Genes associated with anhedonia: a new analysis in a large clinical trial (GENDEP)

Genetic Associations of Anhedonia: Insights into Overlap of Mental and Somatic Disorders

BACKGROUND

Anhedonia is characterized by a reduced ability to anticipate, experience, and/or learn about pleasure. This phenomenon has a transdiagnostic nature and is one of the key symptoms of mood disorders, schizophrenia, addictions, and somatic conditions.

AIM

To evaluate the genetic architecture of anhedonia and its overlap with other mental disorders and somatic conditions.

METHODS

We performed a genome-wide association study of anhedonia on a sample of 4,520 individuals from a Russian non-clinical population. Using the available summary statistics, we calculated polygenic risk scores (PRS) to investigate the genetic relationship between anhedonia and other psychiatric or somatic phenotypes.

RESULTS

No variants with a genome-wide significant association were identified. PRS for major depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia were significantly associated with anhedonia. Conversely, no significant associations were found between PRS for anxiety and anhedonia, which aligns well with existing clinical evidence. None of the PRS for somatic phenotypes attained a significance level after correction for multiple comparisons. A nominal significance for the anhedonia association was determined for omega-3 fatty acids, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and Crohn's disease.

CONCLUSION

Anhedonia has a complex polygenic architecture, and its presence in somatic diseases or normal conditions may be due to a genetic predisposition to mood disorders or schizophrenia.

Determining cut-off values and predictors for the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale: comparison between clinical and school settings

BACKGROUND

Few previous studies have established Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) cut-off values using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and applied these values to compare predictors of anhedonia between clinical and nonclinical groups.

AIMS

To determine the optimal cut-off values for the SHAPS and use them to identify predictors of anhedonia in clinical and nonclinical groups in Taiwan.

METHOD

This cross-sectional and correlational study used convenience sampling to recruit 160 patients from three hospitals and 412 students from two universities in northern Taiwan. Data analysis included receiver operating characteristic curve, univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The optimal SHAPS cut-off values were 29.5 and 23.5 for the clinical and nonclinical groups, respectively. Moreover, two-stage analysis revealed that participants in the clinical group who perceived themselves as nondepressed, and participants in the nonclinical group who did not skip classes and whose fathers exhibited higher levels of care and protection were less likely to attain the cut-off values. Conversely, participants in the nonclinical group who reported lower academic satisfaction and were unwilling to seek help from family or friends were more likely to attain the cut-off values.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the importance of optimal cut-off values in screening for depression risk within clinical and nonclinical groups. Accordingly, the development of comprehensive, individualised programmes to monitor variation trends in SHAPS scores and relevant predictors of anhedonia across different target populations is crucial.

The presence of anhedonia in individuals with subacute and chronic stroke: an exploratory cohort study

Background

Anhedonia refers to the diminished capacity to experience pleasure. It has been described both as a symptom of depression and an enduring behavioral trait that contributes its development. Specifically, in stroke patients, anhedonia has been closely linked to depression, resulting in reduced sensitivity to everyday pleasures and intrinsic motivation to engage in rehabilitation programs and maintain a healthy active lifestyle. This condition may hinder patients' recovery, diminishing their autonomy, functioning, and quality of life.

Objective

We aimed to explore the prevalence and level of anhedonia and those variables that might be associated in patients with both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke at subacute and chronic phases of the disease.

Methods

We conducted an exploratory cohort study with a sample of 125 patients with subacute and chronic stroke presenting upper-limb motor deficits. We measured participants' level of anhedonia with four items from the Beck Depression Inventory-II that describe the symptoms of this condition: loss of pleasure, loss of interest, loss of energy, and loss of interest in sex. We also collected demographic and clinical information and evaluated motor and cognitive functions as well as levels of depression, apathy, and various mood states. The results were compared to a sample of 71 healthy participants of similar age, sex, and level of education.

Results

Stroke patients demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence (18.5-19.7%) and level of anhedonia compared to the healthy controls (4.3%), regardless of stroke phase, level of motor impairment, and other clinical variables. Furthermore, post-stroke anhedonia was associated with lower levels of motivation and higher levels of negative mood states such as fatigue and anger in the long term. Importantly, anhedonia level was superior in stroke patients than in healthy controls while controlling for confounding effects of related emotional conditions.

