1
|
Robertson EG, Komesaroff R, Eisenstat DD, Robertson A, Ludlow LE. A Pilot Evaluation of an Educational Video to Support Consent to a Pediatric Malignancy Biobank. Biopreserv Biobank 2024. [PMID: 38800954 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2024.0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The collection of biological specimens is necessary to support basic and translational research. However, the complexity of biobanking introduces numerous ethical issues, particularly regarding informed consent. Objective: To evaluate the acceptability and perceived benefits of an educational video facilitating the consent process for the Children's Cancer Centre Biobank. Methods: We invited individuals who had previously consented to be (or their child to be) part of the Biobank, and health professionals who were involved in obtaining consent. Participants watched the video and completed a purpose-designed online survey. Results: A total of 16 health professionals (invited = 30) and 15 patients/caregivers (invited = 127) participated. Most patients/caregivers felt informed about the Biobank at consent, however, noted how overwhelmed they were at the time and that they did not engage with the written information. Overall, both patients/caregivers and health professionals rated the video favorably regarding the information provided and format. Participants valued that it was simple and clear, with several health professionals noting the need for linguistic translations to better support the families they work with. Most patients/caregivers agreed that the video provided enough information to begin considering participation. This aligned with the health professionals' feedback that the video was most effective when used as a conversation starter to help formalize the written consent. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that our video is an acceptable and beneficial tool to assist in the Biobank consenting process, from both the perspective of decision-makers and health professionals obtaining consent. It appears particularly valuable as a precursor to an interactive, formal consent discussion. Further work is required to determine whether our video has a significant impact on outcomes such as decision-making satisfaction and knowledge, and to determine the value to adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eden G Robertson
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rebecca Komesaroff
- The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (VCCC) Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David D Eisenstat
- The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Alexandra Robertson
- The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Louise E Ludlow
- The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramtin S, Davids F, Farhoud AR, Tejada R, Ring D. The Impact of a Computer-Based Interactive Informed Consent for Surgery on Decision Conflict. J Hand Surg Am 2024:S0363-5023(24)00144-8. [PMID: 38739071 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Informed consent for surgery can address the legal aspects of care while also being simple, informative, and empathic. We developed interactive informed consents and compared them with standard printed informed consents asking: (1) are there any factors associated with lower decision conflict or greater patient-rated clinician empathy including consent format? (2) Are there any factors associated with rating the consent process as informative, comfortable, and satisfying including consent format? METHODS Ninety-four adult patients accepted an offer of surgery from one of three hand surgeons to address one of six common hand surgery diagnoses: carpal tunnel release, cubital tunnel release, trigger finger release, plate and screw fixation of a distal radius fracture, removal of a benign mass, including a ganglion cyst, and Dupuytren contracture release. Fifty-three patients were randomized to complete an interactive consent, and 41, a standard written consent. Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and unhelpful thoughts were measured. Patients completed the Decision Conflict Scale and the Jefferson Scale of Patient's Perceptions of Physician Empathy and rated the consent as informative, comfortable, and satisfactory on a scale of 0-10. RESULTS Greater decisional conflict was slightly associated with greater patient unhelpful thoughts about symptoms and was not associated with consent format. A higher rating of comfort with the consent process was slightly associated with patient choice to proceed with surgical treatment, but not with consent format. Accounting for potential confounding in multivariable analysis, a higher rating of the consent process as informative was slightly associated with patient preference for surgical over nonsurgical treatment, CONCLUSIONS: The observation that an interactive consent form was not related to decision conflict or other aspects of patient experience suggests that such tools may not have much weight relative to the interaction between patient and clinician. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Efforts to improve informed consent may need to focus on the dialog between patient and surgeon rather than how information is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Ramtin
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Division of Orthopedics, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX.
| | - Floor Davids
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Division of Orthopedics, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX
| | - Amir Reza Farhoud
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Division of Orthopedics, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX
| | - Raul Tejada
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Division of Orthopedics, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX
| | - David Ring
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Division of Orthopedics, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Sutter E, Barbier L, Borry P, Geerts D, Ioannidis JP, Huys I. Personalized and longitudinal electronic informed consent in clinical trials: How to move the needle? Digit Health 2024; 10:20552076231222361. [PMID: 38269372 PMCID: PMC10807334 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231222361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Changes in the clinical trials landscape have been driven by advancements in digital technology. The use of electronic informed consent to inform research participants and to obtain their consent electronically has the potential to improve participant-researcher interactions over time, facilitate clinical trial participation, and increase efficiency in clinical trial conduct. A personalized electronic informed consent platform that enables long-term interactions with the research team could function as a tool to empower participant engagement in clinical trials. However, significant challenges persist impeding successful and widespread implementation. This Perspective provides insights into the opportunities and challenges for the implementation of electronic informed consent in clinical trials. It sets out key recommendations to promote the implementation of this innovative approach to the informed consent process, including the creation of uniform electronic informed consent platforms at regional and national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien De Sutter
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Liese Barbier
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Geerts
- KU Leuven Digital Society Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - John P.A. Ioannidis
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cohen E, Byrom B, Becher A, Jörntén-Karlsson M, Mackenzie AK. Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e43883. [PMID: 37656499 PMCID: PMC10504628 DOI: 10.2196/43883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Providing informed consent means agreeing to participate in a clinical trial and having understood what is involved. Flawed informed consent processes, including missing dates and signatures, are common regulatory audit findings. Electronic consent (eConsent) uses digital technologies to enable the consenting process. It aims to improve participant comprehension and engagement with study information and to address data quality concerns. OBJECTIVE This systematic literature review aimed to assess the effectiveness of eConsent in terms of patient comprehension, acceptability, usability, and study enrollment and retention rates, as well as the effects of eConsent on the time patients took to perform the consenting process ("cycle time") and on-site workload in comparison with traditional paper-based consenting. METHODS The systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Ovid Embase and Ovid MEDLINE were systematically searched for publications reporting original, comparative data on the effectiveness of eConsent in terms of patient comprehension, acceptability, usability, enrollment and retention rates, cycle time, and site workload. The methodological validity of the studies that compared outcomes for comprehension, acceptability, and usability across paper consent and eConsent was assessed. Study methodologies were categorized as having "high" validity if comprehensive assessments were performed using established instruments. RESULTS Overall, 37 publications describing 35 studies (13,281 participants) were included. All studies comparing eConsenting and paper-based consenting for comprehension (20/35, 57% of the studies; 10 with "high" validity), acceptability (8/35, 23% of the studies; 1 with "high" validity), and usability (5/35, 14% of the studies; 1 with "high" validity) reported significantly better results with eConsent, better results but without significance testing, or no significant differences in overall results. None of the studies reported better results with paper than with eConsent. Among the "high" validity studies, 6 studies on comprehension reported significantly better understanding of at least some concepts, the study on acceptability reported statistically significant higher satisfaction scores, and the study on usability reported statistically significant higher usability scores with eConsent than with paper (P<.05 for all). Cycle times were increased with eConsent, potentially reflecting greater patient engagement with the content. Data on enrollment and retention were limited. Comparative data from site staff and other study researchers indicated the potential for reduced workload and lower administrative burden with eConsent. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review showed that compared with patients using paper-based consenting, patients using eConsent had a better understanding of the clinical trial information, showed greater engagement with content, and rated the consenting process as more acceptable and usable. eConsent solutions thus have the potential to enhance understanding, acceptability, and usability of the consenting process while inherently being able to address data quality concerns, including those related to flawed consenting processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anja Becher
- Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kassam I, Ilkina D, Kemp J, Roble H, Carter-Langford A, Shen N. Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e42507. [PMID: 36763409 PMCID: PMC9960046 DOI: 10.2196/42507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing integration of digital health tools into care may result in a greater flow of personal health information (PHI) between patients and providers. Although privacy legislation governs how entities may collect, use, or share PHI, such legislation has not kept pace with digital health innovations, resulting in a lack of guidance on implementing meaningful consent. Understanding patient perspectives when implementing meaningful consent is critical to ensure that it meets their needs. Consent for research in the context of digital health is limited. OBJECTIVE This state-of-the-art review aimed to understand the current state of research as it relates to patient perspectives on digital health consent. Its objectives were to explore what is known about the patient perspective and experience with digital health consent and provide recommendations on designing and implementing digital health consent based on the findings. METHODS A structured literature search was developed and deployed in 4 electronic databases-MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and Web of Science-for articles published after January 2010. The initial literature search was conducted in March 2021 and updated in March 2022. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they discussed electronic consent or consent, focused on the patient perspective or preference, and were related to digital health or digital PHI. Data were extracted using an extraction template and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS In total, 75 articles were included for analysis. Most studies were published within the last 5 years (58/75, 77%) and conducted in a clinical care context (33/75, 44%) and in the United States (48/75, 64%). Most studies aimed to understand participants' willingness to share PHI (25/75, 33%) and participants' perceived usability and comprehension of an electronic consent notice (25/75, 33%). More than half (40/75, 53%) of the studies did not describe the type of consent model used. The broad open consent model was the most explored (11/75, 15%). Of the 75 studies, 68 (91%) found that participants were willing to provide consent; however, their consent behaviors and preferences were context-dependent. Common patient consent requirements included clear and digestible information detailing who can access PHI, for what purpose their PHI will be used, and how privacy will be ensured. CONCLUSIONS There is growing interest in understanding the patient perspective on digital health consent in the context of providing clinical care. There is evidence suggesting that many patients are willing to consent for various purposes, especially when there is greater transparency on how the PHI is used and oversight mechanisms are in place. Providing this transparency is critical for fostering trust in digital health tools and the innovative uses of data to optimize health and system outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iman Kassam
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jessica Kemp
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Heba Roble
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Nelson Shen
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mascalzoni D, Melotti R, Pattaro C, Pramstaller PP, Gögele M, De Grandi A, Biasiotto R. Ten years of dynamic consent in the CHRIS study: informed consent as a dynamic process. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1391-1397. [PMID: 36064788 PMCID: PMC9441838 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01160-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) is a longitudinal study in Northern Italy, using dynamic consent since its inception in 2011. The CHRIS study collects health data and biosamples for research, and foresees regular follow-ups over time. We describe the experience with the CHRIS study dynamic consent, providing an overview of its conceptualization and implementation, and of the participant-centered strategies used to assess and improve the process, directly linked to participation and communication. In order to comply with high ethical standards and to allow broadness in the areas of research, CHRIS dynamic consent was conceived as an interactive process: based on a strong governance and an ongoing tailored communication with participants, it aims to promote autonomy and to develop a trust-based engaged relationship with participants, also relevant for retention. Built within an online platform, the consent allows granular choices, which can be changed over time. In a process of co-production, participants views have been investigated and kept into account in policy development. Participants showed a high degree of participation, thus enabling the consolidation of the CHRIS resources. Even though a low change rate was reported in the baseline, participants valued the possibility of changing their informed consent choices. Communication (language-tailored, ongoing, multimedia) was important for participants, and for participation and retention. In our experience, dynamic consent was proven to be a flexible consent model, which allowed to meet ethical and legal standards for participation in research, and to accommodate participants' and researchers' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Mascalzoni
- grid.511439.bInstitute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Bolzano, Italy ,grid.8993.b0000 0004 1936 9457Center for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Roberto Melotti
- grid.511439.bInstitute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Cristian Pattaro
- grid.511439.bInstitute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Peter Paul Pramstaller
- grid.511439.bInstitute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Martin Gögele
- grid.511439.bInstitute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro De Grandi
- grid.511439.bInstitute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Roberta Biasiotto
- Institute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Bolzano, Italy. .,Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peay HL, Gwaltney AY, Moultrie R, Cope H, Boyea BL, Porter KA, Duparc M, Alexander AA, Biesecker BB, Isiaq A, Check J, Gehtland L, Bailey DB, King NMP. Education and Consent for Population-Based DNA Screening: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Early Check Newborn Screening Pilot Study. Front Genet 2022; 13:891592. [PMID: 35646095 PMCID: PMC9133477 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.891592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
A challenge in implementing population-based DNA screening is providing sufficient information, that is, understandable and acceptable, and that supports informed decision making. Early Check is an expanded newborn screening study offered to mothers/guardians whose infants have standard newborn screening in North Carolina. We developed electronic education and consent to meet the objectives of feasibility, acceptability, trustworthiness, and supporting informed decisions. We used two methods to evaluate Early Check among mothers of participating infants who received normal results: an online survey and interviews conducted via telephone. Survey and interview domains included motivations for enrollment, acceptability of materials and processes, attitudes toward screening, knowledge recall, and trust. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and assessment of factors associated with knowledge recall and trust. Qualitative data were coded, and an inductive approach was used to identify themes across interviews. Survey respondents (n = 1,823) rated the following as the most important reasons for enrolling their infants: finding out if the baby has the conditions screened (43.0%), and that no additional blood samples were required (20.1%). Interview respondents (n = 24) reported the value of early knowledge, early intervention, and ease of participation as motivators. Survey respondents rated the study information as having high utility for decision making (mean 4.7 to 4.8 out of 5) and 98.2% agreed that they had sufficient information. Knowledge recall was relatively high (71.8–92.5% correct), as was trust in Early Check information (96.2% strongly agree/agree). Attitudes about Early Check screening were positive (mean 0.1 to 0.6 on a scale of 0–4, with lower scores indicating more positive attitudes) and participants did not regret participation (e.g., 98.6% strongly agreed/agreed Early Check was the right decision). Interview respondents further reported positive attitudes about Early Check materials and processes. Early Check provides a model for education and consent in large-scale DNA screening. We found evidence of high acceptability, trustworthiness and knowledge recall, and positive attitudes among respondents. Population-targeted programs need to uphold practices that result in accessible information for those from diverse backgrounds. Additional research on those who do not select screening, although ethically and practically challenging, is important to inform population-based DNA screening practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly L Peay
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Angela You Gwaltney
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Rebecca Moultrie
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Heidi Cope
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Beth Lincoln- Boyea
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Katherine Ackerman Porter
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Martin Duparc
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Amir A Alexander
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, United States
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Aminah Isiaq
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Jennifer Check
- Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Lisa Gehtland
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Donald B Bailey
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Nancy M P King
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Simon CM, Wang K, Shinkunas LA, Stein DT, Meissner P, Smith M, Pentz R, Klein DW. Communicating With Diverse Patients About Participating in a Biobank: A Randomized Multisite Study Comparing Electronic and Face-to-Face Informed Consent Processes. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2022; 17:144-166. [PMID: 34410195 PMCID: PMC8712348 DOI: 10.1177/15562646211038819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Some individuals' understanding of informed consent (IC) information may improve with electronic delivery, but others may benefit from face-to-face (F2F). This randomized, multisite study explores how individuals from diverse backgrounds understand electronic IC documents versus F2F, their confidence in understanding, and enrollment in research. A total of 501 patients at two U.S. biobanks with diverse populations participated. There were no overall differences between electronic and F2F understanding, but F2F predicted higher confidence in understanding and enrollment. Ethnicity and a higher educational level predicted higher understanding and confidence. Study findings suggest that electronic consent may lead to better understanding for non-Hispanic patients of higher socioeconomic status. F2F processes may lead to better understanding and higher enrollment of patients from Hispanic and lower socioeconomic levels. Researchers should carefully consider how they implement electronic IC processes and whether to maintain an F2F process to better address the needs and limitations of some populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kai Wang
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Rebecca Pentz
