Lorcainide disposition kinetics in arrhythmia patients

Individual variation in first-pass metabolism

Individual variation in pharmacokinetics has long been recognised. This variability is extremely pronounced in drugs that undergo extensive first-pass metabolism. Drug concentrations obtained from individuals given the same dose could range several-fold, even in young healthy volunteers. In addition to the liver, which is the major organ for drug and xenobiotic metabolism, the gut and the lung can contribute significantly to variability in first-pass metabolism. Unfortunately, the contributions of the latter 2 organs are difficult to quantify because conventional in vivo methods for quantifying first-pass metabolism are not sufficiently specific. Drugs that are mainly eliminated by phase II metabolism (e.g. estrogens and progestogens, morphine, etc.) undergo significant first-pass gut metabolism. This is because the gut is rich in conjugating enzymes. The role of the lung in first-pass metabolism is not clear, although it is quite avid in binding basic drugs such as lidocaine (lignocaine), propranolol, etc. Factors such as age, gender, disease states, enzyme induction and inhibition, genetic polymorphism and food effects have been implicated in causing variability in pharmacokinetics of drugs that undergo extensive first-pass metabolism. Of various factors considered, age and gender make the least evident contributions, whereas genetic polymorphism, enzymatic changes due to induction or inhibition, and the effects of food are major contributors to the variability in first-pass metabolism. These factors can easily cause several-fold variations. Polymorphic disposition of imipramine and propafenone, an increase in verapamil first-pass metabolism by rifampicin (rifampin), and the effects of food on propranolol, metoprolol and propafenone, are typical examples. Unfortunately, the contributions of these factors towards variability are unpredictable and tend to be drug-dependent. A change in steady-state clearance of a drug can sometimes be exacerbated when first-pass metabolism and systemic clearance of a drug are simultaneously altered. Therefore, an understanding of the source of variability is the key to the optimisation of therapy.

Antiarrhythmic effect of lorcainide in patients taking digoxin

To assess the antiarrhythmic effect of lorcainide and determine whether there is a pharmacokinetic interaction between lorcainide and digoxin, 12 patients with frequent premature ventricular depolarizations (PVDs) who were taking digoxin were treated with lorcainide. During a placebo period, serum digoxin concentration was measured for three days; plasma lorcainide concentration, a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), and a 24-hour continuous ECG were measured on the day before the patients began lorcainide and repeated on days 3, 7, and 14 of treatment. Lorcainide was given 100 mg bid or 100 mg tid. Lorcainide did not suppress group mean PVDs per hour, pairs, or ventricular tachycardia. Only four patients (33%) responded with greater than or equal to 80% suppression of PVDs. Mean ejection fraction for responders was 46 +/- 6%, and for nonresponders it was 28 +/- 9% (P less than .01). There was no significant pharmacokinetic interaction between lorcainide and digoxin. Mean digoxin concentration did not change after lorcainide administration; two patients had greater than or equal to 50% increase in serum digoxin concentration. Patients with heart failure or reduced ejection fraction define a subset who have unpredictable effects from lorcainide, including a reduced antiarrhythmic effect.

Pharmacokinetic implications of lorcainide therapy in patients with normal and depressed cardiac function

The influence of cardiac function as measured by the left ventricular ejection fraction on the pharmacokinetic variables of a new antiarrhythmic drug, lorcainide, was investigated in 20 cardiac patients. Patients were divided into two groups: those with normal (ejection fraction greater than .40) or depressed (ejection fraction less than .40) left ventricular function. The elimination half-life, plasma clearance rates, or volume of distribution of lorcainide were not significantly different in patients with either normal or depressed cardiac function. A decrease in arrhythmia frequency could be correlated to plasma lorcainide concentration in the majority of patients, and it was noted that at least 0.1 mg/L of lorcainide was required for the presence of an antiarrhythmic effect. Three unusual cases are presented to illustrate the importance of measuring plasma drug concentrations and calculating the drug pharmacokinetics and to correlate these to the antiarrhythmic response in order to minimize the risk of plasma drug accumulation and side effects. A review of published data shows a three- to sixfold interpatient variation in the elimination half-life of lorcainide with practical implications in its use as an antiarrhythmic drug.

