1
|
Wagner JK, Yu JH, Fullwiley D, Moore C, Wilson JF, Bamshad MJ, Royal CD. Guidelines for genetic ancestry inference created through roundtable discussions. HGG Adv 2023; 4:100178. [PMID: 36798092 PMCID: PMC9926022 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of genetic and genomic technology to infer ancestry is commonplace in a variety of contexts, particularly in biomedical research and for direct-to-consumer genetic testing. In 2013 and 2015, two roundtables engaged a diverse group of stakeholders toward the development of guidelines for inferring genetic ancestry in academia and industry. This report shares the stakeholder groups' work and provides an analysis of, commentary on, and views from the groundbreaking and sustained dialogue. We describe the engagement processes and the stakeholder groups' resulting statements and proposed guidelines. The guidelines focus on five key areas: application of genetic ancestry inference, assumptions and confidence/laboratory and statistical methods, terminology and population identifiers, impact on individuals and groups, and communication or translation of genetic ancestry inferences. We delineate the terms and limitations of the guidelines and discuss their critical role in advancing the development and implementation of best practices for inferring genetic ancestry and reporting the results. These efforts should inform both governmental regulation and self-regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K. Wagner
- School of Engineering Design and Innovation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Institute for Computational and Data Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Rock Ethics Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Penn State Law, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - Joon-Ho Yu
- Department of Pediatrics and Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Duana Fullwiley
- Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | | | - James F. Wilson
- Centre for Global Health Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Scotland
| | - Michael J. Bamshad
- Department of Pediatrics and Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Charmaine D. Royal
- Departments of African and African American Studies, Biology, Global Health, and Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Genetic Ancestry Inference Roundtable Participants
- School of Engineering Design and Innovation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Institute for Computational and Data Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Rock Ethics Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Penn State Law, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
- Department of Pediatrics and Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
- Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- The DNA Detectives, Dana Point, CA, USA
- Centre for Global Health Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Scotland
- Department of Pediatrics and Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
- Departments of African and African American Studies, Biology, Global Health, and Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schmit CD, Doerr MJ, Wagner JK. Leveraging IP for AI governance. Science 2023; 379:646-648. [PMID: 36795826 DOI: 10.1126/science.add2202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Copyleft AI with Trusted Enforcement (CAITE) can support an adaptable so ft law approach for ethics in AI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C D Schmit
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | | | - J K Wagner
- School of Engineering Design and Innovation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.,Institute for Computational and Data Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.,Rock Ethics Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.,Penn State Law, University Park, PA, USA.,Huck Institutes for the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wagner JK. Algorithmic Fairness in the Roberts Court Era. Pac Symp Biocomput 2023; 28:519-530. [PMID: 36541005 PMCID: PMC9782697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Scientists and policymakers alike have increasingly been interested in exploring ways to advance algorithmic fairness, recognizing not only the potential utility of algorithms in biomedical and digital health contexts but also that the unique challenges that algorithms-in a datafied culture such as the United States-pose for civil rights (including, but not limited to, privacy and nondiscrimination). In addition to the technical complexities, separation of powers issues are making the task even more daunting for policymakers-issues that might seem obscure to many scientists and technologists. While administrative agencies (such as the Federal Trade Commission) and legislators have been working to advance algorithmic fairness (in large part through comprehensive data privacy reform), recent judicial activism by the Roberts Court threaten to undermine those efforts. Scientists need to understand these legal developments so they can take appropriate action when contributing to a biomedical data ecosystem and designing, deploying, and maintaining algorithms for digital health. Here I highlight some of the recent actions taken by policymakers. I then review three recent Supreme Court cases (and foreshadow a fourth case) that illustrate the radical power grab by the Roberts Court, explaining for scientists how these drastic shifts in law will frustrate governmental approaches to algorithmic fairness and necessitate increased reliance by scientists on self-governance strategies to promote responsible and ethical practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wagner JK, Tanniru JK, Chane CA, Meyer MN. Exploring access to genomic risk information and the contours of the HIPAA public health exception. J Law Biosci 2022; 9:lsac034. [PMID: 36518815 PMCID: PMC9740515 DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsac034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Considerable resources have been invested in research to identify pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants that cause morbidity and mortality and also in returning these results to patients. The public health impact and cost-effectiveness of these efforts are maximized when probands' relatives are informed of their risk and offered testing. However, such 'Traceback' cascade testing programs face multiple obstacles, including perceived or actual legal and regulatory hurdles. Here, using genetic cancer syndromes as a test case, we explore the contours of the Public Health Exception to the HIPAA Privacy Rule to assess whether it is a viable pathway for implementing a Traceback program. After examining the Privacy Rule as well as state laws and regulations for reportable conditions and genetic privacy, we conclude that this is not currently a viable approach for Traceback programs. We conclude by reflecting on ethical considerations of leveraging HIPAA's public health exception to disclose PHI directly to at-risk relatives and offering insights for how legal hurdles to such a Traceback program could be overcome, if desired.
Collapse
|
5
|
Fleskes RE, Bader AC, Tsosie KS, Wagner JK, Claw KG, Garrison NA. Ethical Guidance in Human Paleogenomics: New and Ongoing Perspectives. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2022; 23:627-652. [PMID: 35537469 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-120621-090239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, the study of ancient genomes from Ancestral humans, or human paleogenomic research, has expanded rapidly in both scale and scope. Ethical discourse has subsequently emerged to address issues of social responsibility and scientific robusticity in conducting research. Here, we highlight and contextualize the primary sources of professional ethical guidance aimed at paleogenomic researchers. We describe the tension among existing guidelines, while addressing core issues such as consent, destructive research methods, and data access and management. Currently, there is a dissonance between guidelines that focus on scientific outcomes and those that hold scientists accountable to stakeholder communities, such as descendants. Thus, we provide additional tools to navigate the complexities of ancient DNA research while centering engagement with stakeholder communities in the scientific process. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, Volume 23 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel E Fleskes
- Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA;
| | - Alyssa C Bader
- Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA; .,Sealaska Heritage Institute, Juneau, Alaska, USA
| | - Krystal S Tsosie
- Native BioData Consortium, Eagle Butte, South Dakota, USA; .,College of Arts and Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs; Institute for Computational and Data Sciences; and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA;
| | - Katrina G Claw
- Division of Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA;
| | - Nanibaa' A Garrison
- Institute for Society and Genetics, Institute for Precision Health, and Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Katsanis SH, Claes P, Doerr M, Cook-Deegan R, Tenenbaum JD, Evans BJ, Lee MK, Anderton J, Weinberg SM, Wagner JK. U.S. Adult Perspectives on Facial Images, DNA, and Other Biometrics. IEEE Trans Technol Soc 2022; 3:9-15. [PMID: 35360665 PMCID: PMC8965792 DOI: 10.1109/tts.2021.3120317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Applications of biometrics in various societal contexts have been increasing in the United States, and policy debates about potential restrictions and expansions for specific biometrics (such as facial recognition and DNA identification) have been intensifying. Empirical data about public perspectives on different types of biometrics can inform these debates. We surveyed 4048 adults to explore perspectives regarding experience and comfort with six types of biometrics; comfort providing biometrics in distinct scenarios; trust in social actors to use two types of biometrics (facial images and DNA) responsibly; acceptability of facial images in eight scenarios; and perceived effectiveness of facial images for five tasks. Respondents were generally comfortable with biometrics. Trust in social actors to use biometrics responsibly appeared to be context specific rather than dependent on biometric type. Contrary to expectations given mounting attention to dataveillance concerns, we did not find sociodemographic factors to influence perspectives on biometrics in obvious ways. These findings underscore a need for qualitative approaches to understand the contextual factors that trigger strong opinions of comfort with and acceptability of biometrics in different settings, by different actors, and for different purposes and to identify the informational needs relevant to the development of appropriate policies and oversight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara H Katsanis
- Mary Ann and J. Milburn Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research, and Evaluation Center, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611 USA; Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
| | - Peter Claes
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, Medical Imaging Research Center, and Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Robert Cook-Deegan
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Washington, DC 20006 USA
| | - Jessica D Tenenbaum
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705 USA
| | - Barbara J Evans
- Levin College of Law and the Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
| | - Myoung Keun Lee
- Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
| | - Joel Anderton
- Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
| | - Seth M Weinberg
- Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822 USA. She is now with the Law, Policy, and Engineering Initiative, School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs, Pennsylvania State University at University Park, University Park, PA 16802 USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Madden D, Baker BA, Wagner JK, Katsanis SH. Framing the utility and potential pitfalls of relationship and identity DNA testing across United States immigration contexts. HGG Adv 2022; 3:100060. [PMID: 35047850 PMCID: PMC8756547 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic information is increasingly used at US border entry points, but the use of DNA in immigration contexts is not new. DNA testing for verification of identity or relationships for visa and asylum petitions began in the 1980s. Long-standing applications demonstrate both the utility and pitfalls of DNA testing in immigration contexts. Some of these pitfalls are shared with health-related contexts of DNA testing, but the power of government officials to deny immigration benefits, separate families, or make accusations of fraud among a vulnerable population elevates the potential harms, including stigmatization, discrimination, and coerced consent. We conducted semi-structured interviews with professional stakeholders on their understandings of the process of DNA testing, opinions on the role of DNA testing in immigration, and experiences with DNA applications in immigration. From the 22 interviews, we sourced 21 case examples involving DNA testing and supplemented these with 10 case examples provided by the study team. The 31 case examples capture instances of DNA testing for relationship or identity across five immigration contexts. Using the case examples, we developed three overarching utilities and six overarching pitfalls of DNA testing that apply across these immigration contexts. Our framework allows long-standing applications of DNA testing in immigration to inform stakeholders’ approaches to applications in new contexts. As the use of DNA data in immigration contexts expands, its implementation should recognize the utility of DNA data to both migrants and government while guarding against pitfalls that could undermine the human rights and dignity of a vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Madden
- Mary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research, and Evaluation Center, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611-2991, USA
| | - Brianna A Baker
- Stigma, Identity, and Intersectionality Research Lab, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City, NY 10027, USA
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - Sara H Katsanis
- Mary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research, and Evaluation Center, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611-2991, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611-2991, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Buchanan AH, Manickam K, Meyer MN, Wagner JK, Hallquist MLG, Williams JL, Rahm AK, Williams MS, Chen ZME, Shah CK, Garg TK, Lazzeri AL, Schwartz MLB, Lindbuchler DAM, Fan AL, Leeming R, Servano PO, Smith AL, Vogel VG, Abul-Husn NS, Dewey FE, Lebo MS, Mason-Suares HM, Ritchie MD, Davis FD, Carey DJ, Feinberg DT, Faucett WA, Ledbetter DH, Murray MF. Correction to: Early cancer diagnoses through BRCA1/2 screening of unselected adult biobank participants. Genet Med 2021; 23:2470. [PMID: 34646007 PMCID: PMC9119243 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01304-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Adam H Buchanan
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA. .,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - Kandamurugu Manickam
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Michelle N Meyer
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Miranda L G Hallquist
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Janet L Williams
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Alanna Kulchak Rahm
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Marc S Williams
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Zong-Ming E Chen
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Chaitali K Shah
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Radiology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Tullika K Garg
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Department of Urology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Amanda L Lazzeri
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Marci L B Schwartz
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - D' Andra M Lindbuchler
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Audrey L Fan
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Rosemary Leeming
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,General Surgery, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Pedro O Servano
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Family Medicine, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Ashlee L Smith
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Women's Health, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Victor G Vogel
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Hematology & Oncology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Matthew S Lebo
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Heather M Mason-Suares
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Marylyn D Ritchie
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Biomedical and Translational Informatics, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - F Daniel Davis
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - David J Carey
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Department of Molecular and Functional Genomics, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - David T Feinberg
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Office of the Chief Executive Officer, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - W Andrew Faucett
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - David H Ledbetter
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Michael F Murray
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Katsanis SH, Claes P, Doerr M, Cook-Deegan R, Tenenbaum JD, Evans BJ, Lee MK, Anderton J, Weinberg SM, Wagner JK. A survey of U.S. public perspectives on facial recognition technology and facial imaging data practices in health and research contexts. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257923. [PMID: 34648520 PMCID: PMC8516205 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Facial imaging and facial recognition technologies, now common in our daily lives, also are increasingly incorporated into health care processes, enabling touch-free appointment check-in, matching patients accurately, and assisting with the diagnosis of certain medical conditions. The use, sharing, and storage of facial data is expected to expand in coming years, yet little is documented about the perspectives of patients and participants regarding these uses. We developed a pair of surveys to gather public perspectives on uses of facial images and facial recognition technologies in healthcare and in health-related research in the United States. We used Qualtrics Panels to collect responses from general public respondents using two complementary and overlapping survey instruments; one focused on six types of biometrics (including facial images and DNA) and their uses in a wide range of societal contexts (including healthcare and research) and the other focused on facial imaging, facial recognition technology, and related data practices in health and research contexts specifically. We collected responses from a diverse group of 4,048 adults in the United States (2,038 and 2,010, from each survey respectively). A majority of respondents (55.5%) indicated they were equally worried about the privacy of medical records, DNA, and facial images collected for precision health research. A vignette was used to gauge willingness to participate in a hypothetical precision health study, with respondents split as willing to (39.6%), unwilling to (30.1%), and unsure about (30.3%) participating. Nearly one-quarter of respondents (24.8%) reported they would prefer to opt out of the DNA component of a study, and 22.0% reported they would prefer to opt out of both the DNA and facial imaging component of the study. Few indicated willingness to pay a fee to opt-out of the collection of their research data. Finally, respondents were offered options for ideal governance design of their data, as "open science"; "gated science"; and "closed science." No option elicited a majority response. Our findings indicate that while a majority of research participants might be comfortable with facial images and facial recognition technologies in healthcare and health-related research, a significant fraction expressed concern for the privacy of their own face-based data, similar to the privacy concerns of DNA data and medical records. A nuanced approach to uses of face-based data in healthcare and health-related research is needed, taking into consideration storage protection plans and the contexts of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara H. Katsanis
- Mary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research and Evaluation Center, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Peter Claes
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Medical Imaging Research Center, MIRC, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Megan Doerr
- Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Robert Cook-Deegan
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| | - Jessica D. Tenenbaum
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Barbara J. Evans
- Levin College of Law, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
- Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Myoung Keun Lee
- Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Joel Anderton
- Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Seth M. Weinberg
- Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Jennifer K. Wagner
- School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wagner JK, Yu JH, Chong JX, Royal CD, Bamshad MJ. Centering Equity in Human Genetics and Genomics Advances. HGG Adv 2021; 2:100048. [PMID: 35047840 PMCID: PMC8756494 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
11
|
Kaplan JS, Wagner JK, Reid K, McGuinness F, Arvila S, Brooks M, Stevenson H, Jones J, Risch B, McGillis T, Budinich R, Gambell E, Predovich B. Cannabidiol Exposure During the Mouse Adolescent Period Is Without Harmful Behavioral Effects on Locomotor Activity, Anxiety, and Spatial Memory. Front Behav Neurosci 2021; 15:711639. [PMID: 34512286 PMCID: PMC8426900 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.711639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-intoxicating phytocannabinoid whose purported therapeutic benefits and impression of a high safety profile has promoted its increasing popularity. CBD’s popularity is also increasing among children and adolescents who are being administered CBD, off label, for the treatment of numerous symptoms associated with autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, and depression. The relative recency of its use in the adolescent population has precluded investigation of its impact on the developing brain and the potential consequences that may present in adulthood. Therefore, there’s an urgency to identify whether prolonged adolescent CBD exposure has substantive impacts on the developing brain that impact behavioral and cognitive processes in adulthood. Here, we tested the effect of twice-daily intraperitoneal administrations of CBD (20 mg/kg) in male and female C57BL/6J mice during the adolescent period of 25–45 days on weight gain, and assays for locomotor behavior, anxiety, and spatial memory. Prolonged adolescent CBD exposure had no detrimental effects on locomotor activity in the open field, anxiety behavior on the elevated plus maze, or spatial memory in the Barnes Maze compared to vehicle-treated mice. Interestingly, CBD-treated mice had a faster rate of learning in the Barnes Maze. However, CBD-treated females had reduced weight gain during the exposure period. We conclude that prolonged adolescent CBD exposure in mice does not have substantive negative impacts on a range of behaviors in adulthood, may improve the rate of learning under certain conditions, and impacts weight gain in a sex-specific manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Kaplan
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | - J K Wagner
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | - K Reid
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | - F McGuinness
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | - S Arvila
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | - M Brooks
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | - H Stevenson
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | - J Jones
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | - B Risch
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States.,Department of Psychology, Experimental Psychology Graduate Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | - T McGillis
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | - R Budinich
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | - E Gambell
- Department of Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barnert E, Katsanis SH, Mishori R, Wagner JK, Selden RF, Madden D, Berger D, Erlich H, Hampton K, Kleiser A, La Vaccara A, Parsons TJ, Peccerelli FA, Piñero MH, Stebbins MJ, Vásquez P, Warf CW, White TJ, Stover E, Svetaz MV. Using DNA to reunify separated migrant families. Science 2021; 372:1154-1156. [PMID: 34045324 DOI: 10.1126/science.abh3979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Barnert
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Sara H Katsanis
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials.
