1
|
Rubina H, Ratnagiri R, Uppin MS, Ayesha S, Lakshmi K M, Chowdary SB, Uppin SG. A Clinical and Immunopathological Analysis of Carcinoma of the Ovary with an Emphasis on Post-chemotherapy Histopathologic Changes. Indian J Surg Oncol 2023; 14:545-552. [PMID: 37900629 PMCID: PMC10611652 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-023-01756-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancers are a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that differ with respect to pathogenesis, morphology, molecular features, and behavior. Pathologists and clinicians need to be aware of the advances in diagnosis and the changes which occur after chemotherapy to offer the optimal treatment to each patient. The present work aims to study the morphologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) profile of primary ovarian cancers with an assessment of post-chemotherapy changes. A total of 51 cases were included in the study from June 2017 to June 2019 (prospective and retrospective). The demographic and clinical details of the patients were collected. The gross and microscopic features of the tumors were studied, and the post-chemotherapy changes were evaluated. A chi-square test was used to determine the association of tumor morphology, the chemotherapy response score (CRS), and stage of the tumor with survival (PFS and OS). The mean patient age was 47.5 years, and high-grade serous carcinoma (66.6%) (HGSC) was the most common subtype followed by mucinous carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma. Immunohistochemical analysis with WT1 and p53 helped in the diagnosis of HGSC. The CRS was 1 and 2 in most of the cases. The follow-up for patients of HGSC was available for a period of 1-27 months with a mean survival for primary resection of 24 months and for post-NACT resection was 17 months. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.38). High-grade serous carcinoma was the most common ovarian cancer in our series, and immunohistochemistry played an important role in the diagnosis. We could not demonstrate any survival benefit of preoperative chemotherapy in our series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Rubina
- Department of Pathology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad Punjagutta, India
| | - Ranganath Ratnagiri
- Department of Pathology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad Punjagutta, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderbad, India
| | - Megha S. Uppin
- Department of Pathology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad Punjagutta, India
| | - Sobiya Ayesha
- Department of Pathology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad Punjagutta, India
| | - Meher Lakshmi K
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India
| | - Stalin Bala Chowdary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India
| | - Shantveer G. Uppin
- Department of Pathology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad Punjagutta, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang CK, Chen TJ, Tan GY, Chang FP, Sridharan S, Yu CHA, Chang YH, Chen YJ, Cheng LT, Hwang-Verslues WW. MEX3A Mediates p53 Degradation to Suppress Ferroptosis and Facilitate Ovarian Cancer Tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 2023; 83:251-263. [PMID: 36354374 PMCID: PMC9845988 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-1159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer is a highly heterogeneous and malignant female cancer with an overall low survival rate. Mutations in p53 are prevalent in the major ovarian cancer histotype, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), while p53 mutations are much less frequent in other ovarian cancer subtypes, particularly in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). Advanced stage OCCC with wild-type (WT) p53 has a worse prognosis and increased drug resistance, metastasis, and recurrence than HGSOC. The mechanisms responsible for driving the aggressiveness of WT p53-expressing ovarian cancer remain poorly understood. Here, we found that upregulation of MEX3A, a dual-function protein containing a RING finger domain and an RNA-binding domain, was critical for tumorigenesis in WT p53-expressing ovarian cancer. MEX3A overexpression enhanced the growth and clonogenicity of OCCC cell lines. In contrast, depletion of MEX3A in OCCC cells, as well as ovarian teratocarcinoma cells, reduced cell survival and proliferative ability. MEX3A depletion also inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival in orthotopic xenograft models. MEX3A depletion did not alter p53 mRNA level but did increase p53 protein stability. MEX3A-mediated p53 protein degradation was crucial to suppress ferroptosis and enhance tumorigenesis. Consistently, p53 knockdown reversed the effects of MEX3A depletion. Together, our observations identified MEX3A as an important oncogenic factor promoting tumorigenesis in ovarian cancer cells expressing WT p53. SIGNIFICANCE Degradation of p53 mediated by MEX3A drives ovarian cancer growth by circumventing p53 tumor suppressive functions, suggesting targeting MEX3A as a potential strategy for treating of ovarian cancer expressing WT p53.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Kai Wang
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Jou Chen
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Grace Y.T. Tan
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Fang-Pei Chang
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | - Yen-Hou Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Jen Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Tzu Cheng
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wendy W. Hwang-Verslues
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.,Corresponding Author: Wendy W. Hwang-Verslues, Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Road, Taipei 115, Taiwan. Phone: +886-2-2787-1246; Fax: +886-2-2789-9924; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cai D, Ma X, Guo H, Zhang H, Bian A, Yu H, Cheng W. Prognostic value of p16, p53, and pcna in sarcoma and an evaluation of immune infiltration. J Orthop Surg Res 2022; 17:305. [PMID: 35689249 PMCID: PMC9185979 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03193-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background p16, p53, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (pcna) genes play significant roles in many chromatin modifications and have been found to be highly expressed in a variety of tumor tissues. Therefore, they have been used as target genes for some tumor therapies. However, the differential expressions of the p16, p53, and pcna genes in human sarcomas and their effects on prognosis have not been widely reported. Methods The Oncomine dataset was used to analyze the transcription levels of p16, p53, and pcna genes, and the gene expression profile interactive analysis (GEPIA) dataset was used to analyze the differential expressions of p16, p53, and pcna. The expression levels of p16, p53, and pcna were further analyzed by Western Blotting. GEPIA and Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to analyze the prognostic value of p16, p53, and pcna. Furthermore, p16, p53, and pcna gene mutations and their association with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using cBioPortal datasets. In addition, genes co-expressed with p16, p53, and pcna were analyzed using Oncomine. The DAVID dataset was used to analyze the functional enrichment of p16, p53, pcna, and their co-expressed genes by Gene Ontology (GO) and Metascape were used to construct a network map. Finally, the immune cell infiltration of p16, p53, and pcna in patients with sarcoma was reported by Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER). Results p16, p53, and pcna were up-regulated in human sarcoma tissues and almost all sarcoma cell lines. Western Blotting showed that the expression of p16, p53, and pcna was elevated in osteosarcoma cell lines. The expression of pcna was correlated with OS, the expression of p16, p53, and pcna was correlated with relapse-free survival, and the genetic mutation of p16 was negatively correlated with OS and DFS. We also found that p16, p53, and pcna genes were positively/negatively correlated with immune cell infiltration in sarcoma. Conclusions The results of this study showed that p16, p53, and pcna can significantly affect the survival and immune status of sarcoma patients. Therefore, p16, p53, and pcna could be used as potential biomarkers of prognosis and immune infiltration in human sarcoma and provide a possible therapeutic target for sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dechao Cai
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230601, China
| | - Xiao Ma
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230601, China
| | - Huihui Guo
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230601, China
| | - Haotian Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230601, China
| | - Ashuai Bian
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230601, China
| | - Haoran Yu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230601, China
| | - Wendan Cheng
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 678 Furong Road, Hefei, 230601, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Evolution of Ovarian Carcinoma Subclassification. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020416. [PMID: 35053578 PMCID: PMC8774015 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Historically, cancers presenting with their main tumor mass in the ovary have been classified as ovarian carcinomas (a concise term for epithelial ovarian cancer) and treated with a one-size-fits-all approach. Over the last two decades, a growing molecular understanding established that ovarian carcinomas consist of several distinct histologic types, which practically represent different diseases. Further research is now delineating several molecular subtypes within each histotype. This histotype/molecular subtype subclassification provides a framework of grouping tumors based on molecular similarities for research, clinical trial inclusion and future patient management. Abstract The phenotypically informed histotype classification remains the mainstay of ovarian carcinoma subclassification. Histotypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms have evolved with each edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours. The current fifth edition (2020) lists five principal histotypes: high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), mucinous carcinoma (MC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and clear cell carcinoma (CCC). Since histotypes arise from different cells of origin, cell lineage-specific diagnostic immunohistochemical markers and histotype-specific oncogenic alterations can confirm the morphological diagnosis. A four-marker immunohistochemical panel (WT1/p53/napsin A/PR) can distinguish the five principal histotypes with high accuracy, and additional immunohistochemical markers can be used depending on the diagnostic considerations. Histotypes are further stratified into molecular subtypes and assessed with predictive biomarker tests. HGSCs have recently been subclassified based on mechanisms of chromosomal instability, mRNA expression profiles or individual candidate biomarkers. ECs are composed of the same molecular subtypes (POLE-mutated/mismatch repair-deficient/no specific molecular profile/p53-abnormal) with the same prognostic stratification as their endometrial counterparts. Although methylation analyses and gene expression and sequencing showed at least two clusters, the molecular subtypes of CCCs remain largely elusive to date. Mutational and immunohistochemical data on LGSC have suggested five molecular subtypes with prognostic differences. While our understanding of the molecular composition of ovarian carcinomas has significantly advanced and continues to evolve, the need for treatment options suitable for these alterations is becoming more obvious. Further preclinical studies using histotype-defined and molecular subtype-characterized model systems are needed to expand the therapeutic spectrum for women diagnosed with ovarian carcinomas.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rodriguez M, Kang EY, Farrington K, Cook LS, Le ND, Karnezis AN, Lee CH, Nelson GS, Terzic T, Lee S, Köbel M. Accurate Distinction of Ovarian Clear Cell From Endometrioid Carcinoma Requires Integration of Phenotype, Immunohistochemical Predictions, and Genotype: Implications for Lynch Syndrome Screening. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:1452-1463. [PMID: 34534137 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) are both associated with endometriosis but differ in histologic phenotype, biomarker profile, and survival. Our objectives were to refine immunohistochemical (IHC) panels that help distinguish the histotypes and reassess the prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) in immunohistochemically confirmed OCCC. We selected 8 candidate IHC markers to develop first-line and second-line panels in a training set of 344 OCCC/OEC cases. Interobserver reproducibility of histotype diagnosis was assessed in an independent testing cohort of 100 OCC/OEC initially without and subsequently with IHC. The prevalence of MMRd was evaluated using the testing cohort and an expansion set of 844 ovarian carcinomas. The 2 prototypical combinations (OCCC: Napsin A+/HNF1B diffusely+/PR-; OEC: Napsin A-/HNF1B nondiffuse/PR+) occurred in 75% of cases and were 100% specific. A second-line panel (ELAPOR1, AMACR, CDX2) predicted the remaining cases with 83% accuracy. Integration of IHC improved interobserver reproducibility (κ=0.778 vs. 0.882, P<0.0001). The prevalence of MMRd was highest in OEC (11.5%, 44/383), lower in OCCC (1.7%, 5/297), and high-grade serous carcinomas (0.7%, 5/699), and absent in mucinous (0/126) and low-grade serous carcinomas (0/50). All 5 MMRd OCCC were probable Lynch syndrome cases with prototypical IHC profile but ambiguous morphologic features: 3/5 with microcystic architecture and 2/5 with intratumoral stromal inflammation. Integration of first-line and second-line IHC panels increases diagnostic precision and enhances prognostication and triaging for predisposing/predictive molecular biomarker testing. Our data support universal Lynch syndrome screening in all patients with OEC when the diagnosis of other histotypes has been vigorously excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Linda S Cook
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Preventative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency
| | - Anthony N Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | | | - Sandra Lee
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sun M, Chen Y, Liu X, Cui Y. LncRNACASC9 promotes proliferation, metastasis, and cell cycle inovarian carcinoma cells through cyclinG1/TP53/MMP7 signaling. Bioengineered 2021; 12:8006-8019. [PMID: 34595994 PMCID: PMC8806755 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1981795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) brings about serious physical and psychological burden for female patients. LncRNA CASC9 has been reported to be intimately linked with the occurrence and development of several tumors. However, the biological role of lncRNA CASC9 in OC still lacks sufficient evidence. The expressions of CASC9 and miR-488-3p in OC cell lines and xenograft mice were detected by qRT-PCR assay. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was used to assess cell inhibition rate and cell proliferation in OVCAR-3 and OVCAR-3/DDP cells. Wound healing assay and transwell assay were performed to evaluate the capacity of migration and invasion, respectively. In addition, cell apoptosis was measured by TUNEL assay and cell cycle was assessed by flow cytometric analysis. Moreover, western blotting was carried out to detect the cyclinG1 (CCNG1)/TP53/MMP7 signaling and apoptosis-related proteins. Furthermore, luciferase reporter assay was performed to verify the combination of CASC9 with CCNG1 and miR-488-3p. The results of our study revealed that CASC9 expression was upregulated while miR-488-3p and CCNG1 expression was downregulated in OC cells with significant higher TP53 and MMP7 protein levels compared with normal ovarian surface epithelial cells. Additionally, luciferase reporter assay confirmed CASC9 bond to miR-488-3p/CCNG1. CASC9 silencing inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion whereas promoted cell inhibition rate and apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. However, CASC9 overexpression showed the opposite effects. In summary, LncRNA CASC9 played a regulative role in ovarian carcinoma by cyclinG1/TP53/MMP7 signaling via binding to miR-488-3p in vivo and in vitro.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Sun
