1
|
Edmundson K, Jnah AJ. Neonatal Hypoglycemia. Neonatal Netw 2024; 43:156-164. [PMID: 38816219 DOI: 10.1891/nn-2023-0068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) is broadly defined as a low plasma glucose concentration that elicits hypoglycemia-induced impaired brain function. To date, no universally accepted threshold (reference range) for plasma glucose levels in newborns has been published, as data consistently indicate that neurologic responses to hypoglycemia differ at various plasma glucose concentrations. Infants at risk for NH include infants of diabetic mothers, small or large for gestational age, and premature infants. Common manifestations include jitteriness, poor feeding, irritability, and encephalopathy. Neurodevelopmental morbidities associated with NH include cognitive and motor delays, cerebral palsy, vision and hearing impairment, and poor school performance. This article offers a timely discussion of the state of the science of NH and recommendations for neonatal providers focused on early identification and disease prevention.
Collapse
|
2
|
Shenker N, Linden J, Wang B, Mackenzie C, Hildebrandt AP, Spears J, Davis D, Nangia S, Weaver G. Comparison between the for-profit human milk industry and nonprofit human milk banking: Time for regulation? MATERNAL & CHILD NUTRITION 2024; 20:e13570. [PMID: 37830377 PMCID: PMC10749996 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Human milk (HM) is a highly evolutionary selected, complex biofluid, which provides tailored nutrition, immune system support and developmental cues that are unique to each maternal-infant dyad. In the absence of maternal milk, the World Health Organisation recommends vulnerable infants should be fed with screened donor HM (DHM) from a HM bank (HMB) ideally embedded in local or regional lactation support services. However, demand for HM products has arisen from an increasing awareness of the developmental and health impacts of the early introduction of formula and a lack of prioritisation into government-funded and nonprofit milk banking and innovation. This survey of global nonprofit milk bank leaders aimed to outline the trends, commonalities and differences between nonprofit and for-profit HM banking, examine strategies regarding the marketing and placement of products to hospital and public customers and outline the key social, ethical and human rights concerns. The survey captured information from 59 milk bank leaders in 30 countries from every populated continent. In total, five companies are currently trading HM products with several early-stage private milk companies (PMCs). Products tended to be more expensive from PMC than HMB, milk providers were financially remunerated and lactation support for milk providers and recipients was not a core function of PMCs. Current regulatory frameworks for HM vary widely, with the majority of countries lacking any framework, and most others placing HM within food legislation, which does not include the support and care of milk donors and recipient prioritisation. Regulation as a Medical Product of Human Origin was only in place to prevent the sale of HM in four countries; export and import of HM was banned in two countries. This paper discusses the safety and ethical concerns raised by the commodification of HM and the opportunities policymakers have globally and country-level to limit the potential for exploitation and the undermining of breastfeeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Shenker
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College LondonIRDBLondonUK
- The Human Milk FoundationRothamsted Institute, HertsHarpendenUK
| | - Jonathan Linden
- Centre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Betty Wang
- Centre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | | | | | - Jacqui Spears
- Centre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Danielle Davis
- Centre for Environmental PolicyImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Sushma Nangia
- Department of NeonatologyLady Hardinge Medical CollegeNew DelhiIndia
| | - Gillian Weaver
- The Human Milk FoundationRothamsted Institute, HertsHarpendenUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gupta Basuray R, Cacioppo C, Inuzuka V, Cooper K, Hardy C, Perry MF. Increasing Exclusive Nursery Care of Late Preterm and Low Birth Weight Infants. Hosp Pediatr 2023; 13:992-1000. [PMID: 37818615 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-007037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Late preterm (LPT) and low birth weight (LBW) infants are populations at increased risk for NICU admission, partly due to feeding-related conditions. This study was aimed to increase the percentage of LPT and LBW infants receiving exclusive nursery care using quality improvement methodologies. METHODS A multidisciplinary team implemented interventions at a single academic center. Included infants were 35 to 36 weeks gestational age and term infants with birth weights <2500 g admitted from the delivery room to the nursery. Drivers of change included feeding protocol, knowledge, and care standardization. We used statistical process control charts to track data over time. The primary outcome was the percentage of infants receiving exclusive nursery care. Secondary outcomes included rates of hypoglycemia, phototherapy, and average weight loss. Balancing measures were exclusive breast milk feeding rates and length of stay. RESULTS Included infants totaled 1336. The percentage of LPT and LBW infants receiving exclusive nursery care increased from 83.9% to 88.8% with special cause variation starting 1 month into the postintervention period. Reduction in neonatal hypoglycemia, 51.7% to 45.1%, coincided. Among infants receiving exclusive nursery care, phototherapy, weight loss, exclusive breast milk feeding, and length of stay had no special cause variation. CONCLUSIONS Interventions involving a nursery feeding protocol, knowledge, and standardization of care for LPT and LBW infants were associated with increased exclusive nursery care (4.9%) and reduced rates of neonatal hypoglycemia (6.6%) without adverse effects. This quality initiative allowed for the preservation of the mother-infant dyad using high-value care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhi Gupta Basuray
