1
|
Gutierrez AM, Robinson JO, Smith HS, Desrosiers-Battu LR, Scollon SR, Canfield I, Hsu RL, Schneider NM, Parsons DW, Plon SE, Allen-Rhoades W, Majumder MA, Malek J, McGuire AL. Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents. Genet Med 2024; 26:101168. [PMID: 38767058 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Professional guidelines recommend engaging adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in medical decision making (DM), including whether to undergo genomic sequencing (GS). We explored DM around GS and attitudes after return of GS results among a diverse group of AYAs with cancer and their parents. METHODS We surveyed AYAs with cancer (n = 75) and their parents (n = 52) 6 months after receiving GS results through the Texas KidsCanSeq study. We analyzed AYAs' DM role in GS research enrollment and their satisfaction with that role. We compared AYAs' and parents' self-reported understanding of, attitudes toward, and perceived utility of the AYA's GS results. RESULTS Most AYAs reported equally sharing DM with their parents (55%) or leading DM (36%) about GS research. Compared with their cancer care DM role, 56% of AYAs reported the same level of involvement in GS research DM, whereas 32% were more involved, and 13% were less involved (P = .011). AYAs were satisfied (99%) with their DM role regarding GS study participation. AYAs and parents had similar self-reported understanding of, attitudes toward, and perceived utility of the GS results. CONCLUSION Our results support engaging AYAs in DM about GS research and provide insights into AYAs' DM preferences and positive attitudes toward GS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda M Gutierrez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
| | - Jill O Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Hadley S Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Precision Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Lauren R Desrosiers-Battu
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Sarah R Scollon
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Isabel Canfield
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Rebecca L Hsu
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | | - D Williams Parsons
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Sharon E Plon
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | | | - Mary A Majumder
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Janet Malek
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bon SBB, Wouters RHP, Bakhuizen JJ, Jongmans MCJ, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Grootenhuis MA. Experiences of pediatric cancer patients (age 12-18 years) with extensive germline sequencing for cancer predisposition: a qualitative study. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:567-575. [PMID: 38409533 PMCID: PMC11061193 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01565-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This study explored the experiences and needs of adolescents, ranging from 12 to 18 years old, who have recently been diagnosed with cancer and participated in a nationwide germline genetic sequencing study within the context of pediatric oncology. The 21 adolescents in this qualitative interview study viewed genetic sequencing as an integral part of their cancer journey. They often characterized germline sequencing as "good-to-know" without specifying immediate utility. While the adolescents comprehended the significance of germline genetic sequencing, they were less focused on its potential long-term implications. Adolescents expressed a strong desire to be actively engaged in decisions related to genetics. They advocated for a participatory role in genetic decision-making from a young age onwards. They recommended that re-consent should be sought before re-analysis of their genetic data is performed and believe that patients should have the opportunity to provide (re-)consent once they reach adulthood. Moreover, the adolescents emphasized the importance of developing counseling materials that are not only concise but also visually attractive. In conclusion, this study underscores the positive perception that adolescents diagnosed with cancer hold regarding germline genetic sequencing. They articulate a strong interest in being actively involved in genetic decision-making. To address these articulated needs and preferences, we recommend the development of visually engaging counseling materials. These materials should effectively convey both the immediate and long-term implications of genetic sequencing, enabling adolescents with cancer to make informed decisions about genetic sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian B B Bon
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Roel H P Wouters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jette J Bakhuizen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn C J Jongmans
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Child Health, UMCU-Wilhelmina's Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Child Health, UMCU-Wilhelmina's Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martha A Grootenhuis
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Child Health, UMCU-Wilhelmina's Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hester DM, Miner SA. Consent and Assent in Pediatric Research. Pediatr Clin North Am 2024; 71:83-92. [PMID: 37973309 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Research involving pediatric populations has important ethical and regulatory considerations. As children generally cannot consent to research, there are special protections put in place to ensure that the decisional vulnerability is protected, including parental permission and often the child's assent. Assent is an ethically important part of the research because it allows the child to participate in the process of agreeing to research, develop their autonomy, and express their values. This article explores a case where the child and parent disagree about the child's participation. In doing so, the regulatory requirements of pediatric research are outlined and the process and product of obtaining assent from a minor is described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Micah Hester
- Department of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, 4301 West Markham Street, #646, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
| | - Skye A Miner
