1
|
Walshe J, Elphinstone B, Nicol D, Taylor M. A systematic literature review of the 'commercialisation effect' on public attitudes towards biobank and genomic data repositories. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (BRISTOL, ENGLAND) 2024; 33:548-567. [PMID: 38389329 DOI: 10.1177/09636625241230864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Initiatives that collect and share genomic data to advance health research are widespread and accelerating. Commercial interests in these efforts, while vital, may erode public trust and willingness to provide personal genomic data, upon which these initiatives depend. Understanding public attitudes towards providing genomic data for health research in the context of commercial involvement is critical. A PRISMA-guided search of six online academic databases identified 113 quantitative and qualitative studies using primary data pertaining to public attitudes towards commercial actors in the management, collection, access, and use of biobank and genomic data. The presence of commercial interests yields interrelated public concerns around consent, privacy and data security, trust in science and scientists, benefit sharing, and the ownership and control of health data. Carefully considered regulatory and data governance and access policies are therefore required to maintain public trust and support for genomic health initiatives.
Collapse
|
2
|
Dortenzio V, Rhodes R, Merkelson A, Naik H. Research biobank participants attitudes towards genetic exceptionalism and health record confidentiality. J Community Genet 2024; 15:267-280. [PMID: 38441842 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00704-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding attitudes towards genetic exceptionalism and confidentiality is important in guiding policies regarding special protections for genetic/genomic information stored in electronic health records (EHR). The goals of this study were to determine biobank participants' attitudes towards genetic exceptionalism and confidentiality and whether those attitudes are related to their preference for return of genetic results. An online questionnaire was distributed to patients with an EHR and email address who had previously enrolled in the BioMe Biobank program. Most participants responded with similar levels of concern in scenarios involving the use of genetic information and other types of health information, suggesting that participants want similar protections for genetic data as other types of sensitive health information, particularly mental health and family history records. Of the 829 respondents, the majority had genetic exceptionalist views when directly asked, even though their concerns about confidentiality were similar for their genetic information and other health information. There were no differences in genetic exceptionalist views between those who had a documented preference to have genetic results returned and those who did not. Notably, for many participants, their recall of preference did not align with their documented preference. The majority of biobank participants were most anxious about the loss of confidentiality for genetic, mental health, and family history information, indicating that certain types of health information are considered more "sensitive" than others. These findings suggest the importance of assuring people participating in biobank research that the confidentiality of their "sensitive" health information is secured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Dortenzio
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Roberts Individualized Medical Genetics Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rosamond Rhodes
- Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amanda Merkelson
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hetanshi Naik
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 483 Quarry Road, 450E, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Richter G, Trigui N, Caliebe A, Krawczak M. Attitude towards consent-free research use of personal medical data in the general German population. Heliyon 2024; 10:e27933. [PMID: 38509969 PMCID: PMC10951576 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The design of appropriate consent procedures for the secondary use of personal health data is a key concern of current medical research. In Germany, the concept of 'data donation' has recently come into focus, defined as a legal entitlement to the research use of personal medical data without prior consent, combined with an easy-to-exercise right of the data subjects to opt-out. Methods Standardized online interviews of 3,013 individuals, representative of the German online population, were conducted in August 2022 to determine their attitude towards data donation for medical research. Results A majority of participants supported a consent-free data donation regulation, both for publicly funded (85.1%) and for private medical research (66.4%). Major predictors of a positive attitude towards data donation included (i) sufficient appreciation of the respective kind of research (i.e. public or private), (ii) a reciprocity attitude that patients who benefit from research have a duty to support research, and (iii) sufficient trust in data protection and data control. Conclusion People's attitude towards data donation to medical research is generally positive in Germany and depends upon factors that can be curbed by legislation and internal rules of procedure. Worthy of note, designing data donation in the form of an opt-out regulation does not necessarily mean that the paradigm of informedness has to be abandoned. Rather the process of information provision must be shifted towards the creation of basic knowledge in the general population about the risks and benefits of data-intensive medical research ('health data literacy').
