1
|
Li J, Ye C, Li S, Lin G. Mapping the evolution of PET/MR research: a bibliometric analysis of publication trends, leading contributors, and conceptual frameworks (2011-2023). EJNMMI REPORTS 2024; 8:36. [PMID: 39482402 PMCID: PMC11527865 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-024-00224-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 11/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) is a cutting-edge hybrid imaging technology with the potential to revolutionize medical diagnosis. This bibliometric study aims to map the research landscape of PET/MR by analyzing a curated set of Web of Science Core Collection documents from 2011 to 2023. METHODS We conducted a bibliometric analysis to map the research landscape of PET/MR, leveraging a curated dataset of 3,600 documents retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection spanning the period from 2011 to 2023. We employed quantitative methods to assess the quantity and distribution of PET/MR studies, including patterns of change, research status, and directions. Additionally, we utilized VOSviewer software to conduct keyword co-occurrence analysis, explore collaborative networks among authors and institutions, and identify influential journals in the field. RESULTS Results: The analysis reveals several key insights: (1) a significant increase in the number of PET/MR publications over the past 12 years, highlighting the growing interest and activity in this field; (2) the United States and Germany as the leading countries in terms of research output and collaboration, with a growing presence of other countries such as China; (3) the Journal of Nuclear Medicine and the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging as the most influential journals in the field; (4) a shift in research focus from imaging techniques to clinical applications, with an increasing emphasis on prostate cancer, PSMA, and FDG imaging. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a comprehensive overview of PET/MR research, identifying prominent trends, key researchers, and influential works. Based on these findings, we propose recommendations for future research directions in this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiajin Li
- Department of Radiology, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- PET/MR Center, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Chuntao Ye
- Department of Radiology, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- PET/MR Center, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shihong Li
- Department of Radiology, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- PET/MR Center, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guangwu Lin
- Department of Radiology, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- PET/MR Center, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Albers P, Kinnaird A. Advanced Imaging for Localized Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3490. [PMID: 39456584 PMCID: PMC11506824 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16203490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2024] [Revised: 10/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Prostate cancer is a prevalent malignancy often presenting without early symptoms. Advanced imaging technologies have revolutionized its diagnosis and management. This review discusses the principles, benefits, and clinical applications of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), micro-ultrasound (microUS), and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) in localized prostate cancer. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive literature review of recent studies and guidelines on mpMRI, microUS, and PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer diagnosis, focusing on their applications in biopsy-naïve patients, those with previous negative biopsies, and patients under active surveillance. RESULTS MpMRI has demonstrated high sensitivity and negative predictive value in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). MicroUS, a newer technology, has shown promising results in early studies, with sensitivity and specificity comparable to mpMRI. PSMA PET/CT has emerged as a highly sensitive and specific imaging modality, particularly valuable for staging and detecting metastatic disease. All three technologies have been incorporated into urologic practice for prostate cancer diagnosis and management, with each offering unique advantages in different clinical scenarios. CONCLUSIONS Advanced imaging techniques, including mpMRI, microUS, and PSMA PET/CT, have significantly improved the accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis, staging, and management. These technologies enable more precise targeting of suspicious lesions during biopsy and therapy planning. However, further research, especially randomized controlled trials, is needed to fully establish the optimal use and inclusion of these imaging modalities in various stages of prostate cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Albers
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada;
| | - Adam Kinnaird
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada;
- Alberta Prostate Cancer Research Initiative (APCaRI), Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Cancer Research Institute of Northern Alberta (CRINA), Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada
- Alberta Center for Urologic Research and Excellence (ACURE), Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Y, Song J, Yang L, Li W, Wang W, Ji A, Wang L, Wang F. The value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the diagnosis of intracapsular prostate cancer with a poor prognosis. Discov Oncol 2024; 15:252. [PMID: 38954151 PMCID: PMC11219597 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01127-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic value of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for intracapsular prostate cancer with a poor prognosis (PPC) and no extracapsular invasion or distant metastasis. METHODS The PET/CT images and clinical data of 221 patients were retrospectively analyzed. These patients all had clear pathological results. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of the main lesions was measured at the postprocessing workstation and was tested for correlation with the pathological score. The diagnostic accuracy was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the best diagnostic threshold was calculated. The correlation between SUVmax and the International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (GG) was also analyzed. RESULTS The pathological results of the 221 patients were 48 benign lesions and 173 malignant lesions, including 81 PPC. Low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancers made up 21.97% (38/173), 54.33% (94/173), and 23.70% (41/173) of the malignant lesions, respectively. SUVmax and GG were positively correlated (r = 0.54, P < 0.01). The best SUVmax thresholds for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the diagnosis of intracapsular PC and PPC were 7.95 and 13.94, respectively; the specificities were 0.83 and 0.85, the negative predictive values were 0.55 and 0.87, and the areas under the ROC curves were 0.88 and 0.88, respectively. CONCLUSION 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has high specificity and NPV in the diagnosis of intracapsular PPC, but the sensitivity for the diagnosis of intracapsular low-risk PC is low, which may cause some cases to be undetected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajing Wang
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Jieping Song
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Lulu Yang
- Department of Pathology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Wencheng Li
- Department of Urology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Aiqing Ji
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Liwei Wang
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China.