- Department of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, 4301 West Markham Street, #646, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moore C, Lazaraki S, Stenta T, Alexander M, Nguyen RP, Elliott DA, Conyers R. A systematic review of knowledge, attitude and practice of pharmacogenomics in pediatric oncology patients. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2023; 11:e01150. [PMID: 38013228 PMCID: PMC10682497 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.1150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics remains underutilized in clinical practice, despite the existence of internationally recognized, evidence-based guidelines. This systematic review aims to understand enablers and barriers to pharmacogenomics implementation in pediatric oncology by assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of healthcare professionals and consumers. Medline, Embase, Emcare, and PsycINFO database searches identified 146 relevant studies of which only three met the inclusion criteria. These studies reveal that consumers were concerned with pharmacogenomic test costs, insurance discrimination, data sharing, and privacy. Healthcare professionals possessed mostly positive attitudes toward pharmacogenomic testing yet identified lack of experience and training as barriers to implementation. Education emerged as the key enabler, reported in all three studies and both healthcare professionals and consumer groups. However, despite the need for education, no studies utilizing a pediatric oncology consumer or healthcare professional group have reported on the implementation or analysis of a pharmacogenomic education program in pediatric oncology. Increased access to guidelines, expert collaborations and additional guidance interpreting results were further enablers established by healthcare professionals. The themes identified mirror those reported in broader pediatric genetic testing literature. As only a small number of studies met inclusion criteria for this review, further research is warranted to elicit implementation determinants and advance pediatric pharmacogenomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Moore
- Pharmacogenomics TeamMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Smaro Lazaraki
- Health Sciences LibraryRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne HealthParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Tayla Stenta
- Pharmacogenomics TeamMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Marliese Alexander
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Pharmacy DepartmentPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | | | - David A. Elliott
- Pharmacogenomics TeamMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Pharmacy DepartmentPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Rachel Conyers
- Pharmacogenomics TeamMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- The Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Stem Cell Medicine, ReNEW, Melbourne NodeParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Children's Cancer Centre, The Royal Children's HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gutierrez AM, Robinson JO, Raesz-Martinez R, Canfield I, Majumder MA, Scollon S, Desrosiers LR, Hsu RL, Allen-Rhoades W, Parsons DW, Plon SE, McGuire AL, Malek J. Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12:773-781. [PMID: 36595372 PMCID: PMC10611971 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: With increased use of genomic testing in cancer research and clinical care, it is important to understand the perspectives and decision-making preferences of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer and their treating oncologists. Methods: We conducted an interview substudy of the BASIC3 Study, which enrolled newly diagnosed cancer patients <18 years of age with assent. Of 32 young adults (YAs) with cancer who reached the age of majority (AOM; 18 years) while on study, 12 were successfully approached and all consented to study continuation at AOM. Of those, seven completed an interview. Patients' oncologists, who enrolled and participated in return of clinical genomic results, were also interviewed (n = 12). Interviews were transcribed, deidentified, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: YAs cited the possibility of helping others and advancing science as major reasons for their assent to initial study enrollment and their willingness to consent at AOM. YAs thought obtaining informed consent from research participants for study continuation at AOM was a good idea in case they changed their minds or wanted to make their own decisions, and to keep them aware of study activities. There was diversity in what YAs understood and learned from genomic testing: some recalled specific findings, while some remembered minimal information about their results. Oncologists varied in their assessment of adolescents' engagement with the study and understanding of their results. Conclusion: Given the different ways AYAs engage with genomic information, careful assessment of AYAs' diverse communication and decision-making preferences is needed to tailor interactions accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda M. Gutierrez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jill O. Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robin Raesz-Martinez
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Isabel Canfield
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary A. Majumder
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah Scollon
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren R. Desrosiers
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rebecca L. Hsu
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wendy Allen-Rhoades
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - D. Williams Parsons
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sharon E. Plon
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amy L. McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Janet Malek
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ormond KE, Blasimme A, Vayena E. Ethical Aspects of Pediatric Genetic Care: Testing and Treatment. Pediatr Clin North Am 2023; 70:1029-1046. [PMID: 37704345 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
Pediatric health care providers caring for patients and families with genetic disease will encounter a range of ethical issues. These include traditional pediatric health care issues, such as surrogate decision making and end-of-life care. Genetic testing raises the importance of informed consent for potential risks that move beyond the oft discussed physical risks and into longer term concepts such as psychological impact, privacy and potential discrimination. Predictive testing in childhood also raises questions of whether the child has an autonomy interest in delaying testing until they have decision making capacity to do so on their own. And finally, treatments including gene therapies and gene editing, may raise issues of identity for families dealing with genetic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Health Ethics & Policy Lab, ETH Zurich. Hottingerstrasse 10, Zurich 8092, Switzerland; Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine.