| | - Ranit Mishori
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Richard F Selden
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Diana Madden
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Dan Berger
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Henry Erlich
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Kathryn Hampton
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Andreas Kleiser
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | | | - Thomas J Parsons
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Fredy A Peccerelli
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | | | - Michael J Stebbins
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Patricia Vásquez
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Curren W Warf
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Thomas J White
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - Eric Stover
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| | - M Veronica Svetaz
- The list of author affiliations is available in the supplementary materials
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wagner JK, Meyer MN. Genomic medicine and the "loss of chance" medical malpractice doctrine. HGG Adv 2021; 2. [PMID: 34250511 PMCID: PMC8270012 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
As genomic medicine expands, interest in how medical malpractice law will apply to such questions as whether and when to return new or updated genomic results has grown. Given that access to some genomic results (such as those pertaining to minors or those for which scientific interpretations are unsettled) is delayed for years, the “loss of chance” (LOC) doctrine is of particular potential relevance. Yet it has received relatively little attention among scholars of law and genomics. We performed legal research to determine the status of this malpractice doctrine across the United States and consider its potential applicability to genomic medicine. We further examined known genomic medicine malpractices to assess whether this doctrine had yet been invoked in that context. We identified a trend toward adoption of the LOC doctrine, finding 29 states (58%) have adopted, 15 states (30%) have rejected, and six states (12%) have deferred or not yet addressed the doctrine. Attempts to invoke or apply the doctrine in the known genomic medical malpractice cases were also found. While our findings do not provide cause for substantial concern, the availability of the LOC medical malpractice doctrine is a potentially important factor to consider when making programmatic decisions for genomic medicine. Future research examining whether liability risks posed by this doctrine prompt defensive medicine practices would be useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, 100 N. Academy Ave., MC 30-42, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Michelle N Meyer
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, 100 N. Academy Ave., MC 30-42, Danville, PA 17822, USA.,Steele Institute for Health Innovation, Geisinger, 100 N. Academy Ave, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
McDonald WS, Wagner JK, Deverka PA, Woods LA, Peterson JF, Williams MS. Genetic testing and employer-sponsored wellness programs: An overview of current vendors, products, and practices. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2020; 8:e1414. [PMID: 32715662 PMCID: PMC7549551 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Employer-sponsored corporate wellness programs have spread despite limited evidence of effectiveness in improving health or reducing costs. Some programs have offered genetic testing as a benefit to employees, but little is known about this practice. METHODS In December 2019, we conducted a systematic Google search to identify vendors offering corporate wellness programs involving genetics. We performed qualitative content analysis of publicly available information about the vendors' products and practices disclosed on their websites. RESULTS Fifteen vendors were identified. Details regarding genetic testing offered within wellness programs were difficult to decipher from vendors' websites, including which specific products were included. No evidence was provided to support vendor claimed improvements in employer costs, employee health, and job performance. Only half offered health and genetic counseling services. Most vendors were ambiguous regarding data sharing. Disclaimer language was included in vendors' stated risks and limitations, ostensibly to avoid oversight and liability. CONCLUSION We found a lack of transparency among corporate wellness program vendors, underscoring challenges that stakeholders encounter when trying to assess (a) how such programs are using genetics, (b) the potential benefits of such applications, and (c) the adequacy of protections to ensure scientific evidence support any health claims and genetic nondiscrimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer K. Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care PolicyGeisingerDanvillePAUSA
| | | | - Laura A. Woods
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Josh F. Peterson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Anticipating and addressing the social implications of scientific work is a fundamental responsibility of all scientists. However, expectations for ethically sound practices can evolve over time as the implications of science come to be better understood. Contemporary researchers who work with ancient human remains, including those who conduct ancient DNA research, face precisely this challenge as it becomes clear that practices such as community engagement are needed to address the important social implications of this work. To foster and promote ethical engagement between researchers and communities, we offer five practical recommendations for ancient DNA researchers: (1) formally consult with communities; (2) address cultural and ethical considerations; (3) engage communities and support capacity building; (4) develop plans to report results and manage data; and (5) develop plans for long-term responsibility and stewardship. Ultimately, every member of a research team has an important role in fostering ethical research on ancient DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- Professional Practice and Social Implications Committee (formerly the Social Issues Committee), American Society of Human Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; Responsible Ancient DNA Research Working Group, American Society of Human Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
| | - Chip Colwell
- Responsible Ancient DNA Research Working Group, American Society of Human Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; Department of Anthropology, Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver, CO 80205, USA
| | - Katrina G Claw
- Responsible Ancient DNA Research Working Group, American Society of Human Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; Division of Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Anne C Stone
- Responsible Ancient DNA Research Working Group, American Society of Human Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Deborah A Bolnick
- Responsible Ancient DNA Research Working Group, American Society of Human Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA; Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
| | - John Hawks
- Responsible Ancient DNA Research Working Group, American Society of Human Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | - Kyle B Brothers
- Professional Practice and Social Implications Committee (formerly the Social Issues Committee), American Society of Human Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; Responsible Ancient DNA Research Working Group, American Society of Human Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Nanibaa' A Garrison
- Professional Practice and Social Implications Committee (formerly the Social Issues Committee), American Society of Human Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; Responsible Ancient DNA Research Working Group, American Society of Human Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; Institute for Society and Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Savatt JM, Wagner JK, Joffe S, Rahm AK, Williams MS, Bradbury AR, Davis FD, Hergenrather J, Hu Y, Kelly MA, Kirchner HL, Meyer MN, Mozersky J, O'Dell SM, Pervola J, Seeley A, Sturm AC, Buchanan AH. Pediatric reporting of genomic results study (PROGRESS): a mixed-methods, longitudinal, observational cohort study protocol to explore disclosure of actionable adult- and pediatric-onset genomic variants to minors and their parents. BMC Pediatr 2020; 20:222. [PMID: 32414353 PMCID: PMC7227212 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-02070-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exome and genome sequencing are routinely used in clinical care and research. These technologies allow for the detection of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in clinically actionable genes. However, fueled in part by a lack of empirical evidence, controversy surrounds the provision of genetic results for adult-onset conditions to minors and their parents. We have designed a mixed-methods, longitudinal cohort study to collect empirical evidence to advance this debate. METHODS Pediatric participants in the Geisinger MyCode® Community Health Initiative with available exome sequence data will have their variant files assessed for pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 60 genes designated as actionable by MyCode. Eight of these genes are associated with adult-onset conditions (Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (HBOC), Lynch syndrome, MUTYH-associated polyposis, HFE-Associated Hereditary Hemochromatosis), while the remaining genes have pediatric onset. Prior to clinical confirmation of results, pediatric MyCode participants and their parents/legal guardians will be categorized into three study groups: 1) those with an apparent pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in a gene associated with adult-onset disease, 2) those with an apparent pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in a gene associated with pediatric-onset disease or with risk reduction interventions that begin in childhood, and 3) those with no apparent genomic result who are sex- and age-matched to Groups 1 and 2. Validated and published quantitative measures, semi-structured interviews, and a review of electronic health record data conducted over a 12-month period following disclosure of results will allow for comparison of psychosocial and behavioral outcomes among parents of minors (ages 0-17) and adolescents (ages 11-17) in each group. DISCUSSION These data will provide guidance about the risks and benefits of informing minors and their family members about clinically actionable, adult-onset genetic conditions and, in turn, help to ensure these patients receive care that promotes physical and psychosocial health. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03832985. Registered 6 February 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Steven Joffe