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine
| | - Carrie Cacioppo
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine
| | - Vanessa Inuzuka
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Keri Cooper
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Charles Hardy
- Center for Clinical Excellence, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shenker NS, Griffin S, Hamill‐Keays J, Thomson M, Simpson J, Weaver G. Understanding the current and future usage of donor human milk in hospitals: An online survey of UK neonatal units. MATERNAL & CHILD NUTRITION 2023; 19:e13526. [PMID: 37400943 PMCID: PMC10483937 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
The use of donor human milk (DHM) where there is a shortfall of maternal milk can benefit both infant and maternal outcomes but DHM supply is not always assured. This study aimed to understand current DHM usage in UK neonatal units and potential future demand to inform service planning. An online survey was disseminated to all UK neonatal units using Smart Survey or by telephone between February and April 2022 after development alongside neonatal unit teams. Surveys were completed by 55.4% of units (108/195) from all 13 Operational Delivery Networks. Only four units reported not using DHM, and another two units only if infants are transferred on DHM feeds. There was marked diversity in DHM implementation and usage and unit protocols varied greatly. Five of six units with their own milk bank had needed to source milk from an external milk bank in the last year. Ninety units (84.9%) considered DHM was sometimes (n = 35) or always (n = 55) supportive of maternal breastfeeding, and three units (2.9%) responded that DHM was rarely supportive of breastfeeding. Usage was predicted to increase by 37 units (34.9%), and this drive was principally a result of parental preference, clinical trials and improved evidence. These findings support the assumption that UK hospital DHM demand will increase after updated recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the British Association of Perinatal Medicine. These data will assist service delivery planning, underpinned by an ongoing programme of implementation science and training development, to ensure future equity of access to DHM nationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie S. Shenker
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College London, IRDBLondonUK
- The Human Milk Foundation, Daniel Hall BuildingRothamsted Institute, HertsHarpendenUK
| | - Samantha Griffin
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College London, IRDBLondonUK
| | - Jonathan Hamill‐Keays
- The Human Milk Foundation, Daniel Hall BuildingRothamsted Institute, HertsHarpendenUK
| | - Merran Thomson
- Neonatal UnitHillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUxbridgeUK
| | - Judith Simpson
- Neonatal Intensive Care UnitRoyal Hospital for ChildrenGlasgowUK
| | - Gillian Weaver
- The Human Milk Foundation, Daniel Hall BuildingRothamsted Institute, HertsHarpendenUK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rojjanasrirat W, Ahmed AH, Johnson R, Long S. Facilitators and Barriers of Human Milk Donation. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2023; 48:273-279. [PMID: 37326551 DOI: 10.1097/nmc.0000000000000940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to examine perceptions and experiences of women who donate human milk and highlight various aspects of the breast milk donation process. STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional descriptive study. METHODS An online survey was conducted with a convenience sample of women who donated milk at several milk banks in the United States. A questionnaire of 36 closed and open-ended items were developed and validated by the research team. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used. Semantic content analysis involved three procedures: coding, categorizing text units, and refining the identified themes. RESULTS A total of 236 women who donated breast milk completed the questionnaire. Mean age of participants was 32.7±4.27 and 89.40% were non-Hispanic White women with a bachelor's degree (32.20%) or graduate degree (54.70%). Most participants were women who actively donated breast milk, ranging from one to four times. Two themes, facilitators and barriers of milk donation, were identified. Facilitators to milk donation included attitudes toward milk donation, commitment for donating, motivation in donating, and support. Barriers included personal factors, environment, milk donor process, and psychosocial factors. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Nurses, health care providers, and lactation professionals should educate women about milk donation resources and opportunities. Strategies to increase awareness about milk donation among underrepresented groups such as women of color are highly recommended. Future research is needed to further explore specific factors that increase milk donation awareness and minimize barriers to potential donors.
