De novo development of circulating anti-endothelial cell antibodies rather than pre-existing antibodies is associated with post-transplant allograft rejection

Anti-glutathione S-transferase theta 1 antibodies correlate with graft loss in non-sensitized pediatric kidney recipients

Introduction

Immunity to Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) cannot explain all cases of ABMR, nor the differences observed in the outcome of kidney recipients with circulating DSAs endowed with similar biologic characteristics. Thus, increasing attention has recently been focused on the role of immunity to non-HLA antigenic targets.

Methods

We analyzed humoral auto- and alloimmune responses to the non-HLA antigen glutathione S-transferase theta 1 (GSTT1), along with development of de novo (dn)HLA-DSAs, in a cohort of 146 pediatric non-sensitized recipients of first kidney allograft, to analyze its role in ABMR and graft loss. A multiplex bead assay was employed to assess GSTT1 antibodies (Abs).

Results

We observed development of GSTT1 Abs in 71 recipients after transplantation, 16 with MFI > 8031 (4th quartile: Q4 group). In univariate analyses, we found an association between Q4-GSTT1Abs and ABMR and graft loss, suggesting a potential role in inducing graft damage, as GSTT1 Abs were identified within ABMR biopsies of patients with graft function deterioration in the absence of concomitant intragraft HLA-DSAs. HLA-DSAs and GSTT1 Abs were independent predictors of graft loss in our cohort. As GSTT1 Ab development preceded or coincided with the appearance of dnHLA-DSAs, we tested and found that a model with the two combined parameters proved more fit to classify patients at risk of graft loss.

Discussion

Our observations on the harmful effects of GSTT1Abs, alone or in combination with HLA-DSAs, add to the evidence pointing to a negative role of allo- and auto-non-HLA Abs on kidney graft outcome.

Renal Endothelial Cytotoxicity Assay to Diagnose and Monitor Renal Transplant Recipients for Anti-Endothelial Antibodies

Tissue-specific nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens can play crucial roles in allograft immunity and have been shown to trigger humoral responses leading to rejection of HLA-matched kidney allografts. Interest in the role of endothelial-specific antigens has grown over the past years, and several case reports have been described in which antibodies reacting with endothelial cells (ECs) are associated with rejection. Such antibodies escape the detection in conventional crossmatch tests as they do not react with lymphocytes. However, due to the heterogeneity of endothelial cells from different vascular beds, it remains difficult to draw organ-specific conclusions from studies describing endothelial crossmatch assays. We present a case of a 69-year-old male patient whose kidney allograft was rejected as hyperacute, despite the absence of pretransplant HLA-specific antibodies. To place findings from previous studies in a kidney-related context, we performed crossmatch assays with primary renal endothelial cells. The patient's serum was reactive with primary renal ECs, demonstrated by antibody binding and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Antibodies from this patient did not react with lymphocytes nor were HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) found. Two years later, the patient successfully received a second kidney transplant after treatment with rituximab and plasmapheresis before and after transplantation. We demonstrated that the removal of antibodies against non-HLA EC-specific molecules can be monitored using a primary renal EC crossmatch test, possibly contributing to a successful transplantation outcome.

Antigen and Cell-Based Assays for the Detection of Non-HLA Antibodies

To date, human leukocyte antigens (HLA) have been the major focus in the approach to acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMBR) in solid-organ transplantation. However, evidence from the clinic and published studies has shown that non-HLA antibodies, particularly anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs), are found either in the context of AMBR or synergistically in the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). Numerous studies have explored the influence of AECAs on clinical outcomes, yet the determination of the exact clinical relevance of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation is not fully established. This is due to highly heterogeneous study designs including differences in testing methods and outcome measures. Efforts to develop reliable and sensitive diagnostic non-HLA antibody tests are continuously made. This is essential considering the technical difficulties of non-HLA antibody assays and the large variation in reported incidences of antibodies. In addition, it is important to take donor specificity into account in order to draw clinically relevant conclusions from non-HLA antibody assays. Here, we provide an overview of non-HLA solid-phase and cell-based crossmatch assays for use in solid-organ transplantation that are currently available, either in a research setting or commercially.

Antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation in children; therapy challenges and future potential treatments

Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) remains one of the most critical problems in renal transplantation, with a significant impact on patient and graft survival. In the United States, no treatment has received FDA approval jet. Studies about treatments of AMR remain controversial, limited by the absence of a gold standard and the difficulty in creating large, multi‐center studies. These limitations emerge even more in pediatric transplantation because of the limited number of pediatric studies and the occasional use of some therapies with unknown and poorly documented side effects. The lack of recommendations and the unsharp definition of different forms of AMR contribute to the challenging management of the therapy by pediatric nephrologists. In an attempt to help clinicians involved in the care of renal transplanted children affected by an AMR, we rely on the latest recommendations of the Transplantation Society (TTS) for the classification and treatment of AMR to describe treatments available today and potential new treatments with a particular focus on the pediatric population.

Increased Autoantibodies Against Ro/SS-A, CENP-B, and La/SS-B in Patients With Kidney Allograft Antibody-mediated Rejection

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) causes more than 50% of late kidney graft losses. In addition to anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies, antibodies against non-HLA antigens are also linked to AMR. Identifying key non-HLA antibodies will improve our understanding of AMR.

