Development and evaluation of a secondary reference panel for BCR-ABL1 quantification on the International Scale

Variant-specific BCR::ABL1 quantification discrepancy in chronic myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Accurate quantification of the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene in whole blood is pivotal for the clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. The fusion protein encoded by BCR::ABL1 can vary in size, depending on the BCR and/or ABL1 gene breakpoint. The vast majority of CML patients have a p210 BCR::ABL1 fusion gene (M-BCR), which can be attributed to the presence of either e14a2 (b3a2) or e13a2 (b2a2) mRNA transcript junctions.

METHODS

Twenty-five CML samples were analyzed in two different ISO15189-accredited centers that both use an Europe Against Cancer-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) protocol. Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) were performed.

RESULTS

qPCR quantification revealed a significant (up to 1 log) difference specifically for the e13a2 transcript variant in contrast to e14a2 transcripts (Hodges-Lehman 4.29; p < 0.001). Reanalysis of the sample set with transcript-specific standard curves abolishes the initial transcript-specific difference (Hodges-Lehman 0.003; p = 0.8192). Comparison of transcript-specific qPCR results of both centers with ddPCR, an absolute quantification method, showed a statically significant association, especially in the lower range, indicating the clinical utility of transcript-specific or absolute quantification methods.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that differences between transcript-specific quantification might exist between centers, leading to potential clinical impact on the follow-up of CML patients. The use of transcript-specific standard curves for qPCR quantification, or absolute quantification, can significantly reduce these differences. Specific attention should be applied to the interpretation of quantification differences of CML patients that switch between diagnostic centers.

Committed change of real-time quantitative PCR to droplet digital PCR for monitoring BCR::ABL1 transcripts in tyrosine kinase inhibitor treated CML

OBJECTIVES

We performed a feasibility study of an FDA-approved commercial ddPCR assay to measure BCR::ABL1 in CML patients treated using TKI therapy.

METHODS

Assay performance of standard RQ-PCR and commercially available FDA-approved ddPCR were compared to measure BCR::ABL1 p210 transcripts in RNA samples from 100 CML patients who received TKI therapy.

RESULTS

%BCR::ABL1/ABL1IS levels obtained from both methods were not statistically significant difference after normalization with batch-specific conversion factor (p = 0.0651). The correlation and agreement of %BCR::ABL1/ABL1IS between the two assays were high. Molecular response stratification data showed 56% concordance between RQ-PCR and ddPCR, and 37% higher residual disease detection using ddPCR. Furthermore, 21.21% (7/33) of RQ-PCR undetectable samples were detected by ddPCR, representing high sensitivity to quantify the low abundance of BCR::ABL1 transcripts.

CONCLUSION

ddPCR was proven to be a highly sensitive method with the potential to overcome some limitations of traditional RQ-PCR, and has the potential of being a valuable tool for monitoring BCR::ABL1 transcripts in CML during TKI therapy. (163 words).

European LeukemiaNet laboratory recommendations for the diagnosis and management of chronic myeloid leukemia

From the laboratory perspective, effective management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) requires accurate diagnosis, assessment of prognostic markers, sequential assessment of levels of residual disease and investigation of possible reasons for resistance, relapse or progression. Our scientific and clinical knowledge underpinning these requirements continues to evolve, as do laboratory methods and technologies. The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically consider the current status of genetic laboratory approaches to help diagnose and manage CML patients. Our recommendations focus on current best practice and highlight the strengths and pitfalls of commonly used laboratory tests.

Reverse Transcription Can Critically Impact the Diagnostic Outcome of BCR::ABL1 Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR

Reverse transcriptases (RT) are essential tools in BCR::ABL1 fusion transcript monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The RT type and cDNA priming method may impair the stoichiometry of cDNA synthesis, thereby potentially introducing a bias in BCR::ABL1 qRT-PCR data. Using the Acrometrix™ BCR::ABL1 reference panel and 37 clinical specimens, we have comparatively investigated the performance of the RTs MLV and SuperScript IV with random hexamer vs. target-specific priming. Quantitative RT-PCR results identified the priming type and RT type as major factors for diagnostic data variation, mainly due to the different efficacies of processing BCR::ABL1 low-copy-numbers (<50) compared to GUSB or ABL1 high-copy targets. The impairment of SuperScript IV in processing low- and high-copy-number RNA targets equally was not reflected by the diagnostically relevant Log (BCR::ABL1/GUSB%) values. Therefore, the correct representation of housekeeping and BCR::ABL1 target genes should have priority when aiming at as high a number of housekeeping gene copies as possible. Our data suggest that for improving BCR::ABL1 assay sensitivity, increased RNA/cDNA amounts and the use of distinct RT/priming combinations are advantageous. However, for inter-laboratory harmonization, the proper conversion factor according to the CML international standard (IS) has to be reevaluated each time the grade of RT is changed.

