1
|
Diedericks A, Bruwer Z, Laing N, Eastman E, De Vries J, Newton CR, Abubakar A, Robinson EB, Donald KA. Parental perspectives regarding the return of genomic research results in neurodevelopmental disorders in South Africa: anticipated impact and preferences. J Community Genet 2024:10.1007/s12687-024-00723-w. [PMID: 39090365 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00723-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Few policies and little research exist regarding the disclosure of genomic results to research participants in Africa. As understanding participant preferences would be pivotal to the success of the feedback process, this study set out to address this issue by engaging with enrolled participants from an ongoing genomics research project on neurodevelopmental disorders with the aim to assess the anticipated impact of receiving pertinent results and explore the preferences for feedback in a South African context. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 parents of children participating in the research study. Transcribed interview data and observational notes were analysed using thematic analysis and framework matrices. Participants linked their own meaning to the impact of receiving a pertinent result and perceived the information as useful for reasons other than only clinical utility. These included closure, improved management of their child's condition and information regarding recurrence risks. In terms of preferences for feedback, an in-person result delivery session, conducted by a member of the study team or medical professional familiar with their child was preferred. In addition, participants felt a sense of ownership over their blood or their contribution to the research study, finding meaning even in non-pertinent results. These findings provide insight into the type of discussions that may be valuable in enabling the development of best practices and guidelines for the return of individual genetic research results, in a culturally appropriate manner, within South African communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelique Diedericks
- Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Zandré Bruwer
- Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Nakita Laing
- Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Emma Eastman
- Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jantina De Vries
- The Ethics Lab, Neuroscience Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Charles R Newton
- Neuroscience Unit, Center for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust, Kilifi, Kenya
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, London, UK
- Institute of Human Development, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Amina Abubakar
- Neuroscience Unit, Center for Geographic Medicine Research Coast, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust, Kilifi, Kenya
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, London, UK
- Institute of Human Development, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Elise B Robinson
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kirsten A Donald
- Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marathe PN, Suckiel SA, Bonini KE, Kelly NR, Scarimbolo L, Insel BJ, Odgis JA, Sebastin M, Ramos MA, Di Biase M, Gallagher KM, Brown K, Rodriguez JE, Yelton N, Aguiñiga KL, Rodriguez MA, Maria E, Lopez J, Zinberg RE, Diaz GA, Greally JM, Abul-Husn NS, Bauman LJ, Gelb BD, Wasserstein MP, Kenny EE, Horowitz CR. Evaluating parental personal utility of pediatric genetic and genomic testing in a diverse, multilingual population. HGG ADVANCES 2024; 5:100321. [PMID: 38918948 PMCID: PMC11284555 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
There is increasing evidence of the clinical utility of genetic and genomic testing (GT); however, factors influencing personal utility of GT, especially in diverse, multilingual populations, remain unclear. We explored these factors in a diverse cohort of parents/guardians (participants) whose children received clinical GT through the NYCKidSeq program. A total of 847 participants completed surveys at baseline, post-results disclosure, and 6 months (6m) post-results. The largest population groups were Hispanic/Latino(a) (48%), White/European American (24%), and Black/African American (16%). Personal utility was assessed using the Personal Utility (PrU) scale, adapted for pediatric populations and included on the surveys. Three PrU subscales were identified using factor analysis: practical, educational, and parental psychological utility. Overall personal utility summary score and the three subscales significantly decreased after receiving results and over time. Hispanic/Latino(a) participants identified greater overall personal utility than European American and African American participants at all time points (p < 0.001) as did participants whose children received positive/likely positive results compared with those with negative and uncertain results (post-results: p < 0.001 and p < 0.001; 6m post-results: p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). Post-results, higher subscale scores were associated with lower education levels (practical, parental psychological: p ≤ 0.02) and higher levels of trust in the healthcare system (practical, parental psychological: p ≤ 0.04). These findings help to understand the perspectives of diverse parents/guardians, which is critical to tailoring pre- and post-test counseling across a variety of populations and clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya N Marathe
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Sabrina A Suckiel
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Katherine E Bonini
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Nicole R Kelly
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Laura Scarimbolo
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Beverly J Insel
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Jacqueline A Odgis
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Monisha Sebastin
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Michelle A Ramos
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Miranda Di Biase
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Katie M Gallagher
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Brown
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Jessica E Rodriguez
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Nicole Yelton
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Karla Lopez Aguiñiga
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Michelle A Rodriguez
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Estefany Maria
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Jessenia Lopez
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Randi E Zinberg
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - George A Diaz
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - John M Greally
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Noura S Abul-Husn
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Laurie J Bauman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Bruce D Gelb
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa P Wasserstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| | - Carol R Horowitz
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matula KA, Blumling AA, Myers MF, McGowan ML, Lipstein EA. Adolescents' and Parents' Perspectives on a Novel Decision-Making Process for Return of Results in Genomic Research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2023; 18:278-283. [PMID: 37491850 PMCID: PMC10529861 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231190826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
To understand whether they found a two-step decision process helpful and why, adolescent-parent dyads participating in a study investigating return of genomic testing results were asked about their decision-making experience. Responses were qualitatively coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Adolescents and parents found both joint and independent decision-making stages helpful. Regarding independent decision-making, adolescents appreciated exercising independence, while parents valued both adolescent and parental independence. Joint decision-making allowed each to hear the other's viewpoints. Some found joint decision-making irrelevant but recognized it might help others. Overall, adolescents and parents had similar reasons for finding the two-step decision-making process helpful. Our findings support using such a process for engaging parents and adolescents in challenging research and clinical decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A. Matula
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH USA
| | - Amy A. Blumling
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH USA
| | - Melanie F. Myers
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH USA
| | - Michelle L. McGowan
- Department of Women’s, Gender & Sexuality Studies, University of Cincinnati College of Arts and Sciences, Cincinnati, OH USA
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - Ellen A. Lipstein
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tsuchida A, Kigawa M, Matsumura K, Ito M, Tanaka T, Hamazaki K, Inadera H. Provision of educational events and subsequent questionnaire response rates in a large-scale birth cohort study from Japan. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e064229. [PMID: 36600436 PMCID: PMC9772631 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We examined whether providing educational events for participants in a birth cohort study would increase the response rates of study questionnaires. DESIGN Birth cohort study. SETTING Questionnaires were distributed and returned by post twice in 1 year. We developed and implemented two educational sessions; a Baby Food lecture for mothers with children around 8 months old (analysis 1) and a Eurythmic session for mothers with children around 1 year and 8 months old (analysis 2). Mothers with children over the target ages were not invited (not-invited group). The invited participants were divided into three groups: those who did not apply to attend (not-applied group), those who applied but did not attend (applied group), and those who applied and attended (attended group). PARTICIPANTS The participants were 5379 mother-child pairs registered with the Toyama Regional Center of the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS). OUTCOME MEASURE The outcome measure was return of the JECS questionnaire for 1 year old sent out after the Baby Food lecture and the JECS questionnaire for 2 years old sent out after the Eurythmic session. The questionnaires were returned to us by post. RESULTS The response rate for the attended group of the Baby Food lecture was 99.7%, and the odds ratio (OR) was significantly higher for this group than for the not-invited group (crude OR 24.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.42 to 176.13; analysis 1). After the exclusion of participants who had previously attended the Baby Food lecture, the response rate for the attended group of the Eurythmic session was 97.8%, and the OR was significantly higher for this group than for the not-invited group (adjusted OR 5.66; 95% CI 1.93 to 16.54; analysis 2). CONCLUSION Providing educational events that are appropriate to the age and needs of the participants may increase questionnaire response rates in birth cohort studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER UMIN 000030786.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akiko Tsuchida