Comparison in vitro of the electrophysiological effects of lorcainide and its metabolite norlorcainide

The effects of lorcainide and its metabolite norlorcainide on the maximal rate of depolarization (Vmax) were compared at different rates of stimulation and at various membrane potentials in ventricular muscle preparations of guinea-pig heart. A standard microelectrode technique was used. The results show that lorcainide and norlorcainide exerted qualitatively similar effects; they both depressed Vmax in a frequency- and potential-dependent way. The following quantitative differences were found: lorcainide was about 50% more potent in depressing Vmax; this difference in potency was observed at 1 and 2 Hz stimulation rates; the block by lorcainide was clearly potential-dependent; in the case of norlorcainide this effect was weak; the onset and removal of block were about twice as fast with lorcainide; the block per action potential was greater with lorcainide. The electrophysiological effects were decreased in the presence of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, though to a similar extent with both drugs. Taking into account the difference in potency found in the present experiments and the difference in plasma concentration described in the literature, it is concluded that the parent drug and its metabolite both contribute to about the same extent to the in vivo effect of oral treatment with lorcainide.

Intravenous lorcainide versus lidocaine in the treatment of frequent and complex ventricular arrhythmias

Thirty patients with frequent (greater than or equal to 30/hr) and repetitive ventricular premature beats (VPBs) unassociated with acute infarction were randomized to intravenous lorcainide (LOR) or lidocaine (LID). Following at least 2 hours of baseline Holter monitoring, patients received LOR, 2 mg/kg then 200 mg/24hr, or LID, 1 mg/kg then 2 mg/min, with rebolus if needed. Nonresponders detected by bedside telemetry were crossed over. Clinical response was 6 of 25 (24%) including two of nine crossovers with LOR and 8 of 26 (31%) including 3 of 12 crossovers with LID (p = NS). By computer analysis of 24-hour Holter monitors and asymptotic regression of success rates at hourly intervals, it was projected that greater than or equal to 80% reduction in VPBs occurred in 28% of LOR and in 25% of LID (p = NS), and complete suppression of repetitive VPBs occurred in 102% of LOR and in 92% of LID (p = NS). The mean drug levels were 405 ng/ml (range 371 to 463) with LOR and 3.4 micrograms/ml (range 2.1 to 3.6) with LID. Side effects were similar, occurring in 8 of 25 LOR trials and in 11 of 26 LID trials (p = NS). Thus, LOR and LID effectively suppress repetitive VPBs and to a lesser extent VPB frequency. However, neither drug is superior and each may be an effective alternative when resistance to the other is encountered.

Intravenous and oral lorcainide: assessment of central nervous system toxicity and antiarrhythmic efficacy

Twenty-eight subjects underwent evaluation of drug toxicity and antiarrhythmic efficacy with oral and intravenous lorcainide. Lorcainide, a new type 1C antiarrhythmic drug, has an active metabolite, norlorcainide, which accumulates after oral but not significantly after intravenous administration. Group 1 consisted of 14 subjects who received intravenous lorcainide with an initial bolus of 2 mg/kg at a rate of 2 mg/min followed by 0.14 mg/min or 200 mg/24 hours. The lorcainide level after bolus was 0.432 micrograms/ml and fell to 0.178 micrograms/ml at 4 to 6 hours despite constant drug infusion. Prior work has demonstrated no detectable norlorcainide levels after intravenous infusion. Group II consisted of 14 subjects who received oral lorcainide, 100 mg orally every 8 hours. Mean lorcainide levels were 0.287 micrograms/ml and mean norlorcainide levels were 0.377 micrograms/ml. Only 2 of 12 subjects in group I experienced headache, dizziness, or sleep disturbance, compared to 12 of 14 subjects in group II (p less than 0.01). Intravenous lorcainide has a lower incidence of central nervous system side effects than oral lorcainide. These effects may be attributable to the accumulation of the norlorcainide metabolite with oral therapy.

