Effects of diltiazem on plasma level and urinary excretion of digoxin in healthy subjects

Calcium channel blockers: spectrum of side effects and drug interactions

Calcium antagonists are a chemically heterogenous group of agents with potent cardiovascular effects which are beneficial in the treatment of angina pectoris, arterial hypertension and cardiac arrhythmias. The main side effects for the group are dose-dependent and the result of the main action or actions of the calcium antagonists, i.e. vasodilatation, negative inotropic effects and antiarrhythmic effects. Pronounced hypotension is reported for the main calcium antagonist drugs; verapamil, diltiazem and nifedipine. While conduction disturbances and bradycardia are seen more often after verapamil and diltiazem, tachycardia, headache and flush are more frequent after nifedipine. Constipation is relatively frequent after verapamil while nifedipine is reported to induce diarrhea in som patients. Idiosyncratic side effects are rare but have been reported from the skin, mouth, musculoskeletal system, the liver and the central nervous system. These side effects include urticarial rashes, gingival hyperplasia, arthralgia, hepathotoxicity and transistory mental confusion or akathisia. Verapamil, diltiazem and possibly also nifedipine have been reported to increase serum digoxin concentrations but the clinical relevance of these drug interactions are not clear. Furthermore, verapamil and diltiazem may potentiate the effects of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs and verapamil may also potentiate the effects of neuromuscular blocking drugs. It is concluded that side effects after calcium antagonist drugs are mostly trivial and transient although they may sometimes be relatively common. Clinically relevant drug interactions are few. Judged from the point of efficacy and safety, calcium antagonists will have a major place in the future pharmacotherapy of several cardiovascular disorders.

Effects of itraconazole and diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine, a substrate of P-glycoprotein

AIMS

Fexofenadine is a substrate of several drug transporters including P-glycoprotein. Our objective was to evaluate the possible effects of two P-glycoprotein inhibitors, itraconazole and diltiazem, on the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine, a putative probe of P-glycoprotein activity in vivo, and compare the inhibitory effect between the two in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

In a randomized three-phase crossover study, eight healthy volunteers were given oral doses of 100 mg itraconazole twice daily, 100 mg diltiazem twice daily or a placebo capsule twice daily (control) for 5 days. On the morning of day 5 each subject was given 120 mg fexofenadine, and plasma concentrations and urinary excretion of fexofenadine were measured up to 48 h after dosing.

RESULTS

Itraconazole pretreatment significantly increased mean (+/-SD) peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of fexofenadine from 699 (+/-366) ng ml-1 to 1346 (+/-561) ng ml-1 (95% CI of differences 253, 1040; P<0.005) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC0,infinity] from 4133 (+/-1776) ng ml-1 h to 11287 (+/-4552) ng ml-1 h (95% CI 3731, 10575; P<0.0001). Elimination half-life and renal clearance in the itraconazole phase were not altered significantly compared with those in the control phase. In contrast, diltiazem pretreatment did not affect Cmax (704+/-316 ng ml-1, 95% CI -145, 155), AUC0, infinity (4433+/-1565 ng ml-1 h, 95% CI -1353, 754), or other pharmacokinetic parameters of fexofenadine.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some drug transporters other than P-glycoprotein are thought to play an important role in fexofenadine pharmacokinetics, itraconazole pretreatment increased fexofenadine exposure, probably due to the reduced first-pass effect by inhibiting the P-glycoprotein activity. As diltiazem pretreatment did not alter fexofenadine pharmacokinetics, therapeutic doses of diltiazem are unlikely to affect the P-glycoprotein activity in vivo.