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gesine Richter
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Division of Biomedical Ethics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Borstel, Germany
| | - Nourane Trigui
- Institute of Medical Informatics und Statistics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Amke Caliebe
- Institute of Medical Informatics und Statistics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Michael Krawczak
- Institute of Medical Informatics und Statistics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tian Y, Liu L, Gao J, Wang R. Homologous chromosome pairing: The linchpin of accurate segregation in meiosis. J Cell Physiol 2024; 239:3-19. [PMID: 38032002 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.31166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Meiosis is a specialized cell division that occurs in sexually reproducing organisms, generating haploid gametes containing half the chromosome number through two rounds of cell division. Homologous chromosomes pair and prepare for their proper segregation in subsequent divisions. How homologous chromosomes recognize each other and achieve pairing is an important question. Early studies showed that in most organisms, homologous pairing relies on homologous recombination. However, pairing mechanisms differ across species. Evidence indicates that chromosomes are dynamic and move during early meiotic stages, facilitating pairing. Recent studies in various model organisms suggest conserved mechanisms and key regulators of homologous chromosome pairing. This review summarizes these findings and compare similarities and differences in homologous chromosome pairing mechanisms across species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqi Tian
- Center for Cell Structure and Function, College of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology of Shandong Province, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
| | - Libo Liu
- Center for Cell Structure and Function, College of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology of Shandong Province, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
| | - Jinmin Gao
- Center for Cell Structure and Function, College of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology of Shandong Province, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
| | - Ruoxi Wang
- Center for Cell Structure and Function, College of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology of Shandong Province, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haas MA, Madelli EO, Brown R, Prictor M, Boughtwood T. Evaluation of CTRL: a web application for dynamic consent and engagement with individuals involved in a cardiovascular genetic disorders cohort. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:61-68. [PMID: 37709947 PMCID: PMC10772119 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01454-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
There has been keen interest in whether dynamic consent should be used in health research but few real-world studies have evaluated its use. Australian Genomics piloted and evaluated CTRL ('control'), a digital consent tool incorporating granular, dynamic decision-making and communication for genomic research. Individuals from a Cardiovascular Genetic Disorders Flagship were invited in person (prospective cohort) or by email (retrospective cohort) to register for CTRL after initial study recruitment. Demographics, consent choices, experience surveys and website analytics were analysed using descriptive statistics. Ninety-one individuals registered to CTRL (15.5% of the prospective cohort and 11.8% of the retrospective cohort). Significantly more males than females registered when invited retrospectively, but there was no difference in age, gender, or education level between those who did and did not use CTRL. Variation in individual consent choices about secondary data use and return of results supports the desirability of providing granular consent options. Robust conclusions were not drawn from satisfaction, trust, decision regret and knowledge outcome measures: differences between CTRL and non-CTRL cohorts did not emerge. Analytics indicate CTRL is acceptable, although underutilised. This is one of the first studies evaluating uptake and decision making using online consent tools and will inform refinement of future designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matilda A Haas
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| | - Evanthia O Madelli
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Rosie Brown
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Megan Prictor
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Tiffany Boughtwood
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Green S, Prainsack B, Sabatello M. Precision medicine and the problem of structural injustice. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2023; 26:433-450. [PMID: 37231234 PMCID: PMC10212228 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-023-10158-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Many countries currently invest in technologies and data infrastructures to foster precision medicine (PM), which is hoped to better tailor disease treatment and prevention to individual patients. But who can expect to benefit from PM? The answer depends not only on scientific developments but also on the willingness to address the problem of structural injustice. One important step is to confront the problem of underrepresentation of certain populations in PM cohorts via improved research inclusivity. Yet, we argue that the perspective needs to be broadened because the (in)equitable effects of PM are also strongly contingent on wider structural factors and prioritization of healthcare strategies and resources. When (and before) implementing PM, it is crucial to attend to how the organisation of healthcare systems influences who will benefit, as well as whether PM may present challenges for a solidaristic sharing of costs and risks. We discuss these issues through a comparative lens of healthcare models and PM-initiatives in the United States, Austria, and Denmark. The analysis draws attention to how PM hinges on-and simultaneously affects-access to healthcare services, public trust in data handling, and prioritization of healthcare resources. Finally, we provide suggestions for how to mitigate foreseeable negative effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Green
- Section for History and Philosophy of Science, Department of Science Education, University of Copenhagen, Niels Bohr Building (NBB), Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
- Centre for Medical Science and Technology Studies, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Oester Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copengagen, Denmark
| | - Barbara Prainsack
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria
- School of Social and Political Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Maya Sabatello
- Center for Precision Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, USA