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Angela R Bradbury
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - F Daniel Davis
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Julie Hergenrather
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Yirui Hu
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | | | - H Lester Kirchner
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Michelle N Meyer
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Jessica Mozersky
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sean M O'Dell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Josie Pervola
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Seeley
- Department of Pediatrics, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Amy C Sturm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wagner JK. Concerning data sharing in biological anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 2020; 172:341-343. [DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K. Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger Danville Pennsylvania USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has an important role to play in the governmental oversight of mobile health apps, ensuring consumer protections from unfair and deceptive trade practices and curtailing anti-competitive methods. The FTC's consumer protection structure and authority is outlined before reviewing the recent FTC enforcement activities taken on behalf of consumers and against developers of mhealth apps. The article concludes with identification of some challenges for the FTC and modest recommendations for strengthening the consumer protections it provides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- Jennifer K. Wagner, J.D., Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy and the Associate Director of Bioethics Research at Geisinger (Danville, PA) as well as a solo practicing attorney. She earned her J.D. at the University of North Carolina (Chapel Hill, NC) and her Ph.D. in Anthropology at the Pennsylvania State University (University Park, PA) before completing post-doctoral research at Duke University (Durham, NC) and the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA) and serving as an AAAS Congressional Fellow in Washington, D.C. She has served as chair of the ASHG Social Issues Committee, co-chair of the AAPA Ethics Committee, and a member of the PBA Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Committee
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Henrikson NB, Wagner JK, Hampel H, DeVore C, Shridhar N, Williams JL, Donohue KE, Kullo I, Prince AER. What guidance does HIPAA offer to providers considering familial risk notification and cascade genetic testing? J Law Biosci 2020; 7:lsaa071. [PMID: 34221429 PMCID: PMC8249115 DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear how the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) should be interpreted in the context of sharing of genomic information between family members. METHODS The authors analyzed the HIPAA Privacy Rule, reviewed the literature and constructed a clinical scenario to inform how HIPAA can be interpreted for multiple forms of patient- and provider-mediated genetic risk notification. RESULTS Under HIPAA, healthcare providers can lawfully notify relatives to recommend genetic risk assessment using multiple approaches, including supporting the patient telling their own relatives, contacting relatives directly with the patient's authorization, or contacting a relative's provider directly. CONCLUSIONS Multiple forms of patient- or provider-mediated contact of relatives are already legally permissible under HIPAA, are consistent with ethical obligations of care to patients and their families, and could result in improved population health through identification of clinically actionable disease risk. Unanswered questions remain about implementation and impacts of provider-mediated programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Christopher DeVore
- Asian Pacific American Institute for Congressional Studies, Washington DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gürsoy G, Doerr M, Wilbanks J, Wagner JK, Tang H, Brenner SE. Navigating ethical quandaries with the privacy dilemma of biomedical datasets. Pac Symp Biocomput 2020; 25:736-738. [PMID: 31797643 PMCID: PMC7329229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
With decreasing cost of biomedical technologies, the scale of the genetic and healthcare data have exponentially increased and become available to wider audiences. Hence, privacy of patients and study participants has garnered the attention of researchers and regulators alike. Availability of genetic and health care information for uses not anticipated at the time of collection gives rise to privacy concerns such that people suffer dignitary harm when their data is used in ways they did not desire or intend, even if no concrete economic damage results. In this workshop, we explore the issues surrounding data use to advance human health from a privacy perspective. Broadly this field can be considered in two encompassing areas: (1) Ethics and regulation of privacy: The ethical and regulatory frames through which we can consider privacy, the existing regulations regarding privacy and what is on the horizon, and implementation of such ethical considerations for data with the new Common Rule. (2) Approaches to ensuring privacy using technology: The technologies that allow responsible use and sharing of data such as encryption and the quantification of privacy leakages in publicly available data through privacy attacks for better risk-assessment tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Haixu Tang
- Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wagner JK. Health, housing, and 'direct threats' during a pandemic. J Law Biosci 2020; 7:lsaa022. [PMID: 32733686 PMCID: PMC7381974 DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic brought into stark relief the intimate nexus between health and housing. This extraordinary infectious disease outbreak combined with the astounding lack of a clear, coordinated, prompt, and effective public health response in the U.S. created conditions and introduced practical challenges that left many disoriented-not only health care providers but also housing providers. Innumerable issues are worth examination, such as implications of moratoria on evictions and foreclosures, force majeure contract clauses, insurability of pandemic-related damages and disruptions, holdover tenancies and delayed occupancies, and possible abatement of rent or homeowner/condominium association dues in light of closed common facilities (such as fitness areas) or reduced benefits to be enjoyed with residential property; however, this article focuses on fair housing law and the ``direct threat'' exemption; finds it unlikely that COVID-19 is a disability, likely that the ``direct threat'' defense is available, and both determinations to be case-specific inquiries dependent upon rapidly-changing scientific understanding of this disease. By highlighting adequate housing as a human right for which the government has primary responsibility for ensuring its achievement, this article underscores the importance of finding a holistic solution to public health and housing problems before the next public health emergency arises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger, MC 30-42, 100 N. Academy Ave., Danville, PA 17822, USA
- KTFG Real Estate, 804 Stratford Dr., Ste. #1, State College, PA 16801, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Doerr M, Wagner JK. Research ethics in a pandemic: considerations for the use of research infrastructure and resources for public health activities. J Law Biosci 2020; 7:lsaa028. [PMID: 32733688 PMCID: PMC7381975 DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The number and size of existing research studies with massive databases and biosample repositories that could be leveraged for public health response against SARS-CoV-2 (or other infectious disease pathogens) are unparalleled in history. What risks are posed by coopting research infrastructure-not just data and samples but also participant recruitment and contact networks, communications, and coordination functions-for public health activities? The case of the Seattle Flu Study highlights the general challenges associated with utilizing research infrastructure for public health response, including the legal and ethical considerations for research data use, the return of the results of public health activities relying upon research resources to unwitting research participants, and the possible impacts of public health reporting mandates on future research participation. While research, including public health research, is essential during a pandemic, careful consideration should be given to distinguishing and balancing the ethical mandates of public health activities against the existing ethical responsibilities of biomedical researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy at Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wagner JK, Madden D, Oray V, Katsanis SH. Conversations Surrounding the Use of DNA Tests