MDR1-mediated interaction of digoxin with antiarrhythmic or antianginal drugs

The multidrug transporter, MDR1-mediated interaction of digoxin with antiarrhythmic or antianginal drugs was examined in vitro by using the MDR1-overexpressing LLC-GA5-COL150 cells, which were established by transfection with human MDR1 cDNA into porcine kidney epithelial LLC-PK(1) cells. Amiodarone, its active metabolite monodesethyl-amiodarone (DEA), and quinidine markedly inhibited the basal-to-apical transport (renal secretion) of [(3)H]digoxin and increased the apical-to-basal transport (reabsorption), but cibenzoline and lidocaine showed slight inhibition of the transport, and disopyramide and mexiletin had no such effects. The IC(50) values for amiodarone, DEA and quinidine on [(3)H]digoxin transport in LLC-GA5-COL150 cells were 5.48 microM, 1.27 microM and 9.52 microM, respectively. These were comparable to, or only several times the achievable concentration in clinical use, suggesting that MDR1 could be responsible for the drug interaction between digoxin and amiodarone found in clinical reports and that DEA contributes the elevation of digoxin serum concentration. Similarly, dipyridamole altered the transport, but isosorbide showed only slight modification of the transport. The IC(50) value for dipyridamole was 40.0 microM, also only several times the achievable concentration in clinical use, indicating a risk of interaction.

Pharmacoepidemiologic detection of calcium channel blocker-induced change on digoxin clearance using multiple trough screen analysis

Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to estimate the effects of digoxin-calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem, nifedipine) in 336 serum levels gathered from 172 patients (104 male and 68 female) receiving oral digoxin as hospital in-patients. The final model describing digoxin clearance (CL) was CL (l/day)=(87.9+2.71C(cr))0.872(CCB)0.880(CHF)0.937(SPI)0.854(DFAC), where C(cr) is the estimated creatinine clearance (ml/min); CCB=1 for concomitant administration of calcium channel blockers and CCB=zero otherwise; CHF=1 for the patients with congestive heart failure and CHF=zero otherwise; SPI=1 for concomitant administration of spironolactone and SPI=zero otherwise; DFAC=1 for administration of a half-tablet of digoxin and DFAC=zero otherwise. Concomitant administration of calcium channel blockers resulted in a 13% decrease in digoxin relative clearance.

Calcium antagonists. Drug interactions of clinical significance

The interaction of calcium antagonists, including the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists (e.g. nifedipine), verapamil and diltiazem, with drugs from other classes has major clinical ramifications as the use of drug combinations increases in frequency. Combinations are used in the treatment of disorders ranging from hypertension to cardiac rhythm disturbances, angina pectoris and peripheral vasospastic disease. In this era of organ transplantation, drugs like cyclosporin are coming into potential conflict with an ever-growing list of drugs. Drug combinations used as part of long term therapies are also making their appearance in toxic drug reactions, including antituberculous and anticonvulsant agents. Bronchodilators and H2-blockers also fall into this category of potential culprits of combined drug toxicity, and the interactions of calcium antagonists with beta-blockers and antiarrhythmic agents are also becoming a matter of concern.

Pharmacokinetic interactions with calcium channel antagonists (Part II)

Since calcium channel antagonists are a diverse class of drugs frequently administered in combination with other agents, the potential for clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions exists. These interactions occur most frequently via altered hepatic blood flow and impaired hepatic enzyme activity. Part I of the article, which appeared in the previous issue of the Journal, dealt with interactions between calcium antagonists and marker compounds, theophylline, midazolam, lithium, doxorubicin, oral hypoglycaemics and cardiac drugs. Part II examines interactions with cyclosporin, anaesthetics, carbamazepine and cardiovascular agents.

