1
|
Raper AC, Weathers BL, Drivas TG, Ellis CA, Kripke CM, Oyer RA, Owens AT, Verma A, Wileyto PE, Wollack CC, Zhou W, Ritchie MD, Schnoll RA, Nathanson KL. Protocol for a type 3 hybrid implementation cluster randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of patient and clinician nudges to advance the use of genomic medicine across a diverse health system. Implement Sci 2024; 19:61. [PMID: 39160614 PMCID: PMC11331805 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01385-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline genetic testing is recommended for an increasing number of conditions with underlying genetic etiologies, the results of which impact medical management. However, genetic testing is underutilized in clinics due to system, clinician, and patient level barriers. Behavioral economics provides a framework to create implementation strategies, such as nudges, to address these multi-level barriers and increase the uptake of genetic testing for conditions where the results impact medical management. METHODS Patients meeting eligibility for germline genetic testing for a group of conditions will be identified using electronic phenotyping algorithms. A pragmatic, type 3 hybrid cluster randomization study will test nudges to patients and/or clinicians, or neither. Clinicians who receive nudges will be prompted to either refer their patient to genetics or order genetic testing themselves. We will use rapid cycle approaches informed by clinician and patient experiences, health equity, and behavioral economics to optimize these nudges before trial initiation. The primary implementation outcome is uptake of germline genetic testing for the pre-selected health conditions. Patient data collected through the electronic health record (e.g. demographics, geocoded address) will be examined as moderators of the effect of nudges. DISCUSSION This study will be one of the first randomized trials to examine the effects of patient- and clinician-directed nudges informed by behavioral economics on uptake of genetic testing. The pragmatic design will facilitate a large and diverse patient sample, allow for the assessment of genetic testing uptake, and provide comparison of the effect of different nudge combinations. This trial also involves optimization of patient identification, test selection, ordering, and result reporting in an electronic health record-based infrastructure to further address clinician-level barriers to utilizing genomic medicine. The findings may help determine the impact of low-cost, sustainable implementation strategies that can be integrated into health care systems to improve the use of genomic medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT06377033. Registered on March 31, 2024. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06377033?term=NCT06377033&rank=1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna C Raper
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Benita L Weathers
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Theodore G Drivas
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Colin A Ellis
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Colleen Morse Kripke
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Randall A Oyer
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anjali T Owens
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anurag Verma
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Paul E Wileyto
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Colin C Wollack
- Information Services Applications, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wenting Zhou
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Marylyn D Ritchie
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert A Schnoll
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roberts MC, Holt KE, Del Fiol G, Baccarelli AA, Allen CG. Precision public health in the era of genomics and big data. Nat Med 2024; 30:1865-1873. [PMID: 38992127 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03098-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Precision public health (PPH) considers the interplay between genetics, lifestyle and the environment to improve disease prevention, diagnosis and treatment on a population level-thereby delivering the right interventions to the right populations at the right time. In this Review, we explore the concept of PPH as the next generation of public health. We discuss the historical context of using individual-level data in public health interventions and examine recent advancements in how data from human and pathogen genomics and social, behavioral and environmental research, as well as artificial intelligence, have transformed public health. Real-world examples of PPH are discussed, emphasizing how these approaches are becoming a mainstay in public health, as well as outstanding challenges in their development, implementation and sustainability. Data sciences, ethical, legal and social implications research, capacity building, equity research and implementation science will have a crucial role in realizing the potential for 'precision' to enhance traditional public health approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C Roberts
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Kathryn E Holt
- Department of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Andrea A Baccarelli
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caitlin G Allen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fahim SM, Westrick SC, Qian J, Ngorsuraches S, Watts Alexander CS, Lloyd KB, Hohmann NS. A survey on awareness, knowledge and preferences toward genetic testing among the United States general public. Per Med 2024; 21:117-129. [PMID: 38380527 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2023-0106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Aim: To understand awareness, knowledge and preferences regarding genetic testing among the USA general public. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey using a Qualtrics Panel. Results: Among 1600 respondents, 545 (34%) were White, 411 (26%) Black, 412 (26%) Hispanic or Latin(x) and 232 (15%) Asian. Most had heard of ancestry testing (87%) and genetic health risk testing (69%), but a third thought inherited genes were only a little or not at all responsible for obesity (36%) and mental health (33%). The majority preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing (n = 74%) compared with reactive testing. Statistically significant differences between racial/ethnic groups and rural-urban respondents were observed. Conclusion: Most preferred pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing; however, about one-quarter preferred reactive testing. Preferences should be discussed during patient-clinician interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Salisa C Westrick
- Department of Health Outcomes Research & Policy, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36830, USA
| | - Jingjing Qian
- Department of Health Outcomes Research & Policy, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36830, USA
| | - Surachat Ngorsuraches
- Department of Health Outcomes Research & Policy, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36830, USA
| | | | - Kimberly Braxton Lloyd
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36830, USA
| | - Natalie S Hohmann
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36830, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bowen A, Gómez-Trillos S, Curran G, Graves KD, Sheppard VB, Schwartz MD, Peshkin BN, Campos C, Garcés N, Dash C, Aburto L, Valencia-Rojas N, Hernández G, Villa A, Cupertino P, Carrera P, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A. Advancing health equity: A qualitative study assessing barriers and facilitators of implementing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk screening tools in community-based organizations. J Genet Couns 2023; 32:965-981. [PMID: 37062905 PMCID: PMC10577152 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
Genetic counseling and testing (GCT) inform cancer management for persons at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Community-based organizations (CBOs) may play a role in identifying at-risk Latinx individuals to connect them to GCT but data are lacking. Two academic centers and their four CBO partners planned to implement a validated questionnaire for HBOC risk screening ("HBOC risk screening tool"). This study aimed to assess CBO's preferences for HBOC risk screening tools, as well as the barriers and facilitators anticipated for future implementation. Pre-implementation focus groups were conducted with CBO's staff. Discussions centered on current practices to identify and refer at-risk patients. During the discussion, staff were asked to select one out of five validated HBOC risk screening tools to implement and to discuss anticipated barriers/facilitators for implementation. The four focus groups were coded and qualitative analyzed following the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Health Equity domains. All CBOs chose the Family History Screen 7 (FHS-7). Participants (N = 35) highlighted how the FHS-7 was easy to adapt to better fit the target population and changing guidelines. They had positive attitudes toward implementing the screening tool, stressed how the culture of the organization positioned them to reach the target population, and noted barriers in different CFIR domains (e.g., low knowledge about HBOC and GCT referrals; scarce available resources). Participants pointed to barriers related to health equity domains including limited access to GCT and follow-up care for uninsured and underinsured populations, challenges obtaining accurate family history, and immigration-related barriers. CBOs highlighted the importance of partnering with other stakeholders to overcome barriers. Findings emphasize the need to develop multi-level implementation strategies to overcome barriers and leverage facilitators. This study can inform the development of implementation toolkits for CBOs to implement HBOC screening tools to advance health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Gómez-Trillos
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Cancer Genomics Research, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Geoffrey Curran
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Kristi D. Graves
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Cancer Genomics Research, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | - Marc D. Schwartz
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Cancer Genomics Research, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Beth N. Peshkin
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Cancer Genomics Research, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | - Nathaly Garcés
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Chiranjeev Dash
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Villa
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- La Casa de la Salud, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Paula Cupertino
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | | | - Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Cancer Genomics Research, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Serrano JG, O'Leary M, VanNoy GE, Mangilog BE, Holm IA, Fraiman YS, Rehm HL, O'Donnell-Luria A, Wojcik MH. Advancing Understanding of Inequities in Rare Disease Genomics. Clin Ther 2023; 45:745-753. [PMID: 37517917 PMCID: PMC10527807 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Advances in genomic research have facilitated rare disease diagnosis for thousands of individuals. Unfortunately, the benefits of advanced genetic diagnostic technology are not distributed equitably among the population, as has been seen in many other health care contexts. Quantifying and describing inequities in genetic diagnostic yield is inherently challenging due to barriers to both clinical and research genetic testing. We therefore present an implementation protocol developed to expand access to our rare disease genomic research study and to further understand existing inequities. METHODS AND FINDINGS The Rare Genomes Project (RGP) at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard offers research genome sequencing to individuals with rare disease who remain genetically undiagnosed through direct interaction with the individual or family. This presents an opportunity for diagnosis beyond the clinical context, thus eliminating many barriers to access. An initial goal of RGP was to equalize access to genomic sequencing by decoupling testing access from proximity to a major medical center and physician referral. However, study participants over the initial 3 years of this project were predominantly white and well resourced. To further understand and address the lack of diversity within RGP, we developed a novel protocol embedded within the larger RGP study, in an approach informed by an implementation science framework. The aims of this protocol were: (1) to diversify recruitment and enrollment within RGP; (2) understand the process and context of implementing genomic medicine for rare disease diagnosis; and (3) investigate the value of a diagnosis for underserved populations. IMPLICATIONS Improved understanding of existing inequities and potential strategies to address them are needed to advance equity in rare disease genetic diagnosis and research. In addition to the moral imperative of equity in genomic medicine, this approach is critical in order to fully understand the genomic underpinnings of rare disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian G Serrano
- Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Melanie O'Leary
- Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Grace E VanNoy
- Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian E Mangilog
- Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yarden S Fraiman
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anne O'Donnell-Luria
- Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Monica H Wojcik
- Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Taylor N, McKay S, Long JC, Gaff C, North K, Braithwaite J, Francis JJ, Best S. Aligning intuition and theory: a novel approach to identifying the determinants of behaviours necessary to support implementation of evidence into practice. Implement Sci 2023; 18:29. [PMID: 37475088 PMCID: PMC10360252 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01284-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disentangling the interplay between experience-based intuition and theory-informed implementation is crucial for identifying the direct contribution theory can make for generating behaviour changes needed for successful evidence translation. In the context of 'clinicogenomics', a complex and rapidly evolving field demanding swift practice change, we aimed to (a) describe a combined clinician intuition- and theory-driven method for identifying determinants of and strategies for implementing clinicogenomics, and (b) articulate a structured approach to standardise hypothesised behavioural pathways and make potential underlying theory explicit. METHODS Interview data from 16 non-genetic medical specialists using genomics in practice identified three target behaviour areas across the testing process: (1) identifying patients, (2) test ordering and reporting, (3) communicating results. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to group barriers and facilitators to performing these actions. Barriers were grouped by distinct TDF domains, with 'overarching' TDF themes identified for overlapping barriers. Clinician intuitively-derived implementation strategies were matched with corresponding barriers, and retrospectively coded against behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Where no intuitive strategies were provided, theory-driven strategies were generated. An algorithm was developed and applied to articulate how implementation strategies address barriers to influence behaviour change. RESULTS Across all target behaviour areas, 32 identified barriers were coded across seven distinct TDF domains and eight overarching TDF themes. Within the 29 intuitive strategies, 21 BCTs were represented and used on 49 occasions to address 23 barriers. On 10 (20%) of these occasions, existing empirical links were found between BCTs and corresponding distinct TDF-coded barriers. Twenty additional theory-driven implementation strategies (using 19 BCTs on 31 occasions) were developed to address nine remaining barriers. CONCLUSION Clinicians naturally generate their own solutions when implementing clinical interventions, and in this clinicogenomics example these intuitive strategies aligned with theoretical recommendations 20% of the time. We have matched intuitive strategies with theory-driven BCTs to make potential underlying theory explicit through proposed structured hypothesised causal pathways. Transparency and efficiency are enhanced, providing a novel method to identify determinants of implementation. Operationalising this approach to support the design of implementation strategies may optimise practice change in response to rapidly evolving scientific advances requiring swift translation into healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Taylor
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, High Street Kensington, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | - Skye McKay
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, High Street Kensington, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Janet C Long
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kathryn North
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jill J Francis
- School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Crowder SL, Buro AW, Lacson JCA, Del Rio J, Kim Y, Roetzheim RG, Sutton SK, Vadaparampil ST, Soto-Torres B, Stern M, Kanetsky PA. Qualitative assessment of uptake retention and evaluation of prevention materials for skin cancer among Hispanics. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 112:107742. [PMID: 37028174 PMCID: PMC10164708 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Examine retention and evaluation of incorporating melanocortin-1 receptor genetic risk information materials in a skin cancer prevention intervention conducted in Hispanics living near Tampa, Florida and Ponce, Puerto Rico. METHODS Two researchers applied thematic content analysis to identify major themes of open-ended responses (n = 1689) from 489 participants. RESULTS Five major thematic categories emerged: 1) intervention comments; 2) tips and tricks; 3) cancer prevention; 4) general information; and 5) risk factors and genetics. Responses captured under intervention comments (e.g., information was clear, easy to understand) and tips and tricks for sun protection (e.g., using sunscreen, wearing protective clothing) were most frequent. Participants noted the importance of conducting skin exams professionally or at home. English-preferring Tampa residents stated their individual risk factors, especially race and/or ethnicity, more frequently than Ponce residents and Spanish-preferring Tampa residents. Ponce residents were more likely to comment on wanting to share intervention materials with family and friends. CONCLUSION Findings suggest Hispanic participants implemented sun safety activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia L Crowder
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Acadia W Buro
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - John Charles A Lacson
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Jocelyn Del Rio
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Youngchul Kim
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Richard G Roetzheim
- Department of Family Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
| | - Steven K Sutton
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | | | - Marilyn Stern
- Department of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
| | - Peter A Kanetsky
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fahim SM, Alexander CSW, Qian J, Ngorsuraches S, Hohmann NS, Lloyd KB, Reagan A, Hart L, McCormick N, Westrick SC. Current published evidence on barriers and proposed strategies for genetic testing implementation in health care settings: A scoping review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:998-1016. [PMID: 37119989 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The slow uptake of genetic testing in routine clinical practice warrants the attention of researchers and practitioners to find effective strategies to facilitate implementation. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to identify the barriers to and strategies for pharmacogenetic testing implementation in a health care setting from published literature. METHODS A scoping review was conducted in August 2021 with an expanded literature search using Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, International Pharmaceutical Abstract, and Google Scholar to identify studies reporting implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in a health care setting, from a health care system's perspective. Articles were screened using DistillerSR and findings were organized using the 5 major domains of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS A total of 3536 unique articles were retrieved from the above sources, with only 253 articles retained after title and abstract screening. Upon screening the full texts, 57 articles (representing 46 unique practice sites) were found matching the inclusion criteria. We found that most reported barriers and their associated strategies to the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing surrounded 2 CFIR domains: intervention characteristics and inner settings. Factors relating to cost and reimbursement were described as major barriers in the intervention characteristics. In the same domain, another major barrier was the lack of utility studies to provide evidence for genetic testing uptake. Technical hurdles, such as integrating genetic information to medical records, were identified as an inner settings barrier. Collaborations and lessons from early implementers could be useful strategies to overcome majority of the barriers across different health care settings. Strategies proposed by the included implementation studies to overcome these barriers are summarized and can be used as guidance in future. CONCLUSION Barriers and strategies identified in this scoping review can provide implementation guidance for practice sites that are interested in implementing genetic testing.