Conclusion

This study provides novel evidence on the prevalence, level and factors related to anhedonia post-stroke. We emphasize the importance of assessing and treating anhedonia in this population, as well as conducting large-scale cohort and longitudinal studies to test its influence on long-term functional and emotional recovery.

Sex Significantly Impacts the Function of Major Depression-Linked Variants In Vivo

BACKGROUND

Genome-wide association studies have discovered blocks of common variants-likely transcriptional-regulatory-associated with major depressive disorder (MDD), though the functional subset and their biological impacts remain unknown. Likewise, why depression occurs in females more frequently than males is unclear. We therefore tested the hypothesis that risk-associated functional variants interact with sex and produce greater impact in female brains.

METHODS

We developed techniques to directly measure regulatory variant activity and sex interactions using massively parallel reporter assays in the mouse brain in vivo, in a cell type-specific manner, and applied these approaches to measure activity of >1000 variants from >30 MDD loci.

RESULTS

We identified extensive sex-by-allele effects in mature hippocampal neurons, suggesting that sex-differentiated impacts of genetic risk may underlie sex bias in disease. Unbiased informatics approaches indicated that functional MDD variants recurrently disrupt a number of transcription factor binding motifs, including those of sex hormone receptors. We confirmed a role for the latter by performing massively parallel reporter assays in neonatal mice on the day of birth (during a sex-differentiating hormone surge) and hormonally quiescent juveniles.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides novel insights into the influence of age, biological sex, and cell type on regulatory variant function and provides a framework for in vivo parallel assays to functionally define interactions between organismal variables such as sex and regulatory variation. Moreover, we experimentally demonstrate that a portion of the sex differences seen in MDD occurrence may be a product of sex-differentiated effects at associated regulatory variants.

[Anhedonia in mood disorders and somatic diseases: results of exploratory Mendelian randomization analysis]

OBJECTIVE

To conduct an exploratory Mendelian randomization analysis of the causal relationships of anhedonia with a wide range of psychiatric and somatic phenotypes based on the genetic data of participants in a population study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 4520 participants, of which 50.4% (n=2280) were female. The mean age was 36.8 (S.D.=9.8) years. Participants were pheno-nailed based on the DSM-5 criteria for anhedonia in the framework of depression. An episode of anhedonia exceeding 2 weeks during life was reported by 57.6% (n=2604) of participants. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the anhedonia phenotype was performed, as well as a Mendelian randomization analysis using summary statistics of large-scale GWASs on psychiatric and somatic phenotypes.

RESULTS

The GWAS on anhedonia did not reveal the variants with genome-wide significant association (p<10^-8). The most significant (p=9.71×10^-7) was the variant rs296009 (chr5:168513184) in an intron of the slit guidance ligand 3 (SLIT3) gene. Using Mendelian randomization, nominally significant (p<0.05) causal associations of anhedonia with 24 phenotypes were identified, which can be divided into 5 main groups: psychiatric/neurological diseases, inflammatory diseases of the digestive system, respiratory diseases, oncological diseases and metabolic disorders. The most significant causal effects of anhedonia were found for breast cancer (p=0.0004, OR=0.9986, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.9978-0.999)), minimal depression phenotype (p=0.009, OR=1.004, 95% CI (1.001-1.007)), as well as for apolipoprotein A (p=0.01, OR=0.973, 95% CI (0.952-0.993)) and respiratory diseases (p=0.01, OR=0.9988, 95% CI (0.9980-0.9997)).

CONCLUSION

The polygenic nature of anhedonia may cause the risks of comorbidity of this phenotype with a wide range of somatic diseases, as well as may be associated with mood disorders.

Characterization of Maternal Psychosocial Stress During Pregnancy: The Healthy Start Study

Objective:

To capture multidimensional maternal psychosocial stress using responses from the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) administered during pregnancy, and to identify sociodemographic, biological, and health behavioral correlates of the stress domains.

Methods:

Using data from 1,079 pregnant women, we implemented principal component analysis on EPDS and PSS responses and retained factors based on the Scree plot and Eigenvalues >1. We then used linear regression to identify perinatal correlates of each domain.