Initial and long-term outpatient experience with lorcainide for suppression of malignant and potentially malignant ventricular arrhythmias

There is a need for effective, well-tolerated antiarrhythmic agents, particularly those effective by both intravenous and oral routes. Lorcainide, a new antiarrhythmic drug with such properties, was given long-term orally to 24 patients controlled initially with intravenous therapy--19 with frequent (greater than 1/min) complex premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) on a baseline 24-hour Holter monitor and five with ongoing sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or frequent paroxysmal sustained VT, for a mean of 13 months (range 0.03 to 39.4 months). Long-term lorcainide was given in divided doses of 200 to 800 mg/day (median 260, mean 269 +/- 90 mg/day). Response to long-term lorcainide therapy was assessed at a mean of both 26 days and 12.2 months. Frequency of PVCs on baseline averaged 13,490/24 hours (median 10,578, range 2,115 to 61,716); couplets averaged 309/24 hours (median 166, range 0 to 5,686), and runs averaged 33/24 hours (median 30, range 0 to 2,951). Median frequency of PVCs decreased by 94% (p much less than 0.001) and 97% (p less than 0.01) at the first and second lorcainide efficacy assessments, respectively. Couplets decreased by a median of 99% (p much less than 0.001) and 100% (p less than 0.005) at the first and second assessments, respectively. Runs were suppressed by a median of 100% at both evaluations (p much less than 0.001). Only three (16%) of the patients with complex PVCs failed to respond to therapy. No recurrence during lorcainide has been noted in the five patients with ongoing sustained VT or recurrent episodes of VT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Chronic lorcainide therapy for symptomatic premature ventricular complexes: efficacy, pharmacokinetics and evidence for norlorcainide antiarrhythmic effect

Chronic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) have been effectively suppressed by oral lorcainide as reported in previous short-term studies. The plasma level-effect relation of lorcainide may be affected by the possible cardioactivity of norlorcainide, a metabolite that accumulates after repeated oral doses. This study evaluated the long-term efficacy of lorcainide in suppressing chronic symptomatic PVCs, and examined the relation of arrhythmia suppression to plasma concentrations of lorcainide and norlorcainide. Fourteen patients were treated with lorcainide, 200 to 400 mg/day, 12 of whom achieved nearly complete suppression of arrhythmias after treatment for 1 year. Chronic lorcainide treatment was well tolerated; no patient discontinued treatment because of adverse effects. Lorcainide and norlorcainide plasma concentrations remained stable after the first week of therapy. Antiarrhythmic activity persisted throughout the year. Upon drug withdrawal, the mean lorcainide washout half-life was 14.3 +/- 3.7 hours and the mean norlorcainide washout half-life was 31.9 +/- 8.9 hours. The return of arrhythmias occurred well after the lorcainide plasma concentration had decreased to subtherapeutic levels, suggesting an antiarrhythmic effect of norlorcainide. Thus, long-term lorcainide therapy is effective in treating chronic symptomatic PVCs and is well tolerated by most patients. The metabolite norlorcainide appears to have antiarrhythmic activity independent of lorcainide.

Metabolites of cardiac antiarrhythmic drugs: their clinical role

Most antiarrhythmic drugs are extensively metabolized, and the accumulation of the metabolites of several of these drugs has been documented. In some cases, the steady-state plasma concentrations of metabolites are considerably greater than is the concentration of the parent drug. Several of these metabolites have been evaluated in animal models for antiarrhythmic activity and their potencies have been defined relative to the activity of their parent compound. Evaluations of activity are generally conducted in animal arrhythmia models, and very few metabolites of antiarrhythmic drugs have been evaluated directly in patients. However, from knowledge of antiarrhythmic activity in animals and the degree to which a metabolite accumulates in the plasma of patients, one can make qualitative judgments about its therapeutic role. Such judgments, however, need to be recognized as tenuous. Quantitative judgments require further information regarding the relationship between the parent drug and metabolite when present simultaneously in the myocardium. One must consider whether the effects of the parent drug and metabolite are additive, synergistic, or even antagonistic. The latter case is most possible with drug-metabolite pairs where the metabolite accumulates substantially, but does not have significant antiarrhythmic potency. Other considerations include noncardiac effects of the metabolites. As in the case of the mono-desethyl metabolite of lidocaine, the significance of its accumulation relates more to central nervous system side effects than to direct cardiac actions. The role of active metabolites also much be considered in regard to differences in the disposition kinetics between the parent drug and metabolite. The most obvious situation where this is important is in designing clinical drug evaluation protocols. As illustrated by the metabolites of encainide and lorcainide, the time course of accumulation and disappearance of the metabolites may be much longer than that of the parent drug. Clinical evaluations at steady state must take into account the time required to achieve steady-state concentrations of the metabolites as well. Similarly, after discontinuation of drug administration, the time required before washout is complete may be totally dependent on the kinetics of the metabolite, and not the parent drug. Variability in metabolic activity also needs to be considered. It has been shown with procainamide and encainide that genetic factors can influence the rate of production of active metabolites and consequently influence the clinical efficacy of these drugs. Another consideration that deserves attention is the question of drug interactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer antiarrhythmic agents

