Apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes and serum lipoprotein(a) levels in maintenance hemodialysis patients with/without diabetes mellitus

Reviews and Original Articles Lipoprotein(A) and Apolipoprotein(A) Phenotypes in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

Objective

To evaluate the distribution pattern of apolipoprotein(a) [Apo(a)] phenotypes in Koreans and the effect of dialysis modality on serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration according to apo(a) phenotype in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRO).

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

A university hospital. Participants: 153 normal controls, 99 hemodialysis (HO) patients and 82 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPO) patients.

Main Outcome Measures

Fasting serum Lp(a), lipids, and apo(a) phenotypes were measured.

Results

The frequencies of the subjects with apo(a) phenotypes of high-molecular weight only, including S3, S4, or S5 or null type were 95.4% of control, 100% of HO patients, and 95.1% of CAPO patients. The frequent apo(a) phenotypes in Koreans consisted of S4, S4S5, S5, and S5S5 isoforms. Significant difference was found in serum Lp(a) concentration among controls and HO and CAPO patients [median (interquartile range): 0.05 g/L, (0.01 0.19); 0.19g/L, (0.10 0.35); 0.63g/L, (0.28 0.90), p< 0.001]. Lp(a) levels in CAPO patients were significantly higher than in HO patients for all four common apo(a) isoforms found in Korean subjects. CAPO patients had higher total and LOL cholesterol levels, and higher ApoB levels than H O patients. Significant differences were found in serum albumin levels between controls and HO and CAPO patients (44 ± 3 g/L, 40 ± 4 g/L, 32 ± 7 g/L, respectively, p < 0.05). There were significant inverse correlations between serum albumin and Lp(a) (r = -0.33, p < 0.01), total cholesterol (r = -0.31, p < 0.01), LOL (r = -0.39, p < 0.01) or ApoB (r = -0.35, p < 0.01) in ESRO patients. A significant positive correlation was found between serum albumin and ApoA1 (r = 0.24, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

These findings indicate that Koreans have mainly high -molecular weight apo(a) phenotypes and serum Lp(a) is elevated in CAPO patients compared to HO patients for common apo(a) phenotypes, which may contribute to the frequent cardiovascular mortality in CAPO patients.

Major and Minor Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Uremia in general and peritoneal dialysis in particular bring with them risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease. These factors include multiple lipid abnormalities, hyperhomocysteinemia, abdominal obesity, chronic inflammation, hypoalbuminemia, oxidative stress, and AGE formation. When these are combined with conventional risk factors, one can appreciate why the incidence of cardiovascular disease is so high in peritoneal dialysis patients. Treatment strategies should address each of these risks appropriately.

The role of lipoprotein (a) in chronic kidney disease

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and its measurement, structure and function, the impact of ethnicity and environmental factors, epidemiological and genetic associations with vascular disease, and new prospects in drug development have been extensively examined throughout this Thematic Review Series on Lp(a). Studies suggest that the kidney has a role in Lp(a) catabolism, and that Lp(a) levels are increased in association with kidney disease only for people with large apo(a) isoforms. By contrast, in those patients with large protein losses, as in the nephrotic syndrome and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, Lp(a) is increased irrespective of apo(a) isoform size. Such acquired abnormalities can be reversed by kidney transplantation or remission of nephrosis. In this Thematic Review, we focus on the relationship between Lp(a), chronic kidney disease, and risk of cardiovascular events.

Hemodialysis Vascular Access Thrombosis and Lipoprotein(A)

Background

Vascular access remains the Achilles's heel of successful hemodialysis and thrombosis is the leading cause of vascular access failure. Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels in hemodialysis patients were reported, and in some studies were also associated with hemodialysis vascular access thrombosis.

Patients and Methods

In our study 84 hemodialysis patients with native arteriovenous fistula were included. Two groups of patients were defined: group A including 61 patients with their vascular access either never or only once thrombosed, and group B including 23 patients with two or more thromboses of their vascular access. We determined serum concentrations of Lp(a) in all our patients.

Results

Average serum Lp(a) concentration for all the patients included in the study was 0.273 ± 0.31 g/l. No relationship was found between serum Lp(a) concentrations and age, gender and duration of dialysis treatment. Serum Lp(a) concentrations were higher in group A than in group B patients (0.301 g/l versus 0.198 g/l), but the difference was not statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference between group A and group B regarding age, gender and duration of hemodialysis treatment. The use of a cut-off value for Lp(a) of 0.3 g/l and 0.57 g/l also failed to provide a significant difference between group A and B patients.

Conclusion

We found no significant differences in Lp(a) concentrations between group A (thrombosis-non-prone) and group B (thrombosis-prone) patients. Our results suggest that Lp(a) is not an independent risk factor for vascular access occlusion in hemodialysis patients.

Lipoprotein (a): impact by ethnicity and environmental and medical conditions

Levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], a complex between an LDL-like lipid moiety containing one copy of apoB, and apo(a), a plasminogen-derived carbohydrate-rich hydrophilic protein, are primarily genetically regulated. Although stable intra-individually, Lp(a) levels have a skewed distribution inter-individually and are strongly impacted by a size polymorphism of the LPA gene, resulting in a variable number of kringle IV (KIV) units, a key motif of apo(a). The variation in KIV units is a strong predictor of plasma Lp(a) levels resulting in stable plasma levels across the lifespan. Studies have demonstrated pronounced differences across ethnicities with regard to Lp(a) levels and some of this difference, but not all of it, can be explained by genetic variations across ethnic groups. Increasing evidence suggests that age, sex, and hormonal impact may have a modest modulatory influence on Lp(a) levels. Among clinical conditions, Lp(a) levels are reported to be affected by kidney and liver diseases.

Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a LDL-like particle consisting of an ApoA moiety linked to one molecule of ApoB(100). Recent data from large-scale prospective studies and genetic association studies provide highly suggestive evidence for a potentially causal role of Lp(a) in affecting risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in general populations. Patients with Type 2 diabetes display clustered metabolic abnormalities and elevated risk of CVD. Lower plasma Lp(a) levels were observed in diabetic patients in several recent studies. Epidemiology studies of Lp(a) and CVD risk in diabetic patients generated inconsistent results. We recently found that Lp(a)-related genetic markers did not predict CVD in two diabetic cohorts. The current data suggest that Lp(a) may differentially affect cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients and in the general population. More prospective studies, Mendelian randomization analysis and functional studies are needed to clarify the causal relationship of Lp(a) and CVD in diabetic patients.

Lipoprotein (a) in chronic renal failure: effect of maintenance hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease accounts for significant morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Besides the higher prevalence of traditional risk factors, several uremia-related factors may play a role in accelerated atherosclerosis, such as elevated levels of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)). The effect of maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) on Lp(a) levels is not well understood. The present work was carried out to study the Lp(a) levels in Stage 4 and Stage 5 CKD patients as well as the effect of MHD on Lp(a) levels in patients with Stage 5 CKD.

METHODS

The study subjects included 15 patients with Stage 4 CKD, 15 patients with Stage 5 CKD, and 15 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Plasma Lp(a) was measured by ELISA in all the subjects at the time of entry into the study and after 4 weeks of MHD in patients with Stage 5 CKD. Patients on MHD were dialyzed two to three times weekly for 4 hr during each session.

RESULTS

Mean Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in patients with CKD than in control patients. In patients with Stage 4 CKD, the Lp(a) level was 34.0 +/- 19.5 mg/dL, whereas in Stage 5 CKD the level was 49.0 +/- 30.9 and in healthy controls it was 22.2 +/- 16.4. In patients with Stage 5 CKD, 4 weeks of MHD led to a significant fall in Lp(a) levels by 23.6% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that increases in Lp(a) levels start early during the course of CKD and become more pronounced with increased severity of disease. Initiation of MHD lowers Lp(a) levels and may have a long-term beneficial effect on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Cardiovascular risk factor profiles and endothelial function in coronary artery disease patients treated with statins

Although endothelial dysfunction is associated with cardiovascular risk factors and is improved by cholesterol-lowering therapy, the relationship between endothelial function and cardiovascular risk factor profiles has not been fully investigated in coronary artery disease patients who have been treated with statins. We investigated endothelial function in male hypercholesterolemic patients (n=53) who underwent statin therapy over 6 months in a cross-sectional study. Patients were classified into three groups based on the results of coronary angiography: a normal coronary artery group (n=15), an angina pectoris group (n=20) and a myocardial infarction group (n=18). Endothelial function was assessed by measuring flow-mediated dilatation after reactive hyperemia in the brachial artery, and serum lipid, lipoprotein (a), glucose and insulin levels were measured. Significant associations were observed between the status of coronary disease and systolic blood pressure, lipoprotein (a), glucose and insulin levels (p <0.05, respectively), and the levels of these risk factors in the myocardial infarction group were higher than those in the other groups. Flow-mediated dilatation was also associated with the status of coronary disease (p <0.05), and the myocardial infarction group showed the lowest levels of flow-mediated dilatation (p <0.05). Flow-mediated dilatation was negatively correlated with systolic and diastolic blood pressures, serum levels of lipoprotein (a), glucose and insulin, and the status of coronary disease. Stepwise multiple regression analysis also revealed that lipoprotein (a), diastolic blood pressure and the status of myocardial infarction were significantly correlated with impaired vasodilatation. Serum lipids, age and smoking habit were independent of flow-mediated dilatation. In conclusion, even after cholesterol-lowering treatment, male patients with myocardial infarction still had endothelial dysfunction, and higher levels of lipoprotein (a) may be associated with endothelial dysfunction in such patients.

Apolipoprotein(a) isoform-specific changes of lipoprotein(a) after kidney transplantation

The atherogenic lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is significantly increased in patients with kidney disease. Some studies in hemodialysis patients described this increase to be dependent on the genetic apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) isoforms. Only patients who express high molecular weight (HMW) apo(a) isoforms but not those with low molecular weight (LMW) isoforms show a relative increase of Lp(a) when compared to healthy controls matched for apo(a) isoforms. However, this was not confirmed by all studies. We therefore prospectively investigated the changes of Lp(a) deriving from each apo(a) isoform in heterozygotes following kidney transplantation. Lp(a) concentrations were measured by ELISA. To calculate the isoform-specific concentrations and the changes of Lp(a) deriving from each isoform, we densitometrically scanned the apo(a) bands from immunoblots before and after transplantation in 20 patients expressing two apo(a) isoforms. Of these, 10 patients expressed both an LMW and an HMW apo(a) isoform. The other 10 patients expressed only HMW isoforms. Densitometric scanning of apo(a) bands and calculation of isoform-derived Lp(a) concentrations clearly demonstrated that the decrease of Lp(a) following kidney transplantation is caused by changes in the expression of HMW apo(a) isoforms. In some patients, we observed an almost complete disappearance of the HMW apo(a) isoform after transplantation. This study clearly demonstrates that the changes of Lp(a) plasma concentrations in kidney disease depend on the genetically determined size of apo(a). This provides evidence for an interaction of apo(a) genetic variability and kidney function on Lp(a) concentrations.