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang Y, Dong L, Zhao H, Li L, Huang G, Xue W, Liu J, Chen R. The superior detection rate of total-body [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT compared to short axial field-of-view [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for early recurrent prostate cancer patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2484-2494. [PMID: 38514483 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06674-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET imaging has been extensively utilized for the detection of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer. However, the detection rate declines to merely 10-40% when PSA levels are < 0.2 ng/mL employing short axial field-of-view (SAFOV) PET. Prior studies exhibited superior detection rates with total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET in BCR patients with PSA > 0.2 ng/mL. Nevertheless, the diagnostic utility of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET for BCR patients when PSA is < 0.2 ng/mL remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT could improve the detection rate compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL. METHODS Eighty BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL underwent total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. These patients were matched by baseline qualities to another 80 patients who received SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The detection rates of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were compared utilizing a chi-square test and stratified analysis. Image quality of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT and SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was assessed based on subjective scoring and objective parameters. The objective parameters measured were SUVmax, SUVmean, standard deviation (SD) of SUV, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of liver and gluteus maximus. RESULTS The image quality of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT was superior to that of SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in both early and delayed scans. The detection rate of total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT for BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL was significantly higher than that of SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (73.75% vs. 43.75%, P < 0.001). Total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT resulted in noteworthy modifications to the treatment regimen when contrasted with SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS In BCR patients with PSA < 0.2 ng/mL, total-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT not only demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate compared to SAFOV [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT but also led to significant alterations in treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yining Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Liang Dong
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Haitao Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Lianghua Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Gang Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianjun Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Ruohua Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oldan JD, Almaguel F, Voter AF, Duran A, Gafita A, Pomper MG, Hope TA, Rowe SP. PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceuticals for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Cancer J 2024; 30:176-184. [PMID: 38753752 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common noncutaneous malignancy in men. Until recent years, accurate imaging of men with newly diagnosed PCa, or recurrent or low-volume metastatic disease, was limited. Further, therapeutic options for men with advanced, metastatic, castration-resistant disease were increasingly limited as a result of increasing numbers of systemic therapies being combined in the upfront metastatic setting. The advent of urea-based, small-molecule inhibitors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has partially addressed those shortcomings in diagnosis and therapy of PCa. On the diagnostic side, there are multiple pivotal phase III trials with several different agents having demonstrated utility in the initial staging setting, with generally modest sensitivity but very high specificity for determining otherwise-occult pelvic nodal involvement. That latter statistic drives the utility of the scan by allowing imaging interpreters to read with very high sensitivity while maintaining a robust specificity. Other pivotal phase III trials have demonstrated high detection efficiency in patients with biochemical failure, with high positive predictive value at the lesion level, opening up possible new avenues of therapy such as metastasis-directed therapy. Beyond the diagnostic aspects of PSMA-targeted radiotracers, the same urea-based chemical scaffolds can be altered to deliver therapeutic isotopes to PCa cells that express PSMA. To date, one such agent, when combined with best standard-of-care therapy, has demonstrated an ability to improve overall survival, progression-free survival, and freedom from skeletal events relative to best standard-of-care therapy alone in men with metastatic, castration-resistant PCa who are post chemotherapy. Within the current milieu, there are a number of important future directions including the use of artificial intelligence to better leverage diagnostic findings, further medicinal chemistry refinements to the urea-based structure that may allow improved tumor targeting and decreased toxicities, and the incorporation of new radionuclides that may better balance efficacy with toxicities than those nuclides that are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge D Oldan
- From the Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Frankis Almaguel
- Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Andrew F Voter
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alfonso Duran
- Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Andrei Gafita
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Martin G Pomper
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Steven P Rowe
- From the Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oprea-Lager DE, MacLennan S, Dierckx R, Fanti S. The EANM Focus 5 consensus on 'molecular imaging and theranostics in prostate cancer': the future begins today. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:1462-1463. [PMID: 38280047 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06552-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela-Elena Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Steven MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rudi Dierckx
