Outcomes in adolescent and young adult patients (16 to 30 years) compared to younger patients treated for high-risk B-lymphoblastic leukemia: report from Children's Oncology Group Study AALL0232

The Experience of Adolescents and Young Adults in Their Cancer Journeys in Japan: I Try to Move Forward With Feeling That I Would Be Okay With "My Cancer"

Purpose: A cancer diagnosis can greatly affect adolescents and young adults (AYAs), especially those in their late teens and early twenties, who might have their special needs. This study aimed to understand the experiences of the AYAs who were diagnosed between 15 and 24 years of age in Japan, thinking about the care guide supporting them, from the time of their cancer diagnosis through the rest of their lives. Methods: Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, which were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative analysis of the transcripts was used to categorize these into themes for comprehensive interpretation. Results: Twenty AYAs participated; they were diagnosed between the ages 15 and 23 and were 19-29 years old at the time of the interview. In total, 14 core categories were identified, consisting of three themes (1) There is a feeling of distance between the cancer and me, (2) I face "my cancer" in my way, and (3) I feel that I would be okay with "my cancer." Conclusions: AYAs had their way of dealing with cancer while experiencing a distant feeling between themselves and the presence of the disease during their cancer journey. Although the process was not simple, they tried to live their lives in their own way, believing that they would be okay. Nurses must respect and understand that AYAs have a process of facing their own cancer with time and watch over AYAs' experiences to appropriately support them to successfully proceed further.

Real-World Outcomes of Adolescents and Young Adults with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose: Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are typically treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). However, a standard of care for managing adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with DLBCL is lacking. We examine treatment approaches and outcomes of this population. Methods: We included 90 AYAs (15-39 years) diagnosed with DLBCL between 2008 and 2018 in three tertiary centers in Peru. Overall response rates (ORR) were available for all patients. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 33 years, 57% were males, 57% had good performance status (Lansky/Karnofsky ≥90), and 61% were diagnosed with early-stage disease (Ann Arbor stages I-II). R-CHOP (n = 69, 77%) was the most frequently used first-line regimen, with an ORR of 91%. With a median follow-up of 83 months, the 5-year OS and PFS among all patients were 79% and 67%, respectively. Among the patients who received R-CHOP, the 5-year OS and PFS were 77% and 66%, respectively. Of the 29 (32%) patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease, 83% received second-line treatment and only 14% underwent consolidation therapy with autologous transplantation. The 3-year OS for R/R DLBCL was 36%. Conclusion: Our data show that AYAs with DLBCL who received conventional therapy had comparable outcomes to those observed in studies conducted among the adult population. However, the prognosis for AYAs with R/R disease was dismal, indicating the unmet need for developing and increasing access to novel treatment modalities in AYAs.

Future of Treatment of Adolescents and Young Adults With ALL: A Vision for Collaboration and Equity

Over the past several decades, survival of children with ALL has improved dramatically with treatment regimens refined through cooperative group trials. Despite aggressive treatment and iterative therapy changes for adolescents and young adults (AYAs), improvement has not been as promising. Comparisons between pediatric and adult clinical trials have consistently demonstrated superior outcomes for AYAs treated on pediatric ALL protocols, leading to the implementation of pediatric-inspired ALL protocols by several groups worldwide and/or expansion of the age limit of pediatric trials to include the full spectrum of the AYA population. Despite these efforts, AYAs in both pediatric and adult settings continue to have inferior survival compared with younger children with ALL. Real-world data suggest that uptake of pediatric-style treatment is variable, and even with identical pediatric-style treatment, AYAs still fare worse than younger children. As we enter an era of immunotherapy and precision medicine for newly diagnosed ALL, now is an opportune time to consider how best to approach future therapy for AYA patients. Comparisons of pediatric and adult treatment approaches and subanalyses of AYA patients will help guide harmonization of treatment. The focus of the next stage of ALL therapy for AYA should not only involve novel treatment approaches but also standardization and optimization of supportive care measures, psychosocial support, adherence interventions, oncofertility treatment, and survivorship care. All these efforts should simultaneously work to address health disparities to ensure that a future of improved outcomes is experienced equitably for all AYA patients.

Prognostic impact of TP53 mutations in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with a pediatric-type regimen

The prognostic impact of TP53 mutations (TP53mut) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains debatable. Herein, we determined the clinical significance of TP53mut in 283 adult ALL patients treated with a pediatric-type regimen. TP53mut were found in 11.0% (31) of patients, including 19 cases in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients and 12 cases in non-AYA patients. Patients with TP53mut had poorer overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in the non-AYA subgroup (n = 64) (3-year OS, 18.2% vs 50.9%, p = .0033; 3-year EFS, 0 vs 45.3%, p = .00028). however, this had to be taken cautiously due to a limited number of patients. In the AYA subgroup (n = 219), TP53mut did not impact OS or EFS (3-year OS, 60.6%vs71.0%, p = .55; 3-year EFS, 52.5%vs59.6%, p = .57). Collectively, our data reveal that the pediatric-type regimen eliminated the poor prognostic impact of TP53mut in AYA ALL. However, in non-AYA ALL patients, TP53mut remain a potential biomarker associated with poor outcomes.