The emerging field of non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies in transplant medicine and beyond

The major medical advances in our knowledge of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system have allowed us to uncover several gaps in our understanding of alloimmunity. Although the non-HLA system has long sparked the interest of the transplant community, recognition of the role of immunity to non-HLA antigenic targets has only emerged recently. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive summary of the paradigm-changing concept of immunity to the non-HLA angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), discovered by Duška Dragun et al., that began from careful bedside clinical observations, to validated detection of anti-AT1R antibodies and lead to clinical intervention. This scientific approach has also allowed the recognition of broader pathogenicity of anti-AT1R antibodies across multiple organ transplants and in other human diseases, the integration of both non-HLA and HLA systems to understand their immunologic effects on organ allografts, and the identification of future directions for therapeutic intervention to modulate immunity to AT1R. Rationally designed successful interventions to target AT1R system provide an exemplar for other non-HLA antibodies to cross borders between medical specialties, will generate new avenues in translational research beyond transplantation, and will foster the development of new and reliable tools to improve our understanding of non-HLA immunity and ultimately allow us to improve patient care.

Therapies for Chronic Allograft Rejection

Remarkable advances have been made in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) over the past decades, leading to improved graft outcomes. However, long-term failure is still high and effective treatment for chronic ABMR, an important cause of graft failure, has not yet been identified. Chronic ABMR has a relatively different phenotype from active ABMR and is a slowly progressive disease in which graft injury is mainly caused by de novo donor specific antibodies (DSA). Since most trials of current immunosuppressive therapies for rejection have focused on active ABMR, treatment strategies based on those data might be less effective in chronic ABMR. A better understanding of chronic ABMR may serve as a bridge in establishing treatment strategies to improve graft outcomes. In this in-depth review, we focus on the pathophysiology and characteristics of chronic ABMR along with the newly revised Banff criteria in 2017. In addition, in terms of chronic ABMR, we identify the reasons for the resistance of current immunosuppressive therapies and look at ongoing research that could play a role in setting better treatment strategies in the future. Finally, we review non-invasive biomarkers as tools to monitor for rejection.

Profiling non-HLA antibody responses in antibody-mediated rejection following heart transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) driven by the development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) directed against mismatched donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is a major risk factor for graft loss in cardiac transplantation. Recently, the relevance of non-HLA antibodies has become more prominent as AMR can be diagnosed in the absence of circulating DSA. Here, we assessed a single-center cohort of 64 orthotopic heart transplant recipients transplanted between 1994 and 2014. Serum collected from patients with ≥ pAMR1 (n = 43) and non-AMR (n = 21) were tested for reactivity against a panel of 44 non-HLA autoantigens. The AMR group had a significantly greater percentage of patients with elevated reactivity to autoantigens compared to non-AMR (P = .002) and healthy controls (n = 94, P < .0001). DSA-positive AMR patients exhibited greater reactivity to autoantigens compared to DSA-negative (P < .0001) and AMR patients with DSA and PRA > 10% were identified as the subgroup with significantly elevated responses. Reactivity to 4 antigens, vimentin, beta-tubulin, lamin A/C, and apolipoprotein L2, was significantly different between AMR and non-AMR patients. Moreover, increased reactivity to these antigens was associated with graft failure. These results suggest that antibodies to non-HLA are associated with DSA-positive AMR although their specific role in mediating allograft injury is not yet understood.

Prevalence of AT1R antibody (AT1R-Ab) among Malaysian multi-ethnic population

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) is a non-HLA antibody that has been reported to cause antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss in kidney transplantation. The prevalence of positive AT1R-Ab varies between 8% and 18% in different regions. Thus, this study aims to determine the prevalence of AT1R-Ab among the Malaysian population.

METHODOLOGY

All sera for AT1R-Ab were collected at the University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The sera were centrifuged and kept refrigerated at -80 °C before being transported to the South Australian Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory (SATIS). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (One Lambda) was used for the detection of AT1R-Ab, and it was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The level of >17.1 U/mL was considered to be AT1R-Ab positive; 10.0-17.1 U/mL at risk, and <10.0 U/mL negative.

RESULTS

A total of 115 samples were collected from 99 patients pre and post-kidney transplant recipients. From the pre-transplant sera (n = 68) 17.7% were positive, 35.3% were at risk and 47.0% were negative. The positive AT1R-Ab cohort were relatively younger, with a mean age of 34.7 ± 8.3 years old and statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.028. Among the sera that were tested positive, 19.0% were from the Chinese ethnicity, 6.7% from Malay and 16.7% from Indian. There was no difference in the rejection episodes, persistent or de novo HLA-DSA, and graft function between the group (AT1R-Ab negative vs AT1R-Ab at risk and positive) and the results were consistent in a model adjusted for all potential confounders.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of positive (>17.1 U/mL) pre-transplant AT1R-Ab was 17.7% and 35.3% were at risk (10.0-17.1 U/mL) in our pre-transplant cohort.

Proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in the serum of patients with acute renal allograft rejection using iTRAQ labelling technology

Transplantation is currently the best treatment for patients with end‑stage renal disease. However, acute rejection (AR) is the major source of failure in renal transplantation. The current best practice for the diagnosis of AR involves renal biopsy, but it is invasive, time‑consuming, costly and inconvenient. Sensitive and less invasive detection of AR episodes in renal transplant patients is essential to preserve allograft function. The present study applied isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) mass spectrometry to analyze serum protein expression in patients with AR and healthy controls. Overall, 1,399 proteins were identified. Using a cut‑off of Q<0.05 and a fold change of >1.2 for the variation in expression, 109 proteins were identified to be differentially expressed between the AR and control groups, 72 of which were upregulated and 37 were downregulated. Several proteins, including properdin, keratin 1, lipoprotein(a) and vitamin D‑binding protein, may have roles in the pathogenesis of AR. The present study focused on iTRAQ‑based proteomic profiling of serum samples in AR. Insight from the present study may help advance the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of AR and identify potential novel biomarkers of AR for further characterization.

