whether discordance is influenced by sampling method and impacts outcome. METHODS A retrospective cohort study within the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC). Surface of preoperative endometrial tissue samples was digitally calculated using ImageJ. Tumor samples were classified into low-grade (grade 1-2 endometrioid EC (EEC)) and high-grade (grade 3 EEC + non-endometroid EC). RESULTS The study cohort included 573 tumor samples. Overall concordance between pre- and postoperative diagnosis was 60.0%, and 88.8% when classified into low- and high-grade EC. Upgrading (preoperative low-grade, postoperative high-grade EC) was found in 7.8% and downgrading (preoperative high-grade, postoperative low-grade EC) in 26.7%. The median endometrial tissue surface was significantly lower in concordant diagnoses when compared to discordant diagnoses, respectively 18.7 mm2 and 23.5 mm2 (P = 0.022). Sampling method did not influence the concordance in tumor classification. Patients with preoperative high-grade and postoperative low-grade showed significant lower DSS compared to patients with concordant low-grade EC (P = 0.039). CONCLUSION The amount of preoperative endometrial tissue surface was inversely related to the degree of concordance with final tumor low- and high-grade. Obtaining higher amount of preoperative endometrial tissue surface does not increase the concordance between pre- and postoperative low- and high-grade diagnosis in EC. Awareness of clinically relevant down- and upgrading is crucial to reduce subsequent over- or undertreatment with impact on outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S W Vrede
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - A M C Hulsman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - C Reijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Colas
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Mancebo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hosepital del Mar, PSMAR, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C P Moiola
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Gil-Moreno
- Gynaecological Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain; Pathology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Huvila
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - M Koskas
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France
| | - V Weinberger
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - L Minar
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - E Jandakova
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - M Santacana
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain
| | - X Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain
| | - F Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M P L M Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - J Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Matias-Guiu X, Selinger CI, Anderson L, Buza N, Ellenson LH, Fadare O, Ganesan R, Ip PPC, Palacios J, Parra-Herran C, Raspollini MR, Soslow RA, Werner HMJ, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Data Set for the Reporting of Endometrial Cancer: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S90-S118. [PMID: 36305536 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is one of the most common cancers among women. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) developed a standardized endometrial cancer data set in 2011, which provided detailed recommendations for the reporting of resection specimens of these neoplasms. A new data set has been developed, which incorporates the updated 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular classification of endometrial cancers, and other major advances in endometrial cancer reporting, all of which necessitated a major revision of the data set. This updated data set has been produced by a panel of expert pathologists and an expert clinician and has been subject to international open consultation. The data set includes core elements which are unanimously agreed upon as essential for cancer diagnosis, clinical management, staging, or prognosis and noncore elements which are clinically important, but not essential. Explanatory notes are provided for each element. Adoption of this updated data set will result in improvements in endometrial cancer patient care.
Collapse
|
11
|
Less is more in endometrial cancer (SLN, conservative treatment, radical hysterectomy, molecular classification). Curr Opin Oncol 2022; 34:511-517. [PMID: 35943439 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The management of endometrial cancer has known many evolutions within the last decades. In this review, we aim to summarize recent evolutions (mainly toward less aggressive management) that have occurred in the management of endometrial cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Enhanced by molecular classification, the determination of lymph node status, in young women, in case of cervical invasion, the treatment is evolving toward a less aggressive strategy. SUMMARY The predictive value and the safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy explain why most societies propose to abandon systematic pelvic and para aortic lymphadenectomy. For young women, the safety of fertility preservation is now well established and efficient protocols have been validated. In stage II endometrial cancer (stromal cervical invasion), radical hysterectomy appears excessive. The Cancer Genome Atlas classification increases prognostic evaluation in association with the traditional pathological classification and permits to tailor adjuvant treatment more accurately.
Collapse
|
12
|
Njoku K, Barr CE, Crosbie EJ. Current and Emerging Prognostic Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:890908. [PMID: 35530346 PMCID: PMC9072738 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.890908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological malignancy in high income countries and its incidence is rising. Whilst most women with endometrial cancer are diagnosed with highly curable disease and have good outcomes, a significant minority present with adverse clinico-pathological characteristics that herald a poor prognosis. Prognostic biomarkers that reliably select those at greatest risk of disease recurrence and death can guide management strategies to ensure that patients receive appropriate evidence-based and personalised care. The Cancer Genome Atlas substantially advanced our understanding of the molecular diversity of endometrial cancer and informed the development of simplified, pragmatic and cost-effective classifiers with prognostic implications and potential for clinical translation. Several blood-based biomarkers including proteins, metabolites, circulating tumour cells, circulating tumour DNA and inflammatory parameters have also shown promise for endometrial cancer risk assessment. This review provides an update on the established and emerging prognostic biomarkers in endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelechi Njoku
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Stoller Biomarker Discovery Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Chloe E. Barr
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma J. Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Emma J. Crosbie,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Romani C, Capoferri D, Reijnen C, Lonardi S, Ravaggi A, Ratti M, Bugatti M, Zanotti L, Tognon G, Sartori E, Odicino F, Calza S, Pijnenborg JMA, Bignotti E. L1CAM
expression as a predictor of platinum response in high‐risk endometrial carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:637-648. [PMID: 35429348 PMCID: PMC9321598 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Romani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public HealthUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Davide Capoferri
- Department of Clinical and Experimental SciencesUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Casper Reijnen
- Department of Radiation OncologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Silvia Lonardi
- Department of PathologyASST Spedali Civili of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Antonella Ravaggi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental SciencesUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Martina Ratti
- Division of Obstetrics and GynecologyASST Spedali Civili di BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Mattia Bugatti
- Department of PathologyASST Spedali Civili of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Laura Zanotti
- Department of Clinical and Experimental SciencesUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Germana Tognon
- Division of Obstetrics and GynecologyASST Spedali Civili di BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Enrico Sartori
- Department of Clinical and Experimental SciencesUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Franco Odicino
- Department of Clinical and Experimental SciencesUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Stefano Calza
- Unit of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Molecular and Translational MedicineUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Johanna M. A. Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Eliana Bignotti
- Division of Obstetrics and GynecologyASST Spedali Civili di BresciaBresciaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Leon-Castillo A, Horeweg N, Peters EE, Rutten T, ter Haar N, Smit VT, Kroon CD, Boennelycke M, Hogdall E, Hogdall C, Nout RR, Creutzberg CL, Ortoft G, Bosse T. Prognostic relevance of the molecular classification in high-grade endometrial cancer for patients staged by lymphadenectomy and without adjuvant treatment. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 164:577-586. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
15
|
Concin N, Planchamp F, Abu-Rustum NR, Ataseven B, Cibula D, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Knapp P, Marth C, Morice P, Querleu D, Sehouli J, Stepanyan A, Taskiran C, Vergote I, Wimberger P, Zapardiel I, Persson J. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1508-1529. [PMID: 34795020 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of surgical care as a crucial component of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary management improves outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma, notably helping to avoid suboptimal surgical treatment. Quality indicators (QIs) enable healthcare professionals to measure their clinical management with regard to ideal standards of care. OBJECTIVE In order to complete its set of QIs for the surgical management of gynecological cancers, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) initiated the development of QIs for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS QIs were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and documentation of the scientific evidence, two consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians and patient representatives. QIs were defined using a structured format comprising metrics specifications, and targets. A scoring system was then developed to ensure applicability and feasibility of a future ESGO accreditation process based on these QIs for endometrial carcinoma surgery and support any institutional or governmental quality assurance programs. RESULTS Twenty-nine structural, process and outcome indicators were defined. QIs 1-5 are general indicators related to center case load, training, experience of the surgeon, structured multi-disciplinarity of the team and active participation in clinical research. QIs 6 and 7 are related to the adequate pre-operative investigations. QIs 8-22 are related to peri-operative standards of care. QI 23 is related to molecular markers for endometrial carcinoma diagnosis and as determinants for treatment decisions. QI 24 addresses the compliance of management of patients after primary surgical treatment with the standards of care. QIs 25-29 highlight the need for a systematic assessment of surgical morbidity and oncologic outcome as well as standardized and comprehensive documentation of surgical and pathological elements. Each QI was associated with a score. An assessment form including a scoring system was built as basis for ESGO accreditation of centers for endometrial cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria .,Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial Sloann Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Pawel Knapp