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
- Toyama Regional Center for Japan Environment and Children's Study, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Mika Kigawa
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
- Department of Liberal Arts and Human Development, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Yokosuka, Japan
| | - Kenta Matsumura
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
- Toyama Regional Center for Japan Environment and Children's Study, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Mika Ito
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Tomomi Tanaka
- Toyama Regional Center for Japan Environment and Children's Study, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Kei Hamazaki
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
- Department of Public Health, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Hidekuni Inadera
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
- Toyama Regional Center for Japan Environment and Children's Study, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Farrell MH, Mooney KE, Laxova A, Farrell PM. Parental Preferences about Policy Options Regarding Disclosure of Incidental Genetic Findings in Newborn Screening: Using Videos and the Internet to Educate and Obtain Input. Int J Neonatal Screen 2022; 8:ijns8040054. [PMID: 36278624 PMCID: PMC9590039 DOI: 10.3390/ijns8040054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Our objective was to develop and test a new approach to obtaining parental policy guidance about disclosure of incidental findings of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF), including heterozygote carrier status and the conditions known as CFTR-related metabolic syndrome (CRMS) and/or cystic fibrosis screen positive inconclusive diagnosis, CFSPID. The participants were parents of infants up to 6 months old recruited from maternity hospitals/clinics, parent education classes and stores selling baby products. Data were collected using an anonymous, one-time Internet-based survey. The survey introduced two scenarios using novel, animated videos. Parents were asked to rank three potential disclosure policies-Fully Informed, Parents Decide, and Withholding Information. Regarding disclosure of information about Mild X (analogous to CRMS/CFSPID), 57% of respondents ranked Parents Decide as their top choice, while another 41% ranked the Fully Informed policy first. Similarly, when considering disclosure of information about Disease X (CF) carrier status, 50% and 43% gave top rankings to the Fully Informed and Parents Decide policies, respectively. Less than 8% ranked the Withholding Information policy first in either scenario. Data from value comparisons suggested that parents believed knowing everything was very important even if they became distressed. Likewise, parents preferred autonomy even if they became distressed. However, when there might not be enough time to learn everything, parents showed a slight preference for deferring decision-making. Because most parents strongly preferred the policies of full disclosure or making the decision, rather than the withholding option for NBS results, these results can inform disclosure policies in NBS programs, especially as next-generation sequencing increases incidental findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael H. Farrell
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Katherine E. Mooney
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Anita Laxova
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Philip M. Farrell
- Departments of Pediatrics and Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, CSC Room K4/948, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-608-345-2308; Fax: +1-608-263-2820
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gupta A, Cafazzo JA, IJzerman MJ, Swart JF, Vastert S, Wulffraat NM, Benseler S, Marshall D, Yeung R, Twilt M. Genomic Health Literacy Interventions in Pediatrics: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e26684. [PMID: 34951592 PMCID: PMC8742210 DOI: 10.2196/26684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The emergence of genetic and genomic sequencing approaches for pediatric patients has raised questions about the genomic health literacy levels, attitudes toward receiving genomic information, and use of this information to inform treatment decisions by pediatric patients and their parents. However, the methods to educate pediatric patients and their parents about genomic concepts through digital health interventions have not been well-established. Objective The primary objective of this scoping review is to investigate the current levels of genomic health literacy and the attitudes toward receiving genomic information among pediatric patients and their parents. The secondary aim is to investigate patient education interventions that aim to measure and increase genomic health literacy among pediatric patients and their parents. The findings from this review will be used to inform future digital health interventions for patient education. Methods A scoping review using PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines and protocols was completed using the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus. Our search strategy included genomic information inclusive of all genetic and genomic terms, pediatrics, and patient education. Inclusion criteria included the following: the study included genetic, genomic, or a combination of genetic and genomic information; the study population was pediatric (children and adolescents <18 years) and parents of patients with pediatric illnesses or only parents of patients with pediatric illnesses; the study included an assessment of the knowledge, attitudes, and intervention regarding genomic information; the study was conducted in the last 12 years between 2008 and 2020; and the study was in the English language. Descriptive data regarding study design, methodology, disease population, and key findings were extracted. All the findings were collated, categorized, and reported thematically. Results Of the 4618 studies, 14 studies (n=6, 43% qualitative, n=6, 43% mixed methods, and n=2, 14% quantitative) were included. Key findings were based on the following 6 themes: knowledge of genomic concepts, use of the internet and social media for genomic information, use of genomic information for decision-making, hopes and attitudes toward receiving genomic information, experiences with genetic counseling, and interventions to improve genomic knowledge. Conclusions This review identified that older age is related to the capacity of understanding genomic concepts, increased genomic health literacy levels, and the perceived ability to participate in decision-making related to genomic information. In addition, internet-searching plays a major role in obtaining genomic information and filling gaps in communication with health care providers. However, little is known about the capacity of pediatric patients and their parents to understand genomic information and make informed decisions based on the genomic information obtained. More research is required to inform digital health interventions and to leverage the leading best practices to educate these genomic concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aarushi Gupta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Centre of Global eHealth Innovation, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joseph A Cafazzo
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Centre of Global eHealth Innovation, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Department of Health and Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Twente, Netherlands.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joost F Swart
- Division of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Vastert
- Division of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Nico M Wulffraat
- Division of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Susanne Benseler
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Deborah Marshall
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rae Yeung
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, AB, Canada.,Immunology and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, AB, Canada
| | - Marinka Twilt
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Donohue KE, Dolan SM, Watnick D, Gallagher KM, Odgis JA, Suckiel SA, Teitelman N, Gelb BD, Kenny EE, Wasserstein MP, Horowitz CR, Bauman LJ. Hope versus reality: Parent expectations of genomic testing. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2073-2079. [PMID: 33640235 PMCID: PMC8679507 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Genomics is increasingly used for diagnostic testing in children. This study describes the expectations of parents whose child received genomic testing and whether or not they were met. METHODS A diverse stratified, purposive sample of parents of 22 children in New York City was interviewed using a semi-structured guide. Genomic test results were positive, negative, or uncertain. RESULTS Parents expressed their expectations in narrative and numeric fashion. Parents expected that their child's test would have a direct effect on their child's diagnosis. Some believed that results would be definitive, while others recognized testing limitations. Expectations reflected parents' hope to find a diagnosis and led to disappointment when results were uninformative or did not impact clinical management. CONCLUSION Results suggest pre-test genetic counseling emphasize the low likelihood of actionable results; however, parents' expectations of genomics' diagnostic capabilities are strongly rooted in their need to end the diagnostic odyssey and may be difficult to manage. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Parents' hope for a resolution and effective treatment for their child is a powerful context in which genetic counseling is heard. Clinicians who provide genomic testing should continue to acknowledge parents' preconceptions. Additional research in other settings will help understand how to best address and manage parent expectations of genomic medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Donohue
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Siobhan M Dolan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Dana Watnick
- Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Katie M Gallagher
- Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Jacqueline A Odgis
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sabrina A Suckiel
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nehama Teitelman
- Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Bruce D Gelb
- Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Melissa P Wasserstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Carol R Horowitz
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Laurie J Bauman
- Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vears DF, Minion JT, Roberts SJ, Cummings J, Machirori M, Murtagh MJ. Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review. Per Med 2021; 18:295-310. [PMID: 33822658 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2020-0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
There has been little discussion of the way genomic research results should be returned and how to obtain informed consent for this. We systematically searched the empirical literature, identifying 63 articles exploring stakeholder perspectives on processes for obtaining informed consent about return of results and/or result delivery. Participants, patients and members of the public generally felt they should choose which results are returned to them and how, ranging from direct (face-to-face, telephone) to indirect (letters, emails, web-based delivery) communication. Professionals identified inadequacies in result delivery processes in the research context. Our findings have important implications for ensuring participants are supported in deciding which results they wish to receive or, if no choice is offered, preparing them for potential research outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton 3052, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville 3052, Australia.,Center for Biomedical Ethics & Law, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics & Society, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Joel T Minion
- Policy, Ethics & Life Sciences (PEALS) Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Stephanie J Roberts
- Policy, Ethics & Life Sciences (PEALS) Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK
| | - James Cummings
- School of Art, Media & American Studies, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Mavis Machirori
- School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Madeleine J Murtagh
- Policy, Ethics & Life Sciences (PEALS) Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK.,School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mezinska S, Gallagher L, Verbrugge M, Bunnik EM. Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review. Hum Genomics 2021; 15:16. [PMID: 33712057 PMCID: PMC7953558 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Genomic research on neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), particularly involving minors, combines and amplifies existing research ethics issues for biomedical research. We performed a review of the literature on the ethical issues associated with genomic research involving children affected by NDDs as an aid to researchers to better anticipate and address ethical concerns. Results Qualitative thematic analysis of the included articles revealed themes in three main areas: research design and ethics review, inclusion of research participants, and communication of research results. Ethical issues known to be associated with genomic research in general, such as privacy risks and informed consent/assent, seem especially pressing for NDD participants because of their potentially decreased cognitive abilities, increased vulnerability, and stigma associated with mental health problems. Additionally, there are informational risks: learning genetic information about NDD may have psychological and social impact, not only for the research participant but also for family members. However, there are potential benefits associated with research participation, too: by enrolling in research, the participants may access genetic testing and thus increase their chances of receiving a (genetic) diagnosis for their neurodevelopmental symptoms, prognostic or predictive information about disease progression or the risk of concurrent future disorders. Based on the results of our review, we developed an ethics checklist for genomic research involving children affected by NDDs. Conclusions In setting up and designing genomic research efforts in NDD, researchers should partner with communities of persons with NDDs. Particular attention should be paid to preventing disproportional burdens of research participation of children with NDDs and their siblings, parents and other family members. Researchers should carefully tailor the information and informed consent procedures to avoid therapeutic and diagnostic misconception in NDD research. To better anticipate and address ethical issues in specific NDD studies, we suggest researchers to use the ethics checklist for genomic research involving children affected by NDDs presented in this paper. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mezinska
- Faculty of Medicine and Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia, Jelgavas Str.3, Riga, LV-1004, Latvia.
| | - L Gallagher
- Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - M Verbrugge
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2400, Rotterdam, 3000, CA, The Netherlands
| | - E M Bunnik
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2400, Rotterdam, 3000, CA, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wagner KE, McCormick JB, Barns S, Carney M, Middleton FA, Hicks SD. Parent Perspectives Towards Genetic and Epigenetic Testing for Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2020; 50:3114-3125. [PMID: 30903561 PMCID: PMC6755071 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-019-03990-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Examining community views on genetic/epigenetic research allows collaborative technology development. Parent perspectives toward genetic/epigenetic testing for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are not well-studied. Parents of children with ASD (n = 131), non-ASD developmental delay (n = 39), and typical development (n = 74) completed surveys assessing genetic/epigenetic knowledge, genetic/epigenetic concerns, motives for research participation, and attitudes/preferences toward ASD testing. Most parents (96%) were interested in saliva-based molecular testing for ASD. Some had concerns about privacy (14%) and insurance-status (10%). None (0%) doubted scientific evidence behind genetic/epigenetic testing. Most reported familiarity with genetics (88%), but few understood differences from epigenetics (19%). Child developmental status impacted insurance concerns (p = 0.01). There is broad parent interest in a genetic/epigenetic test for ASD. It will be crucial to carefully consider and address bioethical issues surrounding this sensitive topic while developing such technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla E Wagner
- Quadrant Biosciences Inc., Syracuse, USA.,Departments of Neuroscience & Physiology, Psychiatry, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA
| | - Jennifer B McCormick
- Department of Humanities, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive Mail Code H134, Hershey, USA
| | - Sarah Barns
- Quadrant Biosciences Inc., Syracuse, USA.,Departments of Neuroscience & Physiology, Psychiatry, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA
| | - Molly Carney
- Department of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Mail Code HS83, Hershey, USA
| | - Frank A Middleton
- Departments of Neuroscience & Physiology, Psychiatry, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA
| | - Steven D Hicks
- Department of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Mail Code HS83, Hershey, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Adolescents' and Parents' Genomic Testing Decisions: Associations With Age, Race, and Sex. J Adolesc Health 2020; 66:288-295. [PMID: 31685375 PMCID: PMC7007858 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adolescents will increasingly be involved in decisions about the return of genomic results. We examined adolescents' and parents' decisions about learning actual genomic research results for the adolescent and whether choices were associated with participants' demographic factors. METHODS Adolescents aged between 13 and 17 years and a parent (dyads) were recruited through flyers, social media, employee emails, and clinic visits at a pediatric hospital. Dyads used a decision tool to independently choose the categories of conditions they wanted to learn about the adolescent. They then came together to discuss their independent decisions and make final joint decisions. Conditions were categorized by preventability, treatability, adult-onset conditions, and carrier status. Participants could make granular choices by including or excluding conditions in each category. Categorical choices were collapsed into the "aggregate choice" to learn all or not all results. RESULTS Study visits were completed by 163 dyads. Adolescents were less likely than their parents to independently choose to learn all results (64.4% vs. 76.1%; p = .0056). Parents were less likely to independently choose to learn all results for their daughters than their sons (odds ratio = .41, 95% confidence interval .18-.96; p = .032). Black adolescents were less likely to independently choose to learn all results than white adolescents (odds ratio = .22; 95% confidence interval .08-.55; p = .0015). After making joint decisions, 70.6% of dyads chose to learn all results. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents independently wanted to learn less genomic information than their parents. Although adolescents cannot legally make genomic testing decisions without parental permission, adolescents' should be engaged in decisions about the return of genomic results.
Collapse
|
12
|
The value of diagnostic testing for parents of children with rare genetic diseases. Genet Med 2019; 21:2798-2806. [PMID: 31239560 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0583-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Exome sequencing (ES) can rapidly identify disease-causing variants responsible for rare, single-gene diseases, and potentially reduce the duration of the diagnostic odyssey. Our study examines how parents and families value ES. METHODS We developed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey that was administered to parents of children with rare diseases. The DCE included 14 choice tasks with 6 attributes and 3 alternatives. A valuation-space model was used to estimate willingness to pay, willingness to wait for test results, and minimum acceptable chance of a diagnosis for changes in each attribute. RESULTS There were n = 319 respondents of whom 89% reported their child had genetic testing, and 66% reported their child had a diagnosis. Twenty-six percent reported that their child had been offered ES. Parents were willing to pay CAD$6590 (US$4943), wait 5.2 years to obtain diagnostic test results, and accept a reduction of 3.1% in the chance of a diagnosis for ES compared with operative procedures. CONCLUSION Timely access to ES could reduce the diagnostic odyssey and associated costs. Before ES is incorporated routinely into care for patients with rare diseases in Canada and more broadly, there must be a clear understanding of its value to patients and families.
