A diagnostic algorithm for the atherogenic apolipoprotein B dyslipoproteinemias

Genetic Architecture and Clinical Outcomes of Combined Lipid Disturbances

BACKGROUND

Dyslipoproteinemia often involves simultaneous derangements of multiple lipid traits. We aimed to evaluate the phenotypic and genetic characteristics of combined lipid disturbances in a general population-based cohort.

METHODS

Among UK Biobank participants without prevalent coronary artery disease, we used blood lipid and apolipoprotein B concentrations to ascribe individuals into 1 of 6 reproducible and mutually exclusive dyslipoproteinemia subtypes. Incident coronary artery disease risk was estimated for each subtype using Cox proportional hazards models. Phenome-wide analyses and genome-wide association studies were performed for each subtype, followed by in silico causal gene prioritization and heritability analyses. Additionally, the prevalence of disruptive variants in causal genes for Mendelian lipid disorders was assessed using whole-exome sequence data.

RESULTS

Among 450 636 UK Biobank participants: 63 (0.01%) had chylomicronemia; 40 005 (8.9%) had hypercholesterolemia; 94 785 (21.0%) had combined hyperlipidemia; 13 998 (3.1%) had remnant hypercholesterolemia; 110 389 (24.5%) had hypertriglyceridemia; and 49 (0.01%) had mixed hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 11.1 (10.4-11.8) years, incident coronary artery disease risk varied across subtypes, with combined hyperlipidemia exhibiting the largest hazard (hazard ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.84-2.01]; P=2×10-16), even when accounting for non-HDL-C (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.30-1.60]; P=2.6×10-12). Genome-wide association studies revealed 250 loci significantly associated with dyslipoproteinemia subtypes, of which 72 (28.8%) were not detected in prior single lipid trait genome-wide association studies. Mendelian lipid variant carriers were rare (2.0%) among individuals with dyslipoproteinemia, but polygenic heritability was high, ranging from 23% for remnant hypercholesterolemia to 54% for combined hyperlipidemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous assessment of multiple lipid derangements revealed nuanced differences in coronary artery disease risk and genetic architectures across dyslipoproteinemia subtypes. These findings highlight the importance of looking beyond single lipid traits to better understand combined lipid and lipoprotein phenotypes and implications for disease risk.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B for cardiovascular care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Some experts and consensus groups continue to argue that apolipoprotein B (apoB) should not be introduced broadly into clinical care. But, too often, the present approach to clinical care is not succeeding. An important reason for this failure, we believe, is that the conventional approach limits what the expert clinician can accomplish and is too complex, confusing, and contradictory for primary care physicians to apply effectively in their practise.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are four major reasons that apoB should be measured routinely in clinical care. First, apoB is a more accurate marker of cardiovascular risk than LDL-C or non-HDL-C. Second, the measurement of apoB is standardized whereas the measurements of LDL-C and non-HDL-C are not. Third, with apoB and a conventional lipid panel, all the lipid phenotypes can be simply and accurately distinguished. This will improve the care of the expert. Fourth, apoB, as the single measure to evaluate the success of therapy, would simplify the process of care for primary care physicians.

SUMMARY

By introducing apoB broadly into clinical care, the process of care will be improved for both the expert and the primary care physician, and this will improve the outcomes of care.

Genetic assessment using whole-exome sequencing for a young hypertriglyceridemic patient with repeated acute pancreatitis

Hypertriglyceridemia is caused not only by environmental factors but also by genetic factors. Severe hypertriglyceridemia is prone to complications of acute pancreatitis. Here, we report a whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis for a young hypertriglyceridemic patient with recurrent acute pancreatitis and the patient's mother. A 28-year-old hypertriglyceridemic female was admitted to our hospital. At 23 years old, a health checkup clarified her hypertriglyceridemia. At the age of 26 and 27, she had repeated acute pancreatitis with severe hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglyceride level were 3,888 mg/dL and 12,080 mg/dL, respectively). The patient's BMI was 29.0 kg/m², and blood samples under fibrate medication showed triglyceride 451 mg/dL and HbA1c 7.2%. Type V dyslipidemia became more apparent at postprandial state. The WES analysis showed that the patients had two heterozygous variants in Apolipoprotein A5 (APOA5) gene (p.G185C and p.V153M), a heterozygous variant in Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene (p.R176C), three heterozygous variants in Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene (p.T1220I, p.R1453W and p.V470M). On the other hand, her mother, who had moderate hypertriglyceridemia without acute pancreatitis, had a heterozygous variant in APOA5 gene (p.G185C) and two heterozygous variants in CFTR gene (p.T1220I and p.V470M). These results suggest that the more severe pathology of the patient than her mother might be due to the possible compound heterozygous APOA5 variants, the heterozygous APOE variant, and the possible compound heterozygous CFTR variants. In this case, WES analyses were useful to evaluate not only the causative genes of hypertriglyceridemia (APOA5 and APOE) but also the genes involved in the development of acute pancreatitis (CFTR) simultaneously.

Diagnosis of remnant hyperlipidaemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, there has been interest for the development of simplified diagnosis algorithms of dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) in order to avoid the complex testing associated with the Fredrickson criteria (reference method). The purpose of this review is to present recent advances in the field of DBL with a focus on screening and diagnosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, two different multi-step algorithms for the diagnosis of DBL have been published and their performance has been compared to the Fredrickson criteria. Furthermore, a recent large study demonstrated that only a minority (38%) of DBL patients are carriers of the E2/E2 genotype and that these individuals presented a more severe phenotype.

SUMMARY

The current literature supports the fact that the DBL phenotype is more heterogeneous and complex than previously thought. Indeed, DBL patients can present with either mild or more severe phenotypes that can be distinguished as multifactorial remnant cholesterol disease and genetic apolipoprotein B deficiency. Measurement of apolipoprotein B as well as APOE gene testing are both essential elements in the diagnosis of DBL.

Palmar striated xanthomas in clinical practice

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of palmar striated xanthomas (PSX) in a wide spectrum of lipid disorders ranging from very severe hypercholesterolemia (homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia) to very severe hypertriglyceridemia (chylomicronemia).

