The National Diabetic Retinopathy Laser Treatment Audit. II. Proliferative retinopathy

A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis on the Role of Analgesics and Anti-Inflammatories in Pan-retinal Photocoagulation

PURPOSE

Pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) is the mainstay of treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), reducing the risk of severe vision loss. Pain poses a potential obstacle to effective laser delivery and patient compliance. Therefore, implementing pain relief strategies can enhance both treatment efficacy and patient comfort.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled patients undergoing PRP due to DR and compared analgesics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) to placebo. Pain was evaluated with the visual analogue scale. The version 2 of the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials tool and its version for crossover trials were used to assess the risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool was used to measure the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included, comprising 1404 eyes from RCTs, nine of which were crossover. Patients who were administered analgesia reported a significantly lower pain sensitivity compared to those who received placebo (Standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.58, -0.17; P<0.01; I2=69%). Subgroup analysis of systemic administration of analgesics/NSAIDs (metamizole, Entonox, acetaminophen, ibuprofen, caffeine, mefenamic acid, intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine, and potassium diclofenac) also showed a statistically significant reduction in pain when compared to placebo (SMD -0.28; 95% CI -0.50, -0.07; P<0.01; I2=43%). Exclusive eye drops administration (ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% and sodium diclofenac 0.1%) also showed a significant difference in pain sensitivity (SMD -0.46; 95% CI -0.88, -0.05; I2=83%), however with a more significant heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis including over 1000 patients demonstrated that the use of analgesics significantly reduced pain sensitivity during PRP, and systemic analgesia is potentially better than topical administration when compared to placebo.

PASCAL laser platform produces less pain responses compared to conventional laser system during the panretinal photocoagulation: a randomized clinical trial

Background

Most of patients experience pain during the panretinal photocoagulation(PRP). Laser photocoagulation delivery has advanced with the introduction of pattern-scanning laser systems (PASCAL). Shorter pulse duration and less choroidal penetration believed to reduce pain during the laser treatment.

Objectives

To compare the severity of expressed pain scores in patients with PDR who underwent PRP either with PASCAL laser or conventional laser.

Methods

A total of 28 patients with a diagnosis of PDR who were scheduled for bilateral PRP therapy were enrolled into the prospective study. Both eyes were treated within the same session and while one eye was treated with PASCAL the other was treated with conventional laser randomly. Pulse duration was adjusted to 100-ms in conventional laser and 30 ms in PASCAL. The severity of pain was graded using a verbal scale and a visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

Mean age was 61.36±9.10 years. Mean verbal and VAS scores were 1.32±0.47 and 2.86±1.21 in the PASCAL laser and 2.39±0.49 and 5.75±1.35 in the conventional laser group, respectively. Differences between expressed pain scores obtained by both two scales were statistically significant (p<0.001).

Conclusion

PASCAL laser significantly alleviates pain levels possibly due to the shorter laser pulse duration and lower intensity.

Pan-retinal photocoagulation and other forms of laser treatment and drug therapies for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy: systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Diabetic retinopathy is an important cause of visual loss. Laser photocoagulation preserves vision in diabetic retinopathy but is currently used at the stage of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim was to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) given at the non-proliferative stage of diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) compared with waiting until the high-risk PDR (HR-PDR) stage was reached. There have been recent advances in laser photocoagulation techniques, and in the use of laser treatments combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs or injected steroids. Our secondary questions were: (1) If PRP were to be used in NPDR, which form of laser treatment should be used? and (2) Is adjuvant therapy with intravitreal drugs clinically effective and cost-effective in PRP?

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for efficacy but other designs also used.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and EMBASE to February 2014, Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

Systematic review and economic modelling.