Assessment of acute myeloid leukemia molecular measurable residual disease testing in an interlaboratory study

The European LeukaemiaNet (ELN) measurable residual disease (MRD) working group has published consensus guidelines to standardize molecular genetic MRD testing of the t(8;21)(q22;q22.1) RUNX1::RUNX1T1, inv(16)(p13.1q22) CBFB::MYH11, t(15;17)(q24.1;q21.2) PML::RARA, and NPM1 type A markers. A study featuring 29 international laboratories was performed to assess interlaboratory variation in testing and the subsequent interpretation of results, both crucial to patient safety. Most participants in this study were able to detect, accurately quantify, and correctly interpret MRD testing results, with a level of proficiency expected from a clinical trial or standard-of-care setting. However, a few testing and interpretive errors were identified that, in a patient setting, would have led to misclassification of patient outcomes and inappropriate treatment pathways being followed. Of note, a high proportion of participants reported false-positive results in the NPM1 marker-negative sample. False-positive results may have clinical consequences, committing patients to unneeded additional chemotherapy and/or transplant with the attendant risk of morbidity and mortality, which therefore highlights the need for ongoing external quality assessment/proficiency testing in this area. Most errors identified in the study were related to the interpretation of results. It was noted that the ELN guidance lacks clarity for certain clinical scenarios and highlights the requirement for urgent revision of the guidelines to elucidate these issues and related educational efforts around the revisions to ensure effective dissemination.

Development and validation of sensitive BCR::ABL1 fusion gene quantitation using next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

BCR::ABL1 fusion has significant prognostic value and is screened for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) disease monitoring as a part of routine molecular testing. To overcome the limitations of the current standard real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR), we designed and validated a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay to quantify BCR::ABL1 and ABL1 transcript copy numbers.

METHODS

After PCR amplification of the target sequence, deep sequencing was performed using an Illumina Nextseq 550Dx sequencer and in-house-designed bioinformatics pipeline. The Next-generation Quantitative sequencing (NQ-seq) assay was validated for its analytical performance, including precision, linearity, and limit of detection, using serially diluted control materials. A comparison with conventional RQ-PCR was performed with 145 clinical samples from 77 patients.

RESULTS

The limit of detection of the NQ-seq was the molecular response (MR) 5.6 [BCR::ABL1 0.00028% international scale (IS)]. The NQ-seq exhibited excellent precision and linear range from MR 2.0 to 5.0. The IS value from the NQ-seq was highly correlated with conventional RQ-PCR.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the NQ-seq is an effective tool for monitoring BCR::ABL1 transcripts in CML patients with high sensitivity and reliability. Prospective assessment of the unselected large series is required to validate the clinical impact of this NGS-based monitoring strategy.

Children with chronic myeloid leukaemia treated with front-line imatinib have a slower molecular response and comparable survival compared with adults: a multicenter experience in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

The direct comparison of molecular responses of front-line imatinib (IM) monitored at the same laboratory between children and adults with chronic phase (CP) of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) had not been reported. In this multicenter study, we compared the landmark molecular responses and outcomes of paediatric and adult CML-CP cohorts treated with front-line IM in whom the BCR::ABL1 transcript levels were monitored at the same accredited laboratory in Taiwan.

METHODS

Between June 2004 and July 2020, 55 newly diagnosed paediatric and 782 adult CML-CP patients, with molecular diagnosis and monitoring at the same reference laboratory in Taiwan, were enrolled. The criteria of 2020 European LeukemiaNet were applied to evaluate the molecular responses.

RESULTS

By year 5, the cumulative incidences of IS <1%, MMR, MR4.0 and MR4.5 of paediatric patients were all significantly lower than those of adult patients (58 vs 75%, 48 vs 66%, 25 vs 44%, 16 vs 34%, respectively). The 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) (90%) and overall survival (OS) (94%) of paediatric patients did not differ from those (92%) of adult patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the paediatric cohort had slower molecular responses to front-line IM and similar outcomes in 10-year PFS and OS in real-world practice.

Comparison of molecular responses and outcomes between BCR‐ABL1 e14a2 and e13a2 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia

Several studies have compared the molecular responses between e14a2 and e13a2 BCR::ABL1 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with front‐line imatinib, but there were very limited studies on nilotinib or dasatinib‐treated patients. We retrospectively analyzed the molecular responses in 1124 CML patients with the e14a2 or e13a2 transcript receiving front‐line imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib treatment. Patients with the e14a2 transcript had higher optimal response rates than those with the e13a2 transcript at 12 months in the imatinib‐treated group, and 6 and 12 months in the nilotinib‐treated group. The optimal response rates were not significantly different between the two transcripts in the dasatinib‐treated group at landmark molecular responses. With a median follow‐up time of 48.4 months, higher cumulative incidences of BCR::ABL1 International Scale ≤1% and major molecular response were observed in patients with the e14a2 rather than the e13a2 transcript receiving front‐line imatinib or nilotinib treatment, but not in dasatinib‐treated patients. The progression‐free survival and overall survival did not differ between the two transcripts in all three treatment groups. In view of the speed and depth of molecular responses, BCR::ABL1 transcript subtypes might provide helpful information in selecting a front‐line tyrosine kinase inhibitor for individual young patients with future potential treatment‐free remission.

Standardization of molecular monitoring of CML: results and recommendations from the European treatment and outcome study

Standardized monitoring of BCR::ABL1 mRNA levels is essential for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. From 2016 to 2021 the European Treatment and Outcome Study for CML (EUTOS) explored the use of secondary, lyophilized cell-based BCR::ABL1 reference panels traceable to the World Health Organization primary reference material to standardize and validate local laboratory tests. Panels were used to assign and validate conversion factors (CFs) to the International Scale and assess the ability of laboratories to assess deep molecular response (DMR). The study also explored aspects of internal quality control. The percentage of EUTOS reference laboratories (n = 50) with CFs validated as optimal or satisfactory increased from 67.5% to 97.6% and 36.4% to 91.7% for ABL1 and GUSB, respectively, during the study period and 98% of laboratories were able to detect MR^4.5 in most samples. Laboratories with unvalidated CFs had a higher coefficient of variation for BCR::ABL1^IS and some laboratories had a limit of blank greater than zero which could affect the accurate reporting of DMR. Our study indicates that secondary reference panels can be used effectively to obtain and validate CFs in a manner equivalent to sample exchange and can also be used to monitor additional aspects of quality assurance.