This article reviews clinical pharmacokinetic data on 8 new antiarrhythmic agents. Some of these drugs have been studied extensively while others are relatively new, with incomplete data due to limited evaluation. Amiodarone is a class III antiarrhythmic drug which is effective in treating many atrial and ventricular arrhythmias that are refractory to other drugs. Amiodarone accumulates extensively in tissues and its disposition characteristics are best described by models with 3 and 4 compartments. Its apparent volume of distribution is very large (1300 to 11,000L) and its elimination half-life very long (53 days). A delay of up to 28 days from of treatment to onset of antiarrhythmic effect may be observed, and the antiarrhythmic effect may persist for weeks to months following cessation of therapy. Clinically significant drug interactions have been observed with amiodarone and warfarin, digoxin, quinidine and procainamide. Encainide is a class Ic antiarrhythmic drug. Although it has a short elimination half-life (1 to 3h), 2 major metabolites with antiarrhythmic effects accumulate in the plasma of patients during long term therapy. Plasma concentrations of O-demethyl encainide appear to correlate with the antiarrhythmic effect. Flecainide, another class Ic antiarrhythmic agent, has an elimination half-life of 14 hours which makes it suitable for twice daily dosing. Flecainide elimination is prolonged in patients with low output heart failure. Significant drug interactions with digoxin and cimetidine have been reported. Lorcainide is also a class Ic antiarrhythmic drug, the bioavailability of which is nonlinear. Clearance of the drug is reduced during long term therapy. A major active metabolite, norlorcainide, accumulates in the plasma of patients during long term therapy and its concentration exceeds that of lorcainide by a factor of 2. The elimination half-lives of lorcainide (9h) and norlorcainide (28h) allow for once or twice daily dosing. Mexiletine, a class Ib antiarrhythmic drug, is structurally similar to lignocaine (lidocaine). A sustained release formulation provides effective plasma concentrations when administered twice daily. The apparent volume of distribution of mexiletine is 5.0 to 6.6 L/kg, and the elimination half-life varies from 6 to 12 hours in normal subjects and from 11 to 17 hours in cardiac patients. Mexilitine is extensively metabolised but the metabolites are not pharmacologically active. Renal elimination of mexiletine is pH dependent. Drugs which induce hepatic metabolism significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of mexiletine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Therapy with investigational antiarrhythmic drugs

The investigational antiarrhythmic agents available for use in this country are predominantly class I drugs with local anesthetic membrane effects. These drugs are often used successfully to control arrhythmias refractory to treatment with the standard antiarrhythmic drugs. Side effects often limit their use, and particular attention needs to be paid to their cardiac side effects, such as exacerbation of arrhythmia or enhanced conduction defects.

Pharmacology of lorcainide

Lorcainide is a new type 1 antiarrhythmic drug that is well absorbed orally, with bioavailability increasing with both dose and continued administration. It is metabolized through the liver, and patients with significant liver disease will require dosage reduction. The drug has an active metabolite, norlorcainide, whose activity is similar to that of lorcainide but whose half-life is 26 hours instead of 8 for the parent compound. The levels of this metabolite are nearly twice those of lorcainide at steady state. The long half-life of the metabolite and the changing bioavailability of lorcainide require that a given dose be administered for 1 week for the maximum effect to be demonstrated.