Results:

We identified three stress domains: “Feeling Overwhelmed,” “Anhedonia,” and “Lack of Control,” which accounted for 10.6% of variance in questionnaire responses. In multivariable analyses, household income ≤$70,000 (β = 0.21 confidence interval [95% CI: 0.05–0.39]), primiparity (0.36 [0.02–0.71]), inadequate (0.21 [0.04–0.39]) or excessive gestational weight gain (0.27 [0.11–0.42]), and Healthy Eating Index (HEI) score ≤57 (0.14 [0.00–0.28]) were associated with Feeling Overwhelmed. Older age (0.02 [0.00–0.03] per 1-year), Hispanic ethnicity (0.19 [0.00–0.38]), and HEI score ≤57 (0.15 [0.02–0.28]) were associated with Anhedonia. Non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (0.37 [0.10–0.63]), not having graduated from college (0.16 [−0.02 to 0.35]), having a partner born outside the United States (0.17 [−0.02 to 0.37]), household size of ≥5 persons (0.21 [−0.02 to 0.37]), receiving public assistance (0.18 [−0.02 to 0.37]), and prenatal smoking (0.32 [0.05–0.59]) were associated with Lack of Control.

Conclusions:

Three domains of maternal psychosocial stress during pregnancy (Feeling Overwhelmed, Anhedonia, and Lack of Control) were differentially related to sociodemographic, biological, and health behavioral characteristics that may be targets for interventions to ameliorate stress in pregnant women.

Clinical Trial Registry

: The Healthy Start study is registered as an observational study at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT #002273297).

The Potential of Polygenic Risk Scores to Predict Antidepressant Treatment Response in Major Depression: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Understanding the genetic underpinnings of antidepressant treatment response in unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) can be useful in identifying patients at risk for poor treatment response or treatment resistant depression. A polygenic risk score (PRS) is a useful tool to explore genetic liability of a complex trait such as antidepressant treatment response. Here, we review studies that use PRSs to examine genetic overlap between any trait and antidepressant treatment response in unipolar MDD.

METHODS

A systematic search of literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO. Our search included studies examining associations between PRSs of psychiatric as well as non-psychiatric traits and antidepressant treatment response in patients with unipolar MDD. A quality assessment of the included studies was performed.

RESULTS

In total, eleven articles were included which contained PRSs for 30 traits. Studies varied in sample size and endpoints used for antidepressant treatment response. Overall, PRSs for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, the personality trait openness, coronary artery disease, obesity, and stroke have been associated with antidepressant treatment response in patients with unipolar MDD.

LIMITATIONS

The endpoints used by included studies differed significantly, therefore it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Associations between a PRS and antidepressant treatment response have been reported for a number of traits in patients with unipolar MDD. PRSs could be informative to predict antidepressant treatment response in this population, given advances in the field. Most importantly, there is a need for larger study cohorts and the use of standardized outcome measures.

Progress and challenges in research of the mechanisms of anhedonia in major depressive disorder

There is an increasing heavy disease burden of major depressive disorder (MDD) globally. Both high diagnostic heterogeneity and complicated pathological mechanisms of MDD pose significant challenges. There is much evidence to support anhedonia as a core feature of MDD. In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, anhedonia is further emphasised as a key item in the diagnosis of major depression with melancholic features. Anhedonia is a multifaceted symptom that includes deficits in various aspects of reward processing, such as anticipatory anhedonia, consummatory anhedonia, and decision-making anhedonia. Anhedonia is expected to become an important clinicopathological sign for predicting the treatment outcome of MDD and assisting clinical decision making. However, the precise neurobiological mechanisms of anhedonia in MDD are not clearly understood. In this paper, we reviewed (1) the current understanding of the link between anhedonia and MDD; (2) the biological basis of the pathological mechanism of anhedonia in MDD; and (3) challenges in research on the pathological mechanisms of anhedonia in MDD. A more in-depth understanding of anhedonia associated with MDD will improve the diagnosis, prediction, and treatment of patients with MDD in the future.