Identification and validation of suitable housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in BCR-ABL1 positive B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

The stability of the housekeeping gene (HKG) expression is an absolute prerequisite for accurate normalization of target gene expression in a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR). In RQ-PCR, the widely used normalization approach involves the standardization of target genes to the most stable HKG control genes. According to the recent literature, in different experimental conditions the HKGs exhibit either up or down-regulation and thus affecting the gene expression profiles of target genes which leads to erroneous results. This implies that it is very important to select the appropriate HKG and verify the expression stability of the HKG before quantification of the target gene.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The present study aims to analyze six different HKGs for their expression profiles and stability in BCR-ABL1 negative cases and validate them in BCR-ABL1 positive cases, detected by multiplex reverse transcribed polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Six commonly used reference genes (GAPDH, ABL1, RNA18S, ACTB, GUSB, and EEF2) were selected in this study. RQ-PCR was performed on 24 BCR-ABL1 negative cases and the outcomes were validated on 24 BCR-ABL1 positive cases. RefFinder™, a web-based composite software was used to check the stability of HKG genes by different algorithms and comprehensive ranking of each HKG gene in BCR-ABL1 negative cases and finally validated in BCR-ABL1 positive cases.

CONCLUSIONS

It was found that RNA18S, ABL1 and GUSB are good stable HKG genes, which showed minimum variability in gene expression compared to GAPDH, EEF2, and ACTB, the most commonly used HKG.

Performance characteristics of the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assay for BCR::ABL1 monitoring in chronic myelogenous leukemia

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a hematopoietic stem cell malignancy that accounts for 15-20% of all cases of leukemia. CML is caused by a translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 which creates an abnormal fusion gene, BCR::ABL1. The amount of BCR::ABL1 transcript RNA is a marker of disease progression and the effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. This study determined the analytical and clinical performance of a droplet digital PCR based assay (QXDx BCR-ABL %IS Kit; Bio-Rad) for BCR::ABL1 quantification. The test has a limit of detection of MR4.7 (0.002%) and a linear range of MR0.3-4.7 (50-0.002%IS). Reproducibility of results across multiple sites, days, instruments, and users was evaluated using panels made from BCR::ABL1 positive patient samples. Clinical performance of the assay was evaluated on patient samples and compared to an existing FDA-cleared test. The reproducibility study noted negligible contributions to variance from site, instrument, day, and user for samples spanning from MR 0.7-4.2. The assay demonstrated excellent clinical correlation with the comparator test using a Deming regression with a Pearson R of 0.99, slope of 1.037 and intercept of 0.1084. This data establishes that the QXDx™ BCR-ABL %IS Kit is an accurate, precise, and sensitive system for the diagnosis and monitoring of CML.

Chronic myeloid leukaemia

Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors have changed the natural history of chronic myeloid leukaemia in such a way that patients with adequate access to these agents, who are properly managed, and who respond well to this treatment can expect a near-normal life expectancy. Achieving this goal requires an adequate understanding of the patient's treatment goals, careful monitoring for the achievement of optimal response hallmarks, implementation of proper interventions according to the attainment of such endpoints, adequate recognition and management of adverse events, and acknowledgment of the relevance of comorbidities. Treatment with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, once considered lifelong, has become terminable for at least some patients, and promising new agents are emerging for those whose disease does not respond to any of the multiple therapeutic options currently available. If these advances reach all patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia, cure might eventually become a reality in most instances.

Droplet Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 Monitoring in Diagnostic Routine: Ready to Start?

Simple Summary

The introduction to clinical practice of a treatment-free remission approach in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with a stable deep molecular response highlighted how crucial it is to monitor the molecular levels of BCR–ABL1 as accurately and precisely as possible. In this context, the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) presents an alternative methodology for such quantification. To hypothesize the introduction of this technology in routine practice, we performed a multicentric study that compares ddPCR with the standard methodology currently used. Our results demonstrate that the use of ddPCR in clinical practice is feasible and could be beneficial.

Abstract

BCR–ABL1 mRNA levels represent the key molecular marker for the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is currently the standard method to monitor it. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) discontinuation, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has emerged to provide a more precise detection of MRD. To hypothesize the use of ddPCR in clinical practice, we designed a multicentric study to evaluate the potential value of ddPCR in the diagnostic routine. Thirty-seven RNA samples from CML patients and five from healthy donors were analyzed using both ddPCR QXDx^TMBCR-ABL %IS Kit and LabNet-approved RT-qPCR methodologies in three different Italian laboratories. Our results show that ddPCR has a good agreement with RT-qPCR, but it is more precise to quantify BCR–ABL1 transcript levels. Furthermore, we did not find differences between duplicate or quadruplicate analysis in terms of BCR–ABL1% IS values. Droplet digital PCR could be confidently introduced into the diagnostic routine as a complement to the RT-qPCR.