Collapse
|
9
|
Farsides B, Lucassen AM. Ethical preparedness and developments in genomic healthcare. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023:jme-2022-108528. [PMID: 37268409 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Considerations of the notion of preparedness have come to the fore in the recent pandemic, highlighting a need to be better prepared to deal with sudden, unexpected and unwanted events. However, the concept of preparedness is also important in relation to planned for and desired interventions resulting from healthcare innovations. We describe ethical preparedness as a necessary component for the successful delivery of novel healthcare innovations, and use recent advances in genomic healthcare as an example. We suggest that practitioners and organisations charged with delivering innovative and ambitious healthcare programmes can only succeed if they are able to exhibit the attribute of ethical preparedness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobbie Farsides
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Anneke M Lucassen
- Clinical Ethics, Law and Society (CELS), Centre for Personalised Medicine, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Serrano JG, O'Leary M, VanNoy G, Holm IA, Fraiman YS, Rehm HL, O'Donnell-Luria A, Wojcik MH. Advancing Understanding of Inequities in Rare Disease Genomics. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.03.28.23286936. [PMID: 37034593 PMCID: PMC10081425 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.28.23286936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Advances in genomic research have led to the diagnosis of rare, early-onset diseases for thousands of individuals. Unfortunately, the benefits of advanced genetic diagnostic technology are not distributed equitably among the population, as has been seen in many other healthcare contexts. Even quantifying and describing inequities in genetic diagnostic yield is challenging due to variation in referrals to clinical genetics practices and other barriers to clinical genetic testing. Methods The Rare Genomes Project (RGP) at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard offers research genome sequencing to individuals with rare disease who remain genetically undiagnosed through direct interaction with the individual or family. This presents an opportunity for diagnosis beyond the clinical context, thus eliminating many barriers to access. Findings An initial goal of RGP was to equalize access to genomic sequencing by decoupling testing access from proximity to a major medical center and physician referral. However, our study participants are overwhelmingly non-disadvantaged, as evidenced by their access to specialist care and genetic testing prior to RGP enrollment, and are also predominantly white. Implications We therefore describe our novel initiative to diversify RGP enrollment in order to advance equity in rare disease genetic diagnosis and research. In addition to the moral imperative of medical equity, this is also critical in order to fully understand the genomic underpinnings of rare disease. We utilize a mixed methods approach to understand the priorities and values of underrepresented communities, existing disparities, and the obstacles to addressing them: all of which is necessary to promote equity in future genomic medicine initiatives.
Collapse
|
11
|
Alarcón Garavito GA, Moniz T, Déom N, Redin F, Pichini A, Vindrola-Padros C. The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:282-295. [PMID: 36517584 PMCID: PMC9995480 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01259-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic healthcare programmes, both in a research and clinical context, have demonstrated a pivotal opportunity to prevent, diagnose, and treat rare diseases. However, implementation factors could increase overall costs and affect uptake. As well, uncertainties remain regarding effective training, guidelines and legislation. The purpose of this rapid evidence review was to draw together the available global evidence on the implementation of genomic testing programmes, particularly on population-based screening and diagnostic programmes implemented at the national level, to understand the range of factors influencing implementation. This review involved a search of terms related to genomics, implementation and health care. The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published between 2017-2022 and found in five databases. The review included thirty articles drawing on sixteen countries. A wide range of factors was cited as critical to the successful implementation of genomics programmes. These included having policy frameworks, regulations, guidelines; clinical decision support tools; access to genetic counselling; and education and training for healthcare staff. The high costs of implementing and integrating genomics into healthcare were also often barriers to stakeholders. National genomics programmes are complex and require the generation of evidence and addressing implementation challenges. The findings from this review highlight that there is a strong emphasis on addressing genomic education and engagement among varied stakeholders, including the general public, policymakers, and governments. Articles also emphasised the development of appropriate policies and regulatory frameworks to govern genomic healthcare, with a focus on legislation that regulates the collection, storage, and sharing of personal genomic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Moniz
- Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, 43-45 Foley Street, W1W 7TY, London, UK
| | - Noémie Déom
- Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, 43-45 Foley Street, W1W 7TY, London, UK
| | - Federico Redin
- Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, 43-45 Foley Street, W1W 7TY, London, UK
| | | | - Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
- Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, 43-45 Foley Street, W1W 7TY, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
DiBiase JF, Scharnetzki E, Edelman E, Lucas FL, Helbig P, Rueter J, Han PK, Ziller E, Jacobs EA, Anderson EC. Urban-Rural and Socioeconomic Differences in Patient Knowledge and Perceptions of Genomic Tumor Testing. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200631. [PMID: 36893376 PMCID: PMC10309515 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Social determinants of health, such as rurality, income, and education, may widen health disparities by driving variation in patients' knowledge and perceptions of medical interventions. This effect may be greatest for medical technologies that are hard to understand and less accessible. This study explored whether knowledge and perceptions (expectations and attitudes) of patients with cancer toward large-panel genomic tumor testing (GTT), an emerging cancer technology, vary by patient rurality independent of other socioeconomic characteristics (education and income). METHODS Patients with cancer enrolled in a large precision oncology initiative completed surveys measuring rurality, sociodemographic characteristics, and knowledge and perceptions of GTT. We used multivariable linear models to examine differences in GTT knowledge, expectations, and attitudes by patient rurality, education, and income level. Models controlled for age, sex and clinical cancer stage and type. RESULTS Rural patients had significantly lower knowledge of GTT than urban patients using bivariate models (P = .025). However, this association disappeared when adjusting for education and income level: patients with lower educational attainment and lower income had lower knowledge and higher expectations (P ≤ .002), whereas patients with higher income had more positive attitudes (P = .005). Urban patients had higher expectations of GTT compared with patients living in large rural areas (P = .011). Rurality was not associated with attitudes. CONCLUSION Patients' education and income level are associated with knowledge, expectations, and attitudes toward GTT, whereas rurality is associated with patient expectations. These findings suggest that efforts to promote adoption of GTT should focus on improving knowledge and awareness among individuals with low education and income. These differences may lead to downstream disparities in GTT utilization, which should be explored in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica F. DiBiase
- Center for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME
| | - Elizabeth Scharnetzki
- Center for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME
| | | | - F. Lee Lucas
- Center for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME
| | | | | | - Paul K.J. Han
- Center for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Erika Ziller
- University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service, Portland, ME
| | - Elizabeth A. Jacobs
- Center for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME
| | - Eric C. Anderson
- Center for Interdisciplinary Population and Health Research, MaineHealth Institute for Research, Portland, ME
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Regier DA, Pollard S, McPhail M, Bubela T, Hanna TP, Ho C, Lim HJ, Chan K, Peacock SJ, Weymann D. A perspective on life-cycle health technology assessment and real-world evidence for precision oncology in Canada. NPJ Precis Oncol 2022; 6:76. [PMID: 36284134 PMCID: PMC9596463 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-022-00316-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) can be used to make healthcare systems more equitable and efficient. Advances in precision oncology are challenging conventional thinking about HTA. Precision oncology advances are rapid, involve small patient groups, and are frequently evaluated without a randomized comparison group. In light of these challenges, mechanisms to manage precision oncology uncertainties are critical. We propose a life-cycle HTA framework and outline supporting criteria to manage uncertainties based on real world data collected from learning healthcare systems. If appropriately designed, we argue that life-cycle HTA is the driver of real world evidence generation and furthers our understanding of comparative effectiveness and value. We conclude that life-cycle HTA deliberation processes must be embedded into healthcare systems for an agile response to the constantly changing landscape of precision oncology innovation. We encourage further research outlining the core requirements, infrastructure, and checklists needed to achieve the goal of learning healthcare supporting life-cycle HTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean A Regier
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (ARCC), Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samantha Pollard
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (ARCC), Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Melanie McPhail
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Tania Bubela
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Timothy P Hanna
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Department of Public Health Science, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Cheryl Ho
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Howard J Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kelvin Chan
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stuart J Peacock
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (ARCC), Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Deirdre Weymann
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (ARCC), Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Precision Oncology in Canada: Converting Vision to Reality with Lessons from International Programs. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:7257-7271. [PMID: 36290849 PMCID: PMC9600134 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29100572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Canada's healthcare system, like others worldwide, is immersed in a process of evolution, attempting to adapt conventional frameworks of health technology assessment (HTA) and funding models to a new landscape of precision medicine in oncology. In particular, the need for real-world evidence in Canada is not matched by the necessary infrastructure and technologies required to integrate genomic and clinical data. Since healthcare systems in many developed nations face similar challenges, we adopted a solutions-based approach and conducted a search of worldwide programs in personalized medicine, with an emphasis on precision oncology. This search strategy included review articles published between 1 January 2016 and 1 March 2021 and hand-searches of their reference lists for relevant publications back to 1 December 2005. Thirty-nine initiatives across 37 countries in Europe, Australasia, Africa, and the Americas had the potential to lead to real-world data (RWD) on the clinical utility of oncology biomarkers. We highlight four initiatives with helpful lessons for Canada: Genomic Medicine France 2025, UNICANCER, the German Medical Informatics Initiative, and CANCER-ID. Among the 35 other programs evaluated, the main themes included the need for collaboration and systems to support data harmonization across multiple jurisdictions. In order to generate RWD in precision oncology that will prove acceptable to HTA bodies, Canada must take a national approach to biomarker strategy and unite all stakeholders at the highest level to overcome jurisdictional and technological barriers.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Reyna VF, Wolfe CR, Gómez-Trillos S, Sutton AL, Brennan A, Sheppard VB. Adapting a Theoretically-Based intervention for underserved clinical populations at increased risk for hereditary Cancer: Lessons learned from the BRCA-Gist experience. Prev Med Rep 2022; 28:101887. [PMID: 35855922 PMCID: PMC9287635 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of GCT in underserved diverse populations is suboptimal. Translational genomics research has been conducted with mostly NHW. Adapting EBIs can enhance the reach of EBI to underserved diverse populations. This paper describes the adaptation BRCA Gist, for at-risk Blacks and Latinas. Findings illustrate the need to integrate fidelity and adaptation considerations.