The effects of diltiazem on hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes in man using antipyrine, trimethadione and debrisoquine as model substrates

Six healthy male subjects were given single oral doses of antipyrine (7 mg kg-1), trimethadione (4 mg kg-1) and debrisoquine (10 mg) before and during diltiazem treatment (30 mg three times daily orally for 8 days). Antipyrine clearance decreased from 33.7 +/- 9.1 to 22.5 +/- 4.9 ml min-1 (P less than 0.05, mean +/- s.e. mean) after diltiazem treatment without any significant change in apparent volume of distribution (0.59 +/- 0.06 to 0.60 +/- 0.04 1 kg-1), resulting in an increase in antipyrine elimination half-life from 13.4 +/- 4.8 to 19.7 +/- 3.2 h (P less than 0.05). The formation clearance of antipyrine to 4-hydroxyantipyrine was decreased significantly from 10.8 +/- 2.7 to 6.6 +/- 2.7 ml min-1 (P less than 0.05), while that to 3-hydroxymethylantipyrine and norantipyrine was not altered by diltiazem. The metabolic ratio of debrisoquine (urinary excretion of debrisoquine/4-hydroxydebrisoquine) was increased significantly from 0.70 +/- 0.05 to 1.95 +/- 0.20 (P less than 0.05), while that of trimethadione (serum concentration of dimethadione/trimethadione) was not changed significantly (0.48 +/- 0.08 vs 0.41 +/- 0.06) after diltiazem treatment. Diltiazem selectively inhibits cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes.

Drug interactions in hypertensive patients. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and genetic considerations

Antihypertensive treatment has proven benefits, and the number of patients being treated with these drugs is significant. Hypertensive patients may have other medical illnesses for which they receive medications, and interactions between antihypertensive agents and other drugs is likely. Some of these interactions may lead to undesirable effects or even loss of blood pressure control. However, drug interactions can also be beneficial when 2 antihypertensive drugs with different pharmacological actions are prescribed in combination and with a clear therapeutic objective in mind. Clinicians should be aware of the mechanisms and the consequences of the different types of interaction in hypertensive patients, so that a desired pharmacological response can be achieved with the fewest side effects in the patients.

Diltiazem attenuates the inotropic and peripheral vascular effects of cardiac glycosides

The influence of diltiazem on the hemodynamic effects of ouabain in 10 preinstrumented awake dogs was studied. Mean aortic pressure increased from 102 to 119 mm Hg with ouabain (p less than 0.05), an effect that was attenuated by pretreatment with diltiazem. The increase in systemic vascular resistance of 30% with ouabain was ablated by prior diltiazem. Heart rate did not significantly change with ouabain or with diltiazem plus ouabain, but intravenous diltiazem alone produced a reflex increase in heart rate of 26%. Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension was significantly greater with ouabain alone, but not with ouabain after pretreatment with diltiazem. LV dP/dt max increased by 40% with ouabain alone, but by only 23% (p less than 0.001) after pretreatment with diltiazem plus ouabain. When observed at matched preload and heart rate, diltiazem markedly attenuates the positive inotropic and peripheral arterial constrictive effects of acute ouabain administration in the conscious animal with normal LV function.

Pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin

Numerous pharmacological agents have been shown to produce clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin. Drugs which reduce digoxin absorption include the antacids aluminium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide and magnesium trisilicate, the antidiarrhoeals kaolin and pectin, the hypocholesterolaemic agent cholestyramine and the chemotoxins cyclophosphamide, vincristine and bleomycin. Certain antibiotics including sulphasalazine, neomycin and aminosalicylic acid reduce digoxin absorption while others, including erythromycin and tetracycline, increase the bioavailability of digoxin in some patients. Capsule preparations of digoxin in solution are less subject to several of the interactions which affect the absorption and bioavailability of digoxin tablets. Various drugs induce alterations in the volume of distribution and clearance of digoxin. Cardiac patients receiving digoxin therapy are particularly prone to interactions with commonly co-administered medications such as the antiarrhythmics quinidine and amiodarone, the calcium channel blockers verapamil and nifedipine, and possibly some vasodilating agents. Studies of digoxin interactions have yielded discrepant results, indicating the need for careful analysis of investigational design before arriving at clinical conclusions.

