1
|
Rink BD, Stevens BK. Incidental Detection of Malignancies With Cell-Free DNA Screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 66:607-615. [PMID: 37443422 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Cell-free circulating DNA is an evolving technology with important clinical applications in both obstetric care and oncology. In the challenging patient with pregnancy and co-existing malignancy, the utility of cell-free DNA both for aneuploidy screening and cancer identification is an area of active research. Understanding the physiology associated with circulating cell-free DNA and subsequent laboratory evaluation is critical for clinicians caring for the obstetric patient with cell-free fetal DNA screening results suggestive of malignancy. Ongoing research is necessary to determine best practices for the evaluation and management of these patients with promising applications in the advancement of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britton D Rink
- Mount Carmel Health Systems, Division of Genetic and Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Blair K Stevens
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scarff KL, Flowers N, Love CJ, Archibald AD, Hunt CE, Giouzeppos O, Elliott J, Delatycki MB, Pertile MD. Performance of a cell-free DNA prenatal screening test, choice of prenatal procedure, and chromosome conditions identified during pregnancy after low-risk cell-free DNA screening. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:213-225. [PMID: 36617980 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for common fetal aneuploidies, choice of prenatal procedure, and chromosome conditions identified during pregnancy after low-risk cfDNA screening. METHOD A single-center prenatal cfDNA screening test was employed to detect trisomies 21, 18, and 13 (T21, T18, T13) and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs). Test performance, choice of prenatal procedure, and cytogenetic results in pregnancies with low-risk cfDNA screening were reviewed. RESULTS CfDNA screening of 38,289 consecutive samples identified 720 (1.9%) pregnancies at increased risk for aneuploidy. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for high-risk singleton pregnancies were 98.5% (T21), 92.5% (T18) and 55.2% (T13). PPVs for SCAs ranged from 30.6% to 95.2%. Most women elected chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis of T21, T18 and T13; amniocentesis and/or postnatal testing were commonly chosen for SCAs. Cytogenetic tests from 616 screen-negative pregnancies identified 64 cases (12.7%) with chromosome conditions not detected by cfDNA screening, including triploidy (n = 30) and pathogenic and likely pathogenic copy number variants (n = 34). A further 15 (0.04%) false-negative common aneuploidy results were identified. CONCLUSIONS CfDNA screening was highly accurate for detecting fetal aneuploidy in this general-risk obstetric population. Fetal ultrasound and prenatal diagnostic testing were important in identifying chromosome conditions in pregnancies screened as low-risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina L Scarff
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicola Flowers
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare J Love
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison D Archibald
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare E Hunt
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Olivia Giouzeppos
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Justine Elliott
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Bruce Lefroy Centre, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark D Pertile
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Loughry L, Pynaker C, White M, Halliday J, Hui L. State-wide increase in prenatal diagnosis of klinefelter syndrome on amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: Impact of non-invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome conditions. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:156-161. [PMID: 35048400 PMCID: PMC11251400 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To analyze population-based trends in the prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) since the availability of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). METHODS Retrospective state-wide data for all prenatal diagnoses performed <25 weeks gestation from 2005 to 2020 in Victoria, Australia. Non-invasive prenatal testing became locally available from 2012. The prenatal diagnosis rates of SCA as proportions of all prenatal diagnostic tests and all births were calculated. Statistical significance was assessed with the χ2 test for trend, with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS 46,518 amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling were performed during the study period, detecting 617 SCAs. There was a significant increase in the rate of prenatal SCAs from 5.8 per 10,000 births in 2005 to 8.7 per 10,000 births in 2020 (p < 0.0001). This increase was predominantly due to 47,XXY cases, 91% of which were ascertained via positive NIPT for this condition in 2020. The prenatal diagnosis rate of 47,XXY significantly increased from 0.8 per 10,000 births in 2005 to 4.3 per 10,000 births in 2020 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Screening for SCAs using NIPT has directly led to an increase in their prenatal diagnosis on a population-wide basis, especially 47,XXY. This has implications for clinician education, genetic counselling, and pediatric services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lulu Loughry
- Reproductive Epidemiology GroupMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Cecilia Pynaker
- Reproductive Epidemiology GroupMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Mary White
- Reproductive Epidemiology GroupMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Endocrinology & DiabetesThe Royal Children's HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Health Services Research UnitThe Royal Children's HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Jane Halliday
- Reproductive Epidemiology GroupMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Lisa Hui
- Reproductive Epidemiology GroupMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Perinatal MedicineMercy Hospital for WomenHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyNorthern Health, EppingMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tian M, Feng L, Li J, Zhang R. Focus on the frontier issue: progress in noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal trisomy from clinical perspectives. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2023; 60:248-269. [PMID: 36647189 DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2022.2162843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The discovery of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood and the rapid development of massively parallel sequencing have revolutionized prenatal testing from invasive to noninvasive. Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) based on cffDNA enables the detection of fetal trisomy through sequencing, comparison, and bioassays. Its accuracy is better than that of traditional screening methods, and it is the most advanced clinical application of high-throughput sequencing technologies. However, the existing sequencing methods are limited by high costs and complex sequencing procedures. These limitations restrict the availability of NIPS for pregnant women. Many amplification methods have been developed to overcome the limitations of sequencing methods. The rapid development of non-sequencing methods has not been accompanied by reviews to summarize them. In this review, we initially describe the detection principles for sequencing-based NIPS. We summarize the rapidly evolving amplification technologies, focusing on the need to reduce costs and simplify the procedures. To ensure that the testing systems are feasible and that the testing processes are reliable, we expand our vision to the clinic. We evaluate the clinical validity of NIPS in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. Finally, we summarize the application guidelines and discuss the corresponding quality control methods for NIPS. In addition to cffDNA, extracellular vesicle DNA, RNA, protein/peptide, and fetal cells can also be detected as biomarkers of NIPS. With the development of prenatal testing, NIPS has become increasingly important. Notably, NIPS is a screening test instead of a diagnostic test. The testing methods and procedures used in the NIPS process require standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Tian
- National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, P. R. China.,Peking University Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, P. R. China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Lei Feng
- National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, P. R. China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jinming Li
- National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, P. R. China.,Peking University Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, P. R. China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Rui Zhang
- National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, P. R. China.,Peking University Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, P. R. China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hui L, Halliday J. A decade of non-invasive prenatal screening in Australia: National impact on prenatal screening and diagnostic testing. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 63:264-267. [PMID: 36529142 PMCID: PMC10952159 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Prenatal screening for aneuploidy has undergone immense changes over the past two decades. In 2013 cell-free DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) became a new self-funded option primarily for Down syndrome screening, but also other aneuploidies and genetic conditions. The numbers of Medicare item claims for prenatal diagnostic procedures have halved since the introduction of NIPT, while billings for serum screening fell by 40% over the same period, on a background of steady births. Australia is now observing historically low rates of prenatal diagnostic testing. These data provide an informative snapshot of historic changes in prenatal screening and diagnosis, as our sector prepares for the impending impacts of other advances in genomics on maternity care. They also highlight the need to address equity and quality issues that arise when consumers must bear the full costs of improved genomic tests in the absence of Medicare funding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Hui
- Reproductive Epidemiology GroupMurdoch Children's Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Perinatal MedicineMercy Hospital for WomenMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyNorthern HealthMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Jane Halliday
- Reproductive Epidemiology GroupMurdoch Children's Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leibowitz R, Lewis S, Emery J, Massie J, Smith M, Delatycki M, Archibald A. Reproductive genetic carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome and spinal muscular atrophy: patterns of community and healthcare provider participation in a Victorian screening program. Aust J Prim Health 2022; 28:580-587. [PMID: 36192111 DOI: 10.1071/py21247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and The Royal Australian College of General Practice recommend that information on carrier screening for at least the most common inherited genetic conditions in our population, that is, thalassaemia, cystic fibrosis (CF), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and fragile X syndrome (FXS), should be offered to all women planning pregnancy or in early pregnancy regardless of family history or ethnicity. The aim of this study was to investigate patterns of participation by healthcare providers (HCP) and the community in screening. METHODS Participation in a Victorian program screening for CF, SMA and FXS between September 2013 and October 2018 was analysed. Requesting HCP and patient data were extracted from screening request forms. Data were analysed with respect to profession of requesting HCP, and characteristics of women screened (age, pregnancy status, socioeconomic status, geographic location, and family history of CF, SMA or FXS). In total, 21 172 women and 1288 HCPs participated in the program over this period. RESULTS There was a steep socioeconomic gradient in screening uptake, with nearly half the women screened (10 349) being in the highest socioeconomic quintile. The screening rate was much higher in metropolitan areas than in regional areas. Obstetricians made most of the requests for screening, whereas 20% of requests were by GPs. Most participating GPs only made a single screening request (78%) and very few GPs made >100 screening requests compared with obstetricians (0.2% vs 17%). GPs were more likely to screen women before pregnancy compared with obstetricians (47% vs 11%). Approximately 1.5% of Victorian women of child-bearing age and 3% of pregnant Victorian women were screened by this program over the period of this study. CONCLUSION This study highlights the translation gap between recommendations and practice, with marked inequity of access to reproductive genetic carrier screening in relation to socioeconomic status and geography. Increased participation by GPs could improve community access to reproductive genetic carrier screening, particularly access to preconception screening. Addressing the causes of inequity of access will allow more women and couples the opportunity to make informed choices about participation in screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Leibowitz
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Sharon Lewis
- Department of Paediatrics, Melbourne Medical School, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia; and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - John Massie
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia; and Children's Bioethics Centre, Parkville, Vic., Australia; and Department of Paediatrics, Royal Children's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Melanie Smith
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Martin Delatycki
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Vic., Australia; and Bruce Lefroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Flemington Road, Parkville, Vic. 3052 Australia; and Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Alison Archibald