- School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kasperbauer TJ, Waltz A, Hudson B, Hawryluk B, Moore C, Schmidt K, Schwartz PH. Collecting Biospecimens and Obtaining Biobank Consent From Patients in an Academic Health Care Setting: Practical and Ethical Considerations. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2022; 97:62-68. [PMID: 34524131 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Academic health centers and health systems increasingly ask patients to enroll in research biobanks as part of standard care, raising important practical and ethical questions for integrating biobank consent processes into health care settings. This article aims to assist academic health centers and health systems considering implementing these integrated consent processes by outlining the 5 main issues-and the key practical and ethical considerations for each issue-that Indiana University Health and the Indiana Biobank faced when integrating biobank consent into their health system, as well as the key obstacles encountered. The 5 main issues to consider include the specimen to collect (leftover, new collection, or add-ons to clinical tests), whether to use opt-in or opt-out consent, where to approach patients, how to effectively use digital tools for consent, and how to appropriately simplify consent information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J Kasperbauer
- T.J. Kasperbauer is a postdoctoral fellow, Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Amy Waltz
- A. Waltz is associate director, Office of Research Compliance, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Brenda Hudson
- B. Hudson is director of strategic operations, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Bridget Hawryluk
- B. Hawryluk is human-centered designer, Research Jam, Patient Engagement Core, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Courtney Moore
- C. Moore is human-centered designer, Research Jam, Patient Engagement Core, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Karen Schmidt
- K. Schmidt is project manager, Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Peter H Schwartz
- P.H. Schwartz is director, Indiana University Center for Bioethics, and associate professor of medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lajonchere C, Naeim A, Dry S, Wenger N, Elashoff D, Vangala S, Petruse A, Ariannejad M, Magyar C, Johansen L, Werre G, Kroloff M, Geschwind D. An Integrated, Scalable, Electronic Video Consent Process to Power Precision Health Research: Large, Population-Based, Cohort Implementation and Scalability Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e31121. [PMID: 34889741 PMCID: PMC8701720 DOI: 10.2196/31121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obtaining explicit consent from patients to use their remnant biological samples and deidentified clinical data for research is essential for advancing precision medicine. OBJECTIVE We aimed to describe the operational implementation and scalability of an electronic universal consent process that was used to power an institutional precision health biobank across a large academic health system. METHODS The University of California, Los Angeles, implemented the use of innovative electronic consent videos as the primary recruitment tool for precision health research. The consent videos targeted patients aged ≥18 years across ambulatory clinical laboratories, perioperative settings, and hospital settings. Each of these major areas had slightly different workflows and patient populations. Sociodemographic information, comorbidity data, health utilization data (ambulatory visits, emergency room visits, and hospital admissions), and consent decision data were collected. RESULTS The consenting approach proved scalable across 22 clinical sites (hospital and ambulatory settings). Over 40,000 participants completed the consent process at a rate of 800 to 1000 patients per week over a 2-year time period. Participants were representative of the adult University of California, Los Angeles, Health population. The opt-in rates in the perioperative (16,500/22,519, 73.3%) and ambulatory clinics (2308/3390, 68.1%) were higher than those in clinical laboratories (7506/14,235, 52.7%; P<.001). Patients with higher medical acuity were more likely to opt in. The multivariate analyses showed that African American (odds ratio [OR] 0.53, 95% CI 0.49-0.58; P<.001), Asian (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.77; P<.001), and multiple-race populations (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.77; P<.001) were less likely to participate than White individuals. CONCLUSIONS This is one of the few large-scale, electronic video-based consent implementation programs that reports a 65.5% (26,314/40,144) average overall opt-in rate across a large academic health system. This rate is higher than those previously reported for email (3.6%) and electronic biobank (50%) informed consent rates. This study demonstrates a scalable recruitment approach for population health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Lajonchere
- Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Arash Naeim
- Center for SMART Health, Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sarah Dry
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Neil Wenger
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - David Elashoff
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sitaram Vangala
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Antonia Petruse
- Embedded Clinical Research and Innovation Unit, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Maryam Ariannejad
- Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Clara Magyar
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Liliana Johansen
- Embedded Clinical Research and Innovation Unit, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Gabriela Werre
- Embedded Clinical Research and Innovation Unit, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Maxwell Kroloff
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Daniel Geschwind
- Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Norstad M, Outram S, Brown JEH, Zamora AN, Koenig BA, Risch N, Norton ME, Slavotinek A, Ackerman SL. The difficulties of broad data sharing in genomic medicine: Empirical evidence from diverse participants in prenatal and pediatric clinical genomics research. Genet Med 2021; 24:410-418. [PMID: 34906477 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to understand broad data sharing decisions among predominantly underserved families participating in genomic research. METHODS Drawing on clinic observations, semistructured interviews, and survey data from prenatal and pediatric families enrolled in a genomic medicine study focused on historically underserved and underrepresented populations, this paper expands empirical evidence regarding genomic data sharing communication and decision-making. RESULTS One-third of parents declined to share family data, and pediatric participants were significantly more likely to decline than prenatal participants. The pediatric population was significantly more socioeconomically disadvantaged and more likely to require interpreters. Opt-in was tied to altruism and participants' perception that data sharing was inherent to research participation. Opt-out was associated with privacy concerns and influenced by clinical staff's presentation of data handling procedures. The ability of participants to make informed choices during enrollment about data sharing was weakened by suboptimal circumstances, which was revealed by poor understanding of data sharing in follow-up interviews as well as discrepancies between expressed participant desires and official recorded choices. CONCLUSION These empirical data suggest that the context within which informed consent process is conducted in clinical genomics may be inadequate for respecting participants' values and preferences and does not support informed decision-making processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Norstad
- Program in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Simon Outram
- Program in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Julia E H Brown
- Program in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Astrid N Zamora
- Program in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Barbara A Koenig
- Program in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Neil Risch
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mary E Norton
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Anne Slavotinek
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sara L Ackerman
- Program in Bioethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Naeim A, Dry S, Elashoff D, Xie Z, Petruse A, Magyar C, Johansen L, Werre G, Lajonchere C, Wenger N. Electronic Video Consent to Power Precision Health Research: A Pilot Cohort Study. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e29123. [PMID: 34313247 PMCID: PMC8459215 DOI: 10.2196/29123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Developing innovative, efficient, and institutionally scalable biospecimen consent for remnant tissue that meets the National Institutes of Health consent guidelines for genomic and molecular analysis is essential for precision medicine efforts in cancer. OBJECTIVE This study aims to pilot-test an electronic video consent that individuals could complete largely on their own. METHODS The University of California, Los Angeles developed a video consenting approach designed to be comprehensive yet fast (around 5 minutes) for providing universal consent for remnant biospecimen collection for research. The approach was piloted in 175 patients who were coming in for routine services in laboratory medicine, radiology, oncology, and hospital admissions. The pilot yielded 164 completed postconsent surveys. The pilot assessed the usefulness, ease, and trustworthiness of the video consent. In addition, we explored drivers for opting in or opting out. RESULTS The pilot demonstrated that the electronic video consent was well received by patients, with high scores for usefulness, ease, and trustworthiness even among patients that opted out of participation. The revised more animated video pilot test in phase 2 was better received in terms of ease of use (P=.005) and the ability to understand the information (P<.001). There were significant differences between those who opted in and opted out in their beliefs concerning the usefulness of tissue, trusting researchers, the importance of contributing to science, and privacy risk (P<.001). The results showed that "I trust researchers to use leftover biological specimens to promote the public's health" and "Sharing a biological sample for research is safe because of the privacy protections in place" discriminated opt-in statuses were the strongest predictors (both areas under the curve were 0.88). Privacy concerns seemed universal in individuals who opted out. CONCLUSIONS Efforts to better educate the community may be needed to help overcome some of the barriers in engaging individuals to participate in precision health initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Naeim
- UCLA Center for SMART Health, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sarah Dry
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - David Elashoff
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Zhuoer Xie
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Antonia Petruse
- Embedded Clinical Research and Innovation Unit, CTSI Office of Clinical Research, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Clara Magyar
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Liliana Johansen
- Embedded Clinical Research and Innovation Unit, CTSI Office of Clinical Research, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Gabriela Werre
- Embedded Clinical Research and Innovation Unit, CTSI Office of Clinical Research, Los Angeles, CA, US
| | - Clara Lajonchere
- Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Neil Wenger