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Winkler EC, Jungkunz M, Thorogood A, Lotz V, Schickhardt C. Patient data for commercial companies? An ethical framework for sharing patients' data with for-profit companies for research. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023:jme-2022-108781. [PMID: 37230744 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research using data from medical care promises to advance medical science and improve healthcare. Academia is not the only sector that expects such research to be of great benefit. The research-based health industry is also interested in so-called 'real-world' health data to develop new drugs, medical technologies or data-based health applications. While access to medical data is handled very differently in different countries, and some empirical data suggest people are uncomfortable with the idea of companies accessing health information, this paper aims to advance the ethical debate about secondary use of medical data generated in the public healthcare sector by for-profit companies for medical research (ReuseForPro). METHODS We first clarify some basic concepts and our ethical-normative approach, then discuss and ethically evaluate potential claims and interests of relevant stakeholders: patients as data subjects in the public healthcare system, for-profit companies, the public, and physicians and their healthcare institutions. Finally, we address the tensions between legitimate claims of different stakeholders in order to suggest conditions that might ensure ethically sound ReuseForPro. RESULTS We conclude that there are good reasons to grant for-profit companies access to medical data if they meet certain conditions: among others they need to respect patients' informational rights and their actions need to be compatible with the public's interest in health benefit from ReuseForPro.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva C Winkler
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Jungkunz
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Vincent Lotz
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Schickhardt
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A preregistered vignette experiment on determinants of health data sharing behavior Willingness to donate sensor data, medical records, and biomarkers. Politics Life Sci 2023; 41:161-181. [PMID: 36880543 DOI: 10.1017/pls.2022.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has spotlighted the importance of high-quality data for empirical health research and evidence-based political decision-making. To leverage the full potential of these data, a better understanding of the determinants and conditions under which people are willing to share their health data is critical. Building on the privacy theory of contextual integrity, the privacy calculus, and previous findings regarding different data types and recipients, we argue that established social norms shape the acceptance of novel practices of data collection and use. To investigate the willingness to share health data, we conducted a preregistered vignette experiment. The scenarios experimentally varied the vignette dimensions by data type, recipient, and research purpose. While some findings contradict our hypotheses, the results indicate that all three dimensions affected respondents' data sharing decisions. Additional analyses suggest that institutional and social trust, privacy concerns, technical affinity, altruism, age, and device ownership influence the willingness to share health data.
Collapse
|
9
|
Deruelle T, Kalouguina V, Trein P, Wagner J. Is there a "pandemic effect" on individuals' willingness to take genetic tests? Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:360-362. [PMID: 36352012 PMCID: PMC9646467 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01223-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
In this cross-sectional, semi-longitudinal and quasi-experimental study, our goal was to determine the effect of data storage conditions on willingness to take a genetic test. We compared individuals' preferences regarding how they want to store health data collected from genetic tests through two survey experiments fielded in Switzerland in March 2020 and January 2022. We tested for differences whether genetic data are presented as private goods or public goods. Results confirm our initial research expectation: more control over storage increases willingness, so does framing genetic data as private good. However, they also show that the willingness to take a genetic test has noticeably increased between 2020 and 2022. Our results point toward a "pandemic effect" which would have increased willingness take a genetic test, nevertheless, more data are needed to understand this putative effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Joël Wagner
- University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pinto da Silva S, de Freitas C, Severo M, Silva S. Gamete and embryo donation for research: what might shape the willingness to donate among gamete donors and recipients? J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:2077-2087. [PMID: 35986809 PMCID: PMC9475016 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02569-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Research using gametes and embryos donated by reproductive and third-party donors contributed to substantial, albeit contentious achievements. The views of gamete donors and recipients on donation for research and the underpinning role of attitudes towards research have been seldom explored and are yet to be incorporated into ethical, legal, and regulatory landscapes. From a cultural standpoint, this study adapts and explores psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Research Attitudes Questionnaire (RAQ), and analyzes the willingness of gamete donors and recipients to donate gametes and embryos for research and its association with sociodemographic, reproductive characteristics, and attitudes towards research. METHODS Between July 2017 and June 2018, 71 donors and 165 recipients completed a self-administered questionnaire at the Portuguese Public Bank of Gametes. Willingness to donate and attitudes towards research were measured with a 5-point Likert scale. RAQ psychometric characteristics were explored. RESULTS Two RAQ components were identified: "trustworthiness of research" and "critical perspective". Most participants were willing to donate gametes and embryos: donors more willing to donate gametes and male recipients more willing to donate gametes and embryos. Higher RAQ scores, indicating a more positive attitude towards research, were observed on the component "trustworthiness of research" among those willing to donate gametes and embryos and on the component "critical perspective" among those willing to donate embryos. CONCLUSION These findings help foster inclusivity, diversity, and responsiveness of research and call for upstream engagement of male and female gamete donors and recipients, promoting a trustworthy, anticipatory, democratic, and people-centered approach to policies, regulations, and practices in human gamete and embryo research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Pinto da Silva
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050‑600, Porto, Portugal.
- Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
- Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Cláudia de Freitas
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050‑600, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal
- Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centre for Research and Studies in Sociology (CIES-IUL), University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE-IUL), Avenida das Forças Armadas, 1649-026, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Milton Severo
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050‑600, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto, Rua Jorge de Viterbo Ferreira nº 228, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal
| | - Susana Silva
- Department of Sociology, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal
- Centre for Research in Anthropology (CRIA), Avenida das Forças Armadas, 1649-026, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schüttler C, Jahns R, Prokosch U, Wach S, Wullich B. [Biobanks, translational research and medical informatics]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2022; 61:722-727. [PMID: 35925243 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01850-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
When we think of medical research, one intuitively associates it with the analysis of study data collected for a specific research question or with the secondary use of patient data from routine care. However, these are not the only sources for answering scientific questions. Especially for translational research, tissue and liquid samples such as blood, DNA or other body fluids provide essential insights into disease pathogenesis, development of new therapies and treatment decisions. Access to these biomedical materials is provided by so-called biobanks. By collecting, characterizing, documenting and, if necessary, processing human biospecimens in accordance with high quality standards, they can support research of the causes of diseases, early diagnosis and the targeted treatment of diseases, or make a significant contribution to the investigation of common diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Schüttler
- Central Biobank Erlangen (CeBE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen und Medizinische Fakultät, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - R Jahns
- Interdisziplinäre Biomaterial- und Datenbank der Medizinischen Fakultät Würzburg, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - U Prokosch
- Lehrstuhl für Medizinische Informatik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - S Wach
- Urologische und Kinderurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - B Wullich
- Central Biobank Erlangen (CeBE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen und Medizinische Fakultät, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland.
- Urologische und Kinderurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zenker S, Strech D, Ihrig K, Jahns R, Müller G, Schickhardt C, Schmidt G, Speer R, Winkler E, von Kielmansegg SG, Drepper J. Data protection-compliant broad consent for secondary use of health care data and human biosamples for (bio)medical research: Towards a new German national standard. J Biomed Inform 2022; 131:104096. [PMID: 35643273 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The secondary use of deidentified but not anonymized patient data is a promising approach for enabling precision medicine and learning health care systems. In most national jurisdictions (e.g., in Europe), this type of secondary use requires patient consent. While various ethical, legal, and technical analyses have stressed the opportunities and challenges for different types of consent over the past decade, no country has yet established a national consent standard accepted by the relevant authorities. METHODS A working group of the national Medical Informatics Initiative in Germany conducted a requirements analysis and developed a GDPR-compliant broad consent standard. The development included consensus procedures within the Medical Informatics Initiative, a documented consultation process with all relevant stakeholder groups and authorities, and the ultimate submission for approval via the national data protection authorities. RESULTS This paper presents the broad consent text together with a guidance document on mandatory safeguards for broad consent implementation. The mandatory safeguards comprise i) independent review of individual research projects, ii) organizational measures to protect patients from involuntary disclosure of protected information, and iii) comprehensive information for patients and public transparency. This paper further describes the key issues discussed with the relevant authorities, especially the position on additional or alternative consent approaches such as dynamic consent. DISCUSSION Both the resulting broad consent text and the national consensus process are relevant for similar activities internationally. A key challenge of aligning consent documents with the various stakeholders was explaining and justifying the decision to use broad consent and the decision against using alternative models such as dynamic consent. Public transparency for all secondary use projects and their results emerged as a key factor in this justification. While currently largely limited to academic medicine in Germany, the first steps for extending this broad consent approach to wider areas of application, including smaller institutions and medical practices, are currently under consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Zenker
- Staff Unit for Scientific & Medical Technology Development & Coordination (MWTek), Commercial Directorate, Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics & Epidemiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusbergcampus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
| | - Daniel Strech
- QUEST Center, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kristina Ihrig
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roland Jahns
- Interdisciplinary Bank of Biomaterials and Data Würzburg (ibdw), University and University Hospital of Würzburg, Building A8/A9, Straubmühlweg 2a, 97078 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Gabriele Müller
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Christoph Schickhardt
- Section of Translational Medical Ethics, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Georg Schmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, German Centre for Cardiovascular Research partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Ronald Speer
- LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Straße 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Eva Winkler
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Dept Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 460, 69121 Heidelberg
| | | | - Johannes Drepper