Non-conditioned bone marrow chimeric mouse generation using culture-based enrichment of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

Bone marrow (BM) chimeric mice are a valuable tool in the field of immunology, with the genetic manipulation of donor cells widely used to study gene function under physiological and pathological settings. To date, however, BM chimera protocols require myeloablative conditioning of recipient mice, which dramatically alters steady-state hematopoiesis. Additionally, most protocols use fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) for ex vivo genetic manipulation. Here, we describe our development of cell culture techniques for the enrichment of functional HSPCs from mouse BM without the use of FACS purification. Furthermore, the large number of HSPCs derived from these cultures generate BM chimeric mice without irradiation. These HSPC cultures can also be genetically manipulated by viral transduction, to allow for doxycycline-inducible transgene expression in donor-derived immune cells within non-conditioned immunocompetent recipients. This technique is therefore expected to overcome current limitations in mouse transplantation models.

Assessment of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for measuring BCR-ABL1 in chronic myeloid leukaemia in an international interlaboratory study

Measurement of BCR activator of RhoGEF and GTPase -ABL proto-oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase (BCR-ABL1) mRNA levels by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RTqPCR) has been critical to treatment protocols and clinical trials in chronic myeloid leukaemia; however, interlaboratory variation remains a significant issue. Reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR (RTddPCR) has shown potential to improve testing but a large-scale interlaboratory study is required to definitively establish this. In the present study, 10 BCR-ABL1-positive samples with levels ranging from molecular response (MR)^1·0 -MR^5·0 were tested by 23 laboratories using RTddPCR with the QXDX BCR-ABL %IS kit. A subset of participants tested the samples using RTqPCR. All 23 participants using RTddPCR detected BCR-ABL1 in all samples to MR^4·0 . Detection rates for deep-response samples were 95·7% at MR^4·5 , 78·3% at MR^4·7 and 87·0% at MR^5·0 . Interlaboratory coefficient of variation was indirectly proportional to BCR-ABL1 level ranging from 29·3% to 69·0%. Linearity ranged from 0·9330 to 1·000 (average 0·9936). When results were compared for the 11 participants who performed both RTddPCR and RTqPCR, RTddPCR showed a similar limit of detection to RTqPCR with reduced interlaboratory variation and better assay linearity. The ability to detect deep responses with RTddPCR, matched with an improved linearity and reduced interlaboratory variation will allow improved patient management, and is of particular importance for future clinical trials focussed on achieving and maintaining treatment-free remission.

Alignment of Qx100/Qx200 Droplet Digital (Bio-Rad) and QuantStudio 3D (Thermofisher) Digital PCR for Quantification of BCR-ABL1 in Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

In recent years, the digital polymerase chain reaction has received increasing interest as it has emerged as a tool to provide more sensitive and accurate detection of minimal residual disease. In order to start the process of data alignment, we assessed the consistency of the BCR-ABL1 quantification results of the analysis of 16 RNA samples at different levels of disease. The results were obtained by two different laboratories that relied on The Qx100/Qx200 Droplet Digital PCR System (Bio-Rad) and Quant Studio 3D dPCR System (Thermofisher) platforms. We assessed the compatibility between the estimated values by linear regression, Bland-Altman bias-plot, and Mann-Whitney nonparametric test. The results confirmed the compatibility of the measures, allowing us tocompute an 'alignment factor' (AF), equal to 1.41, which was further validated by a different series of experiments. We conclude that the performed measurements by the two laboratories are comparable, and also equalized through the introduction of an alignment factor.

Digital PCR can provide improved BCR-ABL1 detection in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in deep molecular response and sensitivity of standard quantitative methods using EAC assays

BCR-ABL1 molecular detection using quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods is the golden standard of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) monitoring. However, due to variable sensitivity of qPCR assays across laboratories, alternative methods are tested. Digital PCR (dPCR) has been suggested as a robust and reproducible option. Here we present a comparison of droplet dPCR with routinely used reverse-transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR) and automated GeneXpert systems. Detection limit of dPCR was above 3 BCR-ABL1 copies, although due to background amplification the resulting sensitivity was 0.01% BCR-ABL1 (MR4.0). Nevertheless, in comparison with GeneXpert, dPCR categorized more than 50% of the patients into different MR groups, showing a potential for improved BCR-ABL1 detection.

•

dPCR assays attain MR4.0 sensitivity due to a blank amplification 3 BCR-ABL1 copies.

•

Quantification principle of RT-qPCR and dPCR introduces bias in copy numbers.

•

dPCR provides more sensitive BCR-ABL1 measurement in >50% MR3.0-MR4.5 CML patients.

Ultra-precise quantification of mRNA targets across a broad dynamic range with nanoreactor beads

Precise quantification of molecular targets in a biological sample across a wide dynamic range is a key requirement in many diagnostic procedures, such as monitoring response to therapy or detection of measurable residual disease. State of the art digital PCR assays provide for a dynamic range of four orders of magnitude. However digital assays are complex and require sophisticated microfluidic tools. Here we present an assay format that enables ultra-precise quantification of RNA targets in a single measurement across a dynamic range of more than six orders of magnitude. The approach is based on hydrogel beads that provide for microfluidic free compartmentalization of the sample as they are used as nanoreactors for reverse transcription, PCR amplification and combined real time and digital detection of gene transcripts. We have applied these nanoreactor beads for establishing an assay for the detection and quantification of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts. The assay has been characterized for its precision and linear dynamic range. A comparison of the new method against conventional real time RT-PCR analysis (reference method) with clinical samples from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) revealed excellent concordance with Pearsons correlation coefficient of 0.983 and slope of 1.08.

Why is it critical to achieve a deep molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia?