Association of kidney function with serum lipoprotein(a) level: the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1991-1994)

BACKGROUND

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels have been observed in patients on dialysis therapy. However, few studies explored the relationship between kidney function and Lp(a) levels in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

We examined the association of estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with Lp(a) level in 7,675 participants in the second phase of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

RESULTS

There was no association between Lp(a) level and estimated GFR in the overall sample (geometric mean, 10.4 mg/dL [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.2 to 11.8] in the group with a GFR of 90 to 149 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 9.3 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.9 to 11.0] in the group with a GFR of 60 to 89 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 12.1 mg/dL [95% CI, 9.0 to 15.9] in the group with a GFR of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.77 for linear trend) or non-Hispanic whites (geometric mean, 8.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.8 to 10.2] versus 8.5 mg/dL [95% CI, 7.1 to 10.2] versus 10.9 mg/dL [95% CI, 8.1 to 14.7]; P = 0.54 for linear trend). However, non-Hispanic blacks (geometric mean, 30.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 28.0 to 33.0] versus 35.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 31.4 to 39.4] versus 40.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 27.7 to 58.2]; P = 0.01 for linear trend) and Mexican Americans (geometric mean, 6.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 5.3 to 7.2] versus 7.4 mg/dL [95% CI, 6.4 to 8.5] versus 11.0 mg/dL [95% CI, 5.7 to 20.3]; P = 0.04 for linear trend) showed modestly, but significantly, greater Lp(a) levels with lower GFRs. In a weighed quantile regression model adjusted for age, sex, and race, a lower GFR was associated with greater 95th percentile serum Lp(a) values in the overall sample and non-Hispanic whites and with greater median Lp(a) levels in Mexican Americans.

CONCLUSION

In a cross-section of the US population, a low GFR is associated with only moderately greater Lp(a) levels, and this association may differ by race-ethnicity.

A giant left ventricular thrombus in a patient with acute myocardial infarction--a case report

The authors report a patient with acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction with a giant left ventricular thrombus at the apex. The patient also had nephrotic syndrome due to diabetic nephropathy. Coronary angiography showed 90% stenosis at segment 6 of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and intracoronary stenting were performed on the 30th day, and effective coronary blood flow was obtained. Heparin was injected intravenously for the first 7 days, and warfarin was administered thereafter. The left ventricular thrombus disappeared after 46 days. No evidence of arterial thromboembolism was found during the disappearance of the left ventricular thrombus as determined by echocardiography.

Effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on serum lipid, lipoproteins, and atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients

Atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease are the main causes of death in hemodialysis patients. Possession of the apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) allele has been associated with increased levels of serum lipids and with coronary and carotid artery atherosclerosis. We investigated the possible relationship between ApoE polymorphism and atherosclerosis risk factors in hemodialysis patients. Two hundred sixty-nine hemodialysis patients (115 women, 154 men) were included in our study. The mean patient age and mean hemodialysis duration were 45.8 +/- 15.3 years and 52.6 +/- 40.6 months, respectively. Testing was done on all patients to determine ApoE genotype and serum levels of total cholesterol (T-Cho), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), high-density cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]), intact parathormone (iPTH), and fibrinogen. ApoE genotype was identified with the polymerase chain reaction. Ultrasonographic measurement of carotid artery intima media thickness (IMT) was used to diagnose atherosclerosis. We also analyzed ApoE polymorphism and risk factors such as age, gender, duration of hemodialysis, smoking, and hypertension in relation to the presence of atherosclerosis. Serum T-Cho and LDL-C levels were higher in patients with the ApoE4/3 phenotype than in those with ApoE3/3 and ApoE3/2 phenotypes (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant link between ApoE polymorphism and serum levels of TG, HDL-C, or Lp(a) (P > 0.05). Apart from a relationship with age and duration of hemodialysis (P < 0.05), we found no significant association between atherosclerosis and ApoE polymorphism or the other risk factors analyzed (P > 0.05). In conclusion, although ApoE polymorphism significantly affects serum levels of T-Cho and LDL-C in hemodialysis patients, this study indicates that ApoE polymorphism is not associated with the presence of atherosclerosis in these individuals. The high incidence of atherosclerosis in these patients underlines the need for further research on other possible causative factors.

Lipoprotein(a) serum concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in mild and moderate renal failure

High lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) serum concentrations and the underlying apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) phenotypes are risk factors for cardiovascular disease in the general population as well as in patients with renal disease. Lp(a) concentrations are markedly elevated in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, nothing is known about the changes of Lp(a) depending on apo(a) size polymorphism in the earliest stages of renal impairment. In this study, GFR was measured by iohexol technique in 227 non-nephrotic patients with different degrees of renal impairment and was then correlated with Lp(a) serum concentrations stratified according to low (LMW) and high (HMW) molecular weight apo(a) phenotypes. Lp(a) increased significantly with decreasing GFR. Such an increase was dependent on apo(a) phenotype. Only renal patients with HMW apo(a) phenotypes expressed higher median Lp(a) concentrations, i.e., 6.2 mg/dl at GFR >90 ml/min per 1.73 m2, 14.2 at GFR 45 to 90 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and 18.0 mg/dl at GFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2. These values were markedly different when compared with apo(a) phenotype-matched control subjects who had a median level of 4.4 mg/dl (ANOVA, linear relationship, P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant differences were observed at different stages of renal function in patients with LMW apo(a) phenotypes when compared with phenotype-matched control subjects. The elevation of Lp(a) was independent of the type of primary renal disease and was not related to the concentration of C-reactive protein. Multiple linear regression analysis found that the apo(a) phenotype and GFR were significantly associated with Lp(a) levels. Non-nephrotic-range proteinuria modified the association between GFR and Lp(a) levels. In summary, an increase of Lp(a) concentrations, compared with apo(a) phenotype-matched control subjects, is seen in non-nephrotic patients with primary renal disease even in the earliest stage when GFR is not yet subnormal. This change is found only in subjects with HMW apo(a) phenotypes, however.