Collapse
|
13
|
McGowan ML, Prows CA, DeJonckheere M, Brinkman WB, Vaughn L, Myers MF. Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018; 13:371-382. [PMID: 29806518 DOI: 10.1177/1556264618776613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Opportunities to participate in genomic sequencing studies, as well as recommendations to screen for variants in 59 medically actionable genes anytime clinical genomic sequencing is performed, indicate adolescents will increasingly be involved in decisions about learning secondary findings from genome sequencing. However, how adolescents want to be involved in such decisions is unknown. We conducted five focus groups with adolescents (2) and parents (3) to learn their decisional preferences about return of genomic research results to adolescents. Discussions about decisional preferences centered around three themes: feelings about receiving genomic risk information, adolescent involvement and capacity to participate in decision-making, and recommendations for parental versus collaborative decision-making. We address the contested space between parental duties to act in their children's best interests when choosing which results to return and adolescents' desires to make autonomous decisions. A collaborative decision-making approach is recommended for obtaining consent from adolescents and their parents for genome sequencing research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L McGowan
- 1 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA.,2 University of Cincinnati, USA
| | | | | | - William B Brinkman
- 1 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA.,2 University of Cincinnati, USA
| | - Lisa Vaughn
- 1 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA.,2 University of Cincinnati, USA
| | - Melanie F Myers
- 1 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA.,2 University of Cincinnati, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mitchell PB, Ziniel SI, Savage SK, Christensen KD, Weitzman ER, Green RC, Huntington NL, Mathews DJ, Holm IA. Enhancing Autonomy in Biobank Decisions: Too Much of a Good Thing? J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018; 13:125-138. [PMID: 29471711 DOI: 10.1177/1556264617753483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
The opportunity to receive individual research results (IRRs) in accordance with personal preferences may incentivize biobank participation and maximize perceived benefit. This trial investigated the relationship between parents' preferences and intent to participate (ITP) in biobank research utilizing their child's genetic information. We randomized parents of pediatric patients to four hypothetical biobanks, one of which employed a preference-setting model for return of results regarding their child. ITP was highest among those desiring all types of IRRs (93.3%) and decreased as participants became increasingly selective with their preferences ( p < .0001). We demonstrated that most parents would participate in a biobank that allows for preference setting; however, those who set preferences to receive a narrower set of IRRs are less likely to participate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sonja I Ziniel
- 2 Center for Patient Safety and Quality Research, Boston, MA, USA.,3 University of Colorado, Aurora, USA.,4 Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, USA
| | | | | | - Elissa R Weitzman
- 6 Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.,7 Boston Children's Hospital, MA, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- 6 Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.,8 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Noelle L Huntington
- 6 Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.,7 Boston Children's Hospital, MA, USA
| | | | - Ingrid A Holm
- 6 Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.,7 Boston Children's Hospital, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lewis MA, Stine A, Paquin RS, Mansfield C, Wood D, Rini C, Roche MI, Powell CM, Berg JS, Bailey DB. Parental preferences toward genomic sequencing for non-medically actionable conditions in children: a discrete-choice experiment. Genet Med 2018; 20:181-189. [PMID: 28771249 PMCID: PMC5868968 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PurposeApplication of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing is likely to increase in clinical practice, public health contexts, and research. We investigated how parental preference for acquiring information from genome-scale testing is influenced by the characteristics of non-medically actionable genetic disorders in children, as well as whether the preferences differed by gender and between African-American and white respondents.MethodsWe conducted a Web-based discrete-choice experiment with 1,289 parents of young children. Participants completed "choice tasks" based on pairs of profiles describing sequencing results for hypothetical genetic disorders, selected the profile in each pair that they believed represented the information that would be more important to know, and answered questions that measured their level of distress.ResultsKnowing the likelihood that the disorder would develop given a true-positive test result was most important to parents. Parents showed greater interest in learning sequencing results for disease profiles with more severe manifestations. This was associated with greater distress. Differences by gender and race reflected small differences in magnitude, but not direction.ConclusionParents preferred to learn results about genetic disorders with more severe manifestations, even when this knowledge was associated with increased distress. These results may help clinicians support parental decision making by revealing which types of sequencing results parents are interested in learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Lewis
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alex Stine
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ryan S Paquin
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carol Mansfield
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dallas Wood
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christine Rini
- Department of Health Behavior and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Myra I Roche
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Cynthia M Powell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Donald B Bailey
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wessel J, Marrero D. Genetic Testing for Type 2 Diabetes in High-Risk Children: the Case for Primordial Prevention. RESEARCH IDEAS AND OUTCOMES 2017. [DOI: 10.3897/rio.3.e20695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
17
|
Myers MF, Zhang X, McLaughlin B, Kissell D, Perry CL, Veerkamp M, Zhang K, Holm IA, Prows CA. Prior opioid exposure influences parents' sharing of their children's CYP2D6 research results. Pharmacogenomics 2017; 18:1199-1213. [PMID: 28745549 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2017-0091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To determine parents' use of their children's CYP2D6 research result. We hypothesized that perceived utility, likelihood of sharing and actual sharing of results would differ between parents with children previously exposed (cases) or unexposed (controls) to opioids. METHODS We returned results by phone (baseline). We surveyed parents about perceived utility and likelihood of sharing their child's research result at baseline, and actual sharing at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS Cases were more likely than controls to agree that they (p = 0.022) and the doctors (p = 0.041) could use the results to care for their child, to report higher likelihood of sharing (p = 0.042) and to actually share results with the child's doctor (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION Prior opioid exposure influenced perceived clinical utility and sharing behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie F Myers
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.,College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
| | - Xue Zhang
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Brooke McLaughlin
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.,College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
| | - Diane Kissell
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Cassandra L Perry
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Matthew Veerkamp
- Center for Autoimmune Genomics & Etiology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Kejian Zhang
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics & Genomics & The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.,Division of Patient Services, Department of Clinical Shared Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Christensen KD, Savage SK, Huntington NL, Weitzman ER, Ziniel SI, Bacon PL, Cacioppo CN, Green RC, Holm IA. Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2017; 12:97-106. [PMID: 28421887 PMCID: PMC5407299 DOI: 10.1177/1556264617697839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Discussions about disclosing individual genetic research results include calls to consider participants' preferences. In this study, parents of Boston Children's Hospital patients set preferences for disclosure based on disease preventability and severity, and could exclude mental health, developmental, childhood degenerative, and adult-onset disorders. Participants reviewed hypothetical reports and reset preferences, if desired. Among 661 participants who initially wanted all results (64%), 1% reset preferences. Among 336 participants who initially excluded at least one category (36%), 38% reset preferences. Participants who reset preferences added 0.9 categories, on average; and their mean satisfaction on 0 to 10 scales increased from 4.7 to 7.2 ( p < .001). Only 2% reduced the number of categories they wanted disclosed. Findings demonstrate the benefits of providing examples of preference options and the tendency of participants to want results disclosed. Findings also suggest that preference-setting models that do not provide specific examples of results could underestimate participants' desires for information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt D. Christensen
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston (USA)
- Harvard Medical School, Boston (USA)
| | | | | | - Elissa R. Weitzman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston (USA)
- Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston (USA)
| | - Sonja I. Ziniel
- Harvard Medical School, Boston (USA)
- Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston (USA)
| | - Phoebe L. Bacon
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (USA)