Low- and medium-dose diltiazem in chronic atrial fibrillation: comparison with digoxin and correlation with drug plasma levels

The safety and efficacy of diltiazem were compared with digoxin maintenance therapy for control of ventricular response in 19 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. The relationship between drug plasma levels and cardiovascular effects was also investigated. After 7 days of combined therapy with diltiazem (60 mg three times a day in 10 patients and four times a day in nine patients) and digoxin (0.125 mg/day in two patients and 0.250 mg/day in 17 patients), the 24-hour mean heart rate derived from ambulatory ECG recording was reduced by 16.3% in comparison with digoxin therapy alone; the serum digoxin level was not significantly changed (1.06 +/- 0.43 vs 1.05 +/- 0.61 ng/ml). After a standardized bicycle exercise test (50 watts for 3 minutes), maximal heart rate was reduced by 19.9%, diastolic blood pressure was decreased by 8.9%, and systolic pressure-rate product was decreased by 12.5%. Diltiazem plasma levels (mean 120.9 +/- 63.3 ng/ml) were linearly correlated with percentage variations in maximal heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, and pressure-rate product during exercise. Eighteen patients in succession discontinued digoxin therapy; after 14 days of diltiazem alone, the 24-hour mean heart rate returned to control values of digoxin therapy, whereas maximal heart rate and pressure-rate product during exercise were significantly reduced (-17.2% and -14.1%, respectively), with no changes in blood pressure. Diltiazem plasma levels (135.0 +/- 83.2 ng/ml) showed a linear correlation with the percentage of reduction in maximal heart rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Combination therapy with diltiazem and nifedipine in patients with effort angina pectoris

The antianginal effects of diltiazem and nifedipine alone and in combination were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 11 patients (nine men and two women, 57 +/- 8 years old) with stable effort angina. Each patient received placebo, 30 mg of diltiazem, 10 mg of nifedipine, and 30 mg of diltiazem plus 10 mg of nifedipine four times daily for 1 week each. Antianginal efficacy was assessed by means of a treadmill exercise test. The exercise tolerance time was significantly prolonged from 235.1 +/- 52 (placebo period) to 342.2 +/- 101 sec by diltiazem (p less than .01) and to 325.6 +/- 73 sec by nifedipine (p less than .01). The drug combination further prolonged exercise time to 451.1 +/- 103 sec, which was significantly longer than the interval attained with either diltiazem (p less than .01) or nifedipine (p less than .01) alone. The plasma concentration of diltiazem was unaffected by the addition of nifedipine, whereas the plasma nifedipine concentration was significantly increased from 34.8 +/- 11 to 106.4 +/- 37 ng/ml (p less than .001) by the concomitant administration of diltiazem. These data suggest that exercise tolerance in patients with effort angina is increased by the concomitant administration of diltiazem and nifedipine associated with an increase in the nifedipine plasma concentration.

Digoxin-felodipine interaction in patients with congestive heart failure

A possible interaction between felodipine and digoxin was studied in 23 patients with congestive heart failure before and after 8 weeks treatment with both drugs. A modest, non-significant increase in serum digoxin level 2 h postdose (+15%) was found in the felodipine group (n = 11) compared to placebo (n = 12), with no change in the trough and 6 h postdose levels. There was a bimodal distribution of the observed changes in serum digoxin level 2 h postdose: a significant increase (p less than 0.001) was observed only in patients with a high plasma felodipine level, which may have been caused by changes in the absorption rate in those patients. Changes in the elimination of digoxin after felodipine therapy appeared unlikely, since the trough and 6 h post-dose levels were unchanged. Analysis of the clinical characteristics, haemodynamics and laboratory values revealed no significant differences between the subgroups. The observed increase in serum digoxin warrants monitoring the trough and peak levels digoxin in patients with congestive heart failure who are also being treated with felodipine.

Diltiazem increases steady state digoxin serum levels in patients with cardiac disease

Diltiazem has been reported to decrease or not to affect digoxin elimination. The effects of diltiazem on steady state concentrations of digoxin was evaluated in eleven patients with congestive heart failure receiving this drug for at least two weeks. The mean trough digoxin was 1.11 +/- 0.18 ng/ml before the coadministration of diltiazem (180 mg/day). This concentration increased to 1.54 +/- 0.22 ng/ml after three days and to 1.54 +/- 0.23 ng/ml after seven days of coadministration (P less than 0.01). Clinically, no patient showed signs of digitalis toxicity. Creatinine clearance was unchanged. The present results show that when diltiazem is added to a regimen that includes digoxin, steady state concentrations of this glycoside may increase.