The primary goal of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia is survival, which is achieved by the vast majority of patients. The initial response to therapy provides a sensitive measure of future clinical outcome. Measurement of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction standardized to the international reporting scale is now the principal recommended monitoring strategy. The method is used to assess early milestone responses and provides a guide for therapeutic intervention. When patients successfully traverse the critical first 12 months of TKI therapy, most will head towards another milestone response, deep molecular response (DMR, BCR-ABL1 ≤0.01%). DMR is essential for patients aiming to achieve treatment-free remission and a prerequisite for a trial of TKI discontinuation. The success of discontinuation trials has led to new treatment strategies in order for more patients to reach this milestone response. DMR has been incorporated into endpoints of clinical trials and is considered by some expert groups as the optimal treatment response. But is DMR a stable response and does it provide the ultimate protection against TKI resistance and death? Do we need to increase the sensitivity of detection of BCR-ABL1 to better identify the patients who would likely remain in treatment-free remission after TKI discontinuation? Is it necessary to switch current TKI therapy to a more potent inhibitor if the goal is to achieve DMR? These are issues that I will explore in this review.

Programme for Harmonization to the International Scale in Latin America for BCR-ABL1 quantification in CML patients: findings and recommendations

Objectives The quantitation of BCR-ABL1 mRNA is mandatory for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, and RT-qPCR is the most extensively used method in testing laboratories worldwide. Nevertheless, substantial variation in RT-qPCR results makes inter-laboratory comparability hard. To facilitate inter-laboratory comparative assessment, an international scale (IS) for BCR-ABL1 was proposed. Methods The laboratory-specific conversion factor (CF) to the IS can be derived from the World Health Organization (WHO) genetic reference panel; however, this material is limited to the manufacturers to produce and calibrate secondary reference reagents. Therefore, we developed secondary reference calibrators, as lyophilized cellular material, aligned to the IS. Our purpose was both to re-evaluate the CF in 18 previously harmonized laboratories and to propagate the IS to new laboratories. Results Our field trial including 30 laboratories across Latin America showed that, after correction of raw BCR-ABL1/ABL1 ratios using CF, the relative mean bias was significantly reduced. We also performed a follow-up of participating laboratories by annually revalidating the process; our results support the need for continuous revalidation of CFs. All participating laboratories also received a calibrator to determine the limit of quantification (LOQ); 90% of them could reproducibly detect BCR-ABL1, indicating that these laboratories can report a consistent deep molecular response. In addition, aiming to investigate the variability of BCR-ABL1 measurements across different RNA inputs, we calculated PCR efficiency for each individual assay by using different amounts of RNA. Conclusions In conclusion, for the first time in Latin America, we have successfully organized a harmonization platform for BCR-ABL1 measurement that could be of immediate clinical benefit for monitoring the molecular response of patients in low-resource regions.

Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR versus qPCR Measurements on the International Scale for the Molecular Monitoring of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients

BACKGROUND

BCR-ABL1/ABL1 p210 measurement by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is used worldwide to monitor the molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) seems to show a greater sensitivity than qPCR, probably due to the high number of replicates analyzed in ddPCR for the comparison. Additionally, in a recently published comparison, ddPCR measurements were not adequately transformed into International Scale (IS).

METHOD

We have analyzed 50 CML patients and ten non-CML donors in parallel by qPCR and ddPCR. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing both techniques under similar conditions, with BCR-ABL1/ABL1 measurements performed via both techniques transformed into IS.

RESULTS

Qualitative and quantitative comparisons showed excellent results. The qualitative correlation showed a Kappa index of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.98) (P < 0.001). In the quantitative comparison, the absolute intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.868 (95% CI 0.734-0.937; P < 0.001), and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.863. The Passing-Bablock test indicated a slight proportional difference between qPCR and ddPCR. A quantitative and qualitative subanalysis including 40 patients with a molecular response of 3.0 or deeper showed similar results in every test. In addition, the proportional difference in the Passing-Bablock test disappeared. There were no differences in the sensitivity for BCR-ABL1 detection between qPCR and ddPCR (McNemar test, P = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our results show very good quantitative and qualitative correlations between BCR-ABL1/ABL1 p210 results obtained by qPCR and by ddPCR and confirm previous scarce data regarding the lack of an increase in sensitivity of ddPCR over qPCR in this setting.

Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to a chemotherapy/radiotherapy-surviving leukemia cell population that gives rise to relapse of the disease. The detection of MRD is critical for predicting the outcome and for selecting the intensity of further treatment strategies. The development of various new diagnostic platforms, including next-generation sequencing (NGS), has introduced significant advances in the sensitivity of MRD diagnostics. Here, we review current methods to diagnose MRD through phenotypic marker patterns or differential gene patterns through analysis by flow cytometry (FCM), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or NGS. Future advances in clinical procedures will be molded by practical feasibility and patient needs regarding greater diagnostic sensitivity.

Standardization of BCR-ABL1 quantification on the international scale in China using locally developed secondary reference panels

For patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction is widely used in laboratories to quantify BCR-ABL1 fusion gene transcripts for disease management. Many efforts have been made to standardize the BCR-ABL1 testing assay, including the primary and secondary reference reagents, but the secondary standards have not been developed and used in the standardization program in China. With the use of armored RNA technology, armored RNA of BCR-ABL1 and control genes was manufactured to prepare the secondary reference material anchored to the World Health Organization primary reference calibrators for standardization of BCR-ABL1 testing assays. The secondary reference was sent to 30 laboratories in China for validation. Data from an external quality assessment after the standardization process were collected and analyzed as well. The assigned %BCR-ABL1/ABL1^IS values of the four levels of the secondary material panels were 0.0118, 0.1345, 1.3808, and 19.4266, respectively. In validation trials, 70.0% (21/30) of laboratories obtained valid conversion factors for the BCR-ABL1 assay. All valid conversion factors from 11 international scale laboratories were equivalent to their respective previous values. External quality assessment data indicated that the accuracy and precision between laboratories were improved. Moreover, the quantity of the panels is abundant to be used as quality control samples for monitoring the shift of data. In this study, we established a secondary genetic reference panel for BCR-ABL1 quantification. This study will play a role in facilitating the worldwide dissemination of the international scale, especially in promoting the standardization of molecular monitoring in China.

