Antinuclear antibody testing — misunderstood or misbegotten?

Relevance of antinuclear antibody in diagnosis and characteristics of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis rely upon clinical and paraclinical data that are supportive of MS in the absence of a better explanation. Patients referred for consideration of a MS diagnosis often undergo an extensive serologic workup including antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing, even when an individual already meets diagnostic criteria for MS. It is unclear whether ANA serostatus is associated with clinical outcomes in MS. The present study aims to determine if ANA seropositivity in those referred with concern for MS differs in those who meet 2017 revised McDonald criteria compared to those who did not receive a diagnosis of MS. Associations between ANA seropositivity and clinical or radiological phenotype of MS patients are also explored.

METHODS

The cohort included people at least 18 years old, referred to our tertiary care MS center with concern for MS (regardless of prior diagnosis) who had an ANA test with known titer completed within one year of first evaluation. Electronic health record (EHR) charts were manually reviewed, and MRIs underwent blinded review by a radiologist with training in neuroradiology. Diagnosis of MS was determined by a neuroimmunologist and was based on 2017 revised McDonald Criteria. Results are reported as odds ratios from multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex at birth, race, smoking history, personal history of comorbid autoimmune conditions, and family history of autoimmunity. Within the MS cohort, similar analytical models were performed to assess association between ANA and clinical and radiological characteristics.

RESULTS

A final cohort of 258 patients was analyzed (out of 542 referrals): 106 nonMS and 152 with MS. There was no association between MS (vs. nonMS) diagnosis and ANA status (ANA positive n = 74) in the multivariable models (OR 1.5, 95 % CI 0.82, 2.72, p = 0.20). Among those with MS, there was no association of ANA seropositivity with the odds of atypical brain MRI features, number of cardinal MRI areas involved, location of MRI lesions, or of having an atypical presentation of first demyelinating event. Black race (OR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.27, 6.26, p = 0.01) and family history of autoimmunity (OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.09, 3.98, p = 0.03) were independently associated with increased odds of ANA positivity. Within the MS cohort analysis, progressive MS (PMS; vs relapsing-remitting MS), a covariate in the model, appeared to be at higher odds of being ANA positive (OR 3.6, 95 % CI 1.03, 13.05, p = 0.046) but only when assessing mean area of cardinal MS locations.

CONCLUSIONS

While ANA testing does not appear to be useful in distinguishing MS from non-MS, it remains less clear as to whether it may be associated with differences in the clinical course of MS (relapsing-remitting vs progressive). Future studies should aim to systematically evaluate whether those who are ANA positive are more likely, in well-designed and representative prospective cohorts, to be diagnosed with or develop progressive MS. Whether a positive ANA early in MS is associated with increased risk over time of developing or diagnosing another systemic autoimmune disease would also be of interest.

Clinical Significance of Antibodies to DFS70 in Immunoinflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

The relevance of the problem of immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IIRD) for modern medicine is determined by their high prevalence in the population, the difficulty of early diagnosis, the rapid development of disability and poor life prognosis. Recent data on the significance of anti-DFS70 have opened up new possibilities for optimizing the step-by-step diagnosis of IIRD. The detection of these antibodies can help in the interpretation of a positive result for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (IIFA-HEp-2) in the absence of autoantibodies specific for IIRD. Detection of anti-DFS70 in antinuclear factor (ANF) seropositive patients without clinical and/or serological markers characteristic of a certain disease from the IIRD group can be considered as a potential marker that excludes this group of diseases.

Unveiling the hidden role of the interaction between CD36 and FcγRIIb: implications for autoimmune disorders

BACKGROUND

The role of the scavenger receptor CD36 in cell metabolism and the immune response has been investigated mainly in macrophages, dendritic cells, and T cells. However, its involvement in B cells has not been comprehensively examined.

METHODS

To investigate the function of CD36 in B cells, we exposed Cd36fl/flMB1cre mice, which lack CD36 specifically in B cells, to apoptotic cells to trigger an autoimmune response. To validate the proteins that interact with CD36 in primary B cells, we conducted mass spectrometry analysis following anti-CD36 immunoprecipitation. Immunofluorescence and co-immunoprecipitation were used to confirm the protein interactions.

RESULTS

The data revealed that mice lacking CD36 in B cells exhibited a reduction in germinal center B cells and anti-DNA antibodies in vivo. Mass spectrometry analysis identified 30 potential candidates that potentially interact with CD36. Furthermore, the interaction between CD36 and the inhibitory Fc receptor FcγRIIb was first discovered by mass spectrometry and confirmed through immunofluorescence and co-immunoprecipitation techniques. Finally, deletion of FcγRIIb in mice led to decreased expression of CD36 in marginal zone B cells, germinal center B cells, and plasma cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that CD36 in B cells is a critical regulator of autoimmunity. The interaction of CD36-FcγRIIb has the potential to serve as a therapeutic target for the treatment of autoimmune disorders.

Programmable Gravity Self-Driven Microfluidic Chip for Point-of-Care Multiplied Immunoassays

Point-of-care testing (POCT) is experiencing a groundbreaking transformation with microfluidic chips, which offer precise fluid control and manipulation at the microscale. Nevertheless, chip design or operation for existing platforms is rather cumbersome, with some even heavily depending on external drivers or devices, impeding their broader utilization. This study develops a unique programmable gravity self-driven microfluidic chip (PGSMC) capable of simultaneous multi-reagent sequential release, multi-target analysis, and multi-chip operation. All necessary reagents are introduced in a single step, and the process is initiated simply by flipping the PGSMC vertically, eliminating the need for additional steps or devices. Additionally, it demonstrates successful immunoassays in less than 60 min for antinuclear antibodies testing, compared to more than 120 min by traditional methods. Assessment using 25 clinically diagnosed cases showcases remarkable sensitivity (96%), specificity (100%), and accuracy (99%). These outcomes underscored its potential as a promising platform for POCT with high accuracy, speed, and reliability, highlighting its capability for automated fluid control.

Identifying antinuclear antibody positive individuals at risk for developing systemic autoimmune disease: development and validation of a real-time risk model

Objective

Positive antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) cause diagnostic dilemmas for clinicians. Currently, no tools exist to help clinicians interpret the significance of a positive ANA in individuals without diagnosed autoimmune diseases. We developed and validated a risk model to predict risk of developing autoimmune disease in positive ANA individuals.

Methods

Using a de-identified electronic health record (EHR), we randomly chart reviewed 2,000 positive ANA individuals to determine if a systemic autoimmune disease was diagnosed by a rheumatologist. A priori, we considered demographics, billing codes for autoimmune disease-related symptoms, and laboratory values as variables for the risk model. We performed logistic regression and machine learning models using training and validation samples.

Results

We assembled training (n = 1030) and validation (n = 449) sets. Positive ANA individuals who were younger, female, had a higher titer ANA, higher platelet count, disease-specific autoantibodies, and more billing codes related to symptoms of autoimmune diseases were all more likely to develop autoimmune diseases. The most important variables included having a disease-specific autoantibody, number of billing codes for autoimmune disease-related symptoms, and platelet count. In the logistic regression model, AUC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.86) in the training set and 0.75 (95% CI 0.68-0.81) in the validation set.

Conclusion

We developed and validated a risk model that predicts risk for developing systemic autoimmune diseases and can be deployed easily within the EHR. The model can risk stratify positive ANA individuals to ensure high-risk individuals receive urgent rheumatology referrals while reassuring low-risk individuals and reducing unnecessary referrals.

Duplex Vertical-Flow Rapid Tests for Point-of-Care Detection of Anti-dsDNA and Anti-Nuclear Autoantibodies

The goal of this study is to develop a rapid diagnostic test for rheumatic disease and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) screening. A novel rapid vertical flow assay (VFA) was engineered and used to assay anti-nuclear (ANA) and anti-dsDNA (αDNA) autoantibodies from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and healthy controls (HCs). Observer scores and absolute signal intensities from the VFA were validated via ELISA. The rapid point-of-care VFA test that was engineered demonstrated a limit of detection of 0.5 IU/mL for ANA and αDNA autoantibodies in human plasma with an inter-operator CV of 19% for ANA and 12% for αDNA. Storage stability was verified over a three-month period. When testing anti-dsDNA and ANA levels in SLE and HC serum samples, the duplex VFA revealed 95% sensitivity, 72% specificity and an 84% ROC AUC value in discriminating disease groups, comparable to the gold standard, ELISA. The rapid αDNA/ANA duplex VFA can potentially be used in primary care clinics for evaluating patients or at-risk subjects for rheumatic diseases and for planning follow-up testing. Given its low cost, ease, and rapid turnaround, it can also be used to assess SLE prevalence estimates.