Clinical pharmacokinetic significance of the renal tubular secretion of digoxin

Tubular secretion appears to be a major route of the renal elimination of digoxin. Secretion of the drug by the tubules is modulated by renal blood flow, by a number of commonly coadministered drugs (e.g. quinidine, spironolactone, verapamil, amiodarone), and by age. The maximal transport capacity does not appear to be achieved with clinically relevant concentrations. The tubular transport of digoxin does not appear to be associated with the anionic or cationic transport systems, nor the Na+/K+-ATPase receptor. Further studies are needed to elucidate the exact mechanisms involved in the transtubular movement of the glycoside.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between digoxin and antiarrhythmic agents and calcium channel blocking agents: an appraisal of study methodology

While preliminary screening for interactions between new cardiovascular pharmacotherapeutic agents and digoxin can be efficiently and safely conducted in normal healthy volunteers, it is particularly important to detect and quantify drug interactions in patients with varying degrees of cardiac, hepatic and/or renal dysfunction. Much of the previously published literature provides only minimal data to guide clinical practice because of limitations of study design including sample size and measurement techniques. Important factors that determine the ability of a particular study design to detect a drug interaction with digoxin include the accuracy and precision of the assay method for serum digoxin concentrations, intrasubject and intersubject variability in serum digoxin concentration, and sample size. The format of the trial (chronic versus single digoxin dosing in cardiac patients; chronic versus single digoxin dosing in normal subjects) and the method of assessment of alterations in digoxin handling (formal determination of digoxin clearance, comparison of multiple or single digoxin measurements during various phases of trial) also impact greatly on the clinical relevance of such investigations. Guidelines for future studies of drug interactions with digoxin in cardiac patients are proposed with particular emphasis on laboratory methods; measurement techniques during baseline, placebo, and active drug phases; calculation of the statistical power of the study; time course of the trial; and assessment of the clinical significance of the findings.

Calcium channel blockers and cardiac surgery

Calcium channel blockers have an important role in the pharmacotherapy of cardiovascular disorders. These agents act by inhibiting the slow inward current into excitable cells, exert direct negative inotropic, chronotropic, and dromotropic activity, and are potent vasodilators. These direct effects are modified by reflex autonomic stimulation and by pathologic states. Serious adverse effects of the calcium channel blockers are most frequently observed in patients with ventricular dysfunction, conduction system disease, or concomitant beta blockade. Calcium channel blockers are indicated in the treatment of angina pectoris, supraventricular arrhythmias, and hypertension. The use of these agents in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension is investigational. The calcium channel blockers are gaining increased importance in the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Verapamil is indicated for the treatment of post-cardiac-surgical atrial flutter and fibrillation; however, the calcium antagonists are not effective as prophylaxis against postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias. Laboratory studies have shown that drug interactions exist between calcium channel blockers and inhalational anesthetics and nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents; clinical studies have demonstrated that these interactions are rarely significant. Perioperative coronary spasm can be effectively treated with the calcium channel blockers. The timing of calcium antagonist withdrawal prior to surgery is controversial, but continuation of therapy until surgery is usually safe. The clinical significance of platelet function inhibition by the calcium antagonists is unknown. Protection of ischemic myocardium by calcium channel blockers has been demonstrated. Important interactions between the calcium antagonists, hypothermia, and the ionic constituents of cardioplegia require further study before the role of these agents as adjuncts to clinical cardioplegia is defined. Expanded indications and the introduction of new calcium channel blockers will result in increased use of these agents in the future.