in the Family Reunification of Migrants Separated at the United States-Mexico Border in 2018. Front Genet 2019; 10:1232. [PMID: 31921289 PMCID: PMC6927295 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In April 2018, the U.S. implemented a "zero-tolerance" immigration policy that would lead to the separation of more than 2,000 migrant families over the following months. By that summer, the policy and resultant family separations had generated a media storm that swept up the public. In early June, the government announced its consideration of DNA testing to aid in the detection of human trafficking in immigration contexts. Later that month, as the government retracted the child separation policy, the public began questioning how children and adults would be reunited and discussing the potential usefulness of DNA testing for those reunifications. Then in early July, the government announced that DNA testing was indeed being used, and by mid-month the public's outrage over the use of DNA was strong. We set out to examine the public dialogue on DNA testing-including misunderstandings and miscommunications-both in newspaper coverage and on Twitter in the 2-month summer period of 2018, at the height of public discussion of migrant family separations and then reunifications. We performed database searches identifying 263 newspaper articles and used Twitter's advanced search function identifying 153 Tweets containing discussion of the use of DNA for migrant family reunification. Upon the resulting sources, we performed content analysis, analyzing for slant on the immigration policy and the use of DNA tests using a combination of open and closed codes. Our analysis showed that perspectives on the use of DNA diverged in connection with perspectives on the immigration policy, and that there was a contrast among the cohorts in the stated utility of DNA testing. These findings offer insight into a) how DNA testing in a highly politicized immigration context was represented in media coverage and b) the public's understanding of the role that DNA testing could or should play in immigration. By detailing the role that comments from experts, stakeholders, and the public played in these discussions, we hope to provide lessons for communications with the public about future non-medical applications of genetic technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Diana Madden
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States.,Mary Ann & J Milburn Smith Child Health Research, Outreach, and Advocacy Center, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Valedie Oray
- Initiative for Science & Society, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Sara H Katsanis
- Mary Ann & J Milburn Smith Child Health Research, Outreach, and Advocacy Center, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.,Initiative for Science & Society, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.,Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wagner JK. Ethical and Legal Considerations for the Inclusion of Underserved and Underrepresented Immigrant Populations in Precision Health and Genomic Research in the United States. Ethn Dis 2019; 29:641-650. [PMID: 31889769 DOI: 10.18865/ed.29.s3.641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been growing recognition of the importance of diversity and inclusion of underrepresented minority populations, including immigrants, in genomic research and precision medicine. Achieving diversity has been difficult and has led some scholars to question whether the law is a help or a threat to the inclusion of underserved and underrepresented immigrant populations. In this commentary, I provide an overview of some of the many relevant legal issues affecting the inclusion of immigrants in genomic research and precision health initiatives, such as the All of Us SM Research Program. Development of research recruitment, retention, and data collection plans without also considering the legal and sociopolitical context within which such efforts are to be carried out is risky. Advancing health policy with a goal of eliminating health disparities (or, at a minimum, ensuring that health disparities are not exacerbated by genomic or precision health technologies) requires us to acknowledge the negative effects that immigration policy and criminal justice policy have on the involvement of immigrants in such research and on their health directly. I conclude that it is not a question of whether the law is a help or a threat but, rather, whether we collectively will prioritize authentic diversity and inclusion policies and also insist on compliance with the laws intended to ensure the human right of every individual - regardless of immigration status or national origin - to share in the advancement of science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger; Danville, PA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tolwinski K, Nemoianu A, Bucaloiu A, Venditto J, Davis FD, Wagner JK. "I Don't Want to Go on Living This Way": Desire for Hastened Death and the Ethics of Involuntary Hospitalization. Am J Bioeth 2019; 19:88-90. [PMID: 31566496 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1654027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
|
26
|
Sero D, Zaidi A, Li J, White JD, Zarzar TBG, Marazita ML, Weinberg SM, Suetens P, Vandermeulen D, Wagner JK, Shriver MD, Claes P. Facial recognition from DNA using face-to-DNA classifiers. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2557. [PMID: 31186421 PMCID: PMC6560034 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10617-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Facial recognition from DNA refers to the identification or verification of unidentified biological material against facial images with known identity. One approach to establish the identity of unidentified biological material is to predict the face from DNA, and subsequently to match against facial images. However, DNA phenotyping of the human face remains challenging. Here, another proof of concept to biometric authentication is established by using multiple face-to-DNA classifiers, each classifying given faces by a DNA-encoded aspect (sex, genomic background, individual genetic loci), or by a DNA-inferred aspect (BMI, age). Face-to-DNA classifiers on distinct DNA aspects are fused into one matching score for any given face against DNA. In a globally diverse, and subsequently in a homogeneous cohort, we demonstrate preliminary, but substantial true (83%, 80%) over false (17%, 20%) matching in verification mode. Consequences of future efforts include forensic applications, necessitating careful consideration of ethical and legal implications for privacy in genomic databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dzemila Sero
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Medical Imaging Research Center, MIRC, UZ Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Science Park 123, 1098 XG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arslan Zaidi
- Department of Anthropology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
| | - Jiarui Li
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Medical Imaging Research Center, MIRC, UZ Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Julie D White
- Department of Anthropology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
| | | | - Mary L Marazita
- Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA
| | - Seth M Weinberg
- Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA
| | - Paul Suetens
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Medical Imaging Research Center, MIRC, UZ Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Dirk Vandermeulen
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
- Medical Imaging Research Center, MIRC, UZ Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Mark D Shriver
- Department of Anthropology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
| | - Peter Claes
- Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
- Medical Imaging Research Center, MIRC, UZ Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, 3052, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bombard Y, Brothers KB, Fitzgerald-Butt S, Garrison NA, Jamal L, James CA, Jarvik GP, McCormick JB, Nelson TN, Ormond KE, Rehm HL, Richer J, Souzeau E, Vassy JL, Wagner JK, Levy HP. The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 104:578-595. [PMID: 30951675 PMCID: PMC6451731 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The evidence base supporting genetic and genomic sequence-variant interpretations is continuously evolving. An inherent consequence is that a variant's clinical significance might be reinterpreted over time as new evidence emerges regarding its pathogenicity or lack thereof. This raises ethical, legal, and financial issues as to whether there is a responsibility to recontact research participants to provide updates on reinterpretations of variants after the initial analysis. There has been discussion concerning the extent of this obligation in the context of both research and clinical care. Although clinical recommendations have begun to emerge, guidance is lacking on the responsibilities of researchers to inform participants of reinterpreted results. To respond, an American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) workgroup developed this position statement, which was approved by the ASHG Board in November 2018. The workgroup included representatives from the National Society of Genetic Counselors, the Canadian College of Medical Genetics, and the Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors. The final statement includes twelve position statements that were endorsed or supported by the following organizations: Genetic Alliance, European Society of Human Genetics, Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors, American Association of Anthropological Genetics, Executive Committee of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, Canadian College of Medical Genetics, Human Genetics Society of Australasia, and National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Bombard
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada.