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an P.R.China
| | - Yanan Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing P.R.China
| | - Xiaobei Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing P.R.China
| | - Yajie Cui
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an P.R.China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pitzer LM, Moroney MR, Nokoff NJ, Sikora MJ. WNT4 Balances Development vs Disease in Gynecologic Tissues and Women's Health. Endocrinology 2021; 162:6272210. [PMID: 33963381 PMCID: PMC8197283 DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqab093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The WNT family of proteins is crucial in numerous developmental pathways and tissue homeostasis. WNT4, in particular, is uniquely implicated in the development of the female phenotype in the fetus, and in the maintenance of müllerian and reproductive tissues. WNT4 dysfunction or dysregulation can drive sex-reversal syndromes, highlighting the key role of WNT4 in sex determination. WNT4 is also critical in gynecologic pathologies later in life, including several cancers, uterine fibroids, endometriosis, and infertility. The role of WNT4 in normal decidualization, implantation, and gestation is being increasingly appreciated, while aberrant activation of WNT4 signaling is being linked both to gynecologic and breast cancers. Notably, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the WNT4 gene locus are strongly associated with these pathologies and may functionally link estrogen and estrogen receptor signaling to upregulation and activation of WNT4 signaling. Importantly, in each of these developmental and disease states, WNT4 gene expression and downstream WNT4 signaling are regulated and executed by myriad tissue-specific pathways. Here, we review the roles of WNT4 in women's health with a focus on sex development, and gynecologic and breast pathologies, and our understanding of how WNT4 signaling is controlled in these contexts. Defining WNT4 functions provides a unique opportunity to link sex-specific signaling pathways to women's health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M Pitzer
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA
| | - Marisa R Moroney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA
| | - Natalie J Nokoff
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Endocrinology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA
| | - Matthew J Sikora
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA
- Correspondence: Matthew J. Sikora, PhD; Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop 8104, Research Complex 1 South, Rm 5117, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. . Twitter: @mjsikora
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gavrielides MA, Ronnett BM, Vang R, Barak S, Lee E, Staats PN, Jenson E, Skaria P, Sheikhzadeh F, Miller M, Hagemann IS, Petrick N, Seidman JD. Pathologist Concordance for Ovarian Carcinoma Subtype Classification and Identification of Relevant Histologic Features Using Microscope and Whole Slide Imaging: A Multisite Observer Study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 145:1516-1525. [PMID: 33635941 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0579-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Despite several studies focusing on the validation of whole slide imaging (WSI) across organ systems or subspecialties, the use of WSI for specific primary diagnosis tasks has been underexamined. OBJECTIVE.— To assess pathologist performance for the histologic subtyping of individual sections of ovarian carcinomas using the light microscope and WSI. DESIGN.— A panel of 3 experienced gynecologic pathologists provided reference subtype diagnoses for 212 histologic sections from 109 ovarian carcinomas based on optical microscopy review. Two additional attending pathologists provided diagnoses and also identified the presence of a set of 8 histologic features important for ovarian tumor subtyping. Two experienced gynecologic pathologists and 2 fellows reviewed the corresponding WSI images for subtype classification and feature identification. RESULTS.— Across pathologists specialized in gynecologic pathology, concordance with the reference diagnosis for the 5 major ovarian carcinoma subtypes was significantly higher for a pathologist reading on microscope than each of 2 pathologists reading on WSI. Differences were primarily due to more frequent classification of mucinous carcinomas as endometrioid with WSI. Pathologists had generally low agreement in identifying histologic features important to ovarian tumor subtype classification, with either optical microscopy or WSI. This result suggests the need for refined histologic criteria for identifying such features. Interobserver agreement was particularly low for identifying intracytoplasmic mucin with WSI. Inconsistencies in evaluating nuclear atypia and mitoses with WSI were also observed. CONCLUSIONS.— Further research is needed to specify the reasons for these diagnostic challenges and to inform users and manufacturers of WSI technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marios A Gavrielides
- From the Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (Gavrielides and Petrick)
| | - Brigitte M Ronnett
- the Departments of Pathology and Gynecology & Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Ronnett, Vang, Jenson)
| | - Russell Vang
- the Departments of Pathology and Gynecology & Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Ronnett, Vang, Jenson)
| | - Stephanie Barak
- the Department of Pathology, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia (Barak, Lee)
| | - Elsie Lee
- Gavrielides is currently at AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland.,the Department of Pathology, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia (Barak, Lee)
| | - Paul N Staats
- the Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore (Staats)
| | - Erik Jenson
- Lee is currently at HNL Lab Medicine, Allentown, Pennsylvania.,the Departments of Pathology and Gynecology & Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland (Ronnett, Vang, Jenson)
| | - Priya Skaria
- the Departments of Pathology and Immunology (Skaria and Hagemann), Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Fahime Sheikhzadeh
- Jenson is now with Hospital Pathology Associates, Minneapolis/St Paul, Minnesota.,the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (Sheikhzadeh)
| | - Meghan Miller
- and the Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park (Miller)
| | - Ian S Hagemann
- the Departments of Pathology and Immunology (Skaria and Hagemann), Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.,and Obstetrics and Gynecology (Hagemann), Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Nicholas Petrick
- From the Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (Gavrielides and Petrick)
| | - Jeffrey D Seidman
- and the Division of Molecular Genetics and Pathology, Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health (Seidman), Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ceppi L, Grassi T, Galli F, Buda A, Aletti G, Lissoni AA, Adorni M, Garbi A, Colombo N, Bonazzi C, Landoni F, Fruscio R. Early-stage clear cell ovarian cancer compared to high-grade histological subtypes: An outcome exploratory analysis in two oncology centers. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 160:64-70. [PMID: 33077259 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE advanced stage clear cell ovarian cancer (CCOC) carries a higher risk of relapse and death compared to other histological subtypes. The prognosis of early-stage CCOC is controversial. METHODS Early-stage high-grade OC patients from two Italian oncologic centers were included. Patients with early-stage CCOC were compared with those with high-grade endometrioid (HGE) and serous (HGS) OC in terms of relapse-free interval (RFI), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and post relapse cancer-specific survival (prCSS). The Cox proportional hazard model and the restricted mean survival time were used. RESULTS Between 1981 and 2012, 134 patients with CC, 152 with HGE and 160 with HGS were treated at two referral centers. Median follow-up was 11.5 years. Ten years RFI rates were 80.6%, 72.1%, 60.6%, and CSS rates were 84.3%, 82.6%, 81.7% respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved RFI (aHR 0.61, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.91, P = 0.015). In the multivariable analysis HGS histotype was associated with a shorter RFI compared to CC, (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.81; 95%CI: 1.12-2.93; P = 0.016), whereas CSS was not statistically different. prCSS was longer in HGS compared to CCOC (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.74; P = 0.006). According to the stage, IA/IB/IC1 HGSOC had a shorter RFI (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.14-3.99; P = 0.018) compared to IA/IB/IC1 CCOC, but similar CSS. For prCSS, CC compared to HGS conferred a worse prognosis regardless of the initial stage. CONCLUSIONS Early-stage CCOC is associated with a longer RFI, similar CSS and a shorter prCSS compared to HGSOC. No prognostic differences were observed between CC and HGE OC. The relapse risk was the lowest in IA/IB/IC1 CC compared to HGS, whereas CC displayed poor sensitivity to chemotherapy after relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Ceppi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy.
| | - Tommaso Grassi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Francesca Galli
- Laboratory of Methodology for Clinical Research, Department of Oncology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Negri 2, 20156 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Giovanni Aletti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; University of Milan, Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Alberto Lissoni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Marco Adorni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Annalisa Garbi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Bonazzi
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Talhouk A, George J, Wang C, Budden T, Tan TZ, Chiu DS, Kommoss S, Leong HS, Chen S, Intermaggio MP, Gilks B, Nazeran TM, Volchek M, Elatre W, Bentley RC, Senz J, Lum A, Chow V, Sudderuddin H, Mackenzie R, Leong SCY, Liu G, Johnson D, Chen B, Group A, Alsop J, Banerjee SN, Behrens S, Bodelon C, Brand AH, Brinton L, Carney ME, Chiew YE, Cushing-Haugen KL, Cybulski C, Ennis D, Fereday S, Fortner RT, García-Donas J, Gentry-Maharaj A, Glasspool R, Goranova T, Greene CS, Haluska P, Harris HR, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Herpel E, Jimenez-Linan M, Karpinskyj C, Kaufmann SH, Keeney GL, Kennedy CJ, Köbel M, Koziak JM, Larson MC, Lester J, Lewsley LA, Lissowska J, Lubiński J, Luk H, Macintyre G, Mahner S, McNeish IA, Menkiszak J, Nevins N, Osorio A, Oszurek O, Palacios J, Hinsley S, Pearce CL, Pike MC, Piskorz AM, Ray-Coquard I, Rhenius V, Rodriguez-Antona C, Sharma R, Sherman ME, De Silva D, Singh N, Sinn P, Slamon D, Song H, Steed H, Stronach EA, Thompson PJ, Tołoczko A, Trabert B, Traficante N, Tseng CC, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Winterhoff B, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Benitez J, Berchuck A, Brenton JD, Brown R, Chang-Claude J, Chenevix-Trench G, deFazio A, Fasching PA, García MJ, Gayther SA, Goodman MT, Gronwald J, Henderson MJ, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Menon U, Orsulic S, Pharoah PDP, Wentzensen N, Wu AH, Schildkraut JM, Rossing MA, Konecny GE, Huntsman DG, Huang RYJ, Goode EL, Ramus SJ, Doherty JA, Bowtell DD, Anglesio MS. Development and Validation of the Gene Expression Predictor of High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Molecular SubTYPE (PrOTYPE). Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:5411-5423. [PMID: 32554541 PMCID: PMC7572656 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gene expression-based molecular subtypes of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSOC), demonstrated across multiple studies, may provide improved stratification for molecularly targeted trials. However, evaluation of clinical utility has been hindered by nonstandardized methods, which are not applicable in a clinical setting. We sought to generate a clinical grade minimal gene set assay for classification of individual tumor specimens into HGSOC subtypes and confirm previously reported subtype-associated features. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Adopting two independent approaches, we derived and internally validated algorithms for subtype prediction using published gene expression data from 1,650 tumors. We applied resulting models to NanoString data on 3,829 HGSOCs from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We further developed, confirmed, and validated a reduced, minimal gene set predictor, with methods suitable for a single-patient setting. RESULTS Gene expression data were used to derive the predictor of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma molecular subtype (PrOTYPE) assay. We established a de facto standard as a consensus of two parallel approaches. PrOTYPE subtypes are significantly associated with age, stage, residual disease, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and outcome. The locked-down clinical grade PrOTYPE test includes a model with 55 genes that predicted gene expression subtype with >95% accuracy that was maintained in all analytic and biological validations. CONCLUSIONS We validated the PrOTYPE assay following the Institute of Medicine guidelines for the development of omics-based tests. This fully defined and locked-down clinical grade assay will enable trial design with molecular subtype stratification and allow for objective assessment of the predictive value of HGSOC molecular subtypes in precision medicine applications.See related commentary by McMullen et al., p. 5271.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Talhouk
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joshy George
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Chen Wang
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Science Research, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Timothy Budden
- University of NSW Sydney, School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Manchester, CRUK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Tuan Zea Tan
- National University of Singapore, Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, Center for Translational Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Derek S Chiu
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Tuebingen University Hospital, Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Huei San Leong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephanie Chen
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Center for Cancer Prevention and Translational Genomics, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, California
| | - Maria P Intermaggio
- University of NSW Sydney, School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Blake Gilks
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tayyebeh M Nazeran
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mila Volchek
- Royal Women's Hospital, Anatomical Pathology, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wafaa Elatre
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Rex C Bentley
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Janine Senz
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amy Lum
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Veronica Chow