| | - Alessandro Blasimme
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Health Ethics & Policy Lab, ETH Zurich. Hottingerstrasse 10, Zurich 8092, Switzerland
| | - Effy Vayena
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Health Ethics & Policy Lab, ETH Zurich. Hottingerstrasse 10, Zurich 8092, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Matula KA, Blumling AA, Myers MF, McGowan ML, Lipstein EA. Adolescents' and Parents' Perspectives on a Novel Decision-Making Process for Return of Results in Genomic Research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2023; 18:278-283. [PMID: 37491850 PMCID: PMC10529861 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231190826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
To understand whether they found a two-step decision process helpful and why, adolescent-parent dyads participating in a study investigating return of genomic testing results were asked about their decision-making experience. Responses were qualitatively coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Adolescents and parents found both joint and independent decision-making stages helpful. Regarding independent decision-making, adolescents appreciated exercising independence, while parents valued both adolescent and parental independence. Joint decision-making allowed each to hear the other's viewpoints. Some found joint decision-making irrelevant but recognized it might help others. Overall, adolescents and parents had similar reasons for finding the two-step decision-making process helpful. Our findings support using such a process for engaging parents and adolescents in challenging research and clinical decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A. Matula
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH USA
| | - Amy A. Blumling
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH USA
| | - Melanie F. Myers
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH USA
| | - Michelle L. McGowan
- Department of Women’s, Gender & Sexuality Studies, University of Cincinnati College of Arts and Sciences, Cincinnati, OH USA
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - Ellen A. Lipstein
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Berset AE, Myers MF, Prows CA, Brinkman WB. Adolescent Decision-Making Involvement in the Receipt of Genomic Testing Results. J Pediatr 2023; 259:113492. [PMID: 37201682 PMCID: PMC10524914 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine hypothesized predictors of adolescent and parent involvement in the decision about which genomic results to receive. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a longitudinal cohort study during phase 3 of the electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network. Dyads reported on how they preferred to make choices (adolescent only, parent only, or jointly). Dyads used a decision tool to choose independently the categories of genetic testing results they wanted. We summarized independent choices, identifying initially discordant dyads. After a facilitated discussion, dyads made a joint decision. Dyads then completed the Decision-Making Involvement Scale (DMIS). We conducted bivariate correlations between DMIS subscale scores and the following hypothesized predictors: adolescent age, preference for adolescent to make their own decision, and discordance on initial independent choices. RESULTS The sample included 163 adolescents, aged 13-17 years and parents (86.5% mothers). Dyads lacked agreement on how they wanted to make the final decision (weighted kappa statistic 0.04; 95% CI -0.08 to 0.16). These preferences, as well as the adolescent's age and adolescent-parent discordance on initial choices for specific categories of genetic testing results to receive, were associated with subsequent decision-making involvement behaviors as measured by DMIS subscales. Dyads with discordant initial preferences had significantly greater scores on the DMIS Joint/Options subscale than those with concordant initial preferences (adolescent report M [SD] 2.46 [0.60] vs 2.10 [0.68], P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Through facilitated discussion, adolescents and parents can work together and reach agreement about receipt of genomic screening results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne E Berset
- Division of General & Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
| | - Melanie F Myers
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Patient Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - William B Brinkman
- Division of General & Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Clayton EW, Smith ME, Anderson KC, Chung WK, Connolly JJ, Fullerton SM, McGowan ML, Peterson JF, Prows CA, Sabatello M, Holm IA. Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1021-1033. [PMID: 37343562 PMCID: PMC10357472 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Two major goals of the Electronic Medical Record and Genomics (eMERGE) Network are to learn how best to return research results to patient/participants and the clinicians who care for them and also to assess the impact of placing these results in clinical care. Yet since its inception, the Network has confronted a host of challenges in achieving these goals, many of which had ethical, legal, or social implications (ELSIs) that required consideration. Here, we share impediments we encountered in recruiting participants, returning results, and assessing their impact, all of which affected our ability to achieve the goals of eMERGE, as well as the steps we took to attempt to address these obstacles. We divide the domains in which we experienced challenges into four broad categories: (1) study design, including recruitment of more diverse groups; (2) consent; (3) returning results to participants and their health care providers (HCPs); and (4) assessment of follow-up care of participants and measuring the impact of research on participants and their families. Since most phases of eMERGE have included children as well as adults, we also address the particular ELSI posed by including pediatric populations in this research. We make specific suggestions for improving translational genomic research to ensure that future projects can effectively return results and assess their impact on patient/participants and providers if the goals of genomic-informed medicine are to be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Wright Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Departments of Pediatrics and Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
| | - Maureen E Smith
- Department of Medicine, Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Katherine C Anderson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - John J Connolly
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Stephanie M Fullerton
- Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Michelle L McGowan
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
| | - Josh F Peterson
- Center for Precision Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Divisions of Human Genetics and Patient Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Maya Sabatello
- Center for Precision Medicine & Genomics, Department of Medicine, and Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities & Ethics Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, NY, NY 10032, USA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