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kasperbauer TJ, Halverson C. Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:686264. [PMID: 34307413 PMCID: PMC8301072 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.686264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Research biobanks that enroll minors face important practical, ethical, and regulatory challenges in reconsenting participants when they reach the age of 18. Federal regulations governing research in the United States provide minimal guidance and allow for a range of practices, including waiving the requirement to obtain reconsent. Some commentators have argued that institutional review boards should indeed grant such waivers, given the low risks of biobank-based research and the impracticality of contacting all participants when they turn 18. There is also significant ethical debate about the age at which adolescents can make authentic, autonomous decisions regarding their research participation. This paper reviews these issues in detail, describes the current state of the ethical discussion, and outlines evidence-based policies for enrolling minors into research biobanks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. J. Kasperbauer
- Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kasperbauer TJ, Schmidt KK, Thomas A, Perkins SM, Schwartz PH. Incorporating Biobank Consent into a Healthcare Setting: Challenges for Patient Understanding. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2021; 12:113-122. [PMID: 33275086 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1851313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Biobank participants often do not understand much of the information they are provided as part of the informed consent process, despite numerous attempts at simplifying consent forms and improving their readability. We report the first assessment of biobank enrollees' comprehension under an "integrated consent" process, where patients were asked to enroll in a research biobank as part of their normal healthcare experience. A number of healthcare systems have implemented similar integrated consent processes for biobanking, but it is unknown how much patients understand after enrolling under these conditions. Methods: We recruited patients who enrolled in a biobank while in a healthcare setting when receiving ordinary care. We assessed knowledge of consent materials using 11 true/false questions drawn from a well-known biobank knowledge test. After reviewing the results from 114 participants, we revised the consent form and repeated the knowledge assessment with 144 different participants. Results: Participants scored poorly on the knowledge test in both rounds, with no significant differences in overall scores or individual items between the rounds. In Phase 1, participants answered 53% of the questions correctly, 25% incorrectly, and 22% "I don't know." In Phase 2, participants answered 53% of questions correctly, 24% incorrectly, and 23% "I don't know." Participants scored particularly poorly on questions about data sharing and accessing medical records. Conclusions: Enrollees under an integrated consent model had significant misunderstandings that persisted despite an attempt to improve information specifically about those topics in a consent form. These results raise challenges for current approaches that attribute misunderstanding to overly complex consent forms. They also suggest that the pressures of the clinic may compound other problems with patient understanding of biobank consent. As health systems increasingly blend research and care, they may need to rethink their approach to educating patients about participation in a biobank.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J Kasperbauer
- Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Karen K Schmidt
- Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Ariane Thomas
- Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Susan M Perkins
- Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Peter H Schwartz
- Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- School of Liberal Arts, Indiana University - Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gesualdo F, Daverio M, Palazzani L, Dimitriou D, Diez-Domingo J, Fons-Martinez J, Jackson S, Vignally P, Rizzo C, Tozzi AE. Digital tools in the informed consent process: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:18. [PMID: 33639926 PMCID: PMC7913441 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00585-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Providing understandable information to patients is necessary to achieve the aims of the Informed Consent process: respecting and promoting patients’ autonomy and protecting patients from harm. In recent decades, new, primarily digital technologies have been used to apply and test innovative formats of Informed Consent. We conducted a systematic review to explore the impact of using digital tools for Informed Consent in both clinical research and in clinical practice. Understanding, satisfaction and participation were compared for digital tools versus the non-digital Informed Consent process. Methods We searched for studies on available electronic databases, including Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Studies were identified using specific Mesh-terms/keywords. We included studies, published from January 2012 to October 2020, that focused on the use of digital Informed Consent tools for clinical research, or clinical procedures. Digital interventions were defined as interventions that used multimedia or audio–video to provide information to patients. We classified the interventions into 3 different categories: video only, non-interactive multimedia, and interactive multimedia. Results Our search yielded 19,579 publications. After title and abstract screening 100 studies were retained for full-text analysis, of which 73 publications were included. Studies examined interactive multimedia (29/73), non-interactive multimedia (13/73), and videos (31/73), and most (34/38) studies were conducted on adults. Innovations in consent were tested for clinical/surgical procedures (26/38) and clinical research (12/38). For research IC, 21 outcomes were explored, with a positive effect on at least one of the studied outcomes being observed in 8/12 studies. For clinical/surgical procedures 49 outcomes were explored, and 21/26 studies reported a positive effect on at least one of the studied outcomes. Conclusions Digital technologies for informed consent were not found to negatively affect any of the outcomes, and overall, multimedia tools seem desirable. Multimedia tools indicated a higher impact than videos only. Presence of a researcher may potentially enhance efficacy of different outcomes in research IC processes. Studies were heterogeneous in design, making evaluation of impact challenging. Robust study design including standardization is needed to conclusively assess impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Gesualdo
- Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù (OPBG), Piazza di Sant'Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
| | - Margherita Daverio
- Libera Università Maria Ss. Assunta (LUMSA), Via della Traspontina, 21, 00193, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Palazzani
- Libera Università Maria Ss. Assunta (LUMSA), Via della Traspontina, 21, 00193, Rome, Italy
| | - Dimitris Dimitriou
- AND Consulting Group SPRL, Place Marcel Broodthaers, 8, 1060, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Javier Diez-Domingo
- The Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), Avda. de Catalunya, 21, 46020, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaime Fons-Martinez
- The Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), Avda. de Catalunya, 21, 46020, Valencia, Spain
| | - Sally Jackson
- Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù (OPBG), Piazza di Sant'Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Pascal Vignally
- Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù (OPBG), Piazza di Sant'Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Rizzo
- Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù (OPBG), Piazza di Sant'Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Eugenio Tozzi
- Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù (OPBG), Piazza di Sant'Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weiss JM, Davis HA, McCarthy AM, Santillan MK, Brandt DS, Santillan DA. Development and Pilot of a REDCap Electronic Informed Consent Form for Research: An Example from the ROPE Study. JOURNAL OF INFORMATICS NURSING 2021; 6:1-8. [PMID: 36249159 PMCID: PMC9565828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
A study that describes the development of an electronic informed consent, using the REDCap platform, and the results of a pilot study to assess participants' understanding and acceptance of that electronic informed consent for use in a research study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heather A Davis
- Institute for Clinical and T ranslational Science, leader in the development and application of data science tools to facilitate and streamline clinical research at the University of Iowa
| | - Ann Marie McCarthy
- University of Iowa College of Nursing Iowa City, IA. McCarthy has a research focus on children with chronic conditions, particularly pain management and medication management in schools
| | - Mark K Santillan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Santillan is also a Maternal Fetal Medicine Subspecialist and a T ranslational Physician-Scientist investigating immunovascular mechanisms of the development of hypertension and cardiovascular disease in pregnancy
| | - Debra S Brandt
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Brandt's area of expertise include the informed consent process
| | - Donna A Santillan
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Santillan's research focuses on improving maternal health in pregnancy and in bolstering the inclusion of pregnant women in research
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pung J, Rienhoff O. Key components and IT assistance of participant management in clinical research: a scoping review. JAMIA Open 2020; 3:449-458. [PMID: 33215078 PMCID: PMC7660951 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Managing participants and their data are fundamental for the success of a clinical trial. Our review identifies and describes processes that deal with management of trial participants and highlights information technology (IT) assistance for clinical research in the context of participant management. Methods A scoping literature review design, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement, was used to identify literature on trial participant-related proceedings, work procedures, or workflows, and assisting electronic systems. Results The literature search identified 1329 articles of which 111 were included for analysis. Participant-related procedures were categorized into 4 major trial processes: recruitment, obtaining informed consent, managing identities, and managing administrative data. Our results demonstrated that management of trial participants is considered in nearly every step of clinical trials, and that IT was successfully introduced to all participant-related areas of a clinical trial to facilitate processes. Discussion There is no precise definition of participant management, so a broad search strategy was necessary, resulting in a high number of articles that had to be excluded. Nevertheless, this review provides a comprehensive overview of participant management-related components, which was lacking so far. The review contributes to a better understanding of how computer-assisted management of participants in clinical trials is possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Pung
- Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Otto Rienhoff
- Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