Recognition of rare antinuclear antibody patterns based on a novel attention-based enhancement framework

Rare antinuclear antibody (ANA) pattern recognition has been a widely applied technology for routine ANA screening in clinical laboratories. In recent years, the application of deep learning methods in recognizing ANA patterns has witnessed remarkable advancements. However, the majority of studies in this field have primarily focused on the classification of the most common ANA patterns, while another subset has concentrated on the detection of mitotic metaphase cells. To date, no prior research has been specifically dedicated to the identification of rare ANA patterns. In the present paper, we introduce a novel attention-based enhancement framework, which was designed for the recognition of rare ANA patterns in ANA-indirect immunofluorescence images. More specifically, we selected the algorithm with the best performance as our target detection network by conducting comparative experiments. We then further developed and enhanced the chosen algorithm through a series of optimizations. Then, attention mechanism was introduced to facilitate neural networks in expediting the learning process, extracting more essential and distinctive features for the target features that belong to the specific patterns. The proposed approach has helped to obtained high precision rate of 86.40%, 82.75% recall, 84.24% F1 score and 84.64% mean average precision for a 9-category rare ANA pattern detection task on our dataset. Finally, we evaluated the potential of the model as medical technologist assistant and observed that the technologist's performance improved after referring to the results of the model prediction. These promising results highlighted its potential as an efficient and reliable tool to assist medical technologists in their clinical practice.

A Retrospective Study on Antinuclear Antibody Patterns in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients and Its Correlation With Serological Markers

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease. Detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) aids in the diagnosis of SLE. The indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assay is often used a routine screening test for the detection of ANA. The pathogenic role and significance of various patterns produced in IIF is yet to be explored.

AIM

This study aimed to detect ANA patterns generated by IIF and correlate these patterns with specific antibodies detected by line immunoassay. We also investigated the significance of each ANA pattern and its association with specific serological SLE markers, such as complement molecules, anti-dsDNA, antiphospholipid antibody, and C-reactive protein (CRP), along with associations with direct Coombs test (DCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study that included 204 patients newly diagnosed with SLE according to the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) criteria. The detection and pattern determination of ANA was performed by IIF using HEp-20-10. Furthermore, line immunoassay was performed, and the antibody profile of each sample was obtained. Other immunodiagnostic markers were analyzed, including C3, C4, anti-dsDNA, antiphospholipid antibodies (anti-cardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I, and lupus anticoagulant), CRP, and DCT.

RESULTS

Of the 204 samples, the most frequent ANA pattern observed was nucleus speckled (52.9%), followed by nucleus homogenous (27.5%), mixed (13.7%), and cytoplasm speckled (5.9%). The nucleus homogenous pattern showed the most pathogenic immune profile due to its close association with markers of disease activity, namely, high anti-dsDNA titer, low C3 level, and DCT positivity.  Conclusion: This study showed that the most common pattern associated with SLE is nucleus speckled, followed by the nucleus homogenous pattern. Based on associations with specific serological markers, the nucleus homogenous pattern may be linked to a high disease activity in SLE.

Clinical value of chemiluminescence method for detection of antinuclear antibody profiles

BACKGROUND

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are crucial in diagnosing autoimmune diseases, mainly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study aimed to compare the performance of chemiluminescence assay (CLIA) and line immunoassay (LIA) in detecting ANAs in patients with autoimmune diseases, evaluate their diagnostic accuracy for SLE, and develop a novel diagnostic model using CLIA-detected antibodies for SLE. Specimens from patients with autoimmune diseases and physical examination specimens were collected to parallel detect specific antibodies. Individual antibodies' diagnostic performance and a model combining multiple antibodies were assessed. The findings provide valuable insights into improving the diagnosis of SLE through innovative approaches.

AIM

To compare the performance of CLIA and LIA in detecting ANAs in patients with autoimmune diseases, assess their accuracy for SLE, and develop a novel diagnostic model using CLIA-detected antibodies for SLE.

METHODS

Specimens have been obtained from 270 patients with clinically diagnosed autoimmune disorders, as well as 130 physical examination specimens. After that, parallel detection of anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody, anti-histone (Histone) antibody, anti-nucleosome (Nuc) antibody, anti-Smith (Sm) antibody, anti-ribosomal P protein (Rib-P) antibody, anti-sicca syndrome A (Ro60) antibody, anti-sicca syndrome A (Ro52) antibody, anti-sicca syndrome (SSB) antibody, anti-centromere protein B (Cenp-B) antibody, anti-DNA topoisomerase 1 (Scl-70) antibody, anti-histidyl tRNA synthetase (Jo-1) antibody, and anti-mitochondrial M2 (AMA-M2) antibody was performed using CLIA and LIA. The detection rates, compliance rates, and diagnostic performance for SLE were compared between the two methodologies, followed by developing a novel diagnostic model for SLE.

RESULTS

CLIA and LIA exhibited essentially comparable detection rates for anti-dsDNA antibody, anti-Histone antibody, anti-Nuc antibody, anti-Sm antibody, anti-Rib-P antibody, anti-Ro60 antibody, anti-Ro52 antibody, anti-SSB antibody, anti-Cenp-B antibody, anti-DNAScl-70 antibody, anti-Jo-1 antibody and anti-AMA-M2 antibody (P > 0.05). The two methods displayed identical results for the detection of anti-dsDNA antibody, anti-Histone antibody, anti-Nuc antibody, anti-Sm antibody, anti-Ro60 antibody, anti-Ro52 antibody, anti-SSB antibody, anti-Cenp-B antibody, anti-Scl-70 antibody, and anti-AMA-M2 antibody (Kappa > 0.7, P < 0.05), but showed a moderate agreement for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibody and anti-Jo-1 antibody (Kappa = 0.671 and 0.665; P < 0.05). In addition, the diagnostic performance of these antibodies detected by both methods was similar for SLE. The diagnostic model's area under the curve values, sensitivity, and specificity, including an anti-dsDNA antibody and an anti-Ro60 antibody detected by CLIA, were 0.997, 0.962, and 0.978, respectively. These values were higher than the diagnostic performance of individual antibodies.

CONCLUSION

CLIA and LIA demonstrated excellent overall consistency in detecting ANA profiles. A diagnostic model based on CLIA-detected antibodies can successfully contribute to developing a novel technique for detecting SLE.

The role of inflammation in autoimmune disease: a therapeutic target

Autoimmune diseases (AIDs) are immune disorders whose incidence and prevalence are increasing year by year. AIDs are produced by the immune system's misidentification of self-antigens, seemingly caused by excessive immune function, but in fact they are the result of reduced accuracy due to the decline in immune system function, which cannot clearly identify foreign invaders and self-antigens, thus issuing false attacks, and eventually leading to disease. The occurrence of AIDs is often accompanied by the emergence of inflammation, and inflammatory mediators (inflammatory factors, inflammasomes) play an important role in the pathogenesis of AIDs, which mediate the immune process by affecting innate cells (such as macrophages) and adaptive cells (such as T and B cells), and ultimately promote the occurrence of autoimmune responses, so targeting inflammatory mediators/pathways is one of emerging the treatment strategies of AIDs. This review will briefly describe the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of different AIDs, and give a rough introduction to inhibitors targeting inflammatory factors, hoping to have reference significance for subsequent treatment options for AIDs.

Serum antinuclear antibodies associate with severe disease activity in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) may correlate with the long-term prognosis of Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). In this study, we investigated ANAs in Chinese patients with NMOSD and their relationship with disease outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 525 patients diagnosed with NMOSD at West China Hospital between September 1, 2009, and October 1, 2021. Patients were classified into two groups: NMOSD with ANA (+) or without ANA (-). We compared the clinical characteristics, relapse rate, severe attacks, laboratory tests, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and prognosis between the two groups.