Pharmacodynamics of the initiation of antiarrhythmic therapy with lorcainide

Lorcainide is an antiarrhythmic drug with unusual pharmacokinetics and an active metabolite, norlorcainide, which complicate oral drug loading. In order to characterize the accumulation of lorcainide and norlorcainide and to define the onset of antiarrhythmic action during lorcainide loading, 9 patients with frequent ventricular ectopic beats were studied. During lorcainide loading with 100 mg orally twice daily, frequent ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings were monitored and blood samples for drug concentrations were determined. There was a 10-fold range of intersubject variation in plasma concentrations. Despite a half-life of only 8.9 +/- 2.3 hours, lorcainide did not reach steady state until after 4.5 days of therapy. Norlorcainide had a half-life of 26.5 +/- 7.2 hours and was estimated to come to steady state after 7 to 10 days. There was considerable intersubject variation in time of onset of antiarrhythmic response (2 to more than 4.5 days) and a 4- to 5-fold range of intersubject variation in threshold therapeutic plasma concentration (lorcainide 40 to 200 ng/ml, norlorcainide 80 to 300 ng/ml). These observations suggest that lorcainide should be started at low doses and the dose should not be increased more frequently than once a week.

Identification of a prazosin metabolite and some preliminary data on its kinetics in hypertensive patients

A metabolite of prazosin was detected in serum from hypertensive patients treated with prazosin. Its structure as 2-(1-piperazinyl)-4-amino-6,7-dimethoxyquinazoline was established by UV, IR, and mass-spectrometry. An assay method for simultaneous determination of prazosin and its metabolite in serum, urine and saliva is described. Preliminary data about the kinetics of prazosin and the metabolite after a single oral dose of prazosin 1 mg, and after multiple doses of 1 to 5 mg t.i.d. for 6-82 days in 7 patients with hypertension, are presented. After the single dose the metabolite level was much lower than that of intact drug, even though the former was eliminated much more slowly than the latter. The slow elimination of the metabolite led to its eventual accumulation in serum during multiple administration. The mean accumulation ratio of the metabolite was estimated to be at least 5.5 (from 3.0 to 7.9). Prazosin itself had a low accumulation ratio, so the mean steady-state level of the intact drug on multiple administration was several times lower than that of metabolite. As this metabolite has some hypotensive effect in animals, it may account for part of the therapeutic activity of parzosin in patients. The mean steady-state concentration of intact prazosin during the course of treatment were found to be significantly lower than that predicted from a single dose study.

First-pass elimination. Basic concepts and clinical consequences

First-pass elimination takes place when a drug is metabolised between its site of administration and the site of sampling for measurement of drug concentration. Clinically, first-pass metabolism is important when the fraction of the dose administered that escapes metabolism is small and variable. The liver is usually assumed to be the major site of first-pass metabolism of a drug administered orally, but other potential sites are the gastrointestinal tract, blood, vascular endothelium, lungs, and the arm from which venous samples are taken. Bioavailability, defined as the ratio of the areas under the blood concentration-time curves, after extra- and intravascular drug administration (corrected for dosage if necessary), is often used as a measure of the extent of first-pass metabolism. When several sites of first-pass metabolism are in series, the bioavailability is the product of the fractions of drug entering the tissue that escape loss at each site. The extent of first-pass metabolism in the liver and intestinal wall depends on a number of physiological factors. The major factors are enzyme activity, plasma protein and blood cell binding, and gastrointestinal motility. Models that describe the dependence of bioavailability on changes in these physiological variables have been developed for drugs subject to first-pass metabolism only in the liver. Two that have been applied widely are the 'well-stirred' and 'parallel tube' models. Discrimination between the 2 models may be performed under linear conditions in which all pharmacokinetic parameters are independent of concentration and time. The predictions of the models are similar when bioavailability is large but differ dramatically when bioavailability is small. The 'parallel tube' model always predicts a much greater change in bioavailability than the 'well-stirred' model for a given change in drug-metabolising enzyme activity, blood flow, or fraction of drug unbound. Many clinically important drugs undergo considerable first-pass metabolism after an oral dose. Drugs in this category include alprenolol, amitriptyline, dihydroergotamine, 5-fluorouracil, hydralazine, isoprenaline (isoproterenol), lignocaine (lidocaine), lorcainide, pethidine (meperidine), mercaptopurine, metoprolol, morphine, neostigmine, nifedipine, pentazocine and propranolol. One major therapeutic implication of extensive first-pass metabolism is that much larger oral doses than intravenous doses are required to achieve equivalent plasma concentrations. For some drugs, extensive first-pass metabolism precludes their use as oral agents (e. g. lignocaine, naloxone and glyceryl trinitrate).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Importance of metabolites in antiarrhythmic therapy