| | - Kyle B Brothers
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Sara Fitzgerald-Butt
- National Society of Genetic Counselors, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Nanibaa' A Garrison
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Leila Jamal
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; National Society of Genetic Counselors, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Cynthia A James
- National Society of Genetic Counselors, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Executive Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Departments of Medicine (Medical Genetics) and Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jennifer B McCormick
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Department of Humanities, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Tanya N Nelson
- Canadian College of Medical Geneticists, Kingston, ON K7K 1Z7, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada; Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Medical and Populations Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Julie Richer
- Canadian College of Medical Geneticists, Kingston, ON K7K 1Z7, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Souzeau
- Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors, Oakville, ON L6J 7N5, Canada; Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
| | - Jason L Vassy
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Howard P Levy
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Katsanis SH, Huang E, Young A, Grant V, Warner E, Larson S, Wagner JK. Caring for trafficked and unidentified patients in the EHR shadows: Shining a light by sharing the data. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0213766. [PMID: 30870468 PMCID: PMC6417704 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Healthcare providers have key roles in the prevention of, detection of, and interventions for human trafficking. Yet caring for trafficked persons is particularly challenging: patients whose identities are unknown, unreliable, or false could receive subpar care from providers delivering care in a vacuum of relevant information. The application of precision medicine principles and integration of biometric data (including genetic information) could facilitate patient identification, enable longitudinal medical records, and improve continuity and quality of care for this vulnerable patient population. Scant empirical data exist regarding healthcare system preparedness and care for the needs of this vulnerable population nor data on perspectives on the use and risks of biometrics or genetic information for trafficked patients. METHODS To address this gap, we conducted mixed-methods research involving semi-structured interviews with key informants, which informed a subsequent broad survey of physicians and registered nurses. RESULTS Our findings support the perception that trafficked persons obtain care yet remain unnoticed or undocumented in the electronic health record. Our survey findings further reveal that healthcare providers remain largely unaware of human trafficking issues and are inadequately prepared to provide patient-centered care for trafficked and unidentified patients. CONCLUSION Meaningful efforts to design and implement precision medicine initiatives in an inclusive way that optimizes impacts are unlikely to succeed without concurrent efforts to increase general awareness of and preparedness to care for trafficked persons. Additional research is needed to examine properly the potential utility for biometrics to improve the delivery of care for trafficked patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara H. Katsanis
- Initiative for Science & Society, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Elaine Huang
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Amanda Young
- Center for Health Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Victoria Grant
- Initiative for Science & Society, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth Warner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Sharon Larson
- Jefferson University College of Population Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Jennifer K. Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wright EA, Wagner JK, Shriver MD, Fernandez JR, Jablonski NG. Practical and Ethical Considerations of Using Personal DNA Tests with Middle-School-Aged Learners. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 104:197-202. [PMID: 30735660 PMCID: PMC6372260 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Personalized genetic information is not widely utilized as a resource in learning environments, in part because of concerns about data privacy and the treatment of sensitive personal information. Here we describe the implementation of a curriculum centered on analyzing personalized genetic-ancestry test results during two-week science summer camps for middle-school-aged youth. Our research focused on how the examination of personalized DNA results affected learners' subsequent perceptions and performance, as measured by in-camp pre- and post-tests and surveys, analysis of voluntary student talk captured by audio and video recordings, and periodic one-on-one post-camp follow-ups. The curriculum was grounded in Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and focused around the central question of "Who am I?" Campers approached this question via guided lessons designed to shed light on their genetic uniqueness, the many attributes of their genotype and phenotype shared with others, their more distant genetic and evolutionary ancestries, and their roles as active agents in the healthy continuation of their lives. Data relevant to these questions came from edited subsets of ancestry-informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phenotype-related SNPs from the campers' genotype results, which their parents had received from a direct-to-consumer vendor. Our approaches to data privacy and the discovery, disclosure, and discussion of sensitive information on paternity, carrier status, and ancestry can be usefully applied and modified for many educational contexts. On the basis of our pilot implementations, we recommend additional and expanded research on how to incorporate personalized genetic ancestry information in a variety of learning contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Wright
- Anthropology Department, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA.
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Mark D Shriver
- Anthropology Department, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA
| | - Jose R Fernandez
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Nina G Jablonski
- Anthropology Department, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Williams MS, Buchanan AH, Davis FD, Faucett WA, Hallquist MLG, Leader JB, Martin CL, McCormick CZ, Meyer MN, Murray MF, Rahm AK, Schwartz MLB, Sturm AC, Wagner JK, Williams JL, Willard HF, Ledbetter DH. Patient-Centered Precision Health In A Learning Health Care System: Geisinger's Genomic Medicine Experience. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019; 37:757-764. [PMID: 29733722 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Health care delivery is increasingly influenced by the emerging concepts of precision health and the learning health care system. Although not synonymous with precision health, genomics is a key enabler of individualized care. Delivering patient-centered, genomics-informed care based on individual-level data in the current national landscape of health care delivery is a daunting challenge. Problems to overcome include data generation, analysis, storage, and transfer; knowledge management and representation for patients and providers at the point of care; process management; and outcomes definition, collection, and analysis. Development, testing, and implementation of a genomics-informed program requires multidisciplinary collaboration and building the concepts of precision health into a multilevel implementation framework. Using the principles of a learning health care system provides a promising solution. This article describes the implementation of population-based genomic medicine in an integrated learning health care system-a working example of a precision health program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc S Williams
- Marc S. Williams ( ) is director of the Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, in Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam H Buchanan
- Adam H. Buchanan is an assistant professor at the Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger
| | - F Daniel Davis
- F. Daniel Davis is director of the Center for Bioethics and Healthcare Policy, Geisinger
| | - W Andrew Faucett
- W. Andrew Faucett is a professor at the Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger
| | - Miranda L G Hallquist
- Miranda L. G. Hallquist is a genetic counselor at the Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger
| | - Joseph B Leader
- Joseph B. Leader is director of the Phenomic Analytics and Clinical Data Core, Geisinger
| | - Christa L Martin
- Christa L. Martin is director of the Autism and Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger
| | - Cara Z McCormick
- Cara Z. McCormick is a senior assistant at the Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger
| | - Michelle N Meyer
- Michelle N. Meyer is associate director for research ethics at the Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger
| | - Michael F Murray
- Michael F. Murray was a physician in the Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, at the time this work was completed. He is now at the Yale School of Medicine
| | - Alanna K Rahm
- Alanna K. Rahm is an assistant professor at the Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger
| | - Marci L B Schwartz
- Marci L. B. Schwartz is a genetic counselor at the Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger
| | - Amy C Sturm
- Amy C. Sturm is a professor at the Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Jennifer K. Wagner is associate director of bioethics research, Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger
| | - Janet L Williams
- Janet L. Williams is director of research genetic counselors, Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger
| | - Huntington F Willard
- Huntington F. Willard is director of the National Precision Health Institute, Geisinger
| | - David H Ledbetter
- David H. Ledbetter is executive vice president and chief scientific officer, Geisinger
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nelson SC, Yu JH, Wagner JK, Harrell TM, Royal CD, Bamshad MJ. A content analysis of the views of genetics professionals on race, ancestry, and genetics. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019; 9:222-234. [PMID: 30608210 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1544177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Over the past decade, the proliferation of genetic studies on human health and disease has reinvigorated debates about the appropriate role of race and ancestry in research and clinical care. Here we report on the responses of genetics professionals to a survey about their views on race, genetics, and ancestry across the domains of science, medicine, and society. Through a qualitative content analysis of free-text comments from 515 survey respondents, we identified key themes pertaining to multiple meanings of race, the use of race as a proxy for genetic ancestry, and the relevance of race and ancestry to health. Our findings suggest that for many genetics professionals the questions of what race is and what race means remain both professionally and personally contentious. Looking ahead as genomics is translated into the practice of precision medicine and as learning health care systems offer continued improvements in care through integrated research, we argue for nuanced considerations of both race and genetic ancestry across research and care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C Nelson
- a Institute for Public Health Genetics , University of Washington
| | - Joon-Ho Yu
- b Department of Pediatrics , University of Washington
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- c Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy , Geisinger Health System
| | | | - Charmaine D Royal
- d Department of African & African American Studies , Duke University
| | - Michael J Bamshad
- b Department of Pediatrics , University of Washington.,e Department of Genome Sciences , University of Washington
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wagner JK. Disparate impacts and GINA: Congress's unfinished business. J Law Biosci 2018; 5:527-549. [PMID: 31143454 PMCID: PMC6534754 DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsz003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) deviated from preceding employment discrimination laws by excluding disparate impact liability, an important enforcement component to promote substantive equality. Nevertheless, Congress did not intend for this to be a permanent exclusion and, instead, assigned itself future work: after six years, a commission was to educate Congress on genetic discrimination incidents, update Congress on relevant scientific advances in genetics/omics, and provide recommendations to Congress on the need to enable disparate impact liability. Ten years after GINA became law, it seems appropriate to take a look back at the broader employment law context within which Congress made this decision to exclude disparate impact liability for genetic discrimination, explore how and why Section 208 became inserted into GINA, and provide a status update on the additional policy work mandated. After reasonable investigation, there is no information to indicate that Congress fulfilled its statutory obligation to appoint members to a Genetic Nondiscrimination Study Commission or that any policy work envisioned by Section 208 has commenced. To fulfill a promise of fairness and equality, Congress must revisit the issue and enable disparate impact liability to value genetic diversity and prevent any 'genetic underclasses' from forming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, 100 N. Academy Ave., MC 30-42, Danville, PA 17822 USA Corresponding author. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Turner TR, Wagner JK, Cabana GS. Ethics in biological anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 2018; 165:939-951. [PMID: 29574844 PMCID: PMC5873973 DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Trudy R Turner
- Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, POB 413, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Graciela S Cabana
- Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rocha HM, Savatt JM, Riggs ER, Wagner JK, Faucett WA, Martin CL. Incorporating Social Media into your Support Tool Box: Points to Consider from Genetics-Based Communities. J Genet Couns 2017; 27:470-480. [PMID: 29130143 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0170-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Patients with newly-described or rare genetic findings are turning to social media to find and connect with others. Blogs, Facebook groups, and Twitter have all been reported as tools for patients to connect with one another. However, the preferences for social media use and privacy among patients, their families, and these communities have not been well characterized. To explore preferences about privacy and membership guidelines, an online survey was administered to two web-based patient registries, Simons Variation in Individuals Project ( www.simonsvipconnect.org ) and GenomeConnect ( www.genomeconnect.org ). Over a three-month period, invitations were sent to 2524 individuals and 103 responses (4%) were received and analyzed. Responses indicate that Facebook is the most popular resource accessed within this sample population (99%). Participants used social media to look for information about their diagnosis or test results (83%), read posts from rare disease groups or organizations (73%), participate in conversations about their diagnosis (67%), and connect with others to find support (58%). Focusing on privacy issues in social media, respondents indicate that membership and access impact the level of comfort in sharing personal or medical information. Nearly 60% of respondents felt uncomfortable sharing photos or medical information within a public Facebook group, whereas only 12% of respondents felt uncomfortable sharing in private group targeted to families alone. Using this preliminary data concerning social media use and privacy, we developed points for genetic counselors to incorporate when discussing available support resources for patients with a new, or rare, genetic diagnosis or genetic test result. Genetic counselors are trained to provide anticipatory guidance to families adapting to new genetic information, and are well-equipped to help patients consider their preferences about using social media as a source of information and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Mae Rocha
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, 100 N Academy Ave, MC 26-20, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
| | - Juliann M Savatt
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, 100 N Academy Ave, MC 26-20, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.,Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, PA, USA
| | - Erin Rooney Riggs
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - W Andrew Faucett
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, 100 N Academy Ave, MC 26-20, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Christa Lese Martin
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, 100 N Academy Ave, MC 26-20, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.,Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nicol D, Eckstein L, Morrison M, Sherkow JS, Otlowski M, Whitton T, Bubela T, Burdon KP, Chalmers D, Chan S, Charlesworth J, Critchley C, Crossley M, de Lacey S, Dickinson JL, Hewitt AW, Kamens J, Kato K, Kleiderman E, Kodama S, Liddicoat J, Mackey DA, Newson AJ, Nielsen J, Wagner JK, McWhirter RE. Key challenges in bringing CRISPR-mediated somatic cell therapy into the clinic. Genome Med 2017; 9:85. [PMID: 28946923 PMCID: PMC5612325 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-017-0475-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome editing using clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated proteins offers the potential to facilitate safe and effective treatment of genetic diseases refractory to other types of intervention. Here, we identify some of the major challenges for clinicians, regulators, and human research ethics committees in the clinical translation of CRISPR-mediated somatic cell therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianne Nicol
- Centre for Law and Genetics, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia.
| | - Lisa Eckstein
- Centre for Law and Genetics, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia
| | - Michael Morrison
- Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 7DD, UK
| | - Jacob S Sherkow
- Innovation Center for Law and Technology, New York Law School, New York, 10013, USA
| | - Margaret Otlowski
- Centre for Law and Genetics, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia
| | - Tess Whitton
- Centre for Law and Genetics, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia.,Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7000, Australia
| | - Tania Bubela
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A1S6, Canada
| | - Kathryn P Burdon
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7000, Australia
| | - Don Chalmers
- Centre for Law and Genetics, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia
| | - Sarah Chan
- Usher Institute for Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9YL, UK
| | - Jac Charlesworth
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7000, Australia
| | - Christine Critchley
- Department of Statistics, Data Science and Epidemiology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, 3122, Australia
| | - Merlin Crossley
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia
| | - Sheryl de Lacey
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042, Australia
| | - Joanne L Dickinson
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7000, Australia
| | - Alex W Hewitt
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7000, Australia
| | | | - Kazuto Kato
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Erika Kleiderman
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, H3A0G4, Canada
| | - Satoshi Kodama
- Department of Ethic, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
| | - John Liddicoat
- Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 9DZ, UK
| | - David A Mackey
- Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Lions Eye Institute, Perth, 6009, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, Australia
| | - Jane Nielsen
- Centre for Law and Genetics, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics & Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | - Rebekah E McWhirter
- Centre for Law and Genetics, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia.,Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ifekwunigwe JO, Wagner JK, Yu JH, Harrell TM, Bamshad MJ, Royal CD. A Qualitative Analysis of How Anthropologists Interpret the Race Construct. Am Anthropol 2017; 119:422-434. [PMID: 30078844 PMCID: PMC6075721 DOI: 10.1111/aman.12890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
This article assesses anthropological thinking about the race concept and its applications. Drawn from a broader national survey of geneticists' and anthropologists' views on race, in this analysis, we provide a qualitative account of anthropologists' perspectives. We delve deeper than simply asserting that "race is a social construct." Instead, we explore the differential ways in which anthropologists describe and interpret how race is constructed. Utilizing the heuristic of constructors, shifters, and reconcilers, we also illustrate the ways in which anthropologists conceptualize their interpretations of race along a broad spectrum as well as what these differential approaches reveal about the ideological and biological consequences of socially defined races, such as racism in general and racialized health disparities in particular. [race concept, social construction, racism, health disparities].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayne O Ifekwunigwe
- Center on Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID), Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA 17822;
| | - Joon-Ho Yu
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105;
| | | | - Michael J Bamshad
- Departments of Pediatrics and Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105;
| | - Charmaine D Royal
- Departments of African and African American Studies, Biology and Community and Family Medicine and Center on Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Huang E, Cauley J, Wagner JK. Barred from better medicine? Reexamining regulatory barriers to the inclusion of prisoners in research. J Law Biosci 2017; 4:159-174. [PMID: 28852561 PMCID: PMC5570691 DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsw064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In 2015, President Obama announced plans for the Precision Medicine Initiative® (PMI), an ambitious longitudinal project aimed at revolutionizing medicine. Integral to this Initiative is the recruitment of over one million Americans into a volunteer research cohort, the All of UsSM Research Program. The announcement has generated much excitement but absent is a discussion of how the All of Us Research Program-to be implemented within the context of social realities of mass incarcerations and racial disparities in criminal justice and healthcare-might excaberate health disparities. We examine how attainment of Initiative's stated goals of reflecting the diversity of the American population and including all who are interested in participating might be impeded by regulatory and administrative barriers to the involvement of participants who become incarcerated during longitudinal studies. Changes have been proposed to the federal policy for human subjects research protections, but current regulations and administrative policies-developed under a protectionist paradigm in response to scandalous research practices with confined populations-dramatically limit research involving prisoners. Our review provides rationale for the development of Initiative policies that anticipate recruitment and retention obstacles that might frustrate inclusivity and exacerbate health disparities. Furthermore, we question the effective ban on biomedical and behavioral research involving prisoners and advocate for regulatory reforms that restore participatory research rights of prisoners. Disparities in health and justice are intertwined, and without regulatory reforms to facilitate participatory research rights of prisoners and careful planning of viable and responsible recruitment, engagement, and retention strategies, Initiative could miss discovery opportunities, exacerbate health disparities, and increase levels of distrust in science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacqueline Cauley
- Bioethics Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wagner JK, Keil E. Das maligne Melanom der Cervix uteri (Kasuistik). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- JK Wagner
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie, Park-Klinik Weißensee, Berlin
| | - E Keil
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie, Park-Klinik Weißensee, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wagner JK, Yu JH, Ifekwunigwe JO, Harrell TM, Bamshad MJ, Royal CD. Anthropologists' views on race, ancestry, and genetics. Am J Phys Anthropol 2016; 162:318-327. [PMID: 27874171 PMCID: PMC5299519 DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 10/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Controversies over race conceptualizations have been ongoing for centuries and have been shaped, in part, by anthropologists. Objective To assess anthropologists' views on race, genetics, and ancestry. Methods In 2012 a broad national survey of anthropologists examined prevailing views on race, ancestry, and genetics. Results Results demonstrate consensus that there are no human biological races and recognition that race exists as lived social experiences that can have important effects on health. Discussion Racial privilege affects anthropologists' views on race, underscoring the importance that anthropologists be vigilant of biases in the profession and practice. Anthropologists must mitigate racial biases in society wherever they might be lurking and quash any sociopolitical attempts to normalize or promote racist rhetoric, sentiment, and behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joon-Ho Yu
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195
| | | | - Tanya M Harrell
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, 98109
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wagner JK, Peltz-Rauchman C, Rahm AK, Johnson CC. Precision engagement: the PMI's success will depend on more than genomes and big data. Genet Med 2016; 19:620-624. [PMID: 27787499 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Genet Med advance online publication 27 October 2016Genetics in Medicine (2016); doi:10.1038/gim.2016.165.