Background Minorities at increased risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) frequently have low awareness and use of genetic counseling and testing (GCT). Making sure that evidence-based interventions (EBIs) reach minorities is key to reduce disparities. BRCA-Gist is a theory-informed EBI that has been proven to be efficacious in mostly non-Hispanic White non-clinical populations. We conducted formative work to inform adaptations of BRCA-Gist for use in clinical settings with at-risk diverse women. Methods Genetic counselors (n = 20) were recruited nationally; at-risk Latinas and Blacks (n = 21) were recruited in Washington DC and Virginia. They completed the BRCA-Gist EBI between April 2018 – September 2019. Participants completed an acceptability scale and an interview to provide suggestions about implementation adaptations. T-tests for independent samples compared acceptability between at-risk women and genetic counselors. The Consensual Qualitative Research Framework was used to code adaptation suggestions. Suggested adaptations were discussed by a multidisciplinary team to integrate fidelity and adaptation considerations. Results At-risk women had a significantly higher acceptability (M = 4.17, SD = 0.47 vs. M = 3.24, SD = 0.64; p = 0.000; scale 1–5) and satisfaction scores (M = 8.3, SD = 1.3 vs. M = 4.2, SD = 2.0; p = 0.000; scale 1–10) than genetic counselors. Genetic counselors and at-risk women suggested contextual (e.g. format) and content (e.g. shortening) adaptations to enhance the fit of BRCA-Gist for diverse clinical populations. Conclusions Findings illustrate the process of integrating fidelity and adaptation considerations to ensure that EBIs retain their core components while enhancing the fit to minoritized clinical populations. Future studies will test the efficacy of the adapted BRCA-Gist in a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.,Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Cancer Genomics, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Valerie F Reyna
- Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | | | - Sara Gómez-Trillos
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.,Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Cancer Genomics, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Arnethea L Sutton
- Department of Health Behavior Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, VA, USA
| | - Ashleigh Brennan
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Khoury MJ, Bowen S, Dotson WD, Drzymalla E, Green RF, Goldstein R, Kolor K, Liburd LC, Sperling LS, Bunnell R. Health equity in the implementation of genomics and precision medicine: A public health imperative. Genet Med 2022; 24:1630-1639. [PMID: 35482015 PMCID: PMC9378460 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent reviews have emphasized the need for a health equity agenda in genomics research. To ensure that genomic discoveries can lead to improved health outcomes for all segments of the population, a health equity agenda needs to go beyond research studies. Advances in genomics and precision medicine have led to an increasing number of evidence-based applications that can reduce morbidity and mortality for millions of people (tier 1). Studies have shown lower implementation rates for selected diseases with tier 1 applications (familial hypercholesterolemia, Lynch syndrome, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer) among racial and ethnic minority groups, rural communities, uninsured or underinsured people, and those with lower education and income. We make the case that a public health agenda is needed to address disparities in implementation of genomics and precision medicine. Public health actions can be centered on population-specific needs and outcomes assessment, policy and evidence development, and assurance of delivery of effective and ethical interventions. Crucial public health activities also include engaging communities, building coalitions, improving genetic health literacy, and building a diverse workforce. Without concerted public health action, further advances in genomics with potentially broad applications could lead to further widening of health disparities in the next decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muin J Khoury
- Office of Genomics and Precision Public Health, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
| | - Scott Bowen
- Office of Genomics and Precision Public Health, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - W David Dotson
- Office of Genomics and Precision Public Health, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Emily Drzymalla
- Office of Genomics and Precision Public Health, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ridgely F Green
- Office of Genomics and Precision Public Health, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Robert Goldstein
- Office of the Associate Director of Policy and Strategy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Katherine Kolor
- Office of Genomics and Precision Public Health, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Leandris C Liburd
- Office of Minority Health and Health Equity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Rebecca Bunnell
- Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Koleva-Kolarova R, Buchanan J, Vellekoop H, Huygens S, Versteegh M, Mölken MRV, Szilberhorn L, Zelei T, Nagy B, Wordsworth S, Tsiachristas A. Financing and Reimbursement Models for Personalised Medicine: A Systematic Review to Identify Current Models and Future Options. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2022; 20:501-524. [PMID: 35368231 PMCID: PMC9206925 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00714-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of healthcare interventions described as 'personalised medicine' (PM) is increasing rapidly. As healthcare systems struggle to decide whether to fund PM innovations, it is unclear what models for financing and reimbursement are appropriate to apply in this context. OBJECTIVE To review financing and reimbursement models for PM, summarise their key characteristics, and describe whether they can influence the development and uptake of PM. METHODS A literature review was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Econlit to identify studies published in English between 2009 and 2021, and reviews published before 2009. Grey literature was identified through Google Scholar, Google and subject-specific webpages. Articles that described financing and reimbursement of PM, and financing of non-PM were included. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively to report on the models, as well as facilitators, incentives, barriers and disincentives that could influence PM development and uptake. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-three papers were included. Research and development of PM was financed through both public and private sources and reimbursed largely through traditional models such as single fees, Diagnosis-Related Groups, and bundled payments. Financial-based reimbursement, including rebates and price-volume agreements, was mainly applied to targeted therapies. Performance-based reimbursement was identified mainly for gene and targeted therapies, and some companion diagnostics. Gene therapy manufacturers offered outcome-based rebates for treatment failure for interventions including Luxturna®, Kymriah®, Yescarta®, Zynteglo®, Zolgensma® and Strimvelis®, and coverage with evidence development for Kymriah® and Yescarta®. Targeted testing with OncotypeDX® was granted value-based reimbursement through initial coverage with evidence development. The main barriers and disincentives to PM financing and reimbursement were the lack of strong links between stakeholders and the lack of demonstrable benefit and value of PM. CONCLUSIONS Public-private financing agreements and performance-based reimbursement models could help facilitate the development and uptake of PM interventions with proven clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Heleen Vellekoop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Huygens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Versteegh
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - László Szilberhorn
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Zelei
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balázs Nagy
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Apostolos Tsiachristas
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Suckiel SA, Braganza GT, Aguiñiga KL, Odgis JA, Bonini KE, Kenny EE, Hamilton JG, Abul-Husn NS. Perspectives of diverse Spanish- and English-speaking patients on the clinical use of polygenic risk scores. Genet Med 2022; 24:1217-1226. [PMID: 35380538 PMCID: PMC10066541 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE As polygenic risk scores (PRS) emerge as promising tools to inform clinical care, there is a pressing need for patient-centered evidence to guide their implementation, particularly in diverse populations. Here, we conducted in-depth interviews of diverse Spanish- and English-speaking patients to explore their perspectives on clinical PRS. METHODS We enrolled 30 biobank participants aged 35-50 years through a purposive sampling strategy, ensuring that >75% self-reported as African/African American or Hispanic/Latinx and half were Spanish-speaking. Semistructured interviews in Spanish or English explored attitudes toward PRS, barriers to adoption, and communication preferences. Data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. RESULTS Perceived utility of clinical PRS focused on the potential for personal health benefits, and most participants stated that high-risk results would prompt physician consultations and health behavior changes. There was little concern among participants about the limited predictive power of PRS for non-European populations. Barriers to uptake of PRS testing and adoption of PRS-related recommendations included socioeconomic factors, insurance status, race, ethnicity, language, and inadequate understanding of PRS. Participants favored in-person PRS result disclosure by their physician. CONCLUSION Findings provide valuable insight into diverse patients' attitudes and potential barriers related to clinical PRS, guiding future research and patient-centered clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina A Suckiel
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Giovanna T Braganza
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Karla López Aguiñiga
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Jacqueline A Odgis
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Katherine E Bonini
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Jada G Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Noura S Abul-Husn
- The Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Allen CG, Judge DP, Levin E, Sterba K, Hunt K, Ramos PS, Melvin C, Wager K, Catchpole K, Clinton C, Ford M, McMahon LL, Lenert L. A pragmatic implementation research study for In Our DNA SC: a protocol to identify multi-level factors that support the implementation of a population-wide genomic screening initiative in diverse populations. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:48. [PMID: 35484601 PMCID: PMC9052691 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00286-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2021, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) partnered with Helix, a population genetic testing company, to offer population-wide genomic screening for Centers for Disease Control and Preventions' Tier 1 conditions of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, and familial hypercholesterolemia to 100,000 individuals in South Carolina. We developed an implementation science protocol to study the multi-level factors that influence the successful implementation of the In Our DNA SC initiative. METHODS We will use a convergent parallel mixed-methods study design to evaluate the implementation of planned strategies and associated outcomes for In Our DNA SC. Aims focus on monitoring participation to ensure engagement of diverse populations, assessing contextual factors that influence implementation in community and clinical settings, describing the implementation team's facilitators and barriers, and tracking program adaptations. We report details about each data collection tool and analyses planned, including surveys, interview guides, and tracking logs to capture and code work group meetings, adaptations, and technical assistance needs. DISCUSSION The goal of In Our DNA SC is to provide population-level screening for actionable genetic conditions and to foster ongoing translational research. The use of implementation science can help better understand how to support the success of In Our DNA SC, identify barriers and facilitators to program implementation, and can ensure the sustainability of population-level genetic testing. The model-based components of our implementation science protocol can support the identification of best practices to streamline the expansion of similar population genomics programs at other institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin G Allen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Daniel P Judge
- Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Katherine Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Kelly Hunt
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Paula S Ramos
- Department of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Cathy Melvin
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Karen Wager
- Department of Healthcare Leadership and Management, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Kenneth Catchpole
- Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Marvella Ford
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Lori L McMahon
- Office of Vice President for Research, Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Leslie Lenert
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Brown HL, Sherburn IA, Gaff C, Taylor N, Best S. Structured approaches to implementation of clinical genomics: A scoping review. Genet Med 2022; 24:1415-1424. [PMID: 35442192 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the extent to which structured approaches to implementation of clinical genomics, proposed or adapted, are informed by evidence. METHODS A systematic approach was used to identify peer-reviewed articles and gray literature to report on 4 research questions: 1. What structured approaches have been proposed to support implementation? 2. To what extent are the structured approaches informed by evidence? 3. How have structured approaches been deployed in the genomic setting? 4. What are the intended outcomes of the structured approaches? RESULTS A total of 30 unique structured approaches to implementation were reported across 23 peer-reviewed publications and 11 gray literature articles. Most approaches were process models, applied in the preadoption implementation phase, focusing on a "service" outcome. Key findings included a lack of implementation science theory informing the development/implementation of newly designed structured approaches in the genomic setting and a lack of measures to assess implementation effectiveness. CONCLUSION This scoping review identified a significant number of structured approaches developed to inform the implementation of genomic medicine into clinical practice, with limited use of implementation science to support the process. We recommend the use of existing implementation science theory and the expertise of implementation scientists to inform the design of genomic programs being implemented into clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen L Brown
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Isabella A Sherburn
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shugg T, Pasternak AL, Luzum JA. Comparison of clinical pharmacogenetic recommendations across therapeutic areas. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2022; 32:51-59. [PMID: 34412102 PMCID: PMC8702450 DOI: 10.1097/fpc.0000000000000452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evaluations from pharmacogenetics implementation programs at major US medical centers have reported variability in the clinical adoption of pharmacogenetics across therapeutic areas. A potential cause for this variability may involve therapeutic area-specific differences in published pharmacogenetics recommendations to clinicians. To date, however, the potential for differences in clinical pharmacogenetics recommendations by therapeutic areas from prominent US guidance sources has not been assessed. Accordingly, our objective was to comprehensively compare essential elements from clinical pharmacogenetics recommendations contained within Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines, US Food and Drug Administration drug labels and clinical practice guidelines from US professional medical organizations across therapeutic areas. METHODS We analyzed clinical pharmacogenetics recommendation elements within Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines, US Food and Drug Administration drug labels and professional clinical practice guidelines through 05/24/19. RESULTS We identified 606 unique clinical pharmacogenetics recommendations, with the most recommendations involving oncology (217 recommendations), hematology (79), psychiatry (65), cardiovascular (43) and anesthetic (37) medications. Within our analyses, we observed considerable variability across therapeutic areas within the following essential pharmacogenetics recommendation elements: the recommended clinical management strategy; the relevant genetic biomarkers; the organizations providing pharmacogenetics recommendations; whether routine genetic screening was recommended; and the time since recommendations were published. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of our results, we infer that observed differences in clinical pharmacogenetics recommendations across therapeutic areas may result from specific factors associated with individual disease states, the associated genetic biomarkers, and the characteristics of the organizations providing recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Shugg