RESULTS

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), published in 1991, was the only trial designed to determine the best time to initiate PRP. It randomised one eye of 3711 patients with mild-to-severe NPDR or early PDR to early photocoagulation, and the other to deferral of PRP until HR-PDR developed. The risk of severe visual loss after 5 years for eyes assigned to PRP for NPDR or early PDR compared with deferral of PRP was reduced by 23% (relative risk 0.77, 99% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.06). However, the ETDRS did not provide results separately for NPDR and early PDR. In economic modelling, the base case found that early PRP could be more effective and less costly than deferred PRP. Sensitivity analyses gave similar results, with early PRP continuing to dominate or having low incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. However, there are substantial uncertainties. For our secondary aims we found 12 trials of lasers in DR, with 982 patients in total, ranging from 40 to 150. Most were in PDR but five included some patients with severe NPDR. Three compared multi-spot pattern lasers against argon laser. RCTs comparing laser applied in a lighter manner (less-intensive burns) with conventional methods (more intense burns) reported little difference in efficacy but fewer adverse effects. One RCT suggested that selective laser treatment targeting only ischaemic areas was effective. Observational studies showed that the most important adverse effect of PRP was macular oedema (MO), which can cause visual impairment, usually temporary. Ten trials of laser and anti-VEGF or steroid drug combinations were consistent in reporting a reduction in risk of PRP-induced MO.

LIMITATION

The current evidence is insufficient to recommend PRP for severe NPDR.

CONCLUSIONS

There is, as yet, no convincing evidence that modern laser systems are more effective than the argon laser used in ETDRS, but they appear to have fewer adverse effects. We recommend a trial of PRP for severe NPDR and early PDR compared with deferring PRP till the HR-PDR stage. The trial would use modern laser technologies, and investigate the value adjuvant prophylactic anti-VEGF or steroid drugs.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005408.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Effect of pan retinal photocoagulation on central macular thickness and visual acuity in proliferative diabetic retinopathy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of pan-retinal photocoagulation with Pattern Scan Laser (pascal)on best corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness in patients having proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

METHODS

This study was conducted at AFIO, Rawalpindi, Pakistan from Oct 2014 to Jul 2015. Sixty seven eyes of 46 patients having proliferative diabetic retinopathy were included in the study. All patients underwent ophthalmic clinical examination including uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus examination with slit lamp and optical coherence tomography to document the pretreatment central macular thickness (CMT). Two sessions of PRP using Pattern Scan Laser were performed 04 weeks apart and OCT was repeated 04 weeks after the 2(nd) session. Central macular thickness and BCVA were documented.

RESULTS

Sixty seven eyes of 46 patients (29 females and 17 males) with mean age of 57.45 ± 5.78 years underwent treatment with two sessions of laser PRP. Mean pretreatment BCVA was 0.67 ± 0.43 and mean post-treatment BCVA was 0.57 ± 0.3. Mean central macular thickness (CMT)as measured by OCT was 391.93 ± 170.43 before treatment and 316.91 ± 90.42 um after treatment. The magnitude of induced change in CMT after treatment was 75.01 ± 90.75 and BCVA was 0.09 ± 0.14.

CONCLUSION

Laser PRP with Pattern scan laser alone in patients with combined presentation of PDR and DME is safe and effective.

Intraocular surgery in a large diabetes patient population: risk factors and surgical results