How does the genomic naive public perceive whole genomic testing for health purposes? A scoping review. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:35-47. [PMID: 36257982 PMCID: PMC9822972 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01208-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The benefits of genomic testing are primarily reported in rare disease, cancer diagnosis and disease management. However, as research into its application in common, more complex conditions grows, as well as the increased prevalence of carrier screening programs, the genomic naive public is more likely to be offered testing in future. To promote social acceptability and ethical application of this technology, it is essential that public perceptions of genomics are considered. Previous studies, however, have primarily focussed on the views of those with genetic conditions or those undergoing genetic testing. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the genomic naive public's perceptions of clinical genomics and clinical genomic testing. Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched, with a total of 3460 articles identified. Data analysis was organised according to the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework. Sixteen full-text articles were included in the final analysis. Most of the studies used questionnaires to determine attitudes of the public toward clinical genomics (n = 12). Public perceptions were found to underpin technology (Domain 2), value proposition (Domain 3), the adopter system (Domain 4) and the wider context (Domain 6) of the NASSS framework, highlighting its importance when considering implementation of an innovative technology such as genomic testing. Our study shows public perceptions are diverse, and highlights the need for more studies on the views of underrepresented groups and the impact of cultural contexts on perceptions.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lynch JA, Idleburg MJ, Butsch Kovacic M, Childers-Buschle KE, Dufendach KR, Lipstein EA, McGowan ML, Myers MF, Prows CA. Developing video education materials for the return of genomic test results to parents and adolescents. PEC INNOVATION 2022; 1:100051. [PMID: 36532300 PMCID: PMC9757811 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the development, implementation, and revision of a video to provide information about genomic testing and the return of genomic research results to adolescents and parents. METHODS Formative, community-engaged research was conducted in three stages: development, implementation, and revision. Existing research participant advisory groups were used for focus groups and convenience sampling was used for interviews. Participants included parents, young adults without children, and adolescents. Transcripts of recorded sessions were used for formative analysis. RESULTS Video was the preferred format for delivering genomic testing information to adolescents during the development stage. During implementation, adolescents identified video length as an impediment to recall. During the revision stage, participants preferred the video in separate short segments, supported plan to require only one short video and leaving other short videos optional. Participants were divided on whether the required short video provided enough information, but all participants reported that watching additional videos would not have changed their decisions about receiving test results. CONCLUSION Genomic education videos should be brief (<4 mins) to improve the odds that participants will view the entirety of any required video. INNOVATION The development of participant materials should incorporate plans for monitoring implementation and plans for revising materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A. Lynch
- Department of Communication, College of Arts & Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
| | - Michaela J. Idleburg
- Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - Melinda Butsch Kovacic
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation, Exercise, and Nutrition Science, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
| | | | - Kevin R. Dufendach
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Ellen A. Lipstein
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Michelle L. McGowan
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
- Department of Women’s, Gender & Sexuality Studies, College of Arts & Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
| | - Melanie F. Myers
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Cynthia A. Prows
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Blumling AA, Prows CA, Harr MH, Chung WK, Clayton EW, Holm IA, Wiesner GL, Connolly JJ, Harley JB, Hakonarson H, McGowan ML, Miller EM, Myers MF. Outcomes of Returning Medically Actionable Genomic Results in Pediatric Research. J Pers Med 2022; 12:1910. [PMID: 36422086 PMCID: PMC9694255 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12111910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Phase III study was undertaken to assess clinical utility of returning medically actionable genomic screening results. We assessed pediatric clinical outcomes following return of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in autosomal dominant conditions with available effective interventions. METHODS The two eMERGE III pediatric sites collected outcome data and assessed changes in medical management at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS We returned P/LP results to 29 participants with outcome data. For 23 of the 29 participants, the P/LP results were previously unknown. Five of the 23 participants were already followed for conditions related to the P/LP variant. Of those receiving novel results and not being followed for the condition related to the P/LP result (n = 18), 14 (77.8%) had a change in healthcare after return of results (RoR). Following RoR, cascade testing of family members occurred for 10 of 23 (43.5%). CONCLUSIONS The most common outcomes post-RoR included imaging/laboratory testing and health behavior recommendations. A change in healthcare was documented in 77.8% of those receiving results by 6 months. Our findings demonstrate how return of genomic screening results impacts healthcare in pediatric populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy A. Blumling
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Cynthia A. Prows
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Margaret H. Harr
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Wendy K. Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Ellen Wright Clayton
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Ingrid A. Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Georgia L. Wiesner
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - John J. Connolly
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - John B. Harley
- US Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA
| | - Hakon Hakonarson
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Michelle L. McGowan
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Department of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
| | - Erin M. Miller
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
| | - Melanie F. Myers
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Miner SA, Similuk M, Jamal L, Sapp J, Berkman BE. Genomic tools for health: Secondary findings as findings to be shared. Genet Med 2022; 24:2220-2227. [PMID: 35980380 PMCID: PMC9643624 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Whether and how to disclose secondary finding (SF) information to children is ethically debated. Some argue that genetic testing of minors should be limited to preserve the child's future autonomy. Others suggest that disclosure of SFs can occur if it is in the best interests of the child. However, the ways that parents conceptualize and weigh their child's future autonomy against the interests of their child and other family members are unknown. METHODS To explore how parents understand SF disclosure in the context of their child and other family members' lives, we conducted semistructured interviews with 30 families (40 parents in total). All parents had children who were enrolled in a genetic sequencing protocol that returned results by default. RESULTS We found that parents did not routinely conceptualize SFs as distinctive health information. Rather parents saw this information as part of their child's overall health. To make decisions about disclosure, parents weighed their child's ability to understand the SF information and their other family member's need to know. CONCLUSION Because most families desired SF information, we argue that disclosure of SF be reconceptualized to reflect the lived experiences of those who may receive this information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Skye A Miner