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Amy L. Pasternak
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jasmine A. Luzum
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stark Z, Ellard S. Rapid genomic testing for critically ill children: time to become standard of care? Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:142-149. [PMID: 34744166 PMCID: PMC8821543 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00990-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapid genomic testing in critically ill neonatal and paediatric patients has transformed the paradigm of rare disease diagnosis, delivering results in real time to inform patient management. More than 20 studies totalling over 1500 patients from diverse healthcare settings worldwide have now been published, forming a compelling evidence base for healthcare system implementation. We review the reported diagnostic and clinical outcomes, as well as broader evaluations of family and professional experiences, cost effectiveness, implementation challenges and bioethical issues arising from rapid testing. As rapid genomic testing transitions from the research to the healthcare setting to become a 'standard of care' test, there is a need to develop effective service delivery models to support scalability at both the laboratory and clinical level and promote equity of access, prompt test initiation, integrated multidisciplinary input and holistic family support. Harnessing the high level of professional engagement with rapid genomic testing programmes will continue to drive innovation and adoption, while close integration with emerging precision medicine approaches will be necessary to deliver on the promise of reduced infant and child mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zornitza Stark
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1058.c0000 0000 9442 535XVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Sian Ellard
- grid.419309.60000 0004 0495 6261Exeter Genomics Laboratory, South West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK ,grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Roberts MC, Mader JM, Turbitt E, Smit AK, Landry L, Olstad DL, Passero LE, Allen CG. Using a Participatory Approach to Develop Research Priorities for Future Leaders in Cancer-Related Precision Public Health. Front Genet 2022; 13:881527. [PMID: 35754808 PMCID: PMC9218810 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.881527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision public health is an emerging discipline combining principles and frameworks of precision health with the goal of improving population health. The development of research priorities drawing on the strengths of precision and public health is critical to facilitate the growth of the discipline to improve health outcomes. We held an interactive workshop during a virtual conference bringing together early-career researchers across public health disciplines to identify research priorities in precision public health. The workshop participants discussed and voted to identify three priority areas for future research and capacity building including 1) enhancing equity and access to precision public health research and resources, 2) improving tools and metrics for evaluation and 3) applying principles of implementation science to support sustainable practices. Participants also developed future objectives for achieving each priority. Future efforts by working groups will continue the process of identifying, revising, and advancing critical research priorities to grow the impact of precision public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C Roberts
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | | | - Erin Turbitt
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Amelia K Smit
- Daffodil Centre, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Latrice Landry
- Program for Cancer Care Equity, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Dana Lee Olstad
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Lauren E Passero
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Caitlin G Allen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chavez-Yenter D, Kimball KE, Kohlmann W, Lorenz Chambers R, Bradshaw RL, Espinel WF, Flynn M, Gammon A, Goldberg E, Hagerty KJ, Hess R, Kessler C, Monahan R, Temares D, Tobik K, Mann DM, Kawamoto K, Del Fiol G, Buys SS, Ginsburg O, Kaphingst KA. Patient Interactions With an Automated Conversational Agent Delivering Pretest Genetics Education: Descriptive Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e29447. [PMID: 34792472 PMCID: PMC8663668 DOI: 10.2196/29447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer genetic testing to assess an individual’s cancer risk and to enable genomics-informed cancer treatment has grown exponentially in the past decade. Because of this continued growth and a shortage of health care workers, there is a need for automated strategies that provide high-quality genetics services to patients to reduce the clinical demand for genetics providers. Conversational agents have shown promise in managing mental health, pain, and other chronic conditions and are increasingly being used in cancer genetic services. However, research on how patients interact with these agents to satisfy their information needs is limited. Objective Our primary aim is to assess user interactions with a conversational agent for pretest genetics education. Methods We conducted a feasibility study of user interactions with a conversational agent who delivers pretest genetics education to primary care patients without cancer who are eligible for cancer genetic evaluation. The conversational agent provided scripted content similar to that delivered in a pretest genetic counseling visit for cancer genetic testing. Outside of a core set of information delivered to all patients, users were able to navigate within the chat to request additional content in their areas of interest. An artificial intelligence–based preprogrammed library was also established to allow users to ask open-ended questions to the conversational agent. Transcripts of the interactions were recorded. Here, we describe the information selected, time spent to complete the chat, and use of the open-ended question feature. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative measures, and thematic analyses were used for qualitative responses. Results We invited 103 patients to participate, of which 88.3% (91/103) were offered access to the conversational agent, 39% (36/91) started the chat, and 32% (30/91) completed the chat. Most users who completed the chat indicated that they wanted to continue with genetic testing (21/30, 70%), few were unsure (9/30, 30%), and no patient declined to move forward with testing. Those who decided to test spent an average of 10 (SD 2.57) minutes on the chat, selected an average of 1.87 (SD 1.2) additional pieces of information, and generally did not ask open-ended questions. Those who were unsure spent 4 more minutes on average (mean 14.1, SD 7.41; P=.03) on the chat, selected an average of 3.67 (SD 2.9) additional pieces of information, and asked at least one open-ended question. Conclusions The pretest chat provided enough information for most patients to decide on cancer genetic testing, as indicated by the small number of open-ended questions. A subset of participants were still unsure about receiving genetic testing and may require additional education or interpersonal support before making a testing decision. Conversational agents have the potential to become a scalable alternative for pretest genetics education, reducing the clinical demand on genetics providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Chavez-Yenter
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Kadyn E Kimball
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Wendy Kohlmann
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | | | - Richard L Bradshaw
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Whitney F Espinel
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Michael Flynn
- University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Amanda Gammon
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Eric Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kelsi J Hagerty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Rachel Hess
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Cecilia Kessler
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Rachel Monahan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Danielle Temares
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Katie Tobik
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Devin M Mann
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kensaku Kawamoto
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Ophira Ginsburg
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Monohan K, Purvis R, Sexton A, Kentwell M, Thet M, Stafford L, Forrest L. Assessing the acceptability, feasibility, and usefulness of a psychosocial screening tool to patients and clinicians in a clinical genetics service in Australia. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:653-662. [PMID: 34788484 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Increasing demand for clinical genetic services may impact the resources and quality of genetic counseling, potentially impacting patient outcomes. Using a psychosocial screening tool may aid the provision of genetic counseling by reliably identifying patients' psychosocial needs. The Genetic Psychosocial Risk Instrument (GPRI) is a validated genetic-specific screening tool designed to identify psychological risk factors that predict distress in patients having genetic testing. This questionnaire-based study investigated the perceived acceptability, feasibility, and usefulness of the GPRI in patients and clinicians in routine clinical genetic practice. From December 2018 to January 2019, 154 patients attending an Australian clinical genetic service were invited to complete a paper-based survey that included the GPRI. The GPRI was scored and provided to the clinician for use in the appointment. In February 2019, clinicians completed an anonymous online survey regarding acceptability, feasibility, and usefulness of the GPRI. Descriptive statistics, chi-squared, t tests, and regression analyses were used to analyze the patient data, and descriptive statistics were employed for clinician surveys. A total of 145 patients participated (94% response rate). The average GPRI score was 46.3 (95% CI 43.6-49.0) with 41% of patients meeting the 50-point threshold indicating high risk for psychological distress. The GPRI was highly acceptable to patients, regardless of their level of psychosocial risk. Fourteen clinicians participated (54% response rate): 85% found the GPRI not too time consuming, and 86% believed it improved patient care by identifying patient needs. All were willing to use the GPRI routinely. The use of the GPRI is highly acceptable to patients and clinicians in this setting, assisting in identifying patients at risk for distress, prompting clinicians to address concerns, provide psychosocial support, and consider ongoing referral. As 41% of patients' scores indicated a high risk of distress, the GPRI is an important tool for potentially enhancing overall patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina Monohan
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Parkville Familial Cancer Centre and Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rebecca Purvis
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Parkville Familial Cancer Centre and Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adrienne Sexton
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Parkville Familial Cancer Centre and Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maira Kentwell
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Parkville Familial Cancer Centre and Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Monica Thet
- Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lesley Stafford
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura Forrest
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Parkville Familial Cancer Centre and Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dong OM, Roberts MC, Wu RR, Voils CI, Sperber N, Gavin KL, Bates J, Chanfreau-Coffinier C, Naglich M, Kelley MJ, Vassy JL, Sriram P, Heise CW, Rivas S, Ribeiro M, Chapman JG, Voora D. Evaluation of the Veterans Affairs Pharmacogenomic Testing for Veterans (PHASER) clinical program at initial test sites. Pharmacogenomics 2021; 22:1121-1133. [PMID: 34704830 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2021-0089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: The first Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle for the Veterans Affairs Pharmacogenomic Testing for Veterans pharmacogenomic clinical testing program is described. Materials & methods: Surveys evaluating implementation resources and processes were distributed to implementation teams, providers, laboratory and health informatics staff. Survey responses were mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs to identify implementation barriers. The Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change strategies were used to address implementation barriers. Results: Survey response rate was 23-73% across personnel groups at six Veterans Affairs sites. Nine Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs were most salient implementation barriers. Program revisions addressed these barriers using the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change strategies related to three domains. Conclusion: Beyond providing free pharmacogenomic testing, additional implementation barriers need to be addressed for improved program uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia M Dong
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke Center for Applied Genomics & Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Megan C Roberts
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - R Ryanne Wu
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke Center for Applied Genomics & Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Corrine I Voils
- William S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI 53705, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Nina Sperber
- Duke Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Kara L Gavin
- William S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI 53705, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Jill Bates
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA.,Division of Practice Advancement & Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Catherine Chanfreau-Coffinier
- VA Informatics & Computing Infrastructure (VINCI), Salt Lake City VA Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
| | - Michael Naglich
- Institute for Medical Research, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Michael J Kelley
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,National Oncology Program Office, Office of Specialty Care, Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Jason L Vassy
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Peruvemba Sriram
- North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - C William Heise
- Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ 85012, USA.,The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
| | - Salvador Rivas
- Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ 85012, USA.,The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
| | - Maria Ribeiro
- Atlanta VA Medical Center, Atlanta, GA 30033, USA.,Department of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Jennifer G Chapman
- Institute for Medical Research, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Deepak Voora
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke Center for Applied Genomics & Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Views and experiences of palliative care clinicians in addressing genetics with individuals and families: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:1615-1624. [PMID: 34549349 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06569-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A proportion of people with palliative care needs unknowingly have a genetic predisposition to their disease, placing relatives at increased risk. As end-of-life nears, the opportunity to address genetics for the benefit of their family narrows. Clinicians face numerous barriers addressing genetic issues, but there is limited evidence from the palliative care clinician perspective. Our aims are to (1) explore the views and experiences of palliative care clinicians in addressing genetics with patients and their families and (2) generate suggested strategies that support integration of genetics into palliative care. METHODS An interpretive descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with palliative care doctors and nurses (N = 14). RESULTS Three themes were identified: (1) Harms and benefits of raising genetics: a delicate balancing act, (2) Navigating genetic responsibility within the scope of palliative care and (3) Overcoming practice barriers: a multipronged approach. Participants described balancing the benefits of addressing genetics in palliative care against potential harms. Responsibility to address genetic issues depends on perceptions of relevance and the scope of palliative care. Suggestions to overcome practice barriers included building genetic-palliative care relationships and multi-layered genetics education, developing clinical resources and increasing organisational support. CONCLUSIONS Integrating aspects of genetics is feasible, but must be balanced against potential harms and benefits. Palliative care clinicians were uncertain about their responsibility to navigate these complex issues to address genetics. There are opportunities to overcome barriers and tailor support to ensure people nearing end-of-life have a chance to address genetic issues for the benefit of their families.