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Duan H, Moradi F, Davidzon GA, Liang T, Song H, Loening AM, Vasanawala S, Srinivas S, Brooks JD, Hancock S, Iagaru A. 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI versus MRI alone for evaluation of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2/3 imaging trial. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:501-508. [PMID: 38423030 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00069-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines include prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET for detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. However, targeting a single tumour characteristic might not be sufficient to reflect the full extent of disease. Gastrin releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) have been shown to be overexpressed in prostate cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the GRPR-targeting radiopharmaceutical 68Ga-RM2 in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. METHODS This single-centre, single-arm, phase 2/3 trial was done at Stanford University (USA). Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, a Karnofsky performance status of 50 or higher, increasing prostate-specific antigen concentration 0·2 ng/mL or more after prostatectomy or 2 ng/mL or more above nadir after radiotherapy, and non-contributory conventional imaging (negative CT or MRI, and bone scan) were eligible. All participants underwent 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with PET-positive findings on 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI compared with MRI alone after initial therapy, at a per-patient and per-lesion level. The primary outcome would be considered met if at least 30% of patients had one or more lesions detected by 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI and the detection by 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI was significantly greater than for MRI. Each PET scan was interpreted by three independent masked readers using a standardised evaluation criteria. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02624518, and is complete. FINDINGS Between Dec 12, 2015, and July 27, 2021, 209 men were screened for eligibility, of whom 100 were included in analyses. Median follow-up was 49·3 months (IQR 36·7-59·2). The primary endpoint was met; 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI was positive in 69 (69%) patients and MRI alone was positive in 40 (40%) patients (p<0·0001). In the per-lesion analysis 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI showed significantly higher detection rates than MRI alone (143 vs 96 lesions; p<0·0001). No grade 1 or worse events were reported. INTERPRETATION 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI showed better diagnostic performance than MRI alone in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Further prospective comparative studies with PSMA-targeted PET are needed to gain a better understanding of GRPR and PSMA expression patterns in these patients. FUNDING The US Department of Defense.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heying Duan
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Farshad Moradi
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Guido A Davidzon
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Tie Liang
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Hong Song
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Andreas M Loening
- Department of Radiology, Division of Body MRI, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Shreyas Vasanawala
- Department of Radiology, Division of Body MRI, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Steven Hancock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhou L, Lu Y, Liu W, Wang S, Wang L, Zheng P, Zi G, Liu H, Liu W, Wei S. Drug conjugates for the treatment of lung cancer: from drug discovery to clinical practice. Exp Hematol Oncol 2024; 13:26. [PMID: 38429828 PMCID: PMC10908151 DOI: 10.1186/s40164-024-00493-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
A drug conjugate consists of a cytotoxic drug bound via a linker to a targeted ligand, allowing the targeted delivery of the drug to one or more tumor sites. This approach simultaneously reduces drug toxicity and increases efficacy, with a powerful combination of efficient killing and precise targeting. Antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) are the best-known type of drug conjugate, combining the specificity of antibodies with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs to reduce adverse reactions by preferentially targeting the payload to the tumor. The structure of ADCs has also provided inspiration for the development of additional drug conjugates. In recent years, drug conjugates such as ADCs, peptide‒drug conjugates (PDCs) and radionuclide drug conjugates (RDCs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The scope and application of drug conjugates have been expanding, including combination therapy and precise drug delivery, and a variety of new conjugation technology concepts have emerged. Additionally, new conjugation technology-based drugs have been developed in industry. In addition to chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, drug conjugate therapy has undergone continuous development and made significant progress in treating lung cancer in recent years, offering a promising strategy for the treatment of this disease. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the use of drug conjugates for lung cancer treatment, including structure-based drug design, mechanisms of action, clinical trials, and side effects. Furthermore, challenges, potential approaches and future prospects are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Zhou
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yunlong Lu
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, School of Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Geriatrics, Key Laboratory of Vascular Aging, Ministry of Education, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Shanglong Wang
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, School of Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, China
| | - Lingling Wang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Pengdou Zheng
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guisha Zi
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Huiguo Liu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wukun Liu
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, School of Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, China.