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia; and Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Montaguti E, Rizzo R, Diglio J, Di Donna G, Brunelli E, Cofano M, Seidenari A, Lenzi J, Battaglia C, Pilu G. Increased nuchal translucency can be ascertained using transverse planes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227:750.e1-750.e6. [PMID: 35662633 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The detection of increased nuchal translucency is crucial for the assessment risk of aneuploidies and other fetal anomalies. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the ability of a transverse view of the fetal head to detect increased fetal nuchal translucency at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective study enrolling a nonconsecutive series of women who attended our outpatient clinic from January 2020 to April 2021 for combined screening and were examined by operators certified by the Fetal Medicine Foundation. In each patient, nuchal translucency measurements were obtained both from a median sagittal view and from a transverse view. A second sonologist blinded to the results of the first examination obtained another measurement to assess intermethod and interobsever reproducibility. RESULTS A total of 1023 women were enrolled. An excellent correlation was found between sagittal and transverse nuchal translucency measurements, with a mean difference of 0.01 mm (95% confidence interval, -0.01 to 0.02). No systematic difference was found between the 2 techniques. The inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.957; 95% confidence interval, 0.892-0.983) and intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.976; 95% confidence interval, 0.941-0.990) of axial measurements were almost perfect. Transverse measurements of 3.0 mm identified all cases with sagittal measurements of ≥3.0 with a specificity of 99.7%; transverse measurements of >3.2 mm identified all cases with sagittal measurements of 3.5 mm with a specificity of 99.7%. The time required to obtain transverse nuchal translucency measurements was considerably shorter than for sagittal measurements, particularly when the fetus had an unfavorable position. CONCLUSION When the sonogram is performed by an expert sonologist, the difference in nuchal translucency measurement obtained with a transverse or sagittal plane is minimal. Increased nuchal translucency can be reliably identified by using transverse views, and in some cases, this may technically be advantageous.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Montaguti
- Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Roberta Rizzo
- Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Josefina Diglio
- Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gaetana Di Donna
- Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elena Brunelli
- Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Cofano
- Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Anna Seidenari
- Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lenzi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Cesare Battaglia
- Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Pilu
- Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Czamara D, Cruceanu C, Lahti-Pulkkinen M, Dieckmann L, Ködel M, Sauer S, Rex-Haffner M, Sammallahti S, Kajantie E, Laivuori H, Lahti J, Räikkönen K, Binder EB. Genome-Wide Copy Number Variant and High-Throughput Transcriptomics Analyses of Placental Tissues Underscore Persisting Child Susceptibility in At-Risk Pregnancies Cleared in Standard Genetic Testing. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms231911448. [PMID: 36232765 PMCID: PMC9569583 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Several studies have shown that children from pregnancies with estimated first-trimester risk based on fetal nuchal translucency thickness and abnormal maternal serum pregnancy protein and hormone levels maintain a higher likelihood of adverse outcomes, even if initial testing for known genetic conditions is negative. We used the Finnish InTraUterine cohort (ITU), which is a comprehensively characterized perinatal cohort consisting of 943 mothers and their babies followed throughout pregnancy and 18 months postnatally, including mothers shortlisted for prenatal genetic testing but cleared for major aneuploidies (cases: n = 544, 57.7%) and control pregnancies (n = 399, 42.3%). Using genome-wide genotyping and RNA sequencing of first-trimester and term placental tissue, combined with medical information from registry data and maternal self-report data, we investigated potential negative medical outcomes and genetic susceptibility to disease and their correlates in placenta gene expression. Case mothers did not present with higher levels of depression, perceived stress, or anxiety during pregnancy. Case children were significantly diagnosed more often with congenital malformations of the circulatory system (4.12 (95% CI [1.22−13.93]) higher hazard) and presented with significantly more copy number duplications as compared to controls (burden analysis, based on all copy number variants (CNVs) with at most 10% frequency, 823 called duplications in 297 cases versus 626 called duplications in 277 controls, p = 0.01). Fifteen genes showed differential gene expression (FDR < 0.1) in association with congenital malformations in first-trimester but not term placenta. These were significantly enriched for genes associated with placental dysfunction. In spite of normal routine follow-up prenatal testing results in early pregnancy, case children presented with an increased likelihood of negative outcomes, which should prompt vigilance in follow-up during pregnancy and after birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darina Czamara
- Department of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany
| | - Cristiana Cruceanu
- Department of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marius Lahti-Pulkkinen
- Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen’s Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK
| | - Linda Dieckmann
- Department of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany
- International Max Planck Research School for Translational Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany
| | - Maik Ködel
- Department of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany
| | - Susann Sauer
- Department of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Rex-Haffner
- Department of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany
| | - Sara Sammallahti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eero Kajantie
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland
- Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine, PEDEGO Research Unit, MRC Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Hannele Laivuori
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
- Medical and Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Center for Child, Adolescent and Maternal Health Research, Tampere University, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Jari Lahti
- Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Katri Räikkönen
- Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Elisabeth B. Binder
- Department of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry, 80804 Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang C, Hu L, Jiang S, Liang F, Zhang S. Analysis of the impact of noninvasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21 and 18 in twin pregnancies undergoing artificial reproductive technology. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29985. [PMID: 35984138 PMCID: PMC9387948 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and impact of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) on twin pregnancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twin pregnancies after artificial reproductive technology(ART) were tested by NIPS for screening trisomy 21, 18, and 13 in a single medical center in Hangzhou. Positive NIPS results were confirmed by karyotyping, while negative results were interviewed after delivery. RESULTS From January 2019 to December 2020, 474 twin pregnancies were tested by NIPS for screening trisomy 21, 18, and 13 in a single medical center in Hangzhou. The performance of NIPS had been evaluated compared to the invasive diagnostic results. The positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPS for chromosome 21 and 18 aneuploidies is 80% (95CI, 36.09-96.59) and 100%, respectively. The incidence of trisomy 21, and 18 chromosome aneuploidies among the twin pregnancies undergoing ART was 0.84% and 0.21%, respectively. CONCLUSION The performance of NIPS was substantially accurate among the twin pregnancies after ART in this study, and NIPS potentially avoided a considerable part of aneuploidies liveborn in twin pregnancies in Hangzhou.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuiyu Yang
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Linhua Hu
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Shudan Jiang
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Fengbing Liang
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Songying Zhang
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, China
- *Correspondence: Songying Zhang, Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, No. 3 Qingchun East Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou 310016, China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Diagnostic value of maternal alpha-fetoprotein variants in second-trimester biochemical screening for trisomy 21 and 18. Sci Rep 2022; 12:13605. [PMID: 35948592 PMCID: PMC9365830 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16807-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical predictive value of serum alpha-fetoprotein variants (AFP-L2, AFP-L3) in combination with maternal serum prenatal screening biomarkers in predicting fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. We analyze the data of singleton pregnant women at 15–20+6 weeks of 731,922 gravidas from October 2007 to September 2019. The research objects were separated into the following groups: control (n = 569), trisomy 21 (n = 116), and trisomy 18 (n = 52). The cases were diagnosed by chromosomal karyotypic analysis of amniotic fluid cells. Level of AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 were detected in maternal serum among control women and patients. Receiver operator characteristic analysis, detection rate, false positive rate, false negative rate, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio, comprehensive discriminant improvement, net weight classification improvement, decision curve analysis and Hosmer–lemeshow (H-L) test were used to investigate the predictive value of free β-hCG, AFP, AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 on the risk models of trisomy 21, 18. There was a statistically significant difference in maternal serum AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 multiple of the median (MoM) among the trisomy 21, trisomy 18, and control groups. The AUCs of AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 for the screening trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 fetus were 0.785, 0.758 and 0.775, 0.754. According to ROC, the optimal cut-off values of AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 for predicting trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 fetuses all were 1.09 MoM and 1.30 MoM, respectively. The risk-calculation model constructed by AFP-L2 + AFP-L3 MoM manifested better efficiency than the original single-value truncation method using AFP MoM alone. Compared with different modeling methods, the AUC of trisomy 21 fetuses predicted by AFP-L2 + AFP-L3 + free β-hCG achieved an optimal value (0.938), while the AUC of trisomy 18 fetus predicted by AFP-L2 + free β-hCG was the best (0.991). Compared with AFP, the IDI of AFP-L2 or AFP-L3 alone increased 9.56% and 12.34%; the NRI increased 26.50% and 26.70 in predicting trisomy 21. For trisomy 18, the IDI of AFP-L2 or AFP-L3 alone declined with 8.12% and 1.52%; the NRI declined with 13.84% and 8.54%. In the combined model, the model with best detection rate, false positive rate and positive likelihood ratio was AFP-L2 + AFP-L3 + free β-hCG, followed by AFP-L2 + free β-hCG and AFP-L3 + free β-hCG, and finally AFP + free β-hCG. Maternal serum AFP-L2 and AFP-L3 in the second trimester is a good marker for screening trisomy 21 and trisomy18 with high sensitivity and specificity. The combined screening results are better than the single marker, and the efficiency of AFP-L2 + AFP-L3 + free β-hCG is the best.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim K, Craft LK. Non-invasive prenatal testing in mitigating concerns from invasive prenatal diagnostic testing: retrospective assessment of utility in an academic healthcare system in the US. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057658. [PMID: 35705340 PMCID: PMC9204434 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a front-line screening for fatal chromosomal aneuploidy. In pregnant women with a risk of having fetal congenital disorders, NIPT is anticipated to reduce the needs of invasive prenatal diagnostic test (IPD). The objective of this study was to understand the acceptance of NIPT and the utility of NIPT to mitigate concerns about IPD in the US high-risk pregnancy management. DESIGN AND SETTING This was a retrospective observational research using healthcare records obtained from an academic healthcare system in the US. The study consisted of site-level longitudinal analysis and patient-level cross-sectional analysis. PARTICIPANT A total of 5660 new high-risk pregnancies with age ≥35 years were identified for the longitudinal trend analysis. Cross-sectional utility assessment included 2057 pregnant women. EXPOSURE AND OUTCOME MEASURES Longitudinal trends of NIPT order, IPD procedure and the number of patients diagnosed with high-risk pregnancy were descriptively summarised. In the cross-sectional assessment, we tested the association between the use of NIPT and IPD using multivariable regression. RESULTS The rate of increase in the NIPT use exceeded the changes in the number of high-risk pregnancies with age ≥35 years, while the number of annual IPD procedures has fluctuated without specific trends. There was no significant association between the numbers of NIPT and IPD with the adjusted ORs between 0.90 and 1.14 (p>0.1). The order of NIPT was not selected as an independent variable predicting the use of IPD. Clinical characteristics indicating low socioeconomic status and limited healthcare coverage are associated with less use of NIPT and lower clinical utility. CONCLUSION Although prenatal care accepted NIPT over the last decade, the utility of NIPT in mitigating concerns on IPD is unclear and needs further investigation. Limited clinical utility should be addressed in the context of disparity in prenatal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kibum Kim
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Douglas MP, Kumar A. Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12040557. [PMID: 35455673 PMCID: PMC9025578 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine (PM), specifically genetic-based testing, is currently used in over 140,000 individual tests to inform the clinical management of disease. Though several databases (e.g., the NIH Genetic Testing Registry) demonstrate the availability of these sequencing-based tests, we do not currently understand the extent to which these tests are used. There exists a need to synthesize the body of real-world data (RWD) describing the use of sequencing-based tests to inform their appropriate use. To accomplish this, we performed a scoping review to examine what RWD sources have been used in studies of PM utilization between January 2015 and August 2021 to characterize the use of genome sequencing (GS), exome sequencing (ES), tumor sequencing (TS), next-generation sequencing-based panels (NGS), gene expression profiling (GEP), and pharmacogenomics (PGx) panels. We abstracted variables describing the use of these types of tests and performed a descriptive statistical analysis. We identified 440 articles in our search and included 72 articles in our study. Publications based on registry databases were the most common, followed by studies based on private insurer administrative claims. Slightly more than one-third (38%) used integrated datasets. Two thirds (67%) of the studies focused on the use of tests for oncological clinical applications. We summarize the RWD sources used in peer-reviewed literature on the use of PM. Our findings will help improve future study design by encouraging the use of centralized databases and registries to track the implementation and use of PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P. Douglas