The prevalence of diabetes is on the increase in developed countries. Accordingly, the prevention and treatment of vision-threatening diabetic eye complications is assuming greater importance. The overall aim of this thesis is to analyse risk factors for intraocular surgery in a large diabetes population and to report surgical results. The specific objectives are to (1) estimate the incidence of diabetic vitrectomy and analyse risk factors (Study I), (2) report long-term results, prognostic factors and incidence of cataract surgery after diabetic vitrectomy (Study II), (3) report results and prognostic factors after cataract surgery in diabetes patients (Study III) and (4) analyse risk factors for diabetic papillopathy with emphasis on metabolic control variability (Study IV). All studies are based on a close-to-complete national surgery register and a large, closely followed diabetic retinopathy screening population. Study I (cohort study, 3980 type 1 diabetes patients) illustrates that diabetic vitrectomy is rarely required in a diabetes patient population with varying degrees of diabetic retinopathy. The risk of reaching diabetic vitrectomy increases fourfold with poor metabolic control, defined as glycosylated haemoglobin A1c > 75 mmol/mol (~9%), which points to good metabolic control as an important preventive measure. Study II (cohort study, 167 diabetes patients) shows that most diabetic vitrectomy patients stand to gain visual acuity ≥0.3 after surgery. Visual acuity is stable after 1 year, and the stability is maintained through 10 years of follow-up. The use of silicone oil for endotamponade is a consistent long-term predictor of low vision after surgery. The risk of requiring cataract surgery after diabetic vitrectomy is substantial, and the risk increases if silicone oil is used. Study III (cohort study, 285 diabetes patients) shows, on the other hand, that diabetes patients can expect a significant improvement in visual acuity after cataract surgery, regardless of the degree of diabetic retinopathy. Poor preoperative visual acuity, a high degree of diabetic retinopathy and advanced age are predictors of a poor visual acuity after surgery. The risk of diabetic macular oedema after surgery is 4%. Finally, Study IV (case-control study, 2066 type 1 diabetes patients) demonstrates that diabetic papillopathy shares characteristics with diabetic retinopathy. The risk of experiencing diabetic papillopathy increases markedly with a drastic, recent reduction in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c and a small optic disc. This lends support to the theory that diabetic eye complications may occur in anatomically predisposed patients in response to metabolic control variability. Overall, results after intraocular surgery in diabetes patients are favourable. Surgery, however, is associated with costs to society, patient discomfort and risk of complications. This thesis provides an analysis of risk factors for intraocular surgery and identifies prognostic factors for visual acuity after surgery, which can be used for preventive purposes, surgical decision-making and patient counselling.

United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database Study: Diabetic Retinopathy; Report 1: prevalence of centre-involving diabetic macular oedema and other grades of maculopathy and retinopathy in hospital eye services

AIMS

To report estimates of the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and maculopathy grades for a large cohort of patients managed by the UK hospital eye service (HES).

METHODS

Anonymised data were extracted from 30 UK NHS hospital trusts using a single ophthalmic electronic medical record (EMR) for the period from April 2000 to November 2010 to create the National Ophthalmology Database (NOD). From 2007, the EMR facilitated capture of a nationally agreed-upon standardised data set (DR Structured Assessment) relating to the presence or absence of clinical signs of DR and maculopathy. An algorithm in the software automatically calculated the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study grades of retinopathy and maculopathy.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2010, 307,538 patients had data on the NOD, with 76,127 (24.8%) patients having been recorded as having diabetes. The proportion of patients with diabetes who had a structured assessment increased from 50.7% (2007) to 86.8% (2010). In each NHS year, 12.6-20.6% of eyes with structured assessments had no DR; 59.6-67.3% had non-proliferative DR; and 18.3-20.9% had active or regressed proliferative DR. Clinically significant macular oedema was present in 15.8-18.1% of eyes, and in 8.7-10.0% of eyes, this involved the central macula.

CONCLUSION

This study provides contemporary estimates of the prevalence of retinopathy and maculopathy grades in a large cohort of patients with diabetes managed by the UK HES. Centre-involving diabetic macular oedema, potentially amenable to anti-VEGF therapy, is present in the eyes of almost 10% of these patients. This information is useful for clinicians, health-care economists, and commissioners involved in planning and delivering diabetic eye services.

Optos-guided pattern scan laser (Pascal)-targeted retinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical effects and safety of targeted pattern scan laser (Pascal) retinal photocoagulation (TRP) in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

METHODS

Prospective and non-randomized study of 28 eyes with treatment-naive proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Single-session 20-ms-Pascal TRP strategy applied 1500 burns to zones of retinal capillary non-perfusion and intermediate retinal ischaemia guided by wide-field fluorescein angiography (Optos). Main outcome measures at 12 and 24 weeks included; PDR grade (assessed by two masked retina specialists); central retinal thickness (CRT); mean deviation (MD) using 24-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA)-standard visual fields (VF); and ETDRS visual acuity (VA).