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
| | - Shuang Wei
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ghezzo S, Mapelli P, Samanes Gajate AM, Palmisano A, Cucchiara V, Brembilla G, Bezzi C, Suardi N, Scifo P, Briganti A, De Cobelli F, Chiti A, Esposito A, Picchio M. Diagnostic accuracy of fully hybrid [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI and [ 68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/MRI in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-center phase II clinical trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:907-918. [PMID: 37897615 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06483-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic accuracy and detection rates of PET/MRI with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [68Ga]Ga-M2 in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS Sixty patients were enrolled in this prospective single-center phase II clinical trial from June 2020 to October 2022. Forty-four/60 completed all study examinations and were available at follow-up (median: 22.8 months, range: 6-31.5 months). Two nuclear medicine physicians analyzed PET images and two radiologists interpreted MRI; images were then re-examined to produce an integrated PET/MRI report for both [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 examinations. A composite reference standard including histological specimens, response to treatment, and conventional imaging gathered during follow-up was used to validate imaging findings. Detection rates, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value were assessed. McNemar's test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity on a per-patient base and detection rate on a per-region base. Prostate bed, locoregional lymph nodes, non-skeletal distant metastases, and bone metastases were considered. p-value significance was defined below the 0.05 level after correction for multiple testing. RESULTS Patients' median age was 69.8 years (interquartile range (IQR): 61.8-75.1) and median PSA level at time of imaging was 0.53 ng/mL (IQR: 0.33-2.04). During follow-up, evidence of recurrence was observed in 31/44 patients. Combining MRI with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET resulted in sensitivity = 100% and 93.5% and specificity of 69.2% and 69.2%, respectively. When considering the individual imaging modalities, [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET showed lower sensitivity compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and MRI (61.3% vs 83.9% and 87.1%, p = 0.046 and 0.043, respectively), while specificity was comparable among the imaging modalities (100% vs 84.6% and 69.2%, p = 0.479 and 0.134, respectively). CONCLUSION This study brings further evidence on the utility of fully hybrid PET/MRI for disease characterization in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa. Imaging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET showed high sensitivity, while the utility of [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET in absence of a simultaneous whole-body/multiparametric MRI remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele Ghezzo
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Ana Maria Samanes Gajate
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Palmisano
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolina Bezzi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Largo Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paola Scifo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Esposito
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mohseninia N, Zamani-Siahkali N, Harsini S, Divband G, Pirich C, Beheshti M. Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: Bone Scan Versus PET Imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:97-118. [PMID: 37596138 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of malignancy among men, with bone metastasis being a significant source of morbidity and mortality in advanced cases. Detecting and treating bone metastasis at an early stage is crucial to improve the quality of life and survival of prostate cancer patients. This objective strongly relies on imaging studies. While CT and MRI have their specific utilities, they also possess certain drawbacks. Bone scintigraphy, although cost-effective and widely available, presents high false-positive rates. The emergence of PET/CT and PET/MRI, with their ability to overcome the limitations of standard imaging methods, offers promising alternatives for the detection of bone metastasis. Various radiotracers targeting cell division activity or cancer-specific membrane proteins, as well as bone seeking agents, have been developed and tested. The use of positron-emitting isotopes such as fluorine-18 and gallium-68 for labeling allows for a reduced radiation dose and unaffected biological properties. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics techniques in medical imaging has shown significant advancements in reducing interobserver variability, improving accuracy, and saving time. This article provides an overview of the advantages and limitations of bone scan using SPECT and SPECT/CT and PET imaging methods with different radiopharmaceuticals and highlights recent developments in hybrid scanners, AI, and radiomics for the identification of prostate cancer bone metastasis using molecular imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasibeh Mohseninia
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Nazanin Zamani-Siahkali
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Research center for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sara Harsini
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Christian Pirich