Methods

This study involved 3,382 dyslipidemic Caucasian adult patients (1,856 men and 1,526 women) seen at the Chicoutimi Hospital Lipid Clinic (Quebec, Canada), covering a wide range of lipid disorders, from severe hypertriglyceridemia to severe hypercholesterolemia. Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson χ2 statistic, whereas univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) or nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis were used for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 5.1% (173/3382) of the studied patients presented PSX, a majority of them (67.1%) being women. PSX were observed in 18.8% of patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia and also among 14.1% of hypertriglyceridemic patients with partial lipoprotein lipase deficiency, 3.7% of patients with chylomicronemia and in all of those with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Overall, 10.7% of patients with PSX did not meet dysbetalipoproteinemia diagnosis criteria.

Conclusion

According to our study, the PSX prevalence estimate among patients without dysbetalipoproteinemia would be around 10% and they could be observed in a wide spectrum of lipid disorders associated with recurrent or sustained remnant lipoprotein accumulation.

The Evolving Story of Multifactorial Chylomicronemia Syndrome

Multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS or type V hyperlipoproteinemia) is the most frequent cause of severe hypertriglyceridemia and is associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. The estimated prevalence of MCS in the North American population is 1:600–1:250 and is increasing due to the increasing prevalence of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. Differentiating between familial chylomicronemia syndrome and MCS is crucial due to their very different treatments. In recent years, several cohort studies have helped to differentiate these two conditions, and recent evidence suggests that MCS itself is a heterogeneous condition. This mini-review will summarize recent literature on MCS, with a specific focus on the genetic determinants of the metabolic risk and the latest developments concerning the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options for these patients. Possible research directions in this field will also be discussed.

Apolipoproteins in vascular biology and atherosclerotic disease

Apolipoproteins are important structural components of plasma lipoproteins that influence vascular biology and atherosclerotic disease pathophysiology by regulating lipoprotein metabolism. Clinically important apolipoproteins related to lipid metabolism and atherogenesis include apolipoprotein B-100, apolipoprotein B-48, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein C-II, apolipoprotein C-III, apolipoprotein E and apolipoprotein(a). Apolipoprotein B-100 is the major structural component of VLDL, IDL, LDL and lipoprotein(a). Apolipoprotein B-48 is a truncated isoform of apolipoprotein B-100 that forms the backbone of chylomicrons. Apolipoprotein A-I provides the scaffolding for lipidation of HDL and has an important role in reverse cholesterol transport. Apolipoproteins C-II, apolipoprotein C-III and apolipoprotein E are involved in triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism. Apolipoprotein(a) covalently binds to apolipoprotein B-100 to form lipoprotein(a). In this Review, we discuss the mechanisms by which these apolipoproteins regulate lipoprotein metabolism and thereby influence vascular biology and atherosclerotic disease. Advances in the understanding of apolipoprotein biology and their translation into therapeutic agents to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease are also highlighted.

Dysbetalipoproteinemia: Differentiating Multifactorial Remnant Cholesterol Disease From Genetic ApoE Deficiency

CONTEXT

Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is characterized by the accumulation of remnant lipoprotein particles and associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). DBL is thought to be mainly caused by the presence of an E2/E2 genotype of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene, in addition to environmental factors. However, there exists considerable phenotypic variability among DBL patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives were to verify the proportion of DBL subjects, diagnosed using the gold standard Fredrickson criteria, who did not carry E2/E2 and to compare the clinical characteristics of DBL patients with and without E2/E2.

METHODS

A total of 12 432 patients with lipoprotein ultracentrifugation as well as APOE genotype or apoE phenotype data were included in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

Among the 12 432 patients, 4% (n = 524) were positive for Fredrickson criteria (F+), and only 38% (n = 197) of the F+ individuals were E2/E2. The F+ E2/E2 group had significantly higher remnant cholesterol concentration (3.44 vs 1.89 mmol/L) and had higher frequency of DBL-related xanthomas (24% vs 2%) and floating beta (95% vs 11%) than the F+ non-E2/E2 group (P < 0.0001). The F+ E2/E2 group had an independent higher risk of PVD (OR 11.12 [95% CI 1.87-66.05]; P = 0.008) events compared with the F+ non-E2/E2 group.

CONCLUSION

In the largest cohort of DBL worldwide, we demonstrated that the presence of E2/E2 was associated with a more severe DBL phenotype. We suggest that 2 DBL phenotypes should be distinguished: the multifactorial remnant cholesterol disease and the genetic apoE deficiency disease.

Biochemical risk factors of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: from a narrow and controversial approach to an integral approach and precision medicine

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines of management of dyslipidemias and prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are based on firm scientific evidence obtained by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, the role of elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C)as a risk factor of CVD and therapies to lower LDL-C are frequently disputed by colleagues who disagree with the conclusions of the RCTs published. This review focuses on this dispute, and evaluates the current approach of management of dyslipidemias and CVD prevention to find modern alternatives for more precise diagnosis and therapy of dyslipidemic patients.

AREAS COVERED

Recent interest in lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and remnants lipoproteins and in therapies that do not influence LDL-C levels primarily, such as anti-inflammatory drugs and icosapent ethyl, has revitalized our concern to optimize the care for patients with increased CVD risk without focusing simply on reduction of LDL-C by therapy with statins, ezitemibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

The limited characterization of study populations by measurement of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) followed by measurement or calculation of LDL-C should be extended by a more integral approach in order to realize precision diagnostics and precision medicine, for the sake of personalized patient care.