- Center for Translational and Policy Research on Precision Medicine (TRANSPERS), Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-415-502-4025
| | - Anika Kumar
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sagi-Dain L, Singer A, Petersen OB, Lou S, Vogel I. Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000-2019) and Israel (2011-2019). Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:768997. [PMID: 34869484 PMCID: PMC8635699 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.768997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50–70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective of our study was to evaluate the trends in NIPS and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) use in Denmark and Israel. Methods: This retrospective study was performed by data acquisition from the Danish Cytogenetics Central Registry throughout the years 2000–2019, and Israeli Public Health Services, Ministry of Health computerized database (from 2011). Results: Of the 1,243,956 live births registered in Denmark over the years 2000–2019, a relatively steady level of invasive testing around 6% was noted since 2004, as opposed to 13.0% in Israel based on 1,594,962 live births between 2011 and 2019. The average uptake of NIPS was 1.1 ± 0.5% in Denmark vs. 4.3% in Israel (2013–2019). Relatively steady rates of invasive testing were noted in both countries, compared to a slight decline in NIPS in the recent years. Discussion: The recent decrease in the rates of invasive testing in the NIPS era was not observed in Denmark or in Israel. These results imply that Danish and Israeli women and/or health providers might favor the high resolution and yield of CMA testing over the non-invasiveness of NIPS. We explore and discuss this phenomenon, based on five central factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Sagi-Dain
- Prenatal Genetics, Genetics Institute, Carmel Medical Center, Affiliated to the Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Amihood Singer
- Community Genetics, Public Health Services, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Olav B Petersen
- Department of Obstetrics, Center for Fetal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stina Lou
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ida Vogel
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wijngaard R, Casals E, Mercadé I, Laguna J, Madrigal I, Badenas C, Borrell A, Rodriguez-Revenga L. SIGNIFICANCE OF LOW MATERNAL SERUM Β-HCG LEVELS IN THE ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF ATYPICAL CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES. Fetal Diagn Ther 2021; 48:849-856. [PMID: 34872079 DOI: 10.1159/000521345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The introduction of prenatal cell-free DNA as a screening test has surpassed traditional combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) in the detection of common trisomies. However, its current limitation in detecting only common trisomies is affecting the diagnostic yield for other clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities. METHODS In efforts to optimize the detection of fetuses with genetic abnormalities, we have analyzed the relationship between the cFTS risk score and biomarkers with atypical chromosomal abnormalities. Furthermore, we have evaluated the impact of prenatal cell-free DNA screening on the detection of chromosomal abnormalities in our population. For these purposes, we performed a retrospective study of 877 singleton pregnancies who underwent chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) between 2013 to 2020 and for whom first-trimester screening data were available. RESULTS The results demonstrated that low levels of free beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) (≤ 0.37 MoM) and increased fetal nuchal translucency (NT) (≥ 3.5mm) were statistically associated with the presence of atypical chromosomal abnormalities. In fact, the risk of pathogenic CMA results increased from 6% to 10% when fetal NT was increased and from 6% to 20% when a low serum β-hCG level was detected in the high-risk cFTS group. Moreover, our results showed that altered serum levels of β-hCG can have a substantial impact on the early detection of clinically relevant copy number variants. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION Traditional cFTS can potentially identify a substantial proportion of atypical chromosomal aberrations, and women with increased NT or low maternal serum β-hCG levels are at increased risk of having pathogenic CMA results. Our results may help clinicians and women decide whether invasive testing or prenatal cell-free DNA screening testing are more appropriate for each situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Wijngaard
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,
| | - Elena Casals
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Imma Mercadé
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Laguna
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irene Madrigal
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER of Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Celia Badenas
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER of Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antoni Borrell
- BCNatal Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Institute Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Rodriguez-Revenga
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER of Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hui L, Pynaker C, Kennedy J, Lewis S, Amor DJ, Walker SP, Halliday J. Study protocol: childhood outcomes of fetal genomic variants: the PrenatAL Microarray (PALM) cohort study. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21:447. [PMID: 34629048 PMCID: PMC8502634 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-02809-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation of genomic testing in pregnancy means that couples have access to more information about their child's genetic make-up before birth than ever before. One of the resulting challenges is the management of genetic variations with unclear clinical significance. This population-based study will help to close this critical knowledge gap through a multidisciplinary cohort study of children with and without genomic copy number variants (CNVs) diagnosed before birth. By comparing children with prenatally-ascertained CNVs to children without a CNV, we aim to (1) examine their developmental, social-emotional and health status; (2) measure the impact of prenatal diagnosis of a CNV on maternal perceptions of child health, behavior and development; and (3) determine the proportion of prenatally-ascertained CNVs of unknown or uncertain significance that are reclassified as benign or pathogenic after 2 or more years. METHODS This study will establish and follow up a cohort of mother-child pairs who have had a prenatal diagnosis with a chromosomal microarray from 2013-2019 in the Australian state of Victoria. Children aged 12 months to 7 years will be assessed using validated, age-appropriate measures. The primary outcome measures will be the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence IV (WPSSI-IV) IQ score (2.5 to 7 year old's), the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (12-30 months old), and the Brief Infant- Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) score. Clinical assessment by a pediatrician will also be performed. Secondary outcomes will be scores obtained from the: Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Maternal Postnatal Attachment Questionnaire, the Vulnerable Child Scale, Profile of Mood States, Parent Sense of Competence Scale. A descriptive analysis of the reclassification rates of CNVs after ≥2 years will be performed. DISCUSSION This study protocol describes the first Australian cohort study following children after prenatal diagnostic testing with chromosomal microarray. It will provide long-term outcomes of fetal genomic variants to guide evidence-based pre-and postnatal care. This, in turn, will inform future efforts to mitigate the negative consequences of conveying genomic uncertainty during pregnancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12620000446965p ; Registered on April 6, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Hui
- Reproductive Epidemiology group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
- Northern Health, Epping, VIC, Australia.
| | - Cecilia Pynaker
- Reproductive Epidemiology group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanne Kennedy
- Reproductive Epidemiology group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Sharon Lewis
- Reproductive Epidemiology group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - David J Amor
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Neurodisability and Rehabilitation group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan P Walker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Jane Halliday
- Reproductive Epidemiology group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ali TM, Mateu-Brull E, Balaguer N, Dantas C, Borges HR, de Oliveira MQG, Rodrigo L, Campos-Galindo I, Navarro R, Milán M. Inherited unbalanced reciprocal translocation with 3q duplication and 5p deletion in a foetus revealed by cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) testing: a case report. Eur J Med Res 2021; 26:64. [PMID: 34187576 PMCID: PMC8243479 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-021-00535-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since 2011, screening maternal blood for cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) fragments has offered a robust clinical tool to classify pregnancy as low or high-risk for Down, Edwards, and Patau syndromes. With recent advances in molecular biology and improvements in data analysis algorithms, the screening’s scope of analysis continues to expand. Indeed, screening now encompassess additional conditions, including aneuploidies for sex chromosomes, microdeletions and microduplications, rare autosomal trisomies, and, more recently, segmental deletions and duplications called copy number variations (CNVs). Yet, the ability to detect CNVs creates a new challenge for cffDNA analysis in couples in which one member carries a structural rearrangement such as a translocation or inversion. Case presentation We report a segmental duplication of the long arm of chromosome 3 and a segmental deletion of the short arm of chromosome 5 detected by cffDNA analysis in a 25-year-old pregnant woman. The blood sample was sequenced on a NextSeq 550 (Illumina) using the VeriSeq NIPT Solution v1 assay. G-band karyotyping in amniotic fluid only detected an abnormality in chromosome 5. Next-generation sequencing in amniocytes confirmed both abnormalities and identified breakpoints in 3q26.32q29 and 5p13.3p15. The foetus died at 21 weeks of gestation due to multiple abnormalities, and later G-band karyotyping in the parents revealed that the father was a carrier of a balanced reciprocal translocation [46,XY,t(3;5)(q26.2;p13)]. Maternal karyotype appeared normal. Conclusion This case provides evidence that extended cffDNA can detect, in addition to aneuploidies for whole chromosomes, large segmental aneuploidies. In some cases, this may indicate the presence of chromosomal rearrangements in a parent. Such abnormalities are outside the scope of standard cffDNA analysis targeting chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y, potentially leading to undiagnosed congenital conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taccyanna M Ali
- Laboratório Igenomix, Laboratório de Genética E Medicina Reprodutiva, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Emilia Mateu-Brull
- IGENOMIX Lab S.L.U., Parque tecnológico, Ronda Narciso Monturiol, 11B, Edificios Europark, 46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain
| | - Nuria Balaguer
- IGENOMIX Lab S.L.U., Parque tecnológico, Ronda Narciso Monturiol, 11B, Edificios Europark, 46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain
| | - Camila Dantas
- Laboratório Igenomix, Laboratório de Genética E Medicina Reprodutiva, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Lorena Rodrigo
- IGENOMIX Lab S.L.U., Parque tecnológico, Ronda Narciso Monturiol, 11B, Edificios Europark, 46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Campos-Galindo
- IGENOMIX Lab S.L.U., Parque tecnológico, Ronda Narciso Monturiol, 11B, Edificios Europark, 46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain
| | - Roser Navarro
- IGENOMIX Lab S.L.U., Parque tecnológico, Ronda Narciso Monturiol, 11B, Edificios Europark, 46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain
| | - Miguel Milán
- IGENOMIX Lab S.L.U., Parque tecnológico, Ronda Narciso Monturiol, 11B, Edificios Europark, 46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Xu Y, Jin P, Lei Y, Qian Y, Xu Y, Wang M, Jin J, Yin Y, Dong M. Clinical Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Common Trisomies in Low-Risk and Twin Pregnancies. Front Genet 2021; 12:661884. [PMID: 34040638 PMCID: PMC8143437 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.661884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical efficiency of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal aneuploidies in low-risk and twin pregnancies, patients who received NIPS in a tertiary university hospital were enrolled, and their clinical data, NIPS results and pregnancy outcomes were collected. Patients were divided into singleton and twin pregnancies, and then those with singleton pregnancies were divided into low- and high-risk pregnancies. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated. Comparisons were made on the clinical efficiency of NIPS between singleton and twin pregnancies, as well as between low- and high-risk pregnancies. Of 66,172 patients enrolled, 59,962 were eligible for analysis. The sensitivity, specificity and NPV were ≥ 99% in singleton and twin pregnancies. The PPVs were 90.4, 56.6, and 13.0% in singleton pregnancies, while 100, 33.3, and 0% in twin pregnancies for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 13 (T13), respectively (P > 0.05 for all). The PPVs were 97.4 and 90.0% in high-risk pregnancies, while 78.6 and 16.7% in low-risk pregnancies for T21 and T18, respectively (P < 0.05 for all). In summary, the performance of NIPS in singleton pregnancies was similar to that in twin pregnancies. NIPS can be recommended for all pregnancies regardless of the risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanfei Xu
- Department of Reproductive Genetics, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Pengzhen Jin
- Department of Reproductive Genetics, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yu Lei
- Department of endocrinology, People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yeqing Qian
- Department of Reproductive Genetics, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics, Ministry of Education (Zhejiang University), Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuqing Xu
- Department of Reproductive Genetics, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Miaomiao Wang
- Department of Reproductive Genetics, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jinglei Jin
- Department of Reproductive Genetics, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yixuan Yin
- Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Hangzhou Women's Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Minyue Dong