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Morgan Similuk
- Centralized Sequencing Program, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Leila Jamal
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; NHGRI/NCI/JHU Genetic Counseling Training Program, National Human Genome Research Insitute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Julie Sapp
- Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Division of Intramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Benjamin E Berkman
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Division of Intramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lillie N, Prows CA, McGowan ML, Blumling AA, Myers MF. Experiences of adolescents and their parents after receiving adolescents' genomic screening results. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:608-619. [PMID: 34695272 PMCID: PMC10093789 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
There has been considerable debate over whether adolescents should have the opportunity to learn genetic information about adult-onset disease risk and carrier status without a clinical indication. Adolescents face increasing opportunities to learn more about such genetic risks through the return of secondary findings from clinical genomic testing, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, and research opportunities. However, little is known about the perspectives of adolescents who have received genomic screening results. We conducted separate qualitative interviews with 15 adolescents and their parents who enrolled in a research protocol where they decided which genomic screening results to receive for the adolescent for up to 32 conditions informed by 84 genes. The goal of these interviews was to explore the impact of adolescents learning genomic results without a clinical indication for screening. Of the participating dyads, four received positive results for a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant for an autosomal dominant (AD) condition, five received carrier results for a heterozygous P/LP variant for an autosomal recessive (AR) condition, and six received negative results. An interpretive descriptive qualitative approach was used. Interview transcripts were coded using a guide developed by the study team based on themes that emerged from the interviews. Degree of recall and description of results, actionability, and emotional responses differed according to the types of results received. However, all participants were satisfied with their decision to learn results, and most did not report any lasting psychological harms. Participants adapted to genomic information about themselves, even after learning about unexpected increased risk for future health problems. Our findings support the position that, whenever possible, perspectives and wishes of adolescents should be strongly considered and respected in the decision-making process regarding genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Lillie
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Michelle L McGowan
- Ethics Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Department of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Amy A Blumling
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Melanie F Myers
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Johnson LM, Mandrell BN, Li C, Lu Z, Gattuso J, Harrison LW, Mori M, Ouma AA, Pritchard M, Sharp KMH, Nichols KE. Managing Pandora's Box: Familial Expectations around the Return of (Future) Germline Results. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2022; 13:152-165. [PMID: 35471132 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2063994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric oncology patients are increasingly being offered germline testing to diagnose underlying cancer predispositions. Meanwhile, as understanding of variant pathogenicity evolves, planned reanalysis of genomic results has been suggested. Little is known regarding the types of genomic information that parents and their adolescent children with cancer prefer to receive at the time of testing or their expectations around the future return of genomic results. METHODS Parents and adolescent children with cancer eligible for genomic testing for cancer predisposition were surveyed regarding their attitudes and expectations for receiving current and future germline results (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02530658). RESULTS All parents (100%) desired to learn about results for treatable or preventable conditions, with 92.4% wanting results even when there is no treatment or prevention. Parents expressed less interest in receiving uncertain results for themselves (88.3%) than for their children (95.3%). Most parents (95.9%) and adolescents (87.9%) believed that providers have a responsibility to share new or updated germline results indefinitely or at any point during follow-up care. Fewer parents (67.5%) indicated that they would want results if their child was deceased: 10.3% would not want to be contacted, 19.3% were uncertain. CONCLUSIONS Expectations for return of new or updated genomic results are high among pediatric oncology families, although up to one third of parents have reservations about receiving such information in the event of their child's death. These results underscore the importance of high-quality pre-and post-test counseling, conducted by individuals trained in consenting around genomic testing to elicit family preferences and align expectations around the return of germline results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza-Marie Johnson
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Belinda N Mandrell
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Zhaohua Lu
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jami Gattuso
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Lynn W Harrison
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Motomi Mori
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Annastasia A Ouma
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Michele Pritchard
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Kim E Nichols
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Docherty A, Kious B, Brown T, Francis L, Stark L, Keeshin B, Botkin J, DiBlasi E, Gray D, Coon H. Ethical concerns relating to genetic risk scores for suicide. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2021; 186:433-444. [PMID: 34472199 PMCID: PMC8692426 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide valuable information in research contexts regarding genomic changes that contribute to risks for complex psychiatric conditions like major depressive disorder. GWAS results can be used to calculate polygenic risk scores (PRS) for psychiatric conditions, such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, as well as for other traits, such as obesity or hypertension. Private companies that provide direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing sometimes report PRS for a variety of traits. Recently, the first well-powered GWAS study for suicide death was published. PRS reports that claim to assess suicide risk are therefore likely to appear soon in the DTC setting. We describe ethical concerns regarding the commercial use of GWAS results related to suicide. We identify several issues that must be addressed before PRS for suicide risk is made available to the public through DTC: (a) the potential for misinterpretation of results, (b) consumers' perceptions about determinism and behavior change, (c) potential contributions to stigma, discrimination, and health disparities; and (d) ethical problems regarding the testing of children and vulnerable adults. Tests for genetic prediction of suicidality may eventually have clinical significance, but until then, the potential for individual and public harm significantly outweighs any potential benefit. Even if genetic prediction of suicidality improves significantly, information about genetic risk scores must be distributed cautiously, with genetic counseling, and with adequate safeguards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Docherty