The clinical and laboratory investigation of dysbetalipoproteinemia

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (type III hyperlipoproteinemia) is a potentially underdiagnosed inherited dyslipidemia associated with greatly increased risk of coronary and peripheral vascular disease. The mixed hyperlipidemia observed in this disorder usually responds well to appropriate medical therapy and lifestyle modification. Although there are characteristic clinical features such as palmar and tuberous xanthomata, associated with dysbetalipoproteinemia, they are not always present, and their absence cannot be used to exclude the disorder. The routine lipid profile cannot distinguish dysbetalipoproteinemia from other causes of mixed hyperlipidemia and so additional investigations are required for confident diagnosis or exclusion. A range of investigations that have been proposed as potential diagnostic tests are discussed in this review, but the definitive biochemical test for dysbetalipoproteinemia is widely considered to be beta quantification. Beta quantification can determine the presence of "β-VLDL" in the supernatant following ultracentrifugation and whether the VLDL cholesterol to triglyceride ratio is elevated. Both features are considered hallmarks of the disease. However, beta quantification and other specialist tests are not widely available and are not high-throughput tests that can practically be applied to all patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. Using apolipoprotein B (as a ratio either to total or non-HDL cholesterol or as part of a multi-step algorithm) as an initial test to select patients for further investigation is a promising approach. Several studies have demonstrated a high degree of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity using these approaches and apolipoprotein B is a relatively low-cost test that is widely available on high-throughput platforms. Genetic testing is also important in the diagnosis, but it should be noted that most individuals with an E₂/₂ genotype do not suffer from remnant hyperlipidemia and around 10% of familial dysbetalipoproteinemia cases are caused by rarer, autosomal dominant mutations in APOE that will only be detected if the gene is fully sequenced. Wider implementation of diagnostic pathways utilizing apo B could lead to more rational use of specialist investigations and more consistent detection of patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia. Without the application of a consistent evidence-based approach to identifying dysbetalipoproteinemia, many cases are likely to remain undiagnosed.

Experimental Therapeutics for Challenging Clinical Care of a Patient with an Extremely Rare Homozygous APOC2 Mutation

Background

Among many causes of hypertriglyceridemia (HTG), familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare monogenic disorder that manifests as severe HTG and acute pancreatitis. Among the known causal genes for FCS, mutations in APOC2 only account for <2% of cases. Medical nutrition therapy is critical for FCS because usual triglyceride- (TG-) lowering medications are ineffective. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is an option to urgently reduce TG and pancreatitis episodes. Several novel biologics are under development to treat HTG and may provide therapeutic options for FCS in the future.

Objective

We present the challenging care of a 43-year-old man with FCS with apoC-II deficiency and the results of two types of TPE and of investigational TG-lowering biologic therapies.

Results

The patient's lipid profile was consistent with FCS. A novel homozygous variant was identified in APOC2, and its pathogenicity was confirmed. Even on a fat-restricted diet, his care was tremendously complicated with unremitting bouts of pancreatitis. TPE with FFP replacement lowered TG >90% post-sessions and appeared to reduce pancreatitis episodes. Experimental ANGPTL3 and APOC3 inhibitors each lowered TG by >50%.

Conclusions

Our case demonstrates the importance of delineating and defining the underlying etiology of a rare disorder to optimize therapy and to minimize unfavorable outcomes.

Evaluation of the Non-HDL Cholesterol to Apolipoprotein B Ratio as a Screening Test for Dysbetalipoproteinemia

BACKGROUND

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia is associated with the accumulation of remnant lipoproteins and premature cardiovascular disease. Identification of dysbetalipoproteinemia is important because family members may be affected. Diagnostic testing involves demonstration of β-lipoprotein in the VLDL fraction or characterization of apo E³. These investigations are complex and relatively expensive. The ratios of apo B to total cholesterol and triglycerides have been proposed as screening tests. However, the ratio of non-HDL cholesterol to apo B (NHDLC/apoB) could offer improved performance as the confounding effect of variations in HDL cholesterol is removed.

METHODS

We evaluated NHDLC/apoB as a screening test for dysbetalipoproteinemia, using β-quantification analysis as a reference standard. Data from 1637 patients referred over a 16-year period for β quantification were reviewed retrospectively. In 63 patients, diagnostic criteria for dysbetalipoproteinemia (VLDL cholesterol/triglyceride ratio ≥0.69 and presence of β-VLDL) were fulfilled, and 1574 patients had dysbetalipoproteinemia excluded.

RESULTS

Mean NHDLC/apoB in patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia was 7.3 mmol/g (SD, 1.5 mmol/g) and with dysbetalipoproteinemia excluded was 4.0 mmol/g (SD, 0.5 mmol/g). The optimum cutoff of >4.91 mmol/g achieved a diagnostic sensitivity of 96.8% (95% CI, 89.0-99.6) and specificity of 95.0% (95% CI, 93.8-96.0). NHDLC/apoB offered improved performance compared to total cholesterol/apoB [diagnostic sensitivity 92.1% (95% CI, 82.4-97.4) and specificity 94.5% (95% CI, 93.2-95.6) with a cutoff of >6.55 mmol/g]. NHDL/apoB reference ranges were not sex-dependent, although there was a significant difference between men and women for total cholesterol/apoB.

CONCLUSIONS

NHDLC/apoB offers a simple first-line test for dysbetalipoproteinemia in selecting patients with mixed hyperlipidemia for more complex investigations.

The spectrum of type III hyperlipoproteinemia

BACKGROUND

Type III hyperlipoproteinemia is a highly atherogenic dyslipoproteinemia characterized by hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia due to markedly increased numbers of cholesterol-enriched chylomicron and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) remnant lipoprotein particles. Type III can be distinguished from mixed hyperlipidemia based on a simple diagnostic algorithm, which involves total cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B (apoB). However, apoB is not measured routinely.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to determine if patients with type III could be distinguished from mixed hyperlipidemia based on lipoprotein lipids.

METHODS

Classification was based first on total cholesterol and triglyceride and then on the apoB diagnostic algorithm using apoB plus total cholesterol plus triglycerides, and validated by sequential ultracentrifugation. Four hundred and forty normals, 637 patients with hypertriglyceridemia, and 714 with hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia were studied. Plasma lipoproteins were separated by sequential ultracentrifugation and heparin-manganese precipitation. Cholesterol, triglyceride, and apoB were measured in plasma and isolated lipoprotein fractions.