RESULTS

Among the 525 NMOSD patients, those with ANA showed a higher frequency of AQP4-IgG (94.1% vs 79.3%, p < 0.001, false discovery rate (FDR) corrected p < 0.001), and anti-SSA (p < 0.001, FDR corrected p < 0.001), anti-SSB (p < 0.001, FDR corrected p < 0.001), anti-Ro52 antibodies (p < 0.001, FDR corrected p < 0.001), than those without ANA. ANA was detected in 403 patients during the acute phase. Patients with ANA (+) had higher EDSS scores in the acute stage (4.0 vs. 3.75, p = 0.013, FDR corrected p = 0.029) and at final follow-up (p = 0.032, FDR corrected p = 0.064). NMOSD patients with ANA (+) had a higher frequency of severe acute myelitis attack, severe acute myelitis and optic neuritis attack, motor and visual disability, compared to those with ANA (-) (42.1% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.001, FDR corrected p = 0.004, 19.3% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.004, FDR corrected p = 0.018, and 11.1% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.008, FDR corrected p = 0.022 respectively). The two groups had no significant difference in the annual recurrence rate (ARR).

CONCLUSION

ANA may be associated with more severe disease activity and disability in NMOSD.

On-Line Dual-Active Valves Based Centrifugal Microfluidic Chip for Fully Automated Point-of-Care Immunoassay

There remains an unmet need for a fully integrated microfluidic platform that can automatically perform multistep and multireagent immunoassays. Here, we proposed a novel online dual-active valve-based centrifugal microfluidic chip, termed DAVM, for fully automatic point-of-care immunoassay. Practically, the puncture valve, one of the dual active valves, is capable of achieving precise, on-demand, sequential release of prestored reagents, while the other valve-reversible active valve enables controlled retention and drainage of the reaction solutions. Thereby, our technology mitigates the challenges of hydrophilic/hydrophobic modifications and unstable valve control performance commonly observed in passive valve controls. As a proof of concept, the indirect enzymatic immunoblotting technique was employed on DAVM for fully automated immunological analysis of eight targets, yielding outcomes within an hour. Furthermore, we conducted a comparative analysis of 28 clinical samples with autoimmune diseases. According to 224 clinical data, the sample testing concordance rate between DAVM and the traditional instrument was 82%, with a target compliance rate of 97%. Therefore, our DAVM system has powerful potential for fully automated immunoassays.

Approach to laboratory ordering and interpretation in rheumatology

Evaluation of suspected rheumatic disease is a significant challenge due to overlapping and sometimes non-specific clinical features. Most laboratory tests in rheumatic disease have incomplete sensitivity and specificity, leading to positive results without disease and negative results despite disease presence. Therefore, judicious ordering and correct interpretation of laboratory testing in rheumatology is critical in order to provide high-value care. Herein we review laboratory testing in rheumatology in the context of a framework for approaching rheumatic disease.

Clinical diagnoses associated with a positive antinuclear antibody test in patients with and without autoimmune disease

BACKGROUND

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are antibodies present in several autoimmune disorders. However, a large proportion of the general population (20%) also have a positive test; very few of these individuals will develop an autoimmune disease, and the clinical impact of a positive ANA in them is not known. Thus, we test the hypothesis that ANA + test reflects a state of immune dysregulation that alters risk for some clinical disorders in individuals without an autoimmune disease.

METHODS

We performed high throughput association analyses in a case-control study using real world data from the de-identified electronic health record (EHR) system from Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The study population included individuals with an ANA titer ≥ 1:80 at any time (ANA +) and those with negative results (ANA-). The cohort was stratified into sub-cohorts of individuals with and without an autoimmune disease. A phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) adjusted by sex, year of birth, race, and length of follow-up was performed in the study cohort and in the sub-cohorts. As secondary analyses, only clinical diagnoses after ANA testing were included in the analyses.

RESULTS

The cohort included 70,043 individuals: 49,546 without and 20,497 with an autoimmune disease, 26,579 were ANA + and 43,464 ANA-. In the study cohort and the sub-cohort with autoimmune disease, ANA + was associated (P ≤ 5 × 10-5) with 88 and 136 clinical diagnoses respectively, including lupus (OR ≥ 5.4, P ≤ 7.8 × 10-202) and other autoimmune diseases and complications. In the sub-cohort without autoimmune diseases, ANA + was associated with increased risk of Raynaud's syndrome (OR ≥ 2.1) and alveolar/perialveolar-related pneumopathies (OR ≥ 1.4) and decreased risk of hepatitis C, tobacco use disorders, mood disorders, convulsions, fever of unknown origin, and substance abuse disorders (OR ≤ 0.8). Analyses including only diagnoses after ANA testing yielded similar results.

CONCLUSION

A positive ANA test, in addition to known associations with autoimmune diseases, Raynaud's phenomenon, and idiopathic fibrosing alveolitis related disorders, is associated with decreased prevalence of several non-autoimmune diseases.

nanoGold and µGold inhibit autoimmune inflammation: a review

The newest data on metallic gold have placed the noble metal central in the fight for the safe treatment of autoimmune inflammation. There are two different ways to use gold for the treatment of inflammation: gold microparticles > 20 µm and gold nanoparticles. The injection of gold microparticles (µGold) is a purely local therapy. µGold particles stay put where injected, and gold ions released from them are relatively few and taken up by cells within a sphere of only a few millimeters in diameter from their origin particles. The macrophage-induced release of gold ions may continue for years. Injection of gold nanoparticles (nanoGold), on the other hand, is spread throughout the whole body, and the bio-released gold ions, therefore, affect multitudes of cells all over the body, as when using gold-containing drugs such as Myocrisin. Since macrophages and other phagocytotic cells take up and transport nanoGold and remove it after a short period, repeated treatment is necessary. This review describes the details of the cellular mechanisms that lead to the bio-release of gold ions in µGold and nanoGold.

Risk of systemic lupus erythematosus flares according to autoantibody positivity at the time of diagnosis

To estimate the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares based on the autoantibody positivity at the time of SLE diagnosis. This retrospective cohort study included 228 patients with newly diagnosed SLE. Clinical characteristics including autoantibody positivity at the time of diagnosis of SLE were reviewed. Flares were defined as a new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A score or BILAG B score for at least one organ system. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to estimate the risk of flares according to autoantibody positivity. Anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-U1RNP, anti-Ro, and anti-La antibodies (Abs) were positive in 50.0%, 30.7%, 42.5%, 54.8%, and 22.4% of the patients, respectively. The incidence rate of flares was 28.2/100 person-years. Multivariable Cox regression analysis, adjusted for potential confounders, revealed that anti-dsDNA Ab positivity (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46, p = 0.037) and anti-Sm Ab positivity (adjusted HR: 1.81, p = 0.004) at the time of diagnosis of SLE were associated with higher risk of flares. To better delineate the flare risk, patients were categorized as double-negative, single-positive, double-positive for anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm Abs. Compared with double-negativity, double-positivity (adjusted HR: 3.34, p < 0.001) was associated with higher risk of flares, while anti-dsDNA Ab single-positivity (adjusted HR: 1.11, p = 0.620) or anti-Sm Ab single-positivity (adjusted HR: 1.32, p = 0.270) was not associated with higher risk of flares. Patients who are double-positive for anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm Abs at the time of the diagnosis of SLE are at higher risk of flares and may benefit from stringent monitoring and early preventive treatment.

Significance of the immunofluorescence staining patterns and titres of the antinuclear antibody test in paediatric rheumatology setting

BACKGROUND

Antinuclear antibody (ANA) is among the most frequently ordered tests in paediatric rheumatology setting. Diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren syndrome is closely related with a positive ANA and classified as ANA associated diseases. Besides, ANA test is ordered in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to assess the risk for uveitis and a positive ANA could be detected in children with nonrheumaticrheumatic conditions. In this study, we aimed to investigate frequency of positive ANA in paediatric rheumatology setting and the association of immunofluorescence staining patterns and titres of ANA with rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

: Immunofluorescence staining patterns, and titres of the ANA and diagnoses of children who tested for ANA between January 2016 and December 2021 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Among 2477 patients with ANA tested, 28.1% had a positive ANA result. Among them, 39.2% had a diagnosis of a rheumatic disease. Most common rheumatic diagnosis was JIA (43.8%) and ANA associated diseases were observed in 24.5% of the patients with a rheumatic diagnosis. While ANA associated diseases had significantly more frequent homogenous staining, dense fine speckled pattern was significantly more common in children with nonrheumatic diagnoses. Despite ANA associated diseases was found to be significantly associated with higher titres, no difference was observed between patients with JIA and nonrheumatic conditions.