Non-HLA Abs in Solid Organ Transplantation

The role of anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ rejection is well established and these antibodies are routinely monitored both in patients in the waiting list and in the post-transplant setting. More recently, the presence of other antibodies directed towards non-HLA antigens, or the so-called minor histocompatibility antigens, has drawn the attention of the transplant community; however, their possible involvement in the graft outcome remains uncertain. These antibodies have been described to possibly have a role in rejection and allograft failure. This review focuses on the most studied non-HLA antibodies and their association with different clinical outcomes considered in solid organ transplantation with the aim of clarifying their clinical implication and potential relevance for routine testing.

Injury derived autoimmunity: Anti-perlecan/LG3 antibodies in transplantation

Ischemic, immunologic or pharmacological stressors can induce vascular injury and endothelial apoptosis in organ donors, in transplant candidates due to the impact of end stage organ failure on the vasculature, and in association with peri-transplantation events. Vascular injury may shape innate and adaptive immune responses, leading to dysregulation in the balance between tolerance and immunoreactivity to vascular-derived antigens. Mounting evidence shows that the early stages of apoptosis, characterized by the absence of membrane permeabilization, are prone to trigger various modes of intercellular communication allowing neoantigen production, exposure, or both. In this review, we present the evidence for the release of LG3, an immunogenic fragment of perlecan, as a consequence of caspase-3 dependent vascular apoptosis leading to the genesis of anti-LG3 autoantibodies and the consequences of these autoantibodies in native and transplanted kidneys.

Non anti-HLA antibodies and acute rejection: A critical viewpoint

In solid organ transplantation, the deleterious effect of antibodies directed against donor HLA antigens, whether preformed or de novo, is well established. Anti-HLA antibodies have been associated not only with the risk of antibody-mediated rejection but also with late graft dysfunction and are now considered to be the leading cause of allograft loss after renal transplantation. In addition to HLA antibodies, the possible involvement of non-HLA antibodies targeting donor endothelial cells has long been the subject of intense research. The purpose of this review is to discuss current knowledge and remaining issues related to the involvement of non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation. More specifically, the clinical data underlying the hypothesis of the role of non-HLA antibodies will be discussed, as well as the different techniques for antibody detection, their clinical relevance and their antigenic targets.

Early Acute Microvascular Kidney Transplant Rejection in the Absence of Anti-HLA Antibodies Is Associated with Preformed IgG Antibodies against Diverse Glomerular Endothelial Cell Antigens

BACKGROUND

Although anti-HLA antibodies (Abs) cause most antibody-mediated rejections of renal allografts, non-anti-HLA Abs have also been postulated to contribute. A better understanding of such Abs in rejection is needed.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide study to identify kidney transplant recipients without anti-HLA donor-specific Abs who experienced acute graft dysfunction within 3 months after transplantation and showed evidence of microvascular injury, called acute microvascular rejection (AMVR). We developed a crossmatch assay to assess serum reactivity to human microvascular endothelial cells, and used a combination of transcriptomic and proteomic approaches to identify non-HLA Abs.

RESULTS

We identified a highly selected cohort of 38 patients with early acute AMVR. Biopsy specimens revealed intense microvascular inflammation and the presence of vasculitis (in 60.5%), interstitial hemorrhages (31.6%), or thrombotic microangiopathy (15.8%). Serum samples collected at the time of transplant showed that previously proposed anti-endothelial cell Abs-angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R), endothelin-1 type A and natural polyreactive Abs-did not increase significantly among patients with AMVR compared with a control group of stable kidney transplant recipients. However, 26% of the tested AMVR samples were positive for AT1R Abs when a threshold of 10 IU/ml was used. The crossmatch assay identified a common IgG response that was specifically directed against constitutively expressed antigens of microvascular glomerular cells in patients with AMVR. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses identified new targets of non-HLA Abs, with little redundancy among individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that preformed IgG Abs targeting non-HLA antigens expressed on glomerular endothelial cells are associated with early AMVR, and that in vitro cell-based assays are needed to improve risk assessments before transplant.

New insights into immune mechanisms of antiperlecan/LG3 antibody production: Importance of T cells and innate B1 cells

Autoantibodies against perlecan/LG3 (anti-LG3) have been associated with increased risks of delayed graft function, acute rejection, and reduced long-term survival. High titers of anti-LG3 antibodies have been found in de novo renal transplants recipients in the absence of allosensitizing or autoimmune conditions. Here, we seek to understand the pathways controlling anti-LG3 production prior to transplantation. Mice immunized with recombinant LG3 produce concomitantly IgM and IgG anti-LG3 antibodies suggesting a memory response. ELISpot confirmed the presence of LG3-specific memory B cells in nonimmunized mice. Purification of B1 and B2 subtypes identified peritoneal B1 cells as the major source of memory B cells reactive to LG3. Although nonimmunized CD4-deficient mice were found to express LG3-specific memory B cells, depletion of CD4⁺ T cells in wild type mice during immunization significantly decreased anti-LG3 production. These results demonstrate that B cell memory to LG3 is T cell independent but that production of anti-LG3 antibodies requires T cell help. Further supporting an important role for T cells in controlling anti-LG3 levels, we found that human renal transplant recipients show a significant decrease in anti-LG3 titers upon the initiation of CNI-based immunosuppression. Collectively, these results identify T cell targeting interventions as a means of reducing anti-LG3 levels in renal transplant patients.