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Oncology Center of Bialystok, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Alsace, France
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Artem Stepanyan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Nairi Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, VKV American Hospital, Istambul, Turkey
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Koskas M, Amant F, Mirza MR, Creutzberg CL. Cancer of the corpus uteri: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 155 Suppl 1:45-60. [PMID: 34669196 PMCID: PMC9297903 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in high‐ and middle‐income countries. Although the overall prognosis is relatively good, high‐grade endometrial cancers have a tendency to recur. Recurrence needs to be prevented since the prognosis for recurrent endometrial cancer is dismal. Treatment tailored to tumor biology is the optimal strategy to balance treatment efficacy against toxicity. Since The Cancer Genome Atlas defined four molecular subgroups of endometrial cancers, the molecular factors are increasingly used to define prognosis and treatment. Standard treatment consists of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy. Lymphadenectomy (and increasingly sentinel node biopsy) enables identification of lymph node‐positive patients who need adjuvant treatment, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy is used for Stage I–II patients with high‐risk factors and Stage III patients; chemotherapy is especially used in non‐endometrioid cancers and those in the copy‐number high molecular group characterized by TP53 mutation. In advanced disease, a combination of surgery to no residual disease and chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy results in the best outcome. Surgery for recurrent disease is only advocated in patients with a good performance status with a relatively long disease‐free interval. The latest state‐of‐the‐art treatment for endometrial cancer is described, incorporating the most recent new data that influence its clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Koskas
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zeiter D, Vlajnic T, Schötzau A, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Montavon C. L1CAM is not a reliable predictor for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer, but L1CAM positive patients benefit from radiotherapy. J Cancer 2021; 12:6401-6410. [PMID: 34659530 PMCID: PMC8489141 DOI: 10.7150/jca.59283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Several studies evidenced the potential of L1CAM as a prognostic marker in endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate whether L1CAM can predict lymph node metastasis and could therefore be used preoperatively to identify patients with low to high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer who would profit from a lymphadenectomy and an adjuvant treatment. To avoid unnecessary morbidity, de-escalating strategies are still required. Methods: Immunohistochemistry for L1CAM was performed on curettage or hysterectomy specimens from 212 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer who were treated at the University Hospital Basel during 2011-2019. L1CAM expression was correlated with clinicopathological features such as histological subtype, FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis, lymphadenectomy, adjuvant treatment and outcome. Results: Using a cut off ≥10%, L1CAM was positive in 41/212 patients (19.3%) and negative in 171/212 patients (80.7%). L1CAM was associated with high-risk features such as non-endometrioid histology, high tumour grade, and high FIGO stage. There was no significant correlation between L1CAM expression and lymph node metastasis. However, patients with L1CAM positive tumours showed improved disease-specific survival if treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. Conclusion: Although L1CAM expression pointed towards aggressive tumour biology, preoperative L1CAM analysis did not add any substantial predictive information regarding lymph node metastasis in low to high-intermediate risk groups. Therefore, L1CAM status is not suitable to tailor the surgical algorithm for lymph node staging. Nevertheless, our results suggest that L1CAM could be used as a predictive biomarker to select patients who may benefit the most from adjuvant radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Zeiter
- Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hospital for Women, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tatjana Vlajnic
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Schötzau
- Ovarian Cancer Research, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
- Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hospital for Women, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.,Ovarian Cancer Research, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Céline Montavon
- Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hospital for Women, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van Weelden WJ, Lalisang RI, Bulten J, Lindemann K, van Beekhuizen HJ, Trum H, Boll D, Werner HM, van Lonkhuijzen LR, Yigit R, Forsse D, Witteveen PO, Galaal K, van Ginkel A, Bignotti E, Weinberger V, Sweegers S, Kroep JR, Cabrera S, Snijders MP, Inda MA, Eriksson AGZ, Krakstad C, Romano A, van de Stolpe A, Pijnenborg JM, Pijnenborg JMA. Impact of hormonal biomarkers on response to hormonal therapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225:407.e1-407.e16. [PMID: 34019887 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 20% of women with endometrial cancer have advanced-stage disease or suffer from a recurrence. For these women, prognosis is poor, and palliative treatment options include hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Lack of predictive biomarkers and suboptimal use of existing markers for response to hormonal therapy have resulted in overall limited efficacy. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to improve the efficacy of hormonal therapy by relating immunohistochemical expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors and estrogen receptor pathway activity scores to response to hormonal therapy. STUDY DESIGN Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and available biopsies taken before the start of hormonal therapy were identified in 16 centers within the European Network for Individualized Treatment in Endometrial Cancer and the Dutch Gynecologic Oncology Group. Tumor tissue was analyzed for estrogen and progesterone receptor expressions and estrogen receptor pathway activity using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based messenger RNA model to measure the activity of estrogen receptor-related target genes in tumor RNA. The primary endpoint was response rate defined as complete and partial response using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The secondary endpoints were clinical benefit rate and progression-free survival. RESULTS Pretreatment biopsies with sufficient endometrial cancer tissue and complete response evaluation were available in 81 of 105 eligible cases. Here, 22 of 81 patients (27.2%) with a response had estrogen and progesterone receptor expressions of >50%, resulting in a response rate of 32.3% (95% confidence interval, 20.9-43.7) for an estrogen receptor expression of >50% and 50.0% (95% confidence interval, 35.2-64.8) for a progesterone receptor expression of >50%. Clinical benefit rate was 56.9% for an estrogen receptor expression of >50% (95% confidence interval, 44.9-68.9) and 75.0% (95% confidence interval, 62.2-87.8) for a progesterone receptor expression of >50%. The application of the estrogen receptor pathway test to cases with a progesterone receptor expression of >50% resulted in a response rate of 57.6% (95% confidence interval, 42.1-73.1). After 2 years of follow-up, 34.3% of cases (95% confidence interval, 20-48) with a progesterone receptor expression of >50% and 35.8% of cases (95% confidence interval, 20-52) with an estrogen receptor pathway activity score of >15 had not progressed. CONCLUSION The prediction of response to hormonal treatment in endometrial cancer improves substantially with a 50% cutoff level for progesterone receptor immunohistochemical expression and by applying a sequential test algorithm using progesterone receptor immunohistochemical expression and estrogen receptor pathway activity scores. However, results need to be validated in the prospective Prediction of Response to Hormonal Therapy in Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer (PROMOTE) study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nero C, Ciccarone F, Pietragalla A, Duranti S, Daniele G, Scambia G, Lorusso D. Adjuvant Treatment Recommendations in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: What Changes With the Introduction of The Integrated Molecular-Based Risk Assessment. Front Oncol 2021; 11:612450. [PMID: 34540651 PMCID: PMC8442623 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.612450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant therapy recommendations for endometrial cancer were historically based on the individual patient's risk of disease recurrence using clinicopathologic factors such as age, stage, histologic subtype, tumor grade, and lymphovascular space invasion. Despite the excellent prognosis for early stages, considerable under- and overtreatment remains. Integrated genomic characterization by the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) in 2013 defined four distinct endometrial cancer subgroups (POLE mutated, microsatellite instability, low copy number, and high copy number) with possible prognostic value. The validation of surrogate markers (p53, Mismatch repair deficiency, and POLE) to determine these subgroups and the addition of other molecular prognosticators (CTNNB1, L1CAM) resulted in a practical and clinically useful molecular classification tool. The incorporation of such molecular alterations into established clinicopathologic risk factors resulted in a refined, improved risk assessment. Thus, the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP consensus in 2020 defined for the first time different prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers. Finally, the feasibility and clinical utility of molecular profiling for tailoring adjuvant therapy in the high-intermediate-risk group is currently under investigation (NCT03469674).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Nero
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze della vita e sanità pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Ciccarone
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Pietragalla
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Duranti
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Daniele