Pediatric-Inspired Regimens in the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have significantly worse outcomes than their younger counterparts. Current treatment guidelines rely mostly on non-randomized retrospective studies. We performed a systematic review of studies published within the last 15 years comparing pediatric-inspired regimens (PIR) versus adult-type regimens or performing an age-stratified analysis of outcomes in the AYA population. Due to the heterogeneity of data, a meta-analysis was not possible. However, the gathered data show a trend toward improvement in outcomes and an acceptable toxicity profile in patients treated with PIRs compared to conventional adult-type regimens. There is still room for further improvement, as older patients within the AYA population tend to perform poorly with PIR or conventional adult-type chemotherapy. Further randomized studies are needed to develop an optimal treatment strategy for AYA with ALL.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: efficacy, toxicity, and practical considerations

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the cell surface receptor CD22 coupled to a cytotoxic calicheamicin payload via an acid labile linker. InO has shown significant activity in relapsed and refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) in both single agent and combination chemotherapy regimens in adult and pediatric trials. Its use in newly diagnosed elderly patients has also been established while clinical trials investigating its use in newly diagnosed pediatric patients and fit adults are ongoing. Notable toxicities include sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), particularly in patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after InO as well as myelosuppression and B-cell aplasia which confer increased infection risk, particularly in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting, the planned subsequent curative therapy modality must be considered when using InO to mitigate SOS risk if proceeding to HSCT and account for potential B-cell aplasia if proceeding to chimeric antigen receptor CAR-T therapy. Studies exploring mechanisms of resistance or failure of InO are ongoing but modulation or loss CD22 expression, alternative CD22 splicing, and high Bcl-2 expression have been implicated. In this review, we will summarize the currently available data on InO, with an emphasis on pediatric trials, and explore future directions including combinatorial therapy.

'Secondary' acute lymphoblastic/lymphocytic leukemia - done playing second fiddle?

Acute lymphoblastic/lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) occurring post-cancer diagnosis (secondary ALL - sALL) is increasingly recognized as a discrete entity, constituting up to as much as 5-10% of all new ALL diagnoses, and carrying its own biologic, prognostic and therapeutic significance. In this review, we will outline the history and current state of research into sALL. We will explore the evidence for differences underlining its existence as a distinct subgroup, as well as examining what might be driving such differences etiologically, including prior chemotherapy. We will examine these distinctions on population-, chromosomal-, and molecular-levels, and we will consider whether they translate to differences in clinical outcome, and whether they do - or should - warrant differences in treatment selection.

Risk of early death in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Advancements in treatment and supportive care have led to improved survival for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer; however, a subset of those diagnosed remain at risk for early death (within 2 months of diagnosis). Factors that place AYAs at increased risk of early death have not been well studied.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was used to assess risk of early death in AYAs with hematologic malignancies, central nervous system tumors, and solid tumors. Associations between age at diagnosis, sex, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, insurance status, rurality, and early death were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 268 501 AYAs diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 were included. Early death percentage was highest in patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies (3.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.9% to 3.2%), followed by central nervous system tumors (2.5%, 95% CI = 2.3% to 2.8%), and solid tumors (1.0%, 95% CI = 0.9% to 1.0%). Age at diagnosis, race, ethnicity, lower socioeconomic status, and insurance status were associated with increased risk of early death in each of the cancer types. For AYAs with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, risk of early death decreased statistically significantly over time.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of AYAs with cancer remains at risk for early death. In addition to cancer type, sociodemographic factors also affect risk of early death. A better understanding of the interplay of factors related to cancer type, treatment, and health systems that place certain AYA subsets at higher risk for early death is needed to address these disparities and improve outcomes.

CD22 Exon 12 Deletion as an Independent Predictor of Poor Treatment Outcomes in B-ALL

We previously reported a splicing defect (CD22ΔE12) associated with the deletion of exon 12 of the inhibitory co-receptor CD22 (Siglec-2) in leukemia cells from patients with CD19+ B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). CD22ΔE12 causes a truncating frameshift mutation and yields a dysfunctional CD22 protein that lacks most of the cytoplasmic domain required for its inhibitory function, and it is associated with aggressive in vivo growth of human B-ALL cells in mouse xenograft models. Although CD22ΔE12 with selective reduction of CD22 exon 12 (CD22E12) levels was detected in a high percentage of newly diagnosed as well as relapsed B-ALL patients, its clinical significance remains unknown. We hypothesized that B-ALL patients with very low levels of wildtype CD22 would exhibit a more aggressive disease with a worse prognosis because the missing inhibitory function of the truncated CD22 molecules could not be adequately compensated by competing wildtype CD22. Here, we demonstrate that newly diagnosed B-ALL patients with very low levels of residual wildtype CD22 ("CD22E12low"), as measured by RNAseq-based CD22E12 mRNA levels, have significantly worse leukemia-free survival (LFS) as well as overall survival (OS) than other B-ALL patients. CD22E12low status was identified as a poor prognostic indicator in both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. CD22E12low status at presentation shows clinical potential as a poor prognostic biomarker that may guide the early allocation of risk-adjusted, patient-tailored treatment regimens and refine risk classification in high-risk B-ALL.