Anhedonia in Depression and Schizophrenia: Brain Reward and Aversion Circuits

Anhedonia, which is defined as markedly diminished interest or pleasure, is a prominent symptom of psychiatric disorders, most notably major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia. Anhedonia is considered a transdiagnostic symptom that is associated with deficits in neural reward and aversion functions. Here, we review the characteristics of anhedonia in depression and schizophrenia as well as shared or disorder-specific anhedonia-related alterations in reward and aversion pathways of the brain. In particular, we highlight that anhedonia is characterized by impairments in anticipatory pleasure and integration of reward-related information in MDD, whereas anhedonia in schizophrenia is associated with neurocognitive deficits in representing the value of rewards. Dysregulation of the frontostriatal circuit and mesocortical and mesolimbic circuit systems may be the transdiagnostic neurobiological basis of reward and aversion impairments underlying anhedonia in these two disorders. Blunted aversion processing in depression and relatively strong aversion in schizophrenia are primarily attributed to the dysfunction of the habenula, insula, amygdala, and anterior cingulate cortex. Furthermore, patients with schizophrenia appear to exhibit greater abnormal activation and extended functional coupling than those with depression. From a transdiagnostic perspective, understanding the neural mechanisms underlying anhedonia in patients with psychiatric disorders may help in the development of more targeted and efficacious treatment and intervention strategies.

Understanding Anhedonia from a Genomic Perspective

Anhedonia, or the decreased ability to experience pleasure, is a cardinal symptom of major depression that commonly occurs within other forms of psychopathology. Supportive of long-held theory that anhedonia represents a genetically influenced vulnerability marker for depression, evidence from twin studies suggests that it is moderately-largely heritable. However, the genomic sources of this heritability are just beginning to be understood. In this review, we survey what is known about the genomic architecture underlying anhedonia and related constructs. We briefly review twin and initial candidate gene studies before focusing on genome-wide association study (GWAS) and polygenic efforts. As large samples are needed to reliably detect the small effects that typically characterize common genetic variants, the study of anhedonia and related phenotypes conflicts with current genomic research requirements and frameworks that prioritize sample size over precise phenotyping. This has resulted in few and underpowered studies of anhedonia-related constructs that have largely failed to reliably identify individual variants. Nonetheless, the polygenic architecture of anhedonia-related constructs identified in these studies has genetic overlap with depression and schizophrenia as well as related brain structure (e.g., striatal volume), providing important clues to etiology that may usefully guide refinement in nosology. As we await the accumulation of larger samples for more well-powered GWAS of reward-related constructs, novel analytic techniques that leverage GWAS summary statistics (e.g., genomic structural equation modeling) may currently be used to help characterize how the genomic architecture of anhedonia is shared and distinct from that underlying other constructs (e.g., depression, neuroticism, anxiety).

Phenotypic and genetic associations between anhedonia and brain structure in UK Biobank

Anhedonia is a core symptom of multiple psychiatric disorders and has been associated with alterations in brain structure. Genome-wide association studies suggest that anhedonia is heritable, with a polygenic architecture, but few studies have explored the association between genetic loading for anhedonia-indexed by polygenic risk scores for anhedonia (PRS-anhedonia)-and structural brain imaging phenotypes. Here, we investigated how anhedonia and PRS-anhedonia were associated with brain structure within the UK Biobank cohort. Brain measures (including total grey/white matter volumes, subcortical volumes, cortical thickness (CT) and white matter integrity) were analysed using linear mixed models in relation to anhedonia and PRS-anhedonia in 19,592 participants (9225 males; mean age = 62.6 years, SD = 7.44). We found that state anhedonia was significantly associated with reduced total grey matter volume (GMV); increased total white matter volume (WMV); smaller volumes in thalamus and nucleus accumbens; reduced CT within the paracentral cortex, the opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus, precentral cortex, insula and rostral anterior cingulate cortex; and poorer integrity of many white matter tracts. PRS-anhedonia was associated with reduced total GMV; increased total WMV; reduced white matter integrity; and reduced CT within the parahippocampal cortex, superior temporal gyrus and insula. Overall, both state anhedonia and PRS-anhedonia were associated with individual differences in multiple brain structures, including within reward-related circuits. These associations may represent vulnerability markers for psychopathology relevant to a range of psychiatric disorders.

[Anhedonia in depression: neurobiological and genetic aspects]

Anhedonia is indeed a pathogenetically important clinical phenotype and a promising endophenotype for depressive symptoms with a very high contribution of biological and genetic factors. Neurobiological mechanisms of anhedonia are impaired functioning of the reward system of the brain, which is confirmed by many neuroimaging, genetic and experimental studies. Anhedonia has a trans-diagnoctic character and should be understood as a complex phenomenon, and it is important to correctly evaluate it within the framework of a particular research paradigm. It seems optimal to form several complementary research strategies that evaluate the most important «facets» of anhedonia, regardless of the nosological form of the disease, within the framework of one study using various methods to search for adequate biomarkers of anhedonia severity (genetic, neuroimaging, biochemical). Given the high-quality organization of such comprehensive studies based on the correct methodology of evidence-based medicine, it is likely that significant biomarker systems will be available in the near future, which, if replicated in independent samples, can be used to personalize the diagnosis and treatment of depression.