Efficacy of oral diltiazem to control ventricular response in chronic atrial fibrillation at rest and during exercise

Although digoxin is often the first choice for control of ventricular response in chronic atrial fibrillation, it fails to slow exercise rates. Diltiazem, a calcium channel antagonist that slows atrioventricular conduction, was administered to 16 patients who failed to achieve adequate rate control on low level exercise testing despite digoxin therapy. Therapeutic response to diltiazem was assessed with submaximal and maximal exercise tests and 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. During the diltiazem treatment phase, ventricular response at rest diminished (96 +/- 17 versus 69 +/- 10 beats/min, p less than 0.001) as did rate during submaximal exercise (155 +/- 28 versus 116 +/- 26, p less than 0.001), maximal exercise (163 +/- 14 versus 133 +/- 26, p less than 0.001) and average ventricular response during 24 hour monitoring (87 +/- 13 versus 69 +/- 10, p less than 0.001). Rate at rest decreased 26 +/- 15% and submaximal exercise rate diminished 24 +/- 12%. Thirteen (81%) of the 16 patients exhibited at least 15% slowing of rate at rest and during submaximal exercise. Eleven patients (69%) reported alleviation of symptoms. There was no change in serum digoxin levels during diltiazem treatment (1.3 +/- 0.5 versus 1.3 +/- 0.6 ng/ml, p = NS). On withdrawal of diltiazem, ventricular response returned to baseline values. Diltiazem is an effective agent for control of ventricular response, both at rest and during exercise, in digoxin-treated patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

No increase in serum digoxin concentration with high-dose diltiazem

The effect of incremental diltiazem dosing during concomitant digoxin administration over a four-week period in eight healthy adult volunteers (mean age, 28 +/- 4 years) was studied. The study group received 0.25 mg of digoxin twice daily for two days, after which they received 0.25 mg daily for the duration of the study. Following baseline electrocardiographic evaluation and measurement of trough digoxin levels, all subjects received 120 mg of diltiazem daily for one week, then 240 mg daily for one week, followed by 360 mg daily for one week. Resting electrocardiographic parameters (heart rate, P-R interval), renal function, electrolyte values, and digoxin and diltiazem concentrations were measured weekly. Daily administration of 360 mg of diltiazem plus 0.25 mg of digoxin resulted in a significant decrease in heart rate (from 68 +/- 9 beats per minute to 61 +/- 10 beats per minute; p less than 0.05), a marginal increase in P-R interval (from 169 +/- 22 msec to 179 +/- 21 msec; p = 0.08), and no significant change in trough serum digoxin concentration (from 0.85 +/- 0.08 ng/ml to 0.90 +/- 0.08 ng/ml; p = NS). The administration of up to 360 mg of diltiazem per day with 0.25 mg of digoxin per day was not associated with significant increases in serum digoxin concentrations in healthy subjects.

The influence of diltiazem hydrochloride on trough serum digoxin concentrations

A significant drug interaction between verapamil and digoxin, resulting in elevated serum digoxin concentrations, has been well documented in the medical literature. However, a similar interaction between digoxin and the calcium channel blockers nifedipine and diltiazem has not been conclusively established. This study investigated the influence of diltiazem hydrochloride on trough serum concentrations of concurrently administered digoxin in eight healthy volunteers. During the control phase of the study, volunteers were administered digoxin 0.25 mg/d for 13 days, and subsequently judged to be at steady state by serial determinations of digoxin serum concentrations. Twenty-four hour urine collections were done for creatinine clearance and urinary digoxin clearance determinations. Phase II of the study involved the addition of diltiazem hydrochloride 30 mg qid to the on-going, daily regimen of digoxin. After 14 days of concomitant therapy, steady-state trough digoxin concentrations were again determined, as well as creatinine clearances and urinary digoxin clearances. This investigation demonstrates that concomitant administration of diltiazem hydrochloride with digoxin results in significantly elevated steady-state trough digoxin concentrations (0.32 +/- 0.07 ng/ml increasing to 0.48 +/- 0.06 ng/ml, p less than 0.01). Urinary digoxin clearance decreased from 223.5 +/- 35.7 ml/min to 153.4 +/- 17.5 ml/min (p less than 0.05). Creatinine clearances were unaltered. A review of the current literature on this topic is included.