Collapse
|
28
|
Morrow A, Chan P, Tucker KM, Taylor N. The design, implementation, and effectiveness of intervention strategies aimed at improving genetic referral practices: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med 2021; 23:2239-2249. [PMID: 34426665 PMCID: PMC8629749 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01272-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Despite rapid advancements in genetics and genomics, referral practices remain suboptimal. This systematic review assesses the extent to which approaches from implementation science have been applied to address suboptimal genetic referral practices. Methods A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO generated 7,794 articles, of which 28 were included. Lay barriers were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and interventions mapped to behavior change techniques. Use of implementation and behavior change frameworks was assessed, and the Theory and Techniques Tool used to determine theoretical alignment. Results Knowledge was the most frequent retrospectively TDF-coded barrier, followed by environmental context and resources, and skills. Significant referral improvements occurred in 56% of studies. Among these, the most frequent interventions were clinical data review systems, family history collection and referral tools, and embedding genetics staff into nongenetic specialties. Few studies used implementation frameworks or reported implementation outcomes, though some deployed intuitive strategies that aligned with theory. Conclusion Genetic referral interventions are rarely informed by implementation and/or behavior change theories, limiting opportunities for learning across contexts. Retrospective coding has provided a suite of theoretically linked strategies, which may be useful for informing future efforts. Incorporating these strategies into clinical guidelines may facilitate operationalization within the system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Morrow
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Priscilla Chan
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital and Community Health Services, Randwick, NSW, Australia.,UNSW Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Behavioral and Psychological Outcomes Associated with Skin Cancer Genetic Testing in Albuquerque Primary Care. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164053. [PMID: 34439206 PMCID: PMC8394482 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Genetic information is publicly available but research examining the best use of such information has not engaged diverse members of the public. We examined public reactions to melanoma genetic testing (using the melanocortin-1 receptor [MC1R] gene) in a study randomizing (like the flip of a coin) 600 diverse primary care patients to a MC1R test offer or usual care. We found that testing did not improve sun protection and skin cancer screening, nor did it lead worry to increase. However, groups less aware of their skin cancer risk, including those who thought their risk was “unlikely” at the start of the study, showed significant improvements in sun protection at three months. In conclusion, testing might be very helpful for certain people who have the most to learn about their risk, who may become motivated to protect themselves from the damaging effects of the sun as a result of skin cancer genetic testing. Abstract Public availability of genetic information is increasing; thus, efforts to improve diversity in basic and translational research in genomics is a top priority. Given the increasing U.S. incidence and mortality of melanoma, and the prevalence of common melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene melanoma risk variants in the general population, we examined genomic testing of MC1R for skin cancer risk in a randomized controlled trial in Albuquerque, New Mexico primary care. Participants were 48% Hispanic and were randomized 5:1 to a MC1R test invitation or usual care. We assessed 3 month sun protection, skin cancer screening, and skin cancer worry outcomes associated with testing, and key effect moderators (e.g., cancer risk perceptions, and skin cancer risk factors). Our findings indicate that the primary outcomes were unchanged by the MC1R test offer, test acceptance, and level of risk feedback. Moderator analyses showed that those with lower risk perception, and those with skin that readily tans, significantly increased their sun protection in response to higher than average risk feedback. Risk feedback did not prompt cancer worry, and average risk feedback did not erode existing sun protection. This study paves the way for the development of tailored strategies to address low skin cancer risk awareness in this understudied context of public health genomics.
Collapse
|
30
|
Weymann D, Pollard S, Chan B, Titmuss E, Bohm A, Laskin J, Jones SJM, Pleasance E, Nelson J, Fok A, Lim H, Karsan A, Renouf DJ, Schrader KA, Sun S, Yip S, Schaeffer DF, Marra MA, Regier DA. Clinical and cost outcomes following genomics-informed treatment for advanced cancers. Cancer Med 2021; 10:5131-5140. [PMID: 34152087 PMCID: PMC8335838 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-arm trials are common in precision oncology. Owing to the lack of randomized counterfactual, resultant data are not amenable to comparative outcomes analyses. Difference-in-difference (DID) methods present an opportunity to generate causal estimates of time-varying treatment outcomes. Using DID, our study estimates within-cohort effects of genomics-informed treatment versus standard care on clinical and cost outcomes. METHODS We focus on adults with advanced cancers enrolled in the single-arm BC Cancer Personalized OncoGenomics program between 2012 and 2017. All individuals had a minimum of 1-year follow up. Logistic regression explored baseline differences across patients who received a genomics-informed treatment versus a standard care treatment after genomic sequencing. DID estimated the incremental effects of genomics-informed treatment on time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), time to next treatment (TTNT), and costs. TTD and TTNT correlate with improved response and survival. RESULTS Our study cohort included 346 patients, of whom 140 (40%) received genomics-informed treatment after sequencing and 206 (60%) received standard care treatment. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were detected across treatment groups. DID estimated that the incremental effect of genomics-informed versus standard care treatment was 102 days (95% CI: 35, 167) on TTD, 91 days (95% CI: -9, 175) on TTNT, and CAD$91,098 (95% CI: $46,848, $176,598) on costs. Effects were most pronounced in gastrointestinal cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS Genomics-informed treatment had a statistically significant effect on TTD compared to standard care treatment, but at increased treatment costs. Within-cohort evidence generated through this single-arm study informs the early-stage comparative effectiveness of precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samantha Pollard
- Cancer Control ResearchBC CancerVancouverCanada
- School of Population and Public HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | | | - Emma Titmuss
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBC CancerVancouverCanada
| | - Alexandra Bohm
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBC CancerVancouverCanada
| | - Janessa Laskin
- Division of Medical OncologyBC CancerVancouverCanada
- Department of MedicineFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | - Steven J. M. Jones
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBC CancerVancouverCanada
- Department of Medical GeneticsFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | - Erin Pleasance
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBC CancerVancouverCanada
| | - Jessica Nelson
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBC CancerVancouverCanada
| | - Alexandra Fok
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBC CancerVancouverCanada
| | - Howard Lim
- Division of Medical OncologyBC CancerVancouverCanada
- Department of MedicineFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | - Aly Karsan
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBC CancerVancouverCanada
- Division of Medical OncologyBC CancerVancouverCanada
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | - Daniel J. Renouf
- Division of Medical OncologyBC CancerVancouverCanada
- Department of MedicineFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | - Kasmintan A. Schrader
- Department of Medical GeneticsFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
- Department of Molecular OncologyBC CancerVancouverCanada
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramBC CancerVancouverCanada
| | - Sophie Sun
- Division of Medical OncologyBC CancerVancouverCanada
- Department of MedicineFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | - Stephen Yip
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
- Department of PathologyBC CancerVancouverCanada
| | - David F. Schaeffer
- Division of Anatomical PathologyVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | - Marco A. Marra
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBC CancerVancouverCanada
- Department of Medical GeneticsFaculty of MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | - Dean A. Regier
- Cancer Control ResearchBC CancerVancouverCanada
- School of Population and Public HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jones LK, Walters N, Brangan A, Ahmed CD, Gatusky M, Campbell-Salome G, Ladd IG, Sheldon A, Gidding SS, McGowan MP, Rahm AK, Sturm AC. Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility of Automated Screening Approaches and Family Communication Methods for Identification of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Stakeholder Engagement Results from the IMPACT-FH Study. J Pers Med 2021; 11:587. [PMID: 34205662 PMCID: PMC8234213 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11060587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Guided by the Conceptual Model of Implementation Research, we explored the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of: (1) automated screening approaches utilizing existing health data to identify those who require subsequent diagnostic evaluation for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and (2) family communication methods including chatbots and direct contact to communicate information about inherited risk for FH. Focus groups were conducted with 22 individuals with FH (2 groups) and 20 clinicians (3 groups). These were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using deductive (coded to implementation outcomes) and inductive (themes based on focus group discussions) methods. All stakeholders described these initiatives as: (1) acceptable and appropriate to identify individuals with FH and communicate risk with at-risk relatives; and (2) feasible to implement in current practice. Stakeholders cited current initiatives, outside of FH (e.g., pneumonia protocols, colon cancer and breast cancer screenings), that gave them confidence for successful implementation. Stakeholders described perceived obstacles, such as nonfamiliarity with FH, that could hinder implementation and potential solutions to improve systematic uptake of these initiatives. Automated health data screening, chatbots, and direct contact approaches may be useful for patients and clinicians to improve FH diagnosis and cascade screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laney K. Jones
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA; (N.W.); (A.B.); (M.G.); (G.C.-S.); (I.G.L.); (S.S.G.); (A.K.R.); (A.C.S.)
| | - Nicole Walters
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA; (N.W.); (A.B.); (M.G.); (G.C.-S.); (I.G.L.); (S.S.G.); (A.K.R.); (A.C.S.)
| | - Andrew Brangan
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA; (N.W.); (A.B.); (M.G.); (G.C.-S.); (I.G.L.); (S.S.G.); (A.K.R.); (A.C.S.)
| | | | - Michael Gatusky
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA; (N.W.); (A.B.); (M.G.); (G.C.-S.); (I.G.L.); (S.S.G.); (A.K.R.); (A.C.S.)
| | - Gemme Campbell-Salome
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA; (N.W.); (A.B.); (M.G.); (G.C.-S.); (I.G.L.); (S.S.G.); (A.K.R.); (A.C.S.)
- Department of Advertising, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 33620, USA
| | - Ilene G. Ladd
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA; (N.W.); (A.B.); (M.G.); (G.C.-S.); (I.G.L.); (S.S.G.); (A.K.R.); (A.C.S.)
| | - Amanda Sheldon
- The FH Foundation, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA; (C.D.A.); (A.S.); (M.P.M.)
| | - Samuel S. Gidding
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA; (N.W.); (A.B.); (M.G.); (G.C.-S.); (I.G.L.); (S.S.G.); (A.K.R.); (A.C.S.)
| | - Mary P. McGowan
- The FH Foundation, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA; (C.D.A.); (A.S.); (M.P.M.)
