Feasibility and safety of enoxaparin whole milligram dosing in premature and term neonates

How to use low-molecular-weight heparin to treat neonatal thrombosis in clinical practice

Among children, neonates have the highest incidence of thrombosis due to risk factors such as catheter instrumentation, an evolving coagulation system and congenital heart disease. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are the most commonly used anticoagulants in neonates. Published guidelines delineate dosing and monitoring protocols for LMWH therapy in newborns. However, challenging clinical situations frequently present that warrant healthcare providers to think critically beyond the range of guidelines, and judiciously resolve specific problems. This review describes the use of LMWH in the neonatal population, including practical aspects such as route and site of administration, preparation from concentrated formulations and methods to minimize pain of subcutaneous injection. It is followed by a discussion on dosing, monitoring and outcomes of LMWH therapy in neonates. The risk of recurrence of thrombosis in neonates after LMWH therapy is approximately 3% based on a pooled analysis of studies reporting this outcome over the last 24 years. The article concludes with an overview of the side-effects of LMWH, including the risk of bleeding which is around 4% based on pooled analyses of more than 30 studies.

The Trilogy of SARS-CoV-2 in Pediatrics (Part 3): Thrombosis, Anticoagulant, and Antiplatelet Considerations

The hypercoagulable state induced by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) affects all patients regardless of age. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2-related illnesses is not well established. Although deep vein thrombosis is rare in children in the absence of risk factors, coagulopathy and the development of thromboses have been described in pediatric patients with acute COVID-19 and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. This comprehensive review provides a detailed overview of SARS-CoV-2-associated coagulopathy as well as strategies for optimizing the evaluation, management, and prevention of thrombosis in pediatric patients.

Arterial embolism caused by a peripherally inserted central catheter in a very premature infant: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Extremely premature infants have poor vascular conditions. Operators often choose deep veins such as the femoral vein and axillary vein to peripherally insert central catheters, and these vessels are often accompanied by arteries; thus, it is easy to mistakenly enter the artery.

CASE SUMMARY

The case of an extremely premature infant (born at gestational age 28⁺³) in whom the left upper extremity artery was accidentally entered during peripheral puncture of the central venous catheter is reported. On the 19^th day of hospitalization, the index finger, middle finger and ring finger of the left hand were rosy, the left radial artery and brachial artery pulse were palpable, the recovery was 95%, and the improvement was obvious. At discharge 42 d after admission, there was no abnormality in fingertip activity during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Arterial embolization in preterm infants requires an individualized treatment strategy combined with local anticoagulation and 2% nitroglycerin ointment for local tissue damage caused by arterial embolism in the upper limb. Continuous visualization of disease changes using image visualization increases the likelihood of a good outcome.

Challenges and Opportunities in the Pharmacological Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Children

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important but historically under-recognized problem in pediatrics, with an incidence concentrated in hospitalized children. A number of specific VTE diseases with discrete triggers have been described, but the most common pediatric trigger is the presence of central venous access devices. VTE diseases, though heterogenous in etiology, are linked by the common therapeutic strategies shared by their management. Historically, the most commonly used drug therapies have been unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, and vitamin K antagonists, based on extrapolation from adult data rather than any specific pediatric trials. Although these widely used drugs appear safe and effective in expert hands, the historical lack of pediatric data is problematic in view of the recognized significant differences between children and adults with regards to hemostatic physiology, VTE etiology, and drug pharmacokinetics. The increasing adult usage of novel VTE pharmacotherapies such as direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has led to considerable interest in exploring the pediatric applications of these newer drugs. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of existing VTE pharmacotherapies and outlines emerging novel pediatric VTE therapies, particularly DOACs, within the context of the current pediatric trial landscape.

Outcomes following neonatal portal vein thrombosis: A descriptive, single-center study and review of anticoagulant therapy

BACKGROUND

Neonatal portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is uncommon with potentially serious complications that may manifest in infancy and childhood.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of our study was to describe the short-term and long-term outcomes of neonatal PVT.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted from 2008 to 2016 of neonates diagnosed with PVT. A systematic review was also performed from 2000 to 2018 to evaluate anticoagulant therapy (ACT) in neonatal PVT.