- Department of Reproductive Genetics, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics, Ministry of Education (Zhejiang University), Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Women's Reproductive Health of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hui L, Poulton A, Kluckow E, Lindquist A, Hutchinson B, Pertile MD, Bonacquisto L, Gugasyan L, Kulkarni A, Harraway J, Howden A, McCoy R, Costa FDS, Menezes M, Palma-Dias R, Nisbet D, Martin N, Bethune M, Poulakis Z, Halliday J. A minimum estimate of the prevalence of 22q11 deletion syndrome and other chromosome abnormalities in a combined prenatal and postnatal cohort. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:694-704. [PMID: 32207823 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2018] [Revised: 11/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the frequency of major chromosome abnormalities in a population-based diagnostic data set of genomic tests performed on miscarriage, fetal and infant samples in a state with >73 000 annual births? SUMMARY ANSWER The overall frequency of major chromosome abnormalities in the entire cohort was 28.2% (2493/8826), with a significant decrease in the detection of major chromosome abnormalities with later developmental stage, from 50.9% to 21.3% to 15.6% of tests in the miscarriage, prenatal and postnatal cohorts, respectively. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Over the past decade, technological advances have revolutionized genomic testing at every stage of reproduction. Chromosomal microarrays (CMAs) are now the gold standard of chromosome assessment in prenatal diagnosis and pediatrics. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A population-based cohort study including all chromosome analysis was performed in the Australian state of Victoria during a 24-month period from January 2015 to December 2016. All samples obtained via invasive prenatal diagnosis and postnatal samples from pregnancy tissue and infants ≤12 months of age were included. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A research collaboration of screening and diagnostic units in the Australian state of Victoria was formed (the Perinatal Record Linkage collaboration), capturing all instances of prenatal and postnatal chromosome testing performed in the state. Victoria has over 73 000 births per annum and a median maternal age of 31.5 years. We analyzed our population-based diagnostic data set for (i) chromosome assessment of miscarriage, prenatal diagnosis and postnatal samples; (ii) testing indications and diagnostic yields for each of these cohorts; (iii) and the combined prenatal/infant prevalence of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (DS) as a proportion of all births ≥20 weeks gestation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE During the 24-month study period, a total of 8826 chromosomal analyses were performed on prenatal and postnatal specimens in Victoria. The vast majority (91.2%) of all chromosome analyses were performed with CMA.The overall frequency of major chromosome abnormalities in the entire cohort was 28.2% (2493/8826). There was a significant decreasing trend in the percentage of chromosome abnormalities with later developmental stage from 50.9% to 21.3% to 15.6% in the miscarriage, prenatal and postnatal cohorts, respectively (χ2 trend = 790.0, P < 0.0001). The total frequency of abnormalities in the live infant subgroup was 13.4% (244/1816). The frequencies of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) detected via CMA for the miscarriage, prenatal and postnatal cohorts were 1.9% (50/2573), 2.2% (82/3661) and 4.9% (127/2592), respectively. There was a significant increasing trend in the frequency of pathogenic CNVs with later developmental stage (χ2 trend = 39.72, P < 0.0001). For the subgroup of live infants, the pathogenic CNV frequency on CMA analysis was 6.0% (109/1816). There were 38 diagnoses of 22q11.2 DS, including 1 miscarriage, 15 prenatal and 22 postnatal cases. After excluding the miscarriage case and accounting for duplicate testing, the estimated prevalence of 22q11 DS was 1 in 4558 Victorian births. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Clinical information was missing on 11.6% of postnatal samples, and gestational age was rarely provided on the miscarriage specimens. We were unable to obtain rates of termination of pregnancy and stillbirth in our cohort due to incomplete data provided by clinical referrers. We therefore cannot make conclusions on pregnancy or infant outcome following diagnostic testing. Childhood and adult diagnoses of 22q11 DS were not collected. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our study marks a complete transition in genomic testing from the G-banded karyotype era, with CMA now established as the first line investigation for pregnancy losses, fetal diagnosis and newborn/infant assessment in a high-income setting. Integration of prenatal and postnatal diagnostic data sets provides important opportunities for estimating the prevalence of clinically important congenital syndromes, such as 22q11 DS. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) L.H. is funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship (1105603); A.L. was funded by a Mercy Perinatal Research Fellowship; J.H. was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowship (10121252). The funding bodies had no role in the conduct of the research or the manuscript. Discretionary funding from the Murdoch Children's Research Institute has supported the prenatal diagnosis data collection and reporting over the years.Dr Ricardo Palma-Dias reports a commercial relationship with Roche Diagnostics, personal fees from Philips Ultrasound, outside the submitted work. Debbie Nisbet reports a commercial relationship with Roche Diagnostics, outside the submitted work. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Hui
- Reproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia.,Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, 3084, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alice Poulton
- Reproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eliza Kluckow
- Reproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthea Lindquist
- Reproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia.,Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, 3084, Victoria, Australia
| | - Briohny Hutchinson
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, 3084, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark D Pertile
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leonard Bonacquisto
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lucy Gugasyan
- Cytogenetics, Monash Pathology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia
| | - Abhijit Kulkarni
- Cytogenetics, Monash Pathology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Harraway
- Department of Cytogenetics/Molecular Pathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Bowen Hills, Queensland 4006, Australia
| | - Amanda Howden
- Cytogenetics, Melbourne Pathology, Collingwood 3066, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard McCoy
- Molecular Genetics, Australian Clinical Labs, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fabricio Da Silva Costa
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melody Menezes
- Monash Ultrasound for Women, Richmond 3121, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ricardo Palma-Dias
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia.,Women's Ultrasound Melbourne, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria, Australia.,Ultrasound Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
| | - Debbie Nisbet
- Women's Ultrasound Melbourne, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria, Australia.,Ultrasound Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicole Martin
- Virtus Diagnostics and Pathology Services, Spring Hill 4000, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Bethune
- Specialist Women's Ultrasound, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zeffie Poulakis
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Infant Hearing Screening Program, Centre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia.,Prevention Innovation Group, Population Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane Halliday
- Reproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ravitsky V, Roy MC, Haidar H, Henneman L, Marshall J, Newson AJ, Ngan OMY, Nov-Klaiman T. The Emergence and Global Spread of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2021; 22:309-338. [PMID: 33848430 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Since its introduction in 2011, noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has spread rapidly around the world. It carries numerous benefits but also raises challenges, often related to sociocultural, legal, and economic contexts. This article describes the implementation of NIPT in nine countries, each with its own unique characteristics: Australia, Canada, China and Hong Kong, India, Israel, Lebanon, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Themes covered for each country include the structure of the healthcare system, how NIPT is offered, counseling needs and resources, and cultural and legal context regarding disability and pregnancytermination. Some common issues emerge, including cost as a barrier to equitable access, the complexity of decision-making about public funding, and a shortage of appropriate resources that promote informed choice. Conversely, sociocultural values that underlie the use of NIPT vary greatly among countries. The issues described will become even more challenging as NIPT evolves from a second-tier to a first-tier screening test with expanded use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vardit Ravitsky
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada;
| | - Marie-Christine Roy
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada;
| | - Hazar Haidar
- Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A3, Canada;
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - John Marshall
- United Kingdom National Screening Committee, London SE1 8UG, United Kingdom;
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Sydney Health Ethics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia;
| | - Olivia M Y Ngan
- Centre for Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China;
| | - Tamar Nov-Klaiman
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Igel CM, Rabin-Havt S, Estrada Trejo F, Doulaveris G, Eisenberg R, Fazzari M, Klugman S. Patient attitudes toward prenatal diagnostic testing during antenatal care in an urban population. Prenat Diagn 2021; 41:888-895. [PMID: 33470437 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigate factors that influence the decision to accept or decline diagnostic testing for pregnant women referred for genetic counseling. METHODS Cross sectional anonymous survey of pregnant women undergoing genetic counseling at a tertiary care referral center. Subjects' perceived risk of procedure related loss and fetal chromosomal problem were obtained via survey where patients rated risk from 0 (no risk) to 10 (highest risk). RESULTS There were no differences in sociodemographic factors between women undergoing a diagnostic procedure compared to those not undergoing a procedure. As the perceived risk for having a baby with genetic problem increased by one point, the estimated odds of having the diagnostic procedure increased by 43% controlling for the perceived risk of procedure related loss (p < .0001). Similarly, as the perceived risk of miscarriage increased by one point, the odds of having the diagnostic procedure decreased by 40%, controlling for the perceived risk of having a baby with a genetic problem (p < .0001). The main reason women cited for not undergoing a procedure was fear of procedure related loss. CONCLUSIONS Pregnant women that decline diagnostic testing have a higher perceived risk of procedure related loss and lower perceived risk of fetal chromosomal abnormality than those who accept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M Igel
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/ Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Sara Rabin-Havt
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/ Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Fatima Estrada Trejo
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/ Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Georgios Doulaveris
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/ Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Ruth Eisenberg
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/ Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Melissa Fazzari
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/ Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.,Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/ Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Susan Klugman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/ Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lindquist A, Hui L, Poulton A, Kluckow E, Hutchinson B, Pertile MD, Bonacquisto L, Gugasyan L, Kulkarni A, Harraway J, Howden A, McCoy R, Da Silva Costa F, Menezes M, Palma-Dias R, Nisbet D, Martin N, Bethune M, Poulakis Z, Halliday J. State-wide utilization and performance of traditional and cell-free DNA-based prenatal testing pathways: the Victorian Perinatal Record Linkage (PeRL) study. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2020; 56:215-224. [PMID: 31625225 DOI: 10.1002/uog.21899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform individual record linkage of women undergoing screening with cell-free DNA (cfDNA), combined first-trimester screening (CFTS), second-trimester serum screening (STSS), and/or prenatal and postnatal cytogenetic testing with the aim to (1) obtain population-based estimates of utilization of prenatal screening and invasive diagnosis, (2) analyze the performance of different prenatal screening strategies, and (3) report the residual risk of any major chromosomal abnormality following a low-risk aneuploidy screening result. METHODS This was a retrospective study of women residing in the state of Victoria, Australia, who underwent prenatal screening or invasive prenatal diagnosis in 2015. Patient-funded cfDNA referrals from multiple providers were merged with state-wide results for government-subsidized CFTS, STSS and invasive diagnostic procedures. Postnatal cytogenetic results from products of conception and infants up to 12 months of age were obtained to ascertain cases of false-negative screening results and atypical chromosomal abnormalities. Individual record linkage was performed using LinkageWizTM . RESULTS During the study period, there were 79 140 births and 66 166 (83.6%) women underwent at least one form of aneuploidy screening. Linkage data were complete for 93.5% (n = 61 877) of women who underwent screening, and of these, 73.2% (n = 45 275) had CFTS alone, 20.2% (n = 12 486) had cfDNA alone; 5.3% (n = 3268) had STSS alone, 1.3% (n = 813) had both CFTS and cfDNA, and < 0.1% (n = 35) had both STSS and cfDNA. CFTS had a combined sensitivity for trisomies 21 (T21), 18 (T18) and 13 (T13) of 89.57% (95% CI, 82.64-93.93%) for a screen-positive rate (SPR) of 2.94%. There were 12 false-negative results in the CFTS pathway, comprising 10 cases of T21, one of T18 and one of T13. cfDNA had a combined sensitivity for T21, T18 and T13 of 100% (95% CI, 95.00-100%) for a SPR of 1.21%. When high-risk cfDNA results for any chromosome (including the sex chromosomes) and failed cfDNA tests were treated as screen positives, the SPR for cfDNA increased to 2.42%. The risk of any major chromosomal abnormality (including atypical abnormalities) detected on prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing after a low-risk screening result was 1 in 1188 for CFTS (n = 37) and 1 in 762 for cfDNA (n = 16) (P = 0.13). The range of chromosomal abnormalities detected after a low-risk cfDNA result included pathogenic copy-number variants (n = 6), triploidy (n = 3), rare autosomal trisomies (n = 3) and monosomy X (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS Our state-wide record-linkage analysis delineated the utilization and clinical performance of the multitude of prenatal screening pathways available to pregnant women. The sensitivity of cfDNA for T21, T18 and T13 was clearly superior to that of CFTS. While there was no statistically significant difference in the residual risk of any major chromosomal abnormality after a low-risk CFTS or cfDNA result, there were fewer live infants diagnosed with a major chromosomal abnormality in the cfDNA cohort. These data provide valuable population-based evidence to inform practice recommendations and health policies. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Lindquist