DISCUSSION

Our study showed that the majority of children with a positive ANA test were not diagnosed with a rheumatic disease. While titres and patterns of ANA were found to be important in diagnosis of rheumatic diseases, ordering ANA test with solid indications might give improved probability of rheumatic diagnoses in children with a positive test.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a devastating autoimmune disease that can result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis and treatment of SLE are clinical challenges. Patient presentation and response to therapy are heterogeneous because of the complex immune dysregulation that results in SLE disease pathogenesis. An intricate interplay between genetic risk and skewing of adaptive and innate immune system responses leads to overproduction of type I interferons and other cytokines, complement activation, immune-complex deposition, and ultimately inflammation and tissue damage. Here, we review the classification criteria as well as standard and emerging diagnostic tools available to identify patients with SLE. We then focus on medical management, including novel therapeutics, nonpharmacologic interventions, and comorbidity management.

Primary Healthcare Practitioners' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia

Objective The study aims to evaluate the primary healthcare practitioner's (PHCP) knowledge, attitude, and practice toward systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to explore the difficulties of early referral to specialized clinics. Method This is a cross-sectional study conducted between February and March 2022 targeting the PHCP among the primary healthcare centers in Qassim, Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted among 203 participants who enrolled via a cluster random sampling technique depending on the survey. Qualitative categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables are reported as means and standard deviations (SD). The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and the independent T-test have been used to explore the relationship between participants' knowledge scores and their socio-demographic characteristics. A P-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result The study found that only 4.4% of participating PHCPs had good knowledge related to SLE, while 45.8% of them had fair knowledge, and nearly half of them (49.8%) had poor knowledge. It was noted that GPs who specialized in family medicine or saw more than 40 patients each week had comparably better knowledge than others, which was statistically significant (p<0.05). The difficulty in diagnosing SLE patients was mentioned by 48.3% of the PHCPs. Family medicine consultants (p<0.001), those who worked in a tertiary care facility for more than six months (p<0.001) and those who worked in a rheumatology department (p<0.05), reported considerably better levels of comfort when treating SLE patients. Conclusion This study found that included participants' understanding of SLE, its diagnosis, and management was inadequate. Coordination between rheumatologists and experts from many disciplines at the primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of care is critical for overcoming ambiguities and obstacles in the diagnosis and therapy of SLE patients.

Frequency and Clinical Utility of Antibodies to Extractable Nuclear Antigen in the Setting of a Negative Antinuclear Antibody Test

OBJECTIVE

Simultaneous antibody testing during screening for autoimmune conditions is discouraged. The incidence of positive extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) in the setting of a negative antinuclear antibody (ANA) has been reported as low. Our objective was to characterize the frequency of diagnosis of new ANA-associated rheumatic disease (AARD) in the setting of a negative ANA with a positive ENA.

METHODS

This was a 7-year retrospective study from a multicenter tertiary health network in Australia. Clinical information was sought on patients over 18 years old who had a negative ANA but positive ENA test result. Results were extracted from hospital computer systems.

RESULTS

From March 19, 2011, to July 23, 2018, ENA testing was ordered simultaneously with an ANA test on 4,248 occasions in 3,484 patients. ANA was positive in 2,520 patients (59.3%) and ENA was positive in 1,980 patients (46.6%). Among positive ANA patients, ENA was positive in 1,563 patients (62.0%). Among 1,728 negative ANA tests, ENA was positive in 417 (24.1%) (P < 0.001). A total of 328 patients with discordant ANA/ENA results had data available for further analysis, of whom 279 had no pre-established rheumatologic condition. A new AARD was diagnosed in 17 of 279 patients, yielding a positive predictive value of 6.09% (95% confidence interval 3.59-9.58).

CONCLUSION

Despite the higher-than-expected incidence of positive ENA in the setting of a negative ANA, the yield of newly diagnosed rheumatic diseases was low. Our findings support the stepwise addition of ENA requests when an ANA test result is positive and clinical suspicion of an AARD is high.

An indirect comparison of automated indirect immunofluorescence vs automated solid-phase immunoassays for antinuclear antibody detection: A meta-analysis and adjusted indirect comparison of diagnostic test accuracy

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of automated indirect immunofluorescence (automated-IIF) and fully automated solid-phase immunoassays (solid-phase assays), compared with gold standard conventional manual indirect immunofluorescence (manual-IIF) for antinuclear antibody (ANA) detection.

METHODS

Indirect meta-comparison was performed using prospective studies reporting comparative data between automated-IIF and fully automated solid-phase assays individually to conventional manual-IIF. Diagnostic tests regarding different automated solid-phase assays and automated-IIF for ANA detection were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WANFANG electronic databases from their inception to January 2022. Assessment of the quality of the studies was undertaken using a second version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The investigated diagnostic indices including pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR), pooled negative likelihood ratio (NLR), pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of automated-IIF and solid-phase assays, respectively. Relative diagnostic odds ratio (RDOR) was calculated to indirectly compare the diagnostic accuracy of automated-IIF and solid-phase assays. To visualize results, we provide forest plots showing the RDOR with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the 2 methods against the "gold standard" manual-IIF by R software. Deeks' funnel was used to investigate the publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies involving 6111 subjects were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, pooled PLR, pooled NLR, pooled DOR and the AUC were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84-0.86), 0.82 (95% CI 0.81-0.84), 14.22 (95% CI 8.55-23.65), 0.06 (95% CI 0.03-0.12), 287.0 (95% CI 124.30-662.68) and 0.983 for automated-IIF respectively, and as for solid-phase assays those were 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.75), 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89), 5.66 (95% CI 3.33-9.62), 0.30 (95% CI 0.20-0.47), 19.14 (95% CI 8.00-45.79) and 0.894. The results of indirect comparison indicated that automated-IIF had statistically significant higher accuracy for the detection of ANA.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis and indirect comparison suggest that automated-IIF should be recommended as an alternative assay for ANA screening under the condition of increased demand for ANA testing in clinical immunology laboratories.

Glucocorticoids Improve the Pregnancy Rate and Outcome in Women With Unexplained Positive Autoantibodies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The effect of glucocorticoid therapy on women with unexplained positive autoantibodies is under debate. This systemic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate whether glucocorticoid administration can improve the pregnancy outcome of this population. Relevant publications were searched from databases, and a total of seven prospective and retrospective cohort studies that investigated the effects of glucocorticoid administration on women with unexplained positive autoantibodies, were included. The outcomes of our systematic review and meta-analysis were measured in terms of risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using fixed or random effect models. We found that glucocorticoid treatment improved the clinical pregnancy rate (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.64–2.92) and live birth rate (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.17–3.16), especially when glucocorticoid administration was started before pregnancy (clinical pregnancy rate: RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.58–3.34; live birth rate: RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.58–3.34). However, no effect of glucocorticoids on the miscarriage rate was found (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55–1.02) regardless of the time of drug administration. Our systematic review and meta-analysis support the rational use of glucocorticoids in women with unexplained positive autoantibodies.

The Prevalence and Clinical Relevance of the DFS Immunofluorescence Staining Pattern in a Large ANA-Positive Cohort

Background

Although the dense fine speckled (DFS) immunofluorescence staining pattern has been studied by various researchers in recent years, its clinical associations remain unspecified. Thus, we performed a retrospective study in a non-selective population to explore the prevalence of this enigmatic antinuclear antibody (ANA) pattern and to determine its possible clinical associations with any identifiable pathology.

Methods

We retrieved the results of ANA testing ordered by various departments in 2019 to study the prevalence of DFS pattern. Demographic characteristics and clinical features of these participants were also collected from the electronic medical record system. Correlation analysis was made to study its clinical associations and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The prevalence of ANA positivity was 37.4% among 72,204 serum samples of which the median age was 44 (interquartile range: 31, 56) years old and 68.0% were women. The prevalence of the DFS staining pattern was 1.1% in the total population and accounted for 3.1% in the ANA-positive population. There were 97.6% of these cases displaying the DFS pattern with a low titer of ANA (≤1:320; starting serum dilution: 1:100). We found that this pattern correlated with several pathological conditions, such as skin disorders (25.1%), alopecia (4.6%), and obstetric complications (6.6%).

Conclusion

The presence of the DFS immunofluorescence staining pattern may accompany several pathological conditions and may be a signal of localized inflammation within certain organs or tissues, especially the skin.

Fibromyalgia: Recognition and Management in the Primary Care Office

Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain condition manifested by chronic generalized pain, fatigue, disordered sleep, and cognitive difficulties, persistent for at least 3 months. Other common complaints/conditions include symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, headaches, intermittent paresthesias, and various mood disorders. Women are more commonly affected than men. The treatment approach should be individualized and focused on associated mood disorders, sleep, exercise, correction of maladaptive responses to pain, and coping with stress.