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hanwei Sudderuddin
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robertson Mackenzie
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Samuel C Y Leong
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Geyi Liu
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dustin Johnson
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Billy Chen
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Aocs Group
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Susana N Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Gynaecology Unit, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sabine Behrens
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clara Bodelon
- NCI, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Alison H Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise Brinton
- NCI, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Michael E Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Yoke-Eng Chiew
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kara L Cushing-Haugen
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Darren Ennis
- Imperial College London, Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Renée T Fortner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jesús García-Donas
- HM Hospitales Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (HM CIOCC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rosalind Glasspool
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Teodora Goranova
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Casey S Greene
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Paul Haluska
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Holly R Harris
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brenda Y Hernandez
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Cancer Epidemiology Program, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Esther Herpel
- Institute of Pathology and NCT Tissue Bank, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Chloe Karpinskyj
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Scott H Kaufmann
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Gary L Keeney
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Melissa C Larson
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Science Research, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, California
| | - Liz-Anne Lewsley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jolanta Lissowska
- M Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Hugh Luk
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Cancer Epidemiology Program, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Geoff Macintyre
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Iain A McNeish
- Imperial College London, Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Janusz Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Nikilyn Nevins
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital and Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ana Osorio
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Madrid, Spain
| | - Oleg Oszurek
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - José Palacios
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Pathology Department. IRYCIS. CIBERONC. Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | - Samantha Hinsley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Malcolm C Pike
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anna M Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Valerie Rhenius
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Cristina Rodriguez-Antona
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Pathology West ICPMR Westmead, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Western Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark E Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Dilrini De Silva
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dennis Slamon
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Honglin Song
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Euan A Stronach
- Imperial College London, Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pamela J Thompson
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Los Angeles, California
| | - Aleksandra Tołoczko
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Britton Trabert
- NCI, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chiu-Chen Tseng
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lynne R Wilkens
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Cancer Epidemiology Program, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Science Research, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Boris Winterhoff
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Javier Benitez
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Brown
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anna deFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - María J García
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Los Angeles, California
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Michelle J Henderson
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, California
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Usha Menon
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, California
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Gottfried E Konecny
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - David G Huntsman
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ruby Yun-Ju Huang
- National University of Singapore, Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, Center for Translational Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
- National Taiwan University, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Susan J Ramus
- University of NSW Sydney, School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| | - David D Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program (OVCARE), BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hufnagel DH, Wilson AJ, Saxon J, Blackwell TS, Watkins J, Khabele D, Crispens MA, Yull FE, Beeghly-Fadiel A. Expression of p52, a non-canonical NF-kappaB transcription factor, is associated with poor ovarian cancer prognosis. Biomark Res 2020; 8:45. [PMID: 32974032 PMCID: PMC7493985 DOI: 10.1186/s40364-020-00227-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The canonical and non-canonical nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB) signaling pathways have key roles in cancer, but studies have previously evaluated only the association of canonical transcription factors and ovarian cancer survival. Although a number of in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated mechanisms by which non-canonical NF-κB signaling potentially contributes to ovarian cancer progression, a prognostic association has yet to be shown in the clinical context. METHODS We assayed p65 and p52 (major components of the canonical and non-canonical NF-κB pathways) by immunohistochemistry in epithelial ovarian tumor samples; nuclear and cytoplasmic staining were semi-quantified by H-scores and dichotomized at median values. Associations of p65 and p52 with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were quantified by Hazard Ratios (HR) from proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS Among 196 cases, median p52 and p65 H-scores were higher in high-grade serous cancers. Multivariable regression models indicated that higher p52 was associated with higher hazards of disease progression (cytoplasmic HR: 1.54; nuclear HR: 1.67) and death (cytoplasmic HR: 1.53; nuclear HR: 1.49), while higher nuclear p65 was associated with only a higher hazard of disease progression (HR: 1.40) in unadjusted models. When cytoplasmic and nuclear staining were combined, p52 remained significantly associated with increased hazards of disease progression (HR: 1.91, p = 0.004) and death (HR: 1.70, p = 0.021), even after adjustment for p65 and in analyses among only high-grade serous tumors. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to demonstrate that p52, a major component of non-canonical NF-κB signaling, may be an independent prognostic factor for epithelial ovarian cancer, particularly high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Approaches to inhibit non-canonical NF-κB signaling should be explored as novel ovarian cancer therapies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew J. Wilson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
| | - Jamie Saxon
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
| | - Timothy S. Blackwell
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
| | - Jaclyn Watkins
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
| | - Dineo Khabele
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA
| | - Marta A. Crispens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
| | - Fiona E. Yull
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
| | - Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Levine AB, Peng J, Farnell D, Nursey M, Wang Y, Naso JR, Ren H, Farahani H, Chen C, Chiu D, Talhouk A, Sheffield B, Riazy M, Ip PP, Parra-Herran C, Mills A, Singh N, Tessier-Cloutier B, Salisbury T, Lee J, Salcudean T, Jones SJ, Huntsman DG, Gilks CB, Yip S, Bashashati A. Synthesis of diagnostic quality cancer pathology images by generative adversarial networks. J Pathol 2020; 252:178-188. [PMID: 32686118 DOI: 10.1002/path.5509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Deep learning-based computer vision methods have recently made remarkable breakthroughs in the analysis and classification of cancer pathology images. However, there has been relatively little investigation of the utility of deep neural networks to synthesize medical images. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of generative adversarial networks to synthesize high-resolution pathology images of 10 histological types of cancer, including five cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the five major histological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. The quality of these images was assessed using a comprehensive survey of board-certified pathologists (n = 9) and pathology trainees (n = 6). Our results show that the real and synthetic images are classified by histotype with comparable accuracies and the synthetic images are visually indistinguishable from real images. Furthermore, we trained deep convolutional neural networks to diagnose the different cancer types and determined that the synthetic images perform as well as additional real images when used to supplement a small training set. These findings have important applications in proficiency testing of medical practitioners and quality assurance in clinical laboratories. Furthermore, training of computer-aided diagnostic systems can benefit from synthetic images where labeled datasets are limited (e.g. rare cancers). We have created a publicly available website where clinicians and researchers can attempt questions from the image survey (http://gan.aimlab.ca/). © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian B Levine
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jason Peng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - David Farnell
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Mitchell Nursey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Yiping Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Julia R Naso
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Hezhen Ren
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Hossein Farahani
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Colin Chen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Derek Chiu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Brandon Sheffield
- Department of Pathology, William Osler Health Centre-Brampton Civic Hospital, Brampton, Canada
| | - Maziar Riazy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Philip P Ip
- Department of Pathology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, PR China
| | - Carlos Parra-Herran
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anne Mills
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Naveena Singh
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Basile Tessier-Cloutier
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Taylor Salisbury
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jonathan Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Tim Salcudean
- Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Steven Jm Jones
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, Vancouver, Canada
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Stephen Yip
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Ali Bashashati
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moterani VC, Tiezzi DG, de Andrade JM, Candido Dos Reis FJ. Analysis of the relationship between hospital characteristics and survival in ovarian cancer: A historical cohort. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:1802-1807. [PMID: 32851684 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The management of ovarian cancer requires complex surgical and medical interventions. Specialized care is associated with superior outcomes in early and advanced stages. This study aimed to estimate the effect of hospital characteristics on the overall survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS We established a cohort with data recorded by the Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo cancer registry. We included 6111 women treated for ovarian cancer in the state of Sao Paulo from January 2000 to December 2018. From 76 hospitals analyzed, 7 were high volume (20 or more cases a year) and 69 low volume. Twenty-nine were teaching and 47 community hospitals. A 10-year survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meyer estimator and the Cox model. RESULTS Fifty-two percent of the epithelial ovarian cancer patients were treated in high-volume hospitals. High-volume - (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.8-0.92; P < .001) and teaching - (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99; P = .019) were hospital characteristics associated with low risk of death in 10 years. CONCLUSIONS High-volume and teaching hospitals are associated with better overall survival in ovarian cancer. Our data suggest that both hospital characteristics are important indicators of good quality of care in ovarian cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinicius Cesar Moterani
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Daniel Guimarães Tiezzi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Jurandyr Moreira de Andrade
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xu J, Chen K, Zhao F, Huang D, Zhang H, Fu Z, Xu J, Wu Y, Lin H, Zhou Y, Lu W, Wu Y, Xia D. Association between vitamin D/calcium intake and 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of ovarian cancer: a dose-response relationship meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2020; 75:417-429. [PMID: 32814859 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-020-00724-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between vitamin D/calcium and risk of ovarian cancer is still a debatable point. The aim of our study was to systematically investigate the association between vitamin D/calcium, and the risk of ovarian cancer and estimate their dose-response association quantitatively. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant observational studies. Two investigators screened citations and extracted data independently. Data were extracted and the association between vitamin D/calcium and ovarian cancer risk was estimated by calculating pooled relative risks (RRs). Subgroup analyses, publication bias estimation, and dose-response analyses were carried out as well. RESULTS In total, 21 articles involving 980,008 participants were included in our present study. No significant association was observed between total vitamin D intake and ovarian cancer risk (RR: 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89-1.16, p = 0.81). Further subgroup analysis suggested that neither dietary vitamin D intake (RR: 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62-1.03, p = 0.09) nor supplementary vitamin D intake (RR: 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85-1.13, p = 0.80) was associated with the risk of ovarian cancer. As for calcium, total calcium intake was found to be statistically inversely associated with ovarian cancer risk in case-control studies (RR: 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86, p < 0.001) but not in cohort studies (RR: 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90-1.24, p = 0.52). Besides, supplementation with calcium plus vitamin D was not effective for the prevention of ovarian cancer (p = 0.98). Of note, dose-response analysis based on cohort studies suggested a potential inverse U-shape relationship between calcium intake (including total calcium and dietary calcium) and ovarian cancer risk, which indicated that low dose of calcium intake might reduce ovarian cancer risk while high dose of calcium intake might not. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, vitamin D could not decrease the risk of ovarian cancer. The role of calcium intake was not proven for reducing ovarian cancer risk. Besides, no evidence showed combinative use of calcium and vitamin D have additional benefits for ovarian cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiawei Xu