RESULTS

Of the 1351 patients with hypertriglyceridemia, 49 had type III hyperlipoproteinemia, as diagnosed by the apoB algorithm and validated by ultracentrifugation. Plasma triglycerides were higher in the type III subjects: 4.16 mmol/L (3.35-6.08, 25th-75th percentile), but there was considerable overlap with the hypertriglyceridemic subjects 2.65 mmol/L (1.91-4.20, 25th-75th percentile) and the combined hyperlipidemic subjects 3.02 mmol/L (2.07-5.32, 25th-75th percentile). Similarly, total cholesterol was 4.79 mmol/L (4.31-5.58, 25th-75th percentile) for type III vs 5.5 mmol/L (4.64-5.78, 25th-75th percentile) and 7.02 mmol/L (6.39-7.96, 25th-75th percentile), respectively. By contrast, as identified by the apoB algorithm, the VLDL-C/TG, VLDL-C/VLDL-TG, VLDL-C/VLDL apoB, and VLDL apoB/LDL apoB ratios were all higher in type III than in the other hypertriglyceridemic dyslipoproteinemias with the exception of type V as diagnosed by the apoB algorithm.

CONCLUSION

Cholesterol and triglycerides cannot reliably distinguish type III hyperlipoproteinemia from mixed hyperlipidemia. Adding apoB and applying the apoB algorithm makes reliable diagnosis possible and easy. However, unless apoB is introduced into routine clinical care, type III hyperlipoproteinemia will often not be recognized. Given the cardiovascular risk associated with type III and its responsiveness to treatment, this should not be acceptable.

A Compound Heterozygous Mutation of Lipase Maturation Factor 1 is Responsible for Hypertriglyceridemia of a Patient

AIM

Dyslipidemia is the most common lipid metabolism disorder in humans, and its etiology remains elusive. Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is a type of dyslipidemia that contributes to atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. Previous studies have demonstrated that mutations in lipoprotein lipase (LPL), apolipoprotein CII (APOC2), apolipoprotein AV (APOA5), glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchored high-density lipoprotein-binding protein 1 (GPIHBP1), lipase maturation factor 1(LMF1), and glycerol-3 phosphate dehydrogenase 1 (GPD1) are responsible for HTG by using genomic microarrays and next-generation sequencing. The aim of this study was to identify genetic lesions in patients with HTG.

METHOD

Our study included a family of seven members from Jiangsu province across three generations. The proband was diagnosed with severe HTG, with a plasma triglyceride level of 38.70 mmol/L. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing were performed to explore the possible causative gene mutations for this patient. Furthermore, we measured the post-heparin LPL and hepatic lipase (HL) activities using an antiserum inhibition method.

RESULTS

A compound heterozygous mutation in the LMF1 gene (c.257C＞T/p.P86L and c.1184C＞T/p.T395I) was identified and co-segregated with the affected patient in this family. Both mutations were predicted to be deleterious by three bioinformatics programs (Polymorphism Phenotyping-2, Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant, and MutationTaster). The levels of the plasma post-heparin LPL and HL activities in the proband (57 and 177 mU/mL) were reduced to 24% and 75%, respectively, compared with those assayed in the control subject with normal plasma triglycerides.

CONCLUSION

A compound heterozygous mutation of LMF1 was identified in the presenting patient with severe HTG. These findings expand on the spectrum of LMF1 mutations and contribute to the genetic diagnosis and counseling of families with HTG.

Highly efficacious, long-term, triglyceride lowering with rituximab therapy in a patient with autoimmune hypertriglyceridemia

We report the first case of an autoimmune hypertriglyceridemia successfully treated with rituximab, an anti-CD20-targeted monoclonal antibody. A 45-year-old man, with prior autoimmune conditions, developed severe, acquired hypertriglyceridemia resistant to traditional triglyceride lowering therapies. After the elimination of secondary or genetic causes, we detected the presence of anti-LPL-IgG by immunoblot. After 3 infusions of rituximab, we observed a marked improvement of his hypertriglyceridemia, concomitant with a reduction in plasma anti-LPL antibody titer and B-lymphocytes counts. The patient has been receiving rituximab maintenance therapy for 5 years without any serious adverse events and with excellent control of his previous, marked hypertriglyceridemia.

Update on the laboratory investigation of dyslipidemias

The role of the clinical laboratory is evolving to provide more information to clinicians to assess cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and target therapy more effectively. Current routine methods to measure LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), the Friedewald calculation, ultracentrifugation, electrophoresis and homogeneous direct methods have established limitations. Studies suggest that LDL and HDL size or particle concentration are alternative methods to predict future CVD risk. At this time there is no consensus role for lipoprotein particle or subclasses in CVD risk assessment. LDL and HDL particle concentration are measured by several methods, namely gradient gel electrophoresis, ultracentrifugation-vertical auto profile, nuclear magnetic resonance and ion mobility. It has been suggested that HDL functional assays may be better predictors of CVD risk. To assess the issue of lipoprotein subclasses/particles and HDL function as potential CVD risk markers robust, simple, validated analytical methods are required. In patients with small dense LDL particles, even a perfect measure of LDL-C will not reflect LDL particle concentration. Non-HDL-C is an alternative measurement and includes VLDL and CM remnant cholesterol and LDL-C. However, apolipoprotein B measurement may more accurately reflect LDL particle numbers. Non-fasting lipid measurements have many practical advantages. Defining thresholds for treatment with new measurements of CVD risk remain a challenge. In families with genetic variants, ApoCIII and lipoprotein (a) may be additional risk factors. Recognition of familial causes of dyslipidemias and diagnosis in childhood will result in early treatment. This review discusses the limitations in current laboratory technologies to predict CVD risk and reviews the evidence for emergent approaches using newer biomarkers in clinical practice.

Apolipoprotein C-II: New findings related to genetics, biochemistry, and role in triglyceride metabolism

Apolipoprotein C-II (apoC-II) is a small exchangeable apolipoprotein found on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL), such as chylomicrons (CM) and very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), and on high-density lipoproteins (HDL), particularly during fasting. ApoC-II plays a critical role in TRL metabolism by acting as a cofactor of lipoprotein lipase (LPL), the main enzyme that hydrolyses plasma triglycerides (TG) on TRL. Here, we present an overview of the role of apoC-II in TG metabolism, emphasizing recent novel findings regarding its transcriptional regulation and biochemistry. We also review the 24 genetic mutations in the APOC2 gene reported to date that cause hypertriglyceridemia (HTG). Finally, we describe the clinical presentation of apoC-II deficiency and assess the current therapeutic approaches, as well as potential novel emerging therapies.