Collapse
|
42
|
Wagner JK, Mozersky JT, Pyeritz RE. "Use it or lose it" as an alternative approach to protect genetic privacy in personalized medicine. Urol Oncol 2014; 32:198-201. [PMID: 24445287 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2013] [Revised: 09/10/2013] [Accepted: 09/13/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies (CIGHT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jessica T Mozersky
- Center for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies (CIGHT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Reed E Pyeritz
- Center for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies (CIGHT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Whether the integration of genetic/omic technologies in sports contexts will facilitate player success, promote player safety, or spur genetic discrimination depends largely upon the game rules established by those currently designing genomic sports medicine programs. The integration has already begun, but there is not yet a playbook for best practices. Thus far discussions have focused largely on whether the integration would occur and how to prevent the integration from occurring, rather than how it could occur in such a way that maximizes benefits, minimizes risks, and avoids the exacerbation of racial disparities. Previous empirical research has identified members of the personal genomics industry offering sports-related DNA tests, and previous legal research has explored the impact of collective bargaining in professional sports as it relates to the employment protections of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). Building upon that research and upon participant observations with specific sports-related DNA tests purchased from four direct-to-consumer companies in 2011 and broader personal genomics (PGx) services, this anthropological, legal, and ethical (ALE) discussion highlights fundamental issues that must be addressed by those developing personal genomic sports medicine programs, either independently or through collaborations with commercial providers. For example, the vulnerability of student-athletes creates a number of issues that require careful, deliberate consideration. More broadly, however, this ALE discussion highlights potential sports-related implications (that ultimately might mitigate or, conversely, exacerbate racial disparities among athletes) of whole exome/genome sequencing conducted by biomedical researchers and clinicians for non-sports purposes. For example, the possibility that exome/genome sequencing of individuals who are considered to be non-patients, asymptomatic, normal, etc. will reveal the presence of variants of unknown significance in any one of the genes associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), long QT syndrome (LQTS), Marfan's syndrome, and other conditions is not inconsequential, and how this information is reported, interpreted, and used may ultimately prevent the individual from participation in competitive sports. Due to the distribution of genetic diversity that reflects our evolutionary and demographic history (including the discernible effects of restricted gene flow and genetic drift associated with cultural constructs of race) and in recognition of previous policies for "leveling" the playing field in competitive sports based on "natural" athletic abilities, preliminary recommendations are provided to discourage genetic segregation of sports and to develop best practice guidelines for genomic sports medicine programs that will facilitate player success, promote player safety, and avoid genetic discrimination within and beyond the program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K. Wagner
- Center for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies, Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Daley LAA, Wagner JK, Himmel TL, McPartland KA, Katsanis SH, Shriver MD, Royal CD. Personal DNA Testing in College Classrooms: Perspectives of Students and Professors. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2013; 17:446-52. [DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lori-Ann A. Daley
- Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jennifer K. Wagner
- Center for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tiffany L. Himmel
- Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Sara H. Katsanis
- Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mark D. Shriver
- Department of Anthropology, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
| | - Charmaine D. Royal
- Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of African & African American Studies, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
As U.S. courts grapple with constitutional challenges to DNA identification applications, judges are resting legal decisions on the fingerprint analogy, questioning whether the information from a DNA profile could, in light of scientific advances, reveal biomedically relevant information. While CODIS loci were selected largely because they lack phenotypic associations, how this criterion was assessed is unclear. To clarify their phenotypic relevance, we describe the standard and recommended CODIS markers within the context of what is known currently about the genome. We characterize the genomic regions and phenotypic associations of the 24 standard and suggested CODIS markers. None of the markers are within exons, although 12 are intragenic. No CODIS genotypes are associated with known phenotypes. This study provides clarification of the genomic significance of the key identification markers and supports--independent of the forensic scientific community--that the CODIS profiles provide identification but not sensitive or biomedically relevant information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara H Katsanis
- Genome Ethics, Law & Policy, Duke Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, 304 Research Drive, Box 90141, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K. Wagner
- Center for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia; PA; 19104
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Discussions about direct-to-consumer (DTC) DNA ancestry tests have to date been based primarily on conjectures, speculation, and anecdotes, despite the industry being more than a decade old. Representative, empirical data on consumer characteristics; motivations and expectations for testing; intended uses for the information; understanding of results; and behavioral and psychological reactions to the tests are absent. Although the 2010 American Society of Human Genetics white paper clarifies the number and some general characteristics of companies marketing and selling DNA ancestry tests, additional data about the industry's practices have been unavailable. METHODS To promote a data-driven discussion of the DNA ancestry testing industry, we conducted a systematic investigation to identify companies selling DNA ancestry tests and conducted an empirical study of the industry's practices using data collected from each company's website. RESULTS Here, we present a wealth of data, including an updated directory of companies, marketing slogans, product types and names, range of prices, diversity of reporting and representing results, noted benefits and limitations of testing, and a host of website practices. CONCLUSION The tremendous diversity of tests, information, and practices of companies in the DNA ancestry sector should be considered when policies for best practice guidelines or regulatory oversight are being developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- Center for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wagner JK. Sidelining GINA: The Impact of Personal Genomics and Collective Bargaining in Professional Sports. Va Sports Entertain Law J 2012; 12:81-125. [PMID: 34366728 PMCID: PMC8341377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- University of Pennsylvania's Center for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wagner JK, Ramsauer B, Vetter K. Die Vernix-Peritonitis – Das Chamäleon des aktuen Abdomens. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2011. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1293381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
50
|
Wagner JK. Understanding FDA regulation of DTC genetic tests within the context of administrative law. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 87:451-6. [PMID: 20920664 PMCID: PMC2948799 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2010] [Revised: 09/02/2010] [Accepted: 09/07/2010] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
How the FDA should regulate direct-to-consumer genetic tests is fiercely contested. Passing a rule or issuing an order is only one down in the series. There is more to the regulatory game.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Wagner
- Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|