- Reproductive Epidemiology group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - L Hui
- Reproductive Epidemiology group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- The Northern Hospital, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Poulton
- Reproductive Epidemiology group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - E Kluckow
- Reproductive Epidemiology group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - B Hutchinson
- Department of Obstetrics, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - M D Pertile
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - L Bonacquisto
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - L Gugasyan
- Cytogenetics, Monash Pathology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Kulkarni
- Cytogenetics, Monash Pathology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - J Harraway
- Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - A Howden
- Department of Cytogenetics, Melbourne Pathology, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - R McCoy
- Molecular Genetics, Australian Clinical Labs, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - F Da Silva Costa
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - M Menezes
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Ultrasound for Women, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| | - R Palma-Dias
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Women's Ultrasound Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Ultrasound Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Nisbet
- Women's Ultrasound Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Ultrasound Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - N Martin
- Virtus Diagnostics and Pathology Services, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia
| | - M Bethune
- Specialist Women's Ultrasound, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Z Poulakis
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Infant Hearing Screening Program, Centre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Prevention Innovation Group, Population Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - J Halliday
- Reproductive Epidemiology group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Samura O. Update on noninvasive prenatal testing: A review based on current worldwide research. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2020; 46:1246-1254. [PMID: 32558079 DOI: 10.1111/jog.14268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Eight years have passed since noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was clinically evaluated and data on NIPT for trisomy 21, 18 and 13 were collected. The data revealed that NIPT is more accurate than conventional first-trimester screening. However, there is still insufficient data regarding the clinical use of NIPT results in detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies or whole-genome regions. NIPT is already being used as a clinical screening method globally. However, it is an unconfirmed diagnostic test and the results must be interpreted with caution as they may yield false negatives, false positives or inconclusive results. Therefore, the aim of this review is to highlight the current status of information, including the different methodologies, shortcomings and implications, regarding NIPT after its adoption worldwide. It is important to include genetic counseling when implementing NIPT. Going forward, the knowledge obtained to date, including the associated shortcomings, must be considered in evaluating the effectiveness of NIPT in detecting genetic abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamu Samura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Okmen F, Ekici H, Hortu I, Imamoglu M, Arican D, Akın H, Sagol S. Comparison of indications and results of prenatal invasive diagnostic tests before and after the implementation of the use of cell-free fetal DNA: a tertiary referral center experience. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:2019-2024. [PMID: 32440934 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01825-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to compare the changes in the number, yield, and the percentage of karyotyping indications of the invasive prenatal diagnostic tests between the periods before and after cell-free fetal DNA was introduced to clinical use. METHOD The number of invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures such as amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling, indication percentages and karyotype results in the periods before (January 1, 2009-December 31, 2010), (n = 1412) and after (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017), and (n = 593) the introduction of cell-free fetal DNA was retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS When compared with the period before cell-free fetal DNA came into clinical use, the number of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests decreased by 58% while their yield was found to have increased (4.4% vs. 10.3%) in the period after cell-free DNA began to be used (p < 0.001). While there was a decrease in the indications due to advanced maternal age, an increase was found in ultrasonography indications for structural anomaly and the risk of a single-gene disorder (p < 0.001). Amniocentesis rate was found to have decreased in invasive prenatal diagnostic procedure types, while an increase was reported in CVS rates (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Invasive prenatal diagnosis gradually decreases over the years, but the yield of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests increases. In parallel with the rapid development of modern molecular technologies and cheaper and easier access to the tests, we think that the number of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests will experience a more dramatic decrease in the following years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Firat Okmen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Ekici
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ismet Hortu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. .,Department of Stem Cell, Institute of Health Sciences, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
| | - Metehan Imamoglu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Duygu Arican
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Haluk Akın
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Sermet Sagol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Li W, Zeng F, Fan B, Yu N, Wu J, Yang Y, Huang H, Li SL, Peng Z. Impact of ultrasonography on identifying noninvasive prenatal screening false-negative aneuploidy. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2020; 8:e1213. [PMID: 32198849 PMCID: PMC7284037 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the impact of ultrasonography on identifying noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) false‐negative aneuploidy. Methods Analysis of large population‐based NIPS false‐negative aneuploidy data comprising karyotypes, clinical outcomes, and ultrasound results. Results From December 2010 to July 2018, a total of 3,320,457 pregnancies were screened by NIPS performed in BGI; among them, 69 NIPS false‐negative aneuploidy cases with informed consent were confirmed, and ultrasound examination data for 48 cases were not available. Of the 21 cases with ultrasound results, 19 (90.5%) had various abnormalities on ultrasound, and two (9.5%) cases were shown to be normal on ultrasound. Additionally, six of seven live‐born fetuses (approximately 85.7%) were found to have abnormalities on ultrasound. Ventricular septal defects constituted the most frequently observed ultrasound abnormality type among the 21 NIPS false‐negative aneuploidy cases. Conclusion Application of NIPS has increased rapidly worldwide and now accounts for a large proportion of prenatal screening tests in China. This study suggests that ISUOG guideline should be followed practically, and structural abnormal ultrasound findings should not be neglected, even when NIPS produces a negative result. Combining NIPS with an ultrasound examination can further reduce the incidence of live births with aneuploidy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Li
- BGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Fanwei Zeng
- BGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Nan Yu
- BGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jing Wu
- BGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yun Yang
- BGI-Wuhan, BGI-Shenzhen, Wuhan, China
| | - Hui Huang
- BGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Sheng-Li Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhiyu Peng
- BGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis by genome-wide haplotyping of cell-free plasma DNA. Genet Med 2020; 22:962-973. [PMID: 32024963 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0748-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Whereas noninvasive prenatal screening for aneuploidies is widely implemented, there is an increasing need for universal approaches for noninvasive prenatal screening for monogenic diseases. Here, we present a cost-effective, generic cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) haplotyping approach to scan the fetal genome for the presence of inherited monogenic diseases. METHODS Families participating in the preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) program were recruited for this study. Two hundred fifty thousand single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) captured from maternal plasma DNA along with genomic DNA from family members were massively parallel sequenced. Parental genotypes were phased via an available genotype from a close relative, and the fetal genome-wide haplotype and copy number were determined using cffDNA haplotyping analysis based on estimation and segmentation of fetal allele presence in the maternal plasma. RESULTS In all families tested, mutational profiles from cffDNA haplotyping are consistent with embryo biopsy profiles. Genome-wide fetal haplotypes are on average 97% concordant with the newborn haplotypes and embryo haplotypes. CONCLUSION We demonstrate that genome-wide targeted capture and sequencing of polymorphic SNPs from maternal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) allows haplotyping and copy-number profiling of the fetal genome during pregnancy. The method enables the accurate reconstruction of the fetal haplotypes and can be easily implemented in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
26
|
van der Meij KR, Sistermans EA, Macville MV, Stevens SJ, Bax CJ, Bekker MN, Bilardo CM, Boon EM, Boter M, Diderich KE, de Die-Smulders CE, Duin LK, Faas BH, Feenstra I, Haak MC, Hoffer MJ, den Hollander NS, Hollink IH, Jehee FS, Knapen MF, Kooper AJ, van Langen IM, Lichtenbelt KD, Linskens IH, van Maarle MC, Oepkes D, Pieters MJ, Schuring-Blom GH, Sikkel E, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Smeets DF, Srebniak MI, Suijkerbuijk RF, Tan-Sindhunata GM, van der Ven AJE, van Zelderen-Bhola SL, Henneman L, Galjaard RJH, Van Opstal D, Weiss MM. TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 105:1091-1101. [PMID: 31708118 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 193] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The Netherlands launched a nationwide implementation study on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier test offered to all pregnant women. This started on April 1, 2017 as the TRIDENT-2 study, licensed by the Dutch Ministry of Health. In the first year, NIPT was performed in 73,239 pregnancies (42% of all pregnancies), 7,239 (4%) chose first-trimester combined testing, and 54% did not participate. The number of trisomies 21 (239, 0.33%), 18 (49, 0.07%), and 13 (55, 0.08%) found in this study is comparable to earlier studies, but the Positive Predictive Values (PPV)-96% for trisomy 21, 98% for trisomy 18, and 53% for trisomy 13-were higher than expected. Findings other than trisomy 21, 18, or 13 were reported on request of the pregnant women; 78% of women chose to have these reported. The number of additional findings was 207 (0.36%); these included other trisomies (101, 0.18%, PPV 6%, many of the remaining 94% of cases are likely confined placental mosaics and possibly clinically significant), structural chromosomal aberrations (95, 0.16%, PPV 32%,) and complex abnormal profiles indicative of maternal malignancies (11, 0.02%, PPV 64%). The implementation of genome-wide NIPT is under debate because the benefits of detecting other fetal chromosomal aberrations must be balanced against the risks of discordant positives, parental anxiety, and a potential increase in (invasive) diagnostic procedures. Our first-year data, including clinical data and laboratory follow-up data, will fuel this debate. Furthermore, we describe how NIPT can successfully be embedded into a national screening program with a single chain for prenatal care including counseling, testing, and follow-up.
Collapse
|
27
|
How B, Smidt A, Wilson NJ, Barton R, Valentin C. 'We would have missed out so much had we terminated': What fathers of a child with Down syndrome think about current non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES : JOID 2019; 23:290-309. [PMID: 30021487 DOI: 10.1177/1744629518787606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) allows early, accurate diagnosis of Down syndrome that has resulted in increased terminations. This qualitative study involved in-depth interviews of fathers of children with Down syndrome about their views on the availability of NIPT. Thematic network analysis revealed that although fathers appreciated an early diagnosis with NIPT, they saw the test as being a predetermined pathway to termination. Fathers felt that expectation to terminate reflects negative societal attitudes towards those with Down syndrome and disability, fearing that NIPT may become a form of eugenics. Fathers retrospectively contrasted these attitudes with the actual reality of raising their children with Down syndrome, which they described as bringing joy to their lives. Findings suggest that although fathers valued NIPT as an information-giving tool that allowed autonomous parental choices about the pregnancy, they believe that it should be accompanied by balanced information about the reality of raising a child with Down syndrome.