High prevalence of apolipoprotein B dyslipoproteinemias in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: The lifelines cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major adverse consequence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The association of NAFLD with various apolipoprotein B (apoB) dyslipoproteinemias is unclear. We determined the prevalence of specific apoB dyslipoproteinemias in subjects with suspected NAFLD.

METHODS

This study was conducted among 22,865 fasting adults living in the northern part of the Netherlands (Lifelines Cohort Study). Six apoB dyslipoproteinemias were defined using an algorithm derived from apoB, total cholesterol and triglycerides. NAFLD was defined as Fatty Liver Index (FLI) ≥60. Advanced hepatic fibrosis was defined as NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) ≥0.676.

RESULTS

4790 participants (20.9%) had an FLI≥60. NAFLD subjects were older, more likely to be men, more obese and more often had diabetes and metabolic syndrome (P<0.001 for each). Among NAFLD subjects, any apoB dyslipoproteinemia was present in 61.5% vs. 16.5% in subjects without NAFLD (P<0.001). Elevated chylomicrons were not observed in NAFLD. In univariate analysis, NAFLD was associated with a higher prevalence of each apoB dyslipoproteinemia vs. subjects with an FLI<60 (P<0.001), except for low density lipoprotein (LDL) dyslipoproteinemia. Additionally, each apoB dyslipoproteinemia was independently associated with NAFLD in age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression analysis, including the apoB dyslipoproteinemias together (P<0.001). The prevalence of apoB dyslipoproteinemias was not altered in subjects with NFS ≥0.676.

CONCLUSIONS

NAFLD rather than advanced hepatic fibrosis is independently associated with increased prevalence of chylomicrons+very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) remnants, VLDL, LDL and VLDL+LDL dyslipoproteinemias. ApoB dyslipoproteinemias may contribute to increased CVD risk associated with NAFLD.

Therapeutic lipid target achievements among high and highest risk patients: results from the CEPHEUS study in the Arabian Gulf

OBJECTIVE

To determine lipid target achievements of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (apo B) in the Centralized Pan-Middle East Survey on the undertreatment of hypercholesterolemia (CEPHEUS) in Arabian Gulf States patients with high and highest risk according to the joint Consensus Statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACC).

METHODS

CEPHEUS was conducted in patients (≥ 18 years of age) in six Middle Eastern countries between November 2009 and July 2010 on lipid lowering drugs (LLDs). Serum samples collected included total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides (TGs), apo B, and apolipoprotein A1 (apo A1).

RESULTS

The overall mean age of the cohort (n = 5275) was 56 ± 13 years, 58% (n = 3060) were male and 69% (n = 3635) were highest risk. LDL-C target was achieved in 25%, non-HDL-C in 36% and apo B in 38% of patients in the highest risk cohort compared with LDL-C 46%, non-HDL-C 58% and apo B 51% in the high risk group. In patients with TGs ≥ 2.2 mmol/L, LDL-C target was achieved in 16% and apo B in 15% of patients in the highest risk group compared with LDL-C 32% and apo B 22% in the high risk cohort.

CONCLUSION

Despite being on LLDs, a large proportion of high and highest risk patients in the Arabian Gulf are not at recommended lipid targets and remain at a substantial residual risk for cardiovascular diseases. Apo B may be used as an additional target in patients with triglycerides ≥ 2.2 mmol/L. The findings should be interpreted in light of the study's limitations.

New therapies targeting apoB metabolism for high-risk patients with inherited dyslipidaemias: what can the clinician expect?

Apolipoprotein B (apoB) has a key role in the assembly and secretion of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) from the liver. Plasma apoB concentration affects the number of circulating atherogenic particles, and serves as an independent predictor of the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. While statins are the most potent apoB-lowering agents currently prescribed, their efficacy in achieving therapeutic targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in high-risk patients, such as those with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), is limited. Resistance and intolerance to statins also occurs in a significant number of patients, necessitating new types of lipid-lowering therapies. Monoclonal antibodies against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9; AMG 145 and REGN727), a sequence-specific antisense oligonucleotide against apoB mRNA (mipomersen) and a synthetic inhibitor of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP; lomitapide) have been tested in phase III clinical trials, particularly in patients with FH. The trials demonstrated the efficacy of these agents in lowering apoB, LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) by 32-55 %, 37-66 %, 38-61 % and 22-50 % (AMG 145), 21-68 %, 29-72 %, 16-60 % and 8-36 % (REGN727), 16-71 %, 15-71 %, 12-66 % and 23-49 % (mipomersen) and 24-55 %, 25-51 %, 27-50 % and 15-19 % (lomitapide), respectively. Monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9 have an excellent safety profile and may be indicated not only in heterozygous FH, but also in statin-intolerant patients and those with other inherited dyslipidemias, such as familial combined hyperlipidaemia and familial elevation in Lp(a). Mipomersen and lomitapide increase hepatic fat content and are at present indicated for treating adult patients with homozygous FH alone.

Autoimmune severe hypertriglyceridemia induced by anti-apolipoprotein C-II antibody

CONTEXT

Among type V hyperlipoproteinemias, only one-fourth of the patients have genetic defects in lipoprotein lipase (LPL) or in its associated molecules; the exact mechanism in other patients is usually unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to report a case of severe hypertriglyceridemia induced by anti-apolipoprotein (apo) C-II autoantibody and to clarify its pathogenesis.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

A 29-year-old Japanese woman presented with severe persistent hypertriglyceridemia since the age of 20 years. The past history was negative for acute pancreatitis, eruptive xanthomas, or lipemia retinalis. LPL mass and activities were normal. Plasma apo C-II levels were extremely low, but no mutation was observed in APOC2.

RESULTS

Apo C-II protein was detected in the serum by immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. Large amounts of IgG and IgM were incorporated with apo C-II protein coimmunoprecipitated by anti-apo C-II antibody. IgG, but not IgM, purified from the serum prevented interaction of apo C-II with lipid substrate and diminished LPL hydrolysis activity.

CONCLUSION

We identified anti-apo C-II antibody in a myeloma-unrelated severe hypertriglyceridemic patient. In vitro analysis confirmed that the autoantibody disrupted the interaction between apo C-II and lipid substrate, suggesting the etiological role of anti-apo C-II antibody in severe hypertriglyceridemia in this patient.