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA
| | - Alanna K. Rahm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA; (N.W.); (A.B.); (M.G.); (G.C.-S.); (I.G.L.); (S.S.G.); (A.K.R.); (A.C.S.)
| | - Amy C. Sturm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA; (N.W.); (A.B.); (M.G.); (G.C.-S.); (I.G.L.); (S.S.G.); (A.K.R.); (A.C.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kaphingst KA, Kohlmann W, Chambers RL, Goodman MS, Bradshaw R, Chan PA, Chavez-Yenter D, Colonna SV, Espinel WF, Everett JN, Gammon A, Goldberg ER, Gonzalez J, Hagerty KJ, Hess R, Kehoe K, Kessler C, Kimball KE, Loomis S, Martinez TR, Monahan R, Schiffman JD, Temares D, Tobik K, Wetter DW, Mann DM, Kawamoto K, Del Fiol G, Buys SS, Ginsburg O. Comparing models of delivery for cancer genetics services among patients receiving primary care who meet criteria for genetic evaluation in two healthcare systems: BRIDGE randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:542. [PMID: 34078380 PMCID: PMC8170651 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06489-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in genetics and sequencing technologies are enabling the identification of more individuals with inherited cancer susceptibility who could benefit from tailored screening and prevention recommendations. While cancer family history information is used in primary care settings to identify unaffected patients who could benefit from a cancer genetics evaluation, this information is underutilized. System-level population health management strategies are needed to assist health care systems in identifying patients who may benefit from genetic services. In addition, because of the limited number of trained genetics specialists and increasing patient volume, the development of innovative and sustainable approaches to delivering cancer genetic services is essential. METHODS We are conducting a randomized controlled trial, entitled Broadening the Reach, Impact, and Delivery of Genetic Services (BRIDGE), to address these needs. The trial is comparing uptake of genetic counseling, uptake of genetic testing, and patient adherence to management recommendations for automated, patient-directed versus enhanced standard of care cancer genetics services delivery models. An algorithm-based system that utilizes structured cancer family history data available in the electronic health record (EHR) is used to identify unaffected patients who receive primary care at the study sites and meet current guidelines for cancer genetic testing. We are enrolling eligible patients at two healthcare systems (University of Utah Health and New York University Langone Health) through outreach to a randomly selected sample of 2780 eligible patients in the two sites, with 1:1 randomization to the genetic services delivery arms within sites. Study outcomes are assessed through genetics clinic records, EHR, and two follow-up questionnaires at 4 weeks and 12 months after last genetic counseling contactpre-test genetic counseling. DISCUSSION BRIDGE is being conducted in two healthcare systems with different clinical structures and patient populations. Innovative aspects of the trial include a randomized comparison of a chatbot-based genetic services delivery model to standard of care, as well as identification of at-risk individuals through a sustainable EHR-based system. The findings from the BRIDGE trial will advance the state of the science in identification of unaffected patients with inherited cancer susceptibility and delivery of genetic services to those patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION BRIDGE is registered as NCT03985852 . The trial was registered on June 6, 2019 at clinicaltrials.gov .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 S. Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| | - Wendy Kohlmann
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | | | - Melody S Goodman
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, 726 Broadway, New York, NY, 10012, USA
| | - Richard Bradshaw
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Priscilla A Chan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Daniel Chavez-Yenter
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 S. Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Sarah V Colonna
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Veterans Administration Medical Center, 500 S. Foothill Boulevard, Salt Lake City, UT, 84149, USA
| | - Whitney F Espinel
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Jessica N Everett
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Amanda Gammon
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Eric R Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Javier Gonzalez
- Medical Center Information Technology, NYU Langone Health, 360 Park Avenue South, New York, NY, 10010, USA
| | - Kelsi J Hagerty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Rachel Hess
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Kelsey Kehoe
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Cecilia Kessler
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Kadyn E Kimball
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Shane Loomis
- NYU Langone Health, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Boost Services, Epic Systems Corporation, 1979 Milky Way, Verona, WI, 53593, USA
| | - Tiffany R Martinez
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Rachel Monahan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Joshua D Schiffman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Dani Temares
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Katie Tobik
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - David W Wetter
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Devin M Mann
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Kensaku Kawamoto
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Ophira Ginsburg
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Roberts MC, Fohner AE, Landry L, Olstad DL, Smit AK, Turbitt E, Allen CG. Advancing precision public health using human genomics: examples from the field and future research opportunities. Genome Med 2021; 13:97. [PMID: 34074326 PMCID: PMC8168000 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00911-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision public health is a relatively new field that integrates components of precision medicine, such as human genomics research, with public health concepts to help improve population health. Despite interest in advancing precision public health initiatives using human genomics research, current and future opportunities in this emerging field remain largely undescribed. To that end, we provide examples of promising opportunities and current applications of genomics research within precision public health and outline future directions within five major domains of public health: biostatistics, environmental health, epidemiology, health policy and health services, and social and behavioral science. To further extend applications of genomics within precision public health research, three key cross-cutting challenges will need to be addressed: developing policies that implement precision public health initiatives at multiple levels, improving data integration and developing more rigorous methodologies, and incorporating initiatives that address health equity. Realizing the potential to better integrate human genomics within precision public health will require transdisciplinary efforts that leverage the strengths of both precision medicine and public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C. Roberts
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 301 Pharmacy Lane, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Alison E. Fohner
- Department of Epidemiology and Institute of Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Ave, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Latrice Landry
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital &The Division of Population Sciences in Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215-5450 USA
| | - Dana Lee Olstad
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada
| | - Amelia K. Smit
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 119-143 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050 Australia
| | - Erin Turbitt
- Discipline of Genetic Counselling, The University of Technology Sydney, 100 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2008 Australia
| | - Caitlin G. Allen
- Department of Behavioral Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bourdon JL, Dorsey A, Zalik M, Pietka A, Salyer P, Bray MJ, Bierut LJ, Ramsey AT. In-vivo design feedback and perceived utility of a genetically-informed smoking risk tool among current smokers in the community. BMC Med Genomics 2021; 14:139. [PMID: 34039360 PMCID: PMC8152342 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-021-00976-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of genetically-informed personalized risk information for behavioral disorders, namely smoking and smoking-related behaviors, is a promising yet understudied area. The Genetics and Smoking Risk Profile, or RiskProfile, leverages genetic and environmental information to communicate one's risk for smoking-related diseases. Although prior studies have examined attitudes toward genetic results, little research has investigated these perceptions through a lens of in-vivo testing; that is, user-centered design feedback in response to personalized genetic results being returned contemporaneously. This qualitative study engaged current smokers in usability testing of the RiskProfile within the context of concurrently receiving this personalized, genetically-informed smoking cessation intervention. METHODS Eighty-nine participants who were current smokers responded to open-ended interview questions on perceptions of smoking-related genetic information and the content and format of the RiskProfile intervention that they had received moments before. Data were analyzed via the conventional content analysis approach in which themes were allowed to emerge throughout the analysis. RESULTS Participants were able to reference and offer design input on specific elements of the RiskProfile. Overall, current smokers perceived the RiskProfile to have high potential utility. Constructive feedback that current smokers offered about the tool centered around suggested improvements to optimize its usability and technical content. CONCLUSIONS The detailed and constructive feedback from participants highlights that in-vivo feedback offers a useful design approach that addresses concerns of rigor and relevance when returning genetic results. This unique method demonstrated perceived utility and constructive design feedback for the RiskProfile among current smokers and can play an important role in optimizing the design and implementation of personalized genetic risk interventions moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Bourdon
- Wellbridge Center for Addiction Treatment and Research, Center for Addiction Science, 525 Jan Way, Room 1523, Calverton, NY, 11922, USA.
| | - Amelia Dorsey
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Maia Zalik
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Amanda Pietka
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Patricia Salyer
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael J Bray
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Laura J Bierut
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alex T Ramsey
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
O’Shea R, Taylor N, Crook A, Jacobs C, Jung Kang Y, Lewis S, Rankin NM. Health system interventions to integrate genetic testing in routine oncology services: A systematic review. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250379. [PMID: 34010335 PMCID: PMC8133413 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integration of genetic testing into routine oncology care could improve access to testing. This systematic review investigated interventions and the tailored implementation strategies aimed at increasing access to genetic counselling and testing and identifying hereditary cancer in oncology. METHODS The search strategy results were reported using the PRISMA statement and four electronic databases were searched. Eligible studies included routine genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer or uptake after universal tumour screening for colorectal or endometrial cancer. The titles and abstracts were reviewed and the full text articles screened for eligibility. Data extraction was preformed using a designed template and study appraisal was assessed using an adapted Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Extracted data were mapped to Proctor's et al outcomes and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and qualitatively synthesised. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies, published up to May 2020, met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-five studies ranged from poor (72%), fair to good (28%) quality. Most interventions identified were complex (multiple components) such as; patient or health professional education, interdisciplinary practice and a documentation or system change. Forty-eight percent of studies with complex interventions demonstrated on average a 35% increase in access to genetic counselling and a 15% increase in testing completion. Mapping of study outcomes showed that 70% and 32% of the studies aligned with either the service and client or the implementation level outcome and 96% to the process or inner setting domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. CONCLUSION Existing evidence suggests that complex interventions have a potentially positive effect towards genetic counselling and testing completion rates in oncology services. Studies of sound methodological quality that explore a greater breadth of pre and post implementation outcomes and informed by theory are needed. Such research could inform future service delivery models for the integration of genetics into oncology services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie O’Shea
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Genetic Counselling, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ashley Crook
- Discipline of Genetic Counselling, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Discipline of Genetic Counselling, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yoon Jung Kang
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Lewis
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole M. Rankin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cerapio JP, Marchio A, Cano L, López I, Fournié JJ, Régnault B, Casavilca-Zambrano S, Ruiz E, Dejean A, Bertani S, Pineau P. Global DNA hypermethylation pattern and unique gene expression signature in liver cancer from patients with Indigenous American ancestry. Oncotarget 2021; 12:475-492. [PMID: 33747361 PMCID: PMC7939527 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) usually afflicts individuals in their maturity after a protracted liver disease. Contrasting with this pattern, the age structure of HCC in Andean people displays a bimodal distribution with half of the patients developing HCC in adolescence and early adulthood. To deepen our understanding of the molecular determinants of the disease in this population, we conducted an integrative analysis of gene expression and DNA methylation in HCC developed by 74 Peruvian patients, including 39 adolescents and young adults. While genome-wide hypomethylation is considered as a paradigm in human HCCs, our analysis revealed that Peruvian tumors are associated with a global DNA hypermethylation. Moreover, pathway enrichment analysis of transcriptome data characterized an original combination of signatures. Peruvian HCC forgoes canonical activations of IGF2, Notch, Ras/MAPK, and TGF-β signals to depend instead on Hippo/YAP1, MYC, and Wnt/β-catenin pathways. These signatures delineate a homogeneous subtype of liver tumors at the interface of the proliferative and non-proliferative classes of HCCs. Remarkably, the development of this HCC subtype occurs in patients with one of the four Native American mitochondrial haplogroups A-D. Finally, integrative characterization revealed that Peruvian HCC is apparently controlled by the PRC2 complex that mediates cell reprogramming with massive DNA methylation modulating gene expression and pinpointed retinoid signaling as a potential target for epigenetic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Pablo Cerapio
- Sorbonne Université, Institut Pasteur, Unité Organisation Nucléaire et Oncogenèse, INSERM, U 993, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, UPS, UMR 1037, CNRS, ERL 5294, Toulouse, France
| | - Agnès Marchio
- Institut Pasteur, Unité Organisation Nucléaire et Oncogenèse, INSERM, U 993, Paris, France
| | - Luis Cano
- Université de Rennes 1, INSERM, CNRS, U 1241 NUMECAN, Rennes, France
| | - Ignacio López
- Institut Pasteur, Unité Organisation Nucléaire et Oncogenèse, INSERM, U 993, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Jacques Fournié
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, UPS, UMR 1037, CNRS, ERL 5294, Toulouse, France
| | - Béatrice Régnault
- Institut Pasteur, Centre d'Innovation et Recherche Technologique, Plateforme de Génotypage des Eucaryotes, Paris, France
| | - Sandro Casavilca-Zambrano
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Departamento de Patología, Banco de Tejidos Tumorales, Lima, Peru
| | - Eloy Ruiz
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Departamento de Cirugía en Abdomen, Lima, Peru
| | - Anne Dejean
- Institut Pasteur, Unité Organisation Nucléaire et Oncogenèse, INSERM, U 993, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Bertani
- Université de Toulouse, IRD, UPS, UMR 152 PHARMADEV, Toulouse, France.,These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Pascal Pineau
- Institut Pasteur, Unité Organisation Nucléaire et Oncogenèse, INSERM, U 993, Paris, France.,These authors contributed equally to this work
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Guan Y, McBride CM, Rogers H, Zhao J, Allen CG, Escoffery C. Initiatives to Scale Up and Expand Reach of Cancer Genomic Services Outside of Specialty Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med 2021; 60:e85-e94. [PMID: 33168338 PMCID: PMC7855907 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT This systematic review aims to (1) characterize strategies used to identify individuals at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and Lynch syndrome outside of oncology and clinical genetic settings, (2) describe the extent to which these strategies have extended the reach of genetic services to underserved target populations, and (3) summarize indicators of the potential scalability of these strategies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Investigators searched PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO for manuscripts published from October 2005 to August 2019. Eligible manuscripts were those published in English, those that described strategies to identify those at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome or Lynch syndrome, those implemented outside of an oncology or genetic specialty clinic, and those that included measures of cancer genetic services uptake. This study assessed strategies used to increase the reach of genetic risk screening and counseling services. Each study was evaluated using the 16-item quality assessment tool, and results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Of the 16 eligible studies, 11 were conducted in clinical settings and 5 in public health settings. Regardless of setting, most (63%, 10/16) used brief screening tools to identify people with a family history suggestive of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome or Lynch syndrome. When reported, genetic risk screening reach (range =11%-100%) and genetic counseling reach (range =11%-100%) varied widely across studies. Strategies implemented in public health settings appeared to be more successful (median counseling reach=65%) than those implemented in clinical settings (median counseling reach=26%). Most studies did not describe fundamental components relevant for broad scalability. CONCLUSIONS Efforts to expand cancer genomic services are limited outside of traditional oncology and genetic clinics. This is a missed opportunity because evidence thus far suggests that these efforts can be successful in expanding the reach of genetic services with the potential to reduce health inequities in access. This review highlights the need for accelerating research that applies evidence-based implementation strategies and frameworks along with process evaluation to understand barriers and facilitators to scalability of strategies with high reach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Guan
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Colleen M McBride
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Hannah Rogers
- Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jingsong Zhao
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Caitlin G Allen
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Learning from scaling up ultra-rapid genomic testing for critically ill children to a national level. NPJ Genom Med 2021; 6:5. [PMID: 33510162 PMCID: PMC7843635 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-020-00168-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In scaling up an ultra-rapid genomics program, we used implementation science principles to design and investigate influences on implementation and identify strategies required for sustainable “real-world” services. Interviews with key professionals revealed the importance of networks and relationship building, leadership, culture, and the relative advantage afforded by ultra-rapid genomics in the care of critically ill children. Although clinical geneticists focused on intervention characteristics and the fit with patient-centered care, intensivists emphasized the importance of access to knowledge, in particular from clinical geneticists. The relative advantage of ultra-rapid genomics and trust in consistent and transparent delivery were significant in creating engagement at initial implementation, with appropriate resourcing highlighted as important for longer term sustainability of implementation. Our findings demonstrate where common approaches can be used and, significantly, where there is a need to tailor support by professional role and implementation phase, to maximize the potential of ultra-rapid genomic testing to improve patient care.