Collapse
|
28
|
Tong S, Joy Kaitu'u-Lino T, Walker SP, MacDonald TM. Blood-based biomarkers in the maternal circulation associated with fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn 2019; 39:947-957. [PMID: 31299098 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with threefold to fourfold increased risk of stillbirth. Identifying FGR, through its commonly used surrogate-the small-for-gestational-age (SGA, estimated fetal weight and/or abdominal circumference <10th centile) fetus-and instituting fetal surveillance and timely delivery decrease stillbirth risk. Methods available to clinicians for antenatal identification of SGA fetuses have surprisingly poor sensitivity. About 80% of cases remain undetected. Measuring the symphysis-fundal height detects only 20% of SGA fetuses, and even universal third trimester ultrasound detects, at best, 57% of those born SGA. There is an urgent need to find better ways to identify this at-risk cohort. This review summarises efforts to identify molecular biomarkers (proteins, metabolites, or ribonucleic acids) that could be used to better predict FGR. Most studies examining potential biomarkers to date have utilised case-control study designs without proceeding to validation in independent cohorts. To develop a robust test for FGR, large prospective studies are required with a priori validation plans and cohorts. Given that current clinical care detects 20% of SGA fetuses, even a screening test with ≥60% sensitivity at 90% specificity could be clinically useful, if developed. This may be an achievable aspiration. If discovered, such a test may decrease stillbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Tong
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Translational Obstetrics Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tu'uhevaha Joy Kaitu'u-Lino
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Translational Obstetrics Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan Philippa Walker
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Translational Obstetrics Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Teresa Mary MacDonald
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Translational Obstetrics Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shi J, Zhang R, Li J, Zhang R. Novel perspectives in fetal biomarker implementation for the noninvasive prenatal testing. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2019; 56:374-392. [PMID: 31290367 DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2019.1631749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) utilizes cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) present in maternal peripheral blood to detect chromosomal abnormalities. The detection of 21-trisomy, 18-trisomy, and 13-trisomy in the fetus has become a common screening method during pregnancy and has been widely applied in routine clinical testing because of its analytical and clinical validity. Currently, noninvasive prenatal testing involving copy number variations (CNVs) and other frequent single-gene disorders is being widely studied, and it plays an important and indispensable role in prenatal detection. The multiple approaches that have been reported and validated by various laboratories have different merits and limitations. Their clinical validity, utility, and application vary with different diseases. This review summarizes the principles, methods, advantages, and limitations of noninvasive prenatal testing for the detection of aneuploidy, CNVs and single-gene disorders. Before implementation of NIPT into clinical practice, a list of criteria that the application must meet is crucial. Essential parameters such as clinical sensitivity, clinical specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) are required to properly evaluate the clinical validity and utility of NIPT. We then discuss and analyze these clinical parameters and clinical application guidelines, providing physicians and scientists with feasible strategies and the latest research information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiping Shi
- Peking University Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, National Center for Clinical Laboratories, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing Hospital , Beijing , China.,National Center for Clinical Laboratories, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing Hospital , Beijing , China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital , Beijing , China
| | - Runling Zhang
- National Center for Clinical Laboratories, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing Hospital , Beijing , China.,Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College , Beijing , China
| | - Jinming Li
- National Center for Clinical Laboratories, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing Hospital , Beijing , China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital , Beijing , China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Peking University Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, National Center for Clinical Laboratories, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing Hospital , Beijing , China.,National Center for Clinical Laboratories, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing Hospital , Beijing , China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital , Beijing , China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Werner-Lin A, Mccoyd JLM, Bernhardt BA. Actions and Uncertainty:How Prenatally Diagnosed Variants of Uncertain Significance Become Actionable. Hastings Cent Rep 2019; 49 Suppl 1:S61-S71. [DOI: 10.1002/hast.1018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
31
|
Koc A, Ozer Kaya O, Ozyilmaz B, Kutbay YB, Kirbiyik O, Ozdemir TR, Erdogan KM, Saka Guvenc M, Oztekin DC, Ozeren M, Pala HG, Ekin A, Gezer C, Sahingoz Yildirim AG, Konuralp Atakul B, Kurtulmus S, Turhan U, Taner CE. Targeted fetal cell-free DNA screening for aneuploidies in 4,594 pregnancies: Single center study. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2019; 7:e00678. [PMID: 31070015 PMCID: PMC6625369 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and discovery of fetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the maternal circulation render possible prenatal screening for trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies. The approach is called "fetal cfDNA screening" and in contrast to noninvasive conventional serum screening, it provides the identification of 98%-99% of fetuses with Down syndrome. METHODS Retrospective analysis of targeted noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) (Clarigo Test) pregnancies with moderate risk, which we have reported between 2016 and 2018 years is presented. Two separate laboratory workflows and NGS platforms are used for the same targeted NIPT analysis. RESULTS In total, 4,594 pregnant women were investigated. Initial 3,594 cases are studied by MiSeq platform, the last 1,000 cases by NextSeq. Failure rate for MiSeq platform is 10.9% and for NextSeq is 8.7%. Automatically reported cases constitute 75% of the MiSeq group and 87% of the NextSeq group. CONCLUSIONS Targeted NIPT results suggest that MiSeq platform could be used for NIPT which would be an essential option particularly for laboratories with low sample flow. And, the NextSeq platform has easier wet lab process and also increased success rate in automatic reporting which is suitable for centers with high number of NIPT cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Altug Koc
- Genetic Diagnosis Center, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ozge Ozer Kaya
- Genetic Diagnosis Center, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Berk Ozyilmaz
- Genetic Diagnosis Center, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Yasar B Kutbay
- Genetic Diagnosis Center, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ozgur Kirbiyik
- Genetic Diagnosis Center, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Taha R Ozdemir
- Genetic Diagnosis Center, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Kadri M Erdogan
- Genetic Diagnosis Center, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Merve Saka Guvenc
- Genetic Diagnosis Center, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Deniz C Oztekin
- Perinatology Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ozeren
- Perinatology Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Halil G Pala
- Perinatology Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Atalay Ekin
- Perinatology Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Cenk Gezer
- Perinatology Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Alkim G Sahingoz Yildirim
- Perinatology Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Bahar Konuralp Atakul
- Perinatology Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Secil Kurtulmus
- Perinatology Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ugur Turhan
- Perinatology Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Cuneyt E Taner
- Perinatology Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lostchuck E, Poulton A, Halliday J, Hui L. Population-based trends in invasive prenatal diagnosis for ultrasound-based indications: two decades of change from 1994 to 2016. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2019; 53:503-511. [PMID: 29877030 DOI: 10.1002/uog.19107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2018] [Revised: 04/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess trends in ultrasound-indicated prenatal diagnostic testing performed over the past two decades in the Australian state of Victoria, in the context of rapidly changing practices in aneuploidy screening and chromosome analysis. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of all ultrasound-indicated prenatal diagnostic testing (amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling) performed in the state of Victoria between 1994 and 2016. Ultrasound indications for testing included: fetal structural abnormality, fetal death, fetal growth restriction, abnormal amniotic fluid volume, genetic 'soft marker' and unspecified ultrasound abnormality. Maternal age, indication for testing, type of diagnostic procedure, gestational age, type of chromosome analysis (G-banded karyotyping or chromosomal microarray (CMA)) and test results were obtained. Diagnostic yield (i.e. percentage of tests yielding a major abnormality) was analyzed by year, maternal age and gestational age. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2 tests for trend or difference in proportions, as appropriate. RESULTS During the 23-year study period, 1 533 317 births were recorded and 16 152 diagnostic procedures were performed for the primary indication of ultrasound abnormality. In recent years, ultrasound abnormality became the most common indication for prenatal invasive testing (29.4% of diagnostic tests between 2013 and 2016) due to a steep decline in testing for other indications such as positive result on combined first-trimester screening or advanced maternal age alone. In 2016, over 95% of ultrasound-indicated procedures were performed with CMA; among these, pathogenic copy number variant (CNV) was the most common (3.5%) abnormality detected, followed by trisomy 21 (2.8%). The diagnostic yield of ultrasound-indicated tests performed < 16 weeks was significantly higher than that of tests performed after 20 weeks (31.5% vs 9.0%). CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound-indicated invasive testing is contributing to prenatal diagnosis in new ways in the genomic era. A pathogenic CNV is now the most likely diagnosis after ultrasound-indicated testing, rather than trisomy 21 or other whole-chromosome aneuploidy. Despite steady improvements in first-trimester screening for aneuploidy, the diagnostic yield of ultrasound-indicated tests > 20 weeks has remained stable due to increased utilization of CMA. Procedures performed for structural abnormalities < 16 weeks continue to have the highest diagnostic yield, supporting the benefits of early fetal structural assessment at 11-13 weeks. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Lostchuck
- MD Undergraduate Program, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada
| | - A Poulton
- Reproductive Epidemiology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - J Halliday
- Reproductive Epidemiology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - L Hui
- Reproductive Epidemiology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Perinatal Medicine, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Northern Hospital, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bowman-Smart H, Savulescu J, Mand C, Gyngell C, Pertile MD, Lewis S, Delatycki MB. 'Is it better not to know certain things?': views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2019; 45:231-238. [PMID: 30679192 PMCID: PMC6582742 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Revised: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is at the forefront of prenatal screening. Current uses for NIPT include fetal sex determination and screening for chromosomal disorders such as trisomy 21 (Down syndrome). However, NIPT may be expanded to many different future applications. There are a potential host of ethical concerns around the expanding use of NIPT, as examined by the recent Nuffield Council report on the topic. It is important to examine what NIPT might be used for before these possibilities become consumer reality. There is limited research exploring views of women on possible future uses of NIPT, particularly those of women who have undergone NIPT. In this study, we examined the views of women who undertook NIPT previously on the acceptability of and interest levels in using NIPT for a number of current and possible future applications. These included several medical conditions encompassing psychiatric, neurodevelopmental and adult-onset conditions as well as non-medical traits such as intelligence. One thousand women were invited to participate and 235 eligible surveys were received. Women generally reported an interest in using NIPT for medical conditions that severely impacted quality of life and with an onset earlier in life and stressed the importance of the accuracy of the test. Concerns were raised about the use of NIPT for non-medical traits. Respondents indicated that termination of pregnancy was not their only reason for testing, particularly in the case of sex. These results can further inform the ethical debate around the increasing integration of NIPT into healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Bowman-Smart
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Cara Mand
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark D Pertile
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharon Lewis