Anti-Nuclear Antibodies Patterns in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Correlation With Other Diagnostic Immunological Parameters

Background

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are major immunodiagnostic tools in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, their clinical and pathogenic roles are not yet elucidated and are a subject of controversy.

Objectives

The aim of the study is to explore the pathogenic significance of ANA patterns among SLE patients, by analyzing their association with ANA titers, complement levels and other pathogenic immune markers, namely, anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), complements C3 and C4, rheumatoid factor (RF), anticardiolipin antibodies IgG (ACL IgG) and IgM (ACL IgM), Beta-2 Glycoprotein 1 Antibodies (β2-GP) IgG (β2-IgM) and IgM (β2-IgM), and lupus anticoagulant (LA).

Method

A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 495 SLE patients, who were diagnosed and classified by consultant rheumatologists according to the new European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 criteria. SLE immunodiagnostic profiles were analyzed including the following parameters: ANA antibody titers and staining patterns, anti-dsDNA, C3 and C4 levels, aCL, and anti-β2-GP and LA.

Result

The most frequently observed ANA patterns were the speckled (52.1%) and homogeneous (35.2%) patterns, while other patterns were rare representing less than 7% of the patients each. ANA titers were highest in patients with mixed pattern followed by the speckled pattern. Of all the investigated patterns, the peripheral pattern showed the most pathogenic immune profile, namely, highest levels of anti-dsDNA, lowest levels of C4, and highest levels of aCL and β2-GP IgG and IgM.

Conclusion

This retrospective study showed that speckled followed by homogeneous ANA patterns were predominant accounting for 52.1 and 35.2% of the patients. The ANA pattern showed several associations with other immune markers that are documented to have significant clinical implications in SLE. Peripheral, mixed, and speckled patterns were associated with higher profiles of immune markers indicative of a potential prognostic value of these patterns in SLE.

Co-positivity of anti-dsDNA, anti-nucleosome, and anti-smith autoantibodies as serological biomarkers for disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

Background

Evaluation of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients is important for modulating the therapeutic plan and decreasing organ damage. Autoantibodies are important serological biomarkers in SLE. We evaluated the effect of co-positivity of anti-dsDNA, anti-nucleosome, and anti-smith, autoantibodies on the SLEDAI score in SLE patients.

Results

Eighty adult SLE patients were included in this study. The correlations of the three autoantibodies with the SLEDAI score in addition to their sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of disease activity were analyzed. There was a highly significant difference between anti-dsDNA, anti-nucleosome, and anti-smith positive and negative groups as regards the SLEDAI score. Increased number of autoantibody positivity was associated with an increased mean rank of SLEDAI, and the three autoantibodies were positively correlated with each other and with the SLEDAI score. Roc curve analysis revealed that anti-smith has the highest sensitivity (90%) followed by anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome (85% for each). Moreover, anti-dsDNA had the highest specificity (88%) followed by anti-nucleosome (86%) then anti-smith (84%).

Conclusions

Anti-dsDNA, anti-nucleosome, and anti-smith autoantibodies have a positive correlation with the SLEDAI score, and they may be considered as good serological biomarkers for the assessment of disease activity in SLE patients.

New Clinical Phenotype of the Post-Covid Syndrome: Fibromyalgia and Joint Hypermobility Condition

Fibromyalgia can be defined as a chronic pain condition, affecting the musculoskeletal system, etiology and pathophysiology of which is sufficiently understudied. Despite the fact that many authors consider this entity to be a manifestation of central sensitization, and not an autoimmune disease, the high prevalence of fibromyalgia in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions requires taking a fresh look at the causes of the disease development. During the patient examination, the authors identified a combination of symptoms that occurs so often, that they can be carefully described as a clinical pattern. These manifestations include young age, female gender, joint hypermobility, the onset of pain after COVID-19, physical traumatization of one particular tendon and the development of the fibromyalgia pain syndrome during the next several weeks. As well as an increase in the titer of antinuclear antibodies and some other systemic inflammation factors. It can be assumed with great caution that local damage to the connective tissue in patients with joint hypermobility, having COVID-19 as a trigger factor can lead to the development of fibromyalgia syndrome. This article presents three clinical cases that illustrated this hypothesis.

Interkit Reproducibility of the Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay on HEp-2 Cells Depends on the Immunofluorescence Reactivity Intensity and Pattern

Introduction

The indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2/IFA) is used worldwide for screening for autoantibodies to cellular antigens. Cell culture and fixation methods influence the cell distribution of autoantigens and the preservation of epitopes. Therefore, discrepancy of results obtained using different HEp-2/IFA kits (interkit nonreproducibility) is a common phenomenon in the clinical laboratory routine.

Objective

This study evaluated the interkit nonreproducibility of HEp-2/IFA results using samples from patients with systemic autoimmune disease (SAD), nonautoimmune diseases (NAD), and healthy blood donors (HBD).

Methods

Serum from 275 SAD patients, 293 NAD patients, and 300 HBD were processed at 1:80 dilution using four HEp-2 kits according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Interkit reproducibility was determined for positive/negative results and patterns. The agreement of positive/negative results among kits for each sample was determined as the reactivity agreement score (RAS). The pattern reproducibility score (PRS) in each sample was calculated as a function of the number of kits showing equivalent patterns. Qualitative variables and ordinal variables were analyzed by the Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively.

Results

A total of 402 samples were nonreactive in all kits and were considered devoid of autoantibodies. Further analysis included the 466 reactive samples (238 SAD, 119 NAD, 109 HBD). Reactivity to the nucleus had the highest interkit reproducibility (RAS = 83.6), followed by the metaphase plate (RAS = 78.9), cytoplasm (RAS = 77.4), and nucleolus (RAS = 72.4). Interkit reproducibility was higher in SAD (RAS = 78.0) than in NAD (RAS = 70.6) and HBD (RAS = 71.3) groups. Samples with strong reactivity (++++/4 and +++/4) had higher interkit reproducibility than those with weak reactivity (+/4). In the SAD group, RAS for nuclear reactivity was 87.5% for strongly reactive samples as opposed to 4.4% for weakly reactive samples, and the same was observed for NAD and HBD samples. The most robust patterns were the centromere AC-3 (PRS = 78.4), multiple nuclear dots AC-6 (PRS = 73.6), nuclear coarse speckled AC-5 (PRS = 71.3), nuclear homogeneous AC-1 (PRS = 67.9), and the reticular cytoplasmic AC-21 (PRS = 68.6).

Conclusion

Interkit nonreproducibility in HEp-2/IFA is prevalent and occurs with the highest frequency with weakly reactive samples. International initiatives with the engagement of in vitro diagnostic industry are encouraged to promote the harmonization of the properties and performance of HEp-2/IFA commercial kits.

Autoantibodies in Common Connective Tissue Diseases: A Primer for Laboratory Professionals

Background

Autoimmune connective tissue disorders are a significant health concern throughout the world with an estimated prevalence of 3% to 5%. They are associated with a variety of autoantibodies that play roles in their diagnosis, risk stratification, prognostication, and/or management. While some autoantibodies have been well-characterized for use in clinical laboratories, many more are in the research stage. Rapid transition from research to clinical practice, lack of clinical guidelines, and harmonization across a rapidly growing number of commercially available tests create numerous challenges to clinicians and laboratories.

Content

This article briefly discusses common connective tissue disorders and their association with well-known autoantibodies, describes current methods used in clinical laboratories, and outlines their advantages and limitations in the context of these diseases.

Summary

Understanding the role of specific autoantibodies and various methodologies for autoantibody testing are important for laboratory professionals who may be introducing/repatriating new tests, updating existing tests, or advising clinicians/patients about testing options/results. Collaboration between laboratory professional staff and clinicians, around the advantages and limitations of each methodology, is also important in their appropriate clinical utilization.

Beyond Titer: Expanding the Scope of Clinical Autoantibody Testing

Background

Autoantibodies that bind self-antigens are a hallmark of autoimmune diseases, but can also be present in healthy individuals. Clinical assays that detect and titer antigen-specific autoantibodies are an important component of the diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune diseases. Autoantibodies may contribute to disease pathogenesis via effector functions that are dictated by both the antigen-binding site and constant domain.

Content

In this review, we discuss features of antibodies, in addition to antigen-binding specificity, which determine effector function. These features include class, subclass, allotype, and glycosylation. We discuss emerging data indicating that analysis of these antibody features may be informative for diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune diseases. We also consider methodologies to interrogate these features and consider how they could be implemented in the clinical laboratory.