Characteristics and Clinical Significance of De Novo Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies after Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The association of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibodies (DSA) and development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is still undetermined.

METHODS

We prospectively screened de novo DSA in 167 KTRs during 32 months after kidney transplantation (KT). Timing of DSA detection was at 3, 6, and 12 months post-transplant and annually thereafter and when clinically indicated. DSA levels were determined by Luminex assays and expressed as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). We evaluated the incidence, characteristics of DSA, and association between DSA and tacrolimus trough levels or AMR.

RESULTS

De novo DSA developed in 16 KTRs (9.6%) and acute AMR occurred more commonly in KTRs with de novo DSA compared to KTRs without de novo DSA (18.8% vs. 0%, P < 0.001). All de novo DSA were against class II antigens. The mean number of DSA was 1.8 ± 1.2 and the average MFI of DSA was 7,399 ± 5,470. Tacrolimus trough level during the first 0-2 months after KT was an independent predictor of DSA development (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.99; P = 0.043). No differences were found in the number of DSA, average MFI of DSA, and tacrolimus levels during the first year between de novo DSA-positive KTRs with AMR and those without AMR.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that monitoring of DSA and maintaining proper tacrolimus levels are essential to prevent AMR during the initial period after KT.

Donor-Specific Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Donor-specific antibodies have become an established biomarker predicting antibody-mediated rejection. Antibody-mediated rejection is the leading cause of graft loss after kidney transplant. There are several phenotypes of antibody-mediated rejection along post-transplant course that are determined by the timing and extent of humoral response and the various characteristics of donor-specific antibodies, such as antigen classes, specificity, antibody strength, IgG subclasses, and complement binding capacity. Preformed donor-specific antibodies in sensitized patients can trigger hyperacute rejection, accelerated acute rejection, and early acute antibody-mediated rejection. De novo donor-specific antibodies are associated with late acute antibody-mediated rejection, chronic antibody-mediated rejection, and transplant glomerulopathy. The pathogeneses of antibody-mediated rejection include not only complement-dependent cytotoxicity, but also complement-independent pathways of antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity and direct endothelial activation and proliferation. The novel assay for complement binding capacity has improved our ability to predict antibody-mediated rejection phenotypes. C1q binding donor-specific antibodies are closely associated with acute antibody-mediated rejection, more severe graft injuries, and early graft failure, whereas C1q nonbinding donor-specific antibodies correlate with subclinical or chronic antibody-mediated rejection and late graft loss. IgG subclasses have various abilities to activate complement and recruit effector cells through the Fc receptor. Complement binding IgG3 donor-specific antibodies are frequently associated with acute antibody-mediated rejection and severe graft injury, whereas noncomplement binding IgG4 donor-specific antibodies are more correlated with subclinical or chronic antibody-mediated rejection and transplant glomerulopathy. Our in-depth knowledge of complex characteristics of donor-specific antibodies can stratify the patient's immunologic risk, can predict distinct phenotypes of antibody-mediated rejection, and hopefully, will guide our clinical practice to improve the transplant outcomes.

Analysis of Sera of Recipients with Allograft Rejection Indicates That Keratin 1 Is the Target of Anti-Endothelial Antibodies

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) are usually directed against the surface antigens on the vascular endothelial cells. Clinical studies suggest a pathogenic role for nonhuman leukocyte antigen in antibody-mediated rejection; however, the antigens on the donor vascular endothelium that serve as the first-line targets for an immune response during allograft rejection have not been fully identified. Here, we used immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry to identify antigens from the sera of kidney transplant recipients who were experiencing antibody-mediated rejection. Keratin 1 (KRT1) was identified as a novel antigenic target expressed on endothelial cells. To validate our finding, we produced recombinant proteins representing the three most common alleles of KRT1. The serum used for immunoprecipitation showed a strong reaction to KRT1 recombinants in western blot and ELISA. In the kidney transplant cohort, more AECA-positive recipients than AECA-negative recipients had KRT1 antibodies (32.2% versus 11.9%, p = 0.002). Sera from 255 renal recipients were tested by ELISA. Of the 77 recipients with deteriorating graft function (serum creatinine > 120 μmol/L), 23 had anti-KRT1 antibodies. KRT1-IgG positivity was, therefore, associated with a higher risk of kidney transplant rejection (29.9% (23/77) versus 16.9% (30/178), p = 0.0187). A better understanding of this antigenic target will improve long-term allograft survival.

Maintenance immunosuppressants in the management of antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection: which regimen is best?

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a pivotal cause of long-term graft failure following renal transplantation. De novo donor-specific antibody reduction is essential to prevent AMR and improve long-term graft survival in renal transplant recipients. Although the number of early AMR episodes can be successfully controlled by attenuating de novo donor-specific antibodies, the long-term outcomes are unsatisfactory. Numerous studies have focused on new strategies to reverse AMR, but the available evidence suggests that maintenance immunosuppressive agents play important roles. This article reviews data on the use of various maintenance immunosuppressive strategies in the management of AMR, with a focus on antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection. Its aim is to help provide options benefitting long-term graft survival in renal transplant recipients.

Isolated De Novo Antiendothelial Cell Antibodies and Kidney Transplant Rejection

BACKGROUND

Studies analyzing the role of antiendothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) in large series of kidney transplant recipients are scarce, and HLA, MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class I-related chain A (MICA), and angiotensin II type 1 receptor have not been formally excluded as targets.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of a cohort of kidney transplant recipients.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

324 kidney transplant recipients who were negative for anti-HLA, anti-MICA, and anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies were tested for AECAs in pre- and posttransplantation serum samples.