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sileo FG, Curado J, Bhide A. A survey of current clinical practice of chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn 2019; 39:299-302. [PMID: 30682214 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The number of invasive procedures (chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis) for fetal testing is decreasing because of the availability of non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) leading to a centralisation of prenatal diagnostic services to accredited fetal medicine centres. A new survey was conducted 10 years after the previous one to update the current clinical practice among clinicians who regularly perform CVS. METHOD Consultants from 32 centres in the United Kingdom were invited to take part in an online survey evaluating: The total number of CVS procedures carried out in the unit in a typical week, the preferred route (transabdominal [TA] vs transcervical [TC]), technique (use of local anaesthetic [LA] and needle technique). RESULTS Response rate was 96.9%; TA was the preferred route (96.8%) in all centres except one. Single-needle technique is used exclusively in half the centres (51.6%). LA is used by most operators (90.3%) before the procedure. Three centres did not routinely use LA for CVS. CONCLUSIONS Operators across the United Kingdom almost exclusively use the TA route for CVS with single-needle technique in 51.6% of cases. The use of LA prior to CVS is a very common practice in the United Kingdom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filomena Giulia Sileo
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Prenatal Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child, and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Joana Curado
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Garcia de Orta Hospital, Almada, Portugal
| | - Amarnath Bhide
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mak A, Lee H, Poon CF, Kwok SL, Ma T, Chan KYK, Kan A, Tang M, Leung KY. Factors associated with common and atypical chromosome abnormalities after positive combined first-trimester screening in Chinese women: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:55. [PMID: 30717698 PMCID: PMC6360741 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2205-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing is used as a secondary screening tool following combined first-trimester screening (cFTS), cFTS is used to estimate the prior risk for chromosome abnormalities. This study aimed to assess the factors that are associated with common and atypical abnormalities following cFTS, including cFTS risk, advanced maternal age, increased nuchal translucency (NT) ≥3.5 mm, and abnormal levels of serum markers. METHODS We reviewed a historical cohort of 1855 Chinese women carrying singleton pregnancies with a positive cFTS [at a threshold of 1:250 for trisomy (T) 21 or 1:180 for T18] in one public hospital over a five-year period. All chromosome abnormalities were confirmed by invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD) with karyotyping, with or without array comparative genomic hybridization. Using multivariable binary logistic regression analysis, we determined the parameters that were associated with common and atypical abnormalities. RESULTS Overall, the prevalence of common and atypical abnormalities was 6.2 and 1.2%, respectively, and the prevalence increased with the risk of T21 by cFTS. In pregnancies with a risk of T21 > 1 in 100, a high risk of both T21 and T18, an increased NT, or a pregnancy-associated plasma A (PAPP-A) level < 0.2 multiple of medians (MoM), the prevalence of common abnormalities was 12.2, 64.7, 25.5 and 33.8%, respectively, while that of atypical abnormalities was 1.6, 3.9, 4.2, and 7.4%, respectively. In the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis, out of these four factors, only two (increased NT and PAPP_A < 0.2 MoM) were significant predictors of common and atypical abnormalities, respectively. Of all positive cFTS pregnancies, 50.4% did not have any of these four factors, and the prevalence of common and atypical abnormalities was 1.1 and 0.6%, respectively. There were three atypical abnormalities, all of which were mosaicism, and they were detected among women with IPD alone. The ages of these women were ≥ 35 years. All three pregnancies were continued after proper counseling. After giving birth, only one child had mild abnormalities, while the other two were phenotypically normal. CONCLUSIONS Our study identified factors associated with common and atypical abnormalities after cFTS. These factors can be used to estimate the prior risk for these abnormalities to help with post-cFTS counseling in terms of choosing between cfDNA testing and IPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annisa Mak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Helena Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - C F Poon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - S L Kwok
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Teresa Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - K Y K Chan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Anita Kan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Mary Tang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - K Y Leung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Howard-Bath A, Poulton A, Halliday J, Hui L. Population-based trends in the prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy before and after non-invasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn 2018; 38:1062-1068. [PMID: 30255507 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2018] [Revised: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 09/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) on trends in the prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) in a population with >73,000 annual births. METHOD Retrospective population-based cohort study from 1986-2016 of all women undergoing prenatal diagnosis before 25 weeks gestation in the Australian state of Victoria. Statistical significance was tested using the chi-square test for trend or proportions. RESULTS There were 2,043,345 births and 842 SCA diagnoses from 1986-2016. The percentage of prenatal diagnostic tests leading to a SCA diagnosis increased significantly from 0.95% in 2010 to 2.93% in 2016 (p < 0.001) but due to a concurrent decline in testing, the annual prenatal diagnosis rate of SCA remained stable at 4.4/10,000 births. Among confirmed fetal SCAs the most common indication for testing in 1986 was advanced maternal age (63%); in 2016 it was high risk NIPT (49%). CONCLUSION SCAs now make up an increasing proportion of prenatal diagnostic results but due to the overall decline in diagnostic testing, the prenatal prevalence as a percentage of births remained steady. The ascertainment of fetal SCA has evolved from an incidental finding after testing for increased risk of trisomy 21, to a diagnosis obtained after suspected SCA on NIPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allanah Howard-Bath
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Public Health Genetics Group, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alice Poulton
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Public Health Genetics Group, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane Halliday
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Public Health Genetics Group, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Hui
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Public Health Genetics Group, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Mercy Hospital for Women, Department of Perinatal Medicine, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,The Northern Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
D'ambrosio V, Squarcella A, Vena F, Di Mascio D, Corno S, Pajno C, Piccioni MG, Brunelli R, Pizzuti A, Benedetti Panici P, Giancotti A. Update in non-invasive prenatal testing. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 71:44-53. [PMID: 30318870 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4784.18.04306-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has revolutionized the approach to prenatal diagnosis and, to date, it is the most superior screening method for the common autosomal aneuploidies, mostly trisomy 21. This screening is having a significant population-wide impact on the uptake of conventional screening and diagnostic testing. In recent years, emerging genomic technologies, largely based around next generation sequencing, have expanded the analyses to the sub-chromosomal aneuploidies. However, further clinical validation studies are needed to better characterize this technology. These tests bring advantage through providing a higher diagnostic yield, without risks of miscarriage than previously available diagnostic test, but also raise the question of harms related to an increase in uncertain and unknown results. In view of the revolution brought about by the NIPT, numerous scientific societies have published recommendations regarding the appropriate application of cell-free DNA screening in pregnancy. In this review, we discuss the progress that has been made to date in NIPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina D'ambrosio
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonia Squarcella
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy - .,Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Flaminia Vena
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Di Mascio
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Corno
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Pajno
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria G Piccioni
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Brunelli
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Pizzuti
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Antonella Giancotti
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Huang T, Dougan S, Walker M, Armour CM, Okun N. Trends in the use of prenatal testing services for fetal aneuploidy in Ontario: a descriptive study. CMAJ Open 2018; 6:E436-E444. [PMID: 30291139 PMCID: PMC6182116 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2014, Ontario augmented its publicly funded multiple-marker screening program for prenatal aneuploidy by incorporating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) analysis for high-risk pregnancies. We assessed trends in the use of multiple-marker screening, cffDNA screening and prenatal diagnostic testing before and after implementation of public funding. METHODS We conducted a descriptive study based on data from the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario. The study population included all pregnant women in Ontario with a singleton pregnancy and an expected date of delivery between July 1, 2012, and Mar. 31, 2016, with pregnancy data captured in BORN. Pregnancy losses and terminations before 20 weeks' gestation not captured in BORN were excluded. We generated descriptive statistics to show trends and regional variations in use. RESULTS The study sample included 534 210 singleton pregnancies. After cffDNA screening was funded for specific indications, uptake of multiple-marker screening increased slightly, from 66.5% to 68.1% (p < 0.001). Uptake of cffDNA screening among women with a positive multiple-marker screening result increased substantially, from 3.2% to 48.8% (p < 0.001). In contrast, the rate of prenatal diagnostic testing in this group decreased from 54.8% to 30.8% (p < 0.001). Although women aged 40 years or older are eligible for primary cffDNA screening, only a small decrease in the use of multiple-marker screening was observed in this group. The greatest use of cffDNA screening and greatest decline in prenatal diagnostic testing were seen in women with a level of risk for trisomy 21 of 1:101-1:200 based on multiple-marker screening. INTERPRETATION After public funding of cffDNA screening was implemented in Ontario, there was a significant increase in cffDNA screening and a significant decrease in prenatal diagnostic testing among women with a positive multiple-marker screening result. These changing patterns show the significant impact of public policy and funding decisions on women's choices regarding prenatal testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianhua Huang
- Ontario Prenatal Screening Program, Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario (Huang, Dougan, Walker, Armour, Okun), Ottawa, Ont.; Genetic Program (Huang), North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Regional Genetics Program (Armour), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont.; Maternal Fetal Medicine Program (Okun), Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Shelley Dougan
- Ontario Prenatal Screening Program, Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario (Huang, Dougan, Walker, Armour, Okun), Ottawa, Ont.; Genetic Program (Huang), North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Regional Genetics Program (Armour), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont.; Maternal Fetal Medicine Program (Okun), Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Mark Walker
- Ontario Prenatal Screening Program, Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario (Huang, Dougan, Walker, Armour, Okun), Ottawa, Ont.; Genetic Program (Huang), North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Regional Genetics Program (Armour), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont.; Maternal Fetal Medicine Program (Okun), Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Christine M Armour
- Ontario Prenatal Screening Program, Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario (Huang, Dougan, Walker, Armour, Okun), Ottawa, Ont.; Genetic Program (Huang), North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Regional Genetics Program (Armour), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont.; Maternal Fetal Medicine Program (Okun), Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Nan Okun
- Ontario Prenatal Screening Program, Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario (Huang, Dougan, Walker, Armour, Okun), Ottawa, Ont.; Genetic Program (Huang), North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Regional Genetics Program (Armour), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont.; Maternal Fetal Medicine Program (Okun), Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- Diana W Bianchi
- From the Prenatal Genomics and Fetal Therapy Section, Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (D.W.B.); and the Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences and the Department of Chemical Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong (R.W.K.C.)