Associations among serum lipoprotein(a) levels, apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes, and myocardial infarction in patients with extremely low and high levels of serum lipoprotein(a)

A high serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level, which is genetically determined by apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] size polymorphism, is an independent risk factor for coronary atherosclerosis. However, the associations among Lp(a) levels, apo(a) phenotypes, and myocardial infarction (MI) have not been studied. Patients with MI (cases, n = 101, M/F: 86/15, age: 62+/-10y) and control subjects (n = 92, M/F: 53/39, age: 58+/-14y) were classified into quintile groups (Groups I to V) according to Lp(a) levels. Apo(a) isoform phenotyping was performed by a sensitive, high-resolution technique using sodium dodecyl sulfate-agarose/gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (3-6%), which identified 26 different apo(a) phenotypes, including a null type. Groups with higher Lp(a) levels (Groups II, III, and V) had higher percentages of MI patients than that with the lowest Lp(a) levels (Group I) (54%, 56%, or 75% vs. 32%, p<0.05). Groups with different Lp(a) levels had different frequency distributions of apo(a) isoprotein phenotypes: Groups II, III, IV, and V, which had increasing Lp(a) levels, had increasingly higher percentages of smaller isoforms (A1-A4, A5-A9) and decreasingly lower percentages of large isoforms (A10-A20, A21-A25) compared to Group I. An apparent inverse relationship existed between Lp(a) and the apo(a) phenotype. Subjects with the highest Lp(a) levels (Group V) had significantly (p<0.05) higher serum levels of total cholesterol, apo B, and Lp(a). Patients with MI and the controls had different distributions of apo(a) phenotypes: i.e., more small isoforms and more large size isoforms, respectively (A1-A4/A5-A9/A10-A20/A21-A25: 35.7%/27.7%/20.8%/15.8% and 22.8%/23.9%/29.4%/23.9%, respectively). Lp(a) (parameter estimate +/- standard error: 0.70+/-0.20, Wald chi2 = 12.4, p = 0.0004), apo(a) phenotype (-0.43+/-0.15, Wald chi2 = 8.17, p = 0.004), High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, apo A-I, and apo B were significantly associated with MI after adjusting for age, gender, and conventional risk factors, as assessed by a univariate logistic regression analysis. The association between Lp(a) and MI was independent of the apo(a) phenotype, but the association between the apo(a) phenotype and MI was not independent of Lp(a), as assessed by a multivariate logistic regression analysis. This association was not influenced by other MI- or Lp(a)-related lipid variables. These results suggest that apo(a) phenotype contributes to, but does not completely explain, the increased Lp(a) levels in MI. A stepwise logistic regression analysis with and without Lp(a) in the model identified Lp(a) and the apo(a) phenotype as significant predictors for MI, respectively.

Apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes and lipoprotein(a) concentrations in patients with renal failure

Patients with renal failure have an increased incidence of atherosclerotic disease. Numerous studies have shown that these patients show increased serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations compared with the control population. However, variable alleles at the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus determine to a large extent the Lp(a) concentration in the general population. We therefore undertook the present study to evaluate apo(a) phenotypes and Lp(a) serum concentrations in a large number of patients with renal disease. Seventy-nine patients treated by hemodialysis (HD), 47 patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), 68 patients with mild/moderate chronic renal failure (CRF) and serum creatinine levels of 1.8 to 8 mg/dL, and 73 healthy controls were studied. All patients showed significantly elevated median serum Lp(a) concentrations in comparison with controls: HD patients, 15.7 mg/dL (P < 0.01); CAPD patients, 20 mg/dL (P < 0. 005); CRF patients, 15.1 mg/dL (P < 0.01) versus controls, 7 mg/dL. The greater Lp(a) values in all groups were not explained by differences in isoform frequencies, whereas their increase was apo(a)-type specific. Thus, patients in all groups with high-molecular-weight (HMW) apo(a) isoforms showed a significant elevation of Lp(a) levels, whereas serum Lp(a) concentrations in patients with low-molecular-weight (LMW) isoforms were not significantly different from controls, except for CAPD patients, who presented increased serum Lp(a) concentrations. We conclude that in patients with renal failure, even of mild/moderate degree, as well as in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing HD or CAPD, elevated Lp(a) concentrations are mainly observed in those with HMW apo(a) phenotypes.

Influence of hematocrit on the measurement of lipoproteins demonstrated by the example of lipoprotein(a)

BACKGROUND

The measurement of many parameters of human blood is usually performed in plasma or serum. Since lipoproteins or apolipoproteins, for example, are found almost exclusively in the plasma fraction after low-speed centrifugation, these parameters can be expected to be distributed in a different plasma volume depending on the hematocrit value. Therefore, the measured plasma levels might be relatively too low or too high in comparison to the whole blood concentrations in the case of abnormal hematocrit levels. The aim of our experiments was to evaluate the extent of differences between whole blood and plasma concentrations, taking as an example lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in hemodialysis patients with documented decreased hematocrit values.

METHODS

Lp(a) was measured in plasma as well as whole blood of 15 hemodialysis patients with low hematocrit values (0.29 +/- 0.02) in comparison to 11 control subjects (0.45 +/- 0.04).

RESULTS

Plasma concentrations were 27% higher in patients than in controls (19.7 vs. 15.5 mg/dl). The relative difference was twice as high (59%) when measured in whole blood (13.5 vs. 8.5 mg/dl). Similar relative differences were observed when whole blood concentrations of 125 hemodialysis patients and 256 controls were calculated with the formula [Lp(a)plasma * (1-hematocrit)].

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings clearly demonstrate that hematocrit is a strong confounding variable of lipoprotein measurement in epidemiological studies when concentrations are measured in plasma, especially in cases of abnormal hematocrit values. Furthermore, studies investigating the longitudinal changes of lipoproteins should consider potential hematocrit changes.