De Sutter E, Zaçe D, Boccia S, Di Pietro ML, Geerts D, Borry P, Huys I. Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e19129. [PMID: 33030440 PMCID: PMC7582148 DOI: 10.2196/19129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Informed consent is one of the key elements in biomedical research. The introduction of electronic informed consent can be a way to overcome many challenges related to paper-based informed consent; however, its novel opportunities remain largely unfulfilled due to several barriers. Objective We aimed to provide an overview of the ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface perspectives of multiple stakeholder groups in order to assist responsible implementation of electronic informed consent in biomedical research. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search using Web of Science (Core collection), PubMed, EMBASE, ACM Digital Library, and PsycARTICLES. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used for reporting this work. We included empirical full-text studies focusing on the concept of electronic informed consent in biomedical research covering the ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface domains. Studies written in English and published from January 2010 onward were selected. We explored perspectives of different stakeholder groups, in particular researchers, research participants, health authorities, and ethics committees. We critically appraised literature included in the systematic review using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort and cross-sectional studies, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative studies, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for mixed methods studies, and Jadad tool for randomized controlled trials. Results A total of 40 studies met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the studies were heterogeneous in the type of study design, population, intervention, research context, and the tools used. Most of the studies’ populations were research participants (ie, patients and healthy volunteers). The majority of studies addressed barriers to achieving adequate understanding when using electronic informed consent. Concerns shared by multiple stakeholder groups were related to the security and legal validity of an electronic informed consent platform and usability for specific groups of research participants. Conclusions Electronic informed consent has the potential to improve the informed consent process in biomedical research compared to the current paper-based consent. The ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface perspectives outlined in this review might serve to enhance the future implementation of electronic informed consent. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020158979; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=158979
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien De Sutter
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Drieda Zaçe
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefania Boccia
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.,Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Di Pietro
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - David Geerts
- Meaningful Interactions Lab, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chen C, Lee PI, Pain KJ, Delgado D, Cole CL, Campion TR. Replacing Paper Informed Consent with Electronic Informed Consent for Research in Academic Medical Centers: A Scoping Review. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE PROCEEDINGS. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2020; 2020:80-88. [PMID: 32477626 PMCID: PMC7233043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Although experts have identified benefits to replacing paper with electronic consent (eConsent) for research, a comprehensive understanding of strategies to overcome barriers to adoption is unknown. To address this gap, we performed a scoping review of the literature describing eConsent in academic medical centers. Of 69 studies that met inclusion criteria, 81% (n=56) addressed ethical, legal, and social issues; 67% (n=46) described user interface/user experience considerations; 39% (n=27) compared electronic versus paper approaches; 33% (n=23) discussed approaches to enterprise scalability; and 25% (n=17) described changes to consent elections. Findings indicate a lack of a leading commercial eConsent vendor, as articles described a myriad of homegrown systems and extensions of vendor EHR patient portals. Opportunities appear to exist for researchers and commercial software vendors to develop eConsent approaches that address the five critical areas identified in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Chen
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Pou-I Lee
- Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Kevin J Pain
- Samuel J. Wood Library & C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Diana Delgado
- Samuel J. Wood Library & C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Curtis L Cole
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Thomas R Campion
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Clinical & Translational Science Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pacyna JE, McCormick JB, Olson JE, Winkler EM, Bublitz JT, Hathcock MA, Sharp RR. Assessing the stability of biobank donor preferences regarding sample use: evidence supporting the value of dynamic consent. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:1168-1177. [PMID: 32327712 PMCID: PMC7608348 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0625-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Dynamic consent has been proposed as a strategy for addressing the limitations of traditional, broad consent for biobank participation. Although the argument for dynamic consent has been made on theoretical grounds, empirical studies evaluating the potential utility of dynamic consent are needed to enhance deliberations about the merits of dynamic consent. Few studies have assessed such considerations as whether donor preferences may change over time or if participants would use a dynamic consent mechanism to modify preferences when they change. We administered a 66-item survey to participants in a large DNA biobank. The survey sought to gauge the stability of donor preferences specified at the time of biobank enrollment, specifically the stability of donors’ preference regarding posthumous availability of biospecimens to next-of-kin. We received 1164 completed surveys for a response rate of 72%. Forty percent of respondents indicated a preference regarding sample availability on the survey (T2) that was inconsistent with the preference they had expressed when they enrolled in the biobank (T1). Most (94%) individuals with inconsistent preferences regarding sample availability had initially restricted sample availability at T1 but were comfortable with broader availability when asked at the time of the survey (T2). Our findings demonstrate that preferences regarding sample use expressed at the time of enrollment in a DNA biobank may not be reliable indicators of donor preferences over time. These findings lend empirical support to the case for a dynamic consent model in which biobank participants are approached over time to clarify their views regarding sample use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel E Pacyna
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Janet E Olson
- Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Erin M Winkler
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Josh T Bublitz
- Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Richard R Sharp
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. .,Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schmidlen T, Schwartz M, DiLoreto K, Kirchner HL, Sturm AC. Patient assessment of chatbots for the scalable delivery of genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:1166-1177. [PMID: 31549758 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
A barrier to incorporating genomics more broadly is limited access to providers with genomics expertise. Chatbots are a technology-based simulated conversation used in scaling communications. Geisinger and Clear Genetics, Inc. have developed chatbots to facilitate communication with participants receiving clinically actionable genetic variants from the MyCode® Community Health Initiative (MyCode® ). The consent chatbot walks patients through the consent allowing them to opt to receive more or less detail on key topics (goals, benefits, risks, etc.). The follow-up chatbot reminds participants of suggested actions following result receipt and the cascade chatbot can be sent to at-risk relatives by participants to share their genetic test results and facilitate cascade testing. To explore the acceptability, usability, and understanding of the study consent, post-result follow-up and cascade testing chatbots, we conducted six focus groups with MyCode® participants. Sixty-two individuals participated in a focus group (n = 33 consent chatbot, n = 29 follow-up and cascade chatbot). Participants were mostly female (n = 42, 68%), Caucasian (n = 58, 94%), college-educated (n = 33,53%), retirees (n = 38, 61%), and of age 56 years or older (n = 52, 84%). Few participants reported that they knew what a chatbot was (n = 10, 16%), and a small number reported that they had used a chatbot (n = 5, 8%). Qualitative analysis of transcripts and notes from focus groups revealed four main themes: (a) overall impressions, (b) suggested improvements, (c) concerns and limitations, and (d) implementation. Participants supported using chatbots to consent for genomics research and to interact with healthcare providers for care coordination following receipt of genomic results. Most expressed willingness to use a chatbot to share genetic information with relatives. The consent chatbot presents an engaging alternative to deliver content challenging to comprehend in traditional paper or in-person consent. The cascade and follow-up chatbots may be acceptable, user-friendly, scalable approaches to manage ancillary genetic counseling tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Schmidlen
- Geisinger, Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Marci Schwartz
- Geisinger, Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Kristy DiLoreto
- The Pennsylvania State University, College of Health and Human Development, University Park, PA, USA
| | | | - Amy C Sturm