Evaluation of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between calcium antagonists and digoxin

Therapeutic uses of calcium antagonists have expanded to include not only ischemic heart disease but arrhythmias, systemic hypertension, congestive heart failure, and various pulmonary and gastrointestinal diseases. Many patients receiving a calcium antagonist concomitantly receive digoxin. Although the potential interaction between these agents has frequently been investigated, literature reports are confusing and inconsistent. We summarized the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and mechanisms of interaction to help clinicians evaluate the potential calcium antagonist-digoxin interaction.

Digoxin-diltiazem interaction: a pharmacokinetic evaluation

The pharmacokinetics of digoxin were studied before and after a 2 week course of diltiazem, 30 mg four times daily, in 7 healthy volunteers. Each subject received an IV dose of digoxin before starting diltiazem and again on day 15 of the study. Diltiazem was continued until all sera and urine were collected. During the control and diltiazem phases, respectively, the terminal elimination rate constants were 0.0231 +/- 0.007 h-1 and 0.0254 +/- 0.007 h-1, the volumes of distribution were 10.5 +/- 3.95 l/kg and 10.2 +/- 3.26 l/kg, and the total body clearances were 3.72 +/- 0.78 ml X min-1 X kg-1 and 4.09 +/- 0.94 ml X min-1 X kg-1. None of these pharmacokinetic parameters of digoxin were significantly different before or during diltiazem administration. Overall, there does not appear to be an interaction between digoxin and diltiazem.

Individualization of calcium entry-blocker dosage for systemic hypertension

The calcium entry blockers are used in a wide variety of clinical situations. Coexisting disease states, such as renal or hepatic dysfunction, may require individualized dosing of these agents. The physiologic changes associated with aging may also affect the pharmacokinetic properties of the drugs. If calcium entry blockers are used concurrently with other medications, dosage adjustment or selection of an alternative drug may be needed. Drug interactions between calcium entry blockers and cimetidine, digoxin and quinidine appear to be clinically significant. Individualized dosing in patients who have coexisting disease or who are using other medications is essential to achieve an adequate therapeutic response and avoid adverse effects. Considerations to attain an optimal response in such situations are presented.

[Pharmacokinetic and cardiac efficacy of beta-acetyldigoxin and digitoxin in combination therapy with diltiazem]

The effect of diltiazem (D) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of beta-acetyldigoxin (AD; n = 12) and digitoxin (DGT; n = 10) was studied in 22 patients with cardiac insufficiency stages II-III by the New York Heart Association. Glycoside plasma concentration and renal excretion as well as electrocardiogram [heart rate, atrioventricular transconduction time (PQ), duration of electrical systole corrected for heart rate (QTc), mean amplitude of T-waves in leads V2 to V6 (TV2-6)] and systole time intervals [total electromechanical systole index (QS21), left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), pre-ejection period index (PEPI), PEP/LVET ratio] were recorded repeatedly before and during co-administration of 180 mg/day D. In eight patients digoxin plasma levels increased continuously during additional D administration. After reaching a new steady state at 0.93 +/- 0.35 ng/ml digoxin concentrations were at an average 43% higher than before D administration (0.65 +/- 0.27 ng/ml) with a simultaneous increase in renal glycoside excretion. The other four patients showed neither changes in digoxin concentrations in plasma nor in renal glycoside excretion. Only half the patients treated with DGT and D revealed an increase in DGT plasma levels of 21.4%. Daily renal glycoside excretion was not altered by D administration. In accordance to the increasing AD plasma concentration, PQ-interval was prolonged and T-wave flattening was intensified, whereas the systolic time intervals after concomitant treatment of AD and D did not differ from those after AD alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Digoxin and nifedipine