- TMF - Technology, Methods, and Infrastructure for Networked Medical Research, Charlottenstrasse 42, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kamradt M, Poß-Doering R, Szecsenyi J. Exploring Physician Perspectives on Using Real-world Care Data for the Development of Artificial Intelligence-Based Technologies in Health Care: Qualitative Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e35367. [PMID: 35583921 PMCID: PMC9161099 DOI: 10.2196/35367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Development of artificial intelligence (AI)–based technologies in health care is proceeding rapidly. The sharing and release of real-world data are key practical issues surrounding the implementation of AI solutions into existing clinical practice. However, data derived from daily patient care are necessary for initial training, and continued data supply is needed for the ongoing training, validation, and improvement of AI-based solutions. Data may need to be shared across multiple institutions and settings for the widespread implementation and high-quality use of these solutions. To date, solutions have not been widely implemented in Germany to meet the challenge of providing a sufficient data volume for the development of AI-based technologies for research and third-party entities. The Protected Artificial Intelligence Innovation Environment for Patient-Oriented Digital Health Solutions (pAItient) project aims to meet this challenge by creating a large data pool that feeds on the donation of data derived from daily patient care. Prior to building this data pool, physician perspectives regarding data donation for AI-based solutions should be studied. Objective This study explores physician perspectives on providing and using real-world care data for the development of AI-based solutions in health care in Germany. Methods As a part of the requirements analysis preceding the pAItient project, this qualitative study explored physician perspectives and expectations regarding the use of data derived from daily patient care in AI-based solutions. Semistructured, guide-based, and problem-centered interviews were audiorecorded, deidentified, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively in a thematically structured approach. Results Interviews (N=8) with a mean duration of 24 (SD 7.8) minutes were conducted with 6 general practitioners and 2 hospital-based physicians. The mean participant age was 54 (SD 14.1; range 30-74) years, with an average experience as a physician of 25 (SD 13.9; range 1-45) years. Self-rated affinity toward modern information technology varied from very high to low (5-point Likert scale: mean 3.75, SD 1.1). All participants reported they would support the development of AI-based solutions in research contexts by donating deidentified data derived from daily patient care if subsequent data use was made transparent to them and their patients and the benefits for patient care were clear. Contributing to care optimization and efficiency were cited as motivation for potential data donation. Concerns regarding workflow integration (time and effort), appropriate deidentification, and the involvement of third-party entities with economic interests were discussed. The donation of data in reference to psychosomatic treatment needs was viewed critically. Conclusions The interviewed physicians reported they would agree to use real-world care data to support the development of AI-based solutions with a clear benefit for daily patient care. Joint ventures with third-party entities were viewed critically and should focus on care optimization and patient benefits rather than financial interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Kamradt
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Regina Poß-Doering
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chen X, Lin F, Cheng EW. Stratified Impacts of the Infodemic During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey in 6 Asian Jurisdictions. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e31088. [PMID: 35103601 PMCID: PMC8942092 DOI: 10.2196/31088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although timely and accurate information during the COVID-19 pandemic is essential for containing the disease and reducing mental distress, an infodemic, which refers to an overabundance of information, may trigger unpleasant emotions and reduce compliance. Prior research has shown the negative consequences of an infodemic during the pandemic; however, we know less about which subpopulations are more exposed to the infodemic and are more vulnerable to the adverse psychological and behavioral effects. Objective This study aimed to examine how sociodemographic factors and information-seeking behaviors affect the perceived information overload during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also investigated the effect of perceived information overload on psychological distress and protective behavior and analyzed the socioeconomic differences in the effects. Methods The data for this study were obtained from a cross-national survey of residents in 6 jurisdictions in Asia in May 2020. The survey targeted residents aged 18 years or older. A probability-based quota sampling strategy was adopted to ensure that the selected samples matched the population’s geographical and demographic characteristics released by the latest available census in each jurisdiction. The final sample included 10,063 respondents. Information overload about COVID-19 was measured by asking the respondents to what extent they feel overwhelmed by news related to COVID-19. The measure of psychological distress was adapted from the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 (DSM-5). Protective behaviors included personal hygienic behavior and compliance with social distancing measures. Results Younger respondents and women (b=0.20, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.26) were more likely to perceive information overload. Participants self-perceived as upper or upper-middle class (b=0.19, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.30) and those with full-time jobs (b=0.11, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.17) tended to perceive higher information overload. Respondents who more frequently sought COVID-19 information from newspapers (b=0.12, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.14), television (b=0.07, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.09), and family and friends (b=0.11, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.14) were more likely to feel overwhelmed. In contrast, obtaining COVID-19 information from online news outlets and social media was not associated with perceived information overload. There was a positive relationship between perceived information overload and psychological distress (b=2.18, 95% CI 2.09 to 2.26). Such an association was stronger among urban residents, full-time employees, and those living in privately owned housing. The effect of perceived information overload on protective behavior was not significant. Conclusions Our findings revealed that respondents who were younger, were female, had a higher socioeconomic status (SES), and had vulnerable populations in the household were more likely to feel overwhelmed by COVID-19 information. Perceived information overload tended to increase psychological distress, and people with higher SES were more vulnerable to this adverse psychological consequence. Effective policies and interventions should be promoted to target vulnerable populations who are more susceptible to the occurrence and negative psychological influence of perceived information overload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Chen