PREDICTORS

AECA-positive (preformed [pre⁺/post⁺] vs de novo [pre^-/post⁺]) versus AECA-negative (pre^-/post^-) before or after transplantation.

OUTCOMES

Patient mortality, transplant loss, and acute rejection events.

RESULTS

66 (20%) patients were AECA positive (39 [12%] preformed, 27 [8%] de novo) and 258 (80%) were AECA negative. During a follow-up of 10 years, 7 (18%) AECA pre⁺/post⁺ patients had rejections compared with 14 (52%) AECA pre^-/post⁺ and 57 (22%) AECA pre^-/post^- recipients (OR, 3.80; P=0.001). AECA pre^-/post⁺ status emerged as an independent risk factor for transplant rejection compared to the AECA pre^-/post^- group (OR, 5.17; P<0.001). However, AECA pre⁺/post⁺ and AECA pre^-/post⁺ patients did not show higher risk for either patient death (ORs of 1.49 [P=0.7] and 1.06 [P=0.9], respectively) or transplant loss (ORs of 1.22 and 0.86, respectively; P for both = 0.8) compared to the AECA pre^-/post^- population.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study. Posttransplantation sera were collected before or after rejection, entailing a nearly cross-sectional relationship between the exposure and outcome. Lack of identification of precise antigens for AECAs.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo AECAs may be associated with rejection. These antibodies might serve as biomarkers of endothelium damage in kidney transplant recipients.

Advances in Pretransplant Donor-Specific Antibody Testing in Solid Organ Transplantation: From Bench to Bedside

Immunological risk stratification has a central role in determining both the feasibility of solid organ transplantation and the type (and amount) of induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. Currently there is poor consensus on how to exactly estimate the global immunological risk, and most transplant centers adopt complicated internal guidelines for risk stratification. Here we systematically review published evidences that should drive appropriateness in risk stratification, focusing on donor-specific antibodies against HLA and other antigens.

Pathogenesis of non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: Where do we stand?

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is associated with poor transplant outcome. Pathogenic alloantibodies are usually directed against human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). Histological findings suggestive of ABMR usually demonstrate an anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA)-mediated injury, while a small subset of patients develop acute dysfunction with histological lesions suggestive of ABMR in the absence of anti-HLA DSAs. Although this non-HLA ABMR is not well recognized by current diagnostic classifications, it is associated with graft dysfunction and allograft loss. These clinical descriptions suggest a pathogenic role for non-HLA anti-endothelial cell antibodies. Diverse antigenic targets have been described during the last decade. This review discusses recent findings in the field and addresses the clinical relevance of anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs).

Non-HLA antibodies against endothelial targets bridging allo- and autoimmunity

Detrimental actions of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) directed against both major histocompatibility antigens (human leukocyte antigen [HLA]) and specific non-HLA antigens expressed on the allograft endothelium are a flourishing research area in kidney transplantation. Newly developed solid-phase assays enabling detection of functional non-HLA antibodies targeting G protein-coupled receptors such as angiotensin type I receptor and endothelin type A receptor were instrumental in providing long-awaited confirmation of their broad clinical relevance. Numerous recent clinical studies implicate angiotensin type I receptor and endothelin type A receptor antibodies as prognostic biomarkers for earlier occurrence and severity of acute and chronic immunologic complications in solid organ transplantation, stem cell transplantation, and systemic autoimmune vascular disease. Angiotensin type 1 receptor and endothelin type A receptor antibodies exert their pathophysiologic effects alone and in synergy with HLA-DSA. Recently identified antiperlecan antibodies are also implicated in accelerated allograft vascular pathology. In parallel, protein array technology platforms enabled recognition of new endothelial surface antigens implicated in endothelial cell activation. Upon target antigen recognition, non-HLA antibodies act as powerful inducers of phenotypic perturbations in endothelial cells via activation of distinct intracellular cell-signaling cascades. Comprehensive diagnostic assessment strategies focusing on both HLA-DSA and non-HLA antibody responses could substantially improve immunologic risk stratification before transplantation, help to better define subphenotypes of antibody-mediated rejection, and lead to timely initiation of targeted therapies. Better understanding of similarities and dissimilarities in HLA-DSA and distinct non-HLA antibody-related mechanisms of endothelial damage should facilitate discovery of common downstream signaling targets and pave the way for the development of endothelium-centered therapeutic strategies to accompany intensified immunosuppression and/or mechanical removal of antibodies.

Alloantibody Generation and Effector Function Following Sensitization to Human Leukocyte Antigen

Allorecognition is the activation of the adaptive immune system to foreign human leukocyte antigen (HLA) resulting in the generation of alloantibodies. Due to a high polymorphism, foreign HLA is recognized by the immune system following transplant, transfusion, or pregnancy resulting in the formation of the germinal center and the generation of long-lived alloantibody-producing memory B cells. Alloantibodies recognize antigenic epitopes displayed by the HLA molecule on the transplanted allograft and contribute to graft damage through multiple mechanisms, including (1) activation of the complement cascade resulting in the formation of the MAC complex and inflammatory anaphylatoxins, (2) transduction of intracellular signals leading to cytoskeletal rearrangement, growth, and proliferation of graft vasculature, and (3) immune cell infiltration into the allograft via FcγR interactions with the FC portion of the antibody. This review focuses on the generation of HLA alloantibody, routes of sensitization, alloantibody specificity, and mechanisms of antibody-mediated graft damage.