- Geisinger, Genomic Medicine Institute, Danville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sakurai-Yageta M, Kawame H, Kuriyama S, Hozawa A, Nakaya N, Nagami F, Minegishi N, Ogishima S, Takai-Igarashi T, Danjoh I, Obara T, Ishikuro M, Kobayashi T, Aizawa Y, Ishihara R, Yamamoto M, Suzuki Y. A training and education program for genome medical research coordinators in the genome cohort study of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2019; 19:297. [PMID: 31375111 PMCID: PMC6679441 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1725-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genome cohort studies are used to analyze interactions between genetic and environmental factors, providing valuable information for personalized healthcare. Large-scale and long-term cohort studies require a number of specially trained personnel, of whom those involved in obtaining informed consent play a vital role, especially during the initial phase of such studies. The Japanese Society of Human Genetics (JSHG) previously established a certification system for genome medical research coordinators (GMRCs) responsible for obtaining written consent via face-to-face explanation. Meanwhile, in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization (ToMMo), GMRCs are expected to play important roles not only in obtaining informed consent and conducting various assessments, but also in communicating with participants throughout the long-term follow-up. Based on the JSHG program, we therefore developed a specific education and training program for ToMMo GMRCs consisting of 17 lectures, one practical training session on the informed consent procedure, and written and interview examinations. Re-education workshops aimed at self-improvement are also carried out following certification. In this study, we evaluated the education and training program in terms of overall understanding, usefulness, and satisfaction using an anonymous questionnaire. METHODS An anonymous questionnaire addressing each aspect of the education and training program (understanding, usefulness, and satisfaction) was distributed among 152 qualified ToMMo GMRCs. Responses were received from 94 participants (61.8%). RESULTS There was a significant association between the level of overall understanding of lectures and medical qualification (nurse or clinical laboratory technologist), but not with age or educational background. The level of understanding and overall usefulness were lower in sessions related to genetics and epidemiology than those dealing with ToMMo practices. In the re-education workshops, GMRCs showed a preference for and hoped to learn more about both background knowledge and research progress in the ToMMo. CONCLUSIONS The results of our questionnaire suggest that not all ToMMo GMRCs are able to understand everything during the initial education and training program, especially in terms of genomic medicine. Continuous re-education is therefore vital in improving knowledge, skills and motivation, and preparing GMRCs for a specialist role in community-based personalized healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mika Sakurai-Yageta
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kawame
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
- Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575 Japan
| | - Shinichi Kuriyama
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
- Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575 Japan
- International Research Institute of Disaster Science, 468-1 Aramaki Aza-Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8572 Japan
| | - Atsushi Hozawa
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
- Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575 Japan
| | - Naoki Nakaya
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
- Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575 Japan
| | - Fuji Nagami
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
| | - Naoko Minegishi
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
- Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575 Japan
| | - Soichi Ogishima
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
| | - Takako Takai-Igarashi
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
| | - Inaho Danjoh
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
| | - Taku Obara
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
| | - Mami Ishikuro
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
- Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575 Japan
| | - Tomoko Kobayashi
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
- Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575 Japan
| | - Yayoi Aizawa
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
| | - Rino Ishihara
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
| | - Masayuki Yamamoto
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
- Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575 Japan
| | - Yoichi Suzuki
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8573 Japan
- Ageo Central General Hospital, 1-10-10 Kashiwaza, Ageo, Saitama, 362-8588 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Individuals approached to participate in human subjects research, irrespective of age, must be completely apprised of the study, and researchers must ensure that the information is understood to the fullest extent possible, prior to decision making. However, evolving regulatory and institutional requirements have led to permission/assent/consent (PAC) forms that are unnecessarily complex, serving only to exacerbate the challenges associated with communicating this important information to prospective participants. At greatest risk are children and other individuals with low literacy, limited English proficiency, and diminished mental capacity, populations all too often neglected in clinical research. This paper examines various strategies that have been evaluated to facilitate informed PAC, drawing on experiences across a broad array of populations whose needs overlap with those of children. These strategies range from simplifying PAC forms for readability and creating multimedia PAC delivery tools to actively engaging participants on their understanding of PAC elements by leveraging testing, rewards, and third-party communications. Notably, the findings from strategies that have been explored in more than one setting are uniformly mixed with respect to their ability to improve comprehension, underscoring the challenges that persist in designing, implementing, and objectively examining strategies intended to facilitate informed PAC. However, these studies do serve to highlight efforts that may reduce anxiety around, and increase the satisfaction of participants with, the PAC process. Ultimately, accommodating a diverse participant pool will require the consideration, and continual refinement, of various PAC strategies along with the engagement of team members who are intimately familiar with these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Abdel-Rahman
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy, 2401 Gillham Rd., POB 2.M02.47, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA. .,Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chen C, Turner SP, Sholle ET, Brown SW, Blau VLI, Brouwer JP, Lewis AN, Cole CL, Nanus DM, Shah MA, Leonard JP, Campion TR. Evaluation of a REDCap-based Workflow for Supporting Federal Guidance for Electronic Informed Consent. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE PROCEEDINGS. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2019; 2019:163-172. [PMID: 31258968 PMCID: PMC6568140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Adoption of electronic informed consent (eConsent) for research remains low despite evidence of improved patient comprehension, usability, and workflow processes compared to paper. At our institution, we implemented an eConsent workflow using REDCap, a widely used electronic data capture system. The goal of this study was to evaluate the extent to which the REDCap eConsent solution adhered to federal guidance for eConsent. Of 29 requirements derived from sixteen recommendations from the United States Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the REDCap eConsent solution supported 24 (86%). To the best of our knowledge, this is among the first studies to evaluate an eConsent approach's support for federal guidance. Findings suggest use of REDCap may help other institutions overcome barriers to eConsent adoption, and that OHRP and FDA expand guidance to recommend eConsent solutions integrate with enterprise clinical and research information systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Chen
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Scott P Turner
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Evan T Sholle
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Scott W Brown
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Vanessa L I Blau
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | - Alicia N Lewis
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Curtis L Cole
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - David M Nanus
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Manish A Shah
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - John P Leonard
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Thomas R Campion
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ditai J, Kanyago J, Nambozo MR, Odeke NM, Abeso J, Dusabe-Richards J, Olupot-Olupot P, Carrol ED, Medina-Lara A, Gladstone M, Storr J, Faragher B, Weeks AD. Optimising informed consent for participants in a randomised controlled trial in rural Uganda: a comparative prospective cohort mixed-methods study. Trials 2018; 19:699. [PMID: 30577809 PMCID: PMC6304001 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-3030-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor participant understanding of research information can be a problem in community interventional studies with rural African women, whose levels of illiteracy are high. This study aimed to improve the informed consent process for women living in rural eastern Uganda. We assessed the impact of alternative consent models on participants' understanding of clinical trial information and their contribution to the informed consent process in rural Uganda. METHODS The study applied a parallel mixed-methods design for a prospective comparative cohort, nested within a pilot study on the community distribution of an alcohol-based hand rub to prevent neonatal sepsis (BabyGel pilot trial). Women of at least 34 weeks' pregnancy, suitable for inclusion in the BabyGel pilot trial, were recruited into this study from their homes in 13 villages in Mbale District. As part of the informed consent process, information about the trial was presented using one of three consent methods: standard researcher-read information, a slide show using illustrated text on a flip chart or a video showing the patient information being read as if by a newsreader in either English or the local language. In addition, all women received the patient information sheet in their preferred language. Each information-giving method was used in recruitment for 1 week. Two days after recruitment, women's understanding of the clinical trial was evaluated using the modified Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) tool. They were also shown the other two methods and their preference assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Semi-structured interviews were administered to each participant. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated verbatim, and thematically analysed. RESULTS A total of 30 pregnant women in their homes participated in this study. Their recall of the trial information within the planned 48 h was assessed for the majority (90%, 27/30). For all three consent models, women demonstrated a high understanding of the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the slide-show message (mean 4.7; standard deviation, SD 0.47; range 4-5), video message (mean 4.9; SD 0.33; range 4-5) and standard method (mean 4.5; SD 0.53; range 4-5; all one-way ANOVA, p = 0.190). The slide-show message resulted in the most objective understanding of question items with the highest average QuIC score of 100 points. For women who had been recruited using any of the three models, the slide show was the most popular method, with a mean score for all items of not less than 4.2 (mean 4.8; SD 0.6; range 4-5). Most women (63%, 19/30) preferred the slide-show message, compared with 17% (5/30) and 20% (6/30) for the standard and video messages, respectively. The reasons given included the benefits of having pictures to aid understanding and the logical progression of the information. CONCLUSION Our results from this small study suggest that slide-show messages may be an effective and popular alternative way of presenting trial information to women in rural Uganda, many of whom have little or no literacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN67852437 . Registered on 18 March 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ditai
- Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAfRI), Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Pallisa-Kumi Road Junction, P.o Box 2190, Mbale, Uganda. .,Sanyu Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's' Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK.