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Virginia Institute for Psychiatric & Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA USA
| | - Brent Kious
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Program in Medical Ethics and Humanities, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Teneille Brown
- Program in Medical Ethics and Humanities, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Leslie Francis
- Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Program in Medical Ethics and Humanities, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Louisa Stark
- S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Genetic Science Learning Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Brooks Keeshin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Jeffrey Botkin
- S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Emily DiBlasi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Doug Gray
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Hilary Coon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kasperbauer TJ, Halverson C. Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:686264. [PMID: 34307413 PMCID: PMC8301072 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.686264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Research biobanks that enroll minors face important practical, ethical, and regulatory challenges in reconsenting participants when they reach the age of 18. Federal regulations governing research in the United States provide minimal guidance and allow for a range of practices, including waiving the requirement to obtain reconsent. Some commentators have argued that institutional review boards should indeed grant such waivers, given the low risks of biobank-based research and the impracticality of contacting all participants when they turn 18. There is also significant ethical debate about the age at which adolescents can make authentic, autonomous decisions regarding their research participation. This paper reviews these issues in detail, describes the current state of the ethical discussion, and outlines evidence-based policies for enrolling minors into research biobanks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. J. Kasperbauer
- Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kanungo S, Barr J, Crutchfield P, Fealko C, Soares N. Ethical Considerations on Pediatric Genetic Testing Results in Electronic Health Records. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11:755-763. [PMID: 33176390 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in technology and access to expanded genetic testing have resulted in more children and adolescents receiving genetic testing for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. With increased adoption of the electronic health record (EHR), genetic testing is increasingly resulted in the EHR. However, this leads to challenges in both storage and disclosure of genetic results, particularly when parental results are combined with child genetic results. PRIVACY AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS Accidental disclosure and erroneous documentation of genetic results can occur due to the nature of their presentation in the EHR and documentation processes by clinicians. Genetic information is both sensitive and identifying, and requires a considered approach to both timing and extent of disclosure to families and access to clinicians. METHODS This article uses an interdisciplinary approach to explore ethical issues surrounding privacy, confidentiality of genetic data, and access to genetic results by health care providers and family members, and provides suggestions in a stakeholder format for best practices on this topic for clinicians and informaticians. Suggestions are made for clinicians on documenting and accessing genetic information in the EHR, and on collaborating with genetics specialists and disclosure of genetic results to families. Additional considerations for families including ethics around results of adolescents and special scenarios for blended families and foster minors are also provided. Finally, administrators and informaticians are provided best practices on both institutional processes and EHR architecture, including security and access control, with emphasis on the minimum necessary paradigm and parent/patient engagement and control of the use and disclosure of data. CONCLUSION The authors hope that these best practices energize specialty societies to craft practice guidelines on genetic information management in the EHR with interdisciplinary input that addresses all stakeholder needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shibani Kanungo
- Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
| | - Jayne Barr
- Internal Medicine-Pediatrics, MetroHealth, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Parker Crutchfield
- Medical Ethics, Humanities, and Law, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
| | - Casey Fealko
- Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
| | - Neelkamal Soares
- Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lewis C, Hammond J, Hill M, Searle B, Hunter A, Patch C, Chitty LS, Sanderson SC. Young people's understanding, attitudes and involvement in decision-making about genome sequencing for rare diseases: A qualitative study with participants in the UK 100, 000 Genomes Project. Eur J Med Genet 2020; 63:104043. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.104043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
20
|
Hoell C, Wynn J, Rasmussen LV, Marsolo K, Aufox SA, Chung WK, Connolly JJ, Freimuth RR, Kochan D, Hakonarson H, Harr M, Holm IA, Kullo IJ, Lammers PE, Leppig KA, Leslie ND, Myers MF, Sharp RR, Smith ME, Prows CA. Participant choices for return of genomic results in the eMERGE Network. Genet Med 2020; 22:1821-1829. [PMID: 32669677 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0905-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Secondary findings are typically offered in an all or none fashion when sequencing is used for clinical purposes. This study aims to describe the process of offering categorical and granular choices for results in a large research consortium. METHODS Within the third phase of the electronic MEdical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE) Network, several sites implemented studies that allowed participants to choose the type of results they wanted to receive from a multigene sequencing panel. Sites were surveyed to capture the details of the implementation protocols and results of these choices. RESULTS Across the ten eMERGE sites, 4664 participants including adolescents and adults were offered some type of choice. Categories of choices offered and methods for selecting categories varied. Most participants (94.5%) chose to learn all genetic results, while 5.5% chose subsets of results. Several sites allowed participants to change their choices at various time points, and 0.5% of participants made changes. CONCLUSION Offering choices that include learning some results is important and should be a dynamic process to allow for changes in scientific knowledge, participant age group, and individual preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christin Hoell
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Julia Wynn
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luke V Rasmussen
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Keith Marsolo
- Department of Population Health Sciences, and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sharon A Aufox
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John J Connolly
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert R Freimuth
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David Kochan
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hakon Hakonarson
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Margaret Harr
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, and the Manton Center for Orphan Diseases Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Iftikhar J Kullo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Nancy D Leslie