Homocysteine, lipoprotein(a) and fibrinogen: metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular complications of chronic renal disease

High plasma concentrations of homocysteine, lipoprotein(a) and fibrinogen are accompanied by an increased risk for cardiovascular complications in the general population. All three parameters are markedly elevated in patients with renal disease, a group with a high prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular complications. This review discusses these parameters in such patients in relation to the occurrence of atherosclerotic complications.

LDL-unbound apolipoprotein(a) and carotid atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients

High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] plasma concentrations, which are genetically determined by apo(a) size polymorphism, are directly associated with an increased risk for atherosclerosis. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), who show an enormous prevalence of cardiovascular disease, have elevated plasma concentrations of Lp(a). In recent studies we were able to show that apo(a) size polymorphism is a better predictor for carotid atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease in hemodialysis patients than concentrations of Lp(a) and other lipoproteins. Less than 5% of apo(a) in plasma exists in a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-unbound form. This "free" apo(a) consists mainly of disintegrated apo(a) molecules of different molecular weight, ranging from about 125 to 360 kDa. LDL-unbound apo(a) molecules are elevated in patients with ESRD. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate whether the LDL-unbound form of apo(a) contributes to the prediction of carotid atherosclerosis in a group of 153 hemodialysis patients. The absolute amount of LDL-unbound apo(a) showed a trend to increasing values with the degree of carotid atherosclerosis, but the correlation of Lp(a) plasma concentrations with atherosclerosis was more pronounced. In multivariate analysis the two variables were related to neither the presence nor the degree of atherosclerosis. Instead, the apo(a) phenotype took the place of Lp(a) and LDL-unbound apo(a). After adjustment for other variables, the odds ratio for carotid atherosclerosis in patients with a low molecular weight apo(a) phenotype was about 5 (p<0.01). This indicates a strong association between the apo(a) phenotype and the prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis. Finally, multivariate regression analysis revealed age, angina pectoris and the apo(a) phenotype as the only significant predictors of the degree of atherosclerosis in these patients. In summary, it seems that LDL-unbound apo(a) levels do not contribute to the prediction of carotid atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients. However, this does not mean that "free", mainly disintegrated, apo(a) has no atherogenic potential.

Effect of increasing serum albumin on serum lipoprotein(a) concentration in patients receiving CAPD

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the general population, is known to be elevated in patients with renal disease accompanied by hypoalbuminemia such as nephrotic syndrome and end-stage renal disease. In this study, the role of hypoalbuminemia in the elevation of serum Lp(a) was investigated in 20 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients with serum albumin below 3.5 g/dL. The patients were divided into two groups. In group 1 (n = 10), fasting serum Lp(a) and albumin were measured before, after repeated infusion of 20% albumin 100 mL three times per week for 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after withdrawal of albumin infusion. In group 2 (n = 10), serum albumin and Lp(a) were measured similarly without albumin infusion. C-reactive protein was monitored in both group as an indicator of acute-phase reactant. Serum Lp(a) was also measured in 20 age- and sex-matched normal controls. Apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype was determined in all the subjects. CAPD patients as a whole (n = 20; median, 70.2 mg/dL; interquartile range, 45.0 to 86.2 mg/dL) had higher serum Lp(a) than normal controls (n = 20; median, 9.9 mg/dL; interquartile range, 2.4 to 24.3 mg/dL) (P < 0.0001), although the distribution of apo(a) phenotype was similar. Serum albumin in group 1 increased from 2.6+/-0.5 g/dL to 3.5+/-0.6 g/dL (P < 0.0005) at the end of repeated infusion of albumin, whereas serum Lp(a) decreased from 73.7 mg/dL (range, 43.2 to 89.0 mg/dL) to 25.6 mg/dL (range, 10.7 to 71.7 mg/dL) (P < 0.01). Four weeks after withdrawal of albumin infusion, serum albumin decreased again to 2.9+/-0.5 g/dL (P < 0.001), whereas serum Lp(a) increased to 65.2 mg/dL (range, 43.3 to 106.0 mg/dL) (P < 0.05). Serum albumin in group 2 was 2.8+/-0.6 g/dL, 3.0+/-0.4 g/dL, and 2.9+/-0.7 g/dL, respectively. The change of serum Lp(a) was not significant (67.0 mg/dL [range, 46.8 to 84.8 mg/dL], 62.8 mg/dL [range, 45.1 to 81.0 mg/dL], and 63.0 mg/dL [range, 44.7 to 74.0 mg/dL]). C-reactive protein was stable during the study period in both groups. These findings support the hypothesis that hypoalbuminemia is one of the important trigger factors in the elevation of serum Lp(a) in CAPD patients.

Cardiac disease in chronic uremia: pathogenesis

Cardiomyopathy in chronic uremia results from pressure and volume overload. The former causes concentric left ventricular [LV] hypertrophy, results from hypertension and aortic stenosis, and is also associated with diabetes mellitus and anemia. Volume overload causes LV dilatation, results from arteriovenous shunting, salt and water overload, and anemia, and is also associated with ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and hypoalbuminemia. Decreased major arterial compliance and an early return of arterial wave reflections are also associated with the extent of LV hypertrophy. Cardiomyopathy predisposes to diastolic and systolic dysfunction. The latter results from myocyte death, and predisposing factors include ischemic heart disease and the uremic environment. Ischemic heart disease may be atherosclerotic or nonatherosclerotic in origin. Multiple factors contribute to the vascular pathology of chronic uremia, including injury to the vessel wall, dyslipidemia, prothrombotic factors, increased oxidant stress, and hyperhomocysteinemia. Ischemic risk factors include hypertension, LV hypertrophy, hypoalbuminemia, and perhaps hyperparathyroidism. The clinical consequences of cardiomyopathy include heart failure, ischemic heart disease, dialysis hypotension, and arrhythmias. The adverse impact of ischemic heart disease is probably mediated through the development of cardiac failure.