| | | | - Robert C. Green
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston (USA)
- Harvard Medical School, Boston (USA)
- Partners Personalized Medicine, Boston (USA)
| | - Ingrid A. Holm
- Harvard Medical School, Boston (USA)
- Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston (USA)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Holm IA. Pediatric Issues in Return of Results and Incidental Findings: Weighing Autonomy and Best Interests. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2017; 21:155-158. [PMID: 28140662 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Nowhere are the ethical issues in genomic research more complex than in pediatrics. Balancing the sometime conflicting autonomy of the parent and the child, and the best interest of the family and the child, brings up many challenging issues. Addressing this balance, especially in the context of the child's developing maturity and comprehension, requires deep analysis and discussion. Issues discussed include the impact of genetic information on the family, parental versus the child's autonomy, the best interests of the child versus the family, potential limitations on the parents' right to know or not know information about their child, and changing role of the developing child in return of research results. Finally, a dynamic model will be proposed that takes into consideration the child's evolving role in consenting and return of results that can be adapted in different national contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid A Holm
- 1 Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.,2 The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research , Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,3 Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kranendonk EJ, Hennekam RC, Ploem MC. Paediatric biobanking: Dutch experts reflecting on appropriate legal standards for practice. Eur J Pediatr 2017; 176:75-82. [PMID: 27866271 PMCID: PMC5219008 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-016-2810-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Revised: 11/04/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Large sets of data and human specimens, such as blood, tumour tissue and DNA, are deposited in biobanks for research purposes, preferably for long periods of time and with broadly defined research aims. Our research focuses on the retention of data and biological materials obtained from children. However important such paediatric biobanks may be, the privacy interests of the children involved and the related risks may not be ignored. The privacy issues arising from paediatric biobanks are the central focus of this article. We first review the international regulations that apply to biobanks and then summarise viewpoints expressed by experts in a round-table discussion. We confine ourselves here to two normative questions: (1) How much control should children's parents or legal representatives, and later the children themselves, have over the stored materials and data? (2) What should be done if research findings emerge that have serious implications for a child's health? CONCLUSION On the basis of international legal standards and the views of experts, involved in paediatric biobanking, we argue that biological material of children may only be stored in a biobank for scientific purposes if parents provide their explicit consent, the child is re-contacted at 16 or 18 years of age to reconsider storage and use of its material, and the biobank maintains a limited policy in disclosure of individual research findings to the child's parents. What is Known: • Increasingly, biological material of children is stored in biobanks for research purposes. • Clear standards on the conditions under which children's cells or tissues may be stored and used are lacking. What is New: • According to experts, storage and use of children's materials should only be allowed if performed in accordance with appropriate consent procedures and feedback policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elcke J. Kranendonk
- Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health AMC, Room J2-210, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raoul C. Hennekam
- Department of Pediatrics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. Corrette Ploem
- Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hyams T, Bowen DJ, Condit C, Grossman J, Fitzmaurice M, Goodman D, Wenzel L, Edwards KL. Views of Cohort Study Participants about Returning Research Results in the Context of Precision Medicine. Public Health Genomics 2016; 19:269-75. [PMID: 27553645 DOI: 10.1159/000448277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The practice of biorepository-based genetics research raises questions related to what ethical obligations researchers have to their participants. It is important to explore and include the thoughts of current biorepository participants as we move forward with this type of research. METHODS Thirty participants (17 cancer patients, 7 cancer-free controls, and 6 relatives) were drawn from the Northwest Cancer Genetics Registry and participated in qualitative interviews lasting between 45 and 90 min. Topics explored in this study include which types of genetic test results participants of large biorepositories expect and would like to receive from research analyzing their samples, as well as thoughts on best practice for conducting this type of research. RESULTS Cancer cases, controls, and first-degree relatives have differing views on what results they would like to receive from biorepository-based research. Participants across all groups attempted to balance the costs and benefits of returning individual research results. DISCUSSION In the wake of precision medicine, it is important to describe the range of ways participants in large biorepositories both think and talk about the utilization of their specimens for genetics research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travis Hyams
- Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash., USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Holm IA, Iles BR, Ziniel SI, Bacon PL, Savage SK, Christensen KD, Weitzman ER, Green RC, Huntington NL. Participant Satisfaction With a Preference-Setting Tool for the Return of Individual Research Results in Pediatric Genomic Research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2016; 10:414-26. [PMID: 26376753 DOI: 10.1177/1556264615599620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The perceived benefit of return of individual research results (IRRs) in accordance to participants' preferences in genomic biobank research is unclear. We developed an online preference-setting tool for return of IRRs based on the preventability and severity of a condition, which included an opt-out option for IRRs for mental illness, developmental disorders, childhood-onset degenerative conditions, and adult-onset conditions. Parents of patients <18 years of age at Boston Children's Hospital were randomized to the hypothetical scenario that their child was enrolled in one of four biobanks with different policies for IRRs to receive (a) "None," (b) "All," (c) "Binary"--choice to receive all or none, and (d) "Granular"--use the preference-setting tool to choose categories of IRRs. Parents were given a hypothetical IRRs report for their child. The survey was sent to 11,391 parents and completed by 2,718. The Granular group was the most satisfied with the process, biobank, and hypothetical IRRs received. The None group was least satisfied and least likely to agree that the biobank was beneficial (p < .001). The response to the statement that the biobank was harmful was not different between groups. Our data suggest that the ability to designate preferences leads to greater satisfaction and may increase biobank participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid A Holm
- Boston Children's Hospital, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sonja I Ziniel
- Boston Children's Hospital, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Phoebe L Bacon
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Elissa R Weitzman
- Boston Children's Hospital, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Partners Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yamamoto M, Fujita M, Mori C, Hata A. Survey of motivation to participate in a birth cohort. J Hum Genet 2016; 61:787-91. [PMID: 27251007 DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2016.60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2015] [Revised: 03/26/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
For a longitudinal prospective cohort study to be successful, participants' motivation to provide information must be maintained. Therefore, this study aimed to identify items that effectively promote participants' motivation. Questionnaires were mailed to 4541 mothers and expectant mothers in Chiba Prefecture, Japan who participated in a nationwide birth cohort. A total of 2387 (52.6%) responses were received. The following items were identified as primary motivating factors among our cohort: "benefits to the participants' children", "monetary compensation" and "contribution to a better future environment". More than 30% of the respondents expressed a lack of understanding regarding the study purpose and requirements for participation. About 14% were concerned about the leakage of personal information, and 13% felt burdened by having to make a long-term commitment to the study. Cluster analysis identified four groups, two of which, one with extremely low levels of motivation and the other motivated by only money or goods, lacked an understanding of the study and tended to be concerned about the associated risks and burdens. Participants in these groups were considered to be at a high risk of dropout. Therefore, implementing measures to provide participants with a better understanding of cohort studies could lead to more successful results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Midori Yamamoto
- Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Misuzu Fujita
- Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Chisato Mori
- Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Bioenvironmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Akira Hata
- Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rodriguez J, Huntington-Moskos L, Johnson A, Williams S, Gulledge E, Feeley C, Rice M. Collecting Biological Measures for Research With Children and Adolescents. J Pediatr Health Care 2016; 30:279-83. [PMID: 26846398 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2015] [Revised: 12/30/2015] [Accepted: 12/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
25
|