Summary

Future autoantibody assays may incorporate assessment of additional antibody features that contribute to autoimmune disease pathogenesis and provide added clinical value.

Salivary anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) mirrors serum ANA in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

To assay salivary anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) and its isotypes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to investigate relevant clinical associations.

METHODS

Saliva samples were collected from SLE patients and assayed for salivary ANA using immunofluorescence (IF). Isotypes of salivary ANA, including IgG-ANA, IgA-ANA, and IgM-ANA, were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The correlations between clinical parameters and levels of salivary ANA and isotypes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Salivary ANA IF intensities were significantly higher in SLE patients than in healthy controls, irrespective of SLE patient disease activity, and strongly correlated with serum ANA titers. Salivary ANA was detected in 67.14% of SLE patients and 10.00% of healthy controls (p < 0.001). Among ANA-positive samples, 80.85% exhibited a nuclear ANA pattern, and 42.55% exhibited a cytoplasmic ANA pattern. Salivary IgG-ANA, IgA-ANA, and IgM-ANA levels, as assayed by ELISA, were significantly increased in both active and less active SLE patients compared with healthy controls, and levels of each isotype were significantly correlated with serum ANA titer. Salivary IgM-ANA levels correlated with the physician global assessment (PGA), SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI), and negatively with serum C3 and C4. Salivary IgG-ANA also correlated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), SLEDAI, and negatively with serum C3.

CONCLUSION

Salivary ANA levels correlate with serum ANA titer, and salivary IgM-ANA and IgG-ANA correlate variably with PGA, SLEDAI, ESR and complement levels. These findings underscore the potential of using salivary ANA and ANA isotypes as surrogates for serum ANA, particularly for future point-of-care applications since saliva is easier to obtain than blood.

Autoimmune Hepatitis: Serum Autoantibodies in Clinical Practice

Circulating autoantibodies are a key diagnostic tool in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), being positive in 95% of the cases if tested according to dedicated guidelines issued by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. They also allow the distinction between type 1 AIH, characterized by positive anti-nuclear and/or anti-smooth muscle antibody, and type 2 AIH, characterized by positive anti-liver kidney microsomal type 1 and/or anti-liver cytosol type 1 antibody. Anti-soluble liver antigen is the only AIH-specific autoantibody, and is found in 20-30% of both type 1 and type 2 AIH. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody is frequently positive in type 1 AIH, being associated also with inflammatory bowel disease and with primary/autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis. The reference method for autoantibody testing remains indirect immunofluorescence on triple tissue (rodent liver, kidney and stomach), allowing both the detection of the majority of liver-relevant reactivities, including those autoantibodies whose molecular target antigens are unknown. Of note, the current knowledge of the clinical significance of autoantibodies relies on studies based on this technique. However, immunofluorescence requires trained laboratory personnel, is observer-dependent, and lacks standardization, leading to ongoing attempts at replacing this method with automated assays, the sensitivity, and specificity of which, however, require further studies before they can be used as a reliable alternative to immunofluorescence; currently, they may be used as complementary to immunofluorescence.

Combined treatment of prednisone and hydroxychloroquine may improve outcomes of frozen embryo transfer in antinuclear antibody-positive patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment

BACKGROUND

The influence of anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) on induced ovulation was controversial, and the effect of prednisone plus hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment on frozen embryo transfer outcomes of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for ANA-positive women was unclear.

METHODS

Fifty ANA-positive women and one-hundred ANA-negative women matched for age and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) were included from a Reproductive Medical Central of a University Hospital. Sixty-one oocytes pick-up (OPU) cycles in ANA+ group and one-hundred OPU cycles in ANA- group were compared; 30 frozen embryo transfer cycles without treatment and 66 with prednisone plus HCQ treatment among ANA-positive women were compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in number of retrieved oocytes (13.66 ± 7.71 vs 13.72 ± 7.23, p = .445), available embryos (5.23 ± 3.37 vs 5.47 ± 3.26, p = .347), high-quality embryos (3.64 ± 3.25 vs 3.70 ± 3.52, p = .832), and proportion of high-quality embryos (26.5% vs. 26.7%, p = .940). Biochemical pregnancy rate (33.3% vs. 68.2%, p < .05), clinical pregnancy rate (20.0% vs. 50.1%, p < .05), and implantation rate (5.6% vs. 31.8%, p < .05) were lower, and pregnancy loss rate (83.3% vs. 23.1%, p < .05) was higher in patients with treatment than no treatment.

CONCLUSION

The influence of ANA on number of retrieved oocytes, available embryos, high-quality embryos, and proration of high-quality embryos was not found. The treatment of prednisone plus HCQ may improve implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate, and reduce pregnancy loss rate in frozen embryo transfer outcomes for ANA-positive women.

Interleukin-1β as clinically predictive risk marker for recurrent pregnancy loss in women positive for antinuclear antibody

AIMS

Antinuclear antibody (ANA) was found to be associated with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). This study was designed to explore the immunological predictive indicators of RPL in women with positive ANA.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study in a university hospital from March 2020 to January 2021 was performed, including 56 cases of women with RPL and 56 controls matched for age, all of which were positive for ANA. Levels of cytokines, lymphocyte subsets, immune globulin and complement in peripheral blood among two groups were compared. Statistical analyses in this study were performed using SPSS 25.0.

RESULTS

The level of IL-1β was higher in RPL women compared with controls according to univariable analysis and multivariable regression logistic analysis (7.67 [5.86-11.35] vs 5.00 [5.00-5.00], P = .000). After the cut-off value of IL-1β was set as 5.66 pg/mL, the prevalence of RPL was significantly elevated in the high IL-1β group as compared with the low IL-1β group (P < .05). The sensitivity and specificity of IL-1β predicting RPL in ANA-positive women were 76.8% and 91.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Increased IL-1β may play roles in the occurrence of RPL among women with positive ANA. The level of the IL-1β has the potential to be a predictive indicator of RPL in women with positive ANA.

Can Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA) be Monoclonal?

Background

Nuclear staining by immunofluorescence in a kidney biopsy is often seen in patients with positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in the serum. These ANA are usually polyclonal, but herein we report 9 cases with an unusual finding of monoclonal nuclear staining by immunofluorescence on kidney biopsy. Case Presentation. Nine cases with predominant stain for kappa or lambda light chain were identified by searching the renal pathology laboratory database for the past 10 years. All cases had positive stain for only kappa (six cases) or lambda (three cases) light chain in the nuclei. Eight out of nine cases had positive nuclear IgG stain, and one case had positive nuclear IgA stain. Among cases with positive nuclear IgG staining, six cases were positive for IgG1 subclass, one case was positive for IgG2 subclass, and one case was positive for IgG3 subclass. All patients with positive IgG nuclear stain, who had testing for ANA, had positive ANA. Patients with positive IgG1 subclass did not have monoclonal protein in the serum or urine, but the patient with positive IgG2 subclass and lambda light chain stain in the nuclei had IgG lambda monoclonal gammopathy.

Conclusions

We identified a new unique pattern of nuclear stain by immunofluorescence in kidney biopsies that suggests the presence of monoclonal ANA. Workup for underlying monoclonal gammopathy is warranted in such patients.

Comparison study of bead-based and line-blot multiplex ANA immunoassays in the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVES

Detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by immunofluorescence assay (IFA) is increasingly substituted by multiplex bead-based immunoassay (MBA) and line-blot immunoassay (LIA). This study is to compare the diagnostic performance of MBA and LIA ANA assays on clinically characterized patient samples.

METHODS

A total of 728 serum samples from 385 patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), 204 patients with non-SARD diseases, and 139 apparently healthy subjects were tested with the BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen and EuroLine ANA Profile 3 as the representative MBA and LIA technologies and HEp-2 ANA IFA. Clinical data were collected independent of laboratory analysis and later related to the ANA test results. The clinical diagnostic performances were analyzed using Analyse-it software.

RESULTS

The MBA demonstrated higher area under curve (AUC) compared to LIA (0.814 vs 0.761, p = 0.002) and HEp-2 IFA (0.814 vs 0.771, p = 0.008). The MBA and LIA ANA methods showed higher specificity (83.8% and 77.0% vs 67.6%, p < 0.001 and p = 0.005) but lower sensitivity (79.0% and 75.3% vs 86.5%, p < 0.001) compared to HEp-2 IFA. The MBA and LIA ANA revealed substantial to excellent agreements on specific antinuclear antibodies except anti-dsDNA, with the total agreement from 92.3 to 99.9% and Cohen's kappa from 0.71 to 0.98. The MBA demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (58.1% vs 19.8%, p < 0.001) and comparable specificity (95.9% vs 97.5%, p = 0.221) on anti-dsDNA assay for the diagnosis of SLE compared to LIA.