Collapse
|
6
|
Doughty KN, Abeyaratne D, Merriam AA, Taylor SN. Self-Efficacy and Outcomes in Women with Diabetes: A Prospective Comparative Study. Breastfeed Med 2023; 18:307-314. [PMID: 36999939 PMCID: PMC10124167 DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2022.0298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
Background: Breastfeeding is especially beneficial to women with diabetes and their infants, yet diabetic mothers frequently experience less favorable breastfeeding outcomes. Objectives: To identify facilitators and barriers to breastfeeding for women with diabetes by comparing cognitive and social factors, health and hospital-related factors, and breastfeeding outcomes between women with and without diabetes. Design/Methods: Women with any type of diabetes (n = 28) and without diabetes (n = 29) were recruited during pregnancy. Data were collected from the electronic medical record and maternal surveys at 24-37 weeks' gestation, birth hospitalization, and 4 weeks' postbirth. We compared differences in mother's regard for breastfeeding, breastfeeding intention, and birth hospital experience by diabetes status, and estimated odds ratios for exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and unmet intention to breastfeed. Results: Women with and without diabetes had similar breastfeeding intentions, attitudes, and self-efficacy. Women with diabetes were less likely to EBF, and more likely to have unmet intentions to EBF at hospital discharge, compared to women without diabetes. At 4 weeks' postpartum, there was no difference in breastfeeding by diabetes status, although EBF at hospital discharge was strongly associated with EBF at 4 weeks. Infant neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and hypoglycemia were significantly associated with diabetes status, reduced EBF rates, and unmet breastfeeding intentions. Conclusions: Despite having a strong intent to breastfeed, women with diabetes experienced less favorable early breastfeeding outcomes and were less likely to meet their own breastfeeding goals. These differences may be driven by neonatal complications, such as infant hypoglycemia and NICU admissions, rather than maternal cognitive and social factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly N Doughty
- Egan School of Nursing and Health Studies, Public Health Fairfield University, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA
| | - Dhatri Abeyaratne
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Audrey A Merriam
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sarah N Taylor
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Siziba LP, Huhn S, Pütz E, Baier C, Peter RS, Gebauer C, Griffin S, Wedekind S, Shenker N, Genuneit J. Diversity and trends of human milk banking: a scoping review from 1946 to 2021. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2022; 108:210-216. [PMID: 36207059 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The provision of donor human milk (DHM) through human milk banks is now widely practised globally. The study aimed to describe the current state, identify major topics and map out the emerging trends in human milk banking. METHODS PubMed was systematically searched for publications related to DHM, with the last update on 14 May 2021, for papers published between 1946 and 2021. Titles and abstracts were screened and indexed into 8 main and 39 subcategories. A top-up search was done in April 2022, but these results have not been incorporated. RESULTS A total of 1083 publications were identified, and more than a third (41%) were either observational or interventional studies. Predominant topics were milk type and milk composition. Almost half (49%) of the publications in the last decade were funded through government/research councils, and industry funding started shortly after links between formula and necrotising enterocolitis were published. Literature from high-income countries was six times more than publications from low-income or middle-income countries (LMICs). CONCLUSION The diversity and trends of publications included in this scoping review ranged from descriptive studies comparing biological and compositional differences of mother's own milk, DHM and/or formula. Very few studies have investigated associations of different milk types with infant outcomes. Evidence on breastfeeding and recipient psychological health outcomes is limited. Further research should identify the appropriateness of different funding sources. Future collaborations between academics, clinicians and milk banks in LMICs should be fostered to bridge the gap that exists between DHM and access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda P Siziba
- Medical Faculty, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sebastian Huhn
- Medical Faculty, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Pütz
- Medical Faculty, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Caroline Baier
- Medical Faculty, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Raphael S Peter
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Corinna Gebauer
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Leipzig Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Samantha Griffin
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sophie Wedekind
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Natalie Shenker
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jon Genuneit