RESULTS

Forty-four premature and 30 term infants (mean gestational age 30.7 vs 39.1 weeks, respectively) had PVT. Sixty-eight involved the left portal vein, one involved only the main portal vein, and 5 involved ≥1 vein. PVT was catheter associated in 46 (62%); none of the 7 neonates tested had thrombophilia. Of 74 neonates, 19 (26%) received ACT and 55 (74%) were untreated. The mean follow-up duration was 16.6 months (SD = 17.62; range, 0-89.6); 59.5% were followed for ≥6 months. On last ultrasound examination, thrombus resolution was documented in treated (ACT; n = 19) and nontreated (n = 55) neonates: 12 (63%) versus 32 (58%) with complete resolution, 1 (5%) versus 6 (11%) partial, 0 versus 1 (2%) extension, and 6 (32%) versus 16 (29%) had nonprogressive lesions, respectively. Seventy-one (96%) had no complications. Seventy-one articles met inclusion criteria for the systematic review and 19 were retained for analysis after assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

PVT resolution rate was similar to previous reports. Although a low complication rate was detected, longer follow-up is necessary to determine the need for early treatment and the precise incidence of outcomes such as portal hypertension.

Management of thrombosis in children and neonates: practical use of anticoagulants in children

Venous thrombosis (VTE) in children and neonates presents numerous management challenges. Although increasing in frequency, VTE in children and neonates is still uncommon compared with adults. The epidemiology of VTE is vastly different in neonates vs children vs adolescents vs adults. In reality, pediatric thrombosis should be viewed as a multitude of rare diseases (eg, renal vein thrombosis, spontaneous thrombosis, catheter-related thrombosis, cerebral sinovenous thrombosis), all requiring different approaches to diagnosis and with different short- and long-term consequences, but linked by the use of common therapeutic agents. Further, children have fundamentally different physiology in terms of blood flow, developmental hemostasis, and, likely, endothelial function. The American Society of Hematology 2017 Guidelines for Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Treatment of Pediatric VTE provides up-to-date evidence-based guidelines related to treatment. Therefore, this article will focus on the practical use of therapeutic agents in the management of pediatric VTE, especially unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and oral vitamin K antagonists, as the most common anticoagulants used in children. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remain in clinical trials in children and should not be used outside of formal trials for the foreseeable future.

Anticoagulant prophylaxis and therapy in children: current challenges and emerging issues

This review is aimed at describing the unique challenges of anticoagulant prophylaxis and treatment in children, and highlighting areas for research for improving clinical outcomes of children with thromboembolic disease. The evidence presented demonstrates the challenges of advancing the evidence base informing optimal management of thromboembolic disease in children. Recent observational studies have identified risk factors for venous thromboembolism in children, but there are few interventional studies assessing the benefit-risk balance of using thromboprophylaxis in risk-stratified clinical subgroups. A risk level-based framework is proposed for administering mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. More research is required to refine the assignment of risk levels. The anticoagulants currently used predominantly in children are unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists. There is a paucity of robust evidence on the age-specific pharmacology of these agents, and their efficacy and safety for prevention and treatment of thrombosis in children. The available literature is heterogeneous, reflecting age-specific differences, and the various clinical settings for anticoagulation in children. Monitoring assays and target ranges are not well established. Nevertheless, weight-based dosing appears to achieve acceptable outcomes in most indications. Given the limitations of the classical anticoagulants for children, there is great interest in the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), whose properties appear to be particularly suitable for children. All DOACs currently approved for adults have Pediatric Investigation Plans ongoing or planned. These are generating age-specific formulations and systematic dosing information. The ongoing pediatric studies still have to establish whether DOACs have a positive benefit-risk balance in the various pediatric indications and age groups.