CONCLUSIONS

The MBA and LIA ANA assays have higher specificity but lower sensitivity compared to HEp-2 IFA. There are good agreements between MBA and LIA ANA for the specific antinuclear antibodies except for anti-dsDNA. The MBA ANA demonstrated better assay performance compared to LIA as the MBA possesses higher sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of SARD. Key Points • The multiplex bead-based immunoassay (MBA) ANA outperformed line-blot immunoassay (LIA) and traditional HEp-2 IFA. • There are good agreements between the MBA BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen and LIA EuroLine ANA Profile 3 for the most of specific antinuclear antibodies except anti-dsDNA. • Additional anti-dsDNA testing is suggested when EuroLine ANA Profile 3 is used for the aid of SLE diagnosis and management. • The positive predictive value of both multiplex ANA assays can be substantially increased without significantly affecting negative predictive value by using at least two specific antinuclear antibodies for reporting a positive ANA result.

Factors associated with the antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases in ANA-positive patients after treatment: a retrospective study

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are a serological hallmark of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs); however, few studies have investigated their post-treatment levels. The mechanism by which ANA titers are upregulated in SARDs remains unclear. We assessed factors associated with the ANA titer after treatment. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical database of Zhongshan Hospital, Medical College of Xiamen. Demographic data and baseline and 12-month post-treatment ANA titers were collected. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with the ANA titer. This study identified 31,923 patients who underwent ANA assay for SARDs screening, and a total of 1043 patients were included in the study. Approximately 16% of the patients showed a decrease in the serological ANA titer. Younger patients (< 20) were 3 × more likely to experience such a decrease (P = 0.005) compared to older patients (≥ 60 years). Having a baseline ANA titer > 1:10,000 was associated with an increase likelihood of a decrease in the serological ANA titer compared with baseline ANA titer 1:10,000, 1:3200 and 1:1000 (P < 0.001). We found that a decrease in the serum ANA titer at 12 months after treatment for SARDs is associated with age and ANA baseline titers.

Properties of Uncommon Indirect Immunofluorescence Staining Patterns Determined during Antinuclear Antibody Detection on HEp-2 Cells

In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of uncommon staining patterns found during testing for the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and to determine their association with certain antibodies and clinical diagnoses. Presence of ANA and the staining pattern was determined in 10955 samples using indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp-2 cells. ANA-positive samples were assessed for presence of 14 specific antibody types using a microbead based system. Demographic data (age, sex) and clinical diagnoses were collected from the referral documentation. Particular staining patterns were then compared with a representative comparison group comprised of samples with common staining patterns using these criteria. There were 22 patterns present in less than 3% of samples each and these were jointly present in 42.43% of ANA-positive samples. Specific antibodies were found in proportions similar to the comparison group (46.06%) and varied significantly between patterns. Likewise, there were significant differences in antibody distribution in particular patterns. Some patterns were associated with presence of rheumatic diseases or inflammatory arthropathies, while in others there was a concurrent diagnosis of liver disease, or a neoplastic process. Many of the uncommon IIF patterns have distinctive characteristics that warrant further investigation in order to determine their role in diagnosing various diseases, not limited only to the illnesses of the rheumatic spectrum. IIF on HEp-2 cells remains an irreplaceable method because of the diversity of ANA, only a number of which can be detected using other standardised methods.

A multianalyte assay panel with cell-bound complement activation products demonstrates clinical utility in systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective

To evaluate the clinical utility of the multianalyte assay panel (MAP), commercially known as AVISE Lupus test (Exagen Inc.), in patients suspected of SLE.

Methods

A systematic review of medical records of ANA-positive patients with a positive (>0.1) or negative (<−0.1) MAP score was conducted when the MAP was ordered (T0), when the test results were reviewed (T1) and at a later time (T2, ≥8 months after T1). Confidence in the diagnosis of SLE and initiation of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were assessed.

Results

A total of 161 patient records from 12 centres were reviewed at T0 and T1. T2 occurred for 90 patients. At T0, low, moderate and high confidence in SLE diagnosis was reported for 58%, 30% and 12% patients, respectively. Confidence in SLE diagnosis increased for the MAP positive, while MAP negative made SLE less likely. Odds of higher confidence in SLE diagnosis increased by 1.74-fold for every unit of increase of the MAP score (p<0.001). Using the MAP-negative/anti-double-stranded DNA-negative patients as reference, the HR of assigning an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision lupus code was 7.02-fold, 11.2-fold and 14.8-fold higher in the low tier-2, high tier-2 and tier-1 positive, respectively (p<0.001). The HR of initiating HCQ therapy after T0 was 2.90-fold, 4.22-fold and 3.98-fold higher, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusion

The MAP helps increase the confidence in ruling-in and ruling-out SLE in patients suspected of the disease and informs on appropriate treatment decisions.

Clinical and Immunological Biomarkers for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by immune system dysfunction and is clinically heterogeneous, exhibiting renal, dermatological, neuropsychiatric, and cardiovascular symptoms. Clinical and physiological assessment is usually inadequate for diagnosing and assessing pathophysiological processes in SLE. Clinical and immunological biomarkers could play a critical role in improving diagnosis, assessment, and ultimately, control of SLE. This article reviews clinical and immunological biomarkers that could diagnose and monitor disease activity in SLE, with and without organ-specific injury. In addition, novel SLE biomarkers that have been discovered through “omics” research are also reviewed.

In vitro diagnostics for the medical dermatologist. Part I: Autoimmune tests

Despite the expansion of available in vitro laboratory tests at a rate far exceeding that of dermatologic pharmaceuticals, the existing literature is dominated by discussion of the latter. With the advent of numerous new tests, it can be difficult for practicing dermatologists to stay up-to-date on the available options, methodologies, and recommendations for when to order one test over another. Understanding the inherent strengths and weaknesses of these options is necessary to inform appropriate ordering and proper interpretation of the results. The first article in this continuing medical education series summarizes information on methodology, test characteristics, and limitations of several in vitro laboratory tests used for the work up of undifferentiated patients suspected of having dermatologic autoimmune diseases and it provides a general guide to ordering these tests.

Assessment of antinuclear antibodies (ANA): National recommendations on behalf of the Croatian society of medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) represent a family of autoantibodies targeting ubiquitous cellular constituents and are a hallmark of systemic inflammatory autoimmune rheumatic diseases named connective tissue diseases (CTD). The gold standard method for ANA determination is indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on the human laryngeal epidermoid carcinoma cell line type 2 substrate (HEp-2), but with increasing demand for ANA testing, novel methods eased for automation emerged, which allows testing by staff less experienced in this specific field of laboratory diagnostic. In 2016 The working group (WG) for laboratory diagnostics of autoimmune diseases as part of the Committee for the Scientific Professional Development of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CSMBLM) published the data of a survey regarding general practice in laboratory diagnostics of autoimmune diseases in Croatia. Results indicated high diversity in the performance of autoantibody testing as well as reporting of the results and indicated the need of creating recommendations for the assessment of ANA that would help harmonize diagnostics of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases in Croatia. This document encompasses twenty-seven recommendations for ANA testing created concerning indications for ANA testing, preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical issues, including rational algorithm and quality control assurance. These recommendations are based on the relevant international recommendations and guidelines for the assessment of ANA testing and relevant literature search and should help to harmonize the approach in ANA testing and clarify differences in interpretation of the results obtained using different methods of determination.

Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Systemic Autoimmune Disease: The Experience of a Systemic Immune-Mediated Diseases Unit

Background

Autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED) represents less than 1% of all cases of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) but its frequency may be underestimated due to lack of specific clinical and laboratory criteria. AIED can be associated with a systemic autoimmune disease (SAID) in 15%-30% of the cases. The objective of the present study was to characterize the clinical and prognostic factors of a cohort of patients with AIED.