Cardiac disease in chronic uremia: clinical outcome and risk factors

Cardiac disease is common and is the major killer in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Cardiac failure is a highly malignant condition in ESRD patients. Cardiac failure mediates most of the adverse prognostic impact of ischemic heart disease. Left ventricular (LV) abnormalities are already present at initiation of dialysis therapy in approximately 80% of patients. These abnormalities (ie, systolic dysfunction in approximately 15%, LV dilatation with preserved systolic function in 30%, concentric LV hypertrophy [LVH] in 40%) independently predict ischemic heart disease and cardiac failure, and are the largest baseline predictor of mortality after 2 years on dialysis therapy. The associations between classical risk factors (eg, hyperlipidemia, smoking, hypertension) and cardiac outcomes in ESRD are inconsistent. "Uremic" risk factors represent a nascent, but potentially important field. In our prospective 10-year study of 433 patients starting renal replacement therapy, we identified the following as major independent risk factors for cardiac disease: (1) hypertension (concentric LVH, LV dilatation, ischemic heart disease, cardiac failure, inverse relationship with mortality); (2) anemia (LV dilatation, cardiac failure, death); and (3) hypoalbuminemia (ischemic heart disease, cardiac failure, death). Transplantation dramatically improved LV abnormalities, suggesting that a uremic environment is cardiotoxic. Multiple risk factors act in concert to produce cardiac disease in ESRD; many of these are avoidable, suggesting that the enormous burden of disease can be reduced considerably.

Kringle-containing fragments of apolipoprotein(a) circulate in human plasma and are excreted into the urine

Apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] contains multiple kringle 4 repeats and circulates as part of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Apo(a) is synthesized by the liver but its clearance mechanism is unknown. Previously, we showed that kringle 4-containing fragments of apo(a) are present in human urine. To probe their origin, human plasma was examined and a series of apo(a) immunoreactive peptides larger in size than urinary fragments was identified. The concentration of apo(a) fragments in plasma was directly related to the plasma level of Lp(a) and the 24-h urinary excretion of apo(a). Individuals with low (< 2 mg/dl) plasma levels of Lp(a) had proportionally more apo(a) circulating as fragments in their plasma. Similar apo(a) fragments were identified in baboon plasma but not in conditioned media from primary cultures of baboon hepatocytes, suggesting that the apo(a) fragments are generated from circulating apo(a) or Lp(a). When apo(a) fragments purified from human plasma were injected intravenously into mice, a species that does not produce apo(a), apo(a) fragments similar to those found in human urine were readily detected in mouse urine. Thus, we propose that apo(a) fragments in human plasma are derived from circulating apo(a)/Lp(a) and are the source of urinary apo(a).

Decrease in lipoprotein(a) after renal transplantation is related to the glucocorticoid dose

Serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes were determined in 46 patients with end-stage renal disease both before as well as 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months after renal transplantation. Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of cyclosporin A, prednisone and azathioprine. Before transplantation median Lp(a) levels did not differ between the patients and a healthy control group. A highly significant decrease (P < 0.001) in Lp(a) levels was observed in both male and female patients 1 week after transplantation. This marked reduction in Lp(a) occurred at a time when patients were receiving the highest doses of corticosteroids. As steroid doses were gradually tapered, Lp(a) concentrations subsequently increased, although at 6 months levels were still significantly reduced (P < 0.01) in women. No significant correlation was observed between Lp(a) and whole-blood cyclosporin levels, nor was there any correlation with the azathioprine dose. The reduction in Lp(a) concentrations was seen for all apo(a) phenotypes observed in the study.

Outcome and risk factors of ischemic heart disease in chronic uremia

To determine the prognosis and risk factors for ischemic heart disease in chronic uremia, a cohort of 432 dialysis patients were followed prospectively from start of dialysis therapy until death or renal transplantation. Baseline demographic, clinical and echocardiographic data were obtained. After the initiation of dialysis laboratory data were collected at monthly intervals, and clinical and echocardiographic data at yearly intervals. Twenty-two percent of patients (N = 95) had either a history of angina pectoris or myocardial infarction on starting dialysis therapy. Median time to onset of heart failure was 24 months in those with ischemic heart disease on initiation of dialysis, compared to 55 months in those without (P < 0.0001). This effect was independent of age, diabetes and underlying cardiomyopathy. Median survival was 44 months in those with ischemic disease compared to 56 months in those without (P = 0.0001). This adverse impact was independent of age and diabetes mellitus but, when cardiac failure was added to the Cox's model, ischemic heart disease was no longer an independent predictor of survival. De novo ischemic heart disease, not evident on starting dialysis therapy, occurred in 41 (9%) patients. When compared to patients who never developed ischemic disease (N = 296; 69%), significant and independent predictors of de novo disease were older age (P = 0.0007), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.0001), high blood pressure during follow up on dialysis (P = 0.02) and hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.03), whereas anemia was not an independent predictor. LV mass index was 174 +/- 7 g/m2 in those who developed de novo ischemic disease compared to 155 +/- 3 g/m2 (P < 0.001) in those who did not. Concentric LV hypertrophy, LV dilation and systolic dysfunction were independent risk factors for de novo ischemic heart disease. We conclude that ischemic heart disease occurs frequently in dialysis patients, that its adverse impact is mediated through the development of heart failure, and that the most important, potentially reversible risk factors are hypertension, hypoalbuminemia, and underlying cardiomyopathy.