RESULTS

Following primary TRP, there was PDR regression in 76% of patients at 12 weeks (κ = 0.70; p < 0.001). No laser re-treatment was required at 4 weeks, and 10 eyes underwent repeat TRP at 12 weeks. Wide-field Optos angiography at 24 weeks showed complete disease regression in 37% and partial regression in 33%. Additional panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) was planned for active PDR in 30%. There were significant reductions in CRT over time (10.4 μm at 12-weeks, p = 0.007; 12.1 μm at 24-weeks, p = 0.0003). The MD on VFs improved after 12 weeks (+1.25 dB; p = 0.015) and 24 weeks (+1.26 dB, p = 0.01). The VA increased by +3 letters at 24 weeks (95% CI, 1.74-5.01; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study reports that Optos-guided Pascal 20-ms TRP using 1500 burns for treatment-naive PDR is a promising procedure with favourable safety profile.

Pascal panretinal laser ablation and regression analysis in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: Manchester Pascal Study Report 4

AIMS

To quantify the 20-ms Pattern Scan Laser (Pascal) panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) ablation dosage required for regression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and to explore factors related to long-term regression.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied a cohort of patients who participated in a randomised clinical trial, the Manchester Pascal Study. In all, 36 eyes of 22 patients were investigated over a follow-up period of 18 months. Primary outcome measures included visual acuity (VA) and complete PDR regression. Secondary outcomes included laser burn dosimetry, calculation of retinal PRP ablation areas, and effect of patient-related factors on disease regression. A PDR subgroup analysis was undertaken to assess all factors related to PDR regression according to disease severity.

RESULTS

There were no significant changes in logMAR VA for any group over time. In total, 10 eyes (28%) regressed after a single PRP. Following top-up PRP treatment, regression rates varied according to severity: 75% for mild PDR (n=6), 67% for moderate PDR (n=14), and 43% in severe PDR (n=3). To achieve complete disease regression, mild PDR required a mean of 2187 PRP burns and 264 mm(2) ablation area, moderate PDR required 3998 PRP burns and area 456 mm(2), and severe PDR needed 6924 PRP laser burns (836 mm(2); P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple 20-ms PRP treatments applied over time does not adversely affect visual outcomes, with favourable PDR regression rates and minimal laser burn expansion over 18 months. The average laser dosimetry and retinal ablation areas to achieve complete regression increased significantly with worsening PDR.

Analgesic effect of etoricoxib (Arcoxia®) 120 mg during retinal laser photocoagulation

Purpose

Panphotocoagulation reduces the risk of vision loss in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. However, not many patients tolerate this treatment well due to pain. Therefore, we evaluated the analgesic effect of etoricoxib during photocoagulation in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Methods

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on 44 consecutive patients eligible for panphotocoagulation due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. During the first panphotocoagulation session, both groups were treated without medication. During the following session, the control group received a placebo pill while the other group received etoricoxib 120 mg. Both groups took the medicines 1 hour before the treatment. After each session, the patients quantified the level of pain on a subjective visual scale.

Results

A total of 52 patients were selected for the study and the data of 44 patients were analyzed. In the control group, the average level of pain in the first session was 7.68 (standard deviation 1.70), dropping to an average of 7.32 (standard deviation 1.39) after ingestion of placebo. Therefore, there was no statistical difference (p=0.1187). In contrast, the average level of pain without the drug in the group taking etoricoxib 120 mg was 7.95 (standard deviation 1.46) vs 5.18 (standard deviation 1.65) with the drug, a significant statistical difference (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Etoricoxib 120 mg reduces pain and can be used before panphotocoagulation. Data show that the medication is more effective against pain during photocoagulation than placebo.

A pilot quality assurance scheme for diabetic retinopathy risk reduction programmes

AIMS

We describe a pilot study of measurement of quality assurance targets for diabetic retinopathy screening and performance comparison between 10 existing services, in preparation for the roll-out of the national programme.