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Fen Lin
- Department of Media and Communication, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
| | - Edmund W Cheng
- Department of Public Policy, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Köngeter A, Schickhardt C, Jungkunz M, Bergbold S, Mehlis K, Winkler EC. Patients’ willingness to provide their clinical data for research purposes and acceptance of different consent models: Findings from a representative survey of cancer patients in Germany (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e37665. [PMID: 36006690 PMCID: PMC9459939 DOI: 10.2196/37665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Köngeter
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Schickhardt
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Jungkunz
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Bergbold
- Epidemiological Cancer Registry Baden-Württemberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Mehlis
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva C Winkler
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Richter G, Borzikowsky C, Hoyer BF, Laudes M, Krawczak M. Secondary research use of personal medical data: patient attitudes towards data donation. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:164. [PMID: 34911502 PMCID: PMC8672332 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00728-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has highlighted once more the great need for comprehensive access to, and uncomplicated use of, pre-existing patient data for medical research. Enabling secondary research-use of patient-data is a prerequisite for the efficient and sustainable promotion of translation and personalisation in medicine, and for the advancement of public-health. However, balancing the legitimate interests of scientists in broad and unrestricted data-access and the demand for individual autonomy, privacy and social justice is a great challenge for patient-based medical research. Methods We therefore conducted two questionnaire-based surveys among North-German outpatients (n = 650) to determine their attitude towards data-donation for medical research, implemented as an opt-out-process. Results We observed a high level of acceptance (75.0%), the most powerful predictor of a positive attitude towards data-donation was the conviction that every citizen has a duty to contribute to the improvement of medical research (> 80% of participants approving data-donation). Interestingly, patients distinguished sharply between research inside and outside the EU, despite a general awareness that universities and public research institutions cooperate with commercial companies, willingness to allow use of donated data by the latter was very low (7.1% to 29.1%, depending upon location of company). The most popular measures among interviewees to counteract reservations against commercial data-use were regulation by law (61.4%), stipulating in the process that data are not sold or resold (84.6%). A majority requested control of both the use (46.8%) and the protection (41.5%) of the data by independent bodies. Conclusions In conclusion, data-donation for medical research, implemented as a combination of legal entitlement and easy-to-exercise-right to opt-out, was found to be widely supported by German patients and therefore warrants further consideration for a transposition into national law. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00728-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gesine Richter
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Division of Biomedical Ethics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Niemannsweg 11, Haus 1, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Christoph Borzikowsky
- Institute of Medical Informatics und Statistics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Bimba Franziska Hoyer
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Matthias Laudes
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Michael Krawczak
- Institute of Medical Informatics und Statistics, Kiel University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Motives for withdrawal of participation in biobanking and participants' willingness to allow linkages of their data. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 30:367-377. [PMID: 34803164 PMCID: PMC8904772 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00997-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Data repositories, like research biobanks, seek to optimise the number of responding participants while simultaneously attempting to increase the amount of data donated per participant. Such efforts aim to increase the repository’s value for its uses in medical research to contribute to improve health care, especially when data linkage is permitted by participants. We investigated individuals’ motives for participating in such projects and potential reasons for their withdrawal from participation in a population-based biobank. In addition, we analysed how these motives were related to various characteristics of the participants and their willingness to permit data linkage to their personal data for research. These questions were explored using a sample of participants in the Dutch Lifelines biobank (n = 2615). Our results indicated that motives for participation and withdrawal were premised on benefits or harm to society and to the individuals themselves. Although general values and trust both played key roles in participation, potential withdrawal and willingness to permit data linkage, they were differentially associated with motives for participation and withdrawal. These findings support and nuance previous findings by highlighting the distinctiveness and complexity of decision making regarding participation in or withdrawal from data donation. We suggest some new directions for improving recruitment, retention and safeguarding strategies in biobanking. In addition, our data provide initial evidence regarding how factors may relate with the probability that individuals will agree to data linkages, when controlling for their unique effects. Future research should further investigate how perceptions of harm and benefits may influence decision making on withdrawal of participation.