Obesity, adiposity, and dyslipidemia: a consensus statement from the National Lipid Association

The term "fat" may refer to lipids as well as the cells and tissue that store lipid (ie, adipocytes and adipose tissue). "Lipid" is derived from "lipos," which refers to animal fat or vegetable oil. Adiposity refers to body fat and is derived from "adipo," referring to fat. Adipocytes and adipose tissue store the greatest amount of body lipids, including triglycerides and free cholesterol. Adipocytes and adipose tissue are active from an endocrine and immune standpoint. Adipocyte hypertrophy and excessive adipose tissue accumulation can promote pathogenic adipocyte and adipose tissue effects (adiposopathy), resulting in abnormal levels of circulating lipids, with dyslipidemia being a major atherosclerotic coronary heart disease risk factor. It is therefore incumbent upon lipidologists to be among the most knowledgeable in the understanding of the relationship between excessive body fat and dyslipidemia. On September 16, 2012, the National Lipid Association held a Consensus Conference with the goal of better defining the effect of adiposity on lipoproteins, how the pathos of excessive body fat (adiposopathy) contributes to dyslipidemia, and how therapies such as appropriate nutrition, increased physical activity, weight-management drugs, and bariatric surgery might be expected to impact dyslipidemia. It is hoped that the information derived from these proceedings will promote a greater appreciation among clinicians of the impact of excess adiposity and its treatment on dyslipidemia and prompt more research on the effects of interventions for improving dyslipidemia and reducing cardiovascular disease risk in overweight and obese patients.

Comparison of therapeutic lipid target achievements among high-risk patients in Oman

We compared therapeutic lipid target achievements among patients with diabetes or coronary heart disease (CHD) in Oman. A retrospective chart review of 94 patients was conducted at an outpatient clinic in Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. The variables included low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (apo B). The overall mean age of the cohort was 59 ± 12 years, 54% were male, 66% were diabetic, 48% hypertensive, 45% had CHD, 94% were on simvastatin, 4% were on fenofibrate, and 2% were on both simvastatin and fenofibrate. Lipid goal attainments of calculated LDL-C (<2.6 mmol/L), apo B (<0.9 g/L), and non-HDL-C (<3.36 mmol/L) were reached in 52%, 39%, and 53% of the patients, respectively. A significant proportion of high-risk patients treated with lipid-lowering agents reach LDL-C but not the apo B treatment targets, suggesting that the use of apo B target values should also be considered.

Evaluation and treatment of hypertriglyceridemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to develop clinical practice guidelines on hypertriglyceridemia.

PARTICIPANTS

The Task Force included a chair selected by The Endocrine Society Clinical Guidelines Subcommittee (CGS), five additional experts in the field, and a methodologist. The authors received no corporate funding or remuneration.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Consensus was guided by systematic reviews of evidence, e-mail discussion, conference calls, and one in-person meeting. The guidelines were reviewed and approved sequentially by The Endocrine Society's CGS and Clinical Affairs Core Committee, members responding to a web posting, and The Endocrine Society Council. At each stage, the Task Force incorporated changes in response to written comments.

CONCLUSIONS

The Task Force recommends that the diagnosis of hypertriglyceridemia be based on fasting levels, that mild and moderate hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides of 150-999 mg/dl) be diagnosed to aid in the evaluation of cardiovascular risk, and that severe and very severe hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides of > 1000 mg/dl) be considered a risk for pancreatitis. The Task Force also recommends that patients with hypertriglyceridemia be evaluated for secondary causes of hyperlipidemia and that subjects with primary hypertriglyceridemia be evaluated for family history of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease. The Task Force recommends that the treatment goal in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridemia be a non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in agreement with National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel guidelines. The initial treatment should be lifestyle therapy; a combination of diet modification and drug therapy may also be considered. In patients with severe or very severe hypertriglyceridemia, a fibrate should be used as a first-line agent.

Mutations in LPL, APOC2, APOA5, GPIHBP1 and LMF1 in patients with severe hypertriglyceridaemia

OBJECTIVES

The severe forms of hypertriglyceridaemia (HTG) are caused by mutations in genes that lead to the loss of function of lipoprotein lipase (LPL). In most patients with severe HTG (TG > 10 mmol L(-1) ), it is a challenge to define the underlying cause. We investigated the molecular basis of severe HTG in patients referred to the Lipid Clinic at the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam.

METHODS

The coding regions of LPL, APOC2, APOA5 and two novel genes, lipase maturation factor 1 (LMF1) and GPI-anchored high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-binding protein 1 (GPIHBP1), were sequenced in 86 patients with type 1 and type 5 HTG and 327 controls.

RESULTS

In 46 patients (54%), rare DNA sequence variants were identified, comprising variants in LPL (n = 19), APOC2 (n = 1), APOA5 (n = 2), GPIHBP1 (n = 3) and LMF1 (n = 8). In 22 patients (26%), only common variants in LPL (p.Asp36Asn, p.Asn318Ser and p.Ser474Ter) and APOA5 (p.Ser19Trp) could be identified, whereas no mutations were found in 18 patients (21%). In vitro validation revealed that the mutations in LMF1 were not associated with compromised LPL function. Consistent with this, five of the eight LMF1 variants were also found in controls and therefore cannot account for the observed phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of mutations in LPL was 34% and mostly restricted to patients with type 1 HTG. Mutations in GPIHBP1 (n = 3), APOC2 (n = 1) and APOA5 (n = 2) were rare but the associated clinical phenotype was severe. Routine sequencing of candidate genes in severe HTG has improved our understanding of the molecular basis of this phenotype associated with acute pancreatitis and may help to guide future individualized therapeutic strategies.

Prehypertension in dyslipidemic individuals; relationship to metabolic parameters and intima-media thickness

INTRODUCTION

Like hypertension, prehypertension is associated with cardiovascular disease.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate: a) the prevalence of prehypertension/hypertension in individuals with various dyslipidemic phenotypes; b) the relation between blood pressure (BP) and other risk factors for atherosclerosis; c) atherogenic potential of prehypertension by the assessment of intima-media thickness of the arteria carotis communis (IMT).