A Historical Misconception in Clinical Trials of Drugs for Cancer-Age Grouping

In clinical trials of cancer drugs, grouping by age is a very common grouping method, as it can allow for a visual comparison of the different pharmaceutical responses in patients at different age stages. Under the guidance of this thinking, many researchers use age grouping when studying clinical cancer drugs. However, even people at the same age may be at different stages in their lives, such as individuals who are going through puberty, menopause/andropause, or intermediate transition, as well as childhood and old age, affected by factors such as hormone levels, immune responses, ethnic groups, and regions. Every individual has different cancer symptoms and responses to drugs; therefore, the experimental effect of life stage grouping will be more obvious and clearer. Not only does this conclusion apply to cancer drugs, but it also applies to clinical trials for other diseases. In addition, this does not mean that age grouping should be completely abandoned. Life stage is a more general interval that can be further divided into life stage groups according to the age of the patients. Based on the principal law of lifespan (PLOSP), age trends in life stages also need to be updated from time to time. To date, life stage grouping has not been discussed systematically and has not been used as a grouping method for cancer patients. In this paper, life stage grouping is discussed as one of the important grouping categories in cancer clinical trials.

Improvements in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes for adults with ALL over the past 3 decades

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a promising treatment for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), an intractable hematological malignancy. The trends in allo-HCT outcomes over the past 30 years were examined to verify the efficacy of evolving treatment methods and to identify further challenges. We analyzed data from a registry database that included 8467 adult ALL patients who underwent their first allo-HCT between 1990 and 2019. The period was divided into three 10-year intervals for analysis. Five-year overall survival improved from 48.2% to 70.2% in the first complete remission (CR1), from 25.6% to 44.1% in subsequent CR, and from 10.0% to 22.7% in non-CR. Nonrelapse mortality improved over the 3 decades in each disease stage. However, the relapse rate only improved in CR1 every decade (26.3% to 15.9% in CR1, 33.4% to 32.8% in subsequent CR, and 53.6% to 54.8% in non-CR). Although there were continual improvements in adjusted survival for Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive patients, the improvement was inadequate for Ph⁻ patients with t(4;11), t(8;14), t(14;18), or hypodiploidy. Allo-HCT outcomes for adults with ALL have improved over the past 30 years. Improved outcomes in the future will require more effective prevention of relapse in patients with ALL not in CR1 and in those with high-risk chromosomal abnormalities.

Study Protocol to Evaluate Influences of Stress and Inflammation on Mucositis in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer

BACKGROUND

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer diagnoses are rising, and gains in survivorship are falling behind for this age group. Dose-limiting toxicities of therapy, including mucositis, are more frequent in this age group and may be contributing to poorer survivorship. Animal models and observational studies suggest that stress and inflammation may be contributing to the high prevalence of dose-limiting mucositis in this age demographic. The AYA oncology population has been an overlooked and under-researched oncology demographic, leading to poor understanding of why this age group has high side-effect burdens and poorer cancer survival.

OBJECTIVES

This paper describes a novel, prospective clinical study in AYAs receiving chemotherapy designed to evaluate if stress at the time of chemotherapy administration predicts the development of dose-limiting mucositis and determines if stress-induced inflammatory profiles mediate this relationship. This is the first study to translate these stress and inflammation findings from animal models to a nurse-centered research design in humans.

METHODS

Persons aged 15-39 years who are receiving chemotherapy with a significant (> 20%) risk of developing mucositis will be recruited for a prospective study. Baseline stress is measured through participant questionnaires, and blood is collected to analyze for inflammatory markers. Participants receive chemotherapy as clinically planned and complete a daily survey of mucositis symptoms for 14 days after chemotherapy. Regression and mediation analysis will determine if stress and inflammatory profiles predict the development of dose-limiting mucositis.

RESULTS

This model of inquiry through a nursing framework uses a biobehavioral model that considers physiologic and psychologic risk factors for chemotherapy toxicities. This study is also an important translational science study essential in bringing data from laboratory studies to the clinical arena. The study may also be important to implementation science since assessing the ability of critically ill individuals to participate in low-burden clinical studies that may yield essential findings to improve care delivery.

DISCUSSION

Findings from this work will identify potentially modifiable factors that may be manipulated to minimize chemotherapy toxicities and lead to improved survival. Data from this study will inform larger research endeavors to better understand symptom development in this high-risk oncologic population.