Collapse
|
39
|
Pearson TA, Califf RM, Roper R, Engelgau MM, Khoury MJ, Alcantara C, Blakely C, Boyce CA, Brown M, Croxton TL, Fenton K, Green Parker MC, Hamilton A, Helmchen L, Hsu LL, Kent DM, Kind A, Kravitz J, Papanicolaou GJ, Prosperi M, Quinn M, Price LN, Shireman PK, Smith SM, Szczesniak R, Goff DC, Mensah GA. Precision Health Analytics With Predictive Analytics and Implementation Research: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 76:306-320. [PMID: 32674794 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Emerging data science techniques of predictive analytics expand the quality and quantity of complex data relevant to human health and provide opportunities for understanding and control of conditions such as heart, lung, blood, and sleep disorders. To realize these opportunities, the information sources, the data science tools that use the information, and the application of resulting analytics to health and health care issues will require implementation research methods to define benefits, harms, reach, and sustainability; and to understand related resource utilization implications to inform policymakers. This JACC State-of-the-Art Review is based on a workshop convened by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to explore predictive analytics in the context of implementation science. It highlights precision medicine and precision public health as complementary and compelling applications of predictive analytics, and addresses future research and training endeavors that might further foster the application of predictive analytics in clinical medicine and public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Pearson
- College of Medicine and College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida Health Science Center, Gainesville, Florida.
| | - Robert M Califf
- School of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rebecca Roper
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Michael M Engelgau
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Muin J Khoury
- Office of Genomics and Precision Public Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Craig Blakely
- School of Public Health and Information Science, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Cheryl Anne Boyce
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Marishka Brown
- Division of Lung Diseases, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Thomas L Croxton
- Division of Lung Diseases, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Kathleen Fenton
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Melissa C Green Parker
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Lorens Helmchen
- Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Lucy L Hsu
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - David M Kent
- Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center, Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amy Kind
- Department of Medicine Health Services and Care Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - George John Papanicolaou
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mattia Prosperi
- College of Medicine and College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida Health Science Center, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Matt Quinn
- Health Technology, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, Frederick, Maryland
| | - LeShawndra N Price
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Paula K Shireman
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio and South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Sharon M Smith
- Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Rhonda Szczesniak
- Division of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - David Calvin Goff
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - George A Mensah
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Implementation Science to Increase Adoption of Genomic Medicine: An Urgent Need. J Pers Med 2020; 11:jpm11010019. [PMID: 33383675 PMCID: PMC7824626 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11010019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in genomics have the potential to improve human health [...].
Collapse
|
41
|
Gray M, Meehan J, Turnbull AK, Martínez-Pérez C, Kay C, Pang LY, Argyle DJ. The Importance of the Tumor Microenvironment and Hypoxia in Delivering a Precision Medicine Approach to Veterinary Oncology. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7:598338. [PMID: 33282935 PMCID: PMC7688625 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.598338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Treating individual patients on the basis of specific factors, such as biomarkers, molecular signatures, phenotypes, environment, and lifestyle is what differentiates the precision medicine initiative from standard treatment regimens. Although precision medicine can be applied to almost any branch of medicine, it is perhaps most easily applied to the field of oncology. Cancer is a heterogeneous disease, meaning that even though patients may be histologically diagnosed with the same cancer type, their tumors may have different molecular characteristics, genetic mutations or tumor microenvironments that can influence prognosis or treatment response. In this review, we describe what methods are currently available to clinicians that allow them to monitor key tumor microenvironmental parameters in a way that could be used to achieve precision medicine for cancer patients. We further describe exciting novel research involving the use of implantable medical devices for precision medicine, including those developed for mapping tumor microenvironment parameters (e.g., O2, pH, and cancer biomarkers), delivering local drug treatments, assessing treatment responses, and monitoring for recurrence and metastasis. Although these research studies have predominantly focused on and were tailored to humans, the results and concepts are equally applicable to veterinary patients. While veterinary clinical studies that have adopted a precision medicine approach are still in their infancy, there have been some exciting success stories. These have included the development of a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor for canine mast cell tumors and the production of a PCR assay to monitor the chemotherapeutic response of canine high-grade B-cell lymphomas. Although precision medicine is an exciting area of research, it currently has failed to gain significant translation into human and veterinary healthcare practices. In order to begin to address this issue, there is increasing awareness that cross-disciplinary approaches involving human and veterinary clinicians, engineers and chemists may be needed to help advance precision medicine toward its full integration into human and veterinary clinical practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Gray
- The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - James Meehan
- Translational Oncology Research Group, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Arran K. Turnbull
- Translational Oncology Research Group, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Breast Cancer Now Edinburgh Research Team, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Carlos Martínez-Pérez
- Translational Oncology Research Group, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Breast Cancer Now Edinburgh Research Team, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Charlene Kay
- Translational Oncology Research Group, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Breast Cancer Now Edinburgh Research Team, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Y. Pang
- The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - David J. Argyle
- The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Attitudes and Practices of Australian Nephrologists Toward Implementation of Clinical Genomics. Kidney Int Rep 2020; 6:272-283. [PMID: 33615052 PMCID: PMC7879212 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Genomic testing is becoming widely available as a diagnostic tool, although widespread implementation is not yet established in nephrology. Methods An anonymous electronic survey was administered to investigate experience and confidence with genomic tests, perceived clinical utility of genomic services, preferences for service delivery models, and readiness for implementation among nephrologists. Questions were guided by a comprehensive literature review and published tools, including a validated theoretical framework for implementation of genomic medicine: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results Responses were received from 224 clinicians, of which 172 were eligible for analysis. Most clinicians (132 [76%]) had referred at least one patient to a genetics clinic. Despite most clinicians (136 [85%]) indicating that they believed genetic testing would be useful, only 39 (23%) indicated they felt confident to use results of genomic testing, with pediatric clinicians feeling more confident compared with adult clinicians (12 of 20 [60%] vs. 27 of 149 [18%]), P < 0.01, Fisher exact). A multidisciplinary renal genetics clinic was the preferred model among clinicians surveyed (98 of 172 [57%]). A key implementation barrier highlighted related to the hospital or organizational culture and/or environment. Specific barriers noted in quantitative and qualitative responses included inadequate staffing, learning resources, and funding. Conclusions Our findings suggest support for genomic testing among nephrologists, with a strong preference for a multidisciplinary model (involving a nephrologist, clinical geneticist, and genetic counselor). Broad-ranging interventions are urgently required to shift the current culture and ensure successful implementation of genomics in nephrology, including reducing knowledge gaps, increased funding and resources, disease-specific guidelines, and streamlining of testing processes.
Collapse
|
43
|
Ball J, Thompson J, Wulff-Burchfield E, Ellerbeck E, Kimminau K, Brooks JV, Petersen S, Rotich D, Kinney AY, Ellis SD. Precision community: a mixed methods study to identify determinants of adoption and implementation of targeted cancer therapy in community oncology. Implement Sci Commun 2020. [DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00064-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Precision medicine has enormous potential to improve cancer outcomes. Over one third of the 1.5 million Americans diagnosed with cancer each year have genetic mutations that could be targeted with an FDA-approved drug to treat their disease more effectively. However, the current uptake of targeted cancer therapy in clinical practice is suboptimal. Tumor testing is not widely used, and treatments based on molecular and genomic profiling are often not prescribed when indicated. Challenges with the uptake of precision medicine may disproportionately impact cancer patients in rural communities and other underserved populations. The objective of this study is to identify the determinants of adoption and implementation of precision cancer therapy to design an implementation strategy for community oncology practices, including those in rural areas.
Methods
This study is an explanatory sequential mixed methods study to identify factors associated with the use of targeted cancer therapy. Levels of targeted therapy use will be ascertained by secondary analysis of medical records to identify concordance with 18 national guideline recommendations for use of precision medicine in the treatment of breast, colorectal, lung, and melanoma skin cancer. Concurrently, facilitators and barriers associated with the use of precision cancer therapy will be elicited from interviews with up to a total of 40 oncologists, administrators, pathology, and pharmacy staff across the participating sites. Qualitative analysis will be a template analysis based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. Quantitative data aggregated at the practice level will be used to rank oncology practices’ adherence to targeted cancer therapy guidelines. Determinants will be compared among high and low users to isolate factors likely to facilitate targeted therapy use. The study will be conducted in eight community oncology practices, with an estimated 4121 targeted therapy treatment decision-making opportunities over a 3-year period.