METHODS

667 clinically asymptomatic subjects were divided into four dyslipidemic phenotypes (DLP) according to apolipoprotein B (apoB) and triglycerides (TG): DLP1 (n=198, normo-apoB/normo-TG), DLP2 (n=179, normo-apoB/hyper-TG), DLP3 (n=87, hyper-apoB/normo-TG), DLP4 (n=203, hyper-apoB/hyper-TG). DLP1 served as a control group.

RESULTS

There was significantly higher prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension in subjects with dyslipidemia (DLP2 43.0%, 41.3%; DLP3 42.5%, 29.9%; DLP4 42.4%, 47.8%) than in normolipidemic individuals (DLP1 32.8%, 20.2%). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP + DBP) correlated with age, total cholesterol, TG, non-HDL-cholesterol, body mass index and waist circumference; SBP additionally with C-peptide, fasting glycemia; DBP additionally with apoB, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. The IMT of hypertensive and of prehypertensive subjects was higher than that of subjects with normal BP in all DLPs.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of prehypertension was higher in all dyslipidemic patients. The common prevalence of prehypertension/hypertension was highest in the hypertriglyceridemic subjects. Prehypertensive and hypertensive patients had higher IMT than normotensive individuals in all DLPs.

The evolution and refinement of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease

Traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease such as systemic hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, all described more than half a century ago, are relatively few in number. Efforts to expand the epidemiologic canon have met with limited success because of the high hurdle of causality. Fortunately, another solution to current deficiencies in risk assessment-in particular, the underestimation of risk both before and after initiation of pharmacotherapy-may exist. Parallel to the investigation of novel biomarkers, such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, ongoing research has yielded improved metrics of known causative conditions. This evolution of traditional risk factors, heralded by measures such as ambulatory blood pressure, central hemodynamics, low density lipoprotein particle concentration, genetic testing, and "vascular age," may better address the detection gap in cardiovascular disease.

Treatment of lipid disorders in obesity

Obesity is the most common cause of secondary hyperlipidemia. Atherogenic dyslipidemia refers to elevated triglycerides, low HDL-cholesterol and small dense LDL associated with visceral obesity and metabolic syndrome. Obesity may also be associated with isolated low HDL-cholesterol or high triglycerides and postprandial hyperlipidemia. While some obese patients have high LDL cholesterol concentrations, obesity has a more pronounced effect on other atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins. Obesity may aggravate familial lipid disorders. Lipid disorders in obesity are responsive to weight loss, pharmacotherapy and weight loss surgery. Statins are the lipid-lowering drug of choice, together with lifestyle change. Hard clinical end point data to support combinations of statins with other drugs is lacking. After weight loss surgery, the absolute risk of cardiovascular disease should be reassessed, but tools to facilitate risk assessment need to be developed.

Apolipoproteins: metabolic role and clinical biochemistry applications

Lipoprotein metabolism is dependent on apolipoproteins, multifunctional proteins that serve as templates for the assembly of lipoprotein particles, maintain their structure and direct their metabolism through binding to membrane receptors and regulation of enzyme activity. The three principal functions of lipoproteins are contribution to interorgan fuel (triglyceride) distribution (by means of the fuel transport pathway), to the maintenance of the extracellular cholesterol pool (by means of the overflow pathway) and reverse cholesterol transport. The most important clinical application of apolipoprotein measurements in the plasma is in the assessment of cardiovascular risk. Concentrations of apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein AI (and their ratio) seem to be better markers of cardiovascular risk than conventional markers such as total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol. Apolipoprotein measurements are also better standardized than the conventional tests. We suggest that measurements of apolipoprotein AI and apolipoprotein B are included as a part of the specialist lipid profile. We also suggest that lipoprotein (a) should be measured as part of the initial assessment of dyslipidaemias because of its consistent association with cardiovascular risk. Genotyping of apolipoprotein E isoforms remains useful in the investigation of mixed dyslipidaemias. Lastly, the role of postprandial metabolism is increasingly recognized in the context of atherogenesis, obesity and diabetes. This requires better markers of chylomicrons, very-low-density lipoproteins and remnant particles. Measurements of apolipoprotein B48 and remnant lipoprotein cholesterol are currently the key tests in this emerging field.

Application and validation of a diagnostic algorithm for the atherogenic apoB dyslipoproteinemias: ApoB dyslipoproteinemias in a Dutch population-based study

BACKGROUND

We applied a diagnostic algorithm using apolipoprotein B (apoB) in combination with triglycerides (TG) and total cholesterol to determine the prevalence of dyslipoproteinemias in the general population. We also characterized the overall cardiovascular (CV) risk profiles, including arterial structure and function as measured with a panel of noninvasive parameters.

DESIGN

Clinical and biochemical characteristics and noninvasive measurements of atherosclerosis (NIMA) were determined in 1517 individuals, aged 50-70 years.

RESULTS

In general, all dyslipoproteinemias were characterized by a worse CV risk profile and deteriorated outcomes of NIMA compared to those with normal apolipoprotein B (< 1·2 g L(-1)) and TG (< 1·5 mM) levels. The prevalence of hyperapoB-hyperTG was 15·1%, and these individuals showed the most abnormal atheroma-related parameters: reduced ankle-brachial-index at rest (-3·5%) and after exercise (-9·8%), increased intima-media thickness (+5·5%) and more carotid plaques (+39·1%). The prevalence of normoapoB-hyperTG because of increased VLDL was 18·1% and 2·3% because of increased chylomicrons and VLDL, and in these groups, the parameters related to stiffness (e.g. pulse-wave-velocity +7·6% and +5·2%, respectively) were most abnormal. Adjustment for apolipoprotein B (apoB) reduced differences in NIMA in the hyperapoB-hyperTG group, whereas adjustment for TG reduced differences in NIMA in the normoapoB-hyperTG group.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall prevalence of dyslipoproteinemias according to the algorithm was approximately 40% in the Dutch population. The different dyslipoproteinemias showed a less favourable CV risk profile and deteriorated NIMA parameters, reflecting increased subclinical atherosclerosis. Furthermore, different effects on different NIMA parameters were observed in the different dyslipoproteinemias.