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze della vita e sanità pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze della vita e sanità pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Visser NCM, van der Wurff AAM, IntHout J, Reijnen C, Dabir PD, Soltani GG, Alcala LSM, Boll D, Bronkhorst CM, Bult P, Geomini PMAJ, van Hamont D, van Herk HADM, de Kievit IM, Ngo H, Pijlman BM, Snijders MPML, Vos MC, Nagtegaal ID, Massuger LFAG, Pijnenborg JMA, Bulten J. Improving preoperative diagnosis in endometrial cancer using systematic morphological assessment and a small immunohistochemical panel. Hum Pathol 2021; 117:68-78. [PMID: 34418427 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Preoperative histopathological classification determines the primary surgical approach in endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients but has only moderate agreement between preoperative and postoperative diagnosis. The aim of the PIpelle Prospective ENDOmetrial carcinoma (PIPENDO) study is to determine whether histopathological assessment and a small panel of diagnostic biomarkers decreases discrepancies between preoperative and postoperative diagnosis in EC. Preoperative endometrial tissue of 378 included patients with EC was stained with 15 different antibodies. Clinically relevant discrepancies in grade or histological subtype between original preoperative and reviewed postoperative diagnosis were observed in 75 (20%) patients. Highest clinically relevant discrepancy was found in grade 2 ECs (20%), compared to 5% and 14% in respectively grade 1 and 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs). A practical two-biomarker panel with PR and p53 improved diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.92; 95%CI = 0.88-0.95) compared to solely morphological evaluation (AUC = 0.86). In preoperative high-grade EC, the diagnostic accuracy of histological subtype was improved by a three-immunohistochemical biomarker panel (PR, IMP3, and L1CAM) (AUC = 0.93; 95%CI = 0.88-0.98) compared to solely morphological evaluation (AUC = 0.81). In conclusion to improve correct preoperative diagnosis in EC, we recommend use of a panel of at least two easily accessible immunohistochemical biomarkers (PR and p53), only in grade 2 ECs. Overall, this will reduce clinically relevant discrepancies in tumor grade and subtype with postoperative diagnosis with 6% (from 20% to 14%). Addition of PR, IMP3, and L1CAM for histological subtyping in high-grade EECs resulted in a further decrease in discrepancies with 8% (from 20% to 12%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole C M Visser
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Dept. Pathology, Stichting PAMM, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Joanna IntHout
- Dept. for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Casper Reijnen
- Dept. Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500 GS, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Parag D Dabir
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Dept. Pathology, Regional Hospital, 8930, Randers, Denmark
| | - Gilda G Soltani
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Luthy S M Alcala
- Dept. Pathology, Amphia Hospital, 4800 RL, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Dorry Boll
- Dept. Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Peter Bult
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Peggy M A J Geomini
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Centre, 5504 DB, Veldhoven and Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis van Hamont
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amphia Hospital, 4800 RL, Breda, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ineke M de Kievit
- Dept. Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500 GS, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Huy Ngo
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elkerliek Hospital, 5700AB, Helmond, the Netherlands
| | - Brenda M Pijlman
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 5200 ME, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Marc P M L Snijders
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500 GS, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M Caroline Vos
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, 5000 LC, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tumor Characteristic Variations between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Endometrial Cancer. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9070902. [PMID: 34356280 PMCID: PMC8304100 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9070902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in Europe and usually diagnosed in its initial stage owing to early symptoms of abnormal bleeding. There is no population screening for this disease, although it can sometimes be accidentally diagnosed in asymptomatic patients. Our study aims to determine differences in clinical and tumor characteristics between an asymptomatic and symptomatic group of patients. This unicentric prospective observational study took place in University Hospital Brno between January 2016 and December 2019. A total of 264 patients met inclusion criteria (26% asymptomatic, 74% with reported symptoms). We did not find a statistically significant difference in clinical characteristics (menopausal status, parity, age, BMI, and serum level of CA 125) between groups. According to ultrasound examination, bleeding tumors were larger (19.5 vs. 12.7 mm, p ≤ 0.001). Definitive histology results indicated more frequent lymphovascular space invasion (p < 0.001), along with deep myometrial (p = 0.001) and cervical (p = 0.002) invasion. There was no difference in advanced stages of the tumor. We did not substantiate statistically significant difference in immunohistochemical profile (estrogen and progesterone receptors, L1 cell adhesion molecule, tumor protein p53), which is relevant for tumor recurrence risk and survival capacity. Our conclusions affirmed that bleeding occurs more often among patients with local tumor invasion into the myometrium and cervical stroma. Final International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, histology, and immunohistochemical characteristics do not significantly affect symptom appearance.
Collapse
|
22
|
Perera J, Hoskin P. Adjuvant Therapy for High-risk Endometrial Carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:560-566. [PMID: 34112584 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
About one-fifth of endometrial cancers are 'high risk', which carries a poorer prognosis. Management strategies to optimise their survival have been under investigation for many years. Despite recent advances, their overall survival remains relatively poor. The definition of high risk in endometrial cancers has been based on clinicopathological factors until recently, when molecular profiling has shown greater discrimination. There is, however, poor correlation between traditional clinicopathological factors and their molecular profile. This is the subject of ongoing trials to better individualise adjuvant post-hysterectomy treatment. The management of high-risk tumours is traditionally based on surgery followed by radiotherapy, despite no proven overall survival benefit in early stages. The place of chemotherapy remains under investigation, with recent trials showing benefit in more advanced stages. The Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC) and Gynecologic Oncology Group trials support the use of chemoradiation and chemotherapy for stage III and adverse histological subgroups. In addition, there is now early evidence of correlation between benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy based on molecular alterations in the tumour cells. In this review, we look at the current evidence on management strategies in the evolving era of molecular diagnosis and stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Perera
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - P Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann J, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Martin AG, Lax S, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell D, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza A, Taylor A, Westermann A, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Creutzberg CL. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2021; 154:327-353. [PMID: 33712263 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria; Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany.
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, UK
| | | | - Sigurd Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Austria; School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy
| | | | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vrede SW, van Weelden WJ, Visser NCM, Bulten J, van der Putten LJM, van de Vijver K, Santacana M, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Moiola CP, Mancebo G, Krakstad C, Trovik J, Haldorsen IS, Huvila J, Koskas M, Weinberger V, Bednarikova M, Hausnerova J, van der Wurff AA, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F, Snijders MPLM, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Reijnen C, Pijnenborg JMA. Immunohistochemical biomarkers are prognostic relevant in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:787-794. [PMID: 33858677 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pre-operative immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers are not incorporated in endometrial cancer (EC) risk classification. We aim to investigate the added prognostic relevance of IHC biomarkers to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and lymph node (LN) status in EC. METHODS Retrospective multicenter study within the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC), analyzing pre-operative IHC expression of p53, L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), and relate to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk groups, LN status and outcome. RESULTS A total of 763 EC patients were included with a median follow-up of 5.5-years. Abnormal IHC expression was present for p53 in 112 (14.7%), L1CAM in 79 (10.4%), ER- in 76 (10.0%), and PR- in 138 (18.1%) patients. Abnormal expression of p53/L1CAM/ER/PR was significantly related with higher risk classification groups, and combined associated with the worst outcome within the 'high and advanced/metastatic' risk group. In multivariate analysis p53-abn, ER/PR- and ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 'high and advanced/metastatic' were independently associated with reduced disease-specific survival (DSS). Patients with abnormal IHC expression and lymph node metastasis (LNM) had the worst outcome. Patients with LNM and normal IHC expression had comparable outcome with patients without LNM and abnormal IHC expression. CONCLUSION The use of pre-operative IHC biomarkers has important prognostic relevance in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and in addition to LN status. For daily clinical practice, p53/L1CAM/ER/PR expression could serve as indicator for surgical staging and refine selective adjuvant treatment by incorporation into the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S W Vrede
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - W J van Weelden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - N C M Visser
- Department of Pathology, Stichting PAMM, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - L J M van der Putten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - K van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Santacana
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain
| | - E Colas
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Gil-Moreno
- Gynecological Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain; Pathology Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C P Moiola
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Mancebo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital del Mar, PSMAR, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Krakstad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - J Trovik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - I S Haldorsen
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - J Huvila
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - M Koskas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France
| | - V Weinberger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - M Bednarikova
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - J Hausnerova
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - A A van der Wurff