Association between GLP-1 receptor gene polymorphisms with reward learning, anhedonia and depression diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors (GLP-1Rs) are widely expressed in the brain. Evidence suggests that they may play a role in reward responses and neuroprotection. However, the association of GLP-1R with anhedonia and depression diagnosis has not been studied. Here, we examined the association of GLP-1R polymorphisms with objective and subjective measures of anhedonia, as well as depression diagnosis.

METHODS

Objective [response bias assessed by the probabilistic reward task (PRT)] and subjective [Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)] measures of anhedonia, clinical variables and DNA samples were collected from 100 controls and 164 patients at McLean Hospital. An independent sample genotyped as part of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) was used to study the effect of putative GLP-1R polymorphisms linked to response bias in PRT on depression diagnosis.

RESULTS

The C allele in rs1042044 was significantly associated with increased PRT response bias, when controlling for age, sex, case-control status and PRT discriminability. AA genotype of rs1042044 showed higher anhedonia phenotype based on SHAPS scores. However, analysis of PGC major depressive disorder data showed no association between rs1042044 and depression diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest a possible association of rs1042044 with anhedonia but no association with depression diagnosis.

Redefining phenotypes to advance psychiatric genetics: Implications from hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology

Genetic discovery in psychiatry and clinical psychology is hindered by suboptimal phenotypic definitions. We argue that the hierarchical, dimensional, and data-driven classification system proposed by the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) consortium provides a more effective approach to identifying genes that underlie mental disorders, and to studying psychiatric etiology, than current diagnostic categories. Specifically, genes are expected to operate at different levels of the HiTOP hierarchy, with some highly pleiotropic genes influencing higher order psychopathology (e.g., the general factor), whereas other genes conferring more specific risk for individual spectra (e.g., internalizing), subfactors (e.g., fear disorders), or narrow symptoms (e.g., mood instability). We propose that the HiTOP model aligns well with the current understanding of the higher order genetic structure of psychopathology that has emerged from a large body of family and twin studies. We also discuss the convergence between the HiTOP model and findings from recent molecular studies of psychopathology indicating broad genetic pleiotropy, such as cross-disorder SNP-based shared genetic covariance and polygenic risk scores, and we highlight molecular genetic studies that have successfully redefined phenotypes to enhance precision and statistical power. Finally, we suggest how to integrate a HiTOP approach into future molecular genetic research, including quantitative and hierarchical assessment tools for future data-collection and recommendations concerning phenotypic analyses. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Novel genome-wide associations for anhedonia, genetic correlation with psychiatric disorders, and polygenic association with brain structure

Anhedonia is a core symptom of several psychiatric disorders but its biological underpinnings are poorly understood. We performed a genome-wide association study of state anhedonia in 375,275 UK Biobank participants and assessed for genetic correlation between anhedonia and neuropsychiatric conditions (major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder and Parkinson's Disease). We then used a polygenic risk score approach to test for association between genetic loading for anhedonia and both brain structure and brain function. This included: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments of total grey matter volume, white matter volume, cerebrospinal fluid volume, and 15 cortical/subcortical regions of interest; diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures of white matter tract integrity; and functional MRI activity during an emotion processing task. We identified 11 novel loci associated at genome-wide significance with anhedonia, with a SNP heritability estimate (h2SNP) of 5.6%. Strong positive genetic correlations were found between anhedonia and major depressive disorder, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder; but not with obsessive compulsive disorder or Parkinson's Disease. Polygenic risk for anhedonia was associated with poorer brain white matter integrity, smaller total grey matter volume, and smaller volumes of brain regions linked to reward and pleasure processing, including orbito-frontal cortex. In summary, the identification of novel anhedonia-associated loci substantially expands our current understanding of the biological basis of state anhedonia and genetic correlations with several psychiatric disorders confirm the utility of this phenotype as a transdiagnostic marker of vulnerability to mental illness. We also provide the first evidence that genetic risk for state anhedonia influences brain structure, including in regions associated with reward and pleasure processing.