- Department of Toxicology of School of Public Health, and Department of Gynecologic Oncology of Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, China
| | - Kelie Chen
- Department of Toxicology of School of Public Health, and Department of Gynecologic Oncology of Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, China
| | - Fan Zhao
- Department of Toxicology, Zhejiang University School of Public Health, Hangzhou, 310058, China
| | - Dongdong Huang
- Department of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Disease Proteomics of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China
| | - Honghe Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Disease Proteomics of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China
| | - Zhiqin Fu
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
| | - Jinming Xu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yongfeng Wu
- Department of Toxicology, Zhejiang University School of Public Health, Hangzhou, 310058, China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Hui Lin
- Department of Toxicology of School of Public Health, and Department of Gynecologic Oncology of Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, China
| | - Yexinyi Zhou
- Department of Toxicology, Zhejiang University School of Public Health, Hangzhou, 310058, China
| | - Weiguo Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China
| | - Yihua Wu
- Department of Toxicology of School of Public Health, and Department of Gynecologic Oncology of Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
| | - Dajing Xia
- Department of Toxicology of School of Public Health, and Department of Gynecologic Oncology of Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The Frequency and Prognostic Significance of the Histologic Type in Early-stage Ovarian Carcinoma: A Reclassification Study by the Spanish Group for Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO). Am J Surg Pathol 2020; 44:149-161. [PMID: 31498173 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The frequency and prognostic significance of the histologic type in early-stage ovarian cancer (OC) is not as well established as in advanced stages. In addition, histologic typing based only on morphologic features may be difficult, especially in high-grade tumors. In this study, we have analyzed a prospective cohort of 502 early-stage OCs to investigate their frequency, immunohistochemical characteristics, and survival of the 5 main histologic types. Histotype was assigned according to not only the morphologic features but also according to the expression pattern of WT1, p53, Napsin A, and progesterone receptors. In addition, an extended panel including p16, β-catenin, HER2, Arid1A, HINF1B, CK7, CDX2, and CK20 was used to refine the diagnosis in difficult cases. In this series, the frequency of the 5 major histologic types was as follows: endometrioid carcinoma, 32.7%; clear cell carcinoma, 25.1%; high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), 24.7%; mucinous carcinoma, 10.2%; low-grade serous carcinoma, 4.6%; and others, 2.8%. The combination of morphology and immunohistochemistry allowed the reclassification of 23% of OCs. The lowest concordance was found between samples initially diagnosed as endometrioid, but finally classified as high-grade serous tumors (22% error rate). Endometrioid carcinoma was the most favorable histologic type, whereas HGSC and low-grade serous carcinoma had the worst prognosis. Clear cell carcinoma with abnormal p53 immunostaining pattern also had poor prognosis. Although histologic grade was not a prognostic factor among early-stage endometrioid OCs, distinction between grade 3 endometrioid OC and HGSC is recommended, taking into account differences in prognosis and molecular alterations that can guide different treatments.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim SR, Cloutier BT, Leung S, Cochrane D, Britton H, Pina A, Storness-Bliss C, Farnell D, Huang L, Shum K, Lum A, Senz J, Lee CH, Gilks CB, Hoang L, McAlpine JN. Molecular subtypes of clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: Opportunities for prognostic and predictive stratification. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:3-11. [PMID: 32331700 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our aim was to characterize the pathological, molecular and clinical outcomes of clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium (CCC). METHODS CCC underwent ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer) classification identifying four molecular subtypes: i) 'POLEmut' for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations, ii) 'MMRd', if there is loss of mismatch repair proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC), iii) 'p53wt' or iv) 'p53abn' based on p53 IHC staining. Clinicopathologic parameters, immune markers (CD3, CD8, CD79a, CD138, PD-1), ER, L1CAM, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS 52 CCCs were classified, including 1 (2%) POLEmut, 5 (10%) MMRd, 28 (54%) p53wt and 18 (35%) p53abn. Women with p53abn and p53wt CCCs were older than women with MMRd and POLEmut subtypes. p53wt CCC were distinct from typical p53wt endometrioid carcinomas; more likely to arise in older, thinner women, with advanced stage disease, LVSI and lymph node involvement, and a higher proportion ER negative, L1CAM overexpressing tumors with markedly worse outcomes. High levels of immune infiltrates (TILhigh) were observed in 75% of the CCC cohort. L1CAM overexpression was highest within p53abn and p53wt subtypes of CCC. CONCLUSION CCC is a heterogeneous disease encompassing all four molecular subtypes and a wide range of clinical outcomes. Outcomes of patients with POLEmut, MMRd and p53abn CCC are not distinguishable from those of other patients with these respective subtypes of EC; p53wt CCC, however, differ from endometrioid p53wt EC in clinical, pathological, molecular features and outcomes. Thus, p53wt CCC of endometrium appear to be a distinct clinicopathological entity within the larger group of p53wt ECs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soyoun Rachel Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Basile Tessier Cloutier
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samuel Leung
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Annick Pina
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Claudine Storness-Bliss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David Farnell
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Leo Huang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kathryn Shum
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amy Lum
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lien Hoang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Magrill J, Karnezis AN, Tessier-Cloutier B, Talhouk A, Kommoss S, Cochrane D, Chow C, Cheng A, Soslow R, Hauptmann S, du Bois A, Pfisterer J, Gilks CB, Huntsman DG, Kommoss F. Tubo-Ovarian Transitional Cell Carcinoma and High-grade Serous Carcinoma Show Subtly Different Immunohistochemistry Profiles. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2020; 38:552-561. [PMID: 30059451 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Tubo-ovarian transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) is grouped with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) in the current World Health Organization classification. TCC is associated with BRCA mutations and a better prognosis compared with HGSC. Previous papers examining the immunohistochemical features of TCC have studied limited numbers of samples. No marker reflecting the biological difference between TCC and HGSC is known. We collected a large cohort of TCC to determine whether TCC and HGSC could be distinguished by immunohistochemistry. A tissue microarray was built from 89 TCC and a control cohort of 232 conventional HGSC. Immunohistochemistry was performed, scored, and statistically analyzed for routine markers of HGSC and urothelial tumors: PAX8, WT1, p53, p16, ER, p63, and GATA3. Using scoring cutoffs commonly employed in clinical practice, the immunohistochemical profile of TCC was indistinguishable from HGSC for all markers. However, more detailed scoring criteria revealed statistically significant differences between the 2 groups of tumors with respect to ER, PAX8, and WT1. HGSC showed more diffuse and intense staining for PAX8 (P=0.004 and 0.001, respectively) and WT1 (P=0.002 and 0.002, respectively); conversely, TCC showed more intense staining for ER (P=0.007). TCC and HGSC therefore show subtle differences in their immunohistochemical profiles which might reflect underlying (epi)genetic differences. Further studies using proteomic analysis will focus on the identification of differentially expressed proteins that might serve as markers of TCC-like differentiation, which could help explain biologic differences between TCC and HGSC and might identify other cases of HGSC with a better prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Magrill
- British Columbia Cancer Agency (J.M., A.N.K., A.T., D.C., D.G.H.) Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia (A.N.K., B.T.-C., C.C., A.C., C.B.G., D.G.H.), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (R.S.) Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands (S.H.) Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen (S.K.) Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.D.B.) Gynecologic Oncology Center, Kiel (J.P.) Institute of Pathology, Friedrichshafen (F.K.), Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
DICER1 and FOXL2 Mutation Status Correlates With Clinicopathologic Features in Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2020; 43:628-638. [PMID: 30986800 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (SLCTs) are rare ovarian sex cord-stromal neoplasms. The only known recurrent genetic abnormality is DICER1 mutation, with rare mutations reported in FOXL2. We set out to establish a molecular classifier using DICER1 and FOXL2 somatic mutation status and clinicopathologic features in 42 SLCTs. Five tumors (12%) were well differentiated, 31 (74%) moderately differentiated, and 6 (14%) poorly differentiated. Eight (19%) had heterologous elements, and 2 (5%) showed retiform differentiation; all 10 were moderately differentiated. DICER1 RNase IIIb domain mutations were identified in 18/41 (44%; 17 moderately, 1 poorly differentiated), including all cases with retiform or heterologous elements. FOXL2 c.402C>G (p.C134W) mutation was identified in 8/42 (19%) tumors (5 moderately, 3 poorly differentiated). DICER1 and FOXL2 mutations were mutually exclusive. Median age for the cohort was 47 years (range, 15 to 90 y). Patients with DICER1 mutations were younger (median, 24.5 y; range, 15 to 62 y) than patients with FOXL2 mutation (median, 79.5 y; range, 51 to 90 y) (P<0.0001). Nine of 10 tumors with retiform or heterologous elements occurred in premenopausal patients (median, 26.5 y; range, 15 to 57 y). Patients with tumors that were wild type for DICER1 and FOXL2 (15/42, 37%) had an intermediate age (median, 51 y; range, 17 to 74 y). All tumors were FOXL2 positive by immunohistochemistry. Patients with FOXL2 mutation trended toward presenting more often with abnormal bleeding (P=0.13); DICER1-mutant patients trended toward having more androgenic symptoms (P=0.22). Our data suggest at least 3 molecular subtypes of SLCT with distinct clinicopathologic features: DICER1 mutant (younger, more androgenic symptoms, moderately/poorly differentiated, retiform or heterologous elements), FOXL2 mutant (postmenopausal, abnormal bleeding, moderately/poorly differentiated, no retiform or heterologous elements), and DICER1/FOXL2 wild type (intermediate age, no retiform or heterologous elements, including all well-differentiated tumors).
Collapse
|
19
|
Casey L, Singh N. Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: Assessing Pathology for Site of Origin, Staging and Post-neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Changes. Surg Pathol Clin 2019; 12:515-528. [PMID: 31097113 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
High-grade serous (HGSC) stands apart from the other ovarian cancer histotypes in being the most frequent, in occurring as part of a genetic predisposition in a significant proportion of cases, and in having the poorest clinical outcomes. Although the pathologic diagnosis of HGSC is now made with high accuracy, there remain areas of disagreement regarding viewpoints on tissue site of origin and designation of primary site, with impact on staging in low-stage cases, as well as difficulties in reproducible and clinically relevant reporting of HGSC in specimens taken after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These areas are discussed in the current article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Casey
- Department of Pathology, Queen's Hospital, Rom Valley Way, Romford RM7 0AG, UK
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, 2nd Floor, 80 Newark Street, London E1 2ES, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ovarian Carcinoma Histotype: Strengths and Limitations of Integrating Morphology With Immunohistochemical Predictions. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019; 38:353-362. [PMID: 29901523 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian carcinoma histotypes are critical for research and patient management and currently assigned by a combination of histomorphology +/- ancillary immunohistochemistry (IHC). We aimed to validate the previously described IHC algorithm (Calculator of Ovarian carcinoma Subtype/histotype Probability version 3, COSPv3) in an independent population-based cohort, and to identify problem areas for IHC predictions. Histotype was abstracted from cancer registries for eligible ovarian carcinoma cases diagnosed from 2002 to 2011 in Alberta and British Columbia, Canada. Slides were reviewed according to World Health Organization 2014 criteria, tissue microarrays were stained with and scored for the 8 COSPv3 IHC markers, and COSPv3 histotype predictions were calculated. Discordant cases for review and COSPv3 prediction were arbitrated by integrating morphology with IHC results. The integrated histotype (N=880) was then used to identify areas of inferior COSPv3 performance. Review histotype and integrated histotype demonstrated 93% agreement suggesting that IHC information revises expert review in up to 7% of cases. There was also 93% agreement between COSPv3 prediction and integrated histotype. COSPv3 errors predominated in 4 areas: endometrioid carcinoma (EC) versus clear cell (N=23), EC versus low-grade serous (N=15), EC versus high-grade serous (N=11), and high-grade versus low-grade serous (N=6). Most problems were related to Napsin A-negative clear cell, WT1-positive EC, and p53 IHC wild-type high-grade serous carcinomas. Although 93% of COSPv3 prediction accuracy was validated, some histotyping required integration of morphology with ancillary test results. Awareness of these limitations will avoid overreliance on IHC and misclassification of histotypes for research and clinical management.