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oprea-Lager DE, MacLennan S, Bjartell A, Briganti A, Burger IA, de Jong I, De Santis M, Eberlein U, Emmett L, Fizazi K, Gillessen S, Herrmann K, Heskamp S, Iagaru A, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Kunikowska J, Lam M, Nanni C, O'Sullivan JM, Panebianco V, Sala E, Sathekge M, Sosnowski R, Tilki D, Tombal B, Treglia G, Tunariu N, Walz J, Yakar D, Dierckx R, Sartor O, Fanti S. European Association of Nuclear Medicine Focus 5: Consensus on Molecular Imaging and Theranostics in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2024; 85:49-60. [PMID: 37743194 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In prostate cancer (PCa), questions remain on indications for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and PSMA radioligand therapy, integration of advanced imaging in nomogram-based decision-making, dosimetry, and development of new theranostic applications. OBJECTIVE We aimed to critically review developments in molecular hybrid imaging and systemic radioligand therapy, to reach a multidisciplinary consensus on the current state of the art in PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The results of a systematic literature search informed a two-round Delphi process with a panel of 28 PCa experts in medical or radiation oncology, urology, radiology, medical physics, and nuclear medicine. The results were discussed and ratified in a consensus meeting. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Forty-eight statements were scored on a Likert agreement scale and six as ranking options. Agreement statements were analysed using the RAND appropriateness method. Ranking statements were analysed using weighted summed scores. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS After two Delphi rounds, there was consensus on 42/48 (87.5%) of the statements. The expert panel recommends PSMA PET to be used for staging the majority of patients with unfavourable intermediate and high risk, and for restaging of suspected recurrent PCa. There was consensus that oligometastatic disease should be defined as up to five metastases, even using advanced imaging modalities. The group agreed that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA should not be administered only after progression to cabazitaxel and that [223Ra]RaCl2 remains a valid therapeutic option in bone-only metastatic castration-resistant PCa. Uncertainty remains on various topics, including the need for concordant findings on both [18F]FDG and PSMA PET prior to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy. CONCLUSIONS There was a high proportion of agreement among a panel of experts on the use of molecular imaging and theranostics in PCa. Although consensus statements cannot replace high-certainty evidence, these can aid in the interpretation and dissemination of best practice from centres of excellence to the wider clinical community. PATIENT SUMMARY There are situations when dealing with prostate cancer (PCa) where both the doctors who diagnose and track the disease development and response to treatment, and those who give treatments are unsure about what the best course of action is. Examples include what methods they should use to obtain images of the cancer and what to do when the cancer has returned or spread. We reviewed published research studies and provided a summary to a panel of experts in imaging and treating PCa. We also used the research summary to develop a questionnaire whereby we asked the experts to state whether or not they agreed with a list of statements. We used these results to provide guidance to other health care professionals on how best to image men with PCa and what treatments to give, when, and in what order, based on the information the images provide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Skåne, Sweden
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Vita e Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Irene A Burger
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Kantonspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Igle de Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Uta Eberlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Louise Emmett
- Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine Department, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sandra Heskamp
- Department of Medical Imaging-Nuclear Medicine Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Jolanta Kunikowska
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marnix Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cristina Nanni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospitaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, UK
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Evis Sala
- Department of Radiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore and Advanced Radiology Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mike Sathekge
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Nuclear Medicine Department, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Roman Sosnowski
- Department of Urooncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Giorgio Treglia
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nina Tunariu
- Clinical Radiology, Drug Development Unit and Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Clinical Trials, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Derya Yakar
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rudi Dierckx
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Oliver Sartor
- Departments of Medicine and Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Albisinni S, Diamand R. Understanding biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: trust biology, not a number. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:637-638. [PMID: 36732361 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00646-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Albisinni
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | - Romain Diamand