| | - J Kanyago
- Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAfRI), Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Pallisa-Kumi Road Junction, P.o Box 2190, Mbale, Uganda
| | - M R Nambozo
- Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAfRI), Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Pallisa-Kumi Road Junction, P.o Box 2190, Mbale, Uganda
| | - N M Odeke
- Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAfRI), Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Pallisa-Kumi Road Junction, P.o Box 2190, Mbale, Uganda
| | - J Abeso
- Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAfRI), Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Pallisa-Kumi Road Junction, P.o Box 2190, Mbale, Uganda.,Department of Paediatrics, Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Mbale, Uganda
| | - J Dusabe-Richards
- Tropical Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - P Olupot-Olupot
- Busitema University, Faculty of Health Sciences, PO Box 1460, Mbale, Uganda
| | - E D Carrol
- Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, 8 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK
| | - A Medina-Lara
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - M Gladstone
- Sanyu Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's' Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK.,International Community Paediatrics, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's' Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK
| | | | - B Faragher
- Tropical Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - A D Weeks
- Sanyu Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's' Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hoang NS, Hwang W, Katz DA, Mackey SC, Hofmann LV. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Semi-Automated Data Collection in the Interventional Radiology Clinic. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 16:472-477. [PMID: 30297246 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Revised: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-reported outcomes are important for clinical research and will likely be used in the near future as a metric for physician reimbursement. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of an electronic data collection system for deep vein thrombosis and lymphedema quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires in a tertiary care interventional radiology practice. METHODS A single provider's clinic patients were automatically e-mailed validated questionnaires 1 week before their appointments. If not completed via e-mail, the questionnaire was administered on an electronic tablet in clinic by a research coordinator. Patients were also sent postprocedure questionnaires. RESULTS In all, 106 patients visited the clinic for a pre-intervention venous consultation. Of them, 96% (n = 102 of 106) completed the pre-intervention questionnaire: 48% (n = 47 of 98) via e-mail and 52% (n = 51 of 98) via tablet. Of the patients who had procedures and were sent questionnaires, 49% (n = 26 of 53) were seen in person. Of the postprocedure in-person clinic patients, 76% (n = 20 of 26) completed the questionnaire via e-mail, and the remainder with the tablet in clinic. Twenty-seven of the 53 (51%) patients did not return for follow-up and instead were sent an electronic questionnaire as their only source of follow-up, of which 74% (n = 20 of 27) complied. CONCLUSION After an initial introduction to electronic QOL reporting, patients were more likely to complete the questionnaires remotely for their follow-up appointment. A semi-automated electronic QOL system allows physicians to collect patient outcome data even in the absence of a clinic visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nam S Hoang
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Winifred Hwang
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Danielle A Katz
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Lawrence V Hofmann
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Allowing persons to make an informed choice about their participation in research is a pre-eminent ethical and legal requirement. Almost universally, this requirement has been addressed through the provision of written patient information sheets and consent forms. Researchers and others have raised concerns about the extent to which such forms-particularly given their frequent lengthiness and complexity-provide participants with the tools and knowledge necessary for autonomous decision-making. Concerns are especially pronounced for certain participant groups, such as persons with low literacy and Indigenous persons. Multimedia strategies have the potential to usefully supplement current consent practices in Australia; however, information is needed about the need for supplementary consent practices, along with drivers for and barriers against adoption. This study initiates the required evidence base through an audit of informed consent practices for medical research in the Australian state of Tasmania to assess the need for, and current uptake of, supplementary consent strategies. Drivers for and barriers against adoption of multimedia consent practices were explored in detail through interviews with key stakeholders, including researchers, HREC chairs and members, and research participants, including Indigenous participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah E McWhirter
- Centre for Law and Genetics, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.
- Menzies Institute for Health Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
| | - Lisa Eckstein
- Centre for Law and Genetics, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Siminoff LA, Wilson-Genderson M, Gardiner HM, Mosavel M, Barker KL. Consent to a Postmortem Tissue Procurement Study: Distinguishing Family Decision Makers' Knowledge of the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project. Biopreserv Biobank 2018; 16:200-206. [PMID: 29746160 PMCID: PMC5995262 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2017.0115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Tissues from postmortem transplantation donors are a viable and productive option for genomic research. This entails obtaining authorization from the family decision makers (FDMs) of deceased donors. This study examined best practices for making such requests within the context of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, a large national effort to collect reference tissues to establish a genomic biobank and database. Our study interviewed 413 FDMs about their donation experiences. We assessed FDM understanding of important consent concepts varied such as ability to withdraw tissues, the risks of donation, and return of results. Using latent class analysis applied to a subgroup of 188 FDMs who had agreed to participate in GTEx, three groups emerged, representing distinct patterns of comprehension of the GTEx project. Tissue requester gender and use of a GTEx brochure were associated with group membership. Results indicate that more research is needed to improve consent processes with FDMs to facilitate informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A. Siminoff
- College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Heather M. Gardiner
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Maghboeba Mosavel
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Institute for Inclusion, Inquiry and Innovation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bossert S, Kahrass H, Heinemeyer U, Prokein J, Strech D. Participatory improvement of a template for informed consent documents in biobank research - study results and methodological reflections. BMC Med Ethics 2017; 18:78. [PMID: 29262814 PMCID: PMC5738718 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-017-0232-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background For valid informed consent, it is crucial that patients or research participants fully understand all that their consent entails. Testing and revising informed consent documents with the assistance of their addressees can improve their understandability. In this study we aimed at further developing a method for testing and improving informed consent documents with regard to readability and test-readers’ understanding and reactions. Methods We tested, revised, and retested template informed consent documents for biobank research by means of 11 focus group interviews with members from the documents’ target population. For the analysis of focus group excerpts we used qualitative content analysis. Revisions were made based on focus group feedback in an iterative process. Results Focus group participants gave substantial feedback on the original and on the revised version of the tested documents. Revisions included adding and clarifying explanations, including an info-box summarizing the main points of the text and an illustrative graphic. Conclusion Our results indicate positive effects on the tested and revised informed consent documents in regard to general readability and test-readers’ understanding and reactions. Participatory methods for improving informed consent should be more often applied and further evaluated for both, medical interventions and clinical research. Particular conceptual and methodological challenges need to be addressed in the future. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-017-0232-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Bossert
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Hannes Kahrass
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ulrike Heinemeyer
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.,MEDIAN Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Bad Pyrmont, Germany
| | - Jana Prokein
- Hannover Unified Biobank, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Daniel Strech