The presence of metabolites with pharmacologic activity can produce unanticipated drug efficacy or toxicity. This is particularly true during treatment with drugs that have narrow therapeutic-toxic ratios, such as the antiarrhythmic agents. The presence of active metabolites can often be inferred from variability in the relation between pharmacologic effect and steady-state plasma concentrations of the parent drug. Moreover, metabolites may ordinarily be unimportant but can accumulate to therapeutic (or toxic) levels in disease states such as congestive heart failure, renal failure and hepatic failure. Further characterization of the contribution of such metabolites during treatment requires direct evaluation of their pharmacology in vitro, in animal models and, if indicated, in man. Procainamide and its active metabolite N-acetylprocainamide provide the best and most complete example of this sequence of observations. Other drugs, including quinidine, disopyramide, verapamil and the investigational agents encainide and lorcainide, have active metabolites for which pharmacologic activity is less well-defined. Further studies in this area will help reduce the frequency of antiarrhythmic drug adverse effects, make successful therapy more frequent, and perhaps allow insights into structure-activity relations.

Plasma level monitoring of antiarrhythmic drugs

It is widely accepted that the effects (both cardiac and extracardiac) of antiarrhythmic drugs are modulated by their concentration at some unidentified active site, and that the drug concentrations in the systemic circulation and at these active sites are in equilibrium. Thus, antiarrhythmic drug effects can be related directly to systemic plasma concentrations, and an optimal plasma concentration can be identified at which satisfactory arrhythmia suppression can be achieved in the absence of intolerable adverse effects. This optimal concentration is influenced by several factors that give rise to significant interpatient variability. These factors include serum protein binding, active metabolites, intrinsic responsiveness and myocardial accumulation. Although plasma concentration guidelines have been suggested for most antiarrhythmic drugs, they are generally not statistically derived and, with the exception of procainamide, are extrapolated from small patient samples. They generally represent the experience of an investigator or group of investigators treating a small homogeneous patient population. Interpretation of plasma concentrations of antiarrhythmic drugs also requires consideration of pharmacokinetic factors. Plasma drug levels are only useful when dosing history and timing of the blood sample, relative to drug administration, are considered. Despite several limitations, plasma concentration monitoring of antiarrhythmic drugs can be helpful if evaluated with an understanding of the pharmacokinetic properties of the drug being measured, the clinical status of the patient and an appreciation of the factors that may influence the relation between the measured level and resultant clinical response.

Comparison of the electrophysiologic effects of intravenous and oral lorcainide in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia

The electrophysiologic effects of intravenous lorcainide (2.2 mg/kg) in 10 patients were compared with the electrophysiologic effects of oral lorcainide (mean dose 400 mg/day for 8 days) in 11 patients, all with recurrent ventricular tachycardia that could be induced with programmed stimulation. Intravenous and oral lorcainide resulted in similar prolongation of the QRS, QT, and HV intervals, but only oral lorcainide resulted in prolongation of the AH interval and atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods. After both oral and intravenous lorcainide, ventricular tachycardia could still be induced, but the arrhythmia was slower and better tolerated hemodynamically. The mean plasma lorcainide level during a maintenance intravenous infusion was 1254 +/- 662 ng/ml compared with a lorcainide level of 562 +/- 41 ng/ml and a norlorcainide level of 1212 +/- 653 ng/ml after oral dosing. No norlorcainide was detected in plasma after intravenous lorcainide. These data suggest that the short-term electrophysiologic effects of intravenous lorcainide may be different from those of short-term therapy with the oral drug. These differences should be considered during short-term studies of lorcainide.