- Department of Pathology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - X Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain
| | - F Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - M P L M Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - C Reijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Guo M, Gong H, Nie D, Li Z. High L1CAM expression predicts poor prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e25330. [PMID: 33787629 PMCID: PMC8021316 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000025330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUD Previous studies have reported that the levels of L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) indicate poor prognosis of patients with various solid tumors. However, the prognostic significance of L1CAM in endometrial cancer has remained controversial. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of L1CAM in endometrial cancer. METHODS All studies related to the association between L1CAM expression and clinical characteristics of endometrial cancer were identified by searching the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Primary outcomes of the meta-analysis were the hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes were odds ratios (ORs) for clinicopathological characteristics. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis were conducted to ensure reliability of the results. RESULTS Overall, 17 studies encompassing 7146 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Results showed L1CAM overexpression to be significantly associated with decreased overall survival (HR = 2.87, 95% CI; 1.81-4.55, P < .001) and disease-free survival (HR = 3.32, 95% CI; 1.99-5.55, P < .001) in patients with endometrial cancer. High L1CAM expression was also related to adverse clinicopathological characteristics. CONCLUSION This systematic review demonstrated that high L1CAM expression is correlated with poor survival outcomes and adverse clinicopathological parameters in patients with endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Guo
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
| | - Han Gong
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
| | - Dan Nie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University
| | - Zhengyu Li
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Coleman RL, Hu W, Soliman P, Nick A, Ramirez PT, Westin SN, Garcia ME, Zhu Z, Palancia J, Fellman BM, Yuan Y, Ram P, Bischoff F, Schmeler K, Bodurka D, Meyer LA, Sood AK. Dasatinib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in women with advanced-stage or recurrent endometrial cancer: A pilot clinical and translational study. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:104-112. [PMID: 33551196 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of dasatinib therapy on EphA2 signaling in cancers of women with measurable (biopsy amenable) advanced-stage, chemo-naïve primary or recurrent endometrial cancer. Preliminary efficacy was also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a pilot study of single-agent dasatinib lead-in, followed by triplet dasatinib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin. We measured the downstream effectors of EphA2 signaling in pre- and post-dasatinib treatment biopsy tissue samples; we also determined the severity of adverse events and patients' progression-free survival and overall survival durations. RESULTS Eighteen patients were recruited and given dasatinib (150 mg orally daily for 14 days), followed by paclitaxel, carboplatin and dasatinib (daily) for six cycles (21-day cycles). Seventeen patients were evaluable for toxicity and 11 patients for response. A reverse phase protein array and proximity ligation assay revealed that CRAF/BRAF dimerization, caveolin-1 level, and Notch pathway signaling were predictive of response and resistance to dasatinib. Overall, the objective response rate was 45% (95% CI: 17%-77%), with median progression-free survival duration of 10.5 months and median overall survival duration of 30.4 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%), thrombocytopenia (53%), anemia (53%), and fatigue (12%). CONCLUSIONS Caveolin-1 expression, in combination with CRAF/BRAF heterodimerization, is associated with resistance to EphA2 targeting by dasatinib. The triplet combination showed interesting clinical activity in endometrial cancer with acceptable toxicity. Pretreatment with dasatinib may accentuate combination therapy toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
| | - Wei Hu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Pamela Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Alpa Nick
- Tennessee Oncology from St. Thomas Medical Partners, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Michael E Garcia
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Zhifei Zhu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Julieta Palancia
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Prahlad Ram
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | | | - Kathleen Schmeler
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Diane Bodurka
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Concin N, Creutzberg CL, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann JA, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, González-Martín A, Lax SF, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell DE, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza AE, Taylor A, Westermann AM, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Matias-Guiu X. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2021; 478:153-190. [PMID: 33604759 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-020-03007-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. .,Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Sigurd F Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria.,School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina E Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke M Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann J, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Gonzalez Martin A, Lax S, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell D, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza A, Taylor A, Westermann A, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Creutzberg CL. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:12-39. [PMID: 33397713 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 797] [Impact Index Per Article: 199.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multi-disciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria .,Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Sigurd Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria.,School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van Weelden WJ, Reijnen C, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Bulten J, Bult P, Leung S, Visser NCM, Santacana M, Bronsert P, Hirschfeld M, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Reques A, Mancebo G, Huvila J, Koskas M, Weinberger V, Bednarikova M, Hausnerova J, Snijders MPLM, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F. The cutoff for estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in endometrial cancer revisited: a European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer collaboration study. Hum Pathol 2020; 109:80-91. [PMID: 33338506 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
There is no consensus on the cutoff for positivity of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) in endometrial cancer (EC). Therefore, we determined the cutoff value for ER and PR expression with the strongest prognostic impact on the outcome. Immunohistochemical expression of ER and PR was scored as a percentage of positive EC cell nuclei. Cutoff values were related to disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using sensitivity, specificity, and multivariable regression analysis. The results were validated in an independent cohort. The study cohort (n = 527) included 82% of grade 1-2 and 18% of grade 3 EC. Specificity for DSS and DFS was highest for the cutoff values of 1-30%. Sensitivity was highest for the cutoff values of 80-90%. ER and PR expression were independent markers for DSS at cutoff values of 10% and 80%. Consequently, three subgroups with distinct clinical outcomes were identified: 0-10% of ER/PR expression with, unfavorable outcome (5-year DSS = 75.9-83.3%); 20-80% of ER/PR expression with, intermediate outcome (5-year DSS = 93.0-93.9%); and 90-100% of ER/PR expression with, favorable outcome (5-year DSS = 97.8-100%). The association between ER/PR subgroups and outcomes was confirmed in the validation cohort (n = 265). We propose classification of ER and PR expression based on a high-risk (0-10%), intermediate-risk (20-80%), and low-risk (90-100%) group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem Jan van Weelden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Casper Reijnen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, 6532, SZ, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, the Netherlands
| | - Peter Bult
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, the Netherlands
| | - Samuel Leung
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Center, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nicole C M Visser
- Foundation Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology (PAMM), 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Maria Santacana
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marc Hirschfeld
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, 79106, Freiburg, Germany; Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Georg-August-University, 37073, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Eva Colas
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, 08035, Barcelona, Spain; Gynecological Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Armando Reques
- Pathology Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Mancebo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital del Mar, PSMAR, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jutta Huvila
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, 20500, Turku, Finland
| | - Martin Koskas
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, 75018, Paris, France
| | - Vit Weinberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marketa Bednarikova
- Department of Internal Medicine, Oncology and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jitka Hausnerova
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marc P L M Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, 6532, SZ, the Netherlands
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium; Center for Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
A Modern Approach to Endometrial Carcinoma: Will Molecular Classification Improve Precision Medicine in the Future? Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092577. [PMID: 32927671 PMCID: PMC7564776 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer has been histologically classified as either an estrogen-dependent cancer with a favorable outcome or an estrogen-independent cancer with a worse prognosis. These parameters, along with the clinical attributions, have been the basis for risk stratification. Recent molecular and histopathological findings have suggested a more complex approach to risk stratification. Findings from the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network established four distinctive genomic groups: ultramutated, hypermutated, copy-number low and copy-number high prognostic subtypes. Subsequently, more molecular and histopathologic classifiers were evaluated for their prognostic and predictive value. The impact of molecular classification is evident and will be recognized by the upcoming WHO classification. Further research is needed to give rise to a new era of molecular-based endometrial carcinoma patient care.