The red blood cell count and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the diagnosis of polycythaemia vera

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency in polycythaemia vera (PV) may impact the validity of the haematocrit (HCT), since HCT is red blood cell count (RBC) × mean corpuscular volume (MCV).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate (a) the effect of microcytosis on HCT, (b) the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as a possible additional diagnostic marker for PV.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included 182 subjects: 39 with PV, 27 with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and 116 suspected of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) with a secondary cause for either thrombocytosis or erythrocytosis.

RESULTS

Patients with PV had significantly lower ratio of MCV and serum ferritin compared to MPN suspects. A good correlation of RBC versus HCT was found for PV and MPN subjects when individuals with microcytosis were excluded (R²  = .87 in PV and R²  = .82 in MPN suspects). We found a specificity of 98% and a sensitivity of 37% for ESR <2 mm in the diagnosis of PV.

CONCLUSION

The RBC may more precisely reflect the total red cell mass and accordingly the hypercoagulable state of the PV patient, which is integrated in the ESR. A combination of RBC and ESR is proposed as a novel tool to substitute the Hb concentration and the HCT in the diagnosis of PV.

Skin lesions in chronic myeloid leukemia patients during dasatinib treatment

Purpose

In our work we sought to define the prevalence rates of cutaneous events during dasatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients and to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics of these reactions.

Patients and methods

In our institution, 67 CML patients were treated with dasatinib. it was given as first line treatment in 26 (39%) and subsequent treatment in 41 (61%) CML patients. Flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood and cutaneous biopsy was done on all CML patients with dermatological lesions appearing during dasatinib treatment.

Results

Among 67 CML patients, 4 (5.9%) showed skin lesions during dasatinib treatment. The cutaneous manifestations were not generalized but mainly located on the back, abdomen, thorax or leg regions. The patients did not show peripheral lymphocytosis at the time when skin lesions appeared. Overall, histological analysis showed that the skin lesions were characterized by a mild perivascular small CD8+ T lymphocytes infiltrate with minimal epidermotropism.

Conclusion

The unusual T cytotoxic cutaneous infiltrate demonstrated in our CML cases could be the expression of a dasatinib-promoted lymphocyte expansion. However, the heterogeneity of the dermatologic manifestations reported in our CML patients could also be related to unknown factors specific to each CML patient. Our work highlights the finding that skin lesions may be associated with dasatinib treatment and that they should not be confused with viral or bacterial infections but rather interpreted as the clinical expression of lymphocytosis promoted by this TKI.

Digital PCR in Myeloid Malignancies: Ready to Replace Quantitative PCR?

New techniques are on the horizon for the detection of small leukemic clones in both, acute leukemias and myeloproliferative disorders. A promising approach is based on digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Digital PCR (dPCR) is a breakthrough technology designed to provide absolute nucleic acid quantification. It is particularly useful to detect a low amount of target and therefore it represents an alternative method for detecting measurable residual disease (MRD). The main advantages are the high precision, the very reliable quantification, the absolute quantification without the need for a standard curve, and the excellent reproducibility. Nowadays the main disadvantages of this strategy are the costs that are still higher than standard qPCR, the lack of standardized methods, and the limited number of laboratories that are equipped with instruments for dPCR. Several studies describing the possibility and advantages of using digital PCR for the detection of specific leukemic transcripts or mutations have already been published. In this review we summarize the available data on the use of dPCR in acute myeloid leukemia and myeloproliferative disorders.

Results of the European survey on the assessment of deep molecular response in chronic phase CML patients during tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (EUREKA registry)

PURPOSE

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommends quantification of BCR-ABL1 transcripts by real-time quantitative PCR every 3 months during TKI treatment. Since a proportion of patients in deep molecular response (DMR: MR⁴, MR^4.5, MR⁵) maintain remission after treatment stop, assessment of DMR is crucial. However, systematically collected molecular data, monitored with sensitive standardized assays, are not available outside clinical trials.

METHODS

Data were collected on the standardized assessment of molecular response in the context of real-life practice. BCR-ABL1 transcript levels after > 2 years of TKI therapy were evaluated for DMR by local laboratories as well as standardized EUTOS laboratories. Since standardized molecular monitoring is a prerequisite for treatment discontinuation, central surveillance of the performance of the participating laboratories was carried out.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2017, 3377 peripheral blood samples from 1117 CML patients were shipped to 11 standardized reference laboratories in six European countries. BCR-ABL1 transcript types were b3a2 (41.63%), b2a2 (29.99%), b2a2/b3a2 (3.58%) and atypical (0.54%). For 23.72% of the patients, the initial transcript type had not been reported. Response levels (EUTOS laboratory) were: no MMR, n = 197 (6.51%); MMR, n = 496 (16.40%); MR⁴, n = 685 (22.64%); MR^4.5, n = 937 (30.98%); MR⁵, n = 710 (23.47%). With a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.708, a substantial agreement between EUTOS-certified and local laboratories was shown.