Lipoprotein(a) is not elevated in non-diabetic microalbuminuric subjects. A longitudinal study of lipoprotein(a) concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) size isoforms

Microalbuminuric non-diabetic subjects have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease which is not explained by standard risk factors. In diabetic patients, microalbuminuria is associated with increased lipoprotein(a) concentrations. We have determined lipoprotein(a) concentrations and duplicate measures of albumin excretion rate, on two occasions separated by around 3 years, in 125 Europid subjects aged 40-75 years without hypertension or glucose intolerance and in 49 offspring aged 15-40 years. The apolipoprotein(a) isoform size, the major genetic determinant of lipoprotein(a) concentration, was also determined. There were no differences in lipoprotein(a) concentration between the 42 subjects who were microalbuminuric on either or both samples at screening (median 9.4 mg/dl, 20th and 80th percentiles 2.6 and 46.3 mg/dl) and the 79 who had been normoalbuminuric at both collections (median 10.9 mg/dl, 20th and 80th percentiles 2.9 and 53.0 mg/dl; P = 0.58). Lipoprotein(a) concentrations were not significantly different between subjects with or without microalbuminuria at recell (P = 0.55) or between those with or without microalbuminuria classified by mean albumin excretion rate in either collection (P = 0.24 and P = 0.73, respectively). There were no significant relationships between albumin excretion rate as a continuous variable and lipoprotein(a) concentration, or between changes in the two variables over 3 years. The microalbuminuric and normoalbuminuric subjects had similar distributions of size isoforms. There were also no differences in lipoprotein(a) concentration or isoform distribution between offspring of microalbuminuric and of normoalbuminuric subjects. In conclusion, we found no evidence that microalbuminuric subjects with normal blood pressure and normal glucose tolerance have elevated concentrations of lipoprotein(a) to explain their increased cardiovascular risk.

Lipoprotein(a) in renal disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Several studies have described a correlation between high Lp(a) plasma levels and coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral atherosclerosis. In healthy individuals Lp(a) plasma concentrations are almost exclusively controlled by the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus on chromosome 6q2.6-q2.7. More than 30 alleles at this highly polymorphic gene locus determine a size polymorphism of apo(a). There exists an inverse correlation between the size (molecular weight) of apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) plasma concentrations. Average Lp(a) levels are high in individuals with low molecular weight isoforms and low in those with high molecular weight isoforms. Mean Lp(a) plasma levels are elevated over controls in patients with renal disease. Patients with nephrotic syndrome exhibit excessively high Lp(a) plasma concentrations, which can be reduced with antiproteinuric treatment. The mechanism underlying this elevation is unclear, but the general increase in protein synthesis caused by the liver due to high urinary protein loss is a likely explanation. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) also have elevated Lp(a) levels. These are even higher in patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis than in those receiving hemodialysis. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations decrease to values observed in controls matched for apo(a) type following renal transplantation. This clearly demonstrates the nongenetic origin of Lp(a) elevation in ESRD. Both the increase in ESRD and the decrease following renal transplantation are apo(a) phenotype dependent. Only patients with high molecular weight phenotypes show the described changes in Lp(a) levels. In patients with low molecular weight types the Lp(a) concentrations remain unchanged during both phases of renal disease. As in the general population, Lp(a) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events in ESRD patients. In this patient group the apo(a) phenotype seems to be equally or better predictive of the degree of atherosclerosis than is Lp(a) concentration. Further prospective studies will be necessary to confirm these observations. Whether Lp(a) also plays a key role in the pathogenesis and progression of renal diseases needs further study. Controversial data on the role of the kidney in Lp(a) metabolism result from insufficient sample sizes of several studies. Due to the broad range and skewed distribution of Lp(a) plasma concentrations, large study groups must be investigated to obtain reliable results.

Lipoprotein(a) in health and disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] represents an LDL-like particle to which the Lp(a)-specific apolipoprotein(a) is linked via a disulfide bridge. It has gained considerable interest as a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Several studies have described a correlation between elevated Lp(a) plasma levels and coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral atherosclerosis. In healthy individuals, Lp(a) plasma concentrations are almost exclusively controlled by the apo(a) gene locus on chromosome 6q2.6-q2.7. More than 30 alleles at this highly polymorphic gene locus determine a size polymorphism of apo(a). There exists an inverse correlation between the size (molecular weight) of apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) plasma concentrations. The standardization of Lp(a) quantification is still an unresolved task due to the large particle size of Lp(a), the presence of two different apoproteins [apoB and apo(a)], and the large size polymorphism of apo(a) and its homology with plasminogen. A working group sponsored by the IFCC is currently establishing a stable reference standard for Lp(a) as well as a reference method for quantitative analysis. Aside from genetic reasons, abnormal Lp(a) plasma concentrations are observed as secondary to various diseases. Lp(a) plasma levels are elevated over controls in patients with nephrotic syndrome and patients with end-stage renal disease. Following renal transplantation, Lp(a) concentrations decrease to values observed in controls matched for apo(a) type. Controversial data on Lp(a) in diabetes mellitus result mainly from insufficient sample sizes of numerous studies. Large studies and those including apo(a) phenotype analysis came to the conclusion that Lp(a) levels are not or only moderately elevated in insulin-dependent patients. In noninsulin-dependent diabetics, Lp(a) is not elevated. Conflicting data also exist from studies in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Several case-control studies reported elevated Lp(a) levels in those patients, suggesting a role of the LDL-receptor pathway for degradation of Lp(a). However, recent turnover studies rejected that concept. Moreover, family studies also revealed data arguing against an influence of the LDL receptor for Lp(a) concentrations. Several rare diseases or disorders, such as LCAT- and LPL-deficiency as well as liver diseases, are associated with low plasma levels or lack of Lp(a).

Serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in the families of NIDDM patients

We studied the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a function of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype in 87 members (42 males, 45 females) of 20 diabetic families, 26 of whom were diagnosed with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) with moderate glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.1 +/- 1.2%). Apo(a) phenotyping was performed by a sensitive, high-resolution technique using SDS-agarose/gradient PAGE (3-6%). To date, 26 different apo(a) phenotypes, including a null type, have been identified. Serum Lp(a) levels of NIDDM patients and non-diabetic members of the same family who had the same apo(a) phenotypes were compared, while case control subjects were chosen from high-Lp(a) non-diabetic and low-Lp(a) nondiabetic groups with the same apo(a) phenotypes in the same family. Serum Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in NIDDM patients than in non-diabetic subjects (39.8 +/- 33.3 vs 22.3 +/- 19.5 mg/dl, p < 0.05). The difference in the mean Lp(a) level between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups was significantly (p < 0.05) greater than that between the high-Lp(a) non-diabetic and low-Lp(a) non-diabetic groups. An analysis of covariance and a least square means comparison indicated that the regression line between serum Lp(a) levels [log Lp(a)] and apo(a) phenotypes in the diabetic patient group was significantly (p < 0.01) elevated for each apo(a) phenotype, compared to the regression line of the control group. These data together with our previous findings that serum Lp(a) levels are genetically controlled by apo(a) phenotypes, suggest that Lp(a) levels in diabetic patients are not regulated by smaller apo(a) isoforms, and that serum Lp(a) levels are greater in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic family members, even when they share the same apo(a) phenotypes.

A new case of apoA-I deficiency showing codon 8 nonsense mutation of the apoA-I gene without evidence of coronary heart disease

We report a 39-year-old Japanese man with HDL and apoA-I deficiency as well as data from members of his family. Corneal opacity and a stomatocyte were found but not tonsillar hypertrophy, xanthomas, or splenomegaly. His serum HDL cholesterol, apoA-I, apoA-II, and LDL cholesterol levels were t mg/dL, < 3 mg/dL, 6 mg/dL, and 175 mg/dL, respectively. Plasma triglyceride, phospholipid, apoB, apoC-III, and apoE levels were all within normal limits. Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase activity was half of normal, while lipoprotein lipase and hepatic triglyceride lipase activities were within normal limits. ApoA-I deficiency was confirmed by combined isoelectric focusing and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and by an immunoblotting method. We surveyed the apoA-I gene of the patient and five of his family members by direct sequencing after amplification by polymerase chain reaction and found a codon 8 nonsense mutation (TGG --> TAG, Trp --> stop) in exon 3 of the apoA-I gene. The results of a pedigree analysis by DNA sequencing and restricted fragment length polymorphism (Sty I) were consistent with an autosomal codominant trait. Coronary angiography was performed to evaluate coronary atherosclerosis, but no significant luminal narrowing was detected. An intracoronary ultrasound study showed mild intimal hyperplasia in segment 6. In summary, this is a case of apoA-I deficiency without evidence of coronary heart disease.

Lipoprotein(a) levels in patients receiving renal replacement therapy: methodologic issues and clinical implications

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for vascular disease and a potential link between coagulation, lipoproteins, and the development of atherosclerosis. Its role in the vascular complications of patients with chronic renal disease is unclear. We review methodologic issues involved in measuring Lp(a), particularly as they relate to studies of patients with chronic renal disease. The accurate measurement of Lp(a) is difficult because all the commercially available assays are sensitive to apolipoprotein(a) isoform size, Lp(a) behaves like an acute phase reactant, and levels vary markedly among ethnic groups. The results of 12 studies that included data on median Lp(a) levels in controls and patients receiving renal replacement therapy were analyzed. Although there was variation among studies, most found elevated levels of Lp(a) in patients receiving hemodialysis (range of medians, 9.0 to 38.4 mg/dL) compared with controls (range of medians, 4.7 to 19.7 mg/dL). With the exception of one study, Lp(a) levels also were elevated in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis compared with controls and patients receiving hemodialysis. In one study, an elevated Lp(a) level in patients receiving hemodialysis correlated with subsequent development of vascular events. A separate study associated the occurrence of vascular access occlusion with Lp(a) level. Following renal transplantation, Lp(a) levels decreased in all four studies, which included data before and after transplantation. Although variability in results were seen, Lp(a) levels appear to be elevated in patients receiving renal replacement therapy. Renal transplantation at least partially reverses this effect. The variability in results is probably related to methodologic difficulties in measuring Lp(a) and failure to segregate ethnic groups in study design and analysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes predict the risk for carotid atherosclerosis in patients with end-stage renal disease

Several studies have demonstrated that atherosclerotic complications are the major cause of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] plasma concentrations are an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have elevated plasma concentrations of Lp(a), which are not explained by size variation at the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus. The aim of our study was to investigate whether Lp(a) concentrations and/or apo(a) phenotypes are predictive of the degree of atherosclerosis in the extracranial carotid arteries in ESRD patients. Of 167 patients, 108 showed atherosclerotic plaques (65%). Univariate analysis showed that the plaque-affected group was significantly older and had a higher frequency of angina pectoris, previous myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident. Furthermore, this group included significantly more patients with low-molecular-weight apo(a) isoforms (26.9% versus 8.5%, P < .005) and had significantly higher mean Lp(a) plasma concentrations (29.3 +/- 31.0 versus 19.7 +/- 25.7 mg/dL, P < .05). Lp(a) plasma concentration increased significantly with the number of affected arterial sites, from 19.7 mg/dL in patients without plaques to 40.1 mg/dL in patients with seven or eight affected sites. In patients with low-molecular-weight phenotypes, significantly more arterial sites were affected (3.62 versus 2.08, P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that age, angina pectoris, and the apo(a) phenotype were the only significant predictors of the degree of atherosclerosis. We conclude that, besides age, the apo(a) phenotype is the best predictor of carotid atherosclerosis in ESRD patients and may be used for assessment of general atherosclerosis risk in this patient group.