- Medical Faculty, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.,German Center for Child and Youth Health (DZKJ), Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gomez J, Wardell D, Cron S, Hurst N. Relationship Between Maternal COVID-19 Infection and In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding for Term Newborns. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2022; 51:517-525. [PMID: 35661652 PMCID: PMC9120128 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the relationship between maternal COVID-19 infection and the odds of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding for term newborns. Design Retrospective descriptive quantitative. Setting A large, urban hospital with more than 6,000 births annually. Sample Term newborns born between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021 (N = 6,151). Methods We retrospectively extracted data from electronic health records to evaluate the relationship of maternal COVID-19 infection with the odds of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding using univariate analysis and logistic regression models. The covariates included insurance type, race/ethnicity, glucose gel administration, length of stay, newborn gestational age, newborn birth weight, and maternal COVID-19 infection. Results Maternal COVID-19 infection was not significantly related to the odds of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding (p = .138) after adjustment for covariates in the logistic regression model. However, when newborns who received pasteurized donor human milk supplementation were excluded from the logistic regression model, maternal COVID-19 infection significantly decreased the odds of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding (p = .043). Conclusion Maternal COVID-19 infection was not significantly related to the odds of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding when newborns received donor human milk supplementation. Access to donor human milk for supplementation for term newborns may protect the odds of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding.
Collapse
|
9
|
Griffin S, Watt J, Wedekind S, Bramer S, Hazemi-Jebelli Y, Boyle R, Weaver G, Shenker NS. Establishing a novel community-focussed lactation support service: a descriptive case series. Int Breastfeed J 2022; 17:7. [PMID: 35033128 PMCID: PMC8760776 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-021-00446-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although breastfeeding is widely acknowledged as protecting both infant and maternal health postnatally, a partial or complete shortfall of maternal milk can occur for a range of reasons. In this eventuality, the currently available options for feeding infants are screened donor human milk (DHM), infant formula or unscreened shared human milk. In the UK, DHM has only been widely available in specific clinical contexts for the last 40 years, mainly to reduce the risk of necrotising enterocolitis in extremely preterm infants alongside optimal support for maternal lactation and breastfeeding. The Hearts Milk Bank (HMB) was established in 2017 as an independent, non-profit human milk bank that aimed to ensure equitable, assured access to screened DHM for neonatal units. As a result of the generosity of mothers, a surplus of DHM rapidly became available and together with lactation support, has since been provided to families with a healthcare referral. This programme has now been formalised for families facing lactational challenges, and DHM stocks are permanently maintained to meet their needs. Case series This case series describes the clinical paths of four families who accessed lactation support and DHM from the HMB, along with a description of the process for community provision. To date, the HMB has supported over 300 families. Working collaboratively with key stakeholders, the HMB team has developed a prioritisation strategy based on utilitarian ethical models, protocols that ensure safe handling and appropriateness of use, broader donor recruitment parameters that maintain safety with a pragmatic approach for full term healthy infants, and a process to ensure parents or carers have access to the knowledge needed to give informed consent and use DHM appropriately. Conclusions Stakeholders, including parents, healthcare professionals, and milk banks, will need to discuss priorities for both DHM use and research gaps that can underpin the equitable expansion of services, in partnership with National Health Service (NHS) teams and third-sector organisations that support breastfeeding and maternal mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Griffin
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, England, W12 0HS, UK
| | - Jo Watt
- The Human Milk Foundation, Rothamsted Institute, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK
| | - Sophie Wedekind
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, England, W12 0HS, UK
| | - Solange Bramer
- Imperial College London Medical School, St Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | | | - Robert Boyle
- Department of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | - Gillian Weaver
- The Human Milk Foundation, Rothamsted Institute, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK
| | - Natalie S Shenker
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, England, W12 0HS, UK. .,The Human Milk Foundation, Rothamsted Institute, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|