Cacioppo CN, Chandler AE, Towne MC, Beggs AH, Holm IA. Expectation versus Reality: The Impact of Utility on Emotional Outcomes after Returning Individualized Genetic Research Results in Pediatric Rare Disease Research, a Qualitative Interview Study. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0153597. [PMID: 27082877 PMCID: PMC4833284 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2015] [Accepted: 03/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Much information on parental perspectives on the return of individual research results (IRR) in pediatric genomic research is based on hypothetical rather than actual IRR. Our aim was to understand how the expected utility to parents who received IRR on their child from a genetic research study compared to the actual utility of the IRR received. METHODS We conducted individual telephone interviews with parents who received IRR on their child through participation in the Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research Gene Discovery Core (GDC) at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH). RESULTS Five themes emerged around the utility that parents expected and actually received from IRR: predictability, management, family planning, finding answers, and helping science and/or families. Parents expressing negative or mixed emotions after IRR return were those who did not receive the utility they expected from the IRR. Conversely, parents who expressed positive emotions were those who received as much or greater utility than expected. CONCLUSIONS Discrepancies between expected and actual utility of IRR affect the experiences of parents and families enrolled in genetic research studies. An informed consent process that fosters realistic expectations between researchers and participants may help to minimize any negative impact on parents and families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara N. Cacioppo
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Ariel E. Chandler
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Meghan C. Towne
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Alan H. Beggs
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Ingrid A. Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kranendonk EJ, Ploem MC, Hennekam RCM. Regulating biobanking with children's tissue: a legal analysis and the experts' view. Eur J Hum Genet 2016; 24:30-6. [PMID: 25873015 PMCID: PMC4795222 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2014] [Revised: 02/20/2015] [Accepted: 02/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Many current paediatric studies concern relationships between genes and environment and discuss aetiology, treatment and prevention of Mendelian and multifactorial diseases. Many of these studies depend on collection and long-term storage of data and biological material from affected children in biobanks. Stored material is a source of personal information of the donor and his family and could be used in an undesirable context, potentially leading to discrimination and interfering with a child's right to an open future. Here, we address the normative framework regarding biobanking with residual tissue of children, protecting the privacy interests of young biobank donors (0-12 years). We analyse relevant legal documents concerning storage and use of children's material for research purposes. We explore the views of 17 Dutch experts involved in paediatric biobank research and focus on informed consent for donation of leftover tissue as well as disclosure of individual research findings resulting from biobank research. The results of this analysis show that experts have no clear consensus about the appropriate rules for storage of and research with children's material in biobanks. Development of a framework that provides a fair balance between fundamental paediatric research and privacy protection is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elcke J Kranendonk
- Department of Public Health, AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Corrette Ploem
- Department of Public Health, AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raoul C M Hennekam
- Departments of Paediatrics and Translational Genetics, AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Adolescent perspectives on the return of individual results in genomic addiction research. Psychiatr Genet 2015; 25:127-30. [PMID: 25748091 DOI: 10.1097/ypg.0000000000000083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This study surveyed all adolescents who were enrolled in behavioral genomic research and provided DNA to a biobank, including 320 patients undergoing treatment for substance and conduct problems (SCPs) and 109 non-SCP controls. Participants selected from three options on the return of individual genomic results (RIR) and rated eight methods of re-contact. Most individuals with SCPs (77.8%) and non-SCP controls (72.5%) wanted RIR involving health or behavioral implications. The majority of individuals with SCPs (67.2%) and non-SCP controls (69.7%) indicated that phone re-contact was 'best', with e-mail (22.5% SCPs, 33.9% non-SCPs) and social networking websites (21.3% SCPs, 20.2% non-SCPs) being viable options. These results suggest a layered approach for RIR: phone calls, followed by e-mails and a secure message to a social networking account. Data from this special and vulnerable population, which includes youth involved in the criminal justice system and substantial minority participation, bring an essential and missing perspective to the discussion of RIR.
Collapse
|
28
|
Salvaterra E, Locatelli F, Strazzer S, Borgatti R, D''angelo G, Lenzi L. Paediatric biobanks: opinions, feelings and attitudes of parents towards the specimen donation of their sick children to a hypothetical biobank. Pathobiology 2015; 81:304-308. [PMID: 25792219 DOI: 10.1159/000362091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last years, the storing of biological materials from children for research purposes in biobanks has become the subject of an intense debate in the scientific and ethical communities on a global level. Paediatric biobanks are an important resource for the development of translational research. At the same time, paediatric biobanks are ethically 'sensitive' due to the unique issues they raise. In this study, we explore opinions, feelings and attitudes of parents towards the specimen donation of their sick children to a hypothetical biobank. According to a qualitative methodology based on focus groups, we analysed parents' views, perceptions and inclinations towards typical ethical, legal and social aspects of paediatric biobanks such as proxy consent, minor assent, privacy protection and return of results. Our study confirms the need for specific policies dedicated to paediatric biobanks by highlighting how the nature of the disease affecting children may influence the parents' opinions and decisions towards the enrolment of their children in biobank-based research studies.
Collapse
|
29
|
Bacon PL, Harris ED, Ziniel SI, Savage SK, Weitzman ER, Green RC, Huntington NL, Holm IA. The development of a preference-setting model for the return of individual genomic research results. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015; 10:107-20. [PMID: 25742675 DOI: 10.1177/1556264615572092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Understanding participants' preferences for the return of individual research results (IRR) in genomic research may allow for the implementation of more beneficial result disclosure methods. We tested four preference-setting models through cognitive interviews of parents to explore how parents conceptualize the process of setting preferences and which disease characteristics they believe to be most important when deciding what results to receive on their child. Severity and preventability of a condition were highly influential in decision making and certain groups of research results were anticipated by participants to have negative psychological effects. These findings informed the development of an educational tool and preference-setting model that can be scaled for use in the return of IRR from large biobank studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoebe L Bacon
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Sonja I Ziniel
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Boston Children's Hospital, MA, USA
| | | | - Elissa R Weitzman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Boston Children's Hospital, MA, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Partners Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ingrid A Holm
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Boston Children's Hospital, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Clayton EW. How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others? THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2015; 43:538-44. [PMID: 26479563 PMCID: PMC4617197 DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Adolescents may often have opinions about whether they want genetic and genomic testing in both the clinic and research and about who should have access to the results. This legal analysis demonstrates that the law provides very little protection to minors' wishes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Wright Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society 2525 West End Ave., Suite 400 Nashville, TN 37203 (615) 322-1186 (office) (615) 385-3779 (home) 615-579-0686 (cell) preferred (615) 936-3800 (fax)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kimball BC, Nowakowski KE, Maschke KJ, McCormick JB. Genomic data in the electronic medical record: perspectives from a biobank community advisory board. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2014; 9:16-24. [PMID: 25747687 DOI: 10.1177/1556264614553922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
A proof of principle pharmacogenomic translational study was used as a case example to explore Biobank Community Advisory Board (CAB) member views about placing genomic information into the medical record and to establish how CAB input could affect research design. CAB members expressed enthusiasm for the potential benefit of the research discussed, yet voiced concerns regarding the recruitment and consent materials. They discussed the value of genomic research and its clinical utility; the risk of genetic discrimination; and personal ownership of genomic data. Members distinguished between indirect benefits to future generations and individual risk to research participants. Feedback was used to revise the recruitment and consent materials. Results highlight tensions reported between the public's support for genomic research and concerns with genomic information in the medical record and its use in medical decision-making.