Potential effects on clinical management of treatment algorithms on the basis of apolipoprotein-B/A-1 and total/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratios

BACKGROUND

Apolipoprotein-B/A-1 (apoB/A-R) and total/high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratios (TC/HDL-R) outperform non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) suggested by Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines for predicting cardiovascular (CV) outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential effects that implementing our proposed apoB/A-R and TC/HDL-R treatment algorithms would have on clinical management.

METHODS

We performed a chart review of all patients referred to the University of Michigan Lipid Clinic from January 2004 to June 2010. ATP III guidelines, including Framingham Risk Scores, were used to determine whether patients met non-HDL-C goals upon referral. Next, we evaluated whether subsequent management would differ if algorithms based upon potential apoB/A-R or TC/HDL-R targets derived from the literature were followed.

RESULTS

Among patients (n = 692), mean non-HDL-C, apoB/A-R, and TC/HDL-R were 192.2 ± 85.8 mg/dL, 0.92 ± 0.64, and 6.7 ± 8.0, respectively. Although moderately well correlated with apoB (r = 0.56, P < .01), non-HDL-C was less related to apoB/A-R (r = 0.20, P < .01) and TC/HDL-R (r = 0.39, P < .01). Most low-risk patients (<2 risk factors; n = 207) at non-HDL-C goal (<190 mg/dL) also met apoB/A-R <0.9 (79%) and TC/HDL-R <6.0 (92%) targets. However, a minority of high-risk patients (Framingham Risk Score >20%, cardiovascular disease or risk equivalent; n = 307) meeting non-HDL-C goal (<130 mg/dL) achieved targets for apoB/A-R <0.5 (21%) or TC/HDL-C <3.5 (42%). The percentages of intermediate-risk patients meeting both non-HDL-C and ratio goals varied; nonetheless, few met an aggressive apoB/A-R <0.6 (36%-50%) target.

CONCLUSIONS

Most high- and many intermediate-risk patients at non-HDL-C goals would require more aggressive treatment to reach the suggested apoB/A-R or TC/HDL-R targets. Whether this strategy yields superior outcomes merits future investigation.

Novel drugs in familial combined hyperlipidemia: lessons from type 2 diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are prevalent entities that share many features of the metabolic syndrome. Recent findings suggest that FCHL and T2DM are less distinct than initially anticipated, which could offer new insights for their therapeutic approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genetic association studies have provided evidence for a common genetic background (upstream transcription factor 1, activating transcription factor 6, transcription factor 7-like 2 and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha) between FCHL and T2DM. The metabolic overlap can be illustrated by the presence of ectopic fat accumulation and insulin resistance (muscle, adipose tissue and liver). We have shown that FCHL patients are at increased risk to develop T2DM. This indicates that both entities are not static, but instead the former is able to migrate to the latter as insulin resistance progresses. Given these new findings, it can be anticipated that FCHL patients could also benefit from insulin-sensitizing therapy such as pioglitazone and metformin. Indeed, pilot studies have demonstrated that pioglitazone might be advantageous in FCHL patients.

SUMMARY

Recent studies suggest that FCHL patients have an increased risk to develop T2DM, which has important clinical implications. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether FCHL patients can be protected from new-onset T2DM and premature cardiovascular events with insulin-sensitizing therapy.

Apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol for identifying individuals at increased cardiovascular risk

BACKGROUND

To compare apolipoprotein B (apoB), non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-c) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) for identifying individuals with a deteriorated cardiovascular (CV) risk profile, including a panel of subclinical atherosclerosis measurements and prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a Dutch population-based cohort.

METHODS

Clinical and biochemical measurements and a panel of noninvasive parameters of subclinical atherosclerosis were determined in 1517 individuals, aged 50-70 years.

RESULTS

Both men and women with increasing levels of apoB and non-HDL-c were more obese, had higher blood pressure and fasting glucose levels, and a more atherogenic lipid profile. Furthermore, compared to the reference group (composed of those with apoB, non-HDL-c and LDL-c levels in the bottom quartiles), participants with high apoB and high non-HDL-c levels had a lower ankle-brachial index at rest (-3.5% and -3.1%, respectively) and after exercise (-6.3% and -4.7%, respectively), a thicker near wall (+4.8% and +4.2%, respectively), far wall (both +6.2%), and mean intima-media thickness (+5.7% and +5.3%, respectively) and more plaques (+54.2% and +54.3%, respectively). In addition, they also showed increased stiffness parameters (e.g. pulse wave velocity both +3.6%). Less clear differences in CV risk profile and subclinical atherosclerosis parameters were observed when participants were stratified by LDL-c level. Furthermore, apoB but not LDL-c detected prevalent CVD, and non-HDL-c only detected prevalent CVD in men. The discriminatory power for prevalent CVD expressed as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.60 (P < 0.001) for apoB, 0.57 (P = 0.001) for non-HDL-c and 0.54 (P = 0.108) for LDL-c.

CONCLUSION

Our data support the use of first apoB and secondly non-HDL-c above LDL-c for identifying individuals from the general population with a compromised CV phenotype.

Diagnosis and treatment of apolipoprotein B dyslipoproteinemias

Conventionally, atherogenic dyslipidemias have been defined by elevated levels of triglyceride and/or LDL cholesterol. However, cholesterol and triglycerides are not metabolically and physically independent entities. Rather, they are constituents of the atherogenic apolipoprotein B (apoB) particles, which differ in their origin and their metabolic function. Moreover, the risk of vascular disease is not related to the plasma concentration of cholesterol or triglyceride per se, but to the number, composition and size of the apoB particles, within which the cholesterol and triglycerides are contained. After all, the entire apoB particle--rather than individual cholesterol or triglyceride molecules--enters and is trapped within the arterial wall, and this particle initiates and sustains the process that results in atherosclerosis. Accordingly, we suggest a change of name and focus from dyslipidemias to dyslipoproteinemias. Virtually all the atherogenic apoB dyslipoproteinemias can be specifically identified on the basis of plasma levels of cholesterol, triglyceride and apoB. Not only does this enable an accurate diagnosis in the individual, but the major familial dyslipoproteinemias can be identified as well. Here, we review the diagnostic algorithm for apoB dyslipoproteinemias and provide, for the first time, a treatment plan on the basis of a reduction of atherogenic lipoprotein particles rather than plasma lipids.