Many investigators have studied the potential interactions between calcium-channel antagonists and digoxin. Digoxin is usually well absorbed, and its excretion is dependent on renal mechanisms, primarily glomerular filtration. Several studies have reported a decrease in digoxin clearance and an increase of approximately 50% in digoxin levels when verapamil was added to digoxin therapy. Because renal digoxin clearance was decreased but no concomitant change in creatinine clearance was shown, the presumed major mechanism for decreased renal digoxin clearance is an alteration in renal tubular secretion of digoxin. Although an early report described a digoxin-nifedipine interaction, several subsequent studies have shown no significant changes in digoxin kinetics during nifedipine administration. Four studies found no significant decrease in creatinine clearance of digoxin during nifedipine administration. Thus significant changes in glomerular filtration are unlikely. Physiologic endpoints were measured by 2 groups describing a digoxin-nifedipine interaction and, although there was an increase in serum digoxin concentration, no changes were found in electrophysiologic correlates. Thus, if a digoxin-nifedipine interaction does exist, steady-state digoxin levels might increase from 24 to 45% when nifedipine therapy is added. Studies to date have involved small numbers of subjects with and without cardiac disease and have used different study protocols. Nonetheless, little evidence exists for any clinically significant increase in physiologic effects and no adverse effects have been found in patients receiving combined nifedipine and digoxin.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between digoxin and other drugs

Drug interactions with digoxin are important because of this agent's narrow therapeutic index. Among the drugs that can decrease digoxin bioavailability are cholestyramine, antacid gels, kaolin-pectate, certain antimicrobial drugs and cancer chemotherapeutic agents. In selected patients, antibiotics may enhance digoxin bioavailability by eliminating intestinal flora that metabolize digoxin. Antiarrhythmic drugs, such as quinidine and amiodarone, can markedly increase steady state serum digoxin levels. Certain calcium channel blocking drugs, particularly verapamil, have a similar effect. Potassium-sparing diuretic drugs, such as spironolactone, can alter digoxin pharmacokinetics. Indomethacin may decrease renal excretion of digoxin in preterm infants. Finally, rifampin, an antibiotic used in the treatment of tuberculosis, may lower steady state serum digoxin levels in patients with severe renal disease. Physicians must maintain constant vigilance whenever medications are added to or withdrawn from a therapeutic regimen that includes digoxin.

Effect of diltiazem on renal clearance and serum concentration of digoxin in patients with cardiac disease

The effect of diltiazem on digoxin serum concentration was evaluated in 9 patients who had been treated chronically for heart disease with digoxin, 0.25 mg/day. The indications for digoxin therapy were arrhythmias in 5 patients and mild heart failure in the other 4. Renal digoxin clearance was also evaluated in 8 of these patients. Serum digoxin concentration was measured at control, 7 +/- 2 days after initiation of 120 mg/day of diltiazem and 11 +/- 5 days after increasing the dose of diltiazem to 240 mg/day. Serum digoxin concentration was 0.9 +/- 0.4 ng/ml at control, 0.8 +/- 0.4 ng/ml with 120 mg/day of diltiazem, and 0.8 +/- 0.3 ng/ml during therapy with 240 mg/day. The differences between these values were not significant. Renal digoxin clearance also did not show a significant change after diltiazem therapy (44 +/- 15 ml/min before diltiazem and 46 +/- 13 ml/min with 240 mg/day of diltiazem). This study shows no effect of diltiazem in doses of 120 to 240 mg/day on serum digoxin concentration or renal digoxin clearance in patients who are treated chronically for heart disease with digoxin. In this dose range, diltiazem has advantages over verapamil, which markedly elevates digoxin levels.

Calcium antagonists--drug interactions

Evaluations of drug interactions should be done with caution. One needs to be aware of the reported interactions and apply the information on an individual basis. This review may therefore serve as a guide to the more common drug interactions and when drug therapy should be monitored closely in clinical practice. Major drug interactions with calcium antagonists are summarized in Table 2.