Clinical relevance of circulating antibodies and B lymphocyte markers in allograft rejection

The main challenge in solid organ transplantation remains to tackle antibody-mediated rejection. Our understanding of the antibody-mediated response and the capacity to detect it has improved in the last decade. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the current clinical tools to monitor B cell activation are perfectible. New strategies, including the refinement in the characterization of HLA and non-HLA antibodies, as well as a better understanding of the circulating B cell phenotype will hopefully help to non-invasively identify patients at risk or undergoing antibody-mediated allograft damage. The current review discusses the current knowledge of the B cell biomarkers in solid organ transplantation, with a focus on circulating antibodies and peripheral B cells.

Plasma cell-rich acute rejections in living-related kidney transplantation: a clinicopathological study of 50 cases

BACKGROUND

Acute rejections (ARs) with plasma cell-rich infiltrates (PCARs) are associated with poor outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 2012 and December 2013, 1630 dysfunctional renal graft biopsies were performed. Of these, 50 (3%) showed PCAR. ARs with >10% plasma cells were defined as PCAR. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies were tested in historic sera and at the time of PCAR. Treatment for PCAR comprised methylprednisolone, antithymocyte globulin, plasmapheresis, and anti-CD20 antibody.

RESULTS

Of the 1630 dysfunctional biopsies, 50 (3%) had PCAR which occurred 3.1 ± 2.55 yr after transplant. The percentage of plasma cells was 28.8 ± 11.7, and CD138, 29.0 ± 12.4. Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were found in 32 (64%) overall, Class I in 15% and Class II in 65%. Post-treatment serum creatinine improved from 3.80 ± 2.59 to 2.66 ± 1.59 mg/dL in DSA positive (p < 0.003) and from 2.59 ± 1.09 to 2.08 ± 0.86 mg/dL in DSA negative (p < 0.008). One- and two-yr graft survival after PCAR was 72%, 42% in the DSA-positive vs. 89%, 82% in the DSA-negative group, respectively (p = 0.071).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that PCAR occurs late after transplant and in many cases is associated with DSAs. Graft outcome was poor when PCAR was associated with DSAs.

Utility of HLA Antibody Testing in Kidney Transplantation

HLA antigens are polymorphic proteins expressed on donor kidney allograft endothelium and are critical targets for recipient immune recognition. HLA antibodies are risk factors for acute and chronic rejection and allograft loss. Solid-phase immunoassays for HLA antibody detection represent a major advance in sensitivity and specificity over cell-based methods and are widely used in organ allocation and pretransplant risk assessment. Post-transplant, development of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies and/or increase in donor-specific antibodies from pretransplant levels are associated with adverse outcomes. Although single antigen bead assays have allowed sensitive detection of recipient HLA antibodies and their specificities, a number of interpretive considerations must be appreciated to understand test results in clinical and research contexts. This review, which is especially relevant for clinicians caring for transplant patients, discusses the technical aspects of single antigen bead assays, emphasizes their quantitative limitations, and explores the utility of HLA antibody testing in identifying and managing important pre- and post-transplant clinical outcomes.

Better understanding of transplant glomerulopathy secondary to chronic antibody-mediated rejection

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is generally accepted to result from repeated episodes of endothelial activation, injury and repair, leading to pathological abnormalities of double contouring or multi-layering of the glomerular basement membrane. TG is a major sequel of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cABMR), from pre-existing or de novo anti-HLA antibodies. Hepatitis C infection, thrombotic microangiopathy or other factors may also contribute to TG development. TG prevalence is 5-20% in most series, reaching 55%, in some high-risk cohorts, and is associated with worse allograft outcomes. Despite its prevalence and clinical significance, few well-studied treatment options have been proposed. Similar to desensitization protocols, plasmapheresis with or without immunoabsorption, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, bortezomib and eculizumab have been proposed in the treatment of TG due to cABMR individually or in various combinations. Robust clinical trials are urgently needed to address this major cause of allograft loss. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the epidemiology, etiology, pathology, and the preventive and treatment options for TG secondary to cABMR.

Glomerular inflammation correlates with endothelial injury and with IL-6 and IL-1β secretion in the peripheral blood

BACKGROUND

Transplant glomerulitis is an active form of glomerular injury associated with suboptimal graft outcome, inadequate histologic reproducibility, and poorly understood pathogenesis. Using a modified pathologic schema where glomerular inflammation is defined by the presence of five or more leukocytes per glomerulus, we sought to assess the reproducibility of transplant glomerulitis and to prospectively investigate the pathogenesis of glomerular inflammation.

METHODS

Our cohort includes 59 kidney transplant recipients who underwent 60 "for cause" allograft biopsies. In addition to light microscopy, the majority of the biopsies were assessed using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy studies. Biopsies were classified as noninflamed (n=21), inflamed (borderline changes or above) without glomerulitis (n=21), and transplant glomerulitis (n=18). Peripheral blood was collected on the day of biopsy and cytokines secreted by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were measured ex vivo.

RESULTS

Our modified schema had higher inter-observer agreement for detecting glomerulitis than that of the current Banff schema. Biopsies with glomerulitis showed ultrastructural signs of glomerular capillary wall remodeling. In contrast to other anatomic compartments, intraglomerular leukocytes in glomerulitis group consisted largely of monocytes. Patients with glomerulitis had high levels of IL-6 and IL-1β secreted by PBMCs. Furthermore, the percentage of inflamed glomeruli and the number of intraglomerular monocytes showed independent association with IL-6 and IL-1β levels, which tended to correlate with subsequent estimated glomerular filtration rate decline.

CONCLUSIONS

Inter-observer reproducibility of transplant glomerulitis can be improved by using more stringent histologic criteria. Glomerular inflammation correlates with endothelial injury, monocyte influx, and IL-6 and IL-β secretion by circulating immune cells.