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Melanie F Myers
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Richard R Sharp
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Maureen E Smith
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Divisions of Human Genetics and Patient Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Prows CA, Marsolo K, Myers MF, Nix J, Hall ES. Adapting Clinical Systems to Enable Adolescents' Genomic Choices. ACI OPEN 2020; 4:e126-e131. [PMID: 36177089 PMCID: PMC9518747 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We offered adolescents personalized choices about the type of genetic results they wanted to learn during a research study and created a workflow to filter and transfer the results to the electronic health record (EHR). METHODS We describe adaptations needed to ensure that adolescents' results documented in the EHR and returned to adolescent/parent dyads matched their choices. A web application enabled manual modification of the underlying laboratory report data based on adolescents' choices. The final PDF format of the laboratory reports was not viewable through the EHR patient portal, so an EHR form was created to support the manual entry of discrete results that could be viewed in the portal. RESULTS Enabling adolescents' choices about genetic results was a labor-intensive process. More than 350 hours was required for development of the application and EHR form, as well as over 50 hours of a study professional's time to enter choices into the application and EHR. Adolescents and their parents who learned genetic results through the patient portal indicated that they were satisfied with the method of return and would make their choices again if given the option. CONCLUSION Although future EHR upgrades are expected to enable patient portal access to PDFs, additional improvements are needed to allow the results to be partitioned and filtered based on patient preferences. Furthermore, separating these results into more discrete components will allow them to be stored separately in the EHR, supporting the use of these data in clinical decision support or artificial intelligence applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia A. Prows
- Divisions of Human Genetics and Patient Services, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Keith Marsolo
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Melanie F. Myers
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center; College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Jeremy Nix
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Eric S. Hall
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Savatt JM, Wagner JK, Joffe S, Rahm AK, Williams MS, Bradbury AR, Davis FD, Hergenrather J, Hu Y, Kelly MA, Kirchner HL, Meyer MN, Mozersky J, O'Dell SM, Pervola J, Seeley A, Sturm AC, Buchanan AH. Pediatric reporting of genomic results study (PROGRESS): a mixed-methods, longitudinal, observational cohort study protocol to explore disclosure of actionable adult- and pediatric-onset genomic variants to minors and their parents. BMC Pediatr 2020; 20:222. [PMID: 32414353 PMCID: PMC7227212 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-02070-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exome and genome sequencing are routinely used in clinical care and research. These technologies allow for the detection of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in clinically actionable genes. However, fueled in part by a lack of empirical evidence, controversy surrounds the provision of genetic results for adult-onset conditions to minors and their parents. We have designed a mixed-methods, longitudinal cohort study to collect empirical evidence to advance this debate. METHODS Pediatric participants in the Geisinger MyCode® Community Health Initiative with available exome sequence data will have their variant files assessed for pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 60 genes designated as actionable by MyCode. Eight of these genes are associated with adult-onset conditions (Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome, MUTYH-associated polyposis, HFE-Associated Hereditary Hemochromatosis), while the remaining genes have pediatric onset. Prior to clinical confirmation of results, pediatric MyCode participants and their parents/legal guardians will be categorized into three study groups: 1) those with an apparent pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in a gene associated with adult-onset disease, 2) those with an apparent pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in a gene associated with pediatric-onset disease or with risk reduction interventions that begin in childhood, and 3) those with no apparent genomic result who are sex- and age-matched to Groups 1 and 2. Validated and published quantitative measures, semi-structured interviews, and a review of electronic health record data conducted over a 12-month period following disclosure of results will allow for comparison of psychosocial and behavioral outcomes among parents of minors (ages 0-17) and adolescents (ages 11-17) in each group. DISCUSSION These data will provide guidance about the risks and benefits of informing minors and their family members about clinically actionable, adult-onset genetic conditions and, in turn, help to ensure these patients receive care that promotes physical and psychosocial health. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03832985. Registered 6 February 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Steven Joffe
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Angela R Bradbury
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - F Daniel Davis
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Julie Hergenrather
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Yirui Hu
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | | | - H Lester Kirchner
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Michelle N Meyer
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Jessica Mozersky
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sean M O'Dell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Josie Pervola
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Seeley
- Department of Pediatrics, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Amy C Sturm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Returning Results in the Genomic Era: Initial Experiences of the eMERGE Network. J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10020030. [PMID: 32349224 PMCID: PMC7354592 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10020030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
A goal of the 3rd phase of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE3) Network was to examine the return of results (RoR) of actionable variants in more than 100 genes to consenting participants and their healthcare providers. Each of the 10 eMERGE sites developed plans for three essential elements of the RoR process: Disclosure to the participant, notification of the health care provider, and integration of results into the electronic health record (EHR). Procedures and protocols around these three elements were adapted as appropriate to individual site requirements and limitations. Detailed information about the RoR procedures at each site was obtained through structured telephone interviews and follow-up surveys with the clinical investigator leading or participating in the RoR process at each eMERGE3 institution. Because RoR processes at each of the 10 sites allowed for taking into account differences in population, disease focus and institutional requirements, significant heterogeneity of process was identified, including variability in the order in which patients and clinicians were notified and results were placed in the EHR. This heterogeneity in the process flow for eMERGE3 RoR reflects the “real world” of genomic medicine in which RoR procedures must be shaped by the needs of the patients and institutional environments.