- Urology Department, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang Y, Chen Z, Zhu Y, Zhao H, Li L, Huang G, Xue W, Chen R, Liu J. Total-body [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT improves detection rate compared with conventional [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:4096-4106. [PMID: 37578502 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06355-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess whether total-body [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT could improve the detection rate compared with conventional [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS Two hundred biochemical recurrent prostate cancer patients with similar clinicopathological characteristics were included, of whom 100 patients underwent early total-body [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and diuretic-delayed total-body [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and the other 100 patients received early conventional [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and diuretic-delayed conventional [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The detection rates of total-body [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and conventional [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were compared using a chi-square test and stratified analysis. The image quality of total-body [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT and conventional [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was compared based on subjective scoring and objective parameters. Subjective scoring was conducted from background noise and lesion prominence using a 5-point scale. Objective parameters were evaluated by SUVmax, SUVmean, the standard deviation (SD) of SUV, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of liver and gluteus maximus. The SUVmax of the recurrent lesions was also measured. RESULTS The liver SD of the total-body [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was significantly lower than that of conventional [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, the SNR was significantly higher than that of conventional [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and the subjective evaluation was significantly better than that of conventional [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The detection rate of total-body [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer was significantly higher than that of conventional [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (91.0% vs. 74.0%, P = 0.003). Total-body [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT had better detection efficiency for patients with a Gleason score ≤ 8 or PSA ≤ 2 ng/ml. The advantages of diuretic-delayed total-body [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were more obvious. CONCLUSION Total-body [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT could significantly improve the detection rate compared with conventional [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yining Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Zijun Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Yinjie Zhu
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Haitao Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Lianghua Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Gang Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Ruohua Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Jianjun Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li T, Zhou Z, Xie Z, Fan X, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Song X, Ruan Y. Identification and validation of cancer-associated fibroblast-related subtypes and the prognosis model of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer based on single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:11379-11395. [PMID: 37369799 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05011-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are an essential component of the tumor immune microenvironment that are involved in extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. We aim to investigate the characteristics of CAFs in prostate cancer and develop a biochemical recurrence (BCR)-related CAF signature for predicting the prognosis of PCa patients. METHODS The bulk RNA-seq and relevant clinical information were obtained from the TCGA and GEO databases, respectively. The infiltration scores of CAFs in prostate cancer patients were calculated using the MCP counter and EPIC algorithms. The single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was downloaded from the GEO database. Subsequently, univariate Cox regression analysis was employed to identify prognostic genes associated with CAFs. We identified two subtypes (C1 and C2) of prostate cancer that were associated with CAFs via non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering. In addition, the BCR-related CAF signatures were constructed using Lasso regression analysis. Finally, a nomogram model was established based on the risk score and clinical characteristics of the patients. RESULTS Initially, we found that patients with high CAF infiltration scores had shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) times. Subsequently, CAFs in four pairs of tumors and paracancerous tissues were identified. We discovered 253 significantly differentially expressed genes, of which 13 had prognostic significance. Using NMF clustering, we divided PCa patients into C1 and C2 subgroups, with the C1 subgroup having a worse prognosis and substantially enriched cell cycle, homologous recombination, and mismatch repair pathways. Furthermore, a BCR-related CAFs signature was established. Multivariate COX regression analysis confirmed that the BCR-related CAFs signature was an independent prognostic factor for BCR in PCa. In addition, the nomogram was based on the clinical characteristics and risk scores of the patient and demonstrated high accuracy and reliability for predicting BCR. Lastly, our findings indicate that the risk score may be a useful tool for predicting PCa patients' sensitivity to immunotherapy and drug treatment. CONCLUSION NMF clustering based on CAF-related genes revealed distinct TME immune characteristics between groups. The BCR-related CAF signature accurately predicted prognosis and immunotherapy response in prostate cancer patients, offering a promising new approach to cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiewen Li
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Wujin Road 85, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Zeng Zhou
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Wujin Road 85, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Zhiwen Xie
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Wujin Road 85, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Xuhui Fan