Collapse
|
31
|
van Weelden WJ, van der Putten LJM, Inda MA, van Brussel A, Snijders MPLM, Schriever LMM, Bulten J, Massuger LFAG, van de Stolpe A, Pijnenborg JMA. Oestrogen receptor pathway activity is associated with outcome in endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer 2020; 123:785-792. [PMID: 32507853 PMCID: PMC7463017 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0925-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oestrogen receptor (ER) expression is a prognostic biomarker in endometrial cancer (EC). However, expression does not provide information about the functional activity of the ER pathway. We evaluated a model to quantify ER pathway activity in EC, and determined the prognostic relevance of ER pathway activity. METHODS ER pathway activity was measured in two publicly available datasets with endometrial and EC tissue, and one clinical cohort with 107 samples from proliferative and hyperplastic endometrium and endometrioid-type EC (EEC) and uterine serous cancer (USC). ER pathway activity scores were inferred from ER target gene mRNA levels from Affymetrix microarray data (public datasets), or measured by qPCR on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (clinical cohort) and related to ER expression and outcome. RESULTS ER pathway activity scores differed significantly throughout the menstrual cycle supporting the validity of the pathway test. The highest ER pathway scores were found in proliferative and hyperplastic endometrium and stage I EEC, whereas stage II-IV EEC and USCs had significantly lower levels. Low ER pathway activity was associated with recurrent disease, and added prognostic value in patients with low ER expression. CONCLUSION The ER pathway test reflects activity of the ER pathway, and may improve prediction of outcome in EC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem Jan van Weelden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Louis J M van der Putten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marc P L M Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lisanne M M Schriever
- Department of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Giordano M, Cavallaro U. Different Shades of L1CAM in the Pathophysiology of Cancer Stem Cells. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E1502. [PMID: 32429448 PMCID: PMC7291284 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) is aberrantly expressed in several tumor types where it is causally linked to malignancy and therapy resistance, acting also as a poor prognosis factor. Accordingly, several approaches have been developed to interfere with L1CAM function or to deliver cytotoxic agents to L1CAM-expressing tumors. Metastatic dissemination, tumor relapse and drug resistance can be fueled by a subpopulation of neoplastic cells endowed with peculiar biological properties that include self-renewal, efficient DNA repair, drug efflux machineries, quiescence, and immune evasion. These cells, known as cancer stem cells (CSC) or tumor-initiating cells, represent, therefore, an ideal target for tumor eradication. However, the molecular and functional traits of CSC have been unveiled only to a limited extent. In this context, it appears that L1CAM is expressed in the CSC compartment of certain tumors, where it plays a causal role in stemness itself and/or in biological processes intimately associated with CSC (e.g., epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and chemoresistance). This review summarizes the role of L1CAM in cancer focusing on its functional contribution to CSC pathophysiology. We also discuss the clinical usefulness of therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting L1CAM in the context of anti-CSC treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ugo Cavallaro
- Unit of Gynaecological Oncology Research, European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, 20128 Milan, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Baxter E, Brennan DJ, McAlpine JN, Mueller JJ, Amant F, van Gent MDJM, Huntsman DG, Coleman RL, Westin SN, Yates MS, Krakstad C, Quinn MA, Janda M, Obermair A. Improving response to progestin treatment of low-grade endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1811-1823. [PMID: 32381512 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review examines how response rates to progestin treatment of low-grade endometrial cancer can be improved. In addition to providing a brief overview of the pathogenesis of low-grade endometrial cancer, we discuss limitations in the current classification of endometrial cancer and how stratification may be refined using molecular markers to reproducibly identify 'low-risk' cancers which may represent the best candidates for progestin therapy. We also discuss constraints in current approaches to progestin treatment of low-grade endometrial cancer and perform a systematic review of predictive biomarkers. METHODS PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting pre-treatment biomarkers associated with outcome in women with low-grade endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia with an intact uterus who received progestin treatment. Studies of fewer than 50 women were excluded. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID 152374). A descriptive synthesis of pre-treatment predictive biomarkers reported in the included studies was conducted. RESULTS Of 1908 records reviewed, 19 studies were included. Clinical features such as age or body mass index cannot predict progestin response. Lesions defined as 'low-risk' by FIGO criteria (stage 1A, grade 1) can respond well; however, the reproducibility and prognostic ability of the current histopathological classification system is suboptimal. Molecular markers can be reproducibly assessed, have been validated as prognostic biomarkers, and may inform patient selection for progestin treatment. DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)-ultramutated tumors and a subset of p53 wild-type or DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient tumors with 'low-risk' features (eg, progesterone and estrogen receptor-positive) may have improved response rates, though this needs to be validated. DISCUSSION Molecular markers can identify cases which may be candidates for progestin treatment. More work is needed to validate these biomarkers and potentially identify new ones. Predictive biomarkers are anticipated to inform future research into progestin treatment of low-grade endometrial cancer and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Baxter
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Donal J Brennan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UCD School of Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,Systems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.,Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Mignon D J M van Gent
- Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - David G Huntsman
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Melinda S Yates
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Camilla Krakstad
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Vestland, Norway.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Vestland, Norway
| | | | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andreas Obermair
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Reijnen C, Gogou E, Visser NCM, Engerud H, Ramjith J, van der Putten LJM, van de Vijver K, Santacana M, Bronsert P, Bulten J, Hirschfeld M, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Reques A, Mancebo G, Krakstad C, Trovik J, Haldorsen IS, Huvila J, Koskas M, Weinberger V, Bednarikova M, Hausnerova J, van der Wurff AAM, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F, Massuger LFAG, Snijders MPLM, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Lucas PJF, Pijnenborg JMA. Preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer (ENDORISK) by a Bayesian network model: A development and validation study. PLoS Med 2020; 17:e1003111. [PMID: 32413043 PMCID: PMC7228042 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bayesian networks (BNs) are machine-learning-based computational models that visualize causal relationships and provide insight into the processes underlying disease progression, closely resembling clinical decision-making. Preoperative identification of patients at risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) is challenging in endometrial cancer, and although several biomarkers are related to LNM, none of them are incorporated in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop and externally validate a preoperative BN to predict LNM and outcome in endometrial cancer patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS Within the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC), we performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study including 763 patients, median age 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58-71), surgically treated for endometrial cancer between February 1995 and August 2013 at one of the 10 participating European hospitals. A BN was developed using score-based machine learning in addition to expert knowledge. Our main outcome measures were LNM and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS). Preoperative clinical, histopathological, and molecular biomarkers were included in the network. External validation was performed using 2 prospective study cohorts: the Molecular Markers in Treatment in Endometrial Cancer (MoMaTEC) study cohort, including 446 Norwegian patients, median age 64 years (IQR 59-74), treated between May 2001 and 2010; and the PIpelle Prospective ENDOmetrial carcinoma (PIPENDO) study cohort, including 384 Dutch patients, median age 66 years (IQR 60-73), treated between September 2011 and December 2013. A BN called ENDORISK (preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer) was developed including the following predictors: preoperative tumor grade; immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), p53, and L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM); cancer antigen 125 serum level; thrombocyte count; imaging results on lymphadenopathy; and cervical cytology. In the MoMaTEC cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.88) for LNM and 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.87) for 5-year DSS. In the PIPENDO cohort, the AUC for 5-year DSS was 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.90). The network was well-calibrated. In the MoMaTEC cohort, 249 patients (55.8%) were classified with <5% risk of LNM, with a false-negative rate of 1.6%. A limitation of the study is the use of imputation to correct for missing predictor variables in the development cohort and the retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we illustrated how BNs can be used for individualizing clinical decision-making in oncology by incorporating easily accessible and multimodal biomarkers. The network shows the complex interactions underlying the carcinogenetic process of endometrial cancer by its graphical representation. A prospective feasibility study will be needed prior to implementation in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper Reijnen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Evangelia Gogou
- Department of Computing Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole C. M. Visser
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hilde Engerud
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jordache Ramjith
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Koen van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maria Santacana
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Hirschfeld
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Eva Colas