Collapse
|
24
|
Adolescents' and Parents' Genomic Testing Decisions: Associations With Age, Race, and Sex. J Adolesc Health 2020; 66:288-295. [PMID: 31685375 PMCID: PMC7007858 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adolescents will increasingly be involved in decisions about the return of genomic results. We examined adolescents' and parents' decisions about learning actual genomic research results for the adolescent and whether choices were associated with participants' demographic factors. METHODS Adolescents aged between 13 and 17 years and a parent (dyads) were recruited through flyers, social media, employee emails, and clinic visits at a pediatric hospital. Dyads used a decision tool to independently choose the categories of conditions they wanted to learn about the adolescent. They then came together to discuss their independent decisions and make final joint decisions. Conditions were categorized by preventability, treatability, adult-onset conditions, and carrier status. Participants could make granular choices by including or excluding conditions in each category. Categorical choices were collapsed into the "aggregate choice" to learn all or not all results. RESULTS Study visits were completed by 163 dyads. Adolescents were less likely than their parents to independently choose to learn all results (64.4% vs. 76.1%; p = .0056). Parents were less likely to independently choose to learn all results for their daughters than their sons (odds ratio = .41, 95% confidence interval .18-.96; p = .032). Black adolescents were less likely to independently choose to learn all results than white adolescents (odds ratio = .22; 95% confidence interval .08-.55; p = .0015). After making joint decisions, 70.6% of dyads chose to learn all results. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents independently wanted to learn less genomic information than their parents. Although adolescents cannot legally make genomic testing decisions without parental permission, adolescents' should be engaged in decisions about the return of genomic results.
Collapse
|
25
|
Raghuram Pillai P, Prows CA, Martin LJ, Myers MF. Decisional conflict among adolescents and parents making decisions about genomic sequencing results. Clin Genet 2019; 97:312-320. [PMID: 31654527 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Genomic testing of adolescents is increasing yet engaging them in decision-making is not routine. We assessed decisional conflict in adolescents and a parent making independent decisions about actual genomic testing results and factors that influenced their choices. We enrolled 163 dyads consisting of an adolescent (13-17 years) not selected based on a specific clinical indication and one parent. After independently choosing categories of conditions to learn for the adolescent, participants completed the validated Decisional Conflict Scale and a survey assessing factors influencing their respective choices. Adolescents had higher decisional conflict scores than parents (15.6 [IQR:4.7-25.6] vs 9.4 [IQR:1.6-21.9]; P = .0007). Adolescents with clinically significant decisional conflict were less likely to choose to learn all results than adolescents with lower decisional conflict (19.6% vs 80.4%; P < .0001) and less likely to report their choices were influenced by actionability of results (33.3% vs 18.9%; P = .044) and feeling confident they can deal with the results (71.2% vs 91.9%; P = .0005). Our findings suggest higher decisional conflict in adolescents may influence the type and amount of genomic results they wish to learn. Additional research assessing decisional conflict and factors influencing testing choices among adolescents in clinical settings are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preethi Raghuram Pillai
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.,Division of Patient Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Lisa J Martin
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Melanie F Myers
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lewis C, Loe BS, Sidey‐Gibbons C, Patch C, Chitty LS, Sanderson SC. Development of a measure of genome sequencing knowledge for young people: The kids-KOGS. Clin Genet 2019; 96:411-417. [PMID: 31323115 PMCID: PMC6851564 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Genome sequencing (GS) is increasingly being used to diagnose rare diseases in paediatric patients; however, no measures exist to evaluate their knowledge of this technology. We aimed to develop a robust measure of knowledge of GS (the kids-KOGS') suitable for use in the paediatric setting as well as for general public education. The target age was 11 to 15 year olds. An iterative process involving six sequential stages was conducted to develop a set of draft true/false items. These were then administered to 539 target-age school pupils (mean 12.8; SD ± 1.3), from the United Kingdom. Item-response theory was used to confirm the psychometric suitability of the candidate items. None of the Items was identified as misfits. All 10 items performed well under the two-parameter logistic model. The internal consistency of the test was 0.84 (Cronbach alpha value) indicating excellent reliability. The mean kids-KOGS score in the sample overall was 4.24 (SD; 2.49), where 0 = low knowledge and 10 = high knowledge. Age was positively associated with score in a multivariate linear regression. The kids-KOGS is a short and reliable tool that can be used by researchers and healthcare professionals offering GS to paediatric patients. Further validation in a clinical setting is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine Lewis
- North East Thames Regional Genetics ServicesGreat Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| | - Bao S. Loe
- The Psychometrics CentreUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Chris Sidey‐Gibbons
- Patient Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) CentreBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusetts
| | - Christine Patch
- Genomics EnglandQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
- Counselling, Society and Ethics ResearchWellcome Genome CampusCambridgeUK
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and MidwiferyKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Lyn S. Chitty
- North East Thames Regional Genetics ServicesGreat Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUK
| | - Saskia C. Sanderson
- North East Thames Regional Genetics ServicesGreat Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Institute of Health InformaticsUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|