Discussion
Despite unprecedented investment in precision medicine, translation into practice is suboptimal. Our study will identify factors associated with the uptake of precision medicine in community settings. These findings will inform future interventions to increase equitable uptake of evidence-based targeted cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
44
|
Ramsey AT, Bray M, Acayo Laker P, Bourdon JL, Dorsey A, Zalik M, Pietka A, Salyer P, Waters EA, Chen LS, Bierut LJ. Participatory Design of a Personalized Genetic Risk Tool to Promote Behavioral Health. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2020; 13:583-592. [PMID: 32209550 PMCID: PMC7335332 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Despite major advancements in genomic medicine, research to optimize the design and communication of genetically informed interventions in behavioral health has lagged. The goal of this study was to engage potential end users in participatory codesign of a personalized genetically informed risk tool to intervene on high-risk health behaviors. We used structured interviews to examine end-user attitudes and interest in personalized genetics, qualitative interviews to guide iterative design of a genetically informed tool, and questionnaires to assess acceptability and potential utility of the tool. Participants expressed strong demand for using personal genetics to inform smoking and alcohol-related disease risk and guide treatment (78%-95% agreed). Via iterative design feedback, we cocreated a genetically informed risk profile featuring (i) explanation of genetic and phenotypic markers used to construct a risk algorithm, (ii) personalized risks and benefits of healthy behavior change, and (iii) recommended actions with referral to freely available resources. Participants demonstrated sufficient understanding and cited motivating behavior change as the most useful purpose of the tool. In three phases, we confirmed strong desire for personalized genetics on high-risk health behaviors; codesigned a genetically informed profile with potential end users; and found high acceptability, comprehensibility, and perceived usefulness of the profile. As scientific discovery of genomic medicine advances in behavioral health, we must develop the tools to communicate these discoveries to consumers who stand to benefit. The potential of genomic medicine to engage populations and personalize behavioral health treatment depends, in part, on preparatory studies to design for the future implementation of genetically informed interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex T Ramsey
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
| | - Michael Bray
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Penina Acayo Laker
- Communication Design, Sam Fox School of Design & Visual Arts, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jessica L Bourdon
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Amelia Dorsey
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Maia Zalik
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Amanda Pietka
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Patricia Salyer
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Erika A Waters
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Li-Shiun Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Laura J Bierut
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Thapa S, Leppin A, Kristensen R, Just Bonde M, Aro AR. Implementation of interventions targeting the uptake of genetic testing services for breast cancer risk: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e031727. [PMID: 32595144 PMCID: PMC7322324 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The timely identification of breast cancer-related pathogenic variants can help to identify the risk of potential disease development and determine healthcare choices. However, the uptake rate of genetic testing services for breast cancer risk remains low in many countries. Interventions targeting the uptake of these services among individuals potentially at risk for inherited breast cancer are often complex and have multiple components, and are therefore difficult to implement, replicate and disseminate to new contexts. Our aim is to systematically review studies targeting the uptake of genetic testing services for breast cancer risk and critically assess the quality of implementation outcomes and the reporting of intervention descriptions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Library and all Campbell Coordinating Group databases will be searched for intervention studies that target individuals' participation in breast cancer genetic testing programmes. Papers published in English within the time period from January 2005 until October 2019 will be considered for inclusion. Titles, abstracts and full papers will be screened for eligibility by two pairs of reviewers independently. For data analysis and synthesis, study-level and intervention-level characteristics will be abstracted. We will present all implementation outcomes that are mentioned in each of the studies and register the number of studies that do not at all look at or report implementation outcomes. The quality of implementation will be checked using a 5-point rubric item, and the quality and completeness of reporting of intervention description will be evaluated using the 12-item Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required to conduct this review. Review findings will be disseminated to academic and non-specialist audiences via peer-reviewed academic journals and presented at appropriate conferences, workshops and meetings to policymakers, practitioners and organisations that work with our population of interest. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018105732.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subash Thapa
- Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Anja Leppin
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Rikke Kristensen
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Mette Just Bonde
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Arja R Aro
- Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Allen CG, Barbero C, Shantharam S, Moeti R. Is Theory Guiding Our Work? A Scoping Review on the Use of Implementation Theories, Frameworks, and Models to Bring Community Health Workers into Health Care Settings. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2020; 25:571-580. [PMID: 30180116 PMCID: PMC6395551 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000000846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Community health workers (CHWs) are becoming a well-recognized workforce to help reduce health disparities and improve health equity. Although evidence demonstrates the value of engaging CHWs in health care teams, there is a need to describe best practices for integrating CHWs into US health care settings. The use of existing health promotion and implementation theories could guide the research and implementation of health interventions conducted by CHWs. We conducted a standard 5-step scoping review plus stakeholder engagement to provide insight into this topic. Using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, we identified CHW intervention studies in health care settings published between 2000 and 2017. Studies were abstracted by 2 researchers for characteristics and reported use of theory. Our final review included 50 articles published between January 2000 and April 2017. Few studies used implementation theories to understand the facilitators and barriers to CHW integration. Those studies that incorporated implementation theories used RE-AIM, intervention mapping, cultural tailoring, PRECEDE-PROCEED, and the diffusion of innovation. Although most studies did not report using implementation theories, some constructs of implementation such as fidelity or perceived benefits were assessed. In addition, studies that reported intervention development often cited specific theories, such as the transtheoretical or health belief model, that helped facilitate the development of their program. Our results are consistent with other literature describing poor uptake and use of implementation theory. Further translation of implementation theories for CHW integration is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin G Allen
- Emory University School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Allen); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Barbero and Ms Moeti; and IHRC, Inc, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Shantharam)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Rapport F, Smith J, O'Brien TA, Tyrrell VJ, Mould EV, Long JC, Gul H, Braithwaite J. Development of an implementation and evaluation strategy for the Australian 'Zero Childhood Cancer' (Zero) Program: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034522. [PMID: 32580982 PMCID: PMC7312332 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Effective implementation of a research Program requires an actionable plan to guide execution. To assess the actionability and success of that plan, both scientific and implementation elements must be taken into account. The aim of this study is to assess the 'Zero Childhood Cancer Personalised Medicine Program' (the Zero Program), an Australian first-ever and most comprehensive personalised medicine programme for children with high-risk or relapsed cancer, in terms of its structure, process and implementational effect. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will assess Program delivery mechanisms. The development of the implementation and evaluation strategy will concentrate on the work of the Zero Program as a complex whole. This includes the structure of collaborative links across stakeholder groups involved in Program development and delivery, changes to collaborative relationships over time and the impact of group working on Program outcomes. We are applying a mixed-methods design including: a rapid ethnography (observations of stakeholder interactions and informal conversations), Program professionals' completion of a rapid health implementation proforma and a social network analysis. Formative evaluations of the implementation science effects, applying feedback techniques, for example, Formative Evaluation Feedback Loops and the Zero Program professionals' feedback, will determine where Program tailoring may be needed. A repeat of the social network analysis downstream will examine network changes over time, followed by an expert panel using the expert recommendations for implementing change to assess the integration of implementation strategies into the Program structure. A summative evaluation of the Program will bring the research elements together, leading to comprehensive data triangulation and determining the sustainability and implementational effects of Program delivery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for this study has been granted by Hunter New England Research Ethics Committee, New South Wales, Australia (approval ref: 2019/ETH12025). Knowledge translation will be achieved through publications, reports and conference presentations to healthcare professionals, patients, families and researchers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03336931; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Rapport
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James Smith
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tracey A O'Brien
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, Australia
| | - Vanessa J Tyrrell
- Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Children's Cancer Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emily Va Mould
- Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Children's Cancer Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Janet C Long
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hossai Gul
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Burnett-Hartman AN, Udaltsova N, Kushi LH, Neslund-Dudas C, Rahm AK, Pawloski PA, Corley DA, Knerr S, Feigelson HS, Hunter JE, Tabano DC, Epstein MM, Honda SA, Ter-Minassian M, Lynch JA, Lu CY. Clinical Molecular Marker Testing Data Capture to Promote Precision Medicine Research Within the Cancer Research Network. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2020; 3:1-10. [PMID: 31487201 DOI: 10.1200/cci.19.00026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate health care systems for the availability of population-level data on the frequency of use and results of clinical molecular marker tests to inform precision cancer care. METHODS We assessed cancer-related molecular marker test data availability across 12 US health care systems in the Cancer Research Network. Overall, these systems provide care to a diverse population of more than 12 million people in the United States. We performed qualitative analyses of test data availability for five blood-based protein, nine germline, and 14 tissue-based tumor marker tests in each health care system's electronic health record and tumor registry using key informants, test code lists, and manual review of data types and output. We then performed quantitative analyses to estimate the proportion of patients with cancer with test utilization data and results for specific molecular marker tests. RESULTS Health systems were able to systematically capture population-level data on all five blood protein markers, six of 14 tissue-based tumor markers, and none of the nine germline markers. Successful, systematic data capture was achievable for tests with electronic data feeds for test results (blood protein markers) or through prior manual abstraction by tumor registrars (select tumor-based markers). For test results stored in scanned image files (particularly germline and tumor marker tests), information on which test was performed and test results was not readily accessible in an electronic format. CONCLUSION Even in health care systems with sophisticated electronic health records, there were few codified data elements available for evaluating precision cancer medicine test use and results at the population level. Health care organizations should establish standards for electronic reporting of precision medicine tests to expedite cancer research and facilitate the implementation of precision medicine approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sarah Knerr
- University of Washington and Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - David C Tabano
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Mara M Epstein
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | | | | | - Julie A Lynch
- Department of Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health System, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Christine Y Lu
- Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Fernandez-Rhodes L, Young KL, Lilly AG, Raffield LM, Highland HM, Wojcik GL, Agler C, M Love SA, Okello S, Petty LE, Graff M, Below JE, Divaris K, North KE. Importance of Genetic Studies of Cardiometabolic Disease in Diverse Populations. Circ Res 2020; 126:1816-1840. [PMID: 32496918 PMCID: PMC7285892 DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.120.315893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies have revolutionized our understanding of the genetic underpinnings of cardiometabolic disease. Yet, the inadequate representation of individuals of diverse ancestral backgrounds in these studies may undercut their ultimate potential for both public health and precision medicine. The goal of this review is to describe the imperativeness of studying the populations who are most affected by cardiometabolic disease, to the aim of better understanding the genetic underpinnings of the disease. We support this premise by describing the current variation in the global burden of cardiometabolic disease and emphasize the importance of building a globally and ancestrally representative genetics evidence base for the identification of population-specific variants, fine-mapping, and polygenic risk score estimation. We discuss the important ethical, legal, and social implications of increasing ancestral diversity in genetic studies of cardiometabolic disease and the challenges that arise from the (1) lack of diversity in current reference populations and available analytic samples and the (2) unequal generation of health-associated genomic data and their prediction accuracies. Despite these challenges, we conclude that additional, unprecedented opportunities lie ahead for public health genomics and the realization of precision medicine, provided that the gap in diversity can be systematically addressed. Achieving this goal will require concerted efforts by social, academic, professional and regulatory stakeholders and communities, and these efforts must be based on principles of equity and social justice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Fernandez-Rhodes
- Department of Biobehavioral Health, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
| | - Kristin L Young
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Adam G Lilly
- Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Laura M Raffield
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Heather M Highland
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Genevieve L Wojcik
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Cary Agler
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Pediatric and Public Health, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Shelly-Ann M Love
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Samson Okello
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Uganda
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Lauren E Petty
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt, TN
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt, TN
| | - Mariaelisa Graff
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jennifer E Below
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt, TN
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt, TN
| | - Kimon Divaris
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Pediatric and Public Health, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kari E. North
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Skvrce NM, Krivokapić S, Božina N. Implementation of pharmacogenomics in product information. Pharmacogenomics 2020; 21:443-448. [DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2019-0166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: The aim of our study was to analyse the level of implementation of pharmacogenomics (PGx) in product information (PI) of medicinal products approved through national procedures in the EU. Materials & methods: In the analysis, we included nationally approved medicinal products in Croatia if guidelines for relevant substances were published. Results: Overall, 265 marketing authorizations were analyzed. The majority of data included in PI was only informative, while the most frequent PGx biomarkers were genes which code CYP P450. Analysis according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification revealed that most substances belonged to the nervous system. Conclusion: Although hindrances in implementation are anticipated, PI should be more specific in terms of when the testing is indicated and should include actionable recommendations according to the results of PGx testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sonja Krivokapić
- Agency for Medicinal Products & Medical Devices, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Nada Božina
- School of Medicine,University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|