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
- Gynecological Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Armando Reques
- Pathology Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Mancebo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital del Mar, PSMAR, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Camilla Krakstad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jone Trovik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ingfrid S. Haldorsen
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jutta Huvila
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Martin Koskas
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Vit Weinberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marketa Bednarikova
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jitka Hausnerova
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain
| | - Frederic Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leon F. A. G. Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc P. L. M. Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter J. F. Lucas
- Department of Data Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M. A. Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kim SR, Cloutier BT, Leung S, Cochrane D, Britton H, Pina A, Storness-Bliss C, Farnell D, Huang L, Shum K, Lum A, Senz J, Lee CH, Gilks CB, Hoang L, McAlpine JN. Molecular subtypes of clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: Opportunities for prognostic and predictive stratification. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:3-11. [PMID: 32331700 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our aim was to characterize the pathological, molecular and clinical outcomes of clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium (CCC). METHODS CCC underwent ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer) classification identifying four molecular subtypes: i) 'POLEmut' for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations, ii) 'MMRd', if there is loss of mismatch repair proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC), iii) 'p53wt' or iv) 'p53abn' based on p53 IHC staining. Clinicopathologic parameters, immune markers (CD3, CD8, CD79a, CD138, PD-1), ER, L1CAM, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS 52 CCCs were classified, including 1 (2%) POLEmut, 5 (10%) MMRd, 28 (54%) p53wt and 18 (35%) p53abn. Women with p53abn and p53wt CCCs were older than women with MMRd and POLEmut subtypes. p53wt CCC were distinct from typical p53wt endometrioid carcinomas; more likely to arise in older, thinner women, with advanced stage disease, LVSI and lymph node involvement, and a higher proportion ER negative, L1CAM overexpressing tumors with markedly worse outcomes. High levels of immune infiltrates (TILhigh) were observed in 75% of the CCC cohort. L1CAM overexpression was highest within p53abn and p53wt subtypes of CCC. CONCLUSION CCC is a heterogeneous disease encompassing all four molecular subtypes and a wide range of clinical outcomes. Outcomes of patients with POLEmut, MMRd and p53abn CCC are not distinguishable from those of other patients with these respective subtypes of EC; p53wt CCC, however, differ from endometrioid p53wt EC in clinical, pathological, molecular features and outcomes. Thus, p53wt CCC of endometrium appear to be a distinct clinicopathological entity within the larger group of p53wt ECs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soyoun Rachel Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Basile Tessier Cloutier
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samuel Leung
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Annick Pina
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Claudine Storness-Bliss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David Farnell
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Leo Huang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kathryn Shum
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amy Lum
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lien Hoang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Reijnen C, Visser NC, Kasius JC, Boll D, Geomini PM, Ngo H, Van Hamont D, Pijlman BM, Vos MC, Bulten J, Snijders MP, Massuger LF, Pijnenborg JM. Improved preoperative risk stratification with CA-125 in low-grade endometrial cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Gynecol Oncol 2020; 30:e70. [PMID: 31328454 PMCID: PMC6658593 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The global obesity epidemic has great impact on the prevalence of low-grade endometrial carcinoma. The preoperative tumor serum marker cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) might contribute to improved identification of high-risk patients within this group. The study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of CA-125 in relation to established preoperative prognosticators, with a focus on identifying patients with poor outcome in low-grade endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients. METHODS Prospective multicenter cohort study including all consecutive patients surgically treated for endometrial carcinoma in nine collaborating hospitals from September 2011 until December 2013. All preoperative histopathological diagnoses were reviewed in a blinded manner. Associations between CA-125 and clinicopathological features were determined. Univariable and multivariable analysis by Cox regression were used. Separate analyses were performed for preoperatively designated low-grade and high-grade endometrial carcinoma patients. RESULTS A total of 333 patients were analyzed. CA-125 was associated with poor prognostic features including advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage. In multivariable analysis, age, preoperative tumor and CA-125 were significantly associated with disease-free survival (DFS); preoperative grade, tumor type, FIGO and CA-125 were significantly associated with disease-specific survival (DSS). Low-grade EC patients with elevated CA-125 revealed a DFS of 80.6% and DSS of 87.1%, compared to 92.1% and 97.2% in low-grade EC patients with normal CA-125. CONCLUSION Preoperative elevated CA-125 was associated with poor prognostic features and independently associated with DFS and DSS. Particularly patients with low-grade EC and elevated CA-125 represent a group with poor outcome and should be considered as high-risk endometrial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper Reijnen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Nicole Cm Visser
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jenneke C Kasius
- Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dorry Boll
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Peggy M Geomini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Màxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Huy Ngo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis Van Hamont
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Brenda M Pijlman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Caroline Vos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Plm Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leon Fag Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna Ma Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gómez-Raposo C, Merino Salvador M, Aguayo Zamora C, Casado Saenz E. Adjuvant chemotherapy in endometrial cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2020; 85:477-486. [PMID: 31950214 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-04027-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is controversial in endometrial carcinoma (EC). Surgery alone is usually curative for women who are at a low risk of disease recurrence. The treatment of EC following surgical staging is based on the risk of relapse, which is defined by the cancer stage at diagnosis, histology of the tumor and other prognostic factors such as grade differentiation, the presence of substantial lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), or depth of myometrial invasion (MI). External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) improved local control and are used as adjuvant treatment for early-stage disease. The role of adjuvant CT is controversial in early-stage EC, and there is no uniform approach to the treatment of women with stage III EC or early-staged non-endometrioid EC. Available evidence did not support the indication of adjuvant CT in stage I-II endometroid EC. In those cases at higher risk of relapse, defined as grade 3 tumors with substantial (no focal) LVSI, specifically with deep MI or cervical involvement, could be considered. Adjuvant CT should be administered to stage III EC patients. When RT is indicated (extensive lymph node involvement or deep MI), sequential treatment with RT or "sandwich" regimen may be considered rather than concurrent CRT. The patients with stage IA MI or IB USC may be offered adjuvant CT alone or in combination with VBT, whereas in stage II uterine serous carcinoma patients adding EBRT may be reasonable. Management approach for patients with stage IA without MI USC who underwent a comprehensive surgery remains controversial, and surveillance alone or CT plus VBT is an appropriate option. Early-stage clear-cell carcinoma patients might not benefit for adjuvant CT, but stage III patients might benefit from the combination of CT and EBRT. Stage I-III uterine carcinosarcoma patients might be offered adjuvant CT followed by RT or as a "sandwich" régimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- César Gómez-Raposo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Avenida de Europa 34, 28702, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain.
| | - María Merino Salvador
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Avenida de Europa 34, 28702, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Aguayo Zamora
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Avenida de Europa 34, 28702, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Casado Saenz
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Avenida de Europa 34, 28702, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Extracellular Vesicles-Based Biomarkers Represent a Promising Liquid Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11122000. [PMID: 31842290 PMCID: PMC6966595 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11122000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are secreted in large amounts into biological fluids of cancer patients. The analysis of EVs cargoes has been associated with patient´s outcome and response to therapy. However, current technologies for EVs isolation are tedious and low cost-efficient for routine clinical implementation. To explore the clinical value of circulating EVs analysis we attempted a proof-of-concept in endometrial cancer (EC) with ExoGAG, an easy to use and highly efficient new technology to enrich EVs. Technical performance was first evaluated using EVs secreted by Hec1A cells. Then, the clinical value of this strategy was questioned by analyzing the levels of two well-known tissue biomarkers in EC, L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) and Annexin A2 (ANXA2), in EVs purified from plasma in a cohort of 41 EC patients and 20 healthy controls. The results demonstrated the specific content of ANXA2 in the purified EVs fraction, with an accurate sensitivity and specificity for EC diagnosis. Importantly, high ANXA2 levels in circulating EVs were associated with high risk of recurrence and non-endometrioid histology suggesting a potential value as a prognostic biomarker in EC. These results also confirmed ExoGAG technology as a robust technique for the clinical implementation of circulating EVs analyses.