BACKGROUND

In 1999 the UK National Screening Committee approved proposals for a national diabetic retinopathy risk reduction programme, including recommendations for quality assurance, but implementation was held pending publication of the National Service Framework for Diabetes. Existing services requested the authors to perform a pilot study of a QA scheme, indicating willingness to contribute data for comparison.

METHODS

Objectives and quality standards were developed, following consultation with diabetologists, ophthalmologists and retinal screeners. Services submitted 2001/2 performance data, in response to a questionnaire, for anonymization, central analysis and comparison.

RESULTS

The 17 quality standards encompass all aspects of the programme from identification of patients to timeliness of treatment. Ten programmes took part, submitting all the data available. All returns were incomplete, but especially so from the optometry-based schemes. Eight or more services demonstrated they could reach the minimum level in only five of the 17 standards. Thirty per cent could not provide coverage data. All were running behind. Reasons for difficulties in obtaining data and/or failing to achieve standards included severe under-funding and little previous experience of QA. Information systems were limited and incompatible between diabetes and eye units, and there was a lack of co-ordinated management of the whole programme.

CONCLUSION

Quality assurance is time-consuming, expensive and inadequately resourced. The pilot study identified priorities for local action. National programme implementation must involve integral quality assurance mechanisms from the outset.

Entonox as an analgesic agent during panretinal photocoagulation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) reduces the risk of visual loss in proliferative diabetic retinopathy but some patients cannot tolerate PRP because of pain. Inhaled Entonox was evaluated as an analgesic during PRP.

METHODS

A randomised, crossover, double masked pilot study was performed. Patients inhaled either air or Entonox and half the PRP was applied. The treatment was completed with the alternate inhaled gas. Patients graded pain experienced during both stages of the treatment using a visual analogue scale. Pain scores were compared using a paired t test.

RESULTS

20 patients participated. Mean pain scores from the Entonox and air treatments were 2.94 (SD 2.73) versus 3.73 (SD 3.20) respectively (p<0.03).

CONCLUSION

Entonox can be used as a safe and effective analgesic agent during PRP treatment.

Delivery of photocoagulation treatment for diabetic retinopathy at a large Australian ophthalmic hospital: comparisons with national clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the delivery of photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy at a large Australian ophthalmic hospital conforms with Australian National Health and Medical Research Council clinical practice guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review was conducted of all patients who had initial laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital from January 1997 to December 1998.

RESULTS

The study included 322 eyes from 203 patients. The mean age was 65.8 years (range 18-89 years) and the mean duration of diabetes was 14.7 years (range 1-40 years). Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) alone was performed in 37 eyes over a mean number of 2.6 sessions. The median waiting time for these procedures was 14 days (range 0-146 days) and the median follow-up time was 7.1 weeks (range 1-25 weeks). Focal treatment was performed (without PRP) in 238 eyes and 55.5% of these cases required repeat focal treatment for persistent clinically significant macular oedema. Median waiting time for focal treatment was 20 days (range 0-302 days) and the median follow-up time after treatment was 12.1 weeks (range 1.7-42.0 weeks). Focal and PRP treatment was used in 47 eyes that had maculopathy concurrently with proliferative retinopathy. Focal treatment was applied before (or at the same session as) the PRP wherever possible.

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicates that the application of photocoagulation and follow up for diabetic retinopathy at this tertiary referral institution conforms closely with Australian clinical practice guidelines.

Visual symptomatology in patients with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy

AIMS

To assess the level of visual symptomatology in patients with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy.

METHODS

Questionnaires were completed by patients undergoing first photocoagulation treatment for diabetic maculopathy or proliferative retinopathy during a 2-month period throughout the UK, and at 9 months' follow-up.