Collapse
|
18
|
Milne R, Morley KI, Almarri MA, Anwer S, Atutornu J, Baranova EE, Bevan P, Cerezo M, Cong Y, Costa A, Critchley C, Fernow J, Goodhand P, Hasan Q, Hibino A, Houeland G, Howard HC, Hussain SZ, Malmgren CI, Izhevskaya VL, Jędrzejak A, Jinhong C, Kimura M, Kleiderman E, Leach B, Liu K, Mascalzoni D, Mendes Á, Minari J, Nicol D, Niemiec E, Patch C, Pollard J, Prainsack B, Rivière M, Robarts L, Roberts J, Romano V, Sheerah HA, Smith J, Soulier A, Steed C, Stefànsdóttir V, Tandre C, Thorogood A, Voigt TH, Wang N, West AV, Yoshizawa G, Middleton A. Demonstrating trustworthiness when collecting and sharing genomic data: public views across 22 countries. Genome Med 2021; 13:92. [PMID: 34034801 PMCID: PMC8147072 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00903-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public trust is central to the collection of genomic and health data and the sustainability of genomic research. To merit trust, those involved in collecting and sharing data need to demonstrate they are trustworthy. However, it is unclear what measures are most likely to demonstrate this. METHODS We analyse the 'Your DNA, Your Say' online survey of public perspectives on genomic data sharing including responses from 36,268 individuals across 22 low-, middle- and high-income countries, gathered in 15 languages. We examine how participants perceived the relative value of measures to demonstrate the trustworthiness of those using donated DNA and/or medical information. We examine between-country variation and present a consolidated ranking of measures. RESULTS Providing transparent information about who will benefit from data access was the most important measure to increase trust, endorsed by more than 50% of participants across 20 of 22 countries. It was followed by the option to withdraw data and transparency about who is using data and why. Variation was found for the importance of measures, notably information about sanctions for misuse of data-endorsed by 5% in India but almost 60% in Japan. A clustering analysis suggests alignment between some countries in the assessment of specific measures, such as the UK and Canada, Spain and Mexico and Portugal and Brazil. China and Russia are less closely aligned with other countries in terms of the value of the measures presented. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the importance of transparency about data use and about the goals and potential benefits associated with data sharing, including to whom such benefits accrue. They show that members of the public value knowing what benefits accrue from the use of data. The study highlights the importance of locally sensitive measures to increase trust as genomic data sharing continues globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Milne
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
| | - Katherine I Morley
- RAND Europe, Cambridge, CB4 1YG, UK
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Global and Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia
| | - Mohamed A Almarri
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
- Department of Forensic Science and Criminology, Dubai Police GHQ, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Jerome Atutornu
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Elena E Baranova
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, 119049, Russia
| | - Paul Bevan
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Maria Cerezo
- EMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Yali Cong
- Medical Ethics Program, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Alessia Costa
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Christine Critchley
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, 3122, Australia
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia
| | - Josepine Fernow
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Peter Goodhand
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, MaRS Centre, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Qurratulain Hasan
- Department of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, Kamineni Hospitals, Hyderabad, 500 068, India
- SAAZ Genetics, Hyderabad, 500033, India
| | - Aiko Hibino
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, 036-8560, Japan
| | - Gry Houeland
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Heidi C Howard
- Medical Ethics, Lund Universitet, Sölvegatan, 19, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Charlotta Ingvoldstad Malmgren
- Department of Public Health and Caring Scienec, Uppsala University, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Solna, Sweden
| | | | | | - Cao Jinhong
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Megumi Kimura
- Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, 186-8603, Japan
| | - Erika Kleiderman
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, H3A 0G1, Canada
| | | | - Keying Liu
- Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
- School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Deborah Mascalzoni
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
- EURAC, Institute of Biomedicine, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Álvaro Mendes
- UnIGENe and CGPP - Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics, IBMC - Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal
| | - Jusaku Minari
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Dianne Nicol
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia
| | - Emilia Niemiec
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Christine Patch
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
- Genomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | | | - Barbara Prainsack
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK
| | | | - Lauren Robarts
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Jonathan Roberts
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Virginia Romano
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
- EURAC, Institute of Biomedicine, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Haytham A Sheerah
- Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - James Smith
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Alexandra Soulier
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Claire Steed
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Vigdis Stefànsdóttir
- Landspitali, the National University Hospital of Iceland, 101, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Cornelia Tandre
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Adrian Thorogood
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Torsten H Voigt
- Institute of Sociology, RWTH Aachen University, 52062, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nan Wang
- Medical Ethics Program, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Anne V West
- Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Bloomington, 47405, USA
| | - Go Yoshizawa
- Work Research Institute (AFI), Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna Middleton
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
- Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brall C, Berlin C, Zwahlen M, Ormond KE, Egger M, Vayena E. Public willingness to participate in personalized health research and biobanking: A large-scale Swiss survey. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0249141. [PMID: 33793624 PMCID: PMC8016315 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper reports survey findings on the Swiss public's willingness, attitudes, and concerns regarding personalized health research participation by providing health information and biological material. The survey reached a sample of 15,106 Swiss residents, from which we received 5,156 responses (34.1% response rate). The majority of respondents were aware of research using human biological samples (71.0%) and held a positive opinion towards this type of research (62.4%). Of all respondents, 53.6% indicated that they would be willing to participate in a personalized health research project. Willingness to participate was higher in younger, higher educated, non-religious respondents with a background in the health sector. Respondents were more willing to provide 'traditional' types of health data, such as health questionnaires, blood or biological samples, as opposed to social media or app-related data. All respondents valued the return of individual research results, including risk for diseases for which no treatment is available. Our findings highlight that alongside general positive attitudes towards personalized health research using data and samples, respondents have concerns about data privacy and re-use. Concerns included potential discrimination, confidentiality breaches, and misuse of data for commercial or marketing purposes. The findings of this large-scale survey can inform Swiss research institutions and assist policymakers with adjusting practices and developing policies to better meet the needs and preferences of the public. Efforts in this direction could focus on research initiatives engaging in transparent communication, education, and engagement activities, to increase public understanding and insight into data sharing activities, and ultimately strengthen personalized health research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Brall
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Berlin
- Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marcel Zwahlen
- Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Matthias Egger
- Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Effy Vayena
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zimmermann BM, Fiske A, Prainsack B, Hangel N, McLennan S, Buyx A. Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e25525. [PMID: 33503000 PMCID: PMC7872326 DOI: 10.2196/25525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The main German-speaking countries (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) have implemented digital contact tracing apps to assist the authorities with COVID-19 containment strategies. Low user rates for these apps can affect contact tracing and, thus, its usefulness in controlling the spread of the novel coronavirus. Objective This study aimed to assess the early perceptions of people living in the German-speaking countries and compare them with the frames portrayed in the newspapers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We conducted qualitative interviews with 159 participants of the SolPan project. Of those, 110 participants discussed contact tracing apps and were included in this study. We analyzed articles regarding contact tracing apps from 12 newspapers in the German-speaking countries. Results Study participants perceived and newspaper coverage in all German-speaking countries framed contact tracing apps as governmental surveillance tools and embedded them in a broader context of technological surveillance. Participants identified trust in authorities, respect of individual privacy, voluntariness, and temporary use of contact tracing apps as prerequisites for democratic compatibility. Newspapers commonly referenced the use of such apps in Asian countries, emphasizing the differences in privacy regulation among these countries. Conclusions The uptake of digital contact tracing apps in German-speaking countries may be undermined due to privacy risks that are not compensated by potential benefits and are rooted in a deeper skepticism towards digital tools. When authorities plan to implement new digital tools and practices in the future, they should be very transparent and proactive in communicating their objectives and the role of the technology—and how it differs from other, possibly similar, tools. It is also important to publicly address ethical, legal, and social issues related to such technologies prior to their launch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Maria Zimmermann
- Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Amelia Fiske
- Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Barbara Prainsack
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nora Hangel
- Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stuart McLennan
- Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alena Buyx
- Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mayeur C, van Hoof W. Citizens' conceptions of the genome: Related values and practical implications in a citizen forum on the use of genomic information. Health Expect 2021; 24:468-477. [PMID: 33453142 PMCID: PMC8077069 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development of large data sets, including genomic data, coupled with rapid advances in personalized medicine where citizens increasingly face complex choices about the use of their genomic information implies that citizens are essential stakeholders in genomics. They should be engaged in the ethical, legal and societal issues to produce a framework that fosters trust and allows them to guide the technology based on their values. OBJECTIVE This article highlights that citizens' conceptions of the human genome inform about and make sense of their main values regarding the use of genomic information, which is critical for policymakers, experts and stakeholders to understand to maintain the public support in genomics. METHOD Through an inductive thematic approach, we reanalysed data collected for the Belgian citizen forum, which aimed to produce recommendations for the Ministry of Public Health and other stakeholders. RESULTS Citizens expressed four conceptions of the genome that determined which uses of genomic information they supported: the most intimate part of individuals; 'I am more than my genome'; the individual's property vs the common good; and uncertainty and fear. CONCLUSION Diversity in their conceptions reveals remaining conflicts of values among citizens, mainly regarding a conception of the genome as an individual property or a common good. However, despite differing conceptions, shared values emerged such as solidarity, privacy, no genetic discrimination and the right to an open future, where individual and common interests coexist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The panel of the citizen forum consisted of 32 citizens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloé Mayeur
- Department of Public Health and Monitoring, Cancer Center, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wannes van Hoof
- Department of Public Health and Monitoring, Cancer Center, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|