Collapse
|
21
|
Gore M, Hackshaw A, Brady WE, Penson RT, Zaino R, McCluggage WG, Ganesan R, Wilkinson N, Perren T, Montes A, Summers J, Lord R, Dark G, Rustin G, Mackean M, Reed N, Kehoe S, Frumovitz M, Christensen H, Feeney A, Ledermann J, Gershenson DM. An international, phase III randomized trial in patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC/GOG 0241) with long-term follow-up: and experience of conducting a clinical trial in a rare gynecological tumor. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:541-548. [PMID: 31005287 PMCID: PMC6559214 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluated four different treatment regimens for advanced-stage mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS We conducted a multicenter randomized factorial trial (UK and US). Patients were diagnosed with primary mEOC: FIGO stage II-IV or recurrence after stage I disease. Treatment arms were paclitaxel-carboplatin, oxaliplatin-capecitabine, paclitaxel-carboplatin-bevacizumab, or oxaliplatin-capecitabine-bevacizumab. Chemotherapy was given 3-weekly for 6 cycles, and bevacizumab (3-weekly) was continued as maintenance (for 12 cycles). Endpoints included overall-survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS The trial stopped after 50 patients were recruited due to slow accrual. Median follow-up was 59 months. OS hazard ratios (HR) for the two main comparisons were: 0.78 (p = 0.48) for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo (each with/without bevacizumab), and 1.04 (p = 0.92) for bevacizumab vs. no bevacizumab. Corresponding PFS HRs were: 0.84 and 0.80. Retrospective central pathology review revealed only 45% (18/40) cases with available material had confirmed primary mEOC. Among these, OS HR for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo was 0.36 (p = 0.14); PFS HR = 0.62 (p = 0.40). Grade 3-4 toxicity was seen in 61% Pac-Carbo, 61% Oxal-Cape, 54% Pac-Carbo-Bev, and 85% Oxal-Cape-Bev. QoL was similar between the four arms. CONCLUSION mEOC/GOG0241 represents an example of a randomized rare tumor trial. Logistical challenges led to early termination, including difficulties in local histopathological diagnosis and accessing drugs outside their labelled indication. There was misalignment between central funders who support clinical trials in rare cancers and the deprioritisation of such work by those managing and funding research at a local level. Rare cancer trials should include centralised pathology review before treatment. Clinical trial registry number: ISRCTN83438782.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Bevacizumab/administration & dosage
- Capecitabine/administration & dosage
- Carboplatin/administration & dosage
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/secondary
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Internationality
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/drug therapy
- Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/secondary
- Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Oxaliplatin/administration & dosage
- Paclitaxel/administration & dosage
- Progression-Free Survival
- Quality of Life
- Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
- Survival Rate
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Gore
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
| | | | | | - Richard Zaino
- Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Centre, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Nafisa Wilkinson
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Ana Montes
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeffrey Summers
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK
| | - Rosemary Lord
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Graham Dark
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sean Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Amanda Feeney
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lan A, Yang G. Clinicopathological parameters and survival of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer by histotype and disease stage. Future Oncol 2019; 15:2029-2039. [PMID: 31140868 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To investigate clinicopathological parameters and histotype-specific survival of epithelial ovarian cancer by stage using the 2014 WHO classification. Patients & methods: Patients were obtained from the SEER database. Multivariate and univariate Cox regression analyses were applied to assess survival outcomes. Results: Irrespective of stages, low-grade serous and endometrioid had the best survival rates. In localized and regional stages, the poorest survival rates were detected for carcinosarcoma and malignant Brenner tumors, but in distant stage, the worst prognoses were observed in mucinous, clear cell and carcinosarcoma (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusion: Our study displayed significant differences in clinicopathological parameters and histotype-specific survival by stages that reflected current consensus on histotype classification and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aihua Lan
- Central Laboratory, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, PR China
| | - Gong Yang
- Central Laboratory, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, PR China
- Cancer Institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Downregulation of miR-4443 and miR-5195-3p in ovarian cancer tissue contributes to metastasis and tumorigenesis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 299:1453-1458. [PMID: 30810880 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05107-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most fatal malignancies in women. High mortality rate may be due to problems with diagnosis in the early stages. The use of new biomarkers for faster diagnosis and selection of more efficient therapies is one of the main concerns in this area. miRNAs are non-coding and conserved molecules that are involved in regulating gene expression throughout different cell processes. Few studies have been conducted on the effects of miR-4443 and miR-5195-3p in cancer. Therefore, to determine the role of these miRNAs in OC, this study was directed to investigate the expression rate in OC tissue samples and its relationship with clinical factors. METHODS Expression levels of miR-4443 and miR-5195 were evaluated in 45 ovarian tumor and 45 ovarian non-tumor tissue samples paraffin embedded using qPCR. Expression was investigated by miRNA-specific primers and then statistical analysis was performed to determine the significance. In the next step, the relationship between clinopathologic factors and miRNA expression was investigated. RESULTS The results showed that miR-4443 decreased in OC in metastatic and serous OC samples (0.154-fold, P < 0.0001). As well as, significant reduction in miR-5195-3p was observed in cancer samples (0.373-fold, P < 0.0001) and its reduction was associated with metastasis. CONCLUSION As a result, the two studied miRNAs may contribute to suppressing tumor, so that decrease in their expression is associated with increased cell proliferation and invasion. Further investigation can help to suggest these miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers or therapeutic targets in OC.
Collapse
|
24
|
Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Le Frère-Belda MA, Leary A. [Biopathology of ovarian carcinomas early and advanced-stages: Article drafted from the French guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 47:155-167. [PMID: 30686728 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Ovarian carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of lesions with specific therapeutic management for each histological subtype. Thus, the correct histological diagnosis is mandatory. MATERIAL AND METHODS References were searched by PubMed from January 2000 to January 2018 and original articles in French and English literature were selected. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS In case of ovarian mass suspicious for cancer, a frozen section analysis may be proposed, if it could impact the surgical management. A positive histological diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma (type and grade) has to be rendered on histological (and not cytological) material before any chemotherapy with multiples and large sized biopsies. In case of needle biopsy, at least three fragments with needles>16G are needed. Histological biopsies need to be formalin-fixed (4% formaldehyde) less than 1h after resection and at least 6hours fixation is mandatory for small size biopsies. Tissue transfer to pathological labs up to 48hours under vacuum and at +4°C (in case of large surgical specimens) may be an alternative. Gross examination should include the description of all specimens and their integrity, the site of the tumor and the dimension of all specimens and nodules. Multiples sampling is needed, including the capsule, the solid areas, at least 1 to 2 blocks per cm of tumor for mucinous lesions, the Fallopian tube in toto, at least 3 blocks on grossly normal omentum and one block on the largest omental nodule. WHO classification should be used to classify the carcinoma (type and grade), with the use of a panel of immunohistochemical markers. High-grade ovarian carcinomas (serous and endometrioid) should be tested for BRCA mutation and in case of a detectable tumor mutation, the patient should be referred to an oncogenetic consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Devouassoux-Shisheboran
- Institut multisite de biopathologie des hôpitaux de Lyon : site Sud, centre de biologie et pathologie Sud, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite cedex, France.
| | - M-A Le Frère-Belda
- Service de pathologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - A Leary
- Inserm U981, service d'oncologie médicale, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Peres LC, Cushing-Haugen KL, Köbel M, Harris HR, Berchuck A, Rossing MA, Schildkraut JM, Doherty JA. Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Survival by Histotype and Disease Stage. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111:60-68. [PMID: 29718305 PMCID: PMC6335112 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 315] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The understanding of ovarian cancer pathogenesis has recently shifted to recognize distinct changes in how ovarian cancer histotypes are defined. Using the 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic guidelines, we classified ovarian cancer histotypes in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry data and examined survival patterns by histotype and disease stage. Methods We extracted data on 28 118 incident epithelial ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in 2004-2014 from SEER and defined histotype using the 2014 WHO guidelines (high-grade serous, low-grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous, carcinosarcoma, and malignant Brenner tumors). By histotype and disease stage, we estimated Kaplan-Meier survival curves and calculated age-adjusted overall and cause-specific survival estimates. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate histotype-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by disease stage while adjusting for age at diagnosis, region, race/ethnicity, and receipt of surgery. Results Within two years after diagnosis, localized/regional-stage carcinosarcoma and distant-stage mucinous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma had a higher risk of mortality compared with high-grade serous, with the most pronounced association for localized/regional carcinosarcoma (>1-2-year time period: HR = 3.81, 95% CI = 2.74 to 5.30) and distant-stage mucinous (0-1-year time period: HR = 3.87, 95% CI = 3.45 to 4.34). In the time period more than four to 10 years after diagnosis, hazard ratios for all histotypes relative to high-grade serous, irrespective of disease stage, were less than 1.00. Cumulatively, both localized/regional and distant-stage low-grade serous and endometrioid carcinomas had the most favorable outcomes. Conclusions Our large study, which is representative of the United States population and incorporates the most current knowledge of ovarian cancer pathogenesis, highlights the need to recognize ovarian cancer as a set of distinct diseases and not a single entity. Only then will we be able to effectively target the unique features of each histotype to reduce ovarian cancer mortality.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/mortality
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/pathology
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/surgery
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/mortality
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/surgery
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Carcinosarcoma/mortality
- Carcinosarcoma/pathology
- Carcinosarcoma/surgery
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/mortality
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/surgery
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Neoplasm Staging
- Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery
- SEER Program
- Survival Rate
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C Peres
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Kara L Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Arora N, Talhouk A, McAlpine JN, Law MR, Hanley GE. Causes of death among women with epithelial ovarian cancer by length of survival post-diagnosis: a population-based study in British Columbia, Canada. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 29:593-598. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesLittle is known regarding the health of women who survive more than 5 years following their ovarian cancer diagnosis. To bridge an important gap in our knowledge about long term health of ovarian cancer survivors, we examined the causes of death among women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer between 1990 and 2014 in British Columbia. These causes were stratified by years since diagnosis, and compared with age- standardized causes of death among women who have not been diagnosed with ovarian cancer.MethodsWe examined all women with epithelial ovarian cancer in British Columbia 1990–2014 using population- based administrative datasets. We stratified women into three groups: all epithelial ovarian cancer patients; women surviving 5 to 9 years post-diagnosis, and women surviving 10 or more years since diagnosis. All- cause and cause specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated.ResultsThere were 4246 deaths among 6427 women with epithelial ovarian cancer. About 55.9% of deaths were from ovarian cancer. When compared with the general population, the highest SMRs (SMR of 5 or higher) were for deaths from other cancers and external causes (44.4% from falls) among women surviving 5–9 years and 10 or more years post-diagnosis. Mortality from other cancers can largely be explained by deaths from breast cancer (15.8%), lung cancer (12.3%), and colorectal cancer (11%).ConclusionsWhile the majority of epithelial ovarian cancer patients continue to die from their ovarian cancer, our results suggest that long term ovarian cancer survivors are particularly vulnerable to deaths from other cancers and from falls in elderly survivors. These data could indicate closer surveillance for breast, lung, and colorectal cancer, and closer attention to bone health is warranted among women surviving for 5 or more years following their epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
|
27
|
Klein O, Kanter F, Kulbe H, Jank P, Denkert C, Nebrich G, Schmitt WD, Wu Z, Kunze CA, Sehouli J, Darb‐Esfahani S, Braicu I, Lellmann J, Thiele H, Taube ET. MALDI‐Imaging for Classification of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Histotypes from a Tissue Microarray Using Machine Learning Methods. Proteomics Clin Appl 2018; 13:e1700181. [DOI: 10.1002/prca.201700181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Klein
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Berlin‐Brandenburg Center for Regenerative TherapiesCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin 13353 Berlin Germany
| | - Frederic Kanter
- Institute of Mathematics and Image ComputingUniversität zu Lübeck Lübeck Germany
| | - Hagen Kulbe
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Department of GynecologyCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin 13353 Berlin Germany
- Fraunhofer—Institute for Medical Image Computing MEVIS 23562 Lübeck Germany
| | - Paul Jank
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Institute of PathologyCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin 10117 Berlin Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Institute of PathologyCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin 10117 Berlin Germany
| | - Grit Nebrich
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Berlin‐Brandenburg Center for Regenerative TherapiesCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin 13353 Berlin Germany
| | - Wolfgang D. Schmitt
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Institute of PathologyCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin 10117 Berlin Germany
| | - Zhiyang Wu
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Berlin‐Brandenburg Center for Regenerative TherapiesCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin 13353 Berlin Germany
| | - Catarina A. Kunze
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Institute of PathologyCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin 10117 Berlin Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Department of GynecologyCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin 13353 Berlin Germany
- Fraunhofer—Institute for Medical Image Computing MEVIS 23562 Lübeck Germany
| | - Silvia Darb‐Esfahani
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Institute of Pathology Spandau 13589 Berlin Germany
| | - Ioana Braicu
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Department of GynecologyCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin 13353 Berlin Germany
- Fraunhofer—Institute for Medical Image Computing MEVIS 23562 Lübeck Germany
| | - Jan Lellmann
- Institute of Mathematics and Image ComputingUniversität zu Lübeck Lübeck Germany
| | - Herbert Thiele
- Fraunhofer—Institute for Medical Image Computing MEVIS 23562 Lübeck Germany