Materials and methods

The authors conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis of a cohort of patients with AIED referred from the otorhinolaryngology department to a systemic immune-mediated diseases unit between March 2013 and November 2020. A consecutive sample of 39 patients with suspected AIED was referred. SNHL was defined as a fall of the hearing threshold of at least 30 decibels in three consecutive frequencies. Eight patients were excluded for not meeting the audiometric criteria or having confounding factors. The remaining 31 patients were included with a total of 50 affected ears. To classify the intensity of hearing loss, an arithmetic mean of pure tone was calculated. Normal hearing or mild hearing loss at the last pure tone audiometry of the follow-up were an indicator of good prognosis and were considered the outcome of interest.

Results

Thirty-two percent of the patients had an associated SAID. There were no differences regarding demographic and clinical characteristics when comparing patients with AIED alone and patients with AIED and a SAID, except for the positivity of antinuclear antibodies (ANA). ANA positivity was superior in patients with the association of AIED and a SAID when compared with patients with AIED alone (90% vs 50%; p=0.037). The SAID was diagnosed after the AIED in 70% of the patients, in which diagnosis of the SAID occurred a median of 4,2 (IQR 0.8-5.1) years after the diagnosis of the AIED. Normal audiometric evaluation or a mild hearing loss was achieved in 31% of the ears at the last audiometric evaluation. A normal audiometry or a mild hearing loss at the time of diagnosis was independently associated with a better outcome (31%, 14%, CI 1.71-273.69; p=0.018). Bilateral hearing loss was independently associated with a worse outcome (54%, 79%, CI 0.01-0.84; p=0.035). The use of systemic corticosteroids (p=0.941), transtympanic corticosteroids (p=0.700) and non-steroid immunomodulator drugs (p=0.986) did not affect prognosis. The presence of a SIAD did not affect the prognosis (p=0.986).

Conclusions

In this cohort, SAID was present in one-third of the patients with AIED. A good prognosis was achieved in one-third of the patients. A normal audiometry or mild disease at presentation was associated with a good outcome, whilst bilateral involvement was associated with a bad one. Association of a SAID did not seem to influence the hearing-related prognosis. Positivity of ANA antibodies may justify performing a complementary investigation to determine the presence of a SAID.

Nanomaterials for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis

Nanomaterials have received increasing attention due to their unique chemical and physical properties for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the most common complex multifactorial joint-associated autoimmune inflammatory disorder. RA is characterized by an inflammation of the synovium with increased production of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10) and by the destruction of the articular cartilage and bone, and it is associated with the development of cardiovascular disorders such as heart attack and stroke. While a number of imaging tools allow for the monitoring and diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis, and despite ongoing work to enhance their sensitivity and precision, the proper assessment of RA remains difficult particularly in the early stages of the disease. Our goal here is to describe the benefits of applying various nanomaterials as next-generation RA imaging and detection tools using contrast agents and nanosensors and as improved drug delivery systems for the effective treatment of the disease.

Sialylated immunoglobulin G: a promising diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for autoimmune diseases

Human immunoglobulin G (IgG), especially autoantibodies, has major implications for the diagnosis and management of a wide range of autoimmune diseases. However, some healthy individuals also have autoantibodies, while a portion of patients with autoimmune diseases test negative for serologic autoantibodies. Recent advances in glycomics have shown that IgG Fc N-glycosylations are more reliable diagnostic and monitoring biomarkers than total IgG autoantibodies in a wide variety of autoimmune diseases. Furthermore, these N-glycosylations of IgG Fc, particularly sialylation, have been reported to exert significant anti-inflammatory effects by upregulating inhibitory FcγRIIb on effector macrophages and reducing the affinity of IgG for either complement protein or activating Fc gamma receptors. Therefore, sialylated IgG is a potential therapeutic strategy for attenuating pathogenic autoimmunity. IgG sialylation-based therapies for autoimmune diseases generated through genetic, metabolic or chemoenzymatic modifications have made some advances in both preclinical studies and clinical trials.

Fibromyalgia: Recognition and Management in the Primary Care Office

Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain condition manifested by chronic generalized pain, fatigue, disordered sleep, and cognitive difficulties, persistent for at least 3 months. Other common complaints/conditions include symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, headaches, intermittent paresthesias, and various mood disorders. Women are more commonly affected than men. The treatment approach should be individualized and focused on associated mood disorders, sleep, exercise, correction of maladaptive responses to pain, and coping with stress.

The antinuclear antibody HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence assay: a survey of laboratory performance, pattern recognition and interpretation

Background

To evaluate the interpretation and reporting of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 substrates based on common practice and guidance by the International Consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP).

Method

Participants included two groups [16 clinical laboratories (CL) and 8 in vitro diagnostic manufacturers (IVD)] recruited via an email sent to the Association of Medical Laboratory Immunologists (AMLI) membership. Twelve (n = 12) pre-qualified specimens were distributed to participants for testing, interpretation and reporting HEp-2 IFA. Results obtained were analyzed for accuracy with the intended and consensus response for three main categorical patterns (nuclear, cytoplasmic and mitotic), common patterns and ICAP report nomenclatures. The distributions of antibody titers of specimens were also compared.

Results

Laboratories differed in the categorical patterns reported; 8 reporting all patterns, 3 reporting only nuclear patterns and 5 reporting nuclear patterns with various combinations of other patterns. For all participants, accuracy with the intended response for the categorical nuclear pattern was excellent at 99% [95% confidence interval (CI): 97–100%] compared to 78% [95% CI 67–88%] for the cytoplasmic, and 93% [95% CI 86%–100%] for mitotic patterns. The accuracy was 13% greater for the common nomenclature [87%, 95% CI 82–90%] compared to the ICAP nomenclature [74%, 95% CI 68–79%] for all participants. Participants reporting all three main categories demonstrated better performances compared to those reporting 2 or less categorical patterns. The average accuracies varied between participant groups, however, with the lowest and most variable performances for cytoplasmic pattern specimens. The reported titers for all specimens varied, with the least variability for nuclear patterns and most titer variability associated with cytoplasmic patterns.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated significant accuracy for all participants in identifying the categorical nuclear staining as well as traditional pattern assignments for nuclear patterns. However, there was less consistency in reporting cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns, with implications for assigning competencies and training for clinical laboratory personnel.

Serum antinuclear antibodies associate with worse prognosis in AQP4-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated that antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) may be correlated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). However, the conflicting results of studies about the value of ANAs in AQP4 antibody-positive NMOSD patients need to be further investigated.

MATERIAL

Case data were collected from 143 patients with AQP4 antibody-positive NMOSD. Patients were divided into two groups based on the ANA test results. The analysis of clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, and MRI examination results were compared between two groups: the NMOSD patients with ANA (+) and with ANA (-).

RESULTS

Disease duration of NMOSD is shorter in the ANA (+) patients with EDSS < 4 than in the ANA (-) patients (12.05 ± 16.73 versus 29.43 ± 41.03, p-value = .013). The median time from disease onset to an EDSS score of 4.0 is significantly longer in the ANA (-) NMOSD patients than in the ANA (+) patients (48.2 months versus 24 months, p = .04). In addition, ANA (RR, 2.234; 95% CI, 1.078-4.629; p-value = .031) can predict the severity of NMOSD.

CONCLUSIONS

Antinuclear antibodies seem to be associated with more severe disease activity in NMOSD patients.

Long-Term Variability in Immunofluorescence Titer of Antibodies to Nuclear Antigens Observed in Clinical Laboratory Proficiency Testing Surveys

CONTEXT.—

Presence of antibodies to nuclear antigens (ANAs) above a threshold titer is an important diagnostic feature of several autoimmune diseases, yet titers reported vary between laboratories. Proficiency survey results can help clarify factors contributing to the variability.

OBJECTIVE.—

To determine the contribution of HEp-2 ANA kits from different manufacturers to the variation in titers, and assess whether the differences between kits are consistent over the long term.

DESIGN.—

HEp-2 ANA titers reported by laboratories participating in the external quality assessment proficiency testing surveys conducted by the College of American Pathologists between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed. The ANA titers reported for each specimen were ranked according to the kits being used by testing laboratories, and the statistical significance of the differences was determined.

RESULTS.—

The ANA titer results were strongly influenced by the HEp-2 ANA kit used (P < .001). During the 11 years studied, the rank order of the ANA titer for each kit relative to the other kits was remarkably consistent. The rank of ANA titer for individual ANA patterns observed for each kit was similar to the overall rank of that kit.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Variability in ANA titers was strongly associated with the kits used, and the differences between kits were quite consistent during the 11 years studied. Because the variability is not random, it has the potential to be managed by harmonizing kits, which could lead to improved consistency in reporting ANA titers.