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Wujin Road 85, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Yichen Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Wujin Road 85, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Wujin Road 85, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Xiaodong Song
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Wujin Road 85, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Yuan Ruan
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Wujin Road 85, Shanghai, 200080, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Huang R, Li Y, Wu H, Liu B, Zhang X, Zhang Z. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT versus 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for the detection of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1216894. [PMID: 37645433 PMCID: PMC10461474 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1216894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our aim was to conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review in order to compare the diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in patients with biochemically recurrent after radical prostatectomy and biochemically recurrent prostate cancers (BCR) after hybrid RT and RP. Methods Up until February 2023, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for pertinent papers. Studies examining the utility of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT or PET/MRI as a screening tool for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer were included. To measure heterogeneity, we employed the I2 statistic. In cases of substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 50%), we used the random effect model to produce a forest plot. In other cases, we utilized the fixed model. Furthermore, we assessed the quality of the studies included using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies (QUADAS-2) method. Results In total, 37 studies involving 8409 patients were examined. For 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI, the combined total detection rate was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.65-0.75) and 0.71 (95% CI:0.67-0.75), respectively. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI did not substantially differ in terms of the overall detection rate for BCR (P = 0.58). The detection rate was unaffected by the PSA values (all P > 0.05). Conclusion The diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT appears to be equivalent to that of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in detecting biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Nonetheless, it should be noted that not all studies have used pathological biopsies as the gold standard. Therefore, additional larger prospective studies are needed to address this issue. Systematic review registration identifier CRD42023410039.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Zhongxi Zhang
- The First Clinical College, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Glemser PA, Rotkopf LT, Ziener CH, Beuthien-Baumann B, Weru V, Kopp-Schneider A, Schlemmer HP, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Sachpekidis C. Hybrid imaging with [ 68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT and PET-MRI in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Cancer Imaging 2022; 22:53. [PMID: 36138437 PMCID: PMC9502876 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00489-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT, [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-MRI and MRI in a cohort of prostate cancer (PCa) patients in biochemical recurrence after initial curative therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-three patients with biochemically recurrent PCa underwent whole-body [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT 1 hour post-injection (p.i.) followed by [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-MRI 2.5 hours p.i., including a multiparametric MRI pelvic protocol examination. Imaging data analysis consisted of visual (qualitative) evaluation of the PET-CT, PET-MRI and MRI scans, as well as semi-quantitative and quantitative analyses of the PET and MRI data, including calculation of the parameters standardized uptake value (SUV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from the PCa lesions. Association analysis was performed between imaging and clinical data, including PSA level and Gleason score. The results were considered significant for p-values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05). RESULTS The hybrid imaging modalities [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT and PET-MRI were positive in more patients than MRI alone. In particular, PET-CT detected lesions suggestive of PCa relapse in 34/53 (64.2%), PET-MRI in 36/53 (67.9%) and MRI in 23/53 patients (43.4%). While no significant differences in lesion detection rate were observed between PET-CT and PET-MRI, the latter was particularly efficient in detection of local recurrences in the prostate bed mainly due to the contribution of the MRI part of the modality. Association analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in the probability of a positive scan with increasing PSA levels for all imaging modalities. Accordingly, there was no significant association between scan positivity rate and Gleason score for any imaging modality. No significant correlation was observed between SUV and ADC values in lymph node metastases. CONCLUSION [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT and PET-MRI provide equally good detection rates for PCa recurrence, both outperforming stand-alone MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Glemser
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L T Rotkopf
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C H Ziener
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B Beuthien-Baumann
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - V Weru
- Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Kopp-Schneider
- Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H P Schlemmer
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Sachpekidis
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|