| | - Eliane T. Taube
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlincorporate member of Freie Universität BerlinHumboldt‐Universität zu BerlinBerlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Institute of PathologyCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin 10117 Berlin Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Arora N, Talhouk A, McAlpine JN, Law MR, Hanley GE. Long-term mortality among women with epithelial ovarian cancer: a population-based study in British Columbia, Canada. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:1039. [PMID: 30359249 PMCID: PMC6202883 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4970-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Among women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), histotype is one of the major prognostic factors. However, few data are available on histotype- specific survival and mortality estimates among these patients. We therefore examined survival and causes of death among women with EOC by histotype. METHODS A population- based cohort including all ovarian cancer patients diagnosed in British Columbia (BC) between 1990 and 2014 was built using population-based administrative datasets. We compared causes of death within histotypes, by age at diagnosis, BRCA status, and time since diagnosis. RESULTS A total of 6975 women were identified as having been diagnosed with EOC between 1990 and 2014 in BC. The most common cause of death among these women was ovarian cancer until 10 years post diagnosis when other causes surpassed ovarian cancer as the leading cause of death. Among women with serous EOCs, ovarian cancer was the leading cause of death 12 years after diagnosis, whereas ovarian cancer was the leading cause of death for 8 years among women with non- serous EOCs. Among women with serous EOCs, ovarian cancer was the leading cause of death for 12 years among younger women (< 60 years of age) compared to 8 years among women > = 60 years of age, and those with BRCA mutations were more likely to die from ovarian cancer than those without a BRCA mutation. CONCLUSIONS Within 10 years from diagnosis, ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among women diagnosed with EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nimisha Arora
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael R Law
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gillian E Hanley
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Diamond Health Care Center, Vancouver General Hospital, 6207A 2775 Laurel St., Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Engqvist H, Parris TZ, Rönnerman EW, Söderberg EMV, Biermann J, Mateoiu C, Sundfeldt K, Kovács A, Karlsson P, Helou K. Transcriptomic and genomic profiling of early-stage ovarian carcinomas associated with histotype and overall survival. Oncotarget 2018; 9:35162-35180. [PMID: 30416686 PMCID: PMC6205557 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy in the western world. Despite recent efforts to characterize ovarian cancer using molecular profiling, few targeted treatment options are currently available. Here, we examined genetic variants, fusion transcripts, SNP genotyping, and gene expression patterns for early-stage (I and II) ovarian carcinomas (n=96) in relation to clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcome, thereby identifying novel genetic features of ovarian carcinomas. Furthermore, mutation frequencies of specific genetic variants and/or their gene expression patterns were associated with histotype and overall survival, e.g. SLC28A2 (mucinous ovarian carcinoma histotype), ARCN1 (low expression in 0-2 year survival group), and tumor suppressor MTUS1 (mutation status and overall survival). The long non-coding RNA MALAT1 was identified as a highly promiscuous fusion transcript in ovarian carcinoma. Moreover, gene expression deregulation for 23 genes was associated with tumor aggressiveness. Taken together, the novel biomarkers identified here may improve ovarian carcinoma subclassification and patient stratification according to histotype and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Engqvist
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Toshima Z Parris
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Werner Rönnerman
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Clinical Pathology and Genetics, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Elin M V Söderberg
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jana Biermann
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Claudia Mateoiu
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Clinical Pathology and Genetics, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Clinical Pathology and Genetics, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Karlsson
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Khalil Helou
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Peres LC, Cushing-Haugen KL, Anglesio M, Wicklund K, Bentley R, Berchuck A, Kelemen LE, Nazeran TM, Gilks CB, Harris HR, Huntsman DG, Schildkraut JM, Rossing MA, Köbel M, Doherty JA. Histotype classification of ovarian carcinoma: A comparison of approaches. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 151:53-60. [PMID: 30121132 PMCID: PMC6292681 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Major changes in the classification of ovarian carcinoma histotypes occurred over the last two decades, resulting in the current 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria that recognize five principal histotypes: high-grade serous, low-grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous carcinoma. We assessed the impact of these guidelines and use of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers on classification of ovarian carcinomas in existing population-based studies. METHODS We evaluated histotype classification for 2361 ovarian carcinomas diagnosed between 1999 and 2009 from two case-control studies using three approaches: 1. pre-2014 WHO ("historic") histotype; 2. Standardized review of pathology slides using the 2014 WHO criteria alone; and 3. An integrated IHC assessment along with the 2014 WHO criteria. We used Kappa statistics to assess agreement between approaches, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate mortality. RESULTS Compared to the standardized pathologic review histotype, agreement across approaches was high (kappa = 0.892 for historic, and 0.849 for IHC integrated histotype), but the IHC integrated histotype identified more low-grade serous carcinomas and a subset of endometrioid carcinomas that were assigned as high-grade serous (n = 25). No substantial differences in histotype-specific mortality were observed across approaches. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that histotype assignment is fairly consistent regardless of classification approach, but that progressive improvements in classification accuracy for some less common histotypes are achieved with pathologic review using the 2014 WHO criteria and with IHC integration. We additionally recommend a classification scheme to fit historic data into the 2014 WHO categories to answer histotype-specific research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C Peres
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, 560 Ray C. Hunt Dr., P.O. Box 800765, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
| | - Kara L Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1110 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Michael Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, 2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3Z6, Canada
| | - Kristine Wicklund
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1110 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Rex Bentley
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, 25171 Morris Bldg., Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President St., MSC955, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Tayyebeh M Nazeran
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1110 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, 560 Ray C. Hunt Dr., P.O. Box 800765, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1110 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary Laboratory Services, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Saif M, Ager EI, Field P, Lilischkis KJ. The role of cancer stem cells and the therapeutic potential of TRX-E-002-1 in ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/21678707.2018.1508339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Saif
- GI Oncology & Exp. Therapeutics, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - E. I. Ager
- Kazia Therapeutics, Three International Towers Level 24, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - K. J. Lilischkis
- Kazia Therapeutics, Three International Towers Level 24, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Benhadjeba S, Edjekouane L, Sauvé K, Carmona E, Tremblay A. Feedback control of the CXCR7/CXCL11 chemokine axis by estrogen receptor α in ovarian cancer. Mol Oncol 2018; 12:1689-1705. [PMID: 30051594 PMCID: PMC6165996 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most intractable diseases, exhibiting tremendous molecular heterogeneity and lacking reliable methods for screening, resulting in late diagnosis and widespread peritoneal dissemination. Menopausal estrogen replacement therapy is a well‐recognized risk factor for OC, but little is known about how estrogen might contribute to this disease at the cellular level. This study identifies chemokine receptor CXCR7/ACKR3 as an estrogen‐responsive gene, whose expression is markedly enhanced by estrogen through direct recruitment of ERα and transcriptional active histone modifications in OC cells. The gene encoding CXCR7 chemokine ligand I‐TAC/CXCL11 was also upregulated by estrogen, resulting in Ser‐118 phosphorylation, activation, and recruitment of estrogen receptor ERα at the CXCR7 promoter locus for positive feedback regulation. Both CXCR7 and CXCL11, but not CXCR3 (also recognized to interact with CXCL11), were found to be significantly increased in stromal sections of microdissected tumors and positively correlated in mesenchymal subtype of OC. Estrogenic induction of mesenchymal markers SNAI1, SNAI2, and CDH2 expression, with a consequent increase in cancer cell migration, was shown to depend on CXCR7, indicating a key role for CXCR7 in mediating estrogen upregulation of mesenchymal markers to induce invasion of OC cells. These findings identify a feed‐forward mechanism that sustains activation of the CXCR7/CXCL11 axis under ERα control to induce the epithelial–mesenchymal transition pathway and metastatic behavior of OC cells. Such interplay underlies the complex gene profile heterogeneity of OC that promotes changes in tumor microenvironment and metastatic acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samira Benhadjeba
- Research Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Canada
| | - Lydia Edjekouane
- Research Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Canada
| | - Karine Sauvé
- Research Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Canada
| | | | - André Tremblay
- Research Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Canada.,Centre de Recherche en Reproduction et Fertilité, University of Montreal, Saint Hyacinthe, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Can Stemness and Chemoresistance Be Therapeutically Targeted via Signaling Pathways in Ovarian Cancer? Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10080241. [PMID: 30042330 PMCID: PMC6116003 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10080241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Revised: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy. Poor overall survival, particularly for patients with high grade serous (HGS) ovarian cancer, is often attributed to late stage at diagnosis and relapse following chemotherapy. HGS ovarian cancer is a heterogenous disease in that few genes are consistently mutated between patients. Additionally, HGS ovarian cancer is characterized by high genomic instability. For these reasons, personalized approaches may be necessary for effective treatment and cure. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that contribute to tumor metastasis and chemoresistance are essential to improve survival rates. One favored model for tumor metastasis and chemoresistance is the cancer stem cell (CSC) model. CSCs are cells with enhanced self-renewal properties that are enriched following chemotherapy. Elimination of this cell population is thought to be a mechanism to increase therapeutic response. Therefore, accurate identification of stem cell populations that are most clinically relevant is necessary. While many CSC identifiers (ALDH, OCT4, CD133, and side population) have been established, it is still not clear which population(s) will be most beneficial to target in patients. Therefore, there is a critical need to characterize CSCs with reliable markers and find their weaknesses that will make the CSCs amenable to therapy. Many signaling pathways are implicated for their roles in CSC initiation and maintenance. Therapeutically targeting pathways needed for CSC initiation or maintenance may be an effective way of treating HGS ovarian cancer patients. In conclusion, the prognosis for HGS ovarian cancer may be improved by combining CSC phenotyping with targeted therapies for pathways involved in CSC maintenance.
Collapse
|
34
|
Pathology of Ovarian Cancer: Recent Insights Unveiling Opportunities in Prevention. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2018; 60:686-696. [PMID: 28990983 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian carcinomas were formerly referred to as "surface epithelial carcinomas," reflecting the belief that they all arise from the ovarian surface epithelium. It is now appreciated that most ovarian carcinomas originate from either fallopian tube or endometriotic epithelium, and how we approach prevention will thus differ between histotypes. The 5 histotypes of ovarian carcinoma (high-grade serous, clear cell, endometrioid, mucinous, and low-grade serous, in descending order of frequency) can be reproducibly diagnosed, and are distinct disease entities, differing with respect to genetic risk factors, molecular events during oncogenesis, patterns of spread, and response to chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
35
|
Ricci F, Affatato R, Carrassa L, Damia G. Recent Insights into Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19061569. [PMID: 29795040 PMCID: PMC6032258 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19061569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian mucinous tumors represent a group of rare neoplasms with a still undefined cell of origin but with an apparent progression from benign to borderline to carcinoma. Even though these tumors are different from the other histological subtypes of epithelial ovarian neoplasms, they are still treated with a similar chemotherapeutic approach. Here, we review its pathogenesis, molecular alterations, (differential) diagnosis, clinical presentation and current treatment, and how recent molecular and biological information on this tumor might lead to better and more specific clinical management of patients with mucinous ovarian carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Ricci
- IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Via Giuseppe La Masa 19, 20156 Milan, Italy.
| | - Roberta Affatato
- IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Via Giuseppe La Masa 19, 20156 Milan, Italy.
| | - Laura Carrassa
- IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Via Giuseppe La Masa 19, 20156 Milan, Italy.
| | - Giovanna Damia
- IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Via Giuseppe La Masa 19, 20156 Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Heitz F, Harter P, Ataseven B, Heikaus S, Schneider S, Prader S, Bommert M, Fisseler-Eckhoff A, Traut A, du Bois A. Stage- and Histologic Subtype-Dependent Frequency of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Undergoing Systematic Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2053-2059. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6412-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
37
|
Icaritin induces ovarian cancer cell apoptosis through activation of p53 and inhibition of Akt/mTOR pathway. Life Sci 2018; 202:188-194. [PMID: 29625193 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.03.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 03/18/2018] [Accepted: 03/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Ovarian cancer (OC) has the highest mortality rate of all gynecological cancers. Currently, the first-line OC treatment consists of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. However, most patients develop chemoresistance after the first-line treatment limits the success of treatment. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify effective therapeutic agents. MAIN METHODS Cell viabilities were detected by MTS assay; Annexin V-FITC/PI assay and western blotting assay were performed to analyze the apoptotic cells in vitro; An immunofluorescence assay was performed to analyze the TUNEL+ apoptotic cells in vivo; Patient-derived xenografts were established to test the in vivo antitumor effects; The key proteins of p53, caspase-mediated apoptotic pathway and Akt/mTOR pathway were detected by Western blotting. KEY FINDINGS Icaritin, a prenylflavonoid derivative from Epimedium Genus, inhibited the proliferation of drug-sensitive OC cells (OV2008 and C13*) and cisplatin resistant OC cells A2780cp. Icaritin induced OC cell apoptosis in vitro, as indicated by the increase of Annexin V+/PI+ apoptotic cells analyzed with flow cytometry, and the cleavage of caspase 9, caspase 3 and poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) detected with western blotting. Icaritin also inhibited tumor growth and induced OC cells apoptosis in patient-derived xenografts, as indicated by the tumor growth delay and increase of TUNEL-positive cells in tumor tissues. The icaritin-induced OC cell apoptosis may be associated with the activation of p53 and the suppression of Akt/mTOR pathway. SIGNIFICANCE This study sheds light on the underlying mechanisms of antitumor effect of icaritin, and warrants clinical trial for treatment of OC.