RESULTS

There were high levels of visual symptomatology prior to the first laser treatment and at follow-up for both patients with maculopathy or with proliferative retinopathy. Only 25.1% of patients with maculopathy and 17.2% of patients with proliferative retinopathy were asymptomatic in terms of reading, seeing the television screen, recognizing faces or with their night vision at baseline. For those with maculopathy 20.1% were aware of colour vision abnormality in the eye to be treated at baseline and 9.5% were aware of new central scotomata since the treatment. Of those with proliferative retinopathy, 13% said that they had given up driving due to poor eyesight and 19% were aware of new peripheral field defects since the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There are high levels of visual symptomatology for patients with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in the UK despite that fact that screening should aim to detect retinopathy prior to visual loss occurring. Patients should be aware that there may not be any significant improvement in their vision with laser treatment, and that the main aim of treatment is to reduce the likelihood of further visual deterioration.

Association of macular involvement with proliferative retinopathy in Type 2 diabetes

AIMS

To determine whether documented evidence of pre-existing maculopathy is present in Type 2 diabetic patients who require photocoagulation or vitrectomy for proliferative disease. This is a retrospective case notes review.

METHODS

The study was performed at Queen's Medical Centre, UK. All patients listed in the laser register and operating theatre register over 5 years (March 1994 to March 1999) who had undergone pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP) for diabetic retinopathy, in one consultant firm, were studied. The medical records of patients who had undergone vitrectomy as their first treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy in a vitreo-retinal firm over the 5 years were examined. The proportion of patients with documented maculopathy before development of proliferative retinopathy was determined.

RESULTS

All except 1/134 or 0.7% (95% confidence interval 0.1-4.5%) patients had documentation of macular signs in at least one eye prior to the patient's first session of PRP. Of the remaining 133, 104 (78%) had had focal or grid photocoagulation of the macula. The median time between the documentation of maculopathy before the first PRP treatment session was 16 months (interquartile range 7-36). Fourteen patients had vitrectomy and endolaser performed as the initial treatment for proliferative disease. All patients had documented maculopathy before the onset of proliferative disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that in Type 2 diabetes, proliferative disease occurs relatively late compared with maculopathy. In such patients, maculopathy is almost invariably present when proliferative disease is detected.

Difficult therapeutic decisions in the management of diabetic retinopathy

Management decisions for patients with diabetic eye disease can remain difficult despite the presence of guidelines. The cases below illustrate the dilemmas about the timing of instituting insulin in patients needing laser photocoagulation for improvement of glycaemic control. The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for diabetic eye disease is also discussed.

The National Diabetic Retinopathy Laser Treatment Audit. III. Clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

To describe the short-term clinical outcomes for a cohort of patients undergoing first photocoagulation treatment for proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy in the United Kingdom.

METHOD

Nine-month follow-up of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' national audit of laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy.

RESULTS

For eyes with maculopathy, 9.2% had had a deterioration in visual acuity equivalent to a doubling of the visual angle and 3.3% of eyes had a visual acuity of less than 6/60 at follow-up. There had been an improvement in the macular oedema or exudate in 64.6% and 77.3% respectively. Prognostic factors for a poorer visual acuity at follow-up were worse visual acuity at baseline, the presence of diffuse (vs focal) oedema and grid (vs focal) treatment. For eyes with proliferative retinopathy, the retinal neovascularisation had regressed fully in 50.8% of cases, whilst there had been no change or a deterioration in 10.3%. A visual acuity of less than 6/60 at follow-up was present in 8.6% of eyes. There was a poor morphological outcome at follow-up (as defined by rubeosis, new tractional detachment or having had a vitrectomy) in 7.2%. Risk factors for poor morphological outcome were the presence of 'high-risk characteristics', female sex and the presence of concurrent maculopathy at baseline. Regression of neovascularisation was associated with greater areas of retinal ablation at the initial treatment session. Although some eyes with proliferative retinopathy appeared to be undertreated initially compared with DRS and ETDRS protocols, some of these eyes did respond to lower amounts of treatment.

CONCLUSION

For maculopathy, poorer outcome was related to worse visual acuity at baseline, diffuse (vs focal) maculopathy, and grid treatment. For proliferative retinopathy, poorer outcome was related to 'high-risk characteristics' and coexistence of maculopathy at baseline, and improvement was related to larger areas of ablation. The relationship of poor outcome with worse initial disease argues for earlier detection of retinopathy.