Collapse
|
32
|
Prows CA, Tran G, Blosser B. Whole exome or genome sequencing: nurses need to prepare families for the possibilities. J Adv Nurs 2014; 70:2736-45. [DOI: 10.1111/jan.12516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia A. Prows
- Division of Human Genetics; Department of Pediatrics; Department of Patient Services; Children's Hospital Medical Center; Cincinnati; Ohio USA
| | - Grace Tran
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Ohio USA
| | - Beverly Blosser
- Division of Human Genetics; Cytogenetics Laboratory, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati; Ohio USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis. Genet Med 2014; 16:932-9. [PMID: 24854226 PMCID: PMC4241188 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2013] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent policies specifying criteria about which individual research results to return leave considerable discretion to researchers. This study investigated the types of results that the public wants when participating in genetic research and whether preferences differ based on willingness to participate. METHODS A representative survey of US adults used conjoint analysis to measure priorities among eight principles of a results policy for a proposed large-cohort study. Policy preferences were measured using 12 tasks in which respondents chose between two groupings of the policy principles. Stratified analysis compared those self-identified as likely or unlikely to participate in genomic research. RESULTS Of 1,515 respondents, 56% would participate in the proposed study. All eight principles were positively endorsed by participants (all P < 0.003), with priority placed on providing results at no cost and returning well-validated results for treatable and serious diseases. Providing detailed result reports was more highly valued than providing staff to explain results (P = 0.0005). Receiving results about major changes in risk was marginally disvalued by those unlikely to participate (P = 0.35). CONCLUSION Public preferences for well-validated individual research results for serious, actionable diseases agree with emerging recommendations. However, because preferences for receiving individual research results vary, some choices should be offered to research participants.
Collapse
|
34
|
Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board. Genet Med 2014; 16:547-52. [PMID: 24406460 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2013] [Accepted: 11/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Approaches to return individual results to participants in genomic research variably focus on actionability, duty to share, or participants' preferences. Our group at Boston Children's Hospital has prioritized participants' preferences by implementing the Gene Partnership, a genomic research repository, based on the "Informed Cohort" model that offers return of results in accordance with participant preferences. Recognizing that ethical oversight is essential, the Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board was convened in 2009. METHODS Over 3 years, the Informed Cohort Oversight Board developed guidelines for the return of individual genomic research results. RESULTS The Informed Cohort Oversight Board defined its guiding principles as follows: to respect the developing autonomy of pediatric participants and parental decision-making authority by returning results consistent with participants' preferences and to protect participants from harm. Potential harms and strategies to eliminate harm were identified. Guidelines were developed for participant preferences that consider the child's development and family dynamics. The Informed Cohort Oversight Board agreed that to prevent harm, including harms related to interfering with a child's future autonomy, there will be results that should not be returned regardless of participant preferences. CONCLUSION The Informed Cohort Oversight Board developed guidelines for the return of results that respect the preferences of parents, children, and adult participants while seeking to protect against harm.
Collapse
|
35
|
Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing. Genet Med 2013; 16:442-7. [PMID: 24310310 PMCID: PMC4597884 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2013] [Accepted: 09/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To explore the implications of sequencing information and stated preferences for return of results among research participants. Methods Six focus groups were held with 39 ClinSeq® participants. Groups included participants who had received results, those who had not, those affected with cardiovascular disease and healthy adults. Audio recordings of the sessions were transcribed and coded and analyzed for themes. Results All participants expressed interest in receiving results that are medically actionable, non-actionable, carrier and less so variants that cannot be interpreted. Most participants preferred to receive results in person although several endorsed use of Internet-based resources that they could return to. Participants identified benefits for health management along with satisfying curiosity, making scientific contributions, and partnering in research. Value was seen in gaining control over health risks. Concerns were distress and/or fear that may result. Some participants were opposed to or ambivalent about learning certain types of results, particularly those having to do with diseases that were incurable or that might have implications for the health of their children. Conclusion There was relative enthusiasm about the value of learning sequencing information, yet it was tempered by concern about negative feeling responses and aversion to learning about incurable conditions.
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
The use of genetic information to guide medication decisions holds great promise to improve therapeutic outcomes through increased efficacy and reduced adverse events. As in many areas of medicine, pediatric research and clinical implementation in pharmacogenetics lag behind corresponding adult discovery and clinical applications. In adults, genotype-guided clinical decision support for medications such as clopidogrel, warfarin and simvastatin are in use in some medical centers. However, research conducted in pediatric populations demonstrates that the models and practices developed in adults may be inaccurate in children, and some applications lack any pediatric research to guide clinical decisions. To account for additional factors introduced by developmental considerations in pediatric populations and provide pediatric patients with maximal benefit from genotype-guided therapy, the field will need to develop and employ creative solutions. In this article, we detail some concerns about research and clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics in pediatrics, and present potential mechanisms for addressing them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara L Van Driest
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, 2200 Children's Way, Nashville, TN 37232, USA ; The Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, 8232 DOT, 2200 Children's Way, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Tracy L McGregor
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, 2200 Children's Way, Nashville, TN 37232, USA ; The Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, 8232 DOT, 2200 Children's Way, Nashville, TN 37232, USA ; The Center for Human Genetics Research, 519 Light Hall, 2215 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232-0700, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
The use of genetic information to guide medication decisions holds great promise to improve therapeutic outcomes through increased efficacy and reduced adverse events. As in many areas of medicine, pediatric research and clinical implementation in pharmacogenetics lag behind corresponding adult discovery and clinical applications. In adults, genotype-guided clinical decision support for medications such as clopidogrel, warfarin and simvastatin are in use in some medical centers. However, research conducted in pediatric populations demonstrates that the models and practices developed in adults may be inaccurate in children, and some applications lack any pediatric research to guide clinical decisions. To account for additional factors introduced by developmental considerations in pediatric populations and provide pediatric patients with maximal benefit from genotype-guided therapy, the field will need to develop and employ creative solutions. In this article, we detail some concerns about research and clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics in pediatrics, and present potential mechanisms for addressing them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara L Van Driest
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, 2200 Children’s Way, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- The Monroe Carell Jr Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, 8232 DOT, 2200 Children’s Way, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Tracy L McGregor
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, 2200 Children’s Way, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- The Monroe Carell Jr Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, 8232 DOT, 2200 Children’s Way, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
- The Center for Human Genetics Research, 519 Light Hall, 2215 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232-0700, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stakeholders' opinions on the implementation of pediatric whole exome sequencing: implications for informed consent. J Genet Couns 2013; 23:552-65. [PMID: 23846343 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9626-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2013] [Accepted: 06/25/2013] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Advances in whole genome and whole exome sequencing (WGS/WES) technologies have led to increased availability in clinical settings. Currently, there are few guidelines relating to the process and content of informed consent for WGS/WES, nor to which results should be returned to families. To address this gap, we conducted focus groups to assess the views of professionals, parents, and adolescents for the future implementation of WES. The discussions assessed understanding of the risks and benefits of WES, preferences for the informed consent discussion, process for return of results, and the decision-making role of the pediatric patient. Professional focus group participants included bioethicists, physicians, laboratory directors, and genetic counselors. Parent focus groups included individuals with children who could be offered sequencing due to a potential genetic cause of the child's condition. On-line discussion groups were conducted with adolescents aged 13-17 who had a possible genetic disorder. We identified discrepancies between professionals and patient groups regarding the process and content of informed consent, preference for return of results, and the role of the child in decision-making. Professional groups were concerned with the uncertainty regarding professional obligations, changing interpretation in genomic medicine, and practical concerns of returning results over time. Parent and adolescent groups focused on patient choice and personal utility of sequencing results. Each group expressed different views on the role of the child in decision-making and return of results. These discrepancies represent potential barriers to informed consent and a challenge for genetic counselors regarding the involvement of pediatric patients in decision-making and return of results discussions.