Collapse
|
38
|
Le Page C, Rahimi K, Köbel M, Tonin PN, Meunier L, Portelance L, Bernard M, Nelson BH, Bernardini MQ, Bartlett JMS, Bachvarov D, Gotlieb WH, Gilks B, McAlpine JN, Nachtigal MW, Piché A, Watson PH, Vanderhyden B, Huntsman DG, Provencher DM, Mes-Masson AM. Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers. BMC Cancer 2018. [PMID: 29587661 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4242-8] [] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian carcinoma is the most lethal gynecological malignancy due to early dissemination and acquired resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Reliable markers that are independent and complementary to clinical parameters are needed to improve the management of patients with this disease. The Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR) provides researchers with biological material and associated clinical data to conduct biomarker validation studies. Using standards defined by the Canadian Tissue Repository Network (CTRNet), we have previously demonstrated the quality of the biological material from this resource. Here we describe the clinical characteristics of the COEUR cohort. METHODS With support from 12 Canadian ovarian cancer biobanks in Canada, we created a central retrospective cohort comprised of more than 2000 patient tissue samples with associated clinical data, including 1246 high-grade serous, 102 low-grade serous, 295 endometrioid, 259 clear cell and 89 mucinous carcinoma histotypes. A two-step reclassification process was applied to assure contemporary histological classification (histotyping). For each histotypes individually, we evaluated the association between the known clinico-pathological parameters (stage, cytoreduction, chemotherapy treatment, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation) and patient outcome by using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS The median follow-up time of the cohort was 45 months and the 5-year survival rate for patients with high-grade serous carcinomas was 34%, in contrast to endometrioid carcinomas with 80% at 5 years. Survival profiles differed by histotype when stratified by stage or cytoreduction. Women with mucinous or clear cell carcinomas at advanced stage or with non-optimally debulked disease had the worst outcomes. In high-grade serous carcinoma, we observed significant association with longer survival in women harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation as compared to patients without detectable mutation. CONCLUSIONS Our results show the expected survival rates, as compared with current literature, in each histotype suggesting that the cohort is an unbiased representation of the five major histotypes. COEUR, a one stop comprehensive biorepository, has collected mature outcome data and relevant clinical data in a comprehensive manner allowing stratified analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Le Page
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kurosh Rahimi
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Pathology du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Patricia N Tonin
- Departments of Medicine and Human Genetics, McGill University; Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liliane Meunier
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lise Portelance
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Monique Bernard
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Brad H Nelson
- Tumour Tissue Repository, Trev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John M S Bartlett
- Diagnostic Development and Ontario Tumour Bank, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Lady Davis Research Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mark W Nachtigal
- Department of Biochemistry & Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Alain Piché
- Centre de Recherche du CHUS. Département de Microbiologie et Infectiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Peter H Watson
- Tumour Tissue Repository, Trev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Barbara Vanderhyden
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.,Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Diane M Provencher
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. .,, 900 rue Saint Denis, Tour R, Montreal, H2X2A0, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Le Page C, Rahimi K, Köbel M, Tonin PN, Meunier L, Portelance L, Bernard M, Nelson BH, Bernardini MQ, Bartlett JMS, Bachvarov D, Gotlieb WH, Gilks B, McAlpine JN, Nachtigal MW, Piché A, Watson PH, Vanderhyden B, Huntsman DG, Provencher DM, Mes-Masson AM. Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:347. [PMID: 29587661 PMCID: PMC5872529 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4242-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian carcinoma is the most lethal gynecological malignancy due to early dissemination and acquired resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Reliable markers that are independent and complementary to clinical parameters are needed to improve the management of patients with this disease. The Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR) provides researchers with biological material and associated clinical data to conduct biomarker validation studies. Using standards defined by the Canadian Tissue Repository Network (CTRNet), we have previously demonstrated the quality of the biological material from this resource. Here we describe the clinical characteristics of the COEUR cohort. METHODS With support from 12 Canadian ovarian cancer biobanks in Canada, we created a central retrospective cohort comprised of more than 2000 patient tissue samples with associated clinical data, including 1246 high-grade serous, 102 low-grade serous, 295 endometrioid, 259 clear cell and 89 mucinous carcinoma histotypes. A two-step reclassification process was applied to assure contemporary histological classification (histotyping). For each histotypes individually, we evaluated the association between the known clinico-pathological parameters (stage, cytoreduction, chemotherapy treatment, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation) and patient outcome by using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS The median follow-up time of the cohort was 45 months and the 5-year survival rate for patients with high-grade serous carcinomas was 34%, in contrast to endometrioid carcinomas with 80% at 5 years. Survival profiles differed by histotype when stratified by stage or cytoreduction. Women with mucinous or clear cell carcinomas at advanced stage or with non-optimally debulked disease had the worst outcomes. In high-grade serous carcinoma, we observed significant association with longer survival in women harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation as compared to patients without detectable mutation. CONCLUSIONS Our results show the expected survival rates, as compared with current literature, in each histotype suggesting that the cohort is an unbiased representation of the five major histotypes. COEUR, a one stop comprehensive biorepository, has collected mature outcome data and relevant clinical data in a comprehensive manner allowing stratified analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Le Page
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kurosh Rahimi
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Pathology du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Patricia N Tonin
- Departments of Medicine and Human Genetics, McGill University; Cancer Research Program, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liliane Meunier
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lise Portelance
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Monique Bernard
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Brad H Nelson
- Tumour Tissue Repository, Trev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John M S Bartlett
- Diagnostic Development and Ontario Tumour Bank, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Lady Davis Research Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mark W Nachtigal
- Department of Biochemistry & Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Alain Piché
- Centre de Recherche du CHUS. Département de Microbiologie et Infectiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Peter H Watson
- Tumour Tissue Repository, Trev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Barbara Vanderhyden
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.,Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Diane M Provencher
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. .,, 900 rue Saint Denis, Tour R, Montreal, H2X2A0, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers. BMC Cancer 2018. [PMID: 29587661 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4242-8]+[] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian carcinoma is the most lethal gynecological malignancy due to early dissemination and acquired resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Reliable markers that are independent and complementary to clinical parameters are needed to improve the management of patients with this disease. The Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource (COEUR) provides researchers with biological material and associated clinical data to conduct biomarker validation studies. Using standards defined by the Canadian Tissue Repository Network (CTRNet), we have previously demonstrated the quality of the biological material from this resource. Here we describe the clinical characteristics of the COEUR cohort. METHODS With support from 12 Canadian ovarian cancer biobanks in Canada, we created a central retrospective cohort comprised of more than 2000 patient tissue samples with associated clinical data, including 1246 high-grade serous, 102 low-grade serous, 295 endometrioid, 259 clear cell and 89 mucinous carcinoma histotypes. A two-step reclassification process was applied to assure contemporary histological classification (histotyping). For each histotypes individually, we evaluated the association between the known clinico-pathological parameters (stage, cytoreduction, chemotherapy treatment, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation) and patient outcome by using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS The median follow-up time of the cohort was 45 months and the 5-year survival rate for patients with high-grade serous carcinomas was 34%, in contrast to endometrioid carcinomas with 80% at 5 years. Survival profiles differed by histotype when stratified by stage or cytoreduction. Women with mucinous or clear cell carcinomas at advanced stage or with non-optimally debulked disease had the worst outcomes. In high-grade serous carcinoma, we observed significant association with longer survival in women harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation as compared to patients without detectable mutation. CONCLUSIONS Our results show the expected survival rates, as compared with current literature, in each histotype suggesting that the cohort is an unbiased representation of the five major histotypes. COEUR, a one stop comprehensive biorepository, has collected mature outcome data and relevant clinical data in a comprehensive manner allowing stratified analysis.
Collapse
|
41
|
Harmsen MG, Piek JMJ, Bulten J, Casey MJ, Rebbeck TR, Mourits MJ, Greene MH, Slangen BFM, van Beurden M, Massuger LFAG, Hoogerbrugge N, de Hullu JA. Peritoneal carcinomatosis after risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Cancer 2018; 124:952-959. [PMID: 29315498 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers because of their increased risk of ovarian carcinoma. Despite RRSO, metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis occasionally is diagnosed. METHODS The literature was searched for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with peritoneal carcinomatosis after risk-reducing surgery. The authors were asked for additional data. Clinical and histopathological data were descriptively analyzed. Cases were compared with a single-institution control cohort. RESULTS Of 36 cases, 86.1% concerned BRCA1 mutation carriers. The median age of the patients was 52 years (range, 30-71 years) at the time of risk-reducing surgery and 60 years (range, 37-75 years) at the time of diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The median interval between the 2 events was 54.5 months (range, 11-292 months). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was mostly high-grade serous carcinoma. Histopathological details of the RRSO specimens were retrieved in 8 cases; 5 (62.5%) were found to have serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and 1 had epithelial atypia. Cases were older (P = .025) at the time of risk-reducing surgery and harbored more serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas (P<.001) compared with women from the control cohort. CONCLUSIONS Metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis after risk-reducing surgery occurs predominantly in BRCA1 mutation carriers, usually within 5 years. Data have suggested that surgery at a younger age lowers the rates of peritoneal carcinomatosis. These data can be used in the gynecologic counseling of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. RRSO should include complete salpingectomy. Detailed histopathological examination of specimens removed during RRSO is essential. Cancer 2018;124:952-9. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marline G Harmsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen M J Piek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Murray J Casey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska.,Department of Preventive Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marian J Mourits
- Department of Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark H Greene
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Clinical Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Center for Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Challenges and Opportunities in Studying the Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer Subtypes. CURR EPIDEMIOL REP 2017. [PMID: 29226065 DOI: 10.1007/s40471-017-0115-y]+[] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Only recently has it become clear that epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is comprised of such distinct histotypes--with different cells of origin, morphology, molecular features, epidemiologic factors, clinical features, and survival patterns-that they can be thought of as different diseases sharing an anatomical location. Herein, we review opportunities and challenges in studying EOC heterogeneity. RECENT FINDINGS The 2014 World Health Organization diagnostic guidelines incorporate accumulated evidence that high- and low-grade serous tumors have different underlying pathogenesis, and that, on the basis of shared molecular features, most high grade tumors, including some previously classified as endometrioid, are now considered to be high-grade serous. At the same time, several studies have reported that high-grade serous EOC, which is the most common histotype, is itself made up of reproducible subtypes discernable by gene expression patterns. SUMMARY These major advances in understanding set the stage for a new era of research on EOC risk and clinical outcomes with the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality. We highlight the need for multidisciplinary studies with pathology review using the current guidelines, further molecular characterization of the histotypes and subtypes, inclusion of women of diverse racial/ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds, and updated epidemiologic and clinical data relevant to current generations of women at risk of EOC.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Purpose of review Only recently has it become clear that epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is comprised of such distinct histotypes--with different cells of origin, morphology, molecular features, epidemiologic factors, clinical features, and survival patterns-that they can be thought of as different diseases sharing an anatomical location. Herein, we review opportunities and challenges in studying EOC heterogeneity. Recent findings The 2014 World Health Organization diagnostic guidelines incorporate accumulated evidence that high- and low-grade serous tumors have different underlying pathogenesis, and that, on the basis of shared molecular features, most high grade tumors, including some previously classified as endometrioid, are now considered to be high-grade serous. At the same time, several studies have reported that high-grade serous EOC, which is the most common histotype, is itself made up of reproducible subtypes discernable by gene expression patterns. Summary These major advances in understanding set the stage for a new era of research on EOC risk and clinical outcomes with the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality. We highlight the need for multidisciplinary studies with pathology review using the current guidelines, further molecular characterization of the histotypes and subtypes, inclusion of women of diverse racial/ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds, and updated epidemiologic and clinical data relevant to current generations of women at risk of EOC.