Collapse
|
39
|
Creutzberg CL, Lu KH, Fleming GF. Uterine Cancer: Adjuvant Therapy and Management of Metastatic Disease. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:2490-2500. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen H. Lu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wortman BG, Nout RA, Bosse T, Creutzberg CL. Selecting Adjuvant Treatment for Endometrial Carcinoma Using Molecular Risk Factors. Curr Oncol Rep 2019; 21:83. [PMID: 31367798 PMCID: PMC6669195 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-019-0825-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview of common molecular risk factors in endometrial cancer (EC) with the possibility to improve adjuvant treatment selection. RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies have discovered and confirmed four different molecular subclasses in EC, with each having a distinct prognosis; POLE-ultramutated, microsatellite unstable, copy-number low, and copy-number high. Subsequent studies have shown that combining both molecular with clinicopathological risk factors can potentially improve adjuvant treatment selection for women with high-intermediate risk EC. For high risk and advanced stage EC, several molecular alterations are being explored for targeted therapy. Molecular alterations are frequently found in endometrial cancer and have currently not been implemented in the treatment guidelines for EC. Assessment of molecular alterations can distinguish patients that require less or more intensified adjuvant treatment. Trials investigating targeted therapies in EC are ongoing and have shown some promising results, however, more evidence is needed and results of randomized trials have to be awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bastiaan G Wortman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, K1-P, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, K1-P, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, K1-P, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Visser NCM, van der Putten LJM, van Egerschot A, Van de Vijver KK, Santacana M, Bronsert P, Hirschfeld M, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Garcia A, Mancebo G, Alameda F, Krakstad C, Tangen IL, Huvila J, Schrauwen S, Koskas M, Walker F, Weinberger V, Minar L, Hausnerova J, Snijders MPLM, van den Berg-van Erp S, Matias-Guiu X, Trovik J, Amant F, Massuger LFAG, Bulten J, Pijnenborg JMA. Addition of IMP3 to L1CAM for discrimination between low- and high-grade endometrial carcinomas: a European Network for Individualised Treatment of Endometrial Cancer collaboration study. Hum Pathol 2019; 89:90-98. [PMID: 31054899 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Discrimination between low- and high-grade endometrial carcinomas (ECs) is clinically relevant but can be challenging for pathologists, with moderate interobserver agreement. Insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) is an oncofoetal protein that is associated with nonendometrioid endometrial carcinomas but has been limited studied in endometrioid carcinomas. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of IMP3 in the discrimination between low- and high-grade ECs and its added value to L1CAM. IMP3 and L1CAM expression was assessed in tumors from 378 patients treated for EC at 1 of 9 participating European Network for Individualised Treatment of Endometrial Cancer centers. IMP3 was expressed in 24.6% of the tumors. In general, IMP3 was more homogeneously expressed than L1CAM. IMP3 expression was significantly associated with advanced stage, nonendometrioid histology, grade 3 tumors, deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, distant recurrences, overall mortality, and disease-related mortality. Simultaneous absence of IMP3 and L1CAM expression showed the highest accuracy for identifying low-grade carcinomas (area under the curve 0.766), whereas simultaneous expression of IMP3 and L1CAM was strongly associated with high-grade carcinomas (odds ratio 19.7; 95% confidence interval 9.2-42.2). Even within endometrioid carcinomas, this combination remained superior to IMP3 and L1CAM alone (odds ratio 8.6; 95% confidence interval 3.4-21.9). In conclusion, IMP3 has good diagnostic value and together with L1CAM represents the optimal combination of diagnostic markers for discrimination between low- and high-grade ECs compared to IMP3 and L1CAM alone. Because of the homogenous expression of IMP3, this marker might be valuable in preoperative biopsies when compared to the more patchy L1CAM expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole C M Visser
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Louis J M van der Putten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Alex van Egerschot
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maria Santacana
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Oncological Pathology Group, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, CIBERONC, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, 79085, Freiburg, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Centre Freiburg, Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79085, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marc Hirschfeld
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Colas
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, 08193, Barcelona, Spain; Gynecological Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, 8035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angel Garcia
- Pathology Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, 8035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Mancebo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital del Mar, 8003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Alameda
- Department of Pathology, Hospital del Mar, 8003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Camilla Krakstad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5021, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ingvild L Tangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5021, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jutta Huvila
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, 20500, Turku, Finland
| | - Stefanie Schrauwen
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Martin Koskas
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, 75877, Paris, France
| | - Francine Walker
- Pathology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, 75877, Paris, France
| | - Vit Weinberger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lubos Minar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jitka Hausnerova
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marc P L M Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500, GS, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Oncological Pathology Group, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, CIBERONC, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Jone Trovik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, 5021, Bergen, Norway
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, 3000, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Academic Medical Centre, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Poor outcome in hypoxic endometrial carcinoma is related to vascular density. Br J Cancer 2019; 120:1037-1044. [PMID: 31011231 PMCID: PMC6738053 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0461-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Identification of endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients at high risk of recurrence is lacking. In this study, the prognostic role of hypoxia and angiogenesis was investigated in EC patients. Methods Tumour slides from EC patients were stained by immunofluorescence for carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) as hypoxic marker and CD34 for assessment of microvessel density (MVD). CAIX expression was determined in epithelial tumour cells, with a cut-off of 1%. MVD was assessed according to the Weidner method. Correlations with disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. Results Sixty-three (16.4%) of 385 ECs showed positive CAIX expression with high vascular density. These ECs had a reduced DSS compared to tumours with either hypoxia or high vascular density (log-rank p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis showed that hypoxic tumours with high vascular density had a reduced DSS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.71, p = 0.002), DDFS (HR 2.68, p = 0.009) and a trend for reduced DFS (HR 1.87, p = 0.054). Conclusions This study has shown that adverse outcome in hypoxic ECs is seen in the presence of high vascular density, suggesting an important role of angiogenesis in the metastatic process of hypoxic EC. Differential adjuvant treatment might be indicated for these patients.
Collapse
|
43
|
Weinberger V, Bednarikova M, Hausnerova J, Ovesna P, Vinklerova P, Minar L, Felsinger M, Jandakova E, Cihalova M, Zikan M. A Novel Approach to Preoperative Risk Stratification in Endometrial Cancer: The Added Value of Immunohistochemical Markers. Front Oncol 2019; 9:265. [PMID: 31032226 PMCID: PMC6473394 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The current model used to preoperatively stratify endometrial cancer (EC) patients into low- and high-risk groups is based on histotype, grade, and imaging method and is not optimal. Our study aims to prove whether a new model incorporating immunohistochemical markers, L1CAM, ER, PR, p53, obtained from preoperative biopsy could help refine stratification and thus the choice of adequate surgical extent and appropriate adjuvant treatment. Materials and Methods: The following data were prospectively collected from patients operated for EC from January 2016 through August 2018: age, pre- and post-operative histology, grade, lymphovascular space invasion, L1CAM, ER, PR, p53, imaging parameters obtained from ultrasound, CT chest/abdomen, final FIGO stage, and current decision model (based on histology, grade, imaging method). Results: In total, 132 patients were enrolled. The current model revealed 48% sensitivity and 89% specificity for high-risk group determination. In myometrial invasion >50%, lower levels of ER (p = 0.024), PR (0.048), and higher levels of L1CAM (p = 0.001) were observed; in cervical involvement a higher expression of L1CAM (p = 0.001), lower PR (p = 0.014); in tumors with positive LVSI, higher L1CAM (p = 0.014); in cases with positive LN, lower expression of ER/PR (p < 0.001), higher L1CAM (p = 0.002) and frequent mutation of p53 (p = 0.008). Cut-offs for determination of high-risk tumors were established: ER <78% (p = 0.001), PR <88% (p = 0.008), and L1CAM ≥4% (p < 0.001). The positive predictive values (PPV) for ER, PR, and L1CAM were 87% (60.8–96.5%), 63% (52.1–72.8%), 83% (70.5–90.8%); the negative predictive values (NPV) for each marker were as follows: 59% (54.5–63.4%), 65% (55.6–74.0%), and 77% (67.3–84.2%). Mutation of p53 revealed PPV 94% (67.4–99.1%) and NPV 61% (56.1–66.3%). When immunohistochemical markers were included into the current diagnostic model, sensitivity improved (48.4 vs. 75.8%, p < 0.001). PPV was similar for both methods, while NPV (i.e., the probability of extremely low risk in negative test cases) was improved (66 vs. 78.9%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: We proved superiority of new proposed model using immunohistochemical markers over standard clinical practice and that new proposed model increases accuracy of prognosis prediction. We propose wider implementation and validation of the proposed model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vit Weinberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Marketa Bednarikova
- Department of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Jitka Hausnerova
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Petra Ovesna
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Petra Vinklerova
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Lubos Minar
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Michal Felsinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Eva Jandakova
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Marta Cihalova
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Michal Zikan
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP) Endometrial Cancer Project: Guidelines From the Special Techniques and Ancillary Studies Group. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019. [PMID: 29521846 PMCID: PMC6296838 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this article is to propose guidelines and recommendations in problematic areas in pathologic reporting of endometrial carcinoma (EC) regarding special techniques and ancillary studies. An organizing committee designed a comprehensive survey with different questions related to pathologic features, diagnosis, and prognosis of EC that was sent to all members of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. The special techniques/ancillary studies group received 4 different questions to be addressed. Five members of the group reviewed the literature and came up with recommendations and an accompanying text which were discussed and agreed upon by all members of the group. Twelve different recommendations are made. They address the value of immunohistochemistry, ploidy, and molecular analysis for assessing prognosis in EC, the value of steroid hormone receptor analysis to predict response to hormone therapy, and parameters regarding applying immunohistochemistry and molecular tests for assessing mismatch deficiency in EC.