| | - Rossa W K Chiu
- From the Prenatal Genomics and Fetal Therapy Section, Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (D.W.B.); and the Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences and the Department of Chemical Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong (R.W.K.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Singletary CN, Krstic NC, Czerwinski JL, Choates MG, Wagner C. Prenatal chromosomal microarray uptake with invasive prenatal diagnosis: How many patients take the leap? Prenat Diagn 2018; 38:748-754. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.5324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Claire N. Singletary
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences; McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; Houston Texas
- Department of Pediatrics; McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; Houston Texas
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; Houston Texas
| | - Nevena Cvjetkovic Krstic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morsani College of Medicine; University of South Florida; Tampa Florida
| | - Jennifer L. Czerwinski
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences; McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; Houston Texas
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; Houston Texas
| | - Meagan Giles Choates
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences; McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; Houston Texas
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; Houston Texas
| | - Chelsea Wagner
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences; McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; Houston Texas
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; Houston Texas
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rieder W, White S, McGillivray G, Hui L. Contemporary prenatal aneuploidy screening practice in Australia: Frequently asked questions in the cell-free DNA era. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 58:397-403. [PMID: 29900540 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Cell-free DNA screening has quickly become established in Australia as an accurate - albeit costly - prenatal screening test for trisomy 21, 18 and 13. It is also commonly used for the detection of sex chromosome abnormalities. The increasing number of prenatal screening pathways available to women has increased the complexity of pretest counselling. Concurrent advances in diagnostic testing with the widespread use of chromosomal microarrays create further challenges for the continuing education of clinicians and health consumers. This article aims to answer common clinical questions in this rapidly evolving field and complements the recently updated Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Statement on Prenatal Screening for Fetal Chromosome and Genetic Conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wawrzyniec Rieder
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Scott White
- Maternal Fetal Medicine Service, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - George McGillivray
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Hui
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Northers Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Dhamankar R, Valenti E, Hedriana HL. Non-invasive Prenatal Testing: A Unique Approach with Single Nucleotide Polymorphism. JOURNAL OF FETAL MEDICINE 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40556-018-0167-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
43
|
Lindquist A, Poulton A, Halliday J, Hui L. Prenatal diagnostic testing and atypical chromosome abnormalities following combined first-trimester screening: implications for contingent models of non-invasive prenatal testing. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2018; 51:487-492. [PMID: 29226487 DOI: 10.1002/uog.18979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2017] [Revised: 11/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate by means of a population-based analysis of a cohort of women who underwent combined first-trimester screening (CFTS), changes in uptake of invasive prenatal diagnosis according to risk of trisomy 21 (T21) on CFTS, and prevalence and methods for ascertainment of atypical chromosome abnormalities. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study using state-wide prenatal datasets from Victoria, Australia. A three-step approach was taken to analyze the data: (1) linkage of records between serum screening and diagnostic results; (2) comparison of rates of diagnostic testing according to CFTS T21 risk result category in a 2014-2015 cohort with those of a historical 2002-2004 cohort; (3) detailed analysis of atypical abnormalities in the 2014-2015 group according to CFTS T21 risk result, individual serum analyte level and other indications for invasive diagnostic testing. RESULTS In 2014-2015, there were 100 418 CFTS results issued for 146 776 births (68.4%). The overall prevalence of atypical chromosome abnormalities in the entire CFTS cohort was 0.10% and was highest in those with CFTS T21 risk > 1 in 10 (4.6%), or serum analyte levels < 0.2 multiples of the median (MoM) (6.9% for pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and 5.2% for beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG)). Almost half (49.2%) of women with PAPP-A < 0.2 MoM had a risk for T21 on CFTS of less than 1 in 100. The majority (55%) of atypical abnormalities occurred in women with CFTS T21 risk below 1 in 300, and were most commonly detected on ultrasound examination (47.1%). CONCLUSION Concerns regarding missed diagnoses of atypical chromosome abnormalities when non-invasive prenatal testing is offered after a result of high risk on CFTS can be mitigated if invasive diagnostic testing is offered to those women with CFTS T21 risk of > 1 in 100, serum PAPP-A or β-hCG < 0.2 MoM, or ultrasound-detected abnormality. This has implications for contingent models of screening. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Lindquist
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Poulton
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J Halliday
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - L Hui
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Edwards L, Hui L. First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 23:102-111. [PMID: 29233624 DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Fetal structural anomalies are found in up to 3% of all pregnancies and ultrasound-based screening has been an integral part of routine prenatal care for decades. The prenatal detection of fetal anomalies allows for optimal perinatal management, providing expectant parents with opportunities for additional imaging, genetic testing, and the provision of information regarding prognosis and management options. Approximately one-half of all major structural anomalies can now be detected in the first trimester, including acrania/anencephaly, abdominal wall defects, holoprosencephaly and cystic hygromata. Due to the ongoing development of some organ systems however, some anomalies will not be evident until later in the pregnancy. To this extent, the second trimester anatomy is recommended by professional societies as the standard investigation for the detection of fetal structural anomalies. The reported detection rates of structural anomalies vary according to the organ system being examined, and are also dependent upon factors such as the equipment settings and sonographer experience. Technological advances over the past two decades continue to support the role of ultrasound as the primary imaging modality in pregnancy, and the safety of ultrasound for the developing fetus is well established. With increasing capabilities and experience, detailed examination of the central nervous system and cardiovascular system is possible, with dedicated examinations such as the fetal neurosonogram and the fetal echocardiogram now widely performed in tertiary centers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well recognized for its role in the assessment of fetal brain anomalies; other potential indications for fetal MRI include lung volume measurement (in cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia), and pre-surgical planning prior to fetal spina bifida repair. When a major structural abnormality is detected prenatally, genetic testing with chromosomal microarray is recommended over routine karyotype due to its higher genomic resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Edwards
- Feto-Maternal Unit, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Lisa Hui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Perinatal Medicine, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Public Health Genetics Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Harris S, Reed D, Vora NL. Screening for fetal chromosomal and subchromosomal disorders. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 23:85-93. [PMID: 29128491 PMCID: PMC5891357 DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Screening for fetal chromosomal disorders has evolved greatly over the last four decades. Initially, only maternal age-related risks of aneuploidy were provided to patients. This was followed by screening with maternal serum analytes and ultrasound markers, followed by the introduction and rapid uptake of maternal plasma cell-free DNA-based screening. Studies continue to demonstrate that cfDNA screening for common aneuploidies has impressive detection rates with low false-positive rates. The technology continues to push the boundaries of prenatal screening as it is now possible to screen for less common aneuploidies and subchromosomal disorders. The optimal method for incorporating cfDNA screening into existing programs continues to be debated. It is important that obstetricians understand the biological foundations and limitations of this technology and provide patients with up-to-date information regarding cfDNA screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Harris
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Dallas Reed
- Tufts Medical Center and the Floating Hospital for Children, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neeta L. Vora
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hui L, Norton M. What is the real "price" of more prenatal screening and fewer diagnostic procedures? Costs and trade-offs in the genomic era. Prenat Diagn 2018; 38:246-249. [PMID: 29441593 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2018] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Any screening approach, including with cell-free DNA, will have an inferior detection rate compared with 100% diagnostic testing with chromosomal microarrays. Cell-free DNA-based screening, however, should not be seen as a threat to informed choice or maximising the benefits of diagnostic testing. Screening methods have become so much better that more women are now comfortable relying on such screening and do not need the certainty of a diagnostic test. This has not lead to a decline in detection of fetal chromosome abnormalities-in fact, we are now seeing historically high yields from prenatal screening. There are both economic and ethical consequences of offering universal diagnostic testing and abandoning the presumption of a normal infant in otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies. However, for some women, comprehensive information and diagnostic accuracy are important. Offering these women all options, with a careful and comprehensive explanation of the risks and benefits of each, results in outcomes that are best aligned with woman's preferences while at the same time requiring fewer diagnostic tests and lowering costs. It is one of the primary challenges of the modern era of prenatal testing to ensure that women receive sufficient information on which to make informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Hui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.,Public Health Genetics Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Perinatal Medicine, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.,Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, Australia
| | - Mary Norton
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Offering pregnant women different levels of genetic information from prenatal chromosome microarray: a prospective study. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:485-494. [PMID: 29410473 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0084-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2017] [Revised: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the choice pregnant women make about the amount of fetal genetic information they want from chromosome microarray. Women having invasive prenatal testing in the absence of fetal structural abnormality were recruited in Victoria, Australia. A decision aid for women described 'targeted' analysis as reporting only copy number variants implicated in a highly penetrant and well-described phenotype and 'extended' as additionally reporting variants of uncertain or unknown significance. Participant's choice and demographics were collected by survey before chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis; psychological data were also collected then and again about 10 days after receiving results. High-resolution single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis was performed, and a clinical review committee assessed variants for reporting before returning results to participants. Sixty-six participants (59.5%) chose extended analysis and 45 (40.5%) targeted. Choosing extended information was associated with (1) indication for prenatal diagnosis: maternal age alone (adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) 9.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-66.0, p= 0.02), or 'other' indication (adjOR 7.1, 95% CI: 1.5-33.1, p= 0.01)); (2) >12 months to conceive (adjOR 4.1, 95% CI: 1.0-17.7, p= 0.05); and (3) Asian background (adjOR 4.67, 95% CI: 1.0-21.0, p= 0.04). No adverse psychological impact occurred in either group. We conclude that offering pregnant women different levels of fetal genetic analysis is warranted, alongside decision support.
Collapse
|
48
|
Hui L, Barclay J, Poulton A, Hutchinson B, Halliday JL. Prenatal diagnosis and socioeconomic status in the non-invasive prenatal testing era: A population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 58:404-410. [PMID: 29380343 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in technology can bring great benefits to human health, but their implementation may be influenced by socioeconomic factors, particularly in the field of prenatal screening for Down syndrome. AIM To analyse screening test indications for, and diagnostic yield of, invasive prenatal diagnostic testing (PNDx) according to socioeconomic status. METHODS Retrospective analysis of population-based data on PNDx and karyotype results for 2014-2015 in the Australian state of Victoria. Women having PNDx < 25 weeks due to combined first trimester screening (CFTS), second trimester serum screening (STSS), or noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results were included. PNDx data were analysed by indication and maternal Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD), the latter determined by postcode. RESULTS There were 145 206 births in 2014-2015; 1906 women underwent PNDx for the indication of CFTS (70.1%), NIPT (17.8%) or STSS (12.0%). Covariates positively associated with NIPT-indicated PNDx, compared with CFTS-indicated testing, were residence in a region of socioeconomic advantage, metropolitan status and maternal age. Women from the most advantaged regions had higher adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of NIPT-indicated testing compared with women from disadvantaged regions (aOR 5.72, 95% CI: 2.95-11.09). The diagnostic yield of PNDx increased with socioeconomic region, from 14% in the lowest IRSAD quintile to 31.2% in the highest (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Population-based data reveal significant disparities in screening indications for PNDx and hence, in diagnostic yield, according to socioeconomic region. This finding may have ethical and policy implications for prenatal screening in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Hui
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Mercy Perinatal, The Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jenna Barclay
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alice Poulton
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Briohny Hutchinson
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Mercy Perinatal, The Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane L Halliday
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cheng YKY, Leung WC, Leung TY, Choy KW, Chiu RWK, Lo TK, Kwok KY, Sahota DS. Women's preference for non-invasive prenatal DNA testing versus chromosomal microarray after screening for Down syndrome: a prospective study. BJOG 2018; 125:451-459. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- YKY Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Hong Kong China
| | - WC Leung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Kwong Wah Hospital; Hong Kong China
| | - TY Leung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Hong Kong China
| | - KW Choy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Hong Kong China
| | - RWK Chiu
- Department of Chemical Pathology; The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Hong Kong China
| | - T-K Lo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Princess Margaret Hospital; Hong Kong China
| | - KY Kwok
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Hong Kong China
| | - DS Sahota
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Hong Kong China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Langlois S, Johnson J, Audibert F, Gekas J, Forest JC, Caron A, Harrington K, Pastuck M, Meddour H, Tétu A, Little J, Rousseau F. Comparison of first-tier cell-free DNA screening for common aneuploidies with conventional publically funded screening. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37:1238-1244. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.5174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie Langlois
- Dept. of Medical Genetics; University of British Columbia; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - JoAnn Johnson
- Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology; University of Calgary; Calgary Alberta Canada
| | - François Audibert
- Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Université de Montréal; Montreal Quebec Canada
| | - Jean Gekas
- Dept. of Medical Genetics and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine; Laval University; Québec City Quebec Canada
| | - Jean-Claude Forest
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine; Laval University; Québec City Quebec Canada
| | - André Caron
- Human and Molecular Genetics Research Unit, Research Center; CHU de Québec; Quebec City Quebec Canada
| | - Keli Harrington
- Dept. of Medical Genetics; University of British Columbia; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Melanie Pastuck
- Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology; University of Calgary; Calgary Alberta Canada
| | - Hasna Meddour
- Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Université de Montréal; Montreal Quebec Canada
| | - Amélie Tétu
- Dept. of Medical Genetics and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine; Laval University; Québec City Quebec Canada
| | - Julian Little
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - François Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine; Laval University; Québec City Quebec Canada
| |
Collapse
|