Collapse
|
44
|
Doherty JA, Jensen A, Kelemen LE, Pearce CL, Poole E, Schildkraut JM, Terry KL, Tworoger SS, Webb PM, Wentzensen N. Current Gaps in Ovarian Cancer Epidemiology: The Need for New Population-Based Research. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109:3847624. [PMID: 29117355 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
With recent ovarian cancer screening studies showing no clinically significant mortality benefit, preventing this disease, identifying high-risk populations, and extending survival remain priorities. However, several challenges are impeding progress in ovarian cancer research. With most studies capturing exposure information from 10 or more years ago, evaluation of how changing patterns of exposures, such as new oral contraceptive formulations and increased intrauterine device use, might influence ovarian cancer risk and survival is difficult. Risk factors for ovarian cancer should be evaluated in the context of tumor histotypes, which have unique molecular features and cells of origin; this is a task that requires large collaborative studies to achieve meaningful sample sizes. Importantly, identification of novel modifiable risk factors, in addition to those currently known to reduce risk (eg, childbearing, tubal ligation, oral contraceptive use), is needed; this is not feasibly implemented at a population level. In this Commentary, we describe important gaps in knowledge and propose new approaches to advance epidemiologic research to improve ovarian cancer prevention and survival, including updated classification of tumors, collection of data on changing and novel exposures, longer follow-up on existing studies, evaluation of diverse populations, development of better risk prediction models, and collaborating prospectively with consortia to develop protocols for new studies that will allow seamless integration for future pooled analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Allan Jensen
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Elizabeth Poole
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Affiliations of authors: Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (JAD); Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (AJ); Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (LEK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI (CLP); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (CLP); Channing Division of Network Medicine (EP, SST) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center (KLT), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (EP, SST, KLT); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, CA (JMS); Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia (PMW); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NW)
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shibuya Y, Tokunaga H, Saito S, Shimokawa K, Katsuoka F, Bin L, Kojima K, Nagasaki M, Yamamoto M, Yaegashi N, Yasuda J. Identification of somatic genetic alterations in ovarian clear cell carcinoma with next generation sequencing. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2017; 57:51-60. [DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Shibuya
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyTohoku University School of MedicineMiyagi Japan
| | - Hideki Tokunaga
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyTohoku University School of MedicineMiyagi Japan
| | - Sakae Saito
- Department of Integrative GenomicsTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku UniversityMiyagi Japan
| | - Kazurou Shimokawa
- Department of Health Record InformaticsTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku UniversityMiyagi Japan
| | - Fumiki Katsuoka
- Department of Integrative GenomicsTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku UniversityMiyagi Japan
- Department of Medical BiochemistryTohoku University School of MedicineMiyagi Japan
| | - Li Bin
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyTohoku University School of MedicineMiyagi Japan
| | - Kaname Kojima
- Department of Integrative GenomicsTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku UniversityMiyagi Japan
| | - Masao Nagasaki
- Department of Integrative GenomicsTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku UniversityMiyagi Japan
| | - Masayuki Yamamoto
- Department of Integrative GenomicsTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku UniversityMiyagi Japan
- Department of Medical BiochemistryTohoku University School of MedicineMiyagi Japan
| | - Nobuo Yaegashi
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyTohoku University School of MedicineMiyagi Japan
| | - Jun Yasuda
- Department of Integrative GenomicsTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku UniversityMiyagi Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Harter P, Hauke J, Heitz F, Reuss A, Kommoss S, Marmé F, Heimbach A, Prieske K, Richters L, Burges A, Neidhardt G, de Gregorio N, El-Balat A, Hilpert F, Meier W, Kimmig R, Kast K, Sehouli J, Baumann K, Jackisch C, Park-Simon TW, Hanker L, Kröber S, Pfisterer J, Gevensleben H, Schnelzer A, Dietrich D, Neunhöffer T, Krockenberger M, Brucker SY, Nürnberg P, Thiele H, Altmüller J, Lamla J, Elser G, du Bois A, Hahnen E, Schmutzler R. Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including BRCA1/2 in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1). PLoS One 2017; 12:e0186043. [PMID: 29053726 PMCID: PMC5650145 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of families at risk for ovarian cancer offers the opportunity to consider prophylactic surgery thus reducing ovarian cancer mortality. So far, identification of potentially affected families in Germany was solely performed via family history and numbers of affected family members with breast or ovarian cancer. However, neither the prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 in ovarian cancer in Germany nor the reliability of family history as trigger for genetic counselling has ever been evaluated. METHODS Prospective counseling and germline testing of consecutive patients with primary diagnosis or with platinum-sensitive relapse of an invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Testing included 25 candidate and established risk genes. Among these 25 genes, 16 genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, NBN, PMS2, PTEN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53) were defined as established cancer risk genes. A positive family history was defined as at least one relative with breast cancer or ovarian cancer or breast cancer in personal history. RESULTS In total, we analyzed 523 patients: 281 patients with primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer and 242 patients with relapsed disease. Median age at primary diagnosis was 58 years (range 16-93) and 406 patients (77.6%) had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. In total, 27.9% of the patients showed at least one deleterious variant in all 25 investigated genes and 26.4% in the defined 16 risk genes. Deleterious variants were most prevalent in the BRCA1 (15.5%), BRCA2 (5.5%), RAD51C (2.5%) and PALB2 (1.1%) genes. The prevalence of deleterious variants did not differ significantly between patients at primary diagnosis and relapse. The prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 (and in all 16 risk genes) in patients <60 years was 30.2% (33.2%) versus 10.6% (18.9%) in patients ≥60 years. Family history was positive in 43% of all patients. Patients with a positive family history had a prevalence of deleterious variants of 31.6% (36.0%) versus 11.4% (17.6%) and histologic subtype of high grade serous ovarian cancer versus other showed a prevalence of deleterious variants of 23.2% (29.1%) and 10.2% (14.8%), respectively. Testing only for BRCA1/2 would miss in our series more than 5% of the patients with a deleterious variant in established risk genes. CONCLUSIONS 26.4% of all patients harbor at least one deleterious variant in established risk genes. The threshold of 10% mutation rate which is accepted for reimbursement by health care providers in Germany was observed in all subgroups analyzed and neither age at primary diagnosis nor histo-type or family history sufficiently enough could identify a subgroup not eligible for genetic counselling and testing. Genetic testing should therefore be offered to every patient with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and limiting testing to BRCA1/2 seems to be not sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Jan Hauke
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Reuss
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frederik Marmé
- National Center for Tumor Disease/Department of Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André Heimbach
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Prieske
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Richters
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Burges
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Munich-Großhadern. Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Neidhardt
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Ahmed El-Balat
- Department of Gynecology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Onkologisches Therapiezentrum, Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany/ Department of Gynecology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Werner Meier
- Department of Gynecology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Rainer Kimmig
- Department of Gynecology, University of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Charité, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Baumann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Endocrinology & Oncology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sana Klinikum, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - Lars Hanker
- Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Sandra Kröber
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Andreas Schnelzer
- Department of Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dimo Dietrich
- University Hospital Bonn, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tanja Neunhöffer
- Department of Gynecology, Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter Nürnberg
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Janine Altmüller
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Doherty JA, Peres LC, Wang C, Way GP, Greene CS, Schildkraut JM. Challenges and Opportunities in Studying the Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer Subtypes. CURR EPIDEMIOL REP 2017; 4:211-220. [PMID: 29226065 PMCID: PMC5718213 DOI: 10.1007/s40471-017-0115-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Only recently has it become clear that epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is comprised of such distinct histotypes--with different cells of origin, morphology, molecular features, epidemiologic factors, clinical features, and survival patterns-that they can be thought of as different diseases sharing an anatomical location. Herein, we review opportunities and challenges in studying EOC heterogeneity. RECENT FINDINGS The 2014 World Health Organization diagnostic guidelines incorporate accumulated evidence that high- and low-grade serous tumors have different underlying pathogenesis, and that, on the basis of shared molecular features, most high grade tumors, including some previously classified as endometrioid, are now considered to be high-grade serous. At the same time, several studies have reported that high-grade serous EOC, which is the most common histotype, is itself made up of reproducible subtypes discernable by gene expression patterns. SUMMARY These major advances in understanding set the stage for a new era of research on EOC risk and clinical outcomes with the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality. We highlight the need for multidisciplinary studies with pathology review using the current guidelines, further molecular characterization of the histotypes and subtypes, inclusion of women of diverse racial/ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds, and updated epidemiologic and clinical data relevant to current generations of women at risk of EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Anne Doherty
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope, Rm 4125, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
| | - Lauren Cole Peres
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800765, Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Gregory P. Way
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Casey S. Greene
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800765, Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Singh N, McCluggage WG, Gilks CB. High-grade serous carcinoma of tubo-ovarian origin: recent developments. Histopathology 2017; 71:339-356. [PMID: 28477361 DOI: 10.1111/his.13248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Extra-uterine high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) accounts for most of the morbidity and mortality associated with ovarian carcinoma, and is one of the leading causes of cancer death in women. Until recently our understanding of HGSC was very limited compared to other common cancers, and it has only been during the last 15 years that we have learned how to diagnose this ovarian carcinoma histotype accurately. Since then, however, there has been rapid progress, with identification of a precursor lesion in the fallopian tube, development of prevention strategies for both those with inherited susceptibility (hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome) and without the syndrome, and elucidation of the molecular events important in oncogenesis. This molecular understanding has led to new treatment strategies for HGSC, with the promise of more to come in the near future. In this review we focus on these recent changes, including diagnostic criteria/differential diagnosis, primary site assignment, precursor lesions and the molecular pathology of HGSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pérez-López FR, Ceausu I, Depypere H, Kehoe S, Lambrinoudaki I, Mueck A, Senturk LM, Simoncini T, Stevenson JC, Stute P, Rees M. Interventions to reduce the risk of ovarian and fallopian tube cancer: A European Menopause and Andropause Society Position Statement. Maturitas 2017; 100:86-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
50
|
Cozzi GD, Levinson RT, Toole H, Snyder MR, Deng A, Crispens MA, Khabele D, Beeghly-Fadiel A. Blood type, ABO genetic variants, and ovarian cancer survival. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0175119. [PMID: 28448592 PMCID: PMC5407760 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Blood type A and the A1 allele have been associated with increased ovarian cancer risk. With only two small studies published to date, evidence for an association between ABO blood type and ovarian cancer survival is limited. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Tumor Registry confirmed ovarian cancer cases from the Vanderbilt University Medical Center with blood type from linked laboratory reports and ABO variants from linked Illumina Exome BeadChip data. Associations with overall survival (OS) were quantified by hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) from proportional hazards regression models; covariates included age, race, stage, grade, histologic subtype, and year of diagnosis. RESULTS ABO phenotype (N = 694) and/or genotype (N = 154) data were available for 713 predominantly Caucasian (89.3%) cases. In multivariable models, blood type A had significantly better OS compared to either O (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.60-0.93) or all non-A (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63-0.94) cases. Similarly, missense rs1053878 minor allele carriers (A2) had better OS (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25-0.99). Among Caucasians, this phenotype association was strengthened, but the genotype association was attenuated; instead, four variants sharing moderate linkage disequilibrium with the O variant were associated with better OS (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39-0.99) in unadjusted models. CONCLUSIONS Blood type A was significantly associated with longer ovarian cancer survival in the largest such study to date. This finding was supported by genetic analysis, which implicated the A2 allele, although O related variants also had suggestive associations. Further research on ABO and ovarian cancer survival is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella D. Cozzi
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN, United States of America
| | - Rebecca T. Levinson
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville TN, United States of America
| | - Hilary Toole
- Meharry Medical College, Nashville TN, United States of America
| | - Malcolm-Robert Snyder
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN, United States of America
| | - Angie Deng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN, United States of America
| | - Marta A. Crispens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN, United States of America
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville TN, United States of America
| | - Dineo Khabele
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN, United States of America
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville TN, United States of America
| | - Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN, United States of America
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville TN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|