Collapse
|
45
|
Hutt S, Tailor A, Ellis P, Michael A, Butler-Manuel S, Chatterjee J. The role of biomarkers in endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: a literature review. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:342-352. [PMID: 30614360 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1540886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer and its incidence is rising due to increasing obesity rates. We are also seeing an increasing trend of young women diagnosed with either endometrial cancer or its precancerous state, endometrial hyperplasia. Diagnosis is dependent on invasive testing and there is no screening tool available for either general or high-risk population groups. Whilst vast amounts of research have been undertaken in higher-profile cancers such as ovarian and cervical, endometrial cancer is comparatively less investigated. AIM In this literature review, we summarise the existing literature in understanding the role of tumour biomarkers for endometrial cancer and its preceding condition of endometrial hyperplasia. METHOD NICE Healthcare Databases Search tool was used to search Embase, Medline and PubMed databases for relevant articles. CONCLUSION There is currently no routinely used biomarker in endometrial cancer for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. Given the establishment of new genomic classifications of endometrial cancers, the use of biomarkers to drive therapeutic approaches will be the cornerstone for individualised cancer care in the coming decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanna Hutt
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Oncology Section), School Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Anil Tailor
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Oncology Section), School Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Patricia Ellis
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Oncology Section), School Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Agnieszka Michael
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Oncology Section), School Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Simon Butler-Manuel
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Oncology Section), School Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Jayanta Chatterjee
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Oncology Section), School Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kwon JS. Preoperative CA-125 in low-grade endometrial cancer: risk stratification and implications for treatment. J Gynecol Oncol 2019; 30:e92. [PMID: 31328464 PMCID: PMC6658603 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e92] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Janice S. Kwon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in high-income countries. Although the overall prognosis is relatively good, high-grade endometrial cancers have a tendency to recur. Recurrence needs to be prevented since the prognosis for recurrent endometrial cancer is dismal. Treatment tailored to tumor biology is the optimal strategy to balance treatment efficacy against toxicity. Standard treatment consists of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Lymphadenectomy (with ongoing studies of sentinel node biopsy) enables identification of lymph node positive patients who need adjuvant treatment, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy is used for Stage I-II patients with high-risk factors and Stage III lymph node negative patients. In advanced disease, a combination of surgery to no residual disease and chemotherapy results in the best outcome. Surgery for recurrent disease is only advocated in patients with a good performance status with a relatively long disease-free interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Amant
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.,Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Koskas
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wortman BG, Creutzberg CL, Putter H, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Jobsen JJ, Lutgens LCHW, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Mens JWM, Slot A, Kroese MCS, van Triest B, Nijman HW, Stelloo E, Bosse T, de Boer SM, van Putten WLJ, Smit VTHBM, Nout RA. Ten-year results of the PORTEC-2 trial for high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma: improving patient selection for adjuvant therapy. Br J Cancer 2018; 119:1067-1074. [PMID: 30356126 PMCID: PMC6219495 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0310-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background PORTEC-2 was a randomised trial for women with high-intermediate risk (HIR) endometrial cancer, comparing pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). We evaluated long-term outcomes combined with the results of pathology review and molecular analysis. Methods 427 women with HIR endometrial cancer were randomised between 2002–2006 to VBT or EBRT. Primary endpoint was vaginal recurrence (VR). Pathology review was done in 97.4%, combined with molecular analysis. Results Median follow-up was 116 months; 10-year VR was 3.4% versus 2.4% for VBT vs. EBRT (p = 0.55). Ten-year pelvic recurrence (PR) was more frequent in the VBT group (6.3% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.004), mostly combined with distant metastases (DM). Ten-year isolated PR was 2.5% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.10, and DM 10.4 vs. 8.9% (p = 0.45). Overall survival for VBT vs. EBRT was 69.5% vs. 67.6% at 10 years (p = 0.72). L1CAM and p53-mutant expression and substantial lymph-vascular space invasion were risk factors for PR and DM. EBRT reduced PR in cases with these risk factors. Conclusion Long-term results of the PORTEC-2 trial confirm VBT as standard adjuvant treatment for HIR endometrial cancer. Molecular risk assessment has the potential to guide adjuvant therapy. EBRT provided better pelvic control in patients with unfavourable risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B G Wortman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - I M Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J J Jobsen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - L C H W Lutgens
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - J W M Mens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC- Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Slot
- Radiotherapy Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | | | - B van Triest
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H W Nijman
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - E Stelloo
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S M de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - W L J van Putten
- Department of Biostatistics, ErasmusMC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V T H B M Smit
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Versluis M, Plat A, de Bruyn M, Matias-Guiu X, Trovic J, Krakstad C, Nijman HW, Bosse T, de Bock GH, Hollema H. L1CAM expression in uterine carcinosarcoma is limited to the epithelial component and may be involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Virchows Arch 2018; 473:591-598. [PMID: 30140948 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2444-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) has been proposed as a model for epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process characterized by a functional change facilitating migration and metastasis in many types of cancer. L1CAM is an adhesion molecule that has been involved in EMT as a marker for mesenchymal phenotype. We examined expression of L1CAM in UCS in a cohort of 90 cases from four different centers. Slides were immunohistochemically stained for L1CAM and scored in four categories (0%, < 10%, 10-50%, and > 50%). A score of more than 10% was considered positive for L1CAM. The median age at presentation was 68.6 years, and half of the patients (53.3%) presented with FIGO stage 1 disease. Membranous L1CAM expression was positive in the epithelial component in 65.4% of cases. Remarkably, expression was negative in the mesenchymal component. In cases where both components were intermingled, expression limited to the epithelial component was confirmed by a double stain for L1CAM and keratin. Expression of L1CAM did not relate to overall or disease-free survival. Our findings suggest L1CAM is either not a marker for the mesenchymal phenotype in EMT, or UCS is not a good model for EMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mac Versluis
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - A Plat
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M de Bruyn
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - X Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics/Oncologic Pathology Group, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain
| | - J Trovic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, Center for Cancer Biomarkers, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - C Krakstad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, Center for Cancer Biomarkers, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - H W Nijman
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - T Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - G H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - H Hollema
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fonnes T, Trovik J, Edqvist PH, Fasmer KE, Marcickiewicz J, Tingulstad S, Staff AC, Bjørge L, Amant F, Haldorsen IS, Werner H, Akslen LA, Tangen IL, Krakstad C. Asparaginase-like protein 1 expression in curettage independently predicts lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma: a multicentre study. BJOG 2018; 125:1695-1703. [PMID: 29989298 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Correct preoperative identification of high-risk patients is important to optimise surgical treatment and improve survival. We wanted to explore if asparaginase-like protein 1 (ASRGL1) expression in curettage could predict lymph node metastases and poor outcome, potentially improving preoperative risk stratification. DESIGN Multicentre study. SETTING Ten hospitals in Norway, Sweden and Belgium. POPULATION Women diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma. METHODS ASRGL1 expression in curettage specimens from 1144 women was determined by immunohistochemistry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES ASRGL1 status related to disease-specific survival, lymph node status, preoperative imaging parameters and clinicopathological data. RESULTS ASRGL1 expression had independent prognostic value in multivariate survival analyses, both in the whole patient population (hazard ratio (HR) 1.63, 95% CI 1.11-2.37, P = 0.012) and in the low-risk curettage histology subgroup (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.44-4.47, P = 0.001). Lymph node metastases were more frequent in women with low expression of ASRGL1 compared with women with high ASRGL1 levels (23% versus 10%, P < 0.001), and low ASRGL1 level was found to independently predict lymph node metastases (odds ratio 2.07, 95% CI 1.27-3.38, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Low expression of ASRGL1 in curettage independently predicts lymph node metastases and poor disease-specific survival. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Low ASRGL1 expression in curettage predicts lymph node metastasis and poor survival in endometrial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Fonnes
- Department of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - J Trovik
- Department of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - P-Hd Edqvist
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - K E Fasmer
- Department of Radiology, Centre for Nuclear Medicine/PET, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - J Marcickiewicz
- Department of Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Halland's Hospital Varberg, Varberg, Sweden
| | - S Tingulstad
- Department of Gynaecology, St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - A C Staff
- Department of Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - L Bjørge
- Department of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - F Amant
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, UZGasthuisberg, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I S Haldorsen
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Section for Radiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hmj Werner
- Department of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - L A Akslen
- Section for Pathology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - I L Tangen
- Department of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - C Krakstad
- Department of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|