CONCLUSIONS

Multicenter DMR assessment is feasible in the context of real-life clinical practice in Europe. Information on the BCR-ABL1 transcript type at diagnosis is crucial to accurately monitor patients' molecular response during or after TKI therapy.

Standardisation and consensus guidelines for minimal residual disease assessment in Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR of e1a2 BCR-ABL1

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a powerful prognostic factor in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is used for patient stratification and treatment decisions, but its precise role in Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL is less clear. This uncertainty results largely from methodological differences relating to the use of real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) to measure BCR-ABL1 transcript levels for MRD analysis. We here describe the first results by the EURO-MRD consortium on standardization of qRT-PCR for the e1a2 BCR-ABL1 transcript in Ph + ALL, designed to overcome the lack of standardisation of laboratory procedures and data interpretation. Standardised use of EAC primer/probe sets and of centrally prepared plasmid standards had the greatest impact on reducing interlaboratory variability. In QC1 the proportion of analyses with BCR-ABL1/ABL1 ratios within half a log difference were 40/67 (60%) and 52/67 (78%) at 10^-3 and 36/67 (53%) and 53/67 (79%) at 10^-4BCR-ABL1/ABL1. Standardized RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and cycler platforms did not improve results further, whereas stringent application of technical criteria for assay quality and uniform criteria for data interpretation and reporting were essential. We provide detailed laboratory recommendations for the standardized MRD analysis in routine diagnostic settings and in multicenter clinical trials for Ph + ALL.

External quality assessment of p210 BCR-ABL1 transcript quantification by RT-qPCR: Findings and recommendations

INTRODUCTION

External quality assessment (EQA) is an essential tool for quality assurance of analytical testing processes of p210 BCR-ABL1 transcripts by RT-qPCR. As an EQA provider, the National Center for Clinical Laboratories organized an EQA scheme of p210 BCR-ABL1 testing in China for the first time to identify existing problems and ensure the reliability of p210 BCR-ABL1 testing.

METHODS

Using armored RNA technology, we first constructed pACYC-MS2-p210 and CG recombinant plasmids and expressed p210 and CG armored RNAs, with packaging segments of p210 BCR-ABL1 fusion gene (FG) and four common control gene (CG) transcripts. Using these armored RNAs, we prepared lyophilized p210 quality control (QC) sample panels and evaluated detection performance of participating laboratories in China.

RESULTS

Of the 66 participating laboratories, great variation was found with coefficient of variation (CV%) of raw p210 BCR-ABL1 results basically ranging from 60.0% to 100.0%. In 24 International Scale (IS) laboratories, the CV% of results decreased from 82.4% to 61.6%, and the percentage of laboratories within 2-, 3-, and 5-fold of the median values increased from 78.2%, 87.0%, and 92.1% to 80.1%, 89.4%, and 97.2%, respectively, after conversion with a laboratory-specific conversion factor (CF); however, poorly converted results were also observed in laboratories resulting from changed components of RT-qPCR procedures. False-negative and false-positive results were also found in the EQA.

CONCLUSIONS

Various problems were found for p210 BCR-ABL1 detection in the EQA. By solving the existing problems, the performance of p210 BCR-ABL1 detection can be improved, ensuring robust laboratory diagnostic capacities in China.

Development and evaluation of armored RNA-based standards for quantification of BCR-ABL1p210/p190 fusion gene transcripts

BACKGROUND

Standards play an important role in detection of the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene (FG) transcript. However, the standards widely used in laboratories are mainly based on plasmids or cDNA, which cannot accurately reflect the process of RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis. Therefore, we aimed to develop armored RNA-based standards for p210 and p190 BCR-ABL1FG transcripts' quantification.

METHODS

Using overlapping polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology, we first linked a segment of the p210 or p190 BCR-ABL1FG transcript with four control genes (CGs; ABL1, BCR, GUSB, and B2M) to form p210FG-CG and p190FG-CG. Subsequently, using armored RNA technology, we prepared p210FG-CG- and p190FG-CG-armored RNAs and the p210FG-CG and p190FG-CG standards, the values of which were assigned by digital PCR (dPCR).

RESULTS

The p210FG-CG and p190FG-CG standards were stable and homogeneous, and were significantly linear with r²  > 0.98. A field trial including 52 laboratories across China showed that the coefficient of variation (CV%) of BCR-ABL1 values among samples was in the range of 58.6%-129.6% for p210 samples and 73.2%-194.0% for p190 samples when using local standards. By contrast, when using the p210FG-CG and p190FG-CG standards, the CV% of BCR-ABL1 values was decreased to 35.6%-124.9% and 36.6%-170.6% for p210 and p190 samples, respectively. In addition, 33.3% (3/9) of the p210 and p190 samples had CV% values <50.0%, whereas 44.4% (4/9) and 77.8% (7/9) of the samples had lower CV% values when using the p210FG-CG and p190FG-CG standards.

CONCLUSION

The overall variability of detection of BCR-ABL1 transcripts decreased significantly when using the p210FG-CG or p190FG-CG standards, especially the p190FG-CG standard.