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cadigan RJ, Butterfield R, Rini C, Waltz M, Kuczynski KJ, Muessig K, Goddard KAB, Henderson GE. Online Education and e-Consent for GeneScreen, a Preventive Genomic Screening Study. Public Health Genomics 2017; 20:235-246. [PMID: 29069655 DOI: 10.1159/000481359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 09/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Online study recruitment is increasingly popular, but we know little about the decision making that goes into joining studies in this manner. In GeneScreen, a genomic screening study that utilized online education and consent, we investigated participants' perceived ease when deciding to join and their understanding of key study features. METHODS Individuals were recruited via mailings that directed them to a website where they could learn more about GeneScreen, consent to participate, and complete a survey. RESULTS Participants found it easy to decide to join GeneScreen and had a good understanding of study features. Multiple regression analyses revealed that ease of deciding to join was related to confidence in one's genetic self-efficacy, limited concerns about genetic screening, trust in and lack of frustration using the website, and the ability to spend a limited time on the website. Understanding of study features was related to using the Internet more frequently and attaining more information about GeneScreen conditions. CONCLUSIONS The ease of deciding to join a genomic screening study and comprehension of its key features should be treated as different phenomena in research and practice. There is a need for a more nuanced understanding of how individuals respond to web-based consent information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Jean Cadigan
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Garrett SB, Murphy M, Wiley J, Dohan D. Standard Versus Simplified Consent Materials for Biobank Participation: Differences in Patient Knowledge and Trial Accrual. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2017; 12:326-334. [PMID: 29037106 DOI: 10.1177/1556264617731869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Replacing standard consent materials with simplified materials is a promising intervention to improve patient comprehension, but there is little evidence on its real-world implementation. We employed a sequential two-arm design to compare the effect of standard versus simplified consent materials on potential donors' understanding of biobank processes and their accrual to an active biobanking program. Participants were female patients of a California breast health clinic. Subjects from the simplified arm answered more items correctly ( p = .064), reported "don't know" for fewer items ( p = .077), and consented to donate to the biobank at higher rates ( p = .025) than those from the standard arm. Replacing an extant consent form with a simplified version is feasible and may benefit patient comprehension and study accrual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marie Murphy
- 1 University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - James Wiley
- 1 University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Dohan
- 1 University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Beskow LM, Lin L, Dombeck CB, Gao E, Weinfurt KP. Improving biobank consent comprehension: a national randomized survey to assess the effect of a simplified form and review/retest intervention. Genet Med 2017; 19:505-512. [PMID: 27735922 PMCID: PMC5391302 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the individual and combined effects of a simplified form and a review/retest intervention on biobanking consent comprehension. METHODS We conducted a national online survey in which participants were randomized within four educational strata to review a simplified or traditional consent form. Participants then completed a comprehension quiz; for each item answered incorrectly, they reviewed the corresponding consent form section and answered another quiz item on that topic. RESULTS Consistent with our first hypothesis, comprehension among those who received the simplified form was not inferior to that among those who received the traditional form. Contrary to expectations, receipt of the simplified form did not result in significantly better comprehension compared with the traditional form among those in the lowest educational group. The review/retest procedure significantly improved quiz scores in every combination of consent form and education level. Although improved, comprehension remained a challenge in the lowest-education group. Higher quiz scores were significantly associated with willingness to participate. CONCLUSION Ensuring consent comprehension remains a challenge, but simplified forms have virtues independent of their impact on understanding. A review/retest intervention may have a significant effect, but assessing comprehension raises complex questions about setting thresholds for understanding and consequences of not meeting them.Genet Med advance online publication 13 October 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M. Beskow
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Li Lin
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carrie B. Dombeck
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily Gao
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin P. Weinfurt
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Boutin NT, Mathieu K, Hoffnagle AG, Allen NL, Castro VM, Morash M, O'Rourke PP, Hohmann EL, Herring N, Bry L, Slaugenhaupt SA, Karlson EW, Weiss ST, Smoller JW. Implementation of Electronic Consent at a Biobank: An Opportunity for Precision Medicine Research. J Pers Med 2016; 6:jpm6020017. [PMID: 27294961 PMCID: PMC4932464 DOI: 10.3390/jpm6020017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2016] [Revised: 05/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to characterize the potential benefits and challenges of electronic informed consent (eIC) as a strategy for rapidly expanding the reach of large biobanks while reducing costs and potentially enhancing participant engagement. The Partners HealthCare Biobank (Partners Biobank) implemented eIC tools and processes to complement traditional recruitment strategies in June 2014. Since then, the Partners Biobank has rigorously collected and tracked a variety of metrics relating to this novel recruitment method. From June 2014 through January 2016, the Partners Biobank sent email invitations to 184,387 patients at Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital. During the same time period, 7078 patients provided their consent via eIC. The rate of consent of emailed patients was 3.5%, and the rate of consent of patients who log into the eIC website at Partners Biobank was 30%. Banking of biospecimens linked to electronic health records has become a critical element of genomic research and a foundation for the NIH’s Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI). eIC is a feasible and potentially game-changing strategy for these large research studies that depend on patient recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie T Boutin
- Partners HealthCare Biobank, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02139, USA.
| | | | - Alison G Hoffnagle
- Partners HealthCare Biobank, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02139, USA.
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Nicole L Allen
- Partners HealthCare Biobank, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02139, USA.
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Victor M Castro
- Partners Research Information Systems and Computing, Partners HealthCare Systems, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Megan Morash
- Human Research Affairs, Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA 02116, USA.
| | - P Pearl O'Rourke
- Human Research Affairs, Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA 02116, USA.
| | - Elizabeth L Hohmann
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
- Human Research Affairs, Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA 02116, USA.
| | - Neil Herring
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Lynn Bry
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Susan A Slaugenhaupt
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
- Department of Neurology and the Center for Human Genetic Research, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Elizabeth W Karlson
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Scott T Weiss
- Partners HealthCare Biobank, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02139, USA.
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Jordan W Smoller
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Human Genetic Research, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hellmers N, Obeng-Aduasare Y, de Melo-Martín I, Henchcliffe C. Future needs for informed consent in stem cell clinical trials in neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen Res 2016; 11:83-5. [PMID: 26981090 PMCID: PMC4774238 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.169632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Hellmers
- Weill Cornell Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Institute, Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yaa Obeng-Aduasare
- Weill Cornell Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Institute, Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Inmaculada de Melo-Martín
- Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claire Henchcliffe
- Weill Cornell Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Institute, Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Karlson EW, Boutin NT, Hoffnagle AG, Allen NL. Building the Partners HealthCare Biobank at Partners Personalized Medicine: Informed Consent, Return of Research Results, Recruitment Lessons and Operational Considerations. J Pers Med 2016; 6:jpm6010002. [PMID: 26784234 PMCID: PMC4810381 DOI: 10.3390/jpm6010002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2015] [Revised: 12/07/2015] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Partners HealthCare Biobank is a Partners HealthCare enterprise-wide initiative whose goal is to provide a foundation for the next generation of translational research studies of genotype, environment, gene-environment interaction, biomarker and family history associations with disease phenotypes. The Biobank has leveraged in-person and electronic recruitment methods to enroll >30,000 subjects as of October 2015 at two academic medical centers in Partners HealthCare since launching in 2010. Through a close collaboration with the Partners Human Research Committee, the Biobank has developed a comprehensive informed consent process that addresses key patient concerns, including privacy and the return of research results. Lessons learned include the need for careful consideration of ethical issues, attention to the educational content of electronic media, the importance of patient authentication in electronic informed consent, the need for highly secure IT infrastructure and management of communications and the importance of flexible recruitment modalities and processes dependent on the clinical setting for recruitment.
Collapse
|