Collapse
|
39
|
Klima J, Fitzgerald-Butt SM, Kelleher KJ, Chisolm DJ, Comstock RD, Ferketich AK, McBride KL. Understanding of informed consent by parents of children enrolled in a genetic biobank. Genet Med 2013; 16:141-8. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2012] [Accepted: 05/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
40
|
Nobile H, Vermeulen E, Thys K, Bergmann MM, Borry P. Why do participants enroll in population biobank studies? A systematic literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2013; 13:35-47. [PMID: 23256702 DOI: 10.1586/erm.12.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Therapeutic misconception has been extensively studied and addressed within clinical trials. An equivalent in the genetic research context has been identified as diagnostic misconception. There is not much data on this phenomenon in population-based biobank studies. Since misconceptions may generate undue motives to enroll, the authors aimed at reviewing studies addressing the reasons to participate in biobank studies. The main databases were searched using relevant keywords. Studies were included if peer-reviewed, in English and describing the reasons to enroll was provided by actual and apparently healthy donors. Although the 13 studies retrieved were heterogeneous, a scheme summarizing the main aspects involved in the decision-making process was developed. Expectation of personal benefit through health-related information was found in eight studies. Three of them discussed whether this expectation could be considered a form of therapeutic misconception. The magnitude of this phenomenon is an important ethical concern and ought to be further studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Nobile
- German Institute of Human Nutrition, Nuthetal, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Christensen KD, Green RC. How could disclosing incidental information from whole-genome sequencing affect patient behavior? Per Med 2013; 10:10.2217/pme.13.24. [PMID: 24319470 PMCID: PMC3852635 DOI: 10.2217/pme.13.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
In this article, we argue that disclosure of incidental findings from whole-genome sequencing has the potential to motivate individuals to change health behaviors through psychological mechanisms that differ from typical risk assessment interventions. Their ability to do so, however, is likely to be highly contingent upon the nature of the incidental findings and how they are disclosed, the context of the disclosure and the characteristics of the patient. Moreover, clinicians need to be aware that behavioral responses may occur in unanticipated ways. This article argues for commentators and policy makers to take a cautious but optimistic perspective while empirical evidence is collected through ongoing research involving whole-genome sequencing and the disclosure of incidental information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt D Christensen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, EC Alumnae Hall, Suite 301, 41 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115-5727, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, EC Alumnae Hall, Suite 301, 41 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115-5727, USA
- Partners Healthcare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lohn Z, Adam S, Birch PH, Friedman JM. Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review. J Genet Couns 2013; 23:463-73. [PMID: 23709124 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9604-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2012] [Accepted: 05/02/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
There are several unresolved challenges associated with the clinical application of genome-wide sequencing technologies. One of the most discussed issues is incidental findings (IF), which are defined as discoveries made as a result of genetic testing that are unrelated to the indication for the test. The discussion surrounding IF began in the context of research, which we have used to frame consideration of IF in the clinical context. There is growing consensus that analytically valid and medically actionable IF should be offered to patients, but whether and to what extent clinicians should disclose other kinds of IF is debated. While others have systematically reviewed the literature concerning genetic IF, previous reviews focus on ethical and research-related issues and do not consider the implications for the genetic counseling profession specifically. This review discusses the practical considerations, ethical concerns and genetic counseling issues related to IF, with a particular focus on clinical genome-wide sequencing. To date, the bulk of the literature with respect to IF in the clinical context consists of commentaries, reviews and case reports. There is a need for more empirical studies to provide a foundation for institutional protocols and evidence-based clinical practice standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Lohn
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lohn Z, Adam S, Birch P, Townsend A, Friedman J. Genetics professionals' perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing. Am J Med Genet A 2013; 161A:542-9. [PMID: 23401068 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2012] [Accepted: 11/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Whole exome or whole genome analysis using massively parallel sequencing technologies will undoubtedly solve diagnostic dilemmas; however, incidental findings (IF) that may have medical and social implications will also be discovered. While there is consensus in the literature that analytically valid and medically actionable IF should be returned to patients if requested, there is debate regarding the return of other IF. There are currently no guidelines established for managing IF in the clinical context. We therefore distributed an online questionnaire to 496 geneticists and genetic counselors in Canada to explore this unresolved issue, and 210 professionals participated (response rate = 42%). The proportion of respondents who indicated that they would return IF to patients depended on the nature of the finding, ranging from 95% for information pertaining to a serious and treatable condition to 12% for information with only social implications (e.g., non-paternity). There was a lack of consensus around the disclosure of certain IF such as genetic carrier status, especially for pediatric patients. The most important considerations identified as impacting IF disclosure included condition-specific factors such as treatment availability, test accuracy, and evidence indicating pathogenicity. This is the first study to document the views of geneticists and genetic counselors in Canada towards the disclosure of IF, and represents a step towards evidence-based guidelines for clinical genome-wide sequencing investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Lohn
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Beliefs and attitudes towards participating in genetic research - a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:114. [PMID: 23388465 PMCID: PMC3568732 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2012] [Accepted: 02/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Biobanks have the potential to offer a venue for chronic disease biomarker discovery, which would allow for disease early detection and for identification of carriers of a certain predictor biomarker. To assess the general attitudes towards genetic research and participation in biobanks in the Long Island/Queens area of New York, and what factors would predict a positive view of such research, participants from the NSLIJ hospital system were surveyed. Methods Participants were recruited at six hospital centers in the NSLIJ system during the summers of 2009 and again in 2011 (n = 1,041). Those who opted to participate were given a questionnaire containing 22 questions assessing demographics, lifestyle and attitudes towards genetic research. These questions addressed individual participant’s beliefs about the importance of genetic research, willingness to participate in genetic research themselves, and their views on informed consent issues. Results Respondents took a generally positive view of genetic research in general, as well as their own participation in such research. Those with reservations were most likely to cite concerns over the privacy of their medical and genetic information. Those who were married tended to view genetic research as important, while those in the younger age group viewed it as less important. Prior blood donation of respondents was found to be a predictor of their approval for genetic research. Demographic factors were not found to be predictive of personal willingness to participate in genetic research, or of approval for the opt-out approach to consent. Conclusions While respondents were generally inclined to approve of genetic research, and those who disapproved did not do so based on an underlying moral objection to such research, there is a disconnect between the belief in the importance of genetic research and the willingness of individuals to participate themselves. This indicates a continued concern for the ways in which genetic materials are safeguarded once they are collected. Also indicated was a general lack of understanding about the various consent processes that go along with genetic research, which should be addressed further to ensure the successful continuation of biobanks.
Collapse
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jeantine E Lunshof
- Department of Molecular Cell Physiology & Netherlands Institute for Systems Biology, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Holm IA, Taylor PL. The Informed Cohort Oversight Board: From Values to Architecture. MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2012; 13:669-690. [PMID: 24371432 PMCID: PMC3872117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid A Holm
- Dr. Holm is a principal investigator for The Gene Partnership (TGP), described herein. She is also affiliated with the following: Division of Genetics and Program in Genomics, Children's Hospital Boston; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School; The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Children's Hospital Boston
| | - Patrick L Taylor
- Mr. Taylor is a co-investigator of TGP and chair of the Informed Cohort Oversight Board (ICOB) from the ICOB's inception through the period described in this paper. He is also affiliated with the following: Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology and Bioethics, Harvard Law School; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School; Children's Hospital Informatics Program, Children's Hospital Boston
| |
Collapse
|