Bosutinib: A Potent Second-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

Bosutinib is one of the five tyrosine kinase inhibitors which are currently approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. By its dual inhibition of Src and ABL kinase and also targeting further kinases, it creates a unique target portfolio which also explains its unique side effect profile. The approval of bosutinib in 2013 made the drug available for patients previously treated with one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitor(s) and for whom imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib are not considered appropriate treatment options. As initially the first-line clinical trial comparing bosutinib with imatinib in CML patients in chronic phase did not reach its primary endpoint and therefore the product was not licensed for first-line therapy, a second first-line trial, the so-called BFORE study, was performed and just recently the promising results have been published predicting a quick expansion of the existing label. In comparison with the other approved TKIs, bosutinib harbors a distinct side effect profile with only very few cardiovascular and thromboembolic events and minimal long-term safety issues with most adverse events happening during the first months of treatment. On the other hand, gastrointestinal side effects are very common (e.g., diarrhea rates in more than 80% of the patients) with bosutinib surprising some of the investigators during the early clinical trials evaluating bosutinib. Until then, several approaches have been used to face this problem resulting in extensive supportive efforts (such as early loperamid treatment) as well as new trials testing alternative dosing strategies with early dose adjustment schedules. This article reports preclinical and clinical data available for bosutinib both in hematologic diseases such as CML or ALL and solid tumours as well as other diseases and envisions future perspectives including additional patient groups in which bosutinib might be of clinical benefit.

Digital PCR: A Sensitive and Precise Method for KIT D816V Quantification in Mastocytosis

BACKGROUND

The analytically sensitive detection of KIT D816V in blood and bone marrow is important for diagnosing systemic mastocytosis (SM). Additionally, precise quantification of the KIT D816V variant allele fraction (VAF) is relevant clinically because it helps to predict multilineage involvement and prognosis in cases of advanced SM. Digital PCR (dPCR) is a promising new method for sensitive detection and accurate quantification of somatic mutations.

METHODS

We performed a validation study of dPCR for KIT D816V on 302 peripheral blood and bone marrow samples from 156 patients with mastocytosis for comparison with melting curve analysis after peptide nucleic acid-mediated PCR clamping (clamp-PCR) and allele-specific quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

RESULTS

dPCR showed a limit of detection of 0.01% VAF with a mean CV of 8.5% and identified the mutation in 90% of patients compared with 70% for clamp-PCR (P < 0.001). Moreover, dPCR for KIT D816V was highly concordant with qPCR without systematic deviation of results, and confirmed the clinical value of KIT D816V VAF measurements. Thus, patients with advanced SM showed a significantly higher KIT D816V VAF (median, 2.43%) compared with patients with indolent SM (median, 0.14%; P < 0.001). Moreover, dPCR confirmed the prognostic significance of a high KIT D816V VAF regarding survival (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

dPCR for KIT D816V provides a high degree of precision and sensitivity combined with the potential for interlaboratory standardization, which is crucial for the implementation of KIT D816V allele burden measurement. Thus, dPCR is suitable as a new method for KIT D816V testing in patients with mastocytosis.

Molecular techniques for the personalised management of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is the paradigm for targeted cancer therapy. RT-qPCR is the gold standard for monitoring response to tyrosine kinase-inhibitor (TKI) therapy based on the reduction of blood or bone marrow BCR-ABL1. Some patients with CML and very low or undetectable levels of BCR-ABL1 transcripts can stop TKI-therapy without CML recurrence. However, about 60 percent of patients discontinuing TKI-therapy have rapid leukaemia recurrence. This has increased the need for more sensitive and specific techniques to measure residual CML cells. The clinical challenge is to determine when it is safe to stop TKI-therapy. In this review we describe and critically evaluate the current state of CML clinical management, different technologies used to monitor measurable residual disease (MRD) focus on comparingRT-qPCR and new methods entering clinical practice. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of new methods.

A review of the challenge in measuring and standardizing BCR-ABL1

Breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (

The Case for Laboratory Developed Procedures: Quality and Positive Impact on Patient Care

An explosion of knowledge and technology is revolutionizing medicine and patient care. Novel testing must be brought to the clinic with safety and accuracy, but also in a timely and cost-effective manner, so that patients can benefit and laboratories can offer testing consistent with current guidelines. Under the oversight provided by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments, laboratories have been able to develop and optimize laboratory procedures for use in-house. Quality improvement programs, interlaboratory comparisons, and the ability of laboratories to adjust assays as needed to improve results, utilize new sample types, or incorporate new mutations, information, or technologies are positive aspects of Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments oversight of laboratory-developed procedures. Laboratories have a long history of successful service to patients operating under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. A series of detailed clinical examples illustrating the quality and positive impact of laboratory-developed procedures on patient care is provided. These examples also demonstrate how Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments oversight ensures accurate, reliable, and reproducible testing in clinical laboratories.

Molecular monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia-how low can you go?

Molecular monitoring of BCR-ABL1 transcripts for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is now used to assess response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including treatment failure that mandates a change of therapy. Therefore, many centers have adopted the molecular technique for measuring BCR-ABL1 and rely on conversion of values to the international reporting scale for appropriate clinical interpretation. However, the technique has a degree of inherent variability despite standardized procedures, which means care should be taken by the clinician when assessing response based on BCR-ABL1 cutoff limits. The last few years have witnessed the emergence of a new molecular response target, which is the achievement and maintenance of a deep molecular response. The ability to achieve treatment-free remission for some patients has shifted the relevant boundary for molecular response. However, the definitive safe BCR-ABL1 transcript level and length of the maintenance phase after which treatment cessation can be attempted has not yet been determined. For patients with TKI resistance, BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutation analysis remains an essential assessment to guide therapy. Furthermore, low-level mutation detection is clinically relevant for response prediction to subsequent TKI therapy for some patients. Multiple low-level mutations may be a biomarker of a clonally diverse disease with the propensity for resistance evolution. Overall, molecular monitoring, including low-level monitoring is a fundamental component of management for patients with CML.