Impact of donor-specific antibodies on the outcomes of kidney graft: Pathophysiology, clinical, therapy

Allo-antibodies, particularly when donor specific, are one of the most important factors that cause both early and late graft dysfunction. The authors review the current state of the art concerning this important issue in renal transplantation. Many antibodies have been recognized as mediators of renal injury. In particular donor-specific-Human Leukocyte Antigens antibodies appear to play a major role. New techniques, such as solid phase techniques and Luminex, have revealed these antibodies from patient sera. Other new techniques have uncovered alloantibodies and signs of complement activation in renal biopsy specimens. It has been acknowledged that the old concept of chronic renal injury caused by calcineurine inhibitors toxicity should be replaced in many cases by alloantibodies acting against the graft. In addition, the number of patients on waiting lists with preformed anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibodies is increasing, primarily from patients with a history of renal transplant failure already been sensitized. We should distinguish early and late acute antibody-mediated rejection from chronic antibody-mediated rejection. The latter often manifets late during the course of the post-transplant period and may be difficult to recognize if specific techniques are not applied. Different therapeutic strategies are used to control antibody-induced damage. These strategies may be applied prior to transplantation or, in the case of acute antibody-mediated rejection, after transplantation. Many new drugs are appearing at the horizon; however, these drugs are far from the clinic because they are in phase I-II of clinical trials. Thus the pipeline for the near future appears almost empty.

Clinical significance of anti-endothelial cell antibody in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients with graft-versus-host disease

Anti-endothelial cell antibody (AECA) is well known to reflect endothelial injury. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), is also closely associated with endothelial injury. We hypothesized that AECA may be associated with GVHD. To investigate the clinical significance of AECA in allo-HSCT recipients with GVHD, we detected AECA by cyto-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cyto-ELISA) in allo-HSCT recipients with acute and/or chronic GVHD (aGVHD and cGVHD). Incidences of anti-HMEC-1 AECA (anti-HMEC) and anti-EA.hy926 AECA (anti-EAHY) were significantly higher in patients with grade II-IV than grade 0-I aGVHD (P = 0.049, P = 0.011, respectively). There was no difference in the incidence of AECA between patients with and without cGVHD. Patients with anti-EAHY positive in the early stage post-transplant demonstrated a higher incidence of cGVHD (P = 0.044). In patients with grade 0-I aGVHD, AECA-positive patients had higher overall survival and disease-free survival (P < 0.05), and tended to have lower incidences of relapse and transplant-related mortality. Our data suggest that AECA plays an important role in the pathogenesis of GVHD.

Long-term follow-up of non-HLA and anti-HLA antibodies: incidence and importance in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Detection of antibody-mediated injury is becoming increasingly important in post-transplant patient care. The role of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in kidney transplant damage is known, whereas the significance of non-HLA antibodies remains an unresolved concern. The aim of the study was to determine the presence and influence on renal function of non-HLA and anti-HLA antibodies in stable patients at 5 years after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We evaluated the antibodies in 35 consecutive patients with stable renal function at 5 years after transplantation.

RESULTS

Pretransplant screening for donor-specific antibodies by CDC cross-matches was negative in all patients. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA), anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (anti-AT1R), and anti-endothelin receptor antibodies (anti-ETAR) were assayed as non-HLA antibodies. Non-HLA antibodies were observed in 12 (34%) patients, including AECA (n = 5; 14%), anti- AT1R (n = 6; 17%), anti-ETAR (n = 4; 11%), and both anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR (n = 3). Among 13 (37%) patients with anti-HLA antibodies, 7 also had both non-HLA antibodies: AECA (n = 1), anti-AT1R (n = 3), and anti-ETAR (n = 3). The antibody-negative group (n = 13) showed significantly better renal function than the antibody-positive group (non-HLA and/or anti-HLA; n = 22). Biopsy-proven acute rejection had occurred in 2 of 13 (15%) antibody-negative versus 8 of 22 (36%) antibody-positive patients. These preliminary data revealed an high prevalence of autoantibody and alloantibody production among stable patients at 5 years after kidney transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous production of these antibodies and their association with reduced renal function suggests that active humoral immune responses are poorly controlled by immunosuppression.

Essential concept of transplant immunology for clinical practice

Our understanding of transplant immunology has advanced from gross allograft rejection to cellular response and to current molecular level. More sensitive assays have been developed to characterize patient sensitization and to detect pre-existing donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in pre-transplant crossmatch. After a transplant, pre-existing or de novo DSA are increasingly monitored to guide clinical management. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to understand the basic concepts and key components of transplant immunology as well as be familiarized with the modern immunological techniques used in kidney transplantation.

Moving beyond HLA: a review of nHLA antibodies in organ transplantation

Given the finite graft life expectancy of HLA identical organ transplants and the recognition of humoral graft injury in the absence of donor directed anti-HLA antibodies, the clinical impact of antibodies against non-HLA (nHLA) antigens in transplant injury is being increasingly recognized. The recognition of the impact of nHLA antigen discrepancies between donor and recipient on transplant outcomes is timely given the advances in rapid and lower cost sequencing methods that can soon provide complete maps of all recipient and donor HLA and nHLA mismatch data. In this review, we present a summary of recent reports evaluating the role of nHLA antibodies and their relevance to the field of organ transplantation.

Vimentin antibody production in transplant patients and immunomodulatory effects of vimentin in-vitro

We investigated the presence of antibodies to vimentin in 150 patients awaiting transplant, (50 kidney, 50 liver and 50 thoracic) and in 51 previously transplanted kidney patients whose grafts had failed. Patients with primary end stage thoracic or kidney disease did not have increased levels of vimentin antibodies, but those with primary liver failure and those with kidney graft failure did. Those with kidney graft failure were more likely to form vimentin antibodies if the patient was HLA-DQ2 positive (p=<0.001). Further to this, we observed antibody mediated rejection in five HLA-DQ2 positive re-transplant patients where no other antibodies were identified. We investigated the effects of vimentin protein on cytokine production in phytohaemagglutinin stimulated and unstimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. When exposed to vimentin at low levels there was increased production of IL-10. When cultures were stimulated, there was a decrease in IL-10, IL-2 and IFN-gamma production and a large increase in IL-4 production (p=0.028) compared to the controls. These results suggest that under normal conditions exposure to vimentin can lead to regulation of the immune response. However, if the immune system is active, exposure to vimentin can enhance Th-2 immunity.

Immunologic monitoring in transplantation revisited

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tailoring immunosuppressive drugs to an individual's needs is crucial to improve long-term outcomes of organ transplant patients. The purpose of this review is to summarize the data on promising biomarkers able to detect the risk of acute or chronic rejection and to discuss the potential issues for their implementation in the clinic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple publications have indicated that circulating antibodies targeting human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA antigens as well as donor-specific memory T cells are associated with accelerated graft failure. Other studies published within the year show that specific genomic and proteomic signatures obtained from urine, blood, and graft tissue correlate with acute rejection in kidney and heart transplant patients.

SUMMARY

The development of reliable biomarkers is crucial for individualizing therapy aimed at extending allograft survival and improving patient health. Emerging data indicate that monitoring assays, likely used in panels, have the potential to be diagnostic and possibly predictive of long-term outcome. In addition to ongoing discovery efforts, progress in the field will require multicenter validation, assay standardization, and commercialization so as to efficiently deliver reliable testing strategies to the practicing clinician.

Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation

BACKGROUND

The introduction of solid-phase immunoassay (SPI) technology for the detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in transplantation while providing greater sensitivity than was obtainable by complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) assays has resulted in a new paradigm with respect to the interpretation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Although the SPI assay performed on the Luminex instrument (hereafter referred to as the Luminex assay), in particular, has permitted the detection of antibodies not detectable by CDC, the clinical significance of these antibodies is incompletely understood. Nevertheless, the detection of these antibodies has led to changes in the clinical management of sensitized patients. In addition, SPI testing raises technical issues that require resolution and careful consideration when interpreting antibody results.

METHODS

With this background, The Transplantation Society convened a group of laboratory and clinical experts in the field of transplantation to prepare a consensus report and make recommendations on the use of this new technology based on both published evidence and expert opinion. Three working groups were formed to address (a) the technical issues with respect to the use of this technology, (b) the interpretation of pretransplantation antibody testing in the context of various clinical settings and organ transplant types (kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, intestinal, and islet cells), and (c) the application of antibody testing in the posttransplantation setting. The three groups were established in November 2011 and convened for a "Consensus Conference on Antibodies in Transplantation" in Rome, Italy, in May 2012. The deliberations of the three groups meeting independently and then together are the bases for this report.

RESULTS

A comprehensive list of recommendations was prepared by each group. A summary of the key recommendations follows. Technical Group: (a) SPI must be used for the detection of pretransplantation HLA antibodies in solid organ transplant recipients and, in particular, the use of the single-antigen bead assay to detect antibodies to HLA loci, such as Cw, DQA, DPA, and DPB, which are not readily detected by other methods. (b) The use of SPI for antibody detection should be supplemented with cell-based assays to examine the correlations between the two types of assays and to establish the likelihood of a positive crossmatch (XM). (c) There must be an awareness of the technical factors that can influence the results and their clinical interpretation when using the Luminex bead technology, such as variation in antigen density and the presence of denatured antigen on the beads. Pretransplantation Group: (a) Risk categories should be established based on the antibody and the XM results obtained. (b) DSA detected by CDC and a positive XM should be avoided due to their strong association with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss. (c) A renal transplantation can be performed in the absence of a prospective XM if single-antigen bead screening for antibodies to all class I and II HLA loci is negative. This decision, however, needs to be taken in agreement with local clinical programs and the relevant regulatory bodies. (d) The presence of DSA HLA antibodies should be avoided in heart and lung transplantation and considered a risk factor for liver, intestinal, and islet cell transplantation. Posttransplantation Group: (a) High-risk patients (i.e., desensitized or DSA positive/XM negative) should be monitored by measurement of DSA and protocol biopsies in the first 3 months after transplantation. (b) Intermediate-risk patients (history of DSA but currently negative) should be monitored for DSA within the first month. If DSA is present, a biopsy should be performed. (c) Low-risk patients (nonsensitized first transplantation) should be screened for DSA at least once 3 to 12 months after transplantation. If DSA is detected, a biopsy should be performed. In all three categories, the recommendations for subsequent treatment are based on the biopsy results.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive list of recommendations is provided covering the technical and pretransplantation and posttransplantation monitoring of HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation. The recommendations are intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance in the use and clinical application of recently developed methods for HLA antibody detection when used in conjunction with traditional methods.

Non-HLA antibodies in kidney allograft rejection: convincing concept in need of further evidence

Mostly indirect evidence suggests an important pathogenic role for non-HLA anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) in both acute and chronic rejection. The lack of standardized screening assays for AECAs unfortunately hampers the systematic collection of data in multicenter trials. Diagnostic tests based on commercially available platforms could pave the way for testing